Slashdot Mirror


Heise Online Reveals Trojan / Spam Connection

yourruinreverse writes "Virus distributors have been caught red-handed selling IP addresses of trojan-infected machines by editors of the German IT magazine c't. Several individuals appear to have been arrested already after c't, revealing one of the virus writer's nationality as British, passed on the information to Scotland Yard. Check out the German article first, then its translation on Groklaw and maybe also same translation posted in the English section of the Heise website (in order of appearance)."

150 comments

  1. The future of law enforcement? by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "With the help of c't, a student of computer science has tracked down the authors of a computer virus. The editorial staff were able to establish contact with the virus distributors and buy IP addresses of infected machines. Because one of the virus distributors has been located in Great Britain, c't has passed on all information to Scotland Yard. By now, individuals in several countries have been arrested."

    The Slashdot heading leaves out that it was a College Student who did this primarily. Will this continue to be a pattern in the future? I sure hope so, as law enforcement is typically behind the times, and overworked as it is. This way, order is still maintained without vigilante justice, since those in the know involved proper law enforcment.

    1. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This way, order is still maintained without vigilante justice...

      What's wrong with vigilante justice? Care to give examples?

    2. Re:The future of law enforcement? by null_session · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Will this continue to be a pattern in the future? I sure hope so

      I don't know that I wouild count on that. There are lots of CS students with lots of time on their hands. Some trade music files, some write virii, and some track down the people doing the first two (and ocassionally someone writes an OS). Anyone with adiquate knowlege and time can do any of the above, their choice is up to them.

      What choice will you make?

    3. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      What's wrong with vigilante justice? Care to give examples?

      In the US vigilante justice has a history that is associated with racism. Lynchings of whites by whites in the south, Bernie Goetz shooting black kids who tried to rob him, Chinese curfew laws in the west being enforced by white mobs, and so on.

      Vigilante justice is anti-democratic, it puts an unpopular minority at the mercy of the majority.

      I'm sure the cultural cultists protesting gay marriage in California would love to string up some of those lawbreaking fags getting married right now.

    4. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did not read the article online, but assume it is the same as was in the copy of C't which I read this morning.

      This is not really 'vigilante justice', especially in the racist sense which some ACs below saw there. It was someone who was affected (if only when cleaning up someone else's computer) and took the trouble to see what the trojan could do and where it came from. He then went to the only organisation he could think of (C't) which was technically able to understand the problem and had the legal knowledge necessary.

      Interesting was that companies like Symantec had also done the analytical work on the trojan(s) (and had posted the results) but had no interest in treating this problem at source (the ISS team). They make their money protecting computers from threats and not attacking those threats at source.

      What is going to happen to ISS now?

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    5. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1, Interesting

      C't reported the people to the police who arrested them. No-one got strung up. What is 'anti-democratic' about putting an 'unpopular minority' (trojan authors) at the mercy of the police? What the hell has this got to do with gay marriage?

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    6. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The post was in response to a question of what is wrong with vigilante action, as opposed to what the action taken by C't. Reporting someone to the police is not a vigilante action, deciding to take capture and punishment into your own hands is. Vigilante punishments are overly harsh, especially when undertaken by a majority that is angry and disgusted by the actions of the minority they wish to punish.

    7. Re:The future of law enforcement? by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How did you get modded interesting? In the 1st sentence, in the 1st paragraph of the comment you replied is your answer: In the US vigilante justice has a history that is associated with racism.

      In this case, C't just did the police work for police too lazy/not knowledgable enough to figure out what to do. But just like the poster said, "In the US vigilante justice has a history that is associated with racism". And he gave some examples of that gay marriage being one of them.

    8. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must admit I am not quite sure :-)

      The (great-)grandfather posting wandered off-topic - presumably because he had not read the very long article - and I thought the parent posting was still trying to be on-topic.

      convoluted? you bet :-)

      Vlad
      No minority groups or furry animals were harmed during this posting.

      oh, just an idea: since the police are not knowledgable enough to figure out what to do, I can think of a solution which would reduce techie unemployment.

    9. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, lynchings were bad. But shooting someone who tries to rob you? Self-defence, rock on!

    10. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the US, auction companies have a history of auctioning slaves... so fucking what? auctions are good.

    11. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are going to sue eBay?

      Vlad, proud member of a minority group ever since I emigrated ;-)

  2. Theo article by andy666 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Back in 2000 Theo predicted that this would be problem... why I took so long to happen god knows....

    1. Re:Theo article by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      Uh. Why do you think zombie networks and selling access to them wasn't a problem earlier?

      Proletariat of the world, unite to kill spammers. The more painful and slower, the better.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    2. Re:Theo article by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh. Why do you think zombie networks and selling access to them wasn't a problem earlier?

      Viruses are finally sophisticated enough to create botnets, and spammers have become more and more desperate for ways to pump their e-mail out.

    3. Re:Theo article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't we proletariat have more pressing matters? Like obtaining control of production? Let's get our priorities straight here comrades.

    4. Re:Theo article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      why I took so long to happen god knows

      Because there has always been an easier way to do it. Spammers used dial accounts, then spoofed dial accounts, then their own servers, then hijacked servers. As human beings became aware of each new spammer tactic that tactic would become unavailable.

      At some point humans will have to face the fact that spammers are not human and adopt a shoot on sight policy to end this terrible scourge.

    5. Re:Theo article by tiger99 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Probably true, but most of it would be stopped if people stopped being stupid and got rid of Outlook, as well as taking all the other appropriate precautions. Theives take advantage of open doors, and Sir Bill has left so many openings..... Especially with new viruses, where it is going to take at best hours, more likely days, to get the countermeasures in place, the simple removal of Outlook and its malignant Express mutant gives far more benefit in terms of cost and time than any other single action. Yes, you do still need a stealth-mode firewall, even better a hardware firewall, and one or more virus scanners, but close the biggest hole first!

      I saw a book in the shop the other day called "Writing Secure Code" or something similar. When I saw the publisher, I did not even bother to pick it up for a look, as the company concerned (Guess who?) has a solidly demonstrated long-term track record of gross incompetence in that area.

    6. Re:Theo article by westlake · · Score: 1
      I've seen no system compromises running OE6 at home in combination with Norton A/V in a year of use over cable broadband, typically receiving twenty-five e-mails daily, not counting spam.

      Looking back, it struck me that the most frequent and clever of e-mail attacks relied more on the old-fashioned tricks and guile of the con artist than on any particular technical vulnerability in Windows or Outlook Express.

      The greatest surprise was to receive a "plain text" newsletter from a open source project well known to Slashdot that embedded a direct link to a Windows executable, something Microsoft never does.

  3. Re:PWN3D! by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope they send them to a British pound-me-in-the-ass prison!

    In Britain, this happens in the private schools, not the prisons...

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  4. So, I suppose the next question is... by Xystance · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When will they post a website that has an engine that will allow us to submit IP addresses / MAC addresses to find out whether they are infected? I have the entire IP table of where I work... knowing what machines have been compromised through trojans would be helpful... Either way... Go Heise!

    1. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Although not quite what you wanted dshield has a page where you can see if your machine has been reported as scanning others.
      They also has a banner you can add to your site that shows a warning if the viewers ip is in the list. But if fear that people will ignore that and mistake if for the "Warning, your machine is broadcasting an IP..." ad. that used to run.
      also check out mynetwatchman

    2. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When will they post a website that has an engine that will allow us to submit IP addresses / MAC addresses to find out whether they are infected? I have the entire IP table of where I work... knowing what machines have been compromised through trojans would be helpful... Either way... Go Heise!

      If your network administrators were worth a damn, they'd be able to find the infected machines on their own.

    3. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      It would be useful for you, but it would be more useful for a hacker to have that information. I would keep it secret, if I were them. It might be worth telling the owners of the infected computers, but it should not be made public.

    4. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it just me or does the "are you cracked" page not work. I only get the crack status of 0.0.0.0 (very busy attacking the DHCP port, it seems). ;)

    5. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by 26199 · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's exactly what tools like nessus are for.

    6. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am wondering how comprehensive dshield's database is and how they gather data about infected systems. Once on their database, always on it? If your server has been compromised and reported to dsheild will you bear the stigma forever?

    7. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      the "Warning, your machine is broadcasting an IP..." ad. that used to run.

      Used to? One company that was doing it got slapped, but I'm sure I've seen that one recently. (Could be wrong, after a while it's just web page fluff that I haven't bother to block and don't really look at, like the "clock fix" one.)

      But you're right that I'd probably ignore anything that looked like that.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by null_session · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dangit, every business model that shows up on the internet, some nut starts doing it for free....

    9. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but nessus needs a server (nessusd) running on the machine that is being checked.

      While nessus for Unix is open source, nessusd for Windows is commercial.

    10. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, look at the site and see for yourself. :)

      People return logs from their routers, there are clients for most system where you send back the list of denied packets. And they do record when the attacks took place. Example..
      But the main focus for the single user is that it sends back daily reports of denied activity against your routers, such as port scanners.
      They do have a block list, which is rather short and only contains the worst current offenders over the last 3 days. They are not anal about it like SPEWS.

    11. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. Popup's made me block most ad's. :)
      you can see the warning here

    12. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I leave a lot of ads unblocked. Someone has to notice when they pull something slimey. :^)(I do currently block ads.osdn.com because at one time some of the ads kept trying to run ActiveX. I should probably just restrict that domain rather than blocking it.)

      I doubt I'd ignore dshield's notice. It wasn't vibrating so it really caught my eye!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    13. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by ScooterBill · · Score: 1

      Where is the public hanging going to take place?

      I want a front row seat!

    14. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by ogre57 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      nessus needs a server (nessusd) running on the machine that is being checked.

      Um, no, nessud runs on the machine that is doing the checking. Machine being checked doesn't need to be running anything special, just up and accessible.

      Re g*parent, seems a public site like that would be a great thing, for the spammers. User enters an IP to scan, say 1 in 1000 with a vuln they report as "none found", then use. Now, a non-public web interface equivalent to the nessus client program, for use on an internal-only server, for eg SOHO use .. hmm. I see potential problems, but might not be such a bad idea at that.

    15. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, nessus uses a server on the machine doing the scanning, not the machine being scanned.

  5. Asking for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the description of the virus. It seems like the author was just asking to get caught.

    That said, It doesn't seem like this trojan would of been a major security problem.

    Contacting him through IRC, personally sending commands to infected computers. All of this can be traced.

  6. A maturing industry... by erick99 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Maybe this isn't so surprising. Virus writers are becoming, as the gangsters in movies like to say, "a business man." Capitalism will grow in any sort of soil. I'm not supporting this by any means, but, sociologically, it sure makes a point about how any "industry" or endeavor will eventually start to emulate more legitimate enterprises.

    Keep Smiling!

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:A maturing industry... by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      In this country, you gotta get the IP addresses first first. Then when you get the IP addresses, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women.

      Actually, virus writers are still geeks so they don't get the women. Never mind.

  7. I new it! by megalogeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, we all knew it, but maybe this will be enough incentive for the major news outlets to pick the story up. In an ideal world people would see this story, realize that much of the spam they get can be blamed on viruses and patch their systems.

    Too bad we don't live in a perfect world.

    1. Re:I new it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In an ideal world people would see this story, realize that much of the spam they get can be blamed on viruses and patch their systems.

      Dude, if you're gonna dream, dream big! In MY ideal world, we still have worms and viruses, but it's much easier (and legal) to track down the Wintards with unpatched machines, and beat some sense into them.

    2. Re:I new it! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Too bad we don't live in a perfect world.

      We could if we wanted to. Like Kucinich says, "I'm electable, if you vote for me."

      --
      What?
  8. Re:PWN3D! by kfg · · Score: 1

    Same dif.

    KFG

  9. Open Relays by pheared · · Score: 0

    I thought that people have been saying that open relays (which, effectively a machine with a RAT on it is) were not to blame for spam these days.

    So, if you're paying for IP addresses then that's probably not entirely accurate. Unless you're just trying to bring the advertisement directly to the person's screen. I'd believe that.

    1. Re:Open Relays by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Most spammers don't use open relays these days. They use open proxies, which are different. (No logging in the Received lines of the email, and no store/forward--it's the spammer's machine doing the real work.)

      From some of the spam I've been getting, I think that some spammers are playing with zombie relay malware. That allows them to load up a whole spam run on a zombie machine and move on to the next one. I'll bet that their relay software is designed to not look like an open relay to anyone else. Why share the box with other spammers, and why set off open relay detectors?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  10. Caught red-handed? by twoslice · · Score: 5, Funny
    The phrase "red-handed," meaning, as the Oxford English Dictionary puts it, "in the very act of crime, having the evidences of guilt still upon the person," A murderer caught "red-handed" still had the blood of his victim on his hands. We have, since the 18th century, also used "red-handed" to describe any criminal caught in the act or bearing irrefutable evidence of guilt.

    So did these guys have IP addresses hanging from their necks like bling blings?

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:Caught red-handed? by Curien · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA. c't ran a "sting" where the virus author sold them the IP addresses.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    2. Re:Caught red-handed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      caught red-handed means being caught with the evidence on one's person.

    3. Re:Caught red-handed? by Curien · · Score: 1

      The act of selling the IPs /is/ evidence of a crime (conspiracy), or at least it would be in the US.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
  11. Also with Linux Root Kit by rqqrtnb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hello!

    This article does not surprise at all. Thus I already read some months ago in the net of a root kit for Linux, which on the stricken computer installs itself and camouflages and then a special SMTP server starts, which from the outside refers always 1000 email addresses in the way of Client server communication and sends then the Spam. In the connection it sent back even still the Resultcodes to the server.

    In the case it was more difficult to pursue the author back because on the one hand the servers were located in several states and on the other hand the companies, to which the IPs/Domains belonged again mail box or dummy firms was.

    The problem is that here regular servers were stricken, which did not have dial up IP and thus also not over RBLs are recognized.

    Which one from it learns is probably clear: Safety updates bring in, mail content scaning (spamassassin), and feel safe never.

    Unfortunately did not know I meant articles any longer to find, otherwise I would have quoted him :(

    1. Re:Also with Linux Root Kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the parent post carefully. What the hell is this guy trying to say? Did he put it through a yoda filter? He might have a point, but I can't figure out what it is!

    2. Re:Also with Linux Root Kit by krilli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I say he's german, and that he's speaking through Google / Altavista. Quite remarkable, actually.

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    3. Re:Also with Linux Root Kit by Guylhem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Like yoda you speak.

    4. Re:Also with Linux Root Kit by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      I say he's german, and that he's speaking through [the] Google / Altavista [language tools / automatic translator]. Quite remarkable, actually.

      I say we set aside one day, and make all our posts to Slashdot via Google translation to some arbitrary language and back to English (non-English speakers can just translate to English directly).

    5. Re:Also with Linux Root Kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This user is a known troll. Read his other posts and you'll see that his English is fine.

    6. Re:Also with Linux Root Kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...make all our posts to Slashdot via Google translation to some arbitrary language and back to English"

      Like this:
      http://momorgan.com/features/index.asp?feat ure=tra nslate

  12. Yes but... by Moth7 · · Score: 1

    First problem: Spammers abuse the system and find the compromised targets and set out to abuse them before the well meaning sysadmin has so much as raised a finger.

  13. Hang 'em High by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...i'm sorry to say it, but goddamn, an example needs to be made of these fools.

    plain and simple: virus writing will get you in deep shit.

    1. Re:Hang 'em High by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      And use a strong cable... like an IEEE-1284, for example. Should be able to hold several hundred pounds at least.

    2. Re:Hang 'em High by 26199 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, that statement would work a lot better if you gave an actual punishment rather than slang...

      e.g. virus writing will put you in jail

      Although personally I find it hard to justify jail for virus writers... maybe...

      virus writing will lose you your right to use computers for a while, along with a hefty sum of cash

    3. Re:Hang 'em High by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You aren't seeing this in in the proper perspective. Virus and trojan authors are at best simple vandals, at worst they are information and resource thieves of the highest caliber. Why should they be treated any differently than anyone else that causes significant damage to organizations and individuals around the world, often for no better reason than proving that they can? Go rob a bank of a couple million for the fun of it, and you won't see daylight for a long time. Cause a hundred or a thousand times that loss on a global scale and suddenly ... it's not a big deal anymore? No longer deserving of adequate punishment? It is commonly assumed that "white collar" crime isn't really so bad because "nobody gets hurt." Baloney. Say that to the guy that didn't get his bonus last year (or lost his job) because his employer spent the money fixing problems caused by a stupid Outlook trojan instead. No, this kind of activity really has to stop, or least the bar has to be raised so high that only those with a lot to gain will take the risk. As it stands now, there's very little penalty for releasing a destructive payload into the wild ... these things appear constantly and how often does an arrest result? Personally, I think the U.S. ought to come up with an offshoot of Special Forces that tracks down and "disappears" virus authors worldwide, since it appears that the majority of them come from overseas.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Hang 'em High by frankie · · Score: 1
      You know, that statement would work a lot better if you gave an actual punishment rather than slang

      You know, I think the grandparent post had an excellent suggestion for appropriate punishment of virus writers:

      virus writing will get you in deep shit

      Convicted virus writers should be sentenced to hard labor, shoveling in a manure processing plant, like the evil midget from Mad Max: Jumping the Sharkdome.

    5. Re:Hang 'em High by ogre57 · · Score: 1

      .. I find it hard to justify jail for virus writers ..

      If they are working with spammers, then I agree, mere jail is much too lenient. At the very least rig the cell to be constantly bombarded with ads.

    6. Re:Hang 'em High by 26199 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I didn't say no serious punishment... but I don't think jail is necessarily the answer. It costs the country money, it stops them doing productive work, and it may not change their ways.

      Jailing people who aren't a continuing threat to society always seems a little odd.

      (I don't have any claim to be an expert on such things, nor on what works, though).

      I'm not sure laws/punishment are particularly effective against viruses, anyway -- it's such a big 'kick me' sign that viruses will always be written, as long as they are permitted by the technology.

    7. Re:Hang 'em High by 26199 · · Score: 1

      (Er, that last paragraph wasn't an argument for leniency, it was an argument that going after the virus writers isn't a way to stop viruses).

    8. Re:Hang 'em High by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, you're correct that jail may stop them from doing productive work ... but it will also keep them from unproductive work, such as authoring more trojans. And anyone that knowingly and with malice aforethought releases one of those things simply deserves to be strung up by his testicles. A harsh jail sentence may (or may not) serve as an adequate deterrent for other potential virus authors, but from the standpoint of simple justice it may be warranted. The guy that wrote Melissa seemed genuinely ignorant of the damage potential of his creation, but there others with far more malignant intentions. Those are the ones that need to be caught and put away.

      But you're right ... ultimately, any real solution the problem will have to be technological in nature. The Internet is an organism and unfortunately is one that doesn't yet have much of an immune system. That will have to change.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  14. Re:PWN3D! by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 1

    But I thought private schools were called public schools in Britain to differentiate them from government schools?

    --
    THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
  15. Dont you have an admin? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If so, its his/her job to do that ( actually to prevent it in the first place ) .. not yours.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  16. The outlawed triangle... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think we've hit the point where three outlawed industries are now joining forces to support each other. P2P file sharing is an application consumers want but just isn't legal. Therefore, the writers of P2P applications just can't use legal means to collect money for it, they have to get paid under the table. Spyware and virus writers have the same goal, find any way possible to get their software onto your computer so they can get it to do their bidding. To them, how they get their payload isn't important How do they get paid? Well, who most needs distributed computing resorces with scattered IP addresses and bandwidth? Spammers. So, they'll gladly pay the creators of bot nets for their services, in a way no ethical buyer ever word. So there you have it, the connection between P2P and spam...

    1. Re:The outlawed triangle... by tiger99 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sadly, it tends to be as you say, although P2P is not inherently illegal, it is only when you share someone else's property that it becomes so.

      I used a P2P network once, to get an unavailable piece of music. Had it been on sale in the shops I would have bought it.

      Lesson for the RIAA - keep everything available for ever, and find a sensible way of charging for odd copies of one track, then honest people would not need to do this. Of course that might need some understanding of technology, which no-one in your organisation apparently has any more, because you can't distinguish between someone who only wants to play the DVD he has paid for on his non-Microsoft PC and a gangster.

    2. Re:The outlawed triangle... by datadood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Insightful? In what way is P2P filesharing 'illegal'? It might get used for copyright infringement, but that doesn't mean the tool itself is illegal. Think crowbar.

    3. Re:The outlawed triangle... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Nothing illegal about p2p software--just how some people use it. Writers of p2p software can try to use legal means to collect money, but who the hell would pay for their registered copy when there's so many other free versions or cracked copies?

      They're trying to make money by giving the software away. Their main options for income are banner ads, or spyware and other malware. If they used the service model of payment, their central servers would be targeted by the RIAA in a heartbeat--if the RIAA had one.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:The outlawed triangle... by nv5 · · Score: 1

      P2P is not inherently illegal. It is just a copying technology. If you make P2P illegal, photocopy machines should long have been illegal. And of course, might as well make FTP and NNTP illegal. And while you are at it, since all web browsing is inherently copying, make HTTP illegal.

    5. Re:The outlawed triangle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Think crowbar

      no, Think Lockpicks.

  17. Re:PWN3D! by Soruk · · Score: 1

    No, the government schools are called state schools.

    --
    -- Soruk
  18. Reality Check by Moth7 · · Score: 1

    Maybe he is the admin? o.0

  19. Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Directly on point!

    I try to be nice I really do. But when moderators mod a post offtopic when it wasn't really gets me steamed. What do I have to do? put Microsoft Sux0rs after every sentence? would that make you happy? huh?

    Note: To all the meta moderators - if you come across this post you know what to do with it.

  20. Re:PWN3D! by baldcamel · · Score: 1

    with the current level of overcrowding of prisons maybe we have found the way forward - detained in a public school. All the joys of prison with a first class education.

  21. This explains much by GeckoFood · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few weeks ago I noticed a HUGE spike in the number of trojan scans against my firewall. I found that the scans were coming from pretty much everywhere (world-wide), and seem to start up almost as quickly as I connect to the net. I have been wondering what was behind such a spike in trojan scan activity; I guess this is my answer.

    Fortunately, there are no known trojans on my system, the firewall and the virus checker are doing their jobs.

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
  22. Re:PWN3D! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, private==public in UK schools.

  23. Excellent work by tiger99 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It is about time that something like this happened, and I hope the courts deal with them severely.

    It would be very useful if the police forces had well-publicised points of contact for reporting computer and internet crime. At the moment, the local police station is unlikely to know anything at all, unless you are lucky to meet one of the few policemen who is really into computers, likely as a hobby. The expertise seems mainly to be in Scotland Yard, the department there could do with more funding, more staff, and more publicity, such as a simple means to contact them by email or web. My systems get beseiged by attacks from a handful of IP addresses, and if there was a central point for reporting all these easily, it would not be hard to spot the patterns and take appropriate action. For example, a warning letter from the police might be sufficient to get open mail relays closed, and cable modem users who have been trojaned might pay heed and take proper precautions. This could be largely automated, only where the parties concerned were deliberately committing criminal acts, or who failed to react to a warning, would the full powers of the Computer Misuse Act need to be applied.

    Not so long ago there was an idiot on the NTL cable network who was causing continual problems to others because his machine was running continually and had been trojaned, and was being used by hackers elsewhere. Something like that, after a few independent reports, should automatically trigger a "cease and desist" letter, together with some good advice on cleaning up the problem.

    It seems to me that it should be quite simple to gather and collate information from the public, which with the ISP's logs would enable the causes of problems to be located and dealt with. I for one don't mind my ISP's files being available automatically to a law-enforcement robot, I rather would get a warning letter or email if something was amiss.

    Of course the way to deal with the most recent round of severe problems is to simply ban Outlook. I wonder if the Convicted Monopolist could gain another conviction for deliberately producing software which facilitates contravening the Computer Misuse Act? BTW it would help if other countries enacted similar legislation instead of being misled by fascists like the RIAA into stupidly focussing on those who might want to play a DVD on their Linux computer, for example. In the UK, the CMA has real teeth, sadly it does not get exercised as often as it should, because it provides a means to outlaw certain vile practices. For example, if an installer deliberately cripples another application (we all know some that do, and most come from the Redmond area), that is a criminal offence, and rightly so, yet I have not seen any prosecutions. The wording of the Act would suggest that if installing Windoze as the second OS blows away the ability of Linux/BSD/OS-2 (or whatever) to boot, then an offence is committed. The only defence seems to be that it was done in ignorance. Can you imagine Bill standing in the dock in the Old Bailey, pathetically whining that he was not guilty, he was only ignorant? Justice would be admirably served by that admission.

    1. Re:Excellent work by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      It would be very useful if the police forces had well-publicised points of contact for reporting computer and internet crime.

      Indeed. This morning, I received four copies of an "Update your paypal account" credit card number stealing scam email, and while it wasn't difficult to trace the people doing the collection (the ip address is 210.78.22.113, it's running Redhat 6.2 with a 2.2.17 kernel by the way), it's located in Shanghai and I have no idea how to take this further.

      Even crashing their box would be satisfying, but alas I lack those skills.

    2. Re:Excellent work by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      2.2.17 is much older than the current 2.2 tree, which is at 2.2.25.

      That should be wide open for Mr. Freighttrain.....

    3. Re:Excellent work by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Not all that hard to do... send them a copy of the Lion worm or Ramen. Or just a mail bomb with 4 gigs of /dev/zero compressed into a .zip.

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:Excellent work by sik+puppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't crash the box, root it.

      Then use it to either send email or host a web page critical of the chinese government or praising the the Fulan Gong (sp?)

      Then wait for the news report of the chinese government executing these criminals for computer crimes.

      Is there a more cheerful thought than dead spammers?

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  24. Scary thought by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If hes the admin, he shouldnt have to ask those questions, and have a much better handle of what his network is doing...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Scary thought by Xystance · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I'm -not- the admin. I don't sit in the middle of the entire network, I simply am in an isolated fringe where I don't pick up much cursory traffic. However, the admins are so overworked (Department understaffed, budget cuts, etc...) that submitting a nice e-mail letting them know what IPs/MAC's are affected,... I might get a cookie. :) I also don't have the luxurt of running a device or thin 'nix client near the outgoing channels to pick anything up, so... I just help anytime I can.

  25. The factor neglected most often.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The machines infected with the trojans can be used as spam relays.. sure - but at the same time theyre also a gold mine for fraud, just think about all the data stored on the hard drives available for download - financial data, all kinds of private documents.. this worries me more than spam. I think data theft will become a hotter topic in the near future.

    1. Re:The factor neglected most often.. by Mesaeus · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but data theft might actually spur the owners of virus ridden pcs to actually DO something. Right now they aren't too bothered by the fact that their beloved pc is attacking and spamming the rest of 'that internet thingy', grand scale data theft and extortion WILL make a lot more clueless people aware of the problem of trojans.

    2. Re:The factor neglected most often.. by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      I think data theft will become a hotter topic in the near future.

      Actually, I don't think so. Not data theft on random computers infected with trojans. There is no useful data, or if there is, it's seldom and hard to find. Plain spamming is probably much more efficient, economically.

      For example, if you had full access to my PC, you could find my credit card number by scanning the 20GB of files I have (OK, statistically, you would have to scan less than the 20 GB). But that's not really a secret anyway. You could also find the numbers of my bank accounts. These would be harder to find than a simple VISA number with /(\d{4}\s?){4}/, but they are not secret either.

      For bank transactions, you would need a different number which isn't stored on the computer, plus a hardware device with my bank card in it, plus a password which isn't stored anywhere.

      Maybe you could find the cookie with my login on Slashdot, but how would you get rich with that?

      The only opportunity to make money with data on my computer seems to be with this email to which I have to reply. It's from the son of a deceased African president. Maybe I should encrypt his email address so nobody can steal this incredibly opportunity from me.

  26. Re:PWN3D! by varunrebel · · Score: 1

    I am in Indian and I do think that Slashdot does NOT discriminate against Indians. I think ur sig is downright stupid and untrue. And what do u have against Indians anyway ???

    --
    "Programming is like sex. Make one mistake and support it for the rest of your life !!"
  27. And the network operaters still do nothing by cluge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is no suprise for people involved in the anti-spam community. It has been discussed for some time in NANAE. What is REALLY sad is that some networks really don't seem to care, or don't have the time to police against this sort of thing. When I was Joe Jobbed by one of these spam gangs, using infected machines for webservers, I reported it to RR and comcast security. They were hosting their site all-oem.biz on several obviously compromised machines AND using my e-mail address in advertisements about their company. What did I get for my trouble? E-mail after e-mail that said - "To the best of our knowledge, the incident that was the basis of your complaint was neither posted by an individual using the Road Runner (Or Comcast) system, nor is it in any way related to the Road Runner (or Comcast) system or content maintained by Road Runner." What was funny is that if you did a dig on the domain being advertised it ALWAYS contained a road runner cable modem account.

    Lets try it again for a test shall we?
    # host www.all-oem.biz
    www.all-oem.biz is an alias for all-oem.biz.
    all-oem.biz has address 217.81.243.206
    all-oem.biz has address 24.98.35.54
    all-oem.biz has address 212.83.89.135
    all-oem.biz has address 213.33.0.67
    all-oem.biz has address 24.6.6.196

    And again, what do we have, 2 comcast cable modems working away trying to sell software that APPEARS to be pirated, and is advertised via spam with false headers.

    Lets check the DNS shall we, the dns servers for the domain are listed as follows

    Name Server:NS1.MOROZREG.BIZ
    Name Server:NS2.MOROZREG.BIZ
    Name Server:NS3.MOROZREG.BIZ
    Name Server:NS4.MOROZREG.BIZ
    Name Server:NS5.MOROZREG.BIZ

    Each of these name servers is also hosted on compromised machines, mostly broadband connections. Don't take my word for it, haul out nmap and take a look for yourself. The IP's for these name servers change pretty often. At this time no road runner accounts are showing up. I give it an hour before we get a few more.

    In short this is nothing new, and no one should be shocked. Spammers have shown themselves to be an unscrupulous lot. What IS good is that this is starting to get some press. Perhaps this will put pressure on providers to police their networks better. Otherwise more drastic action may be required to be taken by other networks to simply protect themselves.

    AngryPeopleRule

    --
    "Science is about ego as much as it is about discovery and truth " - I said it, so sue me.
    1. Re:And the network operaters still do nothing by kiolbasa · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'll bet dollars for doughnuts Comcast and Road Runner never see their own IPs when they do queries on that spammer's domain. I first learned of this trick from NANAE poster "Spamless," so you can look it up for a more thorough explanation (can't find it myself just now). The short story is that the spammer's DNS responds differently depending on the IP that makes the request. When the ISP checks those DNS records, they get something in South America, or China, or another ISP, anything other than them. The cable modem machine is just a proxy.

      It takes a little more effort to track down what is going on, and large broadband ISP's abuse desks are probably too swamped - which should be no excuse.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
    2. Re:And the network operaters still do nothing by thogard · · Score: 1

      Anyone want to write a tool?
      Say maybe a dig-diff program...
      $ dig-diff spamer.com ns1 ns2 ns3 ns4 ns5
      spmer.com is 1.2.3.4 from ns3 and 4.5.6.7 from ns5

  28. AMerican Media by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It is interesting that much of what is happening in the world isn't mentioned in the US news. East Timor anyone?
    I guess it has to do with ratings. It's unfortunate that editing the content of the news increases viewership. You see I, a US citizen, want to see ALL of the news, but unfortunately, our corporate news outlets censor a lot of what's going on to boost ratings! That's why I read foreign news sources as much as I can.

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

    1. Re:AMerican Media by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes. More to the point, a number of foreign sources simply report events, which is how I want it. I'll form my own opinions in any event, but at least I don't have to filter out someone else's first. The U.S. media has way too much political and economic influence to really be trusted to report anything reliably anymore. I was talking to someone a few years ago who was in school to be a journalist, and she was told that it is the journalist's job to mold public opinion. Can you believe that? Not to report the facts honestly and completely, with one's own opinions delivered separately and clearly marked as such, but to tell the rest of us what to think. I guess the term "free press" now means that they are free to say anything they want and package it as "news."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:AMerican Media by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that "editing" is a adequate description of the process. Editing implies the mere removal of irrelevant or inconsequential material. I would think that "lying" or "misrepresentation" are better descriptions of what the U.S. news media often does with items deemed newsworthy. The deliberate manipulation and distortion of recorded imagery by the media is becoming an issue in this country (there have been some cases where broadcasters altered video footage and yet presented it as real. And that's just the few we know about because they got caught.) This really goes completely against the tenets of good journalism.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  29. Re:PWN3D! by Aardpig · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And what do u have against Indians anyway ???

    Nothing whatsoever. My sig is about the growning resentment exhibited on /. against India and Indians; I think some of this resentment is bordering on racist, and I'm worried by it. The fact that you are an Indian and you disagree with me does not make this problem go away.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  30. The reason for the UK term "public school" by smcv · · Score: 3, Informative

    The version I've always heard is that hundreds of years ago the only way to be educated was a private tutor. When they were introduced, "public schools" (schools where pupils' parents pay fees) were called that to differentiate between private tuition and a public school.

    The terminology is a bit unfortunate, now that private tuition doesn't happen and state schools are more public than "public schools", but that's how the English language works ;-)

    Schools entirely paid for by taxes are "state schools" (as in "separation of Church and State", not as in "Washington state").

  31. *pay* for IPs of infected machines? by ignavusincognitus · · Score: 1

    There's a good side to this - spammers pay for addresses, meaning their costs go up. I guess you can get a fairly good list of infected machines, for free, just by tracking nanas. Just to show you how commercialized the internet has become :)

  32. RTFA. RTFA. RTFA. by MyHair · · Score: 4, Funny
    Check out the German article first, then its translation on Groklaw and maybe also same translation posted in the English section of the Heise website (in order of appearance).

    I'm supposed to RTFA 3 times?

    1: You're lucky if one out of every 3 read it once.

    2: Is this supposed to be a cascading Slashdotting? Next time just submit the story 3 times with a different link each time.

    :-)

    1. Re:RTFA. RTFA. RTFA. by yourruinreverse · · Score: 1

      Re: 1.

      If you did a good RTFStory, you'd find the first is the original German article (including some links absent in the translation), the second is the first publication of its translation into English on Groklaw.net, and the third is exactly the same text published on heise.de again. It even has a cute notice at the end which explains which version had become available in what order. Knowing that, you would not have needed to click on all three links: one or two would have sufficed.

      Re: 2.

      If /. had taken out Groklaw.net, you could have looked up the English version at heise.de or quickly learn German yourself and read the German version (including the helpful links not available in the translation I produced for Groklaw.net). Furthermore, I believe the contents of the final published story are under editorial discretion: If the editor had felt the need to make it easier for you to follow precisely the link you needed without you needing to actually read the full story, he probably would have changed the text or inserted a blink tag where appropriate.

      Or he could have truncated the story at "Check out the German article first[.]".

      --
      JeR
  33. The question is do the student get any money? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has $250,000 set aside for a bounty on MyDoom authors and so did SCO. What are the chances this CS student will get some small amount for turning these guys in?

    1. Re:The question is do the student get any money? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      and yes I know this was then Randex and not the MyDoom virus authors.

    2. Re:The question is do the student get any money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What are the chances this CS student will get some small amount for turning these guys in?
      and yes I know this was then Randex and not the MyDoom virus authors.

      You think about it, when you figure it out, please send another comment.

  34. Does this surprise anyone? by olivercromwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This doesn't surprise me in the least. While it sickens me, I don't find this to be that startling. I, for one, have always thought the people who write malware are scum. They may try to justify their actions with lame claims of: 'Oh, i only did it to show how weak the system is', or 'I am only trying to learn more about the internal workings of the O/S'. But, let's face it, they are little more than little creeps with serious social behavioural problems. They know what they are doing is wrong, yest can find any manner of reason to justify their behaviour. In the end, they are criminals, scum, and a**es. That some are now selling harvestedd ip addresses to spammers should come as no surprise at all. I just wish I knew a way to punish them that would not only satisfy the gravity of their offence, but would also serve as a good deterrent. A pox on all of them.

  35. Public/private explanation- a pedant writes by panurge · · Score: 1
    In the UK, a public school is an independent school that was set up by an Act of Parliament or by a religious foundation. Examples are well-known schools like Eton(by the King), and less well-known ones like University College School(by Parliament) and Downside(Catholic foundation). A private school is a school that was set up, either profit or non-profit, by individuals. Examples are schools like Millfield. A State school is a school that is owned and operated by local government. There are a few exceptions and some additional minor groups.

    Not all true public schools are boarding, and a few state schools are. Therefore to be correct, the parent should have said "In Britain, this happens in boarding schools, not the prisons".

    To make life even more complicated, the UK has a prison (Ford Open Prison) which is where all the fraudsters and bent accountants go. It is supposed to provide one of the best (unofficial) MBAs you can get.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  36. The other Trojan (r) / spam connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Trojan broke and the spammers were born.

  37. Illegal IP addresses? by sglines · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Selling infected IP addresses may be immoral but what is illegal about it?

    I run snort on a bunch of systems and have some very large lists of infected IP addresses. I suspect many others do too. Every time snort burps up a new IP address I inform the ISP that "owns" the IP address. The reality is that no one cares. I have been "hit" by 68.162.91.238 over 20 times in the last month by different viruses.

    These lists are easy to come by and even easier to generate. If someone is dumb enough to pay good money for a list of infected computers - let me know. I wonder what the going rate is.

    If these machines get abused enough maybe, just maybe they'll get fixed.

  38. I am shocked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news Norman Bates may not be the best person to teach a course in hospitality.

  39. Re:PWN3D! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you are right too. But when programmers are out of job and see Indians getting those, just because they cost less, they loose their cool. Anyways I am more worried about the fact moderaters are severely biased too. Look at all the comments and anything negative about India is moderrated up more than it should be. Anyone who knows about India only from Slashdot will have the opinion it is worse than medivial slave market because of the caste system. In reality caste system does not exists much in the cities.

  40. Re:PWN3D! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I hope they send them to a British pound-me-in-the-ass prison!

    In Britain, this happens in the private schools, not the prisons...

    or the Catholic church!

  41. Parent should be modded higher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "+5, righteous bloodlust"?

  42. Re:PWN3D! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uhm, most people are resentful of those who take jobs from US workers while the government hands out Visas like fucking candy on halloween. You can gloss it over with flashy words like "racist" if you want to, but that's bullshit.

  43. Re:PWN3D! by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    No it's not. Know how I know of this? I live here! I used to think you were a harmless dilettante but now I see you're crazier than a shithouse rat. Racism? Rising? What the fuck are you talking about? Looks to me from news reports that Europe is having a far worse problem w/ racism than the US. Remember when you were claiming that the US forces Muslim men to register? Boy that one was stupid but I chalked it up to being uninformed or just too much reading of an t-US sites but now I know either you're making this shit up or you're just crazy.
    Look, you're wrong. I live here. It's not happening. I have no reason to lie. Get off your little crusade against the US and try looking into a real evil government such as North Korea.

  44. Re:PWN3D! by Troed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The most interesting thing is that you tried to look it up, but didn't succeed. It's still true (you might try to use words like "illegal immigrant registration" etc when looking, but the fact is still that the US wanted Moslem men to register after 11/9). The source for that information was, if memory serves me correctly, Wolf at CNN.

    The current Christian right wing regime in the US is more dangerous than the socialist Moslem regimes you hate so much. Have a look at that idiot Bush latest suggestion .. rewriting the constitution to forbid gay marriages.

  45. Re:PWN3D! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "socialist Moslems"?

    A contradiction surely, or are you using the American "'socialist' means anything I dislike" definition?

  46. Re:PWN3D! by Troed · · Score: 1

    Islam is socialistic - Mohammed disliked the extreme capitalism amongst the arabs in that region and Islam has as a core belief that you should help others instead of accumulating wealth yourself. ... that "socialism" as a word wasn't invented doesn't mean anything when looking at what Islam is about - something very few people in the West do before judging. How many people know that Islam gave women rights 600 b.c that they didn't get until 1800 b.c in Christian countries?

    (I'm not Moslem, but I study subjects before pretending I know anything about them. I recommend Karin Armstrong's "History of God" as a source to what I wrote above).

  47. Re:PWN3D! by Troed · · Score: 1

    a.d - not b.c. Sorry.

  48. Re:PWN3D! by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the Christian right is known for their sucide bombers destroying buses full of innocent people...oh wait.
    Who said I hate the Muslem regimes? I don't agree w/ any theocracy or gov't that kills women for adultery or simply doesn't believe in women's rights. I don't hate them simply because of their religion, I don't think much of any religion. Check out that whole separation of church and state the groups here in the US always beat the christian fanatics w/.
    Still couldn't find anything on registration of Muslim men either. It didn't happen. You as much as said so. Just because you think you heard a newscaster say so doesn't mean it's a fact.
    That is an idiot suggestion from Bush, you're right.
    You accord the christian right here in the US much more power and influence than they actually have. There's a few vocal idiots but we have our counterbalances-thank god or whoever for Thomas Jefferson.
    So what about North Korea? Much better than the US? I still can't understand why none of you internet activists aren't bothered by North Korea and China. Much more fashionable to bash the US, I suppose.

  49. Re:PWN3D! by Troed · · Score: 1

    Please read the other thread with regards to my original post - I talk about more about Islam (of which you apparently know nothing) there.

    The US is a lot more dangerous than North Korea or China.

    (Regarding the topic of registration, if you look closely you'll find that I never write about things I cannot back up. I was not prepared for CNN removing the link to the article where I got this from, and it is nowhere to be found. If the cause for that was a respected journalist making things up, or pressure on CNN from somewhere, is up to you to decide. I'm still trying to find additional sources)

    That one issue is however, only _one_ issue of many.

  50. Re:PWN3D! by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    Please. I've actually been to Islamic countries and I doubt you've left Europe. The women's rights scenario there IS terrible as 2 minutes of Googling (an American company you'll probably point out) will tell you.
    Anyway whether or not Wolf Blitzer made it up or you can't remember who said it, it did *not* happen. Muslim men have all of the same freedoms everyone else does.
    Get off your ass and go see what the women's rights situation is like now, not a thousand years ago. One of my best friends is a female in the Marine Corps and she is full blooded Afgani. Her family fled Afganistan beucase of the theocracy and the lack of education for women. Now her father is helping the US rebuild his country and is ecstatic over the chance to do it. Again, this isn't off the Internet, it's actually happening.
    As far as which country is the most dangerous, last time I checked the US wasn't threatening nuclear destruction to its neightbors while busily starving it s own people to pay for said nuclear weapons. What the fuck's the matter w/ you? Look at North Korea! Are you blind?

  51. Re:PWN3D! by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    As far the US having the Christian right in charge, you might want to read this.

  52. Re:PWN3D! by Troed · · Score: 1

    You mistake a regime for a religion. You might want to bash any countries you like - but to go and spread lies about Islam won't help you (or the US in general) anywhere.

    Yes, I've both read the Quran and a lot about Islam - out of curiosity, and to be sure not to fall for common western myths.

    The US considers any country capable of producing WMDs a threat, and has reserved the right to attack first to protect itself.

    Sweden can, easily, make WMDs. Do you see the faulty logic here?

  53. Re:PWN3D! by Troed · · Score: 1

    It took a while, but:

    So far the United States has asked only nationals of 25 Muslim nations and North Korea to register with the US Immigration and Naturalization Services in an effort to curb terrorism

    http://www.dawn.com/2003/01/21/top12.htm

    Link was found in a post made pa CJ here: http://www.dialognow.org/node/view/661

    (Search for "registration")

    Excerpt:

    At first it was "Middle Easterners" (exclusive, of course, of Israeli men). Now it's South and Southeast Asian men, and North and East Africans...And for what? The program is not going to stop rogues from coming into the country - it will only punish men who are already in compliance with the laws, and continue the scapegoating of the wrong people.

    Now you might be able to find more information yourself.

  54. Re:PWN3D! by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    How am I spreading lies about Islam again?

  55. Re:PWN3D! by Troed · · Score: 1

    You mistake acts by regimes as being supported by Islam. In reality - Islam is the only religion to embrace all other religions and say "hey - as long as you reach God we don't care how", and Islam also gave women rights in 600 a.d. that they didn't get until 1800 a.d. in the "western" countries. I recommend "History of God" by Karin Armstrong, if you're at all interested in _knowing_ instead of accepting propaganda.

  56. Re:PWN3D! by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    OK,I didn't say that they were supported by Islam but here in America we believe in seperation of chruch and state. They do not. As far as the wome's right are concerned, that was great in 600 a.d. but look at the present day.

  57. Re:PWN3D! by Troed · · Score: 1

    Compared to Sweden your state is extremely tightly connected to Christianity. Scientific American used that (and a few other things) to "judge" countries all over the world as being more or less "modern". Sweden was at the top, with the other Nordic countries close behind. The US was lagging _quite_ a bit.

    I think you'll find that not all Arabic nations have Islam as state religion. Should I name a few of the well known ones, or do you think you can find that info yourself?

    To repeat: There's a lot of anti-Moslem stuff coming out of the US - and then you act surprised when they don't like you back ...