Slashdot Mirror


Proof Is In: Kansas Is Flatter Than A Pancake

plotdot writes "When motorists drive across Kansas with its expansive, fertile fields of grain, they most often observe that the state is flat as a pancake. Now, three scientists have proved that observation wrong. The May/June issue of Annals of Improbable Research (AIR) carries a story by Mark Fonstad, William Pugatch, and Brandon Vogt proving that Kansas is actually flatter than a pancake."

104 comments

  1. Re:what the hell? by violent.ed · · Score: 3, Informative

    the Annals of Improbable Research group do. Quite interesting if your extremly bored i might say.

    --
    - You're not paranoid, they really are after you.
  2. In related news... by momerath2003 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pancake sales in Kansas increase by 20% because the Citizens of Kansas now feel in some way superior to the pancakes!

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    1. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, sellers of French Toast were dissappointed because the hicks out there still blame the French for providing the naval blockade, training and resources (think Lafayette) that allowed us to win the revolutionary war. They are also pissed at the French for warning us ahead of time about the possiblity of 9/11. Still, the fact that the French have popularised topless bathing really annoys them, as does the fact that the French were actually right about Iraq - a fact not contrevened by America's unique ability to kill non-white people.

  3. Wrong measure for flatness. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think that "flatness" was incorrectly measured in this case. What should have been used as the flatness measure is the RMS of the discrete slopes in the measurements at a sampling interval measured at the lowest of the two sampling intervals (if the pancake laser raster contained 500 measurements, then only 500 measurements (derived?) of the USGS cross section would be considered).

    Fitting an ellipse just tells you if the state is eccentric. If the state was a completely upwards tilted plane, either it's perflectly flat, or it's moderately (but constantly) non-flat. I assume it's the latter. Now imagine a state containing nothing but up-and-down hills of the same gradient as before. According to the ellipsoid measure, the state could be considered flatter, when in fact it is should be less flat because of the changes in grade.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Wrong measure for flatness. by Goldsmith · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you're referring to is mathmatically called roughness. Obviously, the expression is not "rougher than a pancake". If we're going to do this scientifically, we have to use the proper scientific definitions.

    2. Re:Wrong measure for flatness. by bheilig · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if a West-East measurement of Kansas was a valid approach. The assumption is that Kansas is a very small part of a very large spheroid (where two of the axis have the same radius). This is true because Kansas is a part of Earth, and the Earth is most closely approximated by an oblate spheroid (called the reference ellipsoid). But like I said, the assumption is that Kansas is like the rest of the world, where it could be dramatically different (assuming there were an anti-Kansas that was equally different in the opposite direction so that the two would average out to the reference ellipsoid). Even their own results betray this assumption, the flatness of the earth is 0.00335, but the flatness of Kansas is 0.997.

      I have a great .sig but I'm not going to give it to you.

    3. Re:Wrong measure for flatness. by Caharin · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      "One common method of quantifying 'flatness' in geodesy is the 'flattening' ratio. The length of an ellipse's (or arc's) semi-major axis a is compared with its measured semi-minor axis b using the formula for flattening, f = (a - b) / a."

      In the case of the surface of the earth, this measurement would be accurate. This is not the case when applied to a pancake. Look down at the graphics of Kansas and the pancake. The pancake corresponds to a plateau. (steep edges, flat on top). Maybe this could be accurate if they didn't count the edges of the pancake.

      Note: according to this article's logic, a thinner pancake, otherwise the same, would be flatter than kansas. Likewise, a very thick pancake (or a cube) would be less flat than the rocky mountains.

      The flaw here is easy to see if you consider this:
      a perfect cube, a box, by this model would not be considered flat at all. Now, this depends on your definition of flat, but the cube would be flat to someone standing on it, right? that's what counts here, someone would be standing on the ground in Kansas.

      --
      By reading this sig, you agree to be bound by all terms and conditions I choose.
    4. Re:Wrong measure for flatness. by gi-tux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually what this means is that Kansas lays on the globe at a point where the Semi-Major Axis and the Semi-Minor Axis are almost equal, thus Kansas is a near perfect spheriod. A perfect spheriod at the diameter of the earth would seem flat (in human terms) and is thus called flat.

      While I don't necessarily agree with their conclusion in this experiment. I do believe that it meets the definition of improbable research. I give these guys credit on innovative thinking and wonder what they could do on a real research project with a real definition.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    5. Re:Wrong measure for flatness. by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Somewhere I read that if you where to scale the Earth down to the size of a 1" steel ball bearing, it would be smoother than any ball bearing that we can manufacture...

  4. I live in Kansas... by xenocide2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its not exactly hilly like a costal California city might be, but most of it isn't too flat. I live in the Kansas City area; there's plenty of hills around. And when I'm not in KC I'm attending school at KSU, where it is also not flat. The region is called the Flint Hills. Not the Flint Plains, nor the Flint Flatter-than-Pancakes. Hills.

    Of course, do be warned, I've never lived on a pancake, so my anecdotal evidence might be flawed =).

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

    1. Re:I live in Kansas... by Fritzed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ok, I'll be honest and say I haven't seen a lot of Kansas. I've only been in it for short bursts because Nebraska's main airport is right on the state borderline. However, if the "hills" in Nebraska are similar to the "hills" in Kansas, and I'll bet they are, they are very gradual. The average slope on the hills can't be more than 7 degrees, the real steep hills having a 10 degree slope.

      Now this doesn't mean the hills or valleys don't have an impact on the landscape. On the contrary, they stand out because there are so few of them. However, they are only noticable because that slope continues for a quarter mile so while looking across the vast open spaces you see a break in the nothingness.

      Back to my point, flatness is affected more by extreme changes in altitude than it is gradual ones, so these hills hardly affect the scale of flatness. Pancakes, have heavy drops at their edges which drastically reduce flatness and several deep (relatively) pits produced by bubbles popped near they end of their cooking. Each one of these pits probably effects flatness more than a Kansas hill.

      I spent way too much time on this post.

      ->Fritz

      --
      Spooooon!!!!!
    2. Re:I live in Kansas... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I've been across Kansas by car - twice. (there, and back again)

      Only a few hours of direct subjective experience, but it was FLAT.

      IMHO your "hills" are comparable to the topological deformities found when you put blueberries into the pancakes.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    3. Re:I live in Kansas... by fdiskne1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I live in Nebraska, I've been through Kansas a number of times. I've also seen genuine hills and mountains while travelling outside the region. I believe most of the "hills" in Kansas and Nebraska (and Oklahoma etc.) are officially called "rolling plains". I think it's a matter of human nature, thinking what you have is better than it actually is.

      A similar argument could be started when talking about football.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    4. Re:I live in Kansas... by 8282now · · Score: 1

      Of course there's the other human nature to perceive that "the grass is greener" in places other than where you are. No?

    5. Re:I live in Kansas... by mlrtime · · Score: 1

      I won't look down on you for choosing KSU over KU, but Lawrence is also very non-flat.

      The campus of KU sits on a hill, and some of the residential streets resemble San Francisco with very steep inclines.

    6. Re:I live in Kansas... by VenTatsu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Driving hardly represents and acurate sample of the state. I would assume you used the interstate systems of roads?
      Civil enginers worked very hard to make sure that the interstates were as flat and strait as posible, there is even a requirement in the laws establishing the interstate system that a certen persentage of the interstates be totaly strate and flat so that they can be used as runways in times of war.
      I don't really thing the fact that a government employe actualy did his job should be held against a whole state.

    7. Re:I live in Kansas... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Yep, my experience of Kansas is limited to visual range of I70. (or is it I80?)

      At least there the Civ-Es did their job. My brother has horror stories of I80 west of Laramie, Wyoming where they didn't.

      I also lived in Cleveland for four years, so I know what it's like living in a national joke.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    8. Re:I live in Kansas... by rhombic · · Score: 1

      Totally true-- I grew up in Manhattan (KS, that is). Going from my parent's back yard straight up the hill is a ~16% grade, about 200ft vertical climb. Compare that to the Los Angeles basin, where you can look out from the Getty and see friggin' Orange County with nary a hill in between (well, alright. You could see Orange County if it wasn't for the smog). Central KS is flat, but anybody who thinks the flint hills are flat should have to jog up & down Manhattan Ave from Kimball to Anderson a few times!

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    9. Re:I live in Kansas... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      there is even a requirement in the laws establishing the interstate system that a certen persentage of the interstates be totaly strate and flat so that they can be used as runways in times of war.

      Wonder how they dealt with this requirement in West Virginia?

    10. Re:I live in Kansas... by Ensign+Nemo · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Kansas. If you've ever been in the west-central, southwest near Garden City and Scott City then you'll know that it is plain flat. There are NO hills! The curvature of the earth is the only thing preventing you from seeing forever.

    11. Re:I live in Kansas... by drafalski · · Score: 1
      there is even a requirement in the laws establishing the interstate system that a certen persentage of the interstates be totaly strate and flat so that they can be used as runways in times of war.

      Actually, that is not true
    12. Re:I live in Kansas... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I remember a silly TV news item about the "highest mountain" in Kansas. (Apparently defined as the highest point in the state.) It proved to be a three foot high lump right on the Colorado border.

      Speaking of flat... drive across South Dakota sometime, on the interstate highway (I-90, IIRC). Once you get out of the Black Hills, it's flat as a board as far as the eye can see -- until you get to the Missouri River. You go WAY DOWN one bank in low gear, across the bridge, and WAY UP the other bank in low gear. Then back to flat as a board all the way to the Iowa border. (What it's like beyond that, I can't attest.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  5. Re:This is not science by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "But then again that's as useful as complaining it's not news for nerds, stuff that matters."

    Who but a nerd would correct somebody about the flatness of Kansas when compared to a fluffy brekfast food?

  6. What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by jeeves99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Declaring kansas flatter than a pancake based upon a comparison to ONE pancake hardly seems fair. A mean value for the flatness of a pancake should have been derived from multiple pancakes and a standard deviation value given. Besides, you get hash browns and a side of variable meat with the 3-pancake special at IHOP.

    1. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by 1in10 · · Score: 5, Funny

      While we're at it, why not compare with more than one Kansas?

    2. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by ooPo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Flatter than _A_ pancake. Not flatter than _ALL_ pancakes.

    3. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by acherrington · · Score: 5, Funny

      So um, add Arkansas into the mix?

      --


      Victory is gained, not in knowing your opponents next move, but in preempting them.
    4. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by stupidsocialscientis · · Score: 1

      I concur, I also take excpetion to a methodology that uses a single case study design (Population and N = 1) for comparison with one member of a population of millions. Talk about error rate increasing from unequal n-size... Sheesh!

      --
      Well, as far as Sig's go, Freud was a doozy.
    5. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that they used data from one state-wide strip, they should have used multiple comparisons for Kansas as well.

    6. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by KillerHamster · · Score: 1

      Or northwestern Ohio, for that matter. I can't imagine how Kansas could be any flatter than the region around Bowling Green, where I go to school.

    7. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      I dunno, in order for even a close comparison you'd have to run over the band with a steamroller.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    8. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by zerOnIne · · Score: 1

      as anyone knows, you should replace the insecure rkansas with the ssl-enabled skansas as soon as possible.

      --
      09
    9. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      Well, they obviously had some problem with getting a color photo...

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    10. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by glaHHg · · Score: 1

      "While we're at it, why not compare with more than one Kansas?"

      Great idea. I'm listening right now. Nope, they're sharp.

    11. Re:What, too cheap to get the 3 pancake stack!? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      corn corn corn corn corn corn Toledo corn corn corn corn corn corn Sandusky corn corn corn corn

  7. Flatness Humor by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm reminded of a scene in one of Donald Westlakes weirder caper novels. Two guys are travelling through a really flat section of Oklahoma. One is a stone killer with no sense of humor or irony. They reach a place where the land is so flat and featureless, you can't even see the horizon. The killer turns to the other guy and says, "You know, before the white man came, there was absolutely nothing here!"

    1. Re:Flatness Humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, the Llano Estacado (sp?) - Staked Plain - got its name from the stakes the NAs had put there to provide landmarks in all the flatness.

      Other than that, yeah, there was nothing there.

  8. [OT] Re: Flatness Humor by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


    > I'm reminded of a scene in one of Donald Westlakes weirder caper novels. Two guys are travelling through a really flat section of Oklahoma. One is a stone killer with no sense of humor or irony. They reach a place where the land is so flat and featureless, you can't even see the horizon. The killer turns to the other guy and says, "You know, before the white man came, there was absolutely nothing here!"

    One of my friends was hitch-hiking across Kansas/Oklahoma when a really weird guy picked him up. They drove for miles and miles without the guy saying anything or even looking at him. Finally he said in a low, slow voice, with his eyes fixed steadily on the road ahead -

    What if I said I had a big ol' knife?
    to which my friend calmly replied -
    What if I said I had a little ol' gun?
    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  9. They got anything else better to do? by chendo · · Score: 1

    I mean, why would anyone waste their time to prove Kansas is flatter than a friggin pancake? Sure, we've seen pretty pointless things on slashdot, but in what way is this gonna help us discover The Meaning Of Life?

    They should use their time to find out The Meaning Of Life.

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
    1. Re:They got anything else better to do? by RevMike · · Score: 1

      Forty-Two

    2. Re:They got anything else better to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why are you looking for the meaning of life on /. ?

    3. Re:They got anything else better to do? by sidecut · · Score: 1

      Performing trivial pseudo-scientific research is the Meaning Of Life!

  10. One of my all time favorite AIR articles: by emcron · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Testing the limits of the U.S. Postal Service:
    http://www.improb.com/airchives/paperair/volume6/v 6i4/postal-6-4.html

    Worth the read.

  11. Not surprising... by floydigus · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

  12. I hope by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

    that no one got paid for that.

    1. Re:I hope by gerddie · · Score: 1

      Hell, its a publication, with slashdot and all it has an high impact factor and that all that counts (at least at some institutes ...)

  13. never thought i'd read this... by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 2, Funny
    We collected macro-pancake topography through digital image processing of a pancake image and ruler for scale calibration

    With a statement like that, nothing else needs to be said.

  14. Shouldn that read ... by gerddie · · Score: 1

    ... Kansas is flattering a pancake. But then I wonder what for?

  15. Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You need less maple syrup to cover kansas than the equivilent sized pancake????

    1. Re:Does this mean... by cellocgw · · Score: 1
      You need less maple syrup to cover kansas than the equivilent sized pancake????


      Not necessarily. Remember that cute problem in your calc course, where the volume of a certain function rotated about the X-axis is finite, but its surface area is infinite, so you can put a finite amount of paint into it but it takes an infinite amount of paint to cover it?

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  16. I-70 by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The single biggest problem is that Interstate 70 (which runs across the northern section of the state) goes through some of the most MIND-NUMBINGLY BORING terrain I've ever seen, and since that is how most people who cross the state see it they form an unjustified opinion.

    Most of Kansas used to be inland see, millenia ago. Hence the flatness - the ocean bottom deposited uniformly across the state.

    However, IF you are going to be going through Kansas, let me give you some pointers on where to go:

    Southeastern section: Go see Big Brutus in West Mineral, KS.. If you have any interest in mechanical engineering you'll love this.

    South Central: The Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center has the best collection of Russian space hardware outside Russia itself, as well as US gear. They were the first to be made a Smithsonian partner, and that was as much so that the Smithsonian could gain access to the Cosmospere's collection as the other way around. Hutchinson, KS - and if you were planning on going across on I-70 I's suggest you drop down on I-35 (throught the Flint Hills)to US-50 then across into Hutch. Stop by Yoder, KS and get some Cinnamon Rolls at the Carriage Crossing Restaurant.
    If you are going towards New Mexico, drop down and take I-160 from Medicine Lodge through the Gypsum Hills. There IS scenery in Kansas - we just don't run our major roads through it.

    North West: If you are heading to Denver, you pretty much have to take either I-70 or K-96. If you are on I-70, stop through Quinter, KS and see Castle Rock, a natural formation akin to the Badlands in South Dakota.
    Also, you can go to Monument Rocks which is a similar sort of geography.
    Also on I-70 in Hays, KS is the Sternberg Museum of Natural History which will be a hit with any parent of children who are interested in dinosaurs.

    1. Re:I-70 by kuknalim · · Score: 1

      Funny reading this story on /. this morning. I am driving down to Hutchinson, Kansas on Friday. Perhaps i should take along a pancake.....

    2. Re:I-70 by afabbro · · Score: 1
      The single biggest problem is that Interstate 70 (which runs across the northern section of the state) goes through some of the most MIND-NUMBINGLY BORING terrain I've ever seen, and since that is how most people who cross the state see it they form an unjustified opinion.

      I disagree. I've driven that section of I-70 and quite enjoyed it. Heck, a lot of it isn't even flat - there are awe very pretty pastoral hills.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    3. Re:I-70 by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      I've always said that the biggest problem isn't the fact that parts of the state are flat, it's that there are few enough trees (compared to the area from the Ozarks to Ohio), and our roads are built up enough, that you can see how flat the horizon is in most places especially along I-70. Being from Topeka, and driving to Manhattan as a college student in the 90s, I noticed that most of the time when you are on a hill, the next hill is the same height, giving the illusion of flatness, when you have a large valley in between. I very much agree with your assessment that judging the whole state on the terrain surrounding I-70. I hate that. Pick any spot in eastern Kansas that you can get off of I-70, and drive 20 miles north or south, and you problably wouldn't guess you were in Kansas, especially if you aren't sitting on a hilltop. Another good spot to recommend is the Praire Reserve a couple of miles south of Manhattan. You can see about 10 miles looking west, but it would be a very hilly walk, and it's always a very beautiful view. All that said, I'd just as soon all of you people from outside of Kansas not go about debunking the myth, to keep hordes of people from moving here, filling up our roads (rush hour traffic in Topeka means having 30 cars at the same stop light as you), bringing the metropolitan attitudes with them, and all the other things that come from too many people. My fiance would hate it as well. But feel free to come, see, and prove us wrong.

    4. Re:I-70 by 200_success · · Score: 1

      Did you just say... Flint Hills? With real hills? In Kansas? Did the guys take that into account in the study?

    5. Re:I-70 by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      I agree with the poster -- Kansas isn't necessarily boring. Heck, my ex girlfriend lives there, which should count for a lot of excitement, at least in the Wichita area (and she'd skew ANY measure of flatness, except maybe surface roughness, at least at a mesoscopic scale, WAYYY up). However, I'll disagree about the REASON for Kansas' flatness (any other-than-armchair-geologists out there?). By far most of the continental US has been under the ocean for some part of its life, receiving a uniform deposition of deposits. Right next door, Colorado (from which we used to venture into Kansas) has lots 'n' lots of nice sedimentary rocks, many of which are still even horizontally-layered. But lots of orogeny has uplifted Colorado's sediments, exposing them to water and wind, and producing a lot of thrust- and fold-mountains. Kansas has had very little of that, at least in recent geological time. One of the main factors to Kansas' flatness is sediment blowing from the more elevated states (like CO, UT, WY, NM) into Kansas, and being deposited evenly. It's more a sea of air effect than a sea of water one. In fact, in David Brin's (admittedly science fiction, but check out John McPhee's stuff) book Earth, the geologist challenges his daughter to find a single, naturally deposited pebble in western Kansas. She can't do it, until she brings him a meteorite.

    6. Re:I-70 by drdrs · · Score: 1
      Most of Kansas used to be inland see, millenia ago
      As opposed to the beautiful Kansas coastline we see today. Oh wait, inland sea. Never mind.
      David
      --
      Please, for the love of God, stay off the dunes.
  17. Not as flat as Central Illinois by n-baxley · · Score: 1

    Now I just moved home to Central Illinois after living in Kansas for 4 years. I lived in the KC area and I've toured Western Kansas several times and I can tell you that Central Illinois is way flatter than Kansas. Kansas has rolling hills/plains and is only really flat on I-70. Central Illinois is flat. There's no getting around it. When you can look out your door and see 30 miles away (when the corn is down) then you know flat. Of course I've also been to Colorado and Kansas sure looks flat compared to the Rockies, but it's just not as flat as you'd think.

    1. Re:Not as flat as Central Illinois by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Is that even possible? I thought the horizon drops at 16-20 miles? Do you mean skyscrapers? Grain silos?

      No sarcasm intended.
      -Chris

    2. Re:Not as flat as Central Illinois by n-baxley · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe 30 miles is a bit of an exageration. But from my house, on a clear day, I can see the Univeristy of Illinois Assembly Hall which is probably 10 stories above ground. The Assembly Hall is about 20 miles North of our place. That's with just the right conditions though. The rest of the time you can easily see 10 miles.

  18. ...And Still No Cure for Cancer by Dr.+Smack+PhD · · Score: 1, Funny

    As the title says...And Still No Cure for Cancer.

    1. Re:...And Still No Cure for Cancer by Makarakalax · · Score: 1

      And Still No Cure for Cancer.

      I hope you're not trying to suggest that as soon as you graduate from scientist-school you're automatically compelled to always work on curing cancer, 100% of your working time.

      Of course I could be missing your point. Which is entirely possible since I've been working on the hypothesis that London air is murkier than pea-soup all morning and am feeling a little worn down at the moment.

    2. Re:...And Still No Cure for Cancer by FrankoBoy · · Score: 1

      I hope you're not trying to suggest that as soon as you graduate from scientist-school you're automatically compelled to always work on curing cancer, 100% of your working time.

      Especially if you're an engineer.

    3. Re:...And Still No Cure for Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Learn more about your local anarchist group [blackened.net] today

      I did. I learned they are thieves and thugs, with quite an ego.

    4. Re:...And Still No Cure for Cancer by FrankoBoy · · Score: 1

      Please educate yourself before writing such stereotypical crap. Seems like you didn't, or like you want to spread political FUD.

      ( And yes, this message and its parent are offtopic. Mod down if you please. )

  19. Is this something you would put on your resume by Alpha27 · · Score: 1

    Research Experience:
    A year of research to determined Kansas was flatter than a well cooked pancake.

    I would have to skip this candidate just on the conclusion that this person has no life and found a completely meaningless experiment that most likely will be proved to be incorrect by some other hapless soul.

    Now if it were compared to say, Jennifer Lopez's arse, then we have some research there.

    1. Re:Is this something you would put on your resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, it's a given that pretty much anything is flatter than J.Lo's ass.

  20. Re:Wrong label for flatness. by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

    flatness measure is the RMS of the discrete slopes

    Shouldn't it be called GNU/flatness?

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  21. Poorly run experiment by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Funny

    This research is faulty in many ways. They did not account for anisotropy is the samples (i.e. different flatness in different directions) and they fail to mention if the pancake was from the bottom or the top of the stack. Also, I don't think a confocal microscope is the best tool- they probably could have gotten better results with a stylus or an AFM (Atomic Food Microscopy) instrument. With an AFM they could have also nano-indented the sample to hold more syrup. The pancake measurement seems under-sampled from both the digital image processing and the confocal measurements, and it was probably stale well before they finished. I think that this report would have a 'rougher' time in any peer-reviewed journal.

    P.S. Their next research- seeing if the humid summer air is really thicker (more viscous?) than the leftover maple syrup...

  22. I live in Kansas by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    ...and I can certainly say that not all of Kansas is flat. The Flinthills certainly aren't flat (where I'm from) as anyone that has ever tried to haul a load up one of those hills can tell you. Sure Western Kansas is quite flat. Basically the entire western half of the state is flat (with some exceptions of course, and the line that devides the flat part of Kansas from the feature-rich part of Kansas isn't really straight). Central and Eastern Kansas is anything but flat. Our glacier-cut hills are fairly steep (including the one named after my family near my home town). Not as steep as the Ozark "hills" mind you but steep enough to give gravel trucks a long grade to pull. This doesn't look very flat. Those hills are mild compared to the ones in my neck of the woods. Kansas flat? Ha! Only if the Pope is Athiest.

    1. Re:I live in Kansas by Ioldanach · · Score: 1
      This doesn't look very flat.

      LOL! Sure looks flat to me. I think you need to get out of your state more. I'd call that gently rolling countryside, and if that's the best example you can come up with, I don't think there's much left to be said.

      Of course, I've lived in California, New Hampshire, and New York. All of these states have substantial mountain ranges.

      Also, I think the analysis was incorrect. It looks like they included the nearly vertical sides of the pancake, which is not what people refer to in the phrase. The phrase "flat as a pancake" refers to one of the two planar surfaces of a pancake, not the sides. Thus, the data set should be chopped where the edge slope begins.

    2. Re:I live in Kansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not very flat? Bloody hell, it's flatter than my floor. Come visit British Columbia sometime, then you will see ... Kansas is flat.

      uuuuh yeah, those aren't even hills.

  23. What They Didn't Tell You by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What they carefully left out was that every place you can think of is flatter than a pancake. "Nepal is flatter than a pancake" would have been news to most people, but not so funny.

  24. Re:As they say on FARK by Zeriel · · Score: 1

    *wordlessly passes the valium*

    --
    "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  25. Let just say... by JooBYE · · Score: 1

    Highest point in Kansas is the smallest mountian in the US.
    See: Mount Sunflower

  26. Yes but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is it flatter than my last girlfriend's chest?

  27. Two things... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    1) I was kidding. I mean, well, the expression is just that: an expression... and it's using the word in an ambigous way. I countered one wrong way to look at flatness with other troll-ish semi-informed thing to be silly.

    And I got modded informative? Sheesh.

    2) RMS of the magnitude of discretely sampled gradients is probably a misleading indicator anyway. You really want is to know: 1) how much of Kansas is "tilted" and to what average magnitude; 2) how much of these titled areas are surrounded by areas of similar tilt. The latter are places that look flat to someone driving through it, but on a geological scale are significant! So roughness might not be a bad measure from that point of view either.

    In the end you're going to need some sort of autocorrelation applied to some heuristics about elevation, grade, and changes in grade.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Two things... by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      Of course.

      I was simply trying to out-troll-ish you. I think you win being modded informative.

      I don't think you can take any discussion of AIR seriously.

  28. The highest point in Kansas by Ross+Finlayson · · Score: 2, Funny

    See the photo here. (No joke.)

  29. Hawaii by kmac06 · · Score: 1

    So...Hawaii is perfectly flat, then? Same elevation on all sides...

  30. Flaw in Research. by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, it seems they used pancakes from International House of Pancakes. The so-called food from this so-called restaurant is severely inferior to any real pancake. Therefore, all of this intensive research should be thrown out and the researchers jailed for gross misconduct.

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  31. OT, all right, but I want to know... by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Then what happened?

    1. Re:OT, all right, but I want to know... by windlord · · Score: 1

      Depends on which muthafucker is faster i guess.

  32. Nothing could be flatter than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my last girlfriends chest. Her nipples didnt even poke up.

  33. ok by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
    any comments from a ninja that loves pancakes?

    Maybe next they can determine if pouring hot grits down your pants has any effect on petrifying a naked Natalie Portman.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  34. Bible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe that's why the bible is so popular there. They have direct experience of the flatness of the earth. They can't venture past the edges of the flat bit, because here be dragons and athiests and jews and stuff.

    1. Re:Bible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the stupidest statement I have heard on /. in awhile.

  35. No...tenure... by siskbc · · Score: 1
    who puts forth the effort to research this kind of shit?

    Untenured junior faculty looking for press. That's who.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  36. The earth by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    I have also heard that if the earth were the size of a billards ball, it would be smoother than any normal current billards ball today.

    hope that makes sense

  37. Carlin said it best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This just in from the pancake institute... Fuck waffles!"

  38. Arkansas? by taniwha · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered about Arkansas ... is it really urKansas? or erKansas (as in "Toto I don't think we're in er Kansas anymore")? or irKansas (as in "gee it's 2 in the morning and I can still feel the glow from the ground")? or maybe just orKansas (as in "I could live here or Kansas, I can't tell the difference and people will make fun of me anyway")?

    1. Re:Arkansas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To eliminate confusion Arkansas should be referred to as Kansas^(-1)

  39. Well, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've driven across KS more times than I remember, and grew up in the state. "Most of it isn't too flat"??? This is just false. The Western two-thirds or so is flat like a pool table (much like Eastern Colorado). There are rolling hills in Eastern Kansas, but that is not "most of it".

  40. air by eglamkowski · · Score: 1

    "Thin air? Why is it always thin air? Never fat air, chubby air, mostly-fit-could-stand-lose-a-few-pounds air?"

    -Garibaldi (Grey 17 is Missing)

    --
    Government IS the problem.
  41. Yet another topical /. bottom quote by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    Is the auto-quote generator using PageRank to determine the content of the discussion or something ?

    Bottom quote from this story page:
    Federal grants are offered for... research into the recreation potential of interplanetary space travel for the culturally disadvantaged.

    but the real question is, if space is curved, and Kansas is flatter than a pancake, do interplanetary travelers need maple syrup ?
    ;)

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  42. SimCity by DavidGuynn · · Score: 1

    Does anybody else think that this sounds remarkably like a headline for a SimCity game??? -dg

  43. The claim is poorly constructed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To say "Kansas is flatter than a pancake" is to say there exists a pancake, somewhere, anywhere, that is less flat than Kansas. I've seen some pretty damn lumpy pancakes in my day, so I really don't think the Kansas claim is much of a claim at all. It's like, "duh!"

  44. syrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it rain syrup there?