Slashdot Mirror


Sharp to Sell 3D laptop for $3299

prostoalex writes "The laptop that allows the user to view the 3D images without the special glasses is finally being sold by Sharp. The price tag is $3299. Actius 3DRD runs Pentium 4 2.8 GHz with 512 MB DDR SDRAM and is also capable of displaying two images in parallax."

212 comments

  1. Cheap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it feel real?

  2. Yes by JRSiebz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sweet! I can finnally watch the booty divx of Spy Kids 3D I've just been dying to watch. Not!

  3. Damn! And I just bought a Powerbook! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 0, Troll
    I guess I'll have to be happy with the fact that I won't be subject to the Windows 3D goatse worm.

    ew.

    1. Re:Damn! And I just bought a Powerbook! by pmz · · Score: 1

      Windows 3D goatse worm

      Damn, such bad timing! Who'd have paid money to see Schwarzenegger in a movie about a city in the future on another planet ravaged by huge worms living in gaping holes? It could have been a sci-fi classic :(

    2. Re:Damn! And I just bought a Powerbook! by veritron · · Score: 0

      I, personally, am glad that I cannot see Tubgirl in her full 3d glory, thanks to POVERTY(tm)

    3. Re:Damn! And I just bought a Powerbook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cant wait till next term when arnie looses the re-election and is finally officially too damn old to make a movie of his style that anyone would want to see. Oh wait thats already true, nevermind :).

  4. What OS does it run? by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

    Windows XPXP?

    1. Re:What OS does it run? by TexVex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm! Maybe they should click here to see how cool LindowsOS is!

      I'm seriously, guys. Click the link. It doesn't just go to the Lindows site. It goes to a part of the site that will make you wonder exactly what the Lindows folks are smoking.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    2. Re:What OS does it run? by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Christ, I think I've just been converted to .NET. Don't ever do that again! Ever!

    3. Re:What OS does it run? by lostindenver · · Score: 1

      That is so funny and Wrong.

    4. Re:What OS does it run? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      It goes to a part of the site that will make you wonder exactly what the Lindows folks are smoking.

      Fortunately for the world, the marketing folks who dream up this kind of stuff aren't the same ones who actually handle development.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    5. Re:What OS does it run? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Gotta admit, that picture of Ballmer was pretty sick tho!

    6. Re:What OS does it run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy fucking shit.

      I'd like to find the guy who made that video and beat him with sticks.

    7. Re:What OS does it run? by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Who can miss the sing-along version?

      Dear gawd! Free speech be damned, there should be laws preventing this!

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    8. Re:What OS does it run? by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      holy fucking shit.

      I'd like to find the guy who made that video and beat him with sticks.


      That response sounds farmiliar AC,.... Hmm. Do you have stairs in your house? [/End secret Mason question]

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    9. Re:What OS does it run? by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Good point. Upon reconsideration, I have not been converted to .NET.

    10. Re:What OS does it run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm protected

    11. Re:What OS does it run? by beyonddeath · · Score: 1

      I think we need some diapers over here... few of us mighta just pissed ourselves... uhm yes... no man not on the cOmpuuuuTr *CARRIER LOST*

    12. Re:What OS does it run? by viware · · Score: 1

      Hahaha I dont know what you guys are talking about, thats hilarious! Hahahahaha...

      I like the rolling Bill head at the end.

      At least Lindows has some spirit, even if it is a little wacky.

    13. Re:What OS does it run? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      Holy Shit! I'd buy a Lindows PC if they sent me some of that "special green organic packing material"

      My hardest laugh all day...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    14. Re:What OS does it run? by NivenHuH · · Score: 2, Funny

      Duh.. We know what they're smoking.. a big fat LindowsRock..

      --
      Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
    15. Re:What OS does it run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Click the link. It doesn't just go to the Lindows site. It goes to a part of the site that will make you wonder exactly what the Lindows folks are smoking.

      These guys are really messed up. It's in flash. Luckily I keep flash disabled. I can't believe they are stupid enough to use it on a website. Crazy.

    16. Re:What OS does it run? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I needed a good laugh. Thanks.

    17. Re:What OS does it run? by dmayle · · Score: 1

      You know, I tried, but all I get is this pretty azure-blue puzzle piece on a white background... (Scratches head)

      Yay Linux on sparc!

    18. Re:What OS does it run? by mkldev · · Score: 1
      That's nowhere near as disturbing as the existence of the sing-along version....

      Now all we need is "William Shatner Sings The Lindows Rock", and I think we have ourselves a tune the whole family can enjoy^H^H^H^H^Hflee from in terror.

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    19. Re:What OS does it run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like something awfully gay you fucking faggot.

    20. Re:What OS does it run? by TexVex · · Score: 1

      I've actually got MP3s of William Shatner doing Rocketman and a couple other "songs".

      For the unitiated, he doesn't sing in these recordings. Instead he speaks the song lyrics with the music. He manages to sound so much like a parody of himself that one can only assume he is parodying himself.

      In any case, it's interesting to listen to once.

      "And I think it's going to be a long, long time..."

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    21. Re:What OS does it run? by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      That is just inspirational. Truly the greatest thing I have ever seen anywhere at any time. Everybody needs to know about this.

    22. Re:What OS does it run? by linear_shift · · Score: 0

      Hey, grooooooooovy maaaaaaannnn! I'm already smokin' it! :D They should have a modified tux penguin, like Slackware with the the cigar/popeye tuxpenguin, except theirs would be smoking a joint ;P

      --

      Nos una. Nos unique. Nos victum.

  5. Well, that's nifty and all.... by TheWhaleShark · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, that's nifty, viewing 3D without glasses and all...

    But you could just save $3299 and simply use some cellophane: http://individual.utoronto.ca/iizuka/research/cell ophane.htm

    --
    "It never got weird enough for me." - HST (RIP)
    1. Re:Well, that's nifty and all.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you still need glasses to use the cellophane.

    2. Re:Well, that's nifty and all.... by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      But you could just save $3299 and simply use some cellophane: link.

      That's not really a "true" 3d solution: you still have to cross your eyes to get it to work. Really, it's no different from splitting the screen down the middle and showing one image on each side. Like this.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    3. Re:Well, that's nifty and all.... by Simonetta · · Score: 1


      I used to work for a company that made a $3000 pen computer (about ten years ago) in Oregon.

      There was zero market demand for the machine.

      I was the first one fired from this company for having 'an attitude problem'. Somehow I must have pointed out to someone there that the emperor had no clothes on.

      Now whenever a new expensive and totally useless computer novelity is released (or announced to the press as if it were about to be released), I have to wonder:

      Who paid for this thing to be developed?

      Why convinced them to do such a thing?

      Who would ever buy something like this and what would they possibly do with it?

      Who is going to get fired for developing this thing?

      If people would have thought like this before they spend billions of yen on this and other things like this, then the Japanese electronics industry wouldn't be in the middle of a twenty year depression.

      Come on, guys, time to be real!

    4. Re:Well, that's nifty and all.... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      "Pen computer"!?! How does it work? I want one!

    5. Re:Well, that's nifty and all.... by Simonetta · · Score: 1


      It was basicly a Palm Pilot with a larger LCD screen.
      There was a fad for 'pen computers' in the early 1990s that peaked with the Apple Newton.
      They never worked correctly and never could find a market.
      The Palm Pilot eventually developed from these early 'pen computers'. They were made by Go, Inc.; Momenta, Inc.; PI Systems and one or two other now long gone companys.
      The book "Start Up" by Jerry Kaplan (1994) describes the Pen PC scene at that time.

  6. Battery Life by pardasaniman · · Score: 1, Funny

    Heh... you just shelled out a load of cash to realize:
    The battery life is only 1.3 hours.

    Shoulda RTFA before you bought the laptop

    1. Re:Battery Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet! That's much better than I get on my two year-old Dell.

    2. Re:Battery Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      hey, if youre gonna pay $3299 for uber-geekdom another 100 or so for another battery isnt going to be a problem.

      Youre like the guy who doesnt want to buy a Porsche because the insurance is 'just too high'.
      If insurance prices is a problem, maybe the car isnt for you.

      zeke

    3. Re:Battery Life by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      Sweet! That's much better than I get on my two year-old Dell.

      I hear ya on that. I (and a couple of my coworkers) currently average about 3-5 seconds on battery power with my Dell. This is with a battery that has been fully charged (on someone else's laptop that doesn't have this problem), and it is completely drained when I'm done with it.
      Fortunately my laptop's lease is expiring and I ought to be getting a replacement up and running this week. Hopefully it doesn't have the same issue (if I can get by that non-bootable harddrive problem it currenly has...)

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
    4. Re:Battery Life by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      I'd still buy it. I don't give a crap about laptop battery life, because I always treat laptops as portable desktop units, and I've always got a plug handy. The last time my battery in my laptop went below 90% was when the power went out.

      This think kicks ass. I just wish it was better than 1024x768.

    5. Re:Battery Life by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      This brings up a serious point: where's my 3D TFT to go with my desktop?

    6. Re:Battery Life by rhombic · · Score: 1

      Right here.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    7. Re:Battery Life by mkldev · · Score: 1
      Laugh now, cry when your power bill comes.

      You: $300 for electricity? But I only used the #*&^$@#&$^ thing for five minutes!

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
  7. What sort of visual range does this thing have? by JayBlalock · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It seems like, for the parallax to work like they're descibing, there'd be a very narrow space you'd be able to stick your eyes to have the effect work. Also, I can't imagine how working with this thing for long wouldn't lead to eye-strain headaches - that's been true of virtually every similar "fake" 3D system.

    Anyone have an article with more info on it?

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    1. Re:What sort of visual range does this thing have? by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1
      I can't imagine how working with this thing for long wouldn't lead to eye-strain headaches - that's been true of virtually every similar "fake" 3D system.

      Yeah, I don't see why they don't just design a "real" 3D system, especially in a laptop. The space, weight, and technology constraints would make it so easy.

    2. Re:What sort of visual range does this thing have? by Java+Pimp · · Score: 2, Informative

      We experimented with a similar display from Dimension Technologies, Inc.. Here's how it works if you are interested.

      It's pretty cool but you don't have much room to move around and we'd get headaches after about half an hour of using it.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    3. Re:What sort of visual range does this thing have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It seems like, for the parallax to work like they're descibing, there'd be a very narrow space you'd be able to stick your eyes to have the effect work.

      It depends how far apart your eyes are, but you are right, the sweet spot has to be uncomforatably small.

    4. Re:What sort of visual range does this thing have? by Ian+at+Sharp · · Score: 1

      The sweetspot is pretty good for a screen of this size. Since this is a notebook, the 3D effect has been optimized for 3D usage when using the notebook in a normal viewing position (i.e. about 18-24" from the screen. You don't have to have your head 'locked' into position, you can move about. front-back movement is very generous.

  8. Sounds nice, but... by cgranade · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds nice, but I think that I'll wait until more content and programs are developed which take advantage of 3-D space. Besides, after shelling out $1900 for a new laptop with the same specs almost, I don't see $3300 for this sucker. Interesting, and I wish it luck, but it isn't for me yet.

    --

    #define DRM chmod 000

    1. Re:Sounds nice, but... by profet · · Score: 1

      Admit it....

      you are just waiting for multi-angle, multi-dimensional pr0n.

    2. Re:Sounds nice, but... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1


      I wouldn't buy one of these, either. I couldn't imagine the 3D effect being all that great.

      Anyway, there's no point in holding out over the number of applications. Anything that uses OpenGL or Direct3D will be displayed in 3D. Any 3D game, application, etc should work just fine.

      One thing I've noticed, though, a lot of 3D applications cheat a little. You'll end up with some crazy anomolies occuring because of programming tricks and illusions of depth where none is actually processed in the 3D space. If you've ever tried to watch Assembly demos with 3D glasses on, you'll know what I'm talking about.

    3. Re:Sounds nice, but... by burtbanner · · Score: 1

      oh they are... http://www.sharp3d.com/partners/NVIDIA.asp

  9. Desktop replacement? by atreus42 · · Score: 1
    It weighs about the same and runs about as long as my desktop with a UPS hooked up.

    Battery Life: Approx. 1.3 hours
    Weight: 10.2 pounds

    1. Re:Desktop replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, Bullshit.

      Get a scale. You don't have a desktop PC and UPS that weigh that little unless it's a laptop carcass. I would bet, at minimum, 35-40lbs.

      I've shipped over 100 computers in the last two months, and even the little 1U jobbers are over 20lbs, without the UPS. Hell, even a little BookPC weighs more than 10 lbs.

      I have one of these that only weighs 2 lbs, but the UPS that powers it for about 45 minutes weighs 25lbs.

  10. Methods by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I read the article, but didn't find anything about how these worked other than a cop-out answer. I've experienced what you might call a 3D effect when different colors are displayed on my LCD monitor. Perhaps their screeen is an extreme of this phenomenon.

    Without glasses, I can only assume the screen shows different images as a function of the angle at which you view the screen (like these pictures that "move" because they have ridges in them with different pictures).

    I'm very curious to see how well these work.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Methods by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you see another picture with another eye basically(two layers on top of each other and something on the top of it to hide the other picture from other eye).

      so viewing angle is definetely limited and it's not a miracle making machine. intresting anyways, even though it can be at this point be practical(and affordable) just as a movable '3d' showcase of company products.. or rich boys game toy.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Methods by whizzzo · · Score: 0

      I saw a demo of a 3D monitor from Sharp around 1995/6 which tracked a reflective dot which you stuck between your eyes and then used some sort of polarising screen to send images from two different CRTs to each eye independently. It could be completely unrelated to this, but I just remember that it was Sharp so they've been researching 3D displays for a while. The tracking worked well and it looked really good but you probably wouldn't want to carry around a sheet of shiny dots with your laptop. It could just be fixed perspective.

    3. Re:Methods by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

      Damn I thought your sig was 'free midgets'...I was about to click over and order a couple of free midgets.

  11. 1.3hr battery, 10.2 pounds by pmz · · Score: 5, Funny


    You know, a 10 pound laptop brings new meaning to "drag and drop".

    1. Re:1.3hr battery, 10.2 pounds by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well my portable weighs 25 lbs and doesn't even have a battery, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:1.3hr battery, 10.2 pounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a new feature! You don't have to go to the gym everyday if you use this laptop.

  12. How does this work? by venicebeach · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does anyone understand how this technology works? "Without special glasses" - Do you need to cross your eyes the whole time you are working on the computer?

    1. Re:How does this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In soviet russia the laptop crosses your eyes for you!

    2. Re:How does this work? by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      ive seen stereoscopic pong before, but an OS? youd have to have an inch of waste on each side of the screen just for the background, not to mention text would be impossible to read. still, it sounds like fun. maybe bolt it on to FVWM or something equally plain and it might work.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    3. Re:How does this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Put nose against screen.
      2. Slowly move away from screen.
      3. Look for hidden 3D surprise beside your My Documents folder.

    4. Re:How does this work? by viware · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It uses a normal LCD display, with a second LCD display in front. Each pixel on the second one has 2 states (solid or transparent), and it blocks light from wither one eye or the other, therefore allowing different pictures to be sent to each eye.
      I believe the downside is you have to double the refresh...

    5. Re:How does this work? by cazzazullu · · Score: 1

      you know those picture-thingies for children that change scene when u turn them? It works almost the same: The trick with these pictures is that actually both pictures are closely interlaced (so narrow vertical lines of each picture switch one over the other). Then they just add a top-layer of long narrow vertical triangles so that they act like little prisms (or like mirrors if u don't really know how a prism works). Then if u turn the picture around you will see first only the left stripes (thus looking like the first picture), later only the right stripes. Now if you make such a thing not out of cheap plastic, but put some more care in it, you use vertical stripes of pixels instead of paper, and you carefully design this thing so that at certain angles your left eye sees the left picture and your right eye the other, BAM, you've got depth perception without glasses or such. But I can imagine the following disclaimer: "only works at certain angles and places. We are not responsible for severe neck-stifness"...

      --
      int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
    6. Re:How does this work? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Do you need to cross your eyes the whole time you are working on the computer?

      A $3000+ dynamic Magic Eye? Now I can get my Sunday Comics headache fix every day!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    7. Re:How does this work? by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      i think i'm getting motion sickness just thinking about it.

  13. Cheap for Mac fans =) by Lizard_King · · Score: 1, Troll

    I hope I'm not misrepresenting Mac owners when I say, $3299? Damn that's cheap!

    --
    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    1. Re:Cheap for Mac fans =) by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are.

      My iBook was $969 + $70 Airport card + $43 256Mb SODIMM. It's a super laptop (4 hour battery life!) for under $1100.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
  14. heh.. by AEton · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the details on Sharp's website:

    Includes 3 free Electronic ArtsTM games to showcase the capabilities of the RD3D! Test your cool with James Bond 007: Nightfire, hit the road with Need for SpeedTM Hot Pursuit 2 or putt for dough in Tiger Woods PGA TOUR(R) 2003. All 3 are yours when you order the new RD3D for a limited time.

    Yeah, because there's a huge audience of 3D golf afficiandos with $3300 spare. (On the other hand, the integrated hybrid DVD-writer is pretty. It'd be neat if they had software for partial 3D rendering of DVD movies.

    So, uh, any guesses on how many years before this technology hits the $500 price point?

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:heh.. by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      Is this a jab at Apple? :)

      /mac owner

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    2. Re:heh.. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      So, uh, any guesses on how many years before this technology hits the $500 price point?

      Right when they stop making replacement batteries for it.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:heh.. by mpweasel · · Score: 1
      Yeah, because there's a huge audience of 3D golf afficiandos with $3300 spare. (On the other hand, the integrated hybrid DVD-writer is pretty. It'd be neat if they had software for partial 3D rendering of DVD movies. So, uh, any guesses on how many years before this technology hits the $500 price point?
      ...because there's a huge audience of 3D pr0n afficionadoes with $500 spare.

      Or at least one.
    4. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because there's a huge audience of 3D golf afficiandos with $3300 spare. (On the other hand, the integrated hybrid DVD-writer is pretty. It'd be neat if they had software for partial 3D rendering of DVD movies.

      So, uh, any guesses on how many years before this technology hits the $500 price point?


      A 2.8GHz, 512Mb RAM, 60GB HD laptop will cost you a fair sum even without 3D stuff. I don't think this technology is necessarily that expensive, it's just that the rest of the specs happen to be awesome too.

  15. WTF?! by Entropy248 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Guys, how hard did you have to look to find an article without pictures?! I remember reading the original stories on /. and wanting to see pictures then too! I mean, how odd is it that an article about display technology doesn't have pictures? Wasn't that everyone's first thought? I wanna see if it's any good so that I can buy one. It's like buying a guitar without ever hearing what it sounds like. Or, like buying a CD without ever hearing the band... Ummm. Never mind that last, but you understand.

    1. Re:WTF?! by flossie · · Score: 1
      Guys, how hard did you have to look to find an article without pictures?!

      Pictures of a 3D screen probably don't give you a very good impression when you look at them on a 2D screen. It's like those old TV adverts for flatter screens that tried to show you how much clearer the picture was - if it works, you know they're faking it.

    2. Re:WTF?! by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

      sorry, but what does looking at a 2d pic of a 3d display tell me?

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    3. Re:WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's like those old TV adverts for flatter screens that tried to show you how much clearer the picture was - if it works, you know they're faking it.


      Those ad may suck, but it's pretty easy to zoom in on a corner and show someone the difference. No help for showing off 3D displays.

  16. Bah, old hat by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

    I've been viewing 3d images on my current screen for ages!

  17. Great...Where are the applications though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IOW...When can I get some 3d pr0n

    1. Re:Great...Where are the applications though? by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      IOW...When can I get some 3d pr0n

      There's already a special application for producing and displaying 3D porn: it's called a girl (or for some models, a woman).

      Sometimes they'll even allow you to touch their naughty bits.

      Unfortunately, Slashdotters can't get one for $3299; in fact, most Slashdotters can't get one at any price.

    2. Re:Great...Where are the applications though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      IOW...When can I get some 3d pr0n

      There's already a special application for producing and displaying 3D porn: it's called a girl (or for some models, a woman).


      But does it run on Linux???

    3. Re:Great...Where are the applications though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but where do I stick the mouse?

    4. Re:Great...Where are the applications though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not quite. $5k will get you a www.realdoll.com ;-)

  18. well, shit... by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    i'm blind in one eye, you insensitive clod...

    1. Re:well, shit... by midav · · Score: 1
      Obligatory, Futurama:

      Mine does not work --Leela
    2. Re:well, shit... by Scorchio · · Score: 1

      Really? Wanna buy this other 3D laptop? Don't let the crayon logo fool you, it's genuinely 3D - honest - and a bargain at only $2999.

    3. Re:well, shit... by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      that's all really funny, but i truly am blind in my left eye :). i remember when i was a kid trying out the 3d glasses. i couldn't figure out what all the fuss was about.

    4. Re:well, shit... by midav · · Score: 1

      damn, still trying to pull my foot out of my mouth

    5. Re:well, shit... by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      I'm not blind in any eyes, but I don't have any binocular (or something) vision - ie those magic eye thingies dont work... and it isn't easier to tell distances from two eyes rather than one. I bet the fake-3d effect is disappointing though. Give me colour video holograms any day...

      Btw, anyone remember that game... magic carpet, flying carpet, something like that. Anyway, you could use random-dot stereograms as a renderer... video-magic-eye... crazy!

    6. Re:well, shit... by keep_it_simple_stupi · · Score: 1

      So if you have no stereoscopic vision then an OpenGL video game should look truly 3d to you right? I mean, how could you tell the difference between "real" and "fake" 3d if the only way the rest of us can tell is with the stereoscopic view? Really. I'm just curious.

    7. Re:well, shit... by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      i suppose i can tell real from 2d video due to the amount of blurriness in more distant objects than ones that are closer.

      my depth perception is definitely different that yours, but not nonexistent. i think that the mind has ways of working around these things. i drive, and have no problem doing so really. my blindness was a birth defect, so i have never had true stereo vision.

      so, there must be more to it that just the stereoscopic view that differentiates "real" and "fake".

  19. pr0n by kipple · · Score: 3, Insightful

    as it is widely known, to launch a technology you need to make it widely support pr0n. see also: "VCR," "Internet" and so on

    does this laptop comes with a full year membership..? I wasn't able to find it out from the links.. :)

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  20. Finally! by tkrotchko · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we don't have to listen to people complain that Apple's prices are too high.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  21. is this a hardware thing? by demonbug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was wondering whether this 3D thing is hardware-based or software-based or a bit of both. One article doesn't say anything about it and the other was /.ed already.

    I seem to remember playing a game called Magic Carpet (I think from Bullfrog) years ago that had "actual" 3D images - the kind where you kind of cross your eyes to get the depth right. You know, like pictures of sailboats that you have to stare at for a while before you see anything.

    So, what exactly is new about this, and why would I want it?

    1. Re:is this a hardware thing? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      You know, like pictures of sailboats

      Obligatory Mallrats quote:
      "When do I get to see the sailboat?" -- William Black

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    2. Re:is this a hardware thing? by dan+g · · Score: 1

      You know, like pictures of sailboats that you have to stare at for a while before you see anything.

      I think you mean pictures of schooners, right?
    3. Re:is this a hardware thing? by sklib · · Score: 1

      It is a combination.

      A few years ago before LCD screens went into style, nVidia (among others) supported 3d glasses for their video cards. They would work by darkening in front of one eye, refreshing the monitor with the image for that eye, and then darkening the other eye, and refreshing the monitor with the other image.

      When the program made a call to draw some triangles or whatever, it would be done to 2 separate framebuffers, and would usually take twice as long. The difference between the two is that the camera viewing options would be slightly different to reflect a different eye position. Then when the program called for a buffer flip, the driver would start displaying the 2 new back buffers, one for each eye. It's really quite a smart system, although it's almost impossible to replicate this behavior with vertex shaders, since the driver doesn't know which input data to the shader is the projection matrix, for example, unlike with the regular fixed-function graphics pipeline.

      I imagine that this laptop has a similar setup on the driver side, but instead of having glasses, just displays 2 separate images on the same screen, one aimed at each eye.

      --
      -S
    4. Re:is this a hardware thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumb shit, it's a sailboat!

    5. Re:is this a hardware thing? by markh1967 · · Score: 1
      I think you mean autostereograms.

      I only tried that option once - they split the screen into several (16 I think) layers and it really did work...for a few seconds at a time then I'd lose it and spend a minute or so trying to focus just right again. The game was unplayable in this mode, of course, but it was impressive all the same.

      --
      Input error. Replace user and press any key to continue.
    6. Re:is this a hardware thing? by OMEGA+Power · · Score: 1
      I think you mean pictures of schooners, right?

      A schooner IS a sailboat stupid head!

  22. Meep-meep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new 3D goggle-wearing masters.

  23. holy shit the lindows song?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all the Lindows kids, adding software is so fun, let's do the Lindows rock.

  24. Usefullness? by NightWulf · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it would be useful in a medical enviornment or a lab or such that needs 3D images of MRI's etc. but for the average person is it really needed? Does Joe Whitecollar need to see the annual reports in 3D Excel, though it could really show the descending barcharts of profits.

  25. Issues for vision impaired? by niola · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While this idea sounds cool, I wonder if it will be one of those technologies that I cannot use. I am legally blind in my left eye and often these 3D technologies rely on the fact that vision in both of the users eyes is relatively equal in order to create the illusion. This reminds me of those stereoscope drawings from a few years back. I was never able to get them to work for me because of my imparied vision.

    1. Re:Issues for vision impaired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The correct format for this kind of post is as follows:

      I'm legally blind in my left eye, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Issues for vision impaired? by Darthnice · · Score: 1

      Are there any 3D technologies that don't rely on the assumption that the viewer has two functioning eyes? I can't imagine that any 'passive' display (including the 'real world') that doesn't rely on that. Direct neural stimulation is still in the relm of Science Fiction.

    3. Re:Issues for vision impaired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sharp's TFT 3D LCD technology works on the principle of displaying left and right eye views that are separated so that the left eye sees only the left eye image, and the right eye sees only the right eye image," said Ian Matthew.

      That's what the article says, anyway. If you would have read it, then you would have already known that.

    4. Re:Issues for vision impaired? by thrillbert · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it will be one of those technologies that I cannot use. I am legally blind in my left eye

      I hate to point out the obvious, and I don't mean to be insensitive, however, if you are blind on one eye, then you are not able to see third dimensionally in the first place, so stating the obvious that you will not be able to use this is either an attempt at some sympathy or quite a lapse in logical thinking.

      ---
      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?

    5. Re:Issues for vision impaired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOOT. You said what we were all thinking.

    6. Re:Issues for vision impaired? by i_really_dont_care · · Score: 1

      I hate to point out the obvious, and I don't mean to be insensitive, however, if you are blind on one eye, then you are not able to see third dimensionally in the first place

      You are wrong. Although it is correct that the one-eyed may have difficulties to see that intense 3D effect which people with two eyes experience, a 3D "measurement" can also be made by other means, such as moving the camera / eye position, and this can replicate the 3D effect in the brain. A 3D screen which relies on the fact that the viewer actually has two eyes won't work in this case, of course.

    7. Re:Issues for vision impaired? by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Well, actually that's not entirely true. Seeing the third dimension is not just the fact that you can see different images out of each eye. One major difference is that if you move your head, you should be able to see objects from a different perspective (for example, step to the right and objects which are close should shift relative to objects which are far away). So someone who is blind in one eye can still quite definately tell the difference between 3d and 2d, and to the best of my knowledge there are no 3d systems which incorporate this aspect of three dimensionality. This is one reason that 3d movies still look fundamentally fake, and indeed one of the reasons it fell out of favor was that you had to keep all your shots framed very carefully to keep this limitation from becoming obvious to the audience.

      In general though, I agree that it seems pretty silly for someone to complain that he won't be able to use this "3d" display if he is blind in one eye.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    8. Re:Issues for vision impaired? by flossie · · Score: 1
      I don't mean to be insensitive, however, if you are blind on one eye, then you are not able to see third dimensionally in the first place

      I don't know very much about this, but I don't think that "legally blind" necessarily means the same as totally blind. Here's one link that I found that describes "Amblyoplia" and mentions depth perception and 3D viewing

    9. Re:Issues for vision impaired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are there any 3D technologies that don't rely on the assumption that the viewer has two functioning eyes?

      Parallax is not the only depth clue your brain uses. There's also focusing and depth of field. That works fine with one eye. Of course the other clues your brain uses are based on shapes and lighting, which 3D games already use just fine.

      I don't know of any 3D technologies that use focusing. That's why the parallax ones cause eye strain. Your eyes know they are being tricked because the focus information doesn't match.

      BTW, I think you responded to flamebait, but it's hard to tell for sure.

  26. I'm a 3d freak... by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Informative
    and proud of it.

    After the last time /. published the story about the 3d laptop, I was engulfed by this urge to try out anaglyph (red-blue) games/software on my machine. What ensued was a frenzy of activity spanning about a week:

    1. I purchased a 3-d jigsaw puzzle from Wal-mart for $15, which came with red-blue glasses. (A wiser idea would've been to go see SpyKids 3d for $6 and save the glasses (which I did later anyway)).

    2. I downloaded and installed Anaglyph Stereo Quake and had hours of headachy fun.

    3. Downloaded some simple shooter/roller coaster type games from stereo3d.com This site, btw, has a cool chart listing software for which 3d patches have been released, graphics cards supported etc. A really interesting quote about 3d API's:

    "The reason why 3D-API's are important for 3D-glasses is the fact games written for these interfaces supply genuine 3D-information in a standard format. These 3D-informations (i.e. depth-informations, Z-values) can be utilized by special universal 3D-glasses-drivers to create real 3D-imagery."

    Can't wait for the prices for 3d displays to come down.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:I'm a 3d freak... by MadocGwyn · · Score: 1

      I dont see why it requires a seperate api, the software should be able to extrapolate, a simple directX extension should allow all exisiting appz to display properly i would think. Now it does come with software to do this in some applications.
      As long as the viewing angle is tightly controlled which if im reading how this works right it is, rewriting shouldnt be neccicary, although u could tweak to make it look better

      --
      Jesus saves, everyone else takes full damage from the fireball.
    2. Re:I'm a 3d freak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, exactly. That's what the quote is getting at: games written since OpenGL and directX became can work with shutterglasses or what have you with a simple driver hook/replacement.

      In contrast with games not written to any 3d API (that is, softeware renderers) where you needed the developers to get around to writing a 3d hardware patch, which practically no one ever did.

  27. Excellent . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can now display the stolen plans of the Imperial Death Star in 3D so all my Alliance buddies can see where to shoot!

  28. site slashdotted by el_salvador · · Score: 0

    and they make great webservers too!

  29. The internet scares me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's it! I'm unpluggin my modem right n

    CONNECTION LOST

    1. Re:The internet scares me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's supposed to be 'NO CARRIER', you flaming faggot.

  30. Easy 3D movies by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 1
    The people making CG movies these days (Toy Story N, Shrek, Bug's Life, etc.) should re-run their rendering scripts with the "camera position" set off a few inches, so they can release 3D versions when the tech to watch it is widely available.

    Of course it ain't that easy. But it's got to be a lot cheaper than making a whole bloody new film. (I hope they archived the rendering scripts!) For the older movies they should be able to re-render in a small fraction of the time spent on the original.

    1. Re:Easy 3D movies by exploder · · Score: 1

      The IMAX by my house is currently running "Antz in 3D". However, a little web searching reveals that it isn't the entire movie:


      If you enjoyed the movie 'ANTZ' in 1998 then the 3D rendition of the bar scene during which the entire colony dances together will amaze you.


      Still, it's only a little way from what you describe...I'm sure it won't be long.

      --
      Yo dawg, I heard you like the Ackermann function, so OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD
  31. waste of time/energy/money by chompswilliam · · Score: 1

    these types of gimmicks are wasting the time of engineers across the world, these people could be working on important stuff, like a 20inch LCD thats folds and has no middle gap to fit in a very small footprint laptop. that would be fantastic. how big are "tabletops" going to get?

    1. Re:waste of time/energy/money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you doing on Slashdot? You could be curing cancer, jackass!

  32. Depth by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

    What about people like me who have lost natural depth perception using their eyes? When I was 3 my right eye squinted alot. I had an operation to fix it however it was never properly fixed, so I seem to be looking straight at someone, but still only seeing them with one eye. Basically.. i figure when it comes to 3d, as much as i love the concept I wont ever be able to see it properly, which will hurt me in the long run with computers i believe. Is there any alternatives to seeing 3d? or different 3d systems that have other ways of projecting stuff? Arg :\ Its really bugged me for years now.

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    1. Re:Depth by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

      You can always get a new eye.

  33. 3D? Big deal by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    So what's the big deal? The last time I checked, everything was in three spatial dimensions. (Granted, a lot of people are very shallow in the third ...)

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  34. Well, Slashdot can... by Ratphace · · Score: 1


    ...surely bring a harsh reality crashing in on a large company like Sharp.

    One good post and the site comes to a grinding halt, lol, if anything, perhaps they will see that their infrastructure needs some work... :)

    Nice job guys, seeing a high-quality /. effect on a website is truly something to behold.

  35. Hurmph. by ErikZ · · Score: 1

    Bah! Kids these days are so spoiled.

    Back in my day, all we had was 1-D laptops. Ever try typing on an infinitesimal point in space? It's hard!

    Then came the 2-D laptops, otherwise known as "Paper" to you cretins...

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    1. Re:Hurmph. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      1-D would be a line, not a point.

    2. Re:Hurmph. by flossie · · Score: 1
      1-D would be a line, not a point

      Depends if you look at if from the side or not.

  36. Viewmaster by jason0000042 · · Score: 1

    So it's a viewmaster without separate eyepieces. Super.
    I'm not enthused at all. That style of 3d (two similar images next to each other) never works for me. It looks good at the edges, and it's blurry in the middle. I strain my eyes looking at computers enough, thank you.

    --
    i don't like my old sig.
  37. target_audience > /dev/null by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    Yeah that was fairly frightening. According to the credits someone named Kevin Carmony did the lyrics for that uh... "song".

    The thing is I don't think that song's going to appeal to anyone. The target audience for Lindows is supposed to be the regular user, at lesat that's what I thought. But to understand that "video" you have to know about Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer and tarballs. Ok so the average user knows about Bill, but not the other two. And I doubt all these people choose Lindows over Windows because they hate Windows. Rather, I'd expect them to choose Lindows on accident or because it's cheaper.

    So I don't think anyone that understands this flash file is going to like it; and Kevin Carmony should't give up his day job.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  38. So... by Skrectumis · · Score: 1

    How many FPS in Quake?

  39. I wonder what horrible eye afflictions... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    I can see it now... I won't be able to see anything! What manner of ungodly pr0n could you cook up for this display? Furthermore, how much more can I sell my art prints for, since they'll be in 3-D?

    --
    stuff |
  40. mod up parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pseudo-mod: "+1 Funny"

  41. For us "disabled" people... by royhuggins · · Score: 1

    I'm blind in one eye, you insensitive clod!

  42. 10.2 pounds. Eeeeek! by flaming-opus · · Score: 1

    Seems like a desktop display would be a good place to release this technology first.

    1. Re:10.2 pounds. Eeeeek! by Obligato · · Score: 1

      DTI has been making 2D/3D desktop monitors like this for years. See http://www.dti3d.com

    2. Re:10.2 pounds. Eeeeek! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be stupid. Not everyone has the drivers to get the 3D effect. There are companies who have tried to release displays... Of course, those displays cost about a couple thousand dollars.

      A notebook as an entry model is a damned good idea. This is obviously early adopter stuff right now. Geeks will buy this... ...at least this geek will.

  43. Man, I just ghettoized my laptop for nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. We tried something like that at SEGA by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 1, Funny

    At my last job at SEGA, my lab was in charge of coming up with many different and pioneering ideas for new ways to play video games, many of which, for one reason or another, never made it to market.

    One of those was HOLO-GENESIS. It was a 3-D laser
    holographic projection device for the MegaDrive/geneis. It could have displayed 3-D rendered images, in full-color, in real-time, using a system of 3 red/green/blue lasers, and a finely-meshed micro-faceted surface which gave a pseudo 3-D effect based on carefully utilized light diffraction effects, a la printed holograms.

    It was slated to come out in mid-1995, but at the time, we couldn't get a acceptable frame rate (3-D graphics accelerator hardware was still very primitive and expensive, the province of SGI workstations and arcade machines), so we decided to not commercialize it at the time.

    In any case, I must say, this is a very interesting announcement, and I must congratulate Sharp for bringing such technology to the market. Hopefully they can continue to lower the price point and make it adopted wider.

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    1. Re:We tried something like that at SEGA by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

      Why do you always have to lie Sammy? You know damn well that you've been at my local 7-11 for the last 20 years. Stop fabricating these PhD and video game technology R&D stories and get me another slurpee God damn it.

    2. Re:We tried something like that at SEGA by AvantLegion · · Score: 1

      So, all those poor Japanese that hated the size of the Xbox... where are they gonna find the space for the larger-than-an-Xbox PSX?

    3. Re:We tried something like that at SEGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man, slashdot's full of suckers if this guy ever gets modded up.

    4. Re:We tried something like that at SEGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude stop lying. it's just pathetic.

      Nichia 's Shuji Nakamura hadn't even created a sucessful prototype blue laser diode until late 1995 and didn't have them into production until well, well after that.

      -The Cheat

  45. Lazy Eye by PaperJam · · Score: 1

    I have a lazy eye. I mean my eyeball moves around and follows what I am looking at, but it's vision is terrible. All my brain sees is what's coming out of my good eye. Am I going to be able to see the 3D? I've never had any success with the 3D glasses for obvious reasons and I've always hated those posters that you are supposed to stare at until you see the picture. If you ask me it's a hoax, cause I've never seen one.

  46. No goggles... by cdunworth · · Score: 1

    ...but if the parallax "sweet spot" is too small, you might need a head brace to lock your skull in the proper position.

    Where can we see one of these in person?

  47. MOD THIS NIGGER UP! (+4, Racist Homophobic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peeeeeeuuuuuuuuuuuupt!

  48. Re:Usefullness - of course! by RobertAG · · Score: 1

    If this follows the trend that previous new display technologies do, you can immediately expect enhanced:

    1. Games
    2. Porn

    After that, expect widespread adoption followed by support from mainstream Windows business apps, followed by support from Linux hardware and software vendors.

    This all hinges on the actual usefulness of the technology, the willingness of Sharp to support it and the willingness of vendors to develop for it.

  49. MOD PARENT TROLL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent poster is obviously not a Mac owner. And he is obviously purposefully misrepresenting Mac owners.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT TROLL!!! by rnd() · · Score: 1

      Uh,... you're taking it a bit seriously, don't you think? Macs are horrendously overpriced when you compare performance vs intel or lintel.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    2. Re:MOD PARENT TROLL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should look at apple.com instead.
      It costs more then the highest possible price for a 17" laptop. No comparison, like champaign against Pee(cee).

      Since they are both yellow and have bubbles it does not mean they are the same.
      Let Mac user drink their flute of champagne in peace, pee(cee) drinker.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT TROLL!!! by rnd() · · Score: 1

      Well, historically they were overpriced. My Powerbook 5300 was $2300 and within a year it was worth $600... way more depreciation than you'd get on x86 hardware during the same period.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  50. several auto-stereo displays at SIGGRAPH by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I saw them at 2001 and 2003. They work OK, with better resolution this year. They draw both perspectives on the screen in quick alternation. Each eye latches on to the one that makes sense.

    Other no-glasses 3D at SIGGRAPH include the concave mirror (floating penny) and the spinning LCD plane. These arent very portable.

    Another interesting approach I'm waiting to see in person is the Stanford 3D phospher cube. A pair of lasers activates phospher dots in 3D locations. Science stores sell the static version of this: 3D dot images etched inside leucite cubes.

    And I'm waiting to see the MIT Media Lab's holographic TV. It computes and redraws the holograph plate in realtime.

  51. I've seen this before by grooveFX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The company that designed this is Dynamic Digital Depth. I used to work for a company ScreenZone that had plasmas displays showing movie trailers in malls. DDD demo'ed their 3D display in our office (we were going to use it in our plasmas). It's actually a really cool technology. Although the image does not "pop" out at you like the effect with 3D glasses, you can see depth and the image changes based on your position to the screen. Can't wait to pick this laptop up!

    1. Re:I've seen this before by Ian+at+Sharp · · Score: 1

      Actually DDD provided some content - TriDef 3D Movie player. The Screen technology was developed by Sharp. For more information visit www.sharp3d.com/3D_display_technology/

  52. 3DRD?!? So this is the grandfather of... by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

    This is just the beginning...who would have guessed that the Sharp Actius 3DRD is the grandfather of R2D2?!? How long until Sharp teams up with Honda and comes out with the R2D2 portable 3D laptop/movie projector/ashtray?!?

  53. Linux Drivers? by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

    Are there Linux drivers for this new technology yet? If not, it doesn't really exist.

  54. How It Works by ewhac · · Score: 1

    I did some extensive work in stereoscopy in the late 1980's, so I know a little bit about this. Basically what Sharp is using is a lenticular grille.

    The key to stereoscopy is to feed different images to each eye. The brain interprets the parallax difference as depth. To see this sort of thing for yourself, close one eye, and hold two pencils vertically so that they line up one behind the other. Now switch eyes. The pencils appear to have "moved," and no longer appear lined up. This is because your other eye is in a different location, and sees from a different point of view ("duh"). This parallax separation in the left/right images is what triggers depth perception in the brain.

    Okay, great, how do you get this on a computer display without funky glasses? Well, to use the pencils you already have, imagine that the farther pencil is the actual LCD pixel element, and the nearer pencil is a black band on a piece of glass/plastic in front of the pixel. One of your eyes cannot see the farther pencil, but the other one can. You have achieved a form of image separation without glasses.

    Now, repeat across the entire horizontal display. Your left eye, being shifted slightly to the left, will see all the even-numbered pixel columns; and your right eye, being located slightly to the right, will see all the odd-numbered pixel columns. Result: Sufficient image separation to display and perceive steroscopy.

    Problem: The optimum viewing location is fixed. You can be no closer or farther away than the prescribed location, or the images will bleed together or invert at the edges. Also, if your eyes are not centered, the lenticular grille will be effectively shifted relative to the pixel columns, and you'll experience stereo inversion (left and right images swapped; always good for a headache).

    If you want to experiment with this stuff at home, and if you have access to a laser printer that will print on transparencies, print up for yourself a transparency with evenly spaced vertical lines, each one pixel in width -- one pixel width black, one pixel width clear, alternating. Lay this over your laptop screen and compose an image with alternating imagery in the odd/even pixel columns. Fun for the whole family!

    Schwab

  55. Other (better?) articles by rahulnair · · Score: 1

    you can check out other articles about this at Wired and CNETNews

  56. How these displays work: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Remember using those old "analogue" thermometers back on the day to measure your temperature? Those termometers always had to be rotated just the right way so that you could see the fine red line inside: Essentially these thermometers had
    "one-dimensional" lenses that magnified the strip along a line along the length of the thermometer.

    Now imagine putting these types of long/thin lenses vertically across a notebook monitor with pixels behind them- As you move your head horizonatlly, these lenses let you see only certain rows of pixels, because moving your head is the same as rotating the thermometer.

    If you look at the monitor exactly dead-center, half of the pixels will make it to your left eye, and half to the right eye. You can now control what these eyes see separately and give the illusion of 3D depth.

  57. Huh? by delmoi · · Score: 1

    This wouldn't be any diffrent then looking at a hologram. And you can also run it in flat mode. Anyway, I've never experianced eye strain looking at a 3d display.

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  58. But you don't have depth perception anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd make a horrible predator. Anyhow, where were all the colorblind people complaining about the uselessness of higher colordepths on our video cards?

    This post brought to you by ICBLF

  59. Sharp has also got a mobile phone with 3D by kroyd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    (In Japan that is)

    There is an interview about the latest 3D phone here: page(EN)

    Also check out this page, which has a drawing explaining how this works: page(JP) (I guess - it is in Japanese :)

    As Sharp also has the Zaurus I'm waiting for a mobile phone with a 3D screen, running linux, and with a full keyboard - perhaps something similar to the C-760, only narrower. Oh, and dual 2mp cameras for taking 3D pictures.. (Sharp already has a 2mp mobile, so why not two of them.)

    It might not fly in the US (lots of features = expensive), but I bet it would sell in Europe.. My mobile (a nokia 9210) is still retailing for 1000$ + without a subscription here.

  60. Um by delmoi · · Score: 1

    If you are blind in one eye, then everything seems flat anyway. So there won't be an advantage for you, but for you a monoscopic images is already as good as it gets. You just won't be able to tell the diffrence, that's all. It won't be like a stare-o-gram, which requires sterioscopic vision. But more like those green holograms like you see on a credit card.

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  61. I've been Converted!!! by flossie · · Score: 1

    Well, almost. Lindows has just gone *way* up in my estimation.

  62. Steve Ballmer + this 3D laptop = bad combination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine watching Steve Ballmer dance around on your 3D laptop and then stick his head out in true 3D fashion and yell:

    "I... *breathing heavily* LOVE *breathing heavily* THIS *breathing heavily* PROOODUCT... *breathing heavily* YEAH..."

  63. TROLL WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samir Gupta is a notorious troll.
    Check the usenet archive for more information

  64. well, theoreticaly by delmoi · · Score: 1

    This guy could just bob his left and right to get the true 3d image.

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
    1. Re:well, theoreticaly by i_really_dont_care · · Score: 1

      This guy could just bob his left and right to get the true 3d image.

      Yeah, but this is a predefined distance which relies on the fact that people's eyes have a "typical" distance. The stereo 3D effect through movement in reality works even when you move your head only a very small distance (depending on the resolution of the eyes of course).

  65. 1024 x 768 on a $3000 notebook?! by raam · · Score: 1

    ...so all those pixels become cubes...whatever.

  66. Can't wait for the price to come down :) by delmoi · · Score: 1

    If this tech has already made it to the laptop market, it'll probably be in plenty of much more reasonably priced laptops in a couple years. (as well as stand-alone LCDs for desktops). I wouldn't be surprised if they took the same course as 3d cards... first only for enthusiasts, then high end systems, then ubiquitous.

    Maybe we'll finaly be done with CRTs... or maybe someone will figure out how to do this with CRTs as well :P

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  67. Calm down by Tired_Blood · · Score: 1

    I mean, how odd is it that an article about display technology doesn't have pictures?

    Just as odd as seeing a TV commercial showcasing HDTV on a black&white.
    It needs to be seen in person to really experience it.

    Your follow-up post literally illustrates this.

    --
    This is not my sig.
  68. Given the Price... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    You'd think Sharp would put in a better graphics card. A GeForce4 440 Go is hardly drool inducing.

  69. It's about time... by milesbparty · · Score: 1

    Sharp to Sell 3D laptop for $3299

    Man, it's about time, I'm really tired of my 2-dimensional laptop!

    --
    eMelody Web Directory add your site today!
  70. How the technology works.. by NivenHuH · · Score: 1

    http://www.sle.sharp.co.uk/research/3d/3dbackgroun d.htm

    And you thought pokemon caused seizures!!

    --
    Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
  71. 3D Golf rules! by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because there's a huge audience of 3D golf afficiandos with $3300 spare.

    You should see the resolution on the 3D golf game I play. The color depth and lighting effects are amazing and you can even *feel* the wind. It's a bit frustrating because it's such a tough game but the realism can't be matched. And it's no trouble at all to find someone to play with a spare $3300. They're more likely to drop it on a new set of clubs though...

  72. you remember it right... by morcheeba · · Score: 1


    That was a cool game, but bullfrog got hit with a crazy frivolous class-action lawsuit. It seems that about 3% of the gamers couldn't handle it and were maimed for life. In the settlement, Bullfrog agreed to build a special colony just southeast of Detroit where these gamers could live out the rest of their days ... since being permanently cross-eyed made them lose their depth perception, all of the buildings in the colony are painted in a 1 foot x 1 foot grid so that accurate depths can be estimated. Outsiders visiting must wear special outfits marked with a horizontal stripe every foot. I've been there and it's a horrible way for any 3d gamer to end up. Let's only pray that something similar doesn't happen with this new technology.

  73. Re:target_audience /dev/null by nizcolas · · Score: 1

    Unless the target audience is m$ hating rastafarians, this ad missed the mark.

    --
    If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
  74. Of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine how trippy it would be to look at a beowulf cluster of these..

    whoa 66D, i guess that was brown acid

  75. Excuse me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They seem to have hired a Jamaica guy in the marketing department who doesn't give a darn about target audience and focus groups. Well, good luck Lindows... you need it with these talents onboard. :)

  76. Puahahah! by Lispy · · Score: 1

    They are genuises. I'm still LMAOF. If only Lindows wouldn't suck as much as it does I would be a convert now. That's really neat. I mean: "Prices going l-o-a-r now, really l-o-a-r now..." That's totally funny!

  77. "Battery Life Approx. 1.3 hrs" by Firestorm_Rising · · Score: 0

    With a "Battery Life Approx. 1.3 hrs", even three bundled DVD programs won't make this a good laptop for airline cinema.

  78. Eye Popping 3D! by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    eye popping 3d

    Yeah,right...If it is a two dimensional surface - how is that any different than my current video games that map 3d objects to a 2d pixilated surface?

    I will believe it when I see it.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Eye Popping 3D! by samhalliday · · Score: 1

      some people just don't RTFA, do they...

    2. Re:Eye Popping 3D! by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      I did RTFA - and it didn't specify how it was supposed to work, other than 'parallax' - which could mean two pictures side by side on the monitor, or some other scheme (turns out to be some other scheme - sort of)

      However, I just followed one of comments that had a link to a company that patented a process for doing the parallax thing via a special LCD monitor. By his own admission, the area of the parallax effect is small (you would have to keep your head in one place infront of the monitor - kind of like the old LCD monitors) - and the developers got headaches after using it for more than a few hours.

      Who would find this really useful - enough to spend thousands of dollars for it? How much of a market will there be for games made specifically for it?

      Probably not many and not much.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  79. PDA applications... by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I hope they'll put this technology in the next model Zaurus.

    C'mon, it'll be like 3D penguins!

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  80. It's actually really funny by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

    And dig the Jamaican accent, mahn!

    Nice little ditty, I will play this all day tomorrow and drive my co-workers totally crazy, they will be dancing around singing "do the Lindows' Rock"...

    Ahl ah need is some o dem dreds, mahn! totally cool, lindows!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  81. Where? by nightsweat · · Score: 1
    Where can I see one of these?

    Did you ever notice the Slashdot 20 second rule is fucking annoying when you don't want to pontificate, but just ask a simple question!

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  82. This is soooo 20th century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dimension Technologies started selling LCD desktop displays like this in the early 1990s. In fact they still do. www.dti3d.com

    1. Re:This is soooo 20th century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit spamming about that already! Nobody cares about your antiquated crap that nobody will buy. The reason nobody knows about it is because nobody cares.

  83. Why oh why are they using the P4? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

    Why would they bother with using a P4 chip when Centrino is here and *way* better? IMHO, if you're going to buy a $3000USD notebook, then it better come with the latest and greatest hardware. 512MB of RAM is a good start, but what about wireless connectivity? MobileMark performance? And don't talk to me about gamers wanting to buy this laptop -- any respectable gamer would take that $3000 USD and buy a tricked out desktop system with a projector!

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  84. 3D Language extensions by flossie · · Score: 1

    This is excellent news! Now we will be able to take advantage of the 3D extensions to C++ that AT&T were researching in 1998, details here (last paragraph).

  85. I, for one... by Indiana+Joe · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new 3-D masters.

    (Hey! This is my first post on /.!)

    --
    I can't decide if this post is interesting, funny, insightful, or flamebait.
  86. Be They Be Smokin' the Ganja ' Mon ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be They Be Smokin' the Ganja ' Mon ?

  87. Now I can finally... by cerebralpc · · Score: 1

    View my 3 dimensional arrays in 3D!

  88. Who would want DVD RAM? by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    Why buy this and say you are gaining a dvd burner? It uses DVD-RAM. That's the least compatible format you could use for burning DVDs. Not to mention the fact that format requires the use of caddies to hold the discs. The discs are expensive as well.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  89. Oh great. by MKalus · · Score: 1
    In addition to a software bundle designed to take advantage of the notebook's 3D capability, the Actius RD3D will include three of the hottest gaming titles available from Electronic Arts, Inc.


    Is it just me or is it a bit sad that the only way they can "sell" the 3D feature is by including games?

    I can just see companies forking out the money for those, for the average consumer I guess it's a bit out of price range, no?
    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  90. Cool! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Cool, a 3D laptop! That puts my current 2D laptop to shame.

    My current laptop is so 2D, the screen can't fold up without leaving the XY plane. :-(

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  91. everquest fanboys by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    great, now everquest fanboys wont be able to tell the difference between reality and fantasy at all.. .....

    nevermind.

  92. Re:target_audience /dev/null by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    LOL. Yeah, that sums it up perfectly.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.