Slashdot Mirror


AP Article On Cyborg Steve Mann

Vellmont writes "Slashdots favorite Cyborg, University of Toronto Engineering Professor Steve Mann has an AP article about him out. You can read the article on Salon or Yahoo (as well as many other places). The article is well done, and I particularly love Prof. Mann's way of dealing with stores who prohibit videotaping. Slashdot ran a previous story about Prof. Mann's troubles with Airport Security in March 2002."

342 comments

  1. I for one . . . by EmCeeHawking · · Score: 5, Funny

    . . . Welcome our new Steve Mann Cyborg overlords.

    1. Re:I for one . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, just show a Psi Corp badge to him and he'll freak out.

  2. Slashdots Favorite Cyborg? by holzp · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought it was Gates of the Borg?

    1. Re:Slashdots Favorite Cyborg? by iswm · · Score: 1

      We shall be assimilated.. Resistance is futile.

      --
      Buckethead
  3. He should be careful ... by DrJimbo · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the yahoo story: One of his common setups involves a computer with a Pentium 4 processor, at least 512 gigabytes of memory ...

    Someone might mug him to get that 512 gig of memory. Or even just to get the battery needed to power it.
    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
    1. Re:He should be careful ... by Phillup · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A DIMM isn't that small... where do you put >= 512 of them?

      Has to be a typo... probably 512 MB.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    2. Re:He should be careful ... by nnnneedles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm starting to think that these journalists make these factual errors to get peoples attention.

      Have you noticed they always put a much bigger number than it was supposed to be? The error is never a lesser number...

      --
      Will code a sig generator for food
    3. Re:He should be careful ... by anticypher · · Score: 4, Funny

      What about the burn marks from the heat? 512 Gigs of memory would have to dissipate an awful lot of heat, and the body doesn't make that good a conductor.

      Of course, this is /. and we know what the editor meant. 512 bytes of memory and 16 toggle switches :-)

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    4. Re:He should be careful ... by sgifford · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they did, though, he'd have a full record of what the mugger looked like and did, relayed through a wireless network back to another computer.

      I saw this guy at USENIX a few years ago, and he was really interesting to listen to.

    5. Re:He should be careful ... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's running Redhat?

    6. Re:He should be careful ... by Randy+Wang · · Score: 1

      Burn marks? Cool!

      Think about it - if he suddenly gets hideous scarring all over his face, not only would he be a cyborg with an extremely cool-looking camera setup over one eye, but he'd also be hideously disfigured!

      That would get him some serious goth-points...

      --
      --- Egads, I glow in the dark!
    7. Re:He should be careful ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Apparently your humor-processing unit is exceeding its memory requirements.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:He should be careful ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. I'd like to see the video of him getting his ass kicked.

    9. Re:He should be careful ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does he have plans for his video gear on his website? I would like to have something like that.

    10. Re:He should be careful ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but isn't Steve Mann the same guy who hooked seven+ HUGE flash bulbs together?

    11. Re:He should be careful ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are starting to think that? RTFA jokes aside, reading the comments (at -1) is where its at. Media drones are usually completely useless as human beings. Their #1 priority is attracting more readers to their employer, hopefully bringing in more money that eventually makes it to them. Getting the facts right is #2 at best, but i am sure it often comes in lower than that too.

    12. Re:He should be careful ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Have you noticed they always put a much bigger number than it was supposed to be? The error is never a lesser number...

      A few years ago a piece of the space shuttle Challenger washed up on a Florida beach and breifly made the news. CNN showed pictures of a forklift truck carrying away the artifact, while the newsreader talked about the peice being 8 inches by 6 inches.

      I'm guessing that the teleprompter she was reading said 8' by 6' and she got confoozed.

  4. Ummm by clifgriffin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to see a bewolf cluster of...hims.

    1. Re:Ummm by sofakingl · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called the Borg, and you probably don't want to see them (at least not up close).

    2. Re:Ummm by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I'd like to see a bewolf cluster of...hims."

      Your wish is my command.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Ummm by Steve+Newall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is a cluster of borgs^h^h^h^h students at Prof. Mann's ECE1766 course at the University of Toronto. http://wearcam.org/ece1766/class2.jpg

    4. Re:Ummm by Grey+Tomorrow · · Score: 1

      Honestly, the only problems I ever had with the Borg was that their method of bringing people into the collective was not voluntary. Essentially it was a kind of rape. They are primarily computer/logic minded so one can almost see how they would not be able to conceive the wrongness of such an act. If that policy were to change to one of merely asking people to "come in" as it were, and a few aesthetic improvements on their wearables, I myself would be willing to join up. It seems like it'd be cool.

    5. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Honestly, the only problems I ever had with the Borg was that their method of bringing people into the collective was not voluntary.

      True. But think about it, if one got laid, they all got laid.

    6. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean like a cyborg gangbang?

    7. Re:Ummm by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      If that policy were to change to one of merely asking people to "come in" as it were, and a few aesthetic improvements on their wearables, I myself would be willing to join up. It seems like it'd be cool.

      You wouldn't consider the complete lack of privacy and inability to think independently to be just a teensy-weensy disadvantage ?

    8. Re:Ummm by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      The legislative developments won't leave us any reasonable privacy soon anyway. Most of the people are already unable to think independently. At least Borgs never feel lonely. (...and think about the firepower!)

  5. Eeeegads! by BoldAC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...so much so that going without the apparatus often leaves him feeling nauseous, unsteady, naked

    This is the way I feel too sometimes... if I forget to leave my pager, cell phone, lap-top, sidekick, and laptop behind...

    Honestly though, this guy is addicted to information. If you tried to take google away from me, I would feel the same way. Information is addicted... there's no way around it.

    AC

    1. Re:Eeeegads! by saunabad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Honestly though, this guy is addicted to information.

      I think this guy is more addicted to publicity than information. I've seen many articles of him, but I still have no idea if he has actually accomplished anything else than just to wear a computer and a camera all the time. No offence to anyone, but what is the point?

    2. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this guy is more addicted to publicity than information. I've seen many articles of him, but I still have no idea if he has actually accomplished anything else than just to wear a computer and a camera all the time. No offence to anyone, but what is the point?

      You don't seem very familiar with the academic world and the gigantic egos (some of them well-deserved) that many professors have.

      Publish or Perish.

    3. Re:Eeeegads! by Yorrike · · Score: 1
      ...so much so that going without the apparatus often leaves him feeling nauseous, unsteady, naked

      That's how I feel when I forget to get dressed in the morning.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    4. Re:Eeeegads! by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I agree.

      I was at the Toronto Film Festival a few years ago and they'd done a film about him (here)

      We walked out on that film. What made the hour we sat in that theatre more offensive than interesting was that this guy wore his gear around, really had no idea what to do with it, and had a huge ego because he had toys on his head that other people didn't. It wasen't that it was a hobby: cool, but possibly inapplicable to real life, but that he thought he was onto something important and he wasen't. I mean, he'd walk into a WalMart and set up a fuss when they told him no cameras in the store.

      Why the university keeps him on I have no idea. If someone can tell me, I'd like to know (seriously, I would like to know).

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    5. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does seem to have become a bit of a git as he's aged.

      However, the camera thing is one of his most *applicable* points. He's paving the way for the civil liberties of *everyone else* with an omnipresent camera... and millions of cellphone owners are going to be there with the next upgrade.

      Now, say, for instance, there's a shooting in that crowded Wal-Mart, someone decides to fly a plane into it, or a disgruntled clerk punches an elderly woman in the face.

      Would you feel better with half the people around ready and able to snap photos of the incident, or with everyone Obeying Company Policy?

      His "weak, nauseous" etc. act with Air Canada was a bit lamer, but apparently many Canadians have a bone to pick with their security practices, and given stories on Slashdot, apparently it *is* becoming harder to travel with a legitimate medical apparatus. (CPAPs were mentioned a lot; imagine the trouble someone with a cochlear implant or anti-epileptic 'pacemaker' must have.)

    6. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As addendum to that, Warwick is just a charlatan with a pet-tracking chip in his arm. (No more or less adventurous than any of the folk on http://www.bmezine.com/, and we don't give the average body-piercer tenure for the sport of it.)

      Brits have an even lower standard of proof for their mad scientists. ;)

    7. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er, if you forget to leave them behind??

    8. Re:Eeeegads! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Like one of the other posters said, he does appear to have become a little more... pedantic(?) with age. But to be fair, I think this is one of the possible problems with people who are heavily involved with computing.

      I've found myself having a greater amount of trouble interacting and dealing with other people as I've become more and more entrenched in computing. I spend about 12-20 hours a day using computers. Whether it's at work (about 7.5 hours spent there. I don't even go out for lunch anymore.) at home (multiple projects going on here with my systems) or at friends and relatives homes (fixing problems or connecting them to my network via VPN). My general day starts at 8:00AM and ends at about 3:00/4:00AM every day with about 95% of it spent in front of computers.

      The funny thing is that I find myslef becoming so annoyed with people when they claim to know something about computers, but in the end they only know a little bit about one aspect (web design, hardware, specific lnaguages, etc...). What's really funny is that I am completely aware of the fact that I have (in psychology more than anything else) become the "Unix guy". When I first started working with PCs back in the late 90s, I ran into a few "Unix guys" (which Mann seems to be one of) and they annoyed the piss out of me. They seemed arrogant, impatient and generally unpleasant. I never really understood why. (This was also back when I thought Unix was dying) But after getting annoyed with Windows and moving to Linux, and then working with Sun Solaris, Tru64 and HP-UX... well, I started to see a lot of those traits just naturally manifesting themselves within me. I still work hard to maintain a pleasant personality and I don't wear suspenders or have any facial hair, so I'm not 100% the "Unix guy". But I can now understand their frustrations. Here is the key issue: (Note this in your memory banks for future use in arguments) Many of the concepts of Unix are basic computing concepts applicable to ALL platforms that people on ANY platform SHOULD be made aware of IF they really want to know how to use a computer. The frustration of the "Unix guy" is much like that of the parent that has to deal with the 16 year old who just got a driver's license and now thinks they actually know how to drive. (I'm not saying that all users of other platforms are like this, but many are. I've met plenty of really great Windows admins on the net who know as much about basic computing concepts as any other Unix guy.)

      So... I think that Mann's experience is very similar with regard to his take on the world. He's moved ahead in a way. Concepts that are basic to him, are esoteric to the world at large. However, his concepts are a set of meta-realities that many of us have not fully experienced. I will argue that some of us are halfway there though. Just yesterday when I was talking to my wife about my lifelong love of machines over humans, I mentioned to her that to me a computer is an extension of the physical world. Back when I was in high school (1980s) I became instantly aware of how I could move much of what I had in the real world into the computer. That continues to my homelife today. All of my computers here at home are networked and any one of them serves as a head for all the others. I've eliminated cassettes, video tapes, audio cds and dvds from my visible life by keeping them only for backup purposes. They take up less space when they needn't be displayed. Instead, all of my important data is on the home application/file server. I am also slowly moving to a point where the majority of the CPU power will be centralized in a cluster with only a few wireless terminals needed around the house. Ideally one or more of those terminals will be wearable. At that point, the need for much in the way of physical items becomes less useful. What need is there for a television, when I can look anywhere in front of me an watch a movie while surrounded with data that constantly keeps me informed of all things that are per

    9. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear ya. I find it helps to remember when I was an enthusiastic windows user back in undergrad days. I used to ride the bus occasionally with a computer science student to whom I would extol the virtues of windows. She used NExT. I only hope I can manage now some of the same patience and grace.

    10. Re:Eeeegads! by saunabad · · Score: 1

      You don't seem very familiar with the academic world and the gigantic egos (some of them well-deserved) that many professors have.

      I am familiar to the academic world, to a some point yes. And where I've been studying/working, professors are usually doing something called research, even if they are otherwise complete nutcases.

      Publish or Perish.

      Yes, and that means they should do scientific publications. There have been no mention of such in these articles I've seen written about this guy.

    11. Re:Eeeegads! by gujo-odori · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think this guy is more addicted to publicity than information

      Uh, yeah, I'd say. My favorite line from the article comes from the description of him starting to experiment with wearable computers in the 1970s, where it says "He wore one to a high school dance." I bet he was real popular with the ladies. No doubt he was noticed, though.

    12. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know... there might actually be more to life than being popular with the ladies. And in Mr. Mann's case, I'm betting he's fairly popular with his wife-- or at least was at one point (enough so that she would marry him). I think you do geeks and women a disservice by assuming that women and geeky tech don't mix.

    13. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a thought: the fact that you are impatient etc etc with others wouldnt by chance have anything to do with sleep deprivation? I mean sleeping 3-4 hours every day does have that effect on people. Not to mention the lack of sex!

    14. Re:Eeeegads! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Actually it'll be more interesting if he was running a wearable _server_ biased towards communication (what they do seems biased towards reinterpretation of the real world). e.g. DB backed https webserver+ multimedia streaming server.

      That way he can selectively allow others to share some of his electronic memories, view his "face page", stream his current video/audio input and so on.

      Virtual telepathy of a sort.

      Virtual telekinesis would be browsing a room server and turning things on/off or changing settings.

      Optionally add in the thought recognition stuff that has successfully worked with apes, monkeys and rats.

      --
    15. Re:Eeeegads! by Dr.+Blue · · Score: 1
      Why the university keeps him on I have no idea.

      I think the guy's wacky, but I also think he fills an incredibly useful role. There are some people out there that take things to an extreme -- way across the boundaries of what most people would consider reasonable. Are we all going to be Steve Manns? No, but by pushing things to extremes he might (and probably will) stumble across some things that really are useful to people.

      As another example (since this is Slashdot), think of Richard Stallman. Very few people completely buy into his extremist positions -- but there are excellent nuggets here and there that have evolved into some fantastic results. I don't think someone would have had near the same success pushing only the mainstream ideas that became "a hit."

    16. Re:Eeeegads! by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Man, I'd be so lost without my sidekick.. Just picked one up a couple weeks ago and am already realizing that until another network in my area picks up the phone that I'm stuck with T-Mobile for the rest of my life (or until something better comes out) :P

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    17. Re:Eeeegads! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about sleeping? :P The remaining 3-4 hours are usually evenly split between sex and sleep.

    18. Re:Eeeegads! by Orion442 · · Score: 0

      My favorite line from the article comes from the description of him starting to experiment with wearable computers in the 1970s

      aka Tin Foil Hats

    19. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the university keeps him on I have no idea.

      In additoin to "being" a cyborg, he is also a professor. I know he sometimes teaches an undergrad course on digital signal processing, and of course a 4th-year undergrad/1st-year grad course called "Personal Cybernetics and Intelligent Imaging Systems". Obviously he's heavily focused on wearable computing, but part of that includes active research in the image processing field. So, sure, he's a bit of a quirky character, but he teaches and does publishable research, and that's what university professors are supposed to do. You can go to his homepage and click on the "research papers" and "textbooks" links to get a better idea of his research area.

    20. Re:Eeeegads! by PacoTaco · · Score: 1
      Just yesterday when I was talking to my wife about my lifelong love of machines over humans

      Ten bucks says your wife is cheating on you.

    21. Re:Eeeegads! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      You lose. How can she be cheating if we have an agreement that we can sleep around?

    22. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not computers you are absorbed with.

      It's yourself.

      How long do you think you'd live if the civilization you so
      obliviously depend on collapsed ?

      I'd give you 2 weeks at the outside. In the mean time, try being grateful to those who came before you, like Sir Issac Newton ( before whose intellect yours would shrivel ) was :
      "If I have seen further, it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants" - Newton.

      As a last word : try volunteering at a homeless shelter. You might be surprised and changed by the experience.

    23. Re:Eeeegads! by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      You won't believe how much you are able to improvise when you are intimately familiar with elementary physics. Couple bits of chemistry, geology and biology sprinkled over physics can nicely boost your survival abilities. Technical skills then come to use for salvaging whatever left from the pre-collapse civilization.
      Don't underestimate the techies. You may happen to need them.

    24. Re:Eeeegads! by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Wearing a portable computer to a high school dance is not just geeky, it's fucking weird. I'm the same as Mann, so I can tell you what a freak people would have considered anybody who showed up at a high school dance wearing a portable computer. He's lucky he didn't get beat up. But then, we don't know that he didn't.

      Like many of us here on /. I was a computer nerd in school too, and I can tell you that it wasn't exactly a chick magnet :-) One of the things that distinguished the school computer club is that all of the members were guys. Girls were allowed - heck, they would have been really, really welcome! - but they just weren't interested. Things are better now, and that's good, but even know most of the IT department where I work is male.

      I thought marrying a geek girl would be great, but there are so few out there that I eventually didn't. My wife is terrific, and has a higher IQ than mine easily, but she neither knows nor cares much about computers. She just wants them to work.

    25. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did I say anywhere above that *I* am better than anyone else? Hmmm? Did I? If so, point it out because I don't see it.

      I know I'm not full of myself because I realize there are people far more intelligent than I am. But, I will say that people like Mann are today's equivalent of the Wright Brothers. People thought they were weird and crackpottish back then when they were attempting to make a flying machine. But now millions of people get in those "flying contraptions" and travel the world with no one thinking ill of them. Someday, Mann's work (and those like him) will be seen in a very similar light.

      Just because you can't understand just how important he is, doesn't give you license to be a prick. In short... fuck yourself bitch. Your a twatflap for trying to discount some important concepts.

    26. Re:Eeeegads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She used NExT?!?! Why did you let her get away!! Can I have her number?!?!

  6. Kevin Warwick? by TehHustler · · Score: 0

    I always thought Kevin Warwick, AKA Captain Cyborg, was everyone's favourite cyborg. http://www.kevinwarwick.org.uk/ TheRegister also insult... er i mean do stories on him.

    --

    TheHustler
    http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
    http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    1. Re:Kevin Warwick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They are both frauds of the same magnitude...
      odd that they have so much in common.

  7. Internet Link by vpscolo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing that I think most people would benefit from is a link to the net, or prehaps better a secure enclopedia. How many times have you thought "I must look up xys" and then forgot. To just have that information at your fingertips would be excellent. However of course it depends on how deep it all llinks in. The last thing you want is a hacker breaking into your brain and controlling you. An army of zombies? No thankyou Rus

    1. Re:Internet Link by Flower · · Score: 1
      How about an always-on spellchecker? /. would never be the same.

      On a more serious note, I could see such technology being of use translating languages. Imagine being in Kyoto and having your eyewear being able to highlight where the bathroom was or being able to take a screenshot of the airport name so you don't forget. I'm not saying it would do anything complex but even simple survival translations would be cool.

      Hell, it might even take the risk out of using the toilets.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    2. Re:Internet Link by gaijin99 · · Score: 1
      The last thing you want is a hacker breaking into your brain and controlling you.
      Read "Ghost in the Shell" (both 1 and 2) by Shirow Masamune, its one of his key plot points. He does a pretty good job of showing a cybernetically integrated society, and the potential drawbacks to cyborging. In addition his art is very good. See a preview here of GitS 2. He's really gotten into using his Mac for 3d imaging and shading lately, he's one of the few artists I've seen who manages to pull it off without looking like he's got 2d drawings badly pasted onto 3d backgrounds. Dunno how he manages that.

      Of course, if manga isn't your thing I guess Shirow wouldn't be much fun to read.

      --
      "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
    3. Re:Internet Link by bishop32x · · Score: 1

      The last thing you want is a hacker breaking into your brain and controlling you why would you need a computer, when you can hack into the root of the brian with a) a virulent proto diease or b) a collection of ancient summarian monosyllabic words...

    4. Re:Internet Link by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Because many years ago his backgrounder got sick and he was forced to do his own backgrounds, unlike most Japanese manga artists. He loved the ability to control the artwork and stopped using stipples (the "rub on dots") and became renown for his intricate backgrounds and how well everything fit together.

      His productivity also dropped *way* down and he puts out a fraction of the works of other artists. But he can get away with it because his work is so good it really stands out. Check out the various Appleseed graphic novels available in the US. (I'll describe them by memory, so I may be off, but the general trend is there...) Volume one is with a background artist. Notice the backgrounds are pretty standard and use quite a bit of drop in stippling. Volume two is when he first started doing his own backgrounds. Notice the way perspectives have started changing and the distinctive "gloopy" organtic look to architecture? Volume three shows his background work has become part of the focus. The backgrounds carry mood and are full of very very fine detail and sometimes subtle plotlines of their own. Plus works like GitS have MAD Magazine style characters walking on the frames cracking jokes and pointing out extra details (like the commentary track on a DVD).

      I'm not a tremendous fan of anime or manga (not for the sake of them just being from Japan, at any rate), but Shirow does do good work. It's a shame that very few of the animated works based on his stories carry the humor and depth his written works do.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:Internet Link by pantherace · · Score: 1

      Use Konqueror :) 3.2 betas or cvs and it will spell check. Translation is just a pull down menu away.

  8. Not a cyborg. by praksys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's not a cyborg, unless some of this hardware actually involved surgery or the replacement of biological parts. He's a gargoyle.

    1. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's a nerd.

      I kid! I kid.

      No, really. A nerd.

      Anonymous Joe

    2. Re:Not a cyborg. by Poeir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But according to this article, linked to in the summary, some of it is implants, so he is a cyborg.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    3. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He has no implants at all, he is not a cyborg, trust me I worked for him.

    4. Re:Not a cyborg. by praksys · · Score: 2, Informative
      But according to this article, linked to in the summary, some of it is implants, so he is a cyborg.

      According to the slashdot summary maybe, but there was no mention of implants in the orginal NYT article.

      You can't get it from the NYT without paying now, so here is the original text:

      STEVE MANN, an engineering professor at the University of Toronto, has lived as a cyborg for more than 20 years, wearing a web of wires, computers and electronic sensors that are designed to augment his memory, enhance his vision and keep tabs on his vital signs. Although his wearable computer system sometimes elicited stares, he never encountered any problems going through the security gates at airports.

      Last month that changed. Before boarding a Toronto-bound plane at St. John's International Airport in Newfoundland, Dr. Mann says, he went through a three-day ordeal in which he was ultimately strip-searched and injured by security personnel. During the incident, he said, $56,800 worth of his $500,000 equipment was lost or damaged beyond repair, including the eyeglasses that serve as his display screen.

      His lawyer in Toronto, Gary Neinstein, sent letters two weeks ago to Air Canada, the airport and the Canadian transportation authority arguing that they acted negligently and seeking reimbursement for the damaged equipment so that Dr. Mann could put his wearable computer back together again.

      The difficulties that Dr. Mann faced seem related to the tightening of security in airports since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11. But he had flown from Toronto to St. John's two days earlier without a hitch.

      On that day, Feb. 16, he said, he followed the routine he has used on previous flights. He told the security guards in Toronto that he had already notified the airline about his equipment. He showed them documentation, some of it signed by his doctor, that described the wires and glasses, which he wears every waking minute as part of his internationally renowned research on wearable computers.

      He also asked for permission not to put his computer through the X-ray machine because the device is more sensitive than a laptop. He said that the guards examined his equipment and allowed him to board the flight.

      But when he tried to board his return flight on Feb. 18, his experience was entirely different. This time, he said, he was told to turn his computer on and off and put it on the X-ray machine. He took his case to Neil Campbell, Air Canada's customer service manager at the St. John's airport, and spent the next two days arranging conversations between his university colleagues and the airline.

      The security guards continued to require that he turn his machine on and off and put it through the X-ray machine while also tugging on his wires and electrodes, he said. Still not satisfied, the guards took him to a private room for a strip-search in which, he said, the electrodes were torn from his skin, causing bleeding, and several pieces of equipment were strewn about the room.

      Once his system was turned off, turned on again, X-rayed and dismantled, Dr. Mann passed the security check. When he was finally allowed to go home, some pieces of equipment were not returned to him, he said, and his glasses were put in the plane's baggage compartment although he warned that cold temperatures there could ruin them.

      Without a fully functional system, he said, he found it difficult to navigate normally. He said he fell at least twice in the airport, once passing out after hitting his head on what he described as a pile of fire extinguishers in his way. He boarded the plane in a wheelchair.

      "I felt dizzy and disoriented and went downhill from there," he said.

      Air Canada said that there was no record that any of Dr. Mann's baggage had been lost and that the Canadian transportation agency, Transport Canada, had required that his belongings be X-rayed. "We don't tell the security firms that there is going to be an exception made

    5. Re:Not a cyborg. by Poeir · · Score: 1

      Also, from reading the comments in the previous story, they're just electrodes. Don't know if that counts or not.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    6. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is god. Kill yourself. Trust me.

    7. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      trust me I worked for him

      So sayeth AC. Note to mods: an AC needs a lot more than an unsubstantiated claim to be informative.

    8. Re:Not a cyborg. by wfberg · · Score: 1

      He's not a cyborg, unless some of this hardware actually involved surgery or the replacement of biological parts.

      I kinda like thinking I'm a cyborg because of my contact lenses. And watch and mobile phone attached to me..

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    9. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about people with pacemakers? Prosthetic limbs? Are they cyborgs too?

    10. Re:Not a cyborg. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      From what I've read of him, I think the proper term is "Idjit".

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/329 91 .html
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archiv e/27003 .html
      http://www.getreading.co.uk/story.asp?intid =4598

      For all your Captain Cyborg crap
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/cgi-bin/dispatc her.cg i?action=search&search=captain%20cyborg

    11. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you are not that far off if you think about it.

      I'm wireless, connected to the net, get email, take pictures, capture video, and do a small bit of computing all through a miniature device called a "cell phone". I can even interface directly by wiring it to myself through my ear. Some run Linux and they too are getting smaller and smaller.

      Steve Mann? I guess he just likes to do it the hard way.

    12. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the sound of it all, I'd just say he's a goof and leave it at that.

    13. Re:Not a cyborg. by jellybear · · Score: 1

      So he just lies about it to get laid? How sad

    14. Re:Not a cyborg. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      So the question is then, when do WE get implants. I know there's people on here who want nothing to do with them, but I'm all for wiring myself up.

      Are there any available consumer cybernetics available yet? How about a bioluminescent, subdermal watch? Also, when am I going to be able to go out and buy off the shelf parts to put together my own Gargoyle suit?

      Geek though I may be, I still don't have the technical knowledge to put this stuff all together by myself, but am very fascinated by it.

      Anybody have any info on when consumer wearable computing might become reality?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    15. Re:Not a cyborg. by LauraScudder · · Score: 1

      I was wondering what kind of tugging they were doing to rip the electrodes out and cause bleeding. The way I picture the situation, that was either an exaggeration or maliciousness on the part of the guys doing the search. I'd probably be pretty frustrated with this guy, too, at that point, but it does seem pretty silly considering the fact that my step-dad had a metal pump implanted in his abdomen and got through airports just fine with a doctor's note. It's not like he's the only guy in the world with metal inside him. Seems like he just made a big fuss over the computer.

    16. Re:Not a cyborg. by LauraScudder · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that company VeriChip already sell implants to track your kids in case of kidnapping? I wonder if those set off the post-9-11 extra-sensitive metal detectors. Wouldn't that be an unpleasant surprise later? Sorry, can't get on the plane with Mommy honey, because Mommy is paranoid that someone will take you from her.

    17. Re:Not a cyborg. by webloser · · Score: 1

      you mean this article I can't get without paying?

    18. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the question is then, when do WE get implants.

      Depends what country you're living in. I don't see it happening in the US untill far after we're all dead. The higher ups are freaked up by same sex marriage, there's no way they're going to let something as unnatural as recreational electronic implants go through.

    19. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad only if it dosn't work.

    20. Re:Not a cyborg. by kungfuBreaks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're thinking of Kevin "Captain Cyborg" Warwick, a University of Reading (UK) professor. Steve Mann is at UofT (Toronto, Canada). Mann actually does quite a bit of legitimate research in wearable computing (not implants!), but he certainly enjoys the media attention ("Ooh! A cyborg!"). Personally, I find the way he roams the halls of the Sanford Fleming building late at night dressed in all black rather creepy.

    21. Re:Not a cyborg. by CoolVibe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's like the old saying:

      "External augmentation does not a cyborg make"

      Or something of that ilk. You figure it out :)

    22. Re:Not a cyborg. by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of the term. This from the American Heritage Dictionary:

      "A human who has certain physiological processes aided or controlled by mechanical or electronic devices."

      Requiring that the electronics be implanted doesn't seem to be a requirement.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    23. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, and I'd wanted a cybernetic prostate!

      -- vranash

    24. Re:Not a cyborg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you get when you hit that link, but I get an abstract and a bunch of links that let me buy the whole article.

  9. Is he - by ir0b0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    - linked to the net through his gear? I couldn't tell from the story.

    --
    I'm laughing at clouds.
    1. Re:Is he - by Cska+Sofia · · Score: 1
      Depending on where he's going, Mann carries a few different wireless transmitters so he can connect to whatever kind of network -- Wi-Fi, cellular, old-fashioned radio -- happens to be available.
  10. Can't be bothered to read the article? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Video quote:

    "Then he tells the employees that "HIS manager" makes him film public places for HIS security -- how does he know, he tells them, that the fire exits aren't chained shut? -- and that they'll have to talk to HIS manager."

    Of course if he does that in a cinema he will be arrested and sent to a state pen where he will become even more attached (ouch) to his wearable computer thanks to the resident cybernetic surgeon, Joe 'Two Teeth' Bob.

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Can't be bothered to read the article? by mondoterrifico · · Score: 2

      No since he lives in Canada. But since you didn't read the article you wouldn't know this... and I forget why it is pressing that i tell you this.
      Hopefully we in Canada can become some sort of pirate nation. AYe matey. but i digress.

    2. Re:Can't be bothered to read the article? by damiam · · Score: 1

      Cinemas generally don't have security camera in them (at least, genberally not that I've seen). So, he couldn't pull that particular trick.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Can't be bothered to read the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But since you didn't read the article you wouldn't know this

      Uh...he quoted part of the article directly.

    4. Re:Can't be bothered to read the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I quote Aristotle all the time. But read him? Who's got the time?

  11. computers as mental extensions and I"P". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ya see, this is why us hackers (in the original "total freedom of information" sense) taking the long view are so totally opposed to intellectual "property".

    When the computer is so tightly integrated with your mind that it's effectively become a part of you, intellectual "property" law enforcement amounts to thought crime enforcement. And DRM is mind control. Just plain evil.

    The right to know should be a basic human right. The right to say should be a basic human right. And if human is expanded to man-machine, that should apply to our computers too.

    So, WAKE UP. Fight for your right to know. Do NOT hand people power to "own" YOUR copy of some information just because it's like THEIR copy. THEIR copy is NOT DIMINISHED by your having a copy.

    It's NOT WRONG to copy information, any information. Let no person, natural or legal, tell you it is.

    1. Re:computers as mental extensions and I"P". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll. Or are you really that stupid?

    2. Re:computers as mental extensions and I"P". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is why us hackers (in the original "total freedom of information" sense)

      No, that is the second generation hacker mindset. Check out Steven Levy's "Hackers".

    3. Re:computers as mental extensions and I"P". by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      This is probably a troll, but to be honest it got me thinking about two things. First, you're taking a slippery slope view of the IP "problem". The computer is, at this point, not integrated with the mind, and probably won't be within our lifetime. And, AFAIK, until the Supreme Court says that copying, sharing, and distributing music files is legal, it remains nominally illegal in the U.S. Moral is another story, but it is as of yet illegal. I don't expect a ruling on this in my lifetime, either.

      However the way things are going necessitates a paradigm shift. I agree somewhat that there's nothing wrong with digitally replicating a work-- everybody wins, more or less (at least, everyone who I feel is entitled to win from such a transaction-- the artist wins because word of mouth will lead to more sales, etc., etc.; we've done that argument to death). However to do so in a one-sided manner (aka leeching) is wrong. You're sucking up another's bandwidth and offering nothing in return. Rather than charging for the right to "own" the music, why not charge for the right to download it from the server or provider? On a peer-to-peer network, shut down anyone who's used the service for >x days and still isn't sharing >y percent of what they downloaded, so that they can repay the community. On a one-way network (like MP3.com (ha ha)), a charge of maybe z cents per song for bandwidth and operating costs plus w cents going to the artist. Popular downloads could even drop the bandwidth charge and offer "you may also like these artists" songs at normal prices on the same page.

      Of course, this doesn't seem likely until the aforementioned ruling happens. But it should.

      On a related note, I'd love to see two studies on how much it REALLY costs to make a CD-- one by an independent source and one published by a record label. Comparing the two might be an interesting project for an economist (which I sadly am not).

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    4. Re:computers as mental extensions and I"P". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, these ideas have been discussed in
      http://wearcam.org/therighttothink.htm.

    5. Re:computers as mental extensions and I"P". by aduzik · · Score: 1
      Very well. Collect all the information you please. Go pick it from the tree you think it grows on. Intellectual property isn't free precisely because it wasn't free to produce. Intellectual property is property like any other precisely because it is the result of labor. If I build a house, or make a pie, or a cup of coffee, that thing is *mine* because I owned the materials and provided the labor.

      Yes, information can be easily copied, but you do diminish my copy by taking yours. You took your copy without my permission. Are you saying you should have access to my credit card number? It's information, and should be totally free! So, your argument implies this: it's my responsibility to produce information for your benefit, and that I have no right to control what I've produced. I have no right to determine what is done with my work. What you're saying is that your unsatiable desire for information -- whether you need it or not -- is more important than my being compensated for producing it.

      Here's some free information for you. They have a word for this. It's called SLAVERY. By what right do you deserve my information? It's *mine." If I had never come along and produced it, you wouldn't have it. It wouldn't exist. I demand, not just credit and recognition, but payment. And I have every right to demand it.

      If I ever live in a world where this becomes legally acceptable, I would refuse to do any work. I won't work for the benefit of a thief like you. And don't give me any socialistic bullshit about everyone helping everyone. Even on P2P networks there are "seeders" and there are "leechers". Even the people with no regard for intellectual property don't play fair.

      Let me put it to you plainly: either we deal with each other through money, or at the point of a gun. There is no other choice. Either we trade by mutual consent, or through coercion and force. But you'll find that when you trade by force, that the producers no longer feel any desire to produce for you. If you need proof, take a peek at any communist country. You want thought policing? Free information at any price is tantamount to thought policing -- after all, all that information that goes against free information must be controlled. We wouldn't want the huddled masses to get the wrong idea about intellectual property. Here's the deal: just because it sounds good doesn't mean it works.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    6. Re:computers as mental extensions and I"P". by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Property rights are a social convention, whose definition is dependent on the norms of the society. This is especially true for abstract forms of property. Current law is supposed to reward creativity and ingenuity, not the simple application of labor.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    7. Re:computers as mental extensions and I"P". by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      And, AFAIK, until the Supreme Court says that copying, sharing, and distributing music files is legal, it remains nominally illegal in the U.S.

      I'd like to point out here that it *is* legal to copy, share and distribute music, music files and CDs. I'd love an RIAA summons so I could tell 'em that my music is mine to do with as I like; they don't own music in the US, just some recordings thereof. Music itself is still free (as in Freedom).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  12. Yeah, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think we all know the REAL reason this guy is becoming a cyborg. I think this is all I need to say: GO GO GADGET PENIS!

    1. Re:Yeah, yeah. by Grey+Tomorrow · · Score: 1

      On behalf of the Slashdot community, I would like to ask "What for is this Penis you speak of?"

    2. Re:Yeah, yeah. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "I think this is all I need to say: GO GO GADGET PENIS!"

      Kind of off-topic, but I couldn't help remember a Shadowrun character I used to play with my friends. He was a dwarf rigger, who lacked any cybernetics (in a campaign full of cyber-munchkins) whatsoever except for a massive hydraulic um.....cybernetic appendage.

      Third leg was an understatement.

      It did 12S water damage, and I've never seen an elven prostitute run screaming in fear like that in all my gaming experience.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Yeah, yeah. by bishop32x · · Score: 1

      cyber penis? Pshh

      he has 24/7 pr0n, where ever, when ever, with 512 Gb of storage...

    4. Re:Yeah, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's sad is that the first people to have these will also have absolutly no use for them. Not counting hookers and realdolls.

    5. Re:Yeah, yeah. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Your .sig has never been more appropriate, I am sure. :)

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  13. More Advanced Than I Thought! by jheinen · · Score: 2, Funny

    "One of his common setups involves a computer with a Pentium 4 processor, at least 512 gigabytes of memory and a specialized operating system based on Linux"

    Wow. Where can I get a box like that that fits under my sweater?

    --
    -Vercingetorix
    "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    1. Re:More Advanced Than I Thought! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Users advanced several theories about that typo in replies to this comment. Hint 1: Fill a vest with iPods.

  14. Yahoo's editor is on loan from /. by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

    "One of his common setups involves a computer with a Pentium 4 processor, at least 512 gigabytes of memory and..."

    512 gig of memory eh? It's not likley to even have that much disk space.

    Mind you, fitting enough power to run that puppy into a wearable PC isn't exactly a minor engineering challenge, it must still be pretty heavy.

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Yahoo's editor is on loan from /. by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's not likley to even have that much disk space.

      How big is the drive in a 40 GB iPod audio player? How big would 13 of those drives be?

    2. Re:Yahoo's editor is on loan from /. by damiam · · Score: 1

      That's not even the best solution. He could easily carry around a could 250GB 3.5" disks. However, there's no reason he'd need all of that, and it can't be very good for drive reliability to be jostled around all day (the iPod drive is rarely spun up during use, generally the iPod plays from a RAM buffer).

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Yahoo's editor is on loan from /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, iPods don't use RAM.

    4. Re:Yahoo's editor is on loan from /. by tepples · · Score: 1

      iPods don't use RAM.

      I know that iPod players store data on hard drives, and I suppressed the premiss because I thought it obvious to the audience. And yes, iPod players do use RAM to buffer an entire song at a time so that they don't have to spin up their hard drives as often. But I mentioned drives used in iPod players, which their makers supposedly make available to embedded system builders other than Apple Computer.

      Did the article specifically mention that the 512 GB referred to "RAM" (that is, volatile solid-state memory technologies)?

  15. nauseous side effects? by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mann, a 41-year-old engineering professor at the University of Toronto, spends hours every day viewing the world through that little monitor in front of his eye -- so much so that going without the apparatus often leaves him feeling nauseous, unsteady, naked.

    I think it's called anxiety. I get it alot when i'm away from my computer, I don't have that clickly click click of the keyboard (it's bordering on OCD now)

    I would also think the nauseous side effects he's experiencing when he takes his headgear off might be what I suffer from too. I think my eyes are used to focusing on my CRT a foot away from my eyes since i'm in front of the PC so much. Also my cochlea in my ear is used to my head not moving so much. When I go outside I get the double whammy of viewing objects that are not in my average focus, and i'm moving around.

    1. Re:nauseous side effects? by KrispyKringle · · Score: 3, Interesting
      That doesn't make much sense. By that logic, people who spend a lot of time reading books would have the same issues.

      I would guess his issue is actually that he's become used to focusing his eyes on a screen in front of him when moving around. Ordinarily, feeling motion when not seeing it causes nausia (such as when sitting in a bus or train where there is no visible motion but your inner-ear can feel the motion. This is because (I remember hearing on the Discovery Channel or somesuch) that situation--feeling but not seeing motion--is a symptom of some poisons and your body has evolved to heave up the toxins.

      Anyway, in his case, he has become used to seeing something always in front of his eyes which is not moving, even when walking about. Perhaps the rapid motion of the world around him, when he isn't wearing his glasses, makes him nauseous? Then again, you'd think you'd see this with people who wear glasses, too, when they remove them (I just got a prescription for farsightedness--guess I'm getting old--so I'll be able to tell you shortly).

      Either that or he's just a kook.

    2. Re:nauseous side effects? by t0qer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      By that logic, people who spend a lot of time reading books would have the same issues.

      Book reading isn't nearly as monotonous to your body as sitting in front of a CRT though. A book you can change its viewing distance by extending your hands, the light is reflected off the pages wheras a CRT the light is being emitted from the screen itself.

      Books can be read in front of a nice warm fire on a cozy couch. They can be taken to your bathroom for a good read during a nice long sit down.

      CRT's have refresh rates. Maybe high refresh rates have an undocumented side effect (we all know low refresh rates leads to headaches) Books refresh in realtime, at the maximum rate our eyes can see the text.

      A book is waaaay more relaxing to your body than the computer is.

    3. Re:nauseous side effects? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      "I think it's called anxiety. I get it alot when i'm away from my computer, I don't have that clickly click click of the keyboard"

      You're not alone. I've absolutely GOT to have access to a computer, even if I don't actually use it, or I start to feel really nervous.

      I'm at the point where if I'm going away for more than a few hours I take my Zaurus and a foldable IRDA keyboard with me. 99% of the time I don't even use it... just knowing that I could...

    4. Re:nauseous side effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can be taken to your bathroom for a good read during a nice long sit down.

      If you have any tendency toward hemorrhoids, throne-reading is not a good habit to get into.

    5. Re:nauseous side effects? by LauraScudder · · Score: 1

      My Mom got bifocal contacts (one lens for near, one for far), and she gets headaches and nausea when she switches between those and her normal bifocal glasses simply from her brain having to readjust to which eye to use for certain tasks. When she puts her glasses on, her brain is still trying to sample one eye for near and one for far when it no longer works that way and vice versa.

      Compound that with the motion (the other stuff he projects onto his screen is no longer floating over the real world image) and I guess that could be pretty miserable.

    6. Re:nauseous side effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I would also think the nauseous side effects he's experiencing when he takes his headgear off might be what I suffer from too. I think my eyes are used to focusing on my CRT a foot away from my eyes since i'm in front of the PC so much."

      I hear ya, brother. People say 'doesn't it hurt your eyes to be on the computer so much? I can't take more than a couple of hours'. Uh, no, seems pretty normal to me.

      "Also my cochlea in my ear is used to my head not moving so much. When I go outside I get the double whammy of viewing objects that are not in my average focus, and i'm moving around."

      But the 3D of reality can be totally amazing! Blows away anything I've seen on the computer. And Nature can get away with so much! A sunset that would look cheezy in any artificial rendering looks stunning in reality, absolutely credible.

    7. Re:nauseous side effects? by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's cochlear offset from the added weight on one side of his head... not visual fixation.

    8. Re:nauseous side effects? by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Then again, you'd think you'd see this with people who wear glasses, too, when they remove them

      This does occur, especially if your new glasses are much stronger than your old glasses. For the first hour or so of wearing them, you'll feel somewhat disoriented and maybe even nauseous, until your brain adapts.

      The phenomenon is even more obvious for astigmatismus glasses (rather than plain short- or far-sightedness). Try wearing a friend's glasses whose prescription is very different from your own, and walk around in them.

      As far as removing the glasses is concerned: the world will be too blurred, and the brain will hook on that blurriness, and not even notice that it is "distorted" as well.

      In Steve's case, he still sees a perfectly on-focus world, but distorted compared to what he is used to (i.e. not distorted, but he was accustomed to the distorted image given by his screen).

    9. Re:nauseous side effects? by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's cochlear offset from the added weight on one side of his head... not visual fixation

      If I had mod points you would get at least a +1 insightful. Good call!

    10. Re:nauseous side effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so much so that going without the apparatus often leaves him feeling nauseous, unsteady, naked.

      I think it's called anxiety. I get it alot when i'm away from my computer, I don't have that clickly click click of the keyboard (it's bordering on OCD now)


      Dudes (both of you), get a life! Go to a bar, pick up chicks, do something that doesn't involve computers!

  16. liberal use of the word by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cyborg? He's not a cybernetic organism, he's guy who lugs around gear.

    He's no more a cyborg than a guy covered in mud is a golem.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:liberal use of the word by puckmaster87 · · Score: 1

      You're right, he isn't a Cyborg. They really shouldn't be calling him that as it technically isn't politically correct.
      He's no more a cyborg than a guy covered in mud is a golem.
      Well, that's just strange.

    2. Re:liberal use of the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He's no more a cyborg than a guy covered in mud is a golem.
      Well, that's just strange.

      Darned right! Everyone knows you need a little scroll with words on it in your mouth!

    3. Re:liberal use of the word by mrmud · · Score: 1

      From dictionary.com:

      cyborg
      A human who has certain physiological processes aided or controlled by mechanical or electronic devices.

      Yep, he seems to fit that definition to me.

      You were right about the golem though, if that's any consolation

      golem
      In Jewish folklore, an artificially created human supernaturally endowed with life.

      --
      -- MrMud
    4. Re:liberal use of the word by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A human who has certain physiological processes aided or controlled by mechanical or electronic devices.

      Yep, he seems to fit that definition to me.


      Wich physiological process does he enhance with what device? (I only read half the article, I've read about him before and they didn't seem to be adding any new information).

      Please make sure your awnser won't mean that anyone with a cell phone is a cyborg...
      Carrying gear around, no matter how frequently, does not a cyborg make.

      Now, people with cochlear implants or pacemakers clearly are cyborgs, but for some reason articles about cyborgs are never about them.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:liberal use of the word by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      I think you need to look up the word physiological. These machines aren't helping him see, breath, digest, hear, or anything else. If he's a cyborg I guess I am too because I carry my laptop in my backpack to school sometimes.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    6. Re:liberal use of the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTF(previous)A. He has implants.

    7. Re:liberal use of the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The machines clearly are helping him see something he otherwise wouldn't.

      Same obviously holds true for your laptop, and cell phones let people hear something they normally can't.

    8. Re:liberal use of the word by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      RTF(previous)A. He has implants.

      If by "implants" you mean "stuff taped to his skin" then yeah.
      But if you meant actual implants, then no.

      And if by A(rticle) you meant the /. sumary, then that's just sad. The summary made it seem like he has implants, probably because the person who wrote it gobbled up that same "cyborg" bullshit. Its a lie, or at best, a gross exageration.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  17. Odd by Quasar1999 · · Score: 0

    With the way things are going in hollywood, you'd think that (a) someone from paramount would fly up from LA to TO, and slap him with an copyright infringment lawsuit... He's trying to be Borg!

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Odd by kmckinlay · · Score: 1

      Except he predates the Startrek Borg by several years. From the article:

      But Mann has sensitive and perceptive motives for his electronic immersion, which began 25 years ago

      ...I wonder if he might be interested in sueing Paramount?

    2. Re:Odd by MacBorg · · Score: 1

      There is the BorgLab/mithril group at MIT...

    3. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that he did it 20 years before hollywood's borg. Maybe he should slap them with a copyright lawsuit, instead of giving it all away for free under GPL.

  18. A bit confused about our usage of the term cyborg by fishexe · · Score: 1

    Uh... since when is someone who wears computer a cyobrg? I was expecting to read about a guy's numerous electronic implants, but...what the hell? Use of computers, whether worn or not, does not qualify one as a "cybernetic organism." Having them as an integrated component of one's being does.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  19. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yea, b/c you know yahoo is going to get slashdotted.

    fucking karma whores.

    and stupid fucking mods.

  20. He is the first volunteer by earthforce_1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    for Borg assimilation.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  21. What does this have to do with online stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, every little law placed on some gadget is now screamed here as being some "online" oppression.

    1. Re:What does this have to do with online stuff? by temojen · · Score: 1

      A better question would be: What does this have to do with "Your rights online"? I don't see anything about rights or legal or ethical issues asside from that the guy likes to push sales clerks around.

    2. Re:What does this have to do with online stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The problem with surveillance is that everyone involved is a clerk at some level. The lowest level clerk says the manager put the cameras there. The manager says the insurance companies require it. The insurance companies say they just follow standard practices and that it's the manufacturers that cause surveillance.


      So if nothing else, sousveillance
      (inverse surveillance) can explore a balance of
      individuals.


      Examples of sousveillance, such as the Rodney King beating,
      show us the other side of the story that surveillance
      cameras never show us.


      Had the police seen the video camera of the King beating, they'd
      likely have tried to destroy that data as well.


      Online glogs
      (cyborglogs) at least balance the equation.

    3. Re:What does this have to do with online stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right not to wear the stuff.

      I'm sure if the consumers won't take this technology up, the industry will.

      Check this out: http://www.mod.uk/dpa/projects/fist.htm

      Wearing this stuff would certainly cause some sore spots or some ear ache or even eye strain if worn over long time constantly. I know this because even the average headphones worn over ears for many cause a lot of ear ache no matter how compact or light they are. I definitely wouldn't want to wear this thing when I'm having a tea break, having lunch, and after work when I'm relaxing in my living room or off on a holiday in the Bahamas.

  22. I want to be there when he goes through security! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After his last experience with airport security guards, he's likely to be sent to Guantanamo Bay if he claims to be a cyborg instead of a computer geek.

    Although if, as he claims, he can't be separated from the electronics, he can go through the X-ray machine with them :)

  23. P4, 512GB, Linux by aardwolf204 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    From the Yahoo Story:

    It can plug into a variety of computers and devices. One of his common setups involves a computer with a Pentium 4 processor, at least 512 gigabytes of memory and a specialized operating system based on Linux

    When did P4s go 64bit?

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  24. Hmmmm.... by Quixote · · Score: 1
    and by the late 1970s, he began experimenting with wearable computers.

    He wore one to a high school dance.

    Must've been quite the ladies' man...

    1. Re:Hmmmm.... by Cska+Sofia · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he only did it to crack some corny "Hey baby, check out the size of my hard drive"-style pick up line.

    2. Re:Hmmmm.... by putaro · · Score: 1

      In the late '70's if you had a hard drive going around with you, you would have had it on a not-so-small cart....with a not-so-small extension trailing behind.

    3. Re:Hmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies have no taste.

      I'd be all over a cyborg chick ;)

    4. Re:Hmmmm.... by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      "That looks more like a 3.5 inch floppy to me" she replied...

  25. I'm sorry, you can't tape in here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    [Steve Mann visualizes: Possible Response - Yes/No / Or what? / You'll have to talk to my manager / Fuck you, asshole / Fuck you.]

    Steve Mann: You'll have to talk to my manager.

    1. Re:I'm sorry, you can't tape in here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the next step would be for him to run for governor.

  26. Not too good for his health... by Cska+Sofia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since the device only covers one eye, it would surely lead to asymmetrical vision problems. Rather quickly, I'd imagine, given how close the image is.

    1. Re:Not too good for his health... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume that "asymmetrical vision" is a "problem"?

    2. Re:Not too good for his health... by drycht · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you actually read information on the eyetap device, you'll find that the aremac project and image that "appears to be spatially aligned, and appears at with the same focus as the real world scene." In other words (as is written in the AP article), it can make it seem that images are projected onto real-world objects, rather than appearing to be at a fixed distance. I think this minimizes the vision problems that might occur.

  27. Getting the documentaries? by sgifford · · Score: 1

    I saw parts of one of Mann's documentaries at USENIX in New Orleans a few years ago (1999?), and it was extremely entertaining. Since then, I've been trying to find a place where I can get my hands on a copy. Does anybody know a place that sells these, or a place where I can download them?

    1. Re:Getting the documentaries? by kmckinlay · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know where to get the documentaries, but the CBC web site has a biography on him at http://www.cbc.ca/cyberman/. Including a couple of interesting videos on Steve and his wife.

    2. Re:Getting the documentaries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://wearcam.org/shootingback/sears.mpg
      (short excerpt), and http://wearcam.org/shootingback/nn.mpg (short excerpt of an interview on origins of wearable computing).

  28. Benefit of the doubt: RAID by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'll give the AP the benefit of the doubt and guess 512 MiB of RAM plus close to 512 GiB of hard drives. AP, Reuters, and other wire services often confuse memory with storage.

    1. Re:Benefit of the doubt: RAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll see your atomic wedgie and raise you a 12 Foot Cock.

  29. Hardware by Quixote · · Score: 1
    Yaknow, I'd like to experiment with some of this wearable stuff. In particular, taking video (and audio) unobtrusively as I walk around. However, I don't have the wife's permission^W^W^W means to spend 1000s of bucks on such a gig.

    Are there any cheap A/V "pen" cameras with a wide lens, that output to USB? I'd like to just record for now; having an over-the-eye small lcd display can come later..

  30. MODS: fourth TLP about the same typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    time to kick in (-1, Redundant)?

  31. Just hit delete? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    I wonder how he feels about spam? It's bad enough normally, but he'll get "you've got mail!" for pen1s-x-tend0rs as he's walking along the sidewalk or talking to someone. (Sure, he could toggle off notification. Do you think he's the type to have anything less than maximum verbosity?)

    And I guess we'll eventually need laws against driving and Instant Messaging at the same time.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  32. "Sticking feathers up your butt... by slashdaughter · · Score: 2, Insightful


    "Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken."
    - Tyler Durden

    .

    --
    "The U.S. Constitution - not perfect, but its better than what we have now"
    1. Re:"Sticking feathers up your butt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that, unlike chickens, cyborgs don't exist. Thus, there are no metaphorical feathers to stick up one's ass.

      Still, it'll be quite amusing when someone like Mann is admitted to an ER for second degree burns after his bionic penile attachment short circuits.

      I'm all for entertainment at another's expense.

    2. Re:"Sticking feathers up your butt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surgically grafting them to your butt makes you a chicken-man.

  33. Borgie Borg by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    When asked how many brothers and sisters he has, his response was "I am third of five."

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Borgie Borg by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Wasn't "third of five" the name that originally designated the borg who called himself Hugh?

  34. Self-Assimilation? by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1

    going round and round in smaller and smaller circles till you dissapear up your own butt could be here at last!

    But seriously, it's one of those things that somebody is bound to do because it can be done, and who knows what we'll learn from it.

    We didn't HAVE to have linux, but look were one man's experiment has taken us.

  35. I wonder by segment · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... If I run a wireless sniffer... can I snoop on his thoughts? ;O

  36. Everyone should have at least three. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The eventual coolness of wearable computers shouldn't be underestimated. Sure, it will start out with bleeding edgers being able to fire off posts to Slashdot using nothing but an elaborate series of eye movements. Early adopters tend to look silly to the rest of us. No shame in that.

    But start combining technologies like mesh networks, cryptographic authentication schemes, GPS, and the like, and imagine where they're going. How cool would it be to walk down any street in the country, and be able to call up the name, location, and menu of every Chinese restaurant within seven blocks? Or pinpoint all the "single and looking" girls at a rock concert who don't identify themselves as cat lovers.

    Imagine walking through a dark parking lot. If someone tries to attack you, one press of a button could notify the police and everyone within a two mile radius of your location.

    In a lot of ways, this means giving up a certain amount of privacy. For example, the distress signal from the last paragraph isn't going to work if anyone, anywhere can hit the panic button anonymously. That's where the cryptographic authentication comes in. There needs to be a way to verify the originator and trustworthiness of a given piece of information, whether it be, "Yes, officer, I'm authorized to drive a motor vehicle," or "Chin Wan's has great stir fry." The infrastructure doesn't exist yet, and it doubtless will never be perfect, but someday it will be at least as trustworthy as asking to see someone's ID.

    Some information will be automatically broadcasted, whether the user likes it or not (wanted for armed robbery). Some of it will be available to cashiers and law enforcement (too young to buy beer). Some of it will be voluntarily made available to the world (likes long walks, sunsets, and jiu-jitsu).

    It's going to be fun to watch these technologies come together. Possibly in a train-wreck fashion.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    1. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by ydrol · · Score: 1
      The eventual coolness of wearable computers shouldn't be underestimated. Sure, it will start out with bleeding edgers being able to fire off posts to Slashdot using nothing but an elaborate series of eye movements. Early adopters tend to look silly to the rest of us. No shame in that

      Reaction to mobile phone technology may be an interesting indicator. Here In the UK, people started using those headset/speaker phone thingys a couple of years ago. They often looked like "mentally challenged" people muttering loudly to themselves until you heard them bellow "I'm on the train .. see you at 7". Now a few people have the blue-tooth thingys that look like little Galaxian Ships balancing delicately on the ear...

      They look mad to me too, but then again I'm not really "into" mobile technology. And if I were a different hue, would visible blush uncontrollably when mine rings on the train because I forgot to turn it off. [whispers] "I'm on the train, Call you later" [Switch Off]

    2. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by Saeger · · Score: 4, Interesting
      How cool would it be to walk down any street in the country, and be able to call up the name, location, and menu of every Chinese restaurant within seven blocks?

      Very cool, since you could get that information ANONYMOUSLY (in an open mesh network), vs the current cell providers' plans to provide "location based services" because they know exactly who and where you are at all times.

      Augmented reality will open up all kinds of possibilities. Vernor Vinge's short story Fast Times at Fairmont High is great take on such a fast-paced and interconnected future.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by bomb_number_20 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not so sure I agree.

      The problem I have with all of this stuff is that it works the other way, too. First, doing most of the things you were excited about would require a GPS to be tracking your location 24/7. Why would anyone want implants that would allow someone to track every single time they stepped into their bathroom to take a crap?

      another problem I have (with his view in particular) is that he seems to think that advertisers won't notice that people are not viewing their ads. If everyone is wandering around in wearable/implanted computers, how long until transmitters broadcast targeted advertising directly to your retinas or your inbox?

      dumbass consumers are going to want to use this technology to do important things like 'chat' and 'IM' and stuff while they walk (or worse- drive) around (rude people on cell phones are bad enough- these would most likely cause me to snap and end up in jail).

      Anyway, the odds are that people are going to be broadcasting all sorts of non-interesting things about themselves to everyone in their immediate vicinity in much the same way that people had to have their own personal web pages in the 90s- complete w/ blinking text, bad images and the MIDI version of 'Wind Beneath My Wings'.

      What's to stop marketers from walking around and doing the same thing? Something like this is a wet dream to the wrong sorts of people. Imagine a completely captive audience that you can track in real time and build a scary smart database of information on.

      I'm sure MS or some other MegaCorp will come along and integrate credit card information into it to make life 'better'. Now, they not only know exactly where you are, but they can tell exactly what you are doing and what your buying habits are.

      No, thanks. I'll keep my meat sack they way it is.

      --
      That's ok, Jesus likes me anyway.
    4. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by scotchtape · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Imagine becoming helpless and crippled because youre battey died. Imagine not being able to remember much of any useful information, because you've never had to. Imagine what this will do to people's already short attention spans.

      Technology is great as a tool, but too many people become dependant on things that should be convieniences.

      But I do like watching the confusion and panic when I tell people I don't have a cell phone.

    5. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      how long until transmitters broadcast targeted advertising directly to your retinas or your inbox?

      Advertising sent directly to your inbox what a silly idea, that will never happen.... oh wait.

    6. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not too worried about the privacy implications, because I don't think anyone could do a deep study into my life without dying of terminal boredom. I think that a lot of privacy loss is inevitable, and won't really be missed. Trying to hide your day to day activities may someday seem as pointless as trying to hide the color of your pants.

      What people won't want to give up is the ability to lie: To say they're going to work when they're really going to a sports bar or a beatnik poetry lounge, or that they're going someplace other than to cheat on their spouse. But it's getting harder and harder to cover your tracks anyways. Caller ID, cell phone bills, and any of a thousand other clues can reveal the truth, while few are savvy enough to cover their tracks.

      What would happen if everyone could know almost everything there was to know about anyone else? I'm not sure, but on average I think that people will stop caring. All the things we think we need to keep secret from everyone else will be revealed as fairly common and trivial. The other extreme is that people may self-censor to the point that nobody ever does anything that would hint of idiosyncrasy.

      I figure these big databases are going to be built anyways, so it may be best if they're simply made public, so that I can know what it's saying about me. Perhaps it could even tell me who has been browsing my information and for what reason. That might cut down somewhat on the overall nosiness of the human race.

      Ninety percent of my concern over these databases is that I won't know how they're being used to manipulate my buying habits. Maybe some sort of "truth in advertising" law would require any advertiser to reveal, upon request, how they came to decide to deliver a given ad to you.

      I have to agree, if ubiquitous connectivity means that I can't walk down the sidewalk without finding out every insipid piece of information about everyone around me, this system will collapse under its own obnoxiousness. I don't see that happening. Instead, I figure that your personal system will intelligently sift through these clouds of information, deciding which things you might want brought to your attention.

      Try to imagine a system that would present the information you wanted, and only when you wanted it. "Computer, please inform me of the presence of any persons of the opposite gender with similar tastes in music. Also, if any slashdotter with a lower UID than me comes around, warn me so that I might pay homage. Finally, I'm looking for something to do this evening, so start collecting suggestions and give me your top ten when I get off work."

      If somebody wants to use the system to publish a detailed explanation of their adventures in stamp collecting, let them. I don't have to see it, and I'm sure there are at least a handful of stamp collectors out there who would love it. Meanwhile, I'll be looking out for people who thoroughly enjoyed "Godel, Escher, Bach" and are willing to give advice on locking down a Linux box. And in the event that "I know CPR" suddenly becomes extremely interesting information, the system is in place to direct me to the interested party.

      As the technology itself gets better, its utility will become directly proportional to how much these systems know about us. It will bring power that everyone will want to wield, often to the detriment of others. We're going to run into all sorts of unexpected problems with this sort of technology. Some problems will require a technological solution, others will require a legal solution. Some may be utterly intractable. I can't claim to know which problems are which.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    7. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You. Don't. Have. A. . . . what????

      But how do you... Where will you... Umm....

      I have to run away now.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    8. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by gubachwa · · Score: 1
      Just because a particular technology has the potential of being abused, does that mean it's a bad technology? No, certainly not. All the bad things that you indicate that can happen may very well happen, but there are also a lot of positive things that can come out of such technology.

      Sticking our heads in the sand and becoming Luddites is not the solution. Examining how the potential abuses can occur, and targeting those things, rather than the technology itself, is what should be done.

    9. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      GPS is passive, it's not "tracking you" in any way if you don't put constantly active transmitter to it.

      That information stays within your personal system, unless you want otherwise and ask it to do something that requires sending location to outside network or person. Why would you do that when you step into your bathroom to take a crap?

    10. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by DreamerFi · · Score: 1

      I'm not too worried about the privacy implications, because I don't think anyone could do a deep study into my life without dying of terminal boredom.

      That's just a matter of motivation. If I'm a sociopath who hates that you just talked to my girlfriend, I won't be bored easily, and I will find something to ruin your life..

      Can you honestly say that you trust everybody around you with all that access?

      -John

    11. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What people won't want to give up is the ability to lie

      No, that's not it at all. What humanity will lose is the concept of trust. Being subject to perpetual monitoring is like being told "you're not trustworthy. We know that you won't be good unless we're watching you 24/7." And, I for one resent that, as I resent the suggestion that the only reason one might want to keep one's privacy is so that they can continue to lie. What a low estimation of humanity! I want my privacy because my life is my business, nobody else's. It doesn't matter that it's so boring that nobody else should be interested, it's a matter of ownership and boundaries. We will all lose our selves.

      And in regard to this thought: The other extreme is that people may self-censor to the point that nobody ever does anything that would hint of idiosyncrasy. That behavior is already here, encouraged by such things as the Patriot act. 1984, here we come... it's dangerous now to express opinions contrary to the approved public feeling, especially if you have something to lose (good job, social status, nice house...). An outspoken transient isn't really taking any risks. However, most people in the middle or upper class don't have that freedom of expression.

      When all of this information is available on everyone, will everyone be using it all the time to maintain checks and balances? No. Only the mega-rich individuals, corporations, or governments will have the capacity to mine that data in real time and do what they will with it. Who watches the watchers? In a society where "everyone" is monitored all the time, he who controls the monitoring is above the law. Sounds like a terrible opportunity for corruption.

    12. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by srcosmo · · Score: 1
      Or pinpoint all the "single and looking" girls at a rock concert who don't identify themselves as cat lovers.

      And who aren't freaked out by a guy with a satellite dish on his head...

      --
      free speach
      Did you mean: free speech
    13. Re:Everyone should have at least three. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Contrary to assertion, I do not have a low opinion of humanity.

      It's kind of odd to say humanity would "lose the concept of trust." Think about what "trust" means: I believe that you behave in a given way, and will continue to do so, even though I have no means of verifying it. If, suddenly, it becomes trivial to verify a given behavior, then it is true that my opinion of you is no longer based on "trust," but on mutually verifiable facts.

      Trust is simply what happens when people either don't have the time to double check things, or don't believe that double-checking is necessary. When the verification process becomes extremely easy, the first sort of trust will disappear, but the second sort of trust may actually increase. After a few checks, it becomes clear that a person really is doing what she said she would do, and overall confidence increases.

      I didn't mean to say that anyone who wanted privacy had "something to hide." What I was trying to say was that a system like this might require us to let go of the irrational fear that somebody might discover what you or I had for breakfast. There are a great many details about our lives that could be broadcasted to the world at large without doing us any real harm. All it requires is a mindset shift.

      Then there are the other facts about us, the ones we really don't want people to know. The things we lie about. Lies and secrets aren't always bad things, but in a world of augmented reality, it becomes very difficult to keep secrets. I think it's a fascinating intellectual exercise to imagine a world where secrets simply cannot exist.

      I think it's hyperbolic to say that the era of complete self-censorship is already upon us. Sure, there are often times and places where people feel that it is unwise to speak their mind. I can't imagine that you believe that all of world history up to the Patriot Act was a long string of unfettered free speech. All presidential pressure to the contrary, the US still has a vibrant and free-wheeling public discourse, and I think that the Patriot Act will get sorted out in time.

      In fact, I'm pretty confident of the alternative: if everything is being monitored, there will be no reason to self-censor, because everyone is pretty much bound to find out your opinions anyways.

      Your closing paragraph is interesting, but I would turn the question back on you: In a society where everyone lives their lives shrouded in a cloak of maximum secrecy, who will be best equipped to pierce those shrouds? Again, the "mega-rich individuals, corporations, or governments." Few people have the savvy or the resources to win an information standoff against them, and freedom shouldn't require it. That's why I'm toying with the idea that complete transparency may be a much more stable solution.

      For an interesting read, try David Brin's "The Transparent Society." According to him, privacy is not a fundamental right, like freedom of speech. Privacy is a possible benefit of living in a free society, but if it is elevated to a "right," then at best it is a derivative one. It is easy to imagine a world of free speech but no privacy, but impossible to imagine it the other way around.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  37. Wearables @ a dance by MacBorg · · Score: 1

    This is just so appealing... I am dreding the prom... this would raise a few eyebrows (how does it work with a tux)

  38. Wrong Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Steve Austin is more popular than this newcomer. Probably more expensive to taxpayers as well.

  39. Sensory overlays with V chip by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Of course they'll only be used for good things right?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  40. Why not use a PDA? by KrispyKringle · · Score: 4, Interesting
    According to this, the current design uses a PC104 100MHz 486 board with all sorts of hacked-up components (4 lithium batteries at like $600 alone). But plenty of PDA's are available at 400MHz or better with decent power consumption, etc.

    Seems to me that that'd be a better place to start. Rewire the LCD output to go to his glasses-screen, find CF modules for things like the video cam, GPS, WiFi, and what-have-you, and you're good. The only big issue I see is the storage space, which, with an IBM microdrive, is probably limited to 5GB or so.

    1. Re:Why not use a PDA? by sremick · · Score: 1

      According to this, the current design uses a PC104 100MHz 486 board

      And according to this they're not.

  41. He suffers from "transition sickness" by farrellj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When he gets sick from not viewing the world through his video camera, he is suffering a form the same thing people who spend a lot of time in Virtual Reality do...their brains adapt to the slight lag caused by the electronics, and I theorize that they do so quickly because video is a much "hotter" medium...that is, it is like a firehose for the real visual field that the eye is used to. When that lag is eliminated, by taking the display off, it takes a while to adapt back to the visually cooler natural environment...and until it adapts, your inner ear and your visual perceptions are out of sync, and that can cause nausia. ...based upon observations from being the techie at a Virtual Reality Gameing place for 6 months.

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    1. Re:He suffers from "transition sickness" by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      You don't need electronics for that. People have tried this with inverting prism glasses. After a while, the brain adjusts to them and perceives things normally. But it's not a lot of fun if you suddenly yank them off after adjusting and try to walk around.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:He suffers from "transition sickness" by farrellj · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I have not heard about that before! I'll to read up on that.

      Thanx!

      ttyl
      Farrell

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    3. Re:He suffers from "transition sickness" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, lifelong adaptation to digital eyeglasses, and similar seeing aids, is described in

      http://wearcam.org/presenceconnect.htm.

    4. Re:He suffers from "transition sickness" by LauraScudder · · Score: 1

      I've read about these experiments and always kinda wanted to try it myself. I imagine I'd be on the floor within 10 seconds clinging to it desperately, but man would it be an experience!

    5. Re:He suffers from "transition sickness" by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      You can experience a similar albiet much less intense effect using an FPS game that lets you change the speed of motion (like America's Army or Deus Ex or GTA:VC)

      set the motion speed up to a little over double time, and play it for a while untill you become used to it. Then stop playing th egame and go do something, everything will seem to be a little bit slower than you're used to, even though nothing has changed. Kinda fun.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    6. Re:He suffers from "transition sickness" by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

      Your post reminded me of something I wrote in my diary a while ago:

      "Sometimes I feel I am accelerating in my thought processes. Sounds like a strange proposition, I'll grant you. But I'll try to explain. For quite a while now I have felt that the world seems to be slowing down ever so slightly around me, like The Matrix's bullet time concept. I feel more comfortable driving a car at higher speeds than slower speeds, as an example. Walking through crowds I can anticipate the patterns before they happen, so I can walk through them easily. Little things that can't be quantified. It's a feeling that comes and goes, but since I've noticed it consciously I have paid attention to it and therefore can begin to assess it."

      Your description of transition sickness has just made me realise that what I felt wasn't unique! I am an avid video gamer, primarily first person shooters and driving simulations, so it makes perfect sense. Thanks for that excellent piece of information!

    7. Re:He suffers from "transition sickness" by Patik · · Score: 1

      I experienced this once after an extended Halo session. The connection was laggy and often hung or skipped, but my eyes were solidly focused on the screen. When I finally got up and walked down the hall to the bathroom, it was weird having the walls move by me smoothly without jerking.

  42. Transition Sickness (see my post below...) by farrellj · · Score: 1

    Scroll down and to see it on the main page for the article...or search for "farrellj"

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  43. DUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times are you going to post the same thing over and over?

    1. Re:DUPE by sanctimonius+hypocrt · · Score: 0

      I didn't post the first one. I just copied it, trying for subtle irony. Maybe too clever by half?

  44. Cool Idea, Not cool person by Sargerion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    While I admit the whole cyborg thing is cool, with constant information and survailance, I have to say this guy is just a bit paranoid. Especially if he lives in Canada. I mean, sure things aren't always fair between companies and consumers, the people and the government, but he has some fairly absurd ideas. I read the article, and there was a part stating:

    Then he tells the employees that "HIS manager" makes him film public places for HIS security -- how does he know, he tells them, that the fire exits aren't chained shut? -- and that they'll have to talk to HIS manager.

    His behavior in such showdowns generally provokes hostility, confusion or resigned shrugs

    Well, of course it does, because that's ridiculous...

    But don't try telling Mann that the complaining employees are just doing their jobs, and that his real beef is with executives who make store policy. Mann believes everyone should fight The System, those powerful institutions lurking behind the one-way mirrors.

    Oh please, the execs of huge corporations are only human, too. Are you saying that corporations are some kind of sentient beings, having no trace of the true human limbs that support them? Lurking behind one-way mirrors... puu-leese. Sure, corporations are greedy, most don't give a crap about their customers, and they have their own little worlds, but there's humans behind those corporations, not idiot machine-humans like you. In the end, you're probably just as greedy and stupid as the execs are. I can see it now: "All humans who do not conform the cyborg initiative will be assimilated by force. Buy Powerade"

    Not everyone can afford your life style, Mr. Mann, some people have to make an honest living, and can't go around being ridiculous the whole day. Some people aren't going to "fight The System" because they have a family to support and lives to lead. This Professor just needs to get a freakin' life, seriously. I think this is just a case of a guy with absurd ideas having the means to realize his equally bizzare notions that everyone should be walking around like a f**king cyborg in order to be more human.

    A cyborg could, say, take pictures of hostile police officers during a political demonstration and instantly post them on the Web -- to spur others to join in the protest, perhaps, or to simply provide alternative documentation of the scene. Mann calls such postings "glogs" -- short for "cyborg blogs"

    Shut the hell up. Wow. "Glogs"? Who the hell do you think you are? The logical progression of human evolution may indeed be through machine integration, but not right now. Just stop it, you pri*k. You know why they have cameras in stores? So if some punk comes in and robs it, they'll have evidence against them. And why don't they allow cameras in stores? Well, I'm not too sure about that one, but why the hell would you want to video tape in a store anyway? I'm sure the exits are chained up, you paranoid piece of crap. And we have police to keep order, not to beat down innocent citizens. Although that may happen in other countries, you live in CANADA!! Canada you idiot! Probably one of the most passive counties in the world! And if there was a demonstration where people got hurt, there's a good chance they deserved it for being stupid radicals with too much time on their hands, like you (but I'm not against demonstrations. There are entirly legitimate demonstrations to be had, such as one against the Iraq war).

    "Clerks should be confronted with their clerk-iness," Mann says one afternoon in the Deconism Gallery, an electronic-art studio he runs near Toronto's Chinatown"

    WHAT!?! What the hell are you talking about!? What is wrong with you!? Clerk-iness?! You mean their honest day's work to support themselves? Oh, oh, sorry, sorry. Wouldn't want to spoil your perfect world with laggarts who have to support themselves. Far be it from them to ask you for a bit of respect for a freakin' job, at least they're trying. You, on the other hand, were

    1. Re:Cool Idea, Not cool person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh please, the execs of huge corporations are only human, too. Are you saying that corporations are some kind of sentient beings, having no trace of the true human limbs that support them? Lurking behind one-way mirrors... puu-leese. Sure, corporations are greedy, most don't give a crap about their customers, and they have their own little worlds, but there's humaAns behind those corporations, not idiot machine-humans like you.

      You fucking moron -- who do you think makes decislons like "I can record you; you can't record me." -- some computer on the third floor? Of course it's done by humans. But if the decision-makers don't have the balls to come out on the sales floor and defend their decisions, well, we'll just have to deal with their human shields instead.

      And if there weren't some humans lurking behind all the one-way mirrors, the mirrors would be made of plywood, not glass.

    2. Re:Cool Idea, Not cool person by Sargerion · · Score: 1

      Well, I read your follow up comments and I have a few things to say. A) I'm DEFINATLY not trying to discredit anyone for being different or diverse. You obviously didn't read my post. I'm simply saying this man is being ridiculous. He's being an idiot as a PERSON, not as a techie or geek. B) I loved your touching stories about the lying clerk and freeon. Of course the clerk lies, he wants to keep his job in the rising unemployment. And that freeon story didn't make any sense at all, why would you dump your fridge in the wrong place? I'm so glad to hear you're perfect and don't lie and take your fidge to a dumpster. Some of you, along with Mr. Manns, are just unrealistic. Your topics are way below my conspiracy radar, that's all i'm saying...

    3. Re:Cool Idea, Not cool person by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1
      And we have police to keep order, not to beat down innocent citizens. Although that may happen in other countries, you live in CANADA!! Canada you idiot! Probably one of the most passive counties in the world! And if there was a demonstration where people got hurt, there's a good chance they deserved it for being stupid radicals with too much time on their hands, like you


      That's interesting ... Canada has had a few interesting cases of police beating down innocent protestors in Montreal and pepper-spraying a peaceful protest group in British Columbia as well. The Prime Minister went so far as to say they were lucky it was pepper spray and not baseball bats.

      There's a *good* reason for his paranoia; a lot of world governments and corporations are starting to think they should have a lot more control over our behaviour than you may believe.

      Mann can wear his HMD, you can stick your head in the sand. To each his own.

      I just wish there were more HMD-wearers and less sand-gazers.
      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Cool Idea, Not cool person by Cska+Sofia · · Score: 1

      There are people who challenge the system, and then there are batty old men who wander round shops in their excessive free time, harassing minimum-wagers, and then bragging about how they're Fighting the Power.

    5. Re:Cool Idea, Not cool person by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1

      You know, we're all basically living in the Panopticon suggested by Jeremy Bentham more than 200 hundred years ago. There are cameras everywhere. We are seen, but we know not by whom or when.

      So let me get this straight -- from a political perspective you think it is absolutely meaningless that you are surveillanced almost all the time? Dude, you need to read William Burroughs' "Electronic Revolution" pronto. Surveillance and playback are the name of the game in the Information War. They do it to us, we NEED to be doing it right back at them.

      Why? Mostly because the leaders and authorities in the world tend to be amongst the lowest, most cynical, greedy, hostile, violent fucks to walk the earth. Amplify some rent-a-cop that gave you a hard time one day a hundred times and you will still not have an asshole as screwed up as the average politician.

      Mann is just trying to turn the tables on authority, perhaps even on reality. Frankly, he's small news -- there are bigger issues at work here. He's just one practitioner of freedom. Let's see how far he does and doesn't get -- it's all a lesson in freedom isn't it?

      Sorry to interrupt the commercials -- you can go back to living in your hovel, breeding with the corpse you call a wife, and working for the man now...

    6. Re:Cool Idea, Not cool person by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      You fucking moron

      Vulgar name calling; always a great way to show your intellectual prowess in a debate.

      -- who do you think makes decislons like "I can record you; you can't record me." -- some computer on the third floor? Of course it's done by humans. But if the decision-makers don't have the balls to come out on the sales floor and defend their decisions, well, we'll just have to deal with their human shields instead.

      No one owes you an explanation of the rationale behind the store policies. It's their property and they set up the rules for how you behave while there. If you aren't willing to abide by the rules, then just leave.

      Instead, Steve Mann, a college professor, gets his jollies by picking on minimum wage high-school kids who are just trying to keep their jobs in retail stores. And people like you aplaud him for that kind of behavior. What has happened to our society?

  45. what happens if a cyborg eats too much granola? by cudaboy_71 · · Score: 1
    A cyborg could, say, take pictures of hostile police officers during a political demonstration and instantly post them on the Web -- to spur others to join in the protest, perhaps, or to simply provide alternative documentation of the scene.
    oh jesus, are the borg all liberals?
    --
    if it ain't broke, break it.
    1. Re:what happens if a cyborg eats too much granola? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh jesus, are the borg all liberals?

      Well, duh, I mean, they live in collectives, believe in sharing with everybody, they're open to new experiences (ie, assimilating new cultures)...

    2. Re:what happens if a cyborg eats too much granola? by damiam · · Score: 1
      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  46. No sex for you! by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you looking for a way to hold onto that virginity for as long as possible, wearing some of Steve's old outfits might be a good start.

    On the other hand... you could look at porn -everywhere- you walked. :/

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:No sex for you! by mark-t · · Score: 1
      There is, in general, an inverse relationship between interest in porn and the amount of sexual activity that a person engages in with another real living person. For example, virgins tend to be more fascinated with pornography than nonvirgins.

      This is, of course, a generalization to the extreme, but it is nevertheless still true to that extent.

    2. Re:No sex for you! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "On the other hand... you could look at porn -everywhere- you walked. :/"

      One can only hope he was smart enough to install that night vision filter for that camera that allowed people to take xray photos. Imagine a live vid feed of that!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:No sex for you! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      One can only hope he was smart enough to install that night vision filter for that camera that allowed people to take xray photos. Imagine a live vid feed of that!
      Yikes! Only if it gots smart software to black out all those people you don't want to see naked.
  47. Control is relative by tommy_teardrop · · Score: 1
    But Mann has sensitive and perceptive motives for his electronic immersion, which began 25 years ago. He believes that wearing computers and cameras will give people more power to maintain their privacy and individuality.

    For one thing, Mann touts the power of wearable computers to filter out advertising and other elements of daily experience he finds objectionable.

    This is all very well, except how many people are going to use MannCorp OpenWare Glasses, and how many are going to have AOL InfoWare Glasses. Mann might think these will block adverts, but you can bet your bottom dollar that most corporations picking up on this kind of technology are going to have a field day with the advertising. Can you imagine a GatorWare pair of glasses? Every advert you see is overlain with a new one.

    I think I'll stick with my current glasses. The only way these obscure the truth is if I haven't cleaned them properly.
    --
    -- IANAL, BIPOOTV
  48. Stores are private property by mark-t · · Score: 3, Informative

    They can kick him out of the store for videotaping within the building. He can object all he wants, but unless he's willing to fork over enough money to buy the store, there's nothing he can legally do to stop them from removing him from the premises, calling security if they need to.

    1. Re:Stores are private property by mriker · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If the guy thinks that he's a hero for trying to argue that people shouldn't be able to define their own rules and policies on their own private property, he's an idiot. If you don't like their rules, stay off their property, you stupid nard.

    2. Re:Stores are private property by MikeBabcock · · Score: 0

      There's a fundamental difference between private property and private commercial property. Commercial property is designed to make money off customers.

      If enough customers want something, the commercial space is going to accomodate that within reason.

      Until one person says something, nobody will. If enough people agree, some commercial spaces will change policies.

      It isn't stupid to voice your opinion in commercial space at all.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Stores are private property by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Until one person says something, nobody will. If enough people agree, some commercial spaces will change policies.

      It isn't stupid to voice your opinion in commercial space at all.


      If you expect people to care... that is somewhat silly. I'm not saying you shouldn't, but typicaly speaking employees just don't care. If they cared, then they would either go insane or quit their jobs.

      It's rather like recent tails I hear about people buying printers at Walmart, you know the type, the cheepo sub $50.00 that don't even include a black cartrage... and they refuse to take it as a return. "You could have done anything to it" is basicly what I hear.... without even looking at it to see if it's faulty or just crap. Chances are it's just crap.

      You can object till you are blue in the face, which I fully support. Doesn't help... the only thing that does help is going in there with a little video camera... based on my observation they are either a hell of alot nicer and actually take it as a return... or get more mean and tell you to get out.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:Stores are private property by mark-t · · Score: 1

      But it's still private property, and the owner of a store does not owe anything to any portion of the public that disapproves of its policies. The *ONLY* thing that can police the owner of commercial property in this regard is how negative a financial impact such decisions would make. The public, by themselves, can do nothing more than boycott the premises.

    5. Re:Stores are private property by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      In Ohio, all they have to do is be playing a copyrighted work on one of their demo TVs, and then they not only could kick him out, but could also detain him while they wait for the police to get there.

      Second offenses of this are a felony.

    6. Re:Stores are private property by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      The public *can* do more than boycott the premises. They can try to enter with video cameras, or voice their concerns about their privacy or tie up all the service reps with questions about video cameras while on camera (for the tape-reviewer types to notice).

      You may get banned from the store -- that's also their right, but you *can* do more than just boycott them. If you want lots of fun, you can even chat up other friendly shoppers near you about whether they've thought about the privacy implications of cameras in the store. Suggest watch some Malcom in the Middle (wherein the store manager labels the tapes based on the bending over of the female shoppers maybe).

      Your comment is flawed ... I know what you're getting at, but no ... I *can* do more, and so can anyone else. Just because someone doesn't *have* to listen doesn't mean speaking is pointless.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    7. Re:Stores are private property by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Let's see your hypothetical store owner put a sign on the door saying "White Only".

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    8. Re:Stores are private property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice strawman there. State and federal law prohibit discrimination based on race, but there's nothing about idiots with cameras.

    9. Re:Stores are private property by gubachwa · · Score: 1
      Several points:

      First of all, a store is NOT a piece of private property in the same way as you and I consider our home to be our private property. You can rant and rave about this point all you want, and it even may be the case that under the law (and we know the law is infallible, right?), they are equivalent, but the simple truth is: they are not! You and I do not open our homes to complete strangers for the purposes selling products and services with the expectation that hundreds (perhaps thousands) of people will show up on a regular basis. In reality, the boundary between public and private spaces is extremely blurred.

      Secondly, just because it is private property, doesn't mean the owners can do anything they want on that property. Would you argue that an owner of a piece of property has the right commit murder on that property if he sees fit? Of course not. You may say, 'but videotaping is not murder.' No, it is not, but certain people (e.g. Mann) may find the practice objectionable. Aren't his concerns valid? You argue 'then he just shouldn't go there.' But the problem is, with the blurring of public and private spaces, and the commercialization and "privatization" of more and more spaces that are traditionally public, there may be fewer and fewer places where people can go. Rather than let things move even further in this direction, people like Mann challenge the status quo.

      Thirdly, let me pose the following scenario to you: Suppose you walk into some store. Normally you don't think about the fact that there are security cameras in the ceiling and the corners of the store videotaping you, and even if you do realize it, it doesn't necessarily bother you. However, suppose that in this store, instead of having video cameras mounted and hidden behind dark pieces of glass and one way mirrors, it has part of its staff dedicated to following you around with a hand-held video camera. Now you're painfully aware of the fact that you are being videotaped. I would find it extremely hard to believe that you would not be made to feel uneasy in this type of situation. I'm guessing that your response would be 'but then I just wouldn't go to that weird-ass store anymore.' So, suppose that you woke up one day and found that it was common practice for all stores to employ this type of video surveillance. Are you just going to lock yourself in your house and not go anywhere? I suspect that any average person, unless he/she is some kind of voyeur, would find such surveillance practices objectionable. But if you think about it, you will realize that the only difference between my hypothetical scenario and the current type of videotaping that goes on in stores is that in my hypothetical scenario you are made painfully aware of the fact that you are being videotaped. So why should people accept being videotaped when they are not made aware of it? People may believe what they don't know won't hurt them, but often the opposite is true.

    10. Re:Stores are private property by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The point was that property owners do not have absolute power to exclude others from their property.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    11. Re:Stores are private property by mark-t · · Score: 1
      First, the blurred boundary between public and private spaces in only in the perception of the public itself, not by law. A business owner can, for any reason that he sees fit, decide to not serve a particular person or even a particular demographic. Of course, he or she may be risking a complaint to the Better Business Bureau, but if that's not something they care about, then it's no big deal for them.

      Second, an owner can do whatever the heck he wants on his own property to the extent that the activity would not already be illegal. Your comparison of videotaping to murder isn't valid because the issue of videotaping may be objectionable to some, but it's still legal to either allow or restrict it, whereas whether or not murder is objectionable to any particular individual, it is still against the law.

      Third, I *AM* "painfully aware" that I am being videotaped whenever I walk into a store, and it actually doesn't bother me that much. Although I admit that being followed around everywhere by people carrying video cameras watching my every move would in fact be uncomfortable, your hypothetical scenario of a world in which it happens everywhere would, if it were to ever happen, occur over a long time, not overnight, so by the time that actually was the norm, most people would probably be pretty used to it.

    12. Re:Stores are private property by mark-t · · Score: 1
      The point was that property owners do not have absolute power to exclude others from their property.
      Actually, they do... the only people they do not have the power to exclude are agents or representatives of the law or justice system.
    13. Re:Stores are private property by gubachwa · · Score: 1
      First, the blurred boundary between public and private spaces in only in the perception of the public itself, not by law. A business owner can, for any reason that he sees fit, decide to not serve a particular person or even a particular demographic.
      Now you are professing your ignorance of the law. Here in Ontario (where I live) there is a thing called the 'Discriminatory Business Practices Act'. A business owner who refuses to engage in business with someone because that person is part of a particular demographic is committing an illegal act. Here is a link to the act. I would be very surprised if other parts of Canada, and the US, didn't have similar laws.
      Although I admit that being followed around everywhere by people carrying video cameras watching my every move would in fact be uncomfortable, your hypothetical scenario of a world in which it happens everywhere would, if it were to ever happen, occur over a long time, not overnight, so by the time that actually was the norm, most people would probably be pretty used to it.
      And this is what we are seeing: the *gradual* erosion of our public spaces into commercialized and private spaces where people accept things that, were they to be introduced overnight, people would otherwise find objectionable. Just because things are introduced gradually doesn't deter from the fact that in the end they are objectionable.
    14. Re:Stores are private property by dustmite · · Score: 1

      First, the blurred boundary between public and private spaces in only in the perception of the public itself, not by law.

      Not entirely true; for example, it is legal to smoke anywhere and anyhow you like on your own private property (such as a home), but this is not the case in commercial buildings (retail stores, offices etc). The law does treat them differently, even though both cases are private property, the latter are still "public places".

      Of course, smoking is a pretty serious 'special case', because it kills people.

      your hypothetical scenario of a world in which it happens everywhere would, if it were to ever happen, occur over a long time, not overnight

      True, but his/her example was perhaps a lousy one, since I doubt anyone would want to do that. But a more realistic one would be, what if stores started including face-recognition software behind all those CCTV cameras? And to take it a step further, what if the FBI were given access to all that data too? These types of changes are more realistic, and could in fact be commonplace VERY SOON, e.g. within only ten or twenty years.

      (BTW, you seem to imply that gradual changes, of even bad things, are acceptable? I don't get it. Something bad is bad whether it takes 1 year or 100 years to occur.)

    15. Re:Stores are private property by mark-t · · Score: 1
      BTW, you seem to imply that gradual changes, of even bad things, are acceptable
      Acceptable to society, yes, not necessarily to any particular individual. There was a time, not all that long ago in fact, when it was entirely unacceptable in our society to be a homosexual... gradual changes in our society led to the acceptance of this as just being a lifestyle choice and it is no longer perceived as being "bad" or wrong.

      You may wish to argue that there was nothing "wrong" with being homosexual in the first place, and that may very well be true, but it must be remembered that much of the only real difference between what is right and wrong or good and bad is whatever mindset happens to be socially accepted at the time, and as surely as fashions change over the years, so would perceptions of what is acceptable and what is not. The trend seems to be that things that were unacceptable in the past are now acceptable, so whether it's right or wrong is irrellevant -- that's the direction we (as a society, and perhaps even as a species) seem to be inexorably heading.

    16. Re:Stores are private property by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      They have to justify their refusal to provide you with service in the setting in question; talk to a lawyer. Even business owners can't prevent you from being on the premises without a valid reason; you can take them to court for it and you'll probably win. Private property laws aren't what you think -- there are a lot of exceptions, including standard "right of passage / thoroughfare" type clauses (the path that runs down the side of your yard that's been used by kids going to school for 30 years can't be fenced off in most places just because you don't like it anymore), etc.

      Just because its your property (unless you live in places like Texas), doesn't mean you can forbid people from being on it for no apparent reason. Its *not* trespassing (for example) to walk into a store uninvited (as it would be for your living room), (partly) because it is considered "normal" to be allowed into the premises.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    17. Re:Stores are private property by mark-t · · Score: 1
      True... but it *IS* trespassing once you've been asked to leave and you fail to comply even after being given free and full opportunity to do so.

      A store owner has the legal right to refuse to serve anyone or even to insist that people leave the premises for any reason that they desire, the only consequences to this being that they lose a customer and risk getting a bad reputation with any people that this person is able to communicate his experience with.

      What you describe is only valid for public property. IANAL, but I've seen this happen to people.

    18. Re:Stores are private property by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Like I said, go ask a lawyer; what I described applies to private property as well under specific circumstances.

      Plus, the "refusal" of service must be valid.

      Try getting kicked out of a store cause you're black (hey, they can kick you out for *any* reason you said) and see how the courts feel about it.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  49. This probably is the future by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    I came up with an idea for something like this years ago. Besides having a constant connection to the Internet, oodles of memory and a backup system at home, I envisioned that my wearable computer would include an AI that would be able to understand speech so that a keyboard would not be necessary. I now believe that any kind of AI is still years away, but it sure would be handy in this case, if only for speech recognition purposes.

    Anyway, I figured that this system would come with a complicated pair of glasses that would be able to overlay the real world with computer data. Besides that, the glasses would come with built-in cameras (potentially giving you 360 degree vision, as well as passive IR and UV), earphones and various microphones.

    My dream would be to walk around all the time with this device. I would ask the AI questions, and after searching the net it would respond by showing me city maps, my location on them (GPS), pictures of people and the things they said, telling me about how much money I had spent, showing me lists of restaurants, my next appointments, incoming phone calls, etc, etc.

    I also think that such a device would be a great for people who forget things a lot (like me). Since it would record everything you would hear and see all the time, you'd be able to recall any of this information at any time and virtually relive any event. It would then be easy to pass your experiences on to your friends -- or even the police if you happened to have been witness to a crime, for instance.

    Of course, there would be lots of people who would object to the use of this technology in there presence on the grounds that anything they said or did around you could be used against them. On the other hand, they'd probably stop complaining as soon as they got one of the devices themselves.

    Businesses would be more difficult, however. Imagine getting fired for whatever reason, and then the company insisting that you also erase all the data from your wearable computer that you accumulated over the period of your employment.

    Anyway, as I was saying, I don't expect this kind of AI technology to become reality any time soon, but I think you would still be able to do a lot of interesting things with it -- even without the AI. I could go on, but IMHO this technology has the potential to radically change our society.

  50. Right, but what is he? by lurker412 · · Score: 1

    The article claims Mann became a cyborg so he could be more human. While I find this guy curious, I fail to see how his wearable stuff makes him more human. He's certainly having more fun than I am, but what is he proving?

  51. A few first-hand comments.. by nathan+s · · Score: 1

    I've had the opportunity to actually work with Steve Mann on a couple of projects he did here at the University of Toronto, where I got my master's in sociology and did the collaborative program with the new Knowledge Media Design Institute [http://www.kmdi.utoronto.ca].

    A couple of people mentioned that they didn't understand how wearing a computer made one a cyborg. The understanding that I've gotten out of my graduate studies in these areas indicates that the academic definition of 'cyborg' is a bit different than the common Hollywood conception. Steve has said before that basically any piece of technology, however primitive or advanced, that you use or reach for without thinking about it, makes you a cyborg. If you automatically check a watch when looking for time, or reach for a pen [or PDA] to record someone's address, or run to Google if you don't know something, you've effectively 'internalized' those technologies as a part of the...organism that is you, for lack of a better way of putting it.

    The Eyetap link a few people have mentioned [http://www.eyetap.org] is a good place to look at what Steve is doing. He's experimenting with what he calls post-post-modernism, and incorporating the cute little "de-as-in-deconstructionism" prefix into anything he possibly can.

    About the videotaping thing - it's probably mentioned in the article [which I haven't read yet - I know, I'm lazy], but this is the whole "sousveillance" idea of "watching the watchers". You can find a paper that Steve Mann helped to author on the Netlab site [http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman] called "Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices to Challenge Surveillance" which talks a bit about this.

    1. Re:A few first-hand comments.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cyborg n.
      A human who has certain physiological processes aided or controlled by mechanical or electronic devices.


      They're wrong, in the end hes just a stuckup wannabe.

    2. Re:A few first-hand comments.. by temojen · · Score: 1

      So then, all people in all cultures are cyborg because they do not exist without knives and fire? Then let us dispense with the term cyborg, and call eachother human. Some of us are just more obsessed with our expensive tools.

    3. Re:A few first-hand comments.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you don't mind agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Adobe, you can get the article in Proprietary Document Format (PDF) from here.


      It was also published in a peer-reviewed journal,Surveillance and Society; here is the link: Steve Mann, Jason Nolan and Barry Wellman Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments.
      .

    4. Re:A few first-hand comments.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      totally unrelated to the topic at hand, but since you brought it up: there is a gpl pdf reader available from: http://www.ghostscript.com/doc/AFPL/get813.htm If you're not runing *nix, it has been ported to Windows quite well, also available on the above page. ps: doesn't adobe acrobat=mud dancer? I use ghostview/script on windows, mainly because it isn't as resource intensive and seems to handle damaged pdf much better than the mud dancer...

  52. Uhh... Typo? by Yawgm8th · · Score: 0

    One of his common setups involves a computer with a Pentium 4 processor, at least 512 gigabytes of memory and a specialized operating system based on Linux.
    I'm assuming he doesn't need a 512GB hard drive but rather, 512 megabytes of ram. And if this isn't a typo, where can I buy a 512GB stick of ram?

    --
    do unto others as you would have them do unto you
  53. MOD PARENT WAY UP!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not everyone can afford your life style, Mr. Mann, some people have to make an honest living, and can't go around being ridiculous the whole day. Some people aren't going to "fight The System" because they have a family to support and lives to lead. This Professor just needs to get a freakin' life, seriously.

    Thank you!

    Steve Mann is just a self-impressed geek who lugs around a portable computer. He's not some kind of visionary. His work isn't improving people's lives. It's not making him more intelligent, healthier, more physically capable, or longer-lived. In fact, about the time that he started drifting away to read e-mail while I was talking to him, I'd be tempted to drive that EyeTap 3" back into his cranium -- which couldn't possibly be good for him.

    Why doesn't Steve Mann take some of that energy and apply it towards systems that do real-time text-to-speech for blind people trying to get around in the sighted world? Why doesn't he put some effort towards a system that stimulates muscles so that paralyzed people could perform tasks we take for granted, like picking things up or turning door knobs? No, he's too full of himself to try to actually help someone.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT WAY UP!!! by Sargerion · · Score: 1

      Your quite welcome, I'm glad at least one other person sees more than just a random article about computer-human integration...

    2. Re:MOD PARENT WAY UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And why don't they allow cameras in stores? Well, I'm not too sure about that one, but why the hell would you want to video tape in a store anyway?

      Of course not, pompous jerk -- you're too busy telling everyone else to shut up. How about recording a transaction where the clerk lies out of both sides of his face to make the transaction.

      The no recording sign is just a license to lie, ceat and steal while preventing leaving a filthy trail.

      They also have such signs at dumpsites. Why, because they charge you an extra $30 for showing up with hazardous waste (freon-filled compressors) then pocket the money and send you out to dump it anyway. Five minutes later, the bulldozer comes along and crushes it, releasing all the freon. Sticking thirty bucks into your pocket is a damned sight easier than pulling the refrigerator and bleeding off the freon for proper disposal.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT WAY UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In fact, about the time that he started drifting away to read e-mail while I was talking to him, I'd be tempted to drive that EyeTap 3" back into his cranium -- which couldn't possibly be good for him.

      You motherfucking cretin -- you're exactly what this world needs -- another asshole who feels slighted and wants to unleash violence on anyone who disses you for being not worth listening to. Someone should mod you and the parent up your respective assholes, whence you came.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT WAY UP!!! by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try to think of Mr. Mann's contribution as stemming from merely being a social outlier. Even if his behavior doesn't seem to be doing anyone any good, he's helping by making a lot of very weird people seem normal in comparison. Thus, he paves the path by which oddness becomes mainstream and accepted, and makes our conception of "normal" broader and more flexible.

      Just as a population thrives due to genetic diversity, a society will stagnate without an influx of diversity. And this guy, I have to admit, is pretty diverse.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    5. Re:MOD PARENT WAY UP!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1
      You motherfucking cretin -- you're exactly what this world needs -- another asshole who feels slighted and wants to unleash violence on anyone who disses you for being not worth listening to.

      I'm sorry, I didn't catch all of that. About halfway through I started reading my e-mail...

      Try reading the article:
      Mann greets you, warmly at first, though he soon gets distracted by something on the tiny computer monitor wedged over his eye.

      In fact, being with Mann sometimes feels like the ultimate, in-your-face version of having a dinner companion who talks on a cell phone.
      Steve Mann agreed to the interview and then didn't even have the courtesy to give the reporter his full attention. Maybe asocial assholes like you think that's appropriate behavior but I don't and neither do the other normal people in the world.
    6. Re:MOD PARENT WAY UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so the solution to this is of course to have a professor of engineering walking around filming stuff?

      Ever heard of investigative journalism? That's their job, not his.

  54. CCTV for everyone - zero privacy? by duncan_entwisle · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    When employees tell him filming is not allowed, Mann points to the stores' own surveillance cameras behind darkened domes in the ceiling.

    If CCTV systems are bad because they invade the privacy of individuals, how can walking around with a camera be better? If he were using it purely to prove a point, that would be fine, but he seems to be advacating that everyone should be wearing cameras. This would be an abandonment of privacy, where no-one would ever be free of CCTV imagining.

    Sticking a camera in everyone's face is just plain rude.

    1. Re:CCTV for everyone - zero privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is one camera more equal than any other camera?

    2. Re:CCTV for everyone - zero privacy? by Cska+Sofia · · Score: 1

      Also, a store is private property, which means they can cover the walls with cameras and still tell him to turn his off.

      I mean, what does he expect them to say? "Ack, caught out by our own rules! Now we'll have to throw all our cameras away!"

  55. Re:A bit confused about our usage of the term cybo by porter235 · · Score: 1

    Having them as an integrated component of one's being does.



    Ok... you better define some of those big terms you are throwing around. I know that I have a daughter is an integrated component of my being, but she does not live inside me. Mann has pretty much integrated his gear into his being. He wears the stuff everywhere all the time. It alters the way he thinks and behaves. It even screws him up when he takes it off. It is a part of what he is.

  56. Re:Get some PRIORITIES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember Nanking.

    300,000+ dead, some even said it reached into the millions - Japs didn't keep score like Hitler did.

  57. Re:Paste this into Mozilla URL bar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. I should look into this... by Upaut · · Score: 0

    Several people I have met, including myself, have very different visual abilities between their eyes. I have 20/20 in one eye, and 20/80 in the other. I figure that if I have to have vision correction in one eye, and I am desensitized to a mild difference in my sight, then the different quality of image provided by the camera would not cause any more problems than common glasses. In fact, where can I get a pair? I might as well have the ability to check my e-mail while between computers.

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
  59. I disagree... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

    Eventually, he says, everyone will want to be more tightly linked with computers, to enhance our memory and connections to other people.

    Haven't there been studies that show people who use PDAs have worse memory than non-PDA-users? What happens is you just put names, phone numbers, e-mail address, etc. on your PDA, you forget about it and rely on that for all your information.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  60. Boring everyday social ramifications. . . by jhobbs · · Score: 2, Funny
    Every thought about what kinds of boring everyday social ramifications come from this sort of thing? Like every girl with be shaved a la Shenade O'Connor in fifty years because hair is so unsexy due to all the wealthy trendsetters having shaved their heads because hair gets in the way of the brainwave-monitoring-wraparound-headset-windows-20 48 must have Rodeo Dr. gadget of the future?

    And of course French women will still have hairy pits.

  61. he thinks he's so tough? by bbdd · · Score: 2, Funny

    let's see how well he does on battlebots!

    i'm guessing he would be in the heavyweight class.

  62. When Cellphones... by logical1010 · · Score: 1

    ...seem so passe and when there are only a few idiots still flashing their RIM gagets around, I was wondering what the next fashion would be... now I know.

    --
    There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by truth. ~John Kenneth Galbraith
  63. What a LOSER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fear me! I am the mighty Cyborg Warrior sent here from the distant future to videotape inside of Walmart and harass the clerks and their clerky clerkiness..."

    This guy is a chump. I think the shielding on the eyepiece he wears needs some checking as it has obviously cooked half his brain.

    Does he really think he is making a great significant social statement by wandering around wearing this crap?

    And does he take this stuff off when he goes to the toilets at Walmart or is it a great social statement for him to video you having a leak at the urinal?

  64. Memory by Barkmullz · · Score: 1

    One of his common setups involves a computer with a Pentium 4 processor, at least 512 gigabytes of memory and a specialized operating system based on Linux.

    Wow, that new 2.6 kernel can really support a bunch of RAM. Neato!

    --
    Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
    1. Re:Memory by Synic · · Score: 1

      Durr... Pentium 4 is 32-bit... I thought the hard limit for memory addressing would be 4 gigabytes?

    2. Re:Memory by pantherace · · Score: 1

      the virtual memory address space is 4GB, but the Pentium (pro and 2?) 3 and 4 have Intel's PAE (Physical Address Extension) which allows the p3 & p4 to use their 36-bit physical address bus (64GB). Long live paged memory access.

  65. Shopping List by GrEp · · Score: 1

    What are the best wearable computers you can cobble together for $2000, $1500, and $750? (USD)

    Minimal Requirements:

    -single eye head mounted display (like this)

    -single hand input (like the twiddler)

    -8 hours battery life

    -linux

    -802.11

    --

    bash-2.04$
    bash-2.04$yes "Don't you hate dialup connections?"| write USERNAME
  66. Utterly pitiful -- needs therapy by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 1

    "Clerks should be confronted with their clerk-iness", he says, and I have a corollary to this:

    Mentally ill pseudo-cyborgs should be confronted with their pseudo-cyborg mental illness.

    Sorry, I don't think this is a good use of technology. People who talk on cellphones constantly already annoy me enough. From the interview, this guy seems to be using this as a replacement for real human interaction, as well as a good way to feel superior to other people.

    The fact that he wore a wearable computer to a high school dance isn't quite as amazing as the fact that he went to a high school dance at all!

  67. I wonder what would happen if.... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    Somebody set off an EMP near him?

    Sure you could be charged with destroying private property but could you be charged with assualt as Mann would doubtlessy claim?

  68. How about the iTap? by ALecs · · Score: 1

    So how long until I can find one on the Apple store? :)

  69. It would be l33t if... by chendo · · Score: 1

    Cyborgs like the ones in Ghost in the Shell exist... Things like video communication, surfing the web, virtual reality, all in your head. How cool would that be, apart from the fact that if hackers gained access to your brain... censorship via 'interceptors' (think them as a way to allow other people to access your sight, and modifiy it, if possible) and tons of other things.

    But having a cyborg body would be pretty good... just get a new body whenever you get run over by a truck, provided your head is still intact. Although I'm personally not sure how they eat/drink/go to the toilet/have sex/and stuff, I'm sure they'll find a way.

    On a more offtopic note, the first few episodes of Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex Season 2 has been aired and the raws are on the net, waiting to be subbed... :o

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  70. And the other side of the coin... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Nor is it wrong for the creator of said information to recieve just compensation for its creation and use. And the law of supply and demand begs to differ with you-- Their information does diminish in value when it can be widely/easily/freely distributed. And I'm sorry, but you don't have a right to know. You don't have a right to know what Cowboy Neil is doing with that sock puppet in the bathroom late at night, let alone distribute information that isn't yours simply because information is free, baby. It's not. The world does not work that way, nor has it worked that way for millenia, and it's not for lack of trying. In fact, go tell Coca Cola that since information is free, you should be allowed to copy their reciept and distribute across the net. Just let me know when you do so I can be their ro laugh my ass off at you.

    Not that I don't -ahem- copy information, just that I'm realistic in knowing I don't have an automatic right to it. you want free information? Try telepathy. I seem to remember somebody (three guesses) refering to it as one of the worst curses you could bestow upon a civilzation.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:And the other side of the coin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confused. Indeed you don't have an automatic right to get information about things from people. So coca cola doesn't have to tell you the recipe if you ask (actually they do under certain country's laws, because it's a foodstuff, but not in the US).

      But if you find out the recipe, coca cola doesn't have legal recourse even in the current framework except trade secret laws (which won't apply to you if you've found out the information innocently, say by chemical analysis of coca cola you walked into a shop and bought.).

      ONCE YOU HAVE INFORMATION, you should NEVER be penalised for the act of spreading it further itself or simply having it. If the information is incorrect and hurtful, you should perhaps be penalised, but not for the act of spreading itself - The correct cure for wrong information is more correct information, anyway, not less information.

      Another issue some people find hard to separate is plagiarism vs. copyright. Copyright is a right to stop people spreading information. It actually has relatively little to do with plagiarism. You could have strong antiplagiarism laws and other "artist's moral rights" in the complete absence of copyright - I could be allowed copy information so long as I didn't claim to originate it (which would be plagiarism). That could be great for artists - free distribution network, yet a legal right to sue the fuck out of people pretending to be them, thus allowing them to make a fortune out of appearance fees / ticket sales.

  71. No more a golem than you are a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that's what the /. mods seem to think, so oh well.

  72. You think Steve had security trouble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Imagine what they'll do to Stefan Vamos with his theft-proof suitcase.
    If the carrier's hand then comes away from the handle, it sets off a 240-decibel alarm and if not decoded within five seconds the case explodes.
    "Will you be checking that bag or carry-on..?"
  73. Such an assinine thing to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It bugs me the way he talks about "fighting the system" and taking on the "clerks" for their "clerkiness"

    He's not fighting any system by being a total ass and filming in a private place. He's just a nerd looking for a fight, and while that can be amsuing in itself, it's really just fucking childish to pretend he's doing it for some "higher cause"

    1. Re:Such an assinine thing to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've summed up 90% of all 'activists'. It would be quite entertaining to see them get their asses kicked because that's the last thing most of them expect.

    2. Re:Such an assinine thing to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He's just a nerd looking for a fight, and while that can be amsuing in itself, it's really just fucking childish to pretend he's doing it for some "higher cause"


      Difficult people are so bothersome, their childish disobedience intolerable. Protesting for a "higher cause" as defined by the fashionable revolution is fine, we can all agree on that. But interfering with the orderly management and operation of commerce is unacceptable. It is difficult to imagine the degree of arrogance displayed by this insistence that mere consumers are equal to providers of consumables! Dogs biting the hand that feeds them. Shame.
    3. Re:Such an assinine thing to say. by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Oooh, burn! Mod parent up!

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  74. does he have Sex by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    With his Palm ....... Pilot ?

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  75. Maybe because ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why the university keeps him on I have no idea.

    ... he's tenured?

    1. Re:Maybe because ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... he's tenured?


      He's not and likely will never be.

    2. Re:Maybe because ... by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1

      Thats interesting because in the film he was portrayed as being an employee of the university, or at least thats the impression I got out of it.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    3. Re:Maybe because ... by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      Tenure: 'permanent faculty' or harder to throw out.

      non-tenured: still an employee of the university, but if not promoted within a given period is essenttialy invited to leave.

      That's the way it used to work.

  76. Re:Get some PRIORITIES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Remember ...

    Sorry, I forget.

  77. He wore one to a high school dance. by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    ...think he got laid?

    1. Re:He wore one to a high school dance. by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, didn't you see the video?

      --
      stuff
  78. Re:nauseous side effects? [OT] by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

    I saw the phrase "@ddicted to slashdot?" in your .sig, and my "delete-spam-now" reflex almost kicked in!

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  79. Re:The original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eminem said it first

    "Just tryin' to buy me some time, then I remembered this magic trick
    Duh duh duh duh duh duh! Go go Gadget Dick!
    Whipped that shit out, there ain't no doubt about it
    It hit the ground, caused an earthquake and power outage!
    I shouted "Now, Bitch, let's see who gets the best,
    Shoved that shit in crooked and fucked that fat slut to death!"
    - "As the World Turns"

  80. I sense the good in him. by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

    He's now machine more than man, twisted and evil.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  81. What about the singularity? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    All this is just warmup to when we isolate consciousness, and transfer it to a different physical object (perhaps silicon based).

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  82. Appreciation of what's given away freely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Little has been said about his many inventions, and
    freely available source code,
    comparametric.sourceforge.net
    and
    Reality Window Manager (RWM),
    as well as other related work that
    is freely available.


    RWM illustration.


    Fundamentals
    link to mediated reality.


    If I were in his shoes, with all these ideas (30 years ahead of his time) I would be saying fsck GNU! I'd be partnering with Adobe, Microsoft, and make some money selling implementations.


    Given what little appreciation has been shown for
    what is given away freely (even Stallman is seldom
    appreciated), I'd be taking a serious look at using a subscription-based model for all the websites. For the amount of hits that wearcam.org, eyetap.org, etc., get, even just a penny a year subscription would produce a fortune. And I'd be stopping all manner of free talks, or free advice. If you hate the guy that much, at least don't take him for a free ride!


    If I were him, I'd be renting a store front, installing some surveillance cameras, and selling shrink-wrap software implementations of VideoOrbits.


    Anyone who's actually making real change in the
    world attracts a lot of wrath from un-appreciative
    people.


    Mann, Stallman, Gates, or anyone else who's
    changed the parameters of our world is hated by
    many. But at least Gates has some money to sweeten the hatred.

  83. Eye replacement by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

    I've always liked the idea of replacing eyes with cameras that would support IR and zoom capabilities, most importantly, implants to let the blind see.

    --
    Karma: Good, or bust!
  84. What is reality? by gods_design · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "For example, Mann and his graduate students have developed software that can transform billboards or other rectangular shapes in the physical world -- when viewed through the lens of a wearable computer -- into virtual boxes for reading e-mail and other messages."

    So in the future we will be able to take the real world and turn it into what we want? So I can make every billboard have Cindy Crawford on it or make it a linux add? What about if we just don't want to see the messages that are around us in the "real" world. I swear officer I didn't see 65 on that speed limit sign. My eye piece made it look like it said 85mph.

    I know that I have had times in my life where I have spent 18 - 20 hours in front of my computer. At that time I thought I had a great life but in truth it sucked. All I did was read and write code and emails. There is so much more to life than that. Sometimes it is good to take a step away from the monitor and see the world as it is.

    --
    -- David inquired...
  85. Rules Change by Detritus · · Score: 1
    Rules evolve and change over time.

    For a current example, many current production cell phones include a camera and audio recorder. With the prevalence of cell phones, rules that treat cameras and audio recorders as unusual devices will need to be changed. I ran into this problem when I was selected for jury duty. A sign at the entrance to the courthouse said that these devices were prohibited. In the jury lounge, it quickly became obvious that most of the jurors were carrying cell phones. I suspect that most of the lawyers were also carrying these devices. If the security personnel had wanted to be hard-asses about it, they could have effectively shut down the courthouse for the day by refusing entry to anyone carrying a cell phone.

    In the future, electronic vision correction/enhancement may become common for people with vision problems that are not correctable with conventional lenses. Now the video camera is no longer a toy, it is part of a medical device. A storeowner who tells his customers that medical devices are prohibited is going to be in big trouble, very quickly.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  86. I've had one of his classes... by CaptCanuk · · Score: 1

    and it's not that bad. He's a little less self righteous when in class. It's obvious that certain things he does is for attention. I had a unique experience in that on the first day of class i had with me, not even 2 hours later, my ex got me tickets to a Toronto Film Festival movie and it just so happened to be Cyberman and lo and behold, Mann walks down the aisle decked out in some old hardware he was laughing at in class. It was pretty blatant that he wore the larger headwear to garner more attention or someone affiliated with the film asked him to. It was actually amusing when some "movie appreciaters" who wanted to hear themselves talk more than actually ask questions questioned him after the movie. He shut a couple of them up quickly and left a few dumbfounded cause it sounded like they expected very few multisyllabic words from a "Tech Geek". There was at the very least one who had no question at all but wanted to state something obvious about the movie.

    Mann's a little hypocritical. He despised Red Hat yet Eyetap used to be a Red Hat mirror (and a big pipe hog for this reason according to some U of T network admins). He used to state that some of the propietary closed code in Red Hat was poisonous with his analogy: "Which of the following would you eat? Pure food, pure poison, or some food mixed with poison." Needless to say, he exhtoled Debian for our labs (that was our first cheesy assignment, installing Debian on a 386/486).

    Mann is kinda scary to walk into in the halls though. It always feels like he's not quite there when he takes off the glasses. He seems disoriented and I've seen him sometimes grab the walls to walk properly. I'm sure he's dependent on that system more than a lot of us could imagine. I think in the movie or in class he stated that they all have Runner's bodies or the health associated with that due to the increase in temperature caused by the machine on his hip.
    He has a book on how he makes his mini-computers on eyetap somewhere - it is of use if you want to build your own (hard part is the power source). His philosophies and actions are easier to swallow with a grain of salt.

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
    1. Re:I've had one of his classes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had one of his classes too. I thought the parametric equations were quite interesting, as well as all the cool camera/photography knowledge the guy seems to have. He is a true photo-elec-geek.

  87. Old news from bad source by barks · · Score: 1

    With great irony I've heard about this guy in a tabloid article back at the beginning of 2002.

    The article was eye-catching b/c it included a picture of this guy. He looked like a victim of malnutrition with a beard and this god awful eye piece that looked hardly ergonomical. The tabloid article went on to mention how if this poor lad went w/o wearing it he wouldn't be as mentioned "feeling nauseous, unsteady, [or] naked", but would rather suffer possible brain damage. I suppose the picture alone wasn't dramactic enough for the editor.

    1. Re:Old news from bad source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe they were talking about his old systems from Smithsonian Institute. There was some of his older systems shown at the Museum of American History, including the wearcomp2 which surely must have been uncomfortable.


      But any new invention has its first implementation that is usually not very comfortable or sleek.


      They also had the Wright Brothers airplanes there, and the old airplanes certainly were not very ergonomic by our standards of today.

  88. dear god by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    My goodness that sounds cool. Several thoughts:

    Given all his work is evidently produced under educational grants, why isn't plans, instructions, and/or specifications made available to the public? If his dream is truely for a connected humanity and not for personal commercial profit, wouldn't that be what we'd see?

    Also, I'd think that his mode of output would cause some fairly severe visual problems. Knowing a little bit about how the bifocality and other various functions or the human eye work, and having had visual disorders since a young child, it seems odd to me that such a contraption would not cause phenominal headaches and degrade the ability of that eye to focus properly, let alone in unison with the other eye.

    I wonder if he uses solidstate storage (and thus "512Gb of memory"), if the AP writer didn't know what they were talking about (doing what many people do: calling the storage memory), carries around 2 large IDE drives, a dozen laptop drives, or if he does something else entirely?

    Does anyone know if there are any other similar projects, or if there is documentation somewhere mentioning what components he is using? I would love to get my hands on osmething similar to this (but maybe with somewhat less expensive processing power driving it). Would it be conceiveable to (at least) have something that's maybe 500MHz, runs cool, uses a little amount of power, and 'only' has a gig or two of RAM? I imagine that the battery would be manageable then. :)

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  89. sir by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    have you travelled at all lately? things at airports have just gotten a little zany since the world trade center attacks...and people being pushed around or worse by airport security in the name of homeland security is not unheard of any more. while your step dad may have been able to get around security without much pressure to find the sheer insanity encompassing the airlines recently as something other than it is...i think it would be folly...and to see this as an unlikely event is included in this. (although it may have taperred off somewhat, i havn't flown recently and mabye people have calmed down a little...but i doubt it.)

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  90. Can't be good for his eyes by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    I looked around for the various eye glass video screen options. I dropped it after I realized it would kill my eyes. Being constantly connected isn't THAT important.

    The idiot will be half blind by the time he is 50.

  91. Clarification? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    "MiB?"

    "GiB?"

    Men in Black? Girls in Black? Obviously not a typo...

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Clarification? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Mebi and Gibi. A rarely used, but fairly official SI standard for powers of 1024 rather than powers of 1000 the Mega and Giga are meant to refer to.

      It's there to remove confusion since memory quantities that are not neccesarily addressed using binary (e.g. hard disks, and data transfer rates) tend to use 1000 Bytes to the KByte.

  92. Yeah, whatever. by Animats · · Score: 1
    The "wearable computing" thing always seems to scream "loser" to me. The first time I encountered true wearable computing was at Alamo rental car turn-in at LAX. Those poor guys wear a computer with an RF link, a credit card reader, a barcode scanner, and a printer. This allows them to check in car after car without a break. This has been in place for a decade. You don't want that job.

    There's been some interest in this in the CAD world. Maintenance techs could see drawings superimposed on their view of the real world. Stuff like that will probably happen. ("Where does this pipe go? OK, there.") You don't want that job either, but if you have to do it, the gear might help.

    Printemps, the Paris department store, had "webcamers" for a few years. Webcamers were cool, young Parisians on Rollerblades wearing designer outfits equipped with audio and video links. Shoppers could make an appointment for remote shopping via the Web. Printemps also sent them to events like the Cannes Film Festival. It was cool, but unprofitable, and has been discontinued.

    I've heard Wynn speak, but he didn't have much to say. We got to see what he sees on a big screen. It wasn't impressive.

    We do need better design of wearable electronics. By now there should be phone sets built into earrings, a necklace, and a bracelet.

    1. Re:Yeah, whatever. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      So far the focus of many of these wearable groups seems to be reinterpretation of the real world + a bit of self-centred communication (access my email, my data, my whatever).

      But how about wearable server(+client combined) for virtual telepathy and telekinesis? Would this be more interesting?

      Virtual telepathy:
      You see a cute puppy playing in the park, commit your video+audio buffer (X minute ring buffer) to permanent storage, and make the url available and accessible to your friend you meet, same goes for other multimedia and data/file objects you store in your electronic brain. Update your public "facepage" so that people who meet you can get your contact information, better know you, skip the usual introductions... Update your private "facepage" for your friends - "sad/happy/worried with explanations accessible to those who need to know".

      Virtual telekinesis:
      Use the browser on your wearable client to browse your home server's relevant "room page" to change the airconditioner's temperature and fan settings, or to dim the lights. Bookmark your favourite settings - heck bookmark different settings for different situations.

      --
  93. An addict, not an artist. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    From the Yahoo story:
    Mann, a 41-year-old engineering professor at the University of Toronto, spends hours every day viewing the world through that little monitor in front of his eye -- so much so that going without the apparatus often leaves him feeling nauseous, unsteady, naked.
    That reads more like a description of addict than anything else.
  94. Someone who knows him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He suffers from typical media lab I AM THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE. Never mind that he got his PhD when he was 40 years old! He sucks every sap of energy from anyone who gets near him, and milks any credit possible for what its worth.
    Steve Mann is a snake oil salesman, you get what you guy. Whatever catches on that is remotely related to wearable computing, Steve will claim he invented it and he did it first.
    Seriously, all that GEAR you see him wearing?! His co-students at MIT made it or his grad students made it. Steve is an egotistical burn-out, and all he does now is rope is suckers for free labour and suck in a professor's salary (at u of t which is below his standards) and do work maybe one day a week. but atleast he's clearing $1 mill with the lab/art gallery he had all his students work on!!

    1. Re:Someone who knows him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think his MIT co-students invented any of this, take a look at http://wearcam.org/shootingback/nn.mpg where you can see an excerpt from an interview with Medialab Director Nicholas Negroponte. It's pretty clearly acknolwedged that Mann invented this work, and brought this idea into the Medialab, even if his co-student (one in particular) doesn't want to admit it.

  95. The human computer by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've actually been accused of being a cyborg before. Due to psychiatic and emotional problems experienced earlier in my life, I've developed a sort of machine perspective on things. Embracing the machine side of things helped me to escape the emotional pain I was feeling. Since then, the machine side has very much been a part of me. It's really interesting. I feel more comfortable expressing myself as a machine. Call it weird or crazy. But it makes sense to me. I have a writing on my website called The Human Computer. It relates to this topic. It expresses the brain in terms of machine and computer parts. Fusing man and machine would be a fantastic marvel. Intelligence, processing power, efficiency, strength and other abilities of the human brain and body would be greatly enhanced.

  96. Favorite not Hated by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    >I thought it was Gates of the Borg?
    I think you've confused "favoret" and "most hated".

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  97. What kind of cyborg? by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    We've already desided Bill Gates represents the ST:TNG borg so from what sifi do we attribute to Steve Mann?
    In Dr Who we have the Cybermen who are much like the Borg however the borg just plug you into a single hive mind you don't think for yourself. The Cybermen reprogram you so while you do think indupendently you think the same was as all the other cybermen and you don't question orders.
    Then there is the Darlek who just kill anything not like them.

    I'd say Steve Mann is more like a Cyberpunk cyborg. Just some upgrades.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  98. I disagree by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1

    I disagree. I wish more people would put up a fight, and then maybe businesses would stop getting worse with each passing year. I have seen clerks get ruder and ruder, to the point that sticking it to them is a perfectly acceptable way to stick it to the man. I'm sure a number of people will know what I am talking about.

    1. Re:I disagree by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      So, your response to the rudeness of people around you is to be at least equally rude.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  99. Information Addiction by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

    If I ever got to the point where not having my "toys" with me 24/7 made me feel "nauseous, unsteady, naked" I'd have to seriously consider going into therapy.

    OK, I have come home from work at times only to turn around and go back because I forgot my cellphone. Given traffic around here, that can take up to an hour to make the round-trip. Since I don't have a landline, I consider it a necessity to have it with me at home.

    My personal PDA? Most of the time it sits in its cradle doing nothing. The only time I really use it is when I travel, and even then half the time I forget it at home.

    There's something to be said about being able to leave everything behind and be inaccessible to the outside world, even if it is for a few hours. Some may call it isolated, or out of touch; I call it relaxing.

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  100. Why is he considered a cyborg ? by andy666 · · Score: 1

    He should just be considered a goofball.

    "Hey everyone, look I have an iPod - I am a cyborg!!"

  101. Someone who knows him, or just angry at him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The credibility of your story is somewhat lacking. For example, he invented wearable computing BEFORE he came to MIT, and brought these ideas AND implementations to MIT when he went there in the early 90's.


    And can you blame him from being a victim of Media Lab exploitation? They were pretty quick to call his work their own, and describe him as "Here's Steve Mann, modeling our latest cyberware" (while showing a picture of his old inventions that pre-date his time at MIT).

  102. This was a non-article by speedbump · · Score: 1

    WTF? Just because this guy is geeky enough to fixate on his wearable computer, how does that make him a cyborg?

    How does any of this help him 'explore his humanity?'

    Waste of time.

  103. You missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some good points, but you missed one of the main ones:

    > I think that Mann's experience is very similar with regard to his take on the world. He's moved
    > ahead in a way. Concepts that are basic to him, are esoteric to the world at large.

    Perhaps, but since when is that license to be obnoxious or act smugly superior?

    A great many people have specialized knowledge. Some concepts that are basic to me are no doubt esoteric to you, and vice versa. Does that mean we should feel all smugly superior and look down on each other?

    Lording your specialized knowledge over others doesn't make you l33t - it just makes you a prick.

    1. Re:You missed the point by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      You are correct sir. However, it's human nature to automatically assume that everyone else thinks the same way that you yourself do. This is something that some of us are better at working against than others. It just sounds like Mann is less adept at this.

      An example for me is that I was raised in a fairly liberal and very cultured city in Ohio (a rarity I know). The emphasis in my education was on intellect and the arts with less emphasis on sports. The best way to describe the city I grew up in is just to watch Ferris Beuhler's Day Off and note the kids around him and the neighborhood they lived in. Mix in a high percentage of punk rockers and new wavers (an 80s kid here) as well as a decent racial balance of about 60% caucasian to %40 non-caucasian (very generalized numbers as I don't really care much about racial issues other than to say I believe in totally equal rights to the detriment of the majority)) and you have a decent picture of the neighborhood I grew up in.

      Naturally, when I went off to college in a small southern Ohio rural town (Ohio U), I was taken aback by the imbalance of races (predominantly white/conservative students) and the lack of liberal views. There were a ton of ditto heads at O.U. even though it's SUPPOSED to be a fairly liberal school. I figured this was just an abberation at the time. But over the years that I've travelled and met other people from outside of where I grew up, I found that MY background was an abberation. It was hard to accept because... I figured most people thought like I do.

      When I became aware of this, it also gave me insight into why people like Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Reilly think that their views are "normal". They live in a vacuum.

      Getting back to Mann (as this isn't really a political discussion and I hate politics) I think he and people like him are also living in a vacuum. I would argue that I am living in a vacuum of my own making based on how involved I am with computers. A few of my friends have commented on how I see the world through computer tinted sunglasses. They can't relate, and a part of me has trouble understanding why they can't. But the difference is that I accept it try to tamp down my internal reactions so as to appear more civil.

      If anyone were to read my internal thoughts regarding computers and technology, they probably would think that I was a prick. But it's really hard to back down from something you know to be true just to appease someone who doesn't "get it". In fact it's damn near impossible and downright frustrating as hell. Kind of like the people who don't "get" the way the X window system works. If you know how it works, you understand that it is a thing of beauty and quite advanced compared to other systems. So it leads to great flamewars between those who DO "get it" and those who don't.

      Get it? :P

  104. CCTV cameras for some people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, if you had a store that was your private property, it's your store, so you might decide to only allow white people to come inside, or you can illegally chain and padlock your fire exits shut, or maybe you decide "since it's my store, I'm going to kill anyone I don't like who comes in here".


    But just because something is your property doesn't make you immune to the law.


    Your store exists inside a city, which exists inside a state or province, which exists inside a country, etc..


    Not to mention that it was built on stolen land, if you really want to get technical about ownership.


    But on another level, there's no such thing as ownership (just stop paying your property taxes for a while and see what happens).


    So I see no problem with sousveillance or other forms of inverse surveillance, if for nothing more than personal safety.

  105. Surveillance is also a violation of copyright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All he, or anyone else has to do is wear a softwear license agreement or other self-created and copyrighted material into the store, and then they get to do the felony offence (and hopefully the time).


    So how about equal rights, e.g. put the surveillers in jail as well.

  106. Yes, the article was poorly written. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What the article didn't focus on, was any of his accomplishments, inventions, or research. It just seemed to be an article about how strange the interviewer thought he was. If I were him, I'd just stop giving interviews, and keep doing great research. He's done lots of great research, and we find his books and papers thought provoking, even if the interviewer at AP News didn't want to take the time to read any of his work or try to understand any of it.


    The crazy thing is that Mr. Bergstein will probably be wearing an eyetap some day, and reading email while he's interviewing somebody in the future. Maybe some day someone (who does not yet have an eyetap) will write the same about Mr. Bergstein.

  107. slashdot effect by kwoff · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, the web server with the article isn't running on Mr. Mann himself.

  108. Pooohah! by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1

    You apparently don't get what it is that Mann is researching. He is attempting to identify the issues that society will need to adapt to fit the technology of the future, and to propose solutions. Wearable computing is in its infancy, but will be commonplace within 5 years. Same with actual individual augmentation like cochlear and corneal implants, nerve actuated robotic prosthetics, etc. Right now its used with the handicapped to enable them. Tomorrow it will be used by 'normals' to expand their capabilities. Examining how society discriminates against augmented individuals will help develop the proposals needed to implement change, both in society and in making augmentations less obvious. When a person like Mann gets treated like a terrorist at the airport and like a shoplifter or peeping tom at the mall, then it is society that is the problem, not the individual.

    --
    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
  109. 512 gig of memory? by Tagren · · Score: 0

    On a P4? A p4 is a 32bit cpu and would not be able to adress all the memory. Yes I know about NUMA or whatever it is called. But that is 4gb per process right?.

    A typo?

    Please remove my bad karma :P

    ---

  110. Yes, a typo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, a typo. The standard EyeTap wearcomp comes with 512 megabytes in the 3GHz P4 configuration.

  111. Re:A bit confused about our usage of the term cybo by fishexe · · Score: 1

    He wears the stuff everywhere all the time. It alters the way he thinks and behaves. It even screws him up when he takes it off. It is a part of what he is.

    Yes, bit you could say the same about my underwear.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009