Slashdot Mirror


South African Gov't Declared An Open Source Zone

fungai writes "The Business Day reports that the South African government has decided to adopt open source software and develop support programs with local research institutes and universities. The CIO of the State IT Agency says: 'The logic for open-source is so compelling that after a year of debates we decided to stop talking and declare government an open-source zone.'"

540 comments

  1. This is great.. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1
    Especally compaired to the previous story.

    Hopefully other disadvantaged countries like ZA will pick up on this. Isn't India considering this too?

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:This is great.. by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

      This is great.. Especally compaired to the previous story.

      You got something against fungi, Mack?

    2. Re:This is great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZA is not all that disadvantaged...

    3. Re:This is great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes. I can't wait for Bill Gates to fly into ZA and announce that he's donating 50 bazillion Rand ($5000) to combat AIDS and 50 squillion ($5 million) to combat open source.

    4. Re:This is great.. by sunbane · · Score: 3, Informative

      South Africa's government is not just choosing this as a "disadvantaged" nation - they actually have some major industry down there and the government is quite well funded (diamonds, gold mining, etc.) Having lived there for a couple years, I found it is far less third world than you would think - there are definitely impoverished areas, but there are also a lot of very educated well off people backing this decision.

      That said, this does not surprise me that they would do this. The So. Africans viewed the American computer industry quite negatively - all of our companies (IBM, et al) pulled out due to the apartheid situation (which is ironic as they were the companies hiring diversity - a topic for another day) and left them in the lurch. Some have probably returned now, but those negative feelings toward "Western" companies remain. So it does not surprise me at all they would go open source.

  2. first post? by dimension6 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd have to say this is a good thing for the future of open source ...

  3. It will be interesting by Evanrude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It will be interesting to see what kinds of programs they come up with and how soon other countries follow suite.

    --

    ~.Evanrude
    1. Re:It will be interesting by tunah · · Score: 1
      It will be interesting to see what kinds of programs they come up with

      Indeed - software programs or bureaucratic programs.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    2. Re:It will be interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      What? you mean, they're going to create software?

      sorry, that's not where the benefit of open source comes from. The benefit is in taking the work of others and using it for free.

    3. Re:It will be interesting by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      This argument has always been a straw-man. When 90% of software users are consumers instead of producers (simply because of lack of talent, knowledge or drive), the other 10% are definitely going to make software that the rest can use.

      The fallacy of the Open Source argument is that All Source should be open source, and that we're entitled to get everything for free.

      There's a lot of bitching and moaning on slashdot about how Microsoft has deep sixed so many good products and companies, but there will be probably very little moaning or bitching when the Open Source movement cripples or destroys small software companies or even Microsoft (long shot)...

      Not that I'm advocating stopping. Full speed ahead!

  4. CIO ? by CySurflex · · Score: 3, Funny

    The South African government has a CIO ? Next thing they'll be offering stock options and buying aeron chairs.

    1. Re:CIO ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The South African government has a CIO ?

      No, the State IT Agency has a CIO. Pleeze lern too reed!

    2. Re:CIO ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must read carefully before you answer. the article says CIO of the State IT Agency.

      "don't put your thoughts in gear, before your brain is engaged."

    3. Re:CIO ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't put commas, where they're not fucking needed."

      Retard.

  5. Intellegent thought by tuba_dude · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I love it! Finally a government entity seems to understand the benifits.

    However, Microsoft's response was the kicker.
    "It's a very popular technology today, but ultimately it's not a sustainable business model. What happens when the developers who find it exciting today move on to something which will pay the bills?"

    I almost fell off my chair laughing. It's interesting seeing them confuse state operations and business...Maybe they've been suckling (sp?) on the US government a bit too hard?

    --
    "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    1. Re:Intellegent thought by achurch · · Score: 1

      It's interesting seeing them confuse state operations and business...

      Actually, the Microsoft rep was probably referring to the developers not being able to sustain themselves on open-source, which (correct or not) does make sense. Their "rhetorical" question, on the other hand, is a no-brainer.

    2. Re:Intellegent thought by Gary+Franczyk · · Score: 1, Insightful

      From the point of a single product, they have a good point. Eventually, the programmer will/might realize that he could have written the same program for Windows, and have made himself a living writing programs (outside of the rat race, might I add)

      At that point, the product will be left hanging.

    3. Re:Intellegent thought by TummyX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So? What if Microsoft decided that they want to move on an abandon a product? You're screwed there.

      At least with OSS you can just contract out someone to continue the work.

      Any many OSS projects are paid for directly or indirectly by various business entities anyway.

    4. Re:Intellegent thought by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      Good point...*rereads article* Yeah, they're probably talking about the developers, but doesn't this particular FUD-ing feel out of place?

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    5. Re:Intellegent thought by achurch · · Score: 1

      I think what it sounds like is "oh shit we're in it really deep now, better throw everything we've got at 'em". ;)

    6. Re:Intellegent thought by gmack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That depends on the reason for writing it in the first place.. was it to do something they needed done? Do they need it to make their own buieness function? Was it something just for fun?

      Or hey maybe they were making money off it.. many developers are actually payed by one copany or another. Redhat, SuSE, Mandrake, IBM and connectiva all pay developers.

      Then again so what if it does get dropped? It's not that hard to hire someone else to fix it.

      Then again it's not as if I've never had commercial products simply discontinued on a whim.
      At least with Open Source you have options after.

    7. Re:Intellegent thought by cranos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes the programmer might have realised that he/she could have written the same programme for Windows and then he/she will breathe a sigh of relief that they didn't. Not all developers are after the almighty dollar, nor are they willing to work with inferior tools.

      The other point you seem to miss is the fact that OSS software can lead to job creation, need a custom module for Apache? Hire a developer, need a more secure version of Sendmail? Hire a developer. The code is there for anyone to use, as opposed to waiting for the proprietry code to be updated and even then there is no garauntee that the new version will meet your needs.

    8. Re:Intellegent thought by achurch · · Score: 1

      So? What if Microsoft decided that they want to move on an abandon a product? You're screwed there.

      While with open source, there'll always be a way to continue it, right? That's pretty much what I was saying. RTFLink before replying, please.

    9. Re:Intellegent thought by tshak · · Score: 1

      At least with OSS you can just contract out someone to continue the work.

      This statement neglects two key issues regarding most businesses (all but the Fortune 1000).

      1) [Insert Business Here] is not in the business of maintaining millions of lines of code (be it an OS, Web Application Server, Office Productivity Apps, or even a simple Mail Client).

      2) [Insert Business Here] generally doesn't have the resources or funds to continue the project.

      The exception to this rule is a custom app configured for the business (like a large accounting package). Then having the source code is most critical.

      Also, within the context of the article I do agree that any non-classified software that the government create's should be BSD'd for both the public and businesses to benefit.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    10. Re:Intellegent thought by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm I disagree. Companies spend a lot of money of software. Both buying and making inhouse software. If there was a business case for modifying some OS software (e.g. it is projected to save X thousands of dollars) I see no reason why the company would hesitate.

      And companies can afford it - the investment is usually worth it.

    11. Re:Intellegent thought by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're trolling.

      Nevertheless:

      When you're the government, and you need a solution to deploy to a five thousand desktops, the money you spend on licenses could just as well be spent on OSS development. Then, when you deploy to ten thousand desktops, licenses cost nothing.

      The programmer *is* making a living writing programs: He's an employee of the South African government, rather than Microsoft. His spending power and expertise improves the economy of South Africa, not Washington state. If he quits, hire and train someone else. It's still a better investment than software licenses.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    12. Re:Intellegent thought by km790816 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interesting thought: What if the United States government, which is the largest single purchaser of MS software (if you include the military) spent all of their IT dollars on Open Source solutions?

      They could invest in nailing the problems they wish to solve with no worries about future price hikes and inter-op.

      What could 100s of millions a year (I'm guessing) properly invested do for big Open Source projects?

      Hmm...

    13. Re:Intellegent thought by Dalcius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One thing I think you're missing is the concept that most development is in-house or bundled software (with hardware; e.g. drivers). Software resellers don't make up much of the market.

      And even then, the idea that you can't sell OSS is a fallacy; people will buy something they can get for free. Seriously, look at all the Linux servers (27% of all servers sold in what, Q4 2002?) being sold; AFAIK, the majority of these all have expensive OS licensing attached, although any IT guy with half a brain can install Linux for free.

      It's only one tiny piece of the pie, but the company I work for is completely open sourced and our new stuff is all based on OSS tools. This was a 30-man company during the dot-com era and we're still breathing fine (now running at 50 employees). Maybe it's the exception and not the rule, but I think you'll find that more resale companies base their products on OSS than you think. And resale companies (and even moreso those with a lot of in-house programming) employ developers.

      Some of you guys make it sound like the only way a developer can work is by contract. ;)

      It's not as clean cut as some folks think; OSS is not all that bad of a gig, money wise.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    14. Re:Intellegent thought by lactose99 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What could 100s of millions a year (I'm guessing) properly invested do for big Open Source projects?



      uh... buy open source programmers $10,000 hammers and $50,000 toilet seats?

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    15. Re:Intellegent thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually, the programmer will/might realize that he could have written the same program for Windows, and have made himself a living writing programs (outside of the rat race, might I add)

      Nice troll. Maybe this can happen, but maybe the programmer hates Windows and Microsoft, or simply see the benefits of open source/free software? Anyways, with the sourcecode, anybody can take over the project, or fork it if nescessary.

      At that point, the product will be left hanging.

      Not if you take R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y. I know it's a tough word these days and severely out of fashion, but those who don't, will pay always dearly for it sooner or later.

    16. Re:Intellegent thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The companies can collaborate on this together. Everybody benefits from free software, and it doesn't make sense to be going solo.

      Break out of your box!

    17. Re:Intellegent thought by rant-mode-on · · Score: 1
      • Eventually, the programmer will/might realize that he could have written the same program for Windows, and have made himself a living writing programs

      Judging by linux advocates here, it'll be a cold day in hell before they start using Windows, let alone adding to its legitimacy by providing software for it. For them, money just ain't going to do it.
    18. Re:Intellegent thought by mpe · · Score: 1

      From the point of a single product, they have a good point. Eventually, the programmer will/might realize that he could have written the same program for Windows, and have made himself a living writing programs (outside of the rat race, might I add)

      Until Microsoft decides to clone their program, bundle it into Windows thus bankrupting them...

    19. Re:Intellegent thought by rseuhs · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You have no idea, right?

      You know why Microsoft's software is expensive?

      First, 70% to 80% of Windows/Office is profit margin.

      Then we have sales and marketing.

      Then we have factories making CDs, packaging them up and sending them around the world where they are further distributed physically.

      Then we have all those "features" like WPA, Palladium, copy protection, purposely breaking formats to force people to upgrade, etc. which are not really needed in an OSS product.

      I'd be surprised if the cost to maintain Windows or Office is more than 2 or 3% of the retail price.

      Just one single developer can maintain even a larger project (hell, Linus still maintains the Linux kernel mostly himself - in his spare time) and the same or (if the project is really huge) another one can add the features you want.

    20. Re:Intellegent thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point taken, but there is a big difference between maintaining an operating system's kernel and maintaining the whole operating system. Also, Linus doesn't maintain the kernel mostly himself, he plays a very strong role (the strongest?) but it's far from something he would be able to maintain just by himself.

    21. Re:Intellegent thought by Isofarro · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You know why Microsoft's software is expensive?
      Then we have factories making CDs,

      Now this is a laugh when you think about it - if a government orders 10,000 copies of windows, what's the point of sending 10,000 copies of the same CD.

      Here Open Source makes so much sense. Download one copy, or order one copy on CD and install it on as many computers as you would like. Logical and simple.
    22. Re:Intellegent thought by StCredZero · · Score: 1

      Actually, MS Office programs are largely written and maintained by very small numbers of programmers. Microsoft is supposed to use the "Operating Room" paradigm from Fred Brook's The Mythical Man-Month on MS office, which means that most of the staff is in some kind of support role: Documentation and the like.

      There is nothing magic about MS office. People commission software of equal or greater complexity all the time. Anhyone know how large the core team is on OpenOffice?

    23. Re:Intellegent thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he quits, hire and train someone else.

      And those who quit are likely to work in another SA company, or start their own, thus becoming tax payers. The government gets the software it needs and at the same invests in the education of the people by funding open source software, thereby strengthening their economy as a whole.

    24. Re:Intellegent thought by Isofarro · · Score: 1
      They could invest in nailing the problems they wish to solve with no worries about future price hikes and inter-op.


      Surely it shouldn't need to take a moderately third world country like South Africa to point out this rather obvious benefit to a supposed superpower?
    25. Re:Intellegent thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not if you take R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y. I know it's a tough word these days and severely out of fashion, but those who don't, will pay always dearly for it sooner or later."

      I think you're confusing nobility with responsibility.
      It's noble to donate one's time to write code for free.
      Responsibility would be bringing home the bacon so your family doesn't starve.

    26. Re:Intellegent thought by Mars+Saxman · · Score: 1

      Eventually, the programmer will/might realize that he could have written the same program for Windows, and have made himself a living writing programs (outside of the rat race, might I add)

      Perhaps; but having taken a turn through the shareware world many years ago, and even launched an ill-fated software startup, I can safely say that it's far more fun giving stuff away. When you sell code, you have to meet deadlines, fix bugs, manage billing, and support users. Good God, is that ever a pain. No thanks. So this programmer eventually realized that he could have written the same program for free, had more fun at it, and earned some good-karma points by giving away the source code too.

      At that point, the product will be left hanging.

      Or someone else will pick it up and continue working on it. Or the people who use the product will hire someone to work on it. Or they'll switch to whatever new package has come along and made the original one irrelevant. Or it won't matter that it's been left hanging, because it was finished anyway, and it will just continue to do its job indefinitely.

      -Mars

    27. Re:Intellegent thought by Peer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now this is a laugh when you think about it - if a government orders 10,000 copies of windows, what's the point of sending 10,000 copies of the same CD.

      That's what they have site-licenses for.

    28. Re:Intellegent thought by tshak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, 70% to 80% of Windows/Office is profit margin.

      At the surface by quickly glancing at the SEC filings one would assume this to be true. Don't get me wrong, Windows/Office are HUGE cash cows, but read prior threads from a few months ago that explain why this is not a correct conclusion.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    29. Re:Intellegent thought by patter · · Score: 1

      It's interesting seeing them confuse state operations and business...

      Actually, the Microsoft rep was probably referring to the developers not being able to sustain themselves on open-source, which (correct or not) does make sense. Their "rhetorical" question, on the other hand, is a no-brainer [slashdot.org].


      Well, that's because of their business model. Microsoft still holds dear to the idea that shrink wrapped software is a commodity.

      Programmers aren't assembly line workers who assemble widgets for sale, we're experts at engineering a solution, which is why you pay us. OSS doesn't mean free of all costs, it means the source code is perpetually available.

      The expertise required to make a software solution still costs money, and OSS developers can certainly make a living.

      It's rather hard to convince customers of the benefits of this type of consulting. In traditional consulting, the consultants kept the code, unless you paid EXTRA for it.

      With solutions built from OSS, you hire a consultant to build it, and if you need it changed, you hire ANY other consultant to fix it if the original one was hit by a bus.

      You can pay the bills on OSS, once the word goes out to business in general that it does them no good to 'buy' software, what they really need is the solution to the general business problem, not the software per se.

      Bah! I need more coffee before I can express this more eloquently :).

      --
      -- If at first you do succeed, try to hide your astonishment. -- Harry F. Banks
    30. Re:Intellegent thought by I+hate+Perl · · Score: 1

      "He's an employee of the South African government, rather than Microsoft."

      I thought entire eastern Europe just went thru 50 years of diaster where they tried various ways of making "goverment" run economy work and compete with western economies.
      Why would you want SA to go into thru that shit again ?

    31. Re:Intellegent thought by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      It would absolutely be better for SA if the coder were an employee of some company in SA, rather than a government employee.

      That is, of course, if the work being done is generalizable to other applications. The gov't would contract their customizations to this outside worker.

      However, if the work being done were specific to the gov't's needs, then it might be best to employ them directly. They would be a system administrator.

      These concepts are of course not at all related to the debate at hand, which is OSS vs closed source software. This explicitly is not industry, and would not be designed to compete with any existing companies. This is just the cheapest way to run government infrastructure. I'm sure you'd agree that is a worthwhile goal.

      You're a troll too.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    32. Re:Intellegent thought by datadictator · · Score: 1

      I just want to finally shut up everybody who thinks you can't get paid to write open-source.

      I started my programming career 4 years ago. Using Linux at home, working on and for windows doing closed source programming. I earned a small salary, went out and got drunk. Suffered a nervous breakdown.

      Nowadays I work for another company. My bosses don't tell me what to do. I tell them what I did.
      I work on my own schedule. I get to travel all over the world. I get paid a huge salary (three and a half times what I used to earn). In fact after paying ALL my requisite expenses and my taxes I have 60% off my income left - which is about enough to buy six PS2's around here. As long as the product works my bosses are happy.
      The code I write is all GPL'd, all copyrighted to me (though I do more than just program) and I get paid to write it.
      See my linked homepage, check out direqcafe for an example of a program did under this contract.

      The biggest surprize of all, I live in Pretoria, and work in Johannesburg South-Africa.

      All hail the penguin, it has been my salvation.

    33. Re:Intellegent thought by Deadplant · · Score: 1
      uh... buy open source programmers $10,000 hammers and $50,000 toilet seats?

      don't you mean buy OSS programmers $800 celeron workstations and then list them on the books as costing $10000 so you can spend the rest on black-ops and more carnivore machines...

    34. Re:Intellegent thought by rseuhs · · Score: 1
      ... read prior threads from a few months ago that explain why this is not a correct conclusion.

      Wow, that has everything. Ignorance, arrogance and even pointing somebody to a (worthless) source.

      Windows and Office are essentially repackaging the same product, not much more.

    35. Re:Intellegent thought by tshak · · Score: 1

      Ignorance, arrogance and even pointing somebody to a (worthless) source.


      Ignorance? I live in the Redmond area and know a LOT of MS employees. I've also consulted for the Evil Empire (in the wise words of Nelly, "Must be the Money!").

      Arrogance? I didn't mean to come off arrogant. I was just pointing out that this is a very common misunderstanding and it's just not true.

      Worthless source? True, /. is generally a worthelss source. I was just assuming that you could figure out how to search for old stories on /. (particularly the one regarding MS's Q4 SEC filling) to see discussions regarding this. Although a lot of it is heresy (it is /. afterall), some very good logic was presented that shows how 70-80% is extremely unlikely.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    36. Re:Intellegent thought by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      > They could invest in nailing the problems they wish to solve with no worries about future price hikes and inter-op.

      Yeah:

      Step 1: Rewrite all OSS code in Ada
      Step 2: ???
      Step 3: Buy more MS code. Microsoft profits!

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
  6. /me rolls the dice by coene · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The logic for open-source is so compelling that after a year of debates we decided to stop talking and declare government an open-source zone"

    You have to love it when governments take a "why not" approach to innovation. It's something a lot of USA busineses (and government entities) could take a lesson from.

    1. Re:/me rolls the dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how the pendulum swings, isn't it?

    2. Re:/me rolls the dice by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't know about that... lots of debate is a good thing. People say that they wish the government made more 'snappy' decisions all the time, because we only ever hear about the times when a 'good' decision is delayed. When a bad decision is shrugged off by the due parliamentary process, we simply say, 'oh, democracy in action.'

      If totally open-source were good for the U.S. gov't (and you have to look at the whole picture, not just the fact that it would be good for Linux :), then I'm sure the bill would have come up at some point.

      Remember that the U.S. gov't is very different from the ZA gov't in terms of money to buy proprietary software, and control they have over the owners of said proprietary software. (Though with the amount of respect Microsoft is giving their conviction, this might not be true!!)

      --

      Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

    3. Re:/me rolls the dice by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Here's the thing: America used to be on the bleeding edge on innovation. We used to take risks. Now money is in the hands of a privilaged few, and they don't want to risk losing it.

      If America in the 1800s were like America now, we'd have a world-renouned gunsmith academy, but no such thing as interchangeable parts. Automobile manufacturing would be a highly skilled and paid industry.

      People with money now see too much risk in using open source software. They've been fed too much FUD from microsoft and they keep buying their software, becuase if it ain't broken, they don't want to fix it.

    4. Re:/me rolls the dice by dynoman7 · · Score: 1

      It's funny how the pendulum swings, isn't it?

      Or the penguin for that matter.

      --
      Blarf.
    5. Re:/me rolls the dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, it was certainly innovative when the South African government declared that AIDS doesn't exist and is just a figment of the imagination. Presumably they used the same sort of 'logic' to arrive at this decision.

    6. Re:/me rolls the dice by tuba_dude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You make a valid point, but we here in the good ol' US of A like big companies. Individuals and individualists are terrorists these days, didn't you know? That and Microsoft (and offtopic, the RIAA, MPAA and friends) pays for a good portion of election campaign bills, among other things.

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    7. Re:/me rolls the dice by Narcissus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "control they have over the owners of said proprietary software"?

      I'm sorry, but I think it's the control owners of said proprietary software have over them that has prevented more open discussion/acceptance of open source software...

    8. Re:/me rolls the dice by tuba_dude · · Score: 2, Funny
      "...becuase if it ain't broken, they don't want to fix it."

      Sorry, don't mean to be an ass, but shouldn't that read "...because if it ain't broken beyond repair...?"

      I don't know about the rest of you, but Windows for me is like an old portable CD player. It works, but you have to shake it a bit before the disc starts spinning.

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    9. Re:/me rolls the dice by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now money is in the hands of a privilaged few, and they don't want to risk losing it.

      Are you fscking kidding me? Are you referring to the last two years, or the last two centuries?

      From 1997 - 1999, anyone with an idea and the balls to walk into a VC's office could walk out with a pile of cash. Privilidged few, my ass. We're in a recession right now, but even so, the opportunities available for low-to-middle class Americans are absolutely staggering compared to what they were two centuries ago.

      But I'm sure you've personally spent your entire adult lifetime toiling in a 19th century factory, so what do I know.

    10. Re:/me rolls the dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Those years (97-99) weren't about innovation at all. They were about get-rich-quick schemes and screwing stupid people out of money with BS techno-babble.

    11. Re:/me rolls the dice by Usquebaugh · · Score: 0

      Go and read the facts. They are looking for solutions not profits. There is something that stinks with aids research but everybody involved keeps on trotting out the party line.

      I'm not convinced either way. Is HIV directly responsible for aids and death or does it take something else? Why do the people searching foe answer not question what they are searching for. Are they looking for the cause of death or the cause of aids?

    12. Re:/me rolls the dice by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      You have to love it when governments take a "why not" approach to innovation. It's something a lot of USA busineses (and government entities) could take a lesson from.

      Uhh... pardon my asking, but do you have a short memory? Isn't a "why not" approach to innovation exactly what caused the tech bubble? "So you want me to invest $50 million in a company to produce a website for transvestite kamakaze circus clowns? And they want to buy a Superbowl ad? Hmmm... Why not?"

      -a

    13. Re:/me rolls the dice by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      Technically that's not an approach to innovation, but an approach to swiping money from the clueless. See this comment.

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    14. Re:/me rolls the dice by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry, but I think it's the control owners of said proprietary software have over them that has prevented more open discussion/acceptance of open source software...

      Get OpenOffice to spell-check around em-dashes and placement of bookmarks in PDFs, and you'll do more to help OSS and harm MS than any number of irate /. comments could ever do.

      Then again, I just downloaded OoO 1.0.2... maybe it works now... (yeah, right...)

    15. Re:/me rolls the dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know anything about pathology, but neither you nor M'Beke do either. I think it's pretty suggestive, though, that people who take anti-viral cocktails to keep their HIV-counts low are not developing AIDS and not dying. However, if you guys want to keep an "open mind" and entertain various conspiracy theories while people suffer and die I guess that's your prerogative.

    16. Re:/me rolls the dice by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      If it ain't broken, it shouldn't be fixed. The problem here is that it is broken but nobody with the money realizes it. The rest of your comment is very true. The situation is broken, and does need fixing.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    17. Re:/me rolls the dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly the HIV is just something planted by aliens to distract us from the truth, namely that it is the exhaust fumes of their UFOs which cause AIDS. My god, some people are so naive, next thing you'll believe that the world is a sphere, just because of that NASA faked fish-eye lense photograph!

    18. Re:/me rolls the dice by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      s/old/cheap/. My 18 year old Discman still works like new. OTOH, there are some things that I now have to shake before... er, never mind.

    19. Re:/me rolls the dice by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. When you take a "Why Not" approach to innovation, you end up getting sold snake-oil.

      -a

    20. Re:/me rolls the dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Make your own os.
      Make your own music.
      then
      Give it away for free.

      2. ...

      3. bankruptcy!

      That's right kiddies!
      Unless you live out in the wild, you'll need some form of money to survive.

    21. Re:/me rolls the dice by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      But that's not really analogous to the topical situation, is it?

      It's not as though South Africa randomly said, "Hey, Open Source, that sounds 1337, let's install Linux on...everything we have! Whoo!" They did what everybody wishes their respective governments would do: take a year to think about things, and then take decisive action once they're done pondering. I think that's the essence of it: people wouldn't mind so much if it took five years to get anything done, if it actually got done at the end of those five years. In America, we debate a policy forever, and then finally implement said policy in the most half-assed way possible. That's a good way of ensuring that things don't get too much worse, but it's not how you build a better future, either.

    22. Re:/me rolls the dice by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/

      More than one researcher has argued that something is wrong with the research done on aids.

      I'm not into conspiracy, well ok LHO did not shoot JFK, but apart from that :-) But I am into thinking and evaluating what experts tell me. If you wish to blindly follow what is said and not inquire as to why we have no simple definition of HIV or AIDs, after how many years, fine.

      Mbeke seems to be doing all he can to find out why so many of his citizens are dying and why no cure is available. I guess his advisors might be more qualified than you?

      In summary your view might be correct, but there is no evidence so far to support it. If there is no evidence so far how much longer must we wait for evidence to appear?

    23. Re:/me rolls the dice by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that South Africa is doing what's best for South Africa, but I hope they're not doing it just to say "why not".

      They did what everybody wishes their respective governments would do: take a year to think about things, and then take decisive action

      I'm sure I'm in the minority here, but I actually prefer indecisive government to decisive government. Decisive govenments tend to spend wads of money on untested programs that are then cancelled by the next government.

      -a

    24. Re:/me rolls the dice by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/

      It's rubbish. A collection of partial half truths and ignored data. The HIV hypothesis is now so robust as to be generally accepted by anyone with an ounce of scientific training.

      More than one researcher has argued that something is wrong with the research done on aids.

      More than one researcher has argued that the world is flat, but that's not true either. These critics clearly have no conception of how science actually works.

      I'm not into conspiracy

      You clearly are. The alternative explanation is that you're just ignorant, so I'd rather take a charitable view.

      But I am into thinking and evaluating what experts tell me.

      Then you need to think a little harder about how you evaluate what constitutes an 'expert'.

      If you wish to blindly follow what is said and not inquire as to why we have no simple definition of HIV or AIDs, after how many years, fine.

      There are 'simple definitions' of both HIV and AIDS. If you don't understand them, then I'd argue that the failure lies with you, not with the definitions.

      HIV is a virus that is implicated in the cause of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. The latter is so called because it describes a cluster of symptoms and illnesses associated with failure of the immune system. Acquired because it isn't congenital (as other immune deficiencies are.)

      What was so difficult about that? Can you point to somewhere aside from an AIDS conspiracy theorist where those definitions are contested?

      Mbeke seems to be doing all he can to find out why so many of his citizens are dying and why no cure is available.

      He'd do rather better to focus on what he can do to help treat them. There's no cure for cancer or the common cold either, but both conditions are treatable, and as with AIDS, indefinite remission is possible with some cancers.

      I guess his advisors might be more qualified than you?

      If so, you'd be guessing wrong. His advisors are clearly fuckwits who have no idea about how to evaluate scientific evidence.

      In summary your view might be correct, but there is no evidence so far to support it.

      Here's a question for you. How much of the mainstream research on HIV and AIDS have you actually read? I'd be willing to bet you any amount of money that the amount adds up to none, and you get *all* of your information from these conspiracy theorists.

      If there is no evidence so far how much longer must we wait for evidence to appear?

      One last time. The evidence today that HIV is a causal factor in AIDS is overwhelming. Everything from the epidemiological data on transmission to what we know about treatment draws us to this conclusion. Yes, there may be co-factors involved -- but there's no strong evidence for this yet. Yes, some people may have a degree of resistance to it. That's true of other viral infections as well. Yes, the virus is mutating or different strains are being found. This is also true of other viruses. (Hepatitis, for example.)

      Learn about Occams razor and apply it here.

    25. Re:/me rolls the dice by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      The difference, of course, is that private business gambles with their own money (*). When private business fails, they pay the price. Government, OTOH, gambles with your money. When governemnt fails, more often than not the failed program is rewarded with even more of your money. I agree with the concept of open source government, as long as they are simply changing the license of existing government software -- instead of simply looking for ways to spend more tax money.

      * NOTE: In today's world, government is so entangled in private business that private business sometimes does end up gambling with your money. This can take many forms, the most obvious of which is corporate welfare (handouts).

    26. Re:/me rolls the dice by OneEyedApe · · Score: 1

      If the government actually takes that year to think about it, then you don't get as many untested programs (there will always be a few). As for the next government cancelling it, that is most likely politics.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all....
      --Thomas J. Kopp
    27. Re:/me rolls the dice by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      Occam's razor is never ever to be used for proof. It is a guiding principle when you perform research in that it guides you towards researching the more likely solutions first, but nothing more.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    28. Re:/me rolls the dice by kootch · · Score: 1

      yea, I can see the South African business logic:

      1) we got screamed at by everyone when we tried to make knock-off drugs
      2) we're so broke we can't afford to buy our citizens food let alone software
      3) if we try to pirate software, we'll be shunned by the WTO
      4) open source software is free!

    29. Re:/me rolls the dice by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that every government always thinks they have all the answers and invariably they don't. In Ontario we always get logic like:

      "These two hospitals are costing us $30 million a year, but if we merge them into a single hospital, it will only cost $25 million a year. Merging them will cost $30 million and the process will take 2 years, so the project will break even after 8 years."

      That argument makes sense on a superficial level, but if you take those odds you have got to be crazy. *Assuming* that you estimated everything perfectly and that circumstances don't change in the next 8 years and that the next government doesn't cancel the program, what you have gained is absolute peanuts compared to the risk you take.

      Therefore, I prefer governments that hem and haw and don't do anything drastice unless they absolutely have to.

      -a

    30. Re:/me rolls the dice by Ho-Lee-Cow! · · Score: 1

      No, they expressed the concern that the 'one size fits all' approach to AIDS treatment didn't account for factors unique to AIDS infections on the African continent. At least Mbeki spent more time thinking about the issue than some knee-jerk /. respondent.

      --
      In space, no one can hear you moo.
    31. Re:/me rolls the dice by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      More than one researcher has argued that the world is flat, but that's not true either. These critics clearly have no conception of how science actually works.

      I find Flat Earthers quite amusing. A while back a friend of mine decided to join the Flat Earth Society. I was able to disprove every one of their arguements based on my (at the time) one semester of Mechanics, without even having to refer to my book, in an hour or so.

      It's truely amazing, and more than a little frightening, what people will accept as "proof".

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    32. Re:/me rolls the dice by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Personal swipes and insinuations removed/ignored.

      > More than one researcher has argued that the
      > world is flat, but that's not true either. These
      > critics clearly have no conception of how
      > science actually works.

      Has the same researcher said the earth is flat and that HIV/AIDS research has a problem? Even if they did what that invalidate their view on AIDS/HIV? Researchers are wrong/right all the time the devil is when the majority is wrong, it happens in-frequently but when it does it's a real bear.

      > There are 'simple definitions' of both HIV and
      > AIDS. If you don't understand them, then I'd
      > argue that the failure lies with you, not with
      > the definitions.

      Please furnish these simple explanations. Something a little more than HIV causes AIDS and AIDS attacks the immune system would be appreciated. This is what has been broadcast since day one. When did HIV appear in man? Why did Aids suddenly explode?

      > HIV is a virus that is implicated in the cause
      > of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. The
      > latter is so called because it describes a
      > cluster of symptoms and illnesses associated
      > with failure of the immune system. Acquired
      > because it isn't congenital (as other immune
      > deficiencies are.)

      Implicated, the mainstream doesn't say implicated it says HIV is the main cause of AIDS, it is often referred to as the only cause.

      > What was so difficult about that? Can you point
      > to somewhere aside from an AIDS conspiracy
      > theorist where those definitions are contested?

      By tone of this post so far it would seem anyone who contests these views is a conspirasist. That would make it rather hard to give you an example?

      > He'd do rather better to focus on what he can do
      > to help treat them. There's no cure for cancer
      > or the common cold either, but both conditions
      > are treatable, and as with AIDS, indefinite
      > remission is possible with some cancers.

      What cheap treatment is currently available for AIDS? Cancer is sometimes treatable, the less cancerous cells you have the more treatable you are. According to the WHO the fourth cause of death in the world is AIDS.

      > If so, you'd be guessing wrong. His advisors are
      > clearly fuckwits who have no idea about how to
      > evaluate scientific evidence.

      A statement such as the above would be better backed with some credentials? I'm assuming by the venom of your post you are somehow involved in the AIDs/HIV research field?

      > Here's a question for you. How much of the
      > mainstream research on HIV and AIDS have you
      > actually read? I'd be willing to bet you any
      > amount of money that the amount adds up to none,
      > and you get *all* of your information from these
      > conspiracy theorists.

      I read the New Scientist weekly, that's about it I'm afarid. The Terrence Higgins trust has made available some info as well although it's pretty sparse. The WHO has a lot of info on current research but they seem to be going for the vaccine rather than the cure?

      The worrying thing is that everybody is talking of ten years for a vaccine/cure which I beleive to mean they still don't have a clue of how to start developing a cure/vaccine.

      > One last time. The evidence today that HIV is a
      > causal factor in AIDS is overwhelming.
      > Everything from the epidemiological data on
      > transmission to what we know about treatment
      > draws us to this conclusion.

      Does everybody who has HIV develop AIDS? Careful how you answer.

      > Learn about Occams razor and apply it here.

      I coded Occam a long time ago. Never shaved with the stuff. I much prefer Murphy's law "if things seem problematic have another Murphys"

  7. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    non-troll but also non-funny

  8. What a surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Not.
    Considering that the country's flock-of-apes substitute for a government has scared away any commercial interests, and that the Soviet Union and the KGB is no longer around to fund the ANC goons.

    Another country down the African drain.

    1. Re:What a surprise! by xrayted_za · · Score: 2

      This sounds a typical comment by one of my fellow white South African. Sure our government has made mistakes and has some bizarre policies, but which countries government does not. The government has been resolute enough to put a decent fiscal policy in place that is seen by the international community as one of the best in the world, even though large parts of the population would have preferred a more socialist policy rather than a capitalist one. We have an economy poised for a major upturn where as most of the rest of the world is teetering on a depression. If you are no longer living in South Africa then good riddance, if you are then get off your whinny butt and do something for your country or emigrate if you think the rest of the world is going to be so much better!

    2. Re:What a surprise! by hvrbyte · · Score: 1

      You know, just because you think that every white person that has left South Africa did so because of the political situation does not mean that it is so. Some of us left long after the goverment changed because there ARE actually BETTER opportunities for developers/programmers in the rest of the world. Speaking for myself, I finally ended up in Canada (originally I planned on the US, but could not quite develop an linking for the US), and I have to admit it is MUCH better than living in SA.

    3. Re:What a surprise! by jthorpe · · Score: 1

      >You know, just because you think that every white person that has left South Africa did so because of the political situation does not mean that it is so.

      You obviously have no idea what it's like living over there, and I can perfectly understand. The reason being that South Africa's media is so incredibly sensored that no murders or serious crimes can be reported (it harms tourism, damages the government's reputation etc). I think that all people leaving South Africa (myself, family and many friends who can included) do so with one of the prime reasons being because of the political situation and because they can get to a better place.

  9. Re:How will this affect apartheid? by nicc777 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey - wake up dude! Apartheid died in '94...

    --
    Need an ISP in South Africa?
  10. I'm pretty sure that's a troll by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

    At least from South Africa's perspective it is.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  11. Top quote: by achurch · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "It's a very popular technology today, but ultimately it's not a sustainable business model. What happens when the developers who find it exciting today move on to something which will pay the bills?"

    Well, that's an easy one: the high school and college kids who were watching the developers will take their places. Duh.

    1. Re:Top quote: by domninus.DDR · · Score: 1

      Aye! Im going to college next year and plan on doing just that with my newfound free time.

    2. Re:Top quote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Aye! Im going to college next year and plan on doing just that with my newfound free time.

      Barber or clown?

      If you have free time you're wasting your parents tuition money.

    3. Re:Top quote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's a very popular technology today, but ultimately it's not a sustainable business model."
      Cause we'll force it out.

      "What happens when the developers who find it exciting today move on to something which will pay the bills?"
      We'll steal (legal or not) milk and bread money from the poorest because we can, and if your willing to partake; you can too.

      When is somebody going to sit down and organize linux to make this guy eat his words.

    4. Re:Top quote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the Government will never figure out the answer?

      HIRE THEM!

    5. Re:Top quote: by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      Barber or clown?

      If you have free time you're wasting your parents tuition money.


      Well, I'd argue that he'd only be wasting it if it was a barber or clown college, or some other trade school he was attending.

      If he was going to college for a proper education, on the other hand, the goal is to teach you how to think critically, not to cram as many facts into your head in the shortest possible time.

      And that should leave him plenty of free time to write open source software, or pursue more college traditional life-enhancing activities like getting drunk, smoking weed and getting laid.

    6. Re:Top quote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OpenSource does not have to be totaly free of cost. OpenSource can be finaced as a service market. They are paying for services as support and development instead of licenses.
      Goverments can buy services and set up their own research and development centers.
      There is no rule that says they can't pay OpenSource developers.

      OpenSource is a service market instead of product market.

    7. Re:Top quote: by macpeep · · Score: 1

      I'm curious about your signature. Where did you get the source code to VC++ 6.0's libc? Running it through a debugger, it asks for the file flcose.c, which is nowhere to be found in the VC++ distribution. I also checked EVC. Or could it be that you are just making that up yourself or citing some Internet rumor? Please provide proof to back up that it really doesn't do the assert until before it is too late?

    8. Re:Top quote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's an easy one: the high school and college kids who were watching the developers will take their places. Duh

      LOL!

      Job requirements: Must have little no experience but extensive knowledge.

  12. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and non-fattening at the same time!

  13. Heh. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Insightful


    > The logic for open-source is so compelling that after a year of debates we decided to stop talking and declare government an open-source zone.

    Someone must not have found it too terribly compelling, or else they wouldn't have spent a whole year debating it.

    At any rate, it's easy to imagine that billg is packing his bags for another emergency handout run right now.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Heh. by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      It a Government you're talkin about mate.

      A year is real quick. Some of the SA Public Servants have probably got wind burn from moving so fast.

    2. Re:Heh. by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I suspect that they spent much of the year whacking clueless politicians over the head with the proverbial clue-by-four, until they got to the point where it was approved by those with the power to do so. And like someone else said, a year's worth of debates in a national government isn't exactly a long time. :)

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not neceserrily. I think, most of the politicians
      knew they were trying something that was not done in
      mainstream. Nobody wants the blame if it goes wrong, and no one really knows if this will go right or wrong. So i guess most of them said: It is an option, but shouldn't we also think about little problem X or Y or ..

  14. please MOD PARENT up !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    insiteful....

    communism is really basically the same as opensource and gpl is all about...

    people never want to admit, but mankind needs to change so that gpl can be really a break thru...

    to many greedy and moneydriven folks out there. money is the worlds number one problem.

    1. Re:please MOD PARENT up !!!!! by JayateMo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      BS!
      I know what communism is about, and it aint openness and free choice. RETARD!! Sorry but this really ticks me off.
      learn this: communism is BAD!! Only attracts naive and powerhungry people.

    2. Re:please MOD PARENT up !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody who has to capitalize and !!! the word retard should automatically be lameness filtered out.

  15. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That comment is pretty insensitive and only betrays your ignorance. Not funny at all.

  16. Now what they need... by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

    ... is "No Propietary Software" signs everywhere sort of like the no smoking signs with the circle around it and the line going through =P

  17. Office is still expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Sun insists on acting like Microsoft every chance it canm get, Star office costs a minimum of $25 per user.

    Why pay that? Why not install some other open office suite? What does Star Office bring to the table?

    1. Re:Office is still expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's really fast and stuff. It also looks really sexy, unlike that lame M$ stuff.

    2. Re:Office is still expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That's funny, I paid $25.00 total for 1,000 PC licenses last fall for StarOffice 6.0. That's about 2.5 CENTS a license. I work in education, though ...

    3. Re:Office is still expensive by Best_Username_Ever · · Score: 1

      Lots of companies like the idea of Star Office because they want to break away from Micro$oft, but they are afraid of free software. They are much happier with paying a nominal amount to Sun for the warm fuzzy feeling of having a company officially support the product. It's all about ensuring you have a throat to choke if something goes wrong IMO.

    4. Re:Office is still expensive by hairmare · · Score: 1

      Thats called outsourcing...

      They pay an external company (ie. Sun) to employ open-source coders for them!

      IMHO Sun is being quite innovative by behaving like this!

  18. SA more progressive than the US? by blackcoot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    (Note: this isn't a flame or a troll, just the obersvations of a South African living in the US)

    It appears that, in general, South Africa has leapt way ahead of the US in a large number of policy areas, not just Open Source. They've got fundamental protections in their constitutions which are significantly stronger than those in the US (for example, you can't discriminate based on percieved sexuality, domestic partnerships are law, with same sex marriages in the works, etc.) Now, to be fair, I haven't been back in SA since the '94 elections, so I don't know how much of the new government's legislation has made it into actual practice, but it does seem odd that SA is apparently overtaking the US in terms of the general "cluefulness" of the administration.

    1. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 4, Interesting


      It appears that, in general, South Africa has leapt way ahead of the US in a large number of policy areas, not just Open Source. They've got fundamental protections in their constitutions which are significantly stronger than those in the US (for example, you can't discriminate based on percieved sexuality, domestic partnerships are law, with same sex marriages in the works, etc.)

      90% of the Western world is ahead of the US on social issues like this. South Africa may have been the longest hold out in the segregation battle, but the US isn't far behind. What other Western country is ruled by a powerful religious lobby?

      -a

    2. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Planesdragon · · Score: 0

      It appears that, in general, South Africa has leapt way ahead of the US in a large number of policy areas, not just Open Source.

      I think the answer to this is that "ahead" is not necessarily "better."

      for example, you can't discriminate based on percieved sexuality

      Leaving the moral argument aside (Yes, there is a moral argument against homosexuality--not that I believe it per-se, but I can concieve of it and I'm an amataeur), I certainly want to be able to discriminate based on percieved sexuality--if nothing else, I want to live in a world where homosexuals can identify and seperate themselves from the heterosexuals when it comes to finding a date. ;)

      domestic partnerships are law, with same sex marriages in the works

      Huh? Can you elaborate on that?

      Now, to be fair, I haven't been back in SA since the '94 elections, so I don't know how much of the new government's legislation has made it into actual practice, but it does seem odd that SA is apparently overtaking the US in terms of the general "cluefulness" of the administration.

      The USA has a long history of going our own way regardless of what the rest of the world thinks. That's why we're the most religous "modern" country, and why we've come to dominate politics in recent years--and our two-term limit presidency (among other things) means that we keep switching policy and pissing off the folks we should be helping.

      So, in other words: Yeah, SA probably is further along than the USA. Half the countries in the world are probably further along than we are in one thing or another. If they weren't, and we _were_ the cream of the crop, we wouldn't have much to aspire to, now would we? ;)

    3. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by RDPIII · · Score: 1, Informative

      What other Western country is ruled by a powerful religious lobby?

      Germany. Well, maybe not so much at the federal level currently, but consider this: the popular right-wing party is called the Christian Democratic Union; you have to declare your religious affiliation to your employer so that if you belong to either of the two major Christian churches the federal government will withhold taxes that go to those fine organizations; also if you're affiliated with those organizations, then religious education is mandatory in public schools, which, by the way, are generously equipped with crosses, but which ban teachers who insist on wearing a head scarf, because that is perceived to be an expression of religious belief that's inappropriate in school.

      --
      Marklar: marklar
    4. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by adaknight · · Score: 2

      Not really a fair statement. This will depend on which U.S. state you are talking about, some will be more progressive than others and will match or exceed the "progress" (which is always up for debate) you describe above. The administration of government elected by a progressive population will pass progressive laws, and that elected by a conservative population will pass conservative ones. This is as true for South Africa as it is for America; American law is simply reflective of the voters that exercise their power.

      --
      hrm. then again. maybe not.
    5. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by tshak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      for example, you can't discriminate based on percieved sexuality, domestic partnerships are law, with same sex marriages in the works, etc

      Good, so I can get a tax discount for marrying two women, or even my dog now, right?

      Seriously, I'm not trolling, but to me the entire concept of marraige tax benefits is for the purpose of having a family, which science has dictated quite plainly that it takes a male and female. Now, if two people, or even three people want to be life partners, that's their choice. I just don't see why they should get a "family" tax benefit.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    6. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      What is the point of a tax benefit for a family?
      If it is for if you get children, then perhaps the benefit should be when you have children - adopted or whatever.
      If it is for a man to look after a women, then it probably a bit outdated now, and should be done on whether someone has to look after someone else..

    7. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      One word : Adoption.

      Think about it.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    8. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if you belong to either of the two major Christian churches ... then religious education is mandatory in public schools

      Yeah as an atheist going to school in Germany I loved that. I got to go home at 10 o'clock in the morning on the day the other kids had to stay behind and have all their religious indoctrination.

    9. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same sex partners have chosen to not have children. Why, then, should they be given children through adoption?

      brain damage

    10. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by blackcoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not just tax benefits. With marriage comes something like 2743 rights in the state of Virginia (your mileage will vary state to state) including shared insurance benefits, hospital visitation rights (which is a big one), power of attourney rights, etc. Quite frankly, the tax benefit doesn't make such a huge difference when you've got another mouth (or two or three) to feed.

    11. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Ancil · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • I haven't been back in SA since the '94 elections, so I don't know how much of the new government's legislation has made it into actual practice
      Ok, I'll fill you in. South Africa has perhaps the greatest divide between Law and Reality that has ever existed. Government wonks in gated communities debate protecting sexual orientation while half the nation live under the tyranny of warlords. There are whole cities in SA which, for all practical purposes, have no police presence. Expats like you talk about how great things are, but probably couldn't be paid enough to go back.
    12. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by blackcoot · · Score: 1

      For most of the time between '94 and now, I haven't been able to leave the US without jeopardizing my ability to return. As for returning, I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place. If I do leave after getting my Ph.D., I'm draining the US's intellectual resources, if I stay, I'm a hippocrit. I'd like a third option please :-) Just out of curiousity, are you yourself South African linving in South Africa? Or offering your expert commentary from a safe distance much as you accuse me of doing?

    13. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      First of all there is a marriage penalty in taxes (in the US). When you have children then you get some tax breaks.

      Secondly I really don't see why people should get a tax break just because they want to have kids. In fact they should get taxed more because the kids get educated on the backs of the tax payers.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    14. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Ancil · · Score: 1
      • Just out of curiousity, are you yourself South African linving in South Africa?
      I've never been to South Africa. My description based on a friend who grew up there, and joined the French Foreign Legion to get a passport and get the heck out of SA.

      But hey, you don't need a friend who went to war in Angola (funny story: his unit caused an international incident with Zamibia by getting lost). A cursory examination of the CIA Factbook reveals a life expectancy of 45 years and infant mortality of 61 per 1000 births. Yikes.
      • Or offering your expert commentary from a safe distance much as you accuse me of doing?
      There's nothing inconsistent about saying "South Africa is a shambles, I'm not going there". It's a bit more suspect to say "I've been avoiding South Africa for almost ten years, but it's way ahead of the US!"

      Bottom Line: Progressive laws don't mean shit when basic things like murder and rape are out of control. More liberals in the US could remember this too. And, to be fair, more conservatives could remember that enforcing laws costs money, but in the long term it's a good investment.
    15. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually live in South Africa and Ancil I think you have been miss led about the country.

      Yes we have your problems like every other country, but it is far from what you discribe. Maybe actually go to a place before you judge it or pass comments.

    16. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by radish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By that argument, why should a childless hetrosexual couple have a tax benefit? Or indeed, why should a homosexual couple with an adopted child not get a benefit? In the UK we have a benefit which is paid out to parents (all parents) per child. That seems like a sensible approach if you really are concerned about "making families". On the other hand, if you're simply trying to attach some entirely false special meaning to a hetrosexual pairing then I'm afraid you're on to a loser.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    17. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infertile sex partners have chosen not to have children. Why, then, should they be given children through adoption?

    18. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by ahillen · · Score: 1

      That schools are 'generously equipped with crosses' is only true for primary schools in Bavaria, AFAIK. It is true that the 'church tax' system is a bit old-fashioned, though. But I surely don't think that you can say that Germany is ruled by a powerful religious lobby. I have the feeling that most of the time the church complains about something it doesn't change really much.

    19. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by TheFr00n · · Score: 1

      domestic partnerships are law, with same sex marriages in the works

      Huh? Can you elaborate on that?

      Basically, it means that a commonlaw marriage is legally enforceable. So if two people live together and are committed to each other, they get the same legal protection, tax benefits and considerations that legally married people do.

      This, therefore, also covers same sex relationships. However, same sex couples can't as yet get "married", because of the current legal definition of the term. This amounts to discrimination, which is unconstitutional, and is being challenged in law at the moment. Watch this space ...

      --
      "By Grabthar's Hammer, what a savings."
    20. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by I+am+Jack's+username · · Score: 1
      There are whole cities in SA which, for all practical purposes, have no police presence. Expats like you talk about how great things are, but probably couldn't be paid enough to go back. [...] I've never been to South Africa. My description based on a friend who grew up there, and joined the French Foreign Legion to get a passport and get the heck out of SA. - Ancil (622971)

      I live in South Africa, born and raised here, with a lineage here going back about 400 years. I can't compare daily live in SA to the USA since I've never been to the USA (I've only been to Namibia and Senegal (and Côte d'Ivoire for a day, before the civil war)) and what I know of the USA is from citizens I've spoken with/written to. I can however give my firsthand impression of SA:

      It has the kind of economic disparity that's hard to believe, and I'm not just talking about a 3rd world country with opulent areas. Because of colonialism and apartheid the millions of whites have an economic stranglehold, and they are dumfounded at the cost of bridging the gap with basic services, education, land, etc.. Crime is prevalent, but is now not limited to the ghettos. The police now have to serve and protect the entire populace. HIV/AIDS is wracking the country.

      That being said, reconciliation is actually getting somewhere. It's a large and diverse country (we have eleven official languages), and instead of lynching the colonizers, the truth and reconciliation commission and human rights institutions has changed the country to something you wouldn't recognize from what it was in the 80s. The neo-liberals has a fight on their hands against those who want to rebuild the country, and implement the bill of rights and social justice. Serious environmental, socio-economic, and democratic problems are being tackled. It's not Switzerland or Sweden, but it's not Sharpeville 1960 or 1976 either.

    21. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>domestic partnerships are law, with same sex marriages in the works
      >>Huh? Can you elaborate on that?
      >Basically, it means that a commonlaw marriage is legally enforceable.
      >So if two people live together and are committed to each other, they
      >get the same legal protection, tax benefits and considerations that
      >legally married people do.

      Is that good, if people want legal protection they should get married, and if they don't it shouldn't be forced upon them.

    22. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      American law is simply reflective of the voters that exercise their power

      Is Dubbya's policy on Iraq reflective of the power you exercised in November 2000?

      South Africa's constitution is designed from the ground up to protect all the members of it's society, regardless of thier circumstances.

      What's more, the constitution applies to all citizens, not just the ones who live in a more progressive state.

    23. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by extra88 · · Score: 1

      There is no marriage tax benefit, this guy is a moron. In fact something Conservatives are constantly trying to work on is the "marriage penalty" which is not a specific tax on marriage people but apparently the way the tax code works out, married people pay a little more than unmarried people. There are tax deductions for having children and homosexual parents can receive it because one of them is legally the parent and receives the deduction. It's demonstrates a lack of respect for such parents but they're not losing out on any money.

      I'm aware of and concerned for such laws because I have a heterosexual life partner (even though they're usually explicitly written to exclude non-homosexuals). Legally that means almost nothing. No health insurance, no decision-making power for health related decisions (she was in the hospital last year and I just lied and said I was her husband so I could stay with her), and problems with inheritance unless there's an explicit will. The only time partnerships really *are* recognized is when they split up. You can bet one can take the other to court and have the kind of financial re-distribution a divorce would have.

    24. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by adaknight · · Score: 1
      Is Dubbya's policy on Iraq reflective of the power you exercised in November 2000?
      Well, you can always start splitting hairs and argue either yes or no to this one. This whole post is obvious flamebait. My argument was that South Africa really can only be compared to one U.S. state, if Africa unifies and becomes the United States of Africa, let's see if South Africa's "constitution applies to all citizens, not just the ones who live in a more progressive state."
      --
      hrm. then again. maybe not.
    25. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude , the only reason SA is somewhat civilized country as compared to the rest of the Africa is precisely because it was run by White people.
      You don't like that fact ? Fine, but it is a fact.

    26. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I do leave after getting my Ph.D., I'm draining the US's intellectual resources, if I stay, I'm a hippocrit.


      I'm sure the US will make do without you. But seriously, by moving to the US, you're draining SA's intellectual resource. The US's educational institutions can always train more people. I moved to the US from Vietnam and I don't feel like a hypocrite for not going back. Vietnam does have some nice things going for it but it's still not a place I want to live in. I do try and help out the old home country by sending money back to relatives stuck there.
    27. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by kyknos.org · · Score: 1

      There's nothing inconsistent about saying "South Africa is a shambles, I'm not going there". It's a bit more suspect to say "I've been avoiding South Africa for almost ten years, but it's way ahead of the US!"
      What is inconsistent or suspect about it? I am avoiding US and of course, would prefer SA over US if I had to leave Europe.

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    28. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Ancil · · Score: 1
      That's nice, kyknos, but we weren't discussing you. The original poster left South Africa 10 years ago for the United States, and hasn't been back since. For someone in his position to prattle on about how much more progressive SA is than the US is, well, a bit awkward.
      • kyknos.org said:
      • of course, would prefer SA over US if I had to leave Europe
      Haha, well, you're welcome to it. Hey, let's do one more statistic about how "progressive" South Africa is. According to The BBC: "It is a fact that a woman born in South Africa has a greater chance of being raped, than learning how to read." Wow.
    29. Re:SA more progressive than the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am, personally, fed up with too much reading and missing sex desperately. It may be a nice country.

  19. A first...... not post by Siriaan · · Score: 1

    Wow, genuinely GOOD, INSPIRING news on slashdot. Nothing for anyone to bitch and moan about; this'll be a boring comments section.

  20. Amazed at common sense. by eniu!uine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am very pleased at the news that open source software will be used in SA, but it's certainly not amazing. What's incredible is that more governments haven't switched to open source. There is excellent software out there being given away for free, but people are still using inferior software and paying money for it. It only stands to reason that eventually all smart governments will adopt the 'don't pay for what we could get for free' policy. The Microsoft reaction seemed entirely panic-driven(giving software to schools), and their argument is weak. They are right about one thing though, open source software in itself(i.e. just the software) isn't a sustainable business model. Of course that's completely irrelevant. What's relevant is that the software continues to advance in leaps and bounds, is free and is showing no signs of stopping. Let the open source companies worry about business models, I'm only concerned with my free software that I'm free to change however I like.

    1. Re:Amazed at common sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS has always given software to schools. Using your logic, Apple is now afraid of OSS, because they're also giving software (and hardware, but so does MS) to schools.

    2. Re:Amazed at common sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That makes perfect sense. I worked in a government research office while going to college. In my experience, governments (and any large organization given enough time) are filled with inefficiency, ineptitude, and office politics. One person continually came to work drunk and usually padded his time card by several hours a day, it took years before they finally threatened to fire him, at which point he retired. While it is nice to spend two months trying to explain to a "system administrator" how to install a perl CGI script, I would rather be productive with my time. We had a single processor AIX box running DCE just because it was standard, and 40 x-windows users connecting to this box over a 10baseT network. At home I had a 100 megabit network and a dual celeron 400 mhz with a 20 gig hard drive and 128 MB ram. At work I had a Pentium 90 with 48 MB ram and 1 gig hard drive.

      Open source makes a lot of sense if you have substantial in-house unix expertise, or if you want IBM to make a fortune on support fees, but if you want an efficient organization, linux (or even open source) isn't the end-all, be-all solution, it might work for part of the problem, but do you really want to write drivers for that gas chromograph spectrometer with a HPIB interface card and the other 20 specialized instruments in the lab? The manufacturers barely support windows, let alone any form of unix.

      Look at the problem and find the right solution for the problem, don't choose a technology and try to wedge it in somewhere because it looks cool. Unix solves a number of problems well, but so does OSX, Windows 2000, Minix, and even DOS. Don't just choose a solution because it's trendy.

    3. Re:Amazed at common sense. by mpe · · Score: 1

      What's incredible is that more governments haven't switched to open source. There is excellent software out there being given away for free, but people are still using inferior software and paying money for it.

      Especially when the money is going to a foreign corporation (run by crooks)...

  21. Dr. Martin Luther King by stonebeat.org · · Score: 1

    Isn't this amazing that this decision come around the Dr. Martin Luther King Day. I think it is great :) Freedom and Free+OpenSource Software. It can not get any better than that. In the memory of Dr. Martin Luther King:
    Early morning, April 4.
    A shot rings out in the Memphis sky.
    Free at last, they took your life,
    But they could not take your pride.

    1. Re:Dr. Martin Luther King by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the struggle for human equality and software go hand and hand is what you're saying?

      Yes, I picture MLK thinking to himself, right before he was killed, what operating system is the best?

      jackass!

  22. It's also been declared a Free-Fire zone... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Dozen of one, half dozen of the other...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:It's also been declared a Free-Fire zone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the saying is "Six of one, half-dozen of another", referring to two choices differing only superficially. Which I don't think is what you're really trying to say.

    2. Re:It's also been declared a Free-Fire zone... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      Curiosity killed the chickens before they hatched too... :)

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
  23. sed s/developers/YourMonopolisticSupplier/g by JayateMo · · Score: 2, Funny

    MS Gordon Frazer said

    "It's a very popular technology today, but ultimately it's not a sustainable business model. What happens when the developers who find it exciting today move on to something which will pay the bills?"

  24. Give South Africa a seat on the Security Council by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kudos to South Africa. It's turned into
    one of the most unenlightened regime to the
    most forward looking government in 10 years or so.
    I hope Capetown becomes a high tech Mecca and
    Redmond becomes a bantustan for crappy
    software developers.

  25. Contrast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn...if you'd told me ten years ago there'd be bad news from Canada and good news from South Africa on the same day...

  26. Quote from Eric Cartman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My mom says there's a lot of black people in Africa".

  27. The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how do you keep posting after all of the downmods you keep getting? do you keep track and when you know you're on your last post you go for the big karma? for someone who spends as much time trolling as you do, you must have the system pretty well figured out.

  28. A slightly different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    One of the areas for future growth for Microsoft was developing countries, so this is an interesting trend. If developing countries adopt OSS policy, that severely limits the growth potential and forces microsoft into a position it doesn't want to be in. Wall Street ranks companies based on growth, and if growth slows or stops all together, it looks bad. Does this mean the company is bad? No, just that wall street thinks in twisted ways and down grades the stock from buy to hold.

    Microsoft is still trying to figure out web services and .NET. The first version of .NET has a lot of improvements over IIS 3 and 4, but it still isn't enterprise class. For small and medium business with minimal needs, it's fine. For serious enterprise apps, it's still has a long way to go.

    If microsoft can't get windows and .NET up to enterprise class in 5 years, they can forget about it happening. I know first hand many large financial corps are moving towards clustered/grid approach to next generation platform, so there's only a small window for microsoft to break in. If they delay be 2 years or more, linux will become the defacto clustering platform for PC hardware.

    1. Re:A slightly different perspective by WiPEOUT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If microsoft can't get windows ... up to enterprise class"

      Linux's clustering capabilities are indeed better than those of Windows, but only in the engineering and scientific calculation space.

      You seem to be overlooking the enterprise database space, where Microsoft has thoroughly smacked-down the competition, both in overall performance and price-performance.

      For "enterprise" computing, what is more important: scientific calculations or databases? I think you will find the latter more critical to the overwhelming majority. Many, if not most, enterprises do not perform the kinds of engineering and scientific calculations that grid computing targets, while most would be hard-pressed to find a company that does not use a database.

      I'm not trying to ridicule the apparent success of linux in this space, but don't delude yourself into thinking that this is the be-all and end-all of computing just yet.

    2. Re:A slightly different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even after reading your message carefully, it almost sounds like your serious. A good troll ought to give the joke away with subtlety. Make the ridiculous assertions with keywords to get the moderator attention, but then explain towards the end that this is all the fault of the space aliens.

      You're off to a good start... maybe next time.

    3. Re:A slightly different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wall Street ranks companies based on growth, and if growth slows or stops all together, it looks bad.


      This is likely to become less of a factor [if|when] Dubya's plan to make stock dividend payouts tax-free comes into effect. One of the few good things about that idea is that stocks will be valued on earnings potential as well as growth potential.

      (Which isn't to say I think it's a good plan overall, because I don't, but encouraging more rational ways to valuate stocks can only be a Good Thing).

      Coincidentally, Microsoft has just decided to start issuing dividends. Hmmm...

    4. Re:A slightly different perspective by MSG · · Score: 1

      Compare this Microsoft cluster's performance:
      http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc _result_detail .asp?id=101091903
      with this single Red Hat Linux server:
      http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_resu lt_detail .asp?id=102111202

      The Microsoft server has a higher max performance, but it requires 80 times the CPU's to get 10x performance. Consider also that Oracle clusters on Linux and I wonder how long it'll be before the #1 spot is held by a cluster of Red Hat Linux boxes running Oracle.

    5. Re:A slightly different perspective by weloytty · · Score: 1

      Well, here is Microsoft getting higher performance, with half the processors (and lower price/tpmC).

      http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_result_deta il .asp?id=102121601

    6. Re:A slightly different perspective by rseuhs · · Score: 2, Interesting
      All of Microsoft's growth markets are already stopped by Linux:

      On servers Windows should have been the Unix-replacement (and in the mid-90's it was), but now Unix-shops migrate to Linux and Windows-shop also start to migrate away....

      WinCE should have been the hot embedded OS for the 21st century. But with the noticable exception of PDAs, it isn't doing too well and can't even replace DOS. While DOS ran on about half of embedded systems in the mid-90's less than 1/4 of todays projects are using WinCE. (I'm working in embedded systems BTW.)

      Microsoft is currently in the phase of being stripped of all their growth opportunities and is reduced to their core markets. Those will be the next to go.

    7. Re:A slightly different perspective by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      OT but possibly relavent: My girlfriend Goy has recently become interested in chat with some email penpals, so we got her on Gaim and yahoo (where she already had email), but when she wanted to talk to someone on MSN, we needed to sign her up for passport. It was a painfully long process. After it was all finished, there was a link at the top right of the web page to "check the availability of teh service." I was curious, clicked, and was told that the servers were all up and running with no problems. Goy (see sig for background) was completely confused as I fell out of my chair laughing. I sure hope they are up I said between gasps for air.

    8. Re:A slightly different perspective by 7-Vodka · · Score: 4, Insightful
      well I'm not saying anything. But, maybe this guy is a little biased you think?

      It's funny how the link he uses shows no results for linux. So your results show that microsoft beat linux but linux wasn't tested?

      Also, if I recall, microsoft is one of the biggest sponsors of that organization.

      --

      Liberty.

    9. Re:A slightly different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So being biased towards linux is ok, but being biased towards MS isn't?

    10. Re:A slightly different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, posting missleading information championing microsoft in a completely unrelated LINUX story is trolling.

    11. Re:A slightly different perspective by FritzTheSkunk · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot for the link to WiPEOUTs Microsoft Marketing speak - that's really a good one (ROTFL).

      OK, its at least slightly OT but just in case anyone in danger to believe that is watching:

      Quoting from the Comment:
      "You've obviously never worked as a developer on Microsoft's platforms. They have the best developer tools, documentation, training and support options I have ever seen. Nothing else from any other company comes close."

      I have tried to work with MS C and C++ from DOS times via Win 3.11 till NT 4.0 and their compiler always was a beast (these errors & warnings alone ...) and the documentation a large pile of sh*t - lots & lots of paper and spend your weekend trying to find anything useful.
      We didn't get anything running until we switched to Turbo C/Borland C++.

      Again:
      "Any developer documentation as comprehensive, accessible and easy to use as the MSDN Library?"

      Same as above: its HTML, sort of and you can read it from CD, DVD or online (whoa!). Take your time, finding anything useful will need lots of it since these guys obviously do not know anything about how an index should be organized and until now they don't even have the clue to copy this concept.

      And yes, i am using a MS IDE on a MS OS. And i am looking forward to the not-so-far-away day when i get the same at my job what i use at home: linux, postgresql, netbeans, eclipse, ant ...

      --
      "Writings of mad Lawyers! The Lawyers upon you" - old dwarven alarm cry.
    12. Re:A slightly different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the original poster to this whole thread is a troll.

      That's what I thought.

    13. Re:A slightly different perspective by tjwhaynes · · Score: 1

      Linux's clustering capabilities are indeed better than those of Windows, but only in the engineering and scientific calculation space.

      I'd say you'd been reading the wrong stats, but please continue...

      You seem to be overlooking the enterprise database [tpc.org] space, where Microsoft has thoroughly smacked-down the competition, both in overall performance and price-performance.

      MS only has decent benchmark results with SQL Server 2000 for small databases. These days, holding small (300MB and 1GB) database benchmarks is small cheer for the most part - the interesting stuff is how far you can scale. MS has set out and acheived good results on the small end because that is the only playground that it can be competitive in. If you think that Linux can't play in this playground too, I think you are sadly mistaken. Wait for equivalent benchmarks from Oracle and IBM (DB2 UDB) and then you can compare performance.

      cheers,
      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    14. Re:A slightly different perspective by 3Bees · · Score: 1
      AC commented:
      Wall Street ranks companies based on growth, and if growth slows or stops all together, it looks bad. Does this mean the company is bad? No, just that wall street thinks in twisted ways and down grades the stock from buy to hold.

      That is not really twisted thinking, that is capitalism. A firm, like a market, must expand to survive. There is no holding steady in capitalism. It is expand or die. That's economics.

      --
      "I think we should tax people who stand in water! " - Mr. Gumby
    15. Re:A slightly different perspective by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      well I'm not saying anything. But, maybe this guy is a little biased

      Biased or not he knows jack shit about Linux or the Linux community, and is therefore completely unqualified to make any comparisons.

      Anyway, here's my favorite quote from the link:

      Any developer documentation as comprehensive, accessible and easy to use as the MSDN Library?

      Last semester I took classes in VB.NET and C. In VB I frequently spent hours following little crosslink circles without gaining any useful information. I did all my C on Linux, though, and found that everything I needed to know was a quick 'man function' away.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    16. Re:A slightly different perspective by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      > If developing countries adopt OSS policy, that severely limits the growth potential and forces microsoft into a position it doesn't want to be in.

      Yeah, it might even have to pay dividends to stock holders to make their stock worth something, when they recognize that the price won't go up anymore.

      Oh, wait a minute...

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    17. Re:A slightly different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A firm, like a market, must expand to survive. There is no holding steady in capitalism. It is expand or die. That's economics.


      No, that's utter codswallop. You're simply repeating the twisted logic of Wall Street; it's still twisted.

      "Oh dear, I've just noticed that we've sold around a billion dollar's worth of widgets every year for the past twenty years and the market's saturated. Better give everybody a pink slip and give it up as a bad job. Too bad, I'll miss all the earnings."

      It's perfectly possible for a business to achieve an optimum size and stay there. As flawed as the overall plan is (and it is very flawed IMHO), at least Bush's proposal to eliminate taxes on dividends is likely to get the market to pay more attention to earnings rather than focussing exclusively on growth. It's the difficulty in distributing earnings which places such an arteficially high value on growth potential, because it leaves you with re-selling the stock as your only effective avenue for recoupment.

    18. Re:A slightly different perspective by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

      My bias in this case is based upon experience and facts. I have backed my assertion with linkage, unlike the ad-hom you've resorted to.

      I was merely showing that contrary to the claim made by the AC I replied to, Microsoft can and has brought windows to an "enterprise class" level.

      Yes, MS is one of the Transaction Processing Council's Full Members. As are IBM, Oracle, SGI and Sun Microsystems, amongst others. Lovely how your own bias allows you to mention only part of the facts, but my own bias is inherent worse because it supports M$. Dear me.

      If the big linux vendors are confident in linux's ability to beat MS in this space, why do they not publish their own results?

    19. Re:A slightly different perspective by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

      "I have tried to work with MS C and C++ from DOS times via Win 3.11 till NT 4.0 and their compiler always was a beast ... and the documentation a large pile of sh*t"

      These are DOS times, nor Win3.11 times, nor NT4.0 times. We are in 2003, so compare what is available now vs the competition as it is at present. Look at VS.NET and come back to me.

      "these guys obviously do not know anything about how an index should be organized"

      Again, that was how it was 5+ years ago. We're in 2003, and thorough indexing and searching has been standard for quite some time in the MSDN library.

      "i am looking forward to the not-so-far-away day when i get the same at my job what i use at home: linux, postgresql, netbeans, eclipse, ant ..."

      I am all for competition. I too hope that I can soon develop enterprise-class applications on linux for those customers that prefer it. Too bad that right now postgresql is a slow, clunky POS, and that it's the best the OSS world has to offer in the database space. On the bright side, some commercial DBMS solutions have become and are becoming available on linux, meaning that in the business application space linux can be a viable option in cases.

  29. You're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. Microsoft kicked out of Venezuela too ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Microsoft suspends Venezuala operations Damn, we're on a roll !!! USA next !!!

  31. MS your move! by codepunk · · Score: 1

    They just got a get outta jail free card...

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:MS your move! by Isofarro · · Score: 1
      They just got a get outta jail free card...


      Expect a software audit. Oh, wait that's not original...

      Oh wait - monopolies don't need originality....
  32. Logic flaw? by Flamesplash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The logic for open-source is so compelling that after a year of debates we decided to stop talking and declare government an open-source zone," says Moseki.

    If it was so compelling why did it take a year of debates? Why did the debates not come across this compelling solution, and have to stop, not decide, and just choose one?

    Maybe the person was misquoted but it sounds a bit illogical.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Logic flaw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They probably didn't meet every day about it, and I would imagine that this is somewhat low on the list of their priorities.

    2. Re:Logic flaw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, the Microsoft cheerleaders will grasp at anything to mod up. Perhaps there was debate because it's a bold move with few or no prescedents? No matter how compelling the arguments, being first always gives rise to self-doubt and fear of the unknown. Obvious enough?

    3. Re:Logic flaw? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      I'll fill in between the lines for you: The beaurocrats and
      politicians were hemming-and-hawing, covering their butts, and
      milking the lobbyists for every last drop of bribery. Finally,
      someone who cared about good policy and the good of the people
      who should be served by the agencies of the government, and
      cut through the crap.

      The function of debate is, often as not, to cloud and confuse
      the issues, so that an inconvenient truth doesn't cost you
      at the bottom line. That's where the concept of "FUD" came
      from.

      I suspect you've never done government work.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    4. Re:Logic flaw? by antiquark · · Score: 1

      The reason it took a year of debates is because it's Government, Committees, RFPs, Tenders, focus groups, surveys, etc.

    5. Re:Logic flaw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read this in some other post. Government has a lot of inertia, right? And it seems that software would be lower priority in most people's minds than something like roads, economic issues, education, defense, stuff like that. And I'm not sure if I'd want a government hearing about something new and making a decision in a few days. Wasn't the PATRIOT Act a bit hasty? How long was that debated?

      I think a year sounds like a great time frame to come up with totally new government policy. It doesn't seem like they procrastinated, and when you plan something for a year, you will probably be pretty thorough.

  33. Your sig by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Funny
    A set of...three button choices: Back, Next, Finish, and Cancel. --Windows SDK

    I'm all for criticizing Microsoft, but that's going a little overboard. It's an honest mistake, and many of Microsoft's competitors (especially OSS developers) have made much larger blunders.

    This quote is more fun:

    Because both the system's privacy and the security of digital money depend on encryption, a breakthrough in mathematics or computer science that defeats the cryptographic system could be a disaster. The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers. Any person or organization possessing this power could counterfeit money, penetrate any personal, corporate, or government file, and possibly even undermine the security of nations [...]
    (The Road Ahead)
    [emphasis added]
    1. Re:Your sig by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers.

      Good one. (heh, thats a joke, good one).

      Is there any concept in OpenSource like a boolean that can hold 5 values? If I remember my VB, their boolean holds something like that.

      _____________________________
      OnRoad: Tempering Detroit iron with our own hot air since, well, last week.

    2. Re:Your sig by tshak · · Score: 1

      Is there any concept in OpenSource like a boolean that can hold 5 values? If I remember my VB, their boolean holds something like that.

      LOL... I don't know much about VB either, but if I remember correctly I think you can test bool's for 3 values... true, false, or nothing. *SIGH*

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    3. Re:Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are actually times when this makes sense. Databases the world over have the concept of "NULL" in a field -- ie, the field has no data contained within it (as distinct from, say, the field having an empty string within.)

      Granted, a boolean that has three states is not a true boolean. But having a tristate variable does have its place.

    4. Re:Your sig by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      If I remember right, its

      True
      False
      Undefined
      Null

      And one more.

      ___________________________
      OnRoad: Tempering Detroit iron with our own hot air since, well, last week.

    5. Re:Your sig by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      Wasn't this uttered by a PR rep? Isn't that their job?

      Ok, given, I've made some REALLY retarded mistakes while programming before; everyone makes dumb mistakes. But Microsoft has made putting their foot in their mouth their favorite past-time.

      A big company WILL emote multiple views on things, and they will make mistakes like this; they're just that big. But for the love of God, it happens so much that it doesn't seem like *anyone* at Microsoft, save some developers, has a farking clue.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    6. Re:Your sig by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      "I don't know much about VB either, but if I remember correctly I think you can test bool's for 3 values... true, false, or nothing. *SIGH*"

      What's wrong with that? Imagine yourself wanting to test a boolean that's dynamically set (or not set) depending on certain conditions. For instance, loading and parsing a config file containing an optional boolean into a hash (er.. em... Dictionary object; it's sad that I know that).

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    7. Re:Your sig by kakos · · Score: 0

      I fail to see why this is so funny. The possibility of such a mathematic development is, well, quite possible. Prime factorization is NOT a provably hard problem. Mathematicians have yet to show that it is NP-complete. For all we know, it could be quite easy and we just haven't found the easy way to do it.

      However, if a efficient prime factorization routine was developed, I'm sure the discovery would be suppressed until encryption was changed to something not based on prime numbers.

    8. Re:Your sig by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1
      > The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers.

      I have a marvelous proof of this, but this post is too small to contain it. And I don't won't anyone to know that the factors of a prime number are just itself and 1, which is really, really easy to figure.

      Oh wait...

      doh!

    9. Re:Your sig by achurch · · Score: 1

      Obviously the whole thing wouldn't fit in the sig, so I just posted the interesting part, which I discovered while debugging an app of my own. (I tried to add a "..." to show there was more in the function, but the /. lameness filter wouldn't let me.) Hint: look at the order of the pointer access and the check for NULL.

    10. Re:Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do remember that C doesn't even have the concept of a boolean (At least, pre-C99 didn't). So I can have a unsigned long long, which can hold billions of values. Of course, it can only be used to evaluate to true or false, but hey, one mans truth is anothers falsehood.

    11. Re:Your sig by Yagotta+B.+Kidding · · Score: 1
      An integer greater than one is called a prime number if its only positive divisors (factors) are one and itself.

      You give me a very large prime number, and i'll give you it's factors in about 2 seconds.....

    12. Re:Your sig by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      I never tested this, but in MySQL, BOOL is an alias for TINYINT(1), so you could probably put a 5 in there.

    13. Re:Your sig by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      I believe in many C compilers, it is a small int, so theres many many states possible there too, but it interprets anything but zero to be true (or false I can't remember).

    14. Re:Your sig by istartedi · · Score: 1

      On closer inspection, you are fundamentally correct in pointing this out as a bug. They are dereferencing a NULL pointer assuming that your analysis of the code that comes before the assertion is correct (my knowledge of assembly is limited). A quick glance at the C99 draft and I don't see anything about defined behavior for when the file pointer is NULL (or invalid for that matter). If the behavior for passing in a NULL pointer is undefined, then I guess it's OK for the runtime behavior to be undefined; but I agree--leaving something like that in the code isn't good. They should move the assert to the beginning.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    15. Re:Your sig by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Wasn't this uttered by a PR rep?

      The Road Ahead is a book supposedly written by Bill Gates.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    16. Re:Your sig by slittle · · Score: 1

      Uh, you gotta factor it before you know it's a prime, no?

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    17. Re:Your sig by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      0 is true, everything else is false. It makes sense to do it that way; if a function completes successfully it doesn't really matter how it does it, but it can fail in any number of ways and it's important to know which one.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    18. Re:Your sig by alienmole · · Score: 1
      I fail to see why this is so funny.

      That's because it seems as though you haven't noticed the issue. The mysterious "easy way to factor large prime numbers" for which Bill is searching has existed since prime numbers were invented, and by definition, it's never going to get any easier. What Bill presumably meant to say is "easy way to find the prime factors of large numbers". What's more interesting is whether Bill understood that when he wrote that, or whether he really was as clueless on this subject as his comment seems to superficially indicate. Which might explain why he eschewed academia for business - his own observation was that he realized (paraphrasing) that he wouldn't be the smartest fish in the academic pool, so he picked a playing field where he could excel.

      However, if a efficient prime factorization routine was developed, I'm sure the discovery would be suppressed until encryption was changed to something not based on prime numbers.

      Only if it's developed by someone who gives a shit...

    19. Re:Your sig by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Prime factorization is NOT a provably hard problem. Mathematicians have yet to show that it is NP-complete. For all we know, it could be quite easy and we just haven't found the easy way to do it.

      You're right. In fact, factoring primes is provably easy: One times the number. Oh, except One isn't a factor, by definition. Oops!

      It is impossible to factor a prime number. I have seen prime numbers expressed in terms of factors (for instance, 7 could be expressed as 2^3-1) but you cannot factor a prime number.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    20. Re:Your sig by Eccles · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with [multiple value booleans]?

      What's wrong with that is that when you need a type with more than boolean values, you should use a non-boolean type. Got an optional boolean in a file? Define and use an OptionalBoolean type to record it with the three relevant values (true, false, not defined). Save booleans for values which are, in fact, boolean.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    21. Re:Your sig by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      Aye, I've actually read parts of it. What I was referring to was the quote from Microsoft regarding the government IT change to OSS:

      "It's a very popular technology today, but ultimately it's not a sustainable business model. What happens when the developers who find it exciting today move on to something which will pay the bills?"

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    22. Re:Your sig by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the variable, whether it's a number, string, boolean, etc., in many languages, there's a way to determine if the variable is undefined. The string "" is different from an undefined or uninitialized string, and there is a good case for the ability to test this.

      For instance, if a function grabs and returns a given number of infinite range from a file, many times the program will need to determine if that value was found or not. In this case, it's impossible to return "-1" to mean "value not found" or "value not set" as the number can be anything including -1.

      In the above case, I find that it's much more logical to test if (var == null) than to create another variable type for this function to return, create a function specifically to test for the value's existance, or make a function return bool and pass in a variable by reference. Think of all the instances in C where testing for null is helpful.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    23. Re:Your sig by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the variable, whether it's a number, string, boolean, etc., in many languages, there's a way to determine if the variable is undefined.

      And at times this is useful, and at other times it gets in the way. You no longer can rely on a variable being true or false, you have to worry about it being undefined too.

      For instance, if a function grabs and returns a given number of infinite range from a file

      Can't be done. Computers are finite machines. That number has to be stored somewhere.

      In this case, it's impossible to return "-1" to mean "value not found" ...which means you have no way of setting your variable to undefined either; you have to expand the type with an additional field.

      In the above case, I find that it's much more logical to test if (var == null)

      But again, you have to test everywhere else.

      Think of all the instances in C where testing for null is helpful. ...and think of all the places where people fail to do so, and the program crashes.

      In C++, there are reference variables. References serve much the same purpose as pointers, but a reference can never be NULL in valid code. So you never have to test it for NULL. In the many cases where there's no reason for an argument to be NULL, this saves you from the added complexity of having to check for it.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    24. Re:Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. There are a few ways to determine primality of a number that have nothing to do with factorization. One is the Sieve of Eratosthenes:

      http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/page.php?sort=Sie ve OfEratosthenes

    25. Re:Your sig by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      "And at times this is useful, and at other times it gets in the way. You no longer can rely on a variable being true or false, you have to worry about it being undefined too."

      Very true. I found this to be a big pain until I got in the habit of initializing variables in which being undefined doesn't matter. That seems to be a typically advocated programming practice. See below for more thoughts on this.


      >For instance, if a function grabs and returns a
      >given number of infinite range from a file

      "Can't be done. Computers are finite machines. That number has to be stored somewhere."


      Ok, assume for a minute that since I seem to have some form of a clue about programming, I'm at least competent with computers. Now, re-evaluate what I said. You don't have to take everyone 100% literally.


      "But again, [if a variable can be undefined] you have to test everywhere else."


      int myvar = 0;
      my $var = 0;
      var anothervar = "";


      >Think of all the instances in C where testing for null is helpful.

      "...and think of all the places where people fail to do so, and the program crashes."


      And because certain keyboard jockies are stupid, we should restrict the language?

      This is just a philosophy, but I would rather have features and have to remember more or be more careful than be forced into using workarounds to accomplish what I need to do.

      Following this philosophy, I much prefer Perl's style to Java's. Perl will let you make a mess in a hurry, but it also lets you create poetry in short time as well. Java, on the other hand, is quite anal. While Java is a very good language, IMO, there are certain, extremely valid things that are left out due to fear of programmer stupidity/laziness (or maybe just plain irrationality), which is no excuse IMO. (Examples are global vars and goto statements; if you think these aren't useful, you've likely bought into the FUD you'll get from most CS departments: do some serious searching on this. Good examples are basic OOP principles for the former, and the Linux kernel for the ladder).

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    26. Re:Your sig by Eccles · · Score: 1

      I found this to be a big pain until I got in the habit of initializing variables in which being undefined doesn't matter.

      So to deal with variables that have an undefined state, you give them a defined state, even when their current value is in fact undefined? That's not a ringing endorsement for using variables that have an undefined state like these erzatz VB booleans.

      No insult was intended regarding variables having to be finite. The point is that any variable has a finite number of states, one of which could be defined to be the "undefined" value, such as -1 (or ULONG_MAX or whatever that #define is.)

      But back to the main idea here. If a language has VB-style booleans, then anyone writing a function must anticipate that any boolean arguments might be passed as Undefined. That's creating significant work and increased complexity. For what gain?

      And because certain keyboard jockies are stupid, we should restrict the language?

      A) at one time or another, we're all stupid.

      2) We're not restricting the language, we're making sure our constructs actually represent what they purport to be. Having true booleans, and having to use enumerations or the like for more complex cases, does not restrict anything. Moreover, an enumerated type better documents what is going on; where I work, we often use enumerations rather than (C++) booleans for that reason.

      Examples are global vars and goto statements; if you think these aren't useful

      Wrongly used global variables are the bane of my existence. Ok, not quite that bad, but I've seen them misused far more frequently than I've seen them used wisely. Much of my time is spent properly factoring out what should have been parametric but was global instead.

      I don't think I've used a goto since the early 80's, so I don't exactly see much need for them.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    27. Re:Your sig by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Now you're talking about Variants, which are essentially dynamically-typed.

    28. Re:Your sig by Dalcius · · Score: 1


      "So to deal with variables that have an undefined state, you give them a defined state, even when their current value is in fact undefined?"


      Yes. How is this any different from having no 'undefined' value? You're telling me that you find a value for every single variable you put in a program? Sometimes things are not used; regardless of doing it "my way" or not having an undef value, it is going to have some form of normal value.


      "No insult was intended regarding variables having to be finite. The point is that any variable has a finite number of states, one of which could be defined to be the "undefined" value, such as -1 (or ULONG_MAX or whatever that #define is.)"


      And here we run into the problem that I tried explaining in my previous post: what value shall you use for undefined? If you create an int that will hold a number whose possible range is that of an int, how do you determine 'undef'? -1 won't work, that's in the possible set of values. You can't using just the int itself. I disagree with using something else: read on below for more reasoning.


      "But back to the main idea here. If a language has VB-style booleans, then anyone writing a function must anticipate that any boolean arguments might be passed as Undefined. That's creating significant work and increased complexity. For what gain?"


      Again I think it goes back to the philosophy of complex vs simple. While your point is very valid, I'll defer to my previous reply.


      "A) at one time or another, we're all stupid."


      Agreed; it's all about keeping your ability to be dumb and hurt yourself within reason. You don't want *too* much rope. This is a feature to feature judgement call based on individual use, and it seems like we disagree.


      "2) We're not restricting the language, we're making sure our constructs actually represent what they purport to be."


      And that's how I see this. I don't want a boolean that's dynamically loaded from a config file saying it's "false" when in fact the config file specifies no value. You sometimes can give it a default value when you find that it's not defined, however when abstracting multiple config files into a data structure, it'll take an out-of-scope hack to get this working.


      "having to use enumerations or the like for more complex cases, does not restrict anything."


      I agree, let me rephrase: it causes me to create a new type or a workaround to do something that I would expect to be in the primary types by default.

      My take is, you don't always know that a variable has a value that was set or not. When loading config files, dealing with constants and other info stored in shared memory (handled by other functions/programs altogether), it's helpful to check to ensure good data. I think this way and in languages like Perl, I use this feature often. And when I'm not in need of it and have to give variables default or dummy values or worry about undef, I just suck it up; I consider it a more robust form of programming for the reasons I just stated.


      "Wrongly used global variables are the bane of my existence."


      Agreed; it's ridiculous the things that some folks will put in the global namespace. However to deny this ability I find absurd.


      "I don't think I've used a goto since the early 80's, so I don't exactly see much need for them."


      I'll try to quickly explain this simplest example. In C, open a file. If the file is null, return -1. Then open another resource, say a socket. If that fails, close the file and return -1. Then open another resource, say malloc() something (bear with me ;)). If that fails, close the file, close the socket, and return -1. Repeat ad naseum.

      Now: initialize your resources, program the main body, return the proper result. Below the final return, using FILO, list all of the cleanup statements, each with a given goto label. I'm sure you can see where it goes from here.

      Not only is this less code, it's easier to maintain. When adding or editing a resource, you don't have to ensure that you've cleaned up every resource that was initialized. And, depending on your application, this code is more memory efficient. In the Linux kernel, gotos are used regularly in cases like this. When writing an OS, the more you can get done using the L1 cache the better simply because it is a few magnitudes faster than the L2 and even moreso for RAM. This cache is extremely small, thus memory is very important.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    29. Re:Your sig by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      Bah, I need to rephrase something that I made unclear:


      >So to deal with variables that have an undefined
      >state, you give them a defined state, even when
      >their current value is in fact undefined?

      "Yes. How is this any different from having no 'undefined' value? You're telling me that you find a value for every single variable you put in a program? Sometimes things are not used; regardless of doing it "my way" or not having an undef value, it is going to have some form of normal value."


      Add to this: only in a case which I don't want to have to worry about or consider undefined variables. When I know I won't be testing a value for being undefined, I set their values to some default or dummy value when I create them. This negates the problem most of the time, although it can't always be done.

      I'm a very dynamic programmer; many things in the programs I write depends on other things, and often you don't know whether a variable exists or even if it exists. I use hashes a lot. =D

      I'm very much enjoying this discussion, I'd like to hear more of what you think so I can make a better informed decision myself. =)

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    30. Re:Your sig by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      "I'm a very dynamic programmer; many things in the programs I write depends on other things, and often you don't know whether a variable exists or even if it exists."

      I'm gonna go grab some coffee or something....

      This should read "...often you don't know whether a variable's value was set or even its name. I use hashes a lot. =D"

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  34. ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember that half the people on the planet still haven't used a telephone. A billion people means nothing if they live in the middle of nowhere in mud huts and the country changes names about once a year.

    1. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that Africa is a continent, not a country.

  35. Oh My God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry man, but your message makes me want to projectile vomit carebear energy.

  36. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New area, no precedent set.

    TCPA is commi. This is typical american choice and seemingly a growing one.

    You guys almost have me convinced to try linux.

  37. Another Stop For The Gates World Tour by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can we expect to see Bill Gates making a trip to South Africa now? After India just said they were leaning towards it, MS wandered over there carpetbagging "Free" software. I garuntee that within the week, there'll be an MS rep on the Dark Continent preaching the joys of their software. Let the countdown begin.

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
    1. Re:Another Stop For The Gates World Tour by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a South African I am fully aware that we have good programmers and a lot of open source followers.I myself use Linux and FreeBSD as much as possible. Even at home. The rest of the world usually find it very weird to hear that we even have computers. We might not be the US , but our cities look just like any other city in Europe. But with our budget and problems, we need to take steps like this to save costs.This is excellent and I'm very glad to hear that our govenment made that choice.
      The funny thing is that recently Microsoft offered a couple of schools (in rural areas where they just recently got running water) *free* copies of MS-Office, but the government made their calculations and realized that the schools would not be able to afford the licenses for Windows and the computers, so they said.Thanks , but no thanks. That was funny to see MS's publicity stunt backfire like that.

      --
      "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  38. Three thoughts to repudiate Microsoft FUD in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    (1) Open-source isn't a "sustainable business model?" So, according to Microsoft, forcing annual upgrades and software subscription on businesses IS a sustainable business model? In the now-infamous Peru letter, didn't Microsoft state that sales make up only a small portion of the overall software cost -- support, integration, and customization make up a far larger percent. That sounds like a sustainable business model to me. Being a US school district that received an audit threat letter from their marketing department, we sure aren't impressed with Microsoft's business model anymore. That's why we switched to StarOffice on 1000 PCs last fall (grand total cost, $25.00)

    (2) What happens when "the developers ... move on to something which will pay the bills?" Well ... either (a) others keep the project open, (b) you hire programmers yourself to keep the project going (and reap the rewards), or (c) you yourself learn to program and keep the project going. Tie in with #3 below.

    (3) What happens when "the developers ... move on to something which will pay the bills?" Well ... what happens when proprietary software is pulled from the market and no longer supported? My school district has a pile of software (as I do at home, for many years) that's been abandoned by their owners. I remember paying $$$ for Lotus Magellan back in the early 90s - incredible software, became abadonware within a year. I could name many more -- I work in education, we a lot of our software gets abandoned over time. You're out your investment. I guess the business model didn't work in those cases???

    The Microsoft FUD machine is really revving up ... but dominoes are still starting to fall.

  39. What is the population of Africa? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    You'd think with a population the size of that, they will never run out of programmers.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:What is the population of Africa? by chromatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't count every one of a billion Africans as a potential programmer. Not everyone has electricity, for one thing. Of those who do, not everyone can afford a computer -- and there aren't a lot of libraries with public Internet access.

    2. Re:What is the population of Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can't count every one of a billion Africans as a potential programmer

      Whereas we can count every on of 200 million Americans as a potential programmer?! Your point was ... ?

    3. Re:What is the population of Africa? by chromatic · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Your point was ... ?

      ... quite lost on you, evidently.

      HanzoSan claimed that the existence of a billion Africans meant that they had an unlimited base of programmers. I responded that there are other factors that exclude many people from being even potential programmers.

      Any conclusion involving Americans exists only in your mind, not in my argument.

  40. Saving lives? by egoff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    especially considering the high costs of HIV/AIDS treatments, anything this government can do to same money in sensible ways is a much, much bigger plus than merely its effect of the open source community, or /. world. People are dying at incredible rates because of a lack of education (costs money) and treatment (costs money). Excellent idea.

    1. Re:Saving lives? by m1chael · · Score: 0

      usually with extra money, it doesnt go where its needed.

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
    2. Re:Saving lives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, too bad the SA govt is covering its eyes and claiming AIDS doesn't exist.

    3. Re:Saving lives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      especially considering the high costs of HIV/AIDS treatments, anything this government can do to same money in sensible ways is a much,

      Yeah, more money in the governments pockets.

      You do know they believe AIDS is a fictitious disease made up by the white man to keep the black man down don't you? Very intelligent government indeed. Maybe choosing open source isn't a good idea.

  41. [OT] Re:Your sig by achurch · · Score: 1

    I didn't pull that quote out so much to criticize Microsoft as simply because I thought it amusing when I came across it (it's obviously a typo, because the entry right next to it is a similar constant for a set of three buttons, I don't recall which). Maybe I'll finally go change it one of these days.

  42. This is AFRICA not America by HanzoSan · · Score: 4, Interesting


    The average African does not make the same amount of money as the average American.

    So when you say stuff about people in Africa somehow getting rich off of windows programs, you would be right if this were happening in 1995-99, but its 2003, theres no longer a shortage of programmers, the supply of programmers are endless and the supply of software is limited, at least in africa where the people cannot afford the software.

    Their best solution is to develop their own software using their own labor, and then they can build the technology they need to export to the USA and thats how they can REALLY make money.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:This is AFRICA not America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Another example of an american not knowing about "the rest of the world".

      This is *not* AFRICA we're talking about; it is "South Africa", not your average african country. South Africa has one of the highest GDP per capita in the world. In fact, several years back, they were #1! Diamonds are really worth something.

      So, chances are, the average south african is richer than the average american.

    2. Re:This is AFRICA not America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, chances are, the average south african is richer than the average american.

      Wrongo. The average South African would not be richer than the average American. The wealth of that country is ever more concentrated in the hands of a few than the wealth of the US.

    3. Re:This is AFRICA not America by mpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is *not* AFRICA we're talking about; it is "South Africa", not your average african country. South Africa has one of the highest GDP per capita in the world. In fact, several years back, they were #1! Diamonds are really worth something.

      This kind of measure dosn't tell you much about the typical person in South Africa. To find this out you'd be better off looking at median or mode figures for the population than the arithmetic mean.

  43. MPU. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (wishin i had mod points...

    thats really a great answer; bill you see that?

  44. great, just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GNU/South Africa

  45. Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by HanzoSan · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Africa needs an economy. They have more than enough workers, what they need is infastructure, they need an OS, they need plenty of software which they can develop on their own considering they have unlimited people power,

    Its almost like China or India, yes they can make money making Windows software but they would make ALOT more money if they didnt have to pay for licenses, this would allow them to advance in the information age faster because even with a poor economy they'd be able to compete with and even surpass us in terms of software development and engineering.

    Robotics, AI, and alot of computer devices they create could be exported giving them a similar economy to that of Japan. Japan currently sells playstation 2 and electronics devices which require alot of programming, Africa has the ability to have an economy like this easily.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Africa has the ability to have an economy like this easily.

      Before you post again, can I buy you a copy of National Geographic? Maybe two? Enlist you in the Peace Corps?

    2. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found your comments interesting, but then you lost all credibility when you used the pseudo-word, "alot". Please return to school for some remedial English education, you stupid FUCKTARD!

    3. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by Anti-HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Robotics, AI, and alot of computer devices they create could be exported giving them a similar economy to that of Japan.

      The economy of Japan has been in recession for over a decade, you stupid fool!

      Why does Africa want and economy like that?!

    4. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by HanzoSan · · Score: 0


      They are in recession not because their overall plan is flawed, they are in recession for the same reason we are in recession.

      Their banks rank out of money after giving away too much venture Capital and their governments continued to cut taxes and so the same things our gov did, which didnt work.

      Economies have their ups and downs but japan is the second best economy in the world.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    5. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Japan has foreign currency reserves so great its unlikely they could go through them in a generation even if they tried.

      Africa is currently experiencing an AIDS plague and given the soil erosion is likely to spend the better part of the 21st century in a state of famine.

      I think Africa would gladly take Japan's economy.

    6. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no wonder you've found yourself a stalker, Hanzosan. I'm currently in deliberations with myself over whether to join the war on terror imposed upon you. Anti-Hanzosan, I'm intrigued by your ideas, can I sign up for your newsletter?

    7. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

      I dont think Africa will have a problem with Famine if they focus their economy on technology and not on stupid stuff like farming.

      China made the same mistake Africa is making the only success came fromm Japan, and thats because Japan found their niche, Africa must do the same.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    8. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The economy of Japan has been in recession for over a decade, you stupid fool!
      Why does Africa want and economy like that?!

      I'm not the original fool, but the standard of living in Japan is infinitely higher than any African country.

    9. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by Anti-HanzoSan · · Score: 1

      Anti-Hanzosan, I'm intrigued by your ideas, can I sign up for your newsletter?

      Certainly! Just get on my friends list! Or on HanzoSan's foes list. Or both!

    10. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by Anti-HanzoSan · · Score: 1

      I'm not the original fool, but the standard of living in Japan is infinitely higher than any African country.

      The standard of living is not the economy. The United States ($36,300 GDP per capita in 2001) has a much more robust economy than Sweden ($24,700 GDP per capita in 2001), however Sweden has a higher average standard of living than the US.

      Japan's economy has been stagnant for almost a decade. If Africa's economy remains stagnant for a decade, how are they better off than they are now?

    11. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by Anti-HanzoSan · · Score: 1

      They are in recession not because their overall plan is flawed

      Yes, they are. Growth slowed in the 1990's due to overinvestment in the 1980's and recovery is being hampered by their protectionist trade policies, and contractionary domestic policies intended to wring speculative excesses from the stock and real estate markets.

      they are in recession for the same reason we are in recession.

      A recession is a decline in the GDP for 2 consecutive quarters. We are not in a recession. We are experiencing a temporary decline in investment as an effect of capitol overhang.

    12. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Japan's economy has been stagnant for almost a decade. If Africa's economy remains stagnant for a decade, how are they better off than they are now?

      Japan's economy is not simply characterised by the word "stagnant". If that came along with all the other indicators, they would still be infinitely better off than currently. Even Japan's banking system, fucked up as it is, is more functional than just about any African country's.

      The yen is still a hard currency, which African country could you say that for?

    13. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by fungai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunatley, you're wrong. I'm a South African, and the masses over here does not have the level of skills they have in India or China. The education programs are lacking too much. The privileged few, sure, they are well trained at top universities. The rest can hardly afford a computer.

      Fungai

    14. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by Isofarro · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm a South African, and the masses over here does not have the level of skills they have in India or China.


      And why don't they have the level of skills? Is it possible one of the main reasons behind this is the financial cost involved? Surely the saving made by not buying proprietory software and going for Open Source alternatives allows a larger portion of the population to get involved in obtaining these skills because of the reduced costs.

      Its the financial cost factor that's the barrier. Removing it or reducing it allows entry by more people. Certainly not all people, but more than before. Its progress.

      The rest can hardly afford a computer.


      So the people that previously couldn't afford a computer and its software but can afford just a computer -- isn't that an improvement? If you want to change an entire country, start with one person.
    15. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by I+hate+Perl · · Score: 1

      This so called "standard of living" is like beauty - in the eye of the beholder ( or rather some UN commission.)

      Frankly, I just recently read that an average income of an African American - the poorest social group in US is higher than an average income of middle class in Sweden.

    16. Re:Africa doesnt need jobs it needs an economy. by johnnyb · · Score: 2, Informative

      "their governments continued to cut taxes" - I'm not sure what you are implying with this, but government tax revenues have gone _UP_ every time a significant tax cut has been issued, because of how much it stimulated the economy.

  46. sustainable business model.... by caino59 · · Score: 1

    I'd have to say that if governments and educational facilities are dropping your product to go with something else...they might have a better 'business model' than you.

    it's only the start...

  47. US Navy goes the other way by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Navy/Marine corp is presently going in the opposite direction. They are launching a large scale contract (NMCI) that restricts all Navy IT to MS and MS solutions. No room for further innovations with other platforms or the application of appropiate technology to the task, just a rosey pink homogeneous MS world. Under the new system you are not even allowed to connect a BSD, Linux, embedded network device or even a MAC machine to the network anywhere.

    At the Navy labs, this one size fits all approach is even more short sighted and foolish. The upper echelon has yet to catch on that the network is the backbone or the infrastructure that enables an ever increasing plethora of monitoring systems, data acquisition and control systems, collabration and communication mechanisms, etc. As more and more devices become Web enabled the Navy has effectively locked itself out in the cold and crawled in bed with built in obsolesce - not to mentioned left itself vulnerable to an attack or virus that would spead like wild fire in a homogeneous network.

    1. Re:US Navy goes the other way by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, the Army is going to a different, equally proprietary system.
      http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,21725,00 .html

    2. Re:US Navy goes the other way by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      Shit, and I just enlisted too...Looks like I'll have to live off-base for my net access...

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    3. Re:US Navy goes the other way by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      After reading your link I noticed that the date on the article was 1999 - no longer relevant.

      Or so I thought I checked it out via netcraft and here are the results:

      The site www.army.mil is running WebSTAR/4.5(SSL) ID/70636 on MacOS

    4. Re:US Navy goes the other way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NMCI is going to hell, and has been since its
      first day, which is very well known.

      But is that really worse than the fact that they're
      moving automated target acquisition and weapons
      systems to MS-Windows ?

      "Look, if you'd just put fucking MDAC 9.3 on,
      we could reacquire the Iraqi bogie before it
      hits us!"

    5. Re:US Navy goes the other way by Klaruz · · Score: 1

      Most of the 'MIS' type stuff in the military is allready windows. Your desktop computer, fileserver, etc will probobly run NT. Some apps for specialized stuff runs on unix though (JCALS for example). But none of it critical for fighting a war, just time saving stuff.

      Mission critical stuff on the other hand is another story. At least in the air force, it's whatever works best for the job. VMS, Solaris, random embeded operating systems, etc. That's the important stuff, and the policy should stay the same. I'd prefer to trust my life to what works best. That said, I somehow doubt key systems will go with the stupid windows policy. Allthough the stuff about the air craft carier (or was it a destroyer, I dunno) and windows crashing it was kinda scary. Don't expect to see a fighter or tracking system or crypto com system running windows any time soon in the air force though.

      As far as net access, unless you're on a remote tour without a computer of your own, you'll be responsable for your own net connection/pc. The dorm I lived in 5 years ago (I'm seperated now) had cable modem support. DSL was added just after I moved out of there.

    6. Re:US Navy goes the other way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fear you are simply dreaming.
      Look at combat rooms and systems in
      Navy cruisers, carriers,...

      They're all going MS-Windows I'm afraid.

      M$-critical will be the new byword.

      I hope they remember to get the corporate
      vesions of XP that don't require internet
      access to activate :)

    7. Re:US Navy goes the other way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it is only fair. The USA has the biggest navy on Earth, so crippling it just evens the odds a little.

    8. Re:US Navy goes the other way by valisk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering the problems they had with the Yorktown and its fantastic fallover NT Cluster. I am suprised that they would ever consider MS again.
      Just goes to show that hard headed stupidity reigns, just lets all hope that they don't have to reboot their systems in the middle of a combat op. because Microsoft Automated Missile Defense 2.1 caused a BSOD.

      --

      Economic Left/Right: -0.62
      Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
    9. Re:US Navy goes the other way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The united states navy, so big and unpredictable even the united states is afraid to use it :)

    10. Re:US Navy goes the other way by An+Enormous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Under the new system you are not even allowed to connect a BSD, Linux, embedded network device or even a MAC machine to the network anywhere.

      Good luck to them finding routers and switches running embedded windows.

    11. Re:US Navy goes the other way by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link to that story? The problems they had with the Yorktown...

    12. Re:US Navy goes the other way by valisk · · Score: 1
      --

      Economic Left/Right: -0.62
      Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
    13. Re:US Navy goes the other way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It never really was relevant. As the article itself stated, the move to Webstar did not indicate any new initiative for changing platforms.

      For comparison, the site www.us.army.mil is running Netscape-Enterprise/4.1 on Solaris 8.

  48. Probably not the best country to have done this by egg+troll · · Score: 1, Troll
    Although I support OpenSource software (OS X is amazing!) and I'm thrilled to see a government give it full backing, I'm less than thrilled to see that South Africa is the one doing this.


    Speaking from a publicity standpoint, South Africa seems to have little credibility in the world these days. I'm sure you all remember their government denying that HIV causes AIDS in a desperate bid to avoid having to take responsibility for South Africa's terrible AIDS crisis. Additionally, South Africa unfortunately has a huge problem with rape. It seems that the country is barely able to govern itself, and is perilously sliding towards the chasm of anarchy.


    Obviously none of this is the fault of Open Source software. However, I think that if/when South Africa collapses, this will taint whatever good using Open Source has done. All I can say is that I hope another, more stable country, does something similar so that when South Africa implodes, its failure doesn't taint the Open Source community.


    Thank you and God bless!


    Egg Troll

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:Probably not the best country to have done this by grammar+nazi · · Score: 4, Funny
      Greetings friend.

      I am from nigeria and I have a huge fortune in source code (100,000,000 lines of source) locked up in the South African government. A friend at the embassy has made me aware of your trustworthiness... and should you help export this sourcecode from my dictator government, then I will give you 25% of the sourcecode. I will keep 60% of the source code and the other 15% will go towards the fees of transfering it out of my country and into an american repository.

      I need to move fast, since I have only days to export this sourcecode out of my contry before the dictator finds out.

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    2. Re:Probably not the best country to have done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.

      On the available evidence, you're doing a pretty poor job of it.

    3. Re:Probably not the best country to have done this by Blue+Stone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Speaking from a publicity standpoint, South Africa seems to have little credibility in the world these days."

      Unlike... say... The United States of America! :o/

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    4. Re:Probably not the best country to have done this by Isileth2002 · · Score: 1

      Now let me think, you base this on personal experience, obviously all those years of living in the Dark continent really helps you making wild statements, almost in the same trend that the South African government make their claims... Maybe I am mistaken, you just pulled this out of some cereal box, I must be missing this chasm, wait actually I am on the bottom of the chasm of anarchy !

    5. Re:Probably not the best country to have done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to add a little comment in here just to clear a couple of things up.

      Firstly, AFAIK OS X isn't open source -- I don't think you can download the source to the whole thing anywhere. Sure, it's based upon darwin and mach (not mac), but I doubt that it fully fits the definition of OSS. I could be wrong though.

      Secondly, on the HiV/AIDS matter. The South Africa Government never denied that HIV causes AIDS, that was President Mbeki -- President != Government. That was later covered over with some really bad spin, and a few advisors being fired.

      On the rape matter. Yup, it bad. Very very bad. What you fail to realise though, is that some of the savings made by using OSS might just find their way past the back pockets of corrupt politicians, and into the hands of the dwindling police force.

      Anything that can bolster the SAPS (South African Police Service) can only be a good thing IMHO.

      Cheers, from a South African actually in South Africa.

    6. Re:Probably not the best country to have done this by SidThePunk · · Score: 1

      As a South African I dont forsee our country sliding down this supposed chasm of anarchy.

      Considering the poor economic conditions in Europe and the States and the inability of many of the first world country's to keep their noses out of everybody elses business, this might well be the place to live and work one day soon.

      South Africa has been first in many great things. We'll be around for a while.

    7. Re:Probably not the best country to have done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Insightful? You people are tragically naive. The U.S. commands more respect and credibility than any other nation in the history of the world. South Africa, on the other hand, is a viciously racist, violent, corrupt, disease-ridden place. Don't let the tall buildings fool you into thinking it's just like Europe. I don't know why you'd give SA credibility on anything.

    8. Re:Probably not the best country to have done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you live in a bubble? Exactly on what Hollywood movie did you learn that? Do you REALLY believe the U.S. commands all that respect and credibility? Have you just listened to your President and/or his fellow cowboys lately? Gimme a break! SA can be a terrible country, i don't know really. But pretending that US is the paradise of freedom, respect and tolerancy... THAT's being naive.

  49. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA.... by m1chael · · Score: 0

    its corporate communism. since they are the ones in control.

    now all they need it a mascot...

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  50. America of the 1800s had slavery. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    So risk didnt cost anything. Building railroads? FREE! So of course if you can use native americans, blacks, asians and other slaves to do all the labor, well of course you can take more risks than you do now.

    Now someone has to be PAID, risks cost money.

    Now if you talk about the early 1900s you have more of a point.

    If US companies want to take risks, it could be the last risk they ever take.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:America of the 1800s had slavery. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. you still need food, housing, clothes, guards etc for the slaves, plus buying them in the first place - so not totally free.

    2. Re:America of the 1800s had slavery. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


      The work that the slaves did more than made up for the food, the clothes were often made by the slaves themselves who picked cotten and then created the clothes. Food = scraps.

      You are right slaves arent free, but their labor more than pays for what you mention.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:America of the 1800s had slavery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are right slaves arent free, but their labor more than pays for what you mention.

      Yes it does, but just. In fact the productivity of a semi-free (serf) and a 'free' labour force far exceeds that of a slave labour force. Which is why of course, slavery was replaced by serfdom and then wage-slavery in Europe. And why the modern American economy is more productive than that of the old south.

  51. South African Citizen call to gov tech support. by inteller · · Score: 1, Troll

    Citizen: "so now how do I use your system to sign up for health benefits and other social benefit programs?" Gov: ....dead silence....then "RTFM! Geez, don't you people know anything?!?! You probably use AOL or something...ROTFLHRHARHARHRA...you are just a Windoze user and not one of us l334 open source people" Citizen: "Time to move"

    1. Re:South African Citizen call to gov tech support. by jbolden · · Score: 1

      That was funny! You didn't deserve the troll mod.

  52. Uhh No by glrotate · · Score: 1, Informative
    From the South Arrican Institute of Race Relations:


    "South Africa has among the highest rates of violent crime in the world. Calculated per 100 000 of the population in 1995, only two countries had higher murder rates - Colombia and Swaziland. The US has a murder rate eight times lower than that of South Africa. Rape figures are the highest in the world, as are South Africa's reported cases of robbery and violent theft."


    Real progressive.

    1. Re:Uhh No by blackcoot · · Score: 1

      Please explain the link between violent crime rates and the progressiveness of legislation, because it's not apparent in your argument. You seem to assume some a priori connection between legislation and its enforcement which I'm afraid doesn't exist. There are many states in the US which have bizarre laws still on the books, like requiring that there be a place to hitch your horse outside every residence, which are not enforced.

    2. Re:Uhh No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah alot of posters are making South Africa like its some nice new progressive country. When its not. My uncle was in Johannesburg (i think its the capital city) for a few weeks about half a year ago. He described the country as like the wild west. You could hear gunfire pretty much from anywere in the city, not all the time but it still wasn't uncommon. Also any public building he would go to would have metal detectors and signs saying please check guns at the door.

      Citizens are even equipping their cars with flame throwers to fight off all the carjackers. Just check this out.

      http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/africa/9812/11/flame.th ro wer.car/

      Watch the video.

      While I have no problem with the government using opensource (as long as its BSD license and not GNU). Posters should really take some time to understand South Africa is a country is pretty bad shape.

  53. Apart Height by farfisa69 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I hope this does not go against any of their Apart Height rules. You know, Microsoft being taller than Linux.

    --
    Meat is murder, I eat chicken.
  54. Exactly by Rufus211 · · Score: 1
    To quote the MS PR guy:
    And while government's idea of training open-source developers is admirable, it will not create new jobs but will simply replace thousands of existing jobs for people who now work with proprietary software, he argues.
    I do believe that is the entire point of their excersize. How may proprietary software companies are there is South America. If overal not one single job is created, they really could care less. What matters is that the new open-source developers will be local in SA instead of in Redmond or Silicon Valley or elsewhere in the US. That 3billion could create a significant tech sector if all of it was diverted from overseas to local.

    I'd expect more governments, especially those of somewhat poorer countries going this route as a way to not only free themselves from ties to the US, but also improve their economy at the same time.
    1. Re:Exactly by devleopard · · Score: 1

      This is why the issue of open source vs. proprietary doesn't matter. Any app of substance is going to be a custom app - it takes more to run a government than a windowing environment and Office/OpenOffice. The last time I checked, I couldn't find anything on SourceForge for tracking military pension payments, maintaining a 50-year history of agricultural surveys in the southeast region of the country, etc. These are apps that will be built in house, on top of whatever platform you're using (Windows, Linux, Mac, web, etc.) As long as they don't get stupid and take "Open Source zone" to mean "non-OSS banned zone", what they're doing is great. If in the process they end up throwing away software that works that must be rewritten, that's a disservice to the taxpayers. A government should base their decision on what's best for their constituents, not what's best for special interests (OSS is as much a special interest as the BSA and RIAA - perhaps more righteous, but a special interest nonetheless)

      --
      The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
    2. Re:Exactly by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      I couldn't find anything on SourceForge for tracking military pension payments, maintaining a 50-year history of agricultural surveys in the southeast region of the country, etc. These are apps that will be built in house, on top of whatever platform you're using
      Methinks you're missing something. Open Source doesn't mean you can find it on SourceForge. It doesn't even mean you can get the binary (at any price). It means that them as gets the binary can easily get the source (if they don't already have it)
      The examples you gave are exactly the kind of things for which you want/need Open Source. Come hell or high water, no matter what any third parties do, you want to ensure the survivability of these programs so you can keep on running them. I do not want to fork Linux. I will go through a lot of extra trouble so as to not fork Linux. But ultimately, if that is the only way I can do what I need to do, I can and I will.

      If in the process they end up throwing away software that works that must be rewritten, that's a disservice to the taxpayers.
      I agree completely. But look at the reasons why the software would need to be rewritten. The most likely cause is gratuitous and incompatible changes in the platforms they are coded for. With Closed Source, you're very easily stuck between a rock and a hard place, with *no* options for a way out.

  55. cluestick by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The notiont of communism attracts powerhungry people because they have seen the way in which socialist or totalitarian states have applied communism to enslave the people.

    There has not been a single communist country in the modern era, so how would you know if it only attracts naive and powerhungry people?

    Imagine there's no heaven,
    It's easy if you try,
    No hell below us,
    Above us only sky,
    Imagine all the people
    Living for today...
    Imagine there's no countries,
    It isn't hard to do,
    Nothing to kill or die for,
    No religion too,
    Imagine all the people
    Living life in peace...
    Imagine no possessions,
    I wonder if you can,
    No need for greed or hunger,
    A brotherhood of man,
    Imagine all the people
    Sharing all the world...
    You may say Im a dreamer,
    But Im not the only one,
    I hope some day you'll join us,
    And the world will live as one.

    People who think they know what communism is about tick me off. It is completely about openness and free choice.

    Communism isn't BAD -- powerhungry people are BAD.
    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:cluestick by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Communism isn't BAD -- powerhungry people are BAD."
      well, d'uh. That can be said about any form of goverment.
      Communism is flawed because it allows powerhungry people to obtain a permanant position without checks and balances.
      There will always be powerhungry people, nad a government that doesn't have a way to control those people built in, will end up broken into smaller 'states', each with its own 'warlord'.
      Until a way for stuff to appear magically, or the hearts of men change, communism will fail.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:cluestick by JayateMo · · Score: 1

      I have grown up (still live) in one of those countries you are talking about. As you put it "socialist or totalitarian states have applied communism to enslave the people". Its not the first time I've heard the argument "no no, thats not *real* communism, in das kapital it says bla bla, yada yada". All of these countries (china etc)are quite sure they are (or used to be) communistic societys, You know better? Please dont slap me with das kapital, as I said, the argument that we never seen an *actual* communistic society is in my opinion flawed. Its just Your idealistic view on communism, not how it *actually* (real examples) manifests itself in a society. It never manifested itself as openness and free choice, and I belive it never will.
      Communistic society without religion?? No possessions? Over my dead body.

    3. Re:cluestick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have grown up (still live) in one of those countries you are talking about. As you put it "socialist or totalitarian states have applied communism to enslave the people"

      I grew up, but unfortunately no longer live, in a Nth-Western European Socialist state. Believe me, there is much more openess and freedom in Social Democracy than there is in a ruthlessley capitalist state ... well unless you are one of the corporate elite that is.

      the argument that we never seen an *actual* communistic society is in my opinion flawed

      It's not an argument, but a simple statement of fact. That being said, I'm not entirely convinced that an actual communistic society is a possibility. On the other hand using the russian experience to cast judgement on socialism, is like using the contemporary russian experience to judge capitalism. Look to somewhere where socialism has been successfully applied before you pass judgement. Also maybe you should move out of your country to a more ruthlessly capitalist society. If you did (and lived on the wrong side of the power divide in both) you might actually be in a position to make a valid comparison.

    4. Re:cluestick by JayateMo · · Score: 1


      Also maybe you should move out of your country to a more ruthlessly capitalist society. If you did (and lived on the wrong side of the power divide in both) you might actually be in a position to make a valid comparison.
      If I could, (its a matter of a greencard I suppose) I would.

    5. Re:cluestick by dipipanone · · Score: 2

      Communism is flawed because it allows powerhungry people to obtain a permanant position without checks and balances.

      You're confusing the political philosophy with the bureaucratic organization of the state apparatus. There's no inherent connection between these two things. There's absolutely no reason why you can't have a communist state that has free and full elections and limits on holding power.

      Communism as a political philosophy may have flaws, but they aren't the ones you say they are.

  56. Shortsighted and blinkered by christophersaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I feel it's nonsense to declare any governemnt department or private institution an 'open source' zone, if the implication is that only open source solutions will be considered.

    What happens when they need functionality that the open source world doesn't offer. I'm thinking of things like the scalability and availability features you get from the big Unix guys (and no, sticking 100 Dells together is not always the answer for big systems). What about when something like SAP, Oracle Apps, Siebel, etc, etc is required?

    Support issues and costs are not instantly solved just because you can look at the source code. That is utterly irrelevant to most IT managers. The last thing govt IT workers I know want to be told is that they no longer need that support contract - they can just look at the code man'. That simply doesn't hack it in a large number of situations. If it does work, then use it, but it shouldn't be the sole policy.

    No IT solution should be dismissed out of hand, whether closed or open.

    1. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by alonsoac · · Score: 1

      I bet on the few cases where big closed apps are really needed they will simply use them. Still most government workers use a simple workstation with windows and office, there is were the money can be saved.
      And no one said support contracts were to be cancelled, on the contrary new local companies will take care of supporting the open source apps.
      I don't see any nonsense, sounds like common sense actually.

    2. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by Yeti7226 · · Score: 1

      The article states SA spends 3Bn Rand ($300 mil) on mostly foreign software licences. You can hire a lot of programmers/support staff for that kind of money. Especially in a country like SA that does not have the same level of labour-costs as the US or Europe.

    3. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is truly shortsighted is using closed-source software. It may seem to get the job done now, but if it ties you down, if you're stuck with it, then you're in trouble in the long run. Only a shortsighted view would measure closed-source stuf as better.

    4. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by bain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a South African all I can say is, In the years of boycots and trade embargo's we have survived and innovated without the help of overseas companies and technologies. South Africa probebly has more raw talent then most 1st world countries, and I see it everyday in my work.

      I have high hopes of this move from the govornment and if there is needs we will develop it ourselvs if need by. that is afterall the strength of linux. scratch your itch.
      Just because we are on the southern tip of Africa doesn't mean we need the rest of the world to write code for our functionality.

      --
      Sanity is a majority vote.
    5. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by fferreres · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What happens when they need functionality that the open source world doesn't offer.

      That doesn't happen. Open Source is not a kind of product, but what under what conditions you will accept to purchase software. If the seller never let's you own the software you are funding then the Goverment can't buy it (not even to self support it if the developer drops the product).

      Remember, there are hundreds of rules that must be followed if you want to be a goverment provider. This is just one more of the requirements, and one that makes a lot of sense.

      Why pay billions every year to end up owning nothing, getting more dependant on a foreing monopolist. Putting billions and billions on open source will really be a bargain: nobody can charge you ever again for it, nor force you to upgrade, nor lock you into it. And the pools of countries investing in Open Source ("Public Goods") will grow, and these funds are "additive"...

      MS has done great things, and keeps doing great things, but "the world" no longer wants to pay the monopolistic rent, they realized they want to pay for the cost of production. And they get "National Security", a local software develoment markets and a better current account as a bonus.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    6. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


      And that is the exact reason why a place like SA can make a fortunee in the open source market.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    7. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      Bain is absolutely right here (and the fact that he's a personal friend has nothing to do with it of course). When you're cut off from the rest of the world, you have to make things work when you run into trouble.

      P.S. better change your homepage dude - twilyt.com goes to Sophy's Web Cam now...

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    8. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      How much does SA spend on foreign made vehicles? Does that mean it's worth developing their own car manufacturing industry?

    9. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      The market decides a lot of things. If Microsoft licences are expensive, fair enough. The logical follow on to that is not simply to mandate 'open source', but to look at all the alternative packages on the market.

    10. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      What is truly shortsighted is using open-source software. It may seem to get the job done now, but if it ties you down, if you're stuck with it, then you're in trouble in the long run. Only a shortsighted view would measure open-source stuff as better.

      Doesn't really matter to a business or government whether it's open or closed - it should offer the best deal and be an acceptable balance of factors. If you go 100% down, say, a Linux desktop route for the company's 30,000 PCs, you're still 'locked in' whether you have the source or not!

    11. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      Having lots of talent and maybe lots of software companies locally has nothing to do with adopting Open Source or not. It could even harm that local talent. Take a small software house creating an app for which release under, say, the GPL, makes no business sense. If the government mandates 'open source' and asks for all source code to be released to them, the result could be that the local company loses money and the local talent can go off and find another job. The app could have been well priced, full of funcionality, etc, etc. That wouldn't matter if a blanked 'open source only' mantra is what appears in government tenders.

    12. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by bain · · Score: 1

      What is the "company" is the government. We pay taxes so the government can employ people to do the coding and still release it under GPL. why can't the governments contract small develop house to make the software they want .. GPL it and still win ?

      --
      Sanity is a majority vote.
    13. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      Why not indeed. The point is that mandating this kind of thing can cause more problems than it solves. I'm happily selling my closed source software to the government and both parties are benefitting. Why should I then have to change my entire business model because of a rather shortsighted mandate from the government? Equally the govt could get spectacularly bad value - they rely on my software and are asking me to GPL it and change my entire business model. Fine - I'd do it, but at a price!

      There are 100s of scenarios, but my original point is that blanket mandates for open source benefit noone.

    14. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
      What happens when they need functionality that the open source world doesn't offer. I'm thinking of things like the scalability and availability features you get from the big Unix guys (and no, sticking 100 Dells together is not always the answer for big systems). What about when something like SAP, Oracle Apps, Siebel, etc, etc is required?

      Hey, we're talking about developing countries here. Have you seen what SAP, Oracle, Siebel charge for licences? Have you seen the GNP (and Government revenue) of a developing country? Can you put two and two together?

      Big name mega software is often not an option for developing countries, whether they need it or not. They can't afford it.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    15. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call SA a developing country. And if a country is a developing country, they're even more unlikely to have the resources to write their own stuff, but will have dollars to buy in outside help, hardware and licences.

      Equally, everyone prices according to the local market.

      If you need to run your national steel monopoly on something like Oracle, you're going to need the budget to do it properly, or you don't do it all. Also, if you have very little budget, you're not going to have the resources to write, test and support that national telco billing app, let alone purchase the F15K you'd need to run it on.

    16. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by mpe · · Score: 1

      What is truly shortsighted is using closed-source software. It may seem to get the job done now, but if it ties you down, if you're stuck with it, then you're in trouble in the long run.

      A lot of data governments handle is long term, sometimes very long term.

    17. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by Isofarro · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How much does SA spend on foreign made vehicles? Does that mean it's worth developing their own car manufacturing industry?


      Foreign-made vehicles in South Africa are merely luxury items for those people with more money than sense. South Africa's car manufacturing industry is World Class. Notable achievements:

      * All right-hand drive BMW's are made in South Africa. Germany produces only left-hand drives now. BMW South Africa scored better quality ratings than their German counterparts for 2002. Both have extremely high quality levels
      * Volkswagen South Africa won the sole contract to supply China with 300,000 vehicles a few years ago.

    18. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And BMWs are the every day workhorse for the common man I suppose? I can just see Soweto packed with all those new 7 series, driving the common man out to plough the land.

    19. Re:Shortsighted and blinkered by fferreres · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the market is composed of buyers and sellers. They are NOT mandating what privates should buy or sell, they are just stating what they want to buy (thatincludes they want the souces, for security, auditing and avoid getting locked into propietary stuff).

      I don't see a problem with that. You can buy whatever you like with your money. Let them buy what they think is best for their country. Well bought OSS is better than surrendering the dollars to foreign monopolies.

      It's stupid to have to sell apples and cars to the US, so that they allow you to copy Windows and Office, so you can mail your friends, surf the net and write a document/spreadsheet. Actually, that's what 90% of the users in the world do. I REPEAT: It's stupid to have to export real stuff (as in "I CAN'T COPY APPLES"!) to be able to use a copy a Windows and Office. It's even more stupid if you have to pay for the 90% of the same functionality over and over and over again, and in the process funding that developer so that they can conquer and lock more more markets.

      The US can do what they want, if they want to have uncompetitive companies on every field except software, they can mandate that the goverment, the states, schools and every company use propietary stuff (MS, Oracle, etc, etc).

      Microsoft/Oracle/etc earning "locally" come from...guess what... USA companies lossing revenues!! No earning comes out of thin air, the only part that comes out of thin air is when you carge this monopoly software to South Africa or Peru. If you are not charging those countries, they you are transfering General Motors, AOL and everyone elses money to the monopolists and the law buyers.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
  57. Thats why they are the perfect country to do this by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    South Africa is a poor country. Just because they have an Aids problem doesnt mean they are the only country with this problem, Asia also has an Aids problem, especially Thailand.

    As far as the Aids crisis, while alot of people in South Africa have aids, the spread of Aids is greater in African than in the USA because Africa does not have the technology, the medicine, the doctors, most people infected with Aids dont know they have it, the fact that most people in Africa arent educated enough, etc.

    You have to start somewhere, a country needs an economy before it can improve.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  58. A Sustainable business model? Really? Hmm... by 4_Scythe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems every time a "big time" Open Source story like this appears on Slashdot, all the posters turn into blind zealots.

    Sure, this is great news - but that's no reason to discount what Microsoft is saying.

    Microsoft may be guilty of a lot of things, but sofar I agree with the "paying the bills" statement. There's scarce few major success story from any developers coding Open Source software alone - but yet there are many successful proprietary developers.

    It seems to me that Open Source software works best when the collaborators are working on behalf of different companies on the one piece of software. That is, the businesses themselves are not reliant on the software, but the collaborative development benefits all those involved.

    1. Re:A Sustainable business model? Really? Hmm... by Isofarro · · Score: 1
      There's scarce few major success story from any developers coding Open Source software alone - but yet there are many successful proprietary developers.


      Open Source developers can switch from one application to the next. They are only limited to the languages they know.

      Proprietary developers cannot do that because the source isn't available to them. Where Open Source development is a community, proprietary developement can only survive by not being a community.
  59. You think capitalism is better? by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Offtopic



    Communism is bad, but no country has successfully been built on Capitalism.

    Countries start off communist and then convert to capitalism.

    Africa had slavery, USA had slavery, China started off Communist, Europe had slavery.

    You act like Capitalism works before the infastructure is actually there to make it work.

    Sure you can build a country on free Labor, but Communism is what works. How is Africa supposed to buy Microsofts software? Capitalism doesnt work because they are too poor, they must first build up their industries and economy.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:You think capitalism is better? by Anti-HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Communism is bad, but no country has successfully been built on Capitalism.

      Oh? You tell me, which ones are in better shape...
      East Germany or West Germany?
      North Korea or South Korea?
      Taiwan and Hong Kong or mainland China?

      You must be trolling. Nobody could really be that dumb!

    2. Re:You think capitalism is better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they could.

    3. Re:You think capitalism is better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay buddy, put the pipe down and back away from it with your hands locked behind your head.

    4. Re:You think capitalism is better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Countries start off communist and then convert to capitalism.

      You don't understand what 'communism' means. There has never been a 'communist' country, even countries run by parties calling themselves 'communist' claimed only to be preparing the way for communism. Under communism there is no state, and no property. The maxim of communism is "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.' As you can see OSS is about as close as humanity has ever been to something that can be called truely communist.

      Africa had slavery, USA had slavery, China started off Communist, Europe had slavery. China started off communist?! I suppose it was the commies who built the great wall. Slavery is about as diametrically opposed to communism as you can concieve. Under communism there is no private property, under slavery people themselves can be private property.

      The way communists thought it worked was like this : Slavery >> Feudalism >> Capitalism >> Socialism >> Communism.

      You act like Capitalism works before the infastructure is actually there to make it work.

      From the communist point of view the benefit of capitalism is precisely that it provides the infrastructure for socialism and communism to work. That was the whole idea of the 5 year plans, ie, to create artificially what capitalism (which the Lenninists thought they could skip) was supposed to accomplish.

      Communism is what works ... Capitalism doesnt work because they are too poor

      Unfortunately you have to be even richer for Communism to work than for Capitalism to work. That is why Marx said Russia could never make a communist revolution, only Britain, and the USA, in his opinion, were advanced enough to move on to the next phase of human development. For communism to work you need increadibly abundance of wealth.

    5. Re:You think capitalism is better? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

      Hong Kong is Communist, Mainland China is Communist.

      Taiwan has nothing to do with any of this but China is beating Taiwan.

      East and West Germany had nothing on the Soviet Union.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    6. Re:You think capitalism is better? by Anti-HanzoSan · · Score: 1
      Hong Kong is Communist

      Um, I don't think so...
      From the 2002 CIA factbook:

      Economy - overview: Hong Kong has a bustling free market economy highly dependent on international trade. Natural resources are limited, and food and raw materials must be imported. Indeed, imports and exports, including reexports, each exceed GDP in dollar value. Even before Hong Kong reverted to Chinese administration on 1 July 1997 it had extensive trade and investment ties with China. Per capita GDP compares with the level in the four big economies of Western Europe. GDP growth averaged a strong 5% in 1989-97. The widespread Asian economic difficulties in 1998 hit this trade-dependent economy quite hard, with GDP down 5%. The economy, with growth of 10% in 2000, recovered rapidly from the Asian financial crisis. The recent global downturn has badly hurt Hong Kong's exports and GDP growth is estimated to be 0% in 2001. Private sector analysts project 2002 GDP growth to be 1.8%.

      Taiwan has nothing to do with any of this but China is beating Taiwan.

      Militarily, yes. Economicly? You must be joking.

      East and West Germany had nothing on the Soviet Union.

      I think they'd be surprised to hear that! You ever heard of the Berlin Wall?
    7. Re:You think capitalism is better? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      For communism to work you need increadibly abundance of wealth.

      That's really it, and it's an ironic paradox. Capitalism CREATES wealth, communism CONSUMES it. And that's the problem--capitalism is sustainable, communism isn't. People complain that capitalism isn't fair because some people are richer than others. Some are MUCH richer than others. But it's not a question of fairness, it's a question of sustainability.

      Capitalism has existed for thousands of years and is still functioning. We still have poor and there are still are rich, and that's just part of reality. But, as far as I know, no communist society has survived for more than about 75 years, has it? I believe USSR held the record but they went belly-up. China's been communist for about, what, 55 years now? But they're opening up to capitalism and I'll bet that they'll be capitalist within 2 decades.

      Point is, history shows that capitalism is sustainable. Communsim isn't.

      Inasmuch as open source, OS really is similar to communism. Everyone puts in what they can and takes what they need. As a closed model it might not be sustainable. But it IS sustainable because, in reality, people do it for fun and have other sources of income. Their other sources of income are the "capitalism" that generates wealth, and open source is the "communism" that consumes it (inasmuch as their time). Another word for that is "hobby." :) It just so happens that this hobby produces something of value to the entire world and which may even increase the capitalistic capabilities of others (or self) in the future.

    8. Re:You think capitalism is better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Point is, history shows that capitalism is sustainable. Communsim isn't.

      Now historical capitalist societies are easy to find, but please show me one Communist (no state, no property, from each according to blah blah blah ...). It is arguable (probably true) that true communism isn't achievable, but not that history shows it to be unsustainable. The idea though is that each stage of development requires the previous to develop. So until the USA leads the way by showing us the communist utopia of plenty and self-motivated producers of wealth, we are simply arguing about a fiction.

      Capitalism CREATES wealth, communism CONSUMES it.

      Now if you want to run the line that the countries that call themselves 'communist', or are under the control of a 'communist' party are the only kind of communist society we can talk about, then it becomes equally difficult to find a such a country that historically was an industrial/capitalist society before it went 'communist.' On the other hand socialist contries, such as the Scandinavian and other NW European states, seems to be sustaining themselves adequately.

      OS really is similar to communism ... t IS sustainable because, in reality, people do it for fun and have other sources of income.

      Agreed! More than that however, the 'from each according to their ability to each according to their need' dictum (well actually the 'to each' part) is only achievable because the the phenominally low marginal cost of productions of software. Try building open building open source cars (with all the raw materials needed) and give them away for nix. Not too difficult to allow each to have according to need when there really is no competition for scarce resources.

  60. I have good news... by Anti-HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...and I have bad news.

    First the bad news...

    ...the Governor of Illinois pardoned all the felons on Death Row.

    Now the good news...

    ...HanzoSan has disappeared!

    1. Re:I have good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First the bad news...

      Wow, that's the best news I've heard all year! You mean there is intelligent life in Illinois after all!

  61. Socialism is required by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    Until the country reaches a point where all the food and educaiton requirements are met, and this is when you can move to capitalism.

    The USA is not pure Capitalism, neither is Canada or any of the European countries.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Socialism is required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that really turns the traditional, "until a country has a fully developed capitalism you can't move to socialism" theory on its head!

  62. Your sig by istartedi · · Score: 1

    When I trace into fclose, I get... oh crap, the /. lameness filter won't let me post it all, but it's a disassembly with debug info and it's got a lot more code in it than that. There are 3 system calls appropriately enough to functions named _lock_file,_fclose_lk, and _unlock_file in that order. At any rate, the source is either not installed on my machine (or not available to begin with). Obviously MS's libc doesn't use the code in your sig, since it wouldn't do much of anything. So, what are you trying to say?



    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  63. A serious question... by boomgopher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this move by South Africa, People's Rep. China, et al. really a big win for the Open Source movement, or is it just governments taking free stuff?

    Maybe I'm being a cynic and/or misunderstanding, but I'm not expecting some of these governments to actually contribute anything back to OSS. I half expect some of them to end up violating any licensing the code is released under.

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    1. Re:A serious question... by devleopard · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that they aren't forced to redistribute their own changes - they only have to distribute source code if they distribute binaries. But your point is valid - I think governments are in it for the beer, not the speech. The power of open source is in the PROCESS, not the PRODUCT.

      --
      The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
    2. Re:A serious question... by jbolden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why? Government universities have a long track record of giving their software back to the community. Government agencies inside the US were actively improving Linux before they were stopped due to lobbying. The government of Germany is funding work that is going into KDE which will be available to everyone.

      I don't see any evidence at all that governments aren't willing to widely share code. Their perspective is likely any of the other major players: if they don't share the code then they have no chance of getting the code in the main tree and they have repatch every new release which is an impossible amount of work.

    3. Re:A serious question... by pjrc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...but I'm not expecting some of these governments to actually contribute anything back to OSS.

      Time and time again, people have tried this and failed again and again. When the primary goal is to simply have a good program to USE (not resell to others), it just doesn't work not contributing back. Many have tried this and regretted it.

      What inevitably happens is the "official" project improves, both fixing bugs and including new features. The private code diverges from the public version, even if only in minor ways, it becomes a headache when a patch doesn't apply cleanly. Whomever "maintains" the private code needs to reimplement the improvements that are deemed critical from the public code, and as time goes on this becomes more and more hassle.

      Often the private changes are contributed back into the public version, simply because that is the only viable way to "maintain" the application over time. Sometimes, the private version stagnates or diverges too far. Either way, the lesson learned by an organization who's primary purpose is simply using the software is that it's in their own self interest to merge their improvements back into the public project, where they will be maintained and tested together with all future improvements contributed by others.

    4. Re:A serious question... by jsse · · Score: 1

      I don't know about other places, but China chose opensource path mainly because they don't want more american made stuffs in their Government. After an unfortunately instance when Microsoft shipped the first version of Simplified Chinese Windows 95 which included pranks from taiwanese developers who hide words like 'Communist Bandit' in their work(so much for not testing their products well before release) Of course, there's rumors about embedded missile guidiance chips in the printers to middle-east, but it's more like a X-Files episode to me. :)

      Do they contribute anything back to OSS? AFAIK none for the China Government, because closing source within an organization is allowed in GPL, while RedFlag Linux, which is co-developed by Minister of Information and a Government co-owned private company seems to take opensource community value in the development.

    5. Re:A serious question... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      really a big win for the Open Source movement, or is it just governments taking free stuff?

      Doesn't matter, I think. Any software user is a win for the OSS community. It means more data will be in OSS accessible formats, more websites will be browsable with OSS browsers etc. It's marketshare, which breaks the monopoly, that the important point, and the benefit for us all.

      In addition such a decision will earn at least some money for OSS companies, and in turn to OSS developers. It also give OSS developers a better job market, etc.

      Really I think we can't lose with this. :-)

    6. Re:A serious question... by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Maybe I'm being a cynic and/or misunderstanding, but I'm not expecting some of these governments to actually contribute anything back to OSS.

      They probably won't, but that's expected. Maybe one day everybody will use Linux and most of our software will be open source, but I don't expect Joe and Jane User to start sending me patches. Right through the history of open source software, the answer has always been "if you want something, do it yourself". That worked because if you were using open source software, you were probably also a programmer.

      In the future, that won't work, because they'll just be users who even if they wanted to help out could not, because they don't have the skills.

      So the idea that if you use open source software you should contribute back is unsustainable really. I mean I use the road network, but I'm not expected to take part in filling holes, that's somebody elses job. Via taxes I pay them to do that for me.

      I think in the future maybe when users outnumber developers in linuxland you'll start seeing people scanning bugzillas for high voted bugs and offering to fix them in return for cash - you want CYMK in the GIMP? How much is it worth to you (and others). So, although I expect the majority of the work would still be done by volunteers, some of the other things would be contributed to by pure users, perhaps business and govt amongst them.

      I've often thought I'd try it after I leave university, in about 3/4 years. But I don't really know what the user:developer ratio will be then, and I wouldn't want to ask money for a feature when probably most of the people who'd contribute were themselves volunteer developers. That'd feel wrong. So, we'll have to see how it goes.

      Anyway, my point was that in the future very few users will actually be able to contribute back patches or docs or whatever directly, so I should think economic models will arise that let them do it indirectly. Governments probably will contribute back in this way.

    7. Re:A serious question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about:
      Manuals
      Art
      Bug reporting
      RFC's

      all can be done by the average Joe and Jane *if they want to*.

    8. Re:A serious question... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Time and time again, people have tried this and failed again and again. When the primary goal is to simply have a good program to USE (not resell to others),

      Which covers the vast majority of software written.

      it just doesn't work not contributing back. Many have tried this and regretted it.

      Either way, the lesson learned by an organization who's primary purpose is simply using the software is that it's in their own self interest to merge their improvements back into the public project, where they will be maintained and tested together with all future improvements contributed by others.

      All government and education and the vast majority of commercial businesses are covered by this. In reality it's a tiny number of businesses which are actually simply selling software.

    9. Re:A serious question... by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about bounties for OSS developement, and I think that's going to be the way of the future. I've got this idea for a website, also. Basically it'd be just an organized, user created (moderated, it would have to be) list of functionality people want added with an easy way to donate to the cause. The business model is that the bounty goes into an interest-bearing no-risk account of some sort, and the website lives off that interest.

      Anyway, I as a user might want CMYK for GIMP (bad example, GIMP 2 will have CMYK, but we'll run with it anyway), and maybe I see that you've already posted a request for it with a bounty of $20. At that point I might decide "hey, GIMP CMYK is worth $20 to me" and add my $20 to the bounty. If there are 50 other people that think GIMP CMYK is worth $20, then the bounty is over $1000. I know a few people in the printing and advertising industry who wouldn't mind a free graphics app that does CMYK, and it might just be worth the cost of a couple of Photoshop licenses to them. In easy numbers lets say 2 copies of Photoshop are $1000, and we get 4 companies to do that, now the bounty is up to $5000, and lets just say for the sake of arguement that there's some developer out there who, at $5000, considers the project to be worth his time.

      The beauty of the system I envision is that, unlike the current situation where we the occasional private individual offering a large bounty ($20k for X functionality in Y package), the bounty is held in escrow (not entirely sure that's the correct term, but it's close enough), so it will be there until someone completes the job. This creates another interesting effect, in that even for rare itches the bounty can become sizable with time. If you and I were the only people in the world who wanted GIMP to have CMYK support, but we each donated $20 a month to the bounty, it would take a long time for the bounty to get up to $5000, but it would get there.

      I see this plan benefiting users in that they can help direct the developement of a project that is important to them with a small outlay of capital. The benefit to developers is fairly obvious, in that they can get paid for something they might be doing anyway. It also removes the "pledge drive" feel that many requests for donations have, since it's the users offering money rather than the developers asking for it, hopefully without creating a code ransom situation which seems to be the other way OSS developers are able to make money.

      Anyway, there's my idea. Feel free to steal it, shoot it full of holes, or give me the kick in the pants I need to actually get it started, as you see fit.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  64. real funny :P by Maskirovka · · Score: 1
    He says there are higher expenses for the management, upgrading and security of opensource software.

    Maybe M$ would have better luck if they didn't hire crap comedians as managers.

  65. Now if only ... by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

    the Australian Labor Party would bring out an OSS policy instead of this

    --
    "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    1. Re:Now if only ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What like this?

      http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/11/07/103 63 08417620.html

      try googling for "lundy open source"

  66. MS was willing to help! by egg+troll · · Score: 0, Troll
    I seem to recall way back in the day of the Microsoft anti-trust trial that MS agreed to donate products to impoverished places & schools. Unfortunately many Open Source advocates pressured the courts into rejecting this offer. Because of this, Microsoft was unabel to help out those in need, such as America's poverty-stricken schools, and third world countries like South Africa.


    Thus Open Source advocates created a self-fullfilling prophecy: Deny third-world countries like South Africa from having access to MS products and then express smug satisfaction when said countries are forced to use Open Source materials!

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:MS was willing to help! by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



      Microsofts goal wasnt to help those in need, Microsofts goal was to sell their OS to schools.

      What good is giving free computers if the software costs more than the computers? The Licenses werent free.

      Open Source poeple said Microsoft could donate twice as much hardware if the software was open source, Redhat agreed to donate software, Microsoft showing their true motives pulled out.

      If Microsoft wanted to help the poor schools they'd have donated the computers with or without their software on it.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  67. its quite kiff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yah, that's kiff. But its all a bit arb at the same time.

  68. Internet Cafes. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    You have to take into account that China is just as bad as Africa and look at China.

    Sure they dont all have electricity, but they all have brains, books, and as open source companies begin to get government funding, the government will build internet cafes all around the country, the companies will use their profits to hire programmers, programmers will make money and this money which goes to taxes will be used to build more infastructure.

    It will take 10-20 years for Africa to go from being a third world country to a world leader.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Internet Cafes. by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If were're talking about Africa as a whole (rather than just SA, which this story is about) then I'd say Africa is _much_ worse off than China.

      Africa still has a fair number of extremely corrupt governments and civil unrest. Chinese peasants are poor, but they don't have to worry about thugs coming through their villages and spraying the buildings with gunfire like in the Congo.

      Lots of reason to hope, of course. Good government in Ghana. South Africa is making progress. But I think China and India are much more likely to become world leaders in the next 50 years.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    2. Re:Internet Cafes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It will take 10-20 years for Africa to go from being a third world country to a world leader.

      Starting when? Can you name one instance in all of recorded history when this has happened? For bonus points, please locate the "country" of Africa on a map.

    3. Re:Internet Cafes. by albanac · · Score: 1
      Lots of reason to hope, of course. Good government in Ghana.

      Woot! Someone other than me knows about Ghana!

      I grew up through the Jerry Rawlings years, which left me with a great respect for that man and for the men he surrounded himself with. The path he set the country on has been positive and sustainable.

      I also know a bit about Ghana's telecommunications and IT development policies, and they're very impressive. I remember an internet cafe opening up in the town 7 miles from where my family live. 7 miles down the road, there is no power, running water or plumbing, but my Mom can email me from WaleWale. Before you think this is disproportionate; all things come with time. My family live in a very small subsitance agriculture village which wouldn't know what to do with power or running water anyway.

      GeekAid were invited to go out to Ghana, and their member's scribblings are on the net somewhere. Have a google and take some time to read 'em.

      ~cHris
  69. Re:Three thoughts to repudiate Microsoft FUD in th by venom600 · · Score: 1

    > So, according to Microsoft, forcing annual upgrades and software subscription on businesses IS a sustainable business model? Of course it is.....for Microsoft.

  70. GPL is ANARCHISM says RMS himself by Szplug · · Score: 1

    Anarchism is communism without rulers.
    Bottom-up organized instead of top-down.
    In the one or two cases (besides open source software) where it has actually existed.

    --
    Someday we'll all be negroes
    1. Re:GPL is ANARCHISM says RMS himself by sam_handelman · · Score: 1

      Anarchism means many different things to different people, and in different contexts.

      Those who advocate anarchy (lit. absence of rulers) as a political system, today, generally mean any sort of non-soviet style, non-authoritarian, socialist regime. Typically, the idea would be that the means of production (factories, farmland, etc.) are publically owned, and thus managed by whatever state apparatus you may have. However, in the words of Noam Chomsky (who describes himself as an anarchist and seems to mean it in this sense): anarchist ideas -- challenging authority and insisting that it justify itself -- are appropriate at all levels.

      Historically, anarchy was a derrogatory term for democracy, which we might call polyarchy (the rule of many) today.

      An individual anarchist, however, may have little or no political conscience. In the philosophical sense, someone who simply does not believe in rules might call himself an anarchist.

      Likewise, a Liberterian might (indeed, probably does) agree that all exercise of "authority" must be heavily justified, although they define authority somewhat differently. Thus, some Liberterians say that they are also Anarchists, in the philosophical if not political sense. Anarcho-capitalist, a term that crops up in literature fairly often, means Liberterian.

      So, yes, the GPL is anarchism, in the "stick it to the man," philosophical sense of the term - "the man" in this case being the conventional software industry.

      RMS himself is also an anarchist in the political sense (I think). Writing software under the GPL is perfectly consistent with an anarchist political philosophy; however, it is not a subversive vehicle for such a political philosophy.

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  71. Re:Heh.-Bailing out the common-man. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "At any rate, it's easy to imagine that billg is packing his bags for another emergency handout run right now."

    Help! Help! I'm a Windows user who's going to wipe his drive clean, and install Linux! Send money quick!.

  72. US will be seing this soon by adamruck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    k.. im really tired and I cant think that good, so this wont be very clearly written how long do you think it will be before we will see more and more state and local goverments doing similar things? There is a HUGE deficit and money shortage, and many groups are looking to cut costs. The public school system in my area has to cut there budget by 2 million dollars(the latest proposal was to cut media aids). Ive got a feeling that more and more people are going to be looking towards open source solutions in the near future.

    --
    Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
  73. Get a grip by jbolden · · Score: 1

    America is on the bleeding edge of innovation. In computer hardware, computer software, biotechnology, manufacturing processes, new models of service... We have on of the least risk adverse but still responsible business cultures in the world. America has 4% of the world's people and over 25% of the world's economy. Our share of the global economy continues to grow (which is remarkable).

    Yes corporations are stupid here; but they are stupid everywhere else and on average moreso everywhere else. And corporations are not adverse to open source. 8 years ago there was almost no open source in most corporations. Today almost all corporations have some open source and many of them have it deployed extensively. That is a very rapid change. You mentioned the gun example; see how long it took for business to use interchangeable parts in most of their manufacturing processes. It wasn't instantly. 25 years took just as long in the 1800s as it does today.

    A few things to remember regarding open source and America:

    1) In 3rd countries (thiugh I'm not sure about SA here) the common office worker is more intellegent and better educated then their counterpart in a first world country. Thus ease of use is less important and ease of configuration more important for them.

    2) The cost of a worker relative ot the cost of software is much higher in 1st world countries than 3rd world countries. Microsoft products are not really that expensive on a per employee basis in the 1st world.

    3) America is Microsoft's home turf. Their programmers are most in tune with American business, and further arguments about exporting capital don't apply to US business.

    For all these reasons you would expect American business to be one of the last dominos to fall not one of the first.

    1. Re:Get a grip by Isofarro · · Score: 2, Insightful
      America [...] We have on of the least risk adverse but still responsible business cultures in the world.


      Enron. WorldCom.

    2. Re:Get a grip by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Frequent bankrupcy is not a flaw of the American model but a feature. In times when there is an excess of debt an a defecit of equity; debt gets converted into equity via. bankrupcy. Worldcom certainly suffered from excess debt and too little equity.

      Enron is simply an example of crime. That's not business that's just criminal activity pure and simple. We know about it, its a public scandal and over the next few years the people responsible are going to go to jail. The willingness of executives to convert corporate assets into personal assets is definitely a flaw in our business culture, but that's not the original poster was addressing. That's more of the issue of rapidly growing corruption which because it involves stock options is often risk-loving not too risk adverse.

    3. Re:Get a grip by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Enron. WorldCom.

      Well, they certainly weren't averse to risk, were they?

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  74. Re:SA more progressive than the US? [OT] by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I must ask even though this is off-topic...

    Leaving the moral argument aside (Yes, there is a moral argument against homosexuality--not that I believe it per-se, but I can concieve of it and I'm an amataeur)

    I don't think I've ever heard a rational argument that homosexuality is immoral. Those who believe that seem to resort to religion or an appeal to "nature". Even if you don't agree with it, I'd be very interested in hearing moral argument you're thinking of.

    --
    It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
  75. Ms. Micro$oft lifts her dress... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Last week the company[Micro$oft]followed up with the surprise news that it will open its source code to governments worldwide so they can enhance the security of its software. That is a calculated move to entrench its position in government markets. But Microsoft's move has come too late to affect the agency's decision.

    Micro$oft's 'open-source' sham is like a woman that teases you by lifting her dress for a second but doesn't let you touch anything... of course in the case of Ms. M$ you wouldn't want to touch anything...

  76. South Africa a 3rd world country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They did the first heart surgery before anyone else and had laser weapons aboard fighter jets in the 1980s.

    1. Re:South Africa a 3rd world country? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      True they also have rapant illiteracy. Apartheid SA is a weird case where a small percentage of the population had a 1st world standard of living and the vast majority lived in the 4th world. Today the wealth is spread around a little more but...

      They are hard to classify. If you want to call them 1st world I can live with that but the economy still strikes me as too underdeveloped with regard to most people.

    2. Re:South Africa a 3rd world country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know this may sound racist, but you must realize that that was before whites began being persecuted. Blacks demand extortion money from white business owners, and if whites don't pay up, they may be killed or robbed of everything they own. I heard a story of such a case just yesterday. In other words, anybody with education and business know-how (the facilitors of a high standard of living and the backbone of the economy) is being stamped out. The black majority is shooting themselves in foot (or in the head). They were deprived of education and business experience during apartheid, but now they are depriving themselves of learning the ways of capitalism from whites who have "been there done that". They are also scaring off a lot of good employers who would be providing good jobs.

      SA is a 2nd world country at best. It's very violent and corrupt. Bullets are flying all the time. SA's short golden days have ended.

    3. Re:South Africa a 3rd world country? by TheFr00n · · Score: 1

      I have to assume you're trolling, or that you only watch CNN.

      I live and work in South Africa, and I'm white. Nobody's demanding extortion money from me. Nobody's shooting at me. In fact, things are better than ever.

      We still have a deeply corrupt government, but at least we elected them for a change. And for all their embezzlement and lunatic AIDS policies, their decision to go the OSS route gives me renewed hope for the future.

      Come visit us. You'd dig it.

      --
      "By Grabthar's Hammer, what a savings."
  77. Why the US gov't can't do this... by Milo77 · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing (probably on slashdot) a conspiracy theory about why MS got off so easily by the justice department. Basically it went something like this: MS is not just a monopoly in the US but the globe, as such they act as a huge funnel, pumping money from over-seas into the US economy. Now, wouldn't the US gov't be crazy to close the valve on something like that? Especially in this economy. No wonder they couldn't be broken up. Further, I wouldn't be surprised if a similar "conspiracy" keeps the US gov't from ever taking OSS seriously. The US gov't *wants* its multinational corporations to have global monopolies. They're at least willing to look the other way more than say for AT&T. The US gov't using OSS would give other coutries even more of an excuse to jump ship on MS ("look even the US gov't uses OSS! YEAH!").

  78. HOLY SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BSD is DEAD already. Mike Smith said so.

    Get over it.

  79. Bill Gates is travelling to South Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next on news.

  80. Civil rights act of 1964 by jbolden · · Score: 1

    In general the US has supported the Lockian notion that property rights lie at the roots of all human rights. Attacking property rights to defend human rights is a war of the branches against the trunk. That position is held by few other Western nations, which isn't suprising given that most of them have had Socialist governments until recently, and some still do.

    The civil rights act of 1964 which outlawed the kind of private discrimination you are talking about was very controversial among many people who were against discrimination but at the same time saw this act as fundementally undermining private liberty. And make no mistake about it, both the opponents and the proponents of the 1964 act have had their predictions validated by history. In the case of homosexuals it is very hard to argue that they are economically disadvanteged since "out of the closet" gays in the US have living standards well above the mean.

    As for same sex marriage I'm not sure what the heck that means. Marriage is a covenant which primarily involves sharing property so as to bind the couple together for the long term which is primarily neccesary to raise children, since raising children takes about 2 decades and with multiple children closer to 3 decades. What exactly do same sex couples need from a marriage that they can't get from living together and owning a house jointly? Finally as for domestic partnership; why would you need that if you have same sex marriage?

    1. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by blackcoot · · Score: 1

      My personal reaction is that the notion of civil union is distinctly insulting, it reeks of an attempt to appease homosexuals while maintaining a "seperate but equal" policy. If the purpose of marriage is solely to produce children, then why are childless heterosexual couples still allowed to be married? And what about those heterosexual couples who aren't able to conceive? I think it would only be fair in those cases to nullify those marriages and replace them with civil unions. But that's just me. If you're curious about what gay, lesbian, bisexual, & transgendered people expect from marriage, PFLAG has some information. The Human Rights Campaign also has more information.

    2. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "What exactly do same sex couples need from a marriage that they can't get from living together and owning a house jointly?"

      Tax breaks, insurance, inheritance, all kinds of legal rights.

      I'll rephrase the question for you. Since a homosexual marriage would be no different then a childless heterosexual marriage what possible harm could come of it? If a homosexual couple decide to have kid by a surragate or adoption then what?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    3. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1
      Marriage is a covenant which primarily involves sharing property so as to bind the couple together for the long term which is primarily neccesary to raise children

      If you're still living in the stone age, then you're 100% right. Then again, some of us have evolved beyond simple animal instincts.

    4. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Since a homosexual marriage would be no different then a childless heterosexual marriage what possible harm could come of it?

      Very little. But lets me clear here, the question was whether this law in and of itself makes a country substantially more free than the United States; which is a much higher standard than if it is harmful or not.

      If a homosexual couple decide to have kid by a surragate or adoption then what?

      If homosexual couples are in general raising children together (in a permanent or semi-permanent fashion) then I do think that marriage makes sense. To the best of my knowledge this behavior is fairly rare and anecdotal; if that underlying premise is false then absolutely the conclusion that gay marriage doesn't really accomplish anything becomes false.

    5. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tax breaks, insurance, inheritance, all kinds of legal rights.
      Speaking as a single person, I think that all of this is crap. Why should people get tax breaks and better insurance coverage from their employers just because they've signed some legal contract about who they have sex with?

      The only way to make the system fair is to remove marriage from the secular domain and leave it completely up to churches where it belongs.

      The system would be completely fair in that case, straights and gays could get married---but no one would discriminate against me for choosing to not become married.

    6. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by jbolden · · Score: 1

      If the purpose of marriage is solely to produce children, then why are childless heterosexual couples still allowed to be married?

      A great number of heterosexuals who marry with no intention of having children end up having them; and vice versa. Further much of the prep work that goes into having children occurs before the children are born. One person in the couple often makes sacrifices for years to increase the financial well being of the couple and then they have kids. In general the cost to society of tieing marriage more directly to children far outweighs the benefits.

      Anyway, the pflag list is an excellent list.
      1) Many of the things on that list would be covered by a general power of attorney document

      2) Many others exist primary for the issue of children (like spousal support, and death benefits). That is these things wouldn't exist apart from the procreative aspects of most marriages.

      3) The remaining few would be covered by a will, business partnership, etc...

      Now I certainly agree there is an aspect of unfairness in forcing homosexual couples to: grant each other power of attorney, form a joint business, and have and maintain detailed wills. If the argument for reforming the laws is that there needs to be a document consoladation that might not be controversial. But many of the "rights" that can't be achieved with the help of a paralegal exists for the purpose of children; and granting those rights to homosexuals IMHO would require that most homosexual couples be raising kids. So while the list is quite a good list of the advantages of marriage for an individual, again I don't really see how it changes the raising children argument. Society protects marriage because it has an interest in the products of marriage; if there aren't going to be products of the marriage the societial interest is much less.

    7. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The creation of generalized societal support structures inside a legal and financial framework rather than inside a tribal framework is the evolution. As for animal instincts this whole discussion is about acceptance and money; both of which are animalistic in nature. If you've evolved beyond the need for money and social acceptance of any nature I don't see how either position on marriage would have any effect.

    8. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "Very little. But lets me clear here, the question was whether this law in and of itself makes a country substantially more free than the United States; which is a much higher standard than if it is harmful or not."

      Free is a funny word. How do you measure the amount of "freedom" in a country. Do you measure the number of laws, the percentage of people in jail, the existance of the death penalty, the severity of punishment for seemingly minor infractions, what? No matter how you define "freedom" I think you will find that the US is behind dozens of countries in the freedom scale.

      "f homosexual couples are in general raising children together (in a permanent or semi-permanent fashion) then I do think that marriage makes sense. To the best of my knowledge this behavior is fairly rare and anecdotal; if that underlying premise is false then absolutely the conclusion that gay marriage doesn't really accomplish anything becomes false."

      Well undoubtably marriage gives a couple rights over and above single people living together. There is no reasonable argument for denying those rights to homosexuals in a free country.

      As for children that might be a chicken and egg problem. The reason homosexuals (especially lesbians) don't raise more children is because they are not allowed to adopt. If they were allowed to adopt more of them might be raising children. Also artificial insemination is a deliberate act whereas most children are born from accidental copulations. If it was as hard for heterosexuals to have children as homosexuals then you would see a lot less children in the world.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    9. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I'll use the big 3: life, liberty, happiness.

      In terms of life all 1st world countries do pretty well. As much as is possible these governments insure people live long and productive lives with very good medical care.... The US has better care at the middle class level and worse care for the lower classes than in Europe but I'd consider this one a tie.

      Liberty.

      1) Freedom of speech -- much better in the US
      1a) State owned media
      1b) No absolute protections on speech.
      In terms of practical freedom of speech it might seem higher in Europe but I think that is mainly because Americans choose non-political or mainstream political programs. Non mainstream political discourse is certainly widely available.
      All told I'd give this a slight win for the US

      2) Freedom of Religion
      I don't even think I need to defend this. YOu have in Europe:
      a) State sponsership of religious institutions
      b) State persecutions of religions
      The number of people effected is quite low and the persecution quite mild. Slight win for the US

      Freedom of assembly, freedom from unreasonable search... I think the US would win mildly on most negative personal freedoms (i.e. freedom from government interference).

      The other area is democracy. With European governments granting more and more of the power for regulation to Brussals there is no question that Europeans should be directly electing the government in Brussels. Even more importantly the US system has strong checks and balances which the European systems lack.

      As for the American criminal justice system it is much much harsher than in the Europe. I'm not sure that's a freedom issue. It is much more difficult to convict someone of a crime in the US and consequently the penalties are quite harsh. It may be that the difficulty in convicting has reached the point where it is interfering with justice on both sides (i.e. too few crimes succesfully prosecuted and sentances which are too harsh when prosecution is succesful); or maybe not. I've lived in states with very harsh laws (like North Carolina), places with informally harsh penalties (like South Philadelphia) and places that are weak on crime (New York, LA). I've generally found freedom is enhanced when criminal penalties are rare and harsh. People know what will get them in trouble and don't do it.

      But to be fair I'll grant criminal justice as a win for Europe. I won't however grant Europe any points (except negative ones) regarding the death penalty. The death penalty in Europe was abolished over the objections of the people; in the US there was an attempt to do so but the people were able to resist. I think if anything this shows the more democratic nature of the US.

      Finally happiness:
      On economic freedom however I think the US wins by a long shot. The degree of micro management in European economies is frankly insane. The low living standards are clearly a detriment to happiness.

      As far as

      _____________

      Well undoubtably marriage gives a couple rights over and above single people living together. There is no reasonable argument for denying those rights to homosexuals in a free country.

      Reread my point. Most of these benefits are designed to benefit children not the couple. Without children the benefits don't make sense. The correlation between marriage and children is strong enough that one can be used as a proxy for the other, and further attempting to directly address children is likely to diminish freedoms in many other ways. That is if hetrosexual couples were having as few children (on average) as homosexual couples I wouldn't see much reason for them to get these benefits either.

      As for adoption there are a shortage of adoptable babies and an excess of couples that want them. There is no reason to extend benefits to assist people in being able to adobt. Its a non-problem.

      As for accidental vs. intentional children, I assume you aren't a parent. Virtually every middle class non-teenage parent I know quite deliberately set out to have children within a few months of when they got pregnant. It was no accident. I don't know about the poor, and I will certainly grant teenage pregnancies are often accidental.

      The physical aspects copulation vs. insemination are quite true. OTOH they aren't really that difficult to overcome; relative to the other difficulties in being a parent.

    10. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by blackcoot · · Score: 1

      You assume that same sex couples do not have children, which is false. There are many same sex couples who have adopted children, there are also many same sex couples who are raising thier own biological children. There are also many same sex couples who want to adopt but face almost insurmountable odds against them, largely based on the fact that they don't have the same parenting rights as heterosexual couples. You are, however, right that with a lot of paperwork many of the same protections and rights as marriage can be achieved, but not all of them.

    11. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      most children are born from accidental copulations.

      "Honestly, it was an accident! I tripped and it just sort of fell in there!"

      Sorry, I couldn't resist. I think you meant to say "conception", not "copulation".

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    12. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I assume that same sex couples raising children is anecdotal. That is some do but the vast majority do not and thus being in a long term same sex relationship is not a good proxy for raising children. If I'm wrong in this premise then it would change the conclusion.

      As for adoption as I've pointed out in the other substread regarding my initial comments, there is a shortage of adobtable children; not a shortage of parents. There is no reason to extend wide subsidies to further increase the supply of homes wanting to adobt. Further non sterile lesbians can have children; and children can be adopted from abroad. If large numbers (in percentage terms) of homosexuals were using either strategy you'd expect to hear more about it. The difficulties in having a child (especially if you don't require biological) are pretty small compared to the difficulties in raising one. I simply have a problem believing there is really that much interest in point of fact. I don't have any trouble believing there is a great deal of interest in principle but those are very different things.

    13. Re:Civil rights act of 1964 by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      I really don't see where you are coming from here. I have traveled extensively in my life and I can tell you from personal experience that the press is more free in most other countries I have been in. Of course I have never traveled in China or Russia or anything like that but most European and Asian countries have really great press. Not only can they attack the govt with a venagance they actually do muckraking and investigative reporting. In the US the press is little more then a megaphone for one of the two official parties. Politics aside the press in other countries are also more free to publish nudity and sestually explicit material. Pick up a fashion magazine in germany or a newpaper in japan and you'd be shocked at the level of nudity. I once saw a TV show in japan where they were weighing womens breasts! It was hilarious.

      Also consider that the US has lots of very contrictive laws that can punish you after you print or say something. That combined with the civil lawsuits that frequently follow "free speech" and it all adds up to a pretty restrictive environment.

      Religion.

      America is the most religious democracy in the world. Virtually every member of the govt from top down are either christians or jews. The religous institutions wield uneblievable power in the policies and laws that are elected. Why is RU486 illegal? Why can't homosexuals marry? It all because of religion. Europe is much more secular then the US, even in Turkey it's illegal to wear religious garb into the senate chambers (in fact they had a politician do that and it was a huge fuss). In the US the senate prays every day to a christian god and jewish politicians wear yamurka (sp?) to work.

      I don't want to go point by point but your other arguments are equally weak. You essentially start from a goofy premise then and follow up with some non sequiters and then claim America is better. Take for example the following quote.

      "Reread my point. Most of these benefits are designed to benefit children not the couple."

      What a silly premise. I can put my wife on my work health insurance whether I have children or not. My wife is considered my survivor whether we have children or not. None of the laws or taxes we have been talking about contain any reference to children.

      I won't even start on how you could possibly think that most children born today are intentional.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  81. Read the article. by tunah · · Score: 1
    For months the State IT Agency had winced at the incessant expense of buying software licences for hundreds of thousands of staff spread across government departments. Now the agency has declared that it will ditch expensive brand name software in many cases and switch to opensource alternatives.

    It seems they have merely made open source the stated preferred option. Closed source alternatives will not be banned.

    --
    Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  82. Build not buy by jbolden · · Score: 1

    I think the article was pretty clear. They are going to build not buy. They are very few times that an inhouse solution can't be used instead of an Oracle app or an Siebel solution.

    As for scalability and availability. First off for real availability I still think Z-OS (formerly S/390, MVS) offers a much better package than any Unix. And probably they aren't excluding Solaris (which is essentially free if you buy the expensive hardare).

    BTW in terms of supercomputing Linux scales excellently, and in terms of availability NetBSD runs on some pretty high reliability hardware; and Linux is going to support Sparc III. So it would be possible though likely not the best solution.

    1. Re:Build not buy by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      "They are very few times that an inhouse solution can't be used instead of an Oracle app or an Siebel solution."

      If that's the case, why are they highly successful multi-billion dollar companies with hundreds of thousands of customers all over the world? Taking the example of the kinds of companies I often work with. Two sys admins, a couple of DBAs and an IT manager, working for a large manufacturing company. You're telling me they have the skills, the time and the inclination to knock up a quick competitor to Oracle financials over the weekend?

    2. Re:Build not buy by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      It's because proprietary (which is not quite the same as closed source) applications tend to work more or less out of the box.

      If you build your own app where an off the shelf solution already exists (be it closed or open source), you are letting yourself in for whole heaps of trouble. You have to fund the entire development yourself and let's be honest: bespoke software delvelopments haven't exactly got a good reputation for being delivered on time to budget and in reasonable working condition.

      With closed source solutions you may have to spend money on forced upgrades every couple of years and there is the risk of the company going bust or simply discontinuing the product (escrow agreements might help there). However, if you are rolling your own you have to pay the entire dev costs (i.e. the salaries of lots of developers and a PM), you have to pay for a team of people to maintain the code after its finished and you're as vulnerable there with people getting bored and leaving as with companies deciding to stop supporting their products.

      Theoretically, open source off the shelf products are better in some respects than proprietary products. e.g. if the official maintenance team gets wound up, you still have the source code. But in reality, no end user is going to hire the staff to maintain an out-of-support product even if they do have the source code.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    3. Re:Build not buy by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Your logic is lacking here. I indicated that Oracle and Siebel can be replaced by inhouse apps; that's not saying that they are replaced by inhouse apps. Large companies (and lets not forget we are talking American companies) often do not want the distraction of large software projects, and more importantly they don't want large adminisrative overhead. The government of SA in this case does what the distraction because of its side benefits. Further a national government is not a business. The analogy to business is often used but the national government is not a player in the economic game; but more like the referree. People understand that monopolies can often have different economic motavations than companies competing within an industry but fail to understand that an entity as entirely different as the government (draws revenue in relation to the size of the entire economy, actions effect the macro not the micro economic sphere...) is even less like a non-monopoly.

      As for your example of a company with no programming department at all; well of course they can't knock off inhouse apps. But the government of South Africa is not in the same situation.

    4. Re:Build not buy by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      Comparing a government department to a business is extremely valid. A national government has a number of 'business' tasks which are similar to those faced by any business and to which can be applied the same rules of profit and loss, value for money, effort vs results, etc, etc.

      A government's customers are its citizens. It has to bill/tax them, just as a telco might, it has to trace them and hold information on them that cannot be lost under any circumstances, just as a bank might, it has to market itself to them, just as any company might to its own customers. Running these operations can be automated, made more efficient, etc, etc by using computers. Judging by the UK government's efforts, writing their own software to do so is absolutely the worst thing to do :)

      The point is that a government's mandate should be to consider all options and make an informed, educated choice, based on all the criteria - which does not mean blindly mandating open source, just as it doesn't mean considering open source should be precluded.

    5. Re:Build not buy by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Two sys admins, a couple of DBAs and an IT manager, working for a large manufacturing company. You're telling me they have the skills, the time and the inclination to knock up a quick competitor to Oracle financials over the weekend?

      Your examples completely ignore the fundamental strength of open source: one company isn't doing all the work.

      You're correct in saying that the company you describe wouldn't be able to recreate Oracle on their own (never mind the timeframe), but they don't need to. There are plenty of other organizations that need that functionality, and there are plenty of OSS developers with detailed knowledge of OSS database apps who would be willing to do the work.

      As a thought experiment, which will hopefully illustrate my point; what if California offered just 1% of the $95M it was prepared to spend on Oracle software as bounties and/or contracts to create the functionality they needed using MySQL or PostgreSQL? How long do you think it would have taken for that functionality and scalability to be achieved?

      Now lets expand that; where would MySQL and PostreSQL be if all the companies buying Oracle and DB2 were instead pouring 1% of that money into the developement communities of those two packages?

      Yeah, it's not going to happen over the weekend, but with that kind of incentive I doubt it would take very long.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  83. Good news for other countries by mr_tenor · · Score: 2, Funny

    And now the US navy get 0wnz0red by hostile countries. Well, it's their choice.

  84. Cheers!! by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    Congradulations to the South African Government!! Now, if we can only convince our friends in the US about the *real* "Homeland Security" dangers. We should be very concerned about this as,

    1) Parts of the Windows source is being handed out to government bodies

    And

    2) Microsoft themselves have admitted that handing out source code would be a national security risk.

    What's 2 + 2, again?

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  85. not at all by asv108 · · Score: 1
    At that point, the product will be left hanging.

    Nope, that's the beauty of the GPL. Because the source code is in the public domain, other developers can step in and advance the application further or organizations that depend on that code can hire their own people. With a closed source solution, if a company stops development and/or support, your screwed. Especially now, when its more profitable for software companies to force upgrades by abandoning support and updates for older products.

  86. Re:Think about it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  87. Re:Intelligent thought by dark-nl · · Score: 1
    Microsoft is being sleazy about it too. Obviously the government is not going to wait around for volunteers to write a new social security administration program or whatever. They're going to pay some contractor to write it, and the main difference with the Microsoft model is that what the government pays for becomes public property. The contractor's developers are not going to wander off, because they're getting paid!

    (Even paid developers wander off, of course, as Microsoft is no doubt painfully aware. But the government can always find a new contractor. It's pretty hard to find a new Microsoft if this one isn't working out.)

  88. MOD PARENT POST DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FL is pretty much irrelevant. Mod down. Mod Down :-)

  89. Perl booleans by dark-nl · · Score: 1
    Perl values can be true, false, or undefined. There's a fourth possibility for hash values, which can "not exist". You can treat those as "undefined" if you want to, though.

    (Of course, perl values can also be "1" or "2" or whatever because perl doesn't have a specific boolean type; but treating "undefined" as false will cause warnings, while treating "1" as true will not.)

    1. Re:Perl booleans by kjeldahl · · Score: 1
      I do not think your comment about treating "undefined" as false will cause warnings is true. In Perl5, I see constructs with if statements where undefined is treated as false all the time, even with both strict and warnings enabled, and at least inside if statements they do not trigger a warning AFAIK. For instance:

      my $value = SomeFunc ();
      if ($value) {
      # Do stuff
      }


      Most often the false return value will be undef and not 0...

  90. Proud by theolein · · Score: 1

    As a South African, this makes me proud. Ridiculous I know, but it does. Amandla Awetu!

  91. Agree!! by 0z0*!a · · Score: 1

    100 % agree.

  92. today, bedroom, henceforth, albeit, saucepan by dark-nl · · Score: 2, Insightful
    English has always had a tendency to gradually combine words that are often used together. Each of the words in the subject was combined from words that used to be separate. Often they merged through an intermediate hyphenated form (bed room, bed-room, bedroom), but sometimes they skipped that.

    It appears that the same thing is happening to "a lot". Deal with it. If you want to complain, why not go straight to the source and complain that "a lot" makes no sense as a term of magnitude? "a lot of wood" used to be a specific amount of wood, i.e. one lot. This was gradually perverted into meaning "any large quantity of...", and is now about as meaningful as "many". People used to complain about ye fuck-tardes who use "a lot" on its own, as in "I swear at people at lot". "A lot of what?" they asked.

    1. Re:today, bedroom, henceforth, albeit, saucepan by alienmole · · Score: 1
      Although, part of the evolution of usage in language is presumably also the rejection of usages that don't find favor. Who knows, perhaps the fucktard-slinger's post will shift the balance away from those who believe "alot" should be aword.

      Besides, having to teach the next generation about the difference between "alot" and "allot" seems like it'd be alot of unnecessary trouble...

  93. In Post-Apartheid South Africa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...GPL discriminates against you.

  94. Government is one thing but by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


    You dont seem to understand that the government influences the whole economy.

    The government will keep some stuff private but will make alot of stuff public because it will help Africa.

    Companies in Africa dont benifit if the stuff developed is not released, with no economy Africa cannot improve its economy thus the government wont get more tax dollars back.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  95. 3rd world country looking for brownie points ? by bushboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Being a South African myself, I just hope this isn't another one of our Governments tricks at appearing to be 1st world and 'up to date/ahead of' 1st world countries.

    Whilst people in our country remain illiterate, homeless and diseased on a vast scale, the government implements such things such as this, instead of facing up to our most immediate problems.

    They implement laws such as 'no smoking in public places', yet fail to curb the serious offences, such as murder, rape and robbery.

    They implement grand new schemes, such as this Open Source 'initiative' when millions are without homes, clean water or electricity.

    It's just lip-service - they can pat themselves on the back and say "Look, we're just as good as the 1st world" while ignoring the real issues that face our country.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:3rd world country looking for brownie points ? by curious.corn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How many vitamin A integrators will your government buy for the price of a M$ license? How many abused safe-homes can be financed for the price of a department upgrade to the latest & greatest WinXP? How many extra rural computer terminals can be deployed for the same investment and at what usaqe rate can they hit if they come in all the possible languages (people, the less educated especially, don't get the feeling they're being 'colonized' but rather treat the novelty as an 'extension' of their own culture)?

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    2. Re:3rd world country looking for brownie points ? by life4m · · Score: 1

      This argument I don't quite understand - I don't think the guys in the IT department are responsible for any of the problems the country faces. Would you suggest that they'd halt any improvements and proposals until the other departments have sorted those out? Surely anything that provides an economic benefit is well needed in this time...

    3. Re:3rd world country looking for brownie points ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      The parlament should talk and pass new laws, not reinforce old ones. That is the job of the government.

  96. Mod parent up! by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1

    That's the clearest reasoning for good OSS citizenship I've heard yet. Very well put!

  97. You get your info about Hong Kong from the CIA? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


    China just recently got involved in world trade.

    China still to this day is Communist.

    You dont have a pure Communist or Capitalist country so you decide if a country is Communist or Capitalist based on the way the majority of that country works.

    USA is Capitalist, but not all states in the USA are cutting taxes and following capitalism, alot of states are socialist high tax and public support states, like massachusettes.

    China but for the most part China is communist.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  98. Billions, Really ?? by pjrc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They're going to save BILLIONS. Wow.

    I was wondering how much that really is. Wandering over to XE.COM, one US Dollar is equal to 8.9 South Africa Rand. The article's writing style seems a bit odd to me, but maybe that's how reporting is done in South Africa. Quoting....

    The move should save at least R3bn a year, says agency chief information officer Mojalefa Moseki.

    Now I'm wondering if "R3bn" is (roughly) equivilant to 337 million US dollars. Suppose the average PC gets $600(usd) installed on it, in windows, office, and a couple other apps. I just pulled that $600 out of a hat, but it seems a reasonably conservative (high) estimate of the amount of proprietary software you'd purchase per machine, on average.

    That'd put their annual software purchasing at (approx) 561600 PCs per year, or 1.12 million PCs in use on a 2-year Microsoft "software assurance" upgrade cycle.

    Is that reasonable, or did I add something up wrong?

    1. Re:Billions, Really ?? by bob_dinosaur · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now start adding up the cost per server. CALs, terminal services licences, Window 2K Advanced Server, etc all add up.

    2. Re:Billions, Really ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that reasonable, or did I add something up wrong?

      You forgot to add the cost of Server OS's DB servers (have you seen how much Oracle costs these days?), messaging and communications services. I could go on.....

      Computers are not _just_ PC's you know.

  99. OS: good for translating in SA's many languages by Reinout · · Score: 3, Informative

    This story at kde.dot.org tells about an effort to translate KDE into all seven official languages in South Africa. No way any commercial program (like windows) is going to go through that effort.

    But open source software allows you to do it yourself. KDE is a nice one in that regard because they have good tools for translations and a good process for dealing with it. Before a big release is made, there's plenty of time for the translators to do their job. There is a "string freeze" to allow every translation to get completed.

    (Other big projects probably 've got something similar, KDE is just an example where I know it worked).

    So: You want the functionality badly? You pay for it (with time or money) and there is nothing to stop you from getting it! Nice, that open source software.

    Reinout

    1. Re:OS: good for translating in SA's many languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "tells about an effort to translate KDE into all seven official languages in South Africa." That is eleven - not seven...

    2. Re:OS: good for translating in SA's many languages by Reinout · · Score: 1

      You're right. Eleven it is. I must have forgotten to put on all my fingers this morning. It's tricky to count that way. :-)

      Reinout

  100. One average American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lives on the backs of 10 Africans.

  101. Re:A Sustainable business model?-Yes it is!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well both you and the original poster are guilty of misquoting. Here's the original. "It's a very popular technology today, but ultimately it's not a sustainable business model. What happens when the developers who find it exciting today move on to something which will pay the bills?" He's trying to cast fear and doubt on there being anyone to back your software "investment", if the developer loses interest. He's viewing the world through the "old model" point of view.. However OSS as you should have realized by now, doesn't play by the same rules. Having the source code puts control of the "investment" back in the hands of whomever holds it, not a company in Washington state. A successful OSS project is one who's code is being used, regardless of how much or how little. Not how much money the developers make:i.e. "successful proprietary developers." Also your "successful proprietary developers", have tied their "success" to a single point of failure. So Microsoft fortunes go, so theirs go. The governments and businesses who are giving OSS a try are simply breaking that link, and placing their success were it should have been all along. In their own hands.

  102. worse yet, you'd be a hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, getting your Ph. D, eh? Learn to spell.

    I've been to South Africa more recently than you.

    Honestly, the laws aren't much of a factor there right now. The law of the land is poverty, immense poverty. The good news is that it isn't just the blacks now.

    Anyway, unfortunately, the situation in SA right now is so dire that human rights aren't really important. Most people are being denied the most basic human right, life, at an early age by the results of poverty or the rampant spread of AIDS due to the sexual practices there.

    As an aside, people of high ideals brag about the successful end to Apartheid by an economic boycott. I wonder, do they realize that their boycott has destroyed SA's economy and now the vast majority of the population has been lowered to the levels that the blacks were at earlier? And yet the rich are largely unaffected. The Sandton Mall is doing just fine. Do these people see what they have wrought on South Africa? It isn't much better than the results of the wars they rail against.

  103. -1, No Signs of Intelligent Life by achurch · · Score: 1

    It took me all day to finally figure out why that quote is funny. Somebody hit me now please.

  104. I know why.... by RapaNui · · Score: 1

    Mmmm. This just means that they can take the money they would have spent on software and buy themselves new Mercedes and BMWs. ;-)

  105. Damn, misinterpreted the title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the .za government was going to open-source itself. Now that would be a story worthy of Slashdot.

    Why *doesn't* the OSS community start working towards OSGov't?

  106. There's probably another reason behind OSS by jthorpe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have lived in South Africa for almost all my life and four years ago, got out of there and have moved to Sydney, Australia (like most who can, do!). The primary reason for this was the amount of corruption going on, largely due to the shocking government in South Africa (it's disheartening to say this, but SA is going like the rest of Africa).

    The RSA Government has obviously recognised OSS software as a means to reduce costs which is excellent news for them, and good for the OSS community, but it won't be sustainable for very long. Professionals are leaving RSA in droves and whilst it's cheap for the government to hire such people to manage Linux systems, corners will be cut everywhere and the South African government's greed will simply make the project fail (OSS software is good, but often requires a little more expertise to implement than other solutions which is ok in almost all circumstances).

    In the end, the corrupt government will screw things up so bad that they can't even afford to maintain even OSS systems.

    1. Re:There's probably another reason behind OSS by steveoc · · Score: 1

      >> and have moved to Sydney, Australia (like most who can, do!). The primary reason for this was the amount of corruption going on, largely due to the shocking government in South Africa

      Ha Ha Ha .. Ho Ho .. Im laughing so hard I cant even breate.

      Man that really is funny.

      Mod that man up !!

  107. Re:How will this affect apartheid? by jthorpe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Apartheid ("separate development") is more alive than ever in South Africa (and having living there most of my life, I am so disheartened to see how it's still in existance), but the now completely black government in power has swapped things over.

    The apartheid is stronger than ever in South Africa, but instead of blacks being disadvantaged, everyone is.

    Try living over there and see how long it is before someone you know (or even yourself, and especially if youre white) is killed for crimes based on race. This is one thing OSS software can't help (unfortunately).

    Most people don't see this because South Africa's racist government has banned media coverage of murders and serious crimes - if no one sees these things happening, how will the "new apartheid" (aposed to the "new South Africa") ever be identified?

    I have nothing against black people, but the majority of them are worse off now than they ever were during the apartheid.

  108. South African who fled like a coward!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Its amazing that a person like yourself can have such a profound opinion about a country which you abandoned 9 years ago just as these "progressive policies" were being applied.
    Who gives you the right to make such a statement. You disgust me!

    1. Re:South African who fled like a coward!!! by blackcoot · · Score: 1

      I disgust you because my family left the country when I was 13 (i.e. before I had any say in the matter)?

  109. Hmm, you're right. by dark-nl · · Score: 1
    I was confused because I often test strings this way:
    my $value = $headers{'Some-Header'};
    if ($value ne "") {
    print "foo\n";
    }
    In this case, I would want to treat "" and undef as false, while treating any non-empty string, including "0", as true. To avoid warnings I always have to add a defined($value) check, which is annoying. (Btw, many perl scripts are buggy this way, treating a string that happens to be "0" as being 'not set'.)
  110. Too stupid to live, to dumb to die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You, sir, are to stupid to live.
    I have made money from OSS software (Apache licenced), if you can't, then too bad for you. Don't blame the rest of us for your own stupidity.

    True, OSS won't build the next MSFT, but then again, who needs a huge corporation? It only takes freedom away for the grunts doing the coding.
    So, unless you are Bill Gates that should not be a problem.

    I pity you.

  111. Re:How will this affect apartheid? by dipipanone · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Apartheid ("separate development") is more alive than ever in South Africa

    Is that so? When did the South African government pass laws dictating who people could and couldn't marry, where they could and couldn't live and work? Where is it that they are throwing the weight of the regime into imprisoning people who challenge this system?

    Oh yeah, that's right. They didn't, did they. They just moved over to a democratic system and you don't like the idea of being governed by a black majority. Well tough. My heart bleeds. Not.

    I have nothing against black people, but the majority of them are worse off now than they ever were during the apartheid.

    Yeah, yeah. Slave owners used to say the same thing about slavery as well. Funny how few black people say it though.

  112. MS SA pricing by KeenestSA · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a South African business & games software retailer, I can tell you Microsoft is one of the few companies in the country who refuse to adjust their software prices based on the country they are dealing with. For example the Age of Mythology retails on average here at R 545 (exchange rate R8.80 = $1.00) Whereas a company such as Electronic Arts average PC Games retails for R 299 or even lower in SA. Taking Microsoft pricing policy forward to their business software and licenses, one can see they are horribly overpricing themselves in a country who can ill afford their high prices.

    1. Re:MS SA pricing by Spoing · · Score: 1
      If any propriatary software company does this, they risk reimportation back into a more 'expensive' country.

      I've seen this already in small mom & pop computer stores in the US that sell UK versions of titles in DVD cases for a little less than the US boxed version. No MS titles, though other popular games have shown up.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    2. Re:MS SA pricing by inteller · · Score: 1

      You freaking dork....if they set their prices the same amount in each currency they'd lose billions. Just think if they charged 199 pesos for XP in Mexico as they charge $199 here. How many companies do you know that wouldn't figure out a way to buy all of their software in Mexico? How utterly retarded.

    3. Re:MS SA pricing by dzym · · Score: 1

      Average EA game -- being one of those interminable Sims add-on packages that cost about $25 in the US?

  113. SQL Server is actually Sybase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever thought why you could access MS SQL server from linux using the Linux Sybase Client - MS SQL server is just that - Relabled & reorganized Sybase. Looked at the documents lately... There is an awfull lot of (C) Copyright Sybase in the documents....

    1. Re:SQL Server is actually Sybase by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good, but it's running on Windows, which is apparently not "enterprise class", yet manages to beat all the competition at the enterprise level.

  114. Wrong in the context of SA by SerpentMage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What bothers SA is that they buy licenses of software, but yet not one company develops software in SA. Using Open Source they are giving the chances to future generations of developers. In other words they are becoming self reliant.

    Lets put it in their context. Would you not do the same? Would you not want to have your people be part of the digital revolution? Buying software does not make you part of that revolution.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    1. Re:Wrong in the context of SA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Thawte from Cape Town. Hey do a Google search. Loads of people in South Africa develop software. Develops software in what context ? The context of "I can download it from Usenet" or "I know about it" ?

    2. Re:Wrong in the context of SA by iandb · · Score: 1

      Not one company develops software in SA? I wonder what I have been doing for the past years. FYI South Africa has a vibrant software industry with some very innovative developers. I am part of a company zenAptix and we have done some serious Java/XMLSchema/ebXML work. I am also a member of OSS Consulting and we not only use open source but also contribute to it.

    3. Re:Wrong in the context of SA by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Well gee whiz, you are actually making my point more apparent. Open Source has helped you build something that is useful.

      The article was discussing that buying licenses from companies like Microsoft Oracle, does not help the local software industry. Using Open Source would, like I am guessing in your case? So in other words the decision of the SA government was the right one? Yes?

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    4. Re:Wrong in the context of SA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although I fully support Open Source I just want to give an accurate representation of the South African market. Open Source is still not THE prevalent platform for development. South Africa has comparatively quite a big IT industry with lots of commercial software development from multi national software houses. (www.itweb.co.za is a good south african IT portal) Unlike India SA is not just a cheap developer haven but focussed around developing products and in most cases these are developed for the Windows/Intel platform using SQL or Oracle or Sybase etc and using commercial development tools.

    5. Re:Wrong in the context of SA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they can's spend time developing software since they all are busy raping and murdering.

  115. Re:How will this affect apartheid? by nicc777 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The stuff you smoke is working :) "Try living over there and see how long it is before someone you know (or even yourself, and especially if youre white) is killed for crimes based on race." I am living in Johannesburg, and everyone is alive and well - thanks Also, there is no such thing as banned media coverage od murders and serious crimes. When it happens you hear it on radio, see it on TV and read about it in the papers - maybe you just got hold of the local town paper which wasn't too concerned about what happened hundreds of kilometers away. The only thing we are on agreement is your last centense. Especially in heatlhcare they are much more worse of then before.

    --
    Need an ISP in South Africa?
  116. Re:SA more progressive than the US? [OT] by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

    There's a moral argument against everything if you're moral compass is twisted the right way. But it usually includes something along the lines of "...against God's will...".

  117. and in the other news.. by Extrymas · · Score: 2, Funny

    B.Gates and S.Balmer is going to South Africa next week to discuss aids and education problems in the country with SA Gov't.

  118. Re:How will this affect apartheid? by BigBadBri · · Score: 0, Troll

    Never fear - Apartheid will live on in Israel.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  119. Get out of jail free by alext · · Score: 1

    me too - Java (as no one else has mentioned it)

    Just finished developing a large app on Linux, demoing it on Windows and deploying it to a huge 64 way Sun box. Yes, it really works... amazing. OK, there's not much of a GUI, but Swing and SWT do work.

  120. This is not a troll... by inerte · · Score: 1

    But who the fuck cares? If they are saving money to deliver water to its citizens houses, build schools and hospitals, and SAVE LIVES, who cares if they will contribute?

    As an OSS developer, knowing that I am helping someone is enough (but that's my point of view of things).

    1. Re:This is not a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OR saving money to buy bombs, and landmines, to help ruin and kill more peoples lives

  121. Tux to be replaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a grey penguin. None of this black and white nonsense! hehe

  122. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since WHEN is the /. community sensitive.

    Get the fuck out of here. Next you'll be wanting us to talk about how this made us feel.

    I suppose you'd never laugh at a joke that was off-color or poor taste or racists in some minor way, hm?

  123. Re:Three thoughts to repudiate Microsoft FUD in th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless a school gets concessions, you can't use SO for the cost of one install. You can use 1 install for every 5 PC's (IIRC), or as many OpenOffice installs for as much as it costs to get the copy ($0-$10?).

  124. Your new sig by Dwonis · · Score: 1
    fclose(FILE *f) { if (f->eof) return EOF; assert(f!=NULL); }

    No problem. It took me a good 60 seconds to figure this one out...

  125. Re:Three thoughts to repudiate Microsoft FUD in th by m00nun1t · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "That's why we switched to StarOffice on 1000 PCs last fall (grand total cost, $25.00)

    So the people who managed the deployment were free? How about the user training? How about the lost productivity time as end users got used to the new app? How about the conversion problems on the few especially complex documents star office struggles with?

    It's been said before, and here it is again... free software is only free if your time is.

  126. SA or ZA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone figure out if this is actually South Africa or Zaire?

  127. They still dont get it .. do they ? by steveoc · · Score: 1

    >> An MS rep was heard to mutter :
    >> "It's a very popular technology today, but ultimately it's not a sustainable business model.

    How is a business model which saves the SA govt billions of Rand, and promotes local employment 'unsustainable' compared to giving all that money to M$ ?? Who has the sustainability then ??

    >> What happens when the developers who find it exciting today move on to something which will pay the bills?"

    Lets see .. if there was no OpenSource, if there never was a Linux .. if M$ had complete reign to set prices in this industry .. then how many hundreds of thousands of dollars would it have cost me to build an 8 node cluster, with all those compilers, SQL database(s), GUI development tools, webserver, unlimited users, etc, etc. What Bills is he referring to ?

    The real question is, without OpenSource, where am I going to find a job which pays me enough money to save up to foot all these bills for stuff that I _need_ ?? I dont need to pull 100k pa to pay for food and board.

    Finally, where is this M$ sales rep going to find a job to pay the bills by this time next year, when the Microsoft Pyramid scheme collides with cold hard reality ??

  128. This is great news for Microsoft fans everywhere.. by weave · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The more threatened Microsoft feels, the better their software will become. If they lock everyone in, watch the innovation grind to a halt. With the subscription model for software, they now have even less need to improve the products (since the upgrade income is no longer an issue, it's now guaranteed).

    Just look at IE. It's been almost two years since IE 6 came out, and that was just a minor upgrade over 5.0 and 5.5. When Netscape ruled the browser kingdom, IE was progressing at a rapid pace. Now if Mozilla, Safari, Opera, etc, make serious dents in market share, watch IE development take off again...

    Competition is a wonderful thing.

  129. Re:Three thoughts to repudiate Microsoft FUD in th by christophersaul · · Score: 1

    Hmm, if you're using StarOffice 6.0, you really ought to be paying some kind of licence fee.

  130. Take a lesson from nature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's good to be diversified. In-breeding never did humans any good so let's all mix it up. Some may want to take to OSS while some take the closed route. Use different OSes, different applications - even different applications to do the same thing. Use another layer to interoperate. We will get innovation because of diversity and not be entirely vulnerable to malicious attacks.

  131. And the MS rep just keeps missing it... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's country manager Gordon Frazer argues that governments must evaluate each application individually rather than routinely opt for open-source over commercial software.

    "It's a very popular technology today, but ultimately it's not a sustainable business model. What happens when the developers who find it exciting today move on to something which will pay the bills?"

    He says there are higher expenses for the management, upgrading and security of opensource software.


    Even if the expenses for maintaining the open source infrastructure in SA is the same as they're paying now the big issue is WHERE the money is going. SA can spend their R3bn (I thought that was a hacker name when I first saw it) on programmers and companies in SA rather than merely writing a big check to MS and watching it leave the country.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  132. A good thing, but... by lockne · · Score: 1

    This might be a good thing if you want OSS to spread. However, the day OSS rules the world (ahem... :-) I'd like to be able to say that non-government organizations (i.e. for-profit companies) adopted OSS early and contributed to it's success, rather than having to explain that governments decided to use it, and then it became successful.

    It would just feel better.

  133. Ahh by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    Guess I'm still idealistic when it comes to some government.

    I've done programming for the government before, but I guess that wasn't the type of work you meant. :)

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  134. Africa of the 2000s HAS slavery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are an asswipe.

  135. Re:Three thoughts to repudiate Microsoft FUD in th by ansible · · Score: 1

    Well, there's different kinds of costs. And time has different value to different people and organizations.

    At most schools the labor is cheap. Students are usually close to free, and even the teachers (or grad students) aren't very expensive.

    In a typical school, they have a lot more labor available than hard dollars (which must come out of a shrinking budget somewhere).

    As for complex documents: In my opinion you shouldn't be using a word processor anyway. Desktop publishing, research papers, and other things like that are best done on different applications. Word processing is fine for letters and memos, but that's about it.

  136. Stick it to the man? Nah by Szplug · · Score: 1
    Well you've expanded on Anarchism; there are nits I won't pick. I was trying to clarify the 'communist feel' of the GPL. Here's RMS saying what his position is; not as radical as I remembered it.

    http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/linuxworldtod ay/lwt-indepth7.html

    As for 'sticking it to the man' I suppose it could fit that, but I don't get the sense that was why it was created, but for social cooperation. As to not being intended to be politically subversive I'm sure that's true, nevertheless here's a good quote from Eben Moglen (FSF lawyer):

    ".. The problems with anarchism as a social system are also about transaction costs. But the digital revolution alters two aspects of political economy that have been otherwise invariant throughout human history. All software has zero marginal cost in the world of the Net, while the costs of social coordination have been so far reduced as to permit the rapid formation and dissolution of large-scale and highly diverse social groupings entirely without geographic limitation [32]. Such fundamental change in the material circumstances of life necessarily produces equally fundamental changes in culture. Think not? Tell it to the Iroquois. And of course such profound shifts in culture are threats to existing power relations. Think not? Ask the Chinese Communist Party. Or wait 25 years and see if you can find them for purposes of making the inquiry. "

    http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/my_pubs/anarchism. html

    --
    Someday we'll all be negroes
  137. SA and crypto? by rsidd · · Score: 1
    Isn't South Africa the country which instituted draconian controls for distribution of crypto software?

    How consistent is that with supporting open source, I wonder. Perhaps something's changed since?

  138. Tomorrow's spam by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    I have a proposition that you may be interested in.

    My country has some very expensive source that needs freeing, but we need some initial capital in order to do it.

    We expect large returns, and you can be a part of it.

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  139. Re:Three thoughts to repudiate Microsoft FUD in th by denzombie · · Score: 1

    It's been said before, and here it is again... free software is only free if your time is.

    It's been said before, and here it is again...
    "Free as in speach, not as in beer."

    --
    --- Evil robots don't kill people, Mad scientists kill people.
  140. 19th vs 20th century economics by jbolden · · Score: 1

    One of the defining characteristics of 19th century economics (which has become popular again the US as part of the Reagan revolution) was treating the government as any other economic actor. Certainly in many of the day to day operations a government IT department is no different than a corporate IT department. But there are huge differences between the two which is essentially the difference between micro-economics and macro-economics (see Keynes). "bill/tax" are similar only in a micro economic sense.

    A great deal of what business is involved in, is Ford vs. GM type compition. Government is neutral with respect those sorts of battles. OTOH GM and Ford have no control over determining the proper level of cyclical unemployment neccesary to maintain a proper exchange rate which in turn spurs the types of investments the economy is looking for. They simply respond to these forces.

    A South African company can't fundamentally alter South Africa's use of technology the government can. The original post expressed things that were very macro in nature:

    a) Wanting to stem the outflow of currency
    b) Wanting to create more South Africans business which were software oriented

    Neither of those are likely to be corporate objectives.

    It is entirely possible that forgetting about the macro-economic arguments that buying Microsoft software is the best solution for South Africa. It is entirely possible that South Africa's macro economic analysis is incorrect and the ineffeciences introduced by in house development will swamp any economic advantages created the two benefits they seek to achieve. What is impossible however is that:

    a) South Africa as a country can't do inhouse development

    b) That the South African government should undergo essentially the same kind of analysis a company would in a similar situation. I'm standing by my difference between a basketball team and the referee, the referee isn't playing basketball in anything like the same sense as the fowards.

  141. MS does this... by druxton · · Score: 1

    Not for Windows since that is bundled with the hardware (#include rant.h). However, when you enter a volume licensing agreement, CDs with all the software you sign up for are sent and updated monthly. Then you order the license and install from the single CDs (or backup copies).

  142. Re:This is great news for Microsoft fans everywher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have been putting more effort into MSN Explorer, which is supposed to replace IE.

    I think IE6 is supposed to be the version of IE.

  143. Lucky Iraq's navy isn't much to speak of by alienmole · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...otherwise, the US could be in serious trouble.

    I'm not kidding. There ought to be a Federal law against this sort of thing, for government agencies. In the commercial world, when a company makes dumb technical decisions, in the worst case, it can go out of business. When the US Navy makes dumb technical decisions, it could literally cost people's lives, and affect national security.

    This gives new meaning to phrases like "no-one ever got fired for buying IBM (or Microsoft)". No-one ever got killed by allowing heterogenous systems.

  144. Mod up funny by alienmole · · Score: 1

    I wish you weren't a Coward, so I could add you to my friends list... You came up with the perfect response to the most ignorant post I've seen all day.

    1. Re:Mod up funny by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

      most ignorant next to yours of course.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    2. Re:Mod up funny by alienmole · · Score: 1
      Why don't you get back to me when you've figured out why Africa doesn't have a hope in hell of having "an economy like [Japan's] easily". Some hints: lack of education, infrastructure, economy, skills, medical care, AIDS epidemic, political corruption...

      "Ignorant" is not an insult in this case - it's simply a fact. There seems to be a lot you don't know about Africa. Ignorance is "lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified". Instead of making pointless & content-free responses here, why don't you try to learn more about the situation in Africa, instead.

    3. Re:Mod up funny by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


      And how do you think this stuff is built? Just because they lack it doesnt mean they should just give up on ever having it.

      What? because they dont have education, infastructure, a good economy, medical care etc they should do everything in their power to ensure they never have it tomorrow?

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    4. Re:Mod up funny by alienmole · · Score: 1
      And how do you think this stuff is built? Just because they lack it doesnt mean they should just give up on ever having it. What? because they dont have education, infastructure, a good economy, medical care etc they should do everything in their power to ensure they never have it tomorrow?

      You said they could have it "easily", which is clearly false. A more accurate assessment is that if the appropriate steps are taken now, then after a number of generations - in perhaps 50-100 years - it would be possible for some African nations to be in a much better position.

      "How this stuff is built", as you put it, is that over a long period of time, a nation or a people's collective knowledge and ability is built up, through education, research, study, good political decisions, favorable conditions, and a host of other factors. There are many factors that can prevent this from happening - and many of them can be seen in Africa. "Easy" is exactly the wrong word to describe what needs to happen in Africa for the situation to improve.

    5. Re:Mod up funny by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


      bullshit it wouldnt take 50-100 years.
      They have cities, they have electricity, they have schools and computers RIGHT NOW.

      Why would it take them 50-100 years to learn C and make stuff like computer games and software?

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    6. Re:Mod up funny by alienmole · · Score: 1
      bullshit it wouldnt take 50-100 years. They have cities, they have electricity, they have schools and computers RIGHT NOW.

      Why would it take them 50-100 years to learn C and make stuff like computer games and software?

      I can tell you've never been to Africa.

      Yes, they have cities. Yes, they have electricity in the cities, and other places - but not everywhere, by any means. And yes, they have schools. But they're nothing like the schools you're probably familiar with! Have you even seen any TV programs about this sort of thing in Africa? For example, many schools in South Africa, which is one of the richest African nations, have crumbling buildings, leaking roofs, no books for the children, no stationery, no way to feed the children during the schoolday, and children who are often undernourished at home... The list goes on. The idea of computers at a school like this is laughable - these schools often don't have electricity. And where do you think their teachers come from? Most are not really qualified to teach - how would these countries have developed a large force of well-trained teachers?

      So the next generation of African children is not going to be spawning a lot of high tech workers.

      What they have in Africa as a whole, are hundreds of millions of people with little to no education, by first world standards. These adults are a lost cause - they're not going to suddenly learn the skills to become more economically productive. So you have to look to the next generation, the children that are growing up now. But by far the majority of those children are still not receiving an education that will allow them to build a much better economy. Improvement, if it happens at all, will be a gradual process that will happen from generation to generation, if things are managed well.

      Simply "learning C" is a nearly impossible task, if you haven't learned to read and write well, or learned basic arithmetic or mathematics. Sure, some of the more well-educated people will be able to do this, but they're in a small minority - there aren't enough of them to transform the economy.

      The cities and electricity you mention are misleading, because they only represent a fraction of the African population - the most highly educated. The most developed cities in Africa (ignoring Arab nations like Egypt) are in South Africa - Johannesburg, Cape Town. But these cities exist in their current form because of 50 years of apartheid rule, in which blacks were used by a relatively elite white population as, essentially, slave labor, to mine resources such as gold and diamonds. A superficially impressive system could be built that way: 5 million white people with 45 million low-paid black laborers working for them, resulted in a country with a decent infrastructure, unlike most of the rest of Africa. But that was a morally bankrupt system which was not sustainable, not a model for development in the rest of Africa - and when the government changed, much of the intellectual capital left for other countries, leaving shortages of qualified personnel in all areas.

      Go one country to the north, to Botswana or Zimbabwe, and check out their cities. Even though Botswana is one of the richer and more politically stable African nations, its biggest city, Gaborone, is nothing remotely like a first world city. It's dusty, with few tall buildings, and mostly poor roads. When I was last there about 5 years ago, there weren't even that many traffic lights.

      In Zimbabwe, looters attack farms, kill the farmers, and take over the land, sometimes even with tacit government support. They have some impressive bits of infrastructure, such as a sports stadium in Harare, but that was a gift from the Chinese back in the cold war days, when Africa was a covert first-world battleground for communism vs. capitalism. Mugabe, Zimbabwe's dictator, is a leftover relic from those days, much like Castro in Cuba - but Mugabe is much more corrupt, and Zimbabwe suffers as a result. The people don't rise up to overthrow him, because they're too busy dealing with their own survival - it's easier to loot a farm than to overthrow the government and figure out what to do next (other than letting another dictator take over).

      Moving north, things don't get any better. "Cities" like Kinshasa, in the Congo, could just as easily be called overgrown shantytowns.

      I don't think the situation in Africa is completely hopeless. But short of divine intervention, there's no way that it can quickly or easily develop significantly better national economies. The process of bringing hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and ignorance is a long, slow one.

  145. Cost of Free software by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 1

    >we switched to StarOffice on 1000 PCs... (grand total cost, $25.00)

    I wholeheartedly agree that switching to StarOffic or other open source applications is the right thing to do for many reasons. Maintainability, security, cost, and just plain morally.

    However, the total cost of switching 1000 PCs is most certainly NOT $25. I presume that was the cost of the original media. But someone needed to install the software; presumably, someone making more than a few pennies an hour. And someone needs to deal with corruption or problems that arise in installations (not because StarOffic is worse than other things, it is just the nature of software). And it takes time to learn new software, no matter how good the new software is. Maybe that learning is accompanied by formal retraining (i.e. paid trainers), or maybe each individual user has to devote a non-zero amount of time learning on her own (instead of doing something else useful, and for which she is paid wages).

    At the end of this, I'm sure the switch saved a substantial amount of money over using MS-Office. But it just discredits the claim to pretend it is $25.

  146. All I Can Say is... by AlastairMurray · · Score: 0

    Well, I was about to say I wish I lived in South Africa, but that would be a lie, any ever heard of the flamethrower car defense system?

    1. Re:All I Can Say is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a Moron.

  147. Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the people that previously couldn't afford a computer and its software but can afford just a computer -- isn't that an improvement? If you want to change an entire country, start with one person.

    It is 90% poor and 10% rich. There is NO middle class. They buy all the old/used/obsolete computers from the U.S. and the poor still cannot afford them...only the rich.

    You can hire someone to kill for you for less than $1 US. They can eat for a week on that.

    You can live like a King there for $300 US/month.

    Changing an entire Country may start with one person but will take several serveral several years to come.

    A government that believes that AIDS is a fictitious disease made up by the white man to keep the black man down--IS the same government choosing to use open source.

    Sorry, I will have to confirm the parent to your reply that they definitely lack the resources and skill level that China and India has.

    1. Re:Reality Check by fungai · · Score: 1

      You can hire someone to kill for you for less than $1 US. They can eat for a week on that.
      You can live like a King there for $300 US/month.


      Sorry, that's just wrong. You'll need about $15 a week at least for food to stay (barely) alive. $300/month ain't that much either. That's a little more than minimum wage. You won't, for example, really be able to afford your own car and house with $300/month.

      Fungai

    2. Re:Reality Check by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

      Go to an internet cafe, or build one using government funding.

      Also food does not cost $15 a week in the USA, why would it cost more in Africa? You can live off rice, or romain noodles for less than $15 a week, hell, you can live off mc donalds
      lets see

      $1 for a burder and $1 for some fries.

      2 dollars a day to eat at mc donalds every day.

      You can buy romain noodles or eat rice for less than this, romain noodles costs 50 cent a pack, you can live off 2 packs a day, a dollar a day is 7 dollars a week.

      Theres ways to live cheaper than you live in the USA than in Africa? Where is all this donation money for free food going to if you pay more than us for food?

      Now I agree you wont be able to afford a house, or eat well, but alot of people in the USA dont eat well either, especially college students.

      Internet Cafes allow people like you in Africa who dont have enough money to buy a computer to use the public computers built specifically for that purpose.

      What stops your gov from using the additional money they save from not spending millions on licenses, on buying computers for public use. These computers could be pentium 2s, even thoses are good enough and they are cheap, you can buy a pentium 2 computer for under $100.

      Lets say in Africa you do make $300 a month, you couldnt save $20 every month by cutting corners on food? You cant find ways to get food cheaper or for free? Its called hustling, people do it here in the USA when poor, I'm sure people can do it in Africa.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  148. Re:Three thoughts to repudiate Microsoft FUD in th by MrResistor · · Score: 1

    Dude, it's a fucking school.

    So the people who managed the deployment were free?

    Their called TAs, and at the district school level they often are free.

    How about the user training?

    Again, it's a school. Training is their business, and I very much doubt anyone at the high school level has any use for the "advanced features" of MS Office. I've never had a use for them, and I've been in the Real World for some time now.

    As for training the teachers, you must be joking. I have a few teachers in my family, and the level of computer training they recieve is readily apparent: none at all.

    How about the lost productivity time as end users got used to the new app?

    I haven't converted many people away from MS Office yet, but in general the only "lost productivity time" I've seen has been the time it takes to install.

    How about the conversion problems on the few especially complex documents star office struggles with?

    Where exactly are all these "especially complex documents" I keep hearing about? Are these the same ones that MS Office seems to choke on?

    It's been said before, and here it is again... free software is only free if your time is.

    And yet OpenOffice still manages to be much cheaper than MS Office.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  149. You forgot about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much more can M'beke put in his pocket?

  150. Microsoft's arguments... by bringert · · Score: 1

    Says "Microsoft's country manager Gordon Frazer":

    "And while government's idea of training open-source developers is admirable, it will not create new jobs but will simply replace thousands of existing jobs for people who now work with proprietary software"

    Sure, but the open source jobs will be created in South Africa. I don't think the South African government cares if people in Seattle get fired.

  151. Errrr, by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    0 is true, everything else is false. It makes sense to do it that way; if a function completes successfully it doesn't really matter how it does it, but it can fail in any number of ways and it's important to know which one.

    If a function completes successfully, it generally returns a VALUE.
    If a subprogram completes successfully it uses the unique value 0 to indicate success and some non-zero value to indicate WHICH FAILURE.
    If a variable is FALSE it is convenient to use 0 as FALSE and any non-zero to indicate TRUE.

    0 AND anything is zero (with maybe some quibbles about anything actually having a value)
    true AND anything is not necessarily true.

  152. The Goodies by farfisa69 · · Score: 1

    Obviously no one has ever seen the episode of the Goodies where they went to South Africa and there were different rules for tall and short people, and it was called "Apart Height". Oh well.......

    --
    Meat is murder, I eat chicken.
  153. [OT] Where my sig came from by achurch · · Score: 1

    Maybe my company purchased a version of VC++ with source code, I don't know, but I have fclose.c installed in \Program Files\DevStudio\VC98\CRT\SRC. At any rate, here are debugger screenshots of a dummy program before and at the beginning of the fclose() call. From the #ifdef's nearby, it looks like somebody screwed up when they were adding multithreading support.

  154. Bullshit ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things are going well enough over here without people like you - Don't knock your own country from far away, rather come here and do it.

    There's far too many ex South Africans who continually put the country down when they are not even here to see the reality.

    The reality is investment is starting to happen, the rand has strengthend and our fledgling government is starting to get better - slowly, agreed, but things are starting to look good again.

    The mood on the street is for the most part, very upbeat and people are looking forward to 2003 as being a prosperous year.

    The same as the rest of Africa ?
    I don't think so - why the F**K would we be hosting the world cup cricket if that were the case.

    Stay in Sydney and DON'T EVER COME BACK - we don't need you, asshole.

  155. 2nd World != (1st World + 3rd World) / 2 by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    Looks like you've misunderstood the term "second world."

    To be a 2nd World country you have to first and foremost be communist. See here

    In truth the 2nd World has all but disappeared. You might argue there's still China, but if that's all that's left you might as well just use the term "China".

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  156. Aren't you confusing SA with Zimbabwe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say no more ...

  157. open source SA by nick29 · · Score: 1

    a few thoughts on the matter:

    Good thing OS is going to be used in SA.
    If our goverment implements it right it might work.

    Hopefully they will use the money they saved to train people
    (they could start with my ex computer science teacher ms. Herbs).

    Our school bought a proprietary product for lots of RRR although i suggested using RealVNC for FREE.

    Microsoft sponsors all the software for schools and universities in South Africa
    (MS Office, Windows XP, Visual Std .Net) i wonder if it is going to end?

    The schools switched from Turbo Pascal to Delphi this year.
    Will the schools switch to Kylix next year?

    christo
    nylstroom,northern province(limpopo?)

    PS. ons gaan gat skop in die krieket wereldbeker

  158. Thats not because of tax cuts. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


    Tax cuts do not stimulate the economy.

    You cannot stimulate the economy, at least not an economy as large at the US economy, with small little drop in the bucket tax cuts.

    10 trillion dollar economy, 600 billion dollar tax cut, thats 6 percent tax cut.

    Now, if we did something more drastic, like cut taxes by 2 trillion dollars overnight instead of over a period of 10 years, the economy would be stimulated.

    The tax cut has to be swift and large enough to matter, small tax cuts dont have much effect.

    Also your tax cuts have to be directed at specific industries, new industries which are still growing.

    Tax cut incentives to support nano technology, bio technology, and industries with no market leader, because when you give tax cuts to a monopoly like Microsoft they wont reinvest it into our economy, they will use the money to hire workers in India.

    We have to give tax cuts to small businesses, not big businesses, this is how in the clinton era the economy was successful.

    Clinton wisely did not tax the internet, this caused the dot com boom to occur, tax incentives helped the Web grow at breakneck speeds, perhaps it grew too fast, but thats how you stimulate the economy.

    Long term stimulus does not work.

    Japan had flawed LONG TERM ideas, they cut taxes but not when the time was right or for the industries which needed them.

    Japan should have grew their internet industry faster, they should have removed all taxes from software industries to encourage software development exports.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Thats not because of tax cuts. by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      The amount of overtaxation in the US economy is drastic. _Any_ taxcuts are beneficial to the economy because the government is taking way too much out as a percentage of the GDP to be healthy.

      Taxcuts to taxpayers. It is not the governments job to dictate the economy. It is up to them to simply provide an environment for the economy to flourish.

    2. Re:Thats not because of tax cuts. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


      Tax cuts should go to tax payers who can boost the economy only.

      Bill Gates, Microsoft, and these other big companies should never get tax cuts, These companies will only use the extra money to hire folks in India and China.

      We need to give tax cuts to small local businesses, this is what boosts the economy. SMALL BUSINESS tax cuts.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:Thats not because of tax cuts. by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Who decides this? I agree we need to give small businesses tax cuts - because they are part of everyone. I myself work for a business of 15 people (and we are growing at a breakneck rate). I don't see why you say a company of X size shouldn't get tax cuts, though. The tax burden should be lightened, period. Creating more and more IRS rules about who gets what and under what conditions is counter-productive. Let's just give everyone a break.

    4. Re:Thats not because of tax cuts. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

      Because big companies do not help the economy, they harm it.

      Microsft harms our economy when they hire people in india, their monopoly harms our economy and our economy would benifit best by FORCING companies like this to give money. These companies have no reason to invest in R&D because they have monopolies, these companies have offices around the world and are no longer considered American companies. The further growth of these companies reduces competition in the industry which slows down the economy.

      We want to create a competitive enviornment for small growing businesses which will get investors to invest. These small businesses hire mostly American workers, and small businesses because they are growing should not have to pay taxes at all depending on the industry.

      This allows us to grow certain industries, say nano technology? Nano tech companies should not have to pay taxes at all. They should be free of all taxes until they reach a certain size.

      Across the board tax cut is a waste of money, that slowly drains money out of our economy and into China and Indias economy, Targetted tax cuts are the only way to improve the US economy in a focused way. If you give Microsoft tax cuts, Microsoft already has 30 billion sitting in the bank, they hire 40 percent of their workers from India, another 10-15 percent in places like Africa, Ireland etc, and then you have maybe 20-30 percent in USA.

      Microsoft is a Global company and Global companies should not get tax cuts, tax cuts should go to local businesses so that they improve the local economy, you give a tax cut to Microsoft and you improve the Economy of India.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  159. Incomes mean nothing by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    The cost of living in the USA is also alot more expensive than sweden. So what good is higher income? So what if you make $30,000, thats poverty level in the USA, you are on the edge of being homeless and living paycheck to paycheck on an income like that.

    So when you figure out what its like to be on the edge of homeless in sweden you'll see its better to be poor in Europe than poor in the USA.

    The USA has far less social programs for the poor. If you are poor in the USA you are fucked, and if you dont have a degree in the USA you will most certainly be poor if you are a minority.

    So compare the education level of the average african american whos living in the middle class to the average swedish person whos living in the middle class as well.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  160. My logic. by eniu!uine · · Score: 1

    My statement wasn't about Microsoft's policy regarding giving software to schools, but rather this particular gift was given directly after SA's announcement that it was going open source. It was an indication that Microsoft felt that they had to do something to alter the SA governments decision. That in itself isn't very insightful, but it's true no less.

  161. Agree and disagree... by eniu!uine · · Score: 1

    No doubt it can be more difficult to run open source solutions sometimes, but SA is planning on some extensive training and developement $$. They know what's up, and they know that in the long run it will be cheaper for them this way. The longer they use open source the more their people will develop the required expertise. I think in the article they specifically mentioned using windows for their gas chromograph spectrometer ;).

  162. SA is kewler than you all think. by kishyr · · Score: 1

    I dont believe how redundant some of you are. After living in South Africa for my entire life, I am proud to be South African.

    South Africa, is far more ahead of the time and technology than some of you think. We aren't as sophisticated as any of the first world countries, but coming from a second world country, I think, we have come a loooong way.

    Opensourceness in South Africa has also come a long way. In my province (KwaZulu Natal) some of the schools are switching to Linux and ridding them selves of M$ Windos. Even though M$ has offered low-cost licences and other packages, some of us are not blinded by this.

    Please think of South Africa, not as a 3rd World country that has suffered and is in the process of developing, but as a country that has grown and has developed into a new era of technology, some even better than first world countries could. Take Mark Shuttleworth for example, he started Thawte, an internet based company that sparked most new encryption technology over the internet. His company was bought by Verisign for $400m.

    South Africa is kewler than you think.

    --
    ~ Kishyr