Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Fuel Injection Computer

renaissance-redneck writes "I was searching for details on assembling a fuelie setup from junkyard parts when I stumbled across this: 'MegaSquirt is an Experimental Electronic Fuel Injector Controller for Internal Combustion engines. Its main goal was to create a simple fuel-only controller that could be easily reproduced with cost-effective components.' If you've got the time and the skills, it beats spending $2000."

282 comments

  1. Injection is nice... by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I'd rather be blown!

    1. Re:Injection is nice... by Alien+Being · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Troll? I've hate to bitch about moderation, but...

    2. Re:Injection is nice... by rifter · · Score: 1

      What did you expect? Car-savvy slashdot nerds? Hey moderator assholes! How about you try and learn about the subject before you start modding crap offtopic when it is topical and funny (and then the submitter even provides a link to prove it!)

      What am I saying? moderators that can click links? NEVER! Trolls will roast their stomachs in hell!

    3. Re:Injection is nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I can buy a $1000 computer for a Honda from AEM.... the EMS system (Engine Management System). Full replacement system.

      Oh, and too bad this doesn't work with MAP sensors... sorta kills alot of import car options (well ok mostly honda's again lol).

      And 3rd, most cars anymore do enter a limp mode when something is really wrong. Honda's won't let you go over 3000 rpm's, cadaliacs and stuff will shut down half the cylinders if the engine over-heats.... etc. In my opinion it's not work your warrenty for this deal. How does this thing store the Fuel maps? How do you tune them? How's the idle? etc. Even making the AEM EMS work is a pain in the ass. over 6 hours of dyno time to properly get the base fuel maps for non-WOT situations figured out.. that's 6 hours @ about $50-$80 an hour.. you can figure that out. It's much better to go with a piggy back system like the Hondata, so the factory base maps are all still pre-programmed but can be modified if need be, since WOT is really all you need to change. In my opinion this isn't worth a dime

    4. Re:Injection is nice... by 8-balll · · Score: 1, Interesting

      or you can be a real man and hack the shit and spend what??$50 bucks...I guess you thought you read to much...these guys took their time and made something that can control your EFI and they will give it to you...but than again I guess you have to understand how to put a part on a board....Since you think that you have to spend alot of money for something to work, I'm sorry...You can buy a couple of hundred or thousand dollar system and then try to set it up...or you could spend less than two hundrad dollars and be a real man and control what goes into your engine....

      --
      such is life...
    5. Re:Injection is nice... by gomiam · · Score: 1
      Hello, nice to meet you. I am your impossible moderator: I usually read the article pointed to when moderating (i.e., if I think the Slashdot excerpt is not enough to make up my mind and/or the comment is not clearly definable). And I usually like moderating up much better than down (this is needed too, though).

      Shall you please vanish in a puff of logic now, please? ;-)

    6. Re:Injection is nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll repeat.... you're going to spend hundreds of dollars tuning this "cheap" system, and what about engine codes should something in the car quit working? Where's the limp mode should say cylinder 3 start knocking or mis-firing, etc? Unless you really understand how this all work (tuning, sensors, etc) i'd advise you not to think this is a cheap solution. It's not. I build race cars for a living (imports, all computer run, etc) and trust me it's not. Tuning the partial throttle fuel maps is the most time consuming and pain in the ass thing you can do, and to have some shop do it you're looking to easily spend $600+. Not to mention if you try it yourself, unless you have a dyno and a wide-band O2 to monitor shit and tune it, you WILL screw your engine.

    7. Re:Injection is nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, not to mention like i said the hondata can be had for $200 and works off the stock base map so tuning (except WOT and maybe a few adjustments to the POT) are taken care of.

      and look at the MF2 if you just want to add some injectors. simple 3d injector controller for $125. Does RPM, throttle, and boost (hence 3d) instead of this other system which is 2d (rpm and throttle

    8. Re:Injection is nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There should be a test that everybody has to pass before they post on slashdot, AC or otherwise.

      Troll or funny? Troll or funny?

      You fail. Get a fargin clue, man.

    9. Re:Injection is nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're going to spend hundreds of dollars tuning this "cheap" system, and what about engine codes should something in the car quit working? Where's the limp mode should say cylinder 3 start knocking or mis-firing, etc?

      JFC. And what if cyl 2 loses 8 pounds of compression? This doesn't monitor tire pressure either. Come on. Obviously, this solution isn't for everybody (and you're on that list.) You "race" cars for a living??? What does that mean, that you put stickers and 3" exhausts on civics at the local rice shop? How often do you think the average new car NEEDS to go into "limp" mode, anyway? That's for grandma and yuppies... anybody with the technical savvy to install their own EFI system isn't gonna panic if their car overheats.

    10. Re:Injection is nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are stupid. You don't even get the joke. It's quite relevant.

    11. Re:Injection is nice... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      OK, a late reply, so prolly nobody will read this, but hey, I was down a few days with a harddrive transplant.
      Oh, and too bad this doesn't work with MAP sensors
      You didn't visit the reference web site, did you? It most certainly does work with MAP sensors. See their FAQ.
      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  2. Interesting... by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This raises an interesting question - namely, when are we going to see more hacking done on modern engine control computers?

    I don't mean the current crop of "chips" that increase horsepower by overriding emissions control code, or remove the rev limiter code, I mean real, creative hacks.

    For example, a friend of mine and I were discussion this possible hack:
    On an engine with sequential multipoint injection (one injector per cylender, near the intake valve), could one modify the ECU so that, when the engine is under minimal load, instead of firing the injector on every intake stroke, it would fire on every other intake stroke - in effect changing a four stroke engine into an eight stroke engine?

    In theory, this would allow you to run a leaner mix (leaner = hotter burning) without burning up the cylinder, and you could save fuel. When the ECU detected the engine being placed under more load, it would start firing on every intake stroke (and remap to a richer mix).

    Of course, I suppose the reason we don't see this is because hotter combustion = more carbon monoxide produced instead of carbon dioxide.

    Now, if I could just get anoncvs access to Ford...

    1. Re:Interesting... by Spirilis · · Score: 1

      I thought the hotter combustion had more to do with NOx emissions than CO...

      --
      the real at&t mix
    2. Re:Interesting... by Juggle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually that has been brought up already on the MegaSquirt list - and Chevy is doing something similar on a vehicle in the next year or two with an engine that dynamically changes from 6 to 4 cylinders. It was done before (by Cadillac IIRC) but didn't work out well because the technology to pull it off just wasn't available.

      Oh - and it's also a technique used in some motors alreeady. The Ford Focus will do exactly what you described if it starts to overheat in an attempt to "Limp home".

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    3. Re:Interesting... by pr1000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In response to your question of when we're going to see (much) more hacking of engine control computers, my guess is that it won't happen soon, if at all. I think most people (including very knowledgable computer people), lacking a strong mechanical knowledge of cars, don't have the time or inclination to learn all the ins and outs of car computer systems.

      That being said, I agree with you and think it would be great if more interesting hacks come out.

    4. Re:Interesting... by barzok · · Score: 5, Informative
      Cadillac still has it, it's part of the Northstar system. But, it's only for use in emergencies - if you lose your coolant, it shuts down half the engine at a time to pump air through to cool it off.

      Word on the street is that Dodge's new 5.7L HEMI has or will have in a near-future iteration cylinder shutoff for when you don't need all 8 sucking down the gas.

    5. Re:Interesting... by thing12 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Cadillac still has it, it's part of the Northstar system. But, it's only for use in emergencies - if you lose your coolant, it shuts down half the engine at a time to pump air through to cool it off.

      The Cadillac 16 uses a similar engine and it switches on demand to run on 4, 8 or all 16 cylinders of its 13.6 liter engine. Very cool stuff...

    6. Re:Interesting... by barzok · · Score: 3, Insightful
      As the government takes more control (with OBD-III) along with the carmakers, expect to see less "home-tuning" as time goes on. Even with recent OBD-II vehicles things are getting difficult. And it requires deep pockets, plus a lot of equipment.

      Really, if you're into this sort of thing, you're probably better off restoring an older car, and dropping in a crate engine with a bolt-on fuel injection kit like Edelbrock offers, then tuning that.

    7. Re:Interesting... by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Informative
      On an engine with sequential multipoint injection (one injector per cylender, near the intake valve), could one modify the ECU so that, when the engine is under minimal load, instead of firing the injector on every intake stroke, it would fire on every other intake stroke - in effect changing a four stroke engine into an eight stroke engine?

      That'd be more like turning your V8 into a 4-banger. Cadillac tried something like it ~20 years ago with the V8-6-4, which ended up not going over too well with drivers. (Their current Northstar V8 has a similar capability, but while the V8-6-4 used it in normal operation to try to squeeze better mileage out of a big engine, the Northstar only uses it as an emergency measure. If the engine loses coolant and starts overheating, the engine computer limits vehicle speed (to 50 mph, IIRC) and shuts down half of the cylinders at a time, cycling through them in turn so they can cool down a bit. Basically, it allows what's normally a water-cooled engine to run as an air-cooled engine long enough to get to the nearest garage and fix the problem.)

      Unless you had a way to hold the intake and exhaust valves open when you didn't want the cylinder to operate (really big solenoids, perhaps?), running each cylinder half as often would rob lots of power...you'd compress a chunk of air, but wouldn't have a combustion cycle to make any use of it. With some engines, holding the valves open would more than likely result in the piston slamming into them on the compression and exhaust strokes, which would be a Bad Thing. (My understanding is that some imports have this problem when the timing belt breaks.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:Interesting... by DonFinch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fuel flow curves and mix balencing is fairly complicated stuff. Most of the chips you see just alter the full throttle intermix curves. and that is about all you can do for power with injection control, and that only gets you a small gain. The stock computers at non WOT (wide open throttle) are designed to keep the engine at the most effective mix, by very quickly qhanging the mix from lean to rich. The best way to get more fuel into the engine is to get more air to the engine. You need more air to make more fuel burn effectivly, simply increase the fuel, you wont have the air to reap the rewards. Get more air to the engine, and the air sensor will compensate by injecting more fuel to the chambers. This is the basis behind forced induction.

      Now, at WOT, you want lotsa fuel, since there is the max amout of air getting to the motor. Engineers know this so when your gas pedal hits the floor, the computer quits computing the best mix. It reverts to pre-programed mix curves from the factory., now if your motor is getting more air than it was originally designed to get, you need new WOT mix curves. this is what your aftermarket chip does. Now, you could program these curves yourself, but you better KNOW your shit. Get this fuel mix wrong, and manage your engine poorly, or make a typo, and you'll be debuging by rebuilding your cylinder head, or worse, replacing pistons and rods.

      if you want to see great examples of automotive stuidity, go here www.overboost.com

      --
      -- Insert wisdom here:
    9. Re:Interesting... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1


      That's a really cool idea, and a helluva heavy-duty engine, but when I clicked the link, all I could think was that is the ugliest car I have ever seen. That impression didn't last long, once I clicked on the links to the other vehicles on that page.

      What are they smoking?

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    10. Re:Interesting... by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

      I'd definately be interested in building something for my car that would let me make the adjustments without having to replace a chip. These days I drive rather conservatively (99% of the time at least) but my car is a gas guzzler.

      When I was shopping for my car I decided I wanted three things. 1) A car I could pay cash for 2) A convertible 3) A car that would still be exhilirating to drive when I step on the pedal. After looking around I found a 1986 Mustang GT ragtop that fit the bill. The previous owners had intended to build it for drag racing, but needed a new truck for their business so sold it to me before they were finished. They re-did the exhaust, put in a shift-kit, and a K&N air filter. They didn't mess with the engine at all. (If they did a bunch of engine and stupid cosmetic mods first I wouldn't have touched it.)

      On average I work from home four days a week so mileage wasn't a big deal. When I want to do a road trip though, it really sucks (no pun intended.) This car is my daily driver (on the days that I actually have to drive) so I'm mostly interested in modifications that won't harm the performance or the engine. The car is about 18 years old after all, and it amazes me that it still is running strong and reliably after all those years and 150,000+ miles.

      Yeah, I love rambling about my car, so I'll get back to the point. A replacement computer for the fuel injection that would be cheap and allow me to improve mileage without permanently sacrificing performance would be great. I wish I had spent a little more time with my gear-head friends in high school.

    11. Re:Interesting... by realdpk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only wankers reply to sigs.

      Ha, who would fall for that.

    12. Re:Interesting... by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      GM is designing such an engine that can hold the valves open
      the entire camshaft is replaced with a computer, i believe its due in 2008 (dont believe me goto one of their classes they hold them for mechanics all the time at the local gm dealerships just gotta find out when and get invited)

    13. Re:Interesting... by Gonzoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I vaguely recall someone doing research on using solenoids to run the valves. I think the problem was with getting the solenoids to run fast enough. I thought it would be a cool idea to be able to change valve timing on the fly and have the whole thing controlled by a computer.

    14. Re:Interesting... by WizardX · · Score: 1

      With some engines, holding the valves open would more than likely result in the piston slamming into them on the compression and exhaust strokes, which would be a Bad Thing. (My understanding is that some imports have this problem when the timing belt breaks.)

      That is what is refered to as an 'interferance engine'. It is not exclusively the domain of imports either.

      It is a function (in the mathematical sense) of the head and/or piston design. (Almost?) Every engine, when at the top of the ompression/exhaust stroke will have the piston head flush with the block. If, when a valve it is at maximum lift, extends below the cylinder head, it will make contact (interfere) with the piston. This can be mitigated by using pistons that have a recess in them or pistons that have 'cut-outs' for the valves.

      Generally, if you have a interferance engine and you jump time, you will need at least new valves (bent) and new pistons (dented, scratched, whatever) Even if the piston is still sructurally sound, you still need them as damage to the piston head will cause (IIRC) hot spot and will burn a hole in the piston.

      Bottom line is you 'gets what you gets'

    15. Re:Interesting... by zogger · · Score: 1

      --if they were building it to be a dragster, maybe it has the wrong rear end in it for a daily driver and better mileage. You might be better off to just go for what's called a "taller" read end. Goto you nearest gear heads they will look at your differential and tell you what you have and what you need to change inside it, or perhaps a straight differential swap. Not as fast off the line, but you could probably be just as happy, it will still be plenty fast enough, and you'll get a lot better mileage. Then maybe start fooling with the fuel injectors. I'm sorta dated, all my stuff has only ever had carbs.....

      Tell ya one nice carb set up I saw once, 6 weber two barrels on a v-12 (real flat V, 178 degrees) ferrari boxer a friend had, all stainless stell linkage. Sounded like a dragon, it was nice...real different from a detroit car, but dang nice

    16. Re:Interesting... by Regul8or · · Score: 1

      If it fired on every other intake stroke then you'd just have a dead cylinder drawing oxygen in and spitting it out into the exhaust stream. Then, this pulse of oxygen would get to the oxygen sensor. The oxygen sensor will detect this high O2 content and think there's not enough fuel and increase the injector pulse width to compensate. Then your emissions would be all screwed up. Leaner mixtures also put out more oxides of nitrogen and that's bad stuff.

      Even when you're idling the oxygen sensor is giving feedback to the PCM. So, ideally you're running the stochiometirc fuel/air ratio, all cylinders are firing, emissions are low and RPMs are high enough to keep the engine alive. An engine needs to be at a certain RPM while idling to be able to respond to changing demands. If the idle is too low, when you snap open the throttle the manifold pressure increases to atmospheric pressure and the incoming air charge stalls and of course the engine stalls.

      There is a "new old" concept engine being produced by GM based on the concept of the old V-8-6-4 that was a total failure because it sucked. The new idea employs the same concepts but much more thoroughly with the help of computer controls. This of course involves mechanical functions such as being able to cut off hydraulic pressure to a cylinder's valves causing the valves not to open. You won't be able to program this feature into a PCM.

    17. Re:Interesting... by CptChipJew · · Score: 1

      This is also a part of 600 grade of Mercedes-Benz's with 6L V12's.

      The difference between this and the Northstar system is that the engine uses 6 cylinders when driving lightly, and all 12 when pressing down on the accelrator a little harder.

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    18. Re:Interesting... by Regul8or · · Score: 1

      What actually happens is that the piston compresses the air and on the power stroke that same compression pushes it back down. The parisitic power loss from this operation is minimal. If the valves were held open the reciprocating pistons would in effect become part of the intake manifold and have a continiously varying manifold volume. As such would cause erratic manifold pressure changes, unreliable MAF/MAP sensor readings and so on.

    19. Re:Interesting... by clbyjack81 · · Score: 1

      This has progressed a little beyond simple research. The new BMW 745Li and 760Li use infinite-variable intake valves that take the place of the throttle body. In this configuration, each cylinder has it's own oxygen regulator that is independent of the other cylinders. This leads to a significant increase in both efficiency and power.

      --
      Cole's Axiom: The sum of the intelligence on the planet is a constant. The population is growing.
    20. Re:Interesting... by Bill+Currie · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, a damaged piston head (really, any sharp corners in the combustion chamber) can cause hot spots which then cause the mixture to pre-ignite (detonate, ping). Really bad news for your piston, rod, crank and case (well, if you've got a lightweight aluminum (or worse, magnesium) aloy case like I (and almost (?) every other vintage VW owner) have:)

      --

      Bill - aka taniwha
      --
      Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

    21. Re:Interesting... by mako · · Score: 1

      Really? You think this is ugly? I really like what Cadillac is doing style wise.

    22. Re:Interesting... by thynk · · Score: 2, Funny

      all I could think was that is the ugliest car I have ever seen.

      See, there you go. I've not been smoking anything and I think it is, as Cartman would say 'Hella Cool'. Sweet modern look, kinda goth and tech at the same time. The only thing that's going to keep me from buying one of these [if|when] then come out is going to be the sticker price. Probably cost more than I've made in the last 2 years combined.

      Still, hand woven silk carpets - I guess you get what you pay for.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    23. Re:Interesting... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Others have already mentioned the Cadillac V8-6-4. It used solenoids to make the valves on certain cylinders stay closed. The energy wasted on the compression and exhaust strokes was mostly recovered on the downstrokes.

      AFAIK, this technique only work for combinations of cylinders which balance against each other. The 8-6-4 dropped the two inner cyls on one bank, and the two outers on the other. I don't think you would ever want to drop just one cylinder.

      It's true that drivers didn't like it. Caddy only did it to meet fuel economy standards for 1981. They rolled out an entirely new engine the next year that made the 8-6-4 cars pretty desirable on the used car market.

    24. Re:Interesting... by jimlintott · · Score: 1

      F1 cars use pnuematic valves.

    25. Re:Interesting... by jimlintott · · Score: 1

      Its called free wheeling if you can spin it over and not clang up the valves. High compression engines are often not free wheeling.

    26. Re:Interesting... by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

      that's what concept cars are supposed to do - get you thinking in different directions. they're not (most of them) going to get made because they are just so freaking weird looking.

      Notable exceptions are the Prowler, the new Thunderbird, and the new VW Bug.

      Concept cars are to the auto industry what concept code is to us - it gets us thinking in new and creative ways so that we can keep on top of the competition.

    27. Re:Interesting... by cdrudge · · Score: 1
      Probably cost more than I've made in the last 2 years combined.

      You are incorrect if you make more then $125,000 a year. The sticker price was going to be in the quarter million dollar range.
    28. Re:Interesting... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1


      Yeah, that was the one I was thinking of when I said that I no longer think the Cadillac 16 is the ugliest car I've ever seen.

      YMMV.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    29. Re:Interesting... by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

      It is interesting that you mention this - there are engines now that no longer have camshafts - they have computer controlled, solenoid driven valves.

      with this very cool tech, you can create an engine that can dynamically and very completely adjust its own timing, giving you mileage timing for long hauls, and power timing for when the pedal is to the metal. These engines can also hold open the exhaust valve on every other cylinder and go into uber-mileage mode, running on 4 cylinders instead of 8, or three instead of 6. And after a certain amount of cycles, it can alternate out the resting cylinders, so that no set of cylinders get more combustion wear than any other.

      Engine tech is going to very cool places nowadays.

    30. Re:Interesting... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      "On an engine with sequential multipoint injection (one injector per cylender, near the intake valve), could one modify the ECU so that, when the engine is under minimal load, instead of firing the injector on every intake stroke, it would fire on every other intake stroke - in effect changing a four stroke engine into an eight stroke engine?"

      It's been done by ford and other companies for years for limp home modes. It doesn't save you anything on gas, infact it would hurt your mileage. To drive the same as you were you need to produce the same amount of power. So now with your engine, it needs to make twice as much power per firing to make up for the de-activated cylinders. So the same amount of fuel is going to be burned. But since you have cycles going through doing nothing your going to have loss. The pumping work of those cylinders is going to have to be made up with more fuel. Ordinarily the loss isn't as important since it is made up by the piston firing.

      Also you're not going to tweak your engine to something better then what it is by controls. Car makers design their engines with 2 goals, high efficency and low emissions for the desired levels of power. Those two goals in general fight each other. In the united states we have very tigh emissions regulations, so american made engines are designed for low emissions more then economy. Thats why they tend to be bigger displacement, slower speed, and not as fuel efficent. In countries with poor emissions laws, and expensive gas engines are tuned for mileage, so they are high reving, small displacement and get better efficency.

      Auto makers take these issues and find the best balance. You might be able to tweak and make one issue better, but others will hurt for those gains.

      Also the maps and so forth in that computer are very complex. People spend years in engine labs collecting data and others spend years more trying to find ways to implement it at it's best. just the slightest messing with it and it's all screwed up. This is why they don't freely let people mess with them. Also if they did let people do such things then the EPA would be all over their asses and have laws passed were you can't mess with such controls, currently the only thing stopping you is the automaker.

      After spending 4 years working on high mileage, low emission vehicles it really blows my mind how many backyard engineers think they can do better.

    31. Re:Interesting... by Gonzoman · · Score: 1

      Sweet!

    32. Re:Interesting... by mako · · Score: 1

      Player Hater! Besides all the cool renegade programs are driving Caddies, get with the program.

    33. Re:Interesting... by Dopeskills · · Score: 1

      If you turned your car into an eight stroke engine you would LOSE power. Less power strokes = less power. (Compare 2 stroke vs 4 stroke motors) for optimum power you want the ignition advanced as much as possible without risking detonation. Most ECU's will advance/retard timing automatically based on sensor readings from the intake tempatures/airflow. Also, this has nothing to do with ECU's that shut down cylinders completely in order to save gas.

    34. Re:Interesting... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually depending on your vehicle you have been able to do stuff like this for some time. I know a guy who races a Viper and with his laptop onboard he can not only monitor everything about the engine but he can actually change things like fuel/air mixture, boost, etc. One of the coolest things is onetime when rally racing he lost partiall cooling capabilities, so his onboard mechanic (two man rally team) turned off half the cylinders in alternating sets until they could get to the next pit area thus avoiding overheating!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    35. Re:Interesting... by Matey-O · · Score: 1

      Displacement on demand is NOT just a selective removal of injector and spark events. There also an oil bypass system that reduces the oil pressue on the lifters for the cylinders not being fired.

      Corvettes have a Limp home mode similar to the Cadillac system mentioned elsewhere. When it happens, it make the car a PIG. Like it can't maintain 50 mph on the highway PIG.

      The older V8-6-4 system mentioned elsewhere actually decoupled the valvetrain and the crank when it went in 'less cylinders' mode. It was a nightmare.

      The new system will only use harmonic multiples of the total number of cylinders: V8 will get a V4 but NOT a V6 mode. There was too much vibration trying to run something with 8 cylinders and only 6 firing.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    36. Re:Interesting... by thynk · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect if you make more then $125,000 a year. The sticker price was going to be in the quarter million dollar range.

      Ah, so if I saved everything I've made in the... last 10 years (the time I was in the Army I didn't make much at all) I could pay cash for one of these. However, with my PowerBall retirement fund [snicker], these might one day be in reach.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    37. Re:Interesting... by rifter · · Score: 1

      For me, this is an important hack not only because it holds the promise of possible increased performance/gas milage, but also because of the attempt to sneak WinCE into cars and not tell us which ones run it. Cars running Windows are unsafe and do not deserve to be on the road. I would prefer the realtime systems that have heretofore been used but if it is WinCE or something I hack then I would prefer to proudly display a "This Truck Powered By Linux!" bumper sticker :).

      I think the article describes a system which is not linux (I have been puzzling thorugh it to figure out if I can get this kit and try it out) but if we can do this then embedded realtime linux is a possibility too.

    38. Re:Interesting... by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      Word on the street is that Dodge's new 5.7L HEMI has or will have in a near-future iteration cylinder shutoff for when you don't need all 8 sucking down the gas
      Mercedes S560 and S600 already have this
      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    39. Re:Interesting... by GMontag · · Score: 1
      For example, a friend of mine and I were discussion this possible hack: On an engine with sequential multipoint injection (one injector per cylender, near the intake valve), could one modify the ECU so that, when the engine is under minimal load, instead of firing the injector on every intake stroke, it would fire on every other intake stroke - in effect changing a four stroke engine into an eight stroke engine?

      That sounds similar to this:


      Input trigger events (compared to ignition events) can be divided by any number between one and eight (number of cylinders must be evenly divisable by this injection number) - this means that there can be an injection event for every ignition event, or an injection event for every other ignition event (skip one), and so on depending on selection. The user can switch which injection division number to use while the car is running - the system will scale the required fuel amount properly on the fly.
    40. Re:Interesting... by GMontag · · Score: 1
      Actually that has been brought up already on the MegaSquirt list

      Well, I hope so, since it is an existing MegaSquirt feature:


      Input trigger events (compared to ignition events) can be divided by any number between one and eight (number of cylinders must be evenly divisable by this injection number) - this means that there can be an injection event for every ignition event, or an injection event for every other ignition event (skip one), and so on depending on selection. The user can switch which injection division number to use while the car is running - the system will scale the required fuel amount properly on the fly.
    41. Re:Interesting... by barzok · · Score: 1

      Then it only makes sense that the HEMI would have it, considering Dodge's parent company (same as Mercedese - Daimler-Benz).

    42. Re:Interesting... by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      that is the ugliest car I have ever seen.
      I find the design very bold and intimidating. US manufacturers are finally getting ahead of the europeans and japanese in the styling department, especially Cadillac & Chrysler. I mean, the Mini? $30 grand for a car that has less space than my closet? I'm sure it will sell well, like the atrocious beetle, but WTF are they thinking when it comes to style?

    43. Re:Interesting... by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Does that mean that if I super duper my inductions system, I could go faster by sitting at say 0.9 throttle instead of flooring?

    44. Re:Interesting... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      I wonder what a Beowulf cluster of these would do in the 1/4 mile? :)

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    45. Re:Interesting... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      That is why I want to modify the whole ECU program - so that when the engine is not firing each pass through, the ECU knows to expect a higher O2 level in the exhaust, and won't over-richen the mix.

      A second point to this idea - in "8 stroke" mode, the exhaust would have a great deal more free 02, which in theory would help the catalytic converter burn whatever was left in the system.

    46. Re:Interesting... by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the system often failed while in the "4" mode, rarely in the "6" mode and never in the "8" mode. The car would be stuck running on 4 cylinders.

    47. Re:Interesting... by Cirvam · · Score: 1

      I would think that its safe to say that most (if not 99%) of the people who tune cars don't really care about emmissions so long as they can pass whatever exists in their state. So when you don't have to worry about stuff like that as much, the backyard engineer can do better, plus the backyard engineer is doing essentally a "one-off" deal, whereas the professional people have to come up with something for production use. I would think if you look at some tuner type shops (Brabus, Ruf, Gembella, etc) they tend to get more power out of cars and ending up with something that still passes emissions and is drivable. Its just hella expensive so its not something that every manufacter can do.

    48. Re:Interesting... by wowbagger · · Score: 1
      Yes, but when the engine is producing much less than maximum power, the engine is not in it's most efficent operating mode - you are moving a smaller air charge with lower velocity, thus less turbulance in the chamber, thus less efficent propagation of the flame front from the spark.

      By making the cylinders that are firing "think" they are running harder, you move the engine nearer to the sweet spot of efficency. True, you lose some efficency due to pumping losses from the dead cylinders, but the question is "Will in increase in efficency of the cylinders that are firing offset the pumping losses of the cylinders that are not?"

      Most of the designs that I have seen for cylinder "feathering" have involved mucking with the valves as well as the fuel charge - that is why I asked if perhaps the industry has had a blind spot to a better method.

      Lastly, allow me to slightly recast your final statement:
      After spending 4 years working on high speed, low memory operating systems it really blows my mind how many backyard engineers think they can do better.


      Many of the "backyard engineers" you so dismissively ignore are just as skilled as the folks working for Ford|GM|etc.

      Yes, Cooter h@><0ring his engine may not come up with a better solution, but there are plenty of folks who might.

      Do remember the two shade-tree mechanics who thought they had a better idea than the experts - who dismissed them as "just a couple of bicycle repairmen who cannot possibly know as much about flight as we do!"
    49. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...with my PowerBall retirement fund...

      Pretty gross, sounds like you are saving all the proceeds from your male prostitute work.
    50. Re:Interesting... by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Probably not. GM decided not to make them. There is only the concept car(s).

    51. Re:Interesting... by snarkasaurus · · Score: 1

      O2 in the converter = fire in your floormats, usually. Not good to let high levels of oxygen in there, shit gets way too hot. Redirect skipped stroke exhaust? Jettison converter? This stuff gets complex eh? Needs a specially designed head, not just a new computer. Interesting idea on the O2 problem though, just give each cylinder its own O2 sensor. Then your program will be able to manage each charge.

    52. Re:Interesting... by duren686 · · Score: 1

      It looks like a cube that ran into a room full of machetes.

      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
    53. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you don't realize is that the major hurdle to effectively implementing this is that you really need to lock open the valves to those cylinders when you cut fuel. Don't forget that an engine is doing a lot of "work" sucking, compressing, and pumping air - and it only happens to gain that back because there is an explosion on every other stroke. By dithering your injection, you will end up with a less efficient motor due to these "pumping losses" - hence it hasn't been very popular until recently when more advanced valvetrains could be modified to open the valves when running in this mode.

      When you think about it in these terms, you can really see how diesels are much more efficient: they're always running in wide-open-throttle (no sucking losses), and they can run as lean as you want!

    54. Re:Interesting... by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Chevy has done that for a long time. I used to have a Grand Prix GTP which would switch from six to three cylinders at steady highway speeds.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    55. Re:Interesting... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      This is a bad idea. It was a bad idea when it was proposed in the '70s, and it's still a bad idea. Do the math. The engine has the exact same friction losses whether it's firing on 4, 6, or all 8 cylinders. The car has the same mass and drag, too. It takes the same amount of energy to move the car at X miles/hour no matter how many cylinders you shut off -- the remaining cylinders just have to work that much harder. At best you burn the same fuel; in practice you could burn more, but you won't burn less, and you get all the start-up emissions problems every time you turn cylinders back on again.

      I forgot who came up with this (one of the automotive companies like Borg Warner, but it wasn't them). They shopped it around to everyone, and only Cadillac bought it. There's a reason Ford, Chrysler, et.al. turned them down. I was at Oldsmobile at the time, and we built a Rocket V8/6/4 engine, tested it, then rejected it. We were amazed that Cadillac went for it, but then again we were amazed at a lot that Cadillac did (like chrome plating their fender dies for a better finish that nobody could detect under a coat of paint).

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    56. Re:Interesting... by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 1

      13.6 Liter.

      And might I ask, who the hell would need that ?

      That seems absurd. Don't tell me it's for performance.... afaik these days the japanese are ahead in street racing, with much, much smaller engines.

      Even F1 cars are less than 3 litres, and they easily break 200mph.

      Maybe we need to pursuade car manufacturers to build more effecient engines....then start tuning the computers.....

      --
      tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
    57. Re:Interesting... by thing12 · · Score: 1
      13.6 Liter. And might I ask, who the hell would need that ? That seems absurd. Don't tell me it's for performance.... afaik these days the japanese are ahead in street racing, with much, much smaller engines.

      If you looked at the cadillac page you'd see that the car weighs in at 5000 lbs. The street racing cars you speak of are all in the 2000 lb range. And if you go to a drag strip sometime, you'll see that people take out their spare tires, rear seats, and anything else they can unbolt just to lose even more weight to improve their times. So I would say that the 1000hp you get from that enormous engine is quite necessary to get 2.5 tons of metal, wood, leather and hand-woven carpets from 0-60 in ~4 seconds.

      Even F1 cars are less than 3 litres, and they easily break 200mph.

      F1 cars have very special engines... and teams of mechanics to maintain them. Sure auto manufacturers take queues from exotic engines, but they aren't going to put them in production cars just because they exist. Look at Ferarri even - V12's V10's -- they consistently go for bigger engines over small high rpm F1 styles.

    58. Re:Interesting... by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 1


      The point I was trying to make is, that there's really no need for such huge cars, as far as I know they don't transport any more people, and at the end of the day they're costing us all.

      If you need confirmation check out here and here

      quote " Every eight months, nearly 11 million gallons of oil run off our streets and driveways into our waters - the equivalent of the Exxon Valdez oil spill "

      --
      tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
    59. Re:Interesting... by thing12 · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree - the sixteen and cars like it are just not meant for average people to drive and use. But I guess my attitude is that if a few of them get built and driven around by the uber-rich, so what? No one seems to look at these and compare them to other toys for rich people - like private jets for example. How much fuel waste and emissions are those creating? And lets move past private jets and just look at ordinary passenger and cargo jets... where an average commercial jet consumes a million gallons of fuel each year... then multiply that by the number of jets each airline has 20? 100? 500 or more for some of the larger airlines. That's 100's of billions of gallons burned each year just to fly people and cargo around.

  3. Crazy world these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean I'll have to gas up my computer now? The oil companies are controlling everything nowadays...

    1. Re:Crazy world these days by NeoMoose · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gas prices are so high that you are better off spending the 2 grand on a new computer anyways.

    2. Re:Crazy world these days by nametaken · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I suppose some people would say, "start a war".

  4. Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Would my auto insurance cover any injuries sustained while doing this?

  5. The question remains... by Fazer · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...does it run Linux?

    1. Re:The question remains... by Juggle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not yet - but there is a Linux based tuning program being written for it. It's still in the early stages at this time but the guy working on it has made a lot of progress the past week or two. Anyone got some good guage widgets for GTK+ they care to donate to him :)

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    2. Re:The question remains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guages like these?

      http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~hennikul/gupsc/

    3. Re:The question remains... by pVoid · · Score: 1
      Not to be a troll, but I find this to be clearly gimmicky.

      This thing is neither multi user, nor multi tasking, nor protected memory addressing, nor io bound really... Why on earth would you want linux to be adapted to it, let alone even any sort of OS (aside from basic firmware).

      To a certain extent, everytime I see about these very 'cool' little pieces of electronics said to be running on linux, I cringe and shake my head in disbelief... Sure linux is nice and all, but recognize what it's good for.

      This being said, maybe I completely didn't realize you were trying to be funny (partially because you were modded informative). In which case... you are funny.

    4. Re:The question remains... by Newsome · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not exactly, although this guy seems to have gotten a TCP/IP stack onto the same chip.

      The MegaSquirt uses the Motorola MC68HC908GP32, which has only 512 bytes of RAM, so it's a bit tough to get much done (you try booting your linux system with "mem=512" sometime).

      If you really want to run Linux on an embedded system, you might look into uClinux on a bigger processor.

      --
      http://www.tuxrocks.com/
    5. Re:The question remains... by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the MS does multitask. It uses interrupts to run timers and kick off events when the timers expire. This device uses a Motorola 68HC908, a fairly low end processor. The lowest end processor you could run linux on is the 332, which the EFI-332 uses and many GM ECMs. Really though, an MPC555 is the realistic target for such an OS. The 555 and 565 are being used by the next generation ECUs because they have lots of everything.

    6. Re:The question remains... by colinnwn · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Even geekier and more elegant...

      The firmware is written in assembler, a la Steve Gibson'esque

      Gibson Research

    7. Re:The question remains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank you for the info. I would mod you informative if I could.

      -pVoid

    8. Re:The question remains... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Ummm - a TUNING program is being written for Megasquirt in Linux. The actual Megasquirt software is written in...wait for it... Assembler.

      I've been monitoring the project for a while till I get the $$$/time to build one. These folks are NOT fooling around.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    9. Re:The question remains... by Juggle · · Score: 1

      I assumed the original poster was trying to be funny and tried to give a funny reply with some serious info mixed in - hope that wasn't too confusing.

      I agree other than novelty there's really no reason to run Linux on the MS hardware. Though I do occasionally enjoy doing things simply for the novelty aspect of doing them!

      The software being developed for Tuning/programming the MegaSquirt under Linux however I felt was something the /. crowd would really be interested in. There's already a fully functional Windows program for doing this so why not make a Linux version and avoid having to deal with getting serial working correctly through Wine (which some people have done with success to program their MS from Linux.)

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    10. Re:The question remains... by Juggle · · Score: 1

      Yeah - in fact that was the only example anyone has offered to the developer yet :) I assume he ran into some problem with them though since he's still asking for more help.

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    11. Re:The question remains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are actually working on a Linux version of the tuning software :-)
      The ecu programming itself is all done in Assembler language (no BSOD!)

      Igor (Australia)

  6. I would make one, by nich37ways · · Score: 4, Funny

    However I would much prefer my car to continue operating afterwards.

    Seriously though how long till you see *Hacked with Megasquirt* stickers on all the rice mobiles going around?

    --
    37 - what does it stand for really...
    1. Re:I would make one, by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      Seriously though how long till you see *Hacked with Megasquirt* stickers on all the rice mobiles going around?

      This won't happen, because MegaSquirt has an actual performance product, as opposed to the dozen or so companies that just make cool stickers. Oh yeah, some of them also make giant wings, seat and seat belt covers, and those stupid blue windshield washer LEDs.

    2. Re:I would make one, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However I would much prefer my car to continue operating afterwards.

      So you're saying your electronics skillz are less than 733+? If you know what you're doing, you can make a pretty reliable piece of kit. Some of the cars running the MS have clocked up many thousands of miles.

    3. Re:I would make one, by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      yeah i hear changing sequential injenction to banked injection is a truly *sweet* mod.. right up there with down clocking your computer..

      If you see a "rice mobile" with *Hacked with Megasquirt* stickers either the owner is stupid or really stupid (if you read the article the product is pointed towards switching carbed vehicles to injection).. then again from the department that thought big wings make you fast... (and don't give me that downforce bullshit.. *most aftermarket wings are not functional and if they are designed to be functional are mounted improperly).. but i digress..

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:I would make one, by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Seriously though how long till you see *Hacked with Megasquirt* stickers on all the rice mobiles going around?

      They're probably already there. But written in Kanji.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    5. Re:I would make one, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is an upgrade.
      Megasquirt has the capability to control boosted motors, whereas the MAP sensors on many Hondas don't like to see positive manifold pressure. That problem is able to be bypassed, but not in an elegant solution. Batch fire is more than good enough for most engines, and since it is fast (written in assembler) it can control combustion events at speeds up to 16,000 RPM, and has a fueling map resolution that is higher than that of many expensive commercially available standalone systems. So eat it.

    6. Re:I would make one, by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      So eat what AC? Batch fire is still far from elegant.. it may be inexpensive but so what? The elegant solution is a standalone such as one by A'PEX (see powerfc). There are other brands but this is the first to pop to head. Can the mega squirt control vtec engagement? Well not unless i add code and hardware, so i just threw out some power there. Can it control ignition? Not by itself. Can it control boost and turbo timing? No. Can it control secondary injectors that's cycle is controlled by boost? No. These lacking aspects make it seem far from an elegant solution.. but rather a nice fun hack.

      Oh and it is fast b/c it is written in assembler? Hahaha.. just because something is written in asm doesn't mean it is fast.. asm does not necessarily breed good programming practices (although i have programmed for the 68hc11 and took a look at this code and it looks good). In the case of a processor that does out of order or always performs the instruction right after a jump (or other oddities) often compiled from c will be less buggy.

      16,000 rpm peak? Hmm, won't work for motorcycles very well then (at least ones i've owned or ridden)...

      and has a fueling map resolution that is higher than that of many expensive commercially available standalone systems OK now I know you didn't RTFA!! The writer claims that a 16x16 (?) map is big enough but not too big like many commercial products that use that as a bragging right (but can cos miss programms).. The a'pex fc has a 20x20 map for both ignition and fuel... The writer did not say it was higher.. he said higher than some lower than others and for a reason, and i agree with him.

      So eat it. Hmmm, maybe next time don't post as an AC. Sure the Megasquirt has the capability to control boosted motors, but a toaster oven has the capability to cook pizza and i won't be doing that any time soon.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    7. Re:I would make one, by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      Can you explain why you imply that batch fire is a substantitive downgrade from sequential? I think you will find that there are very few areas where sequential outshines batch with the exception of emissions. And if you care about emissions, you would be driving a Honda Insight and not contemplating blowing more stink into the atmosphere with a 300hp Civic tuned with a +$1400 APEXi FC and Commander.

      That APEXi might be sexy in the same way a $4000 Mac is sexy sitting on a Silicon Valley VC's desk, but can they get anything worthwhile done with it, no.

      As you pointed out, a power user can mod MegaSquirt to operate VTEC because all of the documentation is public domain. There are currently 4 companion projects to control ignition: MegaJoltION, MegaJoltLight, MegaJoltSuperLight and MegaSpark. There is a guy that almost has completed getting MegaSquirt to control boost and turbo timing. And BZZZ... MegaSquirt is already being used to control secondary boost injectors, its called DualTable MegaSquirt. Pretty nice toolbox for a $120 unit.

      Actually the MS has an 8x8 fueling table that it does linear interpretation between points greatly increasing its effective resolution. No one has yet proven this was insufficient. Too bad that the APEXi is not well documented enough to determine if it does linterp between its 20x20 or 400 fueling points. God bless the poor sap that has to fill that table in.

      Oh yea I forgot, even APEXi recommends having a professional tuner with a dyno tune their unit. So God bless the poor owner of an APEXi that is about to go on welfare paying their tuner. It is very telling where the APEXi website says you can use the Commander to adjust 5x5 groups of bins at once. So now with this little "tool," they have just reduced their effective fuel table to 4x4. Maybe such a big table isn't necessary if you can adjust a section that large together?

      My toaster has the capability to warm PizzaHut leftovers without heating up the whole damn house in the Summer and costing me an arm and leg in electricity. Smiles, Colin.

    8. Re:I would make one, by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      That APEXi might be sexy in the same way a $4000 Mac is sexy sitting on a Silicon Valley VC's desk

      And there we get to my original point.. you won't see this on a "ricer's" car.. not sexy. If we go back to the orig post, he said you'd see megasquirt stickers on "ricer's" cars.. ricer gennerally meaning big wings, and bad body kits. I really stand behind that they won't find it intriging, and you won't be seeing it in Sport compact any time soon (and only because the majority of cars in magazines are people with way too much money that but whatever looks good that can be bolted onby the nearest shop with a dyno). Then some AC troll comes along and is like, but MS is greaaat.. yeah it is. I did not say otherwise.. I said it was missing some points, ie complete intigration with things like ignition, which will come (I did state that their fuel map made more sence).

      My point was MegaSquirt Stickers are Not Going to be The Next big Thing On "Riced" Cars like "powered by honda" stickers on your mazda or toyota (which does not have an engine swap, incase someone wants to say.. ahs but some toyota's or mazdas have honda engines).. the only people that will advertise that they have MS are those that do.. and that's prolly a good thing.

      Oh and if anyone reads this any knowledge on MS being used with rotary engines?

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:I would make one, by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      There are 5 known running Mazda rotaries, probably more because not everyone reports their successes.

      More info here:
      MegaSquirt Success Stories

      The last I heard approximately 2000 parts kits had been sold. Best guess is around 200 cars actually running MegaSquirt. Some have spun their own boards from scratch. In addition the MegaSquirt hardware is being used with custom firmware for other purposes.

      For example:

      MegaSpark runs ignition
      I won't post website to avoid slashdotting it, just in case people are still regularly reading this topic, but its in the MegaSquirt Yahoo group.

      Someone is using it as a greenhouse temperature, humidity and soil moisture monitor and controller.

      And another guy is thinking about making it a Beer brewing controller.

      Laters, Colin.

  7. Please don't knock out the server.... by Juggle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not this weekend! I build my MS back in December but didn't get my new motor together until about a month ago. Now I'm about ready to start putting it all together and /. finally notices the project.

    So of course just when I need the site the most it will probably be overrun and unavailable ;)

    Seriously though it's a great hardware hacking project. Quite a few revisions to the basic system have been made by the users and there are even a few spin-off projects (MegaSpark, MegaSquirtAVR, MegaJolt, MegaView, MegaTune, MSTWeak3k....) all of which were created by users of the system.

    It's based on a stripped down simple version of the DIY EFI-32 project that aimed at building a homebrew version of the GM computer but was getting so complex it was turning some people away.

    If the main site does get slashdotted there's the Yahoo Group: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/megasquirt

    The MS FAQ:
    http://members.shaw.ca/megasquirt/MS%20FAQ.h tm

    And a few photos of my own project for those of you you just want to see the pretty pictures:
    http://www.americansandassociation.org/ phpBB2/modu les.php?set_albumName=album43&op=modload&name=gall ery&file=index&include=view_album.php

    --
    --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    1. Re:Please don't knock out the server.... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if this had something to do with the DIYEFI project. What motor are you building? Hmm.... Guess I could copy and paste that link.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:Please don't knock out the server.... by Juggle · · Score: 1

      My motor is a 1974 2.0l from a Ford Pinto. I run it in a hand built tube chassis "sandrail" which is based primarially off a VW pan and suspension. Mine is somewhat outdated compared to the new ones but I'm on a very tight budget and got my rail for about $3,000

      The motor was just rebuild and has new high compression pistons with a high lift long duration cam - the crank and rods are also new but are just reconditioned stock pieces....they should be strong enough for the power I expect to be making.

      The Injection system is all homebrewed and it looks like I'll meet my goal of keeping the cost under $500. I have about $250 into my MegaSquirt (and stimulator and relay board for interfacing to the engine.) I got a throttle body off a V6 Mustang and injectors off an SHO Taurus for $70 on Ebay. The fuel pump was donated from an injected Bronco and a friend is going to fabricate a custom intake for me.

      Right now the vehicle is stripped down to the bare frame and I'm getting ready to start reassembling it so we can figure out what style of intake will fit within the frame. I'm hoping to have the whole project done by Halloween when the sand season starts out here.

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
  8. I think we can by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    confidently expect to see a lot of geek car enthuasiasts being nominated for Darwin awards after this mod.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  9. Confusing Title by MBCook · · Score: 4, Funny
    Am I the only one who saw that and thought to themselves "I know about watercooling, but how in the world will fuel injection help people's computer performance?"

    That aside, that's pretty cool. I wouldn't be willing to put one in my car, but it's still cool. Plus you could hack up the monitor circuit so you could connect it to your incar Linux PC with a little LCD panel to watch your engine in real time, or maybe use you're engine's performance (rpms, mix, etc) to somehow controll the music being played. The pointless add-on possibilities are endless.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Confusing Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already interface with the engine control computer and watch the data in near-realtime (streaming serial data).

      www.obd-2.com

      Jim

    2. Re:Confusing Title by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      >somehow controll the music being played.

      One of the F1 teams hacked their engine control system to play music using the engine sound.

      The only link I can find right now:

      http://www.atlasf1.com/bb/showthread.php?s=&thre ad id=51587

  10. Pretty cool, but... by Micro$will · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd rather see a Mass Air Flow version of this. Maybe because I'm a little biased towards Ford's system, but MAF seems to be easier to modify. Supercharger? Turbo? No problem! Just make sure you plumb the MAF sensor before the blower or turbo inlet.Of course this is on a stock system, stock or mild cam, and good exhaust. No other modifications necessary.

    OTOH, with access to the assembler code for the EFI controller, you can run any setup you want, but you'll have to spend a couple days driving around with a laptop in the passenger seat adjusting A/F ratios and various timings until the engine runs smooth. This is also a great option for the multitude of oddball engines that never had an EFI option, or if you're like me and don't like those overpriced Rube Goldberg TBI setups Holley makes.

    1. Re:Pretty cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mass air flow would totally ruin everything. the EFI controller might work but i'd recommend you try something more specific. there are a few groups that build their own from scratch.

    2. Re:Pretty cool, but... by bmajik · · Score: 1

      if you want to do it with forced induction, you probalby just want a MAP sensor on the intake manifold.

      Generally, MAP > MAF > AFM (flapper)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  11. Um, "MegaSquirt"?? by Radi-0-head · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like one of those pills advertised in the back of mens magazines or through spam...

    1. Re:Um, "MegaSquirt"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever. you make no sense to me.

  12. Other options by vsigma · · Score: 5, Informative

    They do sell other standalone setups which we use for Rallying (Yes, like you see on SpeedVision, or what you have played on GranTurismo or other Rally racing game) - examples: Link ECU, MoTec, AEM-EMS

    All of the above allow control and modification of all elements of the car via a serial link to a laptop. You can even data log and so forth.

    Depending on where you buy it and so on, it's not going to be as cheap as the product listed here - but, you gain boat loads more functionality. For Rally racing like we do - we need the control/fine tuning ability to change fuel maps, ignition timing, Anti-lag for the turbo (amongst other things) to squeeze out every bit of performance that we can to go against much better funded teams.

    -victor

    1. Re:Other options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, that's funny. rally racing requires very loud horns (trust me, i know this stuff). i was in france. they make rally cars there. it's cool stuff. i definitely support better funded teams.

    2. Re:Other options by vsigma · · Score: 1

      > haha, that's funny. rally racing requires very loud horns (trust me, i know this stuff). i
      > was in france. they make rally cars there. it's cool stuff. i definitely support better
      > funded teams.

      Yes, they employ relay connected Rally horns (For those of you that want these things - check out Hella Supertones - directional and guarenteed to wake up those drivers sleeping behind the wheel or on the cel phone!)

      And yes, the better funded teams provide the development that the poorer teams eventually are able to purchase and use - but occasionally, we come up with some unorthodox but doable things that give us something to at least come close mechanically.

      The rest is up to the driver ;)

      As to tuning and so on - depending on the vehicle base - and assuming that you know what you're doing - you can actually get quite a bit of performance out of stock components by just changing the air/fuel curves. Example: 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX stock is 227hp/217 ft lb TQ

      adjusting the fuel curves, injector duty cycles and boost control- one can push the car *SAFELY* to approximately 245hp/235TQ - with intake and exhaust path fixes, 260/250 is easily achievable. Note that this is Engine ratings, and not at the wheel. With an All Wheel Drive(AWD) system - you suffer a bit more drive train loss than compared to a RWD or FWD vehicle.

  13. I too... by WookieOnTheRun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I too came across this, but I was searching for something entirely different... MegaSquirt oh come on :-)

  14. Hackers. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is very cool. The success stories page has some interesting real life applications of the thing. Reading it is very like reading overclocking stories.

    Some people are replacing stock computers in more modern cars for performance reasons, and some are putting them in older cars, and getting some impressive results. And, yes, you can hook up a laptop for on-the-fly tweaking. Now I want a car.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    1. Re:Hackers. by WetCat · · Score: 1

      BSOD can be VERY real there...

    2. Re:Hackers. by osjedi · · Score: 1

      You have no idea. I've been (trying) hacking at computers for 10 years. Then a few years ago I got into SCCA solo racing. The 30yr-old analog injection on my Porsche 914 (you can pick up a decent one for $5k and be competitive in solo racing and drive it to work on weekdays) was getting problematic due to deterioration of all the components. Last year I planned very carefully and was able to convert the engine to full digital engine control (injection and ignition) for only $500! Emissions are down, power is up. It ROCKS! Sitting in the drivers seat I can look at a laptop screen and monitor rpm, thottle possition, manifold pressure, cylinder head temp, intake air temp, ignition advance angle, injection pulse width, acceleration enrichment, etc etc. With a few clicks on the keyboard I can change everything from idle speed to the amount of ignition retard under boost (yes, I put a turbo on it for about a 40% power increase). This is so much more fun than PC's!

      --
      -=-=-=-=- osjedi uses Debian GNU/Linux. -=-=-=-=-
  15. Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The reason you would want to do this: If you do significant engine modifications, generally to increase engine output, you'll need to tell the injectors to supply a non-standard amount of fuel. Add a turbo, for example, and you can easily double your engine's horsepower -- assuming the engine's internals are up to it -- but you'll need to remap fueling and timing or the engine goes boom.

    It's a pretty cool way to get supercar performance from lesser (read: cheaper!) vehicles. My daily-driver Miata has the factory 1.8L engine, force-fed 15psi boost by turbo. It puts out 250hp/250lb reliably (up from factory 120hp or so) and, thanks also its low weight, it outperforms 'Vettes -- except for top speed, and excluding the awesome Z06, of course. But then I paid about $20k for my car, not $50k... (Check out Flyin Miata for more info, no affiliation except as a happy customer.)

    I'm not using the MegaSquirt (using Flyin Miata's Link ECU instead) but the concept is the same. There is a HUGE need for an affordable programmable ECU among us automotive tinkers.

    1. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However the Miata 1.8L engined cars are known to have a huge number of mechanical failures. turbochargers are extremely dangerous. i think you need to head back to the books again.

    2. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nope! This is a very common mod for Miata's, in particular. The stock engine is way overbuilt -- it's a derivative of the 1.6L from the factory turbo 323GTX. Boosted and properly tuned, the stock motor is very reliable. Unboosted, the stock motor is bulletproof to 200k miles. Mine has >45k boosted miles so far, no problems, and I race it, etc. Read up; you'll be surprised.

      Hell, even if the engine lets go after 100k miles or so, a good used 1.8L is less than $800.

    3. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i really need to pee right now!

    4. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It puts out 250hp/250lb reliably (up from factory 120hp or so) and, thanks also its low weight, it outperforms 'Vettes -- except for top speed

      Unless you put a turbo on a used $6-8k C3 or C4 Vette and boost the stock 230-300HP into the 400+ range. You are comparing modded to stock, you wouldn't like it much if someone compared a modded Vette to a stock Miata either. And there are a lot more, and cheaper mods for the smallblock Chevy than there are for anything else. It isn't hard to double or even triple the stock horsepower of most 1st gen smallbocks or even the LT1/LT4. I've seen a number of buildups of 1st gen SBC's recently running over 500HP and 500+ftlb normally aspirated and on 91 octane pump gas. No nitrous either. And a V8 unlike a 4cyl has a broad, flat torque band, they don't just put out all their power at high RPMs. That kind of power will seriously motivate a 3200lb C3 or C4 Vette.

      I'm not trying to cut you down or anything, your car actually sounds pretty cool (as long as it doesn't have a tacky body kit, fart cannon muffler, ridiculously oversized wing, altezza lights, stickers and all that ugly crap). Just be careful making statements like that...

      I'm not using the MegaSquirt (using Flyin Miata's Link ECU instead) but the concept is the same. There is a HUGE need for an affordable programmable ECU among us automotive tinkers.

      That I absolutely agree with... I'm thinking seriously about trying one of these Megasquirts out on my C3 Vette... I had been planning on buying either the Holley Commander 950 or Accell multipoint systems, but this thing combined with a used TPI manifold looks like a viable alternative for a lot less money.

      BTW, my target HP is between 450-500HP. Based on similar buildups I've seen on the HT383 short block with Edelbrock E-Tech heads and a hotter cam that should be doable (the stock HT383 with truck small valve Vortec heads, low-RPM truck cam and a carb is rated at 340HP). With some strategic weight loss work getting my Vette down under 3200lbs, I should be able to give the Z06 and Viper boys a run for their money pretty soon... :-) And at a budget under $20k.

    5. Re:Here's why... by romanval · · Score: 1

      I think he ment $20K including the car. A good used miata can be had for $14K, the turbo kit is another $3-5K (depending on how fancy you want it).

    6. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a username? I want to add you to my friends list. Finally, a knowlegeable car owner on Slashdot that not only doesn't own some sort of hippy-Prius bullshit or FWD ricemobile, but a real American beaut. Like they say, there's no replacement for displacement. I wouldn't be caught dead buying a Japanese wannabe performer (save, maybe a 300ZX, Supra, or 3000GT).

    7. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you wanted to add a little insult to injury, get a Camaro or Firebird from the early 90's on with basically the same 350 in it. A little heavier car, and a little less handling, but that money saved can do a whole lot of engine work.

      In addition to that - what you said about the V8's torque curve is really true, and it makes it a VERY forgiving drivers car. Look at the torque and horsepower curves on alot of the small displacement engines versus a big NA V8...the smaller engines tend to be a little more difficult to work with as they are more peaky. Works great for some things (indy cars etc) but not others (commuting home). Then again, alot of the wankers today use an auto transmission so I guess it matters a little less...kind of a shame really...I love the feel of a manual.

    8. Re:Here's why... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

      force-fed 15psi boost by turbo.

      Is that all? Some of the marine desils I have worked with have 8 bar (160 psi) overpressure air feeds ;o)

      --
      Beep beep.
    9. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My $20k Vette budget includes the car too. You can quite easily find clean C3 and C4 Vettes for $6 to $8k, and Chevy engines/transmissions are very inexpensive to hotrod, even compared to Ford and Mopar.

    10. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 300ZX (and its predecessors the 240Z/260Z/280Z) are some of the only Japanese cars I consider interesting. Of course part of the reason I do is because a small block Chevy V8 is such an easy swap into them...

      http://www.jagsthatrun.com/Pages/Datsun_Z_V-8.html

    11. Re:Here's why... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      How easy is it to put a Chevy V8 into a 300ZX? That link seemed to be talking about the older Z cars...

  16. Is it obvious... by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it *that* obvious that all computer geeks computers less valuable then their automobiles?

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  17. Pfffft...I want electronic ignition advance too by FatSean · · Score: 2, Informative

    If all you get is the injector pulse, you can buy a system for much cheaper than $2000 US!

    --
    Blar.
  18. Re:True story by baloogan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is this flame bait???

  19. Ummm,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just cut the injector pulse width in half and accomplish the same thing? You'll still be limited by cylinder temps either way -- I just don't get what the "eight stroke" approach buys you that smaller pulse widths doesn't...?

    1. Re:Ummm,... by snarkasaurus · · Score: 1

      If you half the gas pulse it makes a lean fuel charge and burns a hole in your piston. If you just skip a stroke you have the cost of compressing the air to deal with. You need to do is have the correct fuel charge for the ammount of air intake you have on every stroke. Skipped strokes have to find a way to not compress air, or a way to break even with the compression cost. One possibility is a special presure release valve for when you want to skip a stroke. Or possibly water injection into the compressed charge. That could work by giving you a steam expansion by stealing ambient heat from the engine. Pretty hard to inject liquid water into 150 psi air though. Need a kickass injector/pump system to run at >150 psi, regular fuel systems run at ~80 psi.

  20. Re:True story by baloogan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The above comment is because i didnt understand that story, after rereading it......


    I know somthing i shouldnt know untill im in my teens

  21. Close but it needs more... by Tweakmeister · · Score: 5, Informative

    The modern ECU's control more than just the air/fuel (by reading 02 sensors, etc.). They alter things like timing and monitor a host of things.

    Many in the Honda crowd use an Apex'i S-AFC (or similar) to attach in line with the computer to adjust various things. Additionally you can buy other controllers and the like to adjust realtime at will.

    This thing is impressive, but is no replacement, it's a piggyback, and has a long ways to go.

    --

    Colossians 2:8

    1. Re:Close but it needs more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree. i do not like honda. GM makes the best cars in the world.

    2. Re:Close but it needs more... by Juggle · · Score: 1

      That's the beauty of the MS approach - it's like the Unix tools philosphy. Build a tool that does one thing really well then build another to do something else and keep building.

      The MS is by choice fuel only. The same guys who designed it are also working on the MegaSpark which will take care of Timing. From there who knows where they'll go.

      The whole thing is a offshoot of the DIY EFI-32 project which was designed to be an all in one engine management solution - but is so complex and more than what most people need that it was turning people off to homebrew engine control.

      If you really want an all in one solution that can do almost everything an ODBII computer can take a look into the DIY EFI-32 project.

      If you prefer the tools type of approach MS is very much worth a look.

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    3. Re:Close but it needs more... by strider3700 · · Score: 1

      Yes the megasquirt is fuel only. But last time I checked they had been working on the megaJolt to handle the timing. http://www.bgsoflex.com/mjl/mjl_edis.html

      Really both are simple in concept. The problem comes in when doing the calculations in realtime at 9000rpm.

  22. Coincidence? by tiger_66_y2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scary....I was just talking to a friend about attempting to make an OSS version of Ford's EEC (IV or V) with nothing but software and some jerry-rigged type of wiring harness. I definately think it is possible.

    I haven't had time to get into trying it just yet, but after recent issues with my car (fixed now), I thought up the idea. If time permits and I actually do get something hacked up, I will surely post it as OSS for all the world to play.

    Then again, if I or somebody did make something like this...what would Ford's reaction be? I mean with all the casual sueing going on recently.

    Oh well!

  23. No, no, no... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Beowulf cluster, etc...

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  24. At First. by Orcspit · · Score: 1, Redundant

    When I first read the title of this article I thought it said "Build your own Fuel Injected Computer". I for one think that would be a whole lot cooler.

    1. Re:At First. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would certainly kill the ventilator noise problem, wouldn't it?

  25. It's all been done... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Go to this link and see what people have done already. Lotsa hacking going on there...the entire GM Engine Computer has been reverse engineered. I drive a GMC Typhoon...and there are several guys on the "syty list" that have really taken apart the code, and made it possible to change all sorts of things. There is even a programmable box you can use to flip through various programs of timing and fuel.

  26. Yet another DMCA violation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention an emmisions violation. I'm reporting this guy post haste.

  27. Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of Those! (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  28. a fuel injected computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    are the editors crazy? that's impossible! typo aletr!@

  29. Here's some basic information by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 4, Informative
    The main places you want to look for MegaSquirt stuff is:

    Yahoo MegaSquirt Group This has the message archives, files, and links to MS related sites.

    MegaSquirt FAQ This is the place that you should look for answers before sending to the list. If it hasn't been asked here, Lance is more than happy to add the Q/A to the FAQ. It's very well organized and will take a novice through the whole process.

    Since Bruce and Al's site was already linked, I'll forego that link. The best place to start is the Yahoo group, since it really is the nexus.

    Just a couple of quick bits. If you are planning on using GM TBI injectors, get some 2 ohm 25 watt ballast resistors FIRST.

    Second, if you are planning on using a distributor for the tach signal, you are best off by using the hall sensor directly. A lot of VAG vehicles have reported noise problems on the tach signal.

    These are really the only 2 things I'd want to caution about first.

    All in all, the MegaSquirt is a good system for DIYers because it bypasses all of the complexity of factory systems. You can use it with most factory sensors and it performs great. One of the bread and butter applications is replacing CIS with EFI, many people have done it.

    BTW, my engine is the 1991 CBR 600 F2 engine on the IT Runs! page.

  30. Re:gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Don't you think if they could get pussy they would? You insensitive clod!

  31. AND SOME MORE BASIC INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once upon a time whilst walking in a park I asked a geek "Do you have a girlfriend?". He responded with a very puzzled look. "A girlfriend?," he mused, "Who is the developer?". I chuckled and told him this was not an open source project. He then became slightly angry and inquired, "Are you trying to insult me? Only the best geeks use open source only! What planet are you living on?!". I reassured him I was well aware of his integrity as a geek (white skin, clumsy, pants that are too short, lack of daily shower, pocket protector etc), and explained, "A girlfriend is a female who to a male (most oftenly a male) has an intimate friendship." He gave me a very confused look. "I have never heard of such a thing.. this.. g-g-irlfriend?" He asked me, sounding very baffled. "I have heard of friends before, those pets other people have. But what is this thing you say.. Grill?". "Girl," I corrected. Then I asked him to sit down on a bench nearby so I could explain it too him, the poor, helpless thing. I told him that for human beings to reproduce, sexual intercourse must occur between a male and a female. "Perhaps you hear the trolls mention a thing called "pussy" on slashdot?". The geek burst into laughter, "Haha, you have been browsing at -1 lately, haven't you? You know that is just troll talk. Those silly trolls never have anything intelligent to say."

    My face turned serious. "My dear geek, are you not aware of the female population amongst you? Do you not stare in the street and want to hump a post when you pass by a hot, slim, gorgeous looking chick with a firm bust and well sculpted ass?". The geek immediately began to appear as if he was having a nervous breakdown. His glasses began to fog up and he took them off to wipe them with this linux embroidered shirt, "I think I know what you are talking about. Those things are icky. They have cooties. Get away from me!" I felt offended. "Nonsense, I pleaded! Pussy is a beautiful thing. A sacred thing that you should strive to give pleasure to." The geek would not listen and he began to cry. "STOP IT!! You are EVIL!!" He then, quite geekishly, skipped off down the path.

    I walked back to my house feeling rather disheartened. 'Why don't they listen to me' I asked myself? When I got home my girlfriend opened the door. She was wearing short-shorts and a sports bra. She had been doing the thigh master for the past 30 minutes and was sweating. I could see her dark nipples underneath her slightly damp bra. Oh god I could fuck her to the moon and back. I could smell her horniness the second I took my shoes off. I chased her, both of us laughing, to our bedroom [THE FOLLOWING has been censored for the well-being of geeks].... Six hours later, finally satisfied a little, I sat up and noticed that same geek hiding in the trees. He had been watching us the entire time. I swear his penis had to have been the size of a fucking horse cock (not bad for a geek, i might add), and he appeared as if he had gone into a state of shock. I could see cum stains forming near the bulge of his pant zipper. I thought to myself. There is one geek, finally brought into the real world.

  32. I prefer MAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main problem with a MAF is the expandability. For most cars if you increase the plumbing size for better flow, the MAF unit diameter has to remain the same in order for it to be accurate, and this creates a bottleneck to your induction side.

    The next problem with hacking the default ECU controller is that most of these things are built to a cost. The ROMs holding most of the program will generally have just enough space for everything, meaning you don't really have leeway to introduce interesting stuff, like Anti-Lag, Traction Control or Water Injection. The true solution comes with fully programmable ECUs, like Motec and Autronic for instance. Right now they're quite expensive, but I'm hoping increased demand will eventually drive down prices.

  33. Holy lack of engine tuners! by xtal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok; It seems that engine tuning isn't the biggest geek topic. That suprises me, since a few years ago when I got my first car, I learned everything I possibly could about every nook and cranny in it, engine included. There's a lot of interesting things.

    This project isn't of interest to most big engine tuners right now, but it could be. The Megasquirt - which only has fuel injection controllers, you still need to time your ignition spark, a much more difficult problem. Replacing your cars computer right off will not get you much - it will probably cost you HP, because cars have many, many R&D hours into them and are already running at close to maximum efficiency. You can trade a little emissions for power, but in a modern Honda engine, it isn't much.

    The big power comes when you use something like this in combination with a supercharger or turbo charger, then use additional control software to monitor your engine. Think of it like overclocking - you trade safety margin for speed, or in an engine's case, power. Instead of upping the voltage; You shove more air into the engine, allowing you to burn more fuel - added by a device like this, or something that's missing - a true, open source ECU replacement. It is a very difficult problem.

    I love to irk people with big V8s - they are silly in the age of forged engine internals, ECU control, and modern design. You haven't lived until you've seen the expression on a Z06 corvette owner's face when he gets is ass handed to him by a built and tuned 1.8L Acura Integra. My current project is an engine buildup for my 2.2L Prelude, and I have ~300HP as a reasonable target. It's amazing what a little thought and hacking can do. You can't run much more power than that on the street feasibly, so penis issues aside - if you can make 300HP+ from a 1.8L engine - why bother with more? Troll in the extreme - you can design 1500+ HP V8's, but they're not driveable. IMHO. YMMV. YHBT. etc.

    Engine tuning is a great hobby - if you can assemble a PC, with proper tools and the manuals, you can probably assemble a car engine. It might even run!

    OBD-III scares the hell out of me. I don't plan on owning an OBD-III vehile, though.

    There is another sister project or sorts to this one, called MegaSpark. I'll let you find the links, because I don't want to slashdot the poor guys. Ignition timing is a very difficult problem because you need very, very precise control. This is difficult to do. I have played around with this, but the approach I favour is to piggyback a microcontroller onto the computers stock signals and modify them how you want. Complete standalone systems can be very, very difficult and expensive to dyno tune and test.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Desert+Raven · · Score: 4, Funny
      I love to irk people with big V8s - they are silly in the age of forged engine internals, ECU control, and modern design. You haven't lived until you've seen the expression on a Z06 corvette owner's face when he gets is ass handed to him by a built and tuned 1.8L Acura Integra.


      Yeah, and those Accura owners nearly have strokes when I toss them into the weeds with my 8 year old motorcycle. No computer control, just a 15+ year old block, piston and head design so refined and advanced that I can run 85 octane fuel at 12:1 compression, in 110 degree temperatures, up to 13,000rpm, without it even thinking of pinging.

      Can you say "1005cc generating 122 hp measured at the rear wheel"?

      Can you say "absolutely bone-stock"?

      Can you say "53 miles per gallon"?

      I thought you could.
    2. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say "massive head injury?"

    3. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by xtal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fully agree bikes are superior. My survivability - on a track, with a helmet and roll bar - is much, much, much higher in a car. Said roll bar (not cage) also protects me on the road.

      Some bikes CAN be beaten by little 4cyls, too, so don't get too cocky.

      See also:

      "Twisties"

      "Traction"

      "Speed Wobble"

      "Rain"

      "Loose Gravel"

      and

      "Insurance".

      --
      ..don't panic
    4. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by afidel · · Score: 2, Funny

      And then the Acura owner meets up with a Lingenfelter Vett owner and shits bricks. Can you say 550HP/550Lb/ft of torque on a body that is actually designed to use it and can corner at over 200Mph, yeah lets see a hopped up Prelude do that =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by the_brat_king · · Score: 3, Interesting

      300+ HP?
      repeat after me "THERE'S NO REPLACEMENT FOR BIG DISPLACEMENT"... My Buick 455 Stage 2 Year 1 (1970 Buick Wildcat Custom) idles at 300 HP... and lights the tires at 50 MPH. It had (factory) 370 HP and 510 Ft.Lbs. of torque... at the rear wheel. I've added a little, like a bigger carb, HEI, true 2.5 inch dual exhaust (with headers), and a single plane intake (next step is either 2x4 or a 6 pack :D). Dino'd at 600+ HP and 800+ Torque. I plan on actually building it up one day... I haven't restored the body yet, because once that's done rice runners won't race me any more ;)
      If you are hell bent on a small engine though, and wanna' see people shit themselves, go get a 1985-87 High Deck 2.4L Dodge charger (carbed), stroke the bastard, bore it 60 over, turbo charge it, replace the 2bbl with the MP 4bbl carb. The engine was designed by Carrol Shelby (of Shelby Mustang fame); it's actually a destroked 2.6. I've seen 'em built up to produce over 350 HP, without juice or computers (or even injection).
      As for those vette's beat on! I hate those bastards...always trying to pass you, and getting mad when they can't! As for the YMMV mine doesn't vary at all :( 7 MPG, and it'll be going down with a new carb system. But, you are kinda' wrong about 1500 not being streetable... just don't let 'em catch you "streeting" it!
      Last rant... 12-18" 4 wheel Bear Claws are NOT for light cars, the are for beasts like mine (6,000 lbs). Bear Claws are nice and all... but you people with the big V's need 'em (hint LOSE THE 4 Wheel Drums!), and you people with the 4's DON'T... they will NOT help you stop better.

    6. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Troll

      you fucking twat

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      THERE'S NO REPLACEMENT FOR BIG DISPLACEMENT

      yes there is, it's called supercharging

      I enjoyed your idiotic wank fantasy, though - particularly the idea that you'd "Dino'd" it and how large your torque figure is (yet you never mentioned your clutch or gearbox mods...). A 3 tonne car with 600 hp? Sounds like a 1 tonne car with 200 hp could crush it to me...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    8. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      The ER guys don't call them 'donor-cycles' for nothing...

    9. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Your talking about two different classes of cars. Sure you can squeek 300hp out of some 2L 4 banger in an import thats al nice and they drive fairly well. Granted I smoke the little imports regularly on friday nights but with a car that wieghts twice to sometimes 3 times theres but puts out 4+ times the HP (a very modded Smokey and the Bandit limited ed TA)

      But all in all you are correct go over 500hp and it's a monster to drive and generaly not street legal. The import classes make good dialy drivers / strip toys with 2-3 times the stock HP while most corvet owners etc stop at 400 - 500 HP and thats not even 2x there origional HP simply because they become monsters to drive start twisting frame members and go through tires every other week.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    10. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      You correctly recognize that there's no way to get any power out of a Honda engine. Other manufacturers do not share this problem however. You can vastly increase factory power by sacrificing fuel efficiency , etc.

      As someone living in a country without emissions controls, how are yours monitored? Can you get away with removing your cat and only putting it in when your vehicle gets checked? Do the cops ever poll you over and stick their meter in your exhaust?

    11. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by tgkeith · · Score: 1

      Maybe the little Honda motor can make some power, but try dropping it into a 3/4 ton pickup truck, you'll be lucky just getting it to crawl. Honda doesn't make a truck, but Toyota offers a V8 in the Tundra, a V8, not a four, it's about torque, the kind of torque that'll pop the windshield out of a Honda.

    12. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I love to irk people with big V8s - they are silly in the age of forged engine internals, ECU control, and modern design. You haven't lived until you've seen the expression on a Z06 corvette owner's face when he gets is ass handed to him by a built and tuned 1.8L Acura Integra. My current project is an engine buildup for my 2.2L Prelude, and I have ~300HP as a reasonable target. It's amazing what a little thought and hacking can do. You can't run much more power than that on the street feasibly, so penis issues aside - if you can make 300HP+ from a 1.8L engine - why bother with more? Troll in the extreme - you can design 1500+ HP V8's, but they're not driveable. IMHO. YMMV. YHBT. etc.

      No. The best is when you hand the Corvette, Viper, Porsche driver his ass with only 600cc's. Sorry bud, but if you're looking for performance, usable performance, you'll only be finding it on two wheels.

      IMHO. YMMV. YHBT. etc.

      Ditto. ;)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    13. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Shit. Just posted similar thing. What are you referring to, V-Max?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    14. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Something better than displacement or supercharging: displacement and supercharging.

      It's unlikely that his car weighs 3 tons. More like 2-2.5 on the outside. And yes, a 1 ton car with 200 could probably beat it in most instances, but an Acura Integra ain't a 1 ton car.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    15. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      In the US, there are 50 states. There are 50 ways (at least) of checking emissions. Hell, in my state alone, there are 2 (maybe three) different ways. In some areas, no checks at all. In my area, once every two years, you go to the state facility. They strap the car to the rolling road, and put a sniffer in the pipe. Some dipshit gov't worker hops in, gets your car up to 50. There's no rhyme nor reason to the process.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    16. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      The difference is, they EXPECT a bike to hand them their ass. But don't forget either that as soon as you get on a twisty road a porsche will blow the bike away. I have a 10-minute vid of two M5s (not Porsches I know) on the Nurnburgring racing against bikes. In all the turns the bikes are leaned over so far that knees are dragging on the ground and the M5s are PASSING THEM ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE TURNS!

    17. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your car to a road course like Grattan, Road Atlanta, etc and let's see if you can run for 30 minutes without blowing up or catching fire. Let's see you do 12 30 minute sessions in a weekend..

      Not many turbo or supercharged cars can survive on a road course. Best case, they get very hot and lose power..

      There is a reason the little cars don't run in the same class as the big cars. Take a look at the SCCA results for the Valvoline runoffs for the past few years. Look at the laptmes:

      http://www.scca.org/amateur/club_racing/runoffs/ 02 results/

      Do you see how the Z06 spanks everything in similar classes, including the Viper?

      What, you say your car handles better? Take a look at the Solo II results, where the courses are tight and emphasize handling. The Z06 spanks *everything* that is stock:

      http://www.scca.org/amateur/solo2/nationals/2002 /r esults/index.html

      You can toss a Z06 sideways into a corner at 80 mph without drama. And I get 33 MPG on the highway. It isn't my GT1 Mustang, but it is in the ballpark and it has a full warranty. At 3100 lbs it weighs less than many 4 and 6 cylinder cars. It rides better than my buddie's 2002 A4 Audi.

      Bikes are cool, but they don't turn well. The limited contact patch is always a problem. A stock Z06 will spank your bike in the turns.

      A candle that burns twice as bright lives half as long. So you get a bigger candle.

    18. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0wned u ricer bitch

      fuck you, why spend $5000 making your 4 banger rice burner do what an american v8 can do after driving it off the showroom floor?

      can you say 'manufacture warranty'

    19. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      horry for big displacement and supercharging!

      in my 2000 ford svt0 lightning PICKEM UP TRUCK that will walk all over your fucking rice burning 1 liter joke that you daddy bought you to drive to high school like are "cool"

    20. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, and the Tundra V8 is weak compared to the base V8 offerings from GM, Ford and Dodge, let alone their larger and more powerful engines, which Toyota has nothing to match. There is no 3/4 ton Tundra, heck, it isn't even a true full size truck, its more of a competitor to the Dodge Dakota.

    21. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      He said it was 6000 lbs, right? That's 2.724 tonnes by my calculations, stick an American behind the wheel and that's 3 tonnes right there! Sure, I don't know exactly what an Integra weighs, but I'll bet it's around 1250kg tops - our second car is a Mazda Xedos 6 which weighs less than that - and it's got a V6.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    22. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by ttys00 · · Score: 1
      I love to irk people with big V8s - they are silly in the age of forged engine internals, ECU control, and modern design. You haven't lived until you've seen the expression on a Z06 corvette owner's face when he gets is ass handed to him by a built and tuned 1.8L Acura Integra.
      Thats all well and good, but the V8 has its advantages too, simply because of more torque. Can the Integra also tow a boat, or trailer, or caravan? How is its acceleration at freeway speeds with adults in the car and the boot full of heavy things? A V8 will handle the extra load better than a 4 cylinder engine.

      Also, part of the Integra's advantage is being made of plastic and hence has lower mass than the Corvette (afaik anyway, we don't have Corvettes in Australia unless they are privately imported).

      I'd prefer the Integra myself, but I can see the advantages a bigger engine offers.
    23. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      The Ligenfelter package itself costs around $23 thousand dollars. Add in the price of the Corvette, which starts at $44 thousand, and you're look at at least a $67 thousand dollar cost of admission.

      The beauty of small engine tuning is that you take a car that almost anybody can afford and turn it into something better.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    24. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      but an Acura Integra ain't a 1 ton car.
      Actually, my friend's Acura Integra curbs in at 2350 according to the mfgr specs posted on the door frame. Considering he removed the back seat, spare tire, and flashy stuff from behind the two front seats, I'd say he's pretty close to an even ton.

    25. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Commercial video? I wouldn't mind getting a copy. Name, title, distributer.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    26. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      Not commercial. On the net called Sabine_Having_Fun or something

    27. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~cielo/vids/200209_Sabin e.WMV Actually it is a Porsche 996 GT3 chasing the "Ring Taxi"

    28. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Integra is a very heavy car (for what it is) at 2600 lbs.

      The Z06 is 3100.

      A front wheel drive car, at any level of power, just can't compare to a RWD when it comes to putting power down coming off of a turn. With the Z06, that is done with 11.5" wide rears. And it will spin them in a straight line at 60 mph if you squeeze it too hard. 50 mph 1st gear, 70 mph 2nd. 28 MPG highway, though I get 33 on trips.

      I have a 2002 Z06. The engine calibration is amazing. 5th gear pulls smoothly from 30mph at 1100 RPM to the top speed of 177. Smooth power instantly. Over and over again - no turbo heat issues.

      The car has throttle by wire. I was very skeptical of it before I bought the car (since I love the carb on my race car). But it is *very* good and throttle response is very, very quick. It meters out the torque very smoothly. If you dig into the computer with a scanner, it will report variables like "Torque desired" and "torque output".

      The Active Handling works well.. In Competition mode it will allow you to step the rear out about 12" at say 60 mph with power oversteer. Beyond that and it will apply brakes selectively. It is rare that I need to induce more rotation in the car than Competition mode will allow.

      The ABS has a stability function. The computer looks at the steering wheel angle and references a vehicle yaw sensor. The yaw sensor is an accelerometer that reports yaw in degrees/second. Essentially, the ABS computer tries to keep the car heading in the same direction that the steering wheel is pointed. It modulates the braking at each corner in order to make corrections. This makes the braking very stable, especially when braking very hard while turning (or trailbraking)..

      The Z06 has blown my mind in terms of engine management, driveability, etc.. I would love to have an engine management system that powerful on my race car.. Of course gettng the calibration that good is *very* difficult. I'd probably never get to drive it because I'd always be tweakng it..

      And a word on cost.. I paid $45.5K out the door for my 2002 Z06 with 0% financing. I could sell it today for $40-42K. So for 3-5K, I've owned it for 19 months and put 8000 miles on it. Worst case that's $265/month to drive a new Z06 every year or two. Weird eh?

    29. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Yamaha FZR-1000, 5 valves per cylinder, EXUP exhaust power valve.

    30. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1
      Some bikes CAN be beaten by little 4cyls, too, so don't get too cocky.


      Forget it, there isn't a stock, street-legal car that I'd even take notice of. And the only modified car I ever saw that gave me doubts was an NSX with an aftermarket turbo system.

      What all those four-wheel jockeys forget is that 90% of the game is about acceleration, and for that, less weight wins. It doesn't matter if I can't corner as fast, if they can't match me getting to the corner. I mean sure, you've (maybe)* got twice my horsepower, but I've got 1/4 your weight. Effectively, I've got double the power/weight ratio.

      The other thing is about experience. I've got eight years experience pushing that bike through hard maneuvers. I know its limitations, and I know mine. The average kid in one of these hopped-up econo-boxes barely has a two years total driving experience, and has likely never spent any serious time practicing hard maneuvers under controlled conditions.

      Let's not even get into those ridiculous near-zero profile tires that are completely useless under real world conditions. A good pot-hole will shatter the rim (seen it happen several times). And on uneven pavement, traction is severely degraded.

      Oh, and don't forget that a recent model superbike weighs up to 70 pounds less, and generates 20-30 more horses. If my old warhorse can still toss those things, they don't have a prayer in the world against the newer models.

      * Automobile horsepower is usually estimated by the manufacturer (high), and is usually measured at the crankshaft. Motorcycle horsepower is usually not published by the manufacturer, and is thus measured by third-parties on rear-wheel dynamometers. In my own case, I've had my bike run on a rear-wheel dynamometer measureing 122hp at approx 11,000 rpm (12,500 red-line, 13,000rpm rev-limiter)

      "Insurance".


      Heh, I bet I pay less for full-coverage on my bike than most folks do on their cars.
    31. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually Lingenfelter makes packages quite alot more powerful than even that one - and with one interesting perk. You can drive it to work everyday, and get gas at pretty much any station. Nothing fancy needed.

      Sure...the up front costs are steep, but that isn't a car that many 4 cylinders can ever hope to try to keep up with in pretty much every respect.

      Aside from that - if all you want is cheap speed at a stoplight drag, look to the old domestics. You can get cheap parts and bold on 500+ horsepower kinda easily. Plus, it's way more fun to kick someone's riceboy ass with a 1970's looking stationwagon.

    32. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by TW+Burger · · Score: 1
      "OBD-III scares the hell out of me."

      What's wrong with OBD-III?

    33. Re:Holy lack of engine tuners! by zdarnell · · Score: 1

      Obviously you dont know how an internal combustion engine works. My near-stock 4ton 2500HD with a Vortec 350 kicks the hell out of the riced out civics who think they're straight out of the fast an d the furious. People who talk about the upfront cost of a civic compared to american muscle aren't looking at the whole picture. By the time you get those civics close to a ram-air firechicken or a Corvette in terms of top end speed, you're spending thousands more than you would to get the car you're trying to beat. Throw that same amount of money into that firebird or corvette, and you got yourself a monster.

      Cars are all about the power to weight ratio, civis may be light, but that 1.8L leaf blower isnt going to cut it with the big boys. Those engines make their horsepower by being able to run at extremely high rpms, while the longer stroke and larger bore of the larger engines require less rpm, and give you much more torque. Its all a trade off, its impressive that some people get those 4cyl to 1000+ horsepower, but its surely not the economical way to get that much horsepower.

      And just remember, even in the fast and the furious, that Supra needed to use nitrous to catch up to the good old american muscle. Plus american muscle cars just look meaner...

  34. Mod illiterate parent down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The kit normally comes in at under $200. A programmable full engine controllers like Link Plus is still under a grand as well.

  35. Oh and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MAF tends to become innacurate with boost.

  36. MegaSquirt? by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one seeing the pr0n possibilities?

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:MegaSquirt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh please. shut up, you cunt rag

  37. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the heck is fuel injection? can i install linux on it?

    1. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stfu, k thx

  38. the Siemens C167 has free C source that does this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted, you'd have to build injector driver circuits and all. The code is provides to really show off how powerful their microcontroller is. It can run a reasonably sophisticated FI program using somewhere around 10% of the CPU!

    More importantly, I'd like to see people hacking traction control, that's a bit more interesting, unless you're doing tuning for a turbocharged car.

  39. Dont forget the group that inpired the MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Check out diy-efi (homebrew EFI)
    gmecm (modding GM fuel injection)
    efi332 (inspiration and immediate predecessor of megasquirt)
    wb-02 (diy Wideband O2 sensor)

    http://www.diy-efi.org/

    We've been modding injection for 15+ years, how is this news?

  40. fp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did i get it? fp

  41. No joke here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once upon a time whilst walking in a park I asked a geek "Do you have a girlfriend?". He responded with a very puzzled look. "A girlfriend?," he mused, "Who is the developer?". I chuckled and told him this was not an open source project. He then became slightly angry and inquired, "Are you trying to insult me? Only the best geeks use open source only! What planet are you living on?!". I reassured him I was well aware of his integrity as a geek (white skin, clumsy, pants that are too short, lack of daily shower, pocket protector etc), and explained, "A girlfriend is a female who to a male (most oftenly a male) has an intimate friendship." He gave me a very confused look. "I have never heard of such a thing.. this.. g-g-irlfriend?" He asked me, sounding very baffled. "I have heard of friends before, those pets other people have. But what is this thing you say.. Grill?". "Girl," I corrected. Then I asked him to sit down on a bench nearby so I could explain it too him, the poor, helpless thing. I told him that for human beings to reproduce, sexual intercourse must occur between a male and a female. "Perhaps you hear the trolls mention a thing called "pussy" on slashdot?". The geek burst into laughter, "Haha, you have been browsing at -1 lately, haven't you? You know that is just troll talk. Those silly trolls never have anything intelligent to say."

    My face turned serious. "My dear geek, are you not aware of the female population amongst you? Do you not stare in the street and want to hump a post when you pass by a hot, slim, gorgeous looking chick with a firm bust and well sculpted ass?". The geek immediately began to appear as if he was having a nervous breakdown. His glasses began to fog up and he took them off to wipe them with this linux embroidered shirt, "I think I know what you are talking about. Those things are icky. They have cooties. Get away from me!" I felt offended. "Nonsense, I pleaded! Pussy is a beautiful thing. A sacred thing that you should strive to give pleasure to." The geek would not listen and he began to cry. "STOP IT!! You are EVIL!!" He then, quite geekishly, skipped off down the path.

    I walked back to my house feeling rather disheartened. 'Why don't they listen to me' I asked myself? When I got home my girlfriend opened the door. She was wearing short-shorts and a sports bra. She had been doing the thigh master for the past 30 minutes and was sweating. I could see her dark nipples underneath her slightly damp bra. Oh god I could fuck her to the moon and back. I could smell her horniness the second I took my shoes off. I chased her, both of us laughing, to our bedroom [THE FOLLOWING has been censored for the well-being of geeks].... Six hours later, finally satisfied a little, I sat up and noticed that same geek hiding in the trees. He had been watching us the entire time. I swear his penis had to have been the size of a fucking horse cock (not bad for a geek, i might add), and he appeared as if he had gone into a state of shock. I could see cum stains forming near the bulge of his pant zipper. I thought to myself. There is one geek, finally brought into the real world.

  42. you are shitting me, right? by twitter · · Score: 2, Informative
    Now, you could program these curves yourself, but you better KNOW your shit. Get this fuel mix wrong, and manage your engine poorly, or make a typo, and you'll be debuging by rebuilding your cylinder head, or worse, replacing pistons and rods.

    How is this any different from turning valves on a bigger than design carborator? Give me a break. If you program your computer wrong, your engine won't work, but I doubt it will explode or burn up.

    This project is cool. It looks like free software and so, we can imagine the much will come of it. A nice use of this will be to put fuel injection on engines that were never had it to begin with. I wonder what it and some new heads could do for my 1970 VW van.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:you are shitting me, right? by stuffman64 · · Score: 1
      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    2. Re:you are shitting me, right? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      As the owner of an old VW, I would have thought you were familier with stories of explosions/thrown rods in high performance mods.

      This is different than tweaking a carb. Imagine making a mistake that goes into an infinite loop in WOT. I can easily imagine something exiting happening.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:you are shitting me, right? by austad · · Score: 1

      How is this any different from turning valves on a bigger than design carborator? Give me a break. If you program your computer wrong, your engine won't work, but I doubt it will explode or burn up.

      If you program your fuel curves too lean, you WILL burn holes in your pistons. I've seen several guys do it on their DSM's and 3000GT's. Additionally, when modifying turbocharged cars, you need to be careful that you don't run out of fuel because of small injectors or a weak fuel pump. The Eclipse can run up to about 14psi of boost before you need to replace the fuel pump, but the stock turbo will supply somewhere around 21psi. I ran 19psi on mine, but I had an aftermarket fuel pump.

      Anyway, trust me, running your engine too lean will burn holes in your pistons. Just search the mail archives on dsm.org or the 3s mailing list.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  43. Re:It's all been done... (to one very lucky geek) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once upon a time whilst walking in a park I asked a geek "Do you have a girlfriend?". He responded with a very puzzled look. "A girlfriend?," he mused, "Who is the developer?". I chuckled and told him this was not an open source project. He then became slightly angry and inquired, "Are you trying to insult me? Only the best geeks use open source only! What planet are you living on?!". I reassured him I was well aware of his integrity as a geek (white skin, clumsy, pants that are too short, lack of daily shower, pocket protector etc), and explained, "A girlfriend is a female who to a male (most oftenly a male) has an intimate friendship." He gave me a very confused look. "I have never heard of such a thing.. this.. g-g-irlfriend?" He asked me, sounding very baffled. "I have heard of friends before, those pets other people have. But what is this thing you say.. Grill?". "Girl," I corrected. Then I asked him to sit down on a bench nearby so I could explain it too him, the poor, helpless thing. I told him that for human beings to reproduce, sexual intercourse must occur between a male and a female. "Perhaps you hear the trolls mention a thing called "pussy" on slashdot?". The geek burst into laughter, "Haha, you have been browsing at -1 lately, haven't you? You know that is just troll talk. Those silly trolls never have anything intelligent to say."

    My face turned serious. "My dear geek, are you not aware of the female population amongst you? Do you not stare in the street and want to hump a post when you pass by a hot, slim, gorgeous looking chick with a firm bust and well sculpted ass?". The geek immediately began to appear as if he was having a nervous breakdown. His glasses began to fog up and he took them off to wipe them with this linux embroidered shirt, "I think I know what you are talking about. Those things are icky. They have cooties. Get away from me!" I felt offended. "Nonsense, I pleaded! Pussy is a beautiful thing. A sacred thing that you should strive to give pleasure to." The geek would not listen and he began to cry. "STOP IT!! You are EVIL!!" He then, quite geekishly, skipped off down the path.

    I walked back to my house feeling rather disheartened. 'Why don't they listen to me' I asked myself? When I got home my girlfriend opened the door. She was wearing short-shorts and a sports bra. She had been doing the thigh master for the past 30 minutes and was sweating. I could see her dark nipples underneath her slightly damp bra. Oh god I could fuck her to the moon and back. I could smell her horniness the second I took my shoes off. I chased her, both of us laughing, to our bedroom [THE FOLLOWING has been censored for the well-being of geeks].... Six hours later, finally satisfied a little, I sat up and noticed that same geek hiding in the trees. He had been watching us the entire time. I swear his penis had to have been the size of a fucking horse cock (not bad for a geek, i might add), and he appeared as if he had gone into a state of shock. I could see cum stains forming near the bulge of his pant zipper. I thought to myself. There is one geek, finally brought into the real world.

  44. Limited usefullness by Lewie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This device would be good for converting a carbed vehicle to throttle body EFI. With only two injector drivers though, it's ultimate usefullness is pretty limited. They claim you can batch fire several injectors at once (non-sequential EFI), but that is hardly 21st century technology and has all the disadvatages of carbs and TBI like crappy emissions, fuel economy, and idle quality. If your mullet-mobile's Quadrajunk needs another rebuild, then this might work for you. If your tastes reach any higher, though, you'll need one of those "expensive" EFI computers.

    No animals were harmed in the making of this .sig

    --
    This sig washed every five years whether it needs it or not!
    1. Re:Limited usefullness by Dave+Fiddes · · Score: 1

      Don't discount batch injection too quickly. This is the technique used by the cheaper aftermarket EFI units (Edelbrock, etc) costing many $$$. It gives you quite a boost over a carb with a lot better idling, throttle response, emissions and gas mileage.

      The hard bit, as always, is getting all of the plumbing in place to get per-cylinder injectors. I intend to convert my carb SB Chevy to run with megasquirt and batch injection as a stepping stone to a full EFI332 based sequential solution. The megasquirt is definitely a useful technology for upgrading old EFI or mech FI to modern fueling algorithms as well as a stepping stone for those that want to progress to more expensive/harder FI systems (which is what the Megasquirt project grew out of BTW).

  45. Re:the Siemens C167 has free C source that does th by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It can run a reasonably sophisticated FI program using somewhere around 10% of the CPU!

    This is a hard real-time application, so the thing had better have spare cycles available! :-)

    While it sounds fast, car engine things happen at ridiculously slow speeds by computer standards. A 4 cylinder engine running at 6000 RPM still has 5 milliseconds between firing strokes to compute and time the next spark. An eternity to a computer...

    ...laura, whose car (1986 VW Jetta) has mechanical fuel injection and electronic (analog) ignition

  46. Been going on for years and years by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Been going on for years....USA... Europe....Japan.... It's what's known as the kamakazi dyno. That's when you want to swing big mod's on the home-built car computer control system you just hung in the BMW, but you can't afford the money for hours and hours on a real dyno. You use the next best thing, right?

    It's called 'the street'. Makes for tons of fun as you try to work on the software and drive the car at the same time...and the throttle is wide open!

    There are literally thousands of stories of guys that have both succeeded and failed while trying out new ideas with on-board car computers....just visit a few car sites, and start reading.

    1. Re:Been going on for years and years by pr1000 · · Score: 1

      Cool. I guess it's just not well known to some people (such as myself).

    2. Re:Been going on for years and years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One geek in Sweden use to drive a pointac 455 with a laptop on the passanger seat, had some nice spec, cant remember the details...

  47. Fancy schmancy by Ogerman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, yeah.. Who needs all this fancy engine computer stuff.. Ever since I painted my Civic bright yellow (everyone knows yellow is fast), cut off the exhaust pipe, and added a 3 foot high spoiler (have to keep the wheels on the ground), it goes like twice as fast. You can clearly hear that my car has TEH POWER when I rev the engine at red lights. I am so fast you cannot even read my decals.

    1. Re:Fancy schmancy by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      I am so fast you cannot even read my decals.

      But don't all the HOT CHICKS hanging on to the door handles slow you down?

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    2. Re:Fancy schmancy by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is that last night I saw a Dodge Intrepid exactly like that. Chrome window accents and all, too. Only the car was red. *shudder*

    3. Re:Fancy schmancy by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      "I am so fast you cannot even read my decals."

      What, you mean the ones that say TYPE-R?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    4. Re:Fancy schmancy by reconn · · Score: 1

      No, this is slashdot: it says R-TYPE.

      --
      Everything that was once directly lived has receded into a representation. -debord
  48. Beowulf Cluster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the obligatory Beowulf comment? ;)

    Be well,
    - Catherine

  49. 3rd Generation RX-7 by daedel · · Score: 1

    We have a product available to us by Apex called the PowerFC (with an optional commander control) that replaces the stock ECU. It allows special control of absolutely everything. Boost, fuel mixtures, injector duty cycles, rev limiter, and every other aspect of engine management is available for tweaking, and datalogging.

    1. Re:3rd Generation RX-7 by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      Not familar with that one, but it's been a while since I researched 'em.
      You don't mean FCD, do you? If so, that's just a simple aux circuit that's actually quite dangerous.
      Probably not, by your description.
      Either way, how much does this cost?
      MegaSquirt is mega-cheap... only a bit over $100 for the kit!
      Plus there's the satisfaction of having built it yourself, rather than just buying something someone else mass-produced.
      I'm seriously thinking about using one on my TR7, TR8, and RX-7 Turbo II.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
  50. Tuners would never use it by Dopeskills · · Score: 1

    Why bother with it? You can get a programmable air to fuel controller with a display for $200. The most common is the Apexi S-AFC. You put your car on a dyno and and adjust the a/f at each 500 rpm increment for optimum power.

    1. Re:Tuners would never use it by redwards · · Score: 1

      Except for those of us with all-but-undynoable AWD turbo'd cars, yes. Finding and paying for dyno time with an All Wheel Drive car is a nightmare.

  51. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am a fucktard."

  52. oh no!! by ScorpioIlya · · Score: 1

    Oh gawd, now the ricers will learn how to code in assembly because it will be considered 'cool' to do that to the cars and manipulate the fuel injector settings. Now how will the geeks differentiate themselves from the ricers......the standard boundaries will be broken!!! Soon we will have nothing left to get women with.

  53. Re:What about HOT BEEF Injection computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already avaliable... click

  54. They are out there by GnarlyNome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work for an AUDI dealer we sold a lot of parts by Fed-EX to an outfit in Alabama including so many Controllers that Audi contacted us to find out if there was a failure prob. Seem that these people were modifing the new controllers to pump that little 2.5L V-6 to about 450 Hp (street and very driviable) drove one later it was a sweet mod.

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  55. Joking aside by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1

    If you increase the power output of your engine beyond the street spec, you normally have to declair it to the insurers. A major mod like an after market turbo vhargers is rather obvious but an ECU tends to be less so. Chipping should be declared, but often isn't. However, a non-standard ECU would be rather obvious to an insurance claims adjuster after an accident.

  56. Oh get real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure...you can make an Acura Integra outrun a Z06...but modify the Z06 to it's outter limits and see what you get. Lingenfelter has sold a few that are street legal at over 1000 horsepower. Yes...you read that right. Callaway built one that was street legal and could hold at over 255 MPH for that matter. (It went over 255 on a few occasions, which wrecked havoc with the electronic speedometer...it was only 8 bit.) I am sorry...but a properly done Vette is really something to be reconed with. And again - these are street legal...Lingenfelter's works are expensive, but you can drive the thing to work everyday reliably.

    No go watch the fast and the furious a few more times and tell yourself your car is still cooler than an actual sports car, ala Z06, Dodge Viper, BMW Z8, or Porsche 911. Kid...you've still got nothing but an Integra. (Although I suppose the Backstreet boys generation thinks that is a damn cool car...) Sure...price is a concern...but if you are going to play that card, I PROMISE I can make an old Nova that will faster than your integra for less money...WITH one of thos big dumb engines too. Ain't pretty...but I LOVE seeing the kids in their VW's and Acuras all pimped out getting their asses handed to them by and old Nova or Monte Carlo. Especially if it's rusty and about 3 different colors. I fucking hate kiddies in fashion cars...I like what works. That being said, some asian imports I have more respect for than others (think the older Eclipse with the 2.0 turbo, or 3000 GT - just plain nice car, Mazda rotaries were intriguing and did pretty well), but Integra's and pretty much anything Honda is pretty overrated, IMHO. Their style freaking blows chunks on top of it.

    1. Re:Oh get real... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "an actual sports car, ala Z06, Dodge Viper, BMW Z8,"

      these are NOT sports cars, they are GTs (except the Viper, which is just a bad joke).

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  57. Sure there is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called real engineering. You can clean your floor with a nice broom and a vacuum or you can bring in a street sweeper...

  58. amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  59. Hmm by MoronGames · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where, exactly, is the fuel injected into? The PSU? Is that safe? Am I allowed to use diesel fuel? Pure alcohol? What if it runs out of gas? Can I piss into the tank? This fuel injected computer seems silly to me. I mean, it's got to smell bad. And the fire danger. Bam!

    I suppose we can count on the average nerd's life expectancy dropping sharply if these suckers ever become mainstream.

    --
    hey!
  60. what are you 3.0 guys running? by gfody · · Score: 0

    Ever since i did the 3.0 conversion, i've been learning how to launch my q/m times, i had never gone to the track before my bore out. After bustin some 1.13 60ft times, i'm pullin 8's. Sometimes i unload in third, because my NOS is acting up. One time i actually blew the welds on the intake, and me my friend Dom had to rip apart the block and also replace the piston rings that I fried. It was actually fun, because theres just something about an engine that just calms me down. Hell yah is everybody ready for RACEWARS???

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
  61. What the....!!!!???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell does this have to do with SCO!!!????

  62. No, we're not shitting you. by mfh · · Score: 1

    You wonder what EFI and some new heads could do for your 1970 VW Van? Well, if you approach the problem with the ignorance you just displayed in your post, it would probably blow a hole through the side of your van's engine.

    Apart from actual hardware failure (your injectors seizing or fuel lines rupturing), misconfigured electronic fuel injection systems are the first, last, and only reason a computer-managed motor will blow up these days. And it does happen. A LOT.

    What happens if you accidentally program your air/fuel ratio to go to 20:1 at 6000RPMs in 4th gear? Your motor will catastrophically fail (i.e., explode into little pieces and shower your engine bay with molten iron and aluminum). If this happens on a dyno while you're tuning for maximum power, well then you better feel lucky if you don't get a piece of pistonhead lodged into your face by way of your chest.

    Tuning a modern EFI system isn't exactly the same as making sure the knobs on your carb are correct before you drive your junky van to work.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  63. fuel curves by automag_6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    side note on air-fuel mixture ratios. Many people have heard that you need a mixture reation of 14.7:1. 2 important notes about this fact, first, that ratio is by mass, not volume, and so per unit volume, an engine uses thousands of gallons of air per unit of fuel. Most underestimate the amount of air needed. Second, that 14.7:1 is the stoicheometric (sp?) correct, or chemically correct mixture ratio. As in, that ratio is what should occur under lab conditions. Under real world conditions, you get your best fuel economy in the ballpark of 16:1, and your best performance in the ballpark of 12:1, which is why the farther you push that accelerator, not only do you need more fuel for more air, but the RATIO should increase, since obviously pushing the pedal further down indicates a desire for acceleration.

  64. Re:(un)Limited usefulness by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    >has all the disadvatages of carbs and TBI like >crappy emissions, fuel economy, and idle quality Having been involved in the MegaSquirt project for quite a while, I have to disagree with this. Electronic TBI and batch port may have been developed in the 80's, but their performance is favorable to sequential port for 21st century engine modders. First TBI is known for being able to achieve quite impressive fuel economy that is only being surpassed with OBD-II. And OBD-II is still somewhat out of grasp for real DIYers. Idle quality is pretty much a toss up between TBI, batch port and sequential port if all 3 are tuned carefully and are running the same type of idle control... ie none or bipolar stepper pintle or PWM air bleed. Emissions is the only area that sequential has a definite edge. Unfortunately even this is not quite attainable for the DIYer because even more important than the injector timing are other factors such as spray pattern, injector aiming, fuel pressure, etc... Subtle differences can have huge emissions effects that can only be detected and resolved by highly instrumented labs.

  65. Neural Network by jamesh · · Score: 1

    I was studying Neural Networks at about the same time I was interested in this sort of stuff. At the time I thought that a fuel injection controller could be a fun experiment to implement as a neural network.

    It has a bunch of inputs, and a bunch of outputs, and a hazy sort of relationship between them all. You could give it a basic training by the maths (eg so it wouldn't melt the engine the first time it tried to run), and then stick it in and let it learn on the fly. Training could be biased towards economy or power. Economy would be interesting as peek economy might be a little too far on the lean side...

    The big advantage though would be that you could shove in a few other inputs and see what happens, eg humidity, number of people on board, phase of the moon, whatever. It would work it out itself. Yearly re-training could also allow to to make adjustments for wear and tear.

    Training could be done on an external device (eg laptop) as it's fairly cpu intesive, but the actual runtime calculations are relatively cheap.

    That was quite a few years ago though and i haven't touched neural networks since...

  66. clueless ricers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ricers, being ricers, are pretty clueless... they get *everything* wrong and/or do things in a really crappy way. So I guess they'd use VB or something. REAL hot-rodders would be the assembly coders... ;)

  67. Where does the coffee go? by MongooseCN · · Score: 1

    That's the fuel we're talking about, right?

  68. OS outside of computing by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    This is just the tip of the iceburg for Open Source outside of computing... It would be nice to have a central repository for things like OSCar and some of the "open source" plane and other ideas out there... I wonder if there are opensource housing plans (I realize the Amish have had OS-barns for years, "pair programmed" even)..

    --
    meh
  69. Triumph by standards · · Score: 1

    OK, if anyone is interested in experimenting to replace their worn-out Strombergs with something like this, let me know - I'd be happy to work on it too.

    1. Re:Triumph by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      Heh, you know it!
      I'm seriously considering megasquirting my '76 TR7!
      I even have the manifold, throttle-body, injectors, etc. already (from an '81/California model).

      I'm on the wedge-list... there's at least one other person planning to MS his TR8 too.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
  70. Great if you've got a turbo by racerx509 · · Score: 1

    The aftermarket car modding industry is nice, when you've got chips & whatnot to put into your car and run more fuel, but for older cars, you do need that extra oomph. I run a turbo volvo, and while I generally get laughed at by civics, mustangs and its ilk, I can outrun em :) No megasquirt yet, but 15lbs of boost and around 220rwhp. Guys over at turbobricks run very wild setups and there are a few success stories involving megasquirt.

    Forced induction will cause a need for an additional amount of fuel, and this thing is just the ticket. While I run at the ragged edge of reliability at 15-17psi, there are guys running boost in the 20's with this setup, the proper intercooler and turbo. And also much faster.

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
  71. Boring ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tuning.

    woah, a computer in my car? must be silly.
    i ride bikes and the electric diagram of a small bike scares the hell out of me.
    anyways: an internal combustion engine is a hacked down sterling engine.
    you just can't start and stop a sterling engine, so the valves ...
    BUT! what applies to a sterling engine applies to a normal internal combustion engine.
    the hot and the cold cycle. you guys probably already know all this ...
    but the cooler the air you can get into the engine the more you can fill it, the less
    energie you will need to compress it until combustion (e.g. NOX BORG. they would loss any soccer match!
    the big car-companies just don't want to retool their manufacturing-lines ... so go add your pentium
    to your ignition system ... maybe a better valve-design would do more ... i heard the new honda civics got
    titanium valves...etc. drive safe.

  72. How to add linux to this box. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Just put a computer in your car with a serrial line to the box. You can use Linux to porgram the thing and play your ogg files.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  73. Re:IMPORTANT!!! The Linux Gay Conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I sat up and noticed that same geek hiding in the trees. He had been watching us the entire time. I swear his penis had to have been the size of a fucking horse cock (not bad for a geek, i might add), and he appeared as if he had gone into a state of shock.


    Let me explain...I had never seen Gary Coleman have sex with Pee Wee Herman before. And may I add, I didn't know you sir had balls the size of grapefruits and a penis the size of a pencil eraser.

    Shocking!

    Me and willy will be wanking^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlaughing our way home to our archive of Pamalee Lee Anderson movies

  74. Not my Alpha, UltraSparc, and Power4, by themselvs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 21264 Alpha workstation: ~ USD 4,000.00
    My UltraSparc workstation: ~ USD 5,000.00
    My Power4 workstation: ~ USD 5,000.00

    And guess which one has the the greatest performance...yes, the Alpha. Power4, due to IBM's persistant effort is only a little better performance than 21264, but these are completly different lifetimes. The UltraSparc is shit, 21364 Alpha is my next purchase if I can find USD 50k somewhere lol!

    My carriage is a Cadillac Hearse with a GM 350 engine...bartered with computer services and gold coins. I don't use the fiat money from the United States Corporation.

    I don't have a slashdot account...yet...I want to be user number 777777.

  75. Afraid not by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    No.

    What made you think that?

    1. Re:Afraid not by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      The parent poster suggested that the ECU calculates the most efficient fuelmap, except for at WOT when it reverts to pre-programmed values.

    2. Re:Afraid not by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see.

      You missed the other point, best power is developed at a richer than stoich mixture. So what happens under part throttle is that your engine runs under closed loop control, adjusting the mixture via feedback from the lambda sensor.

      However, at full throttle the engine runs under open loop, for fuel, and psossibly for spark as well. This allows the engine to develop more power, and the extra fuel helps to keep EGT down, to stop the exhaust valve from burning. It is also used to cool the catalyst, which may explode a few myths.

      Here's an early experiment into this subject

      http://naca.larc.nasa.gov/reports/1938/naca-tn-6 54 /

  76. It's been done by thomn8r · · Score: 1

    Custom fuel and timing map generation has been common for a while, and there are h/w+s/w combos that let you play with the maps on the fly with a laptop. There's a product called the UniChip, which piggybacks the stock ECU ROM, and is tuned in real-time on a dyno in 200RPM increments, giving a perfectly-matched custom setup.