Slashdot Mirror


Linus Moves To OSDL, Will Work On Kernel Full-Time

worldwideweber writes "With the announcement of the release of the 2.5.72 version of the Linux kernel came the news that Linus Torvalds will be leaving Transmeta for OSDL to work on the linux kernel full-time. The email calls this a leave of absence for about one year." Update: 06/17 17:19 GMT by T : As many readers have pointed out, the length of Linus' leave is not actually specified in this email.

108 of 400 comments (clear)

  1. Go, Linus, go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will this mean we get kernel releases daily? Like in the old times? Will we have 3.0.0 this xmas? I'm soo exited!!!!

    1. Re:Go, Linus, go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is a kernel? And who is this Linus guy? WINDOWS XP Rocks!

  2. Re:Early post! by Jellybob · · Score: 5, Funny

    My god.

    You actually *paid* for the privelidge of being the idiot who FPs an article?

    You really need to get out more (says the person who's been visiting every five minutes to see this story come out of the future).

  3. Kernel Mailing List Email by haydenth · · Score: 5, Informative

    From: Linus Torvalds
    To: Kernel Mailing List
    Subject: Linux v2.5.72 and a move to OSDL
    Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:35:09 -0700 (PDT)

    Ok, I waited too long for 2.5.71, so here's a more timely 2.5.72
    release.

    It's extra timely largely because the hash list poisoning found some
    problems in the RPC code, making NFS break. Trond found and fixed the
    breakage, so 2.5.72 should work fine in an NFS environment too. Let's
    see if the list poisoning shows any other dodgy list users. Knock wood.

    Also, Arnaldo has cleaned up a lot of the networking code to use the
    generic hash lists, instead of the old ad-hoc net-specific list walking
    code. That code has been tested pretty well, but please holler if you
    see something.

    Changelog for other details appended.

    The other big news - well, for me personally, anyway - is that I've
    decided to take a leave-of-absense after 6+ years at Transmeta to
    actually work full-time on the kernel.

    Transmeta has always been very good at letting me spend even an
    inordinate amount of time on Linux, but as a result I've been feeling a
    little guilty at just how little "real work" I got done lately. To fix
    that, I'll instead be working at OSDL, finally actually doing Linux as
    my main job.

    [ I do not expect a huge amount of change as a result, testament to just /how/ freely Transmeta has let me do Linux work. My email address will
    change to "torvalds@osdl.org" effective July 1st, but everybody is
    trying to make the transfer as smooth as possible, so we'll make sure
    that there will be sufficient address overlap etc to not cause any
    problems ]

    OSDL and Transmeta will have a joint official (read: "boring". You
    should have seen the bio - that didn't make it - that I suggested for
    myself for it ;) press-release about this tomorrow morning, but I just
    wanted to say thanks to Transmeta. It has been a special place to work
    for, and hello to OSDL that I hope will be the same.

    Snif. I'm actually all teary-eyed.

    Linus

    --
    - tom -
    1. Re:Kernel Mailing List Email by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's gonna really need a good spam filter now.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  4. Yes, but... by jkrise · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has he got his clearance certificate from SCO?
    Have the Chinese agreed to 'release' him from Transmeta?
    (this last one hurts a bit)...
    while extolling the Linux kernel, we used to say:
    Hey, MS spends $5bn in R&D for a lousy OS. A single chappie named Linus maintains the entire Linux kernel in his spare time! Can't say that any more...

    Anyways, all the best!

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Yes, but... by KingDaveRa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, MS spends $5bn in R&D for a lousy OS. A single chappie named Linus maintains the entire Linux kernel in his spare time! Can't say that any more... Well, now he has all the spare time in the world. Maybe we should get him a part time job, cleaning or something, then he's still not working on the kernel fulltime?

    2. Re:Yes, but... by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Maybe we should get him a part time job"

      McDonald's is always hiring.

      I mean, if this kid can get a job there, Linus might have a shot...

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    3. Re:Yes, but... by covenant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a great job application - too bad it's not a real one...

      http://www.snopes.com/humor/letters/mcdonald.htm

    4. Re:Yes, but... by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey, MS spends $5bn in R&D for a lousy OS. A single chappie named Linus maintains the entire Linux kernel in his spare time! Can't say that any more...

      On the other hand, the Linux kernel supports many, many more platforms than Windows, has hundreds of features that Windows does not and handles hundreds of devices, filesystems, network topologies and tools that Windows has never added or given up on for lack of resources.

      That the relatively small number of people maintaining Linux can do so without having to get rid of large portions of the OS is actually rather staggering. Just look at how hard it is for the BSD folks. They do a good job, and I don't belittle them at all. But, it takes a long time to add new features, and they are now in a perpetual mode of catch-up except in a few key areas that each of the BSDs focuses on and manages well.

      Linus has managed Linux VERY well, and while many of his choices were controvercial, the end result has always been a platform that held together and held developers longer than any other project I've ever seen (on average, certainly some other projects like sendmail or bind have had key developers much longer).

      Kudos to Linus and may Linux live long and prosper.

    5. Re:Yes, but... by minus9 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Nor could you say that linux was a stable OS. Stable, in the sense of Solaris or bsd, that is.

      Well it seems fairly stable.

      [root@www /root]# w
      2:43pm up 481 days, 22:46, 1 user, load average: 0.35, 0.34, 0.30
      [root@www /root]# uname -a
      Linux www 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown


    6. Re:Yes, but... by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The actual number of people maintaining the NT Kernel is comparable. The Kernel perf team (with whom I worked) is about 3 people. That total team responsible for the kernel is maybe 50 people -- similar #s for SQL Server.

      There are hordes of "evangelists" and "managers" surrounding the core team. But within the small core group, the personalities and philosphies of the NT team and the Linux folks are remarkably similar, with the minor exception that neither understands why the hell the other exists!

    7. Re:Yes, but... by LunaticLeo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are making a good point, but I think I can name three:
      [ Note: I am only comparing the MS Product WinXP or Windows Server 2003. If that is to restrictive I imagine you'll correct me. Also I am only thinking about kernel level features.]

      - Very robust full featured statefull packet munging, filtering, notifiying thing (aka firewall).

      - IPv6

      - Support for 64bit address spaces and CPUs. (Where is the ia64 or x86-64 Windows on this?)

      - NUMA (Does some version of Windows support Non-Unified Memory arch, may be something from Wang or some other dinosaur company).

      - I am sure there are some esoteric network protocols linux supports natively. But I am not so impressed by that.

      - Ether-switching (aka bridging; plus some stateful inspection).

      This is from the top of my head. NFS is probably another, but MS has that LanManager file system, CIFS.

      --
      -- I am not a fanatic, I am a true believer.
    8. Re:Yes, but... by slick_rick · · Score: 4, Informative

      In no particular order...
      1 netfilter (firewalling)
      2 hotloading/unloading device drivers
      3 software raid

      1. I know windows has some limited firewalling, but it is really a joke compared to iptables. SNAT/DNAT/TOS/Full customizable logging/Packet Mangling/ARP/TTL, I could go on. Many many commercial firewalls are based on linux, just look around.

      2. I still have a windows box for my wife/kids. I used to have a scanner hooked up to it via an Adaptec 2904 SCSI adapter. Problem is windows would only "scan the bus" on boot, so if it wasn't turned on when I booted the machine (had to turn scanner off when not in use as the lamp stayed on all the time) I had to reboot windows.
      Moved it to my Linux machine, now I just rmmod aic7xxx then modprobe aic7xxx every time I want the scanner. I even wrote a tiny little shell script and put an icon on the desktop so my wife/kids can do it.

      #3 is a life saver to. At work we have a Linux backup server that has four 60 gig IDE hard drives in a raid5. The whole thing cost us less then $700 2 years ago for 180 gigs of file server/backup space. We are upgrading the drives to 120 gigs soon to double our space. Nothing like having 60 days of full backups a click away.

      I could actually go on and on and on. It is astonishing how many usefull features are in the Linux kernel (not to mention the user-space stuff). I converted from windows three years ago now and I can't ever imagine going back. Windows is just so... limited.

      --
      apt-get install redhat please god - Me (take it easy, I love Debian)
    9. Re:Yes, but... by JonK · · Score: 3, Informative
      - IPv6

      Available in Windows

      - Support for 64bit address spaces and CPUs. (Where is the ia64 or x86-64 Windows on this?)

      Available in Windows - Itanic XP was available in a limited release and 64-bit 2003 Server can be bought pretty much off-the-shelf

      - NUMA (Does some version of Windows support Non-Unified Memory arch, may be something from Wang or some other dinosaur company).

      Available in Windows. From your comments, you appear unclear as to what NUMA is - it's not "something from Wang or some other dinosaur company", it's a way of architecting non-symmetrical MP hardware. Go read Greg Pfister's "In Search of Clusters", then go and discover how some Big Computers work - try Sequent (now part of IBM), Cray, SGI and Sun for details

      - I am sure there are some esoteric network protocols linux supports natively. But I am not so impressed by that.

      Yeah, Windows has those too...

      Now, does Linux support hot-swap RAM? Hot-swap PCI cards? Useable async I/O, even (and no select(3) doesn't count...)? Does it even have a kernel debugger? :-)

      --
      Cheers

      Jon
    10. Re:Yes, but... by JonK · · Score: 2, Interesting
      2 hotloading/unloading device drivers

      Have you tried a version of Windows post 3.1/NT4? Not only does the plug'n'play work automagically *without* the need to modprobe (assuming the hardware supports it), but you've also got a better than even chance that any hardware you go to the shop and buy will Just Work

      3 software raid

      Been in NT since at least 3.5 - IIRC, before Linux got it (IIRC NT3.5 was released in 1994, which puts us at about kernel 1.0... anyone care to correct me here)

      --
      Cheers

      Jon
    11. Re:Yes, but... by ccp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Saying that he managed VERY well is the understatement of the century.
      I mean, the way this guy handles politics is AMAZING.
      I have a hunch that, long after the kernel is forgotten, Linus ( and Linux ) will be case studies in administration courses.

      He's THAT good.

      Cheers,

    12. Re:Yes, but... by JahToasted · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well I happen to use Windows 2000 (to play games mostly) and I can tell you fo a fact that when you install ANY device driver it requires a reboot. I hooked up an external modem and I had to reboot. I hooked up a USB game pad... had to reboot.

      So please explain to me what you mean by hotloading a device driver. Do you mean that you don't have to completely turn the machine off, only reboot? Or maybe you mean it has the capability but it just isn't used? Either way it just doesn't compare with linux where you only need to reboot when you change kernels.

    13. Re:Yes, but... by Zorikin · · Score: 4, Informative

      > I have had 2.4.20 completely freeze on me, couldn't even ssh in to it.

      There are interrupt sharing issues with certain hardware in 2.4.20. I was able to get around it by swapping pci cards around. 2.4.21 was recently released and may even have a real fix. I haven't read the changelogs, let alone returned my hardware to its original configuration to check.

      Contrast this to XP, which, with ACPI enabled, puts ALL devices on the same interrupt.

  5. Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Trying not to be overly cynical here is a bit difficult. When Transmeta needed publicity they hired Linus which gave them un-rivaled, and often uncritical, coverage in the US which certainly will have helped in fund-raising. The initial visions and hype have not lived up to their expectations, and especially in the low power end of the market where ARM processors continue to dominate.

    Now that Transmeta are trying to move into a more corporate sphere there is less demand for a posterboy like Linus.

    Its great that Linus is dedicated to the Linux kernel full time, but how much of this is leaving through dedication (for a year) and how much is a result of disappointment at Transmeta not living up to its hype.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was looking at transmeta based notebooks, couldn't seem to find one that shipped without windowsXP. Hands up anybody who thinks this strange.

    2. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by hatrisc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      hands up! however, i have a transmeta based notebook and can't say anything bad about it (other than XP being there, which i'm required to keep...). with two full batterys i get about 10 hours of juice, which is just awesome. and as far as processing power, how much do you really need on a laptop? most of the time you're just surfing the web and writing so it's not that important to have a render-farm of processing power.

      --
      I write code.
    3. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've been critical of Transmeta for their hype-building. But one should give them credit for attempting a very tough feat: trying to build an x86 compatible CPU that is faster than both Intel and AMD. This is *not* easy. Particularly since they came on the scene right in the middle of particularly fierce AMD/Intel performance competition. They failed, so they repurposed their design for small power requirements, which is respectable and a reasonable attempt to recover the original investment. And now they find that beating ARM isn't that easy either, eh? Quelle surprise.

    4. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by geesus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you SEEN linus? If hes a posterboy then I have a shoe in at beauty contests ;)

      --
      Gnome wasnt built in a day.
    5. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by molnarcs · · Score: 5, Informative
      Wrong!!! Transmeta hiring Linus was not merely for publicity. They needed his coding expertise. Unless, of course, you say that he was party to this, just to justify your speculation - after he was allowed to speak about what Transmeta is doing (it was secret for years) he spoke in superlative terms about the innovation and excitement involved in creating the code-morphing technology that Transmeta implemented in their Crusoe chips.
      As Torvalds tells it, "The first day ... when they were giving me a feel for what went on at Transmeta. I went back to the hotel that evening and I thought, "These people are CRAZY!" This was more than three years ago, when Transmeta had not a single chip. The simulations ran at GLACIAL speed. Still, The next day, I basically decided that, if I am to go to work for a company, I want to go to work for a company that does something fun - something interesting. And the first, initial reaction that, 'These people are crazy!' is a positive reaction in that sense." So why choose a chip company, when every Linux start-up in the world was after him? Torvalds explains, "I've obviously gotten a lot of job offers from Linux companies, but I didn't want to polarize the Linux market. I'm really happy being an engineer at a company that is very interested in Linux, but is not seen as a Linux company. We're a chip company where Linux is seen as part of a much larger strategy - and that's something I find very comfortable. Besides, Transmeta has been able to give me opportunities that I wouldn't otherwise have had. It's also a very cool vehicle for doing debugging, when you control the whole chip!" And Torvalds' skill as a debugger is legendary around Transmeta. "He's a god," says Dave Taylor, a co-developer of the original Quake who gave up being CEO of his own company to work for Transmeta. "He can look at a Linux display and somehow predict, just from the way it misbehaves, exactly where, in 100,000 lines of code, the problem is. And, nine times out of 10, he's right."
      Read the rest here. Also, this might also be of interest. So no, he was not just a posterboy there.
    6. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by samhalliday · · Score: 4, Interesting
      why bother with putting GNU/Linux on a laptop? i mean, we are all so fussy over which version of what-not we want anyway, that we'd just end up cfdisking it anyway... :-/

      the best you can ask for with a laptop is a ditributor who is prepared to sell it OS free, and knock a few £ (or $) off the asking price because of that.

    7. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by Horny+Smurf · · Score: 5, Informative
      except that they weren't "trying to build an x86 compatible CPU that is faster than both Intel and AMD" -- they were trying to build a low-power x86 compatible chip.


      Unfortunately, the CPU isn't the biggest power hog in a notebook, and their cost/power/speed ratio wasn't much better than slowed down pentiums.


      I'm actually very excited by their technology. But the only Crusoe laptops I've seen for sale have had tiny screens and huge price tags. It would be less expensive to buy an iBook/PowerBook and virtual PC than most Crusoe laptops.

    8. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by kurosawdust · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey it could be worse - ESR looks like he was born when God was going through his "cubist" phase.

    9. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by dasunt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The nice thing about Linux/BSD (compared to Windows) is that for older laptops, Linux gets you more bang for the buck.

      I'm not sure what your typical laptop usage is for, but I tend to use my laptop for email, news, coding and light web browsing.

      Either I'm stuck with older windows OSes and unpatched software, or I can throw in a debian cd, install only what I need, and have a fast enough system for 90% of what I do.

    10. Re:Transmeta, Linus and Marketing... by mj01nir · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, especially when they came out with Midori and were touting embedded devices. Sadly, Midori hasn't been updated in almost two years. I still run it on my Compaq IA-1 and it does what I need it to do, but it would be nice to see some new features / updated packages.

      --
      the no .sig .sig
  6. This comes at a surprising time... by greppling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...as he is just about to hand over maintenance of 2.5/2.6 to Andrew Morton. So maybe he actually hopes to do some hacking again, instead of just integrating other peoples' work. Cool!

    1. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by greppling · · Score: 4, Informative
      He is? Where did you hear that?

      Sorry, should have added a link rightaway, so here it is. I think Linus didn't enjoy the 2.4 series as much as development kernels, and maybe also understood that others could be better at the more boring side of evaluating bug fixes etc. (Hats off for that!) He might share the maintenance with Andrew Morton, or possibly completely hand it over by 2.6.0.

      2.5 is the development branch, it doesnt need "maintaining".

      Well, it's already mostly in maintenance status, i.e. waiting for bugfixes, more testers reporting and so on.

    2. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by chabotc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually if you break ./ tradition and read the article, you'll notice it says "I do not expect a huge amount of change as a result, testament to just /how/ freely Transmeta has let me do Linux work"

      The motivation he gives for the move seems to involve more around "Transmeta has always been very good at letting me spend even an inordinate amount of time on Linux, but as a result I've been feeling a little guilty at just how little "real work" I got done lately"

      If anything, if he's switching desks and work envirioment, it'll slow him down for a little bit to get settled in again

    3. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The actual rumors are that he is going to spearhead the jump to the 3.0 kernel...

      A major rewrite is rumored to be in store for linux to give us some features that other OS's only dream of.

      But these are purely the wil rumors that are running around and I give no credibility to.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      A major rewrite is rumored to be in store for linux to give us some features that other OS's only dream of.

      YES!! Finally!! BASIC at the command prompt!

    5. Re:This comes at a surprising time... by greppling · · Score: 2, Informative
      "The last Linus-only release before getting together with Andrew".

      Also, why do you think Andrew Morton has started maintaining the "2.6 must-fix list" and had moderated two IRC conferences to know who will feel responsible for which lacking bug fixes etc.?

  7. Again!!! by Spackler · · Score: 5, Funny

    OSDN, The parent of Slashdot, has filed a lawsuit against Linus today for cut-and-pasting the first three letters of OSDN.

    CmdrTaco was quoted and saying "Linus and this Shift-Insert stuff is getting WAY out of control".

    Linus was unavailable to paste in a reply.

    1. Re:Again!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the latest development in the OSDN and OSDL. SCO (a leading supplier of litigation to businesses) has threatened to sue both OSDN and OSDL for using the letters 'S' and 'O'.

      Dunce Mcbribe was quoted as saying "The letters 'S' and 'O' are our intellectual property and we believe that they occur in the names of many businesses".

      The world was to busy laughing to reply.

    2. Re:Again!!! by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just came in:

      Novell has sent a public reaction to SCO that they have used the letter 'O' for years in their name and are certain they didn't sell it to SCO.

      Later today IBM is expected to state that they have a irevokable en perpetual license to use the 'I', 'B' and 'M' letters.

      Further Linus has stated that he holds his parents responsible for cut&pasting the letter 'S' into his name shortly after birth: 'You can't blame me I was like a baby at that time!'

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:Again!!! by mickwd · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you'll find that Linus called his new OS Linux specifically to avoid SCO's letter "S".

      Isn't this man's foresight just incredible ? ;)

    4. Re:Again!!! by jot445 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also just in, The makers of Sesame Street have been served legal notice to stop using the letters "S" and "O" as sponsors for the show. Film at 11.

      --
      The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
  8. Linus career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Work on open source projects
    2. No profit
    3. Get jealous; go to .com startup; startup tanks
    4. No profit
    5. Return to open source projects
    6. No profit

    1. Re:Linus career path by mbrod · · Score: 5, Insightful


      1. Work on open source projects
      2. No profit
      3. Get jealous; go to .com startup; startup tanks
      4. No profit
      5. Return to open source projects
      6. No profit

      7. Being considered the leader of the FREE world, one of the best coders, most honorable people, having made a contribution to all of humanity instead of a contribution only to himself...
      8. Priceless

  9. Too expensive for Transmeta? by mseeger · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Hi,

    i guess that Linus was too expensive for Transmeta. I don't doubt, that he's worth all the money he earns, but Transeta employs him mostly for PR reasons (that's why they left him so much freedom). But you have to have some sales to support PR. I already wondered for some time, if it pays off for Transmeta financially.

    But Linus is so popular, i don't think he will ever encounter serious employment problems.

    For my part, i thank Transmeta for employing Linus. As i don't own any shares, i had the profit from Linus' work without any cost.

    Bye, Martin

    1. Re:Too expensive for Transmeta? by AndroSyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think people forget Linus' real talent is managing people. Getting people to do stuff because they want to, not because they have to. If he is managing patches from other programmers and coordinating things, that takes a level of vision and skill that a lot of programmers don't have. Seeing the big picture and seeing which direction you want to go, and getting countless number of people to go in the same direction. I'd like to see you do that

  10. Predicted itinerary... by AlphaSys · · Score: 5, Funny

    His itinerary includes a brief stop-over in Utah, during which time he will hunt down Darl McBride and maul his body beyond recognition. His court defense will be temporary sanity and David Boies will merrily defend him to acquittal.

    --
    Can I bum a sig? I left mine at the office.
    1. Re:Predicted itinerary... by kurosawdust · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did anyone else read this and think "eh, that wouldn't be too bad - Linus can probably still work on the kernel in prison"?

  11. "I'm actually all teary-eyed." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's a leak in the Linus kernel, someone please post a patch.

    1. Re:"I'm actually all teary-eyed." by DeadVulcan · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's a leak in the Linus kernel, someone please post a patch.

      Here ya go, mayteee! Arrrr!!

      --
      Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
      Power in the hands of the accountable.
    2. Re:"I'm actually all teary-eyed." by rampant+mac · · Score: 2, Funny
      " There's a leak in the Linus kernel, someone please post a patch."

      Wouldn't that be the Linus Kornea?

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  12. Breaking news ... by Surak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linus Torvalds has very recently stated that spam filtering -- right in the kernel -- is now a slated feature for Linux 2.6.

    1. Re:Breaking news ... by RealityMogul · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not? MS put IIS in the kernel of 2003. They know what they're doing, right? I mean, they said they really, really made sure it was secure.

  13. Guy is crazy! by OpenSourced · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Leaving his new, shiny, recently minted e-mail address in the open like that, with all the nasty spammers that prowl the wilderness. Poor, poor address. I notice that his "old" address is properly obscured, but the "new" one is not. Sad mistake :o(

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:Guy is crazy! by warpSpeed · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm sure he treats SPAM and patches the same, 90% get dropped.

    2. Re:Guy is crazy! by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Funny

      notice that his "old" address is properly obscured, but the "new" one is not.

      What?

      You mean I'm not supposed to "remove the animal" from Linus' email address?

      Damn.

      No wonder my patches weren't getting through to him.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  14. Slashdot effect by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, let's not all sell our Transmetta stock at the same time...

    1. Re:Slashdot effect by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why /. subscription pays out ;-)

  15. It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by NZheretic · · Score: 5, Informative
    Its made the NYTimes: Prominent Programmer Will Leave Transmeta.

    Kudos to Transmeta for hiring Linus in the first place ( even if they did transport him to the USA in reach of overlitigious bastards such as The SCO Group ) and supporting his work on Linux for so many years.

    1. Re:It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Informative

      They even have a new title for him: 'leader of the shared software movement' whatever that means...

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:It made the NYTimes and Kudos to Transmeta by cybercuzco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats just what microsoft loves, they start a meme that "shared source=open source" BSA, MPAA, RIAA etc starts a meme that "sharing =piracy" How many people out there do you think now think that open source means youre a bunch of software pirates, and that linus is the leader of them? Theres no such thing as the "shared software" movement, its the open source software movement. Shared software could be anything from linux to the latest commercial isos you get from kazaa

      --

  16. Hmmm, SCO related? by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this related to Transmeta wanting to distance themselves from Linux until the SCO bull$hit is resolved? Hopefully it will be quick, but I can't help but wonder what kind of ace SCO is holding in reserve. Even if they don't really have an ace, businesses seem to be preparing themselves for the possibility that SCO may win a partial victory.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Hmmm, SCO related? by mormop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't help but wonder what kind of ace SCO is holding in reserve

      I can't wait to see what kind of ace IBM have in their huge patent library. If SCO claim they didn't know their own code was in their own version of Linux they may have overlooked IBM code being there as well

      --
      Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
    2. Re:Hmmm, SCO related? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is this related to Transmeta wanting to distance themselves from Linux until the SCO bull$hit is resolved?

      WTF?

      What in the hell would Transmeta be afraid of? Getting a letter saying something like this: "We don't like one of your employees, so we are going to sue you for damages."

      One of the reasons that American companies sue is because they expect more mileage out of the resultant fear than would ordinarily result from the actual litigation. Let's not throw gasoline on a fire, shall we?

  17. Interesting timing. by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A year's leave also just happens to give him time where he could be an expert witness or consultant in certain legal matters.

    1. Re:Interesting timing. by capt.Hij · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too true, especially when you look down at the bottom of his email:

      Trond Myklebust:
      o Fix rpc dentry list usage
      o Copy comments from System V file system routines to make it more "unix like."

  18. List poisoning clearification. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Excuse my ignorance but what is List Poisoning?
    I feel like I should know this but I don't.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:List poisoning clearification. by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Informative
      My reading on this is as follows.
      An entry on a linked list is to be freed.
      Upon it being removed from the list, it's pointers (prev/next) are 'poisoned'
      by being set to hopefully really, really invalid addresses.
      This is to catch any bad code that continues to use the now invalidated pointers.
      The bad addresses should cause an opps instead of allowing the code to possibly trash other valid data structures.

      Clarifications welcome.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  19. Changes by slashd'oh · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's something about these two changes I find amusing. I admit I have no idea what they mean, which is probably why:

    Daniel Ritz:
    o [PCMCIA] fix yenta unload oops

    David S. Miller:
    o [TCP]: Use proper time_*() comparisons on jiffies

    1. Re:Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      yenta unload: now with 20% more chutzpah there, goyim

    2. Re:Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm just quessing here, but I think the following explains everything:

      'yenta' is probably just a some PCMCIA card driver module that you can load and unload. Unloading causes an 'oops' which means a kernel bug (access to some unallocated memoryspace etc.).

      'jiffies' are one kind of time units. On 2.2 and 2.4 series, jiffies run at 100Hz - on 2.5/2.6 series, it will run at 1000Hz. It's just an incremental value that is used in time related jobs.

      One related problem is a 'jiffie wraparound' that causes uptime to jump to zero again. This is only a problem on 32 bit machines of course. At 100Hz it happens somewhere after 400 days and on 1000Hz much sooner (in about a month IIRC). It's easy to calculate exact times if you happen to care :)

      Kernel folks have also spent a lot of time lately to fix driver problems related to wraparound issues.

  20. About OSDL... by sould · · Score: 5, Informative
    from here:


    OSDL is dedicated to enabling Linux and Linux-based applications for data center and carrier-class deployment. We provide the crucial hardware for testing and development at this level, giving open source developers around the world the resources needed to bring Linux further into telecommunications and the enterprise. We are an independently governed, non-profit organization supported by 21 industry leaders.


    Sounds cool

  21. Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Lethyos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That letter is awesome. It's great to have a real, honest, genuine human-being to rally behind.

    This is the greatest things about open-source: the people. People who are willing to donate so much time and effort to the benefit of everyone on earth as opposed to people who want to screw over the world so they can make themselves rich.

    We're much better off than those cheering on phony, cut-throat business men who run and jump around a stage like monkies to the tune of Gloria Estefan.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Lethyos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe they should donate sperm as the pace of development is WAY TO SLOW. Linux is not going to the desktop mainstream. Deal with it.

      This is a troll, but I'll bite. You're just like a friend of mine who does IT knows nothing but Microsoft Windows as a platform. He just has this bullish tactic of telling everyone "Linux is never going mainstream, deal with it. The money is in Windows." It's not about making money, it's about making things better.

      Open source development is very fast. Apache, Mozilla, KDE, GNOME, Linux, and many others are moving at a break neck pace. They produce software and fixes for software much faster than Microsoft. As for being on the desktop, well, it will. It's only a matter of time.

      Lots of people said Linux and open source in general would never make it "mainstream" and look, the popularity is growing all the time. Heck, my mother and sister (as well as myself of course) run Linux. What's funny is the platform runs some Windows applications faster and more reliably than Windows does (thanks to Codeweavers and the Wine project). On top of that, we've even got retail stores selling Linux to desktop consumers preinstalled, ala Walmart's Lindows PCs.

      So, you're wrong, mark my words and just wait and see. I will not "deal with it".

      --
      Why bother.
    2. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by dh003i · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Politics is everywhere and in everything.

      RMS and Perens care deeply about the freedom of users and developers, and want to ensure that that freedom is there today, tomorrow, and as far into the future as possible. I don't see them as egomaniacs, just guys who have a cause.

      Linus, btw, is fully behind the GPL (as the original author of Linux, he could start releasing it under any license he damn well pleased). He released it under the GPL from the start, and that was a large part of his debate with that prick who insisted on using Minix. Linus has just stayed more focused on the Linux code, rather than branching out into advocating the GPL for other software.

    3. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linus is more the excpetion than the rule in open source. Look at the likes of RMS and Bruce Perens

      While I hate to respond to ad homonem trolls like this, letting this silly statement go by unanswered, particularly in light of the clueless moderators marking it up as insightful, and allowing this sort of misinformation to stand unrebutted, would be an even greater disservice than feeding the troll.

      First, RMS and Bruce Perens are hardly the "rule" in open source and free software projects. Quite the contrary, they are exceptional in many respects, as are most public figures in the world for better or worse. Linus is actually more akin to the average coder of free software: he does it for fun, for the joy of coding, and is relatively apolitical about the whole thing.

      ego maniacs desperate to keep their role at the head of their little cliques

      Second, as for the alleged egos of Bruce Perens and RMS, despite their occasional public disagreements and arguments their egos are no more, nor less, developed than those of most male humans above the age of puberty. Indeed, as anyone without an axe to grind who has seen RMS speak will point out, he is actually quite soft-spoken and humble, and his opinions, while strong, controversial, and often unyielding, are born of idealism and not of self aggrandizement.

      Even the whole GNU/Linux thing has nothing to do with RMS personally (notice that he isn't asking people to call it RMS/Linux), but stems from a desire to get his message about software freedom out to the public at large, and the feeling that the 95% or so of the operating system we call Linux (which includes all of the filesystem tools, etc.) was getting zero recognition and thus, the message behind the writing of those tools (in RMSes opinion) was being lost. Idealistic yes. Stubborn, yes. Egomaniacal? Hardly.

      We need the RMSes and Bruce Perenses around. RMS has steered the community clear of numerous dangerous shoals with respect to licensing conflicts (the old KDE/qt license prior to TrollTech's graceful fixing of the problem, the incompatabilities of the old Mozilla license, etc. all of which have since been fixed, denying the likes of SCO and Microsoft ammunition to damage the projects and community at this stage of the game), and Bruce Perens is responsible in no small part for getting closed minded people to look at free software, first embracing its technical advantages and then, later, after seeing the empowerment of the freedom it offers, to embrace free software's freedom: the freedom to innovate as one's business requires, the freedom from having a vendor yank one's chain, the freedom to participate in a free and competative marketplace, rather than to work beneath the thumb of a convicted monopolist, the freedom to modify a tool to better match one's purpose, and so forth.

      But Perens and RMS are hardly indicative of your average free software coder. Linus, while himself far above average in accomplishments, bears a far greater resemblence in temperament and attitude to most free software enthusiasts and developers, certainly far more so than either RMS or Perens.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    4. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by wsapplegate · · Score: 2, Funny

      Â You're just like a friend of mine who [...] has this bullish tactic of telling everyone "Linux is never going mainstream, deal with it. The money is in Windows." Â

      And he's still your friend ? :-)

      --
      Xenu brings order!
    5. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by johnnyb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would say the two are totally unrelated. If that were true, how would you explain emacs, gcc, glibc, and all of the other great software at GNU.

      The truth is, HURD is exploring some ideas never done before. One thing they are working on is the concept of "soft reboots" - being able to restart your operating system with your applications still running.

      In addition, HURD is massively multithreaded, which means in 20 years when we are all running 30CPU boxes, HURD will be our OS of choice. Linux is capable of handling multiple processors, but is not as wildly multithreaded as HURD is.

      HURD is really an amazing system, and actually seems to work decently well these days (actually, I haven't used it in 3 years, but it was starting to stabilize then).

      Anyway, I think the difference is that Linus was able to implement Linux quickly because he was re-creating UNIX, while the HURD guys are trying to re-think the operating system altogether.

    6. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 3, Funny
      HURD is really an amazing system, and actually seems to work decently well these days (actually, I haven't used it in 3 years, but it was starting to stabilize then).

      Wow. Even the HURD fanboys haven't run it in 3 years.

    7. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by drix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Time to brush up on your Ayn Rand and your ESR. Most open-source developers (including me) couldn't care less about "the benefit of everyone on earth", "the common good", or any of those other throwaway commie bromides. We're doing it to "scratch an itch"--either we want some software that doesn't currently exist, and the fastest way to make it exist is to fire up a project and harness the collborative power of the Internet; or we're intellectually attracted to some or another project that our day job doesn't let us touch on. Assuming we even code for a day job. It has way less to do with altruism than you make it sound. Humans are selfish.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    8. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by scrytch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Time to brush up on your Ayn Rand and your ESR. Most open-source developers (including me) couldn't care less about "the benefit of everyone on earth", "the common good", or any of those other throwaway commie bromides.

      I love it. You even used the word bromide. Let's see if we can't work the phrase "angular planes of his face" into there too...

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    9. Re:Linus: so thoughtful, human, and down to earth. by nathanh · · Score: 3, Funny
      This is a troll, but I'll bite. You're just like a friend of mine who does IT knows nothing but Microsoft Windows as a platform. He just has this bullish tactic of telling everyone "Linux is never going mainstream, deal with it. The money is in Windows." It's not about making money, it's about making things better.

      The *real* money is in selling drugs. Tell your friend that if he's going to pimp himself out for money then he should at least do it properly.

  22. Additional related stuff. by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 5, Informative

    I submitted this a few hours ago (always a bridesmaid, *snif*), along with two links not in the story above. One was to the NY Times story about it. The other was to this story which just came out at Wired . . .a brief interview with Linus about his efforts to stand apart from political issues surrounding Open Source, which refers to the discussion here on Slashdot about his opinions on incorporating DRM into the Linux kernel (among other things).

  23. OSDL money by lovebyte · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the nytimes article, about OSDL:
    The organization was created with an investment of $20 million from I.B.M., Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Computer Associates, NEC and Fujitsu.

    What no SCO?

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  24. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nice troll. I'll answer anyway.

    1) Who knows? XFree86 draws my windows just fine. 3d is plenty fast using Nvidia drivers. 90% of desktops users won't care what's going on "under the hood".
    2) See 1. Prolly does need a clean up, but I'd say the same about Windows registry. LFS gives good reasons for locations, and there's also good reasons to retain Unix-ness.
    3) Bollocks. Development is astronomically fast.
    4) Usability is being addressed by both KDE and Gnome. Again, how much maintaining does the average user actually do? As far as software management goes, if RedCarpet or Up2Date is too hard, I honestly don't know how much easier it would need to be.

  25. The rats are abandoning the sinking ship! by Gnulix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally the SCO suit is showing some effect! Linux's leader is abdicating and fleeing the scene. Exactly as the nazis left Germany and took up hiding in South America.

    I guess that this means we can all get back to conducting serious business based on SCO Unix - the bread and butter of many a development company.

    (In 20 years time we'll probably see Torvalds daughter marrying the Swedish king!)

  26. Changing jobs... by TheShadow · · Score: 5, Funny

    While we are posting stories about people changing jobs...

    Just last week I started a new job after a long and tedious four and a half year tenure at my former job. In this new job I'll finally get to work on things other than fighting fires. I'm very excited. Just thought everyone would like to know.

    --

    --
    "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    1. Re:Changing jobs... by d3kk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or a professional Slashdot moderator?

  27. Sue SCO by gspr · · Score: 2, Funny

    He should just sue SCO and live off the money... relaxing in a fabulous villa, doing a bit of kernel coding every now and then ;-)

    1. Re:Sue SCO by bindaaas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Recently a new word was added in English Dictionary... and that is 'SCO' which replaces the old word "SCREW".
      Usage: SCO you (read "Screw you")

      --
      bin
      look siG is kool
  28. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by BillFarber · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First: I love linux and use it primarily, but I am a techno-geek-nerd.

    That being said, linux will not go mainstream until my mother can use it. That won't happen until several things are resolved.
    1) printer setup utilities SUCK
    2) sound card setup utilities SUCK
    3) Most other setup utilities suck (too a lesser degree) also.

    The apps are really improving, but sysadmin for the typical home user requires way more time and thought than they are willing to put into it.

    If my mom buys a new printer for her Windows machine, she plugs it in and uses it. If she was using linux, she would end up returning the printer.

  29. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So let's see, we could :
    1) Scrap KDE and Gnome, put *all* the code into XFree itself, that way everyone is stuck with whatever "paradigms" you think up
    2) Stick every single configuration file into one GIANT configuration file, which would be so big and monsterous that it would require a binary format, along with a special program to edit it and a bunch of API calls to modify it
    3) Make 7-10 different versions of the OS, all built on essentially the same thing, but each requiring their own set of patches and updates
    4) Launch a huge marketing campaign to brainwash people into thinking your product delivers a great "experience"

    Well then you'd just have Windows.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  30. When your job changes are... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...posted on Slashdot, you ARE the alpha geek.

    That is all.

  31. Re:Linux will not succeed on the desktop until... by Some+Bitch · · Score: 2, Insightful
    4) Usability is being addressed by both KDE and Gnome. Again, how much maintaining does the average user actually do? As far as software management goes, if RedCarpet or Up2Date is too hard, I honestly don't know how much easier it would need to be.

    Two words: command line. Until you can press a button in a pretty window it's not friendly enough for the masses.

  32. Wired article by OS390 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was reading wired and they were talking about how after people leave their jobs after being interviewed in Wired. Barry Diller left Vivendi right after he was interviewed, and some other that I can remember because I left the issue at home. This was in the letters to the editor section for anyone that has a copy. One of the editors guessed that since Linus was getting interviewed in this months article, he was going to leave. He said something to the point of " anyone looking for a decent Unix programmer" in reference to Linus. Somebody should have the damn article.

    1. Re:Wired article by wka · · Score: 2, Informative

      The piece mentioning Barry Diller, Howard Schmidt, and Linus can be found online here. It's the intorduction to their letters to the editior section.

  33. Press release from Transmeta by heretic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the press release alluded to in Linus' email. Still no mention of his leave being limited to one year.

    Linux Creator Linus Torvalds Joins OSDL

    First OSDL Fellow Will Devote Himself Exclusively to Linux Development

    BEAVERTON, OR, and SANTA CLARA, CA, June 17, 2003 â" OSDL, a non-profit, global consortium of leading technology companies dedicated to accelerating the adoption of Linux, and Transmeta Corporation (Nasdaq: TMTA), the leader in efficient computing, today announced that Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux, will join OSDL as the first OSDL Fellow.

    As an OSDL fellow, Linus will work exclusively on leading the development of Linux, the open source software that he created in 1991 as a university student in Finland. Torvalds will dedicate himself now full-time to guiding a distributed team of thousands of Linux developers around the world. At OSDL, he will have hands-on access to its state-of-the-art computing resources and test facility. He will also help set priorities and direction for the Lab's different industry initiatives.

    "It feels a bit strange to finally officially work on what I've been doing for the last twelve years, but with the upcoming 2.6.x release it makes sense to be able to concentrate fully on Linux," Torvalds said. "OSDL is the perfect setting for vendor-independent and neutral Linux development."

    Founded in 2000, OSDL has data centers in Portland, Oregon and Yokohama, Japan used by Linux developers around the world. With investment backing from Computer Associates, Fujitsu, Hitachi, HP, IBM, Intel, NEC and others, the lab sponsors key industry projects, including industry initiatives to enhance Linux for use in corporate data centers (Data Center Linux) and in telecommunications networks (Carrier Grade Linux). OSDL is increasingly being recognized as the center-of-gravity for the Linux industry: an important and independent central body that invests in the growth and innovation of Linux for the benefit of customers.

    "OSDL is a leading Linux-industry advocate with the single-minded focus of accelerating its use throughout the enterprise," said Stuart Cohen, OSDL CEO. "Linus' decision to join us is a confirmation of the importance of our mission. OSDL is the only organization where Linux developers, customers and vendors can all participate as equals. The addition of Linus' perspective and guidance to the Lab will enhance our value to all three of these groups."

    Linux is the fastest-growing operating system in the world. Revenue for Linux-based servers grew 62% in 2002, while overall sales of servers dropped 8%, according to Gartner Dataquest, a market research company. By 2007, Gartner predicts that Linux may grab 15% of the worldwide market.

    "Linus Torvalds adds tremendous credibility to OSDL's efforts to drive the evolution of Linux forward into enterprise computing and carrier environments," said George Weiss, vice president and research director for the research firm Gartner. "The computing market is still questioning how far and how fast Linux can go as an enterprise-ready platform. With Linus at OSDL, many will be looking for leadership from the lab for answers to those questions."

    Torvalds will join OSDL on leave from Transmeta Corporation, where he is currently a Transmeta Fellow. Transmeta is an OSDL member and worked with OSDL on the transition. "Linus has made substantial technological contributions as a member of our development team here at Transmeta," said Matthew R. Perry, president and CEO, Transmeta Corporation. "Transmeta appreciates and fully supports Linus' strong interest in devoting his attention and energy to certain emerging industry-wide Open Source initiatives at OSDL."

    About OSDL

    Founded in 2000, OSDL is dedicated to accelerating the growth and adoption of Linux in the enterprise. Supported by a global consortium of IT industry leaders, OSDL provides state-of the-art computi

  34. Cmdr Taco to take leave of absence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Newswire:
    Cmdr Taco is taking an extended four-year leave of absence from Slashdot and will be going to the University of Michigan to learn Journalism. He'll also be taking courses in reality, spelling, housekeeping, grammar, shopping, ethics, marital skills and parenting, just in case he ever grows up, in which case he'll need minimal competency in all of these areas of human interaction.

  35. Re:"leave of absence" by bigpat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Basically he didnt quit outright, I guess he wants to keep his options open."

    Exactly, i'd bet it probably has something to do with his stock options. Usually you have to exercise your options 30 days after leaving a company, but if technically he hasn't left, then he could hang on to his stock options just in case they are ever worth something again.

  36. Things I imagine "OSDL" might stand for by robson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since I'm ignorant enough not to know what OSDL stands for, and lazy enough that I don't feel like searching for it, I'm just going to make something up. Here are my top 5 so far:

    1. Open Source Developer Land
    2. Oprah's Singular Dance Legends
    3. Oops, Stallman Dissed Linus
    4. O'Reilly Still Dignifies Linux
    5. Official Simpsons Disco Library

    (I suspect I'm on to something with #2...)

    1. Re:Things I imagine "OSDL" might stand for by mcd7756 · · Score: 2, Funny

      #6. Only SCO Disses Linux.

      --
      Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? --Abraham Lincoln
  37. And Linux... by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Interesting


    And the number of Linux purposed Transmeta systems out there ? Or Server based systems ? Transmeta is aiming at the notebook market where Linux is pretty much unheard of, then at the lower-scale where again the majority of systems are not Linux.

    I have no doubt the guy is brilliant, but isn't it a bit strange given the markets Transmeta aimed at that they wanted lots of Linux development.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:And Linux... by mrjohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, where have you been?

    2. Re:And Linux... by crisco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Get on Google and search for Transmeta and blade and see for yourself.

      RLX Technologies helped push the 'blade' server concept to the place it is today, with most of the major hardware companies offering something along the same concept in the pages of the trade glossies. RLX started with the original Crusoe chip and continues to make Transmeta servers, as seen in this article.

      --

      Bleh!

    3. Re:And Linux... by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You are misreading his role there. They didn't hire Linus to tune kernels for Crusoe processors. They hired him for his talents as a software engineer. To them, Linux was a credential just like a Doctorate.

      The work he has done on Linux over the past six years has been done with Transmeta's blessing, support and appreciation, but they wanted him on the clock to help code the emulation/translation software they need to make their chips a viable product. I'm guessing that task is somewhere between designing an ISA and writting a kernel. Given what others have said about his psychic debugging skills, I'd imagine Transmeta found him very suited to the job.

  38. what a sweet deal Linus has by ChristTrekker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many of us can honestly say that we're doing what we love to do? And not just "working at an appropriately geek/tech job" either. I mean, this guy started a project as a hobby, people found value in it, and now he gets a salary to maintain it as he sees fit. When you look at history, even people like Michaelangelo who got to do what they liked doing, and got paid to do it, still had to work on someone else's project. "Michaelangelo, paint this ceiling, something in a biblical motif." Even top athletes get told who to play and when. Not many people have, or have ever had, as sweet a deal as Linus. I have several projects, as well as other non-geeky hobbies, that I scarcely have time for. I wish I could get paid to work on them. Heck, I'd settle for simply having more time for them without pay.

  39. Yes, Caldera/SCO was an OSDL member by lma · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, OSDL did have Caldera/SCO money. Caldera joined OSDL early on, and later let their membership expire sometime after the name change to SCO. So SCO has funded Linux kernel development projects through OSDL. Larry

  40. Re:Transmeta sued by SCO? Why? by hesiod · · Score: 5, Funny

    > There's not a single chance for SCO to sue them.

    Not having a good case hasn't stopped them before...

  41. Re:Transmeta sued by SCO? Why? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SCO could alledge that:

    * Transmeta hired Linus primarily to do work on the kernel for them (i.e. have a Linux kernel ready to go when their chip came out, both so linux would run and in case Microsoftware didn't.)

    * While working for them he, as part of his work, distributed (thus copying) the allegedly-SCO's IP that was allegedly ported into Linux by IBM or others, or that he ported some in himself.

    So therefore Transmeta was involved in the IP "theft", yadda yadda...

    Or any of a number of variations on the theme.

    But I doubt that has anything to do with Linus leaving Transmeta. (If nothing else, SCO could still sue them after he's gone.)

    I imagine that, now that Transmeta's first chips are out, most of the Transmeta-specific kernel work is done. So if Linus stays he's likely to get sucked into other software that's less kernel-specific, losing his kernel focus to the detriment of Linux. On the other hand, he can focus on the kernel full-time at his new site, to the benefit of Liunx, Transmeta, Linus' peace of mind, and a whole lot more.

    Linus sounds like he feels uncomfortable being paid by Transmeta for kernel work - even it really IS a big help to Transmeta for the kernel to continue to prosper. Going to somewhere where this is no longer an issue in HIS mind (regardless of whether it's an issue for his management) is good all around.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way