Slashdot Mirror


Missouri Wins American Solar Challenge

dagoalieman writes "The University of Missouri - Rolla won this year's 2300 mile American Solar Challenge. The roughly 339lb car (517lb with driver) with 1500 watts of power won by nearly 5 hours - here's the final results. UMR has now won two out of the past three races, finishing second in the last race, to Michigan. Congrats, and good luck to them in the World Solar Challenge!"

251 comments

  1. Now... by gerf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd like to see real applications. For example, if someone had a few cells on top of their Prius, and were driving cross country, or in Phoenix, how much would it help? This is the news i'd like to hear, the stuff that matters to me.

    1. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some cars have translucent solar cells embedded in their sunroofs. It first arrived on the now discontinued Mazda 929 and current Audi A6's and A8's have it. To give you an idea of the power generated, it was only used to power the fans to circulate air to cool the car down when it was sitting out in the sun.

    2. Re:Now... by homer_ca · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well the specs in the Slashdot blurb are a little off. According to the Univ of Missouri site, it weighs 822 lbs with driver. Of that 176 lbs is the driver and 320 lbs is batteries.

      A Prius has about the same surface area as one of these solar racers. If you covered the entire car with solar cells, you'd get about the same power, 1500W max in bright sunlight at high noon. That's about 2HP which is less power than a 50cc moped, maybe as much power as a lawnmower, and maybe as much power as 3-4 professional bicycle racers. 2HP might be enough to run the headlights and A/C, but forget about it for moving 3000lbs of car + passengers.

    3. Re:Now... by benjamindees · · Score: 3, Informative

      1500 watts would be absolutely useless to any type of consumer vehicle. That's 2 horsepower. Your (push) lawnmower has more power. Try riding that across country.

      Besides, I'm sure they're using ultra-light ultra-expensive solar cells that you couldn't afford. The things you put on your house would barely generate enough energy to compensate for their own weight.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    4. Re:Now... by sacherjj · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it would cost about $20,000 to fix you car after an accident and most body shops don't know how to work with solar cells. :)

    5. Re:Now... by FatlXception · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know where you're getting your specs but the headline is correct. Our batteries weigh 30kg (66 lbs) as per race rules. Maybe you're thinking of an old lead-acid based car. This car uses lithium-ion polymer batteries.

      And as for the question about the solar cells, they're certainly the single most expensive part of the car, but they're really not that bad. They're gallium arsenide cells sold to us at a steep discount by Spectrolab because they were rejected for use on satellites, but even their rejects are much better than standard silicon terrestrial-grade cells (which incidentally is what we won second with in 2001). The full grade cells run in the millions of dollars, but reject cells like ours can be found in the ballpark of tens of thousands. The bare cells themselves are not significantly thinner or lighter than any other type of cell, but I guarantee the packaging and encapsulation is.

    6. Re:Now... by awesjosh · · Score: 1

      Those specs were for Solar Miner II, the car that won the 1999 race. The article has the correct specs for Solar Miner IV, the car that won this year's race.

    7. Re:Now... by awesjosh · · Score: 1

      Looks like the team is pretty slow to update the FAQ on the website. Still has the one that Jeremy Theis and I put together 4 years ago. ;)

    8. Re:Now... by emok · · Score: 2, Informative

      The purpose of the ASC isn't to bring solar cars to consumers--that will never be feasible. The purpose is to inform the public about alternate technologies and to encourage young engineers to think about energy efficieny in their future careers. See this faq: http://www.americansolarchallenge.org/pdfs/faqs.pd f

    9. Re:Now... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC, the theory behind solar powered ventilation is to keep the cars from getting oven hot in the sun. That means that they can use a smaller lighter A/C system since they don't need to battle such extreme heat. (I remember reading somewhere that a typical car A/C unit could cool a small apartment.) The weight reduction provides the real energy savings by increasing the car's fuel economy.

    10. Re:Now... by dagoalieman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The UMR Solar Team site appears to be outdated, and you're citing stats from the Solar Miner II- this year's car was Solar Miner IV. I'm looking for an updated set of stats for us to puruse.

      1500W was enough to power the car at 65mph most of the time, from what I've heard. Certainly, that's no 3000lb. But anyone who remembers races from 95, 97, etc. know that's a big improvement over past years. Also, so far as I know UMR only had one "repair" stop during the racing day (on the first day) and the rest of the stops were to refuel the chase vehichles.

      The technology isn't useful yet. But it's heading that way.

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    11. Re:Now... by Mr.+Ophidian+Jones · · Score: 1

      This is the news i'd like to hear, the stuff that matters to me.

      Sorry, you're on the wrong site. :)

    12. Re:Now... by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 1

      Our 22 year old POS lawnmower had 3.5hp when it was new. ANy new lawnmower has at least five ponies, but it more likely has at least six. Riding mowers I believe start around 20hp.

      --
      [ ]
    13. Re:Now... by FatlXception · · Score: 1

      Andrew made up a new website a long time ago but they never transferred over to it. I guess they had more important things to work on, like building a solar car. :)

    14. Re:Now... by malia8888 · · Score: 2, Funny
      The roughly 339lb car (517lb with driver) with 1500 watts of power won by nearly 5 hours -

      Heck, if I can find a 105 lb jockey and strap him on a fiberglass board with my 1500 W hair dryer I'd beat the weight class.....Oh yeah, the a-c plug....damn!.

      --
      Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
    15. Re:Now... by timjdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know y'all never researched this any eh? Electric motors are rated on continuous output for 30 minutes or something like that while ICE's are rated on peak output. So you can 3x any electrical motor number or something like that. My father-in-law maintins the beetle and the CRX were some of the best cars ever built as they were so lite one could get $50 MPG. Not to mention all that other parts needed for gas-based cars which are not needed on electric cars.

      Anyways, the whole issue with usefulness is battery weight. Period. Lead's about as heavy as it gets. Gas is per weight about as efficient as it gets ('cept the nuke subs) So, the usefulness is in home/fixed power. I researched a fews years back that I could switch over for about $20K but was not convinced the system would last long enough to pay itself off and could not determine that the local power monopoly allowed credit for power I'd supply back to the system when I was not running at capacity.

      I hope we see some more consumer applications of solar in the near future. TimJowers

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    16. Re:Now... by pj737 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, if you covered the entire car including its roof, hood, trunk and rear window (using less efficient transparent solar cells) with cells that automobile manufacturers could actually afford, you could maybe get away with 800 watts max in a practical application. And that's using cells of at least 18% efficiency. But, you have to consider that your car could be parked in the sun all or most of the day. That would yield (or store) anywhere from 3,200 - 4,800 watt-hours of energy. How much is that? Well, it's enough to crank a 75HP electric motor at two-thirds capacity (about 50HP or 37 kilowatts) for about 7.5 minutes. 50HP is enough power to get a well-designed car (decent weight and relatively low coefficient of drag) to maintain 65 mph - easy.

      Cruising at 65 mph on the freeway is relatively as efficient as driving in the city (stop and go vs. constant high speed). This is a HUGE variable so please no rebuttals. I'm trying to be general here.. So if you travel 65 mph on the freeway you'll travel 8.12 miles in 7.5 minutes. If you were in the city in stop and go traffic you would cover about the same distance - 8.12 miles on that same bucket of solar energy. Throw in some hills and a lot of wind and you may have to shave about 20%.

      8 or even 6 miles from pure solar power every day? That's kick ass! Considering I only drive about 4,000 miles per year in my Honda Insight, solar power could supplement over half of the miles I travel every year! Heck, even if you drive 10,000 miles per year, that's still 20% from pure solar.

      Who says solar cars are not viable? I say get those lame ass solar race cars off the road and start integrating some solar technology into hybrids with LARGER storage batteries. Japan, you listening??? (cause I know US car manufacturers sure as hell ain't).

      Autonomous everything!

    17. Re:Now... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      A fairly small passenger car (4 people, 2000 lb / 900 kg), fairly well streamlined but not so much so as to be difficult to use, can be expected to need at least 10 hp for level 55 mph (88 kph) travel. Going uphill (say 9 degrees at 55 mph) would add another 30 hp to the requirements.

      So if you covered your whole car with these excellent cells delivering 2 hp, you could expect to improve your fuel economy by 25%. Fewer cells would mean less improvement. If you could store energy while not driving, that would help even more.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    18. Re:Now... by CraigParticle · · Score: 1
      2HP might be enough to run the headlights and A/C, but forget about it for moving 3000lbs of car + passengers.

      No.

      You would be very surprised to know how little power is required to maintain, say, 50 mph in a (small) car like the Prius. About 6 kW., which is about 8 hp. Of that, 1-2 kW is very significant, and could be used (for example) to improve highway mileage significantly, which is currently not a strength of hybrids.

      This isn't bogus. Even in the very early 1980's, Chrysler made a big deal that their new "K-car" (Phymouth Reliant/Dodge Aries) could cruise at 55 mph with something like 12-15 hp. That was before gas prices fell, and people stopped caring. Today's small cars are a lot lighter and more aerodynamic than the Reliant/Aries was. So the Prius estimate at 6-9 kW (at 50-60 mph) seems very reasonable.

      Admittedly, the full 1-2kW of solar power would only be available in rather idealized circumstances. And accelerating an automobile to 55 mph in a timescale acceptable to most (American) drivers requires a LOT more power for a few seconds. Nevertheless, the common notion that you need ~100 hp to keep a car moving is simply flat-out untrue.

    19. Re:Now... by nucrash · · Score: 1

      Do your homework. 3.5 HP engine's actual output is around 2 HP. Same with all other Lawnmowers, actual output isn't near what it says on the engine. What you buy is the theoretical maximum output. As for the standard mowers today, 20HP riding lawnmower is a big damn mower. I think I see Commercial mowers with engines that big. Riding Lawnmowers range generally from 8 to 19 HP. Once again this is just theoretical maximum HP.

      --
      Place something witty here
    20. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is, I'm usually alone when I drive and generally have little to no cargo, and drive only a short distance (~16k). I imagine this is true for 90% of people on their way to work -- where we do most of our driving. I think one of these little solar cars probably WOULD be practical for these purposes (esp. if you add pettles or a small gas engine to the design to supplement acceleration).

      What is the real impediment here? For one, the government would never allow it on the road screaming safety concerns or some such nonsense -- even though a 450 pound, 100hp motorcycle is considered safe enough. And I bet any attempt to try to get them legally on the road would be quickly blocked by lobbiests for oil and insurance companies...

    21. Re:Now... by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Exactly. As far as energy-density goes, there isn't anything out there right now that beats fossil fuels, esp. when you figure in transportation and storage costs.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    22. Re:Now... by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

      The amount of useable surface area that is horizontal is actually much less on a standard sedan than on a solar car. Even less on a Prius. The practical application here is not solar cars for the masses. The practical applications are:

      1) Solar Power elsewhere

      2) energy-efficient cars

      When you consider how fast these cars go and how little power they use to do it, it becomes obvious just how much room for improvement in current cars. For example, if we stopped using engines that produce 7 times as much waste heat as useable energy, we wouldn't need to cool them nearly as much. You could replace the grill on the front of the car with a faring. Highway gas mileage would go through the roof. As a side bonus, you'd have almost zero radar profile, so if you get pulled over, you could argue that they were actually reading the guy in the Hummer behind you.

    23. Re:Now... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Yeah, after posting I saw someone else point out that the FAQ was for an old car. My bad. :)

    24. Re:Now... by pmz · · Score: 1

      Try riding that across country.

      The world would truly be a better place if we all rode 21" lawnmowers to work each day. Put a bar stool attached to the deck with two strings for steering, and the congestion problems due to the three wasted seats in every car will disappear. Also, highway maintaince costs would plummet as the roads could simply be well-graded grass paths, and each and every driver would be doing their part to keep the grass in check.

      Also, I think everyone riding to work on a barstool attached to a mower is pretty darn funny.

    25. Re:Now... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Actually, at least near Philadelphia, you can get riding mowers up to 25 horsepower (I'll take your word for it that that is the theoretical max).

      I have an old beat up thing that does the job quite well with 12 horsepower, though... so I imagine that the increased horsepower is just there for marketing reasons.

    26. Re:Now... by nucrash · · Score: 1

      Well, I have seen Small Engines with up to 29 HP, but I thought most of them were for Commercial Lawnmowers. Those would be the big ole Zero Radius monsters that they use to mow stadiums and what not.

      To further add to the Theoretical Max ratings of a Small Engine's HP, when you buy from an OEM, that is was you get. But when you buy from a Retailer be wary, the numbers can be upped even more. Today I seen an engine rated at 5 HP Max that was sold as 6.75. Though I know the engine is a high quality engine and worth the $300 that it was sold for, I would be seriously upset to find out as a consumer that what I had purchased was marketed to death.

      --
      Place something witty here
  2. How long? by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does anyone know if the times the race takes are getting shorter each year? In other words, is the technology actually getting better each year?

    1. Re:How long? by Cyclopedian · · Score: 4, Informative
      Here's the results of the ASC race from 2001:
      Overall Results

      The leader finished with 56:10:46, while this year's leader finished with 51:47:39. However, looking at the overall top 10, it appears that the 2001 field was slightly better than the top 10 of this year's field. I'd say it means that solar technology is advancing but at a somewhat slow pace. Until we hit that breakthrough that gets the solar efficiency past 40%, we won't see much of any daily applications of this tech.

      Then again, it's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

      -Cyc

    2. Re:How long? by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "it appears that the 2001 field was slightly better than the top 10 of this year's field. I'd say it means that solar technology is advancing but at a somewhat slow pace."

      Maybe there was more sun that year.

    3. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most solar cells are 12-17% efficient. 40% would be a huge leap.

    4. Re:How long? by utexaspunk · · Score: 5, Informative

      I used to be on the Solar Race car team at UT, and I can tell you that the rules for this and Sunrayce are extremely restrictive as to what kind of cells and batteries you can use (to keep the rich schools from buying all the super-top-of-the-line stuff and outspending the competition), and you're limited to driving the speed limit. It's more of a competition about making a car that won't break down than about speed.

    5. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although some of those hills can get mighty steep...

    6. Re:How long? by emok · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe that UMR was travelling at or near the posted speed limit for the entire race, so it's not really possible to finish much faster. ...yes the teams do have to obey traffic laws.

    7. Re:How long? by Duncan3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      25-30% efficiency cells have been around for a while. I've even seen some report in the 35% range under normal solar spectrum.

      You can't afford them however. Warren Buffet could maybe cover his car roof, but not the hood and trunk. And then he'd be broke. The tech is easy waiting for the patents to expire is the hard part.

      In 15 years, having your house roof be 33% solar shingles will cost next to nothing, but for now, don't hold your breath.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    8. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I go to UMR, and while not on the Solar Car team, I am on the Solar House team.

      My wife also covers all the PR for the Solar Car.

      The solar technology IS better than 2 years ago, but every thing else on the car is better as well. It's lighter, more aerodynamic, has a better battery and a more efficient engine.

    9. Re:How long? by Russ+Moerland · · Score: 1

      The biggest difference is the stop in Albuquerque was changed from 2.5hrs to a staged stop. This changed the the long leg from Rolla, MO to Barstow into a set of two sprints. The strategy for racing them are very different. In '01 the leaders were caught under cloudcover near Albuquerque, which slowed us down on the climb to Flagstaff. With a staged stop in Albuquerque it is possible to sprint all the way up to Flagstaff without worry of cloudcover.

    10. Re:How long? by bfl · · Score: 1

      As a student from Queen's University (7th place) I know that our solar car has a passenger in it this year. This was clearly not done to speed the car up, but rather to push the technology and see what these cars can do.

    11. Re:How long? by ferds32 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if the times the race takes are getting shorter each year? In other words, is the technology actually getting better each year?

      I can't speak for the American race but in the World Solar Challenge the seventh team in 2001 came in quicker than the top place in 1999.[1] So yes, the technology is improving and so are the teams.

      [1] This improvement in timing was also affected by the race taking place later in the year.

      Tom Rowlands
      (Sorry, I can't sign this.)
    12. Re:How long? by ferds32 · · Score: 1

      It's more of a competition about making a car that won't break down than about speed.

      That's an excellent point. By far the hardest part of any solar race is getting the car, along with the telemetry, escort vehicles and, of course, team, reliable. It is imperative that a complete, reliable, package is presented at the race. Getting equipment, electronics in particular, to work well in a car is very hard. Trust me; ``Everything changes when it's actually in the car.''

      Tom Rowlands
      (Sorry, I can't sign this.)
    13. Re:How long? by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
      Until we hit that breakthrough that gets the solar efficiency past 40%, we won't see much of any daily applications of this tech.

      Then again, it's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

      I think you are wrong. Agreed it's only for specalised purposes, but solar power is practical and useful now. For example, a solar panel provides all the power for all the systems - navigation instruments, radio, GPS, interior lighting, navigation lights - on my boat, and it does that reliably in Scotland which is not a sunny country. As far as I'm concerned, that's a practical daily application.

      It's also worth pointing out that a lot of the tech we use wastes a huge amount of power because we're so used to having it on tap and so cheap. For example, at least 75% of the energy used by an incandescent lightbulb gets wasted as heat. My desktop computer has a 450 watt power supply. All the little gizmos you plug into your computer which have their own little AC/DC adaptors waste energy as heat (just feel how hot those little boxes get). In warmer countries than this all the heat given off by inefficient devixces then has to be couteracted by air conditioning systems which consume still more power.

      If you want to make practical use of solar power then you have to think carefully about the systems you use. You can save vast amounts of power by changing to different lighting technologies (LEDs, compact flourescents...) and by using different processor families and more integrated devices. Solar power isn't practical for powering devices designed for mains electricity, but that doesn't mean it cant be practical for doing what you want to do.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    14. Re:How long? by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd rather have such cheap and abundant energy that I can afford to be wasteful, rather than having to scrimp and save every milliamp I can just to use a "cool" technology.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  3. Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is dat them Roads Scholars they got'n thar?

    1. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let me guess, you live on either the east or west coast?

      The University of Missouri Rolla is one of the top Engineering colleges in the country. It ranks right behind MIT and California Institute of Technology. Let's not forget Washington University based in Saint Louis, one of the leaders in the engineering and medical communities.

      Nice job being ignorant.

    2. Re:Missouri? by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, don't be *too* hard on the original poster. I'm from St. Louis, Missouri myself and I laughed at it.

      Many folks who live near the coasts really don't have a clue what midwestern cities are like though. I've talked to a good number of native Californians on IRC chat in the past - and it's surprising how often the *only* thing they know of St. Louis is "Oh yeah, you're the city with that big arch, right?" They also often seem to think there is nothing else in Missouri except for farmland and camp sites. (We've got a LOT of that - but that sure wouldn't describe Kansas City, MO or even Springfield, MO.)

      Speaking of colleges in particular though, you might also point out that another part of the "triangle" of "University of Missouri" schools, "Mizzou" (in Columbia, MO), is nationally recognized for turning out top quality writers and English literature majors.

      Of lesser note, perhaps, but still worth mentioning - St. Louis, MO is also home of Logan School of Chiropractic -- probably one of the largest Chiropractic colleges in the United States.

    3. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the Univ. President at Mizzou is more concerned with NCAA basketball than he is with solving the university's problems (such as lack of funding because the state has no money). After seeing the Ricky Clemons thing play out, I lost all respect for Mizzou that I ever had. It's unfortunate, because I go to UM-St. Louis.

    4. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chancellor at Mizzou has stepped down (as of 1.5 weeks ago) and currently the UM-system president is acting chancellor.

      I've met him, he's a good guy with the UM system's academics as 1st priority.

    5. Re:Missouri? by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Informative? Apparently the moderator attended Oxford

    6. Re:Missouri? by domovoi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another St. Louisan here. Don't forget the many unique places that make StL um...stand out.

      Then again, there are bunches of genuinely cool places and events that make the town with the easy-carry handle worth living in.

      UM-St. Louis also produces a seriously good literary magazine and has a strong creative writing program.

    7. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really bad for faculty and staff too. I work at UMSL and it looks increasingly like a sinking ship. The only reason I stick around is because I take pride in my job and want to help out students.

    8. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I take pride in my job and want to help out students.

      So, you work in Financial Aid, I take it :)?

    9. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computer science faculty, actually.

    10. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an east coast transplant to St. Louis and can attest to the cosmopolitan nature of The Lou and KC. Stupidity is stupidity, whether your from the east, mid, or west coast. No excuses for that parochial crap.

      Lest anyone forget (or missed it in high school history), St. Louis has a rich history in technology. From The Spirit of St. Louis, through the X-Prize and the biotechnology industry fostered here: St. Louis is populated by some fairly enlightened citizens.

    11. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're too pessimistic to be Gayou, so which one are you?

    12. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll never tell. ;-)

    13. Re:Missouri? by domovoi · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Senior faculty go for the buy-out, junior faculty get the wage freeze. Adjuncts continue to get the royal shaft, staff is expected to do more with less. The entire UM system paid tens of millions of dollars to buy an utterly idiotic HR platform (People$oft), but we've gotta raise tuition and cut services.

      Oh, and don't forget the Touhill Mausoleum. Because we need a 1600-seat performing arts space more than, say, enough computers for 10% of the campus. I'm teaching my last class right now. I'll not be back in the Fall. Time to get the flock out of Dodge.

    14. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm truly surprised at the number of /.'ers at UMSL. We should all get together and have lunch or something.

    15. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a CS major at UMSL and I'm a native St. Louisan. UMSL wasn't my first choice to attend; and to be honest, it wasn't in the top five, really. But because of lack of money and some other things that happened, I ended up attending. And now that I'm a senior, I actually like the school and am glad I'm going there and it's a shame seeing what's happening to the place. It's a shame to see UMSL and UMKC get screwed out of funding in favor of MU and UMR.

    16. Re:Missouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In favor of UMR? Sorry but we got the cuts also. Our tuition went up 20 percent this semester.

  4. Usefullness by buck_wild · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So how will this technology be used in forthcoming products? Is there a value here?

    --
    If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    1. Re:Usefullness by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Interesting. The parent comment was made when there were only 7 other comments out there...but this one gets a 'redundant' mod. Thanks all.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  5. Huh? by heli0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The roughly 339lb car (517lb with driver)"

    http://solar42.umr.edu/faq/techfaq.htm
    "Q: What does the car weigh?
    A: Solar Miner II weighs 822 pounds with the driver. The batteries alone weigh 320 pounds and our driver weighs 176 pounds. If the driver weighs in less than 176 pounds, he/she must carry lead shot with them to bring their weight to 176 pounds. "

    Is that 339lb figure from the article only the batteries?

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That figure is for Solar Miner II, the car that won in 1999. The 339 pound figure is from Solar Miner IV, the car that won this year.

    2. Re:Huh? by heli0 · · Score: 1

      Do they have the specs for the new car anywhere on their site?

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    3. Re:Huh? by (startx) · · Score: 1

      The site needs to be updated. That was Solar Miner II, the car UMR won with in 1999. The winner of this rayce (yes, spelled correctly damnit) was Solar Miner IV. It uses much lighter batteries and the car itself is much lighter as well.

  6. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    CEO's of the Big Three yawned in unison when told about Missouri's victory.

    One of them asked "Was the winner an SUV that runs on gasoline?" When told the answer, he replied "whatever."

    1. Re:In other news by sacherjj · · Score: 1

      Moderated as Funny. It should be motderated as "True, but sad". Average gas mileage has been going down over the last decade. Who needs to drive around a Hummer H2 anyway? What exactly are you compensating for?

    2. Re:In other news by (startx) · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh, I find that midly amusing, only because on our longest one-day run in the race, 435 miles, we had to stop to refuel the f'ing chase car. The solar car was just fine running on batteries alone.

    3. Re:In other news by (startx) · · Score: 1

      Damnit, that should have said solar power, not batteries. From what I was told, it barely touched the battery.

    4. Re:In other news by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Maybe they aren't compensating for anything. Maybe they're just tired of self-righteous SOBs making it their d@amn business what they drive, where they live, what they eat and how much money they make.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    5. Re:In other news by sacherjj · · Score: 1

      Driving on public roads is not a right. This means that legislation can control when should be allowed there. I'd love to see your response after that person who should get to drive what they want crushes your car with their Sherman tank. Get real.

  7. Tie In Some Adult stuff for ratings by felonious · · Score: 1, Funny

    How about the American Solar Challenge/Houston 700? We know she can do 660 at a sitting but can she do 700? How about have her do this in each solar car while moving and rotating to each vehicle while moving in a continuous fashion?

    I smell paper view...actually I bet it'd smell a bit fishy...It's all about the ratings damnit!!

    --
    You aren't free to do anything, until you've lost everything.
    1. Re:Tie In Some Adult stuff for ratings by tds67 · · Score: 1, Funny
      I smell paper view...actually I bet it'd smell a bit fishy...It's all about the ratings damnit!!

      Indeed. I saw a Mike Tyson fight on paper view once, but for some reason his image never moved.

  8. Woo! by Keeper · · Score: 0, Troll

    My college is actually good for something other than taking my money and giving me a diploma! :)

  9. From a displaced Missourian: by NOLAChief · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congratulations Miners! Glad to hear you found something productive to do in Rolla. :) (Note to everyone else: this is my dad's alma mater...It's a great engineering school, but there's not much to do in Rolla, MO...I've heard the, er, stories.)

    1. Re:From a displaced Missourian: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, you can always go a couple counties to the north, to a real university, in Columbia.

    2. Re:From a displaced Missourian: by sgups · · Score: 1

      My alma mater sux. It only came in 3rd!!!

      --
      Democratic USA - Government of the corporations, by the Corporations, for the corporations.
    3. Re:From a displaced Missourian: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard that the male students outnumber the female students 10-1, but pound for pound it's about equal.

    4. Re:From a displaced Missourian: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we do have The Grotto... and ummmmm.... ........ ....
      Oh yeah.. St. Pats!

      If it dosn't involve drinking, we don't do it.

    5. Re:From a displaced Missourian: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For engineering? That's a hoot!

      ~~~

    6. Re:From a displaced Missourian: by RandomWhiteMan · · Score: 1

      As a UMR alumni, theres other things to do. Granted they all involve lots of alcohol. Making homemade wine in your dorm room, calculating the proof of some concoction made in a trash can, it's fun, fun, fun. Good Job to the Solar Car team though. A couple of years ago when they first started to really do well I knew several people on the team. Good to see they're still doing well.

    7. Re:From a displaced Missourian: by SatoshiMyuu · · Score: 1

      Ahh, Rolla... where the men are many, the women are few, and the sheep are scared...

  10. need more solar power by m0rphin3 · · Score: 1

    Looks like their server lost its juice.

    How about using the energy made by a slashdotting to power a server?

    --
    for great justice
  11. The reason they beat the U of Minnesota by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny
    they closed the Subway(TM) in Stadium Village. Our driver was 330 pounds!

    Hardly fair.

    1. Re:The reason they beat the U of Minnesota by (startx) · · Score: 1

      That must be why Rolla won then. In a town of 17,000 people (including 5,000 college students) we've got 4 subways! beat that!

    2. Re:The reason they beat the U of Minnesota by M-G · · Score: 1

      we've got 4 subways

      Four? The Subway site lists 3 open stores:

      the one across from Taco Bell, the one on Kingshighway, and one on Hwy 63 S, which must be newer.

      They list a store as 'not currently open' on Forum Dr in the Delano Building, which I take to mean it's tucked in a gas station...

      I'm personally bummed that they closed the one on Pine street. That was my favorite.

    3. Re:The reason they beat the U of Minnesota by (startx) · · Score: 1

      your right, I forgot they closed the one on Pine street. Still, 3 > 0

    4. Re:The reason they beat the U of Minnesota by M-G · · Score: 1

      There's now some baked potato type of place in there.

      For any alums who haven't been back to Rolla recently, you should really stop by when you can. The changes have been dramatic. The new EE and CE buildings really make things look different along Pine Street. There's a Lowe's now too.

  12. Bad For The Environment by tds67 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think these Universities should be promoting solar power. The sun is a finite resource. In about 4 billion years it'll be done for. Wasting its energy like this is not helpful.

    1. Re:Bad For The Environment by Basje · · Score: 1

      It's even worse. Most of the energy the sun produces passes the earth altogether. Talking about waste.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    2. Re:Bad For The Environment by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 3, Funny
      OK, enough waste. Bout time we get Congress to OK funding for building a Dyson's Sphere.

      Let the contract bidding begin!

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    3. Re:Bad For The Environment by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      > Let the contract bidding begin!

      I'd say, oh, for an infinite amount of money, to be completed in an infinite amount of time, I can get that done for ya, no prob.

      Half up front, the other half upon successful, on-time completion of project. :)

      I better call my bank and tell them to expect an infinite amount of money to be deposited soon - I think they'll need to do some upgrades first.

    4. Re:Bad For The Environment by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      Sorry, infinite time is not good enough. You see, 4 billions years from now, Sun go poof! Then we just have one big dead-bulb of a Dyson's Sphere.

      Get it done in 1 billion years, you got a deal.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    5. Re:Bad For The Environment by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Well, okay, but for that kind of schedule, you'll have to pay double. Good, fast, cheap, pick any two, ya know...

      Or, for only 50% more and on the originally proposed schedule, we could fix up your Sun so it'll last longer. The technology level in making a Dyson Sphere is more than that needed to import such amounts of star-fuel from elsewhere.

    6. Re:Bad For The Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shirley Booth, Ed Gardner's wife at the time Duffy's Tavern began (1940), was the original Miss Duffy. They divorced in 1942. Miss Duffy was played by a parade of actresses, most notably Florence Halop and Sandra Gould.

      Florence Halop was Billy Halop's sister (he of Dead End Kids fame) and she later (Much later) replaced Selma Diamond on Night Court.

      Sandra Gould was Elizabeth Montgomery's next door neighbor on Bewitched after Alice Pearce died.

      Duffy's Tavern ran from 1940 to 1952.

    7. Re:Bad For The Environment by bradbury · · Score: 1
      Actually, by star-lifting [1] one can decrease size of the sun to that of a smaller star. The diminished gravity slows the rate of hydrogen consumption and extends the lifespan to potentially trillions of years. And that doesn't consider what would happen if you gradually fed the sun hydrogen harvested from nearby planets (e.g. Jupiter) or perhaps more distant brown dwarfs or even hydrogen gas clouds. Predictions of a natural course of evolution seriously underestimate the capabilities of advanced technological civilizations. For example see [2].

      1. D. R. Criswell, "Solar System Industrialization: Implications for Interstellar Migrations", Chapter 4 in Interstellar Migration and the Human Experience, Ben R. Finney and Eric M. Jones, (eds.), University of California Press, (1985), pp 50-87.
      2. Bradbury, R. J., "Planetary Disassembly" (http://www.aeiveos.com/~bradbury/MatrioshkaBrains /PlntDssmbly.html) (circa 1998).

    8. Re:Bad For The Environment by bradbury · · Score: 1
      You don't have to get Congress to OK funding (in fact its probably even a bad idea to let them know that you are planning to disassemble planets). All you have to do is design the nanobots to do the heavy lifting tasks (and throw in a fair amount of systems administration engineering to keep them all coordinated) and throw them at the project.

      For more see the Matrioshka Brain Home Page

  13. focus. by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

    is it just me or do all the photos fuzzy?

  14. bet they could have done better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with a lighter driver :P

  15. For Non-USians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The University of Missouri - Rolla won this year's 3700 km American Solar Challenge. The roughly 154 kg car (235 kg with driver) with 1500 watts of power won by nearly 5 hours - here's the final results. UMR has now won two out of the past three races, finishing second in the last race, to Michigan. Congrats, and good luck to them in the World Solar Challenge!"

    1. Re:For Non-USians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, my name is Zeebloop from the planet Zorknoff. You earthlings with your silly time formats.. Will someone please tell me wtf 5 "hours" means?!?

  16. Funny how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Funny how the schools that won came from states with little or no sun, and the sunny states didn't place that well.

    Guess people who go to schools with no sun have nothing to do but work all day.

    1. Re:Funny how... by MidnightLightning · · Score: 0

      Not really. As the sun is not as abundant in some states, the cars from these states are probably designed more efficiently because of the possibility of underperformance in testing.

      --

      -------
      Those who can, do, and those who can't, well ... teach.
    2. Re:Funny how... by pyr0 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should visit Missouri in the summer then. *Plenty* of sun...trust me. In fact, I'm a UM-Rolla student (for only two more weeks thank god) and I've lived all my life in Missouri thus far. So, I should know.

    3. Re:Funny how... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      When is there sun in Rolla? When I went there 90% of the time all you got was a murky grey in the sky. And cold.

      But I never stayed for a summer session -- just long enough to get pissed at the reslife people for not turning on the AC soon enough. :)

    4. Re:Funny how... by Keeper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the biggest challenge the solar racers experience is how to plan/cope with NOT having sun.

      Ie: How hard do you push the car to have enough juice in the batteries to start off at full power the next day?

      A more efficient car helps out somewhat, but good judgement (and luck) plays a much greater role than you'd think. And that good judgement comes from experience/practice.

    5. Re:Funny how... by (startx) · · Score: 1

      no sun? NO SUN!?!? I'm in Missouri, and in the past month and a half it has been > 95 degree highs, 60+% humidity, and has rained exactly once. Obviously you've never been the Missouri....

    6. Re:Funny how... by pyr0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the winter the sky is murky grey 90% of the time...or maybe that's just how Rolla seems when you are about to get bent over by a math test that if you get better than a 60% on, then the prof thinks he/she failed at making a hard enough test. They really should hand out vasoline with those things!

    7. Re:Funny how... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Of course I exagerate about how grey the sky usually is. But 90% of the time when you have free time it's pretty murky outside. Or dark....;)

      The Calc III teacher I had actually stated that his goal was a 50% average on the tests. He made half of the test stuff that everyone should know, and the other half of the test hard stuff -- just to see how well people would do on them (probably to get some feedback on how he was teaching). If you did all of the (ungraded) homework, odds are you'd do really well on the tests.

      Of course, he graded on a curve -- if you made a 50% on a test you'd usually end up with a B. But it didn't stop people from complaining about how the test was hard. I personally thought the tests were awesome (when was the last time you had FUN taking a test? :)), and that was probably the best math class I'd ever taken ...

  17. 2003 Dell-Winston Solar Challenge - another race by wherley · · Score: 2, Informative

    here is the info on another solar race from Dell headquarters in Round Rock Texas to the Florida Solar Energy Center in Cocoa FL which just ended (after 9 days of racing) today.

    Good job teams!

  18. Car building guidelines? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it allowed to use the actual *heat* of the sun to produce energy, such as in a Stirling engine, or is that now considered 'Reverse Engineering of Sunlight' and outlawed under the DMCA?

    1. Re:Car building guidelines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but producing energy is not allowed by the laws of thermodynamics

  19. Ever heard of thermodynamics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thermodynamics is the study of energy, its conversions between various forms such as heat, and the ability of energy to do work. It is closely related to statistical mechanics from which many themodynamic relationships can be derived. The field delves into a wide range of topics including, but not limited to: efficiency of heat engines and turbines, phase equilibria, PVT relationships. gas laws (both ideal and non ideal), energy balances, heats of reactions, and combustion reactions. It is governed by 4 basic laws (in brief): The Laws of Thermodynamics Alternative statements are given for each law. These statements are, for the most part, mathematically equivalent. * Zeroth law: A fundamental concept within thermodynamics, however, it was not termed a law until after the first three laws were already widely in use, hence the zero numbering. There is some discussion about its status. Stated as: o If A and B are in thermal equilibrium, and B and C are in thermal equilibrium, then A and C are also in thermal equilibrium. o Two systems in thermal equilibrium with a third system, all must be in equilibrium with each other. * 1st Law: Is stated as follows: o The work exchanged in an adiabatic process depends only on the initial and the final state and not on the details of the process. o The sum of heat flowing into a system, and work done by the system is zero. * 2nd Law: A far reaching and powerful law, it can be stated many ways, the most popular of which is: o It is impossible to obtain a process such that the unique effect is the subtraction of a positive heat from a reservoir and the production of a positive work. o The entropy of a closed system never decreases (see Maxwell's demon) o A system operating in contact with a thermal reservoir cannot produce positive work in its surroundings (Kelvin) o A system operating in a cycle cannot produce a positive heat flow from a colder body to a hotter body (Clausius) * 3rd Law: This law explains why it is so hard to cool something to absolute zero: o All processes cease as temperature approaches zero. o As temperature goes to 0, the entropy of a system approaches a constant The three original laws have been humorously summarised as: (1) you can't win; (2) you can't break even; (3) you can't get out of the game. Thermodynamic Systems A thermodynamic system is that part of the universe that is under consideration. A real or imaginary boundary separates the system from the rest of the universe, which is referred to as the surroundings. Often thermodynamic systems are characterized by the nature of this boundary as follows: * Isolated systems are completely isolated from their surroundings. Neither heat nor matter can be exchanged between the system and the surroundings. An example of an isolated system would be an insulated container, such as an insulated gas cylinder. (In reality, a system can never be absolutely isolated from its environment, because there is always at least some slight coupling, even if only via minimal gravitational attraction). * Closed systems are separated from the surroundings by an impermeable barrier. Heat can be exchanged between the system and the surroundings, but matter cannot. A greenhouse is an example of a closed system. * Open systems can exchange both heat and matter with their surroundings. Portions of the boundary between the open system and its surroundings may be impermeable and/or adiabatic, however at least part of this boundary is subject to heat and mass exchange with the surroundings. The ocean would be an example of an open system. Thermodynamic State A key concept in thermodynamics is the state of a system. When a system is at equilibrium under a given set of conditions, it is said to be in a definite state. For a given thermodynamic state, many of the system's properties have a specific value corresponding to that state. The values of these properties are a function of the state of the system a

  20. Missouri's Solar Cars by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    It seems that the University is not the only one in Missouri working on solar cars. According to this pic, most every resident is working on one!

    Go solar!

  21. Solar? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    So I guess that means no 'VTEC' sticker. Too bad.

    1. Re:Solar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem, some Asian kid would be perfectly happy to put one on anyway.

  22. As a former UMR student, I can say.... by anonymousman77 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We had no women, but we sure had a sweet-assed solar car. =)

    1. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by Kevinv · · Score: 4, Funny

      See what you can accomplish when there are no women clouding your thoughts? 8-)

      Another UMR grad ('91)

    2. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by eoyount · · Score: 2, Funny

      Amen to that.

      Eric Yount
      UMR '98

      --
      To understand recursion,
      you must first understand recursion.
    3. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got that Right!

      Current Student ----> lonely and desperate ;-)

    4. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a current UW student, I can say that one of our drivers is a real cutie, too bad she failed a semester and is no longer in my class. :(

    5. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The men at UMR outnumber the women, but the women make up for it in weight.

      <joke>Q: What do women at UMR and parking spaces have in common...
      A: The best ones are taken and the rest are handicapped! </joke>

      <joke>A female's perspective on the men at UMR, "The odds are good, but the goods are odd!"</joke>

      I'm sure all of these are told at the other engineering colleges as well :)

    6. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      UMR ... where the men are men, the women are men, and the sheep are scared...

      (class of 5/2000)

    7. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by cjackson0 · · Score: 1

      Let us not forget what Comedy Central comedian Lewis Black had to say on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno after performing in Rolla, MO.

      "That's right. I've performed in Rolla MO... Because my life is a rich, full tapestry. And If you're thinking of killing yourself, Rolla's the place to go!"
      Damn if it ain't true.

    8. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by Maledictus · · Score: 1

      You just weren't looking hard enough,

      Maledictus - "Townie,"
      Blonde, blue-eyed, no hick accent
      Daughter of a retired UMR physics prof
      Married to a BSEE, 1983

      --
      Consigned to flames of woe.
    9. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by SunkingvstheChicken · · Score: 1

      Bah, I went to UMSL, we had women and we liked it.

    10. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by pmz · · Score: 1


      See what you can accomplish when there are no women clouding your thoughts? 8-)

      Actually, some parents believe this is a good argument for single-sex education. I suppose they feel more comfortable with their kids screwing screws and not their teammates.

    11. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by M-G · · Score: 1

      had to say on the Tonight Show

      Did you happen to catch Kevin Smith's 'Roadside Attractions' segment that took him through Rolla? He was interviewing the head of the Rock Mechanics lab (Dr. Summers?) at Stonehenge. Asked about sacrificing virgins and such...

      Also did the goofy 'Millenium Arch' sculpture over at Castleman Hall. Which, BTW, was the subject of a recent FARK Photoshop contest.

      Unfortunately, the clip they have on the Tonight Show web site has the Rolla part cut out, so he goes from St. Louis directly towards Branson.

    12. Re:As a former UMR student, I can say.... by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      The phone company seems to have had fewer women than the brokerage house.

      Join me on the dark side where the guys wear ties.

      =)

  23. Lack of Sun by Coneasfast · · Score: 1

    Most pictures show the vehicles on a sunny day. It would be interesting to know how (or if at all) these solar cars perform under somewhat cloudy conditions, which may be a typical environment in many areas.

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
  24. Solar Cell Efficiency? by heli0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    What is the current progress on this?

    This is what I found:
    http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/0304 21.html

    "17.4% Module Conversion Efficiency Industry's Most Efficient --- April 21, 2003"
    "17.3 m2 of area yielding 3.01 kW (4hp)"

    The surface area (hood, roof) of a 2004 Prius is ~10m^2. So that would generate around 2kW with these panels.

    What are the projection for panel efficiency over the next 5-20 years?

    At 50% efficiency you could get 5kW output for a 10m^2 panel. If you drove 1 hour/day and parked in the sun 6 hours/day you could generate an extra 40hp for that hour on the road. As someone mentioned earlier, slap this on a Prius and you should reach 100mpg+ easily.

    Feel free to fix any calculation errors.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:Solar Cell Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick search turned up this article. TECSTAR claims 26.1% efficiency 5 years ago....

    2. Re:Solar Cell Efficiency? by pj737 · · Score: 1

      Well, I just calculated the surface area of my Honda Insight (including the rear window). It was quick and dirty not taking into account the bulging corners and sharper-than-30-degree angled surfaces. I came out with 37 sq ft. If a module is 14% efficient (typical at the commercial level these days), it would yield approx 14 watts per sq ft. That would mean I could only get 518 watts from the entire surface area of my Insight minus the front windshield. Not bad but nowhere near the 2kW you calculated for the Prius. I realize your 17.4% vs. my 14% could make a difference but to a factor of four? Is the Prius just a heck a lot bigger than I thought?

    3. Re:Solar Cell Efficiency? by silverhalide · · Score: 1

      The theoretical maximum for efficiency of a solsr cell made of one material is 30%. You can make 'em out of two materials and get up to 50%, but I believe the manufacturing of these is impractical or impossible. In other words, you will never get more than 3-4000 kW out of current photovoltaic cell technologies. Not to mention that this is more or less wasted, as it takes on average 10-15 hP to maintain a typical vehicle's speed on the interstate. Vehicles with higher drag coeffecients (Read: SUVs) can take as much as 20 HP to keep going (These numbers are what I vaguely recall from my experience in dyno testing SUVs...).

      More photovoltaic cell info here: http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/MSD-fu ll-spectrum-solar-cell.html

      The big question is, will solar cells become cheap enough to mount to the roof of an electric car to keep the batteries fairly charged? (Say your battery dies, just sit on the side of the road for a few hours and you might have enough to make it to a charging station!)

    4. Re:Solar Cell Efficiency? by heli0 · · Score: 1

      No, you are correct, that ~10m^2 figure is probably off. Maybe some of those mods should have double checked the figures as I asked. The new Prius is about 50cm longer than your Insight, and the same width.

      It is 444cm x 173cm. So it takes up ~7.5m^2, but depending on how much the sides stick out and the size of the front and read windows, the surface that could be used for solar panels is probably considerably less than 7.5m^2.

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  25. PROBLEM: BIG DRIVER by cygnus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    178 lbs. of driver? somebody get a horse jockey in that cockpit!

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
    1. Re:PROBLEM: BIG DRIVER by Viceroy · · Score: 1

      Some of the drivers are very small, but to take the drivers weight out of the equation, every driver is ballasted to 80kg, or 176lbs. Some of the smaller girls end up having to carry around 60lbs of lead shot before they get into the car.

    2. Re:PROBLEM: BIG DRIVER by Xeth · · Score: 1

      Read the rules. If they're below 176, they need to pad up to that. Otherwise all the teams would be looking for the most withered of all the geeks to be in the cockpit(Though they likely wouldn't have to look far ;-))

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    3. Re:PROBLEM: BIG DRIVER by (startx) · · Score: 1

      Actually under the rules of the rayce, the driver must weigh a minimum of 176lbs.

    4. Re:PROBLEM: BIG DRIVER by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

      The race rules require an 80 kg driver (176 lbs.) Anything below this and you get ballasted up. When I was on the U.Va. team, all of our drivers were considerably below this weight, since there weren't very many people who could fit into the cockpit comfortably. The nice thing was that we could put the extra weight wherever we wanted it, so we got a better weight balance out if it.

  26. American? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20 percent of the teams were Canadian, how is that the American solar challenge? Oh I see... 20% of "America" is Canada.

    1. Re:American? by DHR · · Score: 1

      So in baseball, the American League contains Toronto, you want that renamed too?

  27. UMR - don't go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    there are like 20 guys for every female. There isn't much else in Rolla, to boot.

    1. Re:UMR - don't go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could like learn something. Maybe get a degree?

      Fucknozzle

    2. Re:UMR - don't go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah.. learn how to pound other boys in the ass..

      can I get a degree in bum banging?

    3. Re:UMR - don't go there by Kevinv · · Score: 1

      eh, more like 4 to 1. Still not good odds, but when does a geek ever have good odds?

      not much else to do is certainly true.

    4. Re:UMR - don't go there by afidel · · Score: 1

      Women love money and guys they can manipulate (read sensitive in chick terms), so many will love geeks even if they don't look like vin diesel. Just wait till you get out of school and you're pulling down near 6 figures, dress like the money you are making and chicks will probably eventually come around.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:UMR - don't go there by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      unless you're a chick, of course ;-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    6. Re:UMR - don't go there by Kevinv · · Score: 1

      heh, i've been out of school for 12 years, don't make anywhere near 6 figures and dress to be comfortable. i don't change who i am to get chicks.

  28. Catch them on television tomorrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, congrads to Minnesota and Waterloo who respectively placed second and third.

    For solar "raycing" fans, Missouri-Rolla is reportedly on the "Today Show" tomorrow morning.

  29. Rolla Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Here's how I express my feelings for Rolla.

    http://web.umr.edu/~phc/pics/rolla_sucks.jpg

    1. Re:Rolla Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice shirt. Looking at the stonework, I'm guessing you're in front of KD? At any rate, I looked up your base URL and saw your schedule --- enjoy Dr. Bogan, he's awesome! He and Dr. Ridley (in the history department) are the teachesr I miss the most. Sager, my boy, probably the least.

      CS UMR 98

    2. Re:Rolla Sucks by M-G · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you're in front of KD?

      Damn. If you're correct, that's impressive. All I can say about KD is to avoid their driveway if you have a low car.

      enjoy Dr. Bogan, he's awesome!

      Bogan is definitely one of the treasues of the campus.

  30. GO BLUE! by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 1

    finishing second in the last race, to Michigan

    I always gotta love the chessy UofM plug. :)

    -B

    GO BLUE!

    1. Re:GO BLUE! by Viceroy · · Score: 1

      And as the driver of both the '99 and '01 Michigan cars, I still have to point out of the 7 American races, Michigan has still won 3 of them. ;) Still, congrats to Rolla.

      The problem I'm seeing with this race though is that as the cars have gotten faster and faster, there is much less strategy involved. Part of the reason this years race was faster was because of the addition of another staged stop in Albuquerque. This essentially changed the race from a cross country endurance run where strategy and energy management were important, to a string of all out sprints where the cars can run right at the speed limit the entire time. If something goes wrong or breaks on a team's car, they are suddenly out of the running for a win. There's no way to catch up if everyone is running at the speed limit. Don't get me wrong, reliability has always been part of the race, but it shouldn't replace strategy as the only way of winning. That's part of the appeal of this kind of race. Its not just about the car and the level of technology on it, but how the weather can change things rapidly, and how you best manage the amount of energy you have.

      Now these are purpose built race cars and most of the technology that goes into them will not and can not be used in real-world applications, just like NASCAR and F1 cars are nothing like whats on the road. The extremely fragile solar cells are for the most part (before sponsorhsip and discounts) worth way more than most homes, let alone another car. But the purpose is not just to develop technology, its to allow students to work in a practical engineering and small company environment and really develop a vehicle using the princples they've learned in class. It was _the_ most useful part of my education at Michigan.

    2. Re:GO BLUE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like Michigan didn't enter this year.

      As usual, no one beats Michigan except Michigan.

    3. Re:GO BLUE! by (startx) · · Score: 1

      actually the Rolla car is extremely efficient, and was running almost completely on solar power, barely touching the batteries. So even without the 2 day stop in Albuquerque, the car still could have gone the speed limit all the way down to California.

    4. Re:GO BLUE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They entered, they just didn't qualify for the final race...

      So any of the teams that show up in the rankings has already beat your school.

  31. same top 3 by nano-second · · Score: 1

    If you notice, the top 3 are the same, and they all appear to have improved.

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
  32. re: affordability by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, the rules for solar races almost always place a limit on the $/watt for the cells, so that competitors can't "buy" the win. (there are some much more efficient solar cells out there, but their cost is insanely high) This forces entrants to work on "the big picture", including vehicle weight, aerodynamics, electronics efficiency, and even their strategy. Many solar competitions allow one battery swap-out during the course of the run, and teams have to decide when the best time for this is, in addition to how hard to push the pedal when power's running low.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  33. Driver by Valiss · · Score: 1

    Hey.. maybe they woulda won by more if they got a smaller (read: lighter) driver.

    --

    -Valiss
    1. Re:Driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Competition requires them to have a driver that weighs that much. Most of the drivers weigh less and actually have to be weighted down.

  34. Congratulations Missouri! by Cruxus · · Score: 1

    As a Missourian and an incoming freshman at a University of Missouri campus (not Rolla), I am glad to see that not only did the University of Missouri - Rolla win but that my University of Missouri Columbia placed six. This goes to show that people should look beyond the Ivy Leagues and consider that a closer school might be almost as good and a lot cheaper.

    --
    On vit, on code et puis on meurt.
    1. Re:Congratulations Missouri! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This goes to show that people should look beyond the Ivy Leagues and consider that a closer school might be almost as good and a lot cheaper.
      Cheaper in what? Hmmm cheaper in actual education or night life? I am from a state that has 2 division 1 schools 1 afforadable the other would require me to work for $6.00 an hour flipping burgers during my study time to be able to afford it. (And around here with an unemployment rate around 3-4% unless you know someone "important" you are only going to get minimum wage.
      I don't know how much I should expect to "earn" by flipping burgers but with a 3-4% unemployement rate it can't be the 50-60,000 you're expected to earn from an Ivy league school.

  35. GO MINERS! by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 3, Funny
    I am a UMR grad, and let me tell you, the solar car is the only "sport" my school has.

    Let me give you an idea of what the campus is like. We have the
    • Chemical Engineering Building
    • Mechanical Engineering Building
    • Electrical Engineering Building
    • Civil Engineering Building
    • Nuclear Engineering Building
    • Geology and Geophysics Building
    • Computer Science Building
    • Physics Building
    • Mathematics Building
    • Engineering Management Building

    and one Arts and Sciences building with all those pansy ass "liberal arts" classes in them. (I probably left one out...it's been a while since I was back)

    So needless to say it's a geekfest. I think our football team has won once....like in it's history. The Solar Car challenge is something we dominate in because, well, we can.

    One more time....GO MINERS!
    1. Re:GO MINERS! by Jim+Haskell · · Score: 1

      Our football team is still as shitty as ever. ;] (I'm a UMR student right now.)

    2. Re:GO MINERS! by auferstehung · · Score: 1
      (I probably left one out...it's been a while since I was back)

      Only the most important one,

      McNutt Hall

      home of the School of Mines and Metallurgy. Or is that what you meant by Geology and Geophysics sans Metallurical, Ceramic, Mining, and Petroleum engineering. For those not familiar with the University of Missouri-Rolla, it was originally the Missouri School of Mines before being "annexed" into the University of Missouri system.

      My condolences to the family and friends of Dr. Robert E. Moore. His enthusiasm introducing the wonders of Ceramic engineering during my "camp-out" at the Jackling Institute the summer between my junior and senior years of high school was instrumental in my decision to attend UMR.

      UMR class of 1988 (Ceramic Engineering)

      JOE MINER!

      --
      Logic is not Divine.
    3. Re:GO MINERS! by wcspxyx · · Score: 1
      Yeah, the football team is pretty bad. In the four years I marched in the marching band, we had three victories.

      The win against Pitt State was awesome. They were ranked #1 in the nation at the time and we beat them on their home turf. The next year (we played them every stinkin' year), the coach for Pitt State said nothing for a pre-game pep-talk. He simply walked up to the chalkboard in the front of the lockerroom and wrote their record from the previous year: 11-1. And then he circled the '1'. Needless to say, UMR lost that game...

      --
      Sig? What sig? Do I have to have a sig!?!?
    4. Re:GO MINERS! by talleyrand · · Score: 1

      Ceramic engineer? What, you make better toliet bowls? ;)

      Just kidding of course, we all know that's what civil's do.

      CS UMR 98

      Posting AC so I can continue moderating alums

      --

      "My fingers Emit sparks of fire in Expectation of my future labours." William Blake
    5. Re:GO MINERS! by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1

      That is what I meant by Geology and Geophysics. Trying to keep it simple for the folks on slashdot.

    6. Re:GO MINERS! by M-G · · Score: 1

      My condolences to the family and friends of Dr. Robert E. Moore.

      Indeed. Never knew Dr. Moore (different department in McNutt), but know he was highly regarded.

    7. Re:GO MINERS! by M-G · · Score: 1

      Crap. Meant to check the 'no karma' box and hit Submit...

      What I wanted to add is that given the low amount of crime in the area, this is probably the only time the UMR Police have had to deal with finding a body in a parked car.

    8. Re:GO MINERS! by nrjyzerbuny · · Score: 1

      And the best part is, we use the largest room in the Humanities and Social Sciences building for Calc 1 lecture.

  36. 176 pound driver? by Daniel+Quinlan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Maybe I'm too competitive, but I would have made sure a few really skinny/short people were available and eligible to be drivers on my team. I weigh 152 pounds and I'm 6 feet tall and I weigh more than a fair number of the skinny geek set. How hard can it be to find a few 115 pound women (they may need to be part of the engineering team, but that too should be no problem, especially in mechanical/electrical engineering which has less of a male-female imbalance than computer engineering) to do the race-time driving? 176 pounds is a fairly mid-sized guy.

    I tried downloading the rules to check, but the PDF was a blank document. Does anyone know if 176 pounds is just that team's average or are teams with lighter drivers required to use weights to bring them up to 176 pounds (like some horse races)?

    Daniel

    1. Re:176 pound driver? by Ummite · · Score: 1

      Man, never let a woman drive an expensive man's car, it is not the rule! Let the male do the male's job! ;-)

    2. Re:176 pound driver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I know for a fact that all cars in the race are required to carry 176 lbs of weight to account for an "average" driver. They use lead shot to make up the weight for light drivers.

      Sort of ruins the fun if some school runs out and recruits a midget driver to get the weight down. :-)

    3. Re:176 pound driver? by RocketScientist · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude. You've obviously never been to Rolla. Standing joke: "There's a tone of women students in Rolla. Both of them."

      There's no business school. There's no school for teachers. There's one building that houses psychology, english, speech, and foreign languages. There are like 10 buildings on campus for different engineering and pure-science disciplines. There just aren't a lot of women going into those fields, which is really unfortunate.

    4. Re:176 pound driver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "176 pounds is a fairly mid-sized guy."

      Depends on how dense the guy is... muscle/fat ratio, you know...

    5. Re:176 pound driver? by Niac · · Score: 1

      Dude, I went to Rolla. The only reason you didn't get a date was cuz you didn't ask. The *actual* ratio at Rolla (at least when I was there), was about 35% women. That's not too bad.

      And there are *two* buildings that do the social sciences.

      --
      http://gabrielcain.com/
    6. Re:176 pound driver? by (startx) · · Score: 2, Informative

      you guessed it. 176lbs is the minimum for the rayce. If the driver isn't that heavy, they do have to use wights to bring the wieght up.

    7. Re:176 pound driver? by (startx) · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe the saying is "There's a ton of women in Rolla, there just aren't many of them."

    8. Re:176 pound driver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How hard can it be to find a few 115 pound women?

      Never been to Rolla, have you Danny?

    9. Re:176 pound driver? by M-G · · Score: 1

      There's no business school. There's no school for teachers.

      Actually, you're not quite right.

      There's an Education program: http://www.umr.edu/index.php?id=310

      And the School of Managment and Information Systems offers a Business Administration program: http://www.umr.edu/index.php?id=319

      And getting back into sciences, there are programs for pre-med, pre-dentistry, and pre-veterinary, as well as pre-nursing, and pre-law.

      The female population is currently listed as 25%. It's been around 23-24% for the past ten years or so. Go back a few years, and it was much worse. In 1977, only 15% of the campus was female. (You used to be able to view the historical enrollment data on the web site, but I can't find it right now.)

    10. Re:176 pound driver? by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      School of MIS is new since I was there (graduated in Dec 1993). As is the school of Education. It's still predominantly an engineering school though, I can't see many teachers wanting to go there unless they happen to live in town. Most of my English and introductory math classes had some local folks taking classes that would fall into the "non-traditional student" category.

      It's great that they're expanding.

      Oh, and if any young slashdotter is out there looking for a good computer science/math/engineering program, UMR is a great school, and all of the jobs I've had since graduating have recruited from there heavily with really good results.

    11. Re:176 pound driver? by M-G · · Score: 1

      School of MIS is new since I was there (graduated in Dec 1993). As is the school of Education. It's still predominantly an engineering school though, I can't see many teachers wanting to go there unless they happen to live in town. Most of my English and introductory math classes had some local folks taking classes that would fall into the "non-traditional student" category.

      I'm a bit more recent, being 1995 and 1997. The whole MIS thing was just getting rolling then. The pre-nursing thing was getting started then too, but I didn't know about it until they started announcing that department at commencement.... ;)

      I'd modify your statement to say that it's predominantly a science school, since non-engineering disciplines like geology, math, physics, chemistry, and life science draw a pretty good non-townie student body, and there's lots of good research being done in those departments. But yes, things like Education are Business aren't likely to be big draws for out-of-town students. However, having the ability to go there for engineering, and either minoring in, or just taking electives from the business school can certainly be useful on the resume.

      Oh, and if any young slashdotter is out there looking for a good computer science/math/engineering program, UMR is a great school, and all of the jobs I've had since graduating have recruited from there heavily with really good results.

      And you'll also run into lots of UMR grads, especially if you hang around St. Louis or KC. A mechanical engineer friend of mine who's not originally from the area once commented on how much of an outsider he feels like because he didn't go to UMR.

      Also, if you're a music geek, while there's not much in the way of a scene in Rolla, it is home to one of the few remaining free-format, student run radio stations, KMNR.

  37. Waterlooooooo! by Gordo · · Score: 1

    Goooooo Waterloo!

    Queens sucks! :-)

  38. Yea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congrats to UMR!

    I was on that team before it was a supported by the school. (Those Jerks!) They have the best race number - 42! I wanted to call our car the "Heart of Gold" after the ship in hhgttg but not all engineers coming out of Rolla are as cool as myself.

    But, After working my ass off testing batteries and other power-related issues with the bitrode machine, I came to the conclusion it was really about the race-team, and how ready they were. Nearly all the components that are important to the solar car are so simular due to the race rules that it is hard to get a real technical advantage.

    By the way, our car in '94-95 was held together by velcro!

  39. Question about solar power in normal car by Ummite · · Score: 1

    I've heard that a commercial car have a solar pannel on top to help electrical consumption on board, reducing gasoline consumption. Is there any hacker in the place that have successfully installed solar pannel on their car and successfully save cash?

  40. Congratulations to UMR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from a UMKC alumnus! Bravo Zulu!

  41. Proud to be from UMR by RTMFD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We've got a good little school here... You can tell it's an engineering school when the solar car team is more popular and well-known than the football team :)

    Anyways, check the domain on my email address. Good job guys!

  42. Great... by ugly_a · · Score: 0

    Northwestern didn't even qualify. Way to go guys!

  43. As a current UMR student, I can say.... by Jim+Haskell · · Score: 1

    This is still very, very true.

  44. Mad props to the Canadian teams by Quantum+Skyline · · Score: 1

    3 - University of Waterloo 7 - Queen's University (and damn proud to be there, those guys worked their asses off to do this) 9 - McGill University 11 - University of Toronto(impressive, I heard their solar car was t-boned while in transit to a practice run) We Canadian folk can compete with the kids down south.

    1. Re:Mad props to the Canadian teams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget those clowns at ETS... But then again, these solar cars are nothing more than TGMs, not actual vehicles. (Thesis Generating Machine)

    2. Re:Mad props to the Canadian teams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac would have dominated... had a wheel not fallen off during qualifiers.

      GO MARAUDERS! GO FIREBALL!

    3. Re:Mad props to the Canadian teams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those "clowns" has you call them made all the parts of the car instead of buying them. This make a pretty customable car, and have probably more chance to win the race than other university, anyway we will see in australia... Ref: http://eclipse.etsmtl.ca/eclipse5/html/english.htm l

      And I invite you to look other student club, like OMER, Mini-Baja, Photon they all won overall this year, Im starting to be proud of been in this clown university.

    4. Re:Mad props to the Canadian teams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised by the number of Ontario entries in this race, pretty well all of the engineering schools better than Ryerson had entries, though Western and Mcmaster couldn't qualify for the final race

      Considering their past performance, i would have expected Queen's to do even better, but it seems that none of the 2 person cars could compete with the lighter single seaters.

      They certainly have the best looking car in the competition:
      http://solarcar.queensu.ca/History/J ournals/ASC_20 03/103-0313_IMG_July-15.jpg

  45. Congrats to UMR! by TitaniumFox · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see that UMC came in only 10h after the UMR team, also (as a UMC student).

    (now watch as all the UM students start adding friends to their lists...heh)

    --
    -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
  46. Vehicle Classes by fven · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know the distinction between class O and class S vehicles?

    1. Re:Vehicle Classes by dagoalieman · · Score: 1

      O is the open class, which has a basic set of restrictions on materials that they may use.

      S is stock class, who has a lot more restrictions on what they can use- namely mostly "cheap" materials. The idea is to create a class 1. of Off the shelf components and 2. for schools with smaller budgets (although open class rules also make an attempt to avoid out-budgeting).

      Stock class, from what I understand, really gets the shaft on the deal, and that's why they really struggled. Someone told me that it basically limits cars to what was used 4 years ago in 99- which really was not that great compared to today. Don't quote me on that, but the stats from the UMR page linked above was the '99 car. Big sucker.

      Hope that helps clear it up a little. For a little more clearness, check the regulations.

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    2. Re:Vehicle Classes by Viceroy · · Score: 1

      The classes refer to the regulations and limitations placed on the the solar cells and batteries that can be used in a car. O is open class, where there are no limits on solar cells or batteries. Most cars in this class are using some type of multi-junction gallium arsenide solar cell with efficiencies better than 20% and some variety of Li-ion battery. S is stock class, which is limited to a specific list of readily available terrestial solar cells and also lead acid batteries. The solar cells in the list are inexpensive and can be obtained by anyone, but also have lower efficiencies in the range of 13%-18%. Lead acid batteries are cheap, but are very heavy. While there were no extremely competitive stock class cars this year, Arizona shocked many teams in '01 by finishing 9th and beating many open class cars. Thier strategy involved only using half of the allowable weight of batteries, sacrificng extra energy storage for keeping thier weight down to make it over the mountains.

  47. GO MINERS!!!! by wcspxyx · · Score: 1
    As a UMR grad (and a townie; 21 years is too long to live in that town) this is awesome.

    For those of you who don't know, UMR has about 5000 students, abour 3800 of those are full-time undergrads (at least those are the numbers last I looked; might be less now). For a school of this size, this is some choice recognition, especially it was chosen as having the most unhappy student population in the latest Princeton Review.

    Some of the other lovely competitions that UMR competes in every year include the concrete canoe races (people actually build canoes out of concrete and race them) and mucking (old time mining).

    BTW, for those of you who don't know the difference between UMR and Mizzou (UM-Columbia), here are two things to remember:

    • If you took the 50 dumbest students from UMR and enrolled them at Mizzou, you'd raise the average IQ of both campuses, and
    • The limit of UMR as GPA aproaches zero is Mizzou (basicly, you can always go to Mizzou if you flunk out of UMR

    (and if you don't like my speling, just remember: UMR is an engineering school, not a spelling school)

    --
    Sig? What sig? Do I have to have a sig!?!?
    1. Re:GO MINERS!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as a mizzou grad, if you took the 50 ugliest women from Mizzou, and enrolled them at Rolla, you'd have 51 women at Rolla.

    2. Re:GO MINERS!!!! by ITWeeniesAreWorthles · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, UM-Rolla. I'd heard rumors of this campus while doing my double-major (BSEE, BSCompE) at Mizzou. Isn't that where they filmed "Revenge of the Nerds"? Also, if you look at the past few years of the solar car challenge, Rolla hasn't always beat Mizzou (I was on the initial team getting funding in the early 90's). I actually ventured to Rolla for a conference once - I almost changed my major to business after seeing what my engineering peers were like...

      Now if you want to talk about Mizzou, you should focus on the Greek Life! There are more hotties per square meter at Mizzou than most campuses (Pi Phi, DG, KKG, Tri-Delts...). Ah how I miss my pledge days living in Greektown and watching the fresh meat during rush week followed by the parties on Bid Day...

      --
      IT, IS, and MIS people suck. They're overblown tech school dropouts who are finally realizing their worth in this econo
    3. Re:GO MINERS!!!! by M-G · · Score: 1

      Now if you want to talk about Mizzou, you should focus on the Greek Life!

      Some of us are looking for more out of a woman than her ability to yell "Wooo!" at a frat party....

  48. Left one out by Otto · · Score: 1

    Some of the other lovely competitions that UMR competes in every year include the concrete canoe races (people actually build canoes out of concrete and race them) and mucking (old time mining).

    I think you left out competitive drinking. In a place where kegs can be bought for $25, it's almost a given, really. ;)

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Left one out by spike+it · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the concrete canoe building comes after the competitive drinking. :)

  49. Congrats, Missouri. by clem · · Score: 1

    Apparantly, it was an interesting race. The California team, originally a favorite to win, suffered an energy crisis midway through the race. They then appealed to the Federal Government to compel other nearby cars to sell them enough power to cross the finish line. The Washington and Colorado teams have submitted formal protests against this tactic.

    --
    Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  50. Go UMR! Very impressive! by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    having been on the solar car team at one point I'd like to say go UMR!

    The impressive part is only the top 12 cars even *finished* the race:
    http://americansolarchallenge.org/daily_race_stand ings.html

    We (UMR) usually gets burned by MIT, but the running joke is our car is less than a quarter million while their's is closer to 1.5 mil, least it was a few years ago.

    Even though the rules are strict there's still plenty of things you can sink money into, like tires, frame material, etc.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  51. weight by wannasleep · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So, the driver's weight is 178 lbs..
    Sorry, a geek like me couldn't help...
    I had to do the math :)

  52. Re: affordability by ferds32 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the rules for solar races almost always place a limit on the $/watt for the cells, so that competitors can't "buy" the win.

    The biggest solar car race of them all, the World Solar Challenge (WSC), doesn't. The rules for 2001 are available online for you to check. I am told this years rules won't change in that respect. One of the best parts of the WSC in previous years has been that the rules are so open. Unfortunately, now that the technology is maturing top teams `buying a win' is becoming a problem. It would be a pity to see solar racing go the way I am told American motor sport has gone.

    Tom Rowlands
    (Sorry, I can't sign this).
  53. Nobody trying solar thermal? by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    If you don't insist on photovoltaic cells you can get more energy out of the sun.

    It's a bit more complex, requiring more innovation but I thought that's what it was all about.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  54. Re: affordability by Viceroy · · Score: 1

    The regulations for the American race haven't put restrictions on solar cells or batteries since 1999. The stock class still has these limitations, but the open class is just that: wide open. That still doesn't mean that weight, efficiency, strategy, and especially aerodynamics don't play a big part in how fast these cars can go. No solar competition that I know of allows a battery swap-out without a huge penalty involved.

  55. Too fast? by Viceroy · · Score: 1

    As the driver of both the '99 and '01 Michigan cars, I still have to point out of the 7 American races, the Universtiy of Michigan has still won 3 of them. ;) Still, congrats to Rolla....this win was well earned.

    The problem I'm seeing with this race though is that as the cars have gotten faster and faster, there is much less strategy involved. Part of the reason this years race was faster was because of the addition of another staged stop in Albuquerque. This essentially changed the race from a cross country endurance run where strategy and energy management were important, to a string of all out sprints where the cars can run right at the speed limit the entire time. If something goes wrong or breaks on a team's car, they are suddenly out of the running for a win. There's no way to catch up if everyone is running at the speed limit. Don't get me wrong, reliability has always been part of the race, but it shouldn't replace strategy as the only way of winning. That's part of the appeal of this kind of race. Its not just about the car and the level of technology on it, but how the weather can change things rapidly, and how you best manage the amount of energy you have.

    Now these are purpose built race cars and most of the technology that goes into them will not and can not be used in real-world applications, just like NASCAR and F1 cars are nothing like whats on the road. The extremely fragile solar cells are for the most part (before sponsorhsip and discounts) worth way more than most homes, let alone another car. But the purpose is not just to develop technology, its to allow students to work in a practical engineering and small company environment and really develop a vehicle using the princples they've learned in class. It was _the_ most useful part of my education at Michigan.

  56. Go Miners! by Zech+Harvey · · Score: 1


    Having also been a student at UMR, and having the pleasure to serve as RA with one of the members of the Solar Car team, I must say congratulations! A job well done. =)

    --
    Zech Harvey, MCSE, MCDBA, CCNA
  57. Re:Go UMR! Very impressive! by (startx) · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the MIT team's budget, but they haven't even been close to competative the last 3 rayces. Oh, and Rolla's car was only around $100,000 this year :-)

  58. Principia College by jankyPhil · · Score: 1

    All the colleges on this list are pretty well known, excpet Principia College. Looking it up on the web, this school only has 500 kids, is in the farm country of illinois, and is a libral arts school with almost no engineering dept. Anyone actually gone to this school and know why it did so well, or is this just a fluke

    1. Re:Principia College by dmstevens · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I went there, and we took the sciences quite seriously. I don't know what other liberal arts schools that size are like, but our CS program was the real thing.

      Also, it's the only college in the world with a religious affiliation to a particular low-key Christian sect, so it draws (a few) students from all over and has a far-flung and dedicated alumni and funding network. Programs like this competition are also seen as great marketing and get all the help they can, but there's no way to fake those results!

    2. Re:Principia College by jaafit · · Score: 1

      As a member of the Principia team, I can say one thing for sure: it takes a lot more than a big name to win a race like this. You can have all the funding, all the research labs, and all the best professors, but still have a team that doesn't know what it's doing. I'd say experience is a more important factor. When we first started out in '93, our car barely went 30 ft. We've been progressing steadily since then, with a lot of help from other teams and our sponsors. Also, the fact that we don't have an engineering department hasn't seemed to matter much, since there's so much sharing of knowledge amongst the teams. Although all the teams have unique cars with unique designs, we tend to learn a lot from each other's mistakes.

  59. Go Miners! by umrguy76 · · Score: 1

    Way to go guys! Must have been a beer shortage in Rolla for this much work to be done. :)

    --2000 MgtSys Grad

  60. Woah by PiGuy · · Score: 1

    "The roughly 339lb car (*with 517lb driver*) with 1500 watts of power won by nearly 5 hours"

    Was I the only one who read it like this? :)

    Anyways maybe some of the technologies used in this car could be applied to `standard' electric cars.

  61. Re:Missouri -- The arm-pit of technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While St. Louis (Missouri) may have good schools, it lacks large businesses. If you are an IT worker, you may call St. Louis "The Arm Pit" of technology.

    I know, I work here, and the jobs in IT are hard to come by.

  62. Ever since The Shack burned down... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    ...Mizzou's been in decline. The place needs another bar with plywood tables, plywood benches, and walls, and doors...and a plywood roof...

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  63. Don't listen that that, I married a MINER by AndyBarrow · · Score: 1

    Well, as a Rolla grad and the spouse of a beautiful Rolla student (from 26 years ago, no less), they aren't ugly.

    My wife drank me under the table on our first date. It was love at first shot...

    Whoohooo! You want a party, go to Rolla on St. Pats day. They, literally, paint the streets green.

    Go MINERS!

    --
    "You can't have everything. Where would you keep it?" -- Steven Wright
  64. strategy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the strategy--reliabilty is about 50 times as important in real life

  65. in order to use this power you need more batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, even with more batteries, I can't think of a way to utilize this energy at all. Due to regenerative braking, a parallel hybrid will generally reach it's parking spot with a near-full set of batteres. If you add more batteries, it will still be near full.

    In essence, a parallel hybrid is topping off it's batteries all the time.

    So, in order to use this solar power you would have to know ahead of time you were going to park and turn off the motor early and then park with the batteries near flat. And then if you return too quickly and the batteries are still flat you need to run the internal motor a little more than normal and you are actually a little less efficient.

    Another possibility would be to make the batteries larger and not make the generator later, thus in essence making the generator marginal and hoping the cells can take up the slack. But that isn't good for people in non-sunny areas (Seattle) or people who drive at night.

    And in either case, the weight of the batteries is non-zero and could cause the overall gain to be negative.

    Hmm.

  66. Re:Missouri -- The arm-pit of technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporate IT is dead *everywhere*. Seattle has among the *worst* tech unemployment rate in North America.

    As for large businesses not being St. Louis: rubbish. A.G. Edwards, Ralston-Purina, Anheuser Busch, Monsanto, SBC, United Healthcare, Boeing are just a few examples.

    It's called a recession.

  67. Quick, tax solar power! by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    Someone call Gephardt and Daschle... there's TAXES to be made on sunlight!!!
    We're going to need plenty of government regulations.
    The liberals should be beside themselves with joy!!!
    Someone will have to make solar meters to measure useage. Standards will have to be developed. Legislators will have to get involved.
    We'll need to hire government solar meter inspectors, meter readers, technicians... the weights and measures department will have to grow!
    The DMV can sell solar licenses!!!
    Keep the government employed!
    When the solar tax money starts to run thin, we can start taxing batteries!

    Cottage industries will sprout. Meters will need to be calibrated. The Mob will make money rolling back solar meters.

    Which wing of the government would be in charge of solar power?
    We'd better spread it across many departments so we can minimize return while maximizing taxpayer expense.
    Liberals will have to create more legislation to enforce taxation.
    Can you imagine law enforcement?
    Will there be police driving around with panels to clamp on top of your vehicle to induce payment of "solar taxes?"
    Police... hmmm... we might need a new department... solar tax revenue. The liberals will give them carte-blanche to arrect tax-dodgers and collect taxes.

    Imagine the black market for solar panels!
    Until the cost comes down, anyone with a SawzAll or a can of spray paint will be a threat!
    Imagine driving into the city, and competing for the top floor of the parking ramp?
    After work, find your hood, trunk lid, and roof Sawzall'd off!
    Imagine the drive home!

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  68. surface area of Prius? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    A Prius has about the same surface area as one of these solar racers

    Huh? I was on the (now defunct due to budget problems) University of Illinois Solar Racing Team. Almost all of the entries in the competition are about the length and width of a full size 9 passanger van, a far cry from a Prius...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  69. The question is... by jo42 · · Score: 1


    Just how much naturual resources did the support vehicles use up in this 'solar powered race'...???

  70. Stopping to refuel... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Stop the chase car, then put the pedal to the metal to catch up...

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  71. Re:Missouri -- The arm-pit of technology by M-G · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Emerson, Graybar, May Department Stores, Charter Communications, Express Scripts, Arch Coal, Brown Shoe, Energizer, Sigma-Aldrich, Enterprise, Maritz, and Solutia....

    St. Louis has 15 Fortune 1000 companies, and ranks 7th as a headquarters location for Fortune 500 companies.

    Plus huge operations for companies like MasterCard, CitiMortgage, etc.

  72. Re:in order to use this power you need more batter by Theide · · Score: 1

    Adaptive software which measures the levels of power vs the levels of sunlight and correlates this with average driving habits to reach an optimal solution. this depends on a slightly different model of hybrid, essentially an electric car with a small gas turbine generator used to supply electric power to the the drivetrain, along with a fairly hefty capacitor bank to allow for extra power, recharged by regenerative braking and solar input, if available (based on cloud conditions). A fairly small battery pack would suffice for any other needs, such as starting the vehicle after long periods of quiescence. Such a vehicle could readily do better than the 100 mpg cited for the prius with laminate panels. In a sunny state such as Arizona, such a vehicle could concievably reach 250+ mpg on flat ground. Todays hybrids are all built wrong.