Slashdot Mirror


Gateway to Ship PCs with Pre-Installed DRM Music Files

Captain Chad writes "News.com has an article about Gateway's decision to bundle Pressplay's music service with its PCs. Of interest is the fact that 2000 popular songs will come pre-installed, helping reduce download time for those of us with modems." I wonder how much Pressplay is paying for this privilege. All sorts of interesting legal wrinkles here: you're buying a computer which contains data that you cannot legally access.

155 of 330 comments (clear)

  1. for those too lazy to load the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Gateway spins Pressplay service on PCs

    By Reuters
    December 5, 2002, 10:11 PM PT

    Computer maker Gateway on Friday announced a deal with online music provider Pressplay to load its PCs with 2,000 songs from music stars such as Eminem, Bruce Springsteen, the Dixie Chicks and Frank Sinatra.

    The deal with Pressplay, a joint venture between Vivendi Universal and Sony, capped a turbulent week for Gateway, which saw its stock fall 17 percent Thursday after the troubled PC maker warned that fourth-quarter revenue might not measure up to expectations.

    The news came after three consecutive quarters of losses at the Poway, Calif.-based computer maker, which has suffered from weak demand and stiff competition from rivals such as Dell Computer.

    Under the Pressplay deal, Gateway consumers can access the Pressplay service and features in several ways, including a 90-day free subscription to the service that contains 2,000 songs preloaded and available for streaming and downloading.

    By loading it on a computer, consumers, especially those using dial-up connections, will save weeks of downloading time, said Michael Bebel, chief executive officer of Pressplay.

    Other Pressplay plan options will also be available, some to be sold separately in hard-drive packages.

    Gateway signed another deal with Pressplay rival Listen.com's Rhapsody a few weeks ago, marking the first distribution pact between a computer maker and one of a current crop of subscription services, trying to lure customers away from unauthorized song-swap services that have emerged in the wake of now-idled Napster.

    Under that deal, buyers of Gateway desktop PCs will get a coupon for one free month of Rhapsody and a demonstration of the service on the PCs.

    "The Pressplay deal is significantly different because we're pioneering a way to deliver digital music on the hard drive," said Brad Shaw, a senior vice president for Gateway.

    Shaw said the deal would have no impact on the company's fourth-quarter forecast announced earlier this week.

    After the free trials, consumers can get the Pressplay service, which provides more than 200,000 songs and additional features, with pricing options starting from $9.95 a month.

    "We're now making it possible for people without a broadband Internet connection to get in on the fun of digital music by delivering it to them in a whole new way," said Ted Waitt, Gateway chairman and chief executive in a statement, adding those with broadband will enjoy it even more.

    Gateway earlier this year sparked the ire of the music industry by running TV ads that showed Waitt and a cow--the company's mascot--singing along to a homemade CD, directing viewers to a Web site that encouraged them to "protect their digital music rights."

    The ad was construed by the recording industry as an invitation to music fans to join in the fight against Hollywood as technology and media companies locked horns over digital copies of entertainment.

    Entertainment companies, burned by piracy and file-sharing services like Napster, have been seeking more control over digital copies of movies, music and TV shows, while tech companies are putting out even more products that encourage customers to "rip" and "burn" entertainment software.

    Gateway executives this week said they have always supported legal copying.

    Waitt said the Pressplay deal was a great example of the technology and recording industries working together to drive innovation and serve demand for legitimate digital music.

    Gateway plans to promote with television, Web, catalog and e-mail marketing.

  2. Gateway... by airrage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't worry the gateway will soon break and the crisis will soon be over...

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Gateway... by bstadil · · Score: 3, Funny

      I liked Gateway until they ditched AMD. Now with DRM included they should replace the Cow with Milquetoast as a logo.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
  3. technicality by timothy_m_smith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The poster says that the computer contains data which you cannot legally access. I would actually interpret that you can access it, you just cannot legally try to go around the protection mechanism that pressplay has put on it.

    1. Re:technicality by k3v0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i wonder if you have to sign a EULA just to purchase the computer

    2. Re:technicality by strictnein · · Score: 2

      i wonder if you have to sign a EULA just to purchase the computer

      Probably not, but you do already have to agree to 3 or 4 before you can actually start using WinXP (one of which I'm sure includes DRM statements)

    3. Re:technicality by EllisDees · · Score: 2

      Would I have to ask an IP lawyer if a book publisher decided that I was only buying a physical copy of a book and not the right to read the words printed within? Of course not. I bought the book and one copy of the words printed within. I am free to do with them as copyright allows.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    4. Re:technicality by dreamword · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're right, as long as the book was just under copyright and you didn't agree to any other license. If you did agree to some, say, shrinkwrap book license, you'd have to obey that license.

      Here, the user is agreeing to a license before they have access to the files. They have to obey that license. Just by keeping and using the computer, they're agreeing to the licenses that came in the box, whether or not they read them. Hill v. Gateway 2000 decided this issue in 1997.

      It's a good opinion, by a smart judge (Frank Easterbrook). Read it.

    5. Re:technicality by aufait · · Score: 2
      As far as I know, that's still an open question.



      Yep,various circuit courts have ruled differently. However, all the opinions I have read dealt with retail software, which has a notice on the box that says that you must accept the EULA before you can use the software.



      But, are you informed that you must accept the EULA before using the software when you buy a PC before you pay for the computer? (I don't know the answer since I buy whiteboxs and build it myself. For the rest of this post, I will assume that it is not made clear to the pursher of a computer that he does not own the software before the OEM takes his money.) If not, the software companies have a problem.



      The offeree must disclose all material terms of the contract before you "sign" the contract. (There is an exception if is pointed out that there are additional terms to be disclosed later. The judge in the ProCD case felt the notice on the box meet that condition.) If one party tries to modify the terms, the other party has the option to accept the new terms or continue under the original contract.



      When you purchase (a purchase is considered a contract), you are the legal owner of it and everything that came with it. Say you bought a VCR that included a demo tape. You are the legal owner of that tape. No amount of shrinkwrap verbiage around that tape can change that since that would be considered a material change to the oringanl contract.



      And, since Section 117(a)(1) of the copyright explicitly gives the legal owner a copy of software the right to install and use that software without the author's permission. I would think that you are not bound by the terms of the EULA.



      The publisher's line will be that all you bought is the physical media and a license,

      Do you any references where a software manufacture eplictitly said that you "bought the physical media"? I would think that they would deny that you bought anything except the license to use the software for the above reasons.



      Some more food for thought. The following is a quote from the ProCD opinion which upheld the EULA:


      Someone who found a copy of [the software product] on the street would not be affected by the shrinkwrap license -- though the federal opyright laws of their own force would limit the finder's ability to copy or transmit the application program.

      --
      I feel like picking a fight with everyone who thinks they are right. - Rainmakers
    6. Re:technicality by aufait · · Score: 2
      You're right, as long as the book was just under copyright and you didn't agree to any other license. If you did agree to some, say, shrinkwrap book license, you'd have to obey that license.



      I think the case that established the first sale doctrine involved a form of shrink-wrap license which the court struck down.



      Just by keeping and using the computer, they're agreeing to the licenses that came in the box, whether or not they read them. Hill v. Gateway 2000



      Thanks for the link. Unfortunetly, I was it after I did my other post. The judge felt that Gateway's advertisement of "limited warrenty" as the functional equivelent of "terms to follow".



      ProCD opened the has opened the flood gates. The judge in the Gateway case relied heviely on ProCD. This ruling means that a quirk that was limited to software can now be applied to all other purchases. What's next? EULAs for toasters?

      --
      I feel like picking a fight with everyone who thinks they are right. - Rainmakers
    7. Re:technicality by EllisDees · · Score: 2

      >If you did agree to some, say, shrinkwrap book license, you'd have to obey that license.

      I don't think so. Simply attaching a notice purporting to be a contract doesn't make it enforcable.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    8. Re:technicality by WNight · · Score: 2

      As Ellis says, it's only an open question to IP lawyers. In all ways it's a closed issue. After-agreement modifications to contracts on the part of a single party have *never* in any legal system that the western world uses, or is based on. (Some conditions can be open for either party to change, but only if the other agreed to it, pre-sale.)

      There's *NO* basis for the claim that "IP" (the misnomer that it is) should be any different. Some claim that "you can simply return it, if you don't agree", and even if it were true (which is most definately is not), that doesn't mean that it's legal to impose conditions like that.

      Actually, bait-and-switch laws prevent changing the conditions of an offer (advertised sale), so it's likely that they'd prevent you imposing more restrictions. If you don't print your EULA, in full, in your print ads (prominently) you probably can't make it stick.

      The only (single!) case that has ever been found in favor of EULAs was a copyright issue where EULAs were only tangentially related. The company forbid something in the EULA that copyright already prevented, the case hung on traditional copyright law, not post-sale contracts. All other courts, in all other cases, have found against EULAs.

      Think about it this way, would the coalition of software publishers be spending millions on bribes (oops, sorry, "donations"...) to try to pass the UCITA if EULAs were valid now. They know full well they aren't, but they want to keep up appearances so they don't admit it.

  4. well I am sure... by mschoolbus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am quite sure that there will, eventually be a very easy workaround for this. Don't companies realize that no matter what they do, somebody will crack it?

    I wonder if and when music will actually get to this point where everyone buys music online? Personally I like to own the CD to have the original CD art...

    1. Re:well I am sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't companies realize that no matter what they do, somebody will crack it?

      Why do you think the DMCA exists?
      "sure, we know some smart bastard will crack it, but when he does we'll nail his ass to the wall."

    2. Re:well I am sure... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Agreed the music industry need to realize you get more with honey than you do with vinigar. Instead of lobying for anti consumer laws they need to give me a reason to buy a cd (not give me a reason not to dl music).

      I dont buy CD's and when they shut donw napster I stoped DLing them, guess what I dont buy any more CD's now than I did then because I am not getting anything I cant listen to on the radio. What they need to do is include things with the CD's that are not easily digitally sent (like a poster, or cupons for concert tickets, a key chain, ...) just something people might actually kinda want if they are a fan. Something like that (or if any of you have better examples) might make a CD worth dropping 20 on.

      three years ago geeks noticed how much we are only tolerated by the music industtry, even when they went after napster the average person who does buy alot of CD's thought it was no big deal but they were at least made aware something was going on. When the copy protection that would not work on some computers and CD players came out more people noticed and I suspect you will see more and more of this as cheap cd music mixers come out (the sony thing I think) and people want to create custom CD's but can not copy due to CD format.

      Note to the music industry, hogs get fat pigs get slaughtered..

      --
    3. Re:well I am sure... by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but LPs are Ten Years Gone, having been Trampled Under Foot by CDs. Doesn't it just makes you Sick Again?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    4. Re:well I am sure... by micromoog · · Score: 3, Funny

      But Hey Hey What Can I Do? Besides, the Song Remains the Same.

    5. Re:well I am sure... by SoCalChris · · Score: 2

      Note to the music industry, hogs get fat pigs get slaughtered..

      Isn't it "Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered"?

      Anyways, I think your quote applies more to people d/ling music. If you're a "pig" and download a few songs here and there, you'll get "fat" and eventually get a decent music collection, but if you're a "hog" and d/l thousands of songs and make them available, you'll probably get "slaughtered".

    6. Re:well I am sure... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      Could be im not really a country boy so I dont know for sure. I think it applies to both, but more so twords the Music industry because downloading music is already illegal.

      Kind of the difference between putting half your money into a "sure" stock and putting all of in into one, your doing something legal but greed will get you. Where as dling music without buying it is greed period!

      --
    7. Re:well I am sure... by Qrlx · · Score: 3, Funny

      When The Levee Breaks, all this DRM stuff won't matter anymore. The RIAA and their old business model is singing its Swan Song. IF they had the Presence of mind to simply say Thank You to music fans, this could be their Celebration Day. Instead, they'd rather have us Swinging From the Gallows Pole.

      I mean, look at how their lawyers come after you. You could try to make a Night Flight Over The Hills and Far Away to Norway, and you'd still find No Quarter. Soon, enough, you'll be Going to California, to stand accused in The Houses of The Holy for "damages" done to Hollywood.

      Okay, I had to google "led zeppelin albums" to get all those names.

  5. This is fine... by Lotek · · Score: 3, Funny

    So long as I can still delete the damn things.

    1. Re:This is fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now, now, don't circumvent any access controls. Did they say you can delete 'em?

    2. Re:This is fine... by richie2000 · · Score: 2

      Another visitor. Stay awhile. Staaay forever! *hahahahaha!*

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    3. Re:This is fine... by Qrlx · · Score: 2

      OMG I remember that game. The little guy you controlled had the best scream when he inevitably fell down the cracks in the floor. AAAaaaaaaAAAAAAA!A!A!A!A!!!!gh!!

      WTF was the story with that game, anyway? Maybe it's because I only played the warez version, but I could never actually tell what was going on. I remember there were these puzzle pieces you had to put together to somehow escape, but I can't remember actuall ever escaping. Anyone care to clue me in? I can't even remember what that game was called anymore...

    4. Re:This is fine... by Qrlx · · Score: 2

      Man, if I could get a WAV of that guy falling to his doom, that would be my new system beep. For some reason that sound has stuck with me after all these years.

      Another impossible to win commodore game was Space Ace 2101. You had to amass sick amounts of money, and you only got one life.

      I think my favorite was Raid On Bungeling Bay. I wore out my space bar with that game, so I cannibalized the keyboard from the VIC-20 and put it in the C-64. Then I learned how to rest the stapler on the keboard just right so that my helicopter was alwaws firing.

      I must have played that game a hundred times. I was so into it that I saw all variations of the newspaper story proclaiming victory at the end, which changed depending on how many lives you had left at the end. Including the incredibly difficult-to-get funeral procession (instead of the fireworks) and day of mourning headline when you managed to steer your crashing helicopter helicopter into the last target. I was so impressed with the programmers for including that ending, and I only ever got to see it once. (In case you never played the game, after your helicopter took too much damage, you hear the rotor start to spin out of control, the screen starts flashing red, and the controls become very choppy. At that point you've got about ten seconds to live.)

      Aw shucks, I'm all nostalgiac now.

    5. Re:This is fine... by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      Man, if I could get a WAV of that guy falling to his doom, that would be my new system beep.

      Ask and ye shall receive.

      Scream

      Another Visitor

      :-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  6. Interesting question by doug_wyatt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since they gave you the content, when you break the DRM for the purpose of listening to it, you're not breaking it for the purpose of copying it (necessarily). They gave you the copy on purpose...so it'd seem that tools designed to give you access to content that was given to you by the copyright owners might not be covered by the same DMCA.

    1. Re:Interesting question by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      DMCA doesn't make any distinction between copying and listening. DMCA talks about access. It applies here.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  7. you can use the songs in spite of editor comment by deft · · Score: 4, Insightful

    " including a 90-day free subscription to the service that contains 2,000 songs preloaded and available for streaming and downloading."

    editor should have read the article.

    also, my cable box comes with the ability to recieve all of the channels too, whats the legal implication there?

    my car comes with the ability to do 150mph, but the chips lets me go to 120... whats the legal wrinkle there?

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  8. All the "popular" songs right? by Hadean · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "After the free trials, consumers can get the Pressplay service, which provides more than 200,000 songs and additional features, with pricing options starting from $9.95 a month. "

    So basically, it's a big ad? Nothing new here.. And we all know that the files will be cracked extremely quickly (of course, some geek will have to fess up and admit to buying one of these!). No matter, they'll all be songs I wouldn't want anyway - the "pop"ular stuff that the radio plays day in and day out, no doubt.

    In general, it's a good idea, but if you think about it: 5 megs on average per file (guess) x 2000 = 10,000 megs... That's a LOT of wasted space for something you're not supposed to be using until you pay for! So, yeah, I'm paying extra to waste space. Nice.

    1. Re:All the "popular" songs right? by Hadean · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now pr0n, you just aren't bombarded by pr0n everyday

      You don't know the Slashdot crowd very much, do you? Why do you think P2P is so popular *ducks and covers*

    2. Re:All the "popular" songs right? by Hadean · · Score: 2

      Let's just pretend it's 128kb/s and the average song length in this bubble-gum chewing world is 3 minutes which makes each file approximately 3 megs... that still comes to 6gigs. That's a LOT of space - at least, it is to me, and I do digital archival work on a daily basis (huge, uncompressed TIF files)... If the ad says I'm getting a 40-gig hard drive, I -want- a 40-gig hard drive, not a 36 gig hard drive...

    3. Re:All the "popular" songs right? by pyr0 · · Score: 2

      "I mean, we are already flooded with pop music on MTv..."

      That's funny, last time I checked MTV didn't play music videos anymore, only stupid "reality" shows.

  9. RIAA/MPAA is holding the cow hostage by burgburgburg · · Score: 2

    If Gateway didn't do this, we'd all be eating talking cow steaks in a week. Those cruel, vicious monsters.

    1. Re:RIAA/MPAA is holding the cow hostage by Servo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank god I'm a vegetarian then! :)

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    2. Re:RIAA/MPAA is holding the cow hostage by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      "mmmmmm steakes"

      [Troy McClure]"Dont let the name Killing floor foll you jimmy, its more of a metal grate that allows Blood and small pieces of meat to fall through"

      [Ralph Wiggum]"When I grow up I want to go to Bovine U"

      --
  10. Oh great.... by jhines0042 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....As if the free AOL icons on the screen weren't enough... now is the paperclip going to pop up and say "You haven't been force fed pop music lately. Would you like me to play something by Brittney Spears?"

    Music = marketing and product all in one. The more you listen to music the more you either like it or hate it. If you like it you'll buy more, if you hate it you'll suffer through it or turn it off.

    Now the music companies are going to put their marketing materials (free?? music) on the computers to further entrench themselves.

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  11. between two fats guys in a buffet line... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Entertainment companies, burned by piracy and file-sharing services like Napster, have been seeking more control over digital copies of movies, music and TV shows, while tech companies are putting out even more products that encourage customers to "rip" and "burn" entertainment software."

    On the one hand, we got tech companies saying burn your music. Enjoy it, play it, sleep with it, whatever. On the other hand, we got the RIAA saying: HEY! Wait! You can't do that. You need to pay me for that.

    In the middle is the customer going you know what? Screw you both. Make music. If I like it, I'll buy it. (--In most cases) Hey, PC makers, you make pcs. Don't worry about what I do with it, it ain't your concern.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  12. All good .. until DRM is broken ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    then you get 2000 songs with your gateway. Lets see ... average 15 songs a cd .... 2000 / 15 = 133 ... times $17.00 for the average CD ... $2267.00 free !!! ... and it's not your fault you did BUY the computer and that just came with your computer. Same thing goes for when you buy a box from an auction, to find it's full of gold, to the victor go the spoils.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:All good .. until DRM is broken ... by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 2

      Same thing goes for when you buy a box from an auction, to find it's full of gold, to the victor go the spoils.

      Full of gold? It sounds like this music will consist of primarily Eminem, Britney Spears, Backstreet Boys, and whatever else is at the top of the charts (after all, they want to convenience the most people, so they'll include what they expect to be the most popular downloads). I wouldn't call any of that gold.

      Maybe more like getting a box that's full of corroded old copper pennies ... they might be worth something to a collector, but aren't particularly attractive or valuable on their own.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
    2. Re:All good .. until DRM is broken ... by Skidge · · Score: 2

      then you get 2000 songs with your gateway. Lets see ... average 15 songs a cd .... 2000 / 15 = 133 ... times $17.00 for the average CD ... $2267.00 free !!!

      Actually, it's just the popular songs, so it would be more like ... average 2 popular songs per cd = 1000 CDs ... times $17 ... $17,000 free.

      Assuming of course, you normally buy CDs to get just the popular songs and the rest are crap.

  13. Re:you can use the songs in spite of editor commen by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >also, my cable box comes with the ability to recieve all of the channels too, whats the legal implication there?

    The premium channels aren't pre-recorded on the box.

    >my car comes with the ability to do 150mph, but the chips lets me go to 120... whats the legal wrinkle there?

    The car company doesn't want to see you dead, perhaps?

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  14. Pre-installed unusable software not new... by scotsalmon · · Score: 2, Informative

    All sorts of interesting legal wrinkles here: you're buying a computer which contains data that you cannot legally access.

    That's not new. I've been other examples of software that comes pre-installed but "locked" where you need a key that you can get by calling the company and paying more money. I seem to remember Adobe having some fonts like that pre-installed at some point, and I definitely recall special-purpose PC's coming with application software pre-installed but disabled until you bought an access key...

    I'm not sure what kinds of "legal wrinkles" might apply, but I do know this is not the first time it's been done.

    --
    101010, 222, 52, ...
    1. Re:Pre-installed unusable software not new... by jbolden · · Score: 2

      I seem to remember Adobe having some fonts like that pre-installed at some point

      The product was called "type-on-call" which was a CD full of encrypted fonts where you paid for keys. Now they sell them over the web
      http://www.adobe.com/type/main.html

  15. what the hell? by mschoolbus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just bought this damn computer and I have no more disk space!! Oh yeah, i have 2000 songs on here that I can't listen to...

  16. What happens when i start sharing these files? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2

    IS this legal, even though noone can legally acces them? I didnt want them, i didnt pay for them.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  17. I bet... by DarkDust · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this will spur some people to try their best to hack this DRM system. After all, if you already have 2000 songs on your HDD you might want to access them, if just for the sport aspect ;-)

  18. access by selderrr · · Score: 3, Informative

    you're buying a computer which contains data that you cannot legally access

    So ? If I recall correctly, mainframes in the old days used to ship with HARDWARE that you couldn't access legally. The machine came preshipped with X amount of RAM, which was enabled by simply flipping a switch after you payed for it. Noone ever complained, even though RAM prices those days were somewhere in the region of what we pay now for an average house.

    1. Re:access by dsb3 · · Score: 2

      > If I recall correctly, mainframes in the old days used to ship with HARDWARE that you couldn't access legally.

      This is still the case. The processor block on an IBM S390 has, I think, 12 CPU chips on the silicon. You pay for as many as you want to use ... if one goes bad it's disabled and you start to use fresh silicon without needing to replace the unit.

      --

      Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    2. Re:access by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not entirely true. If this was, we'd have to had flip a switch to double our processor like we just did. No we BOUGHT a part (mainframe CPU is a HUGE (small compared to past, huge compared to average PCI card) card that sldies right in. After a little configuration type stuff to do on the hardware management console, you start to IML and you have the cpu's installed, but still configged like it was the old one. You have to re config VM to divvy up the extra CPU to the other virtual machines. Otherwise the new CPU runs like the OLD one. Most shops will run for a week or so on the new proc running like it was the old proc before upping the amount of the proc is available to each VM guest. Most shops use all of the CPU's installed on the card and not just part of it. Also, it's no longer called the s/390, it's called the zSeries (with the pSeries being RS/6000 machines and the iSeries the AS/400 and the xSeries for the Intel based Netfinity servers.).

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:access by EllisDees · · Score: 2

      >So ? If I recall correctly, mainframes in the old days used to ship with HARDWARE that you couldn't access legally.

      This is still the case. The major difference is that with these mainframes, you have an actual signed contract that spells out what you are allowed to do with that hardware. Unlike a EULA, which is just wishful thinking on the part of the software industry.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  19. Re: Vivendi Too... by Lobsang · · Score: 2

    Don't forget. Vivendi is also doing bad. They're going to break next. I think the service will have to change name do PressStop instead of PressPlay. :)

  20. So this is how it works: by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. You buy a computer.
    2. It has an OS and software installed.
    3. It also has a folder called "music".
    4. You browse into that folder and you see see songs like "Britney's Latest.drm".
    5. You say, "Boy I'd like to hear that!", so you open it.
    6. They player comes up and says "You don't own this yet, I can't play it, would you like to buy it?"
    7. Being cheap you open another player and try to play the file but you can't because the file is encrypted.
    8. Frustrated, you go back and buy it.
    9. The music player sends your payment info and downloads a decryption key.
    10. The music now plays, but only on that machine with that player.
    11. You caputer the digital out of your sound card, rip the song to mp3, send it to your portable, and put it on the internet.
    1. Re:So this is how it works: by cyt0plas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > 4. You browse into that folder and you see see songs like "Britney's Latest.drm".
      > 5. You say, "Boy I'd like to hear that!", so you open it.
      > 6. They player comes up and says "You don't own this yet, I can't play it, would you like to buy it?"

      7. You say "screw it", delete the file, fire up your favorite P2P application, download it in 30 seconds, and become yet another person sharing Britney's Latest.

      No thanks, I'll just skip to #7.

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
    2. Re:So this is how it works: by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Small problem with that. These people are not idiots. They know that people will do things like that, or find some other way of cracking the encryption and extracting the data. That's why these mp3s are watermarked. As soon as they see certain songs show up on a p2p sharing app, they grab them, examine the watermark, and trace it back to the credit card that purchased the computer.

      Unless you can show that your credit card was stolen, you're getting sued.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
    3. Re:So this is how it works: by fulldecent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what they want! If you start accepting the DRM and use your hardware to pirate the music. Then DRM will have the argument that "the only thing allowing piracy is compromisable hardware". Then everyone will switch to "trusted" hardware, pending the support of the media industry, the software monopoly industry and the government-for-sale industry.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    4. Re:So this is how it works: by ryanvm · · Score: 2

      You capture the digital out of your sound card, rip the song to mp3, send it to your portable, and put it on the internet.

      Not quite. Most sound cards that have digital out also have drivers that refuse to output on the digital out if the O/S (and media player) say the media file is copy protected.

      Naturally, this is a pretty weak system and has probably already been cracked for a number of drivers or applications. Of course, that's what Palladium is supposed to fix...

      The other, more sinister, thing to consider is that the file will quite possibly be imprinted with an audio watermark at the time of purchase. Should a copy (digital or analog) of this file ever end up on Gnutella, they'll be able to trace it back to the original buyer. So unless you're positive you wiped that watermark off it, I'd be real wary of giving it to the rest of the world.

    5. Re:So this is how it works: by AftanGustur · · Score: 3, Insightful


      For the majority of people entries from 10 and onwards will be something like :

      10.0 The music now plays, but only on that machine with that player.
      10.1 The music now plays, but only on that machine with that player.
      10.2 The music now plays, but only on that machine with that player.
      11. The music doesn't play any more, you need to pay more ..

      --
      echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    6. Re:So this is how it works: by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


      Yeah right. Do you seriously think they're going to generate and embed a distinct watermark for each and every PC that goes out the door with this stuff already on disk?

      Somewhere at the OEM a bulk HD copier will be churning out a dozen of these drives at a time. It's impractical NOT to put identical data on every single drive.

      Unless it's the DRM software that embeds the watermarks dynamically during 'playback', based on a unique ID on the processor die... shut up Poot, don't want to give them any ideas.

    7. Re:So this is how it works: by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 2

      Yeah right. Do you seriously think they're going to generate and embed a distinct watermark for each and every PC that goes out the door with this stuff already on disk?

      Somewhere at the OEM a bulk HD copier will be churning out a dozen of these drives at a time. It's impractical NOT to put identical data on every single drive.


      That's an interesting thought, it hadn't occurred to me. I know the download services give you a unique watermark, but, you're right, it would seem impractical to do anything but duplicate data. Maybe if it were a slight modification (like imprinting a unique CD-key onto a PC game CD), but a watermark would involve actual processing and changing the entire data set.

      Unless it's the DRM software that embeds the watermarks dynamically during 'playback', based on a unique ID on the processor die

      This wouldn't be sufficient, because, once someone cracks the format's encryption, and converts it to a normal format, like mp3, it will never be played that first time to set the watermark.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
  21. wait a minute by nizcolas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The Pressplay deal is significantly different because we're pioneering a way to deliver digital music on the hard drive," said Brad Shaw, a senior vice president for Gateway.

    I sort of remember something. A way I used to get digital content onto my machine...nap something or other...man that seems familiar.

    Honestly, who do these people think they're fooling. Look at the selection of music, they're obviously targeting the audience most utilizing current p2p apps. Do you think most high school and college kids are going to give up their napster/kazaa/audio galaxy/etc for something they have to pay for?

    --
    If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
  22. Re:Michael, are you this stupid? by crumbz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, not necessarily. You would have to comply with the full terms of the license agreement, whatever they may be. For example, the agreement may require you to remove the files after xx days or after x uses or pay a additonal fees. I believe the article mentions a 90-day trial to access the 2,000 songs.

  23. No.... by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 2

    ...The way I interpret it, you cannot legally access the same data. Pressplay has put data on the drive that you probably would get from the 'net, so it's saving you time (and maybe bandwidth charges, depending on your ISP). If you were to get it from the 'net, it would be illegal (using p2p).

    The way I interpret it (IANAL), they've broken the law.

    1. Re:No.... by b0r1s · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your interpretation is wrong.

      Under the Pressplay deal, Gateway consumers can access the Pressplay service and features in several ways, including a 90-day free subscription to the service that contains 2,000 songs preloaded and available for streaming and downloading. .

      You get 90 days free when you purchase the system, and in those 90 days you'll be able to access any song PressPlay offers (access = listen to, not burn). The 2,000 on the drive are there to save you time.

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    2. Re:No.... by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 2

      Thank you. Loading the 2000 songs is a smart move on Pressplay's part, for the time/money issues I mentioned.

      I'd mod you up if I could, (and me down), but I can't, so I won't.

      It's a good thing IANAL - I'd suck!

  24. Heh. by zapfie · · Score: 4, Funny


    Gateway computer, preloaded with songs: $999

    Connection to the Internet: $19.95/mo.

    Knowing it's only going to take a couple minutes to crack 20,000 songs wide open: Priceless

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
    1. Re:Heh. by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      From I can tell, it looks like you don't get to play the music until you sign up for a 90-day "free" trial thingie. That means that you have to connect to something else before you can play the music. That means that there might be a key (either a key for the whole collection, or more likely, a key per song) transmitted at that time. And that means that it is actually possible to do this fairly securely.

      What I mean is, there's no technical/implementation reason those files can't be encrypted with real, serious crypto, with a key that is is not stored on the computer at the time it ships. If they did this right, then it's going to take a hell of a lot longer than a "couple of minutes." (Remember how long it took distributed.net to crack a single RC5-64 message.)

      Of course, as soon as you "unlock" a file so that you can play it, the DRM will be crackable. But making the unit as it ships be secure, is quite feasible.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  25. So what? by rebrane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what? My computer already has tons of data I can't access without illegally reverse-engineering files. My server at work is chock full of e-mail that I can't access without (probably) violating my cow orkers' rights. One might argue that the layout of my CPU is data stored inside my computer, but I sure can't have access to that.

    1. Re:So what? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      My computer already has tons of data I can't access without illegally reverse-engineering files.

      Sure you can access it. read the raw contents off the disk platter and there you go.

      Being able to interpret that data in a meaninful way, well, that's different.

  26. And then there's the Apple approach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    License more than 200 songs from mainstream and niche artists, encode them to 160Kbps MP3s, and bundle them on new i-Systems.

    No DRM. No free trial. Just free music.

    Mix. Burn. Repeat.

    2000 "popular" DRMed songs you can listen to for 90 days, or about 300 encompassing all genres of music that you can listen to forever? Hmm.

    1. Re:And then there's the Apple approach... by clontzman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's why Apple doesn't offer a machine -- even an old CRT iMac -- for less than $900. You don't think that music is really *free*, do you? Trust me, you're paying for it, whether you want to or not.

  27. Can you say Desperate? by craenor · · Score: 2

    I knew you could boys and girls. Competition from Dell, and yes even HP and Compaq is just too much for Gateway. Despite lowering prices to the point where they operate in the red, they just can't seem to keep up.

    It's too bad really, I think they were a good company who just had to make too many compromises.

  28. Re:why? by digitalmuse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would have to venture that the idea here is to get new computer buyers (who we can therefore assume do not have an encompasing understanding of DRM, the legalities of file-sharing, etc...) latched into this turn-key system. I'm sure that whatever tool they're using to front-end this initiative has DRM dripping off the edges and will allow you to rip your own music to their proprietary (read:can't take it no-where else and don't even think about trying to share it P2P) format and get the user's locked in. Someone has taken a hint from M$ and is looking to get the 'Embrace and Extend' initiative rolling in the music world.
    Now you may call me cynical, but I highly doubt that this tool will play nicely with standard P2P tools. Would you put it past someone like PressPlay to have any mp3's touched by the system either re-encoded in a DRM-friendly format with minimal warning to the user (click here to import all you files into the PressPlay AudioVault of Doom...)
    or some obnoxious and legaly-questionable click-wrap aggreement that consists of 15 pages of legal bum-fodder that allows them to show up at your house in the middle of the night, rape your dog, kick your grandmother down the stairs and flag all the audio files on your machine with a unique fingerprint that gets matched with your machine ID and therefore your RW identity... hmm, Little Timmy has been uploading his Smurfs Christmas Album to Sweet Suzie. RIAA, sic'em!)
    {/sarcasm}
    Anyhow, I cannot fault Gateway for trying to provide their customers a value-added item like this (like smallpox to the Native-Americans...) I see this as becoming a troubling trend as more companies with DRM products start co-branding with big names in the PC field and set this plague loose on the face of the planet.
    In the meantime, I'll stick with my ogg-vorbis/mp3 server running linux.

    --
    "If I wanted your input on my pet project, I'd stick my hand up your ass and use you like a sock-puppet." - Muse
  29. Secure Audio Path by yerricde · · Score: 5, Informative

    You caputer the digital out of your sound card

    Make that "analog out". Windows ME and Windows XP operating systems have a Secure Audio Path that disables digital outputs and unsigned drivers when playing restrictions-managed audio files.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Secure Audio Path by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      However, this too would be easy to get around with virtualization. Load up a copy of Virtual PC, which fakes a SoundBlaster, and play through that. I would assume that since the driver is provided by Microsoft on the Windows CD, it will support SPA. Windows doesn't know it's not running on real hardware, and would happily play. VPC then sends the digital audio, which would no longer be secured, to your real soundcard.

      Like the page says, analogue output would be acceptable anyhow. Even consumer cards like the Audigy 2 have deceant converters these days.

    2. Re:Secure Audio Path by Captain_Frisk · · Score: 2

      Whats the purpose of digital out then? If i had some high quality tunes on my machine, I would certainly like to use my digital out to send it to my high end stereo system, most likely over the digital output.... seriously, what kindof genius came up with this idea?

  30. The top songs by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Personally, I don't like alot of the mainstream music that is out today. So if I buy a *cough* gateway *cough* why would I want these music files? The top 2000 hits....Ummmmm I would rather not have that on my computer.

    Can I rather have the top 2000 punches?

  31. Interesting combination by Freshie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I do find it interesting that computer makers are making it easier to rip and burn, while supplying pressplay et al inside it. This bothers me a bit. There has to be something backroom-ish going on. I agree all things equal, it may make the college freshman grab one, but other than that I see no special reason for it. So what are they getting out of it? Advertising, sure, but whatabout pressplay logging? You think they are sharing their logs with Gateway so they can determine what songs to put on the next generation of PC's? Maybe Gateway just wants to see how much their computers are actually used for the digital music they push so much in their adverts. Either way, I don't like multi company bundling. It just smacks of small print consumer stick-it-to-em EULA's.

    --
    'I don't want more choices. I just want better things.' - Edina Monsoon
  32. Which songs? by xchino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there a list of the songs that come with it? Is it grouped by genre? There's alot of different tastes out there and I can easily see several people buying this FOR the music (non-tech ppl of course), just to find out that it doesn't have single song they like. 2,000 songs @ ~4 megs a piece = 8,000MB, or 8Gigs sacraficed to an unusuable data format. 8gigs over a modem certianly isn't a laughable amount over a short time span, but how many 56K 80+GB warez sites have you seen? I can't justify the loss of space/Saved bandwidth ratio especially when I won't want most of the music...
    I think it would have been a better decision to slap 8Gigs of DRM'd Porn on the drive..

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  33. I agree by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    Further, didnt I pay for the HD? Isint it my hard drive? They should pay me rent for wasting my space with unaccessable junk.

  34. Eminem? Dixie Chicks? by Bonker · · Score: 5, Funny

    It comes preloaded with the Eminem and Dixie Chicks?

    c:\
    c:\deltree \mypreloadedmusic-DRM

    Are you sure you want to delete the directory \mypreloadedmusic-DRM and all subdirectories? [Y/N]

    Youbetcherass

    172 File(s) deleted.

    c:\

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Eminem? Dixie Chicks? by archmedes5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realize that this is an optional component right? You don't have to get it with preloaded music, in fact you have to specify that you want it and you pay for it. So, why would you pay for it, then nuke it?

    2. Re:Eminem? Dixie Chicks? by Bitmanhome · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Today you're more likely to get these messages:

      C:\mypreloadedmusic-DRM is a system directory, and cannot be deleted.
      or
      Unknown command "deltree"
      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  35. Re:Let me guess....... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

    umm whats wrong with ogg, I would prefer to use mp3 if it was under the same license as ogg. we need to support open standards.

    --
  36. Re:Michael, are you this stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe it is you who are mistaken about a great many things. DRM means that you have to comply with whatever terms the copyright owner wants to put on you in order to access the material. Simply buying the computer may not be the only term, and it most likely will mean that you can only access the material a certain number of times, or for a certain period of time without coughing up more cash.

  37. Re:you can use the songs in spite of editor commen by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Interesting

    my cable box comes with the ability to recieve all of the channels too, whats the legal implication there?

    Its illegal to decrypt them without permission. Doesn't mean that the law is right. I personally agree that the law makes sense, but people are free to disagree with me and try to convinve their elected representatives to change this law.

    But this is just because of percieved cost to them. It costs them money to send me signals. In the case of data that's already on my hard disk, it doesn't cost any more to supply decrypted data than it does to supply encrypted data, yet they want to charge me the full cost of the media just to decrypt it for me.

  38. Does this mean we're adding a PressPlay tax ... by aborchers · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... to the Microsoft Tax when we buy a machine loaded with cruft we have no intention of using?

    --
    Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
  39. Point being??? by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 2

    So...we're now buying computers that have *OUR* hard drive space taken up by useless software that doesn't below to us? A:\format C:\ www.kazaalite.com... Pfft, if I want to have software on my computer that doesn't belong to me, I may as well have it be software of my choice, that I can actually use!

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
  40. An easy way to dodge the license by MCMLXXVI · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would hook the boot HD up to a different computer, extract all the songs onto it and format the drive on the gateway afterwords. Never once did you boot thier install of the OS that has the license agreement. And since they "gave" you the songs on your computer you're free to do what you want with them. I.E. remove DRM and enjoy in OGG format.

  41. I need a new machine. by TheFlu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is there an option available to pre-load my machine with porn instead?

  42. The concept has been around for ages. by Chmarr · · Score: 2

    The concept of 'having data that you cannot legally access' has been around for ages already: Adobe Type-On-Call (Not sold anymore, as far as I can tell.)

    This was a CD full of fonts - Adobe's entire font library, in fact - where you could not access particular fonts or font collections without sending Adobe a bunch of money first. They'd give you a key to unlock those particular fonts.

    I'd been wanting to try and crack it open ever since I was 15 or so, but... looks like I'm not allowed to anymore :)

  43. Re:And that IBM mainframe has 8 CPUs, but only 2 w by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Any problem with that concept?

    Ummm.... actually... No.

    IBM do not have a monopoly on their machines. If they do this, I'll ask Sun if they can supply am 8 processor Sparc for the same price as IBM's "2 processor" machine.

    Obviously, if I think EMI are charing too much for a Robbie Williams CD, I can't ask Warner for a cheaper price.

  44. Re:Is this much different by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2
    Yet they always market it as "comes with 8 zillion dollars worth of free software!"

    Maybe they could start a real value added program with GUNWin.

    http://gnuwin.epfl.ch/apps/en/index.html

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  45. Old hat by andy_geek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "All sorts of interesting legal wrinkles here: you're buying a computer which contains data that you cannot legally access. "

    So what? I bought a name brand PC a few weeks ago that came with Quicken Deluxe on it, to be used only if I have bought the reg key.

    The real issue here is that this won't work: within two weeks of these bad boys hitting the street, there will be dozens of postings on how to circumvent Pressplay's reg/purchase code strategy and gain access to all of the music, just as I can go to any one of dozens of sites for hacks into getting my unregistered copy of Quicken to work. I wouldn't do this, of course: no no, not me....

    There's a metaphor here from Apocalypse Now: the Bridge at Do Long. Every day the Americans would rebuild the bridge, and every night the Vietnamese would blow it up. Each new tack by the RIAA and its DMCA cronies to secure rights in this fashion will be defeated, sometimes within minutes of hitting the street.

    This points to the need for them to dynamite their business model and think up something new: how many people actually pay for content? (And porn doesn't count. Besides, porn is largely stolen anyway!) The answer is none, zero, nada. AOL-TimeWarner's about to find this out the hard way. Gateway and Pressplay are making it easier than some to circumvent by the fact that the files are on your machine, and you can ostensibly do what you want to with them without them knowing. But even if you had to download them, you'll still be able to hack them.

    --
    "Don't matter how New Age you get, old age is gonna kick your ass." - Utah Phillips
  46. Re:you can use the songs in spite of editor commen by michael_cain · · Score: 2
    my cable box comes with the ability to recieve all of the channels too, whats the legal implication there?
    I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. Contemporary analog and digital cable boxes will refuse to tune to channels you aren't paying for. Modified boxes will, but making such modifications is a violation of federal law. A cable-ready TV or VCR will tune to any analog channel, but the cable company will scramble any premium analog content you might receive that way and adding your own analog descrambling circuit is a violation of federal law. If your point is that cable is a precedent for delivering content to users that they are not allowed to access (without paying), you're absolutely right. If your point is something else, I missed it.
  47. Cow commerical? by Schnapple · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember how Gateway ran that commercial that "respected your rights to download music" (or somesuch). I took that commercial to be a slap to the face of the RIAA - now they're the RIAA's lapdog? Or have I completely misread this?

  48. Apple does it already... by imag0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With my new dual USB iBook, on the default install, there's something like 600 megs of MP3's by various big name artists (can't remember them all, since I reloaded with my new 10.2 cd I forgot to back them up), spoken word stuff from Henry Rollins I remember, perhaps someone else can fill /. in on what's all on there. Pretty neat I think.

    Yep, they're 100% unencrypted, copy them anywhere MP3 files. They're installed when you do a full system restore. No DRM here. Not needed or wanted.

  49. Re:why? by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This isn't a Gateway gimmick for increasing their products' sales by making them more attractive. Of course, they are going to spin it ant put it in the best light and make it sound like a feature, but that's not what it is.

    Gateway's insight is this: "Hard disks are getting big, and we are shipping computers with a bunch of unused disk space. Why not fill that space with advertisements (or anything else that a third party will pay us to put there)?"

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  50. Re:don't like it? don't buy it by Bob-o-Matic! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my first 4 years of buying CDs I accumulated about 500 total. In the last 4 years I have bought maybe 5 total, as gifts for others. So considering that 500 CDs @ $18.00 each = $9000.00. If there are more like me, I would say we are definitely not adding to the bottom line of the record industry.

    Now, as for DVDs, I know the MPAA is evil... but I feel like there is $8.99 - $17.99+taxes worth of entertainment on a DVD. I look at a DVD and see the 2 hour product of at least 100 actors and production crew, whereas for about the same price I *might* get an hour of product from really 4-10 people, tops, on a CD.

    Plus all new music is crap, anyways. Everyone should have taken a long break after Social Distortion's "Somewhere Between Heaven and Hell".
    (only half-joking)

  51. Apple... by JHromadka · · Score: 2

    Apple used to include free MP3s with some of its models so people could use them with iMovie and iTunes. Sure the music was mostly instrumental or public domain, but at least it was free and didn't require an Internet connection to unlock.

    --
    "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
    1. Re:Apple... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      Yeah and all of it sucked. Public domain music sucks butt0x0r.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:Apple... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      "Public domain music sucks butt0x0r."

      Wasn't that one of Beethoven's symphonies?

    3. Re:Apple... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      lol

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  52. Recovery CD? by Hadean · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Gateway computers come with a recovery CD, don't they? (at least my friend's did). So what happens if something goes wrong and you lose your hard drive - since you paid to listen to those songs (through advertising, upped computer price, or through the 'free' trial), do you get them back? Do you have to redownload the 2000 songs you have 90 days free access to? I doubt they have a couple of DVDs of music in the box, ready to be reinstalled for you...

    I can see some poor suck^M^M^M^Muser calling the tech support people crying for her Britney! *ack, the horror*

    1. Re:Recovery CD? by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 2

      Well, since the pre-downloaded music is offered as a convenience only, and an internet connection is required to use the services, it's perfectly reasonable to expect the user to contact customer service, and do whatever needs to be done to enable the music to be downloaded. Supposedly, they're fairly helpful about that kind of thing, at least for now (if the service fails or becomes very successful, expect that to change).

      Sure, it'd be a pain in the ass, but anyone signing up for a service with all those DRM hoops to jump through has got to be prepared for that.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
  53. Stainless Steel Balls. by Didion+Sprague · · Score: 5, Funny

    The end of DRM will the following: Microsoft, working in concert with the Big 5 record labels, will begin to deliver content in the form of stainless steel balls. Sort of like BBs, but bigger. They will insist that these steel balls are, in fact, music. "Believe us," they'll say, "we thought long and hard about this one." The steel balls will, however, confuse consumers. "I don't know," they'll say, "I can't hear anything." But the labels will insist that the steel balls work fine. "They're music," Hilary Rosen will say, "but they're copy protected." "It's foolproof," Jack Valenti will say, and then -- a few months later -- introduce his own version of the steel music balls: plastic video pyramids. Each pyramid will be about three inches high, black plastic, and weigh about three ounces. "Microsoft helped us with the protection algorithm," he'll announce. "In fact, they're so secure not even Microsoft's new operating system can play the video. But trust us, these videos look great." Confused consumers will be seen walking around with steel balls and plastic pyramids. "I don't know," they'll say, "I haven't seen anything yet, but I look forward to it." Another music lover will admit to liking the way the steel balls feel. "They're so smooth and lovely. Perfect." "The Register" will point out that the balls are not, in fact, perfectly spherical. "There are tiny, minute imprecise abrasions. But to the naked eye they'll look pretty nice." Posters on Slashdot.com will claim that they've not yet cracked their steel balls and enabled the music. "It's in there," a Slashdot poster named Borg2Soon will say, "I've set up a Linux box to play the steel balls." The plastic pyramids are a bit more diffucult since they take up more space and aren't as portable as the steel balls. "You can't carry as many pyramids around at one time," John C. Dvorak will say. The Screensavers Patrick Norton will be dubious. "Well, I'm not sure why they made the music into steel balls. I liked the normal files." The screensavers Yoshi will design a case-mod in which users can place up to one thousand balls and fifteen pyramids. "It's a wicked mod," Yoshi will say. Thousands will build the mod. Millions will praise the balls. "But not the pyramids. I don't like the pyramids." John C. Dvorak will wonder why they just couldn't have made the pyramids plastic balls instead of plastic pyramids. "Come on, Microsoft," Dvorak will chide, "not everyone has room for all these pyramids." Microsoft's stock will skyrocket. Amazon will merge with Starbucks. They'll rename the new store 'Pequod.' The White Whale will be spotted. "Balls!" Ahab will shout.

    1. Re:Stainless Steel Balls. by KelsoLundeen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funniest -- weirdest -- damn thing I've read all morning.

      Whoever mod'd this as 'Offtopic' is a moron.

      I'll agree it doesn't address the actual situation as specified in the topic, but the idea here -- the anger, at least -- has a ring of truth not heard on Slashdot on a long time.

      Funny shit!

      (BTW -- on topic -- what happens to the DRM files when you need to reinstall the OS? Do you lose everything?)

  54. What's the difference? by dmomo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All sorts of interesting legal wrinkles here: you're buying a computer which contains data that you cannot legally access.

    I don't see much of a difference between this and software demos that are made up of the full version and only need a registration key to be unlocked.

  55. You are wrong by MCMLXXVI · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can access any of that you want. You can't however sell, distribute, or give away what you access. I can take my computer, rip out the CPU and spend a year mapping the layout. I have done nothing illegal. If I sell it or publish it the internet then I have broken the law. You own what you own and unless you SIGNED a waiver to say you were not going to do this you are free to do what you want with YOUR stuff.

  56. Disney did something similar. by MarvinMouse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Disney Interactive about 4-7 years ago used to include entire programs with its computers but would disable them until you paid an online payment to them.

    This is way back though. I just remember trying to figure out how to get through the disabling so I could play... Never figured it out. (I was really young then.) All I knew is that if you signed up with them (it would dial a long distance number and give your info to them), the programs would become active.

    Perhaps now with the internet, more people will go out of their way to break the DRM, but I am willing to say most will either pay to listen to them, or just continue downloading like they always have using morpheus or something similar.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  57. Re:RTFA by b0r1s · · Score: 3, Informative


    Did YOU read the article?

    Under the Pressplay deal, Gateway consumers can access the Pressplay service and features in several ways, including a 90-day free subscription to the service that contains 2,000 songs preloaded and available for streaming and downloading.

    and

    After the free trials, consumers can get the Pressplay service, which provides more than 200,000 songs and additional features, with pricing options starting from $9.95 a month.

    So basically, Gateway is allowing Vivendi to put music on the drives, and Vivendi allows users to play it for 90 days. After that time, I'm sure the assumption is that some of the users will like this way of downloading music (knowing that it's correct, that it's virus free, and that somehow the artists are probably benefiting from it) and will continue to use the service.

    Yes, the users can access the data. No, they don't have to pay for the first three months.

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  58. Re:That isn't getting TOO old or anything by zapfie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, could you say again? I kept getting this static that sounded like "BLAH BLAH I'M AN ANONYMOUS COWARD IGNORE ME"..

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  59. It's too bad that Dell isn't doing the same by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 3

    I'd love to see the first lawsuit after these watermarked mp3s get cracked and make it onto a p2p network.

    "Dude, you're going to Jail!"

    *ducks*

    --

    Money I owe, money-iy-ay
  60. Protected data? by phorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I didn't quite grasp it in the article, but I would assume that this data is somehow encoded/protected so that it is only accessible with the key or subscription (post-trial)?

    I remember when ID software shipped extra games on their Quake, etc CD's. You could call in and get a decoding key to install the games.

    After a while, somebody cracked the CD and you could get the games with a keygen... somehow I think encoding data on a machine is just asking for trouble.

  61. What pressplay sells by jbolden · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pressplay sells two plans:

    $9.95 / month for unlimited streaming + downloading into press play format
    $17.95 / month for unlimited streaming + 10 conversions to portable formats
    they also offer the $17.95 / month plan as $14.95 / month if you pay for the entire year in advance.

    The non portable format is tranferable to one other system. Further tracks can be organized in play lists and sets....

    My guess is that they are trying to sell people on the $9.95 / month to have a large music library on their computer. I'd further guess that pressplay also is coming out with some sort of portable player for their format.

    So a gateway customer paying $9.95 / month has:
    1) a very large music library on their system
    2) The ability to add to it freely as new music comes out
    3) The ability to take this music and move it to their portable player

    I can see this doing quite well. 200k songs ~ 18k albums ~ 500 shelves ~ 100 sq foot CD collection ~ 1/2 a small record store excluding duplicates ~ a small record store including duplicates.

    That's a lot of music for a home user at a price which is not unreasonable. I can see music fans which aren't that computer savvy going for this. The main thing that needs to happen is for gateway/pressplay to offer a way to get the music into a car for people not to realize this is not as good a deal as it looks like.

    1. Re:What pressplay sells by jbolden · · Score: 2

      It wouldn't do you any good. The data as stored on disk is encrypted the player is custom to the installation and the time.

    2. Re:What pressplay sells by quintessent · · Score: 2

      It really oughta be called "Press Play, and we might let you hear your music."

    3. Re:What pressplay sells by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Same thing would apply to movies / video store about 5 years after that. If you are right then we end up with a digital entertainment world filled with "made for television" movies which aren't worth stealing.

    4. Re:What pressplay sells by jbolden · · Score: 2

      I agree. At $.25 per song to burn I'd joing and I spend under 3 figures per year for music.

  62. This reminds me of quake I shareware disc... by venomkid · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...where id software decided to package all of their old games encrypted on the CD with the ability to 'unlock' them with a credit card.

    Then some unscrupulous scoundrels broke the encryption, and turned a $9 game preview into Best of ID Software Platinum "Game of the Year" Edition.

    blah blah client side security blah blah tooth fairy...

    Also, i wonder if, when they tell you the size of the HD, do they chop off the space they've filled up with 2000 unwanted songs? Do they make it obvious that you could save a few gigs by deleting them? Probably not.

    --
    vk.
  63. Re:why? by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

    I cannot fault Gateway for trying to provide their customers a value-added item like this (like smallpox to the Native-Americans...)

    At least the Natives got blankets out of the deal.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  64. It's a proper DMCA use by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2
    The DMCA protects technological measures that control access to a protected work. In copyright law, access = acquisition, so it properly protects things like password systems on web sites. Access is not the same as use, and the abuses of the DMCA so far have been in it's application to protect use control mechanisms. However, the code that stops you accessing the data on the hard drive, data to which you have no legal right of access under copyright law (good old, pre-DMCA copyright law), is rightly protected by the DMCA.

    Flame away!

  65. Dont use the cable box example. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2

    The cable companies did so much legal junk in the past (blatent paying off of senators... judges, congressmen..) that you really shouldn't use it for anything legal. Basically Cable companies got a bunch of junk put on Sattilte tv access, so regular sattilite sucks, and nobody uses it.

    About your car? Your car doesn't falsely advertise that it's capable of going 150... it's just a fact that can be judged by logic. What? you don't think Gateway will make this into a huge scam? 2000 FREEEEEEE Songs!!!!

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  66. So send them a bill for hard drive storage fees. by The+Panther! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they're going to take up storage real estate on a hard drive where you own the platters, but you can't use the data legally, they owe you compensation for the space they're stealing from you.

    In short, charge them a monthly fee for having their data on your hard disk drive. Many companies do that as their primary business--selling external storage.

    The sooner such practices as this bankrupt the businesses at fault, the sooner the practices go away.

    --
    Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
  67. So much for Gateway supporting your "rights..." by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gateway says here:

    "As a leading proponent of inexpensive and easy-to-use downloadable music, Gateway believes consumers should have lawful rights to encode, copy, collect, purchase and listen to their personal music collections in the MP3 format. We fully support an MP3 user's right to:

    'Rip' and encode their own CD music collections into digital music files for their own personal use and enjoyment.

    Make as many copies of their digital music files as they would like for their own personal use. This freely allows consumers to copy their MP3s on any number of their own computers in various locations, as well as on to their portable MP3 hardware players.

    'Burn' their music files onto compact discs for their own personal use."

    Yeah yeah yeah, now that I see Gateway's ACTIONS I can go back and re-read those words with the right slant. "Of course, we never expected you to think that the files you purchased as part of your Gateway Computer are YOUR files." Or perhaps, "Well, we only meant that for .mp3's. We don't feel that you have any rights for files whose names end in any other set of three letters."

    My mother taught me that the essence of a lie was not whether or not the statement was technically true, but whether the speaker intended for the listener to misunderstand them. I'm afraid Gateway's fine talk about consumers' rights is just such a statement.

  68. Predicted !! by rixster · · Score: 2
    --
    Two wrongs may not make a right, but three ....
  69. Im tired of fighting by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    I dont care anymore, most music comeing out is crap, the older stuff isnt affected (yet), I have over 400 (legally purchased) cds, 300 LPs, and 500 casstettes. some independent bands really show us what they have and Ill buy their music directly from them. the older stuff Ill just buy at used music stores/pawn shops

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  70. Pre-Pr0n by 3Y3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, the music may have its merits but when they start loading up the harddrives with a few gigs of pr0n before I buy it, then maybe I'll be interested (Now thats a time saver!)

    3Y3

    --
    ---- Anyone can act smart, but it takes a smart person to act stupid. ----
  71. A hypothetical scenario by mesozoic · · Score: 2

    John is a teenager. His parents bought him a Gateway laptop for his first year at college.

    John opens his laptop to find some really cool songs sitting in 'My Documents'. Wow! That's cool!

    John tries to play a song, and gets a notice that he needs to pay first. John is a college student. John doesn't like paying.

    John opens up the latest flavor of P2P filesharing software and downloads the damn song for free.

    Of course, I'm sure the fact that consumers are rallying around the concept of free MP3s, while by and large still buying CDs, doesn't really mean anything. Research shows if we put padlocks on all our content, and then throw it in consumers' faces every chance we get, we might still be able to inflate our profits to pre-Napster levels!

    Idiots.

  72. Re:digital out / in by pyr0 · · Score: 2

    So are you saying that if I have a set of speakers that are digital only (no analog in), and I play a drm-enabled song in windows, no sound will come out of the speakers? As technology pushes into the future, I imagine digital speakers will become far more commonplace than analog.

  73. I can extend your silly analogies by twitter · · Score: 2
    my cable box comes with the ability to recieve all of the channels too Those other channels don't cover ten percent of your TV screen either, but these songs you can't listen to occupy 10% of your hard drive and must be deleted, if you can.

    my car comes with the ability to do 150mph, but the chips lets me go to 120 and if you drive 120 MPH you endager me and others. No one will die if you listen to music shipped to you on your hard disk without paying some big stupid media company. Nor will anyone die if I make a program that can play that music for you, but unlike the speeder, I might go to jail for that.

    As has been pointed out a million times before, the implications for free speech and publishing are grave. A big fat music publisher has made a format that only they may use to play music that limits your ability to use and share that music which is really someone else's work to begin with. You are not alowed to understand that format and will go to jail if you study it and publish the mechanism used to "protect" the content. You are told that it is immoral for you to read that content without the publisher's permission and that it's wrong to share it with your friends. RMS saw correctly what happens when all publishing goes this way, we all end up being slaves to the publishers. They can charge us more than we can afford to learn then use that debt to extort all our future work, which we will then have to pay to access. Imagine a format like this being used to publish your next paper. Now imagine that your children have to pay the publisher to read that paper. Sick.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  74. Pre Installed Software... Pre Installed Hardware.. by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 2

    Little OT but ...

    This reminds me of the Sun Enterprise 10000 (StarFires) that came with 64 processors pre-installed but you could use only the ones that you paid for (others need to be "enabled" before the system can use it).

    S

  75. No internet connection? by hether · · Score: 2

    This may seem like a silly question, but what good does this do people who buy the computer, but won't have an internet connection? For instance, a person who buys one for their kids to use for schoolwork or a person using it just to store recipes, use Quicken, etc? They won't even be able to access Press Play's online presence. So is the encryption done locally via something like a registration key, or does it require a connection? Just wondering.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  76. Factual correction: by spicyjeff · · Score: 2

    The CRT iMac currently sells for $799.
    iBooks and eMacs start close at $999.

    Is it really that hard to check facts?

    1. Re:Factual correction: by clontzman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ah, right you are. Anyway, $800 is still hundreds of dollars more than an equivalent PC (after all, the CRT iMac's hardware is getting pretty vintage).

      My mistake, but my point still remains. The music isn't free -- you *do* pay for it.

  77. Re:you can use the songs in spite of editor commen by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

    They wouldn't like to take the risk of supplying premium channels if they knew there were no legal sanctions against people pirating it.

    then don't give them to me unless i pay for them, simple as that. don't give me something that's kinda hidden and expect that if i find it i won't use it. maybe the pizza company charge for delivery per pizzl. they can't charge you extra for the delivery if they find out you eat the second pizza somehow.

    untangables are generally services. say i hire an electrician to install some circuits. he installs some extra circuits on the chance that he can upsell them to me. i'm not interested, but find the extra circuits after the fact and find that i am able to use them just fine. can he now start charging me for the service he performed of installing those? hell, no. he can only charge me for what i contracted him to do which was install x amount of circuits.

  78. New trend by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

    I bought the Motorola T720 cellphone, the new color one with games and all. Well it has tetris and tony hawk skater game, Both of these games are DEMOS! and thats one of the main selling points of the phone, look at the ads for it. I bought it for the big screen, and returned it yesterday for a Nokia becouse the Motorola keept crashing on me. But we will see more of this in the furtre becouse people buy things and say, "wow it come with this and that..." umm no.

    --
    hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  79. Re:And that IBM mainframe has 8 CPUs, but only 2 w by pod · · Score: 2

    Your example still does not fly. You're not looking for a specific machine, just a good number cruncher. An activity, as opposed to a specific solution. So why does your example want a specific CD? Don't you just want something good to listen to? Warner has just as many similar artists as EMI, so why not go to the place that provides the cheapest music?

    --
    "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
  80. Does you sign an export restriction agreement? by Kjella · · Score: 2

    If not, you could take this to a country where DMCA doesn't apply, apply any crack that shows up and legally own 2000 songs. You can even sell these unencrypted disks to others and make a business out of it.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  81. Re:What's the big deal? by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

    Uh, we all complain that our PCs come bundled with shit we dont want. Internet explorer, AOL etc... Last year when i got my new compaq i booted it up, i hear a dilatone. On startup it had connected to AOL! Also on the desktop there were icons for disney stuff, nickelodian stuff, compuserve, execpc, internet explorer, outlook express and all sortsa other crap i didn't want. How many gigs of stuff i didn't want and didn't ask for were on my disk.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  82. Chain of thought by stinkydog · · Score: 2

    Ponder this if you will:

    1. User id10t buys a new Gateway with music installed
    2. id10t downloads Kaaza and procedes to share their entire hard drive
    3. Johnny Hacker downloads the watermarked music and cracks it
    4. Johnny puts it back on Kaaza unencrypted(but still watermarked) for the world(and the RIAA) to see
    5. User id10t is charged

    Finally stupitity will be a criminal offense. Of course it could be Grandma going to jail. I would like to see that prosecuted.

    SD

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
  83. In a related move... by kitzilla · · Score: 3, Funny

    Glaxo, Inc, announced today it will soon begin shipping sealed bags of M&Ms with its blood sugar testing kits...

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  84. Re:Copyright by zapfie · · Score: 2

    I think Mastercard has the copyright on that arrangement of words ending with "Priceless" - You just busted their copyright, widely recognized trademark and harmed their good name. Oh oh!

    Interestingly enough, they don't really mind that kind of usage, and actually encourage it. I was watching an interview on TV with a MasterCard spokesman.. and he stated that parodies of MasterCard commercials on shows and by people they had no problem with.. but where they draw the line is when people start to use it for their own gains (in this case, they were upset that a political candidate was using a parody of the MasterCard bit in their commercials).

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  85. Related: Gateway customers to format, reinstall. by Maul · · Score: 2

    My family bought two Gateways about 5 years ago. Back then it seemed they did a decent job about not adding too much useless crap that nobody needed, something that other OEM vendors such as Compaq were notorious for.

    I've not seen a new Gateway since then, but it seems they've gone the way of others and are now innundating users with gigs of junk.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  86. Your numbers are off.. and so is your conclusion by rsborg · · Score: 2
    I can see this doing quite well. 200k songs ~ 18k albums ~ 500 shelves ~ 100 sq foot CD collection ~ 1/2 a small record store excluding duplicates ~ a small record store including duplicates.

    First, it's 2000 songs, not 200,000 as you state. That's at best 200 CD's assuming 10 songs. Considering that there are on average maybe 25 or so music categories (ie, Alternative, Rock, Blues, Broadway_&_Vocalists Children's, Music, Christian_&_Gospel, Classic, Rock Classical, Country, Dance_&_DJ Folk, General, Hard, Rock_&_Metal International, Jazz, Latin, Music Miscellaneous, New, Age, Opera_&_Vocal Pop, R_&_B, Rap_&_Hip-Hop Rock, Soundtracks) that's 8 albums per category. Not a "small record store including duplicates" by any means.

    Secondly, this music will grow old. Sure, they can download new stuff from Pressplay, but how many poeple are going to do that over their 56k lines?

    Ultimately, I think this is an interesting idea, but will not be an overnight success. Then again, Pressplay probably needs all the users it can get, so I doubt they're worried about piracy (as if KaZaa/etc weren't already the dominant players).

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  87. He's talking about the data that's already there by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Informative
    Your interpretation is wrong.
    Nope, yours is.
    The reason they put the data on the PC does not dictate what you can do with it, the law does.

    You are forgetting about the doctine of first sale. This states that if I buy something copyrighted I am automatically given certain legal rights, unless I sign a contract otherwise. So if when buying a gateway, I don't have to sign a contract, I am given certain rights to all the data on that computer. One of those rights being personal use.

    So, I have permission under copyright law to use those files, but the DMCA makes it illegal for me to translate them into a usable format.

    Here are some more links about first sale:
    • http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/law/st_org/iptf/hea dlines/content/1998040801.html
    • http://skyways.lib.ks.us/central/ebooks/firstsal e.html
    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  88. Kiss My Ass Goodbye by fire-eyes · · Score: 2

    My first "PC" was a Gateway. I admired their high quality and worksmanship at the time.

    Then they started making shit computers with proprietary hardware and other junk.

    And now supporting DRM?

    Too bad Gateway. You've just insured I'll never buy another one of your products. I do not deserve to be treated like a criminal before it has been proven I am one.

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
  89. Re:don't like it? don't buy it by HamNRye · · Score: 2

    While I agree that CD's are over priced, there are far more that 4-10 hands that go into any CD. If you have a 4 piece band, you must have an engineer, at the very least. The engineer brings as much musical knowledge to the table as any of the musicians and has just as much influence on the final sound of the album.

    The engineer then has his assistants who do the grunt work, and then the sound guys, etc... There are probably an average of 40 sets of hands on any modern commercial CD just from the artistic side. The biggest difference is there is no union like there is with film, so you don't see all of those names.

    If you really can't figure out where those 40 names come from, ponder the best boy and gaffer positions. Or Assistant to 3 venezuelan llamas...

  90. Re:Your numbers are off.. and so is your conclusio by jbolden · · Score: 2

    Your math is off a bit. First off there is the 200k issue (what's included in the membership). Gateway is only using 2000 as a teaser I guess but that's more of a short term issue. DVDs cost pennies to duplicate in mass. A 10 DVD set...

    Now also notice I said small record store.
    200k songs / 10 songs album / 25 catagories x 2 remove duplicates = 1600 albums per catagory.
    That ain't bad for a small store.

  91. DRM abbreviation by Alethes · · Score: 2

    I'm sure this is a far-fetched idea, but I was just thinking about the fact that marketing droids came up with this "Digital Rights Management" which has been conveniently called "DRM" by everybody from manufacturers, resellers and slashdotters. The idea I had was that, instead of calling this massive problem by the name that the marketing types would prefer, we should go thru the trouble of at the very least saying the full name, and preferably the RMS version of "Digital Restrictions Management", so that Joe User is at least prompted to ask what it is. That way it doesn't get lost in the millions of other acronyms and abbreviations he has a hard time keeping up with, like RAM, P2P, P3P, etc, etc.

    This is just a thought, but I think it'd be at least minimally beneficial.

  92. Re:you can use the songs in spite of editor commen by Alsee · · Score: 2

    out of curiousity, which law prohibits that? the DMCA probably doesn't apply because the viewer isn't attempting to copy copyright material, and in some cases it's an analog signal that's being decoded

    The DMCA has several sections and makes several things illegal. It is not restrticted to digital data. It is not restricted to copying. It is not restricted to "illegal" activity - meaning a librarian, teacher, and student can all go to jail over a completely fair use bookreport which immune from copyright restrictions.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  93. Re:RTFA by Alsee · · Score: 2

    I'm sure the assumption is that some of the users will like this way of downloading music (knowing that it's correct, that it's virus free

    I hear ya there! I downloaded some music from P2P and I came down with chikenpox. Thank god I didn't download any Britteny Spears, who knows what I would have caught!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  94. Re:Doesn't know? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    It could theoritically try and do that I suppose. However, at this point, it doesn't. Windows is not aware that it is running on a virtual machine, it sees all the virtual devices as real hardware and treats them accordingly.

  95. More of the same by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2


    From the story: blah blah blah blah blah.

    Here's where I say blah, blah blah blah blah.

    Seriously... almost every tech company in existence jumps onto whatever the latest fad is. DRM will fail, and I will personally see to it as will millions of other people.

    When will they get it? If 100% of entertainment was DRM'd, I'd still not buy it.

  96. Re:Hash the BIOS by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Like I said, it would be easy. I'm not saying they CAN'T I'm saying they DON'T. If they were to start looking for VPC and the like, well then that would break this particular method. However, since the programs are just virtualizations of real computers, the BIOS can be modified. It's a normal PC BIOS, and that's not reason it can't be swapped out for another one that is compatible.