Slashdot Mirror


High Speed Travelator

Anonymous Award writes "Remember those old Isaac Asimov tales of cities of the future, where everybody walked along on moving sidewalks, sometimes clear across a country? Today's airport travelators have always been disappointingly pale imitations of these, but now in Paris we may be seeing the true birth of this wonderfully dangerous mode of mass transportation. Its already as fast as a bus, but when they can crank them up to motorway speeds... well, lets just say this may have a better chance of having cities designed around it than certain other recent innovations."

333 comments

  1. You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When it gets up to a certain speed, the wind resistance against your body will be greater than the friction of the belt against your feet, and you will cease to move forward...

    1. Re:You know... by archeopterix · · Score: 5, Informative
      When it gets up to a certain speed, the wind resistance against your body will be greater than the friction of the belt against your feet, and you will cease to move forward...
      Now this should look funny. But if you enclose the belt in a tube, with air moving with the speed of the belt (either artificially propelled or just "pulled" by the belt), the wind resistance becomes less of a problem.
    2. Re:You know... by x0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      unless it is contained in a tunnel with the wind being blown behind you at the same speed. Oops, the conveyor belt stops, blown onto your face, sue! Oops, wind stops, blown backwards, smash the face of the person behind you, sue! You will have people literally running into the back of you.

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    3. Re:You know... by io333 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not if it travels in a tunnel and they evacuate all the air.

      I loved that old story. I hope this really happens!

    4. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In which case, why not get rid of the belt completely and go for Futurama-like travel tubes (which I've always thought would be great fun..)

    5. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "But if you enclose the belt in a tube, with air moving with the speed of the belt (either artificially propelled or just "pulled" by the belt), the wind resistance becomes less of a problem."

      Until you fart! "Damn, this smell has been with me all the way from Pittsburgh!".

    6. Re:You know... by visgoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IANAP (I am not a physicist) but the velocities needed to create that much atmospheric friction would appear to be pretty damn high.

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    7. Re:You know... by BorgDrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you will not cease to move forward.

      Once the wind resistance equals the force from the belt against your feet, you will cease to accellerate, it's not like you're suddenly going to stop.

      Note that the belt has to move pretty fast for that to happen.

    8. Re:You know... by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      Uhm, ever took a hand out of car's window? I wonder whether 100kmh is "pretty damn high"...

    9. Re:You know... by klaasvakie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When it gets up to a certain speed, the wind resistance against your body will be greater than the friction of the belt against your feet, and you will cease to move forward...

      IANAP either, BUT I just walked to our wind tunnel at university, and stood in it. It takes no effort to stay upright up to 50km/h. At 80km/h one has to concentrate on staying upright, didn't go faster than that.

      --
      # ssh -l neo the_matrix; killall -9 agent_smith
    10. Re:You know... by FoxMcCloud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well actually the friction only acts on your feet, while the wind resistance acts on your whole body (the front of it anyway), so you'll very likely fall backwards rather than just stop moving forward...

      --
      bool Marketoid::IsGood(){return IsDead();}
    11. Re:You know... by PhysicsExpert · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think you'd actually lose your balance as the friction force would act on your feet whereas the drag force would act on your whole body. Anyway at what speed would the two forces be equal?

      drag = 0.5*C*A*D*V^2
      where:
      C is the drag coefficient
      A is the cross section area
      D is the density of air
      V is the velocity


      The frictional force will equal FMg
      Where:
      F is the coefficient of friction between the walkway and the shoes of the person
      M is the mass of the person
      g is acceleration due to gravity


      Anyway using C = 1, A = 1.4m^2, D = 1.3KgM-3, F = 1, M = 70kg the forces will balance at about 23ms-1 or 51mph

      --
      All that glitters has a high refractive index.
    12. Re:You know... by volsung · · Score: 1

      For something you are going to stand on with no restraining device, yes.

    13. Re:You know... by BattleWolf · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that it would be at a similar similar speed to the terminal velocity reached by skydivers. Does anyone have an idea what that is? 180km/h or something?

    14. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Once the wind resistance equals the force from the belt against your feet, you will cease to accellerate, it's not like you're suddenly going to stop."

      This isn't a case of two opposing forces acting at the center of gravity of a rigid body. You've got the friction force of the belt acting tangentially at the very bottom, and the drag force acting in the opposite direction all over the body. What would actually happen when the drag force got too strong is that the high torque would cause some people on the belt to loose their balance and fall backwards. This would happen long before the static friction of the belt was overcome. But before this happened, there would be other problems, like getting bugs lodged in your eyeball. Plus, if you farted, like 50 people behind you would smell it before it cleared out.

    15. Re:You know... by Funkitup · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All the people on the belt should pull enough air along with them so air pumps wont be that necessary.

      A basic invention is not dissimilar to a train - you get into a box that has rollers/wheels on the bottom. Internal friction in the wheels/rollers will accelerate the box on the conveyor belt and the box can then be accelerated to whatever speed wanted (extremely fast if in a vacuum). The same effect will slow the box down when it comes off the other end.

      Boxes can then be sent back using a travellator that goes the other way, or another idea is to make them collapsible so they can go back under the conveyorbelt.

    16. Re:You know... by yummysoup · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, terminal velocity's about 190km/h when you're on your belly (your body is in an arch with your belly forward and your arms and legs slightly back to maintain control, kind of like a badminton birdie).

      If you go head-down, you become more aerodynamic and fall at 290km/h.

      But with this device, because the force only acts on your hands and feet (which are on the conveyor and holding the handrails) rather than on your whole body (as does gravity in skydiving), I doubt you'll reach anywhere near those speeds.

    17. Re:You know... by paulcammish · · Score: 1

      Not if it travels in a tunnel and they evacuate all the air. Erm, then you'd suffocate. I think i'll walk...

    18. Re:You know... by Jellybob · · Score: 2, Funny
      At 80km/h one has to concentrate on staying upright, didn't go faster than that.


      Chicken.
    19. Re:You know... by 56ker · · Score: 1

      bah I still think a TARDIS or Star Trek Transporter pad are more efficent ways of travelling...... *grins*

    20. Re:You know... by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      Would'nt that be a train? Ok a very long circular one, but a train nonetheless?

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    21. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bah I still think a TARDIS or Star Trek Transporter pad are more efficent ways of travelling...... *grins*

      Well sure, if you're a fictional character.

    22. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IAAP ;-)

      He's not saying you're going to stop accelerating or fall down (which is what he should say). The friction of the belt against your shoes combined with the air resistence will create torque centered around some part of your body. Now, you can either do the Neo thing and bend almost in half backwards to be more aerodynamic, or you fall down, most likely backwards.

      The interesting part of this, of course, is that you may actually be more able to do the Matrix thing (without entering the god-forsaken focus mode). If the shape of your body is right and you're moving fast enough, bending over backwards might be a sustainable position due to lift generated by your geek belly creating a pressure differential (air goes unimpeded beneath you, but above, it has to go around your body). Finally, a real use for conveyor belts!

    23. Re:You know... by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 1

      I think he was thinking of evacuating an appropriate amount of air. It should be just as easy to breathe, because traveling very fast would cause a greater percieved air pressure. It wouildn't be just the same as breathing normal air at a standstill, but you should be far from sufficating (unless the air is evacuated to a point of being a vaccuum ;) )

    24. Re:You know... by FoxMcCloud · · Score: 1

      This is very much oversimplified and isn't realisitic at all.
      We don't need those two forces to be equal for someone to fall backwards.

      The air drag will need to be a lot smaller than what you calculated for the system to break.
      What is preventing you from falling backwards when your feet are pushed forwards and the rest of your body is pushed backwards is not the friction, but simply your body muscles, especially those between your feet and your legs I guess (however they're called in english).

      I do understand you just calculated the speed at which both forces would be equal and you're not claiming that would be the problem, but I still wanted to point out that the result is probably way way off...

      and... 23 m/s = 51mph ? now that's a physics expert talking :)

      --
      bool Marketoid::IsGood(){return IsDead();}
    25. Re:You know... by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 2, Funny
      When it gets up to a certain speed, the wind resistance against your body will be greater than the friction of the belt against your feet, and you will cease to move forward...


      You can test your theory by standing up in the back of a pickup truck at various speeds. Since the friction of the belt would be identical to the friction of the bed of the pickup truck it's a good analogy. Anyone have a pickup truck, some open road and a couple of nutty friends to perform the experiment?

    26. Re:You know... by AlaskanUnderachiever · · Score: 1

      He's actually thinking of the old subway capsule designs dreamed up around the 1800's. A streamlined "capsule" would be pulled & pushed around by air pressure differentials in the tunnel it lay in. No working parts in the capsule itself. Genius idea but wasn't implemented worth a damn. Plus sudden stops and starts made it a rather. . . adventuresome ride?

      --
      Find out about my new childrens book: SS Death Camp Criminal Batallion Go To Monte Carlo For The Massacre
    27. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly much higher than wimpy 9 km/h.

    28. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, this is about the funniest rated (Score:5, Funny)-joke I've ever seen!

    29. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux Users: Quick fucking stealing software and music and get real jobs and girlfriends.. no one fucking cares about your damn computers

    30. Re:You know... by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      The Roads Must Roll (Robert Heinlien 1955)

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    31. Re:You know... by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Did it twenty years ago Don't rember how it came out
      due to a bottle of Jack Daniels Balck Label (I think that I fell out , but those bruises could have been due to the bar fight)

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    32. Re:You know... by MasTRE · · Score: 1

      Easy fix - get down on your stomach. This way one could probably go well in excess of 100 MPH w/o any problems (although breathing may become difficult if going faster than that). No I've-fallen-and-I-can't-get-up either.

      OR

      Seats!

      --
      Must-not-watch TV!
  2. The Roads must Roll by TerryAtWork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    by Heinlein was one of the first ScFi stories I ever read!

    Glad to see it coming to fruition!

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:The Roads must Roll by GeorgeTheNorge · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thanks for reminding me of the title.

      What I remember of the story was that they had this rolling road that spanned the USA from east to west, with lanes that went faster and faster. You got on the first slow speed lane, and just walked over to successively faster lanes. The fastest lane was some cool 1950's velocity like 150-300mph.

      Some disgruntled workers clipped a lane or two, with expected results.

      Nice to see Robert Heinlein's idea making it to reality, now if I could only speak Basic with someone on the moon, or have a farm on Ganymede!

      --
      If you got a $100 bill, put your hands up...
    2. Re:The Roads must Roll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their treachery is quite ingeneous.
      This thing is at the airport.
      American tourists whos legs are slighly rubbery from
      a long sit-down overseas flight leap onto this thing
      and consequently to their doom.

      the locals know not to use it because of local
      advertising letting them in on the secret plot.

      m00hahahaha!

      les grenouilles, ils soient astucieux.

    3. Re:The Roads must Roll by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      of course, in the story the attack takes place by having the men travel via a self balancing unicycle - segway is well on its way to that view. I suspect that we will see cities using both ideas in the future.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:The Roads Must Roll by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      So don't treat your DOT folks like crap and they don't go on strike. 8:o) Labor at it's finest, really.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    5. Re:The Roads Must Roll by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1

      I thought the union comment was particularily apropos because this is France we are talking about -- they have a general strike seemingly every year.

    6. Re:The Roads must Roll by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      Was that it? I couldn't remember. Was thinking Niven's Ringworld.

      Anyways, there was a map in Duke Nukem 3D with a floor like this. Therefore, it's clearly possible!

    7. Re:The Roads must Roll by amanpatelhotmail.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
      by Heinlein was one of the first ScFi stories I ever read!

      Glad to see it coming to fruition!

      Ditto, Although I have not read the book -- this is certainly a major acheivement in the field of trasportation.

      Cars should be a thing of past. Think about this: If everyone moved at the same exact speed there would be no accidents. Certainly this travelator uses this principle, but falls a little behind (and thus has to be restricted to certain speeds).

      Instead of walking/standing, imagine your personalized bubble (read: no need to keep your feet on ground), being accelerated in to a fast moving pathway (ofcourse motion being calculated in such a way that there will be no collision when entering the fast pathway).

      This is what I would like to see come into life.

    8. Re:The Roads must Roll by GusCubed · · Score: 1

      I was reading this just last night (in an anthologised version called 'the man who sold the moon') and the same thoght about the segway occured to me then.
      Although Heinlein's unicycles used a large gyroscope to keep them oriented I imagine instead of tricky circuitry - amazing what we can do with triode valves these days.

      --
      =#= Man, you are such a loser! Why can't you be an individual, like the rest of us?
    9. Re:The Roads must Roll by GusCubed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I'm at it, one thing that puzzled me about 'The Roads Must Roll' is that the fastest strip (going at 100 mph I think) had restaurants etc. on it.

      When I first read the story I assumed they were on massive long looped conveyer belts, which would have made things interesting at the end of the belt when the strip, and all it's attached restaurants etc. would suddenly be hurled round the final drum and spend the return journey upside down, that is if they hadn't been thrown off by the sudden change in momentum (delta V of 200 mph?).

      reading it again, heinlein seems to say that the 'Roads' complete a circular circuit - now how in heck would that work?

      --
      =#= Man, you are such a loser! Why can't you be an individual, like the rest of us?
    10. Re:The Roads Must Roll by rasjani · · Score: 1

      Is it full length book ?

      I just finnished a book from him titled Man who sold the moon and The Roads Must Roll was only short story in that same universe..

      --
      yush
    11. Re:The Roads must Roll by eyeye · · Score: 2


      reading it again, heinlein seems to say that the 'Roads' complete a circular circuit - now how in heck would that work?

      Interesting...
      I suppose they would be like luggage conveyor belts.
      You'd need a semi-flexable mounting for the restaurants though and they wouldnt be nice to eat in unless the strip had very gradual turns (I suppose it could if its that large).
      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    12. Re:The Roads must Roll by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      2 layers. Top layer runs in a circle. The bottom layer looks like our conveyor with hooks to catch the top layer and pull it. It would have to have the capaibility of being pulled back to allow the upper belt to slide incase the conveyor stops.

      How is that idea?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:The Roads Must Roll by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1

      It's a short story, it appears in the Man who sold the Moon and in The Past Through Tomorrow. Rob.

    14. Re:The Roads Must Roll by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean every week, not every year?

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    15. Re:The Roads Must Roll by smithmc · · Score: 1

      See also The Roads Must Roll; Robert Heinlein's book

      OK, here comes the part where everyone crawls out of the woodwork and spits on Heinlein for being an "evil fascist" for writing Starship Troopers, right? </bitter sarcasm>

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    16. Re:The Roads must Roll by x136 · · Score: 1
      Cars should be a thing of past. Think about this: If everyone moved at the same exact speed there would be no accidents. Certainly this travelator uses this principle, but falls a little behind (and thus has to be restricted to certain speeds).

      Instead of walking/standing, imagine your personalized bubble (read: no need to keep your feet on ground), being accelerated in to a fast moving pathway (ofcourse motion being calculated in such a way that there will be no collision when entering the fast pathway).

      Mmmm. Now give these bubbles four wheels and an engine, so people can go 75MPH faster than the speed of the road!

      VROOOOM!

      --
      SIGFEH
    17. Re:The Roads Must Roll by ajs · · Score: 1

      It has been sold as a short book I think, but usually in a collection.

      My first thought when I saw the slashdot article was... ah, I'm a huge Asimov fan, but Heilnein did The Roads Must Roll, which really introduced the moving sidewalk idea as a mass-highway replacement in SF.

    18. Re:The Roads Must Roll by kubrick · · Score: 1

      They'd be better of spitting on him for being a dirty old pervert for writing, oh, pretty much everything he wrote from the late 1960s onward.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    19. Re:The Roads Must Roll by kubrick · · Score: 1

      s/better of/better off/

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  3. The Roads Must Roll by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 4, Informative

    See also The Roads Must Roll; Robert Heinlein's book based upon moving roads and what happens when the guys who maintain them go on strike ...

  4. kinda silly by chef_raekwon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    don't most major airports already have this 'magic carpet ride'?

    --
    We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    1. Re:kinda silly by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      Well, the poster did mention that in the blurb. However, the airport travelator's doesn't exactly let you whiz by in 100 km/h.

    2. Re:kinda silly by trikberg · · Score: 1

      If you would RTFA you could see that these are about three times as fast, which presents a problem when people have to get on or off. So all the magic lies in the acceleration and deceleration zones. The rest is more or less an ordinary travelator at high speed.

      --
      This post is free (as in cheese in a mousetrap).
    3. Re:kinda silly by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      after reading the article, posting, then re-reading the article, i still ask the same question: don't we already have these? I mean, its only 11km an hour, and hell, if its 3km/hour in the airport, is it worth it for the speed jump?

      makes me think of going from a P-166 to a P-200.....

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    4. Re:kinda silly by Zocalo · · Score: 1
      makes me think of going from a P-166 to a P-200.....

      Actually, it's more like going from a PIII/600 to a modern P4/2GHz. I dunno about you, but I wouldn't like to try playing Quake III on a PIII/600 era PC.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    5. Re:kinda silly by GMontag · · Score: 4, Funny

      We have few traditions on SlashDot and you are stepping on the most sacred.

    6. Re:kinda silly by mirko · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't like to try playing Quake III on a PIII/600 era PC

      This was OK on my P3/600 laptop, in 1024x768 res.

      Now 11kmh is not especially a bus speed but would let one cross Paris in exactly one hour (Paris is 10~11km wide), a little more than now, using the metro.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    7. Re:kinda silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now 11kmh is not especially a bus speed
      No ... bus speeds are more like 533MHz or 800MHz.
    8. Re:kinda silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a Nerd : Nobody wants to have any social interaction with you.

      You should get out more, preferably on your feet.

      Once you'll get open-minded, sun-tanned, and preferably funnier-haha than funny-pecular, we'll talk about some real things, nothing to do with computer or chemical caffeine-shite you buy on ThinkGeek.

    9. Re:kinda silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? I played Q3 just fine on the Celeron 450 and voodoo2 that I had when it came out...

    10. Re:kinda silly by tinguru · · Score: 1
      don't we already have these?

      The Fine Article

      Two TRRs in sequence could be used over a distance of one kilometre - on the Champs-Elysees or at Roissy-Charles de Gaulle airport for example, Mr Cote says.

      "The real problem nowadays is how to move crowds; they can travel fast over long distances with the TGV (high-speed train) or airplanes, but not over short distances (under 1km)," he says.

      You can travel from Le Mans to Paris in 50 mins, he points out, but crossing Montparnasse Station may take you 20 minutes.

      Conclusion No, we do not have this. I fail to see the sillyness.

  5. Escalators were scary enough as a kid. by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine getting a pants leg caught in one of these people gobblers.

    1. Re:Escalators were scary enough as a kid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn, I read that as "golden goblers" and was like what does that mean?
      Hm, spose thats what happens when the only job avail was at a helpdesk...

    2. Re:Escalators were scary enough as a kid. by Conspir8or · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Jaaaaane! Stop this crazy thing!!"

    3. Re:Escalators were scary enough as a kid. by mdielmann · · Score: 4, Funny

      Long dresses are going to make a comeback in european pr0n. I keep getting a vision of Benny Hill doing a skit where the real action starts when the lady hits the deceleration point.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    4. Re:Escalators were scary enough as a kid. by delphi125 · · Score: 1

      Someone who had a job repairing escalators told me of a poor asian woman he had to rescue: she was wearing a sari, a corner got caught, she got 'unwrapped'....

    5. Re:Escalators were scary enough as a kid. by mink · · Score: 1

      You should ask him about the Scotsman.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  6. Transition by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As mentioned in the article, the most difficult issue is the transition from moving on the walkway and moving on stationary ground.

    It seems to me the best solution to this is to have "lanes" in the walkway. The far left lane would move at the maximum speed, whereas successive lanes to the right would be decelerated. When exits were reached, you could easily step to the right to get to a lower speed; the transition between 9km/h and 6km/h is still a transition, but its less than 9km/h to 0km/h.

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
    1. Re:Transition by x0n · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yep, it's all very clinical and precise until you bring alcohol into the equasion.

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    2. Re:Transition by KingJoshi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like a nice idea, but people hold on to handrails. You need to have some type of handrails overhead that's short enough for everyone but not too short to be inconvenient for tall people.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    3. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just have poles every metre? people can hold onto the poles, but they're not continuous, so you could move between lanes.

    4. Re:Transition by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dont know; in my personal experience with these devices (in their slower, American and Australian forms), I've rarely seen people hold the railing. Most often, they're holding their bags, walking, or reading, etc.

      Obviously, I'm not suggesting no one uses the railing. But the people who need the railing (i.e. the elderly, the poorly balanced) might not be well advised to use such a device as this.

      Alternately: put hanging handles a la the subway system. They'd be adjustable (i.e. you could raise/lower them) with one hand, and then you'd avoid the need for a railing.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    5. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, but what happens when you reach the end?

    6. Re:Transition by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem would be where would the poles *go* when you reached the end of the strip. If they just went around like on a conveyor belt, someone would get themselves pinned between the pole and the floor either out of malice (if it didn't slice through the person, the belt would jam or break) or sheer stupidity.

      If the belt ran around a deeper area, I could see an "internal" belt, carefully timed and placed so that the poles sank down at the end of the track, where the internal belt just held the poles and the external one had holes for the poles to stick through.

      So many holes and poles... Freud would be shocked.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    7. Re:Transition by tfischer · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>It seems to me the best solution to this is to have "lanes" in the walkway.

      In fact, this is exactly what they have in Paris. The high-speed travelator was put in between two other standard moving walkways. One of the standard walkways goes in the opposite direction, and the other lets you move along at 3km/h. So pedestrians do have a choice between the 9km/h lane, the 3km/h lane, or the "old fashioned" 0km/h walkway.

      The only thing I don't like about the highspeed walkway is the fact that it is only running during the workday, Mon-Fri. There were enough people who were falling on it that they had to employ people to stand at both ends of the thing to make sure that users don't hurt themselves...

      tom

    8. Re:Transition by xA40D · · Score: 2, Funny

      The far left lane would move at the maximum speed, whereas successive lanes to the right would be decelerated.

      No, a better way would the to have the lanes getting faster as you move right. Just as driving on the left is superior, more logical, etc., etc.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    9. Re:Transition by putaro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not quite. The idea would be to have the lanes running at different speed alongside each other (without handrails in between and no gaps) and be able to SWITCH lanes to speed up. This was the system that Heinlein laid out in The Roads Must Roll. The system for accelerating used looks like a clever solution, though. I'm not sure how practical it would be to switch lanes in reality.

    10. Re:Transition by marcus-e · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one thinking of the old 8-bit game Shockway Rider right now?

    11. Re:Transition by lfourrier · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Already done, already in Paris, during 1900 universal exposition: a two lanes, two speeds walkway
      http://gallica.bnf.fr/scripts/Consultatio nTout.exe ?O=03300029&E=50

    12. Re:Transition by Sidoine · · Score: 1

      There is not a transition from 0 to 9 km/h, it would be too dangerous. The walkway accelerates, it is why you must not move and keep the feet on the ground.

    13. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      An easier way to do this woul be to do what they've done recently in Japan to solve this issue. They've got sliding panels as the tread that propels you. Toward the beginning and the end, the panels slide over each other, which slows down the railway. This is because each section of the railway lets a certain number of these sliding panels through per minute, but as they panels lap over each other, the speed needed to let the same number of panels through decreases. This is probably tricky to visualize.

      In the middle of the runway, the panels look like this (different numbers to indicate the different individual panels)

      11111111111________22222222222________33333333333
      ________22222222222________33333333333________4444 4444444

      (sorry about the multiple _s...I've never had to try and find an alternative for on /. before)
      At the ends, they slide together like this:

      111111111112222222222233333333333
      222222222223333333333344444444444

      So that even though the speed slows down, the panels don't squish each other, breaking the machine. I saw it on TV, and the dude was just whipping along the corridor. If they combined this system at a higher pace with the roller system they've got in France, they could probably take the speed up a fair bit.

    14. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alternative for   is what I was going to say, but then I forgot to check to see if /. would swallow it.

      By the way, the 111222333444 drawings are supposed to be from a side view. And there's a much more gentle angle on the real thing, so that your foot wouldn't get squashed (as easily).

    15. Re:Transition by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

      IIRC, this idea was in the aforementioned Asmiov tales.

    16. Re:Transition by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Well, if the existing travelator were to become the "slow lane" in a Heinlein Road, that would still work. The initial accelerating lead-in would get you up to 9Km/h, then stroll sideways to a faster strip.

    17. Re:Transition by insin · · Score: 1

      No, you're not - that's exactly what I was thinking of when I read the parent post :-)

      I wonder if they provide you with bags of bricks to throw at your fellow travellers in Paris?

    18. Re:Transition by jamesangel · · Score: 1

      It was very funny when they started using the thing, they had to have teams of people teaching how to use it...

    19. Re:Transition by DeusExLibris · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It seems to me that a better solution would be to have rotating disks at transistion points along the route. This way people could step onto the outer edge of the disk (where the outer angular velocity equals the linear velocity of the belt). They could walk into the center (where the angular velocity is much lower) and then step off into the center hole.

      Of course, the problem with this is that the disk would need to be enormously large to make the centripetal force reasonable.

      A quick calculation shows that acceleration on the outer edge of a 1000m radius disk that has a angular velocity of 100km/hr is ~130m/s^2. Unfortunately, that is ~13g! To get that down to manageable forces, the disk would need to be at least 10K m in radius (13m/s^2 or ~1.4g).

      Since this is just a back of the envelope type of calculation anyway, pehaps someone has a better idea of reducing the forces?

    20. Re:Transition by DeusExLibris · · Score: 1

      Another thought - perhaps instead of a disk, use a rotating bowl. Then the centripetal force would act to press you to the side (i.e., keep your feet on the floor) as you walk down the side of the bowl. This is kind of like those amusement park rides where they get you spinng fast and then drop the floor out from beneath you.

    21. Re:Transition by sgups · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is all well and good but don't most people in airports and stations have some sort of luggage as well. Those could accound for most of the accidents.

      --
      Democratic USA - Government of the corporations, by the Corporations, for the corporations.
    22. Re:Transition by vrt3 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the way it's described in one of Asimov's books? (Or an SF novel by another author, I'm not sure, it's been a long time since I read it).

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
    23. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeating someone's ideas without credit is a well known path to karma.

    24. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The term you need is tangential velocity, not angular velocity

      Yes, I'll probably die from being pedantic.

    25. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Alternately: put hanging handles a la the subway system. They'd be adjustable (i.e. you could raise/lower them) with one hand, and then you'd avoid the need for a railing."

      And just how would these hanging handles move? Why not install seats too. And walls. And put them underground, and call them "Subways". I think I'm on to something.

    26. Re:Transition by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

      I thought that too, but you'd also need them at the end, otherwise you're still at 9kph when you run out of walkway. My preference was for the Arthur C. Clarke version which, by the magic of writing, had no moving parts but could still whisk you along (I think liquid crystals were mentioned but its been a very long time since I read it). It may have been in 'Against the Fall of Night'

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    27. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not make in-horizontal-plane-O loops of belt, rather than vertical ones? Sure, if they had width(and they would), you'd have to overlap panels or something to turn corners, but since you'll probably want 2-way travel anwyay..

      i.e. (¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦) rather than o=====o

    28. Re:Transition by ogre2112 · · Score: 1

      Dude, I am SO running down this thing backwards!

      (Chugs another beer)

    29. Re:Transition by Echemus · · Score: 1

      This was how Asimov described them in Caves of Steel. Additionally, his city was based on a strict class structure, which if you were of a certain level and higher, you were allowed to sit in the seating on the central express "strip" (as he called them).

    30. Re:Transition by chewie371 · · Score: 1

      The problem with your calculations is that, though linear speed would decrease as one moved towards the center of the ring, the angular velocity would be the same, and the centripital force (M * V^2 / R) would increase as the person moved towards the center of the disc. So using any sort of rotating mechanism would be quite difficult.

    31. Re:Transition by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      "And just how would these hanging handles move? Why not install seats too. And walls. And put them underground, and call them "Subways". I think I'm on to something."

      THe handles would move, suspended from the ceiling, by a corresponding track. Duh.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    32. Re:Transition by grim_foiled · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what they've done with the Montparnasse trottoir. I go through the Montparnasse station every day, but never during the hours that it's open for trials. I've used it maybe twice on the last eighteen months.

      The flat french voice admonishing "Keep your feet flat! Keep your feet flat! Keep your feet flat! Keep your feet flat!" is truly annoying. I like to imagine the voice getting more and more hysterical and insistant as the speed increases.

    33. Re:Transition by kavau · · Score: 1
      Yep, it's all very clinical and precise until you bring alcohol into the equasion.

      This is true for most modes of transportation. Of course it's not foolproof, and severe accidents are bound to happen, but once people get used to these things, I bet they are much safer than cars. One good point is, foolish or drunk people are more likely to injure themselves than to injure innocent bystanders (unlike with cars).

    34. Re:Transition by bogado · · Score: 1

      Unless you're in england. :-)

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    35. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've never been there myself, but according to the article posted, the acceleration section in the France version uses a moving belt of rollers, which then slides the user across a narrow belt separating it from the high-speed rubber band section.

      The sliding panels in the version I talked about don't require you to keep your feet flat, because the piece of metal at you're standing on accelerates, not a bunch of little rollers gradually going faster, which would require you to keep maximum contact with them.

      Maybe instead of just going to a high speed rubber-band section in France, they could run the accelerator to get you up to a certain speed, and then step from the rubber band area onto something like what's being used in Japan, making you go even faster.

    36. Re:Transition by smithmc · · Score: 1

      It seems to me the best solution to this is to have "lanes" in the walkway. The far left lane would move at the maximum speed, whereas successive lanes to the right would be decelerated.

      You non-British-sensitive clod!

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    37. Re:Transition by DavidTC · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You need to make sure that, whatever you do, you jam both of them at once if one of them jams.

      It seems stupid that someone jamming the handles should jam the walkway, but once I was going down an escalator, casually leaning on the rail to look at some store, and some idiotic kids at the top of the escalator stuck something in the railing (whcih for some reason was partially open) and made the handhold jump track. So suddenly I was leaning on something that had stopped moving...and my feet kept going, and I quickly landed on my ass on the step above me. Luckily it was the down escalator, if it had been the up escalator, I would have 'landed on my ass on the step below me', which of course doesn't actually work and results in people rolling down the stairs.

      Trust me, it's much better for the whole thing to shudder and stop than half of it to do so, as people can easily be equally attached to the floor and any handles. Especially with loops from the ceiling...you could end up trying to pull someone's arm off!

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    38. Re:Transition by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Why not make in-horizontal-plane-O loops of belt, rather than vertical ones? Sure, if they had width(and they would), you'd have to overlap panels or something to turn corners, but since you'll probably want 2-way travel anwyay..

      This seems to be exactly what they did in Paris, 100 years ago. Notice the poles. Notice the circular sections in the walkway. Those circular sections allow horizontal rotations at the endpoints (just think how some types of baggage claim conveyor belts at airports work)

    39. Re:Transition by Syre · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your "lanes" idea is a good one.

      Also an old one.

      This exact method of transportation is found in the Isaac Asimov novel "Caves of Steel", published in 1954.

      In that book (if memory serves me correctly), the fast lanes go at highway speed and have limited access on and off points.

    40. Re:Transition by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      I see.. Kinda like a highspeed ski lift but with platforms.

      The real question I suppose, is what is between the platforms? Do you have gates or guards to prevent falling into the hole?

      --
      Rod Taylor
    41. Re:Transition by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Silly me, I should have thought of that ;)

      The problem here wouldn't be corners, but intersections, though (with normal conveyor belt style design, You would just have to get off and walk across the intersection). Maybe some kind of large spinning disc at the intersection which could touch all the "roads". If you always had roads travelling in one way or another (say counter clockwise, at least in the US) then the disc could rotate in the opposite direction and you could step onto the disc in the same direction you were going before.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    42. Re:Transition by youBastrd · · Score: 1

      Make sure the handles are going at the same speed as the track, though.

      "This is the longest jump ever! Weeee!"

      --
      No one has ever fired for blaming Microsoft.
    43. Re:Transition by spaceport · · Score: 1

      Alternately: put hanging handles a la the subway system.

      Obviously the standard issue railing can't accelerate properly, but this 'handles' idea carries a lot of merit. This idea is basically already used in high speed chair lifts on ski hills, and seems perfectly adaptable to this use.

      Basically, a cable runs the length of the high speed section, during which the handle (or chair) is clamped on. At the ends, a mechanism unclamps the handle (or chair) and runs it through an acceleration/deceleration phase before going round the end at a laughably slow speed.

      Of course, people will get hurt, fall, injured, etc. But have you ever seen a ski hill? Even on high speed lifts where the boarding/alighting is significantly slower, there are still myriads of people that fall on their faces in shame.

      Having said all this, though, I think that this device, even in its current form, is really, really cool. I think I might have to get me one!

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for subtlety. Isaac Asimov
    44. Re:Transition by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      The strip doesn't have an end, it just makes a U-turn on the surface like a luggage mover. This would also provide the return road. The poles would just turn right along with the belt (or separate plates riding on the belt).

      This would also solve the potential synchronization problem of two belts as noted above.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    45. Re:Transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The platforms are kind of slanted, so that the gaps are actually just areas where the platform is at a lower height. Instead of fitting together in S-shape like the #s I had to use, the platforms are flat, sliding over one another. You don't need to worry about falling into pits or anything, because when the platforms slide over each other, they would slide together under your shoes.

  7. Yeah. by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one who would be embarrassed to use this simply by virtue of its name?

    "How are you getting there?"
    "Oh, I'm taking the travelator."
    "...."

    1. Re:Yeah. by radish · · Score: 1

      I thought they were always called that? That's what I've always called them anyway (the regular speed ones that is).

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Yeah. by jedinite · · Score: 1

      The real question is, what happens if the Burninator attacks the travelator?

      Oh, the humanity....

      --

      ---------
      There is no try at jedinite.com
    3. Re:Yeah. by _Quinn · · Score: 1

      I thought everybody called them slidewalks.

      - _Quinn

      --
      Reality Maintenance Group, Silver City Construction Co., Ltd.
    4. Re:Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't there a "high-velocity travelator" in some of the old Marvin the Martian cartoons?

  8. Very Neat by squaretorus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read this this morning on the BBC and immediately booked a weekend in Paris for myself and my beloved - hey its summer, the flights were under 200 sterling return and I cant wait to see her fall on her arse as we get on this thing!

    I'm just hoping they dont stop you taking skateboards onto this thing!

    1. Re:Very Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      £200 return to Paris? If you're flying from the U.K (Which admitedly, you may not be, by then why quote in £?) try EasyJet, or just take the Eurostar. It'll cost less.

    2. Re:Very Neat by radish · · Score: 1

      Crikey - £200? Seems a bit steep. I rarely pay more than £50pp return for anywhere in europe, usually less.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Very Neat by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      Your lucky enough not to live in Scotland then! You southerners and your cheap flights!!! Dont get me started!!!!!

    4. Re:Very Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      £200 return?? Take the train for less than £60 return!

    5. Re:Very Neat by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Fly RyanAir out of Prestwick, it's pretty cheap.

      Doesn't get you to Paris though, you have a 1h30 bus ride from Beauvais when you arrive.

      Come to think of it from most places in Scotland you've probably got up to 5 hours to get to Prestiwick.

      Maybe a good idea to move somewhere civilised. How about Paris?

      (Or, like me, Champigny sur Marne, twinned with lovely Musselburgh).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    6. Re:Very Neat by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      I cant wait to see her fall on her arse as we get on this thing!
      that's going to be the thing that keeps these from becoming a reality.
      Everybody who falls down is going to want to sue somebody.
      I don't know about you but when my old man taught me to ride a bike and I fell down,
      I didn't sue him for mental anguish. /people suck

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  9. Motorway speeds? by gclef · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It's unlikely you'll ever reach motoway speeds: wind resistance against a moving person at that speed will cause lots of problems (translation: you'll be on your butt somewhere around 40km/h). Also, it should be noted that the "bus speed" they list in the article is 9km/h. That's not exactly speedy by open road standards, but is probably pretty fast by congested downtown standards.

    1. Re:Motorway speeds? by Bazman · · Score: 1

      Wind resistance? Simple solution, just make sure everyone lies down...

      Baz

    2. Re:Motorway speeds? by thasmudyan · · Score: 1, Redundant

      About wind resistance: you could construct a tube around the travelator and then blow wind through it at the speed of the trottoir. Yeah, that might work.

      But think about the possibilities for gruesome injuries! Naa, this whole travelator concept only goes so far...

      I think I'll wait for my magnetic/antigrav boots, undulating floors, or at least small transportation capsules that go around through pipes. Maybe we should just redesign cities to accomodate more people more elegantly, that would be a start!

    3. Re:Motorway speeds? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who doesn't have trouble standing up in a 25 mph headwind? It seems to me that the only problems at such speeds could be countered with hairspray.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    4. Re:Motorway speeds? by floydigus · · Score: 1

      9kmh = 5.625mph. A slow jog.

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

    5. Re:Motorway speeds? by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

      >It's unlikely you'll ever reach motoway speeds

      Have you never been on the M25?

      (London orbital ringroad for non-UK readers. Commonly referred to as the biggest car park in the South East)

      .

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    6. Re:Motorway speeds? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Funny
      Better yet, let's put in seats for people to sit on. And then we could put groups of seats together on a fixed platform. At that point you don't need all the surface area, so you can propel the platforms from the edges.

      Here's the really cool (and tricky) part: then you put the motors inside the platforms themselves. Then you don't need miles long rubber belts that can wear out. Just replace them with concrete floors. And to keep people from falling out, add walls. If you add a roof, you can operate them outside, even when it's raining! And for more capacity (to make up for having the seats in the first place), you can use more than one platform stacked together.

      I think it would look something like this.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    7. Re:Motorway speeds? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      You don't need to blow air, people moving along would quite naturally pull air along with them. Especially if you made the tube the belt was in smooth. (Which you want to do anyway, as having doorknobs and stuff sticking out is a good way to clip someone in the stomach.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  10. Cool by spoonist · · Score: 2, Funny

    What an accomplishment!

    Did they smash a bottle of cheap Champagne over it to dedicate it?

    1. Re:Cool by AndyRooney · · Score: 0

      Well, like the old saying goes: "Non d'Oh! Ma odeur de pantalon aiment des Cheetos®"

  11. Mmm.. lawsuits.. by walmass · · Score: 5, Funny

    US personal injury lawyers are already lobbying to bring this to the USA.

    1. Re:Mmm.. lawsuits.. by homebru · · Score: 1

      A low-speed version of this was installed at the old Dallas airport (Love Field) when the third terminal was opened in the late 50's. Three endless loop belts carried people and their carry-on baggage from the lobby to the three boarding areas which _seemed_ to be a quarter-mile away. Or farther, if you actually had to carry your own bags.

      A few people may have gotten hurt in accidents over the years, but I don't remember ever seeing a report of major incident in the newspapers.

      Obviously the lowest-common-denominator are able to adopt new technology; slidewalks, automobiles, Slashdot.

    2. Re:Mmm.. lawsuits.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a side note, I think it won't be very long until many states start to put a cap on non economic damages from such lawsuits. It's already happening for medical malpractice, for the simple reason that insurance rates are getting ridiculous.

  12. Read The Article by EnglishTim · · Score: 2, Informative

    This one goes about three to four times as fast as a normal one does. It has acceleration and decelleration zones at the beginning and end, as it would be far too fast to get on otherwise.

  13. The problem is for distances _under_ 1 km ?! by itsme1234 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ----
    "The real problem nowadays is how to move crowds; they can travel fast over long distances with the TGV (high-speed train) or airplanes, but not over short distances (under 1km)," he says.
    ---

    How about good ol' walking ?!

    1. Re:The problem is for distances _under_ 1 km ?! by trikberg · · Score: 1

      How about good ol' walking ?!

      The operative word was "fast". Walking speed is 5-6 km/h tops. In a crowded area such as a train station carrying luggage probably closer to 3-4 km/h. The current high speed travelators go at 9, and you can walk on them for a total of something like 12-15 km/h, a significant increase.

      --
      This post is free (as in cheese in a mousetrap).
    2. Re:The problem is for distances _under_ 1 km ?! by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

      Actually: "Top speed: 11 km/h". How about a bigger tunnel/sidewalk ?

    3. Re:The problem is for distances _under_ 1 km ?! by Frogking · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about good ol' walking ?!

      Well, have you ever been in a public space with a large group of people? As simple as the concept is, many people can't seem to understand that there is a reason people go to airports, etc... they are trying to get somewhere! However, throw in a few shutter-bugs taking pictures of everything, or social butterflies that have to stop and talk to every third person they see, and you've got one large fleshy traffic jam. If I could bypass all of the slow, stupid and otherwise unmotivated people by stepping onto a rolling sidewalk, I'm there! At least there would be a minimum speed. Of course, I'd be one of the people still trying to speed-walk while on the thing, but even when stuck behind someone I'd still be moving.

      Of course, I can see this invention starting a whole new type of road rage... perhaps I should go to France and try it out before they make laws against bumping someone out of the way "by accident."

    4. Re:The problem is for distances _under_ 1 km ?! by hplasm · · Score: 2, Funny
      How about a giant catapult? *ping!*

      thud.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    5. Re:The problem is for distances _under_ 1 km ?! by andrewmc · · Score: 1

      As much as I agree that people in general should walk lots more, it's also incredibly frustrating to be stuck behind slow people in a crowd after getting off a plane on the long walk to the main terminal. At least this guarantees a good minimum speed.

  14. Motorway speeds? by snipingkills · · Score: 1

    Where does it mention motorway speeds? It mentions that the second stage moves up to 9km/h and that it will probably be used mostly for distances of less than 1km.

  15. Strip running by F4Codec · · Score: 4, Funny
    So when can we see the first (Asimov) strip runners.

    Say, whats the bandwidth of one of these if you can stack boxes of DVD-RW on one end and take them off the other.

    Julian.

    1. Re:Strip running by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

      So ... let's see: you can fit 100 DVDs (that's 470 G, maybe more double sided) inside a

      0.12 m x 0.12 m x 0.15 m space.
      Let's say your strip is 4m wide and the height for the pile of DVDs is 3 m.
      We have (3.055m/s=11 km/h):

      (3.055*4*3*470)/(0.12*0.12*0.15) Gbyte/s

      7.98 * 10^6 Gbyte / s !!!

    2. Re:Strip running by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and sorry - I don't know how many LOC or WV bugs is this.

    3. Re:Strip running by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody knows that the penis has a higher bandwidth than a cable modem... so why boxes of DVD-RW's? How about boxes of used porn mags?

      ewww

  16. Coming Autumn 2003 by dewie · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's been sent back through time on a mission: to move between different locations!

    Arnold Schwarzenegger is... "The Travelator".

    --
    Jurisprudence Fetishist Gets Off On A Technicality --theonion.com
    1. Re:Coming Autumn 2003 by DiggiLooDiggiLey · · Score: 1

      JA, I have been designated to trAHvelate you!
      [afterwards]:
      You've been trAHvelated. I'll be back.

    2. Re:Coming Autumn 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in it, he also has to leave family behind.

      "Don't worry honey" [looks at camera] "I'll be back"

  17. Damnable Life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This sounds even better than my idea of having wheels for feet.

    Curses!

  18. Will it be like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... in Futurama - where if they malfunction or you don't know how to get off them properly - you get spatted against the nearest wall???

    Pfft... tourist.
    1. Re:Will it be like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Will it be like... by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

      No...you're thinking of the travel tubes...

      That would be REALLY cool :-)

  19. A Segway for this sidewalk?... by jkrise · · Score: 2, Funny

    And what about moving WiFi hotspots?

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:A Segway for this sidewalk?... by ttj · · Score: 1
      And what about moving WiFi hotspots?

      That actually happened a while ago with the "war car".

  20. Could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tavelator is better than "The moving faster than walking speed while walking at normal speed device" (name brought to you by Leonard da Quirm)

  21. Timeline by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Today: The introduction of the travelator eliminates the need for walking.

    10 years: Our legs become strange, archaic appendages that surgeons will handily remove for a small fee.

    100 years: Our brains float around in little hovering domes.

    I want a cobalt blue dome.

    1. Re:Timeline by Oliver_Etchebarne · · Score: 1

      "Daddy, daddy! Can you tell me how was before, when you had to stand up to turn the TV on?"

      Some 'new technology' makes us useless... "If you don't use it, it rots".

      And then, someone come in and says a human being wired to a computer to do everything a human being must do is a sci-fi tale...

      --
      drmad
    2. Re:Timeline by KingJoshi · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're a slashdotter (like me), so you may have forgotten this activity that many humans find pleasurable. It's called sex. :p

      Sure, 100 years from now, they might be able to replicate the chemical feel of sex, but damn, I doubt people would be willing. Sure, I never had sex, but damn, I hear it's great! :D

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    3. Re:Timeline by DesertFalcon · · Score: 1

      As long as we continue to have sex, womens' legs will never be unneeded appendages.

      --
      --- 11 meters/second, or 24 miles per hour - the airspeed velocity of an unladen European swallow. Really.
  22. This travelator is a lot of fun by James+Durie · · Score: 5, Informative

    I went Paris for the weekend in March and we went through Montparnasse one day and went on this travelator.

    They have guys watching to stop certain people getting on, I have heard they have had to pay out for injuries to some people.

    First it accelerates you to 9kph then it is exactly like a normal travelator only much faster.

    I loved it.

    The only problems are the acceleration and deceleration phases. It's very bumpy. You have to hold on to the rail. If they can fix those aspects these things will start appearing in airports everywhere.

    1. Re:This travelator is a lot of fun by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

      How are the acceleration and deceleration phases done technically? Since it's a conveyor belt, they can't just slow down the whole thing once you move towards the end (as it would slow everybody down).

      I see two possibilities:
      1. At the end of the 9kph belt, there is a 6kph, and then a 3kph belt, and people have to jump from belt to belt
      2. The platforms that everybody stands on are collapsible: To speed up, they grow longer, and to speed down, the become shorter again.

      Could you enlighten us in this aspect? Thanks!

    2. Re:This travelator is a lot of fun by orebokech · · Score: 1

      There are acceleration and deceleration zones at the beginning and end of the travelator, and the transition is very tricky at first: you have to keep both feet on the ground and NOT try to walk from one zone to the other, otherwise you're 100% sure to fall down. They had some serious trouble during the first days, people kept trying to walk in those zones and there were a fair number of broken legs and waistbones...

    3. Re:This travelator is a lot of fun by Matheo · · Score: 1

      I also tried it back in May and it's very fun. Specially the feeling you get in your legs just after.... groovy !

      --
      Why me ?
    4. Re:This travelator is a lot of fun by fruey · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have also been on this travelator

      The accel/decel zones are like a number of ballbearings or something, which are rotating at gradually increasing speeds. This is why you need to keep both feet on the ground, because otherwise you could end up falling over.

      It's a configuration a bit like this:
      xoxoxoxox
      oxoxoxoxo
      xoxoxoxox
      oxoxoxoxo

      where the o's are cylinders and xs are gaps... they gradually accelerate you and then you sort of step onto the travelator moving at 9kph and the reverse happens at the other end. I can see why people fall over. There are notices and announcements everywhere "keep both feet on the floor" and "be careful" and "hold the rail, especially during accel/decel" but the researchers forget ...

      1. Announcements are so poorly used throughout public transport infrastructures that people don't listen to them,
      2. People think they are so clever that they need not heed the announcements, like they can defy acceleration forces and gravity
      3. Old people don't think the "if you are old or have a lot of luggage, please use the regular travelator" applies to them
      4. It's really for regulars, not for tourists, because tourists have loads of baggage and always block the travelator - already they don't read the "stand on the right" signs and stick themselves in the middle of the regular travelators
      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    5. Re:This travelator is a lot of fun by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

      I didn't understood you perfectly. Is your configuration a pic from the top or from the side? If there are gaps, how deep are they? Does it work for small children, people with bare feed or women with high heels stillettos? Does this mean that the thing you are standing on changes its form or how is it done?

      Thanks!

    6. Re:This travelator is a lot of fun by fruey · · Score: 1
      If you look at the flash animation on the article from the BBC site you get a better idea of how it works.

      The view I gave is from the top, and you must stand with both feet on the ground and gripping the rail, because if you had high heels or something it could be a bit dangerous. Barefoot is inconceivable in the Paris metro anyway, unless you have no money for shoes you wouldn't consider it :)

      Small children might not be big enough to grip the rail, but I don't know about how pushchairs would work on the system... although wheeling luggage on isn't too bad, as long as you're not too burdened by it.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  23. Many points of failure? by Savant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would seem to me that the sheer number of moving parts in a kilometre or so of walkway must make the chances of frequent failures pretty high compared to other public transport methods. How fault-tolerant is it? Any French Slashdotters able to answer?

    Would be interesting to see some schematics.

    1. Re:Many points of failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit to being French?!!!

      On Slashdot?!!!

    2. Re:Many points of failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it seems that there's an escalator out of service in virtually every train station, conveyor belts are much simpler devices. Belt, rollers, motor.

      Conveyors that move a thousand tonnes per hour at high speed are quite common in the average mineral processing facility, and they're definitely one of the more reliable parts of such a plant.

  24. So offtopic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://static.hugi.is/video/fyndin/dctf-1.wmv

    Holy crap.

  25. nightfall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't it soemthing similar in Clarke's Nightfall? Something about similar sidewalks that moved at different speeds in different sections...

    1. Re:nightfall? by ddimas · · Score: 1

      Asimov wrote Nightfall.

    2. Re:nightfall? by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

      Clarke wrote 'Against the Fall of Night' which had something similar.

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
  26. it's mechanical.. by way2trivial · · Score: 5, Interesting
    it's a poor solution..
    better would be organic, something like stomach cillia, where the floor doesn't move the length of the journey, but little tiny bits from in place do- not my idea, something I read once.

    the individual elements take turns dropping, moving a tiny bit, pushing up again, and moving you a tiny bit... done repeatedly= ya move down the floor- which doesn't move.

    less to break down, and spilled drinks and food (as long as they aren't too hot) are actually welcome...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:it's mechanical.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      better would be organic, something like stomach cillia, where the floor doesn't move the length of the journey, but little tiny bits from in place do- not my idea, something I read once.

      the individual elements take turns dropping, moving a tiny bit, pushing up again, and moving you a tiny bit... done repeatedly= ya move down the floor- which doesn't move.

      We have that. It's called the sea. What you just described is known, in areas where the sea is generally warm enough, as "surfing".
    2. Re:it's mechanical.. by lorcan · · Score: 1

      You probably read it in a book by Arthur C Clarke. I don't quite recall the name I think it's something like "Visions" or "Visions for the future".

      His idea was inspired on the flow of a river. Near the margins the water moves very slowly, almost stopped. He defends something as organic, as you say, I believe the ideia was to have some sorte of magnetic compound like iron particles (I don't remember) sustained by a magnetic field.

    3. Re:it's mechanical.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that organic cilia, or mechanical cilia?

    4. Re:it's mechanical.. by billimad · · Score: 1, Informative

      material moves through the intestinal tract by peristalsis.

      #define - The wavelike muscular contractions of the alimentary canal or other tubular structures by which contents are forced onward toward the opening [dictionary.com].

      the cilia present a high surface area for maximum absorption.

      IANAD

    5. Re:it's mechanical.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither, its sillier!

    6. Re:it's mechanical.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "better would be organic, something like stomach cillia[...]"

      "and spilled drinks and food (as long as they aren't too hot) are actually welcome... "

      Organic transportation? Stomach cilia? (Hint: stomachs don't have cilia. Perhaps you're thinking of lungs.) Spilled food and drink welcome? Why exactly would they be welcome? To feed the stomach cilia?

      What the hell are you smoking? I want some.

    7. Re:it's mechanical.. by kavau · · Score: 1
      better would be organic, something like stomach cillia

      And what will keep those Seelea thingies from munching away at my feet???

      Laugh. It's a joke.

    8. Re:it's mechanical.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peristalsis. Now there's a scary thought!
      Ian

    9. Re:it's mechanical.. by Chuk · · Score: 1

      less to break down, and spilled drinks and food (as long as they aren't too hot) are actually welcome...

      No caffeine, though -- it makes the travelator hyper.

      --
      chuk
    10. Re:it's mechanical.. by tuber · · Score: 1

      Lungs don't have cilia, lungs have alveolae. If your going to be a know-it-all, try to know something first.

  27. I have been to the future... by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...And it's located in the tunnels beneath the Geneve airport. They've got a system like this there, but I'm not sure they run it at the same speed. At least I didn't think it was moving that fast when I used it. Quite fun, atually.
    I also use a similar thing in a local supermarket. All you'd have to do is crank up the speed on it to equal the Paris one, but then again, it's slighly elevated and I don't think people like being catapulted from the 2nd floor...

    Is this a reinvention of the wheel (Kakakaka! Transportation!) or did I miss something? Prolly the latter, so please releive me of my blissful ignorance.

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
  28. The sound of an American falling... by Duncan3 · · Score: 0

    I can see this coming to America and watching all the overweight people fail their DEX checks, run off to lawyers, and sue it into the ground, ruining it for the rest of us. If you can't do the run/hop to get on, or the hop/run to get off, then go for a walk, you obviously need one.

    Extending the hand rails a ways past the moving mat on either end makes the transitions VERY easy to do even for a total clutz. From the pic I can't tell if they knew that or not.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  29. People will adjust. by FTL · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I was at Toronto International airport last year and saw an Ethiopian woman and young child at the top of an escalator. They were clearly having problems. I took the hand of the child and helped her take "the big step". Presumably her first. She had no problems. Then I realised that I was helping the wrong person. The mother was now stranded at the top wondering what to do.

    Teavelators, escalators, revolving doors, they seem natural and intuitive to those who are used to them.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    1. Re:People will adjust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      saw an Ethiopian woman and young child at the top of an escalator. They were clearly having problems.

      If you thought they had problems there, you should have seen them at the food court!!!

    2. Re:People will adjust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well look at the bright side - you are now the proud owner of a brand new Ethiopian child.

  30. Expressways by ariehk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As an idea, these expressways are a fairly good way of transporting humans. They travel at constant speed, so there should be no obvious difference to the traveller, no matter what the speed is. Of course, in reailty we'd experience air resistence; try sticking your head out of the window on a car going at 70mph. but there may be some way of reducing this in enclosed tunnels, like blowing air at the same velocity as the floor is moving.

    In Asimov's vision (I think), the different-speed strips were parallel to each other, not serial like this French version. This meant that you's step to the side to go onto a faster strip, and keep going until you hit the fastest one, which could be several hundred miles an hour. As the differential in speed between the strip you are on and those near is never more than about 1mph, you won't do yourself any serious damage by falling over. see diagram:

    ---->---7mph->--
    ---->---8mph->--
    ---->---9mph->--
    etc.

    This structure makes them easier to 'network'. The only danger, I suppose, is if a strip breaks then the speed-differential between it and then next one could be massive.

    I suppose any serious implementation would use some kind of semiconductor thang to decrease friction, and on a wide scale could be very energy efficient. These things are probably more useful to society than a Segway, but you'd have to design a city around them from the ground up, so I doubt they'll change the way we live just yet.

    --
    These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined. -- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Expressways by F4Codec · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I think the higher speed ones in Asimovs' vision had seats too, for the long distance commute.

      Trouble is, I can't see how you get a handrail into these multiple strip senarios, so your chance of causing a pile up increases dramatically.

    2. Re:Expressways by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Funny

      ---->---7mph->--
      ---->---8mph->--
      ---->---9mph->--


      That won't work. You'll just get some stupid old lady in the fast lane, walking backwards at 2mph with her blinker on.

      ~Philly

    3. Re:Expressways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd need to have lanes that bump in pairs once in awhile. It means the handrails would end on one side and start on another.

      Let's say you have three parallel lanes. Lanes 1 and 2 are together, with some speed difference. There is a handrail at the outside. Meanwhile, lane 3 is alone with handrails on both sides.

      A bit down the line, lane 2 breaks away from lane 1. Lane 1 now has the double handrails, and one of lane 3's stops. Now lanes 2 and 3 are joined.

      You'd have to do some crafty planning to allow moves between lanes, since you can only have two together at once. Three together would leave a no-man's land in the middle with no handrails, and you really don't want that.

      In the event that you can't turn the lanes to move them laterally to make room for an added rail, then just have it stop and have another one at the same speed start up. You'd just have to move off to one side to keep going, or you'd smack into the approaching handrail.

    4. Re:Expressways by jridley · · Score: 2, Informative

      In **Heinlein**'s (not Asimov's) story, yes, they had seats, but heck, they also had DINERS on the long-haul tracks.

      Obviously, no hand rails, unless they can be attached to the track itself.

    5. Re:Expressways by Bertrum · · Score: 1

      Calm down. It is Heinlein AND Asimov See the Caves of Steel by Asimov. They are in there. It won't be the first time that two sci-fi writers use the same technology.

    6. Re:Expressways by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      The only danger, I suppose, is if a strip breaks then the speed-differential between it and then next one could be massive.

      Yep. That happened, too... The strikers shut down the 100mph road. Somebody stumbled from the shutdown 100mph road onto the 95mph road and got turned into roadkill.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  31. Not that hot by onthefenceman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I first read "already as fast as a bus" I envisioned this thing cranking along at 30mph, people hanging on for dear life with the wind blowing their hair back. 9 km/h is a decent jogging pace, so maybe they are referring to the average speed of a bus in Paris. I am unimpressed.

    Besides, in the first month they are going to have at least one old lady fall on the exit rollers with her gigantic suitcase and 40 other people will be force-fed into the melee to create a giant writhing heap.

    All it will take is one idiot and his lawyer to mess it up for everyone else.

    --
    Have you seen my stapler?
    1. Re:Not that hot by rogerz · · Score: 1

      All it will take is one idiot and his lawyer to mess it up for everyone else.

      IANAF (Frenchman), but my understanding is that the U.S.'s litigation insanity has not yet made it to the land of foie gras and wine-from-the-time-you're-able-to-walk. Note also that the French seem to have quite a bit of tolerance for the risk-reward tradeoffs inherent in technological change. For example, the Green's have been unable to make a dent in France's (quite rational) reliance on nuclear power (> 70% of electricity capacity). This is one of the (few) economic advantages that France has over the U.S.

      --
      If humans are mostly water, and beer is mostly water, then humans must be mostly beer.
    2. Re:Not that hot by baomike · · Score: 1

      The French are not as prone to lawsuits as we in the USA. They assume you will look out for yourself.

      I must admit I chickened out when I saw the thing.
      But people were riding it , and having no problems that I saw.

      Thought: Why be in a hurry when in Paris?

    3. Re:Not that hot by Greener · · Score: 1

      Maybe not but 9 km/h is still twice the average speed of a bus in Bangkok.

    4. Re:Not that hot by CreationLtd · · Score: 1
      in the first month they are going to have at least one old lady fall on the exit rollers with her gigantic suitcase and 40 other people will be force-fed into the melee to create a giant writhing heap.

      That's precisely what could/would happen with escalators. Old lady falls at bottom of escalator.... 40 people are force-fed into her ... creating giant writhing heap.

      Does that mean escalators are too dangerous or should be eliminated? Of course not.

      It is also quite possible to put in some form of automatic shutdown device that would bring the unit to a regular stop when the exit rollers are blocked by a fallen pedestrian. Cameras can be installed at the exits to prevent abuse of this device and to provide merriment to the travelator crews.

    5. Re:Not that hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Besides, in the first month they are going to have at least one old lady fall on the exit rollers
      They don't mention any dates in the article. IIRC, it was started a year ago, and stopped a few weeks later (or I would have found time to try it myself !). After some research, I found out it was started on July 2nd, 2002 (so rather precisely one year ago). The manufacturer's site says it should be officially approved by fall this year.
      Also to be noted, the walkway was going in one direction in the morning, and in the other in the evening.

    6. Re:Not that hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Besides, in the first month they are going to have at least one old lady fall on the exit rollers with her gigantic suitcase and 40 other people will be force-fed into the melee to create a giant writhing heap.

      hmm, how about one of these, a hot summer day and a nudist colony

  32. ObFrance joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Does it have an "emergency reverse" button, in case of invasion?

  33. And the earth moved beneath us by supersam · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a neat thing. I guess they're using it or have at least tried it out at a few other places around the world.

    I had read in a newspaper report some months back that authorities in Mumbai, India were planning to install this kind of 'travelator' to link two of the most important railway stations in Mumbai, Churchgate and CST. But I don't remember seeing any action on it since then.

    Btw, I would like to advise the travelator operators in Paris to hand out barf bags to people travelling on these contraptions. *heh*

    1. Re:And the earth moved beneath us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      had read in a newspaper report some months back that authorities in Mumbai, India were planning to install this kind of 'travelator' to link two of the most important railway stations in Mumbai, Churchgate and CST.

      How will the Indian version work? Will there be mannequins permanently mounted to the moving surface for the passengers to hang on?

  34. travelator for the brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Perhaps we should invent something that speeds up mentally lazy peoples brains, before we humour the physically lazy ones.

  35. Meet George Jetson by n1nj4k3n · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow! After I say goodbye to the wife Jane, my boy Elroy, daughter Jane, and pat Astro on the head, I can hop on one of these babies and start another productive day at Spacely Sprockets. Ain't the future grand?

    1. Re:Meet George Jetson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After I say goodbye to the wife Jane, ... , daughter Jane

      I think you've been watching the Kentucky version of the Jetsons. :-)

  36. Bah! They've done it before. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's not really a big innovations. The French did it 103 years ago, during the 1900 exhibiton. A rolling sidewalk was running along the exhibition and was whisking visitors at about 8 km/h. It was composed of two side-by-side rolling sidewalks one going at half the speed as the other.

    If you ask me, this was a much better design than the neck-breaking jallopy installed in Montparnasse Station...

    They also experimented some 30 years ago with one that was shaped like an integral sign; instead of a rubber plate, there were solid plates which slide sideways at the end, effectively yielding a slower speed but without the jarring hells-on-wheels acceleration.

    1. Re:Bah! They've done it before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep. And I live in Paris. In the last 6 months or so, I went to Montparnasse station about 10 time, and have _never_ seen the High Speed Travelator working (always closed because they were 'fixing' it).

      There have been a lot of stories in the newspaper about it. Basically, it doesn't work. A waste of money, specially considering the lack of escalators in most of Paris metro stations...

  37. I tried it by BigJim.fr · · Score: 3, Informative

    I live in Paris and tried it a while ago. It works like a charm. The acceleration and deceleration are surprisingly smooth provided you keep your feets on the ground. Then it is exactly like a normal conveyor mat. I like it and I see no drawbacks.

  38. Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they let me ride my Segway on it?

  39. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why can't people just be happy where they are?

  40. I can hear it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Jane! Arrêtez cette chose folle! Je me rends!"

  41. OK by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 1
    "But new users also appear every day, and a small proportion promptly fall and hurt themselves. "

    Ehem. This excludes the possibility of highway-speed travelators, now doesn't it?

  42. I've seen it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not _that_ fast, folks.

    The Montparnasse sidewalk was corded off when I visited it a few weeks ago.

    For we 'merkins who don't grok the metric system, it's going at about running speed. This won't blow your hair back or anything.

    -cmiller

  43. But tell me Mr Anderson..... by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

    what good is a trottoir roulant rapide.....if you are unable to talk...err walk.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  44. Slidewalks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An old sfnal name for these things was "slidewalks". Better name than travelator.

  45. Running into the back of other people by henrygb · · Score: 1

    This already happens on escalators when idiots with large bags forget to move away from the exit.

  46. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The RIAA today sued France, for having high-bandwidth moving sidewalks that "encourage piracy." France immediately surrendered.

  47. You can't do that in heels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do the little rollers in the acceleration
    section handle tiny points of women's high heels?

  48. Re:Jump in on by Becquerel · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if you've ever tried jumping on or off a moving car/bus/boat onto terra ferma or vica versa. But it's not all that hard once you've done it a couple of times. You just have to get it set in your mind that you have to go from standing still to running (or vica versa) without actually having to change your velocity (i.e. accelerate/decelerate).

    Of course this isn't particularly practical for the general public...but it would be fun to watch the brave take a running leap onto a belt moving at say 5ms^-1

    --
    My spelling isn't bad, I'm evolving the language
  49. How about... by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    How about we use this idea for certain roads where Point A and Point B are 400 miles away...

    Example:

    Drive your car onto Interstate 95 where a rubber coated ramp picks up the car. There would be 3 lanes... Left would be fastest, if you knew that you would be on the road for a while... Middle for those that don't need to go to far (one city to another)... Right is slowest for those who would be getting off soon and transferring onto an exit conveyor where the speed would gradually reduce to normal commuting speed (30 mph?). Obviously you would need a way to control the cars from speeding down these ramps and transferring between lanes, but this is a work in progress ;)

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
    1. Re:How about... by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      Nice idea, so instead of expanding the energy to propel a ton of metal you instead expand the energy to propel a ton of metal PLUS a huge slab of metal reinfored rubber.

      This idea been done in science fiction, they just left out the car. You walked on instead. And before you think it will be tiring to stand all the way once you are on the belt of youre choice it wouldn't matter if you sat down.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  50. is it a belt? (I can't tell from the picture) by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    there is no reason why one path couldn't move at differing speeds,

    belt a- acceleration, lots of long straight grooves, about 1/4" wide, 1/4" apart, (like the top of an escalator tread) moves at same old airport speeds.. about 50 ft long

    belt b- high speed, same width & groove, starts at the last 20 ft of belt A, interlaced.. slowly raises altitude until it is above the height of belt A, and takes you from low to high speed

    belt c- slowdown, same as A in reverse

    only restriction, folks can not be allowed to walk down belt B,AT ALL, keep the spacing so that when you hit the slowdown belt, you are re-packed at the same distance as entry.. just hold on in place, or they will be one hell of a dogpile at the transition end..

    for longer distances, you can have more gradients in the belts...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:is it a belt? (I can't tell from the picture) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not, it is small "balls" rolling at different speeds and it's... well... surprising at first.

      By the way, it's not really new. They had it run some time ago, but people complained about the lack of stability, so they stopped it and tried again. I think it's working since October.

    2. Re:is it a belt? (I can't tell from the picture) by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      there is a limit to the usefulness of this strategy because of failure rates/cost.

      the more belts/motors (i.e. components) you have, the more likely the system will fail, as in:

      (1/MTBF(A)) * (1/MTBF(B)) * (1/MTBF(C)) etc.

  51. Thousands each year are injured by conveyers : by 2TecTom · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0, 1299,DRMN_15_2087992,00.html

    As usual, some people just can't seem to get along. ;~)

    Personally, I think more could be done with this concept. If the center, fastest "strip" was a sit down type one, wouldn't this really be nothing more than a permanently available, perpetual people bus. Think about it, moving McDonalds, talk about fast food!

    As well, these conveyers could easily be constructed as subways. I can also see these being used at large exhibitions, galleries, parks and muesums.

    Other conveyers of note:

    Zizco, world's longest single flight horizontal curve conveyor
    (15.6 km)
    www.conveyor-dynamics.com/projects/popup/fs_z isco. htm

    Los Pelambres, world's largest downhill conveyor system
    (3 conveyors, 12.7 km, 1296 m drop, 8700 tph)
    www.conveyor-dynamics.com/projects/popup/fs_ lospel ambres.htm

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  52. Of course not! Re:Cool by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're not a bunch of cheapskates! They used the printer ink; naturally.

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  53. Or the Parisian way... by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Rollerblading! Yup, can't get away from the things there.

  54. Effect on sidewalk cafes? by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    One of the main hobbies of people in Paris is sitting in sidewalk cafes watching people go by. If this invention catches on, what will happen? Will people sit in the cafes and people will go wooshing by, or will the cafe also be on the moving part?

  55. Gladiators by mhifoe · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall they had a 'travelator' on Gladiators. A steep uphill travelator going the wrong way followed by a rope swing would certainly liven up a trip through the airport.

  56. You can walk but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    .. not during acceleration and deceleration zones !

    By the way once you are used to ir, you can even walk in those zones ;-)

    SLK

  57. MagLev by Becquerel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why don't they use something like a maglevel/chairlift. On which individual carriages are propelled (at any acceleration you like :-) down a track that doesn't have the limitation of being flat and straight.

    --
    My spelling isn't bad, I'm evolving the language
    1. Re:MagLev by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      Simple carriages require people to wait for the next carriage. If you ever been to an airport with this type of walkway, or indeed an escalator you will notice that it is a much smoother process then the operation of the mentioned skilifts at any resort.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  58. Heinlein, not Azimov by jridley · · Score: 2, Informative

    R. A. Heinlein, _The Roads Must Roll_
    And it was a 5 MPH difference between lanes. Every lane has to have separate motors, etc, so you don't want too many of them. 5 MPH is a brisk walk so it's not hard to move from one to the next.

    1. Re:Heinlein, not Azimov by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Can I smack you around for spelling Asimov like that?

      Or should I just turn around and misspell Hienlen? :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:Heinlein, not Azimov by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone get so uptight here? Yes, Asimov also used the same idea in a couple of his Robot books. In fact, when I read "The Roads Must Roll," my first thought was, hey, just like Asimov.

      I think Heinlein did it first, but who cares?

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  59. You've been reading slashdot too long... by atheken · · Score: 1

    when you know the link to the "recent innovations" is Ginger before you click it (and in fact ,I haven't clicked it yet, but I can only assume)

  60. Acceleration by UtilityFog · · Score: 1

    I've been on an amusement-park ride where you come down onto (or up thru) the center of a large rotating disc, and you walk at your own speed out to the edge, whose speed matches the constantly moving belt (in this case it was a chain of vehicles). It can be made arbitrarily easy to take by making the disc bigger.

  61. Vague recollection of another method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a dim memory of reading something by Arthur C Clarke (I think it was him). His suggestion was to use a material that stiffens vertically under the influence of a magnetic field but remains fluid in the horizontal direction. By suitably arranging the movement of the fields, you'd end up with a footway with a continuously variying speed from outside to inside. Much like the Asimov belts other have referred to, but without discrete transition zones. Sorry this is such a vague reference. Perhaps others can add better information.

  62. Travelator 3: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rise of the big asses.

  63. Wow, Travelator by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    No! I thought, uh, I thought I'd chauffeur myself this evening. Yes, that's what I thought. How difficult could it be? I'm sure the manual will indicate which lever is the velocitator and which the deceleratrix, hmm?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  64. Clothesline at 50mph! by GnoMoreGnuPuns · · Score: 1

    Betcha didn't see that coming!!

  65. You missed the fun stuff about TRR : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the acceleration !

    Usualy you do not have any kind if acceleration on such a conveyor. But there, you go faster and faster up to the cruse speed.... just crusin' ;-)

    SLK

  66. Metatopia by panurge · · Score: 1

    As a kid I read a book, written I think in the 1950s which I have never found again, called Metatopia. It was a kind of hybrid socialist/capitalist society and the author effectively predicted the internet, though an audio-only version based on telephones. (I am not making this up but, as I say, I've never seen it again or heard it referred to). Anyway, before this is marked off-topic by my personal stalker (are you having a good day?) the Metatopian transport system was based on small independent transport vehicles with, I think, overhead monorails. They couldn't overtake but the operating system ensured that the speed on any given section of track was some kind of average of what all the current travellers wanted - completely unrealisable with 50s technology but an interesting notion. What would be the people carrying efficiency of a flat version of a modern cablecar of the automatic type where the separation of the cars can vary with the traffic? It might be overkill for a short distance like the Montparnasse run (180M), but would it work on the level over a kilometre or so?

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  67. Slidewalks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not "travelators," dammit, SLIDEWALKS.

  68. Bah! They've done it before. - From PopSci by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Or Popular Mechanics - I don't remember which.

    The idea was, that the plates would rotate in the "Station", slowing down close to the platfrom. I believe the theory behind it was that the number of plates going past a point in a given amount of time was always constant.

    When the plates were rotated sideways and perpendicular to the direction of motion (in the Station) they moved quite slowly, but as they left the station, they would be rotated so they would be closer to being in parallel with the direction of motion. By rotating, they would "lengthen" and to maintain the same number of plates per second going by a point, their speed would increase.

    Clever idea - part of the concept was to pump air and widen the "tube" at the station, so that there would note be a "wind" each time the passenger came into a station and sped up and slowed down.

    myke

  69. Nothing new here... by outanowhere · · Score: 1

    This appears to be a resurrection of the slidewalk of mid-last-century, as found in some airports. It seems to be shorter than those. But is is an experiment, after all.
    Did Asimov write a tale about slidewalks? I do not recall encountering such.
    Robert Heinlein wrote a short story The Roads Must Roll! in the 1950's about huge slidewalks that crossed the nation like interstates and which had segments with variable speeds to allow people to get on and off safely, without a lot of acceleration. Even so, accidents happened, including fatal ones.
    Heinlein's short story appears in an anthology with several of his other short stories written at about the same time. (sorry, I do not recall the book title.)

  70. Getting on and off by daemon_underscore · · Score: 0

    Is there some sort of acceleration/decelaration belt or are the people just supposed to walk off of the belt traveling at highway speeds - if they have to walk off, wouldn't the momentum kill them and everyone that their flying bodies impail?

  71. My idea by Funkitup · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A basic invention i just came up with is not dissimilar to a train - you get into a box that has rollers/wheels on the bottom. Internal friction in the wheels/rollers will accelerate the box on the conveyor belt and the box can then be accelerated to whatever speed wanted (extremely fast if in a vacuum). The same effect will slow the box down when it comes off the other end.

    Boxes can then be sent back using a travellator that goes the other way, or another idea is to make them collapsible so they can go back under the conveyor belt.

    The next question is how to design slip roads and junctions so we can build a whole network of the things.

    A sliproad is pretty easy - you just have another conveyor belt going the same speed next to the one you already have and you cross over (either in the box, or in the pedestrian version).

    Junctions could be nasty due to the concept of traffic jams. The whole thing would have to be computer controlled with each box knowing its route through the traffic so that traffic jams couldn't happen.

  72. Run by luugi · · Score: 1

    I would just love to run through it as fast as possible. I'm sure the feeling would be cool Or even try to run in the opposite direction. I'm sure some kid tried it already.

    --
    Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
  73. RTFA! by hellish+products · · Score: 1

    there are rollers moving at 2 kp/h at the beggining and endpoints of the travelator, so acceleration is first 0 mph (or walking speed) then 2 kp/h then 9 kp/h 9-2 = 7 so highest acceleration is 7 k/ph. It seems to me that this is really a question of learning how to use a new device.

    --
    This sig blantantly stolen by a pack of robo-monkeys.
  74. turnstiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I recall my first visit to North America, and my first experiences with turnstiles and escalators. (I know there are such in Europe as well, I just saw them in North America first.)
    I just couldn't make sense of what the turnstiles do (I must have been like 15), they seemed crude and dangerous. I didn't want to touch those things, so I just leaped over them (still having paid the fare) until the subway cops stopped me and explained how it worked.
    I admit I was a bit belligerent with them, because I was used to the honour system, where they pretty much trust you, but they have random ticket inspectors. It saves money to trust commuters!!! I told them that they were barbaric and savage.

  75. Fast??? 9km/hr is fast??? NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not quite there yet!

    Hopefully they can speed things up quite a bit more.

  76. Twit: "The Roads Must Roll" was Heinlein... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    not Asamov. If you're going to link a story to old Sci-Fi, at least get the author right.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:Twit: "The Roads Must Roll" was Heinlein... by LostSinner · · Score: 1

      i believe the asimov stories being referred to here are those detective stories which follow the travails of r. daneel olivaw and elijah baley (such as the caves of steel). these sidewalks are all over the place in those.

  77. Quick, someone patent it by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

    Someone, hurry out and patent this. Ya know, an innovative "fast" version of the thingies we have at airports. This version is faster, so it is innovative, and totally non-obvious. Prior art? Naw.. that doesn't matter in America anymore. I think it may be too late though, because either MS or Jeff Bezos will probably have patented this by the time I post this message.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    1. Re:Quick, someone patent it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I thought you needed to use the word "internet" when patenting old ideas. It needs to be computer controled over the internet, then you can patent it.

    2. Re:Quick, someone patent it by kaltkalt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahh but that's where you are wrong. This is a new business model of getting people to their computers/internet connection faster. That way they can buy stuff from your website (i.e. amazon.com) much more often. If you can move the people 50 times faster than they can walk, you can increase your profits by a factor of 50 (well not really but it's good enough for the patent office). And, of course, if someone walks on the Amazon.com travelator to get to a computer to order off of BarnesandNoble.com, it is a DMCA violation.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  78. Re:The Governator by chr1sb · · Score: 1

    I saw on the TV this evening that Arnie might become California's "governator" as he may be considering a political career. Hopefully he would be taking Californians *into* the future...

  79. Terrible Joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were 'John Connor' I'd stay away from this...

  80. disappointed by aggieben · · Score: 1

    I was pretty disappointed when I read this article. As fast as a Paris bus? Yeah....but the bus only does an average of 9 km/hr. That's pretty lame. I want a long distance travelator (under a different name, of course. Maybe "Pedestrian Speedwalk/Highway"?) that does up to 75 km/hr. Now that would be cool!

    --
    Don't become a regular here, you will become retarded. -- Yoda the Retard
  81. It's crowd-surfing. by vaxer · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now all we need is a crowd full of midgets stretching from Paris to Nice, and some really kick-ass midget music at either end to induce the crowd-surfing effect.

  82. Bound to be Misused by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that steps on these, and then turns around about halfway there, and tries walking the other way, walking in place for several minutes? Imagine the entire country walking in place on these things... This isn't going to work out well at all.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  83. More speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gotta know - can I segway and this legway?

  84. DFW moving sidewalks by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1
    While they're not quite as fast, I used a moving sidewalk between terminals at DFW airport once when my connecting flight was in a different terminal.

    This is where I found the main problem with moving sidewalks in general: they can only go straight. I had to walk all the freaking way from the terminal area to the connecting area, and out to the other terminal area. That sucked.

    For those who don't know, the terminals at DFW are semicircles. That time I had to go from a high C terminal to a mid A. I guess I should've taken the train, but I didn't realize just how far away it was!

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:DFW moving sidewalks by sessamoid · · Score: 1
      I guess I should've taken the train, but I didn't realize just how far away it was!

      No, you made the right decision. Those that have been to DFW regularly know that the "train" is even slower than the slidewalks. Their amazingly slow, not even counting the waiting time. They were originally supposed to go much faster, but somehow didn't make spec.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    2. Re:DFW moving sidewalks by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      No, no. For god's sake, do *not* take the tram. That monstrosity is a waste of time for anyone with two good legs and fewer than three hefty carry-on bags.

      I had to hop a connecting flight at DFW once. At a brisk walk, I got to the other end of the airport a full ten minutes ahead of the tram.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  85. Bahh... Everyone knows Ginger is "IT" ! by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    [sarcasim]
    How can this even get off the ground if future cities are designed around the Segway AKA Ginger? Ginger is the future "Human Transporter" . Ginger is "IT" !. Steve Jobs told me so! There's no place for something like this.
    [/sarcasim]

    Seriously though, I think the *real* future is in hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (whether they be private cars or public buses) for three reasons. First, that's where all the serious R&D money is going right now. Secondly, they require no great leap of concept and will be more psychologically acceptable to the public (i.e. its just a car with a different engine as opposed to something strange and possibly "dangerous"). Third, other than adding hyrdogen pumps to existing gas stations, they requie no expesive and massive public works project because they can use the current road infrastructure. The gas station problem can be handled by a government regulation on the lines of "if you run a gas station and have more than two pumps, at least one has to be for hydrogen".

    Now if they could jack up a fuel cell powerful enough for a jet engine capable of inter-city/cross-country transport, we'd be set.

  86. Asimov's stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the Lije Bailey stories, one (_The_Caves_of_Steel_) decribes the slidewalks

  87. Also 'Caves of Steel'? by Bazzargh · · Score: 1

    I don't have it handy but I'm sure Asimov's book Caves of Steel has the same thing going on - ide travelators which get faster at the centre are the means used to get around the city. Reading that guys' page I see they were called 'strips'.

    If you look at this cover which was used for the book you'll see the hero is standing on one! Heinlin appears to have got there first though (he wrote Roads in 1940, Asimov wrote Caves in 1953)

    I guess this was the Asimov reference in the slashdot article, but no-one else seems to be mentioning it...
    -Baz

    1. Re:Also 'Caves of Steel'? by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And Asimov brought up the actual problem you'd run into...not strikers sabatoging the sidewalks, but hot-shot teenagers running around leaping from one to another.

      If each strip is only 10 feet wide, and goes up 5 mph each strip...you just know you'd have kids running the 50 yard dash sideways, occasionally causing major accidents.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  88. Ouch! by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where do you want to be dragged by the balls today?

    I read that as a part of the rest of the post at first, and wondered if that was how those roads worked...

  89. I try it and it was not a big challenge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you follow the instructions it's safe.

    Once in the middle part, it's like a normal travelator, and you can walk or don't pay attention.

    The accleration phase and the deccelaration is on a carpet of little wheels.
    It's like you are on roller and some one pull/retain you by the arm.
    If you grip firmly with your hand and your feet flat, there are no problems of stability or any risk to fall.

    It's like people who try to drive a bycicle without hand, it's possible but if you bump, the more likely you will fall.

    But it was a little bit disapointing, it's not enough speedy, once you are used to the acceleration/decceleration phase, i will like to have a real 30 km/h travelator, that would be fun and more efective to travel quicker.

  90. Old stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nearly one year old.
    It's so so. When you're at full speed it shows a quite standard and good behaviour but acceleration and deceleration phases are weird even whe you get used to them.

    I think proper time distortion using anti-matter would help a lot smoothing these phases.

  91. Solution: shoot the lawyers and their clients. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yup, fortunally this is france. Although they already been so weak as to pay damages, (do car manufacturers pay damages when you slam into a wall at the cars maximum speed?) hopefully they will be less susceptible to frivilous lawsuits.

    Just put a sign up that says you are using it at youre own risk and that the elderly, women and other idiots should just walk. Of course there should be a normal walkway to the side (if for no other reason then to allow maintenance)

    My fists start to itch when I read that stupid womans remark about her mother being scared. You don't have to fucking use it. I am tired of having the world fit itself to the lowest common denominator. This is a nice idea wich could solve some basic problems in large public areas like airports. Stupid people will always be falling over. Don't let the stupid people rule our lives.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Solution: shoot the lawyers and their clients. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This remark is modded insightful, and contains the following gem: "...elderly, women and other idiots should just walk". Ok, who is still wondering why women do not read slashdot in great numbers? SmallFurryCreature, you are a pig.

  92. also "The City and the Stars" by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    Arthur C Clarke's The City and the Stars had roads that moved faster smoothly as you walked to their centre, in the city Diaspar, the last city on earth a billion years in the future. Real sensawonda.

    1. Re:also "The City and the Stars" by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I always thought escalators should do that.

      When you get on them, and start walking down, they should just slowly accellerate the steps downward. And the same upward.

      What's the advantage, you ask? You only need one escalator for both up and down. If two people get on at once, it simply runs both of you together, you step past each other (Remember, you're walk along the steps anyway.) and it picks up past that.

      Granted, detecting you turned around would be a neat trick (But you can't do that on normal escalators anyway.), as would the needed 'steps in the middle disappearing' if two people ran into each other.

      That last problem sound near impossible, but I'm actually thinking it would have something like moveable rollers, where there are no 'steps', just rollers that stick up and make a flat place for you to stand on, and roll you forward onto the next rollers as they sink downward (or raise upward), if that makes sense.

      And, of course, it's a lot easier for flat conveyer belts, you don't have to sink the rollers.

      Sounds absurd, but someday this slashdot post may end up being prior art! ;)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  93. a fly on a bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what if one is driving one of those jet cars they tested in the desert. Or flying on an airplane, and shooting a bullet out the back? Its gonna hang in the air steady (relative to the on-looker) longer than if it were just dropped, wouldn't it? You could even walk up to it and pick it, given it's relative momentum? Arrgh, crap. No it won't. It'll just fall down like a rock.

  94. this one doesn't cost 5000 for every person by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    ehm, rtfa may be in order here. The solutiuon you suggest may or may not work but is aimed at distances a bit longer then the 1km max this one is aimed at.

    Buses and other carriage type transport are not well suited for this type of tranport because of the waiting time involved for the next carriage to come along. If you travel by public transport in a large city you will notice that most of the travelling time is spend waiting not acutually moving.

    This solves that problem. You can get on any time.

    I can remember a similar technology used in wheat processing plants. (very high factories) To move up and down there where belts with foot and handholds moving up and down between floors. Faster then stairs and not the waiting time for elevators. Of course there where strict warnings on how to use them, office staff was not allowed to use them.

    Dangerous? Perhaps, you could fall all the way from the top to the bottom but then stupid people will always find a way to hurt themselves. It is called natural selection.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  95. Perhaps a HK /.tter will be able to comment on it by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

    better, but the world's longest covered escalator is in Hong Kong. A fascinating ride, I might add, particularly for a fine set of eateries and bars on the side.

  96. Moving rollers are a marginal solution by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    There have been many attempts to solve the speed transition problem for moving sidewalks, going back to the Paris Exposition of 1900. The usual idea is to have a speed transition between two conveyor belts, and the usual problem is to avoid someone getting caught or tripped at the transition point.

    The Loderway Accelerating Walkway, circa 1998, used multiple belts at different speeds. The transitions between belts involved a 5mm drop and small-diameter end rollers, instead of a transition plate. That was probably the simplest solution to the problem. Two systems were installed in Australia, field tests were claimed to be successful, but the manufacturer no longer seems to be around.

    NKK (yes, the zipper company) and Mitsubishi have both built prototype "accelerating moving walkways", but neither system seems to have been installed more than once. NKK's system involves expansible plate-type steps that become longer in the high-speed section. The Mitsubishi system works by turning a corner, so that a series of short wide plates transform into a series of long narrow plates. Both of these systems avoid difficult transition points, but are complicated and expensive throughout the whole length of the system. The Loderway and Paris systems have transitions, which adds risk, but the long section is just a plain belt, so the cost of long systems is manageable.

    1. Re:Moving rollers are a marginal solution by jafuser · · Score: 1

      I have to admit the NKK system has to have a good idea going.

      I can't tell enough from the link, but it seems like if the travelator is composed of telescopic panels which can be extended horizontally, it might just be a great solution to the problem.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    2. Re:Moving rollers are a marginal solution by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
      The telescopic-panel idea is reasonable, but mechanically complicated. They have to telescope slowly where they're supposed to, so there's a linkage underneath and a fair amount of mechanical complexity.

      The original moving walkway at the Paris Exposition around 1900 was really an endless train of flatcars with continouous platforms on top. Transitions between cars were handled by circular sections. There were were steps (with vertical overlaps) between the slow train and the ground, and between the fast train and the slow train. That system could turn corners, and did. Very neat, but getting on and off was a bit tricky.

    3. Re:Moving rollers are a marginal solution by jafac · · Score: 1

      I think that the amusement parks had this solved for a while. our average water-park ride.

      The walkway moves in a large circle, matching speed with the outer radius of a large rotating disk. The user steps off the walkway onto the disk, walks to the center of the disk, it's all about relative velocities. At the center of the disk is a stationary platform, but the relative velocity at the center is much smaller, so the passenger steps off, and goes up the escalator - whoops, same problem again. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  97. For those of you who haven't read it by gurensan · · Score: 1

    ... it's called 'The Roads Must Roll'.

    --
    You are all fartheads.
    1. Re:For those of you who haven't read it by drfreak · · Score: 1

      ... it's called 'The Roads Must Roll'.

      Correct. And it was a short story by Heinlein, not Asimov. One of my all-time favourites. Give the man the credit he deserves! :)

      Oh btw, in the story they also used segway-style gyro scooters to work on the roads. Except they were stable on one wheel instead of two.

    2. Re:For those of you who haven't read it by gurensan · · Score: 1

      Heinlein, huh? Well, just goes to show that one cannot remember everything from high school. I was lucky I remembered it at all ;)

      --
      You are all fartheads.
  98. Hah! by Greedo · · Score: 1

    O, where are mod points when you need them. :)

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  99. Handrail solution by Greedo · · Score: 1

    You have your lanes like above, but with tiny handrail lanes between them. Then, looking sideways at the thing you get this:

    ________ ________
    ___/________\______/________\___ etc.

    Basically, the handrails gradually come out of the ground and stay level for a while. Every now and then, they disappear, and people can only make lane changes in those "down" sections. This should also prevent everyone from getting on at a really busy location and rushing over to the fast lane all at once.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    1. Re:Handrail solution by jafuser · · Score: 1

      I refer you to the system used in this picture, posted earlier.

      There are vertical poles, attached to the track, every few meters.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    2. Re:Handrail solution by Greedo · · Score: 1

      Yes, I saw the pole suggestion.

      However, I assume the poles need to "appear" at the start of the run, and disappear at the end, right? I don't know about you, but I don't think I'd want a pole rising up out of the ground and up my skirt and/or ass.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  100. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    french joke

  101. Did anyone immediately think of... by ZeDanimal · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    ..."Jackass" when they saw this?

    Oh the possibilities.

  102. When the sleeper wakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, this significantly predates Asimov and Heinlein in SciFi. It goes back to HG Wells, and When the Sleeper Wakes, which I highly recommend.

    He described not only airplanes, televisions and moving pedestrian roadways, but much of the modern way of life before it existed.

    http://www.online-literature.com/wellshg/sleeper wa kes/5/

  103. How about microbelts? by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Suppose, during the acceleration phase, that they didn't have 3-foot-wide belts, but rather lots of 1-cm-wide belts, all moving at slightly different speeds? Now, things might seem to be more unstable that way, but if you do do things that way you can have a much lower acceleration. For example, initially 80% of the belts are fixed, and 20% move at 1 kph. Then you phase out another 20% of the fixed belts, and phase in more 1 kph belts. Then, since the accelerations are now microaccelerations, you'd be supposed to walk on. Or they could even have chairs on there. you take a chair, slide it around to the start point, and sit down on it (which puts its weight on the belts, causing it to begin accelerating.) -

    I dunno. Probably just another one of my ideas...

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  104. Re:Lazy bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try walking it's good for you...

  105. Old Ladies and Wimpy Men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These sorts riding this thing will get injured for sure. Imagine the warnings on the wall before you get on the belt: "Only physically fit teenagers allowed on the Belt!"

  106. Against the Fall of Night by Boogerman · · Score: 1

    In Arthur C. Clarke's Against the Fall of Night there was a city wide transit system that operated like this, only it could move each person at a different speed by being able to control arbitrary areas of the walkway, and move them through the surrounding surface. An explanation involving materials that could be translated between different dimensions was given, if I recall correctly.

    *encourages scientists to develop such things*

    1. Re:Against the Fall of Night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the moving walkways in Clarke's books were made of anisotropic matter, which acted like a solid in the Z-direction (so you wouldn't sink into it) but acted like a liquid in the X- and Y-directions (so it could flow)

  107. You May Be Thinking of... by Brad+the+Informer · · Score: 1

    World Out of Time by Larry Niven, in which an architect-turned-corpsicle used by a future society as a slave/galactic explorer travels via the black hole at the center of our galaxy 250K years into the future, to help super-intelligent adults rediscover immortality and fight super-intelligent long-lived children. Oh, and he uses a remote-controlled fusion motor to have Venus nudge the Earth farther away from Jupiter, which the Earth orbits since Jupiter was turned into a mini-sun.

    Run of the mill Larry Niven tale.

    Anyway, the evacuated world-circling subway was how he got around.

  108. I'm Lazy by Hellraisr · · Score: 1
    Why don't they just attach a chair to it so I can sit on my butt and not worry about falling over and getting the worst rug burn you've ever seen in your life.


    Also make the chair have internet access so I can use /.

  109. Reinventing the wheel? by slobber · · Score: 0

    Public transportation, standing in the open, and moving at high speed don't go well together. They are having problems at 9km/h and if they go much beyond that, more people are bound to freak out and make things ugly for the rest. I think this problem was solved rather elegantly for downhill skiing lifts. Have you ever used a gondola-type lift? The idea is that multiple carts hung on a steel belt carry (sitting) people up the mountain at high speed. The tricky part is that when such cart approaches the landing zone, it is transferred from the rope onto rails. It decelerates and people get out. As it (slowly) rolls forward, it gets hooked on a belt again and picks up the speed. Using this system for transportation makes even more sense since in the mountains it is (mostly) used for moving people in one direction whereas both directions can be utilized in this case. As for the cost, I think it will be much cheaper than the mountain version and quite competitive with the "travelator". After all, for a mountain lift, a bulk of the cost goes into making this system super-safe AND it has to function under extreme weather conditions (wind, cold, snow, ice, etc.). This should not be the case here.

    --
    "You mortals are so obtuse." -Q
  110. OW MY FOOT! by DCSteelShaft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If its like the ones at american airports such as detroit, and there are walls on the side that are not moving. I guarentee that eventually your going to run across someone who's foot catches the wall and moving at that speed however fast, is going to break the guys ankle slaming him face first into the crack between the wall and the belt grinding his nose off like a belt-sander.

  111. The French take the lead, again. by lpq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems like the French aren't afraid to try techno-miracles -- I haven't seen any metro system as good -- London is close, but alot of inconsistencies. In Paris and France, they aren't afraid to try new things (and the US still
    doesn't have any high-speed trains....bunch of cowards -- look big behind
    their high-tech weapons -- but when it comes to something socially useful...
    forget it. It was a shame the French became the only company to provide
    Super-Sonic speeds on jets -- and, of course, what did we do in the US?
    We banned their use in US airspace because Elmer's cow might stop producing
    milk from the occasional bang. Big woop. We could have had coast-to-coast
    in 2-3 hours, but noooOOOOOooo.... any real R&D goes to defense where
    they don't have to worry about every soldier who breaks a nail suing them.

    Americans are just so damn stupid so often....that and greedy. Grrr.

    Why can't the US every take the lead in these areas --- because it's always
    private development and unless the private developer can prove profit (minus
    real or bogus lawsuits) before it is even tested, it falls dead on the design
    floor.

    I really thought the Casino bosses in Las Vegas just might pull off the
    high speed train idea to L.A. But it's been ages since I heard that idea
    float.

    Everyone in the US seems to want to have the right to stop progress that can benefit large numbers of people -- like all the poltics with the "Rich"
    who can buy their congressmen in Menlo Park/Palo Alto and don't want BART
    to go through their town -- we were promised it would circle he Bay and have
    been paying sales tax to support it since...when, 1970's? Everything
    is politics and self-interest.

    Grrrrrr.

  112. Toronto has one by guanno · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There has been one of these at the Spadina subway station in Toronto for years. It works pretty well. They use it between two sections of perpendicular subway tunnel that are extraordinarily far apart. After living in Toronto for 8 years, I would say that the escalators and the moving sidewalk are out of order roughly 30% of the time. They're great when they work, but I have to question the cost affectiveness.

  113. Someone mod parent Insightful by psoriac · · Score: 1

    Sure it was funny, but it's also very true.

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  114. Liquid crystals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the belt is of significant length you could just stretch it on the outbound leg.

  115. Try it with an attraction-style cart by Vexar · · Score: 1

    We've all been to the Happiest Place on Earth, right? I recall that the Haunted Mansion had a moving walkway, which allowed you to join in on the even-faster-moving bubble cart chairs in a safe transition.
    I also seem to recall this technology has been used in an open-top cart ride of some sort, where the entire cart is moved by a conveyor belt.
    So, it seems to me, if they produced some sort of televator "skiff" (looks like a tall carnival bumper car) they could put a minimalist bench, or steadying bar for the elderly/inebriated/easily spooked. The only requirement would be that the thing went in a loop; perhaps not everyone was required to use it, either. I realize this is more expensive, but I think it would be cheaper than say 6 lawsuits or so. Think of it like the grocery carts with the "infant seats," there will always be a few. Plus, the added benefit of a cool rubbing noise during the belt transition would be a real plus. Probably almost as entertaining as seeing the first guy on a wheelchair trying out the existing televator:
    "Hey, this thing is broken, I'm not going anywhere...(thud!) Oh, Hi! ...(thud, thud thud) Now it's working, thanks everyone, you can get up now!"
    If you want to take this idea a step further, make it an enclosed skiff, oodles more comfortable, charge a fee, and run the skiffs across the country. If you toss out the "supports people on foot" component, you can make the belts simpler, put them on inclines, run them much faster (might need a guide rail in windy outside regions), etc.
    For added effect, if you made them buoyant and balanced, you could run them on the downhill stretch of the California Aqueduct through the "Grapevine pass" (if you took out the concrete berms). That'd be a real blast.
    You know, the more I think about this, the better it sounds. Road repairs cost billions of dollars a year in the USA. The road damage comes from trying to maintain a continuous "pavement" of some sort, which is pounded on by the elements, and subjected to extreme weight and temperature changes. By instead maintaining a rolling lane, you can make repairs by "bringing the road" with you on a service vehicle, and attaching either a new belt or new rollers, making for very fast repairs. I don't know a ton about the electrical requirements, but it is conceivable that a segment could be self-sustaining with something like a low-maintenance heat pump, instead of an expensive windmill or solar panels. Shoot, we could finally find a use for all that rad waste: thermocouples.
    Does anyone know the electrical requirements?

  116. Not the answer by driptray · · Score: 1

    Hydrogen fuel cell cars don't solve the following car-related problems:

    • They perpetuate the current system of land use where roads and parking lots take up valuable real estate that would be better used for housing, farming, industry, or commerce.

    • They do nothing to improve the appalling safety record of cars. This point has particular importance for pedestrians and cyclists.

    • They do nothing to improve or even halt the further suburbanisation of cities, leading to social dislocation and the atomisation of society.

    • They do nothing to improve travel times and traffic problems.

    What problem do they solve? Pollution? Maybe, but how do you produce the hydrogen?

  117. Ice dancing pileups by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    Attending graduate school at a certain institution of higher learning in Greater Los Angeles with (at the time) a particularly poor male-female ratio (for a male), I decided to invest the time, money, and energy learning ice dancing as a way of to meet women and as a distraction from studies. As an engineering student, the detailed lessons in the management of kinetic energy required to skate with a partner in close formation were something I could learn quickly. You may not think of ice dancing as a geek thing, but we had more than one NASA/JPL person in the group. At the time (20 years ago) there were 3 evenings a week where large numbers of people get together to do this in Burbank and one afternoon on the weekend where this happened in Santa Monica.

    Ice dancing is a lot like ballroom dancing on skates inasmuch as its done with male-female partners, the steps are to the beat of the music, and the dance holds (waltz, tango) are much like ballroom only you are going much faster and the forces are much higher and you are wearing edged instruments that can draw blood on your feet, so the holds are somewhat modified and the partners are farther apart.

    Unlike ballroom, when ice dancing is done socially the skaters follow very rigidly choreographed steps that weave in and out along arcs called lobes that fill up the entire skating rink to make up what is called a pattern. The need for this strict choreography will be apparent. When the music is announced, couples line up to start the pattern, the initiation of which takes place on the musical downbeat for each couple at the head of the line. To allow as many couples to participate, each new couple at the head of the line needs to launch with the downbeat of each successive measure of the song. You will observe that the couples back in line will start rocking in synchrony with the music so they are able to launch without hestitation when their downbeat occurs.

    I find it interesting to watch individual pairs of skaters who are really good, such as in competitions and the Olympics, but I also like to watch a rink full of social skaters, no individual couple being Olympic quality, but with the skaters stroking and turning across the ice in time with the music, it all looks like a magical merry-go-round.

    You know what they say about auto racing -- the spectators are not there to see them race. The really fun part to watch is when a skater trips and brings his or her partner down in a clattering heap (I've wrecked hundreds of times -- it hurts but you keep doing it) -- you then see this choreographed dance come apart as skaters dodge and weave, and sometimes you have a multi-couple pile up as if it were a pileup on I-5.

    OK, watching people get hurt is not funny unless it is America's Funniest Home Videos where taking hits to the groin is the only joke. But ice dancing spills are part of the sport just like checking is part of hockey and driving too close to the edge and losing your car on the wall is part of auto racing, and you need to see one of these ice dancing pileups before you get too enthusiastic about high-speed belt-type people mover systems.

    The point of this is that with the proper training, you can get large formations of people moving at high speed together like a well-regulated machine, but it takes just one person to trip. Do they have pileups like this in bike races?

  118. Why not a series of standard people-movers? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

    The people mover at my airport moves at 2 or 3 mph. Why not have a 10 foot section at 2.5 mph, then as that belt ends people step onto another belt at 5 mph? There could be one more belt as well. By all means keep the lights and sirens to make it clear where people HAVE to step, but if people can step on and off one belt, why not step six times and travel three times faster?

  119. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the side of a regular walkway you have a row of chairs on small individual platforms. You sit in one of the chairs and buckle up, maybe even a over the head bar like on a roller coaster. You push the button to go one lane to the right, or left whichever is away from the walkway. The platform which you are quite well secured to moves over to a rail that is going at a rather slow speed so as not to jar you much. Everytime you push the button towards the center of the travel system the next available railway connector moves you over to the next rail while accelerating you to that rails speed. Looks like this :
    |
    \
    |
    This would allow you to go over several lanes to go faster or slower and the difference would even have to be that small the force would be much more than stomping the gas or stepping fairly hard on the brake in a car, and wouldn't matter cuz like I said you are secured in well. When you move back to the slow lane and push the button toward the walkway you are moved into the nearest available "parking spot", depending on where you are going and how many people are there "parking" could mean you have to do that old fashion walking for a ways to get to the place you were going but if you traveled any real distance it's still well worth it.

    brought to you by M.D. Inc.