Slashdot Mirror


Mood-Sensing Computer

handy_vandal writes "'A team at Vanderbilt University is ... developing a robotic assistant whose goal is .. [to] respond to the moods of its human master.' For use on the battlefield -- e.g. when a soldier is overcome with anxiety."

202 comments

  1. Hmm. by Renraku · · Score: 5, Funny

    iMac's that change color based on your mood? That's clever marketing.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Hmm. by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      iMac's that change color based on your mood?

      Mine has just turned brown -- a perfect analogue for the way that I feel today.

  2. Armor plating and heat shielding by infonography · · Score: 1

    If you want a computer to sense my mood it might be better to put at least a bit of protection on it. It's not my mood it has to worry about it's my sledgehammer.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:Armor plating and heat shielding by DeComposer · · Score: 1

      I think they'll get better than 90% accuracy if they just set the default user mood to 'pissed.'

      --


      Karma
    2. Re:Armor plating and heat shielding by infonography · · Score: 1

      Oh that is sooo true, I would like to be able to set my computer's mood to say, simpering. Or Maybe we would be able to jack them up with drugs. Like say sodium penthanol and I could get my Ultrasparc to tell me exactly why it's not seeing the cdrom drive.

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  3. Dangerous responses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A team at Vanderbilt University is ... developing a robotic assistant whose goal is .. [to] respond to the moods of its human master.'
    I'd hate to be around the robots when the soldiers in the battlefield start thinking "man, I really have to take a shit."
    1. Re:Dangerous responses? by oateater · · Score: 1

      Or when the said soldiers spot a playboy bunny on the horizon. Those robots could have a hay-day.

  4. well that should be helpful by banky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sir, it seems the entire 3rd Division is feeling a little anxious.

    You will also note that most of the Marines in the 187th Expeditionary Force are also nervous about their impending landing.

    Lastly sir, the pilots have... the heebee jeebies.

    Impending War/Risk of painful death == anxiety

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    1. Re:well that should be helpful by n3m6 · · Score: 2

      know what?
      i dont' need a computer to sing me a "jolly good fellow" when i want to kill the bastard.

      shit. i'll just blow that thing to make my day.
      that'd bring me in the mood.

    2. Re:well that should be helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be much more useful to have the thing carry some binoculars and call out targets. Oops, I guess I've been playing America's Army a bit too much.

    3. Re:well that should be helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look on the bright side, PFC Smith! When your body parts come home --shipped: Remains, Not Viewable-- everyone will be so proud of you.
      You weren't smart enough to get a civilian job, but you were lucky enough to become one of the featured Americans on FOXnews' 15 minute segment "Heroes of the Reich"!

    4. Re:well that should be helpful by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      "Run away! Run Away!"

    5. Re:well that should be helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the *&%^ ?!
      so if they havea robot to HUG them its going to make much difference?! Is it going to carry them? can it run faster?

      coddling soldiers leads to defeat.

    6. Re:well that should be helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will also note that most of the Marines in the 187th Expeditionary Force are also nervous about their impending landing.

      I take it you don't know any Marines.

      They *like* that shit.

    7. Re:well that should be helpful by ctimes2 · · Score: 2

      They *like* that shit

      Hey, if you'd been stuck on a ship for 6 months with 1000 other guys and one shower... you'd be pretty f'n excited to get off too. ;)

      --
      My cube. My friend. My solace. My prison.
  5. Uh...computers already respond to our moods. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Haven't you noticed when you strike the keys harder and/or faster the computer does what you want? C'mon guys, EVERYONE knows that!! Come to think of it, this tatic is effective on co-workers too.

  6. For use on the battlefield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    you'd need a Beowulf cluster of mood-sensing computers.

    1. Re:For use on the battlefield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the Beowulf cluster joke getting alittle old?

    2. Re:For use on the battlefield by Darling! · · Score: 1

      Isn't the Beowulf cluster joke getting alittle old?

      No, Bitching about the Beowulf cluster joke IS.

  7. advanced? by ItalianScallion · · Score: 5, Funny

    hi, i'm Hal, and i'm really sorry your windows box got hacked. want a beer?

  8. Maybe not a good idea by bdigit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know about you guys but if I am having a panic attack the last thing I want to do is talk to anyone. You just want to get out of where you are, fight or flight. Having a robot asking me questions about how I feel really wouldn't ease any of my anxiety. Although a nice feature would be for the robot to dispense some xanax.

    1. Re:Maybe not a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah. I would think a better application on the battlefield would be a mood-based computer that senses certain moods and automatically releases certain drugs/chemicals into your body to help you function better. For example, automatically releasing pain killers when a considerable amount of pain is being felt, or some kind of stimulant if it detects its host is becoming sleepy. This could help offset a soldier's changes in mood and emotion, possibly maintaining a consistant level of performance when such consistancy is needed.

    2. Re:Maybe not a good idea by Cerlyn · · Score: 2

      Reply or moderate... I think I'll reply.

      This would be yet another "slippery slope" thing. Junior depressed, and being beat up in school? No problem! Just attach one of these devices on him no bigger than a pacemarker and he'll feel real good about being beat up! Attach one to the bully too to calm him down! Watch as the two drugged students exchange medication needles in a peace truce!

      Perhaps I'm going overboard above, but there is a limit to what automatically administered medications can do. And even if you could keep your soldier up for four days on no-doze, chances are high you would have trouble keeping him/her up the fifth as medication tolerance sneaks in.

    3. Re:Maybe not a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you are going a bit overboard. First of all, for your first example to ever actually happen in real life, a whole lot would have to happen: the fda would have to approve the products use on children, and the many riots resulting from that decision (if it is ever made) would have to be eliminated. In short, it would only happen on TV.

      Your second example makes a good point though -- medication tolerance is definately something to consider. There would obviously have to be something in place to prevent a situation such as the one you described

    4. Re:Maybe not a good idea by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Wow that's really interesting. A computer that automatically releases chemicals when you're in pain?

      The interesting part is that everyone already has one. If you hadn't slept through your science classes, you'd know that your brain takes care of stuff like this by itself. If you're in pain, your brain cues the endorphins to ease it. If you have a cold, your immune system gets boosted. If you're in danger, and you know it, your adrenal gland gets stimulated and you get extra power and speed. It doesn't take a battery powered device to accomplish what nature already has.

      At any rate, the sleepiness thing would be nice, but hasn't the government issued amphetamines to the military in the past? I know the Germans kinda pioneered that in WW2 and we thought it was a swell idea. Also lots of snipers are rumored to take medication normally given to Parkinson's patients to calm their jitters (which equals a clean shot).

    5. Re:Maybe not a good idea by pnuema · · Score: 1

      Having a robot asking me questions about how I feel really wouldn't ease any of my anxiety. Yeah, but think about how much better you will feel after you shoot it.

    6. Re:Maybe not a good idea by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      I don't know about you guys but if I am having a panic attack the last thing I want to do is talk to anyone. You just want to get out of where you are, fight or flight. Having a robot asking me questions about how I feel really wouldn't ease any of my anxiety. Although a nice feature would be for the robot to dispense some xanax.

      Well, to make you feel better, I'm pretty sure that you are definitely not in the target audience here. Combat personnel tend to get weeded out of they have panic attacks.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  9. Finally! by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 2, Funny

    A computer that understands what it means when I hold a shotgun to it.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
  10. So, why do we need commanders then? by elnerdoricardo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Researchers envision the emotion-sensing robot serving military personnel on the battlefield.

    "The human commander may get into trouble but be unable to ask for help," said Nilanjan Sarkar, team member and assistant professor of Vanderbilt University's Department of Mechanical Engineering.

    "In cases like these his robot assistant will be able to detect his stress and either communicate the need for assistance or assist in some way itself."

    So, if the machine can do that, what's to stop some meathead Pentagon desk-bound General from deciding that having a fallable commander on the field is worth it?

    I know it's a stretch, but not that much of one...
    Of course, I don't think we will ever get rid of the human equation in the battlefield, and nor should we.

    I have the part in Ender's Game in my head where Razor Mackham talks to Ender about the importance of having individual command, instead of one central brain...

    --
    IN SOVIET RUSSIA, sig changes you!
    1. Re:So, why do we need commanders then? by elnerdoricardo · · Score: 1
      Sorry, I should rephrase:

      "...from deciding that having a fallable commander on the field is worth having at all?"

      and was it Razor Mackham or Mazor Rackham? d'oh!

      --
      IN SOVIET RUSSIA, sig changes you!
    2. Re:So, why do we need commanders then? by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      It was Mazor, i'm wondering who's playing him in the movie.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  11. Sensors sensing the wrong thing. by Zaya · · Score: 1

    Okay, so it takes account your jaw movements and sweat and heartbeat and brow movements. There seems to be an awful lot of leeway there. I hope that they are doing studies on soldiers that have performed well in actual combat to make sure that the robots aren't just sensing what is SUPPOSED to happen during combat. As is said in the article, this is all based on observable emotion which can vary from person to person, or even as the endorphins or adrenaline starts rushing. Along with that, if the commander starts depending on the little robat to give it pep talks, what happens when it gets blown to small little tin bits? Will the commander be able to function without it or will it become a "necessary" aid? Feels like too many holes in the purpose, use and functionality, even for a "few years" from now.

    1. Re:Sensors sensing the wrong thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you always that negative? What do you propose, that they use anal electrodes?

  12. A civillian use? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 0, Redundant

    could a beowulf cluster of these be used to automatically download pr0n?

  13. Because it's not /.ed yet by Red+Warrior · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Feeling Blue? This Robot Knows It By Louise Knapp Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,56921, 00.html 02:00 AM Jan. 01, 2003 PT Science fiction often depicts robots of the future as machines that look like people and feel, or at least hanker after the ability to feel, human emotions. A team at Vanderbilt University is turning this notion on its head by developing a robotic assistant whose goal is not to develop emotions, but rather respond to the moods of its human master. By processing information sent from physiological sensors the human counterpart wears, the Vanderbilt robot can detect when its master is having a bad day and approach with the query: "I sense that you are anxious. Is there anything I can do to help?" But do people really want a machine sensing their anxiety and offering assistance? If that's all the Vanderbilt robot was intended to do, it wouldn't have much shelf life. But the research team has a specific kind of service in mind for its mechanical assistant. Researchers envision the emotion-sensing robot serving military personnel on the battlefield. "The human commander may get into trouble but be unable to ask for help," said Nilanjan Sarkar, team member and assistant professor of Vanderbilt University's Department of Mechanical Engineering. "In cases like these his robot assistant will be able to detect his stress and either communicate the need for assistance or assist in some way itself." The robot's sensors consist of an electrocardiogram to record heartbeat, a skin sensor that can detect tiny changes in sweat production, an electromyography sensor that detects minute muscle activity in the jaw and brow, a blood-volume pressure sensor that measures the constriction on the arteries and a temperature sensor. "The robot uses algorithms to translate the information it gets from the sensors into a format it can understand," Sarkar said. "One of our most important claims is that the robot can process this information in real time." So far tests with the robot have proved promising. The machine responds on cue to signals of distress and approaches its human counterpart to ask if he's OK. The robot's biggest hurdle may not be its design but rather its human counterpart accepting it as a trusted assistant. "Speaking as a former soldier, the last thing I would want is an artificial girlfriend by my side to nag me about how I am feeling while out in the battlefield," said John Petrik, corporate communications officer at the Office of Naval Research. But, Petrik added, as one of the project's sponsors, the ONR believes the research has potential to develop smarter robotic aids for military use. Other robotics researchers agree that the Vanderbilt robot has potential but needs fine-tuning. "Taking these (physiological) signals is certainly a good indication of the human state, but we are at a very primitive stage of understanding the relation between the internal states -- what is observable -- and human emotion," said Takeo Kanade, director of the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University. The Vanderbilt team has time to work the kinks out of its robot's emotion-detecting abilities. Sarkar admits that it will be a few more years before the robot makes it onto the battlefield.

    --
    "If, therefore, any be unhappy, let him remember that he is unhappy by reason of himself alone."
    ~Epictetus
    1. Re:Because it's not /.ed yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Son, I hope you realize copyright infringement is a serious, serious crime.

    2. Re:Because it's not /.ed yet by sheriff_p · · Score: 2

      Wired? Get Slashdotted? Mod parent down: karma whore.

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
  14. battle? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If I think I am going to die in a battlefield and I am shitting in my pants, a robot will do nothing to ease my anxiety or fear. What is it going to do, smile at me when I am freaking out and just trying to survive?

    1. Re:battle? by kisrael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I think I am going to die in a battlefield and I am shitting in my pants, a robot will do nothing to ease my anxiety or fear. What is it going to do, smile at me when I am freaking out and just trying to survive?

      Maybe it could inject some really good drugs? Hyperprozac plus adrenalin?

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:battle? by Imperator · · Score: 2

      Well, for one thing it could call for help even if you're too panicked to do so yourself.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    3. Re:battle? by ramzak2k · · Score: 3, Funny

      a sensible one will say

      "You got fear !" and then go quiet.

      There is however a new 9.0 version will be programmed to systematically bring down your fear.

      " Hey Shmuck ! Is that all you got eh ? I can smell the poopie in yo pants. Come on, dont be a sissy ! When I was your age.."

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    4. Re:battle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe

    5. Re:battle? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      I'd rather have one that monitors my health and screams "MEDIC!" if I get blasted. You may still be alive but be to shellshocked to scream for a medic.

      Better yet, how about a spiderlike robot from Minority Report, equipped to cauterize wounds and inject painkillers, while signaling to the medical center (or robot sentry) that I'm hit and need to fall back? Everyone could carry one around in a single pocket and the little guy can spring into action when your health looks bad. A sharp drop in blood pressure is a sure sign of a big wound.

    6. Re:battle? by Sciamachy · · Score: 1

      Better yet would be a robot to do the battling & keep us humans safe behind the front line.

    7. Re:battle? by seven89 · · Score: 2
      If I think I am going to die in a battlefield and I am shitting in my pants, a robot will do nothing to ease my anxiety or fear.
      That isn't the point -- the data could be fed to a real-time combat status monitoring system, so that "Big Don" Rumsfeld could see little brown dots appear on his computer screen as he sits in his impenetrable bunker.
    8. Re:battle? by wendigo2002 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it could inject some really good drugs? Hyperprozac plus adrenalin?

      Homer: Hey there was just air in mine

    9. Re:battle? by psylent · · Score: 1

      "... die in a battlefield and I am shitting in my pants ..." probably the robot will wipe your butt :-)

  15. Gimme some sugar baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey computer, you come here often?

  16. mood pc in the military!? by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 1

    I can see it now. Our soldier, covered in camo, lying in a sniping position, ready to off Osama... thinks of his wife for a second...

    1) Mood pc starts flashing bright red.
    2) ...
    3) Game over man!

    --
    I got a sig so you would remember me.
  17. Visions of talking toasters by infonography · · Score: 1
    Let me be the first to get this out of the way so a real discussion can commence;

    Mood sensing computers bring visions of those annoying gadgets in Red Dwarf and Hitchhikers.

    Now that this has been said let's retire the humour aspect unless it's a really good one.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  18. I can see it now by serps · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It looks like you're trying to take cover under enemy fire. Do you need some help taking cover?"

    --
    "Einstein argued that [...] God is not capricious or arbitrary. No such faith comforts the software engineer." ~ Brooks
    1. Re:I can see it now by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 2

      Yeah, this is about as good of an idea as Microsoft's talking paperclip. :-0

    2. Re:I can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that was the point.

    3. Re:I can see it now by mstyne · · Score: 1

      Wow, you were all over that one. Good hustle, champ.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
  19. What if ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... the computer sense a little ... you know ... "in the mood" ... "more ready than usual" ... "ready for a different kind of action" ... "ready to play ball" ... "ready to take one for the team" ... "in the mood for some lovin"

    If it can cater to that need ... then it is DEFINANTELLY slashdot worthy and should be expanded to a market far wider than the military.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:What if ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by "playing ball" and "taking one for the team" im starting to wonder if you're a "pitcher" or a "catcher".

    2. Re:What if ... by vidnet · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno, it could be kind of a turnoff to hear Clippy say "It looks like you're trying to spank your monkey. Would you like help with spanking your monkey?"

    3. Re:What if ... by Gyan · · Score: 2

      "...DEFINANTELLY..."

      I'm still wondering how you made this spelling mistake.

      "If it can cater to that need..."

      Should I be saddenned or disgusted ?

    4. Re:What if ... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      "Definitely not a number"?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    5. Re:What if ... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      I'm still wondering how you made this spelling mistake.
      I'm glad I'm not the only one.. he's havening some serious problems.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  20. Mood by sysbot · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hmm....mood sensing? :D

  21. It'd be sad... by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'd be sad when one day your computer will be telling you, "I'm not in the mood, I have a headache."

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:It'd be sad... by jsse · · Score: 1

      It'd be sad when one day your computer will be telling you, "I'm not in the mood, I have a headache."

      "What a minute Doris, we can talk...."

      *Doris-B11 ejects the pilot into the air*

    2. Re:It'd be sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you can say "you lying piece of shit!" and slap it around a bit.

    3. Re:It'd be sad... by trentfoley · · Score: 2
      So long as there is no "sympathy" sensing.

      Imagine after a long night coding, you say outloud, "I think I'm gonna crash". And, your Windows box replies, "I know just what you mean" as your screen glows blue.

    4. Re:It'd be sad... by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      No you've got it wrong... your computer will be telling you "No, You're not in the mood, you have a headache... Why don't you go take some asprin, maybe then I'll let you connect to the yahoo chat groups"

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  22. Could it be... by Valar · · Score: 2

    that they are nervous because they know they are about to GET SHOT AT? I mean, seriously, most people who are in that situation are a little nervous, I'm sure...I'm nervous they're gonna reinstate the draft...

    1. Re:Could it be... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I'm nervous they're gonna reinstate the draft...

      They already did, it's called selective service.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Could it be... by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 2

      Selective Service is a draft database. If the draft is reinstated, the Selective Service DB will be used to get the names and personal info of all men in the US within the age bracket for the draft (or at least those who have sent in the card). However, no people in the US today are going into the military except via a recruiting office.

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    3. Re:Could it be... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Then why is it if you DON'T register with Selective Service (you only have to maintain registration until the age of 26) you either get a $250000 fine and/or 5 years in prison?

      Some database.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  23. it better have a breathalizer built in by SHEENmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    So when you're drunk it can stop you from driving.

    And if you're really drunk it can keep you from calling exgirlfriends.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:it better have a breathalizer built in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a robotic bro-operator.

    2. Re:it better have a breathalizer built in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should stop you from sending email when you are drunk! I never feel the urge to phone people, but I've written some moronic emails, started flamewars, etc.

  24. WWHAHAAAAAAHAAAAaaa! by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    Bloody Paperclip!!

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  25. Another thing to worry about by Dark+Bard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ultimaly doesn't this cause more stress for the soldier? It's one more thing to worry about. If the computer says that your stress level is 10 percent above the norm for a battlefield soldier do you miss a promotion? The information would definately be factored into evaluations. The benefit is questionable but the potential is there for abuse.

    1. Re:Another thing to worry about by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      "If the computer says that your stress level is 10 percent above the norm for a battlefield soldier do you miss a promotion?"

      Only if the battlefield is your typical Office Space-style cubicle where most /.'ers work. A good point though. :)

  26. pr0n position by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 0

    This thing would have me floored. Surfing for pr0n would not only become easy, but dangerous...

    "I don't like this kind of pr0n Dave..."

    After the computer fails to sense your mood...

    "I know I've made some very poor pr0n decisions recently, but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal."

    Okay, you caught me, all I did was grab some 2001 quotes and insert pr0n. Give me KARMA!

    Happy New Years!!!!

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
    1. Re:pr0n position by antistuff · · Score: 1


      Okay, you caught me, all I did was grab some 2001 quotes and insert pr0n. Give me KARMA!


      ..........

      NO!

    2. Re:pr0n position by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 1

      YES!

      --
      Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  27. already been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that sex toys were already in a soldiers basic survival kit.

  28. Battle Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as an electronic shrink on the battlefield would be nice, I have a feeling I would be slightly less anxious if instead of a friendly electronic friend, I had a large, heavily armed, mech-like friend.

  29. obvious target by SHEENmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The government will buy ANYTHING that sounds cool, whether or not they need it.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:obvious target by jedie · · Score: 2

      I bet years ago someone said that about ARPANET too :)

      --
      "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
      http://slashdot.jp
  30. I've heard early versions are quite buggy. by Blue+Stone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Computer: "Sir, I have noticed you are feeling a little horny today, and have downloaded some pr0n for you..."

    User: "Gah!...How many times do I have to tell you???! I only looked at the dwarf stuff once out of curiosity."

    Computer:"Sir I notice you are becoming slightly irritated.... perhaps a wank will calm you down? Observe the dwarf pr0n.... Observe the dwa.. #clik#

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  31. Call me when computers can sense "Horny" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot filler

  32. Oh the irony.. by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 2

    Many people have suggested that, but without the going on the battlefield, and no robot needed. How great is that? Shoot me up!

    --
    "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
  33. What happens when... by phorm · · Score: 1

    It senses my "mood" and decides to switch on a little adult entertainment. I'm thinking that this feature should, of course, have an off button.

    Things could get a little upsetting if it suddenly picks up how I'm feeling at a given moment and decides to switch from the current movie DVD which I'm watching with friends to something from my private collection...

    Somebody had to say it, you're just jealous that I beat you to it - phorm

  34. I'm imagining the enemy hacking into the system... by dagg · · Score: 4, Funny
    Enemy hacks in and watches the moods of our combatants:
    Enemy Underling: Sir, the allied forces are very nervous, should we attack?
    Enemy Commander: Not yet.
    Enemy Underling: Sir, the allied forces are extremely pissed off, should we attack?
    Enemy Commander: Not yet.
    Enemy Underling: Sir, the allied forces are extremely happy and some appear inebriated, should we attack?
    Enemy Commander: ATTTTTAAAACK!!!!
    --
    Sex - Find It
  35. caffeine? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2

    That's what I would want.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  36. Talk about pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like a great way to reduce the soldiers' stress levels.

    Commander: Listen up, men! You will notice in your equipment a new MOOD SENSING ROBOT. In the event that you are under DEADLY ENEMY FIRE it will sense that you have anxiety, that you are SCARED TO DEATH and broadcast this to the whole batallion. If you break one, we will take it out of your paycheck. Now move!

    1. Re:Talk about pressure by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      I'm betting the goal is more like a computerized IV pump sort of thing that administers some kind of drug to calm them down and make them more efficient killers.

      WWII was, of course, won without this sort of thing, not counting the morphine addicts.

    2. Re:Talk about pressure by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > I'm betting the goal is more like a computerized IV pump sort of thing that administers some kind of
      > drug to calm them down and make them more efficient killers.

      "Ah, yeah, that's the stuff."

      Chris Mattern

  37. Oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mood-Sensing Computer? As if my girlfriend isn't enough.

    1. Re:Oh my god! by raider_red · · Score: 1

      How about one that senses your girlfriends moods, and reports them to you?

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  38. Vanderbilt University by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    How about that, they can do more then treat cancer patients (when I was diagnosed at 16 with synovial soft tissue sarcoma, Vanderbilt Universtity Medical Center Children's Hospital treated me).

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:Vanderbilt University by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Isn't it a shame, though?

      Oh well. You can thank my doctors and my parents for that one. Rest assured if I'm ever diagnosed again I will be refusing treatment.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  39. My computer already knows I'm horny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just check the browser cache.

  40. Bad idea by doormat · · Score: 2

    Hmmm... your windows box got hacked once, now you want to be drinking/drunk while you format/reinstall? It wasnt secure before when you were sober, imagine what happens when you install when drunk...

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:Bad idea by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Silly doormat, insecurity isn't the USER'S fault with Windows. That only applies to linux/bsd.

  41. Everyone is "anxious" in combat by jayed_99 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Or, if not anxious, you're FUCKING SCARED SHITLESS! (Or bored off of your ass, but that part isn't pertinent to the rest of my conversation).

    People that don't experience anxiety or fear in combat are either (a) too stupid to know better...which means they'll probably be dead soon or (b) are probably clinically insane.

    Now, don't get me wrong -- combat is the most intense adrenaline rush that you can possibly experience. It's the real-world version of "fight or flight" over and over and over again. Continuously...for hours and days and weeks. And for some people, that adrenaline rush is enjoyable and addictive. But, as an avowed adrenaline junkie, combat is an adrenaline overdose.

    There is a military axiom "Train as you intend to fight". Military training is intended to ingrain patterns of behavior that soldiers will fall back on when their capacity for rational thought has been eroded by the stresses of combat. (I will not digress into a discussion of how that training is mostly centered around "how to kill and survive" rather that "how to comply with the Geneva convention and related accords" -- though that might explain why every army has a history of military atrocities).

    A computer assistant -- to be effective in combat -- would have to "learn" its user in situations equivalent to combat. If it didn't, it wouldn't react the same in actual combat. And, I assure you, no training simulation comes close to approaching combat. The combination of "If I make a mistake I will die" and "I am actually killing a person" and "I could randomly die no matter what the fuck I do" is not something that can be realistically duplicated outside of the experience. I would also like to point out that soldiers do *not* respond well to "things outside of normal training parameters". The general inclination is to "shoot it" or "evade detection while trying to decide if I should shoot it".

    So what we have is (a) a computer program that has "learned" its user in situations less than combat (b) a soldier that has "learned" preset responses to external stimuli -- including the computer. If you throw the soldier+computer into combat, the computer doesn't know how to react anymore -- not correctly anyway -- because it's never "learned" about combat. The soldier will tend to listen to the computer because that's what he's been trained to do...but the computer is going to be offering suboptimal advice/help/whatever...because it doesn't "know" about combat.

    There's definitely roles for computers on the battlefield. Trying to provide stress-relief is probably not one of them. Certainly it's an interesting idea. And one day, it might be plausible. But, now, it's not too feasible. I think that computing will have to evolve quite a bit more before battlefield assistants that monitor emotional states and provide feedback based on that emotional state are truly a force multiplier.

    1. Re:Everyone is "anxious" in combat by Mac+Degger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You make a good number of points here. But I'd say there is plenty of combat experience which includes interaction with computers with which to train/simulate combat experience with a computer.

      For example computers have been in aircraft since at least Vietnam. Then there's the computers which infantary soldiers have had since at least Somalia (that's the one I picked up on from the Discovery channel...certain units had backpacks with camera's and more usefull stuff), and who knows if there haven't been earlier instances.

      Computers have been going into battle for a long time; I'd say there's plenty of data to implement certain systems. I wouldn't want a computer to calm me down in combat either though.

      All I'd need are some 'danger' sunglasses: whenever I'm in danger, they'd turn black to make me feel safe :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:Everyone is "anxious" in combat by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd say that you and a lot of other people seem to have missed the big major selling point, as well as some minor ones.

      1. If a soldier is unable to call for help, but needs it (such as laying unconscious with his blood decorating the countryside) the computer may sense an "abnormal" condition and call for help. Otherwise, he may die. He may die anyway, with or without medical attention, but this computer would increase his chances of survival and remaining in his own army by notifying the appropriate medical unit of his condition, and where he is.

      2. Casualties that need to be recovered can be prioritized in whatever fashion. It would be possible to "home in" on the most dangerously wounded and get them to aid first, because they're in the most dangerous situations.

      3. MIAs: He's missing in action, but we know he's alive. Or we know he's dead. Or we don't know because his unit has stopped transmitting, meaning either the unit is damaged or he's been captured. Secondary transmitters embedded within the soldier could give signal that the soldier is still alive but in distress.

      These are all very important issues to soldiers on the battlefield, their families at home, the citizens they're protecting (at least, we hope they're being employed to protect us), and the military they are serving.

      Detecting mood on the battlefield is more than just knowing how he's feeling, it's also knowing more about what's going on in a tactical perspective.

      1. In the command center a light flickers on near the battalion on the left wing showing *surprise*. This kind of data, while inconclusive, is *faster* than waiting for the comm personnel in the battalion to signal that they are under a surprise attack.

      2. The general is deciding whether or not to fight or retreat, and his instruments show an overwhelming amount of confidence from most of his troops. He decides to fight when he might have decided to retreat, and goes on to win what had been a hopeless battle. Granted there is a risk involved in this decision and I'm presenting the best case, but knowing how your troops view the battle can give your general a tactical advantage over the opposition.

      The article didn't say ANYTHING at all about these machines being a walking counselor trying to help the soldier to feel better. So, with that in mind, READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:Everyone is "anxious" in combat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put. Now think about this: Enemy hackers.

      Situation 1: The soldier laying unconscious with his blood decorating the countryside.
      An enemy patrol, artillery, or even a sniper intercepts the signal and ambushes the rescuers when they arrive.

      Situation 2: It would be possible to "home in" on the most dangerously wounded and get them to aid first, because they're in the most dangerous situations.
      Same as above (enemy ambush); however, it is my understanding that in combat --unlike in civilian life-- it is those who are most able to be saved that get priority medical assistance.

      Think about how the enemy would be able to manipulate our troops if they cracked the code. Whole armies would be devastated by these devices giving the generals the wrong information. Our forces could be diverted away from where the enemy wants and into traps.
      Think of these devices as something the enemy would consider a form of intelligence. If you implant them in soldiers, the enemy would make it a point to _dig_ them out of prisioners or wounded in the field so they can use them to mislead us. Not a pleasant thought.

    4. Re:Everyone is "anxious" in combat by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Think of these devices as something the enemy would consider a form of intelligence. If you implant them in soldiers, the enemy would make it a point to _dig_ them out of prisioners or wounded in the field so they can use them to mislead us. Not a pleasant thought.

      All true, but these are human problems. To be dealt with.

      In war, protecting your sources of intelligence is important, but trusting them is more important.

      Finally, while your fears are all true, and would almost certainly be exploited by the enemy, there are certainly counters. Then there's counters to the counters, and so on and so forth, just as there is with any other tool of war.

      My point was merely to point out the actual benefits of such a thing in a flood of "I sense you are feeling tense, Dave" paranoia comments. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  42. Steps to victory by dlc915 · · Score: 0

    1. Deploy troops
    2. Troops get nervous
    3. Computer senses nervous troops
    4. ???
    5. Victory! Battle is won!
    ---

    --
    I still haven't found the "any" key.
    1. Re:Steps to victory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. Profit

      AND

      In Soviet Russia the computer senses the soldier's mood, err wait...

  43. "Why don't you take a stress pill..." by ashitaka · · Score: 2

    "I can tell from the tone of your voice,
    Dave, that you're upset. Why don't you
    take a stress pill and get some rest."

    We could see it coming.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  44. Clippy mk2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like you're shitting yourself!

    or

    It looks like you want to shoot someone! (Probably the robot)...

    If it senses you're pissed off, does it keep quiet?

  45. come on! by elixx · · Score: 2, Funny

    All I really want is a babelfish in my ear.
    I don't want a mood-sensing doohickey to get jealous!

    --
    No, Beowulf clusters can't imagine in Soviet Russia.
    1. Re:come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget a Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, and an Electronic Thumb (for flagging down passing flying saucers), and of course a Sub-Etha signalling device. And last but not least, do not leave home without your towel!!!

  46. This is used only for war...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already created a program that does this, this one works for war:

    #include

    int main()
    {
    cout

    int main()
    {
    cout "I can tell you're horny.";
    return 0;
    }

    1. Re:This is used only for war...? by antistuff · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... this doesnt compile what am i doing wrong"

      gcc -o icantprogram icantprogram.c

      hmm......

      maybe i should have used visual c++?

    2. Re:This is used only for war...? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      It's just shitty code. Must have come from Microsoft.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  47. On the battlefield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Soldier: Aggghh!! They're trying to kill us!
    A1: Everything is fine, Dave.
    Soldier: Aghhhhhh!
    A1: Is there a problem with, they're trying to kill us, Dave?
    Soldier: help!
    A1: Everything is fine with regards to help, Dave.
    Soldier: We must get out of here!
    A1: Interesting. Tell me more about we must get out of here, Dave.

    1. Re:On the battlefield by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Merge the robot with the old Infocom parser and you get...

      Soldier: Aggghh!! They're trying to kill us!
      ICPR: Unknown word: aggghh!!
      Soldier: Aghhhhhh!
      ICPR: I don't understand Aghhhhhh!
      Soldier: help!
      ICPR: inv -inventory, look, verbose on/off...
      Soldier: We must get out of here!
      ICPR: Choices are N, S, W, E.

    2. Re:On the battlefield by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Soldier: Go north
      ICPR: You cheer north on.

      Chris Mattern

  48. Yeah but is it real intelligence? by euxneks · · Score: 5, Funny

    soldier: AAAAGGH! My ARM HAS BEEN BLOWN OFF!!!
    robot: Your ARM HAS BEEN BLOWN OFF?
    soldier: YES!!!
    robot: What kind of arm is it??
    soldier: OH MY GOD THE PAIN IS UNBEARABLE!
    robot: Yippee! Your GOD THE PAIN IS UNBEARABLE?
    soldier: WHAT??!!! MY ARM!! MY ARM!!!
    robot: Where did you get your ARM?
    soldier: IT'S BEEN BLOWN OFF YOU STUPID PIECE OF SH*T!
    robot: Is it still BLOWN OFF me STUPID PIECE OF SH*T anymore?
    soldier faints from loss of blood
    soldier: uhhnnn...
    robot: Is the holding of hands a symbolic gesture for humans?

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    1. Re:Yeah but is it real intelligence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ARGGG! My ARM HAS BEEN BLOWN OFF! Why do you say arggg your arm has been blown off? GOD DAMNIT! MY ARM IS CUT OFF! Is it because of your plans that you say god damnit your arm is cut off? WHAT THE FUCK? Are you afraid of sex? I HAVE NO ARM! ARG! Maybe your life have something to do with this. YES! I'm going to loose that TOO! Can you elaborate on that? I'm gonna die! ARGGG This is not a healthy way of thinking.

  49. Computer as Tool by lostchicken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whenever I read about projects that will alter the way my computer works to better fit what it thinks it needs, I pray that it will never grace my computer. I use my computer as a very, very powerful tool, and, like any good tool, I want it to do exactly what I say, even if it may seem that I am making a mistake. Don't do anything I didn't tell you to do.

    The 'mood' sensing properties of a computer system would be the worst kind of unwanted adaptation. It would change the way my computer works according to something I cannot always control fully. I want to be in control of my computer, so to do that, everything my computer does must be based on things in my control.

    --
    -twb
    1. Re:Computer as Tool by fliplap · · Score: 2

      May your idea of a "computer" is just too limited. Your type of computer is that of a desktop tool, therefore you buy that kinda of computer.

      There are many groups and projects that want to make computers more than number crunchers, at some point maybe we'll have another name for those types. Such as how a calculator is not general called a computer anymore.

      I agree with what you're saying though, I like my desktop computer, I don't see this project for uses beyond speculation even in military. I think being given a robot companion for the battle field would be even more depressing.

  50. The real use of a mood sensing computer by TheGatekeeper · · Score: 1

    C'mon, we all know what the real use of a mood-sensing computer is. Can you say ren'ai? That's dating / romance sim games for you Westerners!

    "Look, when I smile at Kimiko-chan, she smiles back..."

    --
    'The staff in the hand of a wizard may be more than a prop for age,' -Hamá, the doorward
    1. Re:The real use of a mood sensing computer by PuVDraM · · Score: 1

      Well, most likely Maxis' next step in their famous game series. Will it be "The Sims: Hot date Interactive" ?

  51. bush's computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'master, I see you're in a warmonger-mood again, should we attack another country completely at random and say that they were threatening us ?'

  52. The new version of Windows... by VistaBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

    will probably use this mood sensor to detect if the user is pissed so that it simply refuses to show BSODs when that occur...or they'll make it so that when you're happy it shows yellow screens of death that say, "Have a nice day!"

  53. How do they test these things? by Harald74 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I imagine a couple of white-coated lab workers dressing up some volunteer with probes, then standing back while Igor gets to work inducing anxiety in the subject...

    --
    A)bort, R)etry or S)elf-destruct?
  54. Anxiety on the battlefield. by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2

    Let me get this straight: I'm taking fire, in a trench or something, and I'm supposted to not feel anxiety? What part of a bunch of AK-weilding Afgans screaming at me is supposted to calm me down? Or is the sound of mortars hitting the ground 3 meters from me supposted to be soothing?

  55. Self-contained battlefield drug delivery system? by jgaynor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not that this stinks, but this stinks of automated "liquid bravery/no-doze/morphine" delivery. It seems almost tailor-made to be part of an automated battlefield drug delivery system. It could fit into a small beltpack containing a pda sized circuit board, a few vials of specific drugs and a small motorized needle.

    -If a soldier, whom the pc knows is "on watch" starts to show signs of fatigue, the device automically injects some caffeine or even ephedra.

    -If a soldier gets an arm blown off in a trench far from a medic, the device could automatically inject morphine, or even a heavy coagulant to help his wound stop bleeding.

    Wonder which branch of the military Vanderbilt has been receiving its recent grants from :) ?

  56. Acting in the interest of individual or unit? by Nathdot · · Score: 2

    It'd be interesting to see if this thing acted in the interest of the individual soldier or the military unit.

    INFANTRY NODE #1
    It appears my human is overcome with
    anxiety

    MAINFRAME
    Okay, this is always a shame to have to
    do, but in the interest of the platoon
    pull the pin

    INFANTRY NODE #1
    Grenade pin pulled. Self destruct
    sequence initiated.

    INFANTRY NODE #2
    It appears my human is becoming "aroused"

    MAINFRAME:
    Neutralize horniness.

    INFANTRY NODE #2
    Intravenous bromide release initiated.

  57. hhgttg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can someone pull the Heart of Gold sort of mother themed robot quote?

  58. Combat Clippy by racerx509 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clippy: It looks like you are bleeding to death. Would you like some help?

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
  59. M$ shit Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice microsoft add on the link. maybe ill buy M$ shit now.

  60. Sex for /.ers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It looks like you're feeling frisky. Shall it be porn or a game today?"

  61. MOD PARENT UP by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 0, Troll

    He has a really good .sig which says... er, oh crap!

    And it's at a 4 already too, never mind then.

    Anyways, I like your .sig dude.

  62. Good lord no... by ReaperOfSouls · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is an absolutely horrible invention...Just think, before women only "thought" men were near emotionless pigs...Now they will have diffinitive proof...

    The one benfit is that, the machine that processes the information could probably be something like a Commador 64, since we tend to have so few emotional states...

    --
    Shameless self promotion : The Misadvetures of the in
  63. C'mon, it's asking for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wants to bet they put the interface on a...RING!

    HAHAHA *snort*.

    oh jeez, i kill me sometimes, whoo!

  64. Hal 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I notice that you are feeling stressed Dave.

    1. Re:Hal 2000 by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
      "Speaking as a former soldier, the last thing I would want is an artificial girlfriend by my side to nag me about how I am feeling while out in the battlefield," said John Petrik, corporate communications officer at the Office of Naval Research.

      I have definitely noticed that you are feeling stressed Dave. Is that due to the bullet lodged in your leg? Or are you thinking about that argument about your girlfriend you had last night? *shudder*

      Hmm... But maybe a cheerleader bot might be nice... "Shoot him! Nice shot! Go you!"

  65. I want one... by bsdbigot · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but only if it can tell me when my wife wants to have sex!

    --
    main(){char I,l,O[]={'-',1-1,0,(1<<5)-1,0+'-',-10-1,-10,11-0,- 1,-100};for(I=l=0;l<10+0;put
    1. Re:I want one... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      It would be better if it just told my wife she wanted to have sex.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:I want one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, just use GPS to detect when she's at my place.

    3. Re:I want one... by alexpage · · Score: 1

      It's simple. If you're right in the middle of a good hack session, game, or other absorbing and distracting activity, she wants sex. Otherwise, she's not interested - if you're not giving up something for her, she doesn't want to know ;)

  66. MOD PARENT A FAGGOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's clearly an asshole-licking faggot

  67. this is what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but all microsoft has come up with so far is the mod-sensing computer (that disables itself if you change the bits inside).

  68. They already do respond to mood by mlush · · Score: 1

    I have a theory that computers are much more likely to play up when the user is stressed.

  69. fast forward by kcelery · · Score: 3, Funny

    The new generation VCD player should have a mood sensor connected to the fast-forward button.

  70. Let me get this right... by BrodieBruce · · Score: 2, Funny
    e.g. when a soldier is overcome with anxiety

    Finally, a portable that automatically switches to prostitute mode whenever necessary.

  71. Compulsory Onion Post by servoled · · Score: 1

    The onion already had a story like this, here. This once again proves that the onion is america's finest news source.

    --
    "I have a porkchop, you have a porkchop. I have a veal, you have a veal".
  72. Home uses too... by coene · · Score: 2

    I've detected that Microsoft Word has crashed, resulting in the loss of an estimated 4.5 hours of work. Would you like me to launch Counter-Strike?

  73. Patents by DarkZero · · Score: 2

    I've noticed that the development of the sort of robots that we've seen in movies and TV shows is being done in piece-meal by lots of different groups. There's this group, a group working on facial expressions, several groups working on creating a functional and reliable biped model, some other groups working on conversational skills, several companies working on voice recognition, a few working on face recognition, etc. When all of this is put together and we have a fully functional robot, maybe not akin to Data but certainly something similar to the robots in Bubblegum Crisis 2040 (basically sentient construction workers) or Rockman/Megaman (robots that are clearly robots, but with a human shape and face), how many patents will it violate? 20? 40? 80? 150?

    I see the need for these specific aspects of humanoid or human-like robots to be concentrated on by dedicated groups with dedicated funding, rather than the entire thing being approached as a single project, but are we ever going to get an actual robot this way? Will these people ever be able to create the sort of functional and useful robot that they envision when they have to not only complete this specific project, but then build the entire rest of the robot themselves, using only their own research and development capabilities?

    And before someone mentions that a "robot" isn't necessarily something similar to a human being, please note that this project specifically requires something that can aid a human being emotionally and thus be able to be accepted by a human being as something other than a soulless machine, necessitating that it be something more human-like than a laptop with wheels and a speaker.

    1. Re:Patents by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's the way we build everything. Apple will probably have an iBot for you to purchase within the next 50 years that combines hardware and software from hundreds of vendors, just like they do now for their other products.

  74. Because they want control by billstewart · · Score: 2
    The ability to have a draft is really important to politicians, because if the politicians want to have a big war and can't talk their people into volunteering, it lets them have their war anyway. Without it, politicians could only have wars that the people of their country actually want. Also, it lets politicians have a medium-sized war without having to pay mercenaries' wages, because they can get draftees for less than minimum wage.

    Draft registration is important for a couple of reasons

    • It keeps the public in the habit of obeying orders.
    • If they want to have a big war in a hurry, and the public doesn't want to participate, it's much faster to draft people if you already know where they live.
    • If you've don't do mandatory registration in peacetime, lots of people won't obey or register when you announce that you're having a war, and tracking them down is a slow process - it's much easier to do in peacetime when you're not in a hurry.
    • It's easier to get people to comply when the risk of registration looks low - "having your name in yet another government database" is easier to put up with that "getting sent to VietNam.".
    The reason the US has draft registration today is that Bill Clinton, having been a successful draft dodger and a hypocritical President, didn't want to take the political heat that the Republicans would have given him if he had approved the small amount of funding for closing down Selective Service when it came up for renewal during his term. If he'd had the guts to serve his country by saying "Peacetime Draft Registration is Un-American, let's kill it", we'd be better off. If I remember correctly, the peacetime draft registration was the fault of Jimmy Carter, but it might have been Ford or Reagan.

    My Draft Lottery Number was something over 300, in the last lottery, and I was classified "1-H", which is a holding category that means that the Army didn't want to bother paying to give me a physical. I lost my draft card some time before I turned 26....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Because they want control by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Well, no matter. I registered when I turned 18, and sometime between then and now (thanks to the U.S. Treasury Department) the gov't thinks I'm deceased.

      On occassion I have the notion to make that an accurate listing of my current status.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  75. Peril-Sensitive Sunglasses by billstewart · · Score: 3, Funny
    If you're going to have DouglasAdamsWear, go for the right stuff, Peril-Sensitive Sunglasses that detect scary and potentially upsetting things and darken so you won't look at them.

    "Wouldn't you really rather go to the basement, RIGHT NOW, than up to the 15th floor? Thank you for making a humble elevator so very, very happy...."

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  76. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King is dead at 55 by Helios292 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Can someone back this up with a news link? I can't find any reference to it anywhere.

    Thanks.

  77. Mood-sensing vomit bag by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1

    For immediate use when I see the next story about "smart" war technology.

  78. Sounds stupid. by TheLink · · Score: 2

    What dumb idea. Heck maybe a blood pressure gauge would be better - e.g. if I'm losing lots of blood, some drugs might help.

    If I were a soldier I'd prefer fancy gizmos that'll help me drastically alter the _enemy's_ mood.

    Passive battle gizmos I'd want (not weapons):
    1) high res ultrawideband radar
    2) passive IR/thermal + NV sensors (UV sensors might be good too - if it's possible to detect off-shelf detergent in battle camouflage)
    3) image/sound processing/recognition/location (help spot gun muzzles, detect location of sniper shots - e.g. crack-thump etc)
    4) ultrawideband coms - your teammates can "see" what you see, and can help triangulate unknown shots using their sensors.

    5) If you want something REALLY fancy, how about
    some system that can create a useful artificial metabolic pathway.

    e.g find a way to rapidly generate ATP for your muscles from alternative energy sources (e.g. petrol/diesel).

    Sprint till you run out of fuel. 300ml of petrol = approx 10 megajoules. Assuming sprinting = 1KW. Make that 5KW, assuming horrible conversion inefficiencies and overheads ( power used for artificial cooling, breaking down lactic acid, etc). You could still theoretically sprint for 2000 seconds or till something breaks or you get taken down (whichever comes first).

    Heck even being able to max sprint for only 5 minutes can be very useful tactically.

    As for nonhuman intelligence, give me a war dog anytime. Highly recommended.

    --
  79. the first step towards .... by Suchetha · · Score: 1

    would you like some toast?

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  80. The adventures of Pvt. Clippy by darylp · · Score: 1

    It looks like you are being shot at.

    Would you like help?

    * Return fire
    * Run away
    * Sit in corner crapping your fatigues and wondering why it's not more like 'America's Army'

  81. Automatic medication by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many times the soldiers will have do download device drivers in the middle of combat before the military decides to scrap the project.

    The drivers for Unknown Device "Human Arm" are not certified. Would you like to proceed?

    [Medicate] [Do not medicate]

    Page fault, "Occipital_Lobe.dll". This program will now exit.

    "I sense that you are tired, frightened, chilly, and quickly growing blind, Master. Would you like a mug of hot chocolate?"

  82. Oh great, when used with Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Windows has detected that your mood has changed, press OK to reboot.

    1. Re:Oh great, when used with Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they ran it on Windows, would that make it bi-polar?

  83. Switch places? by videodriverguy · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that thinks it would be better to build a robot that does the fighting, and the soldier worries about the robot? It would seem a lot safer, since humans are 'supposed' to be more emotional than robots.

    Since, in theory, the robot would never get anxious (even when half of it is blown away), it would make the soldiers job pretty easy.

    Soldier - 'Sir, my robot got anxious and was blown to bits'.
    Sergeant - 'Good work son, I'm sure your support helped - here's another robot for you to empathize with'

  84. Great! by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 4, Funny

    It'll be really good when I start to get pissed off at the computer and it then decides to work fine withouth any further questions because it saw me waving a 15Kg iron mallet

  85. For use on the battlefield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For use on the battlefield -- e.g. when a soldier is overcome with anxiety."

    Aha..
    Here's a military application: a med-pack that for you.

  86. And there I was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...scared enough of that MS clip while not in a battle.

  87. Welcome to a Brave New Soldier. by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    Joe is a fighter pilot. On those long stretches, a little speed is what hits the sweet spot.
    Engine on fire? No need to worry, he will die a brave and happy death.

    This ad sponsored by fly-x, your happy dopamine source.

    peace /Dread

  88. Moods to pick Music by Entropop · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting if this same technology was applied to picking which mp3s the computer might play for us based on what seemed to make us feel better the last time we felt this way. Or imagine turning the internet into a sort of concerned television that could display whatever information made other people feel better when they showed the same characteristics of mood that you might be displaying.

  89. Great - some new bitch to placate. by gelfling · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    My mood is fuck you with a tinge of get the fuck out of my house.

  90. AI? My arse.. by grub · · Score: 2


    [computer]: I see you are browsing RealDoll's website again. I sense you are horny. Would you like me to open a frame with low interest loan vendors listed so you can afford a RealDoll?

    [computer]: Ah. now you're looking at goatse.cx again. I sense you're feeling experimental. Would you a new window open with a list of local transgendered dominatrixs?

    [computer]: uh.. I see you're looking at buying a new computer. I sense you are fed up..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  91. How this might actually be useful by Chriscypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An adaptive computer interface which dynamically changes based on fear-level may be useful.

    Special situations call for special tools. Even in Star Trek (TOG) they have tactical display modes when the ship enters combat.

    A heads-up display may typically consume a good portion of the soldiers cognitive and visual capability, displaying squads current location, patrol path, intelligence updates, and other information simultaneously. When the shit hits the fan, the display could automatically change to a reduced information mode with Friendly vs Foe overlays, air support options, etc.

    As the solider becomes more engaged in reality, the cognitive load could be minimized and the heads up display optimized to survivial in close combat situations.

    Of course, I'm pulling these examples out of my but. Not being a soldier, I can only imagine what heads-up utility would be useful in combat, but keep in mind that most first-person shooters have peripheral displays containing foe-friend radar, weapon magazine loads, and other combat-helpful data.

    Of course, a simple tactical mode button would work just as well...

    --
    "You have liberated me from thought."
  92. on ThinkGeek soon ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1


    Expect this robot to be on Thinkgeek soon ... since it's the best stuff for geeks-without-girl/boyfriends!

    clippy: I sense you need to relax a bit, do you wish me to give a "personal massage"?

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  93. obligatory... by SetiAlphaOne · · Score: 1

    1) Mood pc starts flashing bright red.
    2) ...
    3) Game over man!
    4) ???
    5) PROFIT!!!

    bye bye karma.

    1. Re:obligatory... by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 1

      Well it amused me at least :-)

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
  94. True story - virtual reality foxhole digging sim by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    When I was still in the Navy, I got sent to a class on military modeling and simulation. The guy teaching the class was an Army vet who told the story of an Army command in Alaska. This outfit was in trouble because, funny as it seems, they were losing proficiency in digging foxholes (there's more to it than just digging a hole, apparently). There were some kind of environmental restrictions on digging in their area (I think it would have screwed up the permafrost? can't remember), so they needed some substitute.

    Somebody came up with the brilliant idea of building a virtual reality foxhole digging system, which was going to have force-feedback shovels, etc, etc... they were well on their way to expending vast quantities of money on this thing when somebody said, "Hey! Why don't we just ship some dirt up here?" The project was quietly dropped.

    So while it's usually true that the gov't will buy anything if it's cool enough, in this case, reason prevailed.

    Sean

  95. Mine just had a nervous breakdown... by crovira · · Score: 2

    Some people are more Mercurial than others.

    I wonder what it would make of some kids I know either on Prozac and/or on a SugarPops buzz?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  96. more like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joe makes PowerPoint slides for people and gets them just right. However the General is in town and will probably want a "readiness inspection" so now Joe is rather worried that his clip art and all the correct DD-Form 1234.56 - 9950.24b are in their proper place. Joe can now fire up his "Mood-Maker" (tm) and feel like a civilian... well a civilian meaning someone who doesn't wear a uniform and use formal rank structure.

  97. I am betting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    that the black supremacists and any other racists like this are just as shitty. It is probably much like when these people in school make their scribblings on paper and bathroom stalls... it is rarely any "good" but seems to get the point across... that they are monkeys.

    Although it is interesting how I can be racist against whites in this society and that is overlooked or even justified as "being the voice of the oppressed" yet if some redneck drives by with a southern cross he is labled as a bigot and treated like a worm.

  98. Cool! by stimpy · · Score: 1

    Then the robot can slap the soldier around and call him a coward. (just watched Patton, if you were wondering.(and even if you weren't...))

  99. Re:Self-contained battlefield drug delivery system by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 1

    Not that this stinks, but this stinks of automated "liquid bravery/no-doze/morphine" delivery. It seems almost tailor-made to be part of an automated battlefield drug delivery system. It could fit into a small beltpack containing a pda sized circuit board, a few vials of specific drugs and a small motorized needle.

    Like the Stimpack ability in Starcraft. "Eeeyaaaagh!"

    Wonder which branch of the military Vanderbilt has been receiving its recent grants from :) ?

    The Space Marines, of course.

    --
    Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
  100. Uh, you mean to get funding... by wal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why on earth would the military need a robotic assistant on the battlefield? Especially one who responds to the moods of the 'master'?

    "I am sorry sir, I can't allow you to arm that grenade due to the anger you hold from your recent divorce..."

    I think they should reveal the real reason for the research instead of using the military in order to gain funding from some grant or federal cash flow.

    --wal

  101. Just an extension of current techology? by somero · · Score: 1

    Does this technology remind anyone else of Star Trek?

    This system simply collects data, its the analysis that ties into emotional cues such as anxiety, fear, 'I wanna peanut butter and jelly sandwich', etc.

    The technology seems like a few steps up from monitoring a heartbeat, body temperature, etc. which I think is already under development by the military which has great, practical use in a combat theater.

    It's unfortunate that the focus on this article only deals with the military. Mental health professionals could use this to coach patients to improve their self-awareness stressful situations. Understanding the problem is the first step.

    I picture a dialog like this:
    'How did my body react when I saw my dad?'
    'Your response indicates anxiety...'

  102. While looking at pr0n by slashhax0r · · Score: 1

    "I can see you're anxious, is there anything I can do to help?"

  103. Talking elevator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reminds me of another useless/unwanted elevator feature from the Hitchiker's guide to the universe.

    "Pardon me for intruding, but I sense that you are a little ancious. Are you sure that you want to shoot that friendly man over there with the gaily coloured rocket launcher?"

  104. How would this play on Futurama? by dark&stormynight · · Score: 1

    I read this story and thought of how Bender would perform this task.

  105. How Pornography Promotes Technological Inn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SetGO - How Pornography Promotes Technological Innovation
    http://www.setgo.com/article.html?id=5 9b90e1005a22 0e2ebc542eb9d950b1e

    I wonder how porn will help this technological innovation

  106. Re:True story - virtual reality foxhole digging si by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    As with the case in Oregon, a costly, unweildly, unfeasible solution is usually a sign of a lack of common sense. Fortunately, there are some lawmakers and leaders who have common sense, but not enough.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  107. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computers sensing and responding to our moods?

    Hell, they already do that.

    Work five hours late, on a document due the next morning, stressed up to the eyeballs... what does your computer do in this situation? Every time?

    BSOD.

  108. But What Will it DO?? by serutan · · Score: 2

    Ok, say a guy is in the midst of a furious, raging battle, and this highly expensive gadget senses that his breathing, heart rate and bp are all elevated (duh). It says, "You seem stressed, is there anything I can do?" The guy says, "I want my mommy," or whatever you would normally say in this situation. So what does the thing do? Radio for help? Project a hologram of Marina Sirtis? Seems like the situation would call for something simpler, like a lapel-mounted PANIC button that lights up a blip on somebody's battle board. I'm sorry, but I go along with the guy who said the last thing he would want in battle is a girlfriend asking how he was feeling.

  109. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could see a lot of people buying that... Just look at the number of products sold only on their cuteness factor.

  110. HEY!!! Dr. Sarkar from Vanderbilt by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 2

    I took a class from the prof who's researching this! It's all signal analysis and designing a control system to respond right? Now can I have an A in that System Dynamics course?

    Congrats to Sarkar and the grad students toiling away in one of the weirdest buildings known to man: Vanderbilt's Olin Hall.

    I remember he did ask us at the beginning of the course if any of us wanted to work on this project. He said they were going to be using some SBCs (Single Board Computers) not sure if they were PC104 or what.

    Vanderbilt MEs... We RULE.

  111. I can see it now... by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2
    A virtual drill instructor embedded in your kevlar helmet:

    Sgt. Bot: Private! My sensors tell me you just crapped all inside your BDU trousers! Your CO just ordered you to move forward and take that machine gun emplacement! So get moving you worthless pile of camel spit!! What kind of tea party playing, prissyboy, pantywaste are you anyway?! You want to stay here in this foxhole and play grabass with Private Wexler, don't ya?! I'll bet you didn't think I could tell every time your tiny little pencil dick gets hard! Did ya?! Now pick up that weapon and get your goat smellin' ass a' low crawling across that field, you low life maggot!!!

  112. Defensive response to blinding rage? by raider_red · · Score: 1

    Can they make one that will retract into the desk if it detects that its user is really, really pissed off? This could save on some equipment repair costs at my company.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  113. That'd be nice... by StormcallerESC · · Score: 1

    What would really be useful is a version of Windows that can detect when you're REALLY not in the mood for any of its shit.

    --
    - Stormcaller
    http://www.stormcaller.net
  114. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King is dead at 55 by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    yeah...
    1. go here.
    2. Scroll to the bottom and hit next.
    3. Repeat.

  115. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    BOFH excuse #361:

    Communist revolutionaries taking over the server room and demanding all the computers in the building or they shoot the sysadmin. Poor misguided fools.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...