Slashdot Mirror


Even Grues Get Full

honestpuck writes "Even Grues Get Full is the fourth and latest collection of cartoons from User Friendly. I got this collection because a friend said the third collection was brilliant 'from cover to cover.' I have to say that this collection did have some exceptionally good moments, but 'from cover to cover,' I think not." Honestpuck's review continues, below. Even Grues Get Full author J.D. "Iliad" Frzer pages 122 publisher O'Reilly rating 8 - Funny reviewer Tony Williams ISBN 0596005660 summary Chock full o' laughs. Funny, didn't split my sides or spit coffee out my nose, but funny

To start, I didn't find the inside title page even worth a smile, the only joke 'Even Grues Get Full' had already been on the front cover and I'd noticed its repetition on the back one as well.

To investigate a little further I read the 'Foreword' by Wil Wheaton. OK, it did have one good Wesley joke but mostly it seemed to be saying how much he didn't mind Iliad making fun of him in the strip.

Then we get to the strips. Yeah, some are funny. I laughed a bit. Iliad certainly knows a good tech joke when he draws one - even if he does seem to make a lot of jokes at the expense of the Windows operating system -- which seems to be a combination of shooting fish in a barrel and politically incorrect making fun of the crippled and lame. However some things are just not funny, Mr Frazer.

What about those cartoons from page 78 to 83. To start off, no self respecting Lego geek with two hundred and seventy million dollars would buy two million sets of Lego Mindstorms. I'd only (sorry, I mean 'He'd only') buy one and a half million to leave cash left over for buying a couple of hundred thousand Lego models of the Millenium Falcon -- I mean, "D'uh!" Oh, and about the cartoon on page 82: missing a 16-wheel cog to complete your project is no laughing matter you know. I don't see what's so amusing about building a missile silo out of Lego either -- I'm going to build a carry box for my cat when I can get enough blue 12 x 1 bricks.

Then there's the series about the visiting MBA. No real geek would fall in love with a woman merely because her name, 'Pearl,' was a homonym for a scripting language - get real. If her name had been 'See' or 'Jarvah,' maybe. But not funny, Iliad.

Frankly, I think this book is full of the usual 'User Friendly' rubbish. Jokes at the expense of those poor users (hey, they don't know any better), clueless management (hey, they don't know any better) and socially disadvantaged and deprived geeks (hey, we don't know any better.) Joking about the outstanding, well-informed and upright citizens that work in the sales and marketing departments of our IT firms and ISPs? Shame on you J.D. Oh, and poking fun at poor Larry Ellison just cause he isn't as rich as Bill is just downright mean.

I think Tim O'Reilly should be ashamed to publish this book. I guess the only reason he does is that Iliad hasn't poked fun at him (yet).

I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone. It's just chock full of jokes that only a Linux-loving geek could find funny. Cartoons full of references that only a Perl programming geek would understand. I didn't learn a single thing about programming in C# for .NET ot the latest protocols used in Active Directories -- a totally useless tech book, really.

Look, just go to the User Friendly web site and see some more recent examples from this deeply disturbed cartoonist, or go to the O'Reilly book page and check out a few strips from the book itself and you will agree with me.

You can purchase Even Grues Get Full from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

135 comments

  1. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this review made no sense. he said it was crap, but gave it an 8? I guess if it was a scale from 1 to 10 in hex, the 8 would make sense, but otherwise the review is as much crap as the book.

    1. Re:WTF by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the reviewer was trying to be funny. Seeing as how he wasn't, I'm not surprised that you missed it.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    2. Re:WTF by woozlewuzzle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looks less like a book review and more like the reviewer is just trying to dole out his/her own perls of humor.

      Sorry, not impressed.

    3. Re:WTF by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      Here's a fun thought: what if he was trying to mimic Illiads style of humor? That would explain why it was nearly undetectable! >:)

      Seriously, though, I stopped reading UserFriendly ages ago. About the only reason I read this review was to see if other people agreed with me about how poor his work is. It stopped being funny when he kept on repeating the same tired old jokes like "Windows sucks" and "marketers are stupid" - it's like a lame, Linux-oriented Dilbert.

      And, just like UserFriendly repeats the same lame old jokes, this review seemed to sport a similar lame humor that you can only see if you assume that it's supposed to be funny but never really becomes something more than slightly amusing. Ah well - I wouldn't have gotten the book anyway.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    4. Re:WTF by N473 · · Score: 1

      Hello, good AC. You do realize that 10 is has the same value in both base 10 and base 16, right? I think you meant if it was a scale from 1 to 1F in hex...

    5. Re:WTF by BdosError · · Score: 1

      You might want to review number theory. 10 in base 16 is 16 in base 10. That's 1*16^1 + 0*16^0.

      --
      Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
    6. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, good idiot. You do realize that 10 in base 16 is 16 in base 10, right? I think the other AC meant what he said, if it was a scale from 1 to 10 in hex (or, 1 to 16 in decimal)...

    7. Re:WTF by N473 · · Score: 1

      DOH! It has been a long day... and a long time since I was in class. It made sterling sence when I wrote it. I will scurry off now :-)

    8. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just followed your sig and journalism won. You either need to update it or think of something else.

  2. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon link, buy cheaper, support the small guy!

  3. Oh this is great by ChipMonk · · Score: 0

    What a left-handed (or is that insulting to south-paws?) complimentary review. I laughed from start to finish!

    1. Re:Oh this is great by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      To each his own I guess. I always thought they were a bit over-rated. I'd take a mediocre Dilbert cartoon over a "good" User Friendly any day of the week.

  4. I hope it was funnier than the review by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 0
    I don't mean to be flamebait, but this style is very confusing for a front page book review.

    I like a good laugh more than most, probably, but isn't the idea of one of these reviews to provide information to help the /. crowd decide if they should buy it?

    If anyone has read the book and has something to ACTUALLY say about it, reply below!

    --
    The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
  5. Why not lower price and ask for tips? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0

    Magnatune is doing it. USA Today mentioned tipware. Those are both music, but it should work for books.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  6. grow some balls by jbellis · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    you spend the entire review saying this book sucks more than not, and conclude "I wouldn't recommend it to anyone" but still give it an 8. I agree with the substance of the review, but wth, 8???

    k5 seems to be in it's usual state these days right now (down) but when it's back up, check out the amusing poll they had a while ago. ("Most overrated geek icon.") Guess what won by a landslide? Hint: it's a cartoon.

    1. Re:grow some balls by rootofevil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this should clear some things up for you

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    2. Re:grow some balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, he rated it an 8 out of sarcasm? Riiiight.

      I think the reviewer just isn't intelligent. Anyhow, be sure to read that link yourself: don't think anybody else around here needs to.

    3. Re:grow some balls by Nodatadj · · Score: 1


      # A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound.
      # A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.
      # The use of sarcasm. See Synonyms at wit


      Hmm..that reference seems to imply it should have been funny, but it wasn't. It was just annoying.

    4. Re:grow some balls by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Please tell me you're being sarcastic. Otherwise, you've just lowered my opinon of Slashdot users. Permenantly.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:grow some balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... right

      Please repeate sophmore english, kthxbye~~

    6. Re:grow some balls by Asprin · · Score: 1


      Yup, it's called "irony", and it's when you say something and mean the opposite.

      BTW, if any of you know folks who read Fark, be sure to send 'em on over. I'm sure there are a lot of people over there who would love to see a real live working example!

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    7. Re:grow some balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so the summary is too?

      "Chock full o' laughs. Funny, didn't split my sides or spit coffee out my nose, but funny"

      I think you're just a fucking idiot.

  7. Huh! There's only one Groo... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    ...and he lives (well, wanders) here, as any fool can plainly see.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Huh! There's only one Groo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheese dip, baby.

    2. Re:Huh! There's only one Groo... by jfengel · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can plainly see that.

    3. Re:Huh! There's only one Groo... by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Well at least he isn't a mendicant!

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    4. Re:Huh! There's only one Groo... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      But if Groo were caught alone in the dark in or around the Great Underground Empire, the grue might eat him...

  8. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone.

    So is that why it got 8 stars? With the hierarchy being

    10 - fucking classic, next Knuth or Schneier
    9 - superb, read of the decade
    8 - really really good, worth a read by everyone on this planet.

  9. What the? by piggy101 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Does the reviewer think it is funny or not? He gives it an 8 and then says that it's crap. Bad review, bad review

    1. Re:What the? by calethix · · Score: 1

      with statements like:
      " I'd only (sorry, I mean 'He'd only') buy one and a half million to leave cash left over for buying a couple of hundred thousand Lego models of the Millenium Falcon"
      and
      "I don't see what's so amusing about building a missile silo out of Lego either -- I'm going to build a carry box for my cat when I can get enough blue 12 x 1 bricks."
      I thought it was obviously a joke and he did in fact like the book. I don't think it was a very good review though. If I'm trying to decide whether or not to buy a book, I'd like to have something more than a poor attempt at humour to help me make that decision. His review would be better suited as a +5 funny follow-up comment to a real review.

  10. One question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a user?

  11. Re:Worst comic ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Penny Arcade licks balls too. How do you like that shit?

  12. Worst comic ever? Nah... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    User Friendly isn't fit to sniff Penny Arcade's shit.

    Translation: User Friendly isn't as 1337/pretentious * as Penny Arcade.

    (* Delete as applicable.)

    I'll leave it to the individual to decide which statement is true. Frankly, I think they're both pretty good but if I had to pick one I'd pick User Friendly, because at least my other half can get the jokes without first having to do a degree in hardcore gaming.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  13. agreed by sbma44 · · Score: 1
    the artwork is terrible and the jokes are usually pretty lame. just because something is geeky the community embraces it... bleh. Dilbert and Penny Arcade are both plenty nerdy, but actually funny. Hell, even Foxtrot gets in occasional proof of the author's geekdom and it's consistently excellent.

    big pass on this one for me...

  14. Are all book reviews here this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I give this one 3 out of 10.

  15. 9/11 by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did they include that sappy 9/11 cartoon in this book? The one with the geek hugging Dust Puppy?

    I suppose Illiad was trying to do 'something' to make note of the horror of that day, but I found that particular strip to be..well kind of stupid.

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
  16. Re:Worst comic ever by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    User Friendly isn't fit to sniff Penny Arcade's shit.

    That's like saying that crap isn't fit to sniff dung's shit.

    Has either one EVER produced a comic that was remotely clever?

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  17. Oh my god ... by trampel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has no one so far got the subtle humor of the review?

    He obviously loves the book!

    1. Re:Oh my god ... by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1

      And just who are you to say that? Don't you think he would have said so in the review if he liked it?

    2. Re:Oh my god ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He was not funny. It figures he loves User Friendly.

    3. Re:Oh my god ... by polaar · · Score: 1

      Er, wait a minute... does that mean you think he was funny?

    4. Re:Oh my god ... by kfg · · Score: 1

      I got it. It just wasn't funny, subtle or an empire.

      I never so much as cracked a smile. As they say, dying is easy, comedy is hard.

      Still, response to this review certainly goes a long way toward explaining why some of the best satire I've posted here has been modded down as a troll, or even offtopic, while some offhand stupid joke about boogers or something that I toss out gets modded up as funny.

      We seem to have more than our fair share of humorless, grue sniffing morons on "staff."

      May they spend their eternity in the front row of a Gallagher concert.

      KFG

    5. Re:Oh my god ... by mraymer · · Score: 1

      I agree with you completely, KFG. In fact, unfair mods is one of the reasons I check your user page pretty often, since usually your lowest modded posts are the best. ;)

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    6. Re:Oh my god ... by fishmonkey · · Score: 1

      He was not funny. It figures he loves User Friendly.

      Haha classic. User Friendly has been going downhill for years. I think people read it more out of habit from their tech support days than because it's entertaining.

      --
      generic
    7. Re:Oh my god ... by syrinx · · Score: 1

      User Friendly has been going downhill for years.

      That implies that it started out as funny.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    8. Re:Oh my god ... by plover · · Score: 1
      Hey, I cracked a smile at grue-sniffing...

      Anyway, just keep in mind: "Hell is Other People Posting to Slashdot."

      --
      John
  18. Word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Penny Arcade's the shit.

  19. Heads up on the sarcasm folks. by CyberKnet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    By the look of comments so far, there seem to be quite a few people with malfunctioning sarcasm sensors today.

    So, for the sensor deprived: Wrap the entire text in a <SARCASM> tag, and you'll be able to enjoy it much more fully.

    --
    Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    1. Re:Heads up on the sarcasm folks. by juuri · · Score: 0

      This wasn't sarcasm... it was just pathetic. The only thing that might even be ironic about it was the score was high and the review so negative. The attempt at being "funny" in the review was just that, an attempt. Then again given the actual book it was about is rarelt funny maybe it will actually appeal to the target audience.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    2. Re:Heads up on the sarcasm folks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sarcasm was of poor quality.
      I did not enjoy it at all.

    3. Re:Heads up on the sarcasm folks. by _bug_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By the look of comments so far, there seem to be quite a few people with malfunctioning sarcasm sensors today.

      No. I think that the author was trying to be sarcastic but a lot of people agree that UF is crap exactly for the same reasons the review's author gives.

      Every web comic I've ever been to has seen the artist grow and get increasingly better as time progressed. Illiad... I just don't know what's retarding his growth, artistically, but the look of the comic alone is of such repetitive, low quality that any good writing is being horribly overshadowed by the bad art.

      And I think Illiad misses the funny more often than not as well. There's only so many jokes you can make about geek-dom before it's gets really old. It's like when your cousin Bob starts spouting "floppy/hard drive" jokes thinking he's discovered an untapped resource for hilarity.

      There's the antiquated comparison between UF and Penny Arcade that seems to come up every time and gets ignored every time because it's been said before.

      But I just want to point out that Penny Arcade actually does go outside the realm of gaming. In fact there have been several weeks in a row where little actual gaming-related comics are written.

      I don't see that in UF at all. No attempt at broadening the subject matter or expanding into new perspectives.

      There's just no growth and without growth things get boring.

    4. Re:Heads up on the sarcasm folks. by gotroot801 · · Score: 1

      So, for the sensor deprived: Wrap the entire text in a tag, and you'll be able to enjoy it much more fully.

      Wait, he was being sarcastic? Crap... and here I was agreeing with him.

    5. Re:Heads up on the sarcasm folks. by drauh · · Score: 1

      Or irony.

      --
      This is a tautology.
  20. What? by Prince_Ali · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are giving the comics away. Look at the friggin website! Do you want them to give actual physical books away? If so, I hope you never try to run a business.

  21. Brutal comic strip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drawn terribly and not even remotely funny, but the type of people who mod up BSOD jokes will eat this shit up with a spoon.

  22. I certainly hope... by .@. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that the book is funnier than the review.

    No, I'm not humor or sarcasm-impaired. I just think that was the most craptacular review I've ever read. Unfunny, heavy-handed sarcasm does not a review make.

    What? Iliad writes about Linux? He makes fun of Windows? Say it isn't so! We NEVER would have known that without this insightful review.

    What's next, a /. review of RedHat that spends five paragraphs explaining what Linux is to us? Preacher, meet choir. Choir, preacher. Go get acquainted.

    --
    .@.
    1. Re:I certainly hope... by kwerle · · Score: 1

      ...that the book is funnier than the review.

      If I had mod points, you'd get 'em.

      Instead I'm burnig karma saying "Me Too!!!"

      Damn, but that was a terrible review.

    2. Re:I certainly hope... by MacGabhain · · Score: 1
      I just think that was the most craptacular review I've ever read.

      Does that include the one about the book "evaluating" eXtreme Programming that was posted a few days ago? At least this review actually talked about the book itself.

    3. Re:I certainly hope... by .@. · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't know. I didn't read that one. ;)

      --
      .@.
    4. Re:I certainly hope... by antic · · Score: 1

      My favourite online cartoon is Achewood:

      http://www.achewood.com/index.php?date=10252001

      Read it through. How can anyone not love Philippe, the lactose-intolerant otter?

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  23. good god people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how many of you are incapable of recognizing
    sarcasm when you see it?

    a mess of comments about "but but he said it
    sucked and gave it an 8 but but but!"

    slashdot readership is by and large as vapid and
    stupid as the 'non-technical' folks that this
    site makes fun of 24/7

    embrace your own ignorance - you'll see more clearly

    (luckily, the quality of content here mostly
    fits in with the patrons)

    1. Re:good god people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sarcasm was of poor quality.
      Sort of like Conan O'Brien jokes.

    2. Re:good god people by Zildy · · Score: 1

      Umm...this involves money. I'd want an honest review, not shtick.

      --
      Karma: Excer..ex...excellahhh...realll good (mostly affected by drinking not done in moderation)
  24. $1.30 cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ref: Amazon has this book for $1.30 cheaper than bn
    Eligible for free shipping if you spend $15 more.

    1. Re:$1.30 cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember kids, Amazon would patent oxygen and license you the right to breathe if it could.

  25. This bring back memories... by drxenos · · Score: 2

    of my first time playing Zork and my light went out!

    --


    Anonymous Cowards suck.
  26. Anyone visit honestpuck's link in the summary? by Zildy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Sat, 27 Sep 2003

    I Sure Do Like Them Cartoonies

    I like a good cartoon, either political such as Doonesbury or IT such as Dilbert, or in this case User Friendly. That?s distinct from an animated short - which is what Yosemite Sam was referring to, of course. I like them as well.

    I picked up a copy of the latest User Friendly collection, Even Grues Get Full, and it was good. I liked it from the title (and I can remember being eaten by a Grue more than 25 years ago in the Collosal Caves) through to some nice barbs at Microsoft.

    Watch out for a full review, but in the meantime I recommend it to all User Friendly fans."

    LOL what the hell.

    --
    Karma: Excer..ex...excellahhh...realll good (mostly affected by drinking not done in moderation)
    1. Re:Anyone visit honestpuck's link in the summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Annonymous Coward writes:

      "What the fuck is up with that honestpuck dude?!!! Does he think he's the next jonkatz? Who'd the hell want to be that?!!!"

    2. Re:Anyone visit honestpuck's link in the summary? by Whizard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except there were no grues in Colossal Cave. Pirates, Dwarves, yes. Grues, no.

    3. Re:Anyone visit honestpuck's link in the summary? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other news, he recommends the latest Disney film to Disney fans and the latest Danielle Steele to Danielle Steele fans. KISS fans may like the new KISS record, and I hear that cat fanciers often FANCY CATS.

      I mean, fuck, slashdot won't post my stories but they post this crap? An unfunny, rambling review of an unfunny, divisive comic strip? Maybe instead of asking intriguing philosophical questions like "What is the proper way to tell my boss that I have failed a task," I should submit my review of the latest Hieroglyphics album, (which you will probably like if you liked the last one).

      I'll get right on that. In the meantime, I recommend all User Friendly fans fuck off and die. Maybe if you tried understanding WHY somebody doesn't know how to use the computer rather than making fun of HOW they messed it up, we'd have fewer Nick Burns clones in IT and fewer jobs slipping overseas.

      Or maybe it's the ID 10 T virus. Haw haw.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Anyone visit honestpuck's link in the summary? by WNight · · Score: 1

      Many people who call tech support simply need the settings, or to be told to install a pop-up blocker or ad-aware. They're the easy ones and you never see them in the comics.

      Other customers are complete festering morons. Unwilling to learn anything. Droolers who somehow manage to hold down a job, and comprehend that a phone needs to be plugged into a wall, but don't understand how a computer needs the same connection!?

      They're gleeful about their stupidity, proudly proclaiming themselves as "not computer people", as if you need a fucking degree to plug a cable into the only plug on the back of a computer that looks anything like it'll fit. The fact that these people aren't on some sort of federal disability pension means they must be capable of round-peg, round-hole kinds of tasks. Why does that suddenly vanish when they're faced with something slightly new? (Slightly - they've supposedly been plugging in microwaves and TVs for years.)

      Even if they must be this stupid, why the hell do they have to be rude about it. They call up tech support after buying an internet package and get bloody rude about not being able to use it when the power is out, I swear. (She had a laptop, but didn't understand that the cablemodem needed power - hence the power plug.) She got upset about it and wanted it fixed.

      That is why there's tech support humor. Not making fun of your mom for not knowing how to compile a kernel, but making fun of jackasses who can't apply some common sense to it and get beligerant about it.

      Yeah, must be the id10t virus, that's all I can think of that makes an otherwise capable person into a moron when in a slightly new situation.

  27. not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never found User Friendly to be that good.
    It's poorly drawn, and not in a cool sort of way that would be enjoyable. It's just poorly drawn in a high school cartoon comic strip sort of way.

    One of the main characters is just a scribble because the author can't draw. Several others are amorphous blobs -- no hard drawing challenge there.

    On top of that, it's just not funny. Sometimes it gets close but only because it's geeky.

  28. Obligatory Simpsons quote by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2, Funny

    there seem to be quite a few people with malfunctioning sarcasm sensors today.

    CBG: Oh yeah, then everyone's REAL happy then.
    Lady: Do I detect a note of sarcasm?
    Frink: (reading sarcasm detector) Are you kidding me, this baby's off the charts, mmhay!
    CBG: Ooh, a sarcasm detector, well that's a REAL useful invention. (detector blows up)

    --

    Enigma

  29. Obligatory CBG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Worst. Review. Ever.

  30. The slashdot readers who didn't get the sarcasm... by johnmearns · · Score: 1

    The slashdot readers who didn't get the sarcasm of that review are the smartest people here. Don't question them when they go "8, WTF?!?!".

    --
    "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it." -Voltaire
  31. Compact! by dswensen · · Score: 4, Funny

    But not funny, Iliad.

    This should have been the review. It sums up my feelings about User Friendly nicely.

    Well, that and this.

    1. Re:Compact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should have been the review. It sums up my feelings about User Friendly nicely.

      Yep. User Friendly hasn't been funny since, well, ever, but for some reason people seem to eat it up anyway. Maybe techies are humor-impaired.

      Saying "Microsoft sucks" and "geeks don't get management and management don't get geeks" hasn't been funny for a really long time now.

    2. Re:Compact! by xTown · · Score: 1

      I used to like User Friendly. Now I read it because it's on my daily list of things to read and I'm too lazy to take it off. I guess I also keep hoping that it might someday become good again.

      For me, it's hard to pin down quite when I stopped liking it, and I'm starting to wonder if I ever actually did like it. If I had to guess, I'd say that it started going downhill when Iliad started taking himself seriously and User Friendly became the too-too-precious "UFie Community" and then "User Friendly, Inc."

      I mean, come on...does anyone really find the Cthulhu and Hastur jokes funny? I can't remember the last time I even cracked a smile reading User Friendly.

      I give UF props for being the first web comic I ever read, and for introducing me to the wider world of web comics, but it's really starting to seem like a waste of time.

    3. Re:Compact! by faust2097 · · Score: 1
      Well, that and this.


      Let's not forget the following:
      http://www.somethingawful.com/jeffk/co mputarfunnys /comic-2.htm
      http://www.somethingawful.com/jeffk/ computarfunnys /comic-10.htm
      http://www.somethingawful.com/jeffk /computarfunnys /comic-20.htm
      http://www.somethingawful.com/jeffk /computarfunnys /comic-27.htm
      http://www.somethingawful.com/jeffk /computarfunnys /comic-32.htm
  32. Strike While the Irony is Hot by autosentry · · Score: 1

    To start off, no self respecting Lego geek with two hundred and seventy million dollars would buy two million sets of Lego Mindstorms. *Collapses with laughter*

    --
    Monster Zero is the reason we cannot live on the surface, but must live forever live underground like this.
  33. Obligatory Cheaper at Amazon Post by Paul+Burney · · Score: 1

    The book is a buck and change cheaper at amazon.com:

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596005660/ 104-5039843-6646308

    I wish the slashdot editors would just put a little disclaimer before the "You can purchase..." part.

    Something like:

    We get an x% kickback from BN each time you buy from them.

    - or -

    We don't like Amazon because of software patents and thus support BN instead.

    - or -

    We think computer geeks have too much money and should waste it to help dubya improve the economy.

    --
    <?php while ($self != "asleep") { $sheep_count++; } ?>
    1. Re:Obligatory Cheaper at Amazon Post by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      Once again, yes Amazon is cheaper. However, with Amazon's patent craziness (one-click shopping, web-based sales, etc.) Slashdot chooses to support their competitor who hasn't tried to patent such blatantly obvious things.

      It has less to do with kickbacks from BN.com and more to do with taking a stand (however small) against a perceived injustice. I just figure that it's common knowledge on Slashdot how much the editors / some readers don't like Amazon's patent crap.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    2. Re:Obligatory Cheaper at Amazon Post by GeoSanDiego · · Score: 1

      The day I buy something from BN that will cost me less from Amazon is the day BN grows some balls and challenges Amazon's outrageous One-Click patent.

    3. Re:Obligatory Cheaper at Amazon Post by Christopher+Cashell · · Score: 1

      Erm. . . you do realize that Barnes & Noble did challenge Amazon's 1-Click patent, don't you?

      It went to court, and was eventually settled. However, the settlement details were never disclosed, so we're not entirely sure how it turned out. As I recall, things weren't looking good for Barnes & Noble, though.

      --
      Topher
  34. Missing one Lego piece? by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any true Lego geek would have headed right over to BrickLink to pick up the missing piece.

    Pimpin' my own Lego store.....

    1. Re:Missing one Lego piece? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Somebody should have told Shel Silverstein about that place.

      KFG

  35. How does he do it? by fuqqer · · Score: 2

    Honestpuck writes more reviews than I've ever seen anyone do in my life.

    Does he have a job? Is he a book reviewer for someone other than slashdot? Where the hell does he find the time?

    How much coffee does this man drink? How many words per minute can this guy read? What kind of comprehension level does he read at?

    Does he have a life, (he only reviews tech books and sci-fi weeniebooks)? Is he some kind of super ultra mega genetically modified genius after reading all this material?

    I don't know why I wrote this post because it seems like a bunch of drivel, but I needed to satisfy my slashdot posting urge today. I also needed to show my amazement at Honestpuck's mad reading skillz.

    -non siggers will become your new overlords in soviet russia.

  36. I'm a regular Ufie, and I'm speachless. by pecosdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know if I want to do a victory dance for a good review, criticize you for being closed minded, or agree with you for pointing out some obvious but real problems.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:I'm a regular Ufie, and I'm speachless. by Frobnicator · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think his rating of the book, 8/10 - funny, and the meaning and context of his message makes it fairly clear that this reveiw is a parody or sarcastic.

      I mean a comment like "[the title] is a little bit funny. But putting [the title] on the back cover AND on the title page is overkill." is hopefully meant as a joke. I think.

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  37. Tech comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best tech comic: Hackles

    Why? It has lovable characters (unlike User Friendly).

    1. Re:Tech comics by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Hackles rocks, but I only read it once every week or two since they produce so few comics. The only other online comic I read is chopping block.

      Hackles has the potential to be as big as UserFriendly, they just have to put their name out there and build up a community.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  38. Is there a place to donate? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0

    On the website? I want them to give books for nominal value, and get profit from tips.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Is there a place to donate? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I want you to fuck off, and quickly.

      Tips?? Are you insane? You want to run all media like a damn coffee bar? Artists are not WAITSTAFF. They don't want your pity tips, they want a way so they can live securely and create. Appealing to the masses isn't the way to do that. It's a way to dumb things down so the common man likes them better. It's exactly what we have now -- artists selling out for a pay off -- only the payoff is smaller and the art is worse.

      Look. If I write some book on some obscure subject of marginal interest, the ONLY way I can possibly make enough money to survive is to charge as much as I can get for it. You could give away the book for free, and STILL people wouldn't want it. Shit, I can read user friendly for free every day, and I don't. Because I don't like it.

      Trying to run art on generosity is retarded. Do you even LIVE on this planet? We won't pay for schools, complain about taxes, won't let them build prisons near our homes. We throw bombs at each other because our skins are different colours. Hell, we only tip at restaurants out of fear that we'll get our food spit in. How is a musician or artist supposed to punish us for not taking care of them? Make bad art?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  39. Userfriendly by knghtrider · · Score: 1

    Inane, senseless, and trivial.

    I prefer other pursuits--Tim Wilson, Todd Yohn, Heywood Banks..now THEY are funny

    Let us not forget George Carlin...

    --
    In America today you can murder land for private profit. You can leave the corpse for all to see, and nobody calls the c
  40. I've never understood the appeal of User Friendly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The drawings are poor (the artistic quality found on the back of a gradeschool notebook), the jokes are stupid, and the novelty wears thin quickly-"Oh, its about UNIX and geeks! It's about stuff we do for a living, so it must be funny."

    And it's centered around an ISP. How fucking clever. For 1995.

  41. Wakka wakka wakka by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It wasn't subtle humor. It was ill-timed humor.

    As Statler said so eloquently to Ebeneezer Scrooge in The Muppets Christmas Carol, "Leave comedy to the bears!"

    That review would have been more appropriate if it had been sarcastically commenting on anything but a comedy book. As it was, *pfft*. Nothing.

    --
    John
  42. Put it into perspective... by Bubblehead · · Score: 1

    ... because, honestly, there aren't that many goood cartoons out there, maybe a handful, and Illiad is still in the top 10 tech comics, IMHO.

    But this is the problem with the review: The author does NOT put the strip into perspective, i.e. compares it with what's out there.

    I read the strip online, and yes, the quality degraded somewhat over the past few years, but hey, it's free.

    Okay, the book is not free, but then look at the 150th Dilbert or Garfield book. Illiard is still great bathroom reading, reason enough to get the book. Nobody expects Shakespeare.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Put it into perspective... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Illiad is still in the top 10 tech comics, IMHO.

      Sheeit... I don't think I know 10 tech comics. Can you recomend a couple?

      As for cartoons, Userfriendly is nice, tho not laugh out loud funny. There are only so many jokes about tech support before it gets too repetitive. It usually feels like the cartoon version of slashdot articles.

      Ubersoft has the right idea. Makes fun promarily of the company we love to hate, but spares no punches when poking fun at itself.

      --
      No sig
  43. Linux-loving geek? by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

    It's just chock full of jokes that only a Linux-loving geek could find funny.

    Wait, I'm confused. The review was negative, but you're saying I'll find the book funny. Should I buy it, or not?

  44. faint praise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Illiad is still in the top 10 tech comics, IMHO.

    Can you name the other 9?

    As for me, I can safely admit that User Friendly is one of the top ten web-based comics drawn by geeks aimed at geeks and mentioned as of this posting in this article

  45. It is very dark.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

  46. fourth? by cockroach2 · · Score: 1

    Okay, I don't want to be annoying, but if I'm not completely wrong, this is actually the fifth userfriendly book, after "User Friendly", "Evil Geniuses In A Nutshell", "The Root Of All Evil" and "Userfriendly v1.0"...

  47. Thanks for the Review by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    Honestpuck, ignore the bitter libertarians. I like the writing in this review. UF is a great strip and, if this is the book with the nuclear silo sequence, it is certainly worth your money.:)

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  48. User Friendly was soooo 1999 by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The artwork is sloppy, the stories repetitive, the characters mere sketches. But you could say the same about Dilbert. The difference is that back in the heady pre-crash days, User Friendly showed a more optimistic, happier, fuzzier world, populated by and aimed at college geeks that never really grew up. It provided an antidote to the cynicism of Dilbert, and in the days when money hoses got turned on ever nerd with a vision, it was going to be just the core of a huge multimedia empire, run by the forces of good.

    But then the market tanked, and everything changed. The audience of User Friendly found themselves losing their jobs left right and centre. The company behind it - composed of one lousy artist, a web guy, and a bunch of marketing parasites - found that you can't pay ten mortgages if you're giving the goods away. Most of the staff got laid off, and User Friendly went bitter.

    I don't just mean the strip, I mean the whole community around it. Illiad got real brittle, real fast. Posting constructive criticism on the discussion boards got your account wiped, no warnings. The remaining zealots on the boards went passive-aggressive, and savaged anything that didn't fit in with their self congratulatory circle jerking.

    Worse, post 9-11, User Friendly went maudlin. It's bad enough when cartoonists try to cover serious issues, but when they do it with smug ABC style flag worshipping patriotism teamed with really crappy art, it just gets embarrassing.

    User Friendly is now in its death throes. There are about two dozen characters drifting in and out of it (a new one was added this week), and none of them are particularly well realised. If you can't think of anything funny to do with the characters you've got, adding new ones probably isn't the solution.

    It all looked so hopeful, but now a week of User Friendly might - on a good week - give you the same amount of smirk as one day of Dilbert. I guess Illiad has figured out by now that Dilbert shows the tech world as it really is, but he never figured out how to portray that in a funny way. It's sad really, but all childhood things must pass.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:User Friendly was soooo 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen brother! .. thank god for you

      i present to you the "slashdot reader who somehow
      has a sensible perspective" web award

      it looks like this : *8D

    2. Re:User Friendly was soooo 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding, the "community" got really weird after 9/11. They took the left turn at Kucinich Boulevard and kept going. Maybe if the economy gets bad enough JD'll start passing out the kool-aid.

    3. Re:User Friendly was soooo 1999 by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      In unrelated events I joined the board right after 9/11.

      All the news sites were choked, it was a global slashdotting x 10 on all of them, so I figured I would read their message boards since I had been reading the comics for a while.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    4. Re:User Friendly was soooo 1999 by shostiru · · Score: 1
      To the extent that I think UF the strip has declined, and that his business model was tenuous at best, I agree with you. I don't participate in that community, so I can't comment on the politics thereof. I also skipped the strip around 9/11 (lived in DC, had real work to do) so I'll bypass that issue as well.

      I think you missed an important reason why the strip has declined. The subject matter, and the intended audience, are far narrower than Dilbert. Dilbert's appeal extends beyond the IT industry to engineering corporate culture and maybe corporate culture in general. I'd argue that UF's appeal is narrower than even the IT industry; many of the jokes are very specific to the ISP business (and possibly closely related ones).

      Mind you, if you do work in an ISP, the strip can still be coffee-spewingly funny at times. And I think it benefits from reading an entire month at once because, let's face it, some days Iliad misses by a mile.

      But there's a limit to how much new material you can pull out of this industry without either getting overly technical (and thus turning off people who don't have direct experience), or getting into overly complex and definitely un-funny issues (e.g., how do you make a strip about Verizon's wholesale DSL mis-billing dispute process as covert subversion of the Telecomm Bill?)

      Mostly, I think Iliad needs a break, a day job that gives him time to do the strip, and a renewed sense of sarcasm and irony.

    5. Re:User Friendly was soooo 1999 by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      that's a better review than the one posted. somebody delete the one posted and throw the parent up there!

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    6. Re:User Friendly was soooo 1999 by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      > Mind you, if you do work in an ISP, the strip can still be coffee-spewingly funny at times.

      As long as you haven't read the same joke already in BoFH.

      >And I think it benefits from reading an entire month at once because, let's face it, some days Iliad misses by a mile.

      Strange way to defend it. I castigated it on that basis.

      >Mostly, I think Iliad needs a break, a day job that gives him time to do the strip, and a renewed sense of sarcasm and irony.

      I agree, but I don't think he'll accept that. I expect that once he's driven away enough of the remaining sycophants so that it's unsustainable, he'll end it in a hissy fit of bitterness and recrimination, probably by blaming the negative vibes from all of tha playa hataz (e.g. me) that dissed his vision.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  49. User Friendly just isn't funny. Simple as that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux Zealot on the other hand, used to have me in stiches.

  50. Re:I've never understood the appeal of User Friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's centered around an ISP. How fucking clever. For 1995.

    Sure... because ISPs sure don't exist anymore. They're ancient history, like the dinosaurs. Might as well do away with any setting in a hospital, school, business, or home becaus ethey existed long before 1995 too.

  51. They keep pulling me back in! by LookSharp · · Score: 1

    "I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone."

    Ignoring the poor attempt at writing a sarcastic review (all negative, while actually meaning all positive), I honestly don't find UF funny, and haven't since about the second year. What was that, four years ago?

    After a particularly nasty flamewar last year where I politely questioned the humor in Dust Puppy being at the bottom of a portable toilet, being defecated on, and coming out with waste-covered bits of ungested food stuck to himself (I'm not kidding either, look it up for yourself), I decided UF wasn't for me. I haven't visited the site since. It has occasional-hit humor, the drawing hasn't improved from its quaint "raw, untalented" style since the first year, and the people on the board stuff themselves full of dysfunctional, co-dependent social behavior that makes me cringe.

    That's just my take. Maybe you like it. If so, more power to you! But I certainly wouldn't recommend UF-newbies spending two cents on purchasing any "products" from Mr. Fraser, intro by Wil "Wesley Crusher/I'm not Wesley!" Wheaton or not.

    (Mad props to CleverNickName.)

  52. Re:Worst comic ever by Demonix · · Score: 1

    Cardboard Tube Samurai.

    And maybe that wierd bit about the juicer...

    --
    when all is said and done, all a man has left are his blades and his honor.
  53. Comics that are better than UF by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    ... because, honestly, there aren't that many goood cartoons out there, maybe a handful, and Illiad is still in the top 10 tech comics, IMHO.

    I used to think User Friendly was pretty good, but then either it's quality deteriorated, or i found other, better comics to put it in perspective.

    Here's a list of (some of) the comics that in my opinion are better than User Friendly. As usual, your opinion may differ and your mileage may vary.

    Adventurers! the best of the CRPG comics.
    Dragon Tails comic about strange geeky dragons and a squirrel or two. (Has jokes that cover all kinds of geekery, not just the tech variety) The Wings of ChangeFantasy comic about a dragon, a girl with wings, and a group of pixie children
    The Devil's Panties "Real Life" type comic about a female protagonist and a couple of her friends. Frequently touches on goth and comic geekdom, and there's a side comic about LARPs.
    Sparkling Generation Valkyrie YuukiA manga style take-off on the "pretty-girl" anime genre. Has some Ranma-esque gender-bending themes if that disturbs you.
    Freefall Science fiction comic, primarily focused on an kleptomaniac alien scavenger, a friendly but somewhat dim robot, and a genetically engineered anthropomorphic female wolf.
    Ozy and Millie One of those comics with a world (mostly) like ours but filled with anthropomorphic animals. Frequently philisophical or political.
    Something Positive "Real life" type comic with a very twisted and sometimes sick sense of humor.
    Venus Envy A comic about highschool aged MtF transgendered person dealing with all the issues you'd expect such a person to be dealing with. Obviously lots of gender-bending issues.
    8-bit Theater tied for second best CRPG comic.
    RPG World the other tied for second best CRPG comic.
    Anti-here for Hire by the author of Adventurers! Same style mostly, but with a comic-book superhero theme.
    Megatokyo some people love the comic, some people can't stand it. The art is certainly pretty though in either case.
    Penny Arcade people talk about it enough on Slashdot (including several mentions in this thread) that i'm not going to even bother describing it.

    Okay, I'm tired of making descriptions, so some other good comics that didn't make it into the top tier (but still better than User Friendly IMHO) if you feel like looking around, PvP, Ctrl-Alt-Del, Saturnalia. The Life of Riley, No Need for Bushido

    And last (just because everyone here has probably heard of it already) Sluggy, which has had its unfunny moments, but unlike User Friendly has managed to pull out of those slumps and return to its former heights every time (so far)

    There's also a large set of comics that i only check every couple of weeks because they don't updated more than once a week, but are still worth taking the time to check. However i'm going to just stick to my daily list at the moment.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  54. Re:Worst comic ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that Penny Arcade sucks donkey balls, that's a testment to how bad UF is!

  55. Bad bad bad bad!! bad bad bad bad ... !!! by Tom7 · · Score: 1

    Userfriendly is so boring!!! AAaaaaaagh!

    Even slashdot comments are funnier than that shit.

    1. Re:Bad bad bad bad!! bad bad bad bad ... !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say that ... slashdot comments are mostly ranting, uninformed drivel that burns away at a person's soul everytime they make the mistake of reading it. At least after reading Userfriendly I don't feel like my time would have been better spent poking my brain with a pencil.

      Now, occasionally there is some humor to be found perusing it, but no more or less humor then I can get by reading the same variety of comments over at UF. And at least I have some pictures that occasionally warrent a chuckle over there.

  56. UF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Earth to nerds, Earth to nerds: User Friendly hasn't been funny for at least 4 years now.

    1. Re:UF by ZerroDefex · · Score: 1

      Now that's an interesting thing. User-Friendly has been going downhill for the last four years and Penny-Arcade has been getting funnier for the last four years. The first couple years of UF were the best while the first couple years of PA really sucked.

  57. WHAT IS A GRUE? by Uncle+Gropey · · Score: 1

    The grue is a sinister, lurking presence in the dark places of the earth. Its favorite diet is either adventurers or enchanters, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its horrible fear of light. No grues have ever been seen by the light of day, and only a few have been observed in their underground lairs. Of those who have seen grues, few ever survived their fearsome jaws to tell the tale.

  58. Speaking of cartoons ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of years ago I came accross this webpage with some really funny cartoons. Very dark and sarcastic. They all revolved around the same characters (never together on the cartoons). One of them was a sadistic coach, another one was - I think - a priest (dark hair, dark clothes, big eyes, all of the cartoons with this guy were sexual in nature), I think there was also one with a little girl in some of the cartoons. I know this sucks as a description, but these cartoons were *really* funny, so I'd be very thankful to find a link to that page again !

  59. Re:The slashdot readers who didn't get the sarcasm by sdcharle · · Score: 1

    Also, sarcasm aside, there is some irony in the people who brought you 'In Soviet Russia...' and who give '+5 funny' to truckloads of unfunny crap blasting something for not being funny...

  60. Note to Self... by Snaggy · · Score: 1


    Try to avoid an honestpuck review of our new O'Reilly book, The Best of the Joy of Tech. ;)

  61. It's called "Red Meat." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    I hate you, Milkman Dan.

    1. Re:It's called "Red Meat." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's it !! Thanks. Brilliant

  62. For christ sake! Mod up the parent :) by paulgrant · · Score: 1

    People, read it again :)
    It was a ringing endorsment :)

  63. Blender, others... by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0

    I think a good business model is to take all these naysayers who say tips will never work, and have them put their money where their unoriginal mouth is. If they want to be blinded by extreme cynicism, hey, at least profit.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  64. It is called Sarcasm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. ever heard of it?