Slashdot Mirror


Wired: Sony Prototyping Personal Video Player

Cinematique writes "Wired is running an article about Apple beating Sony in the personal music player fight. The author suggest that Sony should skip its planned answer to the iPod and focus instead on a portable video player. But there's a catch: the legality of the content such video players would use."

150 comments

  1. Oh, great! by PakProtector · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what I've needed for YEARS!

    Finally, something that I can watch movies on during those long, boring rides in the car, or on the plane, or during class when I should be taking notes!

    This is truly the end all of my personal video needs.

    If only there was some device like this already on the market, one that I could play games on and send email and program on, too.


    Oh well. I'll have to stick to my TV for watching things and this wonderful little LapTop for the rest.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

    1. Re:Oh, great! by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 1

      "If only there was some device like this already on the market, one that I could play games on and send email and program on, too."

      You mean like a laptop?

    2. Re:Oh, great! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sony is already working on a handheld device called the PSP which will play games, video, and audio. I would not be surprised if they added on support for email. In addition to all the usual shit, the PSP will have 16:9-format widescreen TFT LCD (480x272 pixels, 24-bit full color), MPEG4 AVC decoder, 802.11 (b?), IrDA, USB 2.0, Memory Stick, AV in/out, Stereo headphone out, and be powered by a Lithium ion battery. It also has some kind of expansion port. You could plug a tiny keyboard into it via USB and use it to send email, if they support such a thing. Which they very well may do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Oh, great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhhh yeah, that's what this thread is about! Thank you captain obvious.

    4. Re:Oh, great! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      No one else had got around to specifically pointing it out. I don't mean to suggest that I deserve a blowjob for my comment, I'm just pointing it out so that people lazier than me don't have to look it up.

      I didn't rtfa because wired sucks - their headlines are good and their stories are fluff, though at least it's not in four fruity neon colors per month any more - but if the article is about the psp then it's retarded, they're already doing it and there's money to be made in the short term on an mp3 player, and there's customers for an audio-only player in the meantime and even then, and they can take sales away from the iPod, which is obviously a good thing for Sony, right? Sony has all the pieces, like firewire, flash storage, optical storage, processor technology (MIPS cores, they've been using those for just about forever, all over their operations) so they could practically throw an iPod competitor (not a killer, because iPod is as close to perfect as you can get without making it solid state and somehow no more expensive than it is now, but with the same amount of storage... some kind of low-speed heavily bank-switched mram perhaps? Someone call IBM! I can see it now, the IBM PS/ValuePod.

      So anyway, the best Sony could do is match the quality of the iPod, in terms of an audio device. And they could make it have one of those funky next-wave-of-technology appearances that Sony has always managed to invent, if not pull off with class. For instance, Sony SPORTS walkmans in the classic yellow will always have a place in our hearts, but they did look pretty tacky. However, the original super-angular sony discmans with the flat rechargable battery packs looked downright classy, like something from a sci-fi movie.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Oh, great! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "You mean like a laptop?"

      You must have really big pockets.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Oh, great! by iantri · · Score: 1

      You want to watch movies on a device small enough to fit in your pocket? It would kill my eyes..

  2. Legality of content? by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't see as how this should be a problem.

    First, if you own a DVD, you should be able to "rip" it to one of these players as fair use. This would probably often be a useful feature.

    Even cooler would be if the future of DVRs would be to download content to such players, just like a computer to an IPOD. Being able to "TiVo" shows and watch them whenever you want would be quite a nice feature.

    Is there any "copyright" issues with using TV shows like this? How could it be any different from using a DVR in the first place.

    --
    The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
    1. Re:Legality of content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already "tivo" shows and download them to my personal video player now. You can do it too. Here's how.
      1. Buy a Replaytv
      2. Load freeware application "DVarchive" from sourceforge.net on your laptop.
      3. Download all the TV you want to your laptop
      4. Play video on your "Personal Video Player" AKA "laptop".

    2. Re:Legality of content? by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 1

      If such things violate the DMCA, then this is precisely what we need to get some of that overturned. This would be a major profit opportunity for Sony, so if they turn their full legal backbone behind it, some of the more restricted aspects of the new copyright law might become more lenient.

    3. Re:Legality of content? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Well, the DMCA doesn't apply to Laserdiscs (it never had any copy control mechanism) or any VHS tapes that don't happen to have Macrovision. The video resolution of even VHS might be good enough for a portable's small screen.

      The problem is that this might cause yet more internal issues in a company such as Sony, one division makes movies and another makes hardware to play them.

    4. Re:Legality of content? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      if you own a DVD, you should be able to "rip" it to one of these players as fair use.

      Under the DMCA, that would be illegial.

      Being able to "TiVo" shows and watch them whenever you want would be quite a nice feature.

      That would be legal, only if you are MOVING the files, and not COPYING them. Technically it's a small difference, but legally it is major.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Legality of content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Huh, tough, tough. Sounds like we need a portable TiVo with a satellite dish on, say, your head. YOu've never made a copy, except for recording from he broadcast stream.

      Plus, walking to line up with the sats would improve posture.

    6. Re:Legality of content? by madbeaner · · Score: 1

      well, it's not only the legality, but how many users could (and would) rip their own dvd's? it's not like with music were any number of spyware infested music jukeboxes rip subpar audio content into exclusive, DRM enabled formats *wink*WiMP/Real*wink*, but ripping DVD's is a task not every casual user will embrace. also, the usefulness of such a device is questionable, as stated before.
      the device's saving grace i'd imagine would be TV rips, i could see Sony adding support for the proposed device in their PVRs. as for the legality ... wouldn't it fall under the age old time shifting defense?

    7. Re:Legality of content? by r00zky · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about the DMCA.
      Today Shift key is an illegal circumvention device.
      Tomorrow farting will be illegal under the DMCA.

      Call me optimistic but by the time this gadget is in the market the DMCA will not exist... that or you should consider moving to another country.

      --
      I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
    8. Re:Legality of content? by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1
      Being able to "TiVo" shows and watch them whenever you want would be quite a nice feature.

      That would be legal, only if you are MOVING the files, and not COPYING them. Technically it's a small difference, but legally it is major.

      So as long as I have them, noone else can watch them on TV? ;-)
    9. Re:Legality of content? by lxs · · Score: 1

      Well, what did you expect? if Amazon can patent "One Click Shopping", expect people to get prosecuted for "One Key Cracking"

    10. Re:Legality of content? by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Is there any "copyright" issues with using TV shows like this? How could it be any different from using a DVR in the first place.

      Most TV broadcasters consider taping their shows to be an infringing use because you can skip commercials. They also consider showshifting to be an infringing use (if you've seen TimeWarner's TV commercials for their DVR, have you noticed that they carefully avoid mentioning that you can fastforward through commercials?)

      Unfortunately, copying a show from the device you recorded it on to a new device may be just enough of questionable legality to keep the courts from ruling it fair use; perfect digital copies are what's got the industries up in arms now; they didn't mind it too much when you were making analog copies, because they know that those analog copies can only spawn so many children, the quality degrading all the way...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  3. video vs audio by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it'll do just as well as portable DVD players. Who are they kidding comparing something like that to an iPod?

    I've always thought of video and audio as two completely different classes of product. Sure, the people who buy one buy the other, but CE companies always seem to ignore the fact that we actually use music completely differently from audio. The technology may be similar, but to assume that adding video to an ipod will make a better product just because it does more is quite ridiculous.

    1. Re:video vs audio by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      er woops, I meant to say "music differently from video". heh. Better slow down on that submit button.

    2. Re:video vs audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that the video players aren't necessarily targetted at Americans who ride in cars most of the time. It is designed for train and bus riders who have lots of time on their hands.

  4. HUH? by SugoiMonkey · · Score: 1

    "But there's a catch: the legality of the content such video players would use."

    That was never a 'catch' when it came to the iPod.

  5. What I want by Ty · · Score: 1

    What I want is a portable device that I can plug into my TV, like a VCR, and record shows to watch later when I'm on the train. A portable TIVO of sorts. Any takers please?

    1. Re:What I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sanyo is making one

      - an inside source

    2. Re:What I want by omegachen · · Score: 1

      Archos has a new line of mp3/video players out. They can record tv shows using the DVR module. Very pricey though (up to $900).

    3. Re:What I want by akb · · Score: 1

      Well Tivo is a closed platform, you have to void your warranty in order to be able to download content from it. I would investigate doing this with a ReplayTV, there's software for downloading content, it should be fairly easy to modify it to sync content that it records with something like the Archos 340. The touch part is you have to transcode the mpeg2 from the replay into mpeg4 for the archos.

    4. Re:What I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the Archos 320.

    5. Re:What I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rca lyra av has recording/encoding capabilities, doing exactly what you suggest. (mpeg4 enc)

  6. drm? by narkotix · · Score: 1

    why can i see this thing only playing sony titles only?

    --
    We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    1. Re:drm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ugh minus the extra only :p~

    2. Re:drm? by mm0mm · · Score: 1

      why can i see this thing only playing sony titles only?

      don't worry, it won't happen unless Sony is owned by Gates, which will never happen.

    3. Re:drm? by OMEGA+Power · · Score: 1
      why can i see this thing only playing sony titles only?

      narkotix, step up and receive your certificate of redundancy certificate

    4. Re:drm? by narkotix · · Score: 1

      i did post it as the 5th-ish comment and none of the other comments were referring to DRM as for my grammar...i posted an AC correcting it you blind troll!

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
  7. This would be awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could have porn on the go! Nothing like watching porn while walking around town. When can I get one of these?

  8. iPod rumors by znu · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a rumor that Apple might introduce a device next week which would allow the iPod to be hooked up to a TV for video playback. A lot of people have speculated that the iPod was never supposed to be just about music ("pod" suggests something more general), so this wouldn't be too much of a surprise. A built-in color screen would be the next step, I guess.

    --
    This space unintentionally left unblank.
    1. Re:iPod rumors by raga · · Score: 1

      It's too soon. They just updated their iPod line.

      cheers- raga

  9. Skipping iPod clone is a poor idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not reading the article - I've given up on wired entirely - but that doesn't matter. There will necessarily be a gulf in price between a device which plays mp3s, and a device which plays video. The needs for storage, a fancy display, and additional processing (either in the form of a dedicated video decompressing engine in hardware, or a generally more powerful CPU) pretty much guarantee that a video player is going to cost more money.

    Meanwhile Apple is taking pretty much all the money for a large-capacity portable mp3 player, and Sony would like a bite of it for obvious reasons. They own all the technologies they'll need to implement it, so they need not license anything to do so - the only costs are for development and production. Sony is known to be able to churn out hardware at very low costs, so this should be a doddle for them.

    Let's also not forget that Sony is bringing out their new somewhat-PS2-based handheld, the PSP, in the not so far future. Since they already have a handheld video player coming, they might as well toss off the mp3 player right now, and work on video later.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Skipping iPod clone is a poor idea by cronot · · Score: 1

      Just MHO, but I think Sony wouldn't bother on this market because they already have products that kind of fill that niche - Network Walkmans and MiniDiscs.

      Granted, the iPod offers much more than those (more memory and flexibility), but most people use it just to hear music anyway.

      Then again, while I'm very content with my MiniDisc for audio purposes, an iPod would be very nice for his hacking flexibility...

    2. Re:Skipping iPod clone is a poor idea by MrKinkade · · Score: 1

      I don't think that storage will be a huge problem. The IPODs are packing 20GB on those little laptop harddrives anyway. If you figure they'll use an LCD the size of an IPODs face a DivX of a DVD movie will probably only take up about 500MB anyway. That's 40 movies. Anyone who expects to get as many movies on a similar device, as they could MP3s, is a little bit nuts. My assumption that they could make a player the same size as an IPOD is a little bit silly too... hee hee.

    3. Re:Skipping iPod clone is a poor idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Frankly it doesn't need to be much larger if you spend enough money on the PC board, in order to support very fine connections, which lets you use smaller (chip) packaging. I mean the difference between an audio iPod and a video iPod is basically a bunch of die space and maybe an integrated color lcd controller, with only a driver stage off-chip. All of this will significantly raise the price of the device but people expect to pay good money for a video player, look at how much portable DVD players cost.

      Presumably you'd put linux on it, so you'd want USB and firewire connections. That makes it basically equivalent to a somewhat old school laptop in terms of memory.

      If you put a good enough DSP in the system, you can use it to decode MPEG4, especially at lower resolutions. So that's one way to avoid a big processor. DSPs aren't necessarily all that efficient either, though.

      If you're willing to have a smaller capacity hard drive you can bring the cost back down significantly and also be sure you'll be able to keep the device the same thickness as an ipod. You're going to need to make it larger to accomodate the larger screen, which will let you pack more batteries along, important for running a nice backlit lcd.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Skipping iPod clone is a poor idea by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      I really doubt you'd be able to keep it the same size as an iPod with current tech. You'll need many times the battery capasity of the iPod for the following reasons:
      • Larger, brighter backlight on all the time
      • More proccessing than music
      • HD will have to be spinning pretty much all the time, or significatly more, since the bandwidth will be higher
      My iPod locked-up once, I left it for a while becuase I was busy, it was almost flat after doing nothing but just spinning the HD for an hour.
    5. Re:Skipping iPod clone is a poor idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It will have to get bigger to accomodate the display in any case, so this will give you more room for a larger battery.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. iTMS? by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 1
    Apple rolled out a service to complement the iPod with legal music. I think that answers this question rather nicely.

    More interestingly, would be if Sony took the same approach. An online store where I could download quality video content, especially TV shows, for a reasonable price would be interesting indeed.

    --
    The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
    1. Re:iTMS? by OMEGA+Power · · Score: 1
      Apple rolled out a service to complement the iPod with legal music. I think that answers this question rather nicely.

      iTMS was released over a year after the first iPod and even then only for mac users (about 5% of computer owners, don't know what precentage of iPod users but I would be shocked if it was above 25% seeing as even when iPod was only supported/only included software for macs 3rd party programs such as xplay allowed people to use iPods with other OSes). I would hardly call this a similtainious rollout.

      The reason copyright issuses didn't cause problems for the iPod release was that courts had already ruled that portable mp3 players were legal in the Rio case (RIAA vs. Diamond Multimedia, I beleive)

  11. Add on to TiVo / etc by hattig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Plug this into the Network / Firewire / USB2 port on a TiVo (or future TiVo) and then download the videos that you have recorded on the TiVo onto your device (recoding for the devices display size of course, why store a 720x480 MPEG2 when a 320x240 MPEG4 would be better, and allow more to fit on the device?) for watching.

    As TiVo, etc, appear to be fine legally, this logical extension would be. Watch that Family Guy/Simpons/film on the train to work instead of at home where the wife will bitch because she wants to watch tennis.

    1. Re:Add on to TiVo / etc by 555-5555 · · Score: 0

      the MPAA would raise hell if they did that they're obviously pissed about tive although they have gotten over it they bitch about tivo network transfer ability which allows piracy a portable device would do the same faster because when you're done watching it on your handheld you are obviously gonna upload it to your PC then share it on Kazaa only giving them more reason to shut it down

    2. Re:Add on to TiVo / etc by hattig · · Score: 1

      I'd assume some way that the file would be keyed to the device, e.g.:

      Device -> PVR: Hi, Give me "Futurama Series 2 Episode 3" that you have recorded

      PVR -> Device: OMGHI2U. What's your public key, screen size, capabilities, etc?

      Device -> PVR: Here 'tis: , 320x240, MPEG4 and AVI

      PVR -> Device: Cool, thanks. Here is the content transcoded to 320x240 MPEG4 encrypted with your public key

      Device -> PVR: Sweet dude!

      So the Device would be able to play the content legally, but it wouldn't be able to give it up to another player. The PVR might limit these Devices as well, only allowing 3 registered Devices to be used with it, to stop the PVR being the distribution point.

    3. Re:Add on to TiVo / etc by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      They could also make it so it interfaces with their upcoming PSX. In fact, they could build into the PSX the ability to rip DVDs, resize them, and compress them so they'll work on the portable. They could even include some DRM so you can't just transfer it to your comptuer and share it with everyone.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    4. Re:Add on to TiVo / etc by Kissing+Crimson · · Score: 1

      Actually, that idea gets better as you realize the result:

      Currently, the to make use of the iPod you need to have a Mac/PC. Sad to say, lots of consumers still don't have PCs - or at least have sh*tty ones.

      Making the PSX the connection point for the PVP device would potentially open up a broader customer base for Sony.

      --
      What's that smell? Ah, that's my karma burning...
    5. Re:Add on to TiVo / etc by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Also, being that they'll know perfectly both the PSX and the portable video player, they/the consumer won't have to worry about programs, drivers, incompatibilities, system requirements, etc. It'll make it nice and easy both for them and the consumer, and it would be really damn cool.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    6. Re:Add on to TiVo / etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, how I would love to see that package at Costco. Bundle it with VO 3 and a random Sony movie, and I can't see how I could resist.

    7. Re:Add on to TiVo / etc by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Plug this into the Network / Firewire / USB2 port on a TiVo (or future TiVo) and then download the videos that you have recorded on the TiVo onto your device (recoding for the devices display size of course, why store a 720x480 MPEG2 when a 320x240 MPEG4 would be better, and allow more to fit on the device?) for watching."

      Nice idea. There's just a slight problem with your suggestion here. TiVo's don't have USB 2.0 ports, Firewire ports, or even *network* ports. As it stands, TiVo Series 2 units have two (2) USB 1.1 ports. To hook up a TiVo using ethernet, you have to purchase a USB-to-Ethernet dongle (or USB to wireless, etc.).

      TiVo Series 2 units also won't export recordings without serious hacking. The encryption is much much heavier than the original Series 1 units, thanks to the concern of the MPAA and the Broadcast Industry. TiVo following their concerns is the reason why the company is still in business whereas Replay has already bankrupted its two previous owners.

      I'd much prefer to see an Apple-branded TiVo unit that is actually compatible with .AAC streaming from a PC or Mac using iTunes.

      In fact, I propose us Slashdotters petition Apple to release an Apple-branded TiVo. Apple could advance the PVR industry by bringing out a TiVo with more advanced features. Things such as MPEG4 encoding/decoding for more recording abilities on the same sized hard drives; an Airport Card Slot for easy WiFi; FireWire and USB 2.0 ports; Component Video Output; *Home Media Option* with .AAC streaming from iTunes standard; and perhaps Bluetooth built in (like Nokia's PVR) for easy picture phone image transfers. And an Apple TiVo is no more foolish to consider than a Gateway-branded DVD player 6 months ago...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  12. Maybe its just me but I just don't see the point.. by PierceLabs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure I really see the validity of carrying movies and TV shows around with me. With music its different - I can listen to music while driving, while coding, while jogging, etc. I just don't see the same appeal for video. While it would be a very useful device for those long plane rides when you're unfortunate enough to not be travelling on JetBlue or to calm a child on a road trip (and you already have a larger screen for them to watch) - I just don't see video being a big a draw.

    Listening to music is just a much more passive activity than actually watching a movie. I simply see fewer instances where I'd want to use it AND I wouldn't want a more compelling experience from a gameboy or cellphone games. Maybe its just me - but by the time this market develops - I would expect that 4G phones would be able to deliver all the video I need right to me :)

  13. DMCA violations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Audio CDs are not protected, it is legal to transfer them to other media.

    Technically, it is illegal to rip a DVD since you are circumventing a copy protection system.

    There is a difference.

    1. Re:DMCA violations by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      FWIW, not all DVDs are copy-prevented with CSS. It's relatively rare to find them - the budget horror DVDs you find in the cheap section at your local CD outlet are usually unprotected, and some outfits like Criterion (on the opposite side of the ;-) used to ship their DVDs unprotected too. In these cases, the movies - the VTS_x_y.VOB files - are just straightforward MPEG2 files and can be read directly from the DVD without special software.

      These films are probably legal to rip - at least, they're as legal to rip as CDs. (I say probably because fair use is more art than science. Rather appropriately, I'd say. Morally, of course, I can't see an objection to ripping either, but since when has the law been based on that?)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  14. That's a stupid issue. Sorry. by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But cassette tape players, VCR's, etc. have been made for years, and the responsibility for legal content on these devices has been squarely on the user. I know the music industry had tried to squelch them, just like everything else, but as long as there is a significant use other than piracy (and there is) then the {RI,MP}AA can go fly.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  15. LEgality? by 555-5555 · · Score: 0

    What questions of legality apply to a personal video player that don't apply to my Ipod they could play equally legal and illegal content although it is harder to copy legitimate video to your hard drive with the right hardware it is still fairly simple Sony definetly does need to stick the the personal vidoe market Apple is making a major takeover in the audio market

    Sony stick to what you started with

  16. Where Am I Going...? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1
    ...and why am I in this handbasket?

    ...and is there any wonder why, in this era of pocket-sized Tivos, the bubble for e-books has burst before it even ballooned?

    1. Re:Where Am I Going...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netcraft confirms it: ebooks are dying.

  17. Short update by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 1
    Sorry, but reading below has informed me that ripping a dvd is in fact illegal. I admit I was unaware of this. Further, I think it's pretty ridiculous; I imagine in a DMCA, violating copy protection argument, but fair use is really getting bent over in this deal. In fact, such a player makes the argument about violation of fair use better than anything, imo.

    If someone could post a good link to a discussion of this legality, I'd be very appreciative. Also, I still think this would be a great device if just for the TiVo application.

    --
    The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
  18. Story's title is all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It implies Sony has a PVP, when it does not. It's a writer suggesting that they skip ahead to it.

    1. Re:Story's title is all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only want a PVP if it has built-in P2P apps, runs a PHP server and is protected by PGP encryption.

  19. Re:Oh, great! - Archos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't mind spending about $600, you can have 20Gb worth of audio/video/photo fun... Archos AV320 Video Recorder [archos.com] Sorry, no e-mail or games yet.

  20. three questions by fermion · · Score: 1
    There are three big questions. First, why would use a 3.5" screen when 5" screen DVD player go for under 400. The second is what kind of DRM is Sony going to include to protect it's products. The third is where is the content going to come from.

    The last two are important. The iPod and the Apple store are not encumbered with excessive DRM. Sony, targeting a product for the windows market, is probably looking to develop some sort of DRM protected pay-per-view movie download library. I can easily imagine them using Windows Media Player to come up with all sorts of complicated schemes to limit the use of the movies once they are on the player.

    And five movies isn't really all that significant for many uses of this device. If one is traveling, it is not uncommon to take two to four times that many movies. This is easy to do with DVDs and a portable player. With this player on would have to have a laptop to hold the extra movies, and then why not just us a laptop.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:three questions by gobblez · · Score: 0
      thats what i was thinking, i've seen 7" DVD players for DVD's or download big ass files, not everyone has fast computers with DVD drives or broadband.

      and if someone insists on storing them digitally so they don't have to fumble with DVD's, just get a cheap laptop with a DVD drive and they'll have a 15" screen an lots more.

      somebody has been watching too much run lola run?! ;)

  21. Very interesting by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there also speculation that they might roll out an upgrade to iTMS in conjuction with the Windows release? What if this was an iTVS (Video Store)? I would be VERY interested in the ability to buy quality video content in this format, ESPECIALLY TV shows.

    --
    The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
    1. Re:Very interesting by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1

      Much to early for that IMO. First they need to prove to the world that selling music online will work well and video (even "short" TV shows) will need much more HD space and bandwidth.

    2. Re:Very interesting by computerme · · Score: 1

      read the wired story. sony is claiming 10 hrs on a 20 gig or something like that.

      also, they have already proven that selling music online works.10 million songs enough for you? (selling those 10 million to the 5% of the market that has a mac and an ipod)

      wait till the 16th when the windows version...

      once again, apple will show the rest of the industry how to innovate...

    3. Re:Very interesting by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

      read the wired story. sony is claiming 10 hrs on a 20 gig or something like that.

      Hmm...when I backup my DVDs I usually use a 352x288 MPEG-2 Video Stream with 1500 kbps (variable bitrate) and a 128 kbps MPEG-1 Audio Layer 2 (mp2) audio stream. This gives me pretty good quality and it allows me to put ~3 movies on a DVD, usually with place to spare. Each 90 minute movie has around 1.2 GB that way. So with 20 GB that gets me 25 hours of viewtime in pretty good quality on my TV. If you chose to only watch your movies on a small screen connected to your IPod (or to that new Sony Player) you could reduce the resolution even further.

  22. legality? by R33MSpec · · Score: 1

    "...But there's a catch: the legality of the content such video players would use..."

    Since when has the legality of the content not been an issue with portable audio players as well?

  23. Yah, why did anybody make an iPod anyways by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 1
    I already had my personal music player, AKA "laptop".

    Yes, a laptop is a viable use for this, same with music. A more portable, specialized device probably also has a market, especially if content provider services are rolled out with it.

    --
    The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
  24. And just like every other DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that too will fail massively. Dommage!

    1. Re:And just like every other DRM by hattig · · Score: 1

      Well it depends on whether the standard "bah, lets do this customer security DRM job here and not tell anyone" method is used, or if PVR and portableVP manufacturers get together and deal with it properly.

      The idea is to make it hard or costly to get at the secret, i.e., not worth it for the average person. Anyway, a 320x240 video is not going to turn anyone on these days. Make sure the portable device is not the weak point in any video delivery system.

      For now the only PVPs will be from the likes of Sony, Creative and Apple. These will be locked down tight and can keep the secret key hidden inside and make it hard to get at.

      Of course once the protocol is known, you could hook your computer up to the PVR and say "Hi, I want 720x480 25fps MPEG2 video, here is my key" and then proceed to decrypt and distribute. Of course, you can already do that with current PVRs, so what is the problem?

  25. pornography by JAYOYAYOYAYO · · Score: 1

    forget hooking it up to tivo. follow the mp3 player style and let us download mpeg/wmp/mov/rm/etc onto it. businessmen will want it for trips, students will want it for the bus(and class), everyone will want it for porn... needless to say, if you build it we will come. (pun intended :)

    1. Re:pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      needless to say, if you build it we will come
      That was funny, if only I had mod points.

  26. Legality Issue with Both by DarkHazard · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly when Diamond Multimedia introduced their Rio MP3 Player, the RIAA sued them to stop sales. Then they dropped the suit in 1999(?). Anyways, I am pretty sure legality was an issue for the portable MP3 player, but dropping the suit was just telling people it's ok to produce them. I'm sure if Sony produced a device similar to the one mentioned in the article, the MPAA would probably and try and sue especially if you could 'rip' DVDs.

    1. Re:Legality Issue with Both by Excen · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Sony Pictures a member of the MPAA? The R&D people would probably get a letter from the corporate people saying something to the effect of, "Knock it off, jackass!".

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    2. Re:Legality Issue with Both by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Sony is part of MPAA, im sure they would VOTE not to sue themselves.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  27. Here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's legal for me to rip my CD's because there's no encryption, and I have rights to change formats for media I own. But, with DVD's, there is encryption, and breaking that is a violatation of the DMCA. I can't rip 99.999% of DVD's legally.

  28. Conflicting Goals by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

    Giant corporations have lots of reserve cash and are able to leverage it in all kinds of ways. Unfortuately this also makes them slow. From the article:

    Sony was so worried about piracy, and sapping revenue from its Sony Music division, that it chose to do nothing and let Apple ascend. Apple made boatloads of cash from the iPod, while Sony struggled to remain profitable as revenues from its main cash cow, the PlayStation 2, plummeted.

    Sony lost out because it is trying to do too many things - trying to be many things to many markets. It is things like this that make me wonder if the megacorps can really survive by buying up all the little guys. Most sucessful companies focus on only one goal. Microsoft focused on getting the desktop - and they got it. Now though, Microsoft is headed in many directons (not nearly so much as Sony) is it possible that this lack of focus will push Microsoft aside? I suspect so (in the long run that is.)

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Conflicting Goals by burdicda · · Score: 1

      Sony isnt going to do shit.!!!!
      That's what happens when a huge electronics
      manufacturer also owns an entertainment subsidy.

      Look at their MD technology...
      never went anywhere
      died on the vine
      why ??
      they refused to let it cleanly store data
      without jumping thru sony only drm protocols
      that would not allow 2 way movement of stored data

      just a bunch o dumbasses....
      don't look for anything "open" ever from Sony
      spend your money on anyone else but

  29. How About This for Under $100? by HardCase · · Score: 1
    This month's edition of the IEEE Spectrum has an article about the ZVUE, a portable movie and MP3 player. The article is pay to view on the web (unless you're an IEEE member), but the player's web site is here. Alas, it has a proprietary CODEC. It also seems to me that I read some kind of blurb about "security through obscurity", although I could be mistaken. Here's the text from the IEEE's article:

    Putting the Move Back in Movies

    A personal video player puts films in the palm of your hand for US $99

    By Steven M. Cherry

    Bumper-to-bumper traffic stretches ahead for miles. You're hot, tired, and the kids are fidgeting in the back seat. They're too young for Game Boys. You used to long for one of the big expensive DVD players mounted below the roof. But now you reach into your purse for the ZVUE, a US $99 handheld video player.

    About the same size and shape as a Game Boy, the ZVUE has the added advantage that, unlike a DVD player, a child--or you--can carry it around and watch it on a long airplane ride or in a doctor's waiting room.

    Yes, the ZVUE player's movie screen is very small, but then size didn't keep Nintendo's Game Boy and its ilk from becoming hugely popular among the same 8- to 18-year-old set at which this device is aimed. The ZVUE plays movies, television shows, and music videos with a clarity that will surprise adults and captivate the youngsters.

    From HandHeld Entertainment Inc. (San Francisco), the ZVUE relies on a 2.5-inch (diagonal) thin-film-transistor liquid-crystal display and stores its programs on a Secure Digital Multimedia card already popular for handheld consumer electronics, including digital cameras. These so-called SD cards come with capacities of 8 to 256 MB--at roughly one minute per megabyte, the largest cards can hold two full two-hour movies each.

    A major part of the ZVUE development involved a proprietary encoding scheme, which HandHeld Entertainment calls its HHe codec, that fiercely compresses programs at a 100 to 1 ratio. Nonetheless, the ZVUE plays video with none of the jerkiness (using only a few frames per second) or fuzziness (using just a small number of pixels per frame) one might expect.

    None of those usual problems could be seen when I watched Toy Story 2 on a preproduction demo unit that company CEO Nathan Schulhof brought to the IEEE Spectrum office in mid-August. The 24-bit color picture, the same as on a conventional computer color display, was crisp, and the figures moved as smoothly as in the best video games. A 128-MB SD card, holding a two-hour movie, costs about $50.

    A proprietary codec can be the kiss of death for something like a media player. Sales of the player start out small, so few film distributors encode their movies for it. With only a few movies available, device sales languish and the cycle continues. Aware of this chicken-and-egg problem, Schulhof is licensing his codec to other manufacturers. With more versions of ZVUE out there, more movies should be available for them.

    Additionally, for those who already have movies languishing on their hard drives in the MPEG-4 format, HandHeld will soon release a software package for converting these files into a form compatible with its codec. (Note to Schulhof: a conversion from DivX would be nice, too.) Burn the result onto an SD card via the device's USB connection and your kids will have another movie for the ZVUE.

    The 75-gram unit plays for up to eight hours on four AA batteries and has a slot for the SD card. The device comes with only one set of headphones but a port for a second pair, so both of the little tykes in the back seat can share sound as well as pictures without your having to listen to Shrek for the hundredth time. First units are expected to show up in Toys "R" Us stores in the United States this month, in time for the end-of-year holiday season.

    ZVUE is being manufactured in Hong Kong by Eastern Asia Technology

    1. Re:How About This for Under $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or look at the Phototainer (running linux, alas they did not release the source :( and Archos (Archos.

      Both have a harddisk, big screen (albeit both have only around 350x350 respectively 320x240 pixels, I wish they would make one with 640x480 like the Sharp Zaurus C750//60 - that display is _coool_), and play movies, mp3, have TV out etc.

      See also here for hacking the Phototainer...

      Best wishes,

      Tels

  30. Linux powered? by mm0mm · · Score: 1

    I'm just wondering by what system the new hardware will be powered. Considering Sony's move towards Linux in development of new PS, it's natural to think Linux would be their choice. But they might develop some system of their own...? There are a number of portable DVD player with 7" LCD screen already available in the market. Swapping DVD drive with HD shouldn't be that hard.

  31. An unstated requirement of miniaturization by yerricde · · Score: 1

    You mean like a laptop?

    There is an unstated yet understood requirement in the discussion of battery-powered media devices other than notebook or tablet PCs. The constraint is that the device should be designed to let the owner stuff the device in his pants pocket. Anything bigger than the original green-screen Game Boy won't do.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:An unstated requirement of miniaturization by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Does a Toshiba Libretto fit that requirement? I think it might, although it might not have the CPU or space to cut video.

  32. even the shift key is a dmca violation1 by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Audio CDs are not protected, it is legal to transfer them to other media. Technically, it is illegal to rip a DVD

    there is no difference. did you know that the shift key is now a banned circumvention tool and anybody caught pointing to it will be found in violation of the dmca/

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  33. The porn industry leads the pack, as usual by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Anyway, a 320x240 video is not going to turn anyone on these days.

    Oh really? It's not the size of the image that counts.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  34. nope, story says "a prototype." by timothy · · Score: 1

    "It implies Sony has a PVP, when it does not. It's a writer suggesting that they skip ahead to it."

    According to the story: "... It looks like they just might do that. A few weeks ago, a prototype of a Sony PVP turned up at the WPC Expo trade show in Tokyo."

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:nope, story says "a prototype." by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      Prototypes of electric cars have been demonstrated by GMC for over 20 years now.

      Just putting 'prototype' into perspective here.

  35. sunncomm mediamax 3 by yerricde · · Score: 1

    It's legal for me to rip my CD's because there's no encryption

    didn't you know that using the shift key is a felony/

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  36. Sony doesn't want mp3 players to succeed... by arhines · · Score: 1

    ...why do you think they push the atrac3 standard so hard? It's because they are a major record company too! I doubt if they would want to increase competition in the mp3 player market without requiring the proprietary atrac3, and anyone with enough music to fill up an ipod certainly isn't using legal music...

    1. Re:Sony doesn't want mp3 players to succeed... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1
      anyone with enough music to fill up an ipod certainly isn't using legal music
      Erm, maybe if your encoding at shit quality, but consider for a moment... I have over 300 legally purchased cds. Average 12 tracks a cd, 3 minutes or so a song, encoded at 256kb/s. Thats a bit over 2megs a minute. This all comes out to about 30Gb. Unfortunatly i bought a 20Gb archos jukebox back in the day so all my stuff is encoded @ 192Kb/s and i'm almost out of space on my portable. I still buy cds quite often, so i'm holding out for the 80Gb iPod.
      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  37. Um. Hello? PSP? by iapetus · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing something here, but haven't Sony already announced that the forthcoming PlayStation Portable will be able to play video provided on UMDs?

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    1. Re:Um. Hello? PSP? by DoctorRad · · Score: 1
      Yep, they certainly have, and they've said that the video format will be MPEG-4-based too. I throw down the gauntlet for someone to get XviD encoded video playing on a Playstation Portable :-)

      Before we can do that though, we're going to need recordable UMDs. I had assumed thus far the UMD was going to be a read only medium. Has anyone seen any indication that it'll be more like Minidisc, with a recordable option. Unless they're going to put a writer in the PSP itself, we're also going to need external writers.

      Yes, I'd love to be able to time-shift TV onto a PSP too, but at this stage, I don't think we know if it's going to go down that route. I don't have much of an interest in games, so by the time the PSP comes out / I can afford it, it'll be better for me to get a hard-drive based solution.

      Matt...

  38. There's nothing I enjoy more then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    watching football on my 2" TV! Me and the guys all huddle around the TV...

  39. Who says Sony is Loosing to iPod??? by PetrusMagnusII · · Score: 1

    Maybe in America iPod is king, but in Japan, it's just another one of those cute things Apple makes but no one wants. In Japan, MD is king. In Japan, you can go to Tsutaya (kind of like block buster, but doesn't suck) and rent a CD... Yea, and it get's even better; you can LEGALLY COPY IT TO MD. You can't even play them in computers. Everyone has a MD Player. I tell friends I'll send them an MP3 in the email of this artist or whatever if they don't know who I'm talking about, and they have no idea what an MP3 is.
    This isn't just Japan too, this is pretty much all of Europe too. It's huge in Taiwan. It's huge in Mainland China. (I know this because I go to college in an international school in Japan, so I have class mates from all over the world.) MD is king I think.
    Now you may say, other companies make MD's and MD Players... yea they do... but... at least in Japan, no body buys them. In Europe they buy Aiwa and stuff, but since Sony owns everything about MD, they still get money from other companies.
    Sure, MD may not be doing well in America, but America isn't the only country in the world.

    1. Re:Who says Sony is Loosing to iPod??? by loadquo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say MD was that big in the UK, but then neither is the Ipod. I know of no-one that has either for portable music.

    2. Re:Who says Sony is Loosing to iPod??? by chipace · · Score: 1

      personally i would rather spend my 1 hour train ride with 15 gigs of music variety... but most japanese would rather read, sleep or text-message.

      people don't buy mds because they're great... they buy them because they are functional, and all their music from the last 10 years is on them.

      sony's digital audio sucks... their entanglement with media production (artists) has kept them using drm that is added baggage to their hardware. it's only a matter of time until sony mainstream consumers realize that their friends have more functional hardware.

      normally i don't comment about mainstream consummers... it hurts my brain to try to think at their level.

  40. 2 thoughts by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    1) Ty is right - this would be more useful if it were a TIVO like device. One of the fundamental differences between audio and video content is that while people will listen to a song dozens of times before they get tired of it (and even then probably want to listen to it later), a movie is best watched one, maybe two times at the most (unless you're some sort of sweaty-toothed freak). Fresh content is needed, and TIVO delivers. Video-On-Demand content is the other natural complement. There is the slight problem about putting a hard drive through transfering gigabyte-ranges of data per day. Regardless, neither I nor most people I can think of really have the time/attention to watch video on the go, nor the desire to watch it on such a tiny screen, so what's the point?

    2) Missed the boat on an iPod knockoff? Are they on crack? The iPod is not a complicated or exclusive device. Sony could easily make something that compared favorably and people would buy it. Especially if it were cheaper, although it's unlikely they could do that since the bulk of the cost for any personal audio device is the drive.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  41. a suggestion by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Read a book.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  42. Perfect Match for PSX??? by apetime · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Does anyone else see this as an obvious tie-in to the PSX? Given the hard drive recording and dvd playback features on the psx, as well as IIRC firewire and memory stick ports, Sony has a great chance to tie these two products together.

    It would eliminate worries about piracy for Sony, because it would be a simple matter to tie one Sony PVP to a PSX, like Apple does with iPods and Macs, letting Sony control both sides of the transaction effectively. Since most people can't record directly to digital format yet, the PSX has a good chance at being a hit. Tied together with a really cool looking TV (if what Wired is saying is right), you might have people buying PSXs, like people were buying Macs to use iPods a few years ago.

  43. My Eyes Are Bad Enough by vjmurphy · · Score: 2, Funny

    My eyesight is bad enough staring at 17" CRTs and 15" LCDs all day, now Wired wants me to watch movies on a 3.5" display?

    Sheesh, at that size, no one will be able to tell IF Han shoots first.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  44. Simplicity by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    I know it won't be simple and elegant with style like the iPod, I can see it now, alot of useless buttons on the side, three or four different colours of plastic, a brand name, a company name, a weird logo, and a bunch of clutter on the device in different fonts/etc. They will find a way to make it all stupid and "cool" like cellphones, just like when I saw this oriental girl with a cellphone with a round screen, hello kitty background, and a bunch of other crap. If it is from sony it just won't be the same, as the simple, yet elegant iPod.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  45. legal content by akb · · Score: 1

    The web contains an ocean of interesting video content, its just poorly organized. The Irate project for audio shows a way to harvest legal music content, the same can/will be done for video. I run a site that aggregates links to interesting video around the 'net.

    With the BBC putting their archives online and the archive.org saying they will provide infinite storage and bandwidth for multimedia content, legal content for these devices is no problem.

  46. You know who's back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WIPO Troll is back. That's right. And we're gonna bury you in faeces!

  47. Accidents will come by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    I'm 99.99% sure there'll be a lot of accidents when people hooked up to these things try to do PVP-incompatible actions like driving, crossing streets, walking, etc.

  48. Re:Maybe its just me but I just don't see the poin by iso · · Score: 1

    Agreed. A portable video device always struck me as a device that would be created by a company only because they can, not because they should.

    I absolutely cannot fathom why anybody would want an expensive device to watch video in a postage stamp size. Also, a hard drive (random access media) is a complete waste for linear video data, and expensive too. Not to mention the limited battery life on something like this, unless an extremely expensive battery is used. I believe that these video players will appeal to the "gadget" crowd and nobody else.

  49. Sony Video Walkman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had my Sony Video Walkman for 3 years. It's about the size of a Tom Clancy novel on steroids, and plays miniDV tapes. Has firewire, S-video, and composite in/out (though not at the same time). Works well for a DV editing deck and so-so for watching movies on airplanes. If I hook it up to a Macrovision altered feed it goes "beep beep beep" and refuses to record.

    Take out the cassette bay, shove in a dense HD and you've got a product I'm interested in buying.

  50. I can already watch QT movies on my Clie by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
    Well its my Fiance's Clie I got her for her birthday, but it features a QT video player. I mean quality isn't that great on the 320x somthing 65k color screen, but it works.

    Although with the iPod getting larger everyday, I don't see why you shouldn't be able to DL a movie to it. I mean I have LOTR TTT on my HDD and it takes up about 1.2GB compressed in DivX and all. Hell that would fit on my 5GB iPod.

    I use the iPOD for more than just music. My 250 song collection leaves plenty of room so spare, so I often carry back ups of my powerpoint and other files in there as well.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  51. Ridiculous... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There probably isn't a whole lot the electronics giant can do now to unseat the iPod,

    This is absolutely ridiculous. There are millions of things Sony could do to beat the iPod.
    On of the reasons I look at Sony products first, is because they get incredible battery life out of all of their products. What's the point of hundreds of hours of music, if you need to carry stacks and stacks of AA batteries, and swap them every 2 hours?

    Then there is capacity, price, formats (I'm still looking for a good player with Vorbis support... Spex support would be very good too.)

    However, don't exepct much from Sony. If you've looked at the products they've made in the past few decades, you can see that they are fully in-bed with media companies, and include all the DRM they can.

    DATs were killed off due to DRM. MiniDiscs are just hanging on right now, because of DRM. You aren't allowed to make many copies of your own music, and they do everything they can to prevent you even having digital output at all. You can copy from your computer to your minidisc, but you can't copy the files back. They are going out of their way to give you a product with restrictions you don't want. With hundreds of products just like this, I can't imagine they are going to see the light, and throw out all restrictions immediately.

    The big problem is that all electronics makers are in-bed with DRM of all types, which is the sole reason why computers are doing so well. Instead of doing the same things with stand-alone electronics, we have to do it with a general-purpose processor, because no sector other than the computer industry is willing to give you permission to access your own property how ever you want.

    Apple is only partly in-bed with restrictions against the public, so they made a device that was far better than anything the electronics industry would ever think of comming out with.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MiniDiscs are just hanging on right now

      Only in the US. Minidisc is the standard in Japan (and a lot of East Asia, from what I hear).

    2. Re:Ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      However, don't exepct much from Sony. If you've looked at the products they've made in the past few decades, you can see that they are fully in-bed with media companies, and include all the DRM they can.


      No shit, sherlock. Sony IS a media company.

  52. whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If i was going to make a device with a screen, a harddrive, a cpu, and specialised video decompression, you may as well make it some sort of pda-with-harddrive dealie, instead of just specialising in media playing.

  53. In other words THEY dont care about piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good for them.

  54. Makes you kind of wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How this could happen. Being able to carry only a couple of songs around with you on a mechanical medium is not a big advantage.

    MD unites the worst aspects of solid-state and HD based MP3 players. I guess the Japanese consumer are naive in some ways.

    I doubt you are entirely correct about Europe, I know few people who own MD players in my neck of the woods.

  55. Video Watchman maybe? by jseale · · Score: 1

    Could this be the return of the Video Watchman? It'd have to have the following features: a tuner, at least a 3.5" screen, output to a larger TV, accept UMD compatible media. I don't see what the RIAA/MPAA's problem with this thing is either. Sony seems to be afraid of the 'big bad wolf' here and if they don't get started on this project, Apple is sure to do something similar to this, think iVision.

    1. Re:Video Watchman maybe? by HardCase · · Score: 1
      I don't see what the RIAA/MPAA's problem with this thing is either. Sony seems to be afraid of the 'big bad wolf' here...


      I have seen the enemy and he is us - Pogo


      Sony is both a music and movie company. They ARE the big, bad wolf.

    2. Re:Video Watchman maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iVision? Nah, can't see apple releasing a product with such a stupid name

  56. I like the idea by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

    I've been eyeing devices like these off and on for the past several months or so. If I were to travel more than I do, one of these devices would be invaluable. I don't generally watch much broadcast TV. Before I graduated from school and when I still lived with my parents, I found that more often than not I would watch shows that I had previously recorded on their PVR. I find that I generally manage to stay busy enough that I don't find the time to watch television shows when they are broadcast anyway. Other than the Simpsons and the occasional sporting event, that is. (Go Cubs!)

    Furthermore, when my roommate and I moved into our new apartment after graduation, we elected not to purchase anything but the most basic cable needed to get cable internet. Instead, I get my TV fix buy purchasing DVD collections for series that I never found the time to watch while being broadcast or series which we never broadcast in my area, recording shows onto my computer from the few channels I do get, and being sent the occasional television episode for a particular series from a friend who recorded it on their computer. (That does fall into fair use, correct?) Just as I have all but stopped listening to the radio and watching MTV (when I still had it), I have now all but stopped watching television. Instead, my entertainment fill is based around on-demand entertainment. I watch shows whenever I get the chance and listen to my CDs whenever I get a chance. For me, being able to take my ondemand video entertainment with me is simply the next step. I would love to be able to rip a couple episodes of The Prisoner or Buffy to take with me and watch while on a trip or during a lunch break at work, or pretty much any time I have some free time away from home that I want to fill. As I said before, if I travelled more, I would most certainly be purchasing one of these devices.

    --

    If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  57. If Sony is really worried about piracy.. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    ... then they should make video for the PVP available for sale. Otherwise, people are going to turn to P2P etc to get stuff. I wish these guys would show some sense. You don't create demand and then not fill it. Apple knew this, hence, iTunes.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  58. Re:I LOVE TERA SANTUCCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, can you remind Tera to pick up some more anal lube? She was out of it last night, so I had to give her a vegetable-oil enema before I pounded her pooper.

  59. A true /.er - mod -1, imbecile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't even read the whole comment!

    "If only there was some device like this already on the market, one that I could play games on and send email and program on, too."

    You mean like a laptop?


    Hey, Elrod, you must have missed this part of the comment that you "replied" to!

    Oh well. I'll have to stick to my TV for watching things and this wonderful little LapTop for the rest.

  60. 3 Good PVP already exist !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  61. You can already do it... by mjihad · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want a portable video player, just grab a recent Pocket PC and install PocketMVP

  62. Archos Jukebox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.archos.com/

    It's been around,
    For a while.

  63. Here's a contender by jeti · · Score: 1

    The Archos AV300 lets you record video directly. It's exactly what you're looking for.

    It's not not cheap. But the quality of the screen and audio and video playback is excellent.

  64. Legality? What legality? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    But there's a catch: the legality of the content such video players would use.

    What's wrong with viewing pr0n on a portable video player?

  65. These have been out for a while now by spectecjr · · Score: 1

    I went to Fry's in Seattle today.

    They had at least three MPEG4 players for bargain basement prices.

    What's the deal? Or is it just because it's Sony?

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  66. Re:Maybe its just me but I just don't see the poin by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    comeon

    1. if your a student, record all lectures on a handycam to DV tape, then you can fall asleep

    2. convert/copy to the video pod and watch later and fast forward the boring bits.

    3. watch jayleno at school.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  67. Re:Maybe its just me but I just don't see the poin by Fat+Cow · · Score: 1

    I think it would do well in London, for instance, where people can spend more than an hour a day on the tube, but not so well in the US - where people are (hopefully) paying attention to the road when they're communting :)

    --
    stay frosty and alert
  68. google down the toilet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first four results from google for psp sony were junk!

  69. This already exists. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 3, Informative

    I haven't seen anyone mention the Archos AV320 Mediabox.

    It has a 3.8" screen, plays MPEG4, MP3's, and records from any video source (encodes into MPEG4), including NTSC and PAL video.

    1. Re:This already exists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know several folks who have the Archos device. Given that you can buy the devices from Best Buy, CompUSA, CDW, etc, it's hardly obscure.

  70. Re:Maybe its just me but I just don't see the poin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can a movie be uploaded into an iPod? If so, that would cancel out any argument to concern exclusively on video players as a movie piracy device. I remember a japanese company tried marketing an mp3 player earlier, and failed because they were blocked by american courts. then when american companies caught up, absolute silence by the courts. is this american protectionism in action?

  71. Two Words: by torpor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pocket. Porn.

    Enough said.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  72. Legality of Content? by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

    What about all these Gigabytes (Gigibytes?) of uh... "home videos" everyone is supposed to have?

  73. You would have if you read the article... by Kelmenson · · Score: 1
    There are already a few models on the market from Archos, RCA and others, and it seems every month or so another obscure Taiwanese manufacturer announces another offering. Microsoft and Intel have developed a design of their own for others to build.
  74. Apple *and* Sony? by payndz · · Score: 1
    Whether there's anything to this or not I don't know, but I met up with an old friend of mine a couple of weeks ago who is now a director of a UK record label. (Chah! All my old friends are now earning much more money than me, but...)

    Anyway, after a couple of hours of general catch-up chat we moved onto technology. We're both Mac users, so that was the way the conversation went. He mentioned that he'd been at a wedding reception with some guy from Sony, who told him about Sony's portable video player, and then started talking about working with Apple on hardware - until he realised the champagne had opened his mouth too much and promptly shut up.

    Could all be bollocks, of course, but I can't imagine why my friend would make it up. It could have just been something to do with QuickTime, as well. But it'd be interesting if there were something in the hardware story, though!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Apple *and* Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is Bollocks. Look back at the history of these two and you'll find a number of failed "collaborations" that never got off the ground. Sony doesn't need Apple for hardware or design, and they learned this a long time ago. There's a reason the VAIOs run Windows.

      Here's a better rumor (substantiated too): Microsoft has been courting the MPAA and RIAA to make the Windows Media Player format with built-in digital rights management the DE FACTO and industry supported encoding standard. SONY's video player will use Windows Media Player as a foundation.

  75. I don't see Sony bringing this out... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    First off, there are plenty of portable DVD players on the market.

    Second, why would Sony and the MPAA do anything that might push down DVD sales? Hollywood is awash with DVD profits. Offering portable hard drives for motion-picture viewing is a direct threat to DVD sales. Hollywood won't allow this trend to happen like MP3 trading did to the music industry. Currently, the distribution channel for legal motion-picture digital sales is primitive, so a device like this would only encourage P2P movie trading.

    Put these elements together and you'll see why Sony WON'T bring such a device out.

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    1. Re:I don't see Sony bringing this out... by WileyWiggins · · Score: 1

      What they ought to do is replace the stereo minijack out on the ipod with an AV minijack like the ones on Sony camcorders. Then you could plug the ipod into your stereo system, OR a TV.... once the drive capacities start getting really big, you could fill that sucker up with video.

    2. Re:I don't see Sony bringing this out... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      *What they ought to do is replace the stereo minijack out on the ipod with an AV minijack like the ones on Sony camcorders. Then you could plug the ipod into your stereo system, OR a TV.... once the drive capacities start getting really big, you could fill that sucker up with video.*

      That is a great idea, but there is a reason why Apple hasn't included a digital-out on the iPod. The RIAA would have a fit over it without strong DRM. Think about it. Under the iTunes store license, you have your purchase music tied to your home network of Macs and up to 5 iPods. Apple still hasn't allowed a networked TiVo to become an authorized device on the network chain yet, despite how popular TiVos are with Mac owners. If you allow a perfect digital output to any home stereo system, you open the can of worms on unauthorized replication straight from the iPod. The iPod could stream to a device recording the content. That's why there is no digital output on those babies. Add to the fact that Macs proper are just now coming standard with digital audio outputs (on the G5's) unless a user purchased the Soundblaster Audigy for their PowerMac...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  76. Once upon a time... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1
    "and anyone with enough music to fill up an ipod certainly isn't using legal music..."


    Once upon a time, there were these interesting places you would actually travel to, and you would pull out your wallet, and hand over green paper things and enter into a business transaction, and leave with an object(or ten) containing the 'music' you legally aquired...

    It was really neat back then -- sure there was more music worth buying -- but many of us actually supported the musicians whose music we enjoyed, and by that I mean there are many people over 25 who have actual CD collections(mine is well over 500 CDs) not to mention those of us who have 'L.P.s'...ask your parents -- it was a device used for rolling joints :)
    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  77. Got One! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    focus instead on a portable video player.

    I've already got one. It's called the Sony VAIO laptop.

  78. "Legality of content"? by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

    First, the potential customers aren't likely to care.

    Second, does anybody remember their history? The first hardware MP3 player (Diamond) was sued like hell, and won. Why should this be any different?

  79. I don't get it by inkswamp · · Score: 1

    Is there a market for PVPs when even the cheapest laptops can play movies? I'd much rather buy a low-end laptop if I wanted the ability to play movies on the go (which I never have wanted, btw) than blow a bunch of cash on a machine that can only play movies. IMO, there is a very limited market for this.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  80. Sony Vaio with gigapocket. by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    the article missed it, in it's suggestiont that sony 'might' produce a box that converts video to clie.
    sony already makes it. Vaio desktops with the 'gigapocket' allow recording TV to the hard drive (and to DVD) and the video recording includes a 'convert to clie' software snip that lets you watch prerecorded programs on your clie.

    Buy a Vaio with gigapocket, buy a highend Clie, and you can have exactly what you want- stock software

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random