Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Boeing 737 Simulator

crux6rind writes "This guy built his own Boeing 737-700 simulator in his garage. The simulator uses elements of a retired Continental B-737-100 along with other genuine Boeing 737 avionics and system components. The simulator will be of the fixed-base variety (no motion, just outside visuals), using Microsoft Flight Simulator 2000, interfaced with R&R Electronics' EPIC system. This system allows you to interface switches, lights, buzzers, gauges, digital readouts with virtually any PC flight simulator out there."

274 comments

  1. Boat by buck_wild · · Score: 3, Funny

    So who'd rather fly a boat than a sexy Stealth?

    --
    If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    1. Re:Boat by mnemonic_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      The B-2 Spirit would probably have inferior handling characteristics to a 737 in terms of top speed, turning rate and radius, and climbing rate. It probably has a higher maximum altitude and no doubt much longer range, inherent to the flying wing design. The F-117 Nighthawk would probably be a bit snappier, though I've heard it's pretty "wobbly" ("Wobblin' Goblin").

      Neither would compare to flying a supersonic fighter.

    2. Re:Boat by ummcdou4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try getting parts for a stealth though!

    3. Re:Boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer flying a blackbird.. It's the plane I always choose when playing any flight simulators.. Of course, the last time I played flight simulator was flight simulator 2 ..

    4. Re:Boat by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I hear they're hard to find.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    5. Re:Boat by mwolff · · Score: 1

      I was told that without computer aid the B-2 would be impossible to fly.

    6. Re:Boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of the F-117 Nighthawk (aka Stealth Fighter). The B-2 still uses many avionics computers but it would still be flyable to a reasonable extent while the F-117 would most likly fall out of the sky.

    7. Re:Boat by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      It's always interesting to see these people trying to build cockpits, etc. using microsoft flight simulator, and they always end up with a couple of computer monitors, and some attempt to get more than one screen working with it.

      At work, we have simulation software which allows you to connect arbitrary numbers of computers, monitors, projectors, cockpit switches, etc. to a simulation. LCD screens with dials on? No problem. Put a panel in front of them with cut-outs, and they look like real instruments. Multiple projectors with outside-world views? No problem, and it gives you a much better sense of where you are and how the plane is moving.

      Admittedly we have other cool stuff that you don't get on home flight sims, but the software itself is really not that hard.

      It's just amazing that someone would go to all this work building a cockpit, and yet not have any suitable software to run it on.

    8. Re:Boat by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure flying stealthbombers is what every flight sim fan's dreams are made of. Try something more logical (and sexy), like the F-22. Or, if you still can't get over your bomber fetish, at least comprimise with an FB-22.

    9. Re:Boat by pyrote · · Score: 1

      no crap... I expected to see a cave projection, or something spectacular, and here I see something I can achive with a few thrustmaster parts. Cmon... atleast a frekin screen with a DLP projector... hell if you want real, get a fireGL with the glasses and DLP. I'm now annoyed with innovation.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    10. Re:Boat by DrBobcf · · Score: 1

      The pilots say the F-117 is not unstable, 'course its got computer controlled FBW (Fly-By-Wire)up the Ying-Yang. Unstablity, to a degree, is good in a combat aircraft - quicker turn-rate, etc.

      --
      Don't mind me, I have more fun this way!
    11. Re:Boat by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Wait a sec, I just laid down that piece of window trim, but I can't find it.....

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  2. Errr 2nd post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Heh!

  3. In case it gets slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a mirror.

    1. Re:In case it gets slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Hey moron, the link to the simulator still goes back to the original site! Did you even try to make a decent mirror, or are you just pulling shit out of your ass?

    2. Re:In case it gets slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Look, asshole, I posted the link to the Google cache. If you weren't so fucking stupid, you might have noticed that. But obviously, you're too busy trying to look cool to bother to fucking look at the mirror. Now get busy sucking on my dick you stupid fucking piece of shit slashbot. I fucking hate losers like you. Assclowns such as yourself ought to be dragged into the street and shot. Fuck you.

    3. Re:In case it gets slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      when i read your post, i felt the neck of my scrotum tighten as blood rushed to my sac heralding a handsome hard-on pending.

    4. Re:In case it gets slashdotted.. by ILuvUAmiga · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Ladies please. Can't we just try and be nice, for the sake of humanity? What if an alien was reading this? Just chill

  4. this is ridiculous by Tuxinatorium · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Who would actually do this, or build their own CPU and VGA card, or buy their own Aircraft carrier, or watnot. These slashdot do-it-yourself articles are getting sillier and sillier.

    1. Re:this is ridiculous by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      I use my garage for something better than that...

      I park my car in it!

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    2. Re:this is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      *cough* loser *cough*

    3. Re:this is ridiculous by DShard · · Score: 1

      Well I was going to post me building my own 1 for 1 scale model of mars for testing habitation without actually going there... but obviously it was rediculous and I kept screwing up the tides.

    4. Re:this is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      I hope for your sake your home has a zoning variance because I also pimp your wife to transients in it!

    5. Re:this is ridiculous by cscx · · Score: 1

      You should submit an Ask Slashdot about this, there's obviously plenty of people here that have tried such a thing before

    6. Re:this is ridiculous by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as they don't touch my car...

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    7. Re:this is ridiculous by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Well, this would be useful for increasing flight sim realism, which is what this guy is doing. As for the aircraft carrier, I guess that if you could afford one, it wouldn't make a half-bad yacht...and home for your private plane.

    8. Re:this is ridiculous by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      That made me laugh! Thanks!

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    9. Re:this is ridiculous by diersing · · Score: 0

      Here ya go

  5. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Now the terrorists won't even have to attend to school to learn how to crash planes into buildings.

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Speaking of "attending to school," you might consider my forthcoming class, "English as an n-th language, for n > 1"

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      What's it like being perfect and never making a typo? I'm writing an essay about it, and would to have an interview.

    3. Re:Great by innosent · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if the flight simulator crashes as well as his web server, we don't really need to worry...

      Slashdot: Turning expensive hardware into smoking goo since...

      --
      --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
    4. Re:Great by Seq · · Score: 1

      Now they can learn to crash planes in the comfort of their computer chairs, just like seven year olds with computers have been doing for years.

      --
      -- Seq
    5. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      The letter n is not a vowel dipshit, so you should say:

      "English as a n-th language, for n > 1"

    6. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Actually, dipshit, when speaking a letter that has a sound that begins with a vowel (as in "en" for the letter n), the article "an" is appropriate.

    7. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      No, you are wrong. Remove your pseudo grammar-Nazi intellect from my Internet.

      an -

      The form of a used before words beginning with a vowel or with an unpronounced h: an elephant; an hour.

    8. Re:Great by D4rkSt4lker · · Score: 1

      C'mon man, they'll be learning off of a sim using microsoft flight simulator, it'll teach them how the plane can crash itself.

    9. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      He wouldn't know ;)

    10. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      But "n" is not a word.

    11. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU?

    12. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Why are you yelling? "n" is not a word, neither is "l", which is why you can say "an l" or "an an." Does "a l" sound correct to you?

    13. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Does "a l" sound correct to you?

      Just kill yourself and get it over with. The world will be a better place without self-righteous morosophs such as yourself murdering the continuity and definition of language.

      It is pointless to argue the semantics of whether something can "sound" right (e.g. - if I say 1+1=3 "sounds" right, it does not make it right). The reason languages have definitions and rules is to enable us to communicate. If I should decide transpose the definition of two words or change a definition entirely, it would be silly and incorrect if I did not inform the reader of the definition change.

      Changing a definition retroactively, as in your case, is simply stupid and ignorant.

      Go read some Lewis Carroll if you want to survive "Semantics 101".

    14. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      You've still not addressed the fact that "n" and "l" are not words, and thus do not meet the terms of your earlier rule. In fact, I just looked up "n" on m-w.com (Merriam Webster), and they directed me to... "en." So, when speaking, you would say "an en" since that's how the word that represents that letter is spelled.

    15. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      A vowel is a vowel, a consonant is a consonant.

      You really don't get it do you?

    16. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      It only applies to WORDS. It was your definition. Accept it all, or accept none of it. "n" is a letter, not a word. The word "en" means the letter n, and starts with a vowel, meaning you say "an n."

    17. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      I'm not sure of your source, but the American Heritage Dictionary seems to disagree with you.
      In writing, the form a is used before a word beginning with a consonant sound, regardless of its spelling (a frog, a university). The form an is used before a word beginning with a vowel sound (an orange, an hour).
      Vowel sound, not just a vowel.
    18. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      YOU ARE AN POOP, I WIN!!!

    19. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Poop is a word that starts with a consonant, you'll want to use "a."

    20. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Have you ever seen an grown man naked?

    21. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Just your dad on COPS after he beat your mom.

    22. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Does he wear an "Worlds Greatest Dad" shirt that I make for him?

    23. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      No, he was naked, remember?

    24. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      A little bit of linguistic knowledge will solve this:

      Actually, the form of the morpheme "a" is not dependent on the word following it, it is dependent on the phoneme following it. When "a" is followed by a vowel, it becomes 'an'; when it is followed by a consonant, it becomes 'a'. Since the letter "n" is pronounced as [En]*, it is proceeded by 'an'. If the variable the original posted used was "k", pronounced as [ke]*, it would be preceded by 'a'.

      Long story short, the poster was right.

      *: E is pronoucned like eh, e is pronounced like the letter a

    25. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      NO ONE FUCKING ASKED YOU!

    26. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Did you mean you would like to give me an interview?

    27. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Yes he wears shirt when naked too and plays with me and sing Jesus song.

    28. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Which poster is right?

    29. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      No, I meant love, actually. I suppose this means you're not perfect, so nevermind.

    30. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      The Anonymous Coward, durr.

    31. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      The "English as an n-th language" guy.

    32. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Oh, duh!

    33. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      they are both trolls :\

    34. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      i don't intend to flame, but why do you criticize the discussion of language so vehemently? all he was doing was correcting a criticization someone made about using "a" over "an". it seems as if you thought he had been screaming "I INVENTED ENGLISH, WORSHIP ME". if anyone is the grammar nazi, it's you, buddy. and yes, i know you shouldn't go by how something sounds when dealing with grammar, but this isn't exactly grammar. it's the ease of pronunciation. for example,spanish shortens "a el" to "al", "de el" to "del". the same applies when saying either "a" or "an", and although it is a rule in grammar, the purpose is not a grammatical one like in spanish because "a" and "an" essentially have the same meaning, and are not attached to a certain gender as would be un/una.. de la/de el (del). ok?

    35. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      If I should decide transpose the definition of two words or change a definition entirely
      ... or omit a random word entirely.
    36. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      "I INVENTED BLOWJOBS, SUCK ME OFF"

      ksaj djfh dfjkh xfdfdsrf dor;kjdkjd

    37. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      It's just as well. I assume you'd have butchered the transcript anyway.

    38. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      all he was doing was correcting a criticization someone made about using "a" over "an".
      Enrollment is still open; it's not too late.
    39. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Wouldn't n-th become a word? You don't say EN [pause] THHHH. You say ENTHHH. A dash would make it a legal word right?

    40. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      This is the greatest troll on Slashdot I have ever seen.

    41. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Enrollment is still open.. is that you, parent author? Enrollment is still open for you, at ANGER MAANAGEMNTE CRITIZICER. L000K I C4N SPEL GOOD. I AM KEWL. CUZ SPELING MOST BEE PERFECT

    42. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Good point, I'll be sure to ask your mom the next time I'm fucking her up the ass.

    43. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      It's irrelevant. It's not about words, it's about phonemes. Both begin with a vowel phoneme and therefore have "an" as their indefinite article.

    44. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Are you an idiot? I am full of faults and self doubt. I pick the battles I can win, fuckwit, and as far as this one's concerned, game over -- you're out 30 minutes and some dignity.

    45. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      You should post under your account so I know who not to fuck with. And maybe post a picture of yourself so I can have something to jerk off to.

      YOU ARE MY GRAMMER/SPELLING GOD!

    46. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      will you scratch my butt for me? i have a itchy spot. everyone has doubt, do not worry. i am on YOUR side.

    47. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I am full of faults and self doubt.

      I'm sure the ladies look at you and go "OMG HE KAN SPEEL" and then get naked and have lesbian sex and ask you to join.

      and then you wake up

    48. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Go read some Lewis Carroll if you want to survive "Semantics 101".
      It's called "semiotics" and I was a master long before you and your mother jokingly referred to your penis as the "tinkle stick."

      ... oh, I meant the first time you and your mother jokingly referred to your penis as the "tinkle stick."

    49. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      already you stupid shitbag, try watching wheel of fortune any day. do they say:

      GIVE ME A EN!!!

      or do they say:

      GIVE ME AN EN!!

      YOU GOD DAMN BALL LICKER

      Sincerely,
      Josh Crawley

    50. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      I'm sure the ladies look at you and go "OMG HE KAN SPEEL" and then get naked and have lesbian sex and ask you to join.
      Don't kid yourself. The women in my life generally either:
      • avert their eyes uncomfortably or
      • give me too much change for my Big Mac value meal purchase because they neglected to ring it up as "large size".
      and then you wake up
      Haha, you mean "wipe off."
    51. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      H is an consonant, you FUCKING SHIT licking DICK SHIT BITCH FUCK!!!!!!!

      Sincerely,
      Josh Crawley

    52. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Damn dude, I may have fucking lost the a/an flamware we had going on here, and I am kinda geeky... but at least I get laid on a fairly consistent basis. It's all about self-esteem really, and shape up, nobody wants to look at a fat-ass or have sex with them.

    53. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      "I INVENTED SHIT EATING, EAT MY SHIT."

      grabualsa grabualsa grabualsa grabualsa

    54. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      semantics.

    55. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      good point. it's all in the your attitude. even simply the way you stand. you see a lot of geeks that are scared to socialize. they just sorta hide when a group is chatting (IRL NOW!!). you need to have presence and charisma. any self-confidence you lack is society's pressure on you to be this or that. it's all bullshit and even the guys getting laid knows that. of course, their are many types of lay. so... well GET FREAKIN'

    56. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      but girls are icky! THEY L000K AT M3 AND 1 GET SCAR3D VERY VERY SCARED. OH GOD I 4M N0T PERF3CT WHAT D0 1 D0? I N33D T0 BE PERFECT!! RELAX AND WHIP OUT YOUR COCK AND FUCK SOME WARM WET PUSSY

    57. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      You = future serial rapist.

    58. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      OMG teh micorsoft si teh ghey!! LOLZOR@DRAKSTLAKER, truley a funy man!!~

    59. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I'm going to bust more than your transcript tonight, buster.

    60. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      copacetic

    61. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      But "nth" is, moron. And it does take "an" rather than "a", though normally one says "to the nth degree."

      HTH, HAND.

    62. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      testing..what a modbombing this thread took. is it still on??

  6. FT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    First Terrorist!!

  7. Kaboom by NETHED · · Score: 4, Funny

    He paid 25,000 - 30,000 USD for the stuff currently. I figure thats about how much this slashdotting will cost him in bandwidth.

    Ready....Aim....SLASHDOT

    but this is uber cool anyway. I had a difficult time understanding the timeline of the pictures, but still, very cool. As an avid Sim Pilot and a student pilot, this is the holy grail of sim-ers.

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Kaboom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the ducttape and plastic?

    2. Re:Kaboom by NETHED · · Score: 4, Informative

      spare him!!

      Uploading the gallery right now
      MIRROR HERE

      --
      --sig fault--
    3. Re:Kaboom by agg123456789 · · Score: 1

      If he paid so much for this... Why not just buy a real plane... Some of the new kit planes could easily be had for this sum...

    4. Re:Kaboom by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      whoring the karma ;]

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    5. Re:Kaboom by Colonel+Blimp · · Score: 1
      I love it! I wish I coulda bought stuff of my old airline's 737-100 (the last -100 that flew in america, we called it "death jet")

      I love flight simming, and got to play with some of the real stuff when I worked for the airlines, cool stuff. Best part was once sitting jumpseat on an A320 Lufthansa flight, I resisted the urge to tell the pilots "hey, that's just like Microsoft Flight Sim!!"

    6. Re:Kaboom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, do these guys suck. They post a mirror and it's already slashdotted, a waste of time.

      Next time post a mirror of someone who ISN'T POOR.

    7. Re:Kaboom by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 1

      He paid 25,000 - 30,000 USD for the stuff currently

      Yeah, of course he could've invested that money in a formal pilot training, but there's nothing quite as much fun as pretending, is there? ;-)

      Btw. there was a similar article many moons ago on /. but I suppose since its more than 3 minutes ago that wouldn't count as a dupe.

    8. Re:Kaboom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like the site is back up after the /. Must not have been all that good of a server. Evidently it can't even handle a couple thousand hits an hour...

      "You are visitor number 5502 since May 13 2003"

  8. Fuck off by (TK)Dessimat0r · · Score: -1

    The mother-in-law stopped unexpectedly by the recently married
    couples' house. She rang the doorbell and stepped into the house to
    see her daughter-in-law standing naked by the door.
    _______.____________
    ____.'___'._________ "What are you doing," the mother-in-law asked.
    ___/_//\\\_\________
    __(_(_'\'_)_)_______ "I am waiting for my husband to come home from
    ___'-\_=_/-'_____//_ work," Cmdr. Taco replied.
    ___.-'___'-.___\__/_
    _/__________\__/_/__ "Why are you naked?" asked the mother-in-law.
    _|_\o_/_\_o/_\/_/___
    _|_|\_____/_\__/____ "This is my love dress," Cmdr. Taco
    _\__\__.__\_________ replied.
    __`\_\_____;________
    ___|/|\#/__|________ "LOVE DRESS!?! You are naked," said the
    ___|__()()_|________ mother-in-law.
    ___\___||__/________
    ____(__||_)_________ "But my husband loves it when I wear this
    ____|__\/_|_________ dress. It makes him happy and he makes me
    ____;__|__;_________ happy," said Cmdr. Taco. "I would
    _____\_|o/__________ appreciate your leaving now because my hus-
    _____/o|_\__________ band will be home any minute," the daughter-
    ____ooO_Ooo_________ in-law continued.
    ________o___________
    Soured by all of this romantic stuff, the mother-in-law left. On
    the way home, she thought about the "LOVE DRESS" and got an idea.
    When she got home, she undressed, showered, applied her best per-
    fume, and waited by the door for her husband to come home.

    Finally, the pickup truck drove up the drive way, and she took
    her place by the door. The father-in-law opened the door, and
    immediately saw his wife naked by the door.

    "What are you doing," he asked.

    "This is my love dress," his wife replied.

    "Needs ironing," he replied.

    _________________________________________

    TrollKore forever!
    I HATE YOU, I HATE YOUR COUNTRY, AND I HATE YOUR FACE!


    ::[ irc.freedomirc.net ]::
    ::[ #trollkore ]::

    1. Re:Fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Mod parent up! That sick bitch has a sense of humour I could relate too.

      I FUCKIN HATE YOU ALL.

  9. FUCK YOU! I HOPE YOUR PHONE GETS DISCONNECTED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Thanks, asshole, for wasting a perfectly good fp on your bullshit. Suck my huge fucking cock, fucktard. And fucking like it. Bitch.

    1. Re:FUCK YOU! I HOPE YOUR PHONE GETS DISCONNECTED! by buck_wild · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Yeah, I remember my first beer.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    2. Re:FUCK YOU! I HOPE YOUR PHONE GETS DISCONNECTED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Do you remember sucking on your first cock-n-balls, you fucking faggot, homo, dick lickig, ass munching, rim job giving, queer bait, dingleberry munching, pube flossong, hershey highway riding, ass pirate?

    3. Re:FUCK YOU! I HOPE YOUR PHONE GETS DISCONNECTED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Cock-n-balls are pretty popular in the Solomon Islands.

    4. Re:FUCK YOU! I HOPE YOUR PHONE GETS DISCONNECTED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Do you remember sucking on your first cock-n-balls, you fucking faggot, homo, dick lickig, ass munching, rim job giving, queer bait, dingleberry munching, pube flossong, hershey highway riding, ass pirate?

      Yes, honeybuns, you were great....but I prefer adults now.

  10. Mastercard by Ann+Coulter · · Score: -1, Troll

    Flight training: $25,000
    Home made 737 Simulator: $10,000
    First Class plane tickets: $5000
    Box cutters: $1.99

    Striking back against the great Satan: priceless

    There are some things you can't buy, but for everything else, there's Mastercard: the card used to fund terrorism all over the world.

    1. Re:Mastercard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the terrorists are going to try plane tricks again, they better bring a big bomb and they better be quick about detonating it, because there is zero chance that any passenger in this country will stand idly if they break out anything less at go time.

    2. Re:Mastercard by Stoptional · · Score: -1, Troll

      I thought this was funny.

      If I still participated in the moderation fiasco I would have mod'ed this up as funny.

      --
      Stoptional
  11. What a loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    Here's some facts:
    • weighs over 300 pounds
    • Mac user
    • still belongs to Amiga UG
    • unmarried
    • secret pleasure: gay porn
    • bad teeth, B.O.
    • skid marks aplenty
    • works as "sys admin" in local Wal-Mart
    1. Re:What a loser by torgosan · · Score: 1

      OT: The parent is yet another reason to elim AC's altogether. Pfffffttttt..........

      --
      "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand". -Milton F.
    2. Re:What a loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      heeeeyyyyyy, fucktard. he's probably getting a lot more than you. really, for once the geek gets some decent WARM WET PUSSY... lengthened to perfection and all warmed up, ready to accomodate the infamous geek horse cock.

  12. my gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Insert obligatory slashdoted joke about how he must have also made his own server.

  13. already gone by philhy · · Score: 1, Funny

    boy that /. effect is no sim...

    --
    --
  14. DOH! by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Build Your Own Boeing 737 Simulator - if you happen to have a spare 737 lying around to build it from!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:DOH! by mbogosian · · Score: 1

      Here's my recipe for a Space Shuttle simulator:

      1. acquire real life Space Shuttle cockpit (finished external nose cone and thermal tiles optional)
      2. replace key parts of the instrumentation with a keyboard, joystick and some monitors
      3. install this
      4. ???
      5. profit

    2. Re:DOH! by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      And to think, poor Saddam only had a Boeing 707 fuselage at his Terrorist Training Camp. I guess in the third world, you have to get by with less...

    3. Re:DOH! by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 1

      Haven't we determined that the ??? step is either to a) "imagine a beowulf cluster of these!", or
      b)natalie portman, naked and petrified?

      --
      Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
  15. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    If he paid $25,000 to build this you would think he could pay $50 to get a new version of MS Flight Sim.

    1. Re:Well... by buck_wild · · Score: 2, Funny

      Look at the lenghts he had to go to in order to avoid giving $50 to MS!

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    2. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's linked to MS FS2000 and Project Magenta.

  16. whats more amazing by papasui · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is that he can fit it in his garage.

  17. How realistic is it? by mrsam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does the simulator keep track of how fast the virtual airline is burning up cash, and how long before they go bankrupt?

    And, of course, no airplane cockpit is complete, these days, without a Breathalyzer.

    1. Re:How realistic is it? by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does the simulator keep track of how fast the virtual airline is burning up cash, and how long before they go bankrupt?

      I know this is funny, but the interesting bit is that those airlines who have standardized on a single airframe type (say, the 737) are actually doing quite well. They only have one type of aircraft to train crews on, one type of aircraft to purchase parts for, one type of aircraft to pay gate fees for etc...etc...etc...

      Now, I am no fan of flying on Southwest, but it does make for a compelling business model.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:How realistic is it? by Snover · · Score: 1

      You forgot the guns. THE GUNS!

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
    3. Re:How realistic is it? by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      UAL is actually reporting that they may re-emerge from bankruptcy sooner than expected, possibly next Spring. They're planning on launching another budget carrier to compete directly with jetBlue, which is the only carrier whose revenues have increased since 9-11.

      P.S. personally I doubt that they can match jetBlue's free satellite TV on A320's with *all* leather seats + blue potato chips + low prices. UAL will give the new carrier the backing though to compete on international routes though, jetBlue currently only operates in the U.S., focusing on the lucrative Ft. Lauderdale - NYC La Guardia region routes.

    4. Re:How realistic is it? by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

      $30k for a flight simulator and all he has to snack on are moldy peanuts...

    5. Re:How realistic is it? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is the area which has made Airbus popular enough to unseat Boeing (in terms of aircraft shipped per year, I think it was either last year or this year that they went ahead for the first time).

      Because they had the advantage of starting from scratch fairly recently nearly all of their aircraft have common cockpits, common handling characteristics, common spares and other things designed to save the operator money when running a mixed airbus fleet.

      This is great for people like BA and American who operate short and long haul fleets, as it gives them the chance to be able to interchange pilots, mechanics and some parts between the A318 (tiny, ~100 seats) and the A380 (huge, ~800+ seats) without retraining.

      --
      Beep beep.
    6. Re:How realistic is it? by Spunk · · Score: 1

      It sounds like this virtual airline will be running out of cash very soon.

    7. Re:How realistic is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, fly airbus. boost our economy. :)
      Seriously, I've been in the cockpits of various airbusses and boeings, and the airbusses are just so much more modern and cooler. I admit freely to have no clue about aicrafts except what I see as a passenger and on tours ;) but that's my impression anyway.

  18. been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually helped a friend do this in a spare bedroom of his. Fun project.

    Interestingly, he hooked it up to electric garage door hardware and enabled manual tilt forward and aft.

    We used ProPilot before they got out of the business.

    1. Re:been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Off, Mr. Done It All twatty cunt.

  19. Waiting for .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obvious terrorism/ flight sim remarks. Oh, nevermind.

  20. Too bad... by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    he couldn't build a Beowolf Simulator to keep his site from getting /.ed

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  21. Aaaaiiiiiii! by flacco · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ALLAHU AKBAR! ALLAHU AKBAR!

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    1. Re:Aaaaiiiiiii! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      you missed one: homosexual.

    2. Re:Aaaaiiiiiii! by flacco · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      hehehe, hook, line and sinker. welcome to the bucket!

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    3. Re:Aaaaiiiiiii! by flacco · · Score: 0, Troll

      off topic? does no one get this? flat-heads.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  22. What the...?! by MoThugz · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    About 10 posts, and it's already slashdotted...

    Anyway, I guess here would be a good place to post my Build Your Own Sex Simulator article...

    Hardware Required and Cost
    Your Hand (Free!)
    Lubricant (Less than 5 bucks, or if you're a really cheap bastard, use the handwash liquid in a public toilet).

    HOW-TO
    1) Put lubricant on your hand
    2) Work it all over your shaft
    3) Spank the monkey till it pukes

  23. Ob Simpsons by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Smithers, I've designed a new plane. I call it the Spruce Moose, and it will carry 200 passengers from the New Yorkâ(TM)s Idlewild airport to the Belgium Congo in 17 minutes!

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Ob Simpsons by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Funny
      Burns: We can take the Spruce Moose! Hop in, Smithers!

      Smithers: But sir....

      Burns (pointing a gun at Smithers): I said, hop in....

    2. Re:Ob Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention that it was a tiny model, made out of butter

  24. Slashdotted by jchawk · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    God 4 comments and it's slashdotted already!

    Don't you guys ever go out? I know we're geeks and all but you could leave the house once in a while and do something on a FRIDAY NIGHT!?!??!

    Isn't there a lanparty you should be at.

    Damn it you are screwing the guys who have to work the graveyard shift!

    What am I supposed to do now? Work...?

    1. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Blues Traveller is playing in downtown Atlanta... I'm sure all you fat fuckers will feel comfortable seeing a fellow fat fuck sweating and playing a harmonica.

    2. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      i think john popper lost a lot of weight. if he hadn't, he'd have died in '99 or something.

  25. Mirror: Google Cache no Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here probably doesn't help the server to embed a wave file on your home page

    1. Re:Mirror: Google Cache no Pictures by d3designs · · Score: 0

      even google's cache is slashdoted :(

  26. But is it Linux powered...? by dagnabit · · Score: 1

    A Continental jet cockpit? How ironically funny if he could make it Linux-powered...

    1. Re:But is it Linux powered...? by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

      He could if he used Flightgear instead of MS Flight Simulator. It probably wouldn't crash as often, either.

    2. Re:But is it Linux powered...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LI-NUX!!

  27. More in the current Air & Space magazine by netringer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  28. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    And being of 2000 era, it even comes with the twin towers!

    *rubs hands with glee*

  29. National Security by emeraldWEAPON18 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I hope this guy isn't running a flight school to train terrorists!

  30. Re:More in the current Air & Space magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "There's no air in space."

    Homer: "Then why's there an Air In Space Museum?"

  31. Taking it away... by stoney27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So how long do we give the Feds to come in and determine that it is in National Security interests to confiscate the hole thing.

    --

    It is said that a child learns wisdom from the parent,
    but the truly wise parent learns joy from the child
    1. Re:Taking it away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah well cant he just fly away and theyll never catch him never never!!

    2. Re:Taking it away... by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      they can have the "hole thing" if they want, just so long as they leave the Boeing ;)

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
  32. As long as he remembers... by Vaystrem · · Score: 1

    to practice how to land.

  33. One year ago. by bflame · · Score: 4, Informative

    Iwas just over a year ago /. had another article just like this about a guy who built a 747 cockpit.

    Check it out.

  34. Just one of many crazies by dmerchant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are some 200 people (over a dozen using real aircraft fuselages) who are building home built simulators of aircraft and other things. I am helping to build a F-15C simulator, for more information see the July issue of "Smithsonian Air and Space". The task is really quite involved many of the people within the /. community would find that this is a very engaging hobby. One that involves every skill they ever learned and forces them to learn new skills as well. The very idea that these people are doing case mods that look like aircraft to run some of instruments would interest the /. community.

    1. Re:Just one of many crazies by dfn5 · · Score: 1
      You forgot a link to the project you are helping with. That sounds much more interesting than a 737.

      --
      -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    2. Re:Just one of many crazies by dmerchant · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.f15sim.com

    3. Re:Just one of many crazies by nihilus · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the Department of Homeland Security is keeping one eye on stuff like this, since flight training was one of those thorny post 9-11 issues..

      At the least, is it possible these projects will end up being data mined on admiral poindexter's TIA? (I forget what it's called now) I would think purchasing retired aircraft components on your credit card would probably get you flagged, right?

      --
      Science: The original open source.
  35. Sponsoring Terrorism.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    A group of terrorists could get their hands on this and learn how to fly without going to flight schools. A bill needs to be passed so the Feds have the right to examine your garage and basement without anyone's permission if there is enough suspicion that such activities are going on. Not a police state no-siree, let freedom ring.

  36. Re:More in the current Air & Space magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Can we PLEASE stop going on about this fucking slashdot effect IT IS SO FUCKING TEDIOUS!

    I dont give a fuck that this site gets a lot of readers, or that it can hammer someones bandwidth, WHOOPY FUCKIN DOO.

    But constantly hering about the "effect", fuck me, its so SHITE, like a bunch of kids talking their dads beating another kids dad up EXCEPT YOU ARE ALL LAME and that would never happen.

    I FUCKIN HATE YOU ALL SICK BASTARDS/

  37. how quaint by outlier · · Score: 1

    A 737 is a cute little plane... Remember when Slashdot covered this guy's 747 Simulator?

  38. I'm building a sim blimp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I plan on pumping some fat unix administrator full of helium and tethering him above my computer.

  39. You have to try X-Plane by hh1000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.x-plane.com

    This program has FAA endorsement, unlike that other toy I used to use ...

    1. Re:You have to try X-Plane by thogard · · Score: 1

      But will it run under linux?

      It does run under os-x....

      I would love to buy x-plane. Its a very nice program but I don't run windows.

    2. Re:You have to try X-Plane by Trem · · Score: 1

      If you use Wine, it runs just fine.

    3. Re:You have to try X-Plane by alienw · · Score: 1

      Well, stop being a cheapskate and sign up for Transgaming. Then you can run all those programs that require windows.

    4. Re:You have to try X-Plane by sho-gun · · Score: 1

      There was once planned support for linux. Austin
      Meyers (the single author of x-plane) had given
      the go ahead for a volunteer to write native linux
      support for x-plane. But he decided the market
      was too small for him to risk giving up core parts
      of his source code to complete the port. He pulled
      support for the port before it got off the ground
      only after a beta release or two.

      Austin is constantly releasing new betas and
      upgrades (x-plane is really an ever-evolving beta)
      and anyone who maintains a linux port would be
      busy updating these constant source code changes.

      Perhaps if enough support is shown for a port,
      he would reconsider. His email address can
      be found on the www.x-plane.com website.

      Another sim with native linux support and
      open source is Flight Gear. They just released
      a new version a few weeks ago and has come a
      long way over the years. I've yet to try the new
      version but the changelog shows many improvements
      and features in the latest version.

      Flight Gear can be found at http://www.flightgear.org

    5. Re:You have to try X-Plane by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      It is only approved for training by the FAA when used with a full motion platform keep in mind (most people do not have such things).

    6. Re:You have to try X-Plane by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      It's written for OS X, and then ported to Windows after every release.

      Don't automatically assume things.

      --
      -twb
  40. x-plane by avarame · · Score: 1

    http://www.x-plane.com/ 'nuff said.

    --
    Save time now so you can waste it later
  41. He Spent 30K by PPGMD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can buy you a gem of a Piper Cherokee for that, then you would be flying for real.

    *shrugs* That's about how much I have spent on all my flying minus the money I made by doing a little instruction and commercial flying.

    1. Re:He Spent 30K by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 0
      Screw the piper, for 30gs you could get yourself a ready to fly Loehle P51 Mustang replica. Or if building's your thing then the airframe kit for the 5151 is only $10k (add engine, instruments).

      I don't understand these people that spend BIG dollars on building a heavy-iron simulator, I could understand if they built a light plane sim if they have a disqualifying medical condition (like me, I'm insulin-dependant), but why do people have this fascination with flying LONG stretches, mostly over sea or so high that the sim-world is little more than a patchwork of colour, or even over cloud (mmm, interesting, white, white and more white). They might as well paint a wall and watch it dry!

      Low and slow (or low and fast, which is pretty good too ;-)) is where it's at, and in a Loehle, you look pretty damn hot too.

      I used to do sim flying, but then I found microlights/ultralights (which I can fly even with my type-1 diabetes).

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    2. Re:He Spent 30K by PPGMD · · Score: 1

      True but it isn't certfied. Personally my dream home built is quite a bit more, Lancair 4P Turbine. Hehe at least 300kts cruise.

    3. Re:He Spent 30K by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Where do you get a Piper Cherokee for $30k? Maybe used, but from what I've seen of airplane pricing (IANA pilot, but my dad is), all $30k will get you is a good share of a plane at a flight club.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    4. Re:He Spent 30K by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      hmmmm, $30k? hell, i'd just take 6 months off from working, boring simulator be damned

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    5. Re:He Spent 30K by PPGMD · · Score: 1

      Trade a plane. $32k is what I sold a IFR PA-28-140 for, a real gem, I loved flying it.

      And I have quite a few other ones for around that price, mostly the two seat models. You can find quite a few C172s for that price too.

    6. Re:He Spent 30K by mlk · · Score: 1

      Just out of curosity(sp) whats the maintance costs of your plane, I'm guess it gets big pritty quickly.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    7. Re:He Spent 30K by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      Hah, my plane, hah, yea, I wish buddy. I can't even afford to fly my clubs plane at the moment, let alone buy one of my own.

      However, to answer your question. Like anything, the more you use your plane, the cheaper it is "per hour" to use it. Microlights/ultralights are self-maintained which reduces the costs.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    8. Re:He Spent 30K by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well, if you can get the fuselage and maybe the engine for $30k, I'd say that's a damn fine deal...

      Of course, I expect that little to none of the avionics, radios, or much of anything else is included. Would have to buy all of that later.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  42. Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post-911, learning how to fly a commercial jet became a dangerous skill. The US gov't started monitoring and possibly limiting who can attend flight school for commercial aircraft.

    Now someone can build a garage in Lybia, Syria, Iran, the Philippines, etc.

    Yay. :^(

    1. Re:Scary by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      Lybia, Syria, Iran, the Philippines, et al can just buy a commercial aircraft.

      They could also buy fighter jets (whoo scary).

      The irony is that we sell them to them ;)

  43. I Love it but... by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Instead of the lame little (even at 21inch) CRT, why not get a reasonable LCD projector and a screen a few feet in front of the beast and look out the windscreen at it? Like they do with some real simulators...

    --

    --
    "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

  44. Two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    1) it's not 'go' time, it's 'Let's Roll' time. Perhaps the two dumbest words ever put together for describing an action ON A FUCKING PLANE!

    2) They had BOXCUTTERS! And you were afraid of them!

    1. Re:Two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, they weren't afraid, they were just following what had, up to that point, been standard operating procedure. Someone hijacks a plane, you take them where they want to go, they let people go free. Yay. They changed the rules, and now people will fight back because either way, they may die.

    2. Re:Two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Hmmm, by your definition, they should have known that they were going to smash the plane into a building because they tried to do it once before this? In France.



      Pussies

    3. Re:Two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
      1) it's not 'go' time, it's 'Let's Roll' time. Perhaps the two dumbest words ever put together for describing an action ON A FUCKING PLANE!
      For the terrorists, it was "go" time, as in, "let's go crash these planes so we can get laid for real in the afterlife, ending the unpleasant buggeries."
      2) They had BOXCUTTERS! And you were afraid of them!
      Hi I'm standing right behind you with a boxcutter of my own. As soon as you turn your head I'm going to hyphenate your jugular vein. Oops you were almost afraid there too, and I am neither behind you nor in possession of a boxcutter at this point.
    4. Re:Two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Yes, and what worries me is that next time the authorities aren't going to give us the slightest chance to fight back before downing the plane.

      I'd hate to have a sidewinder smash through the left engine just because some F18 pilot confuses my wild attempts at flying the plane with a determination to slam into a building in that city over on the horizon.

      I wonder how you gesticulate "I'm not a fucking terrorist!" out of a cockpit window?

  45. Been going on for a while. by mnemonic_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    This isn't any more of a full blown simulator than any of the other cockpit building projects. Flight sim enthusiasts have been building their own cockpits using EPIC cards for years- one person even used an old F-15 nose section that was rotting away at a museum and refurbished it completely.

    Building F-16 cockpits is pretty popular, interfaced with Falcon 4.0 which is easily the most realistic combat sim all around (yes, Flanker 2.5 and Il-2 probably have better flight models). Here are some current F-16 cockpit projects:
    http://www.f16cockpit.net/
    http://home .earthlink.net/~bluumax/
    http://virtualf16.20m.co m/

    One convenient thing about building an F-16 cockpit is the Thrustmaster Cougar HOTAS joystick & throttle, which are exact replicas of the HOTAS system used in the F-16; all metal and accurate down to the lettering next to the buttons.

    Again, this is not an uncommon thing in the flight sim world. Some go as far as purchasing flight suits and helmets to wear while flying in their virtual worlds.

    1. Re:Been going on for a while. by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

      And they laughed at that guy that Anarchy Online guy...

      Seriously though, sounds like a lot of fun (and money). Now maybe I need to get a Sherman tank or a King Tiger in my back yard as a Day of Defeat simulator!

    2. Re:Been going on for a while. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      I think people building their own F-15s and F-16s should definitely be hired by the USAF since they certainly have the enthusiasm necessary for those bombing missions in Iraq.

    3. Re:Been going on for a while. by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      Again, this is not an uncommon thing in the flight sim world. Some go as far as purchasing flight suits and helmets to wear while flying in their virtual worlds.

      Now that's just fucking sad. Then again, some people buy shirts with gold bars on the epaulettes, WWII replica flying jackets and the like just to fly their Cessnas. That's fucking sad too.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  46. Osama will have a field day with this one. by neo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sometimes I think maybe people plant these kinds of things just to see if terrorist really will try to use them. Here, take these plans to build a nuke and see what happens. Here, build your own flight simulator.

    1. Re:Osama will have a field day with this one. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      "I think maybe people plant these kinds of things just to see if terrorist really will try to use them. "

      Because as we all know, 9/11 didn't happen. Whats that? They can crash planes into buildings without simulators? wow.

      Better recall Quake2/3, because as soon as ossama rigs up a railgun, he's going to make all the taliban stay up for some good old fashioned deathmatching.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:Osama will have a field day with this one. by Markus+Landgren · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You are lagging. Osama was last year's propaganda. This year Saddam Hussein is the mastermind behind the WTC attacks.

    3. Re:Osama will have a field day with this one. by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      If your first thougt is about terrorist use, you are already terrorized. Your same reasoning counts for model rocketry, home-made UAV's and bread-knives.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  47. repost from a year or so ago? by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

    Didn't I see this here about a year ago? Or am I remember ign things about the XPlane project that this guy happened to be linked to?

    --
    As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
  48. Simulator Slashdotted!? by Like2Byte · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, Fine! I'll go build my own simulator.

    With Black-jack...and hookers.

    In fact, forget the Black-jack!

    Awe, screw the whole thing.

    1. Re:Simulator Slashdotted!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it's "In fact, forget the simulator!"

    2. Re:Simulator Slashdotted!? by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 0

      correction, i believe that should be "forget the simulator and screw some real hookers." For what he paid, he could get a decent used airplane.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
  49. yuo a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    you are a fukc

  50. he used Microsoft FS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just begging for a FlightGear hookup.

  51. Terrorists by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 0, Troll

    It is well known that terrorists use flight simulators to learn how to fly the aircraft they hijack. This one is inexpensive enough for terrorists to build themselves, and uses off-the-shelf Microsoft technology.

    This confirms what we already knew: Microsoft is responsible for terrorism. I think it's time we locked up Gates and Ballmer under the Patriot Act.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Go away, pesky investigators," said Bill Gates, as he motioned both his laywers and his lobbyists to intervene.

    2. Re:Terrorists by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Try this site, and see what you think then:

      http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blwingdings. htm

  52. cache from june 5, 2002 by ThePhreaker · · Score: 1

    http://web.archive.org/web/20020605233123/http://w ww.737sim.com/

  53. Flightgear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it possible to use flightgear?
    I don't want to get an illegal copy of Windows.

  54. Cool Combo... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Build one of these and stick it in the front of this

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Cool Combo... by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      So now the 737sim can do The Sims? :)

  55. about flightgear by bsussman1988 · · Score: 2, Informative

    it will run on linux, mac, and of course the hated and feared os ms windows. it is free to d/l but is 23$ a disk for a copy of all the variations, documentation, and as much north american sceenery as possible. $15 for one of the sceenery disks and $70 for the set of 8

  56. another mirror by polished+look+2 · · Score: 2, Informative
  57. yikes by PukkaStoryTeller · · Score: 0

    damn, this guy really scored: here

    kudos to you buddy. perhaps you could join the zero altitude club in your nifty little homemade cockpit.

  58. Is it Deja Vu or is it Memorex by rochlin · · Score: 1

    More interestin info can be found at this interesting /. thread about a "guy building a 747 simulator in his backyard!"

  59. Another WTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this guy planning to take out some buildings, too?

  60. IIRC, another guy made a... by GrodinTierce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Home-built 747 Simulator, and we all know that 747's are the real bad boys of the sky.

    Tierce

    --


    Tierce
    Who sponsors your feelings?
  61. What's even *more* amazing... by jmorse · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is that his wife/girlfriend/mom lets him keep it.

    A friend and I had an opportunity to do the same thing with an A-7 Corsair cockpit, but his wife nixed the idea of having a 7'x4'x12' perennial project in "her" garage.

    --

    "You done taken a wrong turn."
    -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
    1. Re:What's even *more* amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Yea cuz she gets the house when they divorce (along with EVERYTHING else, and then he has to pay her 1/3 his income for the rest of his life for making the decision to be around the fuking bitch)

  62. Build your own penis bird simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Dear rotten.com,

    I am unsure if you are aware of the problems that your "Incident with the bird" picture has caused on the popular technology website slashdot (http://slashdot.org).
    Many users of this site's messageboards are posting links to http://smoke.rotten.com/bird/ and making text based representations of a bird on a man's penis. Frankly, while I am pro-freedom, this type of photo sickens me. Could you please move the location of the bird page on your site to keep slashdot readers from seeing things that are completeley unrelated to computers and technology? I'm not asking you to remove the content, just to relocate it.
    FYI the text representation of the bird is:
    *p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_*
    p______...___________________________p
    e____(_..__`'-.,--,__________________e
    n_____'-._'-.__`\a\\_________________n
    i_________'.___.'_(|_________________i
    s____________7____||_________________s
    b___________/___.'_|_________________b
    i__________/_.-'__,J_________________i
    r_________/_________\________________r
    d________||___/______;_______________d
    *________||__|_______|_______________*
    p________`\__\_______|__/__''\_______p
    e__________'._\______/.-`____{}|_____e
    n___________/\_`;_.-'_________/______n
    i___________\_;(((____.--'\_/________i
    s_________.(((_____.-;\______________s
    b____.--'`_____,;`'.'-;\_____________b
    i_taco's____.'____'._.'\\____________i
    r_dick_--'_________|__\_|____________r
    d__________________\_\,_/____________d
    *p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_*

    with a link to the offensive site (http://smoke.rotten.com/bird/) underneath, these "Penis Birds" are posted by Penis Bird Guy, Penis Bird MAN and several other users.
    Regards, Andrew J. Tosh

    1. Re:Build your own penis bird simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      huh? can this penis bird run linux?

    2. Re:Build your own penis bird simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Yes. But you will need the latest ac (Anal Cox) kernel patches from Anal's Website.

    3. Re:Build your own penis bird simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      ahh, excellent. thank you very much. thankfully this penis-bird can fully accompany my geek, homosexual, penis-bird needs. muchly appreciated.

      sincerely,
      geek with horse cock occupied by penis bird.

  63. this thread needs a PENIS BIRD (thank me later) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Dear rotten.com,

    I am unsure if you are aware of the problems that your "Incident with the bird" picture has caused on the popular technology website slashdot (http://slashdot.org).
    Many users of this site's messageboards are posting links to http://smoke.rotten.com/bird/ and making text based representations of a bird on a man's penis. Frankly, while I am pro-freedom, this type of photo sickens me. Could you please move the location of the bird page on your site to keep slashdot readers from seeing things that are completeley unrelated to computers and technology? I'm not asking you to remove the content, just to relocate it.
    FYI the text representation of the bird is:
    *p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_*
    p______...___________________________p
    e____(_..__`'-.,--,__________________e
    n_____'-._'-.__`\a\\_________________n
    i_________'.___.'_(|_________________i
    s____________7____||_________________s
    b___________/___.'_|_________________b
    i__________/_.-'__,J_________________i
    r_________/_________\________________r
    d________||___/______;_______________d
    *________||__|_______|_______________*
    p________`\__\_______|__/__''\_______p
    e__________'._\______/.-`____{}|_____e
    n___________/\_`;_.-'_________/______n
    i___________\_;(((____.--'\_/________i
    s_________.(((_____.-;\______________s
    b____.--'`_____,;`'.'-;\_____________b
    i_taco's____.'____'._.'\\____________i
    r_dick_--'_________|__\_|____________r
    d__________________\_\,_/____________d
    *p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_*

    with a link to the offensive site (http://smoke.rotten.com/bird/) underneath, these "Penis Birds" are posted by Penis Bird Guy, Penis Bird MAN and several other users.
    Regards, Andrew J. Tosh

  64. Watch out! by Ridge · · Score: 1

    I suspect he'll be 'detained for questioning' any day now by the feds.

  65. IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    IANAL, but i think this is not a good thing to have going on since the muslim 9/11 attacks.

    1. Re:IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      U ANAL? ME 2!

      name a time and place and I'll be your receiver for a night

    2. Re:IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      i'm go for anal blast off but as long as you aren't a fucking towelhead. i don't want you to backstab me with a box cutter the second we do it doggy style. and speaking of heterosexuality, if anyone has got a box cutter cock.. it's me. cuz i love lickin and cutting up those delicious boxes. i am assuming you are female of course, or transexual geek slashdotard? k thx

    3. Re:IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      im ghey you insentive clod

  66. Re:Great ass sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    now that is just an brilliant post

  67. Train terrorists... IN YOUR GARAGE! by syukton · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Am I the only one that's a little unsettled by this? No need for suicidal terrorist hijackers to go to flight school and get their names written down on paper and entered into databases for tracking; when a paltry $30,000 investment gets them a damn good flight simulator.

    I'm not trying to be funny, I'm trying to be dead serious. As it stands, since 9/11, the US government has been able to track down some of the hijackers and tell which flight schools they attended, and etc. But what about when a hijacker doesn't need to attend flight school; never even has to put his name down on paper, or enter it into a database, or even interact with anyone at all? If some fellow in his garage can throw this together on a $30k budget, what can an oil baron with $2M to throw at it create? They say that the terrorist cells that planned 9/11 were at it for upwards of 7 years, so it is surely obvious to everyone that they'd be willing to throw down the time and effort to build one of these simulators. (No doubt in the trailer of a large truck, so it can tour all over the country and train every single last cell there is...)

    Am I paranoid, or spot-on? Should this be cause for concern, or not?

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    1. Re:Train terrorists... IN YOUR GARAGE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that its too easy. I guess you're right, since anybody on the entire continent in Africa can train to fly a jet unsupervised, or build a bomb, or hack PCs or make anthrax. The point is that the US can't secure the whole world against terrorists.

      Why dont we free Palestine, pull our troops out of the bases in Saudi Arabia, and let the Iraqis run their own country? If we do that, I promise you that public support for terrorists in ALL three places will evaporate. It sure will be hard to recruit terrorists when the bad guys clean their act up.

    2. Re:Train terrorists... IN YOUR GARAGE! by LX.onesizebigger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do have a point, and the same thing occurred to me just after reading about this. The thing is, technology is becoming easier to work with for everybody, for better and for worse.

      I just recently heard about a guy (I believe here in Australia) who is building his very own long range cruise missile in his garage. Why he's doing it? To prove that if he can do it, so could people with an interest in doing some real damage.

      I'm not sure what his point is beyond that; what he thinks the government should do given when it comes to the realisation that people can do some seriously dangerous shit in their own backyards. Personally, I'm inclined to say that terrorism has to be attacked from the other side of the spectrum, remove the frustration that leads to it.

      Terrorism doesn't have reason. It can't be justified, understood or explained, but what we have to understand is the frustration and hopelessness of the oppressed palestinian people and the poverty and misery in wartorn countries like Afghanistan that leads them to the societal suicide that terrorism is.

      --
      I for one welcome our new SCOviet Russian overlords to whom all our base are belong.
    3. Re:Train terrorists... IN YOUR GARAGE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I case you didn't notice, a 727-200 went missing in Africa recently. It didn't crash, it just disappeared.

      List price on a used 727 is about $410,000. So for almost 10x as much money, they guy could have had a real one but I don't think it would fit in his garage.

    4. Re:Train terrorists... IN YOUR GARAGE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is even more scary is how some terrorists can/could go to universities, both foreign and domestic. They can also purchase books on mathematics, physics, engineering, ... With this knowledge they could construct some type of weapons. Maybe we should be not banning these types of books exactly, but put big restrictions on them. Keep the in the universities and require a picture ID to purchase them as well as have a "univ" account that has to be verified against. Then also get places like amazon, barnes&nobles, ebay, ... to stop selling these books. We have to have some type of security somewhere.

      Of cource I'm being sarcastic, however that is EXACTLY how we could turn into a 1981 type country. I wouldn't be suprised if A) people in our govt now dont already think this and B) that youd find a lot of non intelectuals that would agree with some or all of what I said above. To a certain extent, I agree with the Atlas Srugged book. The common man, at least in this country, is probably too stupid to have freedom. I can't speak for other countries because I don't know how the people act there.

    5. Re:Train terrorists... IN YOUR GARAGE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The solution to the hijacking and using the plane as a missile problem isn't to clamp down on general aviation or to impose stricter regulations on flight schools. The solution is to increase in-airport and in-aircraft security. You also assume that the terrorist has no previous flying skills. What if they recruit a disgruntled airline pilot? Then all the identity checks at flight schools in the world won't help you.

    6. Re:Train terrorists... IN YOUR GARAGE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're paranoid.

      No need for sims, you can learn to fly just fine, in a real aircraft, without ever going to a flight school.

      Anybody can learn to fly an ultralight, no paperwork necessary, and flying an ultralight isn't all that different to flying larger stuff - especially if all you want to do is point it at a building.

      For that matter, just learn in a different country, or have a pilot member of your organisation teach you in a private plane on the sly.

      I could build a truck driving simulator to teach myself to drive a truck filled with explosives, a truck sim would be much easier to build than a plane sim.

    7. Re:Train terrorists... IN YOUR GARAGE! by fartmaster · · Score: 1

      what can an oil baron with $2M to throw at it create?

      Oil doesn't fund terrorists. Drugs do.

  68. I plan on building a walnut simulator in my yard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll run Microsoft Walnut 8.0.

  69. Fortran + Ada = Core host SW by KezMaefele · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work in the flight sim business developing software. I was in the commercial side of things (Lear, Cessna, 777, etc) for a couple of years and most of the host software is written in Fortran. Now I am in the military side of things (Apache, Commanche, F18, etc.) Fortran and Ada form the basis for much of the host code. It is an ugly depressing world down in the bowels of the host code for these high tech sims. The Visuals, networking (HLA), and newer systems are starting to propogate towards newer code. It is interesting to see the mish-mash build for such huge projects. CGF (computer generated forces), SAF, IOS (instructor operating staions), are typically of a more modern paradigm, but they interface with Ada and Fortran code that drives the host simulation. You have never seen so many global variables in you life. GOTO's abound. It is a wonder to me at times how the systems work at all. But diligence and hours and hours of trainer time seem to work out most of the bugs. I usually get 10 or so hours a week on a trainer and most of the time don't even fire up the engines and fly it around. At first it is the ultimate video game, but after a while, it is just a job and deadlines have to be met and my code must work. Flight Sims are amazing engineering projects involving hundred of engineers and millions of lines of code. It is imposible for one engineer to know the inner working of all the systems (although I think my cubie might). It is definately an exciting and satisfying industry to get into as a young engineer or software geek, but be prepared to get out that old FORTRAN book from your freshman year in college because you will need it. Oh yeah, and brush up on your Ada. And you better know Unix/Linux. Windows don't play in the real time sim world. All of our systems are progressing from proprietary Unix systems (SGI-IRIX) and the like to Linux (RedHat). Host, visual, IG, networking. All of it eventually will be Linux based PC systems. The cost savings are too important to ignore. And we have the inhouse know-how to run on any system. Why not the cheapest?

    1. Re:Fortran + Ada = Core host SW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Back in 90 - 93 I worked for a small and now defunct company (Regency Systems, in Champaign, IL) building a simplified MD-11 sim for Delta.

      The main simulator was running on a smokin' 486/25 running SCO unix, with some other PCs running DOS for the glass cockpit and a bunch of embedded z80-type cards running the cockpit controls.

      This thing was for their ground school, which means it was used to familiarize the pilots with the systems. It was "flyable" through the instruments, but didn't have control yokes or throttles!

      Unfortunately, we didn't have access to Honeywell code for the control systems, so we reverse engineered the darn thing based on pilot manuals and some time in Delta's simulator in Atlanta, and wrote the whole thing in C/C++. The crazy hardware guys at our company built versions of all the hardware, because the whole point was to build something on the cheap - one switch from the real aircraft (the only real aircraft part we used) cost more than several of the panels we built.

      Since Delta's unloaded all their MD-11 aircraft, I've started wondering what ever because of it. If I had a basement I might see if I could find it and if they still wanted it or just wanted it removed.

      Walt

  70. Terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Funny

    Why would anyone but a terrorist want to do something like that?
    All he wants to learn is how to crash into buildings.

    I hope the FBI seeks this guy out and sends him to Cuba.

  71. Older Aircraft Simulators by Eese · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was watching the Discovery channel, and saw a show about pilot training or something, and it compared the American training sims (with real cockpit controls, digital displays surrounding the pilot, etc) and Soviet ones (where the viewable area around the pilot was broken down into 6 or so sections where the picture on each section was actually printed on a roll, and the rolls would all scroll back and forth with the pilots movements to try and provide a realistic setting for the aircrafts movements).

    The show mention that as the Russian technology/funding improved, and they were able to build better simulators, they auctioned off their old ones, many of which went to nations with hand-me-down militaries, like Afghanistan.

    Does anyone know what I'm talking about? I'd really like to look into buying one just as a keepsake, although they probably belong in museums =)

    1. Re:Older Aircraft Simulators by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The older simulators (about 20 years ago) used physical models and a camera which could be 'flown' through the model. Taller, buildings had to be hinged in case of collision with the camera which was on an arm. Rolls and cameras would be used for flighing at altitude.

  72. Full motion not required... by KC7GR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In my six years at Boeing (and I'm told that, given the layoffs, I did well to last that long), I was fortunate enough to be able to 'fly' the full-motion 747 sim, as well as the fixed-base 737 NextGen.

    Although the full-motion is definitely what I'd class as a "wild ride" in terms of convincing one's senses (ever try to land a 747 on only two engines?), I found that (much to my surprise) the fixed-base sims can produce many of the same sensations, simply by the projected movement on the window displays.

    In other words: When I went into a climb in the fixed-base unit, it still felt like I was tilting up despite the fact that there were no motion components to move the cab around. Same thing when I went into a turn. I caught myself leaning into it, and feeling like it was really happening, just as I did during my private pilot training.

    While fixed-base may not provide the full experience, it most definitely provides enough to effectively fool the senses if it's done right. And it sounds like this fellow did it right.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:Full motion not required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is quite true. With high frame-rates and collimation even the most synthetic graphics can fool one's senses. Of course, full motion and photorealistic graphics help (man I would love to try out one of Flight Safety's Level D's with VITAL graphics!).

  73. only a geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust a geek to build a simulator in his house, rather then actually go out and fly for real, hahaha.
    Im sure, at least, some aircraft have drink holders.:)

  74. So? This guy is building his own ... by torpor · · Score: 1

    ... cruise missile.

    With wonderful plans like this around, I guess terrorists-in-training won't no need to use the flightsim to work out how to crash into the Statue of Liberty any more ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  75. MOD PARENT DOWN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Link contains trojan horse!

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!! by avarame · · Score: 1

      noooooooo no it doesn't. I went to the link immediately afterward and it does not contain a trojan horse, it contains the best consumer/prosumer flight sim available. Which has been FAA certified to get instrument, commercial, and air transport certificates.

      --
      Save time now so you can waste it later
    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!! by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1
      That's right. I'm an X-Plane fan too, though my hardware isn't up to handling the current versions. And avarame is right- you can log time for an airline transport certificate on a full-motion simulator driven by X-Plane. No other sim can claim that, though with Virtual Wings and Elite you can log time towards an instrument rating- in controlled conditions of course, not just sitting at home.

      Austin (who writes X-Plane- yeah, one Stallman-esque virtuoso lone hacker) has been creating spaceship sims too- the guy is amazing. One look at x-plane.com and all the information about real-life planes being designed using X-Plane modelling as an unofficial computer aid, the images of the light plane with all the lift and force vectors for each blade element drawn in- this is nerd candy, it's just too cool to live.

      And yes, it's the same sim engine that can be used for an airline air transport cert. A few other sims can be used for an instrument rating.

      MS Flight Simulator cannot be used for ANY of these things, because it is a bloated and pointless toy, and as an aero geek I get quietly pissed off even _seeing_ it touted on slashdot, even indirectly. *g* which is ok- but geez, guys, recognize your kindred spirits when you see them.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!! by topham · · Score: 1

      My father has X-plane, bought it at version 6, bought 7 as well (which is still in Beta...).

      He likes the program; and I like the programmer/developer.

      Austin is hilarious. The guy seems to always be hyper when sending out notes and updates about what is going on of potential interest.

      I get the impression from him that if you made a 'reasonable' requet for add-on for X-plane that he could seriously consider either making it; or supplying an API interface of some sort to do it. As long as it was cool enough.

      Feasable doesn't necessarily seem to be a requirement. :)

  76. Nerd factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just blows up my nerd factor scala ...

  77. Osama shall send suicide hackers by daedalos · · Score: 1

    to attack Slashdot

  78. Meh, bunch of unfinished projects... whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These type of projects rarely get finished. I mean look at this guy's project. It's been several years, you can tell he's losing interest, and hardly anything is done.

    It takes a crapload of work to get a simulator like this working. Especially a "complicated" plane like a 737. Rewiring all those panels, all the software, blech. This can go on for years and years and never even come close to being what a real simulator is.

  79. NO!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he's allowed to post instructions on the Internet about how to make one of these, then the terrorists win!!

  80. Depends.... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    ... on how much he contributes to CREEP 2K4...

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  81. Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Below are pics of the flight deck as it arrives at Boeing South (my parent's house in Dallas, Texas)

    Now, why am I not surprised...

  82. If you have a few million to spend by Cyclone66 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can buy your own simulator here. The "Tropos" system even uses a custom ATI Chipset.

  83. That's ignorance... in kind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's ignorance.

    First of all, what allows Airbus to "compete" with Boeing is the Gargantuan sunsidies they get from French, Spanish, and British and German governments.

    Pilots do NOT have common type ratings across the entire Airbus line. They can fly common ratings between aircraft of similar size, capacity, and flight characteristics, but the same is true for Boeing's newer glass cockpit aircraft... (757 and 767, for example.)

    Furthermore, Airbus only surpassed Boeing in terms of aircraft ordered. However, once cancellations, are factored in, Boeing maintains its lead in both profitability, and aircraft deliveries.

    By the way, the A380's maximum projected capacity, (in cattle car configuration), is 656, not 800+ or anywhere near it. Since it's not flying yet, we don't know what reality will be. Perhaps you are spouting about the A3XX, which is absolutely going to require a rating all its own.

    1. Re:That's ignorance... in kind. by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Boeing itself is cross subsidised by military contracts, although this is winding down a little now - but so is subsidy of Airbus (for example launch aid for the A380 is being strictly limited by the US-EU agreement on such things).

      Pilots may not have common ratings accross the line, but the training time to transfer can appropriatly be determined as 'non existant' - the rules however mean that you cannot be rated on more than a couple at once. The FBW system means that they all handle in the same way.

      The A380 and the A3XX are the same thing - the A3XX was the name for the A3XX whilst in concept stage. Configuration is pretty much final now, and in max capacity configuration (A380-300 or -400, I forget) for the Japanese market it will actually have in excess of 900 seats - not that you would want such a thing for transatlantic flights!

      --
      Beep beep.
    2. Re:That's ignorance... in kind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh*

      Do you fly these things?

      I do.

      (Well, actually, I currently hold an ATP and type ratings on two of Boeing's commercial fly-by-wire offerings, and have flown many of the others in the past, both glass and mechanical, ranging from old, tired DC-9s to spanking fresh B-767s. No, I do not work for a common carrier, or Boeing. While I've not flown any of the Airbus counterparts as a part of my work, I can say to a certainty that -by-wire flight controls don't make flight characteristics across different airframes ubiquitous, or anything close to it. (The physics of vastly different lifting bodies can't be buffered.) You're just flat wrong in that respect. The rules aren't there for no particular reason. You are correct that common cockpits do make transitioning from one type to another much easier, but again, Boeing's glass cockpits share a similar degree of common interfaces at this time.

      The debate about subsidies vs. military contracts is a long, (and very hot) one for another thread, but suffice it to say that pure funds infusion is a hell of a lot more of a subsidy than even the most generous of military contracts.

      After a bit of research the highest cabin capacity I can find for the single class configurations is 840, though there would appear to be no scheduled deliveries for this configuration.

    3. Re:That's ignorance... in kind. by El+Cabri · · Score: 1
      Airbus only surpassed Boeing in terms of aircraft ordered. However, once cancellations, are factored in, Boeing maintains its lead in both profitability, and aircraft deliveries.

      In 2002, Airbus has delivered more aircraft than Boeing.

    4. Re:That's ignorance... in kind. by El+Cabri · · Score: 1
      pure funds infusion is a hell of a lot more of a subsidy than even the most generous of military contracts.

      Airbus gets loan guaranties from the states, not direct funding. And the latest "leasing" deal that boeing got on tankers is not merely a "generous military contract". It is a rip-off of US taxpayers that would have made proud an Enron accountant.

    5. Re:That's ignorance... in kind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... The didn't. The had more *scheduled* deliveries than did Boeing, but after cancellations, they delivered fewer airplanes.

    6. Re:That's ignorance... in kind. by DrBobcf · · Score: 1

      I have some friends who have been flight crews on Airbus planes. They tell me that they do not like the software controlling the plane. They say it has a poor reliabilty record. You sound like you have the experiance and the mature perspective to comment on this with authority. What's up with this?

      --
      Don't mind me, I have more fun this way!
  84. Jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Welcome to Jackass. My name is Achmed. I call this one 'World Trade Center'."

  85. Save RAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take out the part of the system that simulates landings. Just have the simulations conclude with "docking" at a skyscraper.

  86. x-plane by avarame · · Score: 1

    I totally agree with that, except that I've asked several times for a time-speedup or distance-compression feature. Currently to make an 8 hour cross-country haul, you have to actually have the sim run for 8 hours. Of coruse you can put it on autopilot and walk away..... But Austin did not want to add anything like that to the sim. *shrug*, I can understand that, I'm just playing it as a game but it's *most* useful as an aerodynamic modeler, or in cases like logging time where you don't WANT to speed it up. Can we get a mod to mod down the "mod parent down" post please?

    --
    Save time now so you can waste it later
  87. Try this one on for size by deblau · · Score: 1

    This guy built a replica space shuttle cockpit, complete with missions to run.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.