Slashdot Mirror


Top Searches of 2003, A Dave Odyssey, Banned Words for 2004

Shockmaster writes "Yahoo! has released their top searches of 2003. Google also has a year-end Zeitgeist wrap-up for popular search queries." Elsewhere, TheFairElf writes "The Miami Herald has Dave Barry's annual roundup of the year's main events titled 2003: A Dave Odyssey. The most significant events include the release of the fifth Harry Potter book 'Harry Potter Reaches Puberty and Starts Taking Really Long Showers' and the discovery of large quantities of sugar in Iraq which the CIA claimed 'is a leading cause of tooth decay'." Finally, wideangle writes "'Calling all metrosexuals: Get rid of that bling-bling - or at least find another word for it. In its annual compilation of language irritants, Lake Superior State University singled out 17 words and phrases that it says ought to be banned as overused, trite, euphemistic or just plain inaccurate." LOL, we wish everyone an Xtreme New Year from Slashdot, OMG.

331 comments

  1. I'm sorry for looking like a brickhead, but... by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

    I only count 3 specific words on that list...did i click the wrong link or something?

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    1. Re:I'm sorry for looking like a brickhead, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Click the one before it for the whole list.

    2. Re:I'm sorry for looking like a brickhead, but... by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you noticed the following link from the article... It gave two, the bottom is the more exhaustive.

      http://www.lssu.edu/banished/archive/2004.php

    3. Re:I'm sorry for looking like a brickhead, but... by zhenlin · · Score: 1

      I'm just going to hazard a guess...

      "404 Not Found."

  2. The Usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    May we look forward to a brave new year of more SCO hilarity

  3. Year isn't over yet... by Hao+Wu · · Score: 0

    I stayed home tonight. 19 minutes left in 2003! Still time to make "Hao Wu" number one search in world...

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  4. Since submitters and editors can't be bothered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Here is the karma whoring link to the list.

    I will not stop until AC's are redeemed and have enough karma to post at a minimum of +1.

    1. Re:Since submitters and editors can't be bothered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who modded this up?

  5. Not the BEST, but still weird. by keplon · · Score: 0, Informative

    http://www.metaspy.com/info.metac.spy/metaspy/unfi ltered.htm
    See what people are searching for on MetaCrawler...

  6. 'Frozen Tundra' by fo0bar · · Score: 0
    If you look at the bottom, you will see that they rescinded 'Frozen Tundra' because it turns out it's not redundant. Redundant or not, it aint frozen when it's bought as a brick for $100 and placed your mantle next to your cheesehead.

    (standard disclaimer: born and raised 18 years in green bay, wi, so I am permitted to make fun of my hometown)

  7. Withdrawal. by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

    Never mind, i found it.

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  8. London Congestion Charge... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously doesn't work if it causes traffic spikes like that!

  9. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the last "YOU FAIL IT" of 03!

  10. Good Five? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? Your chinese is almost as bad as mine!

  11. where is the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i want the 17 words, that link is just a review of the list
    blah

  12. Happy New Year from New Zealand by jstockdale · · Score: 0

    Yeah it's already 5:45pm on the 1st of January, but what the hell, I'll wish /. a happy new year anyway.

    And look, I didn't even bitch about how /. should at least start the new year's post earlier as a nod to everyone overseas for the holidays (or god forbid our overseas constituants)

    And for anyone that's interested ... here is the last sunset of 2003 as viewed from Queenstown, New Zealand.

    Have a great year everyone.

    -S ...

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
    1. Re:Happy New Year from New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      did you bother to read the REST of the sentence, where he qualifies his statement as being "as viewed from Queenstown, New Zealand"? That means the last sunset of 2003 viewed from that place, not the last sunset of 2003.

      Learn to read, then learn to bitch.

  13. unneeded words by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Funny
    Heck, "metrosexual" isn't even needed. The English language has several words already to express this exact concept. Among them:

    fop: A man who is preoccupied with and often vain about his clothes and manners.

    dandy: A man who affects extreme elegance in clothes and manners.

    dapper: a. Neatly dressed; trim. b. Very stylish in dress.

    gentleman: A well-mannered and elegant man with high standards of proper behavior.

    I can go on...there are others. But come on, pretending the reemergence of the gentleman fop is something new is just retarded. Jumping on the bandwagon of some writer's column...yuk. Might as well start incorporating slogans from WWE into your daily speech, it's the same concept.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:unneeded words by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I understand it though, the term metrosexual specifficaly says the person isn't gay, which none of the others do. Both fop and dandy have strong gay implications, at least in their common usage. It's less about specifics of dress and more about fitting the sterotype of being gay presented by the general media while actually being straight.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    2. Re:unneeded words by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

      An admirable list, but I don't think it really describes the metrosexual. Dandy has too much of a homosexual connotation. Dapper can't be used in a derogatory way, neither can gentleman. Metrosexual tends to be used negatively. Fop could concievably be used, but I don't think it really reflects the ethos of the metrosexual. It seems to narrow.

      At any rate the only problem I have with the term is its deragatory nature. Where's the brotherly love? It's kinda pathetic when we have to use such silly social divisions to isolate ourselves. I suppose tribalism is innate.

      --
      Photos.
    3. Re:unneeded words by DanThe1Man · · Score: 1
      "A lot" is two words. You wouldn't say "alittle", would you?


      My god, a grammer Nazi. How can you stand to read slashdot?

    4. Re:unneeded words by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      My god, a grammer Nazi. How can you stand to read slashdot?

      I can only guess that he must of found alot to be annoyed with.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    5. Re:unneeded words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you're going to flame someone for being a grammar Nazi, at least have the sack to spell "grammar" properly.

      And for fuck's sake, you capitalized the proper noun "Nazi" (which as a proper noun only refers to the National Socialist Party and not to a colloquial term like "grammar nazi") and didn't capitalize "God"?

    6. Re:unneeded words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the last time its "a lot" not "alot"

    7. Re:unneeded words by fermion · · Score: 1
      But metrosexual is specifically talking about someone who, for all intents and purposes, is gay, but does not wish to be called gay. If women really liked thier men to be prissy, men would be prissy. Now many studies show that women do like looking at effeminate men. It is the same with men. Many female model resemble pubescent boys more thatn women. Much haute coutre would look better on a 12 year old boy than a women. However, for the most part, heterosexual people do not form long lasting partnerships with the picture in a magazine.

      I know many men who are neatly dressed, well mannered, elegant, perhaps even shaved. These men would not meet the defintion of the so-called 'metrosexual' because no one would think they are gay. They are merely men who care about how they look and perhaps care about fashion. These are, in fact, as you would say, gentlemen.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:unneeded words by Animats · · Score: 1
      "Metrosexual" is a marketing term, intended to encourage shopping.

      There's a delightful interview with Georgio Armani in the Economist a few weeks back that touches on this. He points out how hip-hop, unlike rock, induces young people to spend money on decorative objects and clothes.

      I'd wondered why a played-out genre was so heavily promoted. Now I know.

    9. Re:unneeded words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You point that out, but fail to see that "of" was used where "have" should have been (not should of been). You fail to understand even the most basic principles of Grammar National Socialism! To the camps with you!

    10. Re:unneeded words by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      ha. Two of those words are in my sig. I never knew fop was a real word.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    11. Re:unneeded words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And YOU failed to notice the dangling preposition with which his sentence ended, fellow anonymous coward? I think perhaps you will be joining your friend in the camps. You're either with us or you're against us in our war on bad grammar!!! You have shown yourself to be not hyper-vigilant enough, citizen. That's double plus ungood of you.

    12. Re:unneeded words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "it's", not "its"!!!!

    13. Re:unneeded words by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I smoked out the pretenders. My work here is finished.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    14. Re:unneeded words by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      But metrosexual is specifically talking about someone who, for all intents and purposes, is gay, but does not wish to be called gay.

      For all intents and purposes? I think you may win most bizarre definition for 2004 and the year has only just begun. Leaving aside your, um... interesting social observations, clothing and manner do not make a person gay. The only "intents and purposes" that matter regard sexual preference. What, are you in junior high?
      lol

    15. Re:unneeded words by fermion · · Score: 1

      Well, i am overjoyed to have started 2004 with such an award. Being bizarre, is, after all, my raison d'etre

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    16. Re:unneeded words by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      *tips hat* (ah... manfully)

    17. Re:unneeded words by CentrX · · Score: 1

      Dapper and gentleman, however, do not, and they also don't have the silly sexual implications of metrosexual, which has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Metrosexual sounds a lot like it should be more "gay" than fop or dandy.

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
    18. Re:unneeded words by jo42 · · Score: 1


      "Gentlemen, Ladies and Gerbil Enthusiasts" covers everyone.

  14. MOD PARENT UP: OVERRATED = ABUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nm

  15. The actual list. by Worldly+Iconoclast · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seems they must have edited it to make it politically correct. I'm betting these are the real ones:

    Top ten Jennifer Searches:
    1. Jennifer Lopez naked
    2. Jennifer Aniston naked
    3. Jennifer Garner naked
    4. Jennifer Love Hewitt naked
    5. Jennifer Connelly naked
    6. Jennifer Ellison naked
    7. Jennifer Tilly naked
    8. Jennifer Esposito naked
    9. Jennifer Capriati naked
    10. Jennifer O'Dell naked

    Top ten movies:
    1. Harry Potter slash fiction
    2. Matrix download divx
    3. Lord of the Rings download
    4. Star Wars dvd download divx
    5. X-Men hentai
    6. Spiderman fanfic
    7. Finding Nemo download
    8. Hulk download .avi edonkey2000
    9. Matrix Reloaded download
    10. The Ring download edonkey

    The internet is a sad place.

    1. Re:The actual list. by Jerf · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is the Internet. Don't you think those should be links?

      Top ten Jennifer Searches:
      1. Jennifer Lopez naked
      2. Jennifer Aniston naked
      3. Jennifer Garner naked
      4. Jennifer Love Hewitt naked
      5. Jennifer Connelly naked
      6. Jennifer Ellison naked
      7. Jennifer Tilly naked
      8. Jennifer Esposito naked
      9. Jennifer Capriati naked
      10. Jennifer O'Dell naked

      Top ten movies:
      1. Harry Potter slash fiction
      2. Matrix download divx
      3. Lord of the Rings download
      4. Star Wars dvd download divx
      5. X-Men hentai
      6. Spiderman fanfic
      7. Finding Nemo download
      8. Hulk download .avi edonkey2000
      9. Matrix Reloaded download
      10. The Ring download edonkey

      Isn't that better? And surprise surprise, Slashdot is pissed off. "Too few characters per line (20.1)?" Now that's a wierd metric. Still needs more. Probably hit the compression filter next... well, if you see this this got through.

      Shame on you, if any of those links show up in your browser as "already visited"!

    2. Re:The actual list. by ameoba · · Score: 1
      Honestly, don't you think it'd've been better to do a Google image search?

      1. Jennifer Lopez
      2. Jennifer Aniston
      3. Jennifer Garner
      4. Jennifer Love Hewitt
      5. Jennifer Connelly
      6. Jennifer Ellison
      7. Jennifer Tilly
      8. Jennifer Esposito
      9. Jennifer Capriati
      10. Jennifer O'Dell


      I, for one, welcome our new lameness filter overlords. I, for one, welcome our new lameness filter overlords. I, for one, welcome our new lameness filter overlords. I, for one, welcome our new lameness filter overlords. I, for one, welcome our new lameness filter overlords.
      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  16. Couldn't agree more with 'bling bling' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I hear someone say that, I want to slap the shit out of them. Moreso when the person saying it is white.

    1. Re:Couldn't agree more with 'bling bling' by Worldly+Iconoclast · · Score: 0

      YO WASSA DAWG U BRING THE BLING BLING HOMIE? "It's the ring: The bling-bling and the right wing."

  17. YOU GOT PUNKED by crazyhorse44 · · Score: 1

    My understanding of the word is that it is descriptive of a weak male who is physicially dominated and forced into engaging into submissive sexual acts... usually with another male and often while incarcerated. In that sense... it is fitting that Ashton Kutcher name is now associated with this word... even though he has bastardized its meaning.

    --
    . SLASHDOT: Home of the vicious nerd.
  18. You're late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already managed to greet New Year, drink champagne, shot several fireworks and have sex with my mare (may it last whole year!) and then even catch some sleep.
    Poor americans, delayed on everything.

  19. expressions I hate by renehollan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "for all intensive purposes" - It's "for all intents and purposes", dipwad.

    "quote... unquote". There is no such thing as "unquote" -- it's "end quote". Using "quote unquote" as a prefix to the purported quote is doubly irritating.

    "It's like this...." I don't give a blinking fuck what it's like, I want to know what it is.

    People who mess up the meanings of precision and accuracy tick me off. 165.04452 +/= 50 is precise, but not very accurate. Abuse of significant digits is another irritant.

    --
    You could've hired me.
    1. Re:expressions I hate by b3k · · Score: 0
      for all intensive purposes" - It's "for all intents and purposes", dipwad. "quote... unquote". There is no such thing as "unquote" -- it's "end quote". Using "quote unquote" as a prefix to the purported quote is doubly irritating. "It's like this...." I don't give a blinking fuck what it's like, I want to know what it is.

      Lighten up, Francis.

      --

      Heineken? fuck that shit... Pabst Blue Ribbon!

    2. Re:expressions I hate by jrockway · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with you, especially with the "intensive purposes". I think people say that because they can see a purpose as being intensive, while they cannot see intents and purposes. Actually, they probably have never read anything other than an online forum, so they haven't picked up any language idioms. I often read my friends' papers and they read like an online forum... if you're in an online forum, write like it (like I'm doing now) but otherwise, DON'T! I'm worried that good writing will be shunned by my generation (like dude, whoa, that's a big word. is that on the SAT?).

      --
      My other car is first.
    3. Re:expressions I hate by Zebbers · · Score: 0

      go take your pills

    4. Re:expressions I hate by hdparm · · Score: 0
      I don't give a blinking fuck what it's like,

      It's not blinking fuck anymore. It's bling-bling.

    5. Re:expressions I hate by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, especially with the "intensive purposes". I think people say that because they can see a purpose as being intensive, while they cannot see intents and purposes.

      I think it's a case of people hearing a phrase but never seeing it in print. They know what it means, but can't spell it out. Pretty common, knowwhatImean? ;)

    6. Re:expressions I hate by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, especially with the "intensive purposes". I think people say that because they can see a purpose as being intensive, while they cannot see intents and purposes.

      Actually, I think the "intensive purposes" thing started off by somebody hearing somebody say "intents and purposes" with a slur/lisp or some other distortion (crappy telephone?), and then the other person picked it up as "intensive purposes" and started using it. I feel the same way about people who write "of" when they mean "have" (eg, "Dude, you should of seen that thing!"). They sound similar in speech if you're not enunciating, and then people who have only heard the phrase but never seen it written down try to write it out, and they come up with "intensive" and "of".

    7. Re:expressions I hate by floW+enoL · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know what ticks me off more than people who mess up the meanings of precision and accuracy? People who mess then up but think they're right. If you make a measurement of 165.04452 +/- 50 (say, for example, meters of depth), it (the measurement) is not precise at all. Whether it is accurate or not depends on the actual value of the depth being measured.

      To summarize, if the true depth was 165 m:

      165.04452 +/- 50 --> not precise, accurate
      165.04452 +/- .0005 --> precise, accurate
      100 +/- 50 --> not precise, not accurate
      100 +/- .00005 --> precise, not accurate

      See http://www.geoplace.com/gw/2000/1000/1000gps.asp as a reference, and think before you post next time.

    8. Re:expressions I hate by calyphus · · Score: 1

      I just want to know where it is, not where it is at.

      --


      The potato it is uninformed.
    9. Re:expressions I hate by Tim · · Score: 1

      Duuuude...duh!

      For all the non-intensive purposes, you do something else!

      Sheesh.

      --
      Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
    10. Re:expressions I hate by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      What he said. Also, mispelling is common amongst those who don't read.

      Regarding overused words or terms, how many times in the past month have you heard/read the phrase, "at risk"?

    11. Re:expressions I hate by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I fully agree. Here are some more in the same vein:

      "case and point" - is that like* when a thief checks out a potential house to burgle and then gestures towards it with an index finger?

      "the point is mute" - the point may be moot, but it is never "mute," unless maybe it is being made by a mime.

      using "that begs the question" to mean "your statement prompts me to ask this question" instead of its real meaning.

      * =P

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    12. Re:expressions I hate by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      Let's make it a peeve party!

      "Whereabouts" when the speaker meant "where".

      "to be like" instead of "said" - "She's like, where's my metrosexual extreme bling-bling?"

      ...laura who wonders if she's just getting old

    13. Re:expressions I hate by Nugget · · Score: 5, Funny

      Such errors are pardon parcel with people who learn the language through speech and not through reading. I could of made that same mistake had I not encountered the phrase in print before hearing it. Sadly, people who don't read just can't cut the muster. I'd just assume watch a movie instead of read a book.

    14. Re:expressions I hate by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1
      Using "quote unquote" as a prefix to the purported quote is doubly irritating.

      Don't forget the usual dain-bramaged hand choreography.

      The world would be measurably better if people would say "so called" instead of "quote unquote". Even, "And then he used the quote facilities unquote to puke out his drunken little guts."

      Some of my personal peeves:

      • "Tough road to hoe" (row to hoe)
      • "I just assume do [something]" (I'd just as soon ...).
      • "I wasn't doing anying imparticular" (in particular)
      • "And then she was like, "No way!", and then I was like, "Yep, really!" (substitute a transitive verb for the abused intransitive like)
      • Ain't is a fine contraction for "am not" or "have not". The trouble with "ain't" is using it in a double negative, or using it in place of "isn't". "I ain't gonna do that, I quit!" is ok. "I ain't no English teacher" is not. But check with the publisher of the journal before using "ain't" in your next paper. (gay smiley withheld by request)

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    15. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...are pardon parcel with...

      Hmmm...

    16. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the point. Anyone who knows basic grammar would know that the phrase "should of seen" is gibberish. "Intensive purpose" also doesn't make any sense; how can a purpose be intensive?

    17. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand it, "ain't" is a contraction of "are not".

      And for your information, I happen to enjoy making fun of people by Xaggerated "quote-unquote" with the quote-unquote "dain bramaged" hand motions!

    18. Re:expressions I hate by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      Abuse of significant digits is another irritant.

      Oh, I dunno about that - quite often I like grabbing a digit from around the thirtieth decimal of PI and beating it around the head and shoulders with a large red herring for an hour or so.

      Much better than pulling a gun in the midst of road-rage later in the day.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    19. Re:expressions I hate by LinuxHam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder if that came from Spanish slang. After 7 years of learning Spanish in the classroom, I once used "donde esta Cecilia?" to ask one of my sisters where the other one was, and the sister I asked (who lived in Oklahoma) corrected me with, "its adonde, not donde." I was like, "that's funny, none of my teachers, professors, or books have said that.. ever." She was like, "well, that's how native Spanish speakers speak.

      So, there you go.. its not, "where is she?" Instead, its "where's she at?" (technically, "at where is she?") according to Spanish slang.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    20. Re:expressions I hate by Varitek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There is no such thing as "unquote" -- it's "end quote".

      Tell you what I hate, it's people who believe that only their knowledge and experiences are valid. "Quote Unquote" is perfectly valid in the UK, at least. There's even a BBC radio show called that.
    21. Re:expressions I hate by Scaba · · Score: 1
      Also, mispelling is common amongst those who don't read.

      "Misspelling" is misspelled, Miss Spelling.

    22. Re:expressions I hate by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Sadly, people who don't read just can't cut the muster.

      Funny you should mention this one, as "cut the muster" is actually the correct usage. It became "cut the mustard" because people heard the expression and didn't know what a "muster" was. A muster is the calling out of the militia. To not "cut the muster" would be to be sent home as unfit to serve due to age, infirmity, etc.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    23. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ain't gonna do that, I quit! is absolutely not ok. You've split two independant clauses with a mere comma. It's proper to split independant clauses (or, for the kids, complete sentences) with a semicolon: "I ain't gonna do that; I quit!".

    24. Re:expressions I hate by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      The best and worst part of English is, as someone on /. pointed out one day, that you can glork the meaning of a word from its context.

      I have gripes about the usage about certain parts of the language (I am drunk but I think I got the its/it's part right) but we have to keep in mind that the language (and more specifically, the way we use the language) evolves at an incredible rate.

      It's (!) like the whole me/I argument. Me and my friend, versus my friend and I. At some point we must draw a line between obeying rules and being able to commmunicate with each other, and while I am not suggesting that we toss all rules out the window once a few twits start abusing them, no one speaks in Olde English anymore, now do they? Eventually usage will supercede the rules whether we like it or not, and while I am not endorsing or supporting this idea it is nonetheless a fact.

      The fact is that written English in no way approximates spoken English. My written English can be understood by many people, but as I am a Newfoundlander my spoken English is quite different, to the point of being incomprehensible to some people (much to the consternation of my Russian ex-roommate).

      "Howd'ya find dat b'y" makes perfect sense to me and my Newfoundlander friends, but is confusing to most other people. The language is changing far too quickly for universal rules to be laid down and followed, and thus we need to adapt accordingly. A "common" ground must be established, but when you consider the vast number of dialects the expectation that everyone must adhere to every rule becomes quite silly.

      Note that I am not excusing people from learning the language that they claim to speak, but rather that we need to temper what we perceive as "poor language" with what we are observing as "changing language.

      I hope this made some sense...

    25. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      I'll add my favorite pet peeve to the mix: Unthaw.

      Oh, are you going to freeze your food?

      WTF u on dude? Microwaves don't freeze food, des nuke it!

      and so on...

    26. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "at where is she?" is still more correct, since the preposition is not seperated from its object.

    27. Re:expressions I hate by axxackall · · Score: 1
      "It's like this...."

      One of my bosses used to start his every speach on every meeting by: Well... you know... I mean... It's like this.... The rest of hiw speach was usually much cleaner and even articulated, but the introductionary phrase was irritating, especially being so persistent.

      By the way, it was irritating for us ESL-immigrants. Americans used to talk in a similar way and did not found anything wrong in using so many parasite-phrases.

      --

      Less is more !
    28. Re:expressions I hate by onomatomania · · Score: 1

      Christ dude, there were no less than four such mistakes in the post. Duh, that was his point. That's why it's modded funny. If "cut the muster" is the only one that you noticed, perhaps you need to go read it again.

    29. Re:expressions I hate by Antonov · · Score: 1

      Expressions I hate: I was like, she was like, he was like, ....

    30. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After struggling to write a witty reply regarding your complete misunderstanding of the parent post, I'm just going to say reread it. You missed the point.

    31. Re:expressions I hate by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      no one speaks in Olde English anymore, now do they?

      That ne bith swa. Oft ic mid fela othres be thaem ealdre engliscgereorde sprece.

      Come on, someone correct my grammar... ;)

      (Not my spelling, though, please. Damn Slashdot won't let me use perfectly good English characters like þ and &ash;.)

    32. Re:expressions I hate by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      It might be from Spanish slang... but on the other hand my local British dialect uses the similar construction "where's she to" to mean "where has she gone", and given that the Spaniards have historically been our deadly enemies, I doubt our speech has been greatly influenced by theirs. ;)

    33. Re:expressions I hate by Redundant+offtopic+t · · Score: 1

      Fucks don't blink, they fly.

    34. Re:expressions I hate by Redundant+offtopic+t · · Score: 1

      cut the muster--after lurking /. for three years, i finally learned something--thanks! i never did understand the phrase cutting the mustard.

    35. Re:expressions I hate by jvj24601 · · Score: 1

      "Whereabouts" when the speaker meant "where".

      Is this an English or colonial English thing? My ex is originally from South Africa, and she and her family say this all the time.

    36. Re:expressions I hate by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      two independent clauses

      Err, you're right, I did, that's a horrible thing to do, I'll never do it again!

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    37. Re:expressions I hate by SoTuA · · Score: 1
      She was like, "well, that's how native Spanish speakers speak.

      Funny, I've been speaking spanish for the last 25 years, and that's not how people speak. Some do, most don't. Of course, you can't expect everyone to speak properly...

    38. Re:expressions I hate by iantri · · Score: 2, Informative

      Un-fucking-believable. I've never seen anyone write "intensive purposes" before, only "intents and purposes", but apparently the former is more common.

    39. Re:expressions I hate by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      It's a really common misusage. I didn't realize that the former was a bastardization of the latter until a few years ago, probably because I'd heard the phrase a long time ago but only recently encountered the correct wording in print.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    40. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It bugs me, too, so I threw that in there in the spirit of the holiday.. this is Slashdot after all!

      Happy New Year ;)

    41. Re:expressions I hate by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      "Christ dude", I think he was pointing out that "CUT THE MUSTER" is NOT INCORRECT, but the phrase "CUT THE MUSTARD IS".

      Actually I didn't know that either, and I thank him for pointing that out.

    42. Re:expressions I hate by greenrd · · Score: 1
      But if you'd actually READ HIS POST, you would have noticed that that WASN'T A MISTAKE, IT WAS CORRECT.

      Hahaha! Funny isn't it! Laugh!!!! LOL!

    43. Re:expressions I hate by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      Good old Old English...finally someone who doesn't confused Old Modern English with real Old English! I can sort of read Old English because I know English and German. I was going to grab a book on Old English and read it over the winter break but decided that becoming a rock star would be more impressive.

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    44. Re:expressions I hate by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Ahahaha, somebody I know spelt AWOL as "awall" and thought that it meant getting mad. Because on some military movie somebody got mad, and somebody else said they were "awall"

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    45. Re:expressions I hate by BillKaos · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's more correct to say "Donde esta Cecilia?" than "Adonde esta Cecilia?". The common acception of "Adonde" it's denoting going to somewhere: "Adonde vas?" -> Where are you going?.

      Disclaimer: I'm a native spanish speaker and Slash doesn't allow &acute in HTML, sorry :)

    46. Re:expressions I hate by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      And mispronunciation is common for young people who read a lot.

      Random example from childhood: infrared. If it was spelled infra-red, I knew how to say it and what it was; otherwise, I'd be saying "in-frared" (like a rare steak with f in front). There were many others that persisted until I finally heard someone say each one correctly!

    47. Re:expressions I hate by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      You've hit it, whereis.

      How many times must I hear: "These numbers just don't jive"

      And what kind of fish is a card shark?!

      Though this kind of thing doesn't just happen with grammar and spelling/pronunciation...
      New Year's Day today! Imagine we'll be seeing old Father Time -- with his scythe.

      Father Time -- Chronos
      Guy with sycthe -- Cronus (aka Saturn) -- castrates his father (Uranus) and tosses the testacles into the sea (which froth and foam and up comes Aphrodite born of... ahem... passion and blood).

      Why would Father Time have a scythe? He's not a grim reaper stand-in. He's not going to carve up the new year baby (often held in the other arm).

      People confuse names and forget origins and we get the bizarre offspring.

    48. Re:expressions I hate by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Was very helpful while dating a German girl to refer to what she called "high" and "low" English -- from her way of thinking, like high and low German. She'd ask me if a particular wording was correct and it was a great shorthand way of saying, well, if you mean do people say this? Yes. But it's not good English. Or, on the other hand, this is good English, but you may actually be faulted for using it because it is uncommon and often misunderstood!

    49. Re:expressions I hate by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Man, have you ever heard someone say that something is pitch red? That one really stopped me. Excuse me -- do you mean, intensely red? Pure red? Because pitch only comes in one colour: black!

    50. Re:expressions I hate by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Christ dude, there were no less than four such mistakes in the post. Duh, that was his point.

      You'll also notice that the one I pointed out was, in reality, not a mistake when he intended it to be one. That was my point. Duh.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    51. Re:expressions I hate by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Some online dictionaries have audio pronunciations, for example, infrared. Merriam-Webster also has them. Quite useful.

    52. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "untracked" for "on track"?

      As in "get back on track"...

    53. Re:expressions I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is no such thing as "unquote" -- it's "end quote".

      And just where is this written?

      Using "quote unquote" as a prefix to the purported quote is doubly irritating.

      While not logical, it's succinct and perfectly clear in meaning. I don't see why it bothers you. But then I don't get bothered at all when people say "begs the question" while not referring to a logical circular argument. And I have a B.A. in Logic, of all things.

      I agree with the accuracy/precision nit though. When Canada went metric, the newspapers repeatedly had irritating quotes like "the stick was about ten feet (304.80 cm) long". Plebes used this as an argument for why metric is bad ("it needs too many numbers").

      I would have loved to have seen a story like this: "the stick was about ten metres (32 feet, 9 and 22/32nds inches) long" in contrast.

    54. Re:expressions I hate by Shouty · · Score: 1
      That ne bith swa. Oft ic mid fela othres be thaem ealdre engliscgereorde sprece.

      Come on, someone correct my grammar... ;)

      Well, I'm not terribly fluent in OE, but...I think there's something wrong in your indirect object (dative case) there. So correct me if I'm wrong for my part...

      thaem is a demonstrative pronoun, functioning here as an article ("the"), and was used for masculine, neuter, and plural nouns (i.e. any non-feminine-singular noun).

      The e at the end of engliscgereorde doesn't tell me particularly much, since any singular noun, regardless of gender, in the dative case has the -e inflection.

      But the adjective ealdre ("old", I believe) also has the -re inflection, which in dative case is only applied to strong adjectives modifying feminine nouns. For masculine or neuter strong, it should be -um. But I think this would actually be a weak adjective, which takes -an.

      So I think you meant to say "thaem ealdan engliscgereorde".

      But I could be wrong.

      (Using "A Biography of the English Language" 2nd ed, C.M. Millward as a source)

    55. Re:expressions I hate by armando_wall · · Score: 1

      This is a little bit offtopic, but you were right. The correct way is "Donde esta Cecilia?" for "Where is Cecilia?". You say "adonde" a) When pointing a place the subject is going to: "A donde va Cecilia?" ("Where is Cecilia going?"). b) As an adverb, indicating a place: "Cecilia esta adonde estuvo ayer" ("Cecila is where she was yesterday").

    56. Re:expressions I hate by xigxag · · Score: 1

      You're mistaken, because if it wasn't a mistake, then it was a mistake. ;)

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    57. Re:expressions I hate by RickL · · Score: 1

      Rather than your example of quote facilities unquote, I prefer to say ampersand que you oh tee semicolon facilities ampersand que you oh tee semicolon

    58. Re:expressions I hate by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Funny you should mention this one, as "cut the muster" is actually the correct usage.

      I guess he got his just desserts. ;-)

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    59. Re:expressions I hate by xaaronx · · Score: 1

      In an online forum it might be considered polite to assume that a small mistake such as leaving out a single letter is a typo rather than a misspelling due to lack of knowledge. They're easy to make and sometimes go right by you even if you preview your comments.

      But then, when has politeness been valued on /.?

      --
      It's amazing how much "mature wisdom" resembles being too tired. - Robert Anson Heinlein
  20. Banned? by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How about banned sites?

    --
    Campaign finance reform is national security.
    1. Re:Banned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, my girlfried has entered her own specimen at this site (for chuckles)... VERY funny as she is a good looking girl and you would NEVER guess her humor.

    2. Re:Banned? by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 1

      One of the loooong skinny ones?

      --
      Campaign finance reform is national security.
  21. Tru' D'at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When ever I find myself confronted with a situation that might call for urban-youth vernacular, I just ask myself, "What Would Justin Timberlake Do?"

    At which point "I be front'n" right up until the moment one the homies "unstraps his gat and blasts me."

  22. OMFG ROFLMAO by jrockway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, I don't think lol is such a bad expression. To me, it means something like "heh" or more like breathing out and saying "is that right?"* in real life. Since you can't express those emotions in words, we made one for use online. OTOH, people misuse lol and say it after everything. That in and of itself is not bad, if there's a funny conversation it seems right to use lol instead of a smiley. I liked smileys back when they weren't turned into gay (sorry, that's a word that needs to go) yellow things. So lol stays as text and works out better.

    In summary, replace "LOL" with "gay" as an adjective. That would be better.

    Also, anyone who says "bling-bling" is going to be shot by me. And anyone who writes in the passive voice.

    Wow, the first time a grammar nazi-like post has been on topic. I'll go now :) [lol, heh, rofl]

    --
    * Actually, 'lol ok' == 'is that right?' IMO. My friends and I have shortened that to lok, which is more efficient (save on bandwidth, my friends) than 'is that right?'

    --
    My other car is first.
    1. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > In summary, replace "LOL" with "gay" as an adjective. That would be better.

      I mean delete LOL from the list and add gay. Although the other way could work too :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you can't express those emotions in words

      What do you mean I can't? You might not be able to, but I most certainly can.

    3. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by jrockway · · Score: 1

      >> Since you can't express those emotions in words

      > What do you mean I can't? You might not be able to, but I most certainly can.

      True. You may be able to, but I cannot. I should have made that clear.

      --
      My other car is first.
    4. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm happy with it typed, it makes some sense then. When people voice "lol" or "lall" in their speech, I want to slash their throats and remind them THERE ARE REAL WORDS OUT THERE AND THEY ARE GETTING LONELY

    5. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Scum+Puppy · · Score: 0

      Lewis Black once said something like "Where I come from [New York], fuck isn't even a word; it's a comma." The same has happened to "lol". I've seen people use it multiple times in the same sentence, usually something like "lol [phrase which isn't necessarily even funny or related to something that is] lol" complete without punctuation or anything that would make sense of the sentence. Essentially, as it use popularly used, "lol" means nothing. When they're really laughing, they say "(rof)lmao" instead. So stop saying "lol", it's like inserting extra whitespace in your text, without the extra clarity you get for indenting your code.

    6. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by blincoln · · Score: 1

      When I was at university, a friend of mine dated a younger girl who used "lol" (pronounced "lawl") in verbal conversation. That was too weird.

      She ended up getting hooked on crack, then tried to assault her mom and ran away to live in the ghetto though, so maybe it was just some kind of statistical abberation.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by sparklingfruit · · Score: 1

      The real issue with LOL and such is that it is overused to a point whereby it no longer means what it says. LOL now means "I find that funny" rather than "Laughing out Loud".
      I bet my new motherboard that 99% of the times people say lol they aren't actually laughing out loud.

      So it is actually lying. When you say lol and you're not laughing, you're lying without thinking about it. A simple, humble "haha" or ":)" is more honest, and looks less AOL.

      Happy new year, LOL.

    8. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And anyone who writes in the passive voice.

      Starting a sentence with a coordinating conjunction? Nothing wrong with that in itself, but in this case you have a sentence fragment.

      Also, anyone who says "bling-bling" is going to be shot by me.
      I get it now... Your passive voice lecture was a joke, unless you meant to say "I will shoot anyone who says "bling-bling."

      And then there are the stylistic problems with your opening sentence. "In and of itself"? Oh my! You follow it with a run-on sentence (or not, but the relation of the first clause is murky). :D

    9. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by jrockway · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, but the meaning IMO has changed from 'laughing out loud' to 'heh'. It's not an acronym anymore, but an actual word. Not a very good word, though :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    10. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 3, Funny

      > When I was at university, a friend of mine dated a
      > younger girl who used "lol" (pronounced "lawl") in verbal
      > conversation. That was too weird.

      My kids say it out loud too.

      I'm considering selling them.

    11. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      I use lol with my sister, but the key is to institute a delay.. and I often send it as

      l
      o
      effin'
      l

      LOL actually doesn't sound AOL to me, and if you have a sibling you chat with, "haha" sounds too sarcastic and would start fights :) OTOH, I'm *still* sick and tired of the FIDO wannabes dragging ROTFLMAO over to our IP-based world. You should have left it with the QWK packets you last sent from your Mom's basement 20 years ago. I remember when AOL was plugged into the 'net, and even moreso, I remember when FIDO gateways started gatewaying forums to usenet. Ugh. Its like seeing UUCP configuration details in sendmail.cf.

      Happy New Year from FN20og.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    12. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by OverclockedMind · · Score: 0

      bling bling! Oh yeah, by the way /. HAPPY NEWYEAR! yeah lol is overused to the point its butt ugly, specially on irc

      --
      if you can read this, good, because i sure cant
    13. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, i think you just got the first post of 2004...

    14. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Bobdoer · · Score: 1

      "'lol ok' == 'is that right?" Couldn't you just append ",right?" to the statement and be just as efficent?

    15. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know her! What a freak.

    16. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      'lol ok' == 'is that right?'

      That makes absolutely no sense at all. You may as well say 'catfood' == 'is that right?' or 'fhtagn' == 'is that right?'

      Why not just use 'ok?'? It's still three characters (even though bandwidth is not a resource that needs to be conserved), an established colloquialism, and doesn't raise the blood pressure of the recipient.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    17. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      ... is going to be shot by me. And anyone who writes in the passive voice.

      Gonna be shooting alot of engineers, then. We kindof have to.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    18. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      I don't know. "Precious is my bling-bling" is one of my favorite music lyrics

    19. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      This has long been the case, but typing *snickers wryly* just doesn't quite cut it.

      Being a bit of an emotive lad, I actually do laugh out loud at some things I read -- and the shock of actually meaning it when I type lol reminds me of how seldom it's true, so I feel the need to CAPITALIZE, or say something dippy, like "actual lol".

    20. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      WTF-- I'm sorry, but that is completely beyond the pale.

      You might be selling, but I'm not buying!

    21. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a cruel man, AC. Cruel and mercyless.

  23. Popular Queries - Spain. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    1. letizia ortiz

    2. terra

    3. gran hermano

    Curious... They have trouble finding the Earth?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Popular Queries - Spain. by leecho · · Score: 1

      Terra is their major ISP, AFAIK. Sad they look so much for it, anyways.. the service, for the most part, is as crappy as AOL.

    2. Re:Popular Queries - Spain. by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      US top Search: Terrorist
      Spanish Top Search: Terra ISP

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    3. Re:Popular Queries - Spain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      terra.es is a freehost that has a ton and a half of porn on it.

  24. Are you kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's everywhere on the net! OMG! u r chattin to sum1 then...lol this and lol that....Get it away!"

    -Regarding usage of "LOL". Does anyone see anything wrong with this? Personally, I wish people would stop writing U, R, 4, B, 2, etc. It's 1 or 2 extra letters.

    But to that all I have to say is... O NVRMND @ THAT LOL! I B 2 COOL 4 AOL N D 0 4 NE WAYS, ROFL!!11!!one!!11! I B A Q T PIE N I B 2 COOL 4 U.

  25. New Year : OT by Jupiter9 · · Score: 1

    Happy New Year!!! at EST

    --

    --
    Does anyone remember /\/\/\?
    1. Re:New Year : OT by b3k · · Score: 0

      Happy New year to you too...

      --

      Heineken? fuck that shit... Pabst Blue Ribbon!

  26. Woohoo! by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

    LOL and other abbreviated 'e-mail speak,' including the symbol '@' when used in advertising and elsewhere - Alex G. of Warsaw, Poland, says, "It's everywhere on the net! OMG! u r chattin to sum1 then...lol this and lol that....Get it away!" "I wonder if anyone really laughs out loud when they use this short-hand Instant Messenger slang?" Rachel Rose, Pickford, Michigan.

    Yay! I was waiting for this day.

    Thank god I killed my MSN account a few weeks ago and only use Jabber now. MSN is for people who can't learn to chat properly.

    1. Re:Woohoo! by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. I can tolerate (and even use) lol and rofl and the like (IIRC RTFM IANAL IMHO). But when someone says "u r chattin to [WITH!] sum1 and ur comp is like whoa dude" I draw the line. U, R, chattin (add the fucking g. it's one letter!), etc. make me MAD. 1 is not the same as one (it can be, but one must not confuse 'one thing' with 'someone'). UR is NOT how you spell your.

      I can see people abbreivating things like i18n to avoid typing internationalization. But typing u to save yourself the two keystrokes seems lazy and uneducated. Anybody else agree?

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:Woohoo! by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I can see people abbreivating things like i18n to avoid typing internationalization. But typing u to save yourself the two keystrokes seems lazy and uneducated. Anybody else agree?

      Yeah, I agree. The people who say 'u' when they mean 'you' must be so bad at typing that the 2 letters makes an appreciable difference in their speed. It's really sad.

    3. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A-fucking-men. I'm a god on a mud out there somewhere. If I see "Lol", "u", "ur", "gr8", or any other of those fscking annoying abbreviations that shift the burden of comprehension onto me, it's an automatic gag. If it's repeated, they're given a restriction that automatically gags them ever other shout.

      It's my way of fighting back against laziness. Especially when that laziness means I have to work harder. :)

    4. Re:Woohoo! by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      lol isn't actually that bad. Many people seem to use it as a form of textual laughter. (Although I myself prefer typing "Heh.") Thusly, lol is neccesary, in the same way in speech, laughter conveys a different message than saying: "Yes. That's quite amusing."

      I'll agree with you that gr8 is a sickening joke, however.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  27. "Britney Spears" as most popular Google query... by khym · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is surely one of the signs of the Apocalypse...

    --
    Give a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day, but set him on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  28. terra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's the name of a television show.

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. But that's the way language develops by lurker412 · · Score: 1

    Calling terms like "metrosexual" or "bling bling" irritating is silly. Language is a living, evolving thing. Lexicographers develop dictionaries by accumulating samples of speech in the real world. Words come and go. Sure, one could say "fop," but it would sound archaic to most of us.

    1. Re:But that's the way language develops by jrockway · · Score: 3, Funny

      Words that sound like English are fine. Metrosexual? Fine. I don't know what it means, but it doesn't irritate. Bling bling? Don't you just laugh when you hear that? Or want to injure someone? It's not a word, it's just stupid. We educated folk (or those who think they are ;) need to draw the line somewhere.

      Next thing we know, Bush is going to "glork glork" the Iraqi people. Have fun misunderestimating that.

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:But that's the way language develops by momerath2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Calling "calling terms like 'metrosexual' or 'bling bling' irritating" silly is irritating.

      ~:P

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    3. Re:But that's the way language develops by lurker412 · · Score: 1
      I do laugh. I am not into hip hop and probably would not understand 90% of the lyrics. But bling bling is onomatopoeic. I can just hear the bracelets jingling. It is expressive.

      Lighten up.

    4. Re:But that's the way language develops by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the problem is that a lot of these don't describe evolution, but devolution.

      For example, check out the IGN interview with Orlando Bloom and Liv Tyler.

      This is a good example of how a lot of people (including myself) conduct verbal conversations. When it is written down, it is next to impossible to understand. What does "Two takes before last, it's like. (makes weeoowee sound). It's coming to an end." mean? Did his bow break, or fly off a cliff, or turn into the chick from Kung Pow or what?

      "Metrosexual" is another example. It is constructed from Greek and/or Latin roots, but it doesn't mean what those words mean at all. Is it someone who has sex with cities? Or exclusively *in* cities? No, it is a bastardized conglomeration of two perfectly good words into one lame one. And, as others have said, "fop" is perfectly suited to describe this kind of person anyway. Read Stephenson's Quicksilver.

      "Bling bling" at least has the virtue of being an onomatopoeia, and it's good for a laugh. I mean, really, is there anything that doesn't become funny when it's rendered in gangsta?

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:But that's the way language develops by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Calling terms like "metrosexual" or "bling bling" irritating is silly. Language is a living, evolving thing.

      Useful language evolution involves creation of more succinct or precise terms for concepts that previously required longer and vaguer labels. Inasmuch as there are already perfectly good and short terms for the concept ("fop", "dandy"), "metrosexual" is indeed silly.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    6. Re:But that's the way language develops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Language doesn't evolve to get more useful in the narrow sense, it usually evolves to express belonging to a particular social group. Hence the fact that there are many different words for roughly the same thing - if you want to identify with one culture you say "bling bling", if you want to identify with another, you say something else. Language has always been like this, it's not getting worse.

    7. Re:But that's the way language develops by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      WTF does "bling bling" mean anyway? I've never come across the term before - it sounds like the noise your mobile phone makes...?

      Also up until today I thought "Metrosexual" meant people who had a fetish for having sex in underground railways... precisely because about a month ago when I first heard the term on TV they stated that was what it meant (presumably they didn't know either).

    8. Re:But that's the way language develops by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      Bling bling? Don't you just laugh when you hear that? Or want to injure someone? It's not a word, it's just stupid

      Wow...

      I'm doomed. I'm actually over the hill. I now have proof. I'm posting this anonymously because what I'm about to write is 100% true:

      I'd never even heard of the term "bling bling" before this article here today, this morning. The first day of 2004. I don't even know if that makes me racist or something somehow. Doesn't the phrase "bling bling" come from rap music or something? Or does this say I'm hopelessly out of touch with youth culture (I'm 30 and live just blocks outside of a mid-sized city's downtown!!!) Or is this phrase just not in wide usage after all? Please someone reply and tell me I wasn't alone in never having heard this term before...

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    9. Re:But that's the way language develops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CRAP! And after all that, I forgot to check "POST ANONYMOUSLY"!!! *LOL*

    10. Re:But that's the way language develops by FanaticalDesperado · · Score: 0

      Bling bling? Don't you just laugh when you hear that? Or want to injure someone? It's not a word, it's just stupid.

      Don't feel bad. I, too, get homicidal urges when I hear someone use bling-bling in a sentence. Even worse is when someone ends a normal word with 'izzle'. What the fuck is that about?

    11. Re:But that's the way language develops by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Next thing we know, Bush is going to "glork glork" the Iraqi people.

      Don't act like it's so unlikely... This is the man that invented the term "evildoers" and forced all of his staff to use it all the time, just so he wouldn't sound like such an idiot.

      Next month you are going to hear about Powell going to the UN, talking about the 'Glorks of Mass Destruction' they've found in Iraq (better to find Glorks than nothing at all!).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:But that's the way language develops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fo' shizzle FanaticalDesparizzle!

    13. Re:But that's the way language develops by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Next thing we know, Bush is going to "glork glork" the Iraqi people. Have fun misunderestimating that.

      I don't think I've ever "ROFL", but if hungover on no sleep feeling slightly giddy when a particular sentence sends you off on an endless laughing jagg, then I'm friggin OFL alright! heh. thanks for that.

    14. Re:But that's the way language develops by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      jag, even. vroom. heh.

      must sleep

  31. CORBA? by tepples · · Score: 1

    LOL, we wish everyone an Xtreme New Year from Slashdot, OMG.

    What does Object Management Group, the maintainer of the CORBA standard, have to do with anything?

  32. Google's real queries for 2003 by schild · · Score: 1, Funny

    We all know the REAL top queries
    1. Britney Spears naked
    2. Harry Potter torrent
    3. Matrix sucked!
    4. Shakira's fine fine ass
    etc.

    --
    schild
    editor, f13.net
    1. Re:Google's real queries for 2003 by b3k · · Score: 0
      LoL

      Happy New year...!!!!

      --

      Heineken? fuck that shit... Pabst Blue Ribbon!

  33. Happy New Year by SG1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Did anyone else notice they were off by 4 seconds(at least abc was) and so was the ball... According to time.gov... Not that it matters :-p HAPPY NEW YEAR!

    1. Re:Happy New Year by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Satellite transmission time lag. Speed of light, you know.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Happy New Year by superpeach · · Score: 1

      4 seconds sounds like the time difference between watching a channel on terrestrial and the exact same thing on satellite over here. Maybe thats why they were off, some satellite somewhere :)

  34. An omission... by gmaestro · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Might I add the word "schizophrenic" to the list? It seems anyone that uses this word in everyday speech has no idea what it means. The analogy they are often going for is with multiple-personality or bi-polar disorder.

    Oh well, as long as we're griping about the misuse of language...

    1. Re:An omission... by asjk · · Score: 1

      I've relaxed about schizophrenia in common usage. It's not too far from the etymology of the word after all. In addition the second definition is given as "...contradictory or antagonistic qualities or attitudes". BTW I'm at work on a closed psych unit right now and the bipolar pt is up slamming drawers. Guess I'd better go check..

    2. Re:An omission... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Might I add the word "schizophrenic" to the list? It seems anyone that uses this word in everyday speech has no idea what it means.

      I agree that it needs to go, but don't white-wash everyone, just because you've never heard it legitimately used.

      I certainly use it in everyday speech, but that's because I'm literally schizophrenic.

      I also use literally on a regular basis, but unlike 99.999% of the population, I know what literally means.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:An omission... by gmaestro · · Score: 1
      No, saying "anyone" was meant as hyperbole. I apologize if there was a misunderstanding. Certainly few people know what schizophrenic means like you do.

  35. The spelling out of abbreviations like "LALL" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate it, it really irritates me, and more and more tards on IRC and in speech are using it. My nephew and two nieces use it, and it's pointless. If phonespeak wasn't bad enough (U R sxy LOL) then the re-interpretation of those into words again IS.

    lall
    roffal
    roftal
    yur
    omg

    I refuse to speak to one of my son's friends who, instead of actually laughing at funny things, stands there with a straight face saying "roftal".

  36. Wimbledon is where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in what zeit does Wimbledon get geisted over to the Roland Garros Stadium in Paris?

  37. very very young lolita nude by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

    wow. I kept hitting refresh to see the current search,
    and that one was always on there. almost every time.
    someone else posted that the internet is a sad place.
    how true. then I actually clicked on the ratemypoo link
    some else posted.

    jebus. I didnt think it could really be what it was. it was.

    freedom is an ugly thing ;)

  38. The only thing more annoying than these terms: by xant · · Score: 1
    An organization that purports to be able to tell us whether they're useful or not. I'll grant you that "sweat like a pig" certainly implies something inaccurate, but a lot of people like me actually know this about pigs and use the term anyway because it's an interesting turn of phrase. (How hard do you have to be working to be a pig and be sweaty?) Let's look at some others:

    Metrosexual? Bling-Bling? Well, I would never use them in a sentence, but if some people find one of them useful, then let them use it. Like many entries in the list, they are words that annoy the committtee them because they're new, not because they're useless or overused. If it really is useless, it will soon cease to be used. That's how language works.

    Punked? Actually a useful word, I think. There's no word for "play a elaborate prank on", yet. I think this one annoys them only because it comes from pop culture.

    Companion animals: Their smarmy comment "They're called PETS." is probably downright offensive to people who object to the negative connotation of "pet". I call my dogs pets, but I love them, and I can certainly see them as companions.

    Smoking gun: "came to us from Iraq". Uh, no it didn't. This term has probably been around for at least decades. Overused? Maybe this year, but that's certainly not cause for banning it evermore.

    They're trying to be funny, but they're just demonstrating a failure to understand language evolution.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    1. Re:The only thing more annoying than these terms: by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      And what if the companion animal isn't a pet? What if it's a working animal? (Seeing eye dog, etc)

    2. Re:The only thing more annoying than these terms: by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      There's no word for "play a elaborate prank on", yet.

      There's "hack", though that's probably a bit of a loaded word to use if you're trying to get across a clear meaning :)

    3. Re:The only thing more annoying than these terms: by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      If you're offended, here's a clue: SHOW SOME TOLERANCE. Thank you.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:The only thing more annoying than these terms: by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      I think the term "assisted-living animal" applies.

    5. Re:The only thing more annoying than these terms: by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      They're trying to be funny, but they're just demonstrating a failure to understand language evolution.

      They're also ignorant. "Words that rhyme with Iraq", like "attack", "yak", and "back"? Except that none of those words rhymes with "Iraq"! The only word I can think of that does rhyme with "Iraq" is "aardvark", and that's the first time I've ever seen the two together in one sentence.

    6. Re:The only thing more annoying than these terms: by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Kids were using "prank" as a verb 20 years ago. So they might have "pranked" the old man next door. Might sound atrocious, but it does the job in a way that's easy to understand and does not require the invention of a new term.

  39. I'll never use google again by Microsift · · Score: 1

    They think that Wimbeldon takes place in Paris in the spring!

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  40. Oh no. NASCAR is on the Yahoo! top list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been an auto racing fan for many years. I actually LIKE the stuff and I've turned a lot of professional/geek type people like myself onto it. Us fans have constantly had to fight against the redneck jokes, misunderstanding of the sport, and have struggled to try and convince people that it's far more in depth than just cars going around in circles.

    Now I see the Yahoo! top 10 list... KaZaA, Harry Potter, American Idol, Britney Spears, 50 Cent, Eminem, WWE, Paris Hilton, NASCAR, and Cristina Aguilera.

    Oh dear Lord, maybe they've been right all along.

  41. The Netherlands by CSharpMinor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Note that the most popular film search on Google for the Netherlands wasn't LOTR, the Matrix, or Finding Nemo; it was 2 Fast 2 Furious.

    --

    Whatever it is I'm complaining about, I'm sure the Republicans did it. This is /., after all.
  42. OMFG... by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    IANAL, but IMNSHO, TLAs and other MIAs should not be banned. After I RTFA, I was ROFLMAO at the proposition that these quips have no place in the lexicon... YMMV, of course, and of course YAETYOO...

    1. Re:OMFG... by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 1

      Okay I see I ANAL there at the start but I'm gonna need AFTP (a f*ing translation please). Oh and before I forget ADCA (another damn computer acronym) should be on everyones mind.

      --
      Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
      Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
    2. Re:OMFG... by |>>? · · Score: 1
      IANAL, but IMNSHO, TLAs and other MIAs should not be banned. After I RTFA, I was ROFLMAO at the proposition that these quips have no place in the lexicon... YMMV, of course, and of course YAETYOO...


      I am not a Lawyer, but in my not so humble opinion, three letter acronyms and other missing in actions should not be banned. After I read the fucking article, I was rolling on the floor laughing my arse off at the proposition that these quips have no place in the lexicon... Your mileage may vary, of course, and of course {untranslatable - even STFW}...
      --
      |>>? ..EBCDIC for Onno..
    3. Re:OMFG... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I am not a lawyer, but in my not-so-humble opinion, three letter acronyms and other Miscellaneous Internet Abbreviations should not be banned. After I read the fscking article, I was rolling on the floor laughing my arse off at the proposition that these quips have no place in the lexicon. Your mileage may vary, of course, and of course You Are Entitled To Your Own Opinion...

  43. Wimbledon in Paris? by gdp007 · · Score: 1
    It's hard to believe that Google thinks that:
    "The annual Wimbledon tennis tournament takes place at Roland Garros in Paris each spring."

    England hosts the Wimbledon tournament (at... Wimbledon of all places)!

    1. Re:Wimbledon in Paris? by dave1g · · Score: 1

      lol thats what I thought.... strange

      oops I said lol :-p, oops a smiley

  44. You idiots. by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 2, Interesting
    X-files, Xtreme, Windows XP and X-Box are all part of this PR-powered phenomenon," said John Casnig of Kingston, Ontario.

    The X-Files debuted in 1993, well ahead of the "PR-powered phenomonon" ( Phenomenon - now there's an overused word ) of using X in product branding. The X in "X-Games", "X-Box", "X-Wife" refers to 'extreme' ( which, yes, is a trite marketing cliche ). The X in "X-Files" is supposed to connote ideas of mystery or of an unknown quantity.

    And of course, there's the following explanation, given in Season 5's Travelers:

    Dales: X-Files?
    Dorothy: Yes. Unsolved cases. I file them under 'X'.
    Dales: Why don't you file them under 'U'... for Unsolved?
    Dorothy: That's what I did until I ran out of room. Plenty of room in the 'X's.

    Plenty of room in the 'X's indeed. Happy new year everyone.

    YLFI
    --
    One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
  45. Yeah, right. More like "Britney Spears kiss" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is surely one of the signs of the Apocalypse...

    No, just a sign that most internet users are horny males. Big surprise there.

    1. Re:Yeah, right. More like "Britney Spears kiss" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should be into females, ie. real people; not what was a real person before being replaced organ by organ with plastic.

  46. Wimbledon in Paris....eh? by dwater · · Score: 1

    http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html

    "The annual Wimbledon tennis tournament takes place at Roland Garros in Paris each spring."

    I don't watch tennis (much) but I could've sworn Wimbledon was held at Wimbledon. Since when was it held in Paris?

    --
    Max.
    1. Re:Wimbledon in Paris....eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't watch tennis (much) but I could've sworn Wimbledon was held at Wimbledon. Since when was it held in Paris?

      Since Paris forked over a mighty tub of bling bling to the organizers.

  47. The REAL number one search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The REAL number one search of 2003 was for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, wasn't it?

    1. Re:The REAL number one search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but it came back with a 404....

    2. Re:The REAL number one search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't write the page _yet_.

    3. Re:The REAL number one search... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they used MSN, so they didn't find any, apart from Amazon's sponsored links (The Complete Idiot's Guide to Building WMDs and others). MSN's search doesn't yet support searches outside corporate America. If GWB and his henchmen only knew...

  48. (Really) Laughing Out Loud by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

    After typing "LOL" in an IM to my oldest son, he has forbidden me from typing it unless he can actually hear the laughter. Since we usually chat when we're both at home, wisecracks yelled back and forth usually run in parallel to the chat content.

    One day, we were chatting while sitting at adjacent computers. My wife walked in, noticed that we were chatting (primarily with each other), and decided that we were both too geeky for her. I figured at least there was SOME kind of communication with my son.

    Parenting in the new millenium...

    Tim

    1. Re:(Really) Laughing Out Loud by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

      wow, me and my dad do the same thing and ironicly his name is Tim as well ;-)

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    2. Re:(Really) Laughing Out Loud by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      Son, it's WAY past your bedtime!

      Dad

    3. Re:(Really) Laughing Out Loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry to hear that your neighbor died.

  49. Fo' shizzle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  50. lol by blake8087 · · Score: 0

    lol

    --

    --Slashdot readers delight in generalizing the behavior of other Slashdot readers.
  51. Suggested change: by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Exchange LOL for "overlord".

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  52. Why not compile these words in a dictionary? by keeboo · · Score: 0

    Those short-lived-hyped words appear all the time... But then they're gone forever (thank godness).

    A compilation on such kind of words would be entertaining.
    Imagine reviewing the junk from 10, 20 years ago.

    And, why not, to include past much-hyped-but-bogus concepts like:
    "The end of History"
    "Market openness saving poor countries"
    "Multimedia kits (being a cd-rom with sound board)"
    etcetera

  53. Re:Oh no. NASCAR is on the Yahoo! top list... by phillymjs · · Score: 2, Funny

    have struggled to try and convince people that it's far more in depth than just cars going around in circles.

    Yes. Sometimes, the cars also crash.

    ~Philly

  54. Lone Gunman time by frankmu · · Score: 2, Funny

    dammit! don't tell us it's the new year yet!

    think about us in the pacific time zone!

    you bastards!

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:Lone Gunman time by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Insensitive clods!

  55. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up +1, Tragic.

  56. Yeah, right. by sparklingfruit · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. KaZaA
    2. Harry Potter
    3. American Idol
    4. Britney Spears
    5. 50 Cent
    6. Eminem
    7. WWE
    8. Paris Hilton 9. NASCAR
    10. Christina Aguilera

    I wonder which ones Yahoo were paid to feature in that "top 10" and which one made the real top 10.

    I thought the #1 search has always been "Sex".

    1. Re:Yeah, right. by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree they seem suspicious, perhaps putting Kazaa at #1
      was an effort to look legit? In any event looking at the
      rest of the page just confirms the decline of the internet
      into the abyss.

    2. Re:Yeah, right. by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

      Aha! Number 8 refers to the Paris Hilton Sex Tape, which is, in fact, porn.

      Nice one, Yahoo...

    3. Re:Yeah, right. by Spunk · · Score: 1

      When did that sex tape come out? November? The list is over the whole year.

  57. LoL OMG by b3k · · Score: 0

    Paris Hilton.

    --

    Heineken? fuck that shit... Pabst Blue Ribbon!

  58. "short-hand Instant Messenger slang" by Venti · · Score: 1

    Actually (I think) that lol, u, rofl and other silly abvertations come from realtime online games where typing time can be very limited and players might not have yet mastered the skill of typing extremely fast. I caught this habbit while playing Age of Kings where communication can be a big part of the game (serriously) and even if it isn't you still wan't to respond when the other player is yapping... just say "lol!!11" (which basicly means... " thats right, keep talking asshole, im coming...") or something similar to distract him.

    Ofcourse after I started typing faster and stopped playing that became unnessessary and actually started hating people who say "lol" and "u", especially "u", yep... its 67% less letters and almost 0.001s less typing time but cmon!

  59. I'll fess up by Degrees · · Score: 1
    I used to say "intensive purposes" for exactly that reason. I heard it somewhere (I guess mis-heard is a better description) and used the wrong phrase for years. It was less than two years ago that I read the phrase, and learned what a mistake I had been making.

    Oops.

    At least I now know better.

    The one that bugs me is "Could care less" - no, you could not care less - that's the point: your amount of 'care' is at zero, and you cannot go lower....

    Did I mention that for all intents and purposes, the North Koreans were planning on invading Cuba in a 1951 pickup truck, but called it off because GWB couldn't care less?

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    1. Re:I'll fess up by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Yup. How about "lowest common denominator". If you think about that, it's always one. All numbers share 1 as a common denominator. Maybe people mean "least common multiple" or "greatest common denominator". Number theory should be part of grade school math, methinks :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:I'll fess up by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Yup. How about "lowest common denominator". If you think about that, it's always one. All numbers share 1 as a common denominator. Maybe people mean "least common multiple" or "greatest common denominator". Number theory should be part of grade school math, methinks :)

      That one used to bother me, till I had it pointed out that to "aim for the lowest common denominator" is (for example) exactly what many businesses do. The ideal product or service is one which is the equivalent of "1", as it appeals equally to all people. Unfortunately, this also means it's dumbed down such that a "1" person and a "100" person get the same thing.

      But yeah, people use it wrong most of the time.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:I'll fess up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that the LCD is defined as "greater than zero" much in the same wasy that primes are defined as numbers greater than 1 (but not including 1).

    4. Re:I'll fess up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing "denominator" with "divisor". There is a lowest common denominator for any finite set of rational numbers. For instance, the lowest common denominator of 2/5 and 3/7 is 35.

    5. Re:I'll fess up by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Man, that could care less thing drives me crazy! It seems to be this bizarre way of exaggerating -- by saying the opposite of what you mean, perhaps out of a misguided sense of syntactical sarcasm. Like saying: "I was literally starved to death". It's bad enough when people misuse words and phrases because they simply parrot -- but then they change them for emphasis and say the reverse of what they mean!

      How about climate change being climactic? (and I don't mean building to an exciting conclusion)

    6. Re:I'll fess up by xaaronx · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty anal at times about these sorts of things but sometimes use "could care less" when my actual meaning is that I could not as a way of emphasis through sarcasm. I imagine the common usage of the phrase is a corruption of that usage.

      --
      It's amazing how much "mature wisdom" resembles being too tired. - Robert Anson Heinlein
  60. "Shots rang out" by ElJefe · · Score: 4, Funny

    On a related note, why are explosions always rocking, e.g., "Explosions rock Baghdad"? Why don't they ever roll?

  61. Bling-bling in the negative by jefdiesel · · Score: 1

    What about using these terms as derogatory? Like describing the teenagers in the mall, all decked out with matching velour track suits, baby blue work boots, and $100 worth of bling-bling..

    I'm sure as hell not admiring those kids.. the other day, while returning improperly fitting christmas gifts, I saw mother and teenage son, he longly gazing at the 10 karat cubic zirconia earring in the display case, while she looked around embarrassed that her lame ass white boy SON was shopping for giant ghetto pirate jewelry..

    I guess nothing wrong with jewelry on men, but all this plastic 'ice' is a bigger joke than the term bling bling

    --

    I hate spyware and spies
  62. Typo in the Zeitgeist by karen_sjet · · Score: 2, Informative
    As I see it right now, Google's Zeitgeist says: (my emphasis)
    The annual Wimbledon tennis tournament takes place at Roland Garros in Paris each spring.

    How is it that the Harry Potter is second only to Britney Spears on the popular queries list and also below the Simpsons on the fictional characters list?

    1. Re:Typo in the Zeitgeist by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Beat me to it.

      The All England Tennis Championships are at Wimbledon in the late spring. The French Open is at Roland Garros.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  63. Happy New Year From the Slashdot Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CmdrTaco's new year's resolution is to not suck anymore dick, but each year for the past five, he's made the same resolution and failed within two hours.

    Meanwhile, instead of ringing in the new year by popping open a bottle of champagne, Michael Sims celebrated by ejaculating all over Hemos.

    Finally, CowboiKneel celebrated the new year by letting out a minute-long fart to count down the last minute of the old year.

    Happy New Year from Slashdot.

  64. HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!! by GerbilSocks · · Score: 1

    Happy New Year you motherfockers!!!

  65. Smoking gun hardly came out the current Iraq war by kfg · · Score: 1

    Last I researched it it appeared to have been coined by Deep Throat during the Watergate scandal and means something rather more than "hard evidence." Fingerprints at the scene are hard evidence. If you have a smoking gun you don't need no stinking fingerprints.

    Yes, shots really do ring out.

    "Harm's way is actually in the dictionary."

    Embedded journalist may be a new term but a concept that goes back at least until WWII. It has real and important meaning which is not "at the scene." It may be overused now, seeing as how there are so few embedded journalists in Iraq, but I actually hope the term lasts.

    I reserve judgement on lol. I use it, but not often. Yes, when I've actually laughed out loud. Even though I may vote for not getting rid of this one there's no denying that many of the people who use, and abuse, it might be better off done away with.

    I'll go along with the rest without much fuss though.

    Pet actually means companion animal. Give the PC shit a rest already.

    What's wrong with "dandy" or "narcissist"?

    X the "X" shit already. Even "Extreme" everything was bugging the hell out of me. It's this decade's "Turbo."

    What's with the Iraq War's code names all being about the level of an old Sgt. Rock comic book? Remember him, going out to get the gooks, charging out of a foxhole while pulling the grenade pin with his teeth? George, grow up already.

    And trust me. You ain't no Sgt. Rock. No way Jose.

    KFG

  66. Avril by SKPhoton · · Score: 1

    Avril Lavigne came in 10th in Canada. Oh the irony!

  67. Re:Oh no. NASCAR is on the Yahoo! top list... by strider3700 · · Score: 1

    I've never been a nascar fan due to the lack of real technology on the cars. Yes they keep the racing tight and yes that gives us big spectacular crashes, but I'd much rather see them allowed to push the limit tech wise. F1 has far more interesting technology. Personally I think rally is the most exciting racing on TV.

    Looking at that top 10 list leaves me very very scared about the state of the world.

  68. uhhh, by twitter · · Score: 1
    I thought the top seach was for Kazaa. Yep, it's number one.

    Nice work RIAA. By threatening 12 year old girls in housing projects, granmothers and other people who had no clue, you have spread the good news of music sharing far and wide. Only a such a large and well funded organization could create such great advertising. Keep it up.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  69. No, they don't know what it means... by Presence1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...if they did, they would spell it correctly.

    Just because they spell out a homonym, dosen't mean they knew it and just made a typographical error. I fail to see how anyone who knows the meaning of the phrase "intents and purposes" could mistype it as "intensive purposes". These are completely different sets of words.

    Another one that I find very irritating is ignorance of the difference between 'Affect' and 'Effect'. However, this one-character substitution might enjoy the benefit of the doubt, if their other usage is good.

    I remember growing up being frequently annoyed at my mother's continual corrections of my errors, but I find that I'm now grateful for it almost every day. Language, like code, is a tool, and should be used correctly if it is used at all.

    "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." -- (Attrib. to Abe Lincoln, Mark Twain, and others)

    1. Re:No, they don't know what it means... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I think it's a case of people hearing a phrase but never seeing it in print. They know what it means, but can't spell it out. ...if they did, they would spell it correctly.

      I disagree. The meaning of an unknown phrase can be taken from the context in which it is used, not the actual words. You know the phrase "it's just an expression". Expressions often can't be taken literally, so I don't find it hard to believe that the person would just accept the expression's meaning without analyzing the individual words. The reason is that it is common for those individual words to not make sense when used in an expression.

      Language is a tool, yes, and like other tools it can be wielded by professionals and by non-experts alike. Complicating language is a great deal of context which is interpreted differently by different people and their unique experiences and perspectives, which I think is why legal contracts are worded the way they are. Would you have everyone talk like lawyers to be exactly correct and leave no room for misinterpretation? That would be pretty boring.

    2. Re:No, they don't know what it means... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Sorry for all the bold type... forgot the /b tag.

    3. Re:No, they don't know what it means... by Presence1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I completely agree that it would be VERY boring if everyone spoke like lawyers in contracts, and I'm certainly not expecting that (ugh).

      In this example, the question is whether the people making this error ("intents and purposes" typed as "intensive purposes") actually know the meaning of the phrase.

      This significant an error is not merely a typo, but an indication that the person knows nothing more than a string of syllables, which they are MIS-assembling into the wrong words. They are unthinkingly parroting this string of syllables into this context where they guess it might fit. The fact that you and I can deduce what the original phrase that they might-have-intended-to-use-if-they-had-a-clue does NOT mean that they actually knew the meaning of the phrase.

      Note that this is not only a character or syllable substitution, but a substitution of one word for two and different parts of speech. This error also completely changes the meaning of the phrase. The expression "...for all intents and purposes..." carries a meaning that emphasizes the practical finality or completeness of the rest of the sentence. In contrast, "...for all intensive purposes...", would refer to some specific subset of purposes, or something. Very differnt meanings. Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how they actually know the meaning if they type something this far off.

      In the larger context, we completely agree that people have differnt experiences and perspectives, and that language must be used both formally and casually, literally and figuratively, etc.

      However, this is not an excuse to be sloppy. It is the very reason that we must be clear and establish common contexts and meanings for our utterances, usually by successive approximation across those gaps. Without care to establish common meanings, we are not communicating, but merely babbling in close proximity to others. With care to maintain common meanings, we can truly communicate across incredible chasms of experience and context.

    4. Re:No, they don't know what it means... by funkhauser · · Score: 1
      I think "for all intents and purposes" has become something of a fixed expression. Sure, it's made up of individual words, but it's meaning is no longer really bound to those words. It's gained a meaning of its own. As such, a lot of people who have never seen the expression in print end up mispelling it.

      Are they "unthinkingly parroting" this string of syllables? Perhaps. But you have to keep in mind, that's how language works. People repeat a given series of syllables to convey a given meaning. Whether they understand the underlying structure is irrelevant. If, in actual speech, I uttered "for all intensive purposes," at a normal, conversational rate, there would be no loss in understanding. That series of syllables (and close approximations to it) convey the exact same meaning as the fixed expression "for all intents and purposes."

      The point: even if the underlying structure of the expression "for all intents and purposes" is lost completely, that string of syllables has taken on a meaning of its own, independent of that structure. Common context is maintained, the intended meaning is conveyed, and the only people who get upset about it are pedantic types like yourself.

  70. New Years Resolution by toupsie · · Score: 1

    I resolve to pay my Linux fee to SCO. But then again I am drunk right now and might start using FreeBSD. Who cares if it is dead and all, they got a depeguinator which sounds pretty cool at this point in inebriation.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  71. Banned Word Nomination by ewhac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Normally, bad grammar and malformed words just roll off me. But for some reason this one really gets my back up:

    "Incentivize"

    The verb form of "incentive", presumably intended to mean, "to provide incentives for," which is another way of saying 'encourage' or 'influence'.

    ...Except that "incentive" is itself the noun form of the verb "incent", which means to encourage or influence. So you could use an actual word, save five letters, and not look like a pretentious twit.

    Don't get me started...

    Schwab

    1. Re:Banned Word Nomination by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Well, you know what Calvin (of Calvin and Hobbes) says: "Verbing weirds life."

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Banned Word Nomination by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Normally, bad grammar and malformed words just roll off me. But for some reason this one really gets my back up:

      "Incentivize"

      Verbing weirds language, and that's a prime example.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:Banned Word Nomination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *ahem*, "Verbing weirds language."

    4. Re:Banned Word Nomination by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the root word is actually the noun "incentive". "Incentivize" (first used in 1968) actually predates "incent" (first used in 1977) and is more widespread in usage.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    5. Re:Banned Word Nomination by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      Not to get you started or anything, but the good folk at The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language seem to think that incentivize is a perfectly cromulent word. That's American english for you...

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    6. Re:Banned Word Nomination by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      You mean you don't like to orientate yourself to new surroundings?

    7. Re:Banned Word Nomination by damiam · · Score: 1

      And, actually, the definition for "incent" is "to incentivize".

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  72. Doing my part by Vilim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The LOL ROFL ROFLMAO ROFLMGDMFAO and the like, along with stupid abbreviations used to obscure the point of a conversation (my theory is that it is a vain attempt to make the recipient believe the sender is more intelligent than they really are by obscuring thier point in a stream of unintelligable ASCII) has been on my list for a very long time. I generally ban anyone on any of my IM lists that attempt to talk to me like that and tell them I will unban them when they learn thier lesson and promise never to do that again.

    Another popular tactic is to use the poor excuse for an MSN client I wrote a few years back to send them "OMG j00 sh00d 5t0p yoozing 5TVp1D T/\1| LOL!!!!!11111!!!" followed by a bunch of smileys in a very long for loop. It makes a windows 98 machine slow to a crawl suprisingly quickly.

    Just doing my part to rid the world of idiots

    --
    History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Sir Winston Churchill
  73. Re:"Britney Spears" as most popular Google query.. by kfg · · Score: 1

    In all of 2003 I didn't search for a single term on the Yahoo! lists.

    The Google list is a bit more interesting. I searched for Roland Garros. You know, the flying pioneer and WWI fighter pilot? (Hey, Google, the Wimbledon Tennis Tournament doesn't take place in Paris. Why do you think they call it Wimbledon? Jeez.)

    I searched on Winnie the Pooh, but added a +latin. Interesting stuff there on the history of the translation. Very interesting.

    I'm searching for a way to avoid any reference to Britney Spears. If you've found a method short of hanging myself let me know.

    KFG

  74. Google logs by harmonica · · Score: 1

    I'd really like to do some data mining on those myself.

    Can't they make them available for download? That would be one large access_log file... ;-)

  75. XXX by twitter · · Score: 1
    X-Ray, turn of the 19th century. X used as a marker for experimental craft, 50 years ago? X Windowing system, 1993, thank you MIT Athena. There was plenty of room in the Xs.

    Then came Microsoft, with billions of dollars in advertising money. ActiveX, Xbox, the whole fucking eXPerience, blasted at giga dolar levels. They plastered it everywhere, in the Wintel pulp pages, on TV, on billboards even four page fold outs in National Geographic next to bullshit about "green" enviornmentally friendly NiCad batteries. It gets anoying as any heavy rotation crap will. You can add NET to the same list. You told me about it a hundred times Bill, and I still think it sucks. Go away.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:XXX by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      I believe for Russian geeks "Windows XP" actually was meaningful - XP - hooi poimesh'.
      It is like (loosely translated) "Windows: f.ck-you-if-you-understand-it".

  76. Also, for us Geeks there is often the opposite by Bombcar · · Score: 1

    Who else hear thought that there were two words:

    Rondeyvo and rendezves (phonetic spelling)?

    If you only read and never correlate the spelling with the pronunciation, you can be very confused.

    Horse devours.

    1. Re:Also, for us Geeks there is often the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rondeyvo? What kind of a fuck nut pronounces 'rendezvous' as 'rondeyvo'?!? 'rande-voo' maybe, if you're aiming for some kind of phonetic spelling.

  77. "I could care less." by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My aunt is a professional attorney and she says, "I could care less" when she really means, "I couldn't care less."

    Hooray for legalese?

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
    1. Re:"I could care less." by Confused · · Score: 1

      But perhaps, she really could care less because the subject at had has at least some relevance to her?

    2. Re:"I could care less." by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      she says, "I could care less" when she really means, "I couldn't care less."

      "I could care less, but not much" works, though.

  78. Bling *is* negative outside the ghetto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the last drive home from Florida, we came up on a white Expedition with chromed up 20's and big ole' black dude behind the wheel. I pointed out the window for my wife and said, "hoo whee! that nigga's BLINGIN'!!"

    And yes I am disgusted when I see people like that. Anywhere. Even on tv. Yes, even actors. Disgusted.

  79. Notice the Slashdot related item? by deathcow · · Score: 1

    DVD-R was one of the top terms. Not DVD+R....

  80. Europeans more accurate by baomike · · Score: 1

    I have always been impressed at the accuracy of
    European and asian explosive experts. To wit:
    In the US we get reports like "a ten pound or twenty
    pound bomb went off".
    In Europe they really know , it is usually a "
    2.2 lb or maybe a 22 lb bomb".
    Nome of the rounding junk!
    Maybe the bombers in foreign contries have a
    message board system to let the police know
    what size of bomb they used.

    Mike

  81. I can do it in two active verbs... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    Actually, lol isn't to you thought to be such a bad expression. To you, it is understood as something like "heh" or more like "is that right?"* being breathed out and said in real life. Since those emotions cannot be expressed in words, one was made up for use online. OTOH, lol is misused and is said after everything. That in and of itself is not bad, if a funny conversation is being undertaken it seems right for lol to be used instead of a smiley. Smileys were liked by me back when they weren't turned into gay (sorry, that's a word that needs to be gone) yellow things. So lol stays as text and works out better.

    In summary, "LOL" should be replaced with "gay" as an adjective. That would be better.

    Also, anyone by whom "bling-bling" is said is going to be shot by me. And anyone by whom the passive voice is written in.

    Wow, the first time a grammar nazi-like post has been on topic. Now you'll be left by me :) [lol, heh, rofl]

    --
    * Actually, 'lol ok' == 'is that right?' IMO. It was shortened to lok by my friends and me, which is more efficient (save on bandwidth, my friends) than 'is that right?'

  82. It's frankly scary.. by James_G · · Score: 1
    .. the extent of acronyms these days. A typical sentence uttered by a 13 year old on a Counter-Strike server might look like this:

    wtf omfg ffs nfw tbh bs h4x ban plskthx

    There's a clear solution to this problem: Ban 13 year olds. Actually, you'd need to take out quite a few other ages as well, but that would be a good start.

  83. a recent thread on usenet... by mantera · · Score: 1


    a recent 232 articles' thread on usenet's misc.writing and rec.arts.comics.strips had the "Subject: what are the most annoying cliches"...

  84. ... but not "shnazizle fazzizle buzizzle" ? by kaltkalt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How could that "fizzle in my snizzle" (or whatever the whole -izzle thing is) be left off? I'll concede I have no clue what it supposedly means, but I assume it means or refers to something. Once it got used in an Old Navy commercial, that was the final straw with me.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    1. Re:... but not "shnazizle fazzizle buzizzle" ? by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      It's kind of like a replacement for certain words. Like shizzle my nizzle is ummm "For reall?" Or "No shit my nigger?" Nizzle being nigger, shizzle being shit, izzle by itself is also shit. It's kind of like "Hax0r j00r b0x0rs" or j00 are teh sux. Geek people get annoyed by this but they find things like "j00 g0t pwned" really funny even though they're the exact same type of bastardization of the english language.

    2. Re:... but not "shnazizle fazzizle buzizzle" ? by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      D00d.. UR post was K-|

      (as one might reply back in 1985)

    3. Re:... but not "shnazizle fazzizle buzizzle" ? by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      goddamned slashdot.. can't take "|" and "
      and yeah, I didn't use the (P)review button first.. so shoot me.

    4. Re:... but not "shnazizle fazzizle buzizzle" ? by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1
      Uh, Urban Dictionary disagrees with you on some of the finer points.
      "fo shizzle ma nizzle" is a bastardization of "fo' sheezy mah neezy" which is a bastardization of "for sure mah nigga" which is a bastdardization of "I concur with you whole heartedly my African american brother"
      --
      -insert a witty something-
    5. Re:... but not "shnazizle fazzizle buzizzle" ? by higle · · Score: 1

      People would not care about nonsense like that if they didn't watch so much television.

    6. Re:... but not "shnazizle fazzizle buzizzle" ? by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      You know... come to think of it, i don't think I've ever heard anyone say it in real life, i.e. not on TV.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  85. "place stamp here" by rabidcow · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a reason that they put "place stamp here" on envelopes, and it's not because they think you don't know where it goes. This is to reinforce that they won't recieve mail "postage due," to draw a contrast to the envelopes that say "postage will be paid by the addressee" in the same place. (what, has everyone forgotten those?)

    Basically it cuts down on the costs that the post office has to pay making it very clear to everyone that the addressee will NOT be paying for it. Otherwise they may have to get it halfway across the country before throwing it out.

    1. Re:"place stamp here" by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "There is a reason that they put "place stamp here" on envelopes, and it's not because they think you don't know where it goes."

      It also means there's a square printed logo, right about where a postage-paid logo would normally go. So the envelope looks postage-paid at first glance, until you look closer at the writing.

      It's basically a way of taunting your customers: "Nyeeeh, not only do you have to pay our bill, but you've got to buy a stamp as well"

      Would the council really refuse to collect an unstamped envelope if they were sent a $800 cheque, but had to pay 20c postage to receive it? (dumb question, this is the government..)

  86. Re:haha fag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, I did too. But I allready know my life went down the toilet recently. At least he's not trolling on slashdot on New Years - that's a whole new level of sad. And this is coming from someone whose strongest hope for the new year is getting put out of my misery.

  87. Re:"Britney Spears" as most popular Google query.. by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

    Hang yoursel..oops!
    Nevermind.

  88. E-mail speak? LOL by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    I noticed they refer to LOL and other short hand as e-mail speak.
    How very odd.

    This stuff is used extensively in online chat and only occasionally shows up in e-mail. I might add it just as quickly finds itself in real life...

    (The phrase 'BRB' was often spoken by chat users in the 1980's often with out realising it much to the dismay of off-line friends)

    I seldom if ever see chat speak used in e-mail let alone the more annoying "31337"..
    But there is a whole vocabulary that it did enherent from the postal mail...

    RSVP..

    However about 90% of my e-mail uses phrases that come out of "Things you don't say when doing an advertisment" but then I've never had any respect for spam.

    Metrosexual: You mean this woman isn't a metrosexual?
    Well... a person who likes to dress up... well that she most certanly is NOT.
    But I'd say she looks so much better and she saves on cloathing bills let alone laundry. But if this keeps up she'll be spending most of that in public nudity tickets.
    (It's a conspericy to sell cloaths)

    Well.. if I want to be a metrosexual I'll have to get my bling bling. Umm yeah me fat bauld my friends would just LOL. Forget it.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  89. Dave Barry feeds RIAA "the final solution"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The music industry, in what is seen as a last-ditch effort to halt the sharing of music files on the Internet, asks a federal judge to issue an injunction against `the possession or use of electricity.'"

  90. Patent lawsuit! by cra · · Score: 1

    Patent lawsuit is what I'd really love to NOT see again. . .

    --
    This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for higher security.
  91. Proprietary Pish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wimbledon in Paris ?

    And searches for "Carnaval" - why would so many people search for carnival by entering carnaval ?

  92. Zeitgeist by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

    I was looking over the lists of most popular 2003 search requests for Yahoo and Google, and there weren't any real major surprises there, with one exception. Britney Spears is still pretty high on both lists (#1 for Google, #4 for Yahoo), and I was under the impression that she was already out the door and way down the block.

    Which got me to wondering... how honest are these lists? We've read a lot of stories about the great pains Google goes through to score web pages so that a search request will return an unbiased list. But what about the requests themselves? Is Britney still that popular, or is there some massive bank of computers in some dark basement somewhere submitting her name over and over as a search request to drive her up the list?

    --
    I am NOT a man!
    I am a free number!
  93. Good/Bad phrases by droleary · · Score: 1

    None appear to have made the list this year (or in previous), but I can't be the only one who can't stand people saying "My bad!" The real kicker is that those same people are usually the ones who belt out "It's all good!" Make up your bloody mind!

  94. Hacking==cheating in Korea by Louis+Guerin · · Score: 1

    Amongst South Korean school children, the word "hack" (usually in the form "hacking") is used in both English and Korean with the meaning "to cheat". As in "Teacher! Min-Su [is] hacking!!" (Yes, I am an ELT in Korea :)

    Apparently this usage comes via a Japanese influence, but it's used (with the -ing ending), even by students who otherwise speak NO English at all.

    Chalk up another level of confucion to an already midunderstood word.

    L

  95. From the Google Zeitgeist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the Google Zeitgeist:

    The annual Wimbledon tennis tournament takes place at Roland Garros in Paris each spring.


    Do tell me they're trying to make a joke. If they are can someone tell me what's funny about it.
  96. Down with censorship by crimson30 · · Score: 1

    What I want to see are the REAL lists... not some made-for-public-consumption, disgusting pop-culture crap.

    This reminds me of a 2600 'article' entitled "Spying on Yahoo", which clearly showed how fucked up searches really are.

    The real top searches would be humorous... the ones they posted are just plain pathetic.

  97. Variations on LOL by GreenEggsAndHam · · Score: 1

    Because precisely of the case you make about LOL (are you really Laughing Out Loud ?) I came up with the col and the gol (Chuckle and Giggle).

    I chuckle out loud at my screen numerous times a day but when I write LOL you know I sprayed Coke through my nose onto the keyboard.

    Feel free to use my more accurate alternatives to lol, there's no copyright attached.

  98. More: expressions I hate by filtersweep · · Score: 1

    add- array- everything is an array of services these days... an array this and an array that best practices- how did all this consulting jargon make its way into normal business-speak

    --


    Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
  99. LOL by Zugok · · Score: 1

    but I like LOL granted I never actaully LOL when I LOL, but when I use Trillian, a little kid laughs when ever I type LOL. It's so cute.

    --
    "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
  100. LSSU by Archfeld · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lake Superior State U, wow that is obviously a place of higher learning, with serious subjects and weighty discussion occupying large amounts of the industrious, academically driven students. Then again maybe the sit around and talk about useless inane B$. You be the judge. I would have expected to see reality TV there, afterall we know the networks just plain CAN'T NOT script everything down to the slightest audience chuckle, just ask Ozzy :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:LSSU by seney · · Score: 1

      "Then again the sit around..." ?

      "CAN'T NOT..." ?

      I suppose this post is funny in more than one way.

  101. Embedded Journalist... by escallywag · · Score: 0, Troll

    is redundant ? Well, I guess there are other words for them... "Patriotic Reporter" and "Propaganda Mouthpiece" come to mind....

  102. So what you are saying is that... by Presence1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...as long as the data is only mangled within the capibility of the error-recovery system to reconstruct it, there is no error.

    This is true in some limited contexts, where the ECC works and you only care about the current result, not the robustness of the system. But, it is merely pedantic to distinguish between a correct data transmission and an erroneous data transmission that was corrected.

    It definitely matters to people who are not already familiar with the phrase, and especially to non-native speakers, whose greatest difficulty with English is the idiom.

    These people effectively lack the error-correction capability that you describe. They have no way to know that "...intensive purposes..." is really a mangled version of "... intents and purposes...". When they read our sloppy writer's text (or need to ask him to repeat himself), the communication fails.

    There is no way for them to figure out the meaning from the written text, and the speaker cannot give the correct meaning because he doesn't know it (he'll have to give a description or some other phrase to convey his meaning).

    So, I suppose that if you speak only to a set of people who are already fully familiar with idiomatic English and context, and can correct errors on the fly, it matters little. But, if you want to talk to people in a larger context, or to write well and avoid unintentionally jarring the reader, it does matter. And of course, it also maters to us pedantic types ;)

    Happy New Year.

    1. Re:So what you are saying is that... by funkhauser · · Score: 1
      You bring up a good point, that these mistakes lead to poor writing. But then, writing style is several hundred years behind actual spoken language anyway.

      As far as restricting idiomatic usage to maximize understanding, this simply guts the richness that make natural language so interesting. You'd end up with something analagous Ogden's Basic English, functional but rather boring.

      Furthermore, just as you say that you shouldn't assume that a someone would know that ...intensive purposes..." is a mangled form of "...intents and purposes...", you can't make the assumption someone would know that "RAM" is an abbreviation for "Random Access Memory" or even what the word "cat" means.

      Natural language isn't static. It evolves, sometimes very quickly, in complex ways. What you have to realize is that formal written language is not a really a natural language and that the spoken language is necessarily chaotic and hard to understand. That's just how language works. The pedantic types hate that. :)

  103. You insensitive clods!!!! by ignavus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I cannot believe that Google, in their review of the year, made such a huge error as the following:

    "The annual Wimbledon tennis tournament takes place at Roland Garros in Paris each spring."

    Umm, folks, the Wimbledon tennis tournament takes place at *Wimbledon* in England. The *French Open* Tennis Tournament is what takes place at Roland Garros in Paris.

    Next they'll be saying that the American Open tennis tournament takes place in London, and the Australian Open in New York.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  104. 2003? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The page shows banned words for 2004. Did anyone notice that, at the bottom of the page, they have a link to submit words for 2003's banned list? I think that university may have stumbled upon the secret to time travel, and have been keeping it cleverly under wraps...until now.

  105. top search term for gnu millennium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the truth. as elusive as it may be, in the cesspool of greed/fear/ego based felonious execrable, that we call corepirate nazi unmerica.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creators.... the enlightening is not frightening.

  106. Happy GNU Year! by rbook · · Score: 1

    This is slashdot -- shouldn't we be saying "Happy GNU Year"? :-)

  107. Definately!! by finelinebob · · Score: 1

    Its gotta be one of the biggest mistakes people make out there. I also hate "needless to say", which means "for anyone of normal intelligence, this is painfully obvious ... so I'd better spell it out for you". That phrase is not unlike an insult, so why use it (unless you want to be insulting)? Their two of the worst ... can't people use the English language anymore? Sheesh!!

    1. Re:Definately!! by sfe_software · · Score: 1

      Their two of the worst ... can't people use the English language anymore? Sheesh!!

      I hope you were going for humor here... ;)

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    2. Re:Definately!! by finelinebob · · Score: 1

      Humor? Nah. Sarcasm? Definately, once again.

  108. The Out/In List by PizzaFace · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not the new year without the Washington Posts's annual list of what's out and what's in for 2004.

  109. hrmmm by WhitehatSystems.com · · Score: 1

    I thought there would have been more porn type words being searched, or was that the Politically correct terms being searched.. I highly doubt Yahoo would post "Young teens and Donkeys" on their criteria though...

  110. Ironic? by slavefishy · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that the Google Zeitgeist used the phrase "Ripped from the headlines", which was amongst the 17 phrases that people would like to see banned?

  111. You can see weekends in the plots! by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 1

    The beauty of the Google Zeitgeist is that you can see weekends! All of their plots show five days of high activity followed by two days of low activity. Look at the congestion plot, for example. I guess people still access the internet from work at lot more than from home.

    --
    On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
  112. Re:"Britney Spears" as most popular Google query.. by danila · · Score: 1

    Install Proxomitron and set it to filter out all tag pairs containing the term you don't like, like <A HREF="...">Britney Spears</A> Be sure to use a RegExp to catch all misppelings as well.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  113. Re:"Britney Spears" as most popular Google query.. by evilviper · · Score: 1

    It's not as bad as you think... You see, most of those Britney Spears searches were accompanied by words like "must die", and "is evil"!

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  114. Re:Oh no. NASCAR is on the Yahoo! top list... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    F1 has far more interesting technology.

    I became slightly interested in F1 for a couple years when Nissan kept winning. They apparently had a HUGE tech edge on everyone else because their cars would come in first and second, one right behind the other, and then third place would come dawdling in many seconds later. Supposedly Nissan had developed an amazing turbocharging system that gave their cars an unbelievable advantage. But instead of spurring the competition to out-tech Nissan what happened? They complained to the F1 powers-that-be and had a new design rule passed that placed a limitation on the size of the air intake-- which hindered the Nissan turbo enough so that others could win. That idiocy put me off pretty much all car racing forever.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  115. Who is Bertrand Cantat? by jfengel · · Score: 1

    Number 4 on the "most popular news searches" is "bertrand cantat". Perhaps my worldview is too limited, but I'm surprised to discover that #4 is somebody I've never heard of.

    Apparently he's a French guy who murdered a French actress. The French must have been searching like crazy for him to bid him up above Korea.

  116. Two Nice Words, In The Wrong Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dislike it very much when anyone says "my bad" after making a mistake. It's so pervasive in pop culture now that we've even heard it on the Simpsons (remember Fat Tony and his cave full of fireworks?). "my bad" is unforgivable when used in speech or print. Instead, one should say "I'm sorry; I've made a mistake" or something similar.

    "my bad" makes you sound like a pre-schooler who hasn't yet grasped the English language.

  117. when they were talking about banning 17 words... by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1

    I thought they meant words like: !@#$, @#%$^, and $#%#$%.
    Of course the words I posted above are subjectively more or less insulting and I know some would have put on the list things such as @#%#, #@%$^@@$, and %(^#^ but slashdots #$^% lameness filter kicked in and would not let me post too many and so I had to make choices. If you think of a word that I should have added to the list and didn't, you can take a plunger and !@#$ ^$#^^3 while you ^%#$^ yourself (or you can post me a reply listing the ones I missed) but really - who gives a (*&^.

    --
    I miss the Karma Whores.
  118. Google's Accuracy is Second to None by Sirch · · Score: 1
    The annual Wimbledon tennis tournament takes place at Roland Garros in Paris each spring.
    Well, they meant well...
  119. Re:More: expressions I hate by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

    Well now you're getting into my pet peeve area: new-agey business-speak.

    "Value-added"
    "Best practices"
    "Lessons learned"

    I just found out that in my home town, there is no longer a police or fire department. Now they are police and fire services. Makes you feel all warm inside, doesn't it?

    I would have to say that pricey organizational seminars are the root of this particular evil.

  120. Re:"Britney Spears" as most popular Google query.. by kfg · · Score: 1

    That doesn't seem to work at the CVS magazine rack.

    KFG

  121. Must we by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

    separate out the wheat from the chaff? Don't we just separate them?

  122. Leverage? by GlasWolf · · Score: 1

    And since when did "leverage" become a verb? What was wrong with "lever"?

  123. LSSU - Hear ye, hear ye by Xconnect · · Score: 0

    (tongue-in-cheek) I'm Harm, so don't you get in my way! 'Nuff said.

    --
    --- root@127.0.0.1
  124. two more by dreadlocks · · Score: 1

    1. Considering the amount of Lego posts, I propose banning "Legos". One sheep, two sheep: one Lego, two Lego. 2. Banning the use of "your" in the wrong context as in: "Your going to like this new programming job in India."

  125. Don't these guys know any history? by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 1

    From the 2004 List of Banished Words:

    SMOKING GUN - Another one that came to us from Iraq, but is widely used elsewhere.

    The term "smoking gun" did not come "to us from Iraq." Please. It is at least as old as the Watergate scandal.

  126. .02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate when people say 'exact, same' or 'same, exact'. "That's the exact, same thing I just did"

  127. Terra... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... is a popular ISP over there....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  128. I just drove through Wimbledon yesterday... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... I kid you not, I did not hear any French spoken.

    Plenty of Punjabi and Pashtun.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  129. Yes, upgrading or degrading? by Presence1 · · Score: 1

    We have indeed arrived at the old question of upgrading in dynamic language, vs the degrading of sloppy language. It may surprise you to hear that I'm actually quite in favor of the dynamic language concept (and wholeheartedly against the French effots to rollback modern/foreign influences on their language). One of my (relatively unsubstantiated) pet theories is that English is becoming the world's de-facto language precisely because England was overrun so many times (Romans, Saxons, Normans, etc.) that the language became very extensible.

    So, how do I find myself arguing on the side of the pedants on this item? It may be partly that I haven't really clearly deliniated the line between changes that enhance the language and changes that degrade it. I'm also not sure that the line will ever be clear, at least not without decades of hindsight.

    Thanks to your discussion, I'm thinking that a first cut at this distinction could be to ask if a particular language change is adding any new clarity, brevity, or expression of a new concept or style. If so, then it is an enhancement and should be welcomed. However, if the change simply loses clarity, blurs discinctions or erases historical context, then it should be considered an error to be corected. Is the speaker rifing, or just being sloppy? Of course, pure examples of each will be rare among the interesting cases, but perhaps this might be a useful rule of thumnb.

    I must say that I'm intrigued by your argument that the changed version of "intents and purposes" is actually a new word or contraction. I'm sot sure I buy it yet ;), but it is interesting.

    So, does this make any sense? Do you have any useful way of making these distinctions, or do you just welcome almost all change? And why?

    1. Re:Yes, upgrading or degrading? by funkhauser · · Score: 1
      First, I think your criteria for choosing between a useful change in language and errors are on the right track. I also totally agree with you about the French efforts.

      I think that a sort of laissez-faire attitude towards language change is the best bet. Sure, some changes are annoying (evidence: yearly Banished Words Lists), but if you think about it, language change as a whole is merely a case of people adapting a tool for specific needs and environments. As important as language is to human beings, it's doubtful that anyone is going to try to subvert language and try to get it to evolve in a self-destructive way, and even more doubtful that they'd be successful. Over the millenia, speech has evolved to suit its users, and I don't think there's any reason to think that this trend is changing our should change.

      Your theory about English becoming a de-facto language because of extensibility is very interesting. It also brought up another question for me: what kind of languages tend to be the most extensible? The two most extensible languages that I'm at least somewhat familiar with are English and Japanese. They're entirely unrelated, but both seem to handle neologisms with ease. Why? Is it the mostly isolating synactic structure? Is it cultural? It's an interesting question.