Slashdot Mirror


Surviving Tornadoes

SharkJumper writes "We here in central Oklahoma, USA are just climbing out of the wreckage of another series of tornadoes. Unlike the tornadoes of May 3rd, 1999, which killed 47 and injured more than 800, we now have much better tornado information and prediction technology. Largely because of this, there have been far fewer injuries, and (as of this morning) no reported deaths. Here in the greater Oklahoma City area, we can even register our storm shelters with the city. After a severe storm, GIS technology is used to create a map for rescuers detailing location and type of the shelter as well as emergency contact information. Rescuers can then use these maps to search for survivors that may be trapped by debris in their shelters."

66 of 352 comments (clear)

  1. Tip #1 by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 4, Funny

    Being a big fat ass can actually increase your chances of survival.

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:Tip #1 by robslimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I suppose. But being a wide-load also makes you a bigger target for flying debris.

      I live in Stillwater, OK and was watching the news very closely yesterday afternoon/evening just to make sure those twister weren't headed my way.

      Sure, the early warning systems are better, but the main improvements are:

      (1) Modern variants of doppler radar (and software for it) that can better identify wind velocities in terms of rotation and likelihood of funnel formation. However, the radar can rarely (if ever?) tell for certain if a rotation in a storm is actually a tornado or if it is on the ground.

      (2) Communication. The National Weather service and the Severe Storm labs in Norman work closely with radio and TV to get the info out about severe weather. But too often, they know to report actual tornados only after an eyewitness has called to report one on the ground.

      The one thing they do know fairly well is the conditions that could lead to tornado formation. But the presence of those conditions (as we can sense/interpret them now) does not tell us that there *will* be a twister or *where*.

    2. Re:Tip #1 by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, the radar can rarely (if ever?) tell for certain if a rotation in a storm is actually a tornado or if it is on the ground

      Actually to be entirely technical only when a funnel cloud touches down on the ground is it called a tornado... prior to that it's called a funnel cloud

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  2. Best way to survive tornadoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't live where they happen.

    1. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Networkink*Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The best way to survive is not to be stupid.

      1) Know your surroundings
      2) If the sky is green, there's a problem.
      3) Have a plan
      4) Practice the plan
      5) Hang on for dear life

      --
      "How am I supposed to remember you, when you won't let me forget?" --Bare Naked Ladies
    2. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't live where they happen.

      And move to where?

      West coast? quakes, fires, mudslides, volcanoes
      East coast? Hurricanes
      South? Hurricanes
      Northeast? Blizzards

      Everywhere has stupid weather. Just stupid in different ways.

      No, the best way to survive a tornado is not to live in a trailer park/tornado-hurricane magnet.

    3. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by dackroyd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And move to where?
      England has weather that's quite unlikely to kill you.

      Unless of course you find a winter season that lasts from September to June a bit too depressing and kill yourself.

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    4. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Peyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tornados can come out of nowhere in a matter of minutes; I take it you've never lived somewhere they happen regularly, eh?

      The only good thing about where tornados tend to occur is that population is relatively sparse; so a few farm houses get hit or small communities, but rarely a big city. If you're out in the middle of nowhere, asleep, and you're too far from a siren to have any kind of advance warning, what will your plan be then?

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Blizzard Survival 101

      1. Have food already bought
      2. Have wood already cut for heat
      3. Have a steep enough roof to naturally dump off snow.
      4. ...
      5. Profit!

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    6. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by The_K4 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the sky is green, there's a problem

      What about is a cow or two go flying by?
      "Actualy I think that was the same cow." :)

    7. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if you're walking around in the fog, and fall in a hole and break your neck?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last year, we had a major ice storm in the Midwest. A huge number of people lost their electricity. Some of them died from the cold, others died from their space-heaters catching their house on fire. Blizzards are far from safe.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    9. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by fataugie · · Score: 2, Funny

      The solutions is obvious....fill in the low area with the standing water using the mounds of earth to the west.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    10. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by hax4bux · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a California transplanted Okie. It's not all earthquakes out here. Hell, Chico could be Oklahoma in many ways. Just ask my mule.

    11. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by Wog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I second the green-sky tip. I'm a student at Union University in Jackson, TN, and have lived through two major tornados in as many semesters... When the sky turns green and the rain goes vertical, get the heck inside and hope you can close your exterior door.

    12. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by mattsucks · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actualy I think that was the same cow.

      Deja-moo.

    13. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Weather radio with instant on functionality. Once or twice a year you get woken out of a deep sleep for no reason, but it just might save your life.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    14. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the area of potential tornados is a VAST area. Are you seriously suggesting that nobody should build anywhere in all of Oklahoma, Texas, Nebraska, etc?

      Other than that, I agree with your sentiment. I felt the same way when the mississippi river flooded and wiped out all those farmers - tough luck. You built right next to a huge river that is known to flood every 50 years or so. You knew it was a flood plain because you liked the rich farming soil it provided - people told you the Misissippi river has one nasty flood like that once every 50 years or so. So tough. Live with it. Taking into account the fact that you might get flooded out one year should have been part of your risk assessment when deciding if the rich soil of a floodplain was worth it.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    15. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...and the rain goes vertical


      Uhh. Doesn't it normally go that way? Y'know, kinda from the sky to the ground?

      Oh, my god! It's raining...vertically!!! RUN FOR SHELTER!

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    16. Re:Best way to survive tornadoes by rikkards · · Score: 2, Funny

      6. If you see small people its too late for the plan

  3. What are you doing? by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Funny

    We here in central Oklahoma, USA are just climbing out of the wreckage of another series of tornadoes.

    Ok, you just climbed out of tornado wreckage (which is nothing to laugh about, I've been through a couple when I lived in Indiana), but the first thing that comes to your mind is dude, I bet we can submit this to /. and they'll post it!

    Seriously, though, its cool that technology can help when mother nature is being a muthah...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:What are you doing? by robslimo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's right, pick on us Okies when we spin a little figure of speech.

      What I take exception to is this phrase:
      Unlike the tornadoes of May 3rd, 1999, which killed 47 and injured more than 800, we now have much better tornado information and prediction technology.

      Perhaps the fact that '99s tornado was an F5 and this one was a F2 to low F3 has a little to do with the difference in damage/causualties?

    2. Re:What are you doing? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps the fact that '99s tornado was an F5 and this one was a F2 to low F3 has a little to do with the difference in damage/causualties?

      I though that the F ratings were a measure of the damage caused. If so, then what you said is a tautology.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:What are you doing? by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Perhaps the fact that '99s tornado was an F5 and this one was a F2 to low F3 has a little to do with the difference in damage/causualties?

      Actually since the rating of a tornado is directly based on the amount of damage it does... yes it does have a 'little' to do with the difference in damage but nothing to do with the number of casualties.

      This does not change the fact that the "size" of the tornado has little to do with the rating on the Fujita Scale. A tornado that is capable of being a F4 or F5 may only be rated as an F2 if it simply passes through open fields causing minimal damage. So the argument of '99s tornado was and F5 an these were F2 to F3 accounts for the difference in causualties does not hold water unless you take into account the path of the tornados. An F2 sweeping through an open air concert jammed with people could cause many more deaths then an F5 sweeping through an urban setting where few people are killed due to adequate shelter and warning.

      Better technology will always help in reducing the number of deaths and injuries due to tornados. In the long run it may even assist in redefining the Fujita scale as engineered structures become more tornado tolerant thereby reducing the amount of damage produced by tornados.

      Overall I am glad I have only seen one tornado in my life for real. I will be quite happy if the most intense tornado I see close up is the one in the movie Twister watching from the 3 row :-)

      [offtopic]For those of you 'in the know' how realistic was the movie Twister anyway? It impressed the hell out of me and I throughouly enjoyed it; wouldn't even mind a sequal (hmm, title suggestion "Twisted" :-) ).[/offtopic]

      Merlin.
      P.S. So how do you include 'fake' tags with less-then, greater-then signs in /. messages anyway?

    4. Re:What are you doing? by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Informative

      I though that the F ratings were a measure of the damage caused...

      Nope. An F5 could pass through open prairie and cause very little damage. An F3 can plow through a densly populated area and do lots of damage.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  4. Sadly... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    Despite all our advances in tornado detection, storm shelter technology, and early warning systems, the fact remains that tornadoes still really suck.

    *ducks*

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  5. Tornados, bombs, Land slides, earthquacks by mgrennan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just ejoy where you live. If you feer about these things move. I live in OKC. I've helped dig people out. But I still wouldn't move.

    --
    There are 10 type of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  6. I like bad weather by paRcat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's wierd... I grew up in Tulsa, and I moved to NYC when I was 19. I'm now back in the Tulsa area. Why? I missed the storms. Granted, I've made sure that the areas I live in have been geographically pre-disposed to not having tornadoes, and I don't like the idea of people being hurt... but being in a shelter as an enormous supercell passes overhead is a bit of a rush.

    go fig.

  7. Re:Crazy Winds~ by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We had Tornado shelters in South Dakota.

    Storm cellers, basements, crawl spaces. It's all good.

    Bathtubs are good not because of the material, but because it's one piece, they usually survive and it's a place you can get down and cover your vital organs and noggin while having some side protection.

    Tubs usually were cast iron with a porcelain coating over them, now they are usually fiberglass.

  8. Registration is just the first step by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh sure, it seems harmless now -- "Just register your shelter with the government, and we'll help you out later!"
    But the next thing you know, Big Brother has these lists of shelters! It only makes it easier when they need to confiscate them later!!
    I tell you what, you can have my unregistered shelter when you pry it from my cold, dead hands!

    --

    1. Re:Registration is just the first step by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you know, once the government confiscates those legally registered shelters, only the criminals will have them...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  9. Re:Crazy Winds~ by itchyfidget · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would think you wouldn't want to be near porcelain at a time like that...

    I'd be wishing I was near porcelain, since the alternatives involve begging rescue-workers for a clean pair of pants...

    --
    Mod early, mod often.
  10. Get a Monolithic Dome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    These things can survive just about anything short of a direct hit with a nuke.

  11. Earth... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You mean move to another planet???

    Seriously, tornadoes can occur *anywhere* where a _thunderstorm_ can develop. That's pretty much most of Earth's surface between the Arctic and Antarctic circle latitudes. Of course there are unique areas within these zones where thunderstorms are rare like extremely high mountain tops, etc, that interfere with thunderstorms.

    Of course you can also build a city under the sea to escape them.

  12. the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by Starrider · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The 1999 tornado in Moore Oklahoma killed so many not because there wasn't enough warning, but because it was the most powerful tornado every recorded. It was listed as an F5, the nastiest class of tornado, but many meterologists say that the F5 classification doesn't fit, because the 1999 tornado was off the scale.

    That tornado was so powerful it removed the foundation of the homes and left barren earth. Unless you had a dedicated storm shelter underground, you were at risk.

    I'm from Tulsa, Oklahoma, and I saw the devestation too. There was plenty of warning about this tornado, but when they are this nasty, this powerful, this devestating, sometimes there isn't anything anyone can do.

    That same storm cell went up I-44 and hit Tulsa a few hours later. The tornados by then were not nearly as powerful, but that was the first time in my life I was actually scared of a tornado. I was 21 at the time, have lived in Oklahoma all my life, but when they show a street level map of you neighborhood and show the path of the tornado coming right at you, it is unnerving to say the least. (Especially after seeing what this storm cell did to the poor folks in Moore.)

    Our home did not get hit, as the tornado hit the Arkansas River and went back up into the wall cloud. It touched down again across town.

    Here, tornados are a fact of life. Most people who live in "Tornado Alley" accept this, and just pray it never hits them. My heart goes out to those who have suffered losses from this tornado.

    1. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 5, Informative
      The 1999 tornado in Moore Oklahoma killed so many not because there wasn't enough warning, but because it was the most powerful tornado every recorded. It was listed as an F5, the nastiest class of tornado, but many meterologists say that the F5 classification doesn't fit, because the 1999 tornado was off the scale.

      I saw somewhere that the 1999 Moore tornado had its windspeed measured with a doppler radar, and the number they came up with was one mph below F6 status. It would have been the first F6 tornado ever documented.

      It was truly a monster...

      !Sig

    2. Re:the 1999 Tornado killed because it was so huge by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Informative
      Technically speaking F5 isn't the largest tornado. Ted Fujita's scale was actually calculated through F-12, better known as Mach-I or the speed of sound (750 mph). The scale NOAA uses to categorize tornados ranges from F-0 to F-5. However an F-6 is entirely possible. A F-6 would have winds measuring 319-379 mph. It's actually believed that the Moore/Oklahoma City tornado was an F-6. However they'll never be able to prove it. The F-6 is called the "inconceivable tornado" and the "impossible tornado". It's not inconceivable or impossible that it will ever happen (or has ever happened) but that it's inconceivable and impossible by any practical measure to prove it ever happened. The F-6 damage would be masked by the damage caused by F-4 and F-5 winds around the core. The only way something like this could ever be proved is if researchers had an abundance of data and aerial views to compute the projected wind speed based on the ground swirl patterns in the debris. Most people don't realize that a tornado isn't categorized by its actual size. Many hear 1/2 mile wide and think "gee, it has to be a F-5." Not so. Tornados are classified by their wind speed. Wind speed can't be calculated at the actual time of damage (ie, they can't be taken directly from the tornado itself (yet)). Wind speed is calculated by the amount and type of damage done. For example researchers know exactly how muhc force it takes to put up a Ford Excursion and hurl it 45 yards. They know how much wind speed is takes to topple a 25-year old red oak tree in rocky soil. They know that it doesn't take much more than a stiff breeze to topple that 30-year old maple tree in moist soil (because it's soft as hell and moist soil means nutrients closer to the ground surface so you see a great deal of surface roots).

      Tornados are a bitch. People would be well advised to learn about them and learn how to protect themselves before they have to adlib.

  13. SKYWARN and amateur radio by KD7JZ · · Score: 3, Informative

    A program that has helped (even in the network age) to speed warnings is SKYWARN. SKYWARN is an adjunct program of the National Weather Service that trains spotters to deliver real time, on the ground, info to the NWS.

  14. Simple solution by CommieLib · · Score: 4, Funny

    Four words: decoy mobile home parks.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  15. Why do people live there? They have to! by itchyfidget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is it that draws you people to live there, why do you not move from such an obviously inhospitible place to live

    There was a documentary about Tornado Alley on Channel 5 last week, which showed horrific devastation from past tornadoes that seemed mainly to hit trailer-parks and cheap housing in places like Oklahoma.

    I infer from this that many/most people who live in those areas of the US are not able to move elsewhere, because they are simply too poor to do so.

    (not a Troll, by the way, I'm sure there are plenty of affluent people in OK too - but the rural community really isn't well-off, as I understand it)

    --
    Mod early, mod often.
  16. The chances of being hit by a tornado are small by Starrider · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is it that draws you people to live there, why do you not move from such an obviously inhospitible place to live, and why do you insist on FEMA paying your (collective Kansas and Oklahoma) asses money to rebuild your houses in the same Goddamned spot so the next Chet-chasing twister can blow you to hell all over again?

    I live in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and I don't think you realize the very very small likelyhood of being hit by a tornado. While tornados themselves are not rare, it is not everyday that they hit populated areas. It only seems that way because of the last few weeks.

    You say it is inhospitable? What about California? Earthquakes hit on a massive scale and destroy HUGE areas. A tornado, while devestatingly powerful, does not destroy hundreds of square miles like an earthquake will.

    Also, being hit by a tornado TWICE is really against the odds. You really are far more likely to be struck by lightening than to be hit by a tornado.

  17. Get a good job by snatchitup · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get out of the trailor park... Dude... Stop driving a Yugo, get an H2.

  18. Testbed for weather radar in Norman, OK by landtuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Sorry for the blatant plug, but my company's working right now with the University of Oklahoma on new radar technology that should double the warning time for severe storms.


    You can see some pictures and read about the new radar here.


    The current radar technology used for all weather forcasting (NEXRAD) is really pretty old. By using a phased array, the scan times are much quicker than the old spinning dish style.


    We hope to get this thing operational really soon. Off the above site, there's a webcam where you can see the progress of its construction.

  19. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by tuffy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why do people live in places like this when they get hit _every year_ by tornados? I mean, holy crap - what kind of stress must it be to know that, next year, come May, you or someone near you has almost a 100% chance of having their new house flattened ... again... next may. Hell, maybe in two months?

    Really now. In spite of nasty natural phenomena, people continue to build homes in California and Florida without a second thought. By comparison to the widespread damage caused by earthquakes and hurricanes, tornadoes tend to be localized affairs that are much more likely to happen to somebody else. For most people, the dangers are (pardon the pun) overblown.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  20. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by veddermatic · · Score: 2, Informative

    First: I live in the NE (upstate NY) as much as I bitch about the cold, the snow, and shoveling my damn driveway, everytime I see something like this (or a hurricane, or an earthquake, or a tidle wave, or flooding) I thank my lucky stars I am where I am.

    That said....

    People live where they do for many reasons. Number one is economic. *something* drew enough people to the area (this is "any" area", not jsut tonado alley) for it to be "profitable" to live there... either a scarce resource (like gold, which drew folks to eathquake ridden cali) or an environment... the flood ridden mississipi (-sp?) delta is sure as hell prone to floods.. but that's how it got it's amazing soil, which is why farming there is "worth" the risks.

    Once a sufficient population has developed in said areas, willing to take those risks, then another population grows to support them... those running the stores, restaraunts.. etc.

    Then a strange thing happens.. a "community" forms.. and people have family ties, etc. to the area. This makes it hard to leave. How many times have you packed up an moved to a new part of the country? It's not easy. Esp with [insert rant about GW here] today's economy. It COSTS to move.. both financially and personally.

    Do yourself a favor, and trace every product you buy, and where it came from. If *none* of them come from areas that have natural disaters "regularly" then bitch and moan. Until then, pay your taxes and pray for the folks who's lives are ruined by this and other events.

    --
    Department of Homeland Security: Removing the rights real patriots fought and died for since 2001
  21. I've always wanted to see a tornado before I die by dugless · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...just not right before.

  22. Tornado's? Ha! by MeanE · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton can easily survive them anyone can.

  23. MMMM... Oklahoma by cens0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I actually grew up in Oklahoma, just north of Tulsa in Bartlesville, and graduated from OU. I live in Seattle now, and I actually miss the weather some times as crazy as that sounds. A few days ago I saw lightening and heard thunder here and it brought a smile to my face.

    If you haven't ever been to the middle of the US, and you get a chance, watch the weather reports some time. If you're from the west coast they will simply amaze you. All the weather people are real meterologists (most with phd's) and they really know what they're talking about. When there is a severe storm or tornado they track the thing and tell you at what time it's going to hit certain intersections in the city. The weather people here are just a joke.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  24. We don't have it here. And we're a quite big... by adilsonoliveira · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This place is Brazil. We don't have tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, blizards are *very* rare, floodings happens sometimes in some places but are quite rare too and not too severe and mostly due to abnormal wheater fenomena as the "El Niño". I'm not 100% sure but I believe our surrounding countries have the same lack of wheather disasters. This makes me ask myself sometimes why people lives in such places, have to been aware of tornados, for instance. Don't get me wrong, I understand what is been attached to where you were born but it's a life threat of huge proportions we're talking about.

    --
    Faith can move mountains. I prefer dynamite.
  25. Weather in England by sjbe · · Score: 2, Funny

    England has weather that's quite unlikely to kill you.

    Unless of course you find a winter season that lasts from September to June a bit too depressing and kill yourself.


    I had a roommate back when I was an undergrad who was from near Birmingham. Everytime we'd have a rainy, cold, gloomy, miserable day he'd get homesick. None of us quite understood why you'd miss that but hey, it's home right? You get used to it I guess. Being from near Cleveland, I don't think it's winter unless there is two feet of lake effect snow on the ground.

    Anyway England is a nice place but it needs a roof.

  26. Wait, now I'm confused by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny
    2) If the sky is green, there's a problem.

    What about tangerine trees and marmalade skies?

  27. Re:Not inteded to be a callus question by jellisky · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow... callous isn't quite the word I'd use...

    Let's do a little estimation, shall we? Let's call the "average" tornado as about 200 meters wide with a 10 kilometer path. That's actually a pretty big average, but let's take it for argument's sake. There are 1000 tornadoes in a year, on average. So, that's 2000 km^2 of damage per year. That translates roughly into a square patch of damage 9 miles on a side (80 mi^2).

    Let's then further assume that all this damage happens in only Oklahoma proper. Again, a limiting and fanciful assumption, but one useful for these purposes. The area of Oklahoma is nearly 70,000 mi^2. So, the chances that your house will fall in tornado damage will be 80/70000, or 0.11% per year.

    Of course, that percentage drops dramatically once you add in Kansas, northern and western Texas, western Missouri, and Nebraska (i.e. the rest of the traditional "Tornado Alley"). Think on the order of 0.01% chance per year.

    Now take the Gulf and Atlantic coasts where hurricanes can be prevalent. I'd be willing to bet that the probabilities are higher since hurricanes are much bigger. Or how about damages related to massive snow and ice storms that can plague the northern states? (You live in Colorado... you surely saw the damages that the blizzard there this year caused.) How about those massive forest fires in the western states driven by weather also? Or maybe the floods that happen in the US every few years or so? Gods, how can we live anywhere in this country?

    The point is that extreme and dangerous weather is not limited to the central US. What happened there this week was an astonishing and record-setting week in terms of tornadoes. Just put it this way... according to the preliminary tornado data, the US has had, in the first 8 days of May, the climatological average for tornadoes in the entire month of May. Yes, we've reached (and surpassed) the long-term average for a month in the first 8 days. (http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/torn/monthlytornsta ts.html )

    Oklahoma City is the most hit metropolitan area, and even that is underwhelming when you examine the data for it all. (http://www.srh.noaa.gov/oun/tornadodata/okc_torna do.html ) Just take a look at the map of the data (which is over an entire century, I remind you) and tell me that people are "expect{ing} taxpayers to buy them new trailers every few years"...

    The southern plains are not as bad as you think. What has happened there is a pure fluke of weather... the same area of a city gets hit by a significant tornado twice in five years... and the same area of the nation gets hit by two or three batches of tornadoes in the same week. Set your integer random number generator to pop out random integers between 1 and 100 and tell me that you wouldn't expect a number to be repeated three or more times in a row in a sample size of 3 million. Streaks happen in randomness or even psuedo-randomness. The OKC area has probably the similar chance of not being hit for ten or more years than they do being hit again in the next three. Do some research into independent probabilities and such before going off on your stupid and inane rant.

    Besides, as a storm chaser, I find that area of the country quite pleasant. Granted, I wouldn't want to live out there since, well, it's a little dull outside of storm chase season, but it's still a nice place to live. It's no worse weather-wise than the subtropical southeastern US with the hurricanes, or the northern states with their ice and snow storms, or the western states with the forest fires and flash floods. It's just different phenomena.

    -Jellisky

  28. In house tornado shelter for $2500 by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Texas Tech University, in Lubbock, has extensive experience with wind. The Wind Engineering department has developed and tested an in home tornado shelter that can be built into a new home for just a couple thousand bucks.

    My next house will certainly have one of these.

    Peter

  29. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Few people lose their lives nowadays though. Almost every single piece of bad weather it predicted well in advance by NOAA and the NWS and alerts are issued. I live in Pittsburg, KS (the far SE corner of KS). 6 miles north of me 3 people died in Franklin, KS in last Sunday's tornados. Those 3 people ignored the warnings on radio, TV, and via local fire whistles to take shelter. The gambled and they lost. For some reason people simply do not pay attention to the weather. They don't listen to the radios during periods common for tornados. They don't own a weather radio. They simply play dumb and hope they're safe. The evidence shows that they are not.

    This tornado is the 5th that I've helped clean up after. I grew up 2.5 hours west of here, south of Wichita. I cleaned up from 4 different tornado incidents back home, including my grandfathers farm/ranch. Back home those families that weren't hit help those that were. That very night or early the following morning the community decends on the destruction in mass to help clean up. I was surprised by what happened in Franklin. I went up there expecting to help people dig out like I'd done before. I couldn't get into the town. The police were guarding all the entrances to the town and only permitting entrance to those people with photo ID that proved they lived in the affected area. As it turns out, within 30 minutes of the tornado city folks swamped the city streets looking for damage. They were rubbernecking. They couldn't stay home and watch it on TV. They had to get in their cars and drive through the affected areas looking for death and destruction. This prevented emergency vehicles from being able to gain access to those areas. Hence, the city was shut down. Damned city folk. In the end I donated some clothing and rode an Red Cross IRV and served food all day. I would have felt more useful doing something else but someone had to feed the people and workers.

    Back on topic. There is no such thing as a tornado proof building. NOAA has done hundreds of studies into building material. They have yet to find anything that can withstand the winds of even a strong F3 tornado. A F3 tornado damaged reinforced concrete. A F4 ripped reinforced concrete apart. A F5 crumbles it into little bits. What needs to be focused on is tornado shelters and getting people into them. Homes and possessions can be replaced. People can not.

  30. know your weather patterns by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tornados have been recorded on 6 of 7 continents, and in all 50 states. If you've had a thunderstorm, you can have a tornado. Granted, they take a very specific set of conditions to form, and even then you've got no guarentees. Move to Antarctica if you want to avoid them.

    Here in SE Michigan you can get a very easy feel for what storms you can watch from the porch, and what storms you should watch from the TV in the basement. "good" storms track West to East. A high percentage of storms come off of lake michigan, track across the state, then split north or south when they hit Ann Arbor.

    (The city's a heat island. 10-ish square miles of concrete and asphault that forms a giant column of rising air that tends to split all but the biggest storms. Once the storms hit Ann Arbor, they either go north and hit Oakland county or Head south and slam Monroe. Ypsilanti, which is just west of Ann Arbor, seldom catches the full force of a storm.)

    "bad" storms are the ones that trace South to North. Theres nothing south of us (except ohio farm fields, ideal storm breeding grounds) to protect the urban areas. The worst storms I can remember have all run South - North.

    Moral of the story; know your local weather, your TV weather man is a dipshit, weather.com radar is your friend, and when in doubt, go for the basement. (if you have one, you insensitve clod)

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  31. Re:Directing Tornadoes by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Any change/attempt to direct the path of a tornado by appropriate landscaping?

    -Max


    Yes. Lawn gnomes are good for blocking very small tornadoes.



    Peter

  32. Pringles crisis by juan2074 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did anyone notice the Pringles crisis caused by a tornado last Sunday?

  33. Re:Anti-MS? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Funny

    "As anybody with half a clue knows, all severe weather is caused by closed source, Microsoft anti-chaos climate control devices located in Redmond. If only the source code to these devices would be released to the public, the bugs that cause tornadoes, hail and other extreme atmospheric distubances could be eliminated. When it is eventually released, the GNU/linux GnStorm software will prevent these tragedies. Of course, the evil, neo-fascist, corporate worshiping Busch administration and their E-VIL minions in the republican-taliban party will prevent this from ever coming to pass"

    There, Better?

  34. Re:we need to develope construction techniques by headonfire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    hey, welcome to the party. i'm here in lawrence, kansas and we got hit thursday. no deaths and only minor injuries, thank goodness.

    we had the rubberneck syndrome last night really badly. i'm an emergency service volunteer, and traffic just started -pouring- into the area. people were on foot just walking around, taking pictures, blocking traffic, you name it. if nothing else, i'd beg people to please, for the love of god, stay clear of the disaster area if you don't live there. :/

    http://www.ljworld.com/section/severeweather/sto ry /131328

  35. I knew there was a reason I lived through it. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thanks. My fat ass is safe. lol... BMI 29.5 (almost obese).

    Actually when this thing hit I was working at home and the power went off. I was trying to figure out why (I live in Norman which is about 5-10 miles south of where the tornado touched down in Moore) so I turned on the TV (it was sunny and clear in Norman). The cable recycled and of course I turn on local channels and they are showing a tornado just north of where I live. Crazy ass weather. The alarms didn't even sound in my town (which they shouldn't have) so I was oblivious.

    I drove by it today on the way to work and it isn't 1/5th as bad as the one in 1999. That one looked like a fucking bomb went off (it was 1 to 1.5 miles wide). Nothing stranger than driving by where an entire housing area used to be and all you see is a few pieces of lumber and red dirt. The 99 tornado stripped all the grass too! The things that were scary/cool were the pieces of hay embedded in telephone poles (or what was left of them) and the cars that were folded like a piece of paper around powerlines and no longer had any paint because the flying debris stripped it all off.

    Tornado Alley still feels safer to me because unless you've seen the weather here and been able to compare it to other places, it's difficult to understand how well the weathermen/women do in these storms.

    My best friend lives in San Fran and I'm pretty sure I could live through a tornado, I hope he lives through the big one if it ever does hit san fran.

    Boomer Sooner

  36. Re:Survival is simple by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    But, then you look up, see Dorthy's house falling towards you, and you can't get the chains off in time!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  37. That's an acid trip by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 2, Funny

    not a tornado.

    Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds

  38. Texas Tech and FEMA have a lot of info on the subj by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Texas Tech University (the folks that invented the 2x4 launcher for testing the strength of building siding and other fun games) and FEMI have put together a lot of Tornado survival info over the years.

    Check out FEMA's website as well as Texas Tech's Wind Engineering site.

  39. Weather Knowledge by The+Asmodeus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've lived in Oklahoma all my life and take most of this for granted. It wasn't until I started traveling and found that most places across the nation had pathetic weather technology.

    The thing that is most strange is that in some places I would bet the average Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas person would have more knowledge of weather and how to read radar. We know what a "hook echo" is, can point out a "wall cloud", and know that the green tint means hail.

    Oklahoma isn't much for technology but if you want cutting edge radar tech, no place is better. They recently did a study near here to see if airborne particles (like would be released from a terrorist crop duster) could be detected on our radar. Never will know the results but.. We also have Tinker AFB, home of the AWACS (the ultimate flying radar).

  40. Fujita scale and damage by Rosenkavalier · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Fujita scale categories are listed with both wind speed and typical damage produced. The 'official' Fujita rating of a given cyclone is still determined by damage assessment. With modern Doppler radar providing accurate wind speed measurements from a distance, the 'F' rating can be estimated for locations where damage measurements are problematic (open farmland, etc.).

    Related note: the record-setting May 1999 Bridge Creek/Moore/Del City/Midwest City tornado had the most accurate wind speed measurement to date, thanks to special portable Doppler units.

    Moore High School, Class of 1988 -- Go Lions!

  41. Re:Need to send a wireless camera up in a tornado by Negadecimal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe a 802.11 cam or something.

    Tornadoes generate a tremendous amount of EM radiation. Nearby twisters are known to jam low-VHF frequencies (i.e. the infamous "white channel two" warning). Of course, they may not affect WiFi frequencies at all, but I also wonder if the rotating iron in a tornado forms something of a faraday cage.