Slashdot Mirror


Home Theatre Projectors, Dell, InFocus and Sanyo

ssassen writes "Hardware Analysis is gearing up towards the holiday season with an indepth comparison of three popular home theatre projectors; the perfect gift for under the Christmas tree. They decipher the marketing mumbo-jumbo you'll be faced with and explain all that you need to know prior to buying a home theatre projector."

261 comments

  1. Well until they get cheaper by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 0

    They are going to be a running joke between my wife and I.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Well until they get cheaper by snoochyboochy · · Score: 1

      Take a look at Infocu- they are offering the X1 for $999. Excellent reviews, and how can you argue with a bigscreen for $1000?

    2. Re:Well until they get cheaper by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I have a newborn. At this point I'm arguing $100 for a new CRT, and the merits of taking the bus versus parking.

      Of course I know I have only to wait until the little one starts to watch movies... Muhahahaha. Then it will be a matter of do disney movies look better under LCD or DLP?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Well until they get cheaper by Raybies · · Score: 0

      I just picked up the Infocus X1 which is the same as the Infocus 4800 for $750 after some discounts. This is a steal compared to plasma and rear projection TV's which cost 2 to 3 times more for a smaller size picture than I can get with a projector.

  2. InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini review by scottm · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Once I had a room to dedicate to home theater I started looking for an affordable upgrade to the 32" TV I had been watching on.

    I bought an Infocus X1 a few months ago and have been amazed. It's nearly identical to the Screenplay 4800 reviewed in the article (some software/settings tweaks and extra cables for your few hundred bucks extra for the 4800).

    I bought the X1 after seeing glowing reviews on AVS Forums. There are a number of good entry level choices in the projector market now. I did make sure I bought from a place with no restocking fees, as I was worried about rainbows (X1 has a 2x color wheel and some fraction of people seem to be sensitive to them, it's a potential problem with any low end DLP)... I can see rainbows if I try, but they haven't bothered any of the 15 or so people who've watched movies on my X1.

    Once I got it home & set up, I was amazed... You have to have some level of light control in your viewing area, but it's such a huge difference... I've seen only 2 movies in the theater since I got the projector... I'm projecting a ~90" diagonal 16:9 screen (note the X1/4800 is natively 4:3, but scales fine to 16:9). DVDs are spectacular, 4 player split screen Gamecube is a lot of fun (vs. squinting at your little corner of the 32" tv).

    Not sure why anyone spends the $$ on a big screen CRT/FPTV/RPTV anymore. I've already converted two coworkers to projectors (an X1 & a Z1).

    Now, if anyone has an easy DIY screen I can get rid of this bed sheet nailed to the ceiling in my basement....

  3. cheap! by proj_2501 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the dell one is missing some useful features!

    NO POWER SWITCH!

    still, under $1k is awesome.

    1. Re:cheap! by jelle · · Score: 1

      You want the fan to stay on a little longer than the lamp, because that greatly increased lamp life. Hence, no switch. A button will do, actually just a button on the remote will do because the projector will be up there close to the ceiling anyway.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    2. Re:cheap! by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      i assumed that would be the power switch, no?

    3. Re:cheap! by jelle · · Score: 1

      A switch is not a button. A switch breaks the circuit and cuts the power. Hence, there will be no fan running after you flip the switch...

      Yes I've seen projectors with both a switch and a button, and their lamps suddenly last a lot longer when you tell their owners about the button, the lamp, and the fan.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    4. Re:cheap! by At0miC · · Score: 1

      There are several discussions about this on avsforum and the word from an infocus engineer is that it's acutally BETTER for the bulb to do a hard shut off, as long as you let it cool before re-striking the bulb.

    5. Re:cheap! by laddhebert · · Score: 1
      Let me tell you about cheap:

      Go to circuitcity.com , buy the Infocus X1 for 999.99 dollars, do the instore pickup option, then fill out the 10% off your purchase rebate form, mail it in, you should get about 108 bucks back on a gift card to spend on whatever you like at CC. Better hurry though, because I think this deal ends today (Mon Nov 17).

      -L

      --
      Don't Panic.
  4. Z-coordinate? by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can they project vertically? Since I spend most of my life being horizontal, that would be a great feature on the ceiling.

    1. Re:Z-coordinate? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1, Funny

      yes, but be careful not to move it to quickly or the liquid crystal will slosh around and ruin your picture. ;)

    2. Re:Z-coordinate? by Marillion · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't know. However, a small front coated mirror on an end table and use the rear projection feature to correct the reversal problem caused by the mirror.

      If you have a higher tollerance for distortion, a cheap cosmetic mirror (non-magnifying) would do too and save you the cost of front coated optics.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    3. Re:Z-coordinate? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The reversal problem isn't reversal, and it isn't "caused" by the mirror.

      If you point the projector towards your toes, the image on the ceiling will appear upside-down. The top of the image will hit the top of the mirror and be sent toe-ward from the bottom of the image.

      If you point the projector towards your headboard, the top and bottom of the image will appear to be in the right places, but now the normal right-side of the image will be on your left. This reversal is caused because you turned the machine around wrt your eyes. It's here where you'll need to switch to the "rear-projection" mode.

      Mirrors don't reverse images; that's why they appear backwards.

    4. Re:Z-coordinate? by Marillion · · Score: 1
      That's fair. I suppose it's like trying to explain the difference between centripital acceration (which is real) and centrifugal force (which is fictional) It's often easier to just accept that most people will never give upcommon misperceptions and explain that going around a curve your pushed outward against the side of a car (centrefugal) versus the car pushing inward against you (centripital).

      Thanks for getting my head turned around straight.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    5. Re:Z-coordinate? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Both centripetal acceleration and centrifugal force exist. Just ask your hand next time you swing a bucket full of sand.

  5. Previously Featured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's a link to a previous Slashdot article that discusses a similiar comparison: http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/13/17 47258&mode=nested&tid=123&tid=126&tid=172&tid=95&t id=99

  6. how about the Sony HD-20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    My friend likes the new Sony HD-20 projector;
    It seems to be quiet and bright, with the
    new HDMI interface which is a superset of DVI
    and allows for longer cable length.

    Ref:
    http://www.projectorexperts.com/projector/ Sony/665

    Does anyone have one of these yet?

    1. Re:how about the Sony HD-20 by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      (Sniff) I miss the days of having $3,700 bucks to spend on this and that... No wait a minute. I've never had a time where I've had more that $100 bucks that wasn't allocated for bills. If I added up all the goofy things I bought that were frivilous over the last 5 years, it MIGHT add up to $3,700.

      I don't envy those who can afford it. I am very content with what I do have. I have a cute little house, a car that's paid off. A wife. A kid. A job that understands that my family come first.

      For now if I want a "theater" experience, I'll walk 3 blocks to the movie theater and pay 8 bucks for the privilage. Rental vids and playstation look fine on my 20".

      And I'll actively seek out friends like yours who have the Sony HD-20. Does he/she live in Philadelphia by any chance?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:how about the Sony HD-20 by rhyno46 · · Score: 1

      (Sniff) I miss the days of having hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on this and that...No wait a minute. I always have times where I have more than $5000 allocated for anything but a kid.

      I don't envy those who can afford them. I am very content with what I do have. I have a cute little house (well, if you count >2500 sq.ft. little), a car that's paid off, a truck that I bought with 0% financing. A wife. A dog. A job that understands that whatever I want comes first.

      For now, if I want a "raise-an-ungrateful-kid" experience, I'll walk 1/2 mile to my fathers house and watch how my younger siblings walk all over him for anything they want. Rental vids, playstation, xbox, gamecube, pc games all look fine on my 65" wide-screen HDTV.

      ...Geeze. You'd think, these days, people could spend money on anything (within legal bounds) they want with out being judged.

    3. Re:how about the Sony HD-20 by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      The Eldest too I see...

      I had to work a paper route for my first (chepo) bike. My sisters each got a Trek that they never use.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  7. Rent, then buy! by dada21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many online and offline business rental companies will let you rent a projector. This is HIGHLY recommended. The $50-$100 more you'll spend will give you a big chance to see if the projector is for you.

    Lumens, contrast ratio, and even resolution is NOT comparitive between brands. Some people see "rainbows" with DLP projectors. Some people see excess screen door with LCD projectors.

    Before I bought my (CHEAP) Sanyo PLV-Z1 projector, I scoured the AVS Forums for information, and it was the best help I could find.

    Now I have a 110" projector on my living room wall, the room feels twice as big (the TV took up so much space), and my projector looks great during the day, the night, and in HDTV (thanks Comcast for doing something right!).

    dada

    1. Re:Rent, then buy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(thanks Comcast for doing something right!)."

      It's come that far that you have to thank them for doing their jobs right?

    2. Re:Rent, then buy! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Informative
      Many online and offline business rental companies will let you rent a projector. This is HIGHLY recommended. The $50-$100 more you'll spend will give you a big chance to see if the projector is for you.
      Better yet: the shops that specialise in projectors often both rent beamers and sell them. Sometimes you can get good deals from them... some will waive the rental fee if you decide to buy a unit from them when you return the rental. Ask around!
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Rent, then buy! by jelle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm.

      700 Lumens at 110" and still 'looks great during the day'.

      Lumens is an absolute measure of light defined in physics. Unless the manufacturers are lying about the numbers, it's comparable between brands.

      At 700 Lumen spread across a 110" screen, there is not much light left per unit surface area.

      Indoor artificial lighting for offices is usually 300-500 lux, and outdoors it goes up to 30000 lux. Lux is lumens per square meter. So, assuming your 110" measure is the size of the bottom edge of your screen, then you have about 5.8 square meters of screen, which under office lighting conditions already gets 1750-2900 lumens of light. So an additional 700 lumens of light on that surface is going to be visible, but the contrast will not be that great. If your 110" is the diagonal, the numbers get a bit better but still, the ambient light would have to be made pretty close to dark to give a good contrast.

      Or are you using some sort of wonder screen?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    4. Re:Rent, then buy! by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 0, Troll

      Now I have a 110" projector on my living room wall

      Wow, that's enormous.. how big is the image it projects?

  8. TechTV by kajoob · · Score: 1

    Yoshi did this on TechTV. Projector, HTS, Screen with Microperf, very nice setup indeed (and for cheap, well, relatively speaking). You can check it out here

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:TechTV by tealwarrior · · Score: 1

      TechTV also had a review of projectors under $1000 in September. It featured the Epson PowerLite S1, the Toshiba TLP-S10, and the Gateway 205 Projector. The Gateway came out on top but check out the full review here.

      --
      In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, in practice there is.
  9. ... you insensitive clod. by jpmahala · · Score: 1

    "...They decipher the marketing mumbo-jumbo you'll be faced with and explain all that you need to know prior to buying a home theatre projector."

    IF, unlike me, you can afford one.

  10. Best HT projector dealers? by Mochatsubo · · Score: 1

    For those who have gone through the trials and tribulations of buying online, can you recommend good HT projector dealers?

    -mimosa

    1. Re:Best HT projector dealers? by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Informative
      You dont want to go to a dealer if you can help it since they'll just sell you something you dont need. Watch and I'll prove it right now:

      the best system is oddly enough SVGA and not XGA or SXGA, if you main goal is to show DVD movies. The reason is simple. DVD movies only have a certain amount of information on the disk and that is almost exactly matched to the 800x600 projector size. XGA has to interpolate and even the expensive one do a crummy job creating jagged edges on fast moving sharp edges, and moving type.

      the most important spec is contrast ratio followed by noise level followed by lumens.

      finally almost all the low end ones are made by the SAME company, PLUS (thats the name) then rebranded as Sharp, mitsubishi, and many others.

      On the other hand if you plan to give presentsations or watch HDtv then get an XGA since its better matched. But whatever you do dont buy more pixels than your source supports.

      now as I said at the start a lot of people will now reply that I'm totally wrong. THese are people the dealers like to see coming into their stores. dont be one.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:Best HT projector dealers? by Lurking+Grue · · Score: 1
      I've been on the fence too long, and am about to fall off and buy one. Dealers with good reputations and reasonably good prices include:

      Projector People

      Ritz Audio Visual

      Visual Apex

      You can also go to Pricegrabber to do competetive price lookups.

      I finally got my boss to order one yesterday. He bought a Sony HS-10 from RitzAV. By the time I jump (January), it will be between the Sony HS-10/HS-20 and the Panny LT300/LT500. My choice will depend on projector model availability, price, and my mood.

      You may want to spend some time trudging through comments at AVS Forum to get some feedback on various projectors and dealers. And search the specific forums using the keyword "shootout" if you'd like some good comparative reviews.

    3. Re:Best HT projector dealers? by srvivn21 · · Score: 1
      The guys a projectorcentral.com seem to disagree.
      There is a popular myth espoused by many projector salespeople that since an NTSC or DVD video signal is 480 lines, then an SVGA-resolution (600 lines) projector is plenty adequate to resolve all of the information in the video signal. "No point in buying an XGA machine," they say, "it's overkill."

      Those who promote this myth are sorely mistaken. But it is a prevalent belief, so it's an issue that needs to be clarified. So here we go...


      *shrug* Grain of salt time.
  11. mmmm... projector... by TWX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had the interesting experience of working for a company back in 2001 that closed and couldn't pay me for the vacation that I'd accrued, so the office manager/CFO and I made a deal where I'd write off the time in exchange for the company video projector. It was probably the best deal that I'd made working with them.

    I use a Philips Proscreen 4100, which is an older 800x600 projector that puts out 300 ANSI Lumens. It's not nearly as bright as modern projectors (coming in at 1000+ Lumens), but the 4000 hour lamp is nice.

    I'll never go back to a TV. Even if my projector breaks and I am forced to replace it outright, I'll buy the $1500 projector again. The furniture savings, the space savings, and the ability to have a room not centered around a glass TV, but still able to become a multimedia room with 100" of screen with the pull of a retractable screen far outweighs having a fixed TV. I can take it wherever I go, and it'll fit in the trunk of my friend's Mazda Miata. I can show up to 200" diagonal picture from a computer, composite, or S-Video source on any wall suitable.

    For versatility, picture size, and general niftiness, I don't think that you can beat a video projector.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  12. Where is EPSON? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    EPSON is a reference in video projectors, they are the number 1 in sales worldwide and other companies just simple OEM the products from them! My company has 2 EPSON projectors, I took one home for testing (don't tell anyone) and it rocks DVD, X and Counter-Strike!

    I heard they launched a new one below 30 dB! That's silent!

    1. Re:Where is EPSON? by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      EPSON is a reference in video projectors, they are the number 1 in sales worldwide and other companies just simple OEM the products from them!
      Not anywhere that I've seen. Epsons are the toys that people get conned into buying at Office Depot.

      Sanyo, on the other hand, is an OEM for InFocus, Eiki, etc. I have a few different Sanyos in my rental inventory, and they are all-around impressive projectors: Good construction, good packaging, reasonably intelligent software design, etc.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    2. Re:Where is EPSON? by snoochyboochy · · Score: 1

      I think you have that backwoards- Infocus is the major OEM manufacturer and sells projector enginges (guts minus the skins) to Epson, Sanyo, RCA, etc... Look at RCA's latest rear projection HDTVs- infocus inside.

    3. Re:Where is EPSON? by zonker · · Score: 0

      while i agree that epson makes decent projectors, they are designed primarily for office presentations.

      when you are dealing with high resolution (hdtv for instance), fast moving video, where quality counts, epson is not the place to go looking first.

      though i will say the s1 is decent for on-the-cheap, (which is what this article seems to be spotlighting)...

      however, if it is *quality* you want, look elsewhere.

  13. Rainbows by TWX · · Score: 1

    "Some people see 'rainbows' with DLP projectors. Some people see excess screen door with LCD projectors."

    Well, some people need to lay off Timothy Leary's activity of choice too. I wonder if these are the same people?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  14. just wondering... by supercooled32 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have been in an AF training enviroment training for the past year, and have used a projection screen almost everyday that has gone by for projection of power point slide shows.. The only downfall I see in using one of these in your home would be that you have to turn the lights off in the room in order to obtain any sort of clarity.

    if i wanted to use this for passively watching the simpsons or something it seems that would be annoying..

    any thoughts on this?

    1. Re:just wondering... by xianzombie · · Score: 1

      Depends on the projector and its image output. Most that the AF seems to buy are cheap and portable, so they're a bit more picky.

      Something with a higher lumens rating and contrast ratio will work better in a lighted room than something with a lower output.

      Any projector will look better in a dark room, the difference is more just how easily the image is washed out.

    2. Re:just wondering... by Aadomm · · Score: 1

      We've got a Sanyo which is rated at about 1000 lumens and the Simpsons (amongst other things) is totally watchable in a normally sized room lit with a 100W bulb. Of course turning the lights out improves things but I couldn't rate this as a serious problem.

      --
      Mention the Lord of the Rings one more time and I'll more than likely kill you.
  15. All you really need to know... by Channard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. if you need a home theatre system to make a particular film worth watching, then it's not worth watching.

    1. Re:All you really need to know... by ShavenYak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is modded insightful? Should be -1, Sour grapes!!

      I'll agree that a great film is a great film, even if you watch it on a 13" B&W TV. And Gigli is going to suck even in a $50K home theater.

      However, I'd much rather watch a good movie with a modest HT setup (decent size screen, surround sound, and so forth) than on a piddly standard TV with built-in speakers. It cannot be overstated how much better the experience is.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    2. Re:All you really need to know... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Absofuckinglutely!

      Surround sound too!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  16. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Informative

    We project in one of our labs using a similar unit onto a painted wall. We just had to find the proper flat white paint. Looks good, no "sun bursts" or areas of intense light from various viewing angles...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  17. Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've noticed that many of these large screen products (projectors and PDPs) have VGA or DVI inputs and support higher resolutions than the minimum required to display an NTSC signal. Thus, they could be connected to a computer and used for multi-user computer applications (e.g., gaming, boardrooms, or extreme programming) or just a single-person big-screen. What is it like to have a big screen that is more distant than the usual monitor?

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >What is it like to have a big screen that is more distant than the usual monitor?

      It makes it harder to cover up the pr0n when your mother walks into your room. :)

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      if you still live with your mother, you shouldn't be thinking about spending over a THOUSAND on a video projector

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

      At work we have a NEC 540T, XGA, 1500 Lumen,400:1, 2.5 kg. I took it home for the weekend, 5 months ago and hooked it up to my computer. 100" diagonal is like being right in the middle of the action, when you play GTA VC or Unreal Tournament. If you happen to sit slighty of axis you surely will get motion sickness. I will not recommend it for hardcore programming, but for leisure surfing, divxing and watching funky screensavers or Visualisations at partys. While my boss had his hoilidays i had the projector at home for 2 weeks and i had tears in my eyes returning it.

      --
      ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
    4. Re:Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that eye-fatigue wasn't an issue. I would imagine scanning over a 100" display, having your eyes move from one corner to the other, would be rather tiring. Of course, depending on the distance from the screen, the movement of the eyes wouldn't be any more than on your standard monitor . . .

    5. Re:Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I've worked with our planetarium's computer. Imagine, if you will, a computer screen 80 feet in diameter, in a room with perfect darkness, perfect reflectivity, and all the noisy equipment banished to a backroom.

      You use the screen a lot differently when projected. A desktop screen is treated like a piece of scribble paper. You try to fill in every square inch with crap. A projected screen takes you back to the days of on window at a time. Since your eyes need so much more time to navigate the screen, your attention is at the center of a projected screen. A desktop screen is treated like paper again, you trapse the edges first, and then move to the center. As such, you almost always operate with one window at a time maximized, oversize icons, and a larger font size.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    6. Re:Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      I have a DLP Projector I use at home mostly for watching movies and HDTV. I tried using it for some computer use, but it really wasn't worth it. I have a 100in diagonal screen and reading on that screen for a long time causes a lot of eye strain because your eyes have to move around so much (at your usual distance from the screen). It is great for gaming (especially when you have a bunch of friends over), and nice for occasional surfing, but not really suited for coding or anything serious. You also have to remember that bulbs cost about $.20 to $.30 per hour, so why bother using it for something that may be done better with a smaller screen? That said, I will never go back to regular TV. It save significant space in my family room. It is HUGE. And compared to Plasma screens (which lose 50% of brightness over 10 years), it is a better deal (even with bulb costs).

    7. Re:Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I'm surprised that eye-fatigue wasn't an issue. I would imagine scanning over a 100" display, having your eyes move from one corner to the other, would be rather tiring.

      I've always thought that moving your eyes around is a good and natural thing, and intently staring at a small area (e.g. television) is bad.

    8. Re:Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't seen the 250+ pound obsessive computer geek with thousands of dollars of computer equipment, living in their parents' basement?

    9. Re:Anyone using this tech for daily computer use? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      I use one all the time at work. I work for InFocus.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  18. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by squinty · · Score: 1

    "Now, if anyone has an easy DIY screen I can get rid of this bed sheet nailed to the ceiling in my basement...."

    You can find quite a few threads in the screens section of AVS Forum about the Parkland Plastics DIY screen. I was able to build a nice 4'x7' screen with this for less than $30.

  19. What a waste. by Guano_Jim · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Instead of blowing wads of cash on a home theater system, why not give $100 to your local food bank this holiday season?

    Think about hungry kids less than a mile from your house while you're munching popcorn and suddenly that immersive home theater experience seems a little shallow.

    1. Re:What a waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you already donate food and time, why don't you invite some people over to watch movies. Food and surviving is very important... but entertainment makes life worth living.

    2. Re:What a waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, just because you waste all of your money on poor people doesn't mean the rest of us have to.

    3. Re:What a waste. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      Shame this was modded down because thats exactly what I thought.

      A home projector just seems like a real waste of money considering how much they cost.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:What a waste. by nicodaemos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      $100 will not buy you a decent home theater system so I'm not sure why the choices are mutually exclulsive.

      But even if they were equal, buying the HTS contributes far more to society than the food bank donation. Why? Because $100 to a HTS company will mean jobs for marketeers, salespeople, technicians, engineers, researchers, local power company, etc. Not to mention a lot of fun for you, your family and friends. Give people a reason to work and they will aspire to be more than they are today.

      Give them a handout, well thanks for the bandaid, but what they really need is a job to help make ends meet. If only there were a way to create jobs .....

    5. Re:What a waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A car is a waste of money. You can ride the bus.
      Indoor plumbing is a waste of money. Just take a dump behind a tree.
      A house is a waste of money. Just live in a commune.

      Seriously, where does it end? If you want a projector (or any other high dollar item), why should you feel guilty about it?

    6. Re:What a waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you ever considered the fact that some folks might blow wads of cash on a home theater system AND give wads of money to the local food bank/homeless shelter/what-have-you? It's not an either/or thing, ya know.

      Frankly, it really pisses me off when people assume that anyone who spends more than $X (where X is usually an amount just slightly out of reach of the person doing the assuming) on something frivoulous is somehow depriving hungry children of food by doing so. Besides, if we all quit buying our home theater gear, or our computers, or whatever, there'd be a lot more homeless kids when all the factories producing those things had to shut down from lack of demand.

      Dear Lord, I sound like a fucking Republican now, somebody kill me please.

    7. Re:What a waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here is something to remember to calm yourself in a free market society.

      People with too much money buying expensive toys is good. It keeps people employed, from the engineers who designed the video chipset, to the guy who drove the delivery truck to Circuit City. And all those people pay taxes somewhere.

      Maybe the parents of those poor kids could get off their asses and at least learn to drive that truck, or load/unload it. Bottom line: People working hard and spending money = good. People sitting around on crack and vegetating = bad.

    8. Re:What a waste. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      > where does it end?

      Thats is a good point.

      It depends on the person but I think in general a projector for watching TV would be classified as a "want" and not a "need".

      >If you want a projector (or any other high dollar item), why should you feel guilty about it?

      Not guilty, but it should make you stop and think about what you are doing. Could you be spending your hard earned money a better way? And it is up to the individual to define what is "better".

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    9. Re:What a waste. by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      Instead of blowing wads of cash on a home theater system, why not give $100 to your local food bank this holiday season?

      If you're someone who is seriously considering spending over $1,000 on a home theatre projector, you can probably afford to give $100 to a charity and still get the projector...

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    10. Re:What a waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Giving CASH to poor people is like giving LIQUOR to an alcoholic.

      You don't give DRUGS to people with DRUG PROBLEMS; you don't give MONEY to people with MONEY PROBLEMS. It's a shame LIBERALS don't know this.

    11. Re:What a waste. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 0, Troll
      They certainly aren't providing American jobs, but you are helping out all those Starving kids in China, Malaysia, Korea, and Singapore.

      To be fair, there are a few executives in the US and China whose pockets you will be lining.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    12. Re:What a waste. by pmz · · Score: 1

      Instead of blowing wads of cash on a home theater system, why not give $100 to your local food bank this holiday season?

      Because supporting the economy is the biggest act of charity there is. Allow some salesman to earn a living, get a TV. It's win-win.

      Supporting the local food bank is nice and all (and it's certainly better than paying taxes), but it only feeds a man for a day rather than supporting a business that feeds people for a career.

    13. Re:What a waste. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      As one who owns a car but still takes the bus, I take umbrage at the thought that one alternative is superior to the other. In rush hour all gods creatures are created equal, and for what it costs to park in the city I save a bundle with bus fare. Not to mention the fact that I don't have to remember where I parked, nor worry about who is going to drive me home if I decide to get utterly shitfaced at the pub. Yeah, the car is nice for shopping and vacations.

      On another note, I also just rebuilt our toilet so I can tell you through my own actions that indoor plumbing is indeed worth the trouble. Communes didn't even catch on under communism, everyone needs a little private place of their own.

      Home theater systems are still an utter waste of money. A good movie can be enjoyed on a 3 inch screen with mono sound, on a crappy copy of a copy, or just in the retelling.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    14. Re:What a waste. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Actually those homeless kids would be somewhere across the pacific. We don't manufacture electronics here anymore. (As spoken by a bitter former employee of the Semiconductor Industry who was laid off in 1997.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    15. Re:What a waste. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      You could just but $100 in food and give the food to them, you know. And a food bank doesn't give cash to the needy. They buy food.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    16. Re:What a waste. by nicodaemos · · Score: 1

      And who do you think makes the syndicated tv shows and big budget movies that you will be watching on your your HTS?

    17. Re:What a waste. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched Network TV for more than an few hours in the last 3 years. And no cable either. TV is a waste of time and money.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    18. Re:What a waste. by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      ...jobs for marketeers, salespeople...

      This is Slashdot, care to revise that statement?

    19. Re:What a waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I take umbrage

      Oh sure. Take *all* the umbrage. Don't leave any for us. (Sorry had to say that :-).

      >>the thought that one alternative is superior to the other

      The point is separating luxuries from basic needs. Where is that distinction drawn? And who is going to draw it? You? Not for me you're not.

      Some people want DLP projectors, Rolexes, Mercedes Benzes, and whatnot. You don't. So don't buy them. And (the thread parent's poster) using guilt trips isn't going to do anything to prevent that.

      >>Home theater systems are still an utter waste of money. A good movie can be enjoyed on a 3 inch screen with mono sound, on a crappy copy of a copy, or just in the retelling.

      I have a feeling you've never really watched a heavily compressed/copy-of-a-copy movie in a 3" window. It's unenjoyable. Do I absolutely need a 100" plasma screen and a 1000W Dolby Digital EX 7.1 system? No.

    20. Re:What a waste. by rking · · Score: 1

      Actually those homeless kids would be somewhere across the pacific.

      And that makes a difference because....?

    21. Re:What a waste. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  20. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by yomahz · · Score: 1

    I'm curious about your setup. What kind of hardware are you using for DVD player and TV? Are you using a computer with a DVD and HDTV/VIVO card? If you're using your PC, what kind of resolution are you able to achieve with it?

    Do you have any recommendations or know of a good site with more info?

    --
    "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  21. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Albanach · · Score: 3, Informative
    Not sure why anyone spends the $$ on a big screen CRT/FPTV/RPTV anymore

    Because a 36" flat tube wide-screen TV at, say 1,500 GBP ($2,500) or a 32" screen at a fraction of that cost will probably have a lifespan of a decade, with zero maintenance costs. The same cannot be said for any LCD projector I've seen.

  22. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Fux+the+Penguin · · Score: 3, Informative

    The inFocus rocks.

    The ScreenPlay 110's connectivity options are fairly comprehensive. Without the Enhanced Connectivity Module, the projector only offers an I-MI connection for a computer (as well as a DVI connection), one S-video input, one composite video input, and a mini-jack audio input. When you add the module, you get one set of broadband component video inputs (Y/Pb/Pr) that will do 480i, 480p, 720p, and 1080i, a standard HD-15 VGA input, a 15-pin monitor output to send the signal to a PC or laptop, and an RS-232 port for use with a Crestron, AMX, or similar automation system. There's also a set of line-level stereo audio inputs, as well as a shared mini-jack stereo audio input for the two computer inputs.

    I was a little disappointed to find that the ScreenPlay 110 doesn't have two sets of broadband component video inputs. If you want to have component DVD and HDTV coming into the projector and you don't have an HDTV set-top box or a DVD player with a DVI output, you'll have to use a separate component video switcher.

    Still, it's a great value for the money.

  23. Ehh.. where's the sharp? by muffen · · Score: 4, Informative

    How can you have a serious home cinema projector comparison without comparing the Sharp AE series projectors?
    I own the Sharp AE-100 and Sharp AE-300 (no, I don't work for them or think that they are the best brand in everything, they just make awesome "cheap" widescreen projectors).

    I had some minor problems with my AE-100 (red/green tint in the picture), but this was a known problem with the AE-100, and it is solved in the AE-200 and AE-300.
    In my livingroom I have the AE-300 running, projecting a 110 inch screen. If you get the right signal to it (progressive NTSC or VGA), the projector is unbeatable by anything in the same pricerange (asuming you want a WideScreen projector).

    I read A LOT of articles/reviews/forums before going for the sharp, and with the AE-300, I'm really happy! You'd be able to get the AE-300 for under $2000, and you can get the AE-100 for around $1000 (although you should be aware of the red/green tint in the picture on the AE-100).

    1. Re:Ehh.. where's the sharp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm.. dude.. those aren't SHARP model numbers, they're Panasonic.

      I own a brand new Panasonic AE-500 and it's predecessor, the AE-300.

    2. Re:Ehh.. where's the sharp? by muffen · · Score: 1

      LOL, you're right! I was looking at sharp DVD players in another tab (my HK DVD-25 is giving up:/), didn't even notice that mistake... guess I mixed them up.... kinda funny... :)

      Anyways, I didn't know the AE-500 was released, might be worth looking at an upgrade soon.

    3. Re:Ehh.. where's the sharp? by phreakmonkey · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hey, I just bought the AE-500 and my friend has the AE-200 so we did some comparasons. There are also some great reviews over at avsforums.com.

      Long and short of it is this:
      The AE-500 is much brighter, has better contrast, and no "screen door effect" in comparason to the AE-200. However, many of these improvements were seen in the AE-300 as well so it appears the AE-300 to AE-500 jump is very incremental.

      The biggest new improvements on the Panasonic AE-500 are this:
      - Native 1280x720 resolution. (ROCKS as a computer display with a 1280x720 video card.)
      - DVI Input. (Cleaner than VGA at 1280x720)
      - "AI Lamp Modulation". Improves contrast, but is annoying in computer mode. Thankfully it can be disabled per input type.

      Downside:
      - JAPANESE ONLY setup menus

      For me, that's just funny. They got tired of Americans undercutting Panasonic-USA's distributors by importing the AE series instead of buying the more expensive (and identical) USA PT series, so they locked the menus into Japanese.

      As it turns out it's not a problem at all. The menus are very intuitive and you only need them once to set up brightness / contrast / etc. Plus, when I hit the "Menu" button to check the mode it's in or something I get laughs from non-geeks and automatic cool-factor points from geeks. :-) I get to say "Yeah, I imported this model from Japan because it's superior to the projectors available in the USA for the same price."

      Overall, I'm pleased with mine. It has a couple of "lazy pixels" though, which show up as light green when they aren't supposed to. I'm not willing to pay the round-trip shipping to replace it since they are only visible in certain colors and I almost never notice them. (They don't show up in white, black, or green... only in skin-tones or similar beige colors. Oh well.)

      - PhreakMonkey

    4. Re:Ehh.. where's the sharp? by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      I just saw the 500 today, and I didn't yet get down to the specs. 1280x720 native sounds worth the money, but I think I'll wait till it comes out in the US. I'm wary with dealing overseas even though I hear good things about Pricejapan.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  24. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Mantrid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are your bulb costs? I looked at doing this a year or so ago, but ended up with a rear projection TV - the bulb costs just seemed too high.

  25. DIY Screen by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    I tried the bed sheet thing too and wasn't happy with the results. I then went to Home depot and purchased the largest vinyl shade(the old-fashioned pull down shades to keep light from coming in your windows) they had. It has a much smoother finish and my images look much crisper.

    I have used the InFocus X1 too and have been extremely happy with it. I can't believe anyone would waste money on a plasma display. Projection gives a real home theater experience.

  26. Yeah, they're great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...It's the cost of the freakin' bulbs that'll kill ya. 500 for 2000 hours? You'd better be watchin' some pretty top-drawer p0rn to make it worth your while.

    1. Re:Yeah, they're great, but... by pdp8 · · Score: 1

      If it is not worth $0.25 / hr, you should proably not
      be doing it....

    2. Re:Yeah, they're great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      top-drawer p0rn

      And I thought I had seen every orifice abused ... I'm not even sure what a top-drawer is, or sure I want to know.

    3. Re:Yeah, they're great, but... by jimsum · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the price of the projector. If the projector lasts 6000 hours before becoming obsolete, that's about an additional $0.25 / hr.

      And what about the cost of the porn? Say $5 to rent a 2 hour DVD that you watch 3 times; that's $0.83 / hr.

      The bulbs cost money, but that cost is only one among many.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    4. Re:Yeah, they're great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Say $5 to rent a 2 hour DVD that you watch 3 times; that's $0.83 / hr."

      So your point is that there are multiple costs, but then in your counter-example you only consider the cost of the DVD rental (which you watch 3 times?) and no other costs? If you're going to amortize the cost of the projector then you need to do the same for the TV.

      I really don't think you have much of a point to make. Projectors are affordable, and when you factor in the performance, there's really no comparison with tubes.

  27. Reference Links by ed1park · · Score: 4, Informative

    Best PJ's by price range
    http://www.projectorcentral.com/recommended -home-t heater-projectors.htm

    Reviews of each PJ and other info
    hhtp://www.projectorcentral.com

    Great forum site
    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdisplay. php?fo rumid=9

    I used to own a 42" Plasma (Panny EDTV 848x480 $4000). However, had I known how good projectors were nowadays, I would never would have bought it.

    Currently I own a Sanyo PLV-70 ($3,500 1366x768) with a 105" Dalite HiPower screen ($350). And it's almost like a 105" plasma!

    HDTV looks awesome. And DVD's look pretty good too. Finding Nemo is one of the best looking ones so far... But the hardware really needs Hi Definition material to shine. 480 just don't cut it at that size. Hollywood needs to get their butt in gear.

    And with a DVI input, I've connected my computer and played Unreal2, MotoGP2, Vice City, etc. at 16:9 widescreen at 1360x768. Sick!

    And you can do email, surf the web and everything with the 3D gyro mouse and keypad. Completely useable as a computer screen. :)

    I can only hope Half Life 2 and Doom 3 properly support widescreen.

    1. Re:Reference Links by ed1park · · Score: 1

      Correction. You can pick up a PLV-70 for about $4,300. shopping.yahoo.com

      And if you ever decide to move, the PJ weighs about 20lbs. Compare that to an 90lb plasma that's fragile as hell, or a giant rear projection system.

      Bulbls are expensive, at around $400. But totally worth it as it'll last me about a year. No plasma burn in fears.

      If I had to do it again I would get a screen no larger than 80" as everything but HDTV material looks crappy at 105". DVD's, cable TV, etc just don't have enough resolution. Can't wait for WM9 and other HD material... and maybe there will be an affordable native 1920x1080 projector by then. :)

      In the meantime, I think I'll go pickup Max Payne 2 and MS Flight Simulator and play them in HD. :)

  28. I gotta great solution - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - if you want a really big picture, you don't need to fork out $2000 for a projector - just sit closer to your TV! ;-)

  29. BenQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently ran a head to head comparison between InFocus, Optoma, Epson and BenQ. Even though the BenQ is a relatively unknown brand, it won hands down. The colors were true, very little screen door, and no rainbow effect. Not only that, it was the least expensive of the bunch.

    1. Re:BenQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't BenQ have some proprietary tech for longer bulb life, also? I think I recall reading that in their adverts.

      If they do, it's certainly worth some extra expenditure initially. Having worked professionally with lighting instruments for over twenty years, I know that a cheap fixture with high bulb replacement costs/lower lamplife-hours is no bargain. (You know the cheap printer/expensive ink cartridge scam)

  30. Instant surround sound.. by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny
    Instead of blowing wads of cash on a home theater system, why not give $100 to your local food bank this holiday season?

    Or even better, do that, then invite six of the local needy kids around for Christmas dinner. With the proviso that after dinner they stand around your armchair, shouting 'Boom!', 'Bang!' and 'Woosh!' whenever a particularly loud explosion comes on screen - you won't even miss your surround sound speakers.

    1. Re:Instant surround sound.. by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

      That's only if you've got 5.1 - with newer systems you'll need seven or eight kids. The quiet one can be the center channel.

      8-PP

    2. Re:Instant surround sound.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And we all know a few kids who could easily be the .1

  31. Projector problem by novakane007 · · Score: 1

    I used to borrow a projector from work to turn the wall in my den into a 100" High Def. TV. It was great! Especially to play XBOX on. Some people would accutally get vertigo from it. The only reason I haven't replaced my TV with a projector is the light bulbs. The projectors are getting cheaper, but for most the bulbs are still $400-$800. I know a guy that got one and ended up having to buy a high def. TV as well. They're great for watching movies, but for $600 bones per bulb, you don't really want to use it to watch the news.

    --

    WURD!!
    1. Re:Projector problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you took a typical 800x600 or 1024x768 PJ, you DIDN'T HAVE A HI-DEF TV!

      Sorry to burst your gay bubble, but HD modes are 1920x1080 (aka 1080i) or 1280x720 (aka720p). The only 720p DLP PJs out there are still MORE EXPENSIVE than any of the cheapos being talked about here.

      It's really gay to say you have HI DEF when you don't. What else do you lie about?

    2. Re:Projector problem by novakane007 · · Score: 1

      very smarrt response from an 8 year old. How many other places can you incorrectly insert gay in a sentence?
      I could have said High-RES which is what they are, but then people may not have understood.

      --

      WURD!!
  32. Uh, EDITING! by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Fig 2. The left projector clearly has too much lumen output, saturating the image, the left one is alright.

    This is under two pictures, one atop the other, on page 2. My brain hurts.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  33. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    Or even better, a 36" flat screen (4:3 aspect) for only $500. Considering that I was upgrading from an older 27" boob tube, this represented a major step forward (using component jacks instead of coax, for example) and I couldn't be happier. Not to mention the fact that a TV fits my living space much better than a projector would...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  34. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by EricTheRed · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not sure what the bulb costs are at the moment, but since I've bought my Sony CS5 last February, I've used only 10% of the bulb life.

    It's nice watching DVD's and certain TV programmes on the "big screen" but I tend to use it only if a programme deserves it, hence the low 200hrs useage in the last 10 months.

    The only downside I have with it is the amount of electricity it uses - about a days worth of normal useage in about 4 hours.

    Saying that I did a rough calculation back in March and it worked out at 0.15 quid (UK) per hour for the bulb, and ~ 0.50 quid per hour in total.

    --
    Java gaming nut - http://www.retep.org/ or for the rail http://uktra.in/
  35. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I don't have the X1 yet (still waiting for a few bonuses and such), I have put a good amount of research into it. The bulb is rated for 3,000 hours, and goes for $300. I estimated ~2 hours per day of viewing between myself and my SO, which puts me at just over 4 years between bulbs, a completely reasonable expense. Of course, your mileage may vary based on how much you watch, but do keep in mind that when the X1 first hit the streets, replacement bulbs were $500, so I don't see any reason why they wouldn't drop some in the next few years as well.

  36. Better get a wipe clean screen... by Channard · · Score: 1
    Some people would accutally get vertigo from it.

    How about motion sickness? I'd imagine a bigger screen would make problems that some people have playing games - noticable ones where the gun bobs - more pronounced.

  37. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    The bulbs say they last for 3000 hours, and cost a whopping $450 at Office Depot. So after around 3 years (at 3hrs/day), you'll have to pay $450 (although they'll probably cost less by then, and I'm sure there are cheaper places than OD).

    It sounds like a lot, but considering that every 5-10 years or so most people end up buying a new TV anyways...

  38. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by amigabill · · Score: 1

    >Not sure why anyone spends the $$ on a big screen CRT/FPTV/RPTV anymore.

    Well, not everyone has a nice dark room to put a projector in. My smallish townhouse doesn't give me a good place. The living room has a sliding door on one side and an open kitchen on the other side. My roommates are usually home the same times I am and do whatever cooking they;re into at different times, including during the few good shows on these days, and I use the grill outside that sliding door quite a bit. So it's a lighting nightmare for using a projector, and in many other similar cases, CRTs and other non-front projectors are better suited.

    Sure, I'd love to have a nice giant projected screen, but I'd like it to look OK too. Perhaps in my next house, but I don't plan on that until I'm either rich or married, neither of which seem to be going to happen real soon. So I've made my dilemma the choice between the Sony 40" CRT and the new Samsung 50" DLP for my situation.

  39. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by muffen · · Score: 1

    Now, if anyone has an easy DIY screen I can get rid of this bed sheet nailed to the ceiling in my basement....

    ROFL, EXACTLY like my first screen (my bedsheet was light blue, made everything look really interesting) :)))

    It's really easy to make your own screen, all you need is the right colour paint and a big piece of thin, stable wood.
    I found a forum that explained exactly which colours would give the best picture, and I ended up paiting the wood really light grey (gives a better black for my AE-300, without affecting the white too much). You should find all the info you need on (I think it was here I found it anyways) http://www.avsforum.com/.

  40. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by kagejishin · · Score: 1

    The bulbs should cost $300 or less and were recently upgraded from 3000hrs to 4000hrs. Nothing was actually changed on the bulb itself; Infocus simply found through testing that 4000hrs was a more acurate figure.

  41. I own one, and LOVE it! by phreakmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative
    I just bought (4 weeks ago) the Japanese-only Panasonic AE-500 projector for $1700US including shipping from PriceJapan. (Be sure to read his terms and conditions carefully before ordering from him- he's only a broker, not a reseller.)

    Let me just say I _LOVE_ this projector. It does native 16:9 1280x720 resolution and makes a great computer display in addition to being a great home theater projector. I have it projected on a homemade 100" diag screen! (7.1' wide, 4' tall) and it's very usable. Video games are unbelievable, web sites are HUGE, and WinAmp visualizations are absolutely breathtaking.

    With ANY projector though- a light-controlled environment is KEY. Sunlight completely destroys the picture, so be sure you have a decent size room with no windows or are willing to cover the windows with something if you use it during the day.

    The Sanyo Z2 / Panasonic AE-500 use the same LCD array, so either one would be an excellent choice for the /. crowd.

    - P.M.

    1. Re:I own one, and LOVE it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy yourself a real screen (like a SilverHawk) and REALLY get your money's worth!

    2. Re:I own one, and LOVE it! by instarx · · Score: 1

      I second the comment about ambient light control being key for anyone considering one of these. I used to bring home a projector from work too, but simply stopped because it wasn't worth it. I had to darken the room or make the image so small it was pointless. Who wants to sit in the dark all day?

      Rear-projection or LCD/Plasma screens eliminate this problem. I use a Samsung 50" DLP rear-projection TV now and I can see it clearly in any light. My living room even has wrap-around windows. Rear-projection TV's have improved much in the past few years. They are no longer the big box taking up floor space. Mine is only 11" deep and 30 lbs (that is only 6 inch deeper than many flat panel LCD screens and lighter to boot) . It is essentially a very big table-top HDTV. Like you I love it as a PC monitor. You would have to use a gun to get it out of my apartment. Although normal video from the PC looks very, very good on my setup, DVI output improves sharpness nd contrast greatly.

      In order to get brightness equivalent in a projector you would have to buy one of the commercial models that cost many thousands of dollars.

      The other key concern is burn-in. DLP (and I think LCD) don't have burn-in problems. Don't even think of trying to use a monitor that will burn the image onto the screen. A great place for information in this and related areas is avsforum

  42. The InFocus model can be had for cheaper by saddino · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to Projector Central (IMHO the best site for ind. projector reviews, the InFocus Screenplay 4800 is the basically the same model as the InFocus X1 (which can be had for $500 cheaper and can be bought online instead of an AV dealer). More details here.

  43. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by kagejishin · · Score: 1

    Another thing worth mentioning about the X1 is that, unlike the SP4800, the X1 can be had for under $1k.

  44. Bitchslapped Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen so many Offtopic mods in one thread since The Post.

    1. Re:Bitchslapped Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, well, it seems that some folks just don't know how to have fun I guess.

  45. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
    While I don't have the X1 yet (still waiting for a few bonuses and such), I have put a good amount of research into it. The bulb is rated for 3,000 hours, and goes for $300.

    I bought an X1 over the summer and have been satisfied with it. The only complaint I have is a bit of rainbow effect from the slow spinning color-wheel on dark action sequences (I see this a bit in the Matrix and Spider-man). Otherwise it's great. I went into it with the expectation that it was just a step up from my 32" TV for watching DVDs so it's been fantastic. It's not going to beat a high end $5000 projector, but I'd take it over a 65" HDTV if given the choice. Hell, I project my movies onto an off-white wall without a screen and it looks fine to me.

    I've only used it for about 19 hours of bulb life so far (I ONLY watch movies on it so far, no TV since I don't have an extra digital cable box) so I imagine my 3000 hour bulb, even if it only lasts 1000 hours, will be just fine for me for years to come. Check out avsforum.com before you make any decisions though. They have a LOT of comments on various projects under $5000 and how well they rate in real world users' perspectives. IMHO though the X1 is a great value for a budget projector. It's not going to beat any $5000 projector, but it's not even in the same league as people who spend $25k refurbishing their basements to build a real theater.

  46. No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll wait until I see your contribution, of course.

  47. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by jacksonyee · · Score: 1
    Not sure why anyone spends the $$ on a big screen CRT/FPTV/RPTV anymore. I've already converted two coworkers to projectors (an X1 & a Z1).

    There are three primary reasons why people still purchase screens rather than projectors even with the cost differential:

    • Lighting: as you said, you must have adequate lighting control to be able to view the image
    • Noise: projectors generate much more noise than screens because they must dissipate the heat generated by the bulb using fans. Newer projectors have dynamic fan speed control, but it is still nevertheless an important issue if you dislike background noise.
    • Bulb replacement: The X1 is excellent at 3,000 hours, but over the lifetime of the product, those bulbs can add up at a couple of hundred dollars a piece.

    I've had the X1 in my sights for quite some time now as well, but screens do have their advantages.

  48. Well since I live in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only hungry kids are probably too FAT anyways.

  49. Bulb costs by JMZero · · Score: 1

    The bulb for my Epson Powerlite S1 (also a great projector) is about $250. I figured I'll spend that about once every 4 years - and by that time I might just go buy another $1000 projector as they should be amazing by then.

    As long as you have an appropriate room (a large paintable wall far that's darkenable during the day), the projector is easily the way to go.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    1. Re:Bulb costs by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "As long as you have an appropriate room (a large paintable wall far that's darkenable during the day), the projector is easily the way to go."

      That's my one problem. The place where this would go, the living room, has windows that let in a pretty decent amount of light. In the mornings...hits the screen a little bit. So, would a projector be bright enough for day time viewing? If I get one...I want it to replace my TV. Once advantage I can see, is that I would no longer have the 'glare' problem of the lighted windows reflecting off the tv screen.

      I'm guessing I need to get as high of a lumen rating as I can get. Is the X1 bright enough?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Bulb costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, probably not. The X1 is only rated at 1100 Lumens and you'll need a dim room to get enough brightness out of it. Do you have blinds / curtains on your windows that you can close?

  50. Bummer... by twoslice · · Score: 1
    I made a deal where I'd write off the time in exchange for the company video projector.

    You settled too cheap. I would have grabbed a lifetime supply of the bulbs and all the pr0n DVDs that were left at the XXX video store before it went bankrupt had had to punt your sorry ass to the curb.

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  51. Some Cautions and Observations: by xianzombie · · Score: 2, Informative

    First let me state that I will never buy nor reccomend an InFOcus projector. Unless you are an "authorized" service rep, you cannot get replacment parts (sans lamps and normal "user replacable parts). I had one that someone shattred the lamp in and damaged the diffuser panel. Cost of replacment? ~$1000. Could only get it by ordering the full optics assembly. Basically, we found that you can only order via "assemblies" not individual parts.

    If you want to be able to repair your own...don't bother with Infocus.

    Most other companies are quite nice about supplying parts and manuals (at a price of course) I've delt most w/ Toshiba and Sharp and they've all provided exceptional customer/technical service to someone wishing to repair their own units.

    Smaller projectors (such as the SONY VPL-PX11(?)) are wonderful LCD Projectors (image quality wise), but have a fairly low lamp life for a theater or confrence room type setup.

    Recently we've begun using some DLP's from Plus Vision Corp (namely the U2-1200 line) which also seem to provide exceptional image quality and a fairly adequate lamp life (given their size). 1200 Lumens and about 3000hrs (4k hrs in Eco mode). Eco drops the brightness down a bit, however its still fairly acceptable in a dark room. Price is a bit higher for these, MSRP around $5k, but can be found closer to $3200 or so if you look. These support the standard 4:3 as well as a 16:9 aspect ratios, VGA, DVI, and Composite video inputs.

    I would highly reccomend these at this point, and Plus/Lightware have both provided us with very acceptable warrenty service as well over the years.

    In closing: Infocus is the devil!

    1. Re:Some Cautions and Observations: by Fitch · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had much the same experience with them. I'm looking to buy a new projector to replace my aging InFocus LP735, but from my dealings with them in attempting to purchase a replacement polarization filter (a piece of color coated glass worth $1000 to have replaced through them) I've decided I'll never purchase any of their products again. In fact it's even more appealing for me to pay more for an inferior product that I can get parts for than purchase something that will cause me to scour eBay for salvage units when (not if) it breaks down. The prevalent word from the people I've spoken to in my parts quest was that Sharp is the hands down best to deal with for replacement parts.

  52. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by swordboy · · Score: 1

    Now, if anyone has an easy DIY screen I can get rid of this bed sheet nailed to the ceiling in my basement....

    Get yourself a large piece of MDO board with a nice finish. You may want to contact a sign supply shop to see if they have something pre-finished. The stuff from a sign shop is generally of better quality than that of the typical lumber yard. You should be able to get a primed piece as well.

    Once you've got your board cut to size, you'll need to get some glossy white paint (or silver for the extra contrast) and some fine glass bead. They use glass bead at industrial places for bead blasting. Stop by your local engine shop to see if you can pick some up. Make sure that it is relatively free of impurities.

    Experiment with mixing the glass bead in with the paint. You'll reach a point where everything is homegenous and the glass is pretty well saturated into the paint. At this point, you simply paint your wood. You'll also need to experiment with application technique since the glass bead adds a twist to the normal procedure. I have found that a liberal application followed by a dry rolling works well.

    Let dry and you've got the basis for a nice DIY glass-beaded screen. Put some edges on and perhaps build a frame to keep is straight/help with mounting and you'll be a couch potatoe with the best of 'em.

    Cheers...

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  53. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by swb · · Score: 1

    There are a number of good entry level choices in the projector market now. I did make sure I bought from a place with no restocking fees, as I was worried about rainbows (X1 has a 2x color wheel and some fraction of people seem to be sensitive to them, it's a potential problem with any low end DLP)... I can see rainbows if I try, but they haven't bothered any of the 15 or so people who've watched movies on my X1.

    The rainbows are an artifact of the single chip DLP system's need for a color wheel. Even "high end" single-chip DLP systems can suffer from them.

    The "high end" 3-chip DLP projectors are really expensive -- 10s of $K.

    I've seen the rainbow by turning my head and paying attention to my peripheral vision, but I can't really do it reliably. My personal feeling is that DLP looks a little too "digital" compared to some of the LCD offerings, at least in the RPTV arena. We have a DLP projector here at work, I should check it out sometime and see what it does for me.

  54. Which brings me to a question- by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1
    (since I own one and all) Why does no one make p0rn in 16:9 aspect ratio, damnit!?!?

    FWIW- The bulbs for mine are about $250 and at 2000 hours a bulb that's $.13 an hour which is fine by me. $.26 to watch Monday Night Football on a 100" screen in high-def (or LOTR in my private home theater) is quite worth it, thank you!

    - PM

    1. Re:Which brings me to a question- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look for Andrew Blake's stuff, everything of his I've seen is 16:9

    2. Re:Which brings me to a question- by jimsum · · Score: 1

      Are they enhanced? I've seen letterboxed porn, but not anamorphic widescreen. I don't care about the aspect ratio, I want the higher resolution!

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
  55. Sharp projector(1024x768) on sale at Costco by flyingace · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at a projector too for sometime and I notice X1, PLV-Z1( which are around $1000 ) are 800x600 or a little more, but not quite 1024x786.

    Last week I noticed the Sharp Projector on sale in costco. I dont know how good it is, but when i tested it in costco it looked great and it was $999.

  56. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by steveorama · · Score: 1

    A normal bulb is roughly 300 to 400 bucks, but if you think that the normal lifetime of the bulb is 2000 hours and put that in perspective it seems ok. If you watched one 2 hour DVD a night every day it'll last you almost 5 and a half years. 300 bucks ammortized over that time seems ok to me, and I'll probably want to upgrade at the end of it anyway...

  57. I have a Mitsubishi SL1U by cybrthng · · Score: 1

    1 Year, a nearly 100+ movies watched (thank the lord for netflix) and a few hundred hours on the XBOX and no problems.

    I have a 105" 4:3 screen that gives me a large 16:9 real-estate for the dvd movies and HDTV content.

    I have converted all my "tubbies" to projectors since they're light, affordable, easy to hide and give you a move experience over and beyond what any tv can do.

    Plus they support, like others have said, Computers, VGA/Component/DVI and many other interfaces. These uses go over and beyond a tv and the cost of bulbs is easily justified once you see what your getting.

    As others have stated it comes down to a few cents per hour. My bulb is a 1500 hour buld and costs nearly 300 to replace. I figure i'll buy a new bulb, ebay this projector and upgrade sometime next christmas to get DVI support as well as SXGA or higher graphics.

    Otherwise i'm very happy and its nice to see this market taking off!

  58. What is a Vacuum by supergreentriangle · · Score: 1

    Quoted from the article "(the inside of the lamp is a vacuum, filled with an inert gas that's excited with a high voltage generator to produce the light)." A vacuum filled with gas is no longer a vacuum!

    1. Re:What is a Vacuum by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      "(the inside of the lamp is a vacuum, filled with an inert gas that's excited with a high voltage generator to produce the light)." A vacuum filled with gas is no longer a vacuum!


      And most projectors don't have sealed bulbs for cooling reasons... There is no gas even, just air.

    2. Re:What is a Vacuum by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      A vacuum filled with gas is no longer a vacuum!

      Isn't space a vacuum? Isn't the earth residing in space?

  59. 8 per hour by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    The specs on the InFocus site says 4000 hrs.
    The bulb goes for around $300.

    Considering the projector costs only $999, Three bulbs will cost almost as much as the projector.

    Projectors are becoming inexpensive commodity hardware like computers and inkjet printers. Printers have become so cheap, I don't buy ink cartridges for $40 anymore. I just buy a brand new printer for $60 and use the old printer as a stocking stuffer.

    1. Re:8 per hour by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      > use the old printer as a stocking stuffer

      What a great idea! I've been using the old printers as wastebasket stuffers!

      Although... I can imagine my disappointment when I open a good-sized box and find, "Oh, how...great! An Epson C-42UX!" Ooh, and with no ink cartridges!

  60. I work at Dell... by craenor · · Score: 1

    We occassionally have "movie day" where people are selected at random to see a movie on company time and they vote on which movie to see.

    We just set up one of our Dimension Desktops with a THX certified speakers and a dvd player, pushing the video through one of our Dell Projectors.

    Now, I don't really know that much about projectors in general, but let me tell you...having watched a few movies on the Dell Projector, I was and am just amazed at the quality. Absolutely stunning...amazing home theatre setup.

    1. Re:I work at Dell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you elaborate on the Dell 3200 MP? How good is that puppy?

    2. Re:I work at Dell... by craenor · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I don't really know anything about projectors. But this is better quality than anything I have ever seen in a home theatre system. Forget plasma, forget HDTV, forget bigscreen TV's...the projector blew them all away. Crisp, beautiful picture. Bright, vibrant colors, no hesitations or delays in the image quality. I can't recommend it enough. If every projector is like this, everybody should own one.

  61. WARNING: None of these are TRUE HD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    WARNING: None of these devices are TRUE HD. The best you can do is get one with the "MUSTANG HD2 DLP" (which gives 720p NATIVE 1280x720) and NONE of these units mentioned have one.


    Having a 16:9 PJ that is not TRUE HD is as gay as those folks who by one of those 832 x 470 16:0 plasmas at CostCo and think they have an "HD TV". They may have senile dementia (and lousy eysight) BUT THEY DON'T HAVE HDTV.

    1. Re:WARNING: None of these are TRUE HD! by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Having a 16:9 PJ that is not TRUE HD is as gay as those folks who by one of those 832 x 470 16:0 plasmas at CostCo and think they have an "HD TV". They may have senile dementia (and lousy eysight) BUT THEY DON'T HAVE HDTV.


      Technically true, however compressed XGA next to true 1080i is something most people(layman) cannot even discern the difference with their eyes, let alone across a room with a 20ft screen.

  62. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by misterpies · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Read the post. The X1 is a DLP projector. No LCDs involved. And for the price of your 36" CRT behemoth you'll be able to get diagonals measured in yards from a box the size of a few video cassettes, plus you'll be able to use it for PC gaming.

    --
    The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  63. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by danila · · Score: 1

    May be, but another benefit of having a projector is that you can play computer games on it. Console games are fine on TV, but with PC games you really lose in image quality.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  64. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by uradu · · Score: 1

    > Bulb replacement: The X1 is excellent at 3,000 hours,
    > but over the lifetime of the product, those bulbs can
    > add up at a couple of hundred dollars a piece.

    Yes, but for the extra money that RPTV will cost, you can buy an awful lot of bulbs. Plus you end up with a smaller screen that has moving brightness bands as you shift your head, and it weighs as much as a piano (ok, not quite, but you KNOW your SO won't lift a hand to help you move it!). OTOH it will do real 1080i, something the X1 (or in fact most projectors) can't, if that's important to you. But for $2000 less than a 65" RPTV I'd say it's a tough option to pass up.

  65. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by uradu · · Score: 1

    > My personal feeling is that DLP looks a little too "digital"
    > compared to some of the LCD offerings, at least in the RPTV arena

    That's because you've probably only seen one set up for presentations, not for video. If you crank up the brightness and contrast to make those PPT slides bright and saturated, video will look like sh!t, kind of like RPTVs on the showroom floor. Calibrate the projector for video and you won't recognize the picture.

  66. Anyone know why projectors are so expensive? by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's not that much technology in them. A bulb, a lens, the LCDs or the DLP, some mirrors, a fan or two. I would think they would cost much less than they do. What's keeping the price so high? Is it simply lack of demand? A television seems to have a lot more hardware than a projector so maybe it is demand that is driving the price.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/3t236
    1. Re:Anyone know why projectors are so expensive? by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is alot to them. The bulbs are fairly advanced and expensive to make, the entire color wheel/motor/lcd panel needs to be calibrated to exact measurements and it takes a refigned/exact process to build an lcd panel or DLP system effeciently and with 0 errors.

      You have to remember a dead pixel can look HUGE on a large screen.

      On the other hand, this stuff costed 2,500 to 5,000 just 2 years ago. Now you can get it for 900 or less.

      That seems like a fairly decent price drop!

      Speeed, Performance, Durability, Bulb Lifetime, Resolutions and such have been increasing faster then they can mass produce antyhing hence the higher costs. With HDTV standardization and DLP technologies catching up the prices will fall since there are industry standards to meet and build upon

    2. Re:Anyone know why projectors are so expensive? by greenstork · · Score: 1

      Increased demand drives prices higher, not lower. Perhaps you are thinking of supply.

    3. Re:Anyone know why projectors are so expensive? by 2Paranoid · · Score: 1
      I bought my 640x480 LCD SharpVison (45 lbs) 5 years ago and paid about $5000 for it. I'm about to replace it because the technology has come so far. I can get a name brand 1024x768 DLP (2.2 lbs) for about $1600, HDTV compatible. I can't wait.

      Oh yeah, 5 years with the same bulb with my SharpVision. :)

  67. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    The bulb cost is high but I think it is worth it. Bulbs cost between $300-$500 but they last between 1000 and 5000 hours depending on the model of projector you bought. If you assume you watch two hours of video per evening, every evening, that is nearly 1.4 years for every 1000 hours. So if you get a unit with a 3000 hour bulb rating, watch two hours a night, then that means four years of use before replacing it.

    On a 2000 hour bulb, if you pay the SRP of $500, that is twenty five cents per hour. That is a pittance compared to the typical geek daily Mountain Dew budget, although I don't drink any.

    I haven't done this yet, but a change jar might be a good way to save up for the next bulb.

    I keep a smaller TV as well, mostly for watching regular TV and tapes.

  68. I think that's a bad idea... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    I mean, I would only leave the couch for the bathroom and sleep. Well, maybe not sleep....

    --
    Blar.
  69. Really oooooooooold models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Dell and Sanyo models are both more than one year old. The Dell whines like a whore. This is more like an archeological report instead of a timely review. You should start to see more and more of them on ebay when people dump them.

    Before the 3-chip DLP projectors fall under $3000, DLP lovers will have to have their guests suffer the eyestrain cause by spinning a color wheel in front of the single chip. There are three new LCD models coming out this year that have 720p as native resolution, which is as good as it gets before 1080i becomes the norm. They are Panasonic L500U (Jan 2004), Sony HS20, and Sanyo Z2 (yes, the next generation of Z1). And the good news is Sanyo and Panasonic are both under $2000. So just sell some of your stocks that have grew 50% this year, pay Uncle Sam the tax and buy one of the new LCDs and you can watch your DVDs and HDTV in "shock and awe" while others mourn another crash in the market!

    FYI, visit avsforum.com and projectorcentral.com for better reviews and more BS from average joes.

  70. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know its true

  71. More advantages of projection viewing by figa · · Score: 2, Interesting
    About two years ago, I bought a Sony CPJ-200 from eBay for about $600. It's a crappy projector, but it was about the only affordable projector when I got it.

    Since I'm not experiencing any of the modern wonders of video projection, I thought I'd share some of the inherent strengths of projection viewing:

    • It's a much better experience for movies, since it really feels like sitting in a theater. I have young children, so my movie days are over. This has been a lifesaver.
    • At least with my projector, you can't watch it during the day. This keeps the kids from camping out in front of the thing. I don't have a TV tuner or cable, so it's for movies only.
    • The whole apparatus is out of the way. My apartment is tiny, and I don't really have room for a TV. It just wouldn't fit so that the couch would be in front of it. I have a ceiling-mounted screen, and when we want to watch a movie, I just pull it down. When we're done, it rolls up out of the way. The projector sits on a bookshelf over the couch. It really eliminates all the problems with incorporating a TV as a part of your furniture.
    • Since the projector is off most of the time, when I have friends over, we aren't all sitting on the couch staring forward into a TV, we actually face each other and talk.

    I wouldn't recommend it for watching network programming, but for someone only watches movies, it's the ideal setup.

    1. Re:More advantages of projection viewing by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      My Wife and I had a tiny apartment before we moved into our tiny house. We have been doing pretty will with just a 20" monitor (a cast-off from work). Our computer is our DVD player, and we have TV card that lets us plug in the Playstation. (Not bad considering the computer is Linux ;) We don't watch any network TV. I'm too cheap for cable, and TV reception is crappy even with rabbit ears.

      I definitely know what you mean by the center of attention for guests. We actually seat folks on all 4 sides of the room. We have a wireless mouse and keyboard which lets us control everything from the couch.

      I should add that the reason a 20" screen works in my application is largely due to the size of my living room. 12' x 10'.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  72. Watch out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're seriously considering an HT projector then get the NEC 1000HT, SONY HS, or the X1 or any projector which is designed for Home Theater. Business projectors tend to wash out an image, in a home setting you need color saturation and contrast and the parameters for PowerPoint slides are different from watching Lord of the Rings.

    Also, pay attention to how much BLACK your projector produces. The more black the better the contrast will be.

  73. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Innova · · Score: 1

    I have an Infocus 5700. The bulb lasts 3000 hours. I'm am planning on upgrading to a better projector before the bulb runs out.

    By the time the bulb does run out, it will probably cost about $.05 per hour to run it.

  74. My projector Experience by Innova · · Score: 3, Informative

    I did a lot of research both at AVSForums and at a local dealer. I decided on the Infocus 5700. I also saw the Infocus 4800, but the faster color wheel (reduces rainbows), and higher resolution of the 5700 was definately worth the extra money in my book.

    I would have really liked to get the 7200, but like all electronics the prices of projectors are falling fast. I decided that I could upgrade in a year or two and spend alot less in the long run.

    All I know is that once you've seen a HD Football game on a 119" screen, you will never want to go back to a "normal" tv.

    You have to love Infocus' marketing: You measure your tv size in inches? How cute.

    1. Re:My projector Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All I know is that once you've seen a HD Football game on a 119" screen


      You're exactly right. BUT NONE OF THE PROJECTORS HERE (the Infocus) are HD resultion. They can't even do the 720p (which ABC uses for sports because they claim it does better on motion) without downsampling.


      Maybe if you drink enough beer you may THINK you're watching football in HD, but I assure you, you won't get HD out of an INFOCUS 5700. Save your pennies a bit more (or buy a greymarket Sharp 10000U, the cheapest TRUE HD DLP on the market at around 600,000 Yen).

  75. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by shroudedmoon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Simple, go to Home Depot, get a can of glidden Misty Evening, and some Kilz 2 primer. Paint desired size/shape on wall. Point projector at newly painted space. Done. There are several threads at AVS right now, in the Screens forum, dealing with this very subject. Misty Evening is the easy, one coat choice right now. There are several variations that tweak it, but it doesn't get much easier than that. If painting isn't your thing, then just go buy a parkland plastics or doable board at HD for about $20, and hang it up.

  76. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by figa · · Score: 1
  77. So it's a total loss then by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Because my X1 bulb life is ~5 years with average use (3000 hours) and that puts the cost at around $1500 instead of your overpriced $2500 screen.

    How often do you take that 32" screen over to someone elses house to watch a movie or play games or show pictures? It takes about a minute to detach from my ceiling mount.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So it's a total loss then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the previous post is an example of how dangerous it can be to get between a geek and his hardware.

  78. WARNING: Parent Poster is not TRUELY REALISTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Get a fuggin' grip, man! My God!

    What are you "warning" people about? That the techinical specs on the projector are not the same as the technical specs of a not-fully-implemented format?!?!

    Most "HDTV" stations in my area (the small town of downtown Atlanta) don't broadcast at 1080i ANYWAY... Some of them are at 750p and one is even at 480p!

    The best way to judge the quality of an image is to look at it. If you like it, buy it. If you don't, then don't. Geez.

  79. DLP Biased by cfoster70 · · Score: 4, Informative

    They are missing a lot of important information in that article. It seems written to promote DLP and skims over a lot of deficiencies with what they tested, and uneven ways in which the testing was done.

    Page 3, Contrast. What it doesn't mention is that above 800:1, it becomes hard to see any difference, and above 1200:1, it's pretty much impossible.

    The examples are also set up to make you think that the 'low constrast LCD' is the Z1, which it isn't. Here's a quick snap taken of my Z1 (slight blur due to hand-held camera) of the same scene.

    Page 4, Resolution. Again what's left out is at what point it no longer makes a difference. This varies projector by projector and is a factor of the screen size, LCD resolution and distance the viewer is sitting from the screen.

    For SVGA/WVGA one can no longer see the grid at all if they are sitting about 1.8x the diagonal of their screen away. For XGA, WXGA that number drops to 1x (probably closer than you'd want to be).

    I sit 1.5x screen diagonal away from my WVGA projector (Z1) and can see the grid in very bright-white scenes only. (Specifically, I sit 15' away from a screen with a 10' diagonal.)

    Page 5, Fan Noise. Fan noise varies depending on whether you are using the projector's low-lamp/theatre mode. Most projectors give you an option of running at its highest brightness level, or a dark but quieter mode. Where the manufacturer doesn't list

    I sit directly below my Z1 and can definitely hear the fan in 'low-lamp' mode, if there is no sound in the movie. I can also here my refrigerator humming in the kitchen if its quiet. If someone is speaking it covers up the sound of the projector (and the fridge). Any guests I have seem oblivious to the sound of the fan until I mention it.

    It seems like they must have measured the Z1s lumens in 'low-lamp' mode, and its fan in regular mode (to make it measure as loud as possible). If a manufacturer only lists one fan noise level, it will be their 'low-lamp' mode volume.

    Page 6,7, LCD & DLP. He fails to mention that some people cannot watch a DLP projector without getting a headache or becoming nauseous due to a 'strobing' effect. It only happens to small percentage of the population (maybe 2%), but it is a well documented phenomenon. The problem does not exist on high end DLP projectors as they use a slightly different projection technique, but it does exist on all low end DLPs.

    This is an issue because if you are ordering your projector over the internet, sight unseen, you may get it home to find out you can't watch it. Likewise, you may have a bunch of friends over, only to find out one of them can't sit through the film/game/etc.

    The article fails to mention that LCD has better color saturation.

    For a fair and balanced look at the DLP vs. LCD debate, see this Projector Central article.

    The conclusion fails to factor in other important cost information, like that over the course of 6 years of ownership, the Dell projector will cost significantly more because you will have to buy 2 bulbs for it, in the same period you will only buy 1 for the other two projectors.

    It also never returns to the briefly mentioned benefits of natively Widescreen projectors over traditional 4x3 projectors. Unless you watch a lot of very old movies, you will want to own a widescreen projector. All movies today are widescreen, and in 5 years, so will your television.

    There is a lot more wrong with the article, but this should at least give you an idea that you should not make this your single source of information about home projectors. Instead do some reading over at AVSForum. There are a lot of knowledgeable people there who can set you straight where this article would mislead you.

    -Colin.

  80. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bubl has been rated at 4000 hours now. The new firmware will now stop the projector after 4000 hours. It used to be 3000.
    -tang

  81. My Favorite Quotes by Aidtopia · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "They decipher the marketing mumbo-jumbo you'll be faced with and explain all that you need to know prior to buying a home theatre projector."

    Oh really?

    ... a high-pressure gas-discharge lamp ... generates a substantial amount of heat which must be transported away from the lamp because of risk of melting and imploding

    If it's a high-pressure lamp, wouldn't the risk be exploding?

    the inside of the lamp is a vacuum, filled with an inert gas

    A filled vacuum?

    Obviously with these three primary colors every possible color can be displayed....

    Not so obvious to those of use who understand device gamuts.

    Despite these errors, I found the comparison useful, but I'm still confused as to their methods. In one place, the author says:

    We've adjusted the lumen output, the contrast and the color balance as well as the sharpness of the individual projectors to get as close to the [reference image] as possible.... If we had not done so we'd have ended up with the factory defaults that in some cases did not do the projector justice.

    But a few screens later:

    We've used the default factory settings for all projectors so we get a fair comparison between them.

    Perhaps for some measurements they used defaults and some they adjusted to match the reference image, but that's far from clear.

  82. Sony HS20 owner here by maynard · · Score: 1

    Bought the HS20 from Pricejapan recently as well. Almost purchased the AE500 and would have were it not for the Japanese menu limitation. Looks like the AE500 is a great deal though. Congratulations on your purchase! So, what did you do about a screen? I wound up buying a Carada and am highly pleased. --M

    1. Re:Sony HS20 owner here by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1

      I used a 4x8 sheet of Parkland Plastic wallboard that I purchased at Lowes for $14. It was a bit hard to find, I had to get the SKU number from avsforum.com and call half the Lowes in the area to find it. However, it looks great!

    2. Re:Sony HS20 owner here by maynard · · Score: 1

      Yup, I considered that route - but I wanted to control the screen gain and use a professional looking screen, so I blew the money. I'm nearing the end of a renovation so when the contractors blew through my LR I had them install conduit for the video cables and an outlet up in the ceiling. It looks pretty good except for the lack of theatre seating. I'm not going to bother with that as the room has to double as a LR and I live in a fairly small apartment. BTW: are you near the Boston area? If so, interested in a shoot out? --M

    3. Re:Sony HS20 owner here by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm in downtown Atlanta. Sorry.

  83. Off-axis bigscreen use & motion sickness by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    100" diagonal is like being right in the middle of the action, when you play GTA VC or Unreal Tournament. If you happen to sit slighty of axis you surely will get motion sickness.

    Interesting (and thanks for your impressions). Its not surprising that off-axis veiwing leads to motion sickness - I'm sure the game's rendering engine assumes you are sitting front and center. If bigscreens become more popular for gaming, I wonder if game makers will need to add controls for off-axis use -- something that asks about the screen diagonal, distance, and up/down, left/right axial alignement. (Actually, the graphic layer of the OS should handle this using 3-D viewer rendering preferences records for each monitor.)

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  84. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We got a second hand screen which was yellowed through age, and being thrown out. Experimented with a spray gun and various paints. THe best results came from "super-saturated" theatrical paint, about 10 a litre, from any specialist theatre shop (Rosco were the paint manufacturers). You could also just paint it straight onto the wall- screen of up to 20 square metres (you must dilute it 50:50 wuith water) for less than a tenner (thats $16 for those the other side of the pond)

  85. Also have the X1, very happy - some advice. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I've had my X1 for a few months now. The only annoying factor I would say is this - it takes progressive input only through the VGA style connector, not through the component->SVideo connector. That means if you have a device that has mixed progressive/non-progressive output (which is the case for most consoles right now) you need some kind of switching solution as you'll probably want to hook it up to the progressive source.

    I use a KVM to bring together output from various devices and out to the projector - that works pretty well.

    The ceiling moust seems expensive but is really well made and makes it very easy to remove when you want to take the projector elsewhere. Also, you'll want to buy one of the adaptor cables that takes progressive input and has a VGA plug on the other end (rather cheap from X1).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  86. screen replacement by gades · · Score: 1

    I bought my projector screen on ebay from a place called Inventory Solutions Inc. I got a 60"x60" piece of DaLite material on a broken tripod for $35, although they often sell bigger ones. My friend has bought from them too, and they were very good with his slightly problematic order. They also have a good reputation on a few DIY projection forums.

    Their website is http://www.avforsale.com/

  87. MOD UP by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Now that deserves a mod up, I was happy to see I was not missing anything owning the X1. The cable that combines component to VGA is really cheap, only around $15 or so.

    If anyone is thinking ob buying the component->Svideo connector, I have to say the one I have (came with the X1 at the time) seems very flaky.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  88. And that post by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Shows why AC posts are roundly ignored by most.

    If you had the choice between a TV you could move and one you couldn't which would you choose? I was helping move a 27" TV recently and am damn glad I have a projector. Plus the wall niche where the previous owner used to house a TV makes a great storage space with a screen hund in front...

    I was just pointing out benefits others did not.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  89. Re:Bandwidth, Baby! by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    RevGrub, What's your holl IP my brother? ]:3}> thumper^

  90. How do I get the badness out of my head? by Channard · · Score: 1
    And Gigli is going to suck even in a $50K home theater.

    Sweet Jesus, that's an image I didn't need. You just know that somewhere there's someone listening to Jennifer Lopez say 'gobble gobble' in Surround Sound.

  91. Re:8 cents per hour by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    That should have read "8 cents per hour"

  92. Projectors? Have to get a wall first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is far enough from another wall to allow the thing to focus...

    I will get one when I get my new 8 br mansion.... right then...

    l8,
    AC

  93. How much $$ for a new bulb? by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    I had a friend that spent $4000 on a really nice Sharp projector that had more lumens than the X1, and better resolution. He displayed it on a 120" screen. It was fabulous. The BIG downside was the $600 bulb. If I remember, the bulbs are rated for only so many hours (500?). That was not made clear to him when he bought the projector. Of course football season came along, the bulb dies in the middle of a college football game, and panic set in. I know he could have saved money mail order, but he needed a new bulb immediately, and wasn't willing to wait for mail order.

    Check out the replacement bulb costs before ever buying a projector.
    Personally, I bought a Mitsubishi 46" and an HD set top box. Total investment (including the satellite set top box was $2400. I've had the TV for 3 years, and not one complaint. I have a smaller room. The Mits is only 23" deep. The picture is fantastic. The only other TV that has a better picture is the Pioneer Elite, but I couldn't justify the extra $2000.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  94. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Nexzus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Now, if anyone has an easy DIY screen I can get rid of this bed sheet nailed to the ceiling in my basement....

    The guy at the site below made his out of a material called blackout cloth, and he has instructions on the site. Be gentle, it just ISP webspace.

    http://members.shaw.ca/danhanson/Theater/screen/sc reenproject.htm

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
  95. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by bogie · · Score: 1

    Don't know if its true, but I was just reading someone who said bulb life for this unit had been increased to 4000 vs 3000 hours, and that bulbs were down to $99 vs $199. Seems like its worth it to me.

    Although I don't have a grand to blow right now, saving up a year for it is certainly possible. I'd love to redo my basement and dedicate part of it to a HT. Let's hope these typs of projectors continue to come on the market for afforable prices.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  96. AVS Forum by Vedanti · · Score: 1

    First thing to note is that these are essentially business projectors. Real home theatre projectors cost a lot, so lot of us tend to use good business projectors for HT. Best way to learn about the projectors for HT use is not by reading such low-depth reviews ... but by going through AVSForum.

    I'd never get a 800x600 projector for hometheatre now. I'm on my 4th digital projector and the first two were SVGA. By buying them with coupons etc with the help of fatwallet forums, I've been able to buy new projectors for the price I can get on ebay for the old projector. So this way, you don't even have to wait for the price of the projector to come down.

    I'm surprised the review talks so much about luminence ... who cares that much about it in HT ? Color accuracy, black level (something not even mentioned in the review) and contrast are much more important.

    --
    karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
  97. Re:Bandwidth, Baby! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    Geeks love numbers. When I connected it said, "Aaaaagggghh!!!! Will you F*cking /.ers leave me alone and let me do my job!!?" ;P

  98. What !? by Vedanti · · Score: 1

    I've to disagree with you on this.

    With projectors More pixels is always Better. You have to just take care of the source. 800x600 is not enough to show the full resolution of anamorphic DVDs.

    That is easily done. A simple PC (aka Home Theatre PC or HTPC) can take care of that. Take a look at the forums at AV Science (avsforum).

    A good XGA projector with DVI input, fed by a HTPC with a decent DVI equipped video card is all you need for fantastic pictures.

    And I won't even mention HD ....

    --
    karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
    1. Re:What !? by Chalex · · Score: 1
      Sounds like you guys agree.

      The parent says "don't buy more pixels than your source supports".

      The reply says "buy more pixels and use a better source".

      The main difference is the costs :)

    2. Re:What !? by Vedanti · · Score: 1

      s-video input on either SVGA or XGA projector sucks, anyway. To get good PQ, you have to use higher pixel projector AND a better source like HTPC.

      --
      karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
  99. DLPs and flicker may be a problem for video by Goldenhawk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I purchased a DLP project (an InFocus) about a year ago. While it's a GREAT projector for the cost, about $1200 for a 1500-lumen SVGA unit, I've found it's not very well suited for video.

    The problem is that the update frequency on the DLP, combined with the color wheel technology, means that when you look from one area of the image to another, and the image contains any high-contrast vertical edges, you'll catch an afterimage of vertical red, green and blue bars on the margin of the edge. Essentially, your eye catches the sequential flashing of R, G and B used to form white or any bright color.

    The problem is obvious even with still content - like a powerpoint slide presentation or a DVD menu - because even though the content isn't moving, the DLP still has to mix RGB to get white, and the mirrors and color wheel are rotating thru the colors constantly.

    The problem gets more apparent the closer you get to the screen, because your eyes have to move farther to see various parts of the image - if the action suddenly changes from the left edge of the screen to the right edge, you look to follow the action. Up close, your peripheral vision is more tasked, so you tend to look back and forth a lot. When you're further from the screen you don't need to move your eyes as often.

    So while it's great for slow content like a powerpoint slide show, and it's fine if you're a long way from the screen (like in a big presentation), when you try to use it as a video projector in a smallish living room setting, it's VERY distracting.

    This may not be true for all DLPs. But the moral of the story is TRY IT before you buy it. Specifically, stand close to the screen, set up some still image with a vertical white line, or white-on-black text, and look back and forth across the screen. If you see color bars, you'll see them just the same in your dark living room watching a movie.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  100. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Shagg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not sure why anyone spends the $$ on a big screen CRT/FPTV/RPTV anymore.

    Easy, in addition to the ambient light requirements the X1 (along with most front projectors) doesn't do an HD picture. It will take an HD signal and downconvert it to it's 800x600 native resolution, but that's not the same. There are lots of RPTVs out there that will natively do full HD. If you're spending that amount of money on a picture that big, most people would want it to be HDTV capable.

    --
    Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
  101. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by JamieF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did you miss the part where he said 90" diagonal? You might as well say that he's foolish for spending any more than $99 because you have a mini TV that cost that much.

    I'm not trying to make this a Size Matters thing any more than it needs to be. But compare like to like - a 60" rear projection TV runs more like $4500, and is a bastard to get up and down stairs. A few years ago when I bought my LCD projector, Fry's (a local chain in Silicon Valley) was selling a 70" projection-screen TV for $8000.

    BTW folks, bear in mind that if you have a home theater and NetFlix, you'll save a TON on things like movie tickets, candy/popcorn, gas, etc. My wife and I have been to the movies three times this year. How much do you spend on going out to the movies every year? (It doesn't have to be a super deluxe home theater, either, no matter what the freaks who spend $30,000 on home theater setups would have you believe.)

  102. all you need is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a vcr, a home theare set up (amp and speakers and a nice sub) and a projector from circuit city or compusa..

    voila.. instant home theatre system.

  103. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    Hmm...my TV is pretty much as long as I am home. Hell, I even set the timer on it...so I can sleep at night to the tv. It's my 'big' nightlight.

    Do any of these projectors have a timer on them? During the week, I probably avg. 3-4 hours/day. On the weekends...tv is on 24/7. Even if not being watched...it is background noise unless I throw on some music. But, even at that...most of my DVD's I buy these days are music performances...so, once again...tv on.

    How bad would this cost in bulb replacements?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  104. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by jimsum · · Score: 1

    Look in the mirror before you call anyone a freak. I'm amazed you put someone down for thinking that wanting a bigger screen makes you a freak, and then call someone who wants a $30,000 system a freak.

    You consider yourself rational because you save money by not going to the theater. Perhaps the freak needed to spend $30,000 before they were content to watch movies at home; a $30,000 system is still substantially cheaper than buying and running a 35 mm movie theater.

    --
    -- Pot is safer than Beer
  105. You ARE a Republican! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come to the dark side.

    It's fun over here!

  106. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by jimsum · · Score: 1

    A rear projection TV has a bulb too (if LCD or DLP based), otherwise it has three very bright CRTs that also burn out and are even more expensive to replace than bulbs.

    The only difference between rear and front projection TV's is the side of the screen the light hits. The cost of replacing bulbs or CRT tubes depends on how bright they need to be. If you could buy a 100" rear projection set, it would have identical bulb (or CRT) replacement costs as an equally bright front projection setup. If you're happy with the size and brightness of a rear projection set, your bulb/CRT replacement costs will be lower, but those costs are not zero.

    --
    -- Pot is safer than Beer
  107. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    exactly only 5 months after I bought my Sony vpl-cx5 the bulb burned out. Come to find out the bulb is only warranted for 3 months. Now I have to spend $300-400 for a new bulb or have a $3000 useless projecter sitting in my house. I really hope this isn't the normal life span of a projector bulb.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  108. Build your own. It's cheap and easy. by Ogerman · · Score: 1

    Forget $1000+ store-bought projectors and their $300 replacement bulbs. You can build your own LCD projector for $300-500. I've done it myself and the results are simply outstanding. I now have an bright, sharp, 8-foot-wide 1024x768 screen powered by a $30 metal-halide bulb that lasts 10,000 hours. Can't beat that. And it was a fun, minimal-time hobby project too!

    The following site has quality plans and even sells the specialized parts you'll need. (the guy who runs the site researches and bulk orders parts)

    http://www.diylabs.org/projector/main.htm

    There's also a good forum for DIY builders here:
    http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/forumdisplay .php?fo rumid=12

  109. plug question by hakalugi · · Score: 1

    "( 100-120 volt,Japanese OSD only )" - I'm in the US, too.

    how did you hook it up to our 60hz/120v systems?
    .
    .

    --
    If she floats, she's a witch.
    1. Re:plug question by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1
      Thankfully, it works on 100 - 120 VAC, 50/60Hz. So it is compatable with US line voltage.


      I did, however, swap it's power cord with my Compaq EVO N610c notebook. Ironically, they use the same power cord, except the notebook had a grounded (3-prong) plug and the Panny AE500 had a two-prong one. It seems the Japanese don't use 3-prong outlets.

  110. Re:WARNING: Parent Poster is not TRUELY REALISTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can never understand people like you. If you can only afford a budget, NON-HD projector, you declare it "good enough" and anything else isn't necessary.

    I am man enough to admit that there are some things I can't afford. I won't claim, for the sake of analogy, that flying cross country on JetBlue is GOOD ENOUGH and that there's no need for a PRIVATE JET just because I can't afford a private jet!

  111. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by sahala · · Score: 1
    Fry's (a local chain in Silicon Valley)

    Fry's is also in other reputable locations:

    Oh and I'm not trying to nitpick. Just a public service announcement aimed at geeks with cash to burn.

  112. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After a lot of research I went with a flat tube. A sony XBR 34".

    My main reasons were noise, and bulb replacement. Sure it's only $300 to replace a bulb, but if you don't have a retail store that carries them, you can be without TV for a week waiting for a replacement, unless you're proactive about it.

    Brightness does not shift in the least, and has an extreme viewing angle (160+). I do get true 1080i and 720p, which makes a huge difference.

    But the main reason is total lifetime of the projector. If you're really good with maintenance of all the parts, you can expect a 5-7 year lifetime. My tube TV will last 10+ years easy.

    Personally I believe RPTVs blow (glare issues mostly), they're not $3500 anymore either. Clever shopping can get you a 65" for $2k. If you're an HT-aphile, projectors, while good when size matters, aren't necesarrily the best. If I had all the money in the world, I'd likely go with something like Samsung's 50" plasma for the pure picture quality.

  113. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Mantrid · · Score: 1

    Hey, now that's an interesting fact! I have like 6 years warranty on my current TV --- I wonder if any electronics superstores would offer warranties on projectors including the bulbs? Darn and my basement would've been perfect for a projector...

  114. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by pHDNgell · · Score: 1

    Fry's is also in other reputable locations:

    Can you be specific as to which of those are reputable?

    --
    -- The world is watching America, and America is watching TV.
  115. Idiots! was Re:My Favorite Quotes by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    ""We've used the default factory settings for all projectors so we get a fair comparison between them.""

    "Perhaps for some measurements they used defaults and some they adjusted to match the reference image, but that's far from clear."

    Oh dear. This is a huge mistake. Every display regardless of type MUST be tuned for its setting. There are slight variations between projectors, and settings ideal for one room and lighting suck for other rooms and lightings, so they just pick a generic setting and make that the stock "factory settings". One does NOT do default settings if you want the best picture or a fair comparison of what they can do.

  116. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by sahala · · Score: 1
    Can you be specific as to which of those are reputable?

    Yes only Austin, Texas is reputable. :)

  117. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA, lamp lifetime is 2000 to 3000 hrs for the reviewed projectors. If you didn't look into lamp lifetime and replacement cost before you bought your projector, then you obviously didn't do much research, as this is a commonly discussed concern.

  118. How do YOU mount one. by phriedom · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the best way to get the projector out of the way and avoid blocking the beam would be to hang a box from the ceiling to hold the projector. For those of you out there that have projectors, is this what you guys are doing?

    I just wonder about the logistics of connecting the projector to video sources, and the sources to your receiver and speakers, etc. I'm sure there are some cable length restrictions for some signals and I wonder how you all deal with them.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  119. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Raybies · · Score: 0

    I was going to try the Do-Able board but now that I've read about the Misty Evening, it might be easier to just paint my wall instead. Right now I'm using my white wall which works well but I want something that will give me more contrast.

  120. InFocus X1 projector review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a complete and detailed review of the InFocus X1 projector here:
    InFocus X1 Review

    This is a cheap and good projector to use.

  121. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by Jonathan+Platt · · Score: 1

    The big differance with the X1 is the noise level; at 37dB I find the X1 compleatly unacceptable. Also the native resolution on the X1 is 4:3 and if I remember correctly, it's a 4 segmant color wheel, with poor color contrast. This is improved in movie mode because they turn off the white gegment on the color wheel, but this knocks off over a third of the lumes.

    --


    VENI, VIDI, VICI, DIXI
  122. 700 Lumen spread across a 110" by 2Paranoid · · Score: 1

    I have a 600 lumens 3-panel LCD projector (a couple years old) that I display 129" diagonal at 16:9 and 90" at 4:3. I admit that I had to buy new drapes for the three windows in room. I made sure that they were thick enough to block bright sunlight. During the day, I need to close the drapes, but I don't need to dim or turn off the lights in the room. Normal room lighting is not an issue, just sunlight. If you are able to control the sunlight in the room, 700 lumens at 110" diagonal should not be an issue. As for the picture quality, I've never had a complaint. Everyone who visits my house loves it, for movies, game and/or the Super Bowl. And as I've told everyone who has ever asked me about my project, "I can't go back". I know people that have paid more for their TV (tube or rear projection) than I paid for my projector, but their home theater will never compare to mine. I've been told that I need to sell tickets to the show and popcorn. I have also convinced four others at my work that a projector is the way to go. Two have already purchased projectors and the other two are researching which model to buy.

  123. Re:mmmm... projector... by 2Paranoid · · Score: 1
    I have a similar store with my "first" projector (meaning introduced at work). It was my job to return a checked out projector after a standing late Friday office meeting. Well, all at the AV depart would leave before our meeting would end, so I had no choice but to bring it home so that it wouldn't grow legs.

    Well, the first weekend I had it I noticed the video inputs, so I hooked it up to my home theater and watched a movie, and I've been hooked ever since.

    The inevitable happened and our standing meeting ended and I was left without a projector. Within a month I had bought a SharpVison. I, too, will never go back to a TV.

  124. Couch-Computing by instarx · · Score: 1

    As I write this I am sitting on my couch with a wireless keyboard and mouse with a Samsung HLN50w Rear Projection DLP sitting about 12 feet in front of me (50" diagonal). It doubles as an HDTV and PC monitor. A new term has been coined for this type of computing - couch computing.

    Frankly it is wonderful. I have a 50" 16:9 PC screen that is very bright and sharp. I invest in stocks and use this display during the day to track my accounts and so have some small fonts displayed which are very readable. I could display smaller fonts and still have them sharp, but my aging eyes have trouble with them. The extra screen space of the 16:9 ratio is great, too. I can get more windows on the screen at the same time than with a normal monitor.I am also an artist and use the TV/Monitor do do Photoshop work on my prints.

    This is the way to go for computing unless you have to sit at a desk. It is a bit hard to write and take notes from the couch, but a desk would fix that. I do not think a projector would work very well in this situation since the light loss and lack of contrast in my very well-lit room would be a problem. I don't want to sit in the dark when I work. The DLP also prevents burn-in on the monitor. If you plan to couch-compute I would strongly recommend DLP or LCD which do not have burn-in problems.

    As an added bonus I can have my Excel-based accounts displayed on screen during the day while I have a PIP of financial news services in the lower corner simultaneously (or a DVD or whatever). I use a HTPC (home theater PC) to run the monitor and can stream music, world radio, or digital music from my cable while I work.

    This is close to computing heaven for me.

  125. so-called experts are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Gee you'd think those guys at projector central would have a clue, unfortunately they dont. Their whole argument comes down to this: interpolation on an SVAG is not as good as interploation on a XGA. Okay maybe that's true BUT YOU DONT HAVE TO INTEPOLATE ON AN SVGA. your screen is basically filled at the native resolution. At this point their entire argument goes down the tube.

    I know this for a fact since I've actually done the experiment comparing XGA and SVGA in native and inteprolated modes.

    oh in case you are saying, well I could always run my XGA in a native mode and not use all its pixels. Sorry this doesn't work well since your only using a 25% of the pixels and thus get 25% of the lunmen, not to mention annoying borders and inadequate zoom.

  126. Re:InFocus Screenplay 4800 same as X1. my mini rev by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 1

    Simple addition to the rescue!

    4 hours per day per weekday = 20
    14 waking hours per weekend day *2 = 28

    48 hours per week.

    which works out to just under 2500 hours per year, or something like $250 a year. Do keep in mind, of course, that although some projectors do have speakers on them, they're not intended to be used as such, and that you'd want to have some sort of stereo/surround audio system, so you wouldn't necessarily have to run the projector in order to hear your music DVDs.

  127. Brightness by JMZero · · Score: 1

    You don't need 100% darkness to get a reasonable picture out of an X1 - unless you're a real videophile, which I'm not. You will need to get something in the room's windows, though. I'd say if you can read comfortably in a room, it's too bright.

    Whether a projector makes a good TV replacement depends on how much you use the TV. I'm kind of an "event" TV-watcher (ie, the TV goes on for Simpsons or for a basketball game) so it works great for me. You certainly don't want to have a projector on as background TV while cleaning.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...