Slashdot Mirror


My Segway HT "Month-iversary"

Phillip M. Torrone writes "I didn't realize it, but I've been using a Segway HT for one month as of 01/04/03. To put it simply--it's been great and the HT has exceeded all expectations, I'm cautiously optimistic that this was a great purchase and look forward to the next 30 days. You can read, see and hear about my experiences here: http://www.bookofseg.com." I have yet to see one of these in real life, but they do look fun.

214 of 546 comments (clear)

  1. Concept by BrianGa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think all the people who are saying "electric scooter, big whoop. $3,000, yeah right" are slightly missing the point. Yeah, it's kind of wimpy for the price tag. Yeah, it's kind of expensive, and it's questionable who would want to use it.

    But this is just the first model. It's more sort of a proof of concept--a demonstration that the scooter can work, and looks as neat as all get-out in motion. As time goes on, the performance will improve and the price will fall.

    Look at the Palm (Pilot). The first model was, what, 128K? With no backlight, no infra-red, or anything? And how high was the price tag? And now the Visor Deluxe, which was at one time the wet dream of anybody who even looked at a Palm, is only $130 brand new.

    Look at the DVD player. The original models were expensive enough, the first bunch of discs were glitchy enough, that a lot of people scoffed and made snide remarks. But the DVD went on to become the fastest-adopted new consumer technology ever.

    So here we have a relatively slow, electric-powered self-stabilizing scooter, for $3,000. Are very many of us going to buy it? Do very many of us have the money to sink into that sort of gee-gaw? No and no. I know I'm not going to be spending three grand on something like that myself, either. Nor would I be likely to spend two grand, or even one grand.

    But by the time it gets to about $500, sign me up.

    1. Re:Concept by Handpaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This article contains many of the best reasons that this device is a complete waste of time. It seems to me that somebody remembered the Sinclair C5, realized people wanted to be on the sidewalks where they felt safer, and wasted a dynamic stabilization system.
      Incidentally, does anyone know how much weight the Segway is designed to handle? Because if it does become popular, its gonna need to handle much more...

    2. Re:Concept by NeuroManson · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I dunno, there's electric motorscooters that have a vastly superior range over Segway, run around $2,000 less, and are as easy to ride around on as a bicycle.

      I mean, when Segway's MSRP is being beaten out by Hammecher Schlemmer, it doesn't take a genius to tell who's trying to pull a fast one.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    3. Re:Concept by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Hey, I know how you feel, I bought one of the first MP3 car players, about 550 bux. Now they are so many brands you can get them at Kmart for 60.

      At work the marketing folks call these people, "Early Adopters". They make it so the average moms/dads/kiddies can buy them at normal prices. So please keep buying them, and drop the price for us. :)

    4. Re:Concept by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think your examples work for the segway. You examples work for most products though. Just that when you make a jump to something like this is doesn't work. A seqway is very expensive, and doesn't bring very much to the world that the few hundred dollor e-scooters you can buy anywheres allreayd have. Also it's not a problem of cost or new technology and such. It is simple an item with very limited use. And its not something that will continuly find new uses. Things like safty are issues. But just it's use is a problem. It cannot be used in a lot of situations. It really only works in cities, and warm climate ones. Needs cities that have a place for it to run. Many cities arn't going to alow them on sidewalks since they cause more of a safty issue than bikes or roller bladers that are allready banned. Things like a palm pilot may have been over kill for their uses but work universialy and have few limitations, and will continue to find new uses.

      I can see segways in uses like mail men chariots, and use in warehouses. But it's not something that the mass public has a use for or can even dream up a use for. If there was the previous electric scooters would have had big impacts allready. Even if a segway in time becomes a $200 dollar item, few people will buy one since they have no use for it, or can't use it do to where they live.
      Also walking will always remain popular mode of transportation, this thing will not help reduce the gross national product of fat in the US. Things like palm pilots relived people of trying to remember to much stuff. DVD's replaced a poor techology.

      Your anologies work, but not for all things.

    5. Re:Concept by Jonathan · · Score: 2

      No, all the article says is that Segways are evil because they 1) apparently can cause damage to buildings, although this is based on very weak anecdotal evidence and 2) somehow encourage obesity. This second point shows pretty faulty logic because it assumes that anyone using a Segway would have biked if they didn't have this evil machine. What if they would have used a car? And why, pray tell, must the only source of exercise be through transportation? I don't bike, but I work out in a gym.

    6. Re:Concept by Xerithane · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This article [sfweekly.com] contains many of the best reasons that this device is a complete waste of time.

      That is the worst article I have ever seen in SF Weekly, and that's saying a lot.

      A tsunami of Lard? What the hell, like everyone who is going to use a Segway wont just drive in a car? Why is a scooter going to make people fat when they have to stop using it out of safety concerns if they start to weigh in over 110kg.

      Their arguments are this, "Segway makes you fat, and cracks marble walls." They have no evidence of either, as I read it. Are they claiming she ran into the wall, or did her segway do it after she jumped off? Either way, it's a stupid remark that seems like she didn't do it because there is zero documentation on her "vandalism."

      There are no reasons why it was a waste of time, there were a few speculations and a lot of bitterness. I think whoever wrote the article was probably just pissed his bicycle shop is going to take a hit.

      Because if it does become popular, its gonna need to handle much more...
      Yeah.. because efficient transporation makes people fat. News flash, people get fat for other reasons. Fat people don't ride bikes, unless it's for excercise. Their fat long before the Segway came along. End of story.

      This FUD is worthy of Anti-Microsoft or Anti-Linux posts, you should be proud.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    7. Re:Concept by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are also cheap gas powered scooters like Honda's Metropolitian or Elite 80, both with MSRPs around $2000. Their engines are sufficient to drive them to full road speeds, they have a rather long range on their 1 gallon tanks, and can be quickly refuled at any standard service station.

      Personally, if I wanted efficient, small, no-effort transportation, I'd look at one of these. They are far more practical than a Segway as well as cheaper.

    8. Re:Concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So we iron out the bugs...you can go say 300 miles on a quick 2 min recharge...you can go around 55mph and never lose balance. Just imagine...all the DEATH AND CARNAGE. "Look at me, a little old man driving his vintage 2004 Cadilac special edition Segway a measly 10 mph down the sidewalk when...WHAM!!! I get splattered by a crazy whipper-snapper in his new 2048 segway w/ the tricked out wheels doing 75 on the wrong side of the friggin cracks, breaking my mother's back..." I mean, isn't technology just super?

    9. Re:Concept by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, they use highly efficient 4 stroke engines. Look it up before you shoot your mouth off. Sure to their light weight and small size, they have amazing fuel effciency, much better than a car.

    10. Re:Concept by Charcharodon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're compairing apples to oranges. A scooter is designed to operate on the road. They are looking to the Segway where only pedestrians are normally allowed. It's a different animal looking to fill a different nitch. SAM's used to put there employees, especially the cute girls in roller blades, to zip around the store doing errands and customer service. Same concept for the Segway. Zoo's, guided tours, security, messengers, you get the idea. Saw a ton of these things at Epcot Center in Florida. These guys were roving information booths and probably security to boot. It's a good concept and if it can be cut in half in size I can imagine quite a few people who have many miles everyday will look into them to be more productive. Personally I think they just need to close off a lot of the streets to cars and make everyone use shuttles or bikes, but then that's just me.

    11. Re:Concept by Jay+L · · Score: 3, Funny

      Funny you should mention this. I gave up using my Palm about 2 years ago. It's strictly a toy.

      Yeah, I got a girlfriend too.

    12. Re:Concept by los+furtive · · Score: 2

      Why would you say its gonna need to handle much more right after admitting you don't know how much it can handle in the first place?

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    13. Re:Concept by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      I think the idea here is that people will start using the Segway when they would normally walk the 1 block to the corner market. And plenty of people who now ride bikes might switch because its easier.....and then they'll start putting on the pounds.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    14. Re:Concept by wheany · · Score: 2

      Of course, that space pen story is an urban legend.

    15. Re:Concept by jo42 · · Score: 2

      I'll buy one [Smegway] when it also wipes my arse for me...

    16. Re:Concept by Bilestoad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those who criticize the Segway are missing the point. Without this incredible device how will Americans maintain their worldwide leadership in arse size through the next century and beyond? It's a breakthrough in allowing sedentary mobility!

    17. Re:Concept by hamburger+lady · · Score: 2
      um... not quite, if it's stock.

      i have 2, count 'em, 2 74 Vespa 20's (Rally models), and the best i ever got was 70 mph on the stock one.

      now the one with the PM pipe and the Malossi kit got 80 mph, but it also got about 35 mpg.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  2. this is science?! by adminispheroid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What in the world is this story doing in the science section?

    1. Re:this is science?! by jmccay · · Score: 2

      I agree with that. I don't see how this has anything to do with Science. Heck, I live in Manchester, NH and I don't see the big deal with this lazy rich man's toy.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    2. Re:this is science?! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      I live in Manchester, UK, and wouldn't mind one of these for getting to uni. Buses cost me too much and are way too annoying. (The journey is only 20 mins, but the busses can wait another 20 mins just waiting for ppl). I cycled it for 2 years, but it is too damn cold and wet in the winter.. although that probably means too cold for segway too.

  3. Who is Phillip M. Torrone by djupedal · · Score: 5, Informative

    And what else does P. M. Tyronne endorse?

    XBox live, for one...and the iPod...and large doses of Flash, apparently. This gentleman is a one-man press release :)

    1. Re:Who is Phillip M. Torrone by darkov · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Slashdot is increasingly becoming a tool of the guerilla (sp?) marketers. Editors should get a clue on a story before posting it. What do these guys get paid for, anyway?

      But back on topic, am I the only one who wouldn't be seen dead driving one of these? It's so geeky in a very uncool way. And since you can't really carry anything on it which you could carry yourself, it screams "lazy prick" and is impractical. I predict after the early adopters, the people who think it's neat and people who collect artifacts of the modern age buy one, the company will quietly go out of business.

    2. Re:Who is Phillip M. Torrone by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      Personally I don't think they look to bad.

      I wonder if americans dislike it more than europeans. One reason for suggesting this is that americans are very into big 'image' cars compared to european small and fuel-efficent cars.
      Perhaps because of this, image is a lot more important to americans.

      Be interesting to see statistics on it :)

    3. Re:Who is Phillip M. Torrone by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2
      Good point. I could see this going much further, more quickly, in Europe.

      I'm a Canadian. Any time I cross the border I'm struck by how much bigger everybodys car is. And how much bigger every body is.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  4. upright wheelchair by trance9 · · Score: 4, Interesting


    A reasonable bicycle can be had for around $100 and will get you anywhere you want to go, and get you into better shape as well. You won't sweat on your bike if you travel at segway speeds either.

    I really don't see the appeal of this $3000 upright motoroized wheelchair--what will it do for me that my bike won't?

    Can it hop curbs? Is it easy to lock up on the street? I just don't get it, sorry.

    1. Re:upright wheelchair by cuyler · · Score: 2

      Great arguement. You're right who would want to have a powered mode of transportation over the good old fashioned bicycle.

      Now, please re-read your arguement and make the following subsitutions:
      bike -> horse
      Segway -> car
      (You may wish to ignore the bit of getting sweaty on the horse...)

      Your arguement is not new. It's been said and lost before.

    2. Re:upright wheelchair by HEbGb · · Score: 2

      Bicycles can certainly go on the sidewalk, they're just dangerous and inconsiderate for the pedestrians.

      Just like the Segway.

    3. Re:upright wheelchair by EvanED · · Score: 2

      Bikes are a lot more dangerous and inconsiderate. They're bigger, and I presume would generally be faster, though I'm not sure of Segway's speed. This is why it's illegal to ride bikes on sidewalks, while some states have given explicit permission for segways to be used on them.

    4. Re:upright wheelchair by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Just like the Segway.

      Spoken like someone who knows absolutely nothing about them. Segways are NOT dangerous on the sidewalks.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:upright wheelchair by geek · · Score: 2

      After a while and after you are in shape sweating is a non issue. You'll find your pace and have the energy to do it without signifi9cantly increasing your heart rate. If it's a hot day you are going to sweat, segway or not.

      Considering distance isn't a factor on a bike, the better option is clear. People with Segways will be labeled lazy, it's just bound to happen.

    6. Re:upright wheelchair by Kenshin · · Score: 2

      Winter will do GREAT wonders for that Segway battery. I don't think its gyroscopes compensate for ice, either.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    7. Re:upright wheelchair by trance9 · · Score: 4, Interesting


      At segway speeds on a bike you aren't going to work up a sweat at all, you'll use less energy than walking. Mostly you'll just be coasting along, and you'll pedal only every now and then.

      Powered individual transit ought to be able to merge in either with pedestrians or with cars. Otherwise it's too limited--if you can only ride on the road, or only on the sidewalk, if you can't hop curbs, etc., then it's kind of pointless.

      A non-motorized scooter, by the way, can hop curbs pretty easily: take your foot off for one second and step over the curb. You can do it smoothly and hardly breaking your speed.

      The self-balancing thing, I think, is a boondoggle. I'm not sure it's really that useful: a powered tricycle would also suit you but it wouldn't be so "cool".

      Well, if wasting $3000 is cool, welcome to it.

    8. Re:upright wheelchair by bwalling · · Score: 2

      Bicycles can certainly go on the sidewalk, they're just dangerous and inconsiderate for the pedestrians.

      Sure, they can, however, in many states bicycles are to behave as automobiles, riding in the street and following traffic laws.

    9. Re:upright wheelchair by bm_luethke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      well, for one thing the segway was more marketed towards people like mailmen and such - and it's an improvement over thier current needs.

      Then there are places that propelled transportation is very desirable (such as where I live, an extremely hilly area - east tennessee) where many hills are kinda long and steep for a bike ride (as a teenager I had a spedometer on my bike, by about halfway down the hill I lived on I got up to 45 MPH coasting - no input from me - and I finally lost nerve and braked - I was still accelerating). I've seen pictures from california where things are pretty dense and steep - so they would be usefull.

      The important part of your post is "what will it do for me that my bike won't?" - probably nothing, but that doesn't mean it won't for someone else - not every single person on the planet lives in the same environment that you do.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    10. Re:upright wheelchair by billstewart · · Score: 2
      The article you're replying to asserts that if you're going at average Segway speeds, you won't get sweaty. At least on flat ground, I'd agree with that, though if you're on San Francisco's hills it may be a bit different. Certainly if you're cruising at 3-4mph on a bike like sidewalk speeds you're not putting out as much effort as walking - and if you want to cruise on the sidewalk at Segway speeds, e.g. 10mph, you're about as much traffic hazard as a bicycle and don't belong there. Now, I happen to disagree with the San Francisco board of supervisors decision to ban Segways from bike lanes. I think they should be able to coexist just fine with bikes in that environment. But they shouldn't be going fast on sidewalks if there are pedestrians around. If you want to go walking speed on sidewalks, there are old-people motorized chairs that work ok except on steep hills.

      And as far as powered transportation goes, yes, there's a place for it, and I've seen a wide variety of electric bikes in the ~$1000 range - lots cheaper than Segways, lighter though bigger, and much more versatile. (Also, an electric bike with the batteries run down works a lot better than a Segway with the batteries run down :-) Next step up, things like Vespa scooters in the $1000-2000 range give you a lot more speed and distance, or electric scooters in the $500 range get you Segway-like speed, range, and weight, though they're a lot lamer :-)

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    11. Re:upright wheelchair by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I can't believe someone invented this. Surely you can all walk, no? Testament to how incredibly lazy some people are.

      And I simply can't believe how unimaginative people are when these things come up. Are you seriously suggesting that there's no place for powered transporation?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    12. Re:upright wheelchair by HEbGb · · Score: 2

      A bicycle, blade, or scooter would be no more dangerous at equal speed.

      And I HAVE ridden a Segway, so back off.

    13. Re:upright wheelchair by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2

      That was a very polite 'fuck you', and it's a pity you got modded 'flamebait'. Oh, and this is off-topic, so go ahead.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    14. Re:upright wheelchair by drsquare · · Score: 3, Funny

      But surely, if the segway was safe enough to go along the pavements with other people, then it would have to be going the same speed as walking people. And if it's going the same speed as walking people, then WHY THE HELL DON'T YOU JUST WALK????!??!??

      Unless of course, you're some INCREDIBLY lazy person who can't even walk without getting tired. Bloody hell, no wonder people are so fat these days if they need a $3000 dollar contraption to do all their walking for them!

      Personally, I walk 6 miles each way to college and back every day. In the rain. And the cold. And the wind. And the dark. Wearing only a t-shirt. And no hat. And the only thing keeping me going is a portion of sausage and chips picked up from the chippy half way there.

      People are far too soft and lazy these days.

    15. Re:upright wheelchair by dead_penguin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you seriously suggesting that there's no place for powered transporation?

      I believe they already have these places. They're called "roads".

      --

      It's only software!
    16. Re:upright wheelchair by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      Bikes are not inconsiderate or dangerous. That's like saying cars are inconsiderate or dangerous. It's all about the driver of the vehicle. I race bikes, but when I'm on the sidewalk (for whatever reason) I coast and always have my fingers on the brakes. I've not hurt anyone is all my years of cycling. I probably never will.

      The segway is a bad solution to the wrong problem. It seeks to allow people to be just as complacent, without spending the money on gas to get their SUV to the corner store. What should be happening is people should be walking or using their bikes to go short distances. Small environmental impact and a little bit of exercise. According to statistics, those are both things that America really needs.

    17. Re:upright wheelchair by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      Heh, I loved cycling down hill too, but never at that speed. I got scared when you are going so fast the whole bike is shaking and rattling.. of course I had a bike without fancy suspension so that wasn't particulary fast :) (I'm not implying that you did have fancy suspension)

    18. Re:upright wheelchair by EvanED · · Score: 2

      >>I don't know about your state, but here in mine (California) anyone who wants to ride their bicycle on a sidewalk may do so.

      That the laws vary from state to state is true. However, I would bet that msot states have laws similar to Pennsylvania's, which require that bikes obey all laws (including driving on the road, stopping for red lights and stop signs, and theoretically signalling (with hand signals) your turns and stops) that motor vehicles follow.

      >>Why would you say they are faster than a Segway? You can ride your bicycle at any speed you please. You can pedal slowly or even walk your bicycle if you choose to do so, or you can pedal quickly if you need to get somewhere.

      Also true. However, I would also bet that most people ride faster than Segways go. I'm not sure how fast that is.

    19. Re:upright wheelchair by EvanED · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>Bikes are not inconsiderate or dangerous.

      This is true, but reaks of the "guns don't kill people" argument. What I mean is that, while it's certainly possible to use a bike considerately, and indeed most people do, it takes a bigger concious effort than just walking down the street, since you are much bigger and are moving much faster. Thus, it's much easier to be careless and inconsiderate, just as having a gun makes it infinitely easier to wound or kill someone. And believe me, as someone who both goes to Penn State and has lived in the town for over a decade, there are *plenty* of people who are both dangerous and inconsiderate.

    20. Re:upright wheelchair by g4dget · · Score: 2
      Now, please re-read your arguement and make the following subsitutions: bike -> horse, Segway -> car

      Horses are more expensive to use than cars, they are slower, and have shorter range.

      Bikes are less expensive to use than cars, they are faster, and have more range than Segways. And they keep you in shape, too.

      If you really want a motor, we have electric bicycles, mopeds, and motorcycles--still cheaper and faster than a Segway.

      That's easy, isn't it?

    21. Re:upright wheelchair by g4dget · · Score: 2

      Just get an electric bike, then. You still get exercise, it's cheaper than a Segway, and it gets you over the hills.

    22. Re:upright wheelchair by trance9 · · Score: 2


      I'm a little doubtful about using a segway in the mountains. If a segway can go 12mph up a steep hill and keep on doing that for a few hours I'll grant you a point for mountain use.

      A segway will have the same problem as a bike: it'll have to brake down the hill and accelerate up the hill. If it uses its motor for braking then it's going to have big problems in the mountain.

      Even if it doesn't I think it would lose its charge. But this is all speculation as I'm not gonna shell out $3k to find out.

    23. Re:upright wheelchair by bm_luethke · · Score: 2

      For most cities I would say hours aren't needed. Time to get from the grocery store and back is all (say 30 minutes at a maximum). Though I agree it's probably not the best (in this case a motor vehicle - not necessarily a car - is best) the question was what does it gain over a bike, and it does gain that in steep areas.

      A segway will have the same problem as a bike: it'll have to brake down the hill and accelerate up the hill

      well, they claim stair management so I would assume that is taken care of, it has to brake pretty hard going down steps. Though, like you, I'm not going top pay $3k to test :) (as I said above I'm only offering what it buys over a bicycle in certain conditions, not why every one should have one)

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    24. Re:upright wheelchair by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      Heh, I've had a share of accidents on my bike :)
      Talking about wall electrical outlets, I remember me and a friend dropped a table on one, and the cover broke off. So real cautiously my friend goes and tries and puts the cover back on, shorting it and causing the brightest flash I've seen and causing our hearts to stop for several minutes i'm sure ;)

    25. Re:upright wheelchair by Spunk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting that you call it that.

      Kamen actually has created an upright wheelchair. Once it's in mass-production, it should do amazing things for the disabled.

      For those of us who can walk ... I don't really get the Segway either.

    26. Re:upright wheelchair by ckedge · · Score: 2
      Are you seriously suggesting that there's no place for powered transporation?
      ....
      I believe they already have these places. They're called "roads".


      Uhhh, so you're suggesting that the average people (not daredevil bike couriers, but average everyday people) who ride bikes and 4 horsepower electric vehicles should share interstates and 4 lane downtown roads with 2 ton 150 horsepower behemoths.

      Oh you're just the epitomy of sane forward thinking.

    27. Re:upright wheelchair by digitalcowboy · · Score: 2

      Personally, I walk 6 miles each way to college and back every day. In the rain. And the cold. And the wind. And the dark. Wearing only a t-shirt. And no hat. And the only thing keeping me going is a portion of sausage and chips picked up from the chippy half way there.

      Yeah, but have you ever done it uphill, both ways, in the snow, barefoot?

    28. Re:upright wheelchair by dead_penguin · · Score: 2

      Actually, yes, within certain reasonable bounds.

      While most highways within cities are probably not safe for biking (too many on/off ramps and vehicles merging), pretty much every highway I've seen has a very wide shoulder giving a cyclist a safe distance from the traffic. Most off-ramps in this area even have signs for cyclists telling them to "Cross here when safe" or indicating a safer alternate route to get across for busier places.

      As far as cycling on city streets, there are roads I'd avoid because the traffic is just too much. I don't feel absolutely safe in a car on these roads either though. For my commute to work (on a bike, of course), I tend to stick to stick to designated bike routes. These are normal roads running parallel to the major arterials, with bike + pedestrian operated lights where they cross the bigger streets.

      --

      It's only software!
  5. Maybe just cynical, but... by Urthpaw · · Score: 5, Informative

    The domain "bookofseg.com" is registered to Phillip Torrone. (listed on the about page as well). According to his site , this guy works at Fallon , an advertising company devoted to "generating disproportionate results for our clients through a unique combination of rigor, relentlessness, and surprise" .

    What I'm getting at is, how do we know that this site isn't just a plant by Segway's marketing agency?

    1. Re:Maybe just cynical, but... by quantumparadox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      simple, it IS a plant by segway's marketing department. I know people make fan sites ... but some of that stuff goes beyond simple fan-boy articles. He's even got links to buy it at amazon. Its a barely covered astroturf campaign. To top it off he even throws in a great description of Kamen. If I read any more of this site I'm gonna puke.

      "over thanksgiving weekend, we went to dean kamen's house for a amazing tour, a great dinner and a glimpse into one of the greatest minds of our time...i'll have a full write up later..."

      He's more bought than a hooker's enthusiam. NT though

    2. Re:Maybe just cynical, but... by jerrytcow · · Score: 2
      What I'm getting at is, how do we know that this site isn't just a plant by Segway's marketing agency?

      I'm pretty sure it is. This page made me suspicious when the author claims getting rid of a car will save $16,000/year. $10,000/year for payments and insurance? What kind of car is he driving? I would say $300 or so per month is a typical car payment, and my insurance with collision and tons of liability is $600/year. Their estimate of $5,000/yr for fuel and maintenance? If this person really drives 100,000 miles per year, I'm not sure a segway will cut it.

      The entire site is an ad for segway.

    3. Re:Maybe just cynical, but... by istartedi · · Score: 2

      You know what this reminds me of? The Blair Witch Project. It's been the same kind of effort to create buzz in the media and on the internet, with the hope that they can get everybody to shell out for something crappy (which I did for Blair Witch, because, well... I just had to see what people were talking about). Only difference is, plunking down $7 at the multiplex and wasting a couple hours is much less a waste than plunking down $3000 and getting honked at by drivers and scowled at by pedestrians.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  6. Only useful in certain environments by bwalling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That thing only has a range of 15 miles. That's really not very far if you're not in college or living in Manhatten. It's 7 miles round trip for me to get to a grocery store. Beyond the grocery store (and a gas station), it's well more than 15 miles to get to anything else.

    Before you ask: no, I don't live in the boondocks. I live in a metropolitan area (Tampa, FL, US).

    1. Re:Only useful in certain environments by wadetemp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think more important than range in your case is carrying capacity. Even if you can get to the grocery store with it... what's the point? Plan on riding it 7 miles daily to pick up groceries? :) You won't even get any exercise for your wasted time and trouble.

    2. Re:Only useful in certain environments by silentbozo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. If I lived in a city where you had to drive 7 miles just to buy groceries, I'd shoot the city planner, guy in charge of zoning, and the asshole developers who built the residental areas. Do you even have sidewalks (and if you do, did they plant shade trees?), or mass transit?

      This kind of sprawl is the sort of thing the Segway is meant to combat, as sprawl depends on cars. If you get people out of their cars, even up to the 4 or 5 mile limit, smaller stores in a mixed-use environment become more practical, and you can dramatically reduce the imapact that car traffic has on urban environments (stuff like pollution, excessively wide roads that you can't cross safely as a pedestrian, loss of useable space in favor of parking lots or parking garages, etc.)

    3. Re:Only useful in certain environments by bwalling · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree. If I lived in a city where you had to drive 7 miles just to buy groceries, I'd shoot the city planner, guy in charge of zoning, and the asshole developers who built the residental areas. Do you even have sidewalks (and if you do, did they plant shade trees?), or mass transit?


      No mass transit here (Tampa Bay area). Not much chance of a subway - there's water 3.5 feet down. Busing sucks.

      There is a nice sidewalk (8ft wide) between my house and the grocery store. I just happen to live in the very back of the neighborhood. However, many of the houses around here (North Pinllas) are in my situation, with considerable distance to shopping, despite this being an overdeveloped county.

    4. Re:Only useful in certain environments by bwalling · · Score: 2

      Sorry, if anyplace worth going is 3 1/2 miles away, you're probably in the boondocks. And if anyplace more interesting than a gas station and a grocery store is further away than 15 miles, it's a high probability

      15 miles round trip. I live in a neighborhood surrounded by a preserve.

    5. Re:Only useful in certain environments by Joey7F · · Score: 2

      True, where in Tampa did this guy live? Within 5 miles are 3 big grocery stores, 15 gas stations and tons of fast food...

      --Joey

    6. Re:Only useful in certain environments by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Hey, if you want to live in a city in apartments that feel like stacked animal cages, that's your right. I live in the country on a gorgeous several acre tract, and I wouldn't trade it for a loud, smelly, cramped, stressful, expensive city for a million bucks. Just because you happen to like city "life" doesn't make it the one "right" way to live. I happen to think that most city dwellers live miserable existences.

  7. Innovation by uptownguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Offtopic alert -- but I had to reply:

    Funny you should mention this. I gave up using my Palm about 2 years ago. It's strictly a toy.

    Ever buy a fold-up keyboard for a Palm? And use something like WordSmith? Ever just slip the keyboard and the Palm into your pocket, go someplace and just WRITE? Having the keyboard with me everywhere is what made it a killer "app" for me. Meetings, coffeeshops... no more yellow pads. No more searching for information. I've always got it with me. And before I saw the keyboard, I couldn't even imagine it.

    The most exciting part, for me, about something new is waiting to see how people innovate. I'd keep watching the Segway...

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    1. Re:Innovation by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      The most exciting part, for me, about something new is waiting to see how people innovate.

      Just because something is new, doesn't means it's truly innovative... The Segway strikes me as a solution in search of a problem -- and for the problems it would solve, there already exist mature-tech and better solutions.
    2. Re:Innovation by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      I'm saving up to get a keyboard for my palm (why are they so expensive??). Then at last I can code and document on it. (vi for coding, not sure yet for documenting - probably vi also since I don't need formatting, or if I do, I can live with docbook, latex, or something :)

    3. Re:Innovation by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      Heh. I won my ipaq, and it costs more than my gf's laptop. But I can't quite justify spending £90 on it yet - I'll have a hunt on ebay tho, although I distrust ebay.

    4. Re:Innovation by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      It's one of those ipaqs with bluetooth support - forget the number.

  8. Segway Banned in San Francisco by Anenga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you haven't heard, the was banned in San Francisco. Ouch.

    The judges claim they banned it because it is "unsafe for city sidewalks", but they also commented that the Segway is "a national threat at least as grave as Iraq" because of laziness. I don't think Iraq is that dangerous, so I don't know exactly what that comment is suppost to mean =) Also they said they didn't want to see a "potential tsunami of lard".

    Personally, I don't think Segway is the "future of transportation". I'd much rather see PRT everywhere in the future.

    1. Re:Segway Banned in San Francisco by benzapp · · Score: 2

      I'd much rather see PRT [taxi2000.com] everywhere in the future.

      They have something similar to that here. Its call the subway.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:Segway Banned in San Francisco by vondo · · Score: 3, Informative
      The judges claim they banned it because it is "unsafe for city sidewalks",


      The ban was by the "supervisors," presumably the city council equivalent. Not judges who don't (or at least aren't supposed to) make policy.


      commented that the Segway is "a national threat at least as grave as Iraq" because of laziness. I don't think Iraq is that dangerous, so I don't know exactly what that comment is suppost to mean =) Also they said they didn't want to see a "potential tsunami of lard".


      These comments were made by an editorial writer for the SF Times, not any government official.

  9. Weight by uptownguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Incidentally, does anyone know how much weight the Segway is designed to handle?

    From the How Stuff Works Website:

    Weight capacity: 250 pound (110 kg) person with 75 pounds (34 kg) of cargo.

    (Good link about more Segway stuff without all of the marketing hype at Howstuffworks, too.)

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    1. Re:Weight by EvilAlien · · Score: 3, Interesting
      By "cargo", do they mean "belly" and/or "ass"?

      If the Segway replaces walking for the average person, then the "it will make Americans fatter" argument has some merit unless the users' lifestyle is adjusted to compensate, i.e., more trips to the gym via Segway. If it replaces driving, then we will see environmental benefits. If it replaces biking, we are midway between the two.

      I just don't see the point of this technology. It is the most over-hyped invention I've ever seen. I'd rather spend a couple grand on some neat technology that helps me get smarter or at least has some entertainment value (travelling between point A and point B has to get pretty boring pretty fast). I see no value in the Segway.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    2. Re:Weight by Desert+Raven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Weight capacity: 250 pound (110 kg) person with 75 pounds (34 kg) of cargo.

      It's gonna have to do a lot better than that if it's going to succeed. Let's face it, the folks most likely to want one are those who sweat five gallons walking across the street.

      The local ambulance company here just got a special ambulance for handling extremely heavy patients. (Extra-heavy rear suspension, extra-large stretcher, electric winch to pull the stretcher in, etc...) They won't even dispatch it unless the patient weighs more than 500 pounds...

      The crews assigned to it hate it because they don't get to take a break all day. They run from call to call from the moment shift starts until the shift ends. Regular ambulance crews are still getting calls to handle extremely overweight patients, because there's just so damn many of them.

      The way I figure it, if they don't build it to handle at least 450+ pounds, they're going to be dealing with lawsuits because they're breaking, or ADA lawsuits because it won't handle weight-challenged people.

    3. Re:Weight by matguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Without going too much in to weight debates, maybe the point is if you're too heavy for the Segway the excercise may do you some good.

      --

      matguy(.com)
    4. Re:Weight by malarkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      unless the users' lifestyle is adjusted to compensate, i.e., more trips to the gym via Segway

      Then after riding to the gym on the Segway they take the elevator up to the gym to get on the step machine!!!

    5. Re:Weight by Bastian · · Score: 2

      At 12mph, the Segway isn't going to be useful except as a replacement for walking. Maybe it would work as a way to transport stuff like 75lb mailbags that are too much for one person to carry, but with the company advertising it as a way to imporve employee productivity by reducing the time they walk, this seems like the perfect way to make people fat - it's well known that exercise as a part of one's lifestyle, even if it's just walking a lot, is generally more effective than going to the gym - it's certainly more effective if you count the likelihood of a given person sticking to the exercise.

      I think that the thing that a lot of corporations who see the Segway as a productivity booster don't see is that this will probably result in a productivity loss - when I'm walking around during work, I'm often doing work such as looking over papers and the like. I don't think that would be happening if I had to be concerned with making sure my Segway isn't bumping into anything. Plus, every extra pound of fat on an employee is more potential money you're spending either on higher insurance premiums or on giving them sick leave for their coronary bypasses and the like.

    6. Re:Weight by MKalus · · Score: 2

      And on that note I guess I am going to head into the Gym now.....

      No seriously, I can see a certain sense in having a Segway (postalworkers for example) but for the average person? Heck, that thing has the ability to become the SUV of Sidewalks.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    7. Re:Weight by ptorrone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you're kidding right? most people don't weigh 250lbs don't...i weigh under the average of 180lbs...if you read my site, you'll see i've actually unexpectedly lost weight since getting the segway ht since i have more time to exercise as opposed to sitting in traffic. the segway chassis can support 7 tons (that's what they tested it to as i recall) the weight limit has more to do with operational safety and recommended guidelines. cheers, pt

  10. Sorry Mr. Tarrone, by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

    I won't be buying your Segway, when I can easily afford a decent used car for the same price, and actually be able to get around the Puget Sound (try getting anywhere here with a Segway, and be prepared to do a lot of hitchhiking).

    You'll just have to troll for sales elsewhere.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  11. Segway modding! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny

    New hobby for those of you with too much money and spare time! Segway modding! New mods include:

    • Supercharger
    • Tank tracks
    • Built-in boombox
    • Ridiculous amounts of blue LEDs
    • Ridiculous amounts of red LEDs
    • Ridiculous amounts of red LEDs with a KIT car pattern (cheesy music excluded)
    • USAF certified afterburner
    • 2U rackmounts
    • Nuclear reactor (fuel rods excluded)
    • Nuclear fuel rods (reactor excluded)
    • Fuzzy dice
    • Dual/quad exhaust
    1. Re:Segway modding! by bobdotorg · · Score: 2

      Hey! I just saw one of those here in L.A..

      It's called a Segway Type R.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    2. Re:Segway modding! by Have+Blue · · Score: 2
      • Big-ass spoiler.
    3. Re:Segway modding! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      How about one of the high-frequency noise emitors for shattering windows that you are about to crash into, like in Snow Crash.

  12. Disneyworld has 32 of them.... by droopus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just came back from a trip to Disneyworld and they have 32 Segways for what seemed like managerial staff and patrolling the parking lots. Even considering how stair-free WDW is, and what large distances might need to be crossed, when I saw the first Segway in the Epcot plaza, first I thought "this is the best tech they can show off? Pffft."

    Then I thought, "hmm, big distances to cover, maybe not the worst idea I ever heard."

    Then I saw the huge Segway display at Innoventions and realized it was just more smart marketing by Dean Kamen. The yokels were all saying "gaaaahlee where's the gas tank?" and similar comments, then getting lessons in gyroscopic stabilization and Michelin tire alchemy from the well-rehearsed cast members. Hey, if they can get high visibility at Epcot, that's better than /.,right? B)

    I've tried one...yeah they are neat, but at 80 pounds, just too heavy to lug ino my car trunk or public transport and when compared for value with a $150 electric Razor, it loses. But as someone said above..bring em down to $500 and I'll consider it.

    Oh, BTW, I lost all respect when I saw them selling whirling Buzz Lightyear lights, glow sticks and flashlight ight-sabers off the Segways at Epcot at night. Gah.

    --
    "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    1. Re:Disneyworld has 32 of them.... by bje2 · · Score: 2

      "Then I saw the huge Segway display at Innoventions and realized it was just more smart marketing by Dean Kamen. The yokels were all saying "gaaaahlee where's the gas tank?" and similar comments, then getting lessons in gyroscopic stabilization and Michelin tire alchemy from the well-rehearsed cast members. Hey, if they can get high visibility at Epcot, that's better than /.,right? B)"

      that's cool, i didn't know they were having a segway display at innoventions...but, actually, they've been showing Kamen stuff off there for a while...i was there like 2 or 3 summers ago, and they had a couple of Dean Kamen inventions, most notably the wheelchair he worked on that could balance on two wheels (again - gyroscopes), and also go and down stairs...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    2. Re:Disneyworld has 32 of them.... by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      I just came back from a trip to Disneyworld and they have 32 Segways for what seemed like managerial staff and patrolling the parking lots.

      I gotta wonder about that last potential application. For those who have been to Disneyworld--do you remember how large the parking lots are? There are trams running continuously from the far reaches of the parking lots to the gates. Specially trained service people help tourists locate their lost rental cars (all identical). The Segway has a range of only fifteen miles--how big are the parking lots? And why can't any other vehicle navigate them? Under most circumstances, they move thousands of full-sized cars through those lots. Can't you buy a golf cart with more range, storage capacity, and a nice sun shade for three thousand dollars?

      Right you are about Kamen. My hat's off to him for all the brilliant advertainment at Epcot. And I agree; the Segway probably is well-suited to the selling-glowsticks-and-crappy-tourist-knicknacks niche. Then again--how hard was it for the guys selling this stuff to walk?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  13. Mirrored, in case of slashdotting by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2

    Journal entry: Day 3.
    Got my butt kicked by the cool kids again. Maybe I'll see if the geeks at slashdot will respect me instead. Geez this thing sucks. For $3k, I could have bought that snazzy water cooled overclocked P4! Damn!

  14. Amazon.com by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 2

    for weeks if not months has had a segway in its upper left-hand corner. (Go to their main page now to see it[1])

    I found the page it links to (if this doesn't work, click the segway logo in the link above) interesting, especially the lengthy Amazon.com Review, which somehow fails to mention once how you charge the damned thing. Although apparently Amazon.com staff got to test-drive it, I doubt they got to play with it above 20 minutes.

    [1] This promotion might not be served to logged in users, depending on your shopping preferences. Apparently amazon customizes their content heavily, to the point that some time ago they got in trouble for giving different customers different prices.)

  15. I'm happy with my Megway by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 2, Funny

    I got my own Megway for Christmas. It can do everything the Segway does, but better. The Megway is also theft resistant with the new Fist Antitheft Device (FAD). I've also discovered that you can take the Megway to parties and make it look like you aren't stuck working a graveyard every Friday and Saturday night. I'm quite happy with my Megway.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:I'm happy with my Megway by Synn · · Score: 2

      Dude that's priceless.

      Personally my "Megway" is a Suzukiway. It goes 130 mph, costs about as much as a segway and it's just as inconvenient in the rain and can't carry groceries either.

  16. Oh please by geek · · Score: 2

    Thats a tired example. Segway has nowhere near the range of a car, it's far inferior as a mode of transport. Sorry to burst your bubble but the segway is useless to 99.9% of the human population.

    1. Re:Oh please by cuyler · · Score: 2

      It is a tired example I'll agree but you can't flat out say "Oh this new fangled technology will never catch on".

      The horseless carriage was laughed at when it came out. Completely useless. It also cost a fortune to run. No one would use it. After many revisions we get the car that we use today.

      Many times throughout history new technology has come along and people laughed at it. Said it was uesless to 99.9% of the population. Many times it is. In other cases it's not.

      I'm not a fan of the Segway myself but I do see how it may be useful. The way it balances itself is quite neat - quite possibly something that would be useful to use in robots.

  17. Beyond Segway by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A lot of people may not know this, but the segway, in addition to being a means of transportation, is also a testbed for technologies used in Dean Kamans latest invention, the iBOT. Its a new wheelchair thats being tested by the FDA, but most of its technology has been proven in the non medical(meaning it didnt have to be tested by the FDA) Segway HT. The iBOT is a revolutionary wheelchair with that can climb stairs and raise a person up to normal eye-level. link link link link

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Beyond Segway by blair1q · · Score: 2


      How does it handle under random load?

      People with Cerebral Palsy aren't known for their ability to stay still.

      How does this think know the difference between Palsy and a desire to do donuts?

  18. Aagh by dachshund · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What I'm getting at is, how do we know that this site isn't just a plant by Segway's marketing agency?

    What do you mean "how do we know it isn't a plant"? Of course it's a plant.

    I don't mind the dupes. I don't mind the mistakes. But blithely posting underhanded ad pitches on the front page cross the line.

    I like Slashdot, and I've never before stooped to bitching at the editors... But I can't take it anymore: what the fuck is the matter with you guys? I know VA Linux stock ain't doing all that well, but for christ's sake, you have jobs unlike a lot of Slashdot's readership. If you don't care about this site-- which seems to be the case-- why don't you step down and let someone else take over?

    1. Re:Aagh by WasterDave · · Score: 2

      What do you mean "how do we know it isn't a plant"? Of course it's a plant.

      Yeah, once some digging has gone on. But, hey, /. editors are rarely able to check spelling and/or links. Why exactly should we expect them to actually confirm the accuracy of what they're posting?

      Rhetorical question, of course.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    2. Re:Aagh by WasterDave · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My apologies. This is the most obvious astroturfing in the history of man.

      Oh, look. I got to go to Dean Kamen's house, just like all the other segway owners.

      Fuckers. America's turning into the corporations' bitch.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    3. Re:Aagh by WasterDave · · Score: 2

      Finally got it.

      Monsieur market-spiel turns out to have won a "contest" for early adopters.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    4. Re:Aagh by HEbGb · · Score: 2

      I don't really believe you're who you say you are, since there are anonymous posts also claiming to be you.

      But if you are, care to comment on the fact that your website is actually attempting to sell Segway and related items?

      How can you claim to "not work for or with segway in any way"? You sell them!

    5. Re:Aagh by Spunk · · Score: 2

      Granted, the site appears to be a pile of feces. However, Dean Kamen does have a history of letting Average Joes in his house as part of the FIRST program. As a promotion to get the Segway popularized, it's not that far of a stretch.

  19. Worst . . . Astroturf . . . Ever by droleary · · Score: 2

    Rips off the Mac face for the icons, uses Windows Media for the video, and posts to /.
    Dude, pick a market to target before you start your next ad campaign!

  20. is 70 lbs too much to steal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "the segway ht i series weighs well over 70lbs, without the activation key you'd literally need to drag it around. the weight of the unit, a couple great locks as well as using common sense should keep your ht safe and secure."

    What the heck is this guy thinking? 70 lbs is NOTHING. Most men ought to be able to pick up 70 lbs and toss it on the back of a pickup. I know I could, and I only weigh 230. I hear about motorcycles being stolen all the time on the news by 3 guys picking it up and putting it in a truck, even heavy harleys.

    The guy's a fool if he thinks the weight of the unit will deter anyone from stealing it.

    p.s. My 21" monitor weighs 80 lbs, and who do you think carried it in?

    1. Re:is 70 lbs too much to steal? by dead_penguin · · Score: 2

      The guy's a fool if he thinks the weight of the unit will deter anyone from stealing it.

      Perhaps there is some truth to all of the threads in here claiming that Segways make people weak, fat, and lazy...

      --

      It's only software!
  21. Seriously, these are kinda easy to steal.. by wackybrit · · Score: 2

    Just pick the damn thing up (it's not that heavy) and run with it or throw it in the back of a pick-up truck.

    Screw going down to K-Mart in one of these only to have some hick throw it in his truck while I run inside.

    Sure, the hick won't be able to do anything with it until hacks come online so you can make your own keys and stuff.. but still, these are worth stealing for novelty value alone.

    How can you avoid someone stealing these damn things? Get ready for sky high insurance.

  22. Bicycles by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just what part of the world do bicycles cost $100? Cheapest I've ever found a new bicycle is $250. You might find a Huffy, Murray or Magna claiming to be a bicycle around that price range, but in reality, these are single-use units (ask your local bicycle commuter and he'll probably agree with this statement). For the short-distance, never out after dark, in the rain or carrying anything, expect to pay about $250.

    If you ever have to ride at night, in the rain, or carry stuff, expect to pay extra for lights (as required by law), full-length fenders (unless you like the "dragged through the mud" look), and luggage racks, possibly panniers or a trailer for larger loads. If you go the Boy Scout method and have lights, speedometer (bikes have to follow the same rules of the road including speed limits (I learned the hard way in downtown)), luggage rack, fenders, airhorn, and a rear-view mirror, expect to pay closer to $850.

    Either way, you're right, bicycles are far more practical and far less expensive than a Segway.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:Bicycles by trotski · · Score: 2

      What part of the world do you live in?!?

      You can get an OK bicycle perfect for commuting to work for ~150 bucks... add all the acessories you're looking at ~200 bucks, it will be a k-car of a bike but it will work.

      Following you're argument buying anything less than a BMW is a usless waste of money... get real. If you want a luxurious bike, thats tought, efficient and hip looking than yeah 850 bucks atleast. IF you want basic transportation, go down to walmart and you can pick up a decent bike today!

      --

      "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    2. Re:Bicycles by dead_penguin · · Score: 2

      Cheapest I've ever found a new bicycle is $250.

      And who ever said that you had to buy new? ;)

      In all honesty though, I have to agree with what you're saying. Buying a crap bike (new or used) will leave you unhappy in the long run, and can leave you with a long walk when something breaks that can't be fixed on the road.

      I've bought both new and used bikes, and in either case it helps to do your research beforehand, and to bring someone knowledgable along if you don't know bikes well.

      --

      It's only software!
    3. Re:Bicycles by TellarHK · · Score: 2

      Hey, I'm all for bashing on crappy cheap products but the best bike I ever had was a Huffy Stalker. Solid, the only problem with it was weight, good tires, great brakes, and a shifter that I replaced with a Shimano a few weeks after I got it. Once the shifter was replaced, for around $50, that bike was really slick. I could ride just about anyplace in it, in good or bad weather. All a bike needs to be good for 95% of bicyclists is a solid frame, good tires, and smooth shifting. Most people aren't as anal-retentive as I am about brakes.

      I think that bike was around $129 when I got it, and when I gave it to a neighbor before moving out of state it was in almost perfect shape.

    4. Re:Bicycles by trotski · · Score: 2

      would require nearly the purchase price of the bicycle to fix.

      Huh, you mean you actually PAY to have someone fix your bicycle?!? Just what kind of geek are you? There's nothing on your bicycle you shouldn't be able to fix yourself.

      Trek 800 is the human-powered equivilent to a Geo Metro

      So your saying that 80% of the bicyclists on the road, you know... that kind that don't have to money to pay for a Trek 800 are riding on garbage. I myself have been riding some shitty mongoose bike I picked up for 200 bucks (CND!). Although I have to tune the gears after something like 10 rides, and I have had to replace the chain, it has worked reasonably well for me for the past 4 years. Something tells me you are not living on the same planet as I am. OH well.....

      --

      "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
  23. Awkward! by simetra · · Score: 2

    In these little clips, the riders look very awkward, like they're struggling to keep going. Or, like they're trying to hold a massive bowel movement in (or both). They seem to be thinking "Damn it, I paid $3000 for this, I'm going to enjoy it whether I like it or not! HEY! LOOK AT ME!"

    Then in winter, you know they'll be hitting you up for a ride to work. Just you wait and see!

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  24. i don't understand the fascination by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    hey all you fat rich americans

    try WALKING

    i mean really, this segway thing is so ridiculous, i am absolutely ashamed looking at it. can you imagine what other people think of you riding around on this thing? it's like training wheels for our electric scooters when we're old, fat, with diabetes. i have nothing but derision for anyone who buys one. ;-P

    negativity disclaimer: i am an american, i get paid an above average salary, and i am trying to lose weight.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i don't understand the fascination by freeweed · · Score: 2

      Dude, ever take a car anywhere? a bus? a train? Why didn't you WALK?

      negativity disclaimer: i am an american, i get paid an above average salary, and i am trying to lose weight.

      I'm none of the above, in fact I'm a bit below my ideal weight supposedly, and yet I still am a lazy son of a bitch. I'd buy a Segway in a heartbeat if they could handle the 6 months of snow we get up here. Doesn't mean I'd use it for everything, and it sure wouldn't help me on my 5+ mile hikes into the bush for camping.

      Having efficient transportation != making you fat. NEVER doing anything and overeating like crazy.. well sir, they just might.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:i don't understand the fascination by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      Dude, ever take a car anywhere? a bus? a train? Why didn't you WALK?

      scale, my friend. the comparison doesn't hold because these modes of transportation are on a diffeent scale. the segway is in direct competition with the scale of walking. geez.

      Having efficient transportation != making you fat. NEVER doing anything and overeating like crazy.. well sir, they just might.

      there is an epidemic in the us of obesity. having efficient transportation that competes with efficient walking= making you fat. anything i say that criticises the american propensity to overeat and underexercise can only be constructive. diabetes is the problem. the best way to get to the post office is WALKING. the segway is an extension of the american propensity to underexercise. end of friggin' story.

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:i don't understand the fascination by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      I'd consider one, if i didn't live out in the country. Kinda useless here, anyplace i'm going is more than 10 miles away. If i lived in a city, sure...

      what the heck is your point? the segway competes with walking. it does not effect other scales of transportation. so we agree. so again, what is your point?

      Got a TV?

      yes, do you? again, your point?

      Wouldn't really care, you image-concious fat american pig.

      HAHAHAHA. so is this your reaction to my negativity over the segway? more negativity? criticizing me as image conscious is rather hypocritical unless you live in a monastry. ever wonder what color your car should be before purchasing it? ever wonder what color you should paint your house? what to wear in the morning? thought so. and i'm "image conscious?" you're a hypocrit.

      ...But then, i'm not fat.

      call me a fat pig and then saying you're not fat? do you know what that makes you? a glorified, 100% genuine asshole.

      there is an epidemic in the us of obesity. having efficient transportation that competes with efficient walking= making you fat. anything i say that criticises the american propensity to overeat and underexercise can only be constructive. diabetes is the problem. the best way to get to the post office is WALKING. the segway is an extension of the american propensity to underexercise. end of friggin' story.

      image conscious my ass. if that's not substantial non-image conscious criticism of the segway, i don't know what is.

      i'll tell you what troll. criticize that which you have a chance of making a point on. otherwise, shut up.

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:i don't understand the fascination by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 2

      anything i say that criticises the american propensity to overeat and underexercise can only be constructive.
      No, if you talk outright nonsense then it's not constructive, and thus better off not said. Things like -
      there is an epidemic in the us of obesity. having efficient transportation that competes with efficient walking= making you fat... diabetes is the problem. the best way to get to the post office is WALKING. the segway is an extension of the american propensity to underexercise. end of friggin' story.
      I have news for you: if you're obese (and you indicated you are), walking to the post office, even if several times every day, isn't going to cure that problem. You need to change your diet and do serious exercise, i.e. hitting the gym and taking up running or similar kinds of aerobic exercise.
      I know a lot of people who do very little walking to get to the places they need to go in life (and for most Americans, that's not really an option anyway, given the sprawl of American towns and cities) yet they manage to exercise and eat well. Using a vehicle and staying fit and healthy aren't mutually exclusive, and the sooner you realize that, the sooner you can stop posting nonsense to Slashdot.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    5. Re:i don't understand the fascination by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      scale, doofus, scale!

      car does not compete with walking. you walk 1-3 miles, you drive 10-30 miles.

      walking to the post office, even if several times a day IS EXACTLY WHAT DOCTORS SAY IS THE BEST FIRST AND MOST OBVIOUS STEP TO LOSING WEIGHT. simple walking is the BEST prescription for overweight americans.

      the segway COMPETES with the same SCALE as walking. or biking. geez, how obvious is that?

      this is not OUTRIGHT NONSENSE. and it is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism in an environment where americans are getting fatter and fatter, with more and more heart attacks and more and more diabetes.

      and i am not overweight! i said i am trying to lose weight, there is a difference. i am 6'2", 200 pounds.

      so look to your own nonsense first before talking about mine.

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    6. Re:i don't understand the fascination by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

      the segway competes with walking. it does not effect other scales of transportation.

      I'm not going to involve myself in the name calling in this discussion, but I do think it's worth noting that the Segway does not really compete with walking. In fact, the Segway is meant to enable a new scale of transportation, primarily urban, mechanized, and (where appropriate) indoor in nature. If you lived just a few miles from work and could get there reasonably safely in a smaller-than-car vehicle, then the Segway could really be a good thing for you. Is it as fast or durable as a car? No, it's not designed to be. But, for single occupancy transportation that can be brought indoors, it has few equals.

      One could easily argue that you should be using a bike instead if this is what you need (and that would be more exercise) but, let's face it, not everyone who can use a bike is doing it. So, let's at least offer them a transportation option that isn't so space and energy hungry. Why not?

      I don't see the problem here.

      --
      Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    7. Re:i don't understand the fascination by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      dude, what is the range of the segway? what is the range of walking? put those two answers together and tell me they don't compete with each other.

      ok, then tell me, which way are american waistlines trending to?

      do you get the gist of my point?

      so what is the responsibilty level of buying one of these things instead of buying a pair of sneakers?

      we need to WALK more. we do not need to scoot around on a high-tech granny scooter. this is like training wheels for diabetics.

      But, for single occupancy transportation that can be brought indoors, it has few equals.

      what about FEET. geez! talk about your emperor's new clothes. ;-P

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    8. Re:i don't understand the fascination by Da+VinMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you've got this one in the bag if we're only talking about 2 miles or less. For most people, that's all the distance for which they're going to reasonably be able to make time. For someone who's walking 4 mi./hour (which is fast), a 2 mile walk is half an hour. If you keep in mind that one also has to come back home, you're actually committing to an hour of walking. *IF* that's all we're talking about, then it's GAME OVER, I shut up, and we all agree that you've sealed this up.

      BUT....

      How close to reality is that for most people? I'm guessing it's not even close. There are two factors I'm considering that make this true. First of all, most people don't live within 2 miles of work. I don't have the statistics, but I'm dead certain of this. I betting the average is more like 9 miles. Even if we all could walk that far everyday, we don't have time (at least I don't). Secondly, there are many times where a quick trip to the store is warranted (e.g. for milk). Now, assuming I'm not perfect and didn't remember to get it on the way home (ideal of course) and assuming that the store is even within 2 miles of me (which it is not), why should I have to commit to an hour of my time usage just to get the item?

      I understand (and agree) that Americans exercise far too little. However, depriving everyone of efficient transportation in the current system is not the solution. That system exists to give us time to do other things and everyone will be loath to give that time back to less efficient transportation methods.

      Now, one could argue at this point that the reason we have a transportation system with such sprawl is because we do have efficient transportation, etc. etc. etc. and there would be some truth to that. But then if we're forced to build everything within walking distance of everyone, then other inefficiencies creep into the system. For instance, instead of that one grocery store that stands now, there might need to be 5 of them of smaller size. And those stores need their own product distributions, etc. etc.

      The real problem that the Segway attempts to solve is the economics of the single occupant vehicle. If everyone who could were to stop driving a car and took up with a Segway instead, that would represent a *major* savings in roadways, parking ramps, and fuel consumption. And wouldn't it be nice if it worked out that way? I think so!

      The Segway doesn't address the problem of exercise because it's not designed for that. Apples and oranges. The responsibility people have is to utilize the most cost effective method of transportation they have available to them. That will translate to less pollution, higher productivity, and higher satisfaction. Walking may or may not fit that bill for some people, but it's definitely not a case of "one size fits all".

      --
      Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    9. Re:i don't understand the fascination by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      you have good points, well thought out. the first reply is that when it comes to efficiency, anything beyond 3 miles and your average person would rather make the trip in a car (less time) then a segway. plus, the range of the segway isn't really that much, so it's like you use it, you have to recharge it. and what, are there sidewalks everywhere? are you going to put it on the road in traffic? are you going to go offroad with it? ;-P

      your analysis of average trip distance, etc. is accurate. which really means the only market for the segway is inner city transportation. for which alternates (subway, bus, scooter, bike, etc.) of much less cost already exist. try to scoot with your segway through midtown manhattan at rush hour. not going to happen. walking just isn't better here for waistlines, it's better for maneuverability.

      i think the segway will only appeal to a certain technophillic fringe, or fringe locales, like golf courses, or inhouse corporate work, such as scooting around a warehouse (even then, moving material around easily isn't addressed, so this is problematic as well).

      it's too pricey. it's the emperor's new clothes. and we spend all of this hot air discussing it when we should just walk more. america is FAT. walking more is the simple solution to a demographic healthcare crisis. anything that discourages walking is irresponsible.

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    10. Re:i don't understand the fascination by MKalus · · Score: 2

      >>I understand (and agree) that Americans exercise far too little. However, depriving everyone of efficient transportation in the current system is not the solution. That system exists to give us time to do other things and everyone will be loath to give that time back to less efficient transportation methods.

      Excercise alone is NOT the problem (that's what the fitness industry wants you to think). The problem is what you put in your mouth on a daily basis, have you ever read what it is IN that microwave food you just ate?

      Reality is be cautious of what you eat and yes, spent the hour a day walking and you'll be off way better health wise than driving around in your car (or segway), eating microwave food and going to the Gym.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  25. Fat Lazy Americans... Not! by silentbozo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, you can look at the Segway as another excuse not to walk or ride. But the truth of the matter is, for distances greater than 3 city blocks, most people will hop in their cars and drive. This leads to community designs without sidewalks, an absence of shops that can survive outside of a mall, shopping, strip, or otherwise, and other omissions (shade trees, pedestrian crossings, etc.) that tend to reinforce the impulse to drive.

    In this light, the Segway is an ideal tool for getting people who otherwise would have driven the mile or so distance to the grocery store, video rental place, or local strip mall, and putting them on the local streets. Consider this a way of boosting pedestrian traffic by extending the 3-block distance people would choose to walk, and thus displace auto travel. This is what Jobs and other people who saw the Segway meant when they said that cities would be redesigned around them.

    Sure, I'll walk, or ride my bike, or ride the bus. But then again, I don't own a car. If a Segway can displace cars for short-distance travel, then all the more power to them, fat lazy Americans be damned!

    BTW, 15 miles on a single charge is far more than many people tend to commute, even in their cars, in highly urbanized areas. Hell, I used to bike the 15 miles from West LA to Burbank and back (up the Cahuenga pass and back every day) - that trip took me 1.5 hours (each way). If you're willing to bike that much, more power to you, but complaining 15 miles isn't enough range for a Segway is missing the point - 15 miles is overkill for the purpose the Segway is meant to serve - bridging the gap between the 3 blocks most people are willing to walk, and when they whip out their car keys and start contributing to traffic, pollution, and parking problems.

    Also, if you think about it, you get a lot more exercise standing on a Segway than you do sitting in your car...

    1. Re:Fat Lazy Americans... Not! by jagapen · · Score: 2

      I have to chime in here, having read up on this topic recently....

      Sure, you can look at the Segway as another excuse not to walk or ride. But the truth of the matter is, for distances greater than 3 city blocks, most people will hop in their cars and drive. This leads to community designs without sidewalks, an absence of shops that can survive outside of a mall, shopping, strip, or otherwise, and other omissions (shade trees, pedestrian crossings, etc.) that tend to reinforce the impulse to drive.

      In my opinion, that's the wrong way to look at it. The question: Why in hell is your destination usually more than 3 blocks away?! Well, it started out as a good idea -- get dirty industry away from residential areas -- but has turned into poor zoning laws. Just look at how most new development since the 1950's has residential, retail, and other business areas strictly segregated. In a lot of places (like Tampa, FL it seems), there's no worthwhile destination nearby and people are forced to drive. Once people are in their cars to go everywhere, why build pedestrian amenities? Thus, it's become a negative feedback loop.

      I don't believe that a Segway is the answer. If an area lacks pedestrian- or bike-friendly facilities, why would people use a Segway to make the trip instead of a car? It's going to be just as dangerous and unpleasant as on foot or on a bike.

    2. Re:Fat Lazy Americans... Not! by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      If an area lacks pedestrian- or bike-friendly facilities, why would people use a Segway to make the trip instead of a car?

      They wouldn't. But in areas where pedestrian-friendly shops are marginal because of decreased foot-traffic and lack of parking, a Segway-enabled set of customers would make a big impact.

      Of course, you're right, it really is a matter of zoning and proper design. Hopefully by strengthening existing ped-friendly communities, we can drive car-centric dinosaurs out of existence, and encourage more efficient mixed-use development. Nothing sickens me more than to drive by strip-mine housing tracts in the middle of nowhere with curvy roads (so no defined intersections for crosswalks), huge 8 lane boulevards (isolating city blocks, so that crossing the street becomes a major chore, and a serious danger for children and older folks), and no sidewalks.

      Unfortunately, my local supermarket just went out of business (it was a Pavilions, can you believe it?), so now I have to drive instead of walking the 3 blocks to the store...

  26. One use of them... by stype · · Score: 2

    Well, my school was just happy to announce that they are the first university in the world to use Segways. Campus police is using them for patrols (I haven't seen this yet, but I hear they're out there), and the press release even says they plan to use them for tours. Tours? Come on...no one wants to follow one of these around unless the whole damn tour group gets them.

    --
    -Stype
    Bus error -- driver executed.
  27. Hell, think of Pocket Calculators by serutan · · Score: 2

    Sure, plenty of people will buy Segways because they just have to have one. A guy I used to work with showed me his 1970 vintage, 4-function pocket calculator that cost him $400 new. That would be about $600 in today's dollars (or $2800 dog-dollars).

    1. Re:Hell, think of Pocket Calculators by qengho · · Score: 3, Informative

      1970 vintage, 4-function pocket calculator that cost him $400 new

      It was probably a "5-function" device: the square root key was the thing that had geeks tossing out their slide rules en masse.

    2. Re:Hell, think of Pocket Calculators by forgotmypassword · · Score: 2, Funny

      peh

      just take 1/2 the log, pretty boy

      all true geeks had a log log duplex or such

    3. Re:Hell, think of Pocket Calculators by Slime-dogg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and it's the reliance on the calculator that has caused many of our teachers to be unable to do multi-digit addition in their heads. If we took a couple old grannies and let them add prices, they'd have the solution in a snap. Let an average 20 year try that, and they'll sit there and ponder where the calculator is.

      Teachers have grown lazy, and in trying to advance students as far as possible, they've overlooked the basic foundation that they need to build upon. We expect kids to do algebra when they can't do arithmetic. We've undermined our children's ability to do arithmetic by making it easier.

      I'm one of the lucky ones. I wasn't allowed to use a calculator until I hit the public school.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    4. Re:Hell, think of Pocket Calculators by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "Yeah, and it's the reliance on the calculator
      that has caused many of our teachers to be unable to do multi-digit addition in their heads."

      And physics majors can't do math involving exponents or logarithms in their heads, or visualize a curve numerically (today, they tend to think in terms of a graph).

      Back in the "slide rule days" which I remember clearly, it was much more common to think in terms of log, because that's what the slide rule represents. When you do a slide rule operation, you see the transition of intermediate values, and this is something that you miss with a calculator. Not that I'm saying a slide rule is better, just that it's representation educates you differently. I would not be surprised to learn that there are some calculations that can be performed faster on a slide rule than on a calculator, because of the time spent pressing the keys.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  28. An expensive novelty item by release7 · · Score: 2
    Ever plunk down a few bucks for some cool gadget even though you knew would just end up as an unused paperweight in your desk drawer? That's exactly what this segway deal is if you happen to have a few extra thousand dollars laying around.

    This machine is for some attention starved numbnut with a few thousand bucks laying around so that he can tool around his neigborhood for a few weeks and amaze his friends. Once the novely wears off and he realizes that a skateboard is more practical (shit, a $400 repair bill to replace the broken gyro???) for getting around town, it'll end up right next to his pushmower in the garage.

    Sure it was super cool when it first came out. But now that's it's been a year since we've all seen it, most of realize the segway for what it is: an over-hyped machine with little practical application.

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

  29. Segway marketing desperation by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 4, Informative
    This slashvertisement is just one of a series of marketing ploys from Segway fans--their sales must really suck.

    Just last week, Reuters bought and CNN published as a front page story this Amazon /Segway press release. Reuters must not employ any of those hard-driving investigative reporters we loved in old 30s movies.

    For example the "story" "reports"

    • "pre-orders already place the high-tech scooter in the top half percent of sales" Yeah? Each Segway costs $5000, while the average Amazon item costs maybe $50. So if Amazon sells 100 Segways in a month, it's in the same percentile as a book that sold 10,000 copies in the same month--that's pretty impressive sales for a book, pretty lousy sales for an item that got the publicity buzz Segway did, an item featured on Amazon's front page.
    • "It's selling better than many of our digital cameras" Yeah? And is Amazon the only retailer selling digital cameras, the way it is the only retailer selling Segways? In fact, do you know anybody who would go to Amazon to buy a digital camera?
    • "Frazier declined to provide actual pre-sale numbers" I am sure the carefully phrased hype provided is much closer to what CNN readers care about.
    What got left out of the "news story" is also interesting. There is no mention of the financial stake that Amazon has in pumping up Segway sales by releasing phony hype aimed at making the product look more popular than it is. Jeff Marshall at Mercury News has some interesting background on the financial ties involved

    Some Reuters Clark Kent may have added one note of reality in the final sentence: "in San Francisco a debate is raging over whether the human transporter should be allowed on that city's streets. " That debate stopped raging a week before this press release came out. According to the Dec. 20 SF Chronicle , after extensive public discussion 9 of 11 supervisors have voted to ban the Segway, enough to overturn the mayor's veto if he decides to try one.

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
    1. Re:Segway marketing desperation by NineNine · · Score: 2

      There's definitely something fishy going on. Not saying what sales are, having some bizarre delay between ordering and shipping, only selling a limited quantity. I wouldn't buy shit from a company like this. They sound more like Amway thana "real" company offering "real" products. To me, it seems like the company is nothing but a PR generating machine, and a really shady one at that.

    2. Re:Segway marketing desperation by ckedge · · Score: 2
      after extensive public discussion 9 of 11 supervisors have voted to ban the Segway, enough to overturn the mayor's veto if he decides to try one.

      That's funny as hell. Of all the cities in the US where walking or biking up and down hills is a real pain in the ass, SF is it.

  30. I agree completely by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2
    Except that they aren't $3,000 as originally promised, they are $5,000.

    Once the initial price-gouging subsides, I see these things becoming very popular.

    Anything to get us fat lazy Americans farther away from having to do anything physical is going to succeed. The Segway does a fantastic job of doing just that. (Hell, when I finished watching The Matrix the first time, my initial impression was, well isn't that what we're all working toward anyway?)

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    1. Re:I agree completely by ogre2112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you talk of fat, lazy americans, please disregard from using the phrase, "us".

      Some of us aren't fat, lazy, pigs.

  31. hey this guy rides right by my house by drivers · · Score: 2

    Looks like this guys route takes him right by my house... I'll have to keep an eye out.

  32. Price tag -- am I missing something? by pez · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I see a number of people talking about the $3,000 price tag of this thing (which, in my opinion, is about $2,500 too much ;-)

    Yet Amazon, who claims to be "the only place to buy the Segway HT," is selling them for $4,950.

    What am I missing?

  33. Segways at Disney World EPCOT by billstewart · · Score: 2
    My family went to Disney World last month so the various kids could see the Big Mouse. While I'm not very convinced of the usefulness-vs-cost ratios for Segways in general, they're so cute and futuristic looking that how could Disney *not* buy the things? I mean, if you lived in an Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow, wouldn't *you* use a Segway to head down to the corner general store if you weren't going far enough to take the Flying Car but were going along the big sidewalk so you didn't need your Rocket Belt?

    We saw a couple of Disney managers zipping around on the things - they're just right for EPCOT's big sidewalks and flat terrain. One of them said that Disney ordered a bunch of them when they first became available, and had to bully the Segway folks a bit to get the N of them they wanted out of early production (there were some early investment connections there...) They're fast enough to be helpful, but unobtrusive-looking and not so fast that they'd cause problems, and the managers are obviously having fun cruising around on them. And after all, cost-effectiveness in the Magic Kingdom is at least as much about image as practicality, which makes them way more effective there than at most businesses.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  34. wow by tps12 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:

    washington is one of the 32+ states that have specific legislation that states that the segway ht can go anywhere a pedestrian can go

    Fascinating that they can pass a law that allows the Segway to go up ladders.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  35. It's the helmets... by mtec · · Score: 2

    That's why.

    How in the world did I survive my childhood of high speed, daredevil bicycle and scooter riding without a helmet?
    Maybe I'd have retained a few more IQ points taken away by the unprotected falls. (hmmm - also may explain why I like slashdot...)

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  36. I believe the hype. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2
    I'm continually suprised by the number of /. readers who don't seem to 'get' the segway. I was blown away when I saw it. I believe this will revolutionize transport. I believe cities will be built around it (or something like it). It seems so obvious to me I can't even explain why.

    Of course, I also believe all that 'The network is the computer' stuff also.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  37. Re:It's all about the future by -tji · · Score: 2

    The Segway HT is not about what it can do now, but about what it promises about the future of human transportation.

    Yes, you're absolutely right. The fools that cannot see this have no vision. The segway represents the future of humanity, the start of a new evolution... In the future humans will no longer need legs.

    Screw my bike.. Bikes are for suckers. Those fools will be peddling away on the shoulder, while I glide effortlessly on the sidewalk.

    And, those walkers.. jostling with the other peasants. Let them dare to cross my path, and the will feel the force of my massive Segway travelling at it's top speed of 12.5 mph.

  38. Washington State Law by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    Reading that site, there is a link to http://www.segwaychat.com/ and links for the legal status for each state.

    Checking on my state Washington, its legal on bikepaths but not local highways or sidewalks. Some local highways act as streets, with stop lights, and all major streets intersect only on them. They should really allow people to use sidewalks in absence of a bike trail. Makes a segway useless around the area I live, shame...

    1. Re:Washington State Law by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      I thought it was legal on sidewalks, but reading those legal bills is a headache.

      Yup, legal on washington sidewalks seattletimes

  39. Val Mallinson, meet Phillip M. Torrone by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 2
    Remember that phony "I switched from Mac" "user" who turned out to be a publicity shill for Microsoft? She must have started a trend. Dear editors: blatant PR for a tech toy does not qualify as a "Science" story. Okay, Segway has some cool Slashdotty features:
    • The technology behind Segway is cool.
    • It could work well inside a closed environment like a big warehouse.
    • The inventor Dean Kamen has done other good things.
    But the Segway gets my goat for the following reasons:
    • Incredible hype before, during, and after release.
    • Sneaky lobbying campaign to get these big kahunas onto sidewalks, so that pedestrians are giving up both space and safety to enhance Segway profits.
    • Retail buyers will lose out big time in liability suits, not to mention that their Segways are going to get kicked off sidewalks around the country as other city governments, like San Francisco, realize how mad they make pedestrians.
    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
  40. Hee hee! by mtec · · Score: 2

    It's funny to hear so many slashdotters condemn something because it results in 'less exercise'!

    It's like... Geek LaLane... Hoo!

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  41. My Segway Anecdote by worst_name_ever · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I was working the booth at a trade show last summer and who should come rolling up but Dean Kamen himself. Literally rolling, as he was of course riding on one of his Segways. I spent probably ten minutes talking to him about a problem he was having with one of my then-employer's products (or rather, he did most of the talking, as he's a somewhat impatient conversationalist).

    The interesting thing about talking to Mr. Kamen while he was standing on the Segway, aside from the fact that he was of course towering a full head above everybody else in the crowd, was the fact that he is one of those people who likes to lean towards you as he talks. As I learned firsthand, talking to one of these people who happens to be standing on an electric scooter that is controlled by leaning your body means that you are constantly being semi-run-over by the thing, in direct proportion to the intensity of the point the other person is trying to make! He kept having to back the thing up a couple feet, like it was an overly-friendly horse that wanted to lick my face (instead of an overly-pricey scooter that wanted to run over my feet).

    (I would have liked to have a go with his scooter though, as I was not relishing the prospect of having to slog all the way back across the show grounds to the car yet again!)

    mcb

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
  42. Just Because We Can, Should We? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this will be modded to troll immediately, since I'm questioning something everyone considers wonderful. That said:

    1) I can see this device being a real help to the elderly or people with various handicaps, but:

    2) I notice the submitter pointed out he jogs every day, but I hear more and more reports about how over 50% of the population is overweight. I can only wonder how this will effect that particular issue. I would guess that it won't be long before they have to make sure the HT is even sturdier because so many people using them are over 250 lbs (or over 325 w/ cargo).

    3) I can't help but to remember what Ray Bradbury discussed in Fahreinheit 451. The fire chief is explaining how books became eliminated and people stopped thinking (or was it Faber talking about how people stopped thinking). He pointed out buttons were replaced with a zipper, and that was just that many fewer minutes to think in the morning when getting dressed.

    I've spent the last 2 years chained to a computer. (I'm not complaining, my salary is going up and up and I'll never have to worry about my retirement or having a job for the rest of my life.) Now I'm back to exercising every day at the gym. I've got over 50 lbs to lose.

    It's great that we can do more faster than ever before. But if we don't balance all the new toys and gadgets we have to make life so easy, we will lose a significant part of the quality of our lives. For example, computers were supposed to save time (and paper, too), but now we get more done and we're asked to do more. Sure, they save time, but then the company wants even more from us (and numbers show computers have driven paper use up -- due to number of drafts printed out and number of extra documents printed -- and docs printed in multiple copies).

    I'm not saying this is a bad thing, but I am saying it seems we should seriously question how it is used in life. We can make the choice of a life crammed full of too much to do, or one where we can take the time to enjoy life. I've noticed that the people that take time to enjoy life (like many friends I know through Quaker Meeting) live life such that they don't need to save the extra half hour here or rush to another appointment at some other time.

    Saving time, or making it easier is not the answer. Segway, for most of us, is not the answer. Finding a way to reduce the clutter and meaningless activites in our lives would help save much more time than a Segway HT.

    Just my 2 cents worth. Go on and mark me as flamebait.

    1. Re:Just Because We Can, Should We? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2

      Ya i'm going to ride my segway to the health club where i will ride on a stationary bike.

      Overall, I prefer a good ride outdoors, even during winter. (I think exercising in the gym -- other than doing weights -- is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.)

      I wouldn't knock stationary bikes. There are many reasons to use them (and other indoor fitness machines) instead of outdoor or other exercise. If a person is on a stationary, it's easier to monitor them for things like heart rate or to chart improvement. They're also very useful when it's too cold or hot outside for people who are not in the best of shape (or elderly, or pregnant, etc.). And they're also a BIG help for people who are just starting or getting back to working out.

  43. This guy creeps me out... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Funny


    On the security page he wrote

    since the segway ht is used for our commute, we take it in our office and plug in while we're at work. so the segway is safe and secure at all times. other places, we stick to the guidelines above

    Since the damn thing is a single seater (so to speak) who is the "we"? He sounds like Gollum to me...I kept expecting him to refer to it as his "precious".

    P.S. "month-iversary" doesn't make sense. Each year does he celebrate his wedding "year-iversary"?

    1. Re:This guy creeps me out... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2

      I was trying to figure out an appropriate word for that...thanks. He missed a chance to educate people...

  44. Segway Type R by mph · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean like this?

  45. the real question is.. by g4dget · · Score: 2
    walking. so one thing that i've heard from a few people is "what you're not going to walk anywhere?" here's the deal- my commute by walking would be 62 minutes, it's less than 17 on the segway ht.

    The real question is: why not use a bicycle? It's proven technology, it's a lot cheaper, it's faster, and it gets you a little, but not too much, exercise on that 4 mile commute.

  46. Re:The most amazing thing is... by release7 · · Score: 2

    The only thing that leads me to believe this guy is for real is that no company would actually hire this moron to do astroturfing. His persona is that of a shallow, uneducated douchebag. That's not the kind of person I'd want pitching my $5,000 machine.

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

  47. what a shmuck by djupedal · · Score: 2

    The adapter was part of the Linux dev kit. The headset that came w/Navy Seals is not limited to use with SOCOM apps. I can use it as an internet phone...how about that for saving money?

    "...most likely Microsoft will charge maybe $50/year for XBox Live in the future..."

    You know, when you talk out your ass like that...no one listens (and your breath wreeks worse than ever). MS has not announced those costs, so in reality, you have no idea. You're simply waving the MS flag. Get back to us when MS beats up on your parent's credit card...over and over. Only a fool would agree to charges without knowing what they will be.

    It used to be that when someone talked about other OS's, in favor of MS, the big argument was "no software". Now, with xbox having a very small percentage of software, compared to Sony PS2, MS fools ignore the fact, and wave the vapor flag, about how good the future will be...that future will only be good for MS, as long as fools keep their wallets open and their eyes/ears closed. Have fun helping bg build a new home...sleep well knowing he couldn't do it without you. bahhhhhh....sheep that you are :)

  48. Just one question. by mcgroarty · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I just have one question... seriously: Have you weighed yourself before and after?

    I'd love to see whether the Segway makes people more or less active.

  49. Re: Respect? by droopus · · Score: 2

    You'd think so, but you're also the guys also put out Lilo and Stitch, built Blizzard Beach, run Sunrise Safari at AK and the backstage stuff at Living Seas, which more than makes up for doing endless Lion King sequels for twelve years. Y'all still get my $7k a year for our yearly two week Haj to the Mouse (DAKL) and I'm already booked for next December. B)

    I find WDW amazing in that some guy from Bumfuck, Mississippi can stay in a tent for $20 a night at Fort Wilderness and have just as good a time on the same attractions as the poser in the Presidential suite at AKL. Anyone ever do an analysis of why WDW appeals to Southern religious conservatives and New York liberals; college geeks and uneducated dullards; 90 year olds and virtually every kid on the planet?

    Probably the reason I keep going back is to find out the answer to that question.

    --
    "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
  50. Segue /= Car!!! by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    "to be crystal clear, this is a car replacment for us. i cannot convey how thrilled i am to be getting rid of a car. to have a choice, a better one, and to be part of a movement is exhilarating. car, buh-bye. walking to work isn't possible since i need to carry 2 laptops and 4-5 pieces of equipment every day."

    I beg to differ. This is not a replacement car. How many passengers can a Segue carry? Will you drive this thing in incliment weather? Rain? Snow!? And is this person saying he actually carries 2 laptops AND 4-5 pieces of EQUIPMENT on a Segue? I'd like this equipment defined. I mean really. Ok, bag+2 laptops = Bulk. Since we don't know what exactly his equipment is, i'll assume a briefcase of some sort. More bulk. Plus whatever else he's toting along. Does he cruise along in his suit to work? Open air? Change of clothes maybe? I have no doubts the Segue can handle the weight, but it almost sounds like he's forcing it to fill the roll of a car.

    Make no mistake, it's not a replacement for a car. A bike or motorcycle maybe, but not a car unless ALL you use it for is A->B travel within a short range, then sure. Hit the Segue cuz your wasting money with a car. But don't fool yourself into thinking it is if you step outside those very narrow parameters I mentioned.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  51. his math holds up by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 2
    ... the author claims getting rid of a car will save $16,000/year. $10,000/year for payments and insurance? What kind of car is he driving? I would say $300 or so per month is a typical car payment, and my insurance with collision and tons of liability is $600/year.

    He says somewhere that he has a "mid-range BMW" which probably means a $40K-55K 5-series. Calculate the monthly payment on a 4-year loan for *that*, son.

    And $600 a year for auto insurance? Riiiiight. You're driving a Tercel in Omaha, I take it.

    Yes, I realize I've just been trolled by a 19-year-old.

  52. Superior, cheaper alternative to Segway by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Buy a biycle. Cheap, fast, and actually good for you. Get one with front suspension and some nice riser handlebars. Maybe even a suspension post seat and a cargo basket. All of this will cost you less than a $1,000 U.S. dollars.
    How many people do you know that can admit to getting too much exercise?

  53. Obligatory link to other Diary of a Segway owner by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Funny
  54. Nonsense by dachshund · · Score: 2
    He says somewhere that he has a "mid-range BMW" which probably means a $40K-55K 5-series. Calculate the monthly payment on a 4-year loan for *that*, son.

    Talk about comparing apples and gold-plated oranges. If you're the kind of person who feels the need to drive a $40-55K BMW 5-series, you're sure not likely to give it up for a Segway. Unless you've just had a pretty major conflict with your state's motor vehicle laws.

    But given that this guy seems to be employed by a grass-roots ad-agency, it's not surprising that his math's a little generous. And I wouldn't be too surprised if BMW was also one of his clients.

    PS With proper maintenance you should be able to drive that BMW for years after you've paid it off. What's the estimated lifespan of a Segway?

    1. Re:Nonsense by $carab · · Score: 2

      And I wouldn't be too surprised if BMW was also one of his clients.

      They are indeed.

  55. A suggestion by Artifex · · Score: 2
    What I'm getting at is, how do we know that this site isn't just a plant by Segway's marketing agency?


    Let's all write him and ask? :)
    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  56. An incredible tool. by presearch · · Score: 2

    This guy seems like a incredible tool.
    The pile of fuzzy photos, even of the FedEx guy.

    His iPod and Palm on the bookshelf, tilted towards the camera. Oohh look what I bought!

    A cheezy self portrait with him, his ht, and his haircut.

    "Saving" $10K a year on an extra car pmt. and insurance.
    That's something like a $750 car payment. Screw him.

    If he does have any friends, I wouldn't like them either.

    Yeah. What a tool.

  57. I saw one a few months ago out of the blue by morrison · · Score: 2, Funny

    Speaking of never having seen one of those things in real life, I just happened to see someone using one of those a couple months ago in Bel Air, MD. I was driving down through and did a double-take as the guy was crossing the road on an intersection crosswalk. Looked like he was leaving from the supermarket (which was rather close -- and he had grocery bags) and he was heading towards a residential area.

    I thought to myself "Bastard!" Man was I jealous...

    Looked pretty cool.

    --
    Cheers!
    Sean
  58. how does it handle the elements by sirinek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This man says he lives near downtown Seattle, how is he dealing with riding his Segway in the rain. They do get rain almost every day of the year (well not every day of course but still its very rainy there...)

    siri

  59. Re:Not an electric motorscooter by g4dget · · Score: 2

    You're confusing your scooters. Kids ride around standing on two-wheeled things. Adults ride bicycle-like motorized things. The latter are comfortable, convenient, and not (too) weird.

  60. Your Alternatives. by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did some digging and came up with a nifty little comparison. both vehicals are electric, so it all comes down to the nitty gritty.

    Segway
    Range: Appox 15 miles/charge
    Speed: 12mph
    Cost: $4,950.00 [Amazon.com]

    Viento Scooter
    Range: Appox. 50 miles/charge
    Speed: 30mph
    Cost: $2,999.99

    There are three main advantages the Segway has over our competitor. 1) It's really compact. 2) It's "sexy" 3) You can drive it on sidewalks, however flawed I may find that. Oh, and auto stabilization for those who didn't learn to ride a bike. That's nice until you realize for about $2,000 less you gain speed, range and utility, only sacrificing some size, percieved coolness and the legalities of driving on sidewalks while gaining Speed, range and utility.

    And no, I'm not considering the supposed saftey of the Segway, because people can still be idiots whatever they drive. Mixing a maximum 250lbs at 12mph on a sidewalk full of pedestrians is a BAD idea. But hey, the Segway is still cool. (I'm sure if you looked hard enough you could find a neato looking scooter too).

    Revolutionary? It's not as if alternatives didn't already exist.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Your Alternatives. by Madmanz123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seqways belong on the sidewalk more then the road, it's a worstcase of a broken arm if you hit a person on the road, if someone hits you riding a segway with truck, your road pizza. Because the segway can go 12mph, doesn't mean it WILL always be travelling at top speed.

      Dunno, the idea is nice but our society doesn't fit it well, it could work in NY and other very dense cities but few other places.

    2. Re:Your Alternatives. by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      Seqways belong on the sidewalk more then the road, it's a worstcase of a broken arm if you hit a person on the road, if someone hits you riding a segway with truck, your road pizza.

      That's tantamount to saying that bicycles also belong on the sidewalk, not on the road. Collisions with pedestrians hurt less than collisions with trucks. Duh.

      Just because the worst-case scenario is 'only' a broken arm, as a pedestrian I don't want to have some jackass on a Segway decide that's an okay risk for me to have to take. Sidewalks are for pedestrians and pedestrians only. For the record, I do most of my in-town travelling by bicycle, and wherever possible, I stick to the roads--where I belong.

      What would really be useful would be city planning that considers cyclists and pedestrians, and not just SUVs. If there were comfortably wide bicycle lanes on major roads, perhaps that would be a suitable place for the Segway, too.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  61. Exactly right by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I live in a suburb, and have a grocery store about a mile and a half away from me. Though I could bike, I think I've only done so once - after all, my workplace is far enough away (37 miles) over terrian and roads I don't want to bike along, that my car gets maintained and my bike does not. Even now, my biike sits ignorned with a flat tire... for a casual biker a bike is not convienient for anything.

    With a Segway, I would definatley use it most of the short trips I take right now in my car.

    Right now it is priced at the "toy" level, but when they start to cost $500 or so OR be included with a house in a designed community (not so far fetched, look at custom communities they are designing right now with mixtures of houses and live/work units) then it really could reach widespread use.

    It might seem like the refuge of the lazy, but the fact is it would be a lot safer for most people carrying small loads (like two or three bags of groceries) on the Segway than on a bike.

    If you want a real stretch, how about this thought - it would help people eat healthier because it would be more practical (and environmentially sound) to get fresh vegetables more often. So there, health fanatics!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  62. It can go on sidewalks... Legally... by Viewsonic · · Score: 3, Informative
    In 40 or so odd states it is legally allowed to be "driven" on public sidewalks in heavily congested areas where people on bikes have to actually get off and walk them or get fined.

    I honestly dont understand how this got passed, but you can bet someone will be run over in one and that will be the end of it.

  63. paper use down by asv108 · · Score: 2
    Sure, they save time, but then the company wants even more from us (and numbers show computers have driven paper use up -- due to number of drafts printed out and number of extra documents printed -- and docs printed in multiple copies).

    I don't know where your getting your numbers from, but total paper use has been decline for quite some time. Personal use via printers may be up, but total paper use is declining.

  64. Why I pre-ordered one. by toybuilder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live up on a slight hill about 3.5 miles from work.

    For about a year, I had an older (mid-70's model) "Tomos" 2-cycle 50cc "scooter". (Similar to this, but older and needed pre-mixed fuel.)

    Except during the winter when the wind on my face and hands were a bit too cold, I really preferred to take my trips to work and to the grocery store on my scooter. I liked the open-air feeling of gliding on the scooter, and also felt better about not lugging a 3000 lb. car just to carry myself. I was getting about 50 miles to a gallon of fuel + a cup of oil.

    One thing that I didn't like about the scooter was having to drive on the street (along the side, like a bicycle) while cars whizzed by me at 45+ mph. On the uphill stretches going home at night, that got scary sometimes. (My uphill speed was about 15-18 mph; flats around 25; and downhill around 32 mph.)

    I also didn't like having to worry about the bike's chain maintenance (needed frequent cleaning), and the fact that it was a 2-stroke polluter (today's 4-stroke mopeds should be pretty good in comparison).

    When an axel bearing crunched away I couldn't find a convenient place to fix it, I gave it up.

    Since then, I've been thinking about buying another, more modern moped. But I just sorta never did. I toyed with the idea of getting a real motorcycle, and got my class-M permit; but I really didn't want a bike because I would have to be IN traffic, and I prefer not to be in between two cars (or SUV's as is likely to happen around here).

    When the Segway was first revealed, I thought "neat, cool gadget". But I dismissed buying it for myself.

    But, I've been missing that open-air gliding feeling for some time now. The Segway would allow me to get that feeling back (though at 12 mphs, it's a bit slower than I would have liked compared to when I used to pull 20-30). And, since I can used it on sidewalks, I would feel much safer. Since the sidewalks around here (L.A. suburb) are pretty much open, I think I can safely travel at the top speed for most of my travel.

    The only concern I have now is the TCO. While a "full charge" is 11 to 17 miles of range, and costs about $0.10, that translates favorably to my car which gives about 20 miles to the gallon at $1.70. But the batteries are rated only for 300-500 full-charge cycles, or about 3,000 (worst case) to 8000 (best case) miles. The power train is supposed to be a "lifetime" design needing no servicing, so I'm hoping that the supposed 5-(active use)-year lifetime of the Segway holds.

    It's not clear how much a battery replacement will cost... But I'm guessing it'll be about $1,000. So that then pushes the cost up to as much as $0.55 per mile. Even if the battery is $2,000, that's favorable compared to my 3,000 lb. car.

    I can already tell some of my co-workers will approve, and some of them will scoff and ridicule me. But I used to own a scooter, and I liked it. And I've pre-ordered a Segway, and I expect to like it when it arrives. (Yes, it is a small leap of faith.)

    1. Re:Why I pre-ordered one. by toybuilder · · Score: 2

      Ah, thanks to a member, I found that the batteries are $300 each, two batteries per transporter.

      So, let's assume $5,000 for 5 years, driving about 10 miles a day * 300 days/year... I'll need a new battery set every year after the first... About $7,500 for 15,000 miles... $0.50/mile.

      No insurance. No oil change. Not bad.

    2. Re:Why I pre-ordered one. by ckedge · · Score: 2
      If work is the only place you go, such that you don't need your car for anything else, then you live a very boring life.

      That's right, driving around between 7-eleven's getting super-big-gulps makes a person's life worth living. And GOD knows you can't do anything else in this world without a car. Dinner with friends, a movie, the seashore, jogging, working out, canoe tripping, hiking through the rockies, skiing all winter - all impossible without a car.

      Fsck off troll.

    3. Re:Why I pre-ordered one. by toybuilder · · Score: 2

      >No insurance. No oil change. Not bad.

      If work is the only place you go, such that you don't need your car for anything else, then you live a very boring life.

      Oh, yeah, that does sound like I was getting rid of my car, didn't it? Alas, I live in Los Angeles where "everything is always 30 minutes away by car" -- I'm not about to give up my car anytime soon. Heck, I just logged 80 miles today just to have lunch with family.

      I was thinking of my time in San Francisco when I made the comment -- in that city, having a car was a liability -- you drive around for 30 minutes looking for parking, and then get towed because you didn't move your car every 3 days. I should have sold off my car then, and just get car rentals whenever I needed to take a trip out of The City. For all its faults, I could manage there with Muni or take a taxi when in a hurry.

      As for the present, work is 3.5 miles away. The two shopping/dining districts, the mall, Target, and about 6 different movie theatres are all located roughly in between.

      And, I admit, I'm also getting the SHTi for it's "fun" value.

    4. Re:Why I pre-ordered one. by toybuilder · · Score: 2

      Try neoprene wet suit gloves.

      Okay, I will! Anything to keep the fingers from turning into icicles! I had the 'warm riding gear' worked out except for the fingers and face. I just didn't seem to find gloves that were both warm and comfortable working the throttle and brakes.

      I don't care if it is illegal, better a ticket than death.

      I sorta figured out the less busy roads to reduce most of the scary patches, but never completely. The problem with sidewalk riding is that I know I'd get pulled over. I originally typed up a long winded explanation why -- but please take my word on this -- if I made a regular habit of taking the sidewalk at night on my daily commute, I'd get ticketed once or twice a month.


      Look up bearings in the thomas register & fix it your self.


      You know, that would just make sense, wouldn't it? I should have cracked it open and checked to see if I could find a suitable match in the McMaster catalog... I never had a service manual, though, so I was a bit trepidatious. But hell, it wasn't working... I should have just torn it apart. Oh well.

  65. Gotta say it by legLess · · Score: 2
    What do you mean "how do we know it isn't a plant"? Of course it's a plant.

    I don't mind the dupes. I don't mind the mistakes. But blithely posting underhanded ad pitches on the front page cross the line.
    Amen, I agree, etc. It's pretty clear that most Slashdot editors don't read the stories they approve. I bet over 50% of the people who clicked through to that link thought, "Bullshit - this is a press release - the editors got taken for a ride. Again."

    This is an expensive tech product marketing guy's wet dream - create a fake diary and get it posted to Slashdot. The bare fact that the site hasn't melted yet is proof that it's not a personal diary.
    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
  66. Re:It's all about the future by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Segway HT is not about what it can do now, but about what it promises about the future of human transportation.

    It reminds me of some of the criticisms levied against the first cars: it costs too much, the horse carriage is better, it requires changes to the roads, laws are not ready, it will disturb pedestrian circulation (remember laws from the turn of the last century forcing someone WALKING in front of a car to warn people it was coming?), etc.


    However, it should be mentioned that the automobile is only one of a large number of transportation innovations to come out of the turn of the century. What about the Stanley Steamer?, the light rail trolley? the ordinary? the interurban? the zepplin? Heck, the compact car was first unveiled at the '49 New York World's Fair "The World of Tomorow" and needed 25 years and an oil embargo to even get market share.

    The point I am making is that the objections have some validity, but it doesn't invalidate the usefulness and promise made by the Segway about future human mobility.

    The segway would not bother so many people if it were not so overhyped as something revolutionary. It is not all that revolutionary in terms of battery powered transportation. Small battery powered vehicles have been a niche market for over a decade now and don't appear to be on the virge in the near future.

  67. Re:Weight a sec, lemme finish this eclair... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    Weight capacity: 250 pound (110 kg) person with 75 pounds (34 kg) of cargo

    I guess /.ers won't be buying any Segways.

    Maybe when they come out with a Lugaway.

  68. Astroturf by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    The Segway is the most overhyped letdown in recent history!

  69. Re:He's real. by WasterDave · · Score: 2

    Ummm, bullshit.

    "the segway ht unit is about $5,000, for my household having one this year will have paid itself off by delivery.
    so we ordered one..."

    http://www.bookofseg.com/diaries/index.html

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
  70. Re:He's real. by WasterDave · · Score: 2

    Twice in one day I post then find I'm talking out of my arse. Possibly:

    http://www.bookofseg.com/diaries/Img_2033_JPG.ht ml

    So he paid for it, *and* won a contest. How weird.

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
  71. Re:Segway is not geeky by darkov · · Score: 2

    I agree with you - they're not "geek" as in nerdy cool. I was using geek in its most pejorative sense as in silly, stupid or daffy.

  72. read my sig by ctar · · Score: 2

    read my sig

  73. Re:Poor-man's Segway by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

    Participating in FIRST costs way more than a Segway.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  74. Ever since that Frasier infomercial by happyhippy · · Score: 2
    of the segway I knew they are desperate for suckers to buy it.

    Except huge losses in 2003.

    And wave to Clive Sinclair for me when you see him on the way down.

  75. Doesn't anyone else see the potential of these? by RichardX · · Score: 2

    Okay, right now the segway is an overpriced lard transporter, but once it gets past the stage of being an early adopter thing, think of the possibilities!.. these things could bring about a whole renaissance of chariot racing!

    C'mon, you know you love the idea of tearing down the street on one of these things - or at least, trundling down the street - razor-sharp wheelblades glinting in the sunlight, whip in hand, dressed in your finest mock-roman armour (yes, there's a U an armour, dammit. I'm british), ramming the other gladiators - sorry - Segway riders - out of the way while the crowds cheer your name...

    Well, you have to admit, it would be interesting :)

    And for the sake of not totally wasting this comment on rambling nonsense, two other things come to mind about this:

    Firstly, the stuff on the guy's website about the Segway replacing his second car was pretty interesting - he jogs every morning.. but the Segway lets him jog when he chooses and ride the rest of the time, instead of being forced to jog to work, or whatever - sounds pretty sensible to me..

    But then it falls down with all the near cultlike worship of the Segway team. I mean, this isn't anything new - there are plenty of those around here who worship Linus, or even Bill (you know who you are).. but rarely with such a degree of fervor.. to quote just one bit of the diary:

    "everyone at segway ht is part of the vision, the trainers, marketers, product development teams, to dean kamen himself; you get the immediate feeling that what you're part of isn't just another form of transportation but an evolution of our species and maybe society."

    A bit much, don'tcha think?

    --
    Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  76. Segway waste of time for consumers by Wonderkid · · Score: 2, Insightful
    While the technology in Segway is amazing, as a consumer product, it does not deserve the hype it has received. It WILL make Americans fatter because ALL it does is replace walking or riding the far more efficient and environmentally friendly bicycle. There are vertical market applications for Segway, but the materials used in its manufacture and the fact it draws on ANY power source, render it a waste of time. In a time when obesity and reliance on oil, coal or nuclear (which does indirectly power Segway) are in short supply and damaging to the environment, I hope it fails. An improved bicycle would be a far better invention. For example, a way to ride without needing to hold the handle bars, therefore freeing them for holding something or playing a sport of some form.

    Any ideas?

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

  77. getting deep around here by djupedal · · Score: 2

    And we suppose the ad agency thing has nothing to do with any of your so called writing, eh?

    I'm positive that is a negative thing. And we all know the saying "any publicity is good, and good publicity is even better"... ~ I'm sure you are very happy with your latest rabbit out of the hat.

    Nice try tagging someone else as the bad guy. Better luck next dodge. Can't wait for your next (paid) revelation.

  78. Re:Not an electric motorscooter by wheany · · Score: 2

    So a Segway has a zero radius turns as opposed to what, 3 foot radius turns?

  79. Who do you work for? by djupedal · · Score: 2

    Well, I can understand why you don't want to publically deny the Fallin ad agency thing...ok by me :)

    pt...wasn't that what P.T. Barnum used to sign with?

  80. Come to Denmark! by infolib · · Score: 2

    Powered individual transit ought to be able to merge in either with pedestrians or with cars. Otherwise it's too limited--if you can only ride on the road, or only on the sidewalk, if you can't hop curbs, etc., then it's kind of pointless.

    How about bike lanes in every slightly urban area? The skaters use them as well. Works like a charm.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  81. We're talking about your con... by djupedal · · Score: 2

    You're a pitch man...a mouthpiece...a shill. You claim one thing, while masking the truth. Your opinion and endorsement are paid for. Your segway love affair is a timed and scripted event that you planted (Amazon last month...CNN last week...Slashdot this week). It did not spring forth as you suddenly realized it had been one month since you'd been swept away in the magic of dean. That's a nice touch, but then any story needs a lead in.

    And the more you deny it, the more it sticks. Save your breath, you'll need it for your next pitch. I'm feeling guilty for giving you a chance to keep talking as it is. If you were the innocent contributor you're trying to be, you'd keep quiet and let all the chatter flow around you.

    Seattle, eh? That explains the xbox live endorsement.

  82. hidden feature of Megway! by Artifex · · Score: 2

    If you store it in the front of your car, instead of in the trunk, you can use the HOV lanes. Totally legal, I swear!

    I'm working on some ideas for overclocking and streamlining it... I imagine it will involve removing some (or all) of that fibrous covering. Does it come with or without a "bra" for the front end, like cars?

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:hidden feature of Megway! by Artifex · · Score: 2
      I knew I wouldn't be the only geek who saw that movie and then thought about sleeping with her!


      Sleeping? Who has time to sleep? No, I expect with a new-generation prototype like that, I could easily spend nights in full diagnostic mode once I strip it down, maybe some extended-transfer throughput tests on her - uhh, it's - ports, etc. Yah. Nothing like finding the undocumented tweaks and getting the system truly singing, so to speak.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  83. Val Mallinson is a real person too by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 2
    Is Phillip Torrone a paid publicist for Segway? Google-able info suggests he is not. This AdAge article names New York PR giant Burson-Marsteller as the power behind the huge Segway PR blitz (they also work for Botox.) Torrone's business email is at an ad agency called Fallon , whose client list includes BMW and PBS but not Segway.

    Does Phillip Torrone have an undisclosed financial interest in promoting Segway and his BookOfSeg website on Slashdot? Google-able info suggests he does.

    I have no objection to Phillip Torrone turning an honest dollar on his website. What I do object to is seeing on Slashdot publicity stories that don't mention the author's financial interest in selling you the product being so lavishly praised.
    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
  84. Re:What about "tripping" a segway? by MrTechno · · Score: 2

    What about riding your bike into a sewer grate with channels that catch your front tire and flip you. What about riding your bike, or rollerblades into a narrow channel formed where a sidewalk meets a driveway. My point is that every mode of transportation mas its limitations. Drive your average car into a 5 inch curb and let me know what happens. Not only did Segway training address what you can and can't to....but it also gave me training in the ways to properly get the Segway up a high curb, down a high curb, or drag it up the stairs in its power-assist mode.

  85. Re:It's all about the future by NineNine · · Score: 2

    Teh car was a major advantage because it allowed people to go relative long distances at relatively high speeds, carrying a relatively heavyier load. By contrast, the Segway goes much shorter distances, much more slowly, carrying much less. I hardly see this as an "advance".

  86. Yes, the legs really do wear out at the big shows by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2
    However, a show normally has too many poeple around (except for the spaces between the halls).

    No, the place that I think the segway will clean up in is the airport for moving staff around between checkins. Bicycles and gate taxis are great but they are not that manouverable when people are around. The Segway is sort like a slower bicycle and usually the passenger density is less than the crowd at shows.

    Apart from that I can see the thing being used by maintenance workers to move around production lines and plant. Bikes are often used, but again this may be better because of the better manouverability at slow speeds.

    For private use, I can't see it being useful.

  87. where the seat for fat people? by fantomas · · Score: 2

    When do you reckon they'll launch a version with a seat for people who complain that standing is too much effort? :-))


    I think it's really interesting somebody's having a go at selling self-balancing machines, I got a feeling the practical use for this might come pop up in a completely different area (military? industrial? space?). May help put some research time into alternative fuel power supplies as well. Maybe even get "urban transport lanes " (bicycles, skates, etc) into more towns outside of Denmark and Netherlands, which would be a good thing.

    Me, I think the self propelled transport angle is a loser, I go with the other postings which vote for the zero-emission ultra-efficient, gets-you-fit option, the bicycle. You can do an office job and cycle in, you just don't have to cycle for an Olympic Gold sprint medal. Cycle easy and you'll still get there in a third the time it takes to walk :-)



  88. I know I am late... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    AC, you probably won't read this, but the guy who developed/invented the Segway did create such a wheelchair-like device, which could roll around at normal wheelchair height, but "push a button", and it could stand up to normal height, balancing on two wheels (it had six total wheels, and could climb stairs as well). I don't remember the name of the device, and I don't think they are widely sold, but it led to the development of the Segway.

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  89. Re:What about "tripping" a segway? by cr0sh · · Score: 2
    The segway tries to move underneath you, but it can't, because the wheels are stopped. Now, suppose the wheels are firmly locked (ignore the fact that this isn't very likely). The motors are trying to turn the wheels "forward", but can't - so the torque is applied instead to the motor housing, and thus rotates the platform "backwards".

    Providing the motors are strong enough, the mountings and case mounts are solid, the motors should just rotate the rider to an upright position. If anything (but the sensors would stop it, unless they fail as well), the rider would be bashed or flung off backward. The Segway is really a form of servo-like feedback device, always trying to gain it's equalibrium - I wouldn't be a bit surprised if very little current is used to keep a rider balanced, and only when moving do the motors really use power...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  90. Torrone says he's not a Segway publicity droid by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 2
    It's true that Segway is putting out a massive publicity blitz, but I think the assumption by many of us here that Phillip Torrone is working for Segway was wrong. He does have some financial stake in promoting the Segway, however--the Amazon links on his website to Segway products. But lots of people, as he points out, put Amazon links on their blogs.

    I have no objection to Phillip Torrone turning an honest dollar on his website, or linking to that website from a story posted to Slashdot. I do strongly object to seeing on Slashdot yet another technical-content-free puff piece about Segway.

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
  91. Re:Not an electric motorscooter by g4dget · · Score: 2
    Two wheels with a motor doesn't have to be noisy, smelly, or without style.

    A Vespa is a perfectly acceptable way for adults to motor around on two wheels and will probably get you a nicer kind of date than either an SUV or a motorcycle. And an electric bike is the choice for environmentally and health-conscious folks.

  92. Re:He and his wife have them. That's why "we". by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2


    I did read the site but didn't see where they got 2. Could you point it out? Everywhere I look (like on this page) I see a reference to a single Segway. Even the "why page" reads why did we get a segway?

  93. Pro/Con article by toybuilder · · Score: 3, Informative

    This list of pro's and con's seem pretty fair and balanced. (At least, when taken from a pedestrian or bicyclist's point of view.)