Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake News

DCowern writes "Mandrake yesterday released their FY2001-2002 earnings and I'm glad to say it's looking real good for them. They've cut operating costs by 42% and increased revenues by 31%. They're still not quite in the black yet but they're expecting to break even month-to-month beginning in February. The full report is here. In other news, Mandrake announced two new programs yesterday. The first is Multi Network Firewall, which looks like an extremely nice package for running small to medium-sized networks. The second program, and my favorite, is their "OS refugee" offer."

270 comments

  1. Question. by yobbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How much revenue did Mandrake Charity contribute?

    1. Re:Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is directly related to Mandrake's business model, which is the TOPIC FOR DISCUSSION.

      Off topic, suuuure.

      Maybe the moderation options should include "ooh, I agree with this guy" ...

    2. Re:Question. by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ask not what MandrakeClub can do for you, but what you can do for MandrakeClub.

      But seriously, what good is Microsoft's computer aid to children who don't have food, clean drinking water, and an education. Someone enlighten me on this...

    3. Re:Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to clarify, this post was originally posted when there was an "off topic" moderation - this now no longer is the case, which means that the dumb fuckwit who moderated it accordingly is someone who posted to this thread within the first 18 posts.

    4. Re:Question. by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Informative

      The first rule of MandrakeClub is - you do not talk about MandrakeClub.

      The second rule of MandrakeClub is - you DO NOT talk about MandrakeClub.

      Your MS comment is a straw man and certainly overgeneralized. If they didn't give at you'll you'd bitch about that. A quick search turned up this and more generally this

      And in case you miss it, here is a more direct link to their Annual Report of Giving.

    5. Re:Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, fuck you.

    6. Re:Question. by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2
      Interesting definition of "Straw Man argument":

      The key points here that make it a Straw Man Argument are these:

      1. Someone #1 makes a statement.

      2. Someone #2 mis-uses that statement to draw an invalid conclusion.

      3. Someone #2 uses their invalid conclusion as the basis for refuting
      contrary arguments (or other goals).


      From here.
    7. Re:Question. by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2
      Other straw man definitions that may be clearer:

      The author attacks an argument which is different from, and usually weaker than, the opposition's best argument. ref

      ...it relies on the creation of a false image of someone else's statements, ideas, or beliefs. ref

      Parent said: ...what good is Microsoft's computer aid to children who don't have food, clean drinking water, and an education.

      To use your definition:
      1. MS donates computers/software to 3rd world countries
      2. "What good is Microsoft's computer aid to children who don't have food, etc?"
      3. The implication (attack) is MS doesn't provide aid in these areas

  2. They're in the black but the color for the thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IS GREEN!!! Maybe this is appropriate? :)

  3. Record breaking bandwidth.. by PFAK · · Score: 5, Funny

    bankrupts MandrakeSoft after slashdot, a OSDN news site posts a link to MandrakeSoft causing excessive bandwidth usage and financial loss.

    --

    Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
    1. Re:Record breaking bandwidth.. by n3m6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      slashdotted jokes are doesn't seem too funny anymore!

      Thank you.

    2. Re:Record breaking bandwidth.. by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      Its funny in a dry, yet twisted sort of way. Twisted because it may turn out to be true...

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    3. Re:Record breaking bandwidth.. by mr_nba · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, all your slashdot jokes are belong to us.

    4. Re:Record breaking bandwidth.. by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      In Soviet Russia, all your slashdot jokes are belong to us.

      Isn't it more like "In Soviet Russia, all of us are belong to slashdot jokes?"

    5. Re:Record breaking bandwidth.. by moosesocks · · Score: 1, Troll

      slashdottec jokes are doesn't seem too funny anymore

      What idiots voted this insightful? He is either making a joke, or has the linguistic ability of a slashdot editor.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  4. Good For Them by dirkdidit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mandrake is one of the best Linux distro's for new users and I feel it's a vital part in getting more people turned onto Linux. I was worried for a while that Mandrake might not exist a few years down the road but hopefully this turn toward profitability will continue. And remember, if you use Mandrake, it doesn't hurt to donate some money to them. It is, afterall, the season of giving. :-)

    1. Re:Good For Them by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And remember, if you use Mandrake, it doesn't hurt to donate some money to them.

      I'm sorry, but if I've paid for their PowerPack in a store (which, by the way, it decently priced as far as distros go, AND it includes StarOffice 6.0), I don't feel guilty by not donating or joining MandrakeClub. For some reason, after leaving the "other" operating system behind, I don't feel it necessary to pay twice for an operating system.

    2. Re:Good For Them by dirkdidit · · Score: 2

      You have a good point. I should have said that if you downloaded the distro and not bought the PowerPack, it wouldn't hurt to join MandrakeClub and donate a few dollars.

    3. Re:Good For Them by electromaggot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Even for experienced users, I think Mandrake is a great distro. If it's easy to install, why does that make it strictly "for newbies"? I'm a developer, not a network admin, and personally I'd rather spend my time progging than editing .conf files and troubleshooting my network (my past Debian installs come to mind as I say that).

      I just installed Mandrake's MNF on a system yesterday and it was cake to set up! Especially after I almost threw my P200 box out the window because the Red Hat 8.0 (Server) Install kept crashing on it (and RH 7.2 didn't seem to be stable either). This Mandrake MNF seems to be rock solid.

      Mandrake is great. I'm gonna start sending them money. I hope they make it.

    4. Re:Good For Them by Malor · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you buy the CD from anyone but Mandrake directly, they only get about half of the money. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, because if distributors and retailers are making money from Linux, it'll get more shelf space. But I don't really think Linux NEEDS to be on the shelf all that much yet... it's getting to be a pretty okay desktop, but it's not ready for Mom to install on her own. It's Mom-ready after it has been installed, but the geeks who know how to install it also know how to find it online. :-)

      Seems to me that the basic membership ($5/mo) is a nice way to give them a steady revenue stream, which is important for software businesses.

      I downloaded the OS, so so I felt a bit obligated to subscribe. I got StarOffice 6.0 as well, because I subscribed at the silver level. ($10/mo or $115/year.) As long as I keep getting bennies that are worth it, I'll keep resubscribing at that level, but I will renew at least a basic membership for as long as I keep using the distro.

      It just seems like the right thing to do.

    5. Re:Good For Them by npietraniec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, Mandrake isn't a "not for profit" company. Why don't you donate some money to Ford, GE, or Microsoft while you're at it... That's the dumbest thing I've seen all day (although it is 2am)

    6. Re:Good For Them by Sneftel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Ford were developing a really cool car that I wanted, and might not be able to stay afloat financially without outside help, yeah, I might donate.

      --
      The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
    7. Re:Good For Them by Afrosheen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You should donate to them because all the code they generate is open source. Actually there isn't one piece of software in their Download Edition of 9.0 that isn't opensource and free. They're strong believers where other distros are tending to hide their contributions.

      Also, they let you leech all their ISO's free of charge. Try doing that with Xandros, Lindows, or any of the other 'new and improved desktop distros'. All they ask is that you have a heart and give them a few bucks so their developers can eat and they can pay for their bandwidth.

    8. Re:Good For Them by npietraniec · · Score: 1

      No you wouldn't. You might buy the car if you liked it... But would you write Ford a check because you thought they were coming out with a neat car? Let's be realistic here.

    9. Re:Good For Them by Martigan80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      getting more people turned onto Linux

      Why should this be the main focus? I mean trying to make it user friendly-fine that's a great idea to appeal to the non-Linux user, but I don't think a lot of effort should be focused on actively trying to get users converted. Because the one thing that will start happening, and we have seen RedHat do it, is that they will start catering to these users, ex-windows users who are used to getting things their way by complaining about this or that. Users who have been using Linux for two years but still can't use lp in the CLI. This is not meant as a lash out or an insult, just a question of motive. If you bring too many of these half users on board you will ask for allot more than you have ever bargained for, and will start making a distro to make it easier for them, and focus less on the real applications.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    10. Re:Good For Them by npietraniec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You seem to forget that they are a BUSINESS. Donate to debian, purchase services from Mandrake.

      I'm actually a member of a mandrake club... Oh the irony.

    11. Re:Good For Them by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems to me that the basic membership ($5/mo) is a nice way to give them a steady revenue stream, which is important for software businesses.

      A membership of this sort would be great if they were a non-profit company. While I agree that they do good work, it is their job to become profitable. It's not my job to support their work or pay twice for an OS or product I've already paid for.

      If you buy the CD from anyone but Mandrake directly, they only get about half of the money.

      Note to all: This is why you should buy directly from Mandrake.

    12. Re:Good For Them by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean trying to make it user friendly-fine that's a great idea to appeal to the non-Linux user, but I don't think a lot of effort should be focused on actively trying to get users converted.

      I agree. People should use Linux because they like Linux, not because Linux can be made to look like Windows.

      [rant] I tried to set up a Red Hat box for someone. Big mistake. Not only did they not understand what was going on, but with all of the GUI cruft on top, any time they tried to tweak something, they ended up overwriting my customizations. Now, I'm not against GUI tools, but when a GUI tool is too stupid to keep settings that are hand entered, then it's not the right way to do something. Or, at least, it should ask confirmation. I ended up setting up a Debian box, and I ssh into it to maintain it for them if something goes wrong.[/rant]

    13. Re:Good For Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems clear that the truth hurts.

    14. Re:Good For Them by geekoid · · Score: 2

      FIrst off, its not leeching, second, the poster said he BOUGHT his copy. IF you are selling something, and it costs more to make then you are selling it for, well...goodbye.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Good For Them by ddeyoung · · Score: 1

      Can I get a show of hands from all the people out there who's moms have installed Windows on there own? That's what i thought... No operating system is designed for the average MOM to install. And if that's the goal, maybe I could suggest a new M$ certification...

      Microsoft Certified System Mom (MCSM)

    16. Re:Good For Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing hurting is your hemerroids.
      Fucking commie Microsoft bastard.

    17. Re:Good For Them by zenyu · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Um, Mandrake isn't a "not for profit" company. Why don't you donate some money to Ford, GE, or Microsoft while you're at it... When Ford and GE start giving away cars, and Microsoft GPL's their software I might consider donating. Mandrake isn't asking for donations anyway, they still allow you to make donations. But as someone working for a not-for-profit I think that makes sense because institutions often have to transfer money in a certain way for accounting purposes. "not-for-profit" and "non-profit" are just labels, a not-for-profit can own a commercial company, they just don't have shareholders to pay dividends to and can't bribe politicians. A "non-profit" is a more restricted entity, it can't have profits for too long before losing it's status.

      The only real reason to start an entity as a not-for/non-profit is if you expect the tax deduction on donations to get you more money, and you won't ever need political support. Mandrake is in France, I don't even know if a charity donation is tax-deductable there. Most donations are small and in cash anyway, so the tax deduction isn't really an issue, like it would be if BillG were considering a 6 billion dollar donation in stock that would normally be subject to a 20% gapital gains tax. We all also know Linux and open source in general can use all the political support we can afford to buy.

      As long as they are contributing to open source there is nothing wrong with sending donations. Hell, if you're working for a company that makes use of XFS, what's wrong with sending a $50,000 donation to SGI? If you tell them why they might have an easier time justifying the programmer time next time someone wants to port something to Linux there. Think about how you TIP at your local bar; you probably TIP better than you have to for your conscience. You know you will get treated better the next time you come in and might even get a couple buy backs or be told when your favorite beer is a little flat and it's best to order something else.

      If you're a programmer it might be better to work on some code. Or, you might know some other organization/person that will spend the money more productively; give your money there then. But if you are using Mandrake, maybe you think they are spending the money well? So what's wrong with giving them more? Is it so different from the time I spend working on OSS? Others use it for profit and it doesn't bother me, I've gotten a lot more value from OSS than my cost in time, writing the code. That code will end up creating a lot more value on other people's collective desks than I lost by working on it.

      Nothing wrong with just signing up for MandrakeClub or buying a boxed set either.

    18. Re:Good For Them by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you think people are doing when they buy shares in a company? Same principle. You're giving a certain amount of money to a company with the expectation of something in return. You may donate to Mandrake, Slackware, or any other software company with the expectation that that company will continue to provide you with great software, or you may purchase stock in Ford, GM, Trojan, BigCloudFromOuterSpaceCorp, etc. with the expectation that whichever company will use the money to continue (or in some cases, such as IPOs, be able to start) providing you with a product you value (and often financial return). Either way, you're funding a company so they can operate.

    19. Re:Good For Them by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2

      Microsoft Certified System Mom (MCSM)

      It would fit right in with the Microsoft Certified System Enfants. Yeah, I had to kludge it, but don't we all sometimes...

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    20. Re:Good For Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, this is a good one: A guy posts something basically saying "I like mandrake because i don't like to edit configuration files by hand", and soem overzeleous Debianer automatically mods this down as "troll".

      Cool! :-)

    21. Re:Good For Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See? That's because Linux is rubbish!

    22. Re:Good For Them by Idou · · Score: 2, Informative

      Five elements of Present Value Measurement:

      1. The price for bearing uncertainty

      2. Expectations about timing variations of future cash flows

      3. other factors (e.g., liquidity issues and market imperfections)

      4. time value of money (the risk-free rate of interest)

      5 estimate of future cash flow

      (Becker Conviser CPA Review)

      The present value of money is the most basic element of the financial market. Companies need cash to operate and steady revenue to negotiate loans. This is why you do Mandrake more of a favor by becoming a club member and buying the CD at cheapbytes than just buying the packet, by itself.

      No reason to feel guilty about "donating." However, a basic grasp of present values and revenue recognition might enable you to optimize your support of, imho, the world's best distro.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    23. Re:Good For Them by leviramsey · · Score: 2
      It's not my job to support their work or pay twice for an OS or product I've already paid for.

      That's the case if you bought a boxed distro... then there's no real point in joining the Club (well, there are certain other privileges that you get, though whether they're worth it is questionable).

      However, someone that downloads an ISO or performs a network install should, imho, join the Club.

    24. Re:Good For Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supporting Linux (any distro, for that matter) is a win-win deal for all of us who use it: helping keep distros alive spurs competition and makes up for their time and effort.

      The term "donation" referred to MandrakeClub memberships, even if Mandrake doesn't like the term (they call it membership, not charity, truth is the club is IMO still of little use: I'm a member and don't use it, but as I read it, many people do find it usefull) should be better viewed as an "investment". What do I get in return? Not cash, as I'm not buying stock (not that their stock is making any money yet). I am betting on the future.

      In the long run, Mandrake and every other distro that is laid out as a business should be able to pull a profit in order to survive. Open Source projects need strong resource backings, call it money, or faithfull users, or convinced developers, or all of them, but they need to end up making money to survive. If they make a business and sell products, they need to -finally- get revenues.

      Mandrake has been highly creative up till now in their ways of getting the necesary cash to keep up their operation until they get to the blacks. If any of us use it and want to keep on using it, the least we can do is help them get to the blacks.

      Bottom line: investment, not donation, not charity.

      ---Molocrom

    25. Re:Good For Them by thelen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm a developer, not a network admin

      Same here. I just wanted a desktop that would enable me to do my work, not qualify as a part-time job to use. I've been running MDK 9 for about 8 weeks now, and I've booted into Win2k about twice during that whole time. In contrast, when my Linux partition was RH 7.2 I spent the bulk of my time under Windows b/c the RH desktop was so cluttered with redundant (many non-functional) menus, terrible multimedia capabilities, printing didn't work.

      You could say MDK is for newbies, but another way of putting it is that they made some tough choices and cut a lot of bs that end users shouldn't have to deal with. If you want tighter control over your system, use Debian or Gentoo or something. I simply needed a working desktop, and Mandrake did a great job providing it.

    26. Re:Good For Them by bhsx · · Score: 2

      Why should this be the main focus?
      Because MandrakeSoft is a business, a publicly-traded one in fact. They need to keep heading in the money-making direction and the only way to do that is to attract ex-Windows users. There are a finite number of current Linux users, certainly not enough to keep even a few of the current businesses afloat. So, they can try to attract the current Linux users, many of whom are already paying customers; but many of whom are migrating towards a grassroots gentoo-esque distribution and away from the businesses. So how do you keep afloat trying to compete with Windows? By concentrating on getting more people turned onto Linux, or specifically, Linux-Mandrake.

      --
      put the what in the where?
    27. Re:Good For Them by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "It's Mom-ready after it has been installed, but the geeks who know how to install it also know how to find it online. :-)"

      True, but not all people who know where to download it have a fat broadband connection ;-)

      It is for this reason, plus the five other CDs of goodies that I bought the Mandrake Powerpack 8.2 edition. Even if all CDs were available online, it would take me ages to download it over my measly 28.8 connection. (There is nothing better where I live.)

    28. Re:Good For Them by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      I'd sign up for the membership if you got anything valuable in return.

      Mandrake has the active 'Cooker' distribution containing recent versions of many packages, and providing a good opportunity to report bugs (especially since, as I mentioned elsewhere in this discussion, they seem to object to anyone filing bugs against the stable distribution). But it is impossible to keep up with Cooker development unless you have a fast network connection.

      For $50 a year surely they could burn a CD every two weeks with the latest Cooker packages and post it to you? Plus maybe the latest errata packages for the stable distribution.

      The current MandrakeClub options seem to involve paying money in order to get a discount on proprietary software. Somehow, paying MandrakeSoft to act as a middleman so I can get a discount on StarOffice doesn't appeal to me.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    29. Re:Good For Them by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Basically, I agree with you. But I do think that they need to work a bit harder at QA.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    30. Re:Good For Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Note to all: This is why you should buy
      > directly from Mandrake.
      >
      Too bad Mandrake itself doesn't do their part! My lady preordered the Powerpack (plus two subsequent versions) directly from Mandrake back in October. Up to this day she hasn't gotten it!! Of course, the money was being deducted anyway. Numerous e-mails have not brought about a resolution. Meanwhile, Mandrake offers the same thing now "minus shipping and handling" for people who ordered later. Having brought this again to Mandrake's attention they offered her *not* a reimbursement of her shipping costs but 6 months of MandrakeClub membership instead. A club for a product she *still doesn't even have*!! If she doesn't get it by the end of the month she will consider legal actions against Mandrake for fraught and deception. The funny thing is, she still really really wants to use it, but Mandrake can't even ship it's own goddamn product!!

    31. Re:Good For Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the heck is speakin of donating money for Mandrake ? The MandrakeClub-fee isn't a greatly donation to Mandrake. You will become something back. And if GM or whoever car builder providing specs and documetation of their car for easy repair the car on my own and/or with someone who is capable to do that, why should I not give some money to them in Order to get some new firmware for that car, so I am able to have the double horsepower ?

      You see this sort of comparing is really dump.

    32. Re:Good For Them by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      The present value of money is the most basic element of the financial market. Companies need cash to operate and steady revenue to negotiate loans.

      I feel like I'm repeating this until I'm blue in the face. Mandrake is a for-profit company. They are not a charity. By buying their PowerPack, I have become a customer. A customer is not responsible for the cash flow of a company they buy product from. If their revenue stream isn't what they want, it is there responsibility to fix it in any way they see fit. If they wish to take donations, fine. But I will not be giving. I will buy the products I need from them because I want to support them. By the way, I purchase one copy, and then refer others to the Mandrake Club if they feel they want to support. Every comment I get from people is positive, and many do subscribe.

    33. Re:Good For Them by imr · · Score: 2

      The current MandrakeClub options involves paying money in order to support mandrake, a true to free software ideals compagny.
      THEN, we also might get some services in return like those you ask for, or like those discounts.
      Personnaly, it's a way to pay them back for those mandrake distros i got from magazine cds or from internet downloads.

  5. Wow.. by ryochiji · · Score: 3, Interesting
    >They've cut operating costs by 42% and increased revenues by 31%

    That's impressive. Except...they're still not profitable? Wow. They must've been screwing up big time before.

    It's still nice to hear some good news for once I guess.

    1. Re:Wow.. by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Their previous CEO and his cronies wanted to take Mandrake in a radically different direction. They tried making inroads into educational software and POP software, kiosk stuff, etc. Just some really creative but ultimately terrible decisions.

      Ask Enron or anyone else victimized by retarded management how hard it is to make a comeback. Without it's userbase standing by, I'm sure Mandrake would've gone tits up this summer.

  6. OS Refugees.... by tgrotvedt · · Score: 5, Funny

    After my brief stint recently with a friend's laptop running Win ME (no memory management just like 98), I think I'd prefer the term "asylum seeker".

    --
    What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
    1. Re:OS Refugees.... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I just hope you're not living in Australia...

    2. Re:OS Refugees.... by tgrotvedt · · Score: 1

      LOL, I live in Sydney!

      --
      What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
  7. OS Refugee Offer by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reading the OS Refugee Offer, I think it's a great idea. Personally, if they had an idea like that when I was shopping around for distros (metaphorically speaking) I would have gone for that offer in a heartbeat. Now only of Red Hat and SuSE (especially SuSE) did this, we might have some competition with Windows for PHBs. (Of course, the undisputed king of distros shall be unnamed at this time to avoid starting a flamewar. It suffices to say that it is free and always will be.)

    1. Re:OS Refugee Offer by mrscorpio · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gentoo, right? ;)

      Chris

    2. Re:OS Refugee Offer by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, if Gentoo starts with a D, then yes. Otherwise, it's that "other" free distro that gave Gentoo some of its direction and its social contract. :-)

    3. Re:OS Refugee Offer by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Did it also get it's ease of installation and configuration from that D distro? LOL

    4. Re:OS Refugee Offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, here we go!

      Chris

    5. Re:OS Refugee Offer by wass · · Score: 1
      Of course, the undisputed king of distros shall be unnamed at this time to avoid starting a flamewar. It suffices to say that it is free and always will be.

      You mean Linux One? :-)
      [ducks for cover]

      --

      make world, not war

    6. Re:OS Refugee Offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heheh... I forgot to click the little anonymous tab because I know the Gentoo and Deb zealots are gonna mod my ass to oblivion for that little crack. Anyway we'll see if anyone can take a joke. :)

    7. Re:OS Refugee Offer by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      eh... I took a look at the offer. I'm not terribly excited about it. It is convenient to get the disc from Mandrake for almost the production of the disc and packaging, but I don't know if that's quite enough.

      If we (as the linux community) want to reach out to the lost souls in the Windows world, then something more than just the CD should be offered. Anyone can download the Mandrake 9.0 CD for free, so offering a CD for a fee is maybe not the best idea. Instead, we take a small hit by sending them the CD, and offering free support for a limited time, say... 3 months.

      Once everyone is acclamated and the three months are up, offer support for a fee, and ask them to pledge to a membership. This is all optional, of course, but it is a pathway for the moola.

      I just don't think that the average consumer is going to put the effort into trading a Windows CD and License in, while paying a fee, for a non-supported Mandrake Linux cd.



      Just my two cents tho.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    8. Re:OS Refugee Offer by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      "something more than just the CD should be offered..."

      I totally agree. I've been telling Mandrake for years we need some freakin' bumper stickers.

    9. Re:OS Refugee Offer by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      What struck me was that it was just one CD.
      When I DL'd the 8.2 release, it was 3 CDs.

      It was also a breeze to install.
      I'm curious as to what you get/don't get on that one 9.0 CD

      Maybe they will take an AOL CD. I think I have one around here somewhere...

    10. Re:OS Refugee Offer by HiThere · · Score: 2

      If you are going to lowball it, I think I would prefer to get my distribution from CheapBytes. That's partially because they are fairly local, and shipping time is about a day. They'll sell you boxed sets or burned CDs, your preference. At corresponding prices. (A large selection of linux versions, both old and new. Several of the old versions are going for what has to be less than the production cost, but of course those ARE old versions).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    11. Re:OS Refugee Offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the guy who thought up the OS refugee offer - the aim was to allow people to TRY linux with either the latest version of MDK, or a previous version complete with manuals, and then if they like it, not have 'lost' their initial layout if they decide to upgrade to a full 9.0 powerpack.

      Incidentally, I don't ask that people give up their 'other' OS (whatever it might be - i've even had a few 'other' linuxes), i just ask that someone prove to me that they do own an OS.

      just to clarify, for what it's worth

  8. Cost by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 4, Funny


    Who would pay $30 for Linux when you can download Windows XP for free?

    1. Re:Cost by npietraniec · · Score: 2, Funny

      A better question might be "who would want to run XP for free when you could run linux for 30 bucks?" Not me, but flame away.

      Wait, what am I talking about, I run linux for free...

    2. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, what... the... hell... are you talking about? You can download Linux for free in many forms!! What's more, legally!! And anyways, I think I'd pay $30 in order to ensure that I would never have to use a GUI with orange and green colors and uberpatronising menus and "tips", a good investment, i think.

  9. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Gabrill · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is there a point to these Soviet Russia comments, or is someone performing a denial of good taste attack on Slashdot?

    --
    Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
  10. Good News by fozzy(pro) · · Score: 5, Informative

    I often find myself in Discussions wondering why Linux hasn't taken off due its good qualities. I often get referred to complexity of use, difficulty of installation, and Microsoft using its powers of Gigantism. These are all somewhat true. But, I always have felt that part of it was poor management in the major distribution companies. I am glad to see Linux cleaning up their offices and will be happy to see a switch occur. I am also glad to see Mandrake doing well as it is very easy to use and install making it a better choice for average users.

    The other thing I would like to see happen with all the Linux companies is to organize a general lobbying group to challenge MS's marketing force. To challenge the public and government perceptions of the system. Alliances with PC Manufactures would come with demand. The final thing needed is solid development efforts by manufacturers to support hardware in Linux. I feel lack of driver support killed Be which had a really solid OS. BSD was hardly moving on the workstation market until OS X hit and many Apple folks switched voluntarily, and the others are being forced to now even though they don't like the change.

    Regardless Best of Luck to Mandrake and the Linux market in General.

    1. Re:Good News by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other thing I would like to see happen with all the Linux companies is to organize a general lobbying group to challenge MS's marketing force. To challenge the public and government perceptions of the system.

      I think that this could be a Good Thing (TM). However, just showing the governement that something is technically superior is not enough. There are such things as legacy systems. A business evaluates (or should evaluate) a plan to change something in its computer infrastructure based on technical merits and capital needed to get its legacy systems to change. Somehow, I think getting a lot of their older systems working with Linux will be easier than getting them to work with Windows. However, what would the cost be for them to convert many of their Windows desktop machines to Linux desktop machines running Mandrake or Red Hat or any other distribution? I somehow think that it will be a little more expensive.

      The final thing needed is solid development efforts by manufacturers to support hardware in Linux.

      I think it will be a pretty cold day in hell before you see every piece of consumer hardware come with Linux drivers as well as Windows drivers. Why? Because (say it with me now) it's cheaper to develop, maintain, and support drivers on one operating system as opposed to developing, maintaining, and supporting them on many operating systems. For example, take HomePNA devices. For awhile, they were popular with Windows users when 802.11b was very expensive. There exists a binary only Linux driver, and it doesn't work correctly with the kernel when you compile the glue code with gcc-3.2. Why haven't they been updated? Nobody knows or cares enough about the internals of the devices to update the code, and the company that wrote them doesn't want to give out the specs for the devices.

      I personally use Linux all of the time, but until there is a giant attitude change (or hell freezes over, or Microsoft licensing terms become more strict than now), I don't think I'll see this soon. I'm okay with that. I use Linux not because it's popular, but because I like and appreciate choice in operating systems.

    2. Re:Good News by s390 · · Score: 2
      The other thing I would like to see happen with all the Linux companies is to organize a general lobbying group to challenge MS's marketing force.

      Well, there's the Open Source Software Institute that lobbies for Open Source in government and academic organizations.

      Some vendors are low-profile sponsors. I believe they also accept individual donations, which are tax-deductible because they're a non-profit.

    3. Re:Good News by geek+of+nixhelp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As regular slashdoters (is that the correct term?) will know, more and more factions are adopting linux as opposed to windows, governments and councils are the best example we have, they are finding the cost is what drives them to it, but (assuming they have the same experience as me) it's the ease of use and sheer number of open source applications that keeps me using it. I would (and have done) pay for Linux, I own real copies of Mandrake 7.2 and Slack 8. these days the myth of hard to install, and hard to maintain is just that, a myth! my mandrake 9 install detected every bit of obscure hardware in one go, it even managed the GeForce 4, which I was suitably impressed with. I think the main problem is that people expect too much from it, as we sit here running our Linux servers and playing the occasional game, we forget about people who have Sony vaio laptops and want all the buttons to function properly :) it's the little things that make the difference, and since we all know that Linux can do everything windows does better, cheaper and faster, this is all it needs to drive I into the main stream. Good to see money being made here. lets just hope this drive forward doesn't cause open source software to go commercial, I don't know what I would do if nmap wasn't free :)

    4. Re:Good News by Malcontent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      " I often find myself in Discussions wondering why Linux hasn't taken off due its good qualities"

      Just exactly what do you mean by "hasn't taken off"? Linux userbase grows by leaps and bounds every year. It has gone from a hobby OS to a major player in the server market in three years. It will make similar advances in the desktop in the next three years.

      Rome wasn't built in a day you know. If you are really impatient for world dominance then I am sure lots of programmers could use your help in writing documentation and testing for bugs. Roll up your sleeves world domination is but a few years away!

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    5. Re:Good News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "regular slashdoters (is that the correct term?)"

      More correct than you know, evidently.

    6. Re:Good News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not lack of drivers or complexity of use or any of those reasons. The market has settled on a standard and that standard is Windows. To most people what OS is being used has about as much bearing on their lives as what kind of screws are used in the chair they are sitting on.

    7. Re:Good News by Eric+Damron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "we forget about people who have Sony vaio laptops and want all the buttons to function properly:) it's the little things that make the difference..."

      You hit the nail right on the head there. We must must make every effort to ensure that everything works and is easy to setup. It's not always going to be possible to support every piece of hardware as there are companies who will not release the needed information.

      However, We can improve in a number of ways. First of all, much of the documentation that comes with open source software really sucks. I'm an IT professional and I struggle with it. I don't see how a non-IT person would stand a chance with some of this crap. I understand that documenting a project is not fun. I hate documenting my own work but I also know that it is a very important part of a project.

      Another thing that we should move toward is a standard set of libraries that all programmers can count on being there. And the API should not become incompatible from one release to another without a very good reason.

      The developers of libraries should allow other developer's to purchase a license (at a reasonable price) that would allow them to link and still keep their code proprietary. I believe that some offer this but at a price of about $1,200.00. This would be an insignificant cost for a major software company if the Linux platform would support the kind of return that would allow justification. However, Linux, as of yet, doesn't have a large enough user base that is willing to pay for programs to make this price justifiable.

      Joysticks should be better supported and fonts still have a way to go.

      I use Linux at home for my desktop and home server but I think that we are a number of years away before Linux will be truly ready for the average home user.

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    8. Re:Good News by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      It takes time. There's the matter not just *what* to do, but *when* to do it. Most things run pretty much on inertia.

      Perception has a lot to do with it. Linux on the desktop as a mere replacement for Microsoft Windows seems like a waste of valuable resources, and out of character for what Linux should grow up to be. Somewhere, somehow there is something that a Linux desktop should be good for that Microsoft *cannot* compete with. I have no idea what, but it's probably related to the fact that Unix is inherently multi-user and Microsoft seems to have trouble walking and chewing gum at the same time, even for relatively unsophisticated single users.

      There is a shifting sense of (can't find the word for it) exemplified by the following joke that seems to be making the rounds.

      There are four engineers traveling in a car. One is a
      mechanical engineer, one a chemical engineer, one an
      electrical engineer and the other one an engineer
      from Microsoft.

      The car breaks down.

      "Sounds to me as if the pistons have seized. We'll have
      to strip down the engine before we can get the car
      working again," says the mechanical engineer.

      "Well," says the chemical engineer, "it sounded to me as
      if the fuel might be contaminated. I think we should
      clear out the fuel system."

      "I thought it might be a grounding problem," says the
      electrical engineer, "or maybe a faulty plug lead."

      They all turn to the Microsoft engineer who has said
      nothing and say. They ask him, "What do you think?"

      "Well, I think we should close all the windows, get
      out, get back in, and open the windows again."

    9. Re:Good News by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I often find myself in Discussions wondering why Linux hasn't taken off due its good qualities.

      I wondered that a lot untill I installed mandrake 9 and found not being able to copy and paste anything but the most tiny files from cd/zip was considered a minor enough problem that it didn't stop the release. mount/umount works fine to get at them still, but it's not the most intuitive thing form someone coming directly from windows.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    10. Re:Good News by electroniceric · · Score: 2

      There's something a lot simpler keeping Linux off the desktop: inertia.

      Companies very quickly reach a saturation stage in computing where the number of things they could do dwarfs their resources to do them and dilutes their mission. Microsoft offers them a clear path. Buy this now, but that later. It may seems counterintuitive to pay the MS tax and deal with the intense aggravation of CALs, but recall, most companies have money, and they're happy to pay it to not have to pay someone every 20 minutes to research what to do next.

      This especially applies to the desktop. Consider that most office drones' salaries are above $20/hr when you include support costs, and $100 a year comes out to 5 hours of work. It's pretty hard to get the time-to-conversion down to 5 hours or less per employee, so naturally businesses are hesitant to commit to that big a change of direction. Not to mention that IT departments seem to rapidly converge into a heady mic of territoriality, and fending off the additions of all sorts of extra projects.

      I certainly hope that Mandrake does well - I think they make a nice alternative for filling in those not well served by MS' pricing and license model: schools, small business, developing countries etc. I'd expect enough incremental progress in the needed desktop apps that in two years desktop Linux will be a reasonable alternative for small businesses with less need for polished interoperability features. Microsoft will probably remain a considerable force (noone else in the world has the experience of building a software house that big), which could turn out to be positive once their iron grip is broken. If you look at the slow march, things look good for a positive software environment. Now if only the BSDs and Linux would cooperate more, the spectrum of Unix would offer even better choice.

    11. Re:Good News by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      " It takes time. There's the matter not just *what* to do, but *when* to do it. Most things run pretty much on inertia."

      maybe most things run on inertia but clearly linux is not one of them. It's under very active development and improvements come at an amazing pace. Two years ago linux did not support SMP. The next version of the kernel will be avble to support more processors then most people can afford.

      "Linux on the desktop as a mere replacement for Microsoft Windows seems like a waste of valuable resources, and out of character for what Linux should grow up to be. Somewhere, somehow there is something that a Linux desktop should be good for that Microsoft *cannot* compete with."

      On this I agree with you 100%. Linux has a bigger and better destiny then to mimic some crappy OS that consists of stolen ideas from other operating systems. Windows is the worst thing linux can attempt to emulate.

      I remain optimistic that the tens of thousands of people working in and around the OSS projects will one day stumble upon an idea that will shake the world. I look at zope, mozilla and jabber and see that it is already happening to some degree. Innovation is out there and clearly the OSS people are creative as hell.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  11. Personally by sickboy_macosX · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I like Mandrake, it is nice to finally see a company compete with redhat in the Linux for sale department. Redhat has done a good job, but if you leave them sitting there to long, they might think they are another Microsoft. --

    --
    --- /* In Soviet Russia, the Mac OS X kernel panics you! */
  12. Re:kernel.org is down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! Thanks!

  13. 2 grand, wtf!!! by b17bmbr · · Score: 0

    gee they're not in the black? let me see, they release a product like MNF, and they put it up for download, and they have it listed for $1990 at mandrakestore.com. well no shit they're not profitable. 2 grand or free, let me see...

    i have been a mandrake user since 7.0, as well as 7.2, 8.1, and 9.0 all of whcih i bought, and which i love. it is awesome. anyways, why can't a company create a value added product to gpl software. for instance, the mandrake wizards are awesome, if yo haven't tried them, they blow anything in windows away, like network card setup, video res., and even printers. for instance, at my school, we have a bunch of HP laser jets, and they all run jet direct. just had printerdrake auto find all the TCP printers, found them, auto configured them, yada yada. now, that is awesome shit. and they give it away. and they're still not profitable, no shit.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:2 grand, wtf!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me a newbie, but...

      I've tried two Linux installations today, Mandrake 9.0 and Redhat 8.0. So far so good, for both distros. Then I tried to install Netscape 7.0, which seamlessly installed. The problem is that no shortcuts were created after the installation. In Mandrake, the default browser is still KDE, and in Redhat, it's Mozilla. I also tried to install StarOfice, which happily installed, but I couldn't, for the life of me, determine how to launch the wonderful suite.

      I've been working with computers since high school, but I've never been dumbfounded as much as these two distros did to me. I've installed a program, now I can't find it. Don't even have a clue on what to type in the console to launch it.

      This is constructive criticism and all, but Linux still has a loooong way to go....

    2. Re:2 grand, wtf!!! by wolvenwraith · · Score: 0

      Well here goes.. Apparently the programs didn't include the icons/links to be added to your desktop, or something to that sort. In GNOME and KDE it's fairly easy to add an icon to the desktop/menu to like to a program, just type in the program name and command to run to load it (like netscape to load netscape.. sometimes netscape-communicator.. but I haven't used netscape in a long time so I can't say for sure)

      think of it this way.... did you learn windows overnight? If not, and I know you didn't, how did you learn? Apply that same method to Linux. Learn how the system works, learn things you never knew before, just keep at it. Trust me, it's worth it.

      --
      Civilization at it's best! www.hydratech.org
    3. Re:2 grand, wtf!!! by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      You're definitely a newbie. Check your Networking>WWW menu. That's where your browsers get hidden..in plain sight.

      I hate to disappoint you but Mandrake and Redhat don't add more clutter to your desktop every time you install an app. All that stuff goes neatly into the menu (on Mandrake it goes in if you install from a mandrake RPM).

  14. I have tried a by Kurt+Russell · · Score: 0

    few linux distros in my day and Mandrex is one of the better ones.
    Its got some goodies such as urpmi etc..
    If I was to spend some cash on Linux for the desktop I would go with Mandrex.

  15. Re:"os refugee" offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I mean, what exactly are you trying to say here:

    Give me your product for free, since I'm too lazy or stupid to return another company's product that I decided to buy.

    You may have chosen to pay for Windows, but that doesn't pay the bills at Mandrake. They're hardly obligated to replace things you buy from other companies. May as well go to Circuit City and say "I don't care to take this broken TV back to where I bought it, so give me a new one for free. After all, I did pay for the other one."

  16. IN CAPITALIST AMERICA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    THE OS FORCES YOU TO UPGRADE.

  17. Why I will continue to support Mandrake by salvius · · Score: 4, Informative

    MAndrake is still the OS I use, and this will continue to be so. It is the first distribution that made me convert from Windows. When I saw it, I couldn't believe the EASE of installation and the user-friendliness of the whole package. Regardless of the fact that even distros like Red Hat are getting easier to use, this is still the *only* distro which I can give to my non-convert friends. I have done this for a few people now while advising them which computer to buy, and ALL of them never needed help. Mandrake is just what the doctor ordered to show that Linux CAN be user friendly. It is one of the distros that definetely deserves all the support it can get!

  18. Thankfully not mature by A+non+moose+cow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pulled my Mandrake from my shelf and it started wailing such a shrill scream that I almost passed out. The mature distro surely would have killed me.

    </potter>

  19. GOAT LINK WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That one suprised me...

    1. Re:GOAT LINK WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Having "Love my goat" in the url didn't tip you off? Dumbass.

    2. Re:GOAT LINK WARNING by Crapface · · Score: 0
      That one suprised me...

      ;-)

  20. Given up on Mandrake by phutureboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to be a big Mandrake fan-boy, but no longer. All I want is system configuration tools that work, and have a decent, consistent user interface. Is that too much to ask for?

    I tried to add a second IP address to my machine the other day using the GUI admin tools provided in Mandrake 9, and it was a total mess. I ended up just editing the files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, which is what I should have done in the first place. Desktop users shouldn't have to deal with that, though.

    I'm gonna give Xandros a spin next. Seems like a pretty well integrated desktop distro they have.

    1. Re:Given up on Mandrake by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Me too, their 8.x series was embarrassing. To quote someone off of IRC:

      MDK's QA Process:

      Guy #1: "Is this the latest version of the software? I mean the very latest?"

      Guy #2: "Yeah, except this one package, it had some bug I think, so we just created the package from CVS and we think it might be fixed there."

      Guy #1: "Ok, burn the gold CD!"

    2. Re:Given up on Mandrake by zenyu · · Score: 2
      I tried to add a second IP address to my machine the other day using the GUI admin tools provided in Mandrake 9, and it was a total mess. I ended up just editing the files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, which is what I should have done in the first place. Desktop users shouldn't have to deal with that, though.

      I started on Mandrake with 7.something, and I've been disappointed with their QA since, but this particular problem I solved with netconf. I'm sticking with Mandrake though. I installed RedHat on a server the a few months ago because I wanted a rock solid machine and I encountered the same problem that made me switch, too many "wha? there is no package, I have to install from source?"

      I like the changes they made with their UI last time around, they just need to fix some of the bugs in the X configuration and maybe add a "download and install nVidia/ATI commercial driver" button. And more important, cope with more than one mouse. I encouraged a non-technical coworker to install Mandrake on his laptop -- instead of the supported RedHat. The mouse problem was his biggest hickup, the others were the need to install things like Java, Flash, Acrobat, and the Crossover plugin by command-line. Once he got going Mandrake was something he could administer himself, although I wish he downloaded patches more often...

    3. Re:Given up on Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mandrake is a mess like most other distros.

      on the other hand, xandros is so spiffy clean and polished it really is incredible.

      i highly recommend it to anyone, even a newbie/win 98 geek.

    4. Re:Given up on Mandrake by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Great that they're headed toward financial stability, but I've pretty much given up on Mandrake as well. Mandrake Update is a total POS (and I don't mean point of sale). It hardly ever works properly. The support sight is terrible... I tried reporting bugs on 8.1 in bugzilla, and I'm sure no one ever saw it. My most recent attempt with Mandrake was with 8.2 PPC, which was a nightmare. I never did get X set up properly, and MandrakeUpdate doesn't work at all. If I had to do it all over, I'd go back to RedHat.

      It's great that any linux company is surviving, but Mandrake has some serious issues to work out. Perhaps there really is something to that whole stereotype about french engineering ;).

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:Given up on Mandrake by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Just a little note on your troubles.

      The Nvidia drivers come with the commercial boxed cd's, the download edition can't pack them for licensing reasons. Dunno about the ATI drivers.

      Also there's a new mandrake flash6 rpm out there somewhere, so your pal should have it easy.

    6. Re:Given up on Mandrake by joestar · · Score: 2

      Mandrake has a clean and rather consistent user interface. Additionally, they don't break KDE & GNOME like Red Hat does. Furthermore, Mandrake is *STILL* the leading desktop OS in my opinion: MandrakeUpdate is a great tool and works very well, their configuration tools are also great, and supermount is really what we need for a desktop OS: I tried Red Hat 8.0 (which is partly broken and unstable by the way), and it's amazing to see that they want to be on the desktop but they keep your cd-rom locked in its tray until you click on "unlock" or type "umount". That's the kinf of thing Mandrake has been working on and solved for years and I'm pretty confident that they will continue to be a leader in this area. They just miss a better set of icon and a good Mandrake theme, which is a very easy task...

    7. Re:Given up on Mandrake by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      My biggest problem with Mandrake is the lack of any sensible system for reporting bugs. Their Bugzilla at https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/ is for the unstable 'Cooker' release only. So you can report bugs for the version that's expected to be buggy, but not for the stable version! WTF?

      I still use Mandrake though because it seems to have a good selection of packages and I haven't yet recovered from the trauma of trying to install Debian a few years back. The administration packages for Mandrake are totally broken, as you would expect, but I'm happy to edit config files anyway.

      These desktop distros like Xandros and Lycoris sound nice: which ones of them are free software?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:Given up on Mandrake by mickwd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well it's not as though your average newbie is going to want to set up two IP addresses for the same machine, is it ?

      If you want to set up something like that you've obviously got some level of knowledge about TCP/IP networking (i.e. which packets you want to route via which interface, etc.).

      I don't think Mandrake should write GUI tools to support every little tweak a user might want to do. Just provide a GUI interface for the most common, and most useful, functions.

      Good luck on finding a GUI facility for doing this on Xandros.

      And yes, the Mandrake tools could be improved - when everything works, they work fine, but their handling of error conditions (e.g. timeouts on non-responsive mirror sites) could be improved. But they're getting there.

      Mandrake has had some bad QA problems in the past. But here again, they're improving. I've heard lots of complaints that Mandrake 9.0 wasn't much of an "advance" on 8.2. But is far is I'm concerned, they updated a lot of software (KDE 3, Gnome 2, etc.) and put out a much more solid release.

      And all this while having the number of people they employ cut quite drastically.

      So hats off to Mandrake. (including red ones ;)

    9. Re:Given up on Mandrake by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      Couldn't agree more.

      I'm a linux newbie. Not an IT newbie, not an idiot. I can and will figure out how to do it the hard way if I have to.

      If you're going to put in a config applet, make the damned thing work or leave it out. I don't want to waste half an hour or (much) more trying to figure out how to get your broken tool to work before I start learning how to do it the hard way.

      Long path... I can handle that. Dead end paths all over the place... damn, I'd rather use Windows.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    10. Re:Given up on Mandrake by dd301 · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem with Mandrake is the lack of any sensible system for reporting bugs. Their Bugzilla at https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/ is for the unstable 'Cooker' release only. So you can report bugs for the version that's expected to be buggy, but not for the stable version! WTF?

      Is this true? They used to have a proper bugtracking system some time ago. You could add listing to the specific rpm. However, now they want you to go through this interface where your bug is "evaluated" and then maybe added to the system.

    11. Re:Given up on Mandrake by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Can you tell me what the procedure is to have my bug report 'evaluated'? Is it that MandrakeExpert site?

      I do have direct access to Bugzilla, but the last time I reported a bug there I was told off because it didn't apply to Cooker.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    12. Re:Given up on Mandrake by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Well it's not as though your average newbie is going to want to set up two IP addresses for the same machine, is it ?

      If you want to set up something like that you've obviously got some level of knowledge about TCP/IP networking (i.e. which packets you want to route via which interface, etc.).


      I think that Mandrake is good, but I have to disagree with you here. Lots of newbies have two IP adresses now, usually when they have a cable modem and a LAN. I have had this kind of setup since when I used NT 4.

      In NT, there is a config window for each interface, with all of the relavant configuration stuff avaiable(IP adress, DNS, Sharing, Proxy, etc). In Mandrake, I had netconf and some other GUI tool. However, they were so wierd and unintuitive that I ended up doing everything by command-line. I actually bought a copy of the Linux Network Administrator's Guide and learned all about the workings of TCP/IP. I guess that would make me a slightly more 'advanced' user than a newbie, like you said. The point is, however, that I did not need to go to such lengths in NT just to set up my cable modem and LAN. I don't know if a newbie would be willing to put up with that.

    13. Re:Given up on Mandrake by dd301 · · Score: 1

      Can you tell me what the procedure is to have my bug report 'evaluated'? Is it that MandrakeExpert site?

      Yes, I was talking about the MandrakeExpert site. I think the qa site redirects you there. Very frustrating. And BTW, are there any working US mirrors for Cooker? Most of the links on the main site seem to be in Europe.

    14. Re:Given up on Mandrake by phutureboy · · Score: 1

      Well it's not as though your average newbie is going to want to set up two IP addresses for the same machine, is it ?

      Yes, but the same tool (netconf - yuck) is used to set your primary IP address - or to set the machine to use DHCP. That's not uncommon at all.

    15. Re:Given up on Mandrake by Feztaa · · Score: 0

      You ought to give RedHat 8 a shot. I've been using it for a few months and it's rather good, as far as ease-of-configuration and consistent interface goes. The installer is really nice, too :P

      Interesting story about RH, actually... one day, my freind (who dual boots XP and RH8) upgraded his video card to an ati radeon 9000. When he booted XP, it would simply reboot the computer. It just couldn't deal with the card. XP wouldn't load at all, just reboot. RH loaded just fine, and kudzu detected and configured the card with no problems.

      Of course, he was far to reliant on XP to go all-out Linux (he had been using linux for all of a week), so in the mean time he's lent me the radeon 9000, and he's got his XP back up and running again. I'd say I got the better deal: free radeon 9000 + reliable OS ;)

  21. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I find weird is that the Soviet Russia comments almost inevitably get modded down, while the far, far more overplayed underpants gnomes/numbered buisness plan, beowolf cluster, and the absolute worst of them all, the priceless jokes still get modded up on a regular basis.

    It reminds me of one Yakov comment in reply to a troll moderation of another, "In SOVIET RUSSIA, moderators tell YOU what is funny!".

  22. Re:"os refugee" offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, Mandrake doesn't have to pay you back, but you know they're also not giving you anything in their "offer," either. You get to buy a $12 cdr which has software which you could download for free and burn for about $0.10 worth of media (legally). You've "won" a chance to pay someone else money for being such a sucker to Microsoft. Congrats!

  23. They've had some problems... by proxima · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because my g/f enjoys using Mandrake on her laptop, we decided to buy the 9.0 standard edition for the following reasons:

    1.) At the time our internet connection was having issues and 3 isos were not easy to quickly get

    2.) We wanted to support Mandrake since they've created an excellent desktop distribution.

    We got our copy just fine in mid-November, but then about three weeks later we got another copy. I e-mailed them and they said it was a mistake but in the end we cost Mandrake more money than I would've liked. Both packages were sent to a U.S. from Europe - not cheap. One would think they'd have a warehouse here, but maybe it's for tax purposes. They mentioned in their e-mail that they've had some shipping problems, so I'm probably not the only one.

    I'm not sure how we'll support Mandrake in the future...for her, I think a small subscription fee for a dedicated update server would work well. She'd be getting value-added software (because it's faster to download), and Mandrake would get money that was a bandwidth + server cost, not shipping + packaging.

    At the end of the day, I am a happy Debian user.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:They've had some problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Mandrake Club

      It's not precisely a dedicated update server, but it does offer packages that aren't on the install CD's plus a few other goodies.

    2. Re:They've had some problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You almost had us going there with the girlfriend thing... Almost.

      You screwed up bigtime when you said that you use debian though. Debian users don't have girlfriends. In fact, debian users can't speak to a woman without first giving them their credit card number.

    3. Re:They've had some problems... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      debian runners don't have cc.
      wtf they would they/we do with it? (except order stuff from thinkgeek)

      besides, i use prefer cash for dirty schmuck stuff, so much harder to trace back to me and i get more than talk.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:They've had some problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI:
      although many people claim mdk-club is a donation service, it does give you the ability to update your system with new rpms. You are given the ability to vote for new packages. And, if you are lucky, updated rpms are provided. As the service matures, and more people are volunteering to build programs, it is expected that this is really a terrific service. Worth the $5 per month...

    5. Re:They've had some problems... by proxima · · Score: 2

      I gave a few bucks to Mandrake before MandrakeClub existed, and they gave me a free entry subscription for about a year I think (it's just about to expire). Thing is, it isn't quite worth the $5/month to us (yet). I'll keep my eye on it, and if they provide a fast update server (like Red Hat), they'll probably see at least $60/yr from us.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  24. IN LIBERAL AUSTRALIA by nihilogos · · Score: 3, Informative

    we lock our OS refugees up in camps for years on end. And they're not refugees, they're "illegal immigrants".

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:IN LIBERAL AUSTRALIA by yobbo · · Score: 1, Troll

      You are correct, they are not refugees, they are in fact illegal immigrants.

    2. Re:IN LIBERAL AUSTRALIA by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Funny

      STFU you damned racist. Attitudes like that get us bombed.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    3. Re:IN LIBERAL AUSTRALIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I assume, then, that you are an Aborigine ?

      Otherwise, shut the f**k up.

    4. Re:IN LIBERAL AUSTRALIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proably a troll, but I'll bite.

      Many of the "asylum seekers" are in fact economic refugees that paid large amounts of money to get here.

      What is the alternative to detention? Release into the community as long as they promise to come back when we reject the claims? Oh wait, 14,000 of them didn't come back when their claims were rejectd... source: yesterday's "The Australian".

      The ALP's plan is good, 90% processed with 90 days. Tough but fair for all.

      Only people that are in genuine need should be able to enjoy Australia's hospitality.

      -A proud Australian.

    5. Re:IN LIBERAL AUSTRALIA by nihilogos · · Score: 2

      Many of the "asylum seekers" are in fact economic refugees that paid large amounts of money to get here.

      Sure. People with large amounts of money to spend are likely to pay for passage on an overcrowded boat with a non trivial chance of sinking when they can afford to pay for plane tickets and visas.

      What is the alternative to detention? Release into the community as long as they promise to come back when we reject the claims? Oh wait, 14,000 of them didn't come back when their claims were rejectd... source: yesterday's "The Australian".

      No, the source is the immigration department. The Australian article also notes that:

      "In September 1997, Philip Ruddock's office had said in response to a question on notice from Democrats senator Natasha Stott Despoja: 'No unauthorised asylum-seeker released on a bridging visa in Australia from 1996 to 1998 failed to meet their reporting obligations.'"

      And it also points out that "The executive officer of the Catholic Commission for Justice Development and Peace, Marc Purcell, described the latest figures as 'wildly inaccurate', and demanded that the department clarify them."

      Howard's government are liars. Remember "children overboard?" You are a fool if you believe that was an honest mistake.

      If you were really a proud Australian you would not put up with the disgraceful behaviour of our "leaders."

      The ALP's plan is good, 90% processed with 90 days

      It is good, but how practical is it? Currently it takes up to 18 months to process some cases, but it is inhuman to detain people for that long. The alternatives are release on temporary visas, or temporary housing in open compounds where they may be visited by relatives, work and contribute to the community.

      Only people that are in genuine need should be able to enjoy Australia's hospitality.

      Hospitality? How about the sickening rocks and petrol bombs thrown at mosques and islamic primary schools? The taunts that Muslim women wearing burkhas endure? What sort of hospitality is that supposed to be?

      --
      :wq
  25. Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon as I saw the story on the front page I knew what awaited inside. Hundreds of posts from zitty geeks trying to be punker-than-thou by coming up with ever-more-obscure namedropping to make up for their lack of real style (or to pretend that they are actually old enough to have been involved). Drop the pretension kiddos. We all know that your Blink 182 CD is older than your copy of Bollocks.

    I love how a whole new level of conformity has been created by the average bozo's efforts at individuality. It might almost work if your personal definition of individuality didn't depend so heavily on how you present yourself to others. I mean, what's the sense of being into bullshit like [insert pseudo-non-mainstream hobby here] if you can't talk about it to make yourself superior to your peers?

    Kinda sounds like the Linux crowd, huh? "I'm so ALTERNATIVE by patching my kernel every day while you brainwashed Windows sheep meander in unenlightened tedium." Funny to think that if you had back all the time you spent tweaking and patching (for no good reason other than to say you have the latest version), you wouldn't know what to do with the workstation on your desk.

    *sigh*

    excuse the rant. caffiene has yet to be digested.

    1. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how a whole new level of conformity has been created by the average bozo's efforts at individuality. It might almost work if your personal definition of individuality didn't depend so heavily on how you present yourself to others. I mean, what's the sense of being into bullshit like [insert pseudo-non-mainstream hobby here] if you can't talk about it to make yourself superior to your peers?

      And exactly WHY did you post as AC you chicken shit? At least I have a reason.

    2. Re:Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume I don't. When infact, I do. Now you look like an asshole.

    3. Re:Mandrake by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      AAAugh! My EYES! DAMN YOU!!!!
      Are you sure? (Y/N) Y

      Gouging eyes out in 5 seconds...

      Gouging /dev/eyes*********************[100%]

  26. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, Soviet Russia posts get modded up.

  27. Re:kernel.org is down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd have no problem with that attitude, except to do it right you have to REMOVE PLIP FROM THE KERNEL. As long as Linus leaves that plip.c in there, people like me are going to presume that it FUCKING WORKS GODDAMN IT. Leaving it there not working is just a trap to waste people's time, not to mention simply taking up space and bandwidth everytime another idiot downloads it.

    I'm not hopeful about 2.4.20 either since I just found a changelog message on groups.google.com (from the kernel mailing list group) from Alan Cox with the cryptic line "plip.c: fixed plip." Thanks Alan. What was broken ? Will it totally not work unless I get your patch ? Should I just give up and go back to DRDOS and laplink ?

  28. I think Mandrake's problem... by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is the same as a lot of linux distros. When linux was first getting usable and instalable (around the time of RH6.2 IMHO) there was a lot of talk about companies giving the OS away and then charging for support. Well there's at least two problems with this:

    1. Users have been paying for software and getting free support so long that they can't seem to deal with the idea of paying for support.

    2. I think Sun had this problem with staroffice. They couldn't give it away so they started charging for it. People look at RH and Mandrake's personal editions and see a complete OS with tons of usable apps included for $40 bucks and figure there must be something wrong with it. They can't understand the open source movement and the idea that somebody would write a program for no other reason than the joy of writing it, and then happily give it away. To be fair the the average consumer, look at the sort of "free" things they get for their computers. Cuecats, bonzai buddy, gator. Not exactly encouraging. Slashdot readers know that OSS is totaly different than the kind of nonsense companies give away, but do people at large do?

    I don't really have a solution for Mandrake (If I did I'd start a company). I think their best bet would be to get cosy with OEMs and charge them for offering the support. At any rate I wish them the best of luck, but alas for me RH's fonts have drawn me away from Mandrake 9.0 :).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I think Mandrake's problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure users have been paying for software and getting free support - but how is that different to paying for support and getting free software? It's still presented in the format they actually understand - box with cd's in it for $$$, call us when you screw up.

    2. Re:I think Mandrake's problem... by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2

      You don't really make money on support targeted at end-users. You make money on corporate support. There will always be a market there.

      End user support has nothing to do with any decent revenue model, actually; completely irrelevant.

      --
      Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    3. Re:I think Mandrake's problem... by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 0

      Have you ever run a business?

      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    4. Re:I think Mandrake's problem... by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Have you ever run a business?

      Of course not. None of them have. It's very easy to blabber about how simple and natural it is to make money off of something that's free, until you actually try to do it.

    5. Re:I think Mandrake's problem... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      There are several meanings of the term "support". On a Red Hat system, I pay extra for support. I pay it to KRUD. KRUD sends out a monthly CD with all the changes needed to keep your system up to date, so only important security packages need updating in between. I buy a yearly subscription, for not much more than the cost of a boxed Red Hat. (Or less, depending on your edition.)

      Red Hat could provide this service, but they don't choose to. They've got a different definition of service, and a different price target. I don't need that. And I haven't ever gotten any use out of the "free service" that you get when you buy a boxed set. ("Sorry, we only cover installation problems.")

      That said, I buy a box of Red Hat now and then, because I think I should. I skipped 8.0 because of the way they removed KDE's logos. Not serious, but impolite. I tried Mandrake (I have a surscription), but they have QA problems. And service problems. [There wasn't anyway to let people know that they had shipped me an unreadable set of disks.]). So I can't recommend Mandrake right now. This is probably related to staffing problems, and should clear up in a bit. Hopefully before my subscription runs out. (I wouldn't currently renew.)

      But despite the way they have flubbed their subscription process, I think that's the right approach. Sell CD subscriptions, one a month. All the latest updates, and a complete basic system on one CD. (Or two, actually. This doesn't fit on one any more.)

      Now the subscription CDs wouldn't contain all the optional packages. (You want it to fit on two CDs!) But they'd be a complete basic system, plus the updates since the last major release. If you were a penny-pinching fool who didn't count his time as worth anything, all you'd need is one of these CD sets, and an internet connection. Of course, then you'd need to figure out what needed updating, what was missing that you wanted, etc.
      But if you wanted to go that route, there's Debian, Linux-from-Scratch, Gentoo, etc. That's not what Mandrake's selling. Mandrake's selling a non-problems system that's slick, smooth, and easy to use.

      But they need to work on their QA. A lot. (I've gotten more than one of their systems that was so bad I didn't bother trying to salvage it!)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  29. Nice to know.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I just recieved Mandrake 9.0 PowerPack by chronopost/fedex on Thursday, which means I paid for it, rather than downloaded it. I figure the money is well spent, especially if it keeps them going.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Nice to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I await your follow up post - after you have installed and used it for say... 15 minutes?

  30. Nothing like Enron by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ask Enron or anyone else victimized by retarded management how hard it is to make a comeback.

    Don't you mean "Ask the shareholders of Enron how victimized they felt when a company they relied on betrayed them"? I'm sorry, I feel bad for the workers and shareholders of Enron, but this is nothing like Enron. First, Enron managment wasn't retarded: they knew full well what they were doing, and did it anyway. Second, Enron had some help at the federal level to get away with some of its corporate misdeeds. Finally, Enron's employees and customers had no idea what was going on.

    Contrast that with Mandrake. The managemnt that you call "retarded" had a different direction for the company that didn't work out. They didn't try to steal from the company, screw the shareholders, or cover their own ass. Secondly, Mandrake has always been supported by its users, be it donations or purchases of its boxed set. Finally, the user base of Mandrake saw where it was going and let the company know that wasn't the way they wanted it to go.

    Sorry, somehow I don't see how this was ANYTHING like Enron.

    1. Re:Nothing like Enron by Afrosheen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah Enron was the first company killed by management that sprung to mind, and I admit it was a terrible example.

      IIRC, the Mandrake users weren't the ones complaining loudly to the new management at the helm there, it was the developers and founders that were pretty concerned about their eroding bottom line. Remember, every CEO has a board that has the right to hire and fire him based on performance or something as petty as his choice of ties.

      At any rate, when a company (the workers plus the investors, remember when they went public) isn't doing well, the shareholders and the board get nervous. The board usually tries to fix problems from the top down and make the shareholders a little happier.

      I'm still confused as to why they just got a new CEO. Maybe he brings some kind of financial wizardry or business ties to the table..because I read an article today saying how he's 'enjoying learning about Open Source software'. Like he's never heard of it before.

      Oh well..at any rate, I'm glad Mandrake is getting healthier. It always has been my favorite distro over the last 3 or 4 years, and it seems to be growing with me.

    2. Re:Nothing like Enron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your average OSS junkie does not know jack shit about running a business.

      what bank offers the best credit?

      best terms?

      cheap shipping companies?

      cheapest place to get cd's burned in bulk?

      marketing companies?

      investors?

      etc etc etc

      that is the job for a seasoned CEO who has been doing it longer then the OSS movement has been around (barely a decade).

  31. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Stupid comments shut themselves up.

  32. Re:kernel.org is down by geek+of+nixhelp · · Score: 0, Troll

    i am going to film myself shooting you in the face with a shotgun. haha!

  33. YUO ARE TEH GAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now please give me some buttsex.

    because i like it.

    yours truly,

    jesus h. christ
    superstar with cheese (no pickles)

  34. Where are the $*#&@!!! real financials? by USC-MBA · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What kind of stunt is Mandrakesoft trying to pull? Having a little timeline chart showing "revenue" and "expenses" by themselves tells us nothing. This is an imortant point, so I shall be a snot and repeat it: MandrakeSoft's little chart tells us nothing.

    There are any number of ways for a company's reported revenues to increase, ranging from a genuine increase in sales to more underhanded methods like (for example) reporting certain types of expected future income as present revenues. Likewise, there are any number of ways to show a decrease in expenses on the balance sheet, ranging from honest-to-goodness cost cuts, to sneaky Enron moves like hiding expenses through the use of stock options as executive pay, or dummy subsidiaries.

    Don't get me wrong, I am not accusing MandrakeSoft of any wrongdoing, what I am saying is unless we get to see detailed financials, and I mean income and cash flow statements, a balance sheet, and footnotes, MandrakeSoft's rosy financial report is just another press release.

    MandrakeSoft's stock price is still off around $1.25 from its high for the year, if they want to get their price up, it would help to get better information to investors.

    1. Re:Where are the $*#&@!!! real financials? by joestar · · Score: 2

      Did you have a look to these figures before posting? I'm not a specialist in finances but it seems the following figures they provide sound "standard" financials at least in Europe:

      http://www.mandrakesoft.com/company/investors/fina ncials

    2. Re:Where are the $*#&@!!! real financials? by ninewands · · Score: 2

      Buy their stock if you want the details.

    3. Re:Where are the $*#&@!!! real financials? by leviramsey · · Score: 2
      Did you have a look to these figures before posting? I'm not a specialist in finances but it seems the following figures they provide sound "standard" financials at least in Europe:

      That's true. Europe's standards of disclosure and accounting make WorldCom, Enron, Global Crossing, et al look like paragons of adequate disclosure. I hesitate to say that any of those stunts would even be illegal if those companies were in the EU.

      It's really hilarious to see a European company go into contortions getting its books in order to trade on a US stock exchange (DaimlerChrysler comes to mind).

  35. IN SOVIET RUSSIA .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Operatin costs cuts YOU

  36. A thread in a nutshell by gleffler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Me: Mandrake sucks, Debian rules!
    /.er: Retort about difficulty of installation
    Me: Counter-retort about lack of 'free'ness of $DISTRIBUTION
    /.er: Counter-counter-retort still about difficulty of installation
    /.er 2: "One distribution to rule them all" comment
    /.er 3: "Beowulf Cluster" comment
    Troll: "You get what you pay for" comment
    /.er 4: "Linux will never be on the desktop" manifesto (at least 100K)
    {several replies about why Linux WILL TOO be on the desktop, several replies about why Linux isn't ready, and at least 4 people advocating throwing away X}

    Yeah, I can now create threads in my head. Who needs to actually *READ* the threads, you can just make them up yourself!

    1. Re:A thread in a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true, so true.

    2. Re:A thread in a nutshell by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      You are so right.
      This has been going on for years.
      See this reference to a 1996 article to explain just why this has become so predictable.

  37. Re:Slackware by rebel_cdn · · Score: 0

    That's great, if you can RTFM and understand what it's trying to tell you. The problem is, some people don't understand how to edit configuration files. I think Mandrake ends up being easier for people who have never been exposed to anything other than a Windows GUI.

  38. wrong, man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...goes like this:

    In Capitalist America...

    forces upgrade YOU to OS!

    1. Re:wrong, man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I preferred the first version.

  39. What's with the teeny little fonts... by aquarian · · Score: 2

    ...on the Mandrake site? My aging eyes can't deal...

    1. Re:What's with the teeny little fonts... by cymandee · · Score: 1

      Ctrl - + on Mozilla.

  40. Re:IN LIBERAL & RACIST AUSTRALIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We have been so bombarded with multi-cultralism that we have forgotten we are racist. I can think of a few other countries too.
    -- An Australian

  41. Funny & True by evil_roy · · Score: 2

    This might be offtopic , but it is not a troll.

    Actually it is on-topic and funny. Still not a troll.

    It is also true. Funny and true like the joke about edison and the lightbulb - the one on The Simpsons.Funny and true

  42. Boycott Mandrake by capitalsucks · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I think I'll just boycott mandrake until it works with the modem that it is advertised to work with! The actiontek modem that cost me $70 didnt work so fuck them..it worked fine in RedHat..but now I have reverted to windows until further notice.

    --
    "I feel it is my duty to look at the porn that kids download before I delete it, to be sure what it is."--School Admin
    1. Re:Boycott Mandrake by Sciamachy · · Score: 1

      Why does it work in RH but not in MDK? Have a look in RH & see if there's a driver there called Actiontek that isn't in MDK, grab the source & recompile it in MDK. Cripes...

    2. Re:Boycott Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't try to help him. He is exactly who we don't want running linux. He obviously can't read the fuckin manual.

    3. Re:Boycott Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "..but now I have reverted to windows until further notice."

      Missing you already.....

    4. Re:Boycott Mandrake by capitalsucks · · Score: 1

      Ill try that.

      --
      "I feel it is my duty to look at the porn that kids download before I delete it, to be sure what it is."--School Admin
  43. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by amokk · · Score: 1

    This is quite possibly the worst SOVIET RUSSIA joke I've heard in two years.

    If you've been reading slashdot recently, you know that that's saying a hell of a lot.

    --
    I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
  44. Shut the fuck up you idiots by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 0

    Most of the posts around here are just dumb. Which is pretty much par for the course whenever there's a Mandrake topic:

    "I installed something and now I can't find it!"

    "I used GUI configuration wizard and now nothing works!"

    "Linux gots a long way to go!"

    I'm tired of all this bullshit. You guys are just dumb. Linux is not going to be like Windows. Or like MacOS (which has the best desktop). The only reason why you're running Linux is because you have some irrational hatred of Microsoft, or because --in an attempt to be cool-- you got a lot more than you bargained for and now you're lost. Because everything you guys say shows that you are completely in the dark as to what's going on.

    So why don't you shut up. Linux is a UNIX platform for research, hobbyism and programming. It will never be easy-to-use because that makes research, hobbyism and programming harder. Get that through your heads, start coding, or wipe your partition and enjoy Windows XP. Or anything, I don't care, whatever keeps you from posting moronic comments on Slashdot.

    --
    Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
  45. If this is good news... by melonman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So this is the most overtly aimed-at-end-users and putting-the-emphasis-on-ease-of-use installation around, and they still can't make money? And this is good news? Is it just me, or are we in the twilight zone?

    Surely one of the enormous problems we have with Linux is that no-one seems to be able to make any money out of it. Linux almost bankrupted Corel, and even Redhat distributes the software at a loss. Selling Windows pays, selling Linux manifestly doesn't. As long as that is the case, it is hardly surprising that most distributors don't want to know.

    I think one of the things that will have to change if Linux is to get much further in terms of market penetration is the look it didn't cost me a bean mentality. At one point I was going to offer Linux support from my cybercafe. Then I noticed that people with Windows problems expect to pay and ask for a price up front, whereas Linux users expect two hours of my undivided attention and might possibly buy a cup of coffee.

    Giving money to Mandrake is nice, but I would suggest that buying a boxed copy from time to time from a non-specialist supplier would do far more to improve the distribution of Linux.

    --
    Virtually serving coffee
    1. Re:If this is good news... by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess you missed the last 6 or 7 articles posted here about Mandrake. They ARE making money now, but are still in the red.Over a year ago their CEO and upper management started steering the company into a collision course with the ground. They lost alot of money at that time. They've since been steadily restructuring while cranking out a quality distro at the same time.

      The only reason this is news at all is because Mandrake expected to be 'profitable', i.e. higher income than debt, by this time of this year. However, they're still making a comeback.

      Might want to do some searching here for Mandrake articles..there's a detailed history behind all this stuff.

    2. Re:If this is good news... by melonman · · Score: 2

      They ARE making money now, but are still in the red

      OK, but if we replace 'making money' with 'being profitable', we still seem to end up at the same point, ie this isn't a great incentive to get into their line of business, at least for the moment.

      Also, you appear to be describing a major crisis, a restructuring and a recovery, all in less than a year. That might be good, or it might be terrible. They could achieve an operating profit in the short term by firing all their development staff, doing no more publicity and cashing cheques for the stuff they have shipped, but they would be out of business in a year.

      If they become profitable, and stay there for a full year, it starts to sound like good news. For the moment, it still sounds like slightly less terrible news than before.

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
    3. Re:If this is good news... by dd301 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Linux almost bankrupted Corel

      Corel was in trouble even before they moved into Linux. This was at a time when Linux was supposed to be the Silver Bullet.

      Redhat distributes the software at a loss

      I think Redhat makes a small profit now.

      Selling Windows pays, selling Linux manifestly doesn't.

      Selling Windows pays for Microsoft and a few large companies. I doubt if you would be successful with a Windows startup right now.

    4. Re:If this is good news... by melonman · · Score: 2

      I think Redhat makes a small profit now

      My understanding was that RedHat were making a small profit, but the profits came from support to fairly large corporate customers, not from the distro itself.

      Selling Windows pays for Microsoft and a few large companies.

      I was more thinking of all the companies who make money (re)selling Windows products. I know plenty of people who make a very nice living installing Windows systems and supporting them, both for end users and companies. From my experiences here in France, I don't think anyone could make money supporting Linux for end users, and I'm not even sure about installing networks: a few companies have tried, and have got some business from schools, govt departments etc, but I'm not sure any of them are still trading.

      I doubt if you would be successful with a Windows startup right now

      You are certainly right in my case, and probably right in the more general case too. But there are plenty of companies selling solutions for Windows who manage to pay their bills, and not all of them are large: I can think of one company I know with 3 staff that knocks out bespoke solutions based on the Sage accounting package. The only people I can think of who might be making money on Linux are IBM.

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
    5. Re:If this is good news... by dd301 · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that RedHat were making a small profit, but the profits came from support to fairly large corporate customers, not from the distro itself.

      Server market is where the money is right now. However, RedHat has recently started focusing on the desktop again, and they even have a multimedia distribution. And a lot of people swear by the RedHat update system. I think they will do well.

      From my experiences here in France, I don't think anyone could make money supporting Linux for end users, and I'm not even sure about installing networks: a few companies have tried, and have got some business from schools, govt departments etc, but I'm not sure any of them are still trading.

      There are certainly markets in which Linux is doing well right now. Every week there is an announcement about a high performance computing system installed by a Linux company.

      The only people I can think of who might be making money on Linux are IBM.

      And all the companies IBM allies with for different tasks (RedHat etc.).

  46. Don't forget Mandrake PPC by plavigna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    MandrakeSoft recently released a new Installation ISO for PPC Cooker. PPC Cooker (which is the development branch) is pretty sweet right now -- it's got GNOME2, KDE 3.1 RC5, Mac-on-Linux (which supports Mac OS X and OS 9) and lots of other goodies.

    Anyone who's got a Mac is invited to participate by testing PPC Cooker.

    1. Re:Don't forget Mandrake PPC by fldvm · · Score: 1

      I've got a 6 year old mac that no one uses, I would like to install mandrake and give it to some one to use for word processing and email; Is linux on mac working well enough for that?

    2. Re:Don't forget Mandrake PPC by plavigna · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would say so; but PPC Cooker is still in development so you should probably stick to the latest official PPC release which is 8.2. Since you have an older machine it most likely requires BootX (which can be a little tricky to setup, but it's do-able). Documentation is on the CD and the Mandrake website.

  47. Revenue analasis by edox. · · Score: 1

    Redhat Press idg.net has an article about SuSE Linux

    --
    quote:port 17 udp
    1. Re:Revenue analasis by Medieval_Thinker · · Score: 1

      The SuSE article is dated 1999.

      The clue is the mentioned relelase of 6.1 (and the date at the top).

  48. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rolling and LMFAO... Score 2 Informative! No, the moderators aren't biased at all... no way!

  49. Damn right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #include <objects/discoball.h>
    #include <soul/discomusic.h>
    #include <vocalist/isaac_hayes.h>

    signal_discometaljazro ckguitarlead();

    'couple o' mean guys
    With fire in their eyes
    Known by the names of
    Stallman and Raymond!

    Yeah

    They'll chew you up and spit you out
    beyond their doubt
    it pays _not_ to mess with them

    Stallman and Raymond!

    You got it!

    signal_rising2chorus();

    Ah yes!

    signal_chorus();

    Don Hackers, Cracki-nova's, players, cloved-foot

    ...

    Stallman and Raymond!

  50. Heres what I dont understand.. by Chicane-UK · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I understand that the old business method for Linux companies of offering their full products for download, and selling box retail copies for like $29.99 is not the best one... so I understand the need for them to branch out into these more specialist versions of their OS.

    But why the hell do they charge so much? The cost of that firewall package was 1,999 Euro. We bought a PIX firewall and it cost like 3,000 Euros. Considering the PIX is actually a hardware appliance as well, I dont think its that bad a deal.

    The whole point about Linux distributions (for me at least) was that they undercut the opposition by being either free or ridiculously cheap.. but now they are releasing products that are priced so highly, there is hardly anything in it. Why the huge mark up?

    I was looking at the very cool looking SuSE OpenExchange which is designed to compete with Exchange.. and I seriously think after looking at the web demo that it really could.. but it again is priced so damn high, its actually cheaper for us to buy MS Exchange 2000 on our educational license than it is to buy that.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    1. Re:Heres what I dont understand.. by dd301 · · Score: 2, Informative

      But why the hell do they charge so much? The cost of that firewall package was 1,999 Euro. We bought a PIX firewall and it cost like 3,000 Euros. Considering the PIX is actually a hardware appliance as well, I dont think its that bad a deal.

      What about support for your product? I think with companies like SUN you will have to pay extra for support (and I don't mean the read from the script kind).

    2. Re:Heres what I dont understand.. by locutus2k · · Score: 4, Informative

      So far, I've used SuSE 8 and 8.1. Each of them were $80 retail. I know I could have downloaded a different distro for free, but after trying 8 and realizing the level of polish, I felt it was worth it.

      Your talking about getting PIX firewall, andthey are very nice units. The downside is you can't use some of the really cool linux network toys on it. Its an important step in the right direction for MandrakeSoft, SuSE, and the others to charge for their specialized software (and their OS as well). Perhaps they haven't learned the agressive pricing thing yet. Lets face it, MS is much better at marketing because they've been doing it much longer. Give them some time, and hopefull it will work out.

      When you mention that you can get MS Exchange cheaper, I'm wondering if that includes all of the licensing. Also, my guess it you won't spend near as much time patching the SuSE stuff. With the MS products, you don't get the source code (not sure if you do with the SuSE products, but I'd bet you do). Finally, I've personally installed about a dozen or so copies of Exchange on different networks and I've spent more time cleaning up the mess WHEN (not if) they break.

      Lets face it, Micro$oft isn't known for their stability.

    3. Re:Heres what I dont understand.. by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Yea... admittedly Exchange is not the most amazing product in the world. It still suffers from the same old Microsoft stigma of when something goes wrong with it (for which there is no easy explanation for) you just give it a reboot :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    4. Re:Heres what I dont understand.. by div_2n · · Score: 2

      PIX is Cisco and there isn't a Linux company on the market that can beat their support. Match it MAYBE, but not beat it.

    5. Re:Heres what I dont understand.. by dd301 · · Score: 1

      PIX is Cisco and there isn't a Linux company on the market that can beat their support. Match it MAYBE, but not beat it.

      I don't think that will be a problem for really high end stuff when you are willing to pay whatever it takes. But for something like this, I think Linux would be competitive. I don't know what they charge for SMARTNET, but it must be in the thousands.

  51. MandrakeClub by Andreas(R) · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you downloaded Mandrake Linux, then I suggest you join Mandrake Club to support futher development:
    Mandrake Club

    How are membership fees used?

    * Membership fees are primarily used to directly fund the development of the Mandrake Linux distribution. Membership fees also pay the salaries of employees who often contribute directly or indirectly to "external" Free Software projects such as the Linux kernel, KDE, GNOME, Prelude, and others

    * Fees may also be used for the development of community websites such as MandrakeLinux.com, MandrakeUser.org, MandrakeForum.com and the development of Internet services specifically for the benefit of Club members

  52. IN FRENCH REPUBLIC by cymandee · · Score: 1

    we close down our OS refugees camps, and tell them to go to hell, so they end up sleeping in bus shelters and phone booth, wandering along the Channel. Try to beat that, Oz!

  53. Another Question. by JPriest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does "cut operating costs by 42%" mean we can expect the distro to stagnate? ...

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:Another Question. by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

      Even if it does it wont be as bad as debian.
      If you want them to develop faster join the mandrake club.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    2. Re:Another Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did, I usually test the cookers as well :P

  54. They currently have an opened increase of capital by joestar · · Score: 2
    I thought it was interesting to notice that Mandrakesoft is currently conducting an increase of capital which is still open to all. They sell new shares at 2.10 Euros (this is under the current stock price which is 2.25 Euros). It might be a good way to invest in such an interesting and innovating company, while giving them more chances to develop.


    Additional information about the current increase of capital is available at:

    http://www.mandrakesoft.com/company/investors/bsa


    It includes several very interesting FAQs about MandrakeSoft & Linux, including a long statement about UnitedLinux.

  55. Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how Microsoft donated more to charity this year than Mandrake has earned.

    1. Re:Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the 'charity' money always goes to some country that is slipping out of M$'s control.

  56. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the crappiest 'In Soviet Russia' joke i've heard.

  57. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by kylegordon · · Score: 1

    What the hell is it with all these stupid Soviet Russia, Capitalist America shite comments in the past week or so? Christ, they're worse than the goatse.cx trolls now!

  58. Packet shaping feature? by Ruudjah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone in the house maybe know if the're is a packet shaping feature with Multi Network Firewall? So Kazaa can get some downloading limits, and i can game with a reasonable ping. (sorry for my bad english)

  59. Are you stupid or just evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posts like this make me wonder:

    Is someone who posts yet another dumb "they want to live from charity" post:

    A) Too stupid to understand that MandrakeClub is a service
    B) misinformed
    C) desperately looking for something bad to say about Mandrakesoft?

    Ah, yes- one more thing: MandrakeClub rulez! :-)

    1. Re:Are you stupid or just evil? by aelfgar · · Score: 1

      Mandrake is not my favorite distro, but it is what I started on. It makes me so mad when poeple knock Mandrake, without ever trying it. If it wasn't for an old copy of Mandrake I'dd still be using Windows. When my dad descided to learn how to use Linux, I ordered him Mandrake! I hope they to churn a profit.

  60. os/2 warp on floppies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    so, if I scan all of my os/2 warp floppies and mail them... uh... 13 ounces of photocopy I can get mandrake 9.0 for $12.50US? Thats only about $3.13US for shipping for me, not including: envelope, photocopy paper, toner, electricity and the gerbils running in the wheel that make the copier squeeeeeek. "9.0 MandrakeLinux Standard Edition" on the mandrake website costs $30US and comes with 3 cds and a book. With my 13 ounces of photocopied os/2 warp disks I can get the mandrake 9.0 one-CD set for only $12.50 - $3.13 shipping ($9.37). A savings of negative $0.63 per cd!

    in all seriousness, this is a really cool offer. mandrake is a great distro for people who just want stuff to work ootb so they can see whats up with the whole linux thing. And really, it's way cheaper than a copy of Windows 2000 Professional (not the upgrade, mind you, which requires 98 or 95 - you DID PURCHASE 98 or 95, right?) for just $319 US (wtf?!). Or XP for $199 for the full version. Eww.

  61. a Windows users reviews Mandrake 9.0 by StillTrekkin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.tweakhound.com/mandrake9.htm

    1. Re:a Windows users reviews Mandrake 9.0 by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Click here.

  62. Here Here by ninewands · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mandrake 1.0 was the first Linux distro I ever installed ... I've staggered up the food chain (or is that "learning curve"?) from there since 1997, but my point is this ... Mandrake, Red Hat, Debian and Slackware (and the other "old school" distros (sorry SuSE, your licensing requirements disqualify you from the "old school" grouping)) seem to pour their work product back into the community, while those who've jumped on the bandwagon in the last 2-3 years all seem to want to lead the Microsofting of Linux.

    My feeling is this ... give to those who give back!

  63. even though im normally a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who doesn't really use linux, i have to say this is good news. mandrake was one of the distros i tried and liked, but still wasn't up to being a desktop replacement in my case (and in a lot of other people's case as well, imo).

  64. I disagree ... by ninewands · · Score: 2
    The final thing needed is solid development efforts by manufacturers to support hardware in Linux.

    I think it will be a pretty cold day in hell before you see every piece of consumer hardware come with Linux drivers as well as Windows drivers.

    I think you are missing the point here ... the Microsoft monopoly FORCES hardware manufacturers to deliver their goods with Windows drivers. Does anyone other than me remember the days when you bought hardware based on whether the manufacturer supported your bus/OS??? Does anybody remember when Mac boards wouldn't plug in to, much less work with, MS-DOS machines?

    One company having 90+% penetration of the personal computer market space GUARANTEES that new hardware will ship with drivers for that OS (they may be pre-alpha quality, but what the heck?) ... if the h/w manufacturer didn't support Windows they'd be out of business within a week ...

    the beauty that is occurring now is that SOME (re: Nvidia) manufacturers are actively supporting Linux ... but more importantly ... a LOT of them are releasing documentation to the community that allows truly free drivers to be developed OUTSIDE the manufacturing world.

    just my US$0.02
    1. Re:I disagree ... by dd301 · · Score: 1

      the beauty that is occurring now is that SOME (re: Nvidia) manufacturers are actively supporting Linux ... but more importantly ... a LOT of them are releasing documentation to the community that allows truly free drivers to be developed OUTSIDE the manufacturing world

      A much deeper problem is hardware being optimized for Windows. This is apparent only at the kernel level. I am not talking about Winmodems and such, but stuff like SCSI controllers. You have a situation where it performs well on the Windows infrastructure, but Linux needs a lot of workarounds leading to performance problems.

    2. Re:I disagree ... by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing the point here ... the Microsoft monopoly FORCES hardware manufacturers to deliver their goods with Windows drivers.

      Nobody FORCES people to write Windows drivers any more than somebody FORCES them to breathe. I'm getting sick of this rhetoric. It's a BUISNESS decision. It's a decision that maximizes profit. I'm not going to argue if that's a good thing or not. It just is.

      Following your logic nobody FORCES hardware manufacturers to NOT make Linux drivers. Again, this is a marketing and buisness decision. In order to give them an incentive to write drivers, there must be a significant installed base of Linux users with their hardware (as was the case with NVidia). If you want them to release the specs for their hardware, it still requires a significant number of Linux users to get this done. Until the incentive and profit potential is there, companies will not write drivers.

      What does this mean? This means that if you want drivers for Linux, write your device manufacturer. Conduct boycotts, or just flat out tell people not to buy hardware from company X because they don't support Linux. Instead buy hardware that is either supported by Linux or hardware that has Linux drivers. When you fill out a registration card or customer input card, note that you're using it with Linux. This is the only way we can get the changes that most people in the Linux world want.

  65. Too many distributions by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    It fucks with economies of scale.

    Look at KDE verses Gnome. No one can use both at hte same time but double the developers are need as would be needed if just one existed.

    Plus apps have to make themselves compatible with both, meaning more redundent development.

    1. Re:Too many distributions by melonman · · Score: 2

      Absolutely. I've ended up using Redhat just because I got fed up with finding that binaries didn't work with other distros, but I still come across programs that have been tested on something forked from something that was once Debian. And then we wonder why people have trouble taking open source seriously...

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
  66. look at the airline industry by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    The best news the airline industry could have is for United's Chapter 11 attempt to fail, the end of united would overnight make America's other airlines much more sustainable.

    An example of this is Anset going belling up in Oz, meaning QANTAS now makes raging profits, & prices on average haven't gone up. So it's not a matter of less competition meaning higher profits, it's a matter of greater market share/turnover making the fixed costs less in relation to the gross profits, IE simply economies of scale.

    1. Re:look at the airline industry by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      "United's Chapter 11 attempt to fail"

      Rhapsody in red.

  67. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore the naysayers. It made me snicker.

  68. If you were a member . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    you would probably have read about the fact that Mandrake has been thinking/trying to turn its development segment into a not-for-profit organization.

    Not sure what are the obstacles,(plug) but you can get more information if you become a member;)(/plug)

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  69. But they are open source by HanzoSan · · Score: 2


    They are supporting open source, so what if they are for profit, if you want them to survive you will support them, Open source companies must make money somehow.

    Or are you so greedy you wont even give them money so they will keep making your code?

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:But they are open source by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are supporting open source, so what if they are for profit, if you want them to survive you will support them, Open source companies must make money somehow.

      Yes, they are making their money by selling their distro. I have bought their distro, therefore I have supported them. I feel no remorse in not joining MandrakeClub if I have bought their boxed distro.

      Or are you so greedy you wont even give them money so they will keep making your code?

      As much as I love and support Mandrake, if they can't get their buisness model turned around and turn a profit and they go under, it won't be the end of my world. I will go to one of the many other fine distros out there for newbie users for machines that I set up for other people. Doesn't bother me. That's why Open Source is so nice. If you can't get it from one distributer, you can always go to another and get it from there, or you can get it from the source.

      The flaw in your logic lies in the fact that Mandrake is a for profit company. As much as I like them, they are out to make a profit through their products. Would you apply the same logic to Microsoft since they're for profit?

      They are supporting closed source, so what if they are for profit. If you want them to survive, you will support them. Closed source companies must make money somehow.

      Again, this doesn't work because Microsoft is a for-profit company. If a company cannot find a way to make money on its products, too bad, so sad, they go out of buisness.

    2. Re:But they are open source by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



      So now they make money from selling something thats free? What kinda BS is this?

      Not even redhat makes money by SELLING redhat linux, they make money by selling services.

      Mandrake Linux is extremely important because its the only Desktop Linux that gives a damn about the community, Redhat doesnt, Lycoris and Lindows doesnt, Suse and United Linux dont.

      So your only other options are Debian, and Slackware.

      Theres no community for newbies without Mandrake.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  70. Microsoft is releasing their source code? by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    I'd donate money to Microsoft if they were going to release the source code to Windows.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  71. Mandrake Club IS a service by HanzoSan · · Score: 3, Insightful


    What the hell do you think your money pays for? The service of producing code, the service of being able to download the ISO, the service of being able to access all the code, the service of being able to get all this great software packaged up, the service of Linux Mandrake.

    Open Source software is NOT a product, its a service, CLOSED SOURCE SOFTWARE IS A PRODUCT.

    Theres a difference

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Mandrake Club IS a service by npietraniec · · Score: 1

      Right. I purchased services. I didn't *donate money* to Mandrake. What are you talking about? I wasn't talking about services vs. products. I was talking about donating vs. purchasing. You're off in your own little world.

    2. Re:Mandrake Club IS a service by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

      Mandrake club has nothing to do with donating, your money goes directly to pay for the code production, the website, its a membership you fool.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:Mandrake Club IS a service by npietraniec · · Score: 1

      No shit. what is your point? Are you trying to argue with me or just trying to repeat what I'm saying for your own verification? Are you even reading what I'm posting here?

  72. edited /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts by Idou · · Score: 1

    look, drakconf (the program you were using) is brand new, so I think your expectations where a bit too high.

    For 3 years, I have been using "netconf" to configure nics. It exists in both RH and Mandrake and is stable, gets the job done. It is a GUI programnot as fancy as drakconf), and included by default.

    Linux usually has many ways to do the same thing . . . passing judgement by only trying 1 or 2 ways seems inappropriate (not that Xandros, which I have never tried, isn't your dream come true of a distro . . .)

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  73. Why do Americans get so confused and angry . . . by Idou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    when things aren't the same in a different country? America's FASB does not reach around the globe. Therefore, it is reasonable not to expect American GAAP principles to be applied in France, wouldn't it?

    American GAAP are the most stringent in the world and compliance with the SEC can be very costly. Mandrake stock is not traded in the U.S. so they are not under the same rules you are accustomed to . . . get used to it, there are 6billion OTHER people in this world that don't live life like you do. Why should Mandrake incur more cost just because YOU think they should do things differently?

    If you really want Mandrake to release F/S that conform to your conditioned expectations, start requesting that their stock is traded in the U.S. Otherwise, get used to people doing things differently . . .

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  74. My Mandrake. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    I've been quite happy with Mandrake for 4 versions.. Purchased 6.0 and had it running a samba server in college when I was doing tech support work. VERY nice and stable. :) Purchased 6.5 after that and then 8.0 and 9.0 directly from them once I realized the distribution channel thing.

    I have no problems paying for something that has been really good to me for stability, ease of use, and letting me have the final say on how I use my computer. Currently I have the download 9.0 edition running on a 1.2 ghz athelon and when the boxed 9.0 set came in it went right on my dell inspiron 8000 laptop.

    I'd say for ease of use this is one of the best distros out there. Though Redhat 8.0 is really pretty too. Either way I wouldn't even let my mother install Windows, much less linux. I'd say both are equally confusing to a new user.

    Thumbs up to the Mandrake people. I'll be buying from you guys for sure more often.

    The best feature I like about Mandrake is that unlike some other proprietary OS. It ASKS me if it can connect to the internet for updates instead of said proprietary OS's current trend moving to an "Auto-Update" w/out my approval. :)

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  75. "I'm glad to say it's looking real good for them"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I read it, during the fiscal year just ended they took in 4.7 million euros and spent 10.8 million. Not even close to profitable! Their spin -- that they've massively reduced losses -- is classic Wall Street-style deception. You /.ers shouldn't give them a break for this, even if their product is a Linux disto.

  76. Mandrake install by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    Well I can see why they have all that money! I bought Mandrake 8.2 about a month ago and couldn't install it on my new system (have XP Pro on it at the moment) and then I saw version 9 and thought "ahh that should work!" ...nope :( So I've spent close to $200(Canadian) for squat. I looked at the other distros and Mandrake looked like the best the start with for a new to Linux user. ...and yeah I'm posting and searching the various forums on Mandrake(which all seem to have gone to hell by the way), ARS(good), and Linuxnewbie.org(lot of bitchy people there lately).

  77. Bad signs from my ordering experience . . . by div_2n · · Score: 1

    I have zero confidence in Mandrake. After purchasing an Open Brick from them a little over a month ago, I heard nothing from them. My credit card was charged, but I didn't receive so much as a confirmation e-mail.

    After two weeks of silence, I sent them an e-mail requesting correspondence. Three days more of silence I sent a letter indicating I was on the brink of turning in the charge as fraudulent to my credit card company. One more week of silence and I sent them one last e-mail informing them that I was calling my bank the next business day to have them pursue the charge.

    The very next morning I had an e-mail from them telling me they have been having e-mail problems. For an entire month? What kind of garbage are they running e-mail servers on?

    I informed them they had two days to respond to my query before I reported the charge. Finally they said they would ship it as soon as possible. That was almost a week ago.

    There exists the greatest possiblity I will NEVER buy from them again. I urge you caution in your purchases.

  78. Leeching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mandrake is leeching. They owe $20 million according to their financials. And they'll never pay it back. How's that for leeching?

  79. What mystifies me... by Perdition · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is how so-called "upgrades" of Mandrake seem to be total rehashes. I ordered 9 from Mandrake and eventually got it (with appropriate apologies for its tardiness). I backed up my important stuff and decided to do a wipeout install just for fun. Nothing worked quite as well as 8.2 out-of-box. No printer, no sound, odd omissions of access to partitions, etc. After running the rabbits for a while, I gave up and reinstalled 8.2. Bingo, evrything worked. Upgraded packages to 9, and everything still worked. What had Mandrake forgotten about from 8.2 to 9? It is these stuttering steps in development that hamper Linux' growth at times, I think. Anyway, I'm using 9 now and am happy, just weirded out.

    --
    Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
  80. Sorry here is a correction. by lastninja · · Score: 1

    all your slashdottec jokes are doesn't seem too belong to us.

    --
    John Carmack fan, browsing at +5 since 1999.
  81. I just realized that mandrake could be profitable by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Remember that story about MS's huge profits from Windows and Office. One of the cool points was MS could be profitable by selling the OS for $45. Now obviously Mandrake doesn't have the markets of scale to make this figure right now (support costs can be a real killer, I read once that one support call on a piece of $50 software kills all profit) but how about $90, which is what the powerpack costs ;). From that perspective I think linux distro companies could be quiet profitable.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  82. thanks by zogger · · Score: 1

    --thanks for bringing up documentation! As a semi noob still and a non coder, I get frustrated as heck when I see the instructions for some program tell me to "write a script". OK, I can mangle out some terrible html. How is that gonna help? I got no desire to be forced to become a unix admin. Or if I follow the install readme down to the letter, look 5 times before I hit enter in the console, and it still don't work. I tried linux once years ago, went "no way jose, I'll wait". I'd say it's close now but still needs more functionalty/ease of use, less eye candy emphasis on customizing skins and "themes". It's very good as it stands now at least how I use it, no idea about anyone else I only know one other person in my whole area uses linux and don't talk to him much. I got the internet and that's it for help. I use google, I am on my second full printed out notebook of notes, and starting on the third, and still am not really comfortable changing things to make them work. Although I used windows off and on in the past I never cared for it,same deal with getting in and trying to fix files was just way too bogus for me, hated it, so have been mostly always a mac classic until steve jobs priced me out of computers and OS, which is the opposite experience, I never had anything fail to install or run, it just never happened to me. classic had a few problems, speed and memory management the two biggees, but honestly it never was that bad installing and running programs or having some accessory work. Plug it in, worked. Never had to "edit a file". It's hard for non-coders sometimes in linux and harder to find instructions that are de-acronymed adequately. I'm finding myself NOT trying out programs as much as I'd like as I got a "sort of" working pretty good computer now an am more or less chicken I'm going to screw it up (again) and have to start all over again, and this shouldn't happen, IMO. I also still won't use linux for any online e commerce, there's no way to tell as a noob if you are owned or not, I just go boot the old mac back up if I ever order anything online. I can't take a chance on that yet, casual surfing is one thing, having to be a trained systems engineer in security is another. I like the concepts, I support my distro, but I'm looking for a more professionally finished product, and I don't care if the cd install disks have half as many programs either. The winner will keep getting my cash, not twice a year, but every other year for an upgrade, I see zero need to "upgrade"constantly, as do most people. Great for some folks, but they are in the minority, vast numbers of people I know just don't want to do that.

    1. Re:thanks by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Odds are that when he said "write a script" he was thinking bash or perl, not javascript. Javascript is intentionally bad at calling OS routines.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:thanks by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

      Linux is a wonderfully unique environment and it always will be. You will always find crappy documentation and projects that are hacked together. The ability to hack together things quickly to fill our needs is one of the powers of Linux and one of the reasons that I use it.

      However, this environment is not kind to a newbie and can be very frustrating.

      I think what you will see over the next few years is better setup support and more proprietary products. The free hacker tools and projects will always be there for the techies but non-techies will have more and more well documented professional products that can be purchased.

      Linux is truly a wonderful environment that is robust enough to support both open and closed source products.

      Things will get better. Hang in there.

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  83. Re:edited /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts by phutureboy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, netconf is what I used. That's the only thing I could find under K-> Configuration -> Networking. It just barfed when I tried to apply the changes, and wiped out my primary interface.

    I know my way around the text config files quite well, but I would prefer to point & click to configure things. Unlike some *nix users, I actually like GUIs.

  84. Try Lycoris or Redhat 8 first by bogie · · Score: 2

    Don't use those semi-free distros. They are bad for linux and opensource in general. Mostly free does not equal free and that is exactly what Xandros and Lindows are. It's an alarming trend and I hope all of those distros which are eager to add proprietary bits to the central cores of their distros go out of business. Either one of the distros I mentioned in the subject should do what you ask as both have very good consistent user interfaces and are easy to configure.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  85. Im being pushed to alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have always wanted to give linux a shot and Mandrake seems like it is going to be my first try. Recent additions to the Windows OS like DRM are just going to push more people like me away. Also, the one thing I have noticed slowly happening over the last couple of years is I can buy a piece of software, and usually soon after I buy it, I test out a piece of freeware or shareware that was superior to what I just bought. Tell me if I am wrong but this kind of thing seems like it would flourish in the Linux environment. If you feel a need for some other feature in the software, someone has probably already thought of it and is working updating it or making a new version using the same source code as a base. If you feel like adding a feature to it yourself, give it a shot. Who wouldn't like that? *coughcough* MS *coughcough* I mean I have no idea ;)

  86. FY2001-2002 by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Fuck You 2001-2002? From Mandrake? Sounds more like a Microsoft customer service plan.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  87. Pre-installed Linux on PC by shnarez · · Score: 1

    If you want to appeal to new users, you need to get them to see Linux. Pre-installed. None of that "download this ISO, burn it, and then reboot and ..." nor "repartition, blah, blah, etc.". Computer. With Linux. Pre-installed. Be it Mandrake, or RedHat or what have you. But such that the user doesn't have to install it. So it's immediately there to be used. AND the whole system MUST be cheaper than a comparable WinXP system.

    Why a big-name manufacturer doesn't go for it is obvious once they read the "thou shall distribute no OS other than that from MS" clause, but I should expect to start seeing pre-installed Linux distros on new computers, otherwise it's hard to get newbies to start using Linux.

    Remember, most non-computer-literate users do NOT install their operating system. They do not upgrade their modem/network/graphics card nor do they apply regular patches to keep their software secure. How then do you expect them to take their working PC, repartition it and install a new and random OS? And there are so many! RedHat, Mandrake, Suse, they all seem different. And indeed, they have their differences.

    I'm not advocating UnitedLinux. I'm advocating distributing Linux pre-installed on PCs and laptops. So a new user knows that stuff is compatible. And doesn't have to worry about hunting down drivers. Heck, I'd be willing to buy a laptop if I don't have to pay the WinXP tax on it.

  88. probably was... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...it probably was, you are correct. I won't identify the app, but it's a pretty common gui front end for a *real* important application that I would guess most linux users use. And there it is right in the docs, for a problem that I bet a lot of people see, it says 'well, if you see this kernel foobar on bootup, shoot it's easy, just write a script to fix it"and THAT'S IT! Well, if it's "that easy" like why wouldn't the developer just type the few lines necessary and include it? it's easy FOR HIM to "write a script" he knows What he's thinking and talking about. Me, I have no idea, no idea what language, what it's supposed to do or say. I ALREADY got a job, I just ain't gonna learn some programming language just to write a few lines of this cryptic "script". Is typing the few sentences that are necessary all that hard? I'd do it if I even knew how, so there's zilch I can do to either fix it or offer any help back. En-screwed again. That's what I am thinking, stop coding a minute, type a few explanatory lines, change the docs so a non programmer might have a clue. Just bugged me when I saw that.

    thanks for your reply

    1. Re:probably was... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Yah. As documentation that's pretty bad. But knowing that you can fix an unforseen (in detail) problem with a shell script, and knowing what the shell script has to say (without seeing the problem) are very different things.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  89. Mandrake Refugee by rtdrury · · Score: 1


    All I know about Mandrake is that I ordered the CDROM Mandrake Linux for PPC past August, and after the promised two week shipping period when it hadn't shipped, I cancelled the order by phone and got Yellow Dog Linux, which I'm perfectly happy with. Then a month later, Mandrake's charge showed up on my credit card. I just had my card company cancel the payment. I'm disappointed in experiencing this sort of thing within the Linux community.

  90. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OS upgrades YOU!

  91. In Communist Russia by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

    Asshole Looks like YOU!

    This is SO off-topic. Go ahead, I deserve it. I had to do it. Besides, I should at least get +1, Traumatised by goatse.cx. (no I won't link it, dammit I just cleaned my keyboard last week)

  92. Re:kernel.org is down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, just to follow up on my own bitching here.

    Plip in 2.4.20 works. In fact, some of the other kernels that I thought didn't have plip working may also actually work.

    The main problem was that I was running an ftp server accross my parallel cable, and my ftp client was midnightcommander. Midnightcommander was screwed. It turns out I can't just install mc by doing an ldd on the binary on another system to find out what libraries to copy with the main binary. Mc would then not correctly act as an ftp client, and I had to run strace on a working mc to find out that it explictly loaded all kinds of libnss_* crap once you did an ftp.

    The system I was setting things up on had no names, just IPs, so what the fuck name services were needed for just to do an ftp is beyond me. But I got it working so all of you can stop worrying and breath easy.

  93. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    I do not remember ever having seen a sustained argument by an author which,
    starting from philosophical premises likely to meet with general acceptance,
    reached the conclusion that a praiseworthy ordering of one's life is to
    devote it to research in mathematics.
    -- Sir Edmund Whittaker, "Scientific American", Vol. 183

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...