Slashdot Mirror
FCC Supports Neighborhood Radio
RevMike writes "According to this story from the Associated Press, the FCC is recommending to Congress that restrictions on low-power FM stations be relaxed. The FCC found that low-power FM stations can be operated in the gaps of spectrum between major stations without substantially interfering with those major stations. If Congress adopts the FCC's recommendations, it will loosen the stranglehold that companies like ClearChannel have on the airwaves."
i don't if they're going to want to do that. that might lead to increased free speech, creative ideas, and non-biased information
Awesome! About time. i've been running a great community station for several years without any interference!
complaints they get because people are not following the law.
I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
I can broadcast my remixes of Britney Spears for everyone in my neighborhood to enjoy!
- Nick Busey
www.pedalbmx.com
www.nickbusey.com
Let us not forget how powerful and important college radio can be. College radio certainly falls under this category and has been here for awhile. I was a program director at a college radio station in Hawaii in my college days (KTUH) and, in balance, I believe we offered more to the community than any other station (Public Radio excepted).
shock the monkey
ClearChannel will not let go without a fight.
ClearChannel is ranked among the top 5 radio conglomerates in the world.
Allowing neighbourhood radio station, will detoriate the quality on frequencies that ClearChannel has control over. This will be big problem in areas like Mojave Desert etc.
Consensus is good, but informed dictatorship is better
It seems like the reason you shouldn't be allowed to broadcast is clear, you'll cut into profits.
Big corporations don't want you to transimit over their signal as they'll loose audience and hence, revenue. But that hasn't stopped most people before.
The interesting thing will be when the RIAA starts suing people for broadcasting their music.
This seems like it would be a no-brainer, but I'm glad they're finally waking up to hear the radio.
... tick...tick...tick..)
I played around with broadcast back in my college days, and had some fun, especially knowing that the odds of somebody actually listening in were fairly remote ("free pizza to the next caller!"
And with the size of my CD collection (as well as free MP3's from various places) I think it would be fun to set up a random genre station. Or, as my friends and I have talked about, a mobile station, for when we're taking long road trips.
Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
If this works, small stations like WGHR would have a chance to get back on the air. Yes, I'm plugging my old college radio station that just got forced off the Atlanta airwaves in the past year, due to the lack of spectrum real estate. It was one of the last remaining Class D stations, but due to recent purchases of several new stations in the area by Susquehanna and Clear Channel, there has been no place left to go. But now the internet has become the only home for the station. Please help support them!
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
"After significant expense by the taxpayers, the scientists have reported on the same laws of physics that have always existed," deputy director Cheryl Leanza said. "These tiny radio stations are no threat to the current broadcast system. It is now time for Congress to take action based on that analysis."
anyone else notice this portion? makes you wonder who actually expected the laws of physics to bend to the whims of lawmakers and lobbyists?
okay, now flag me as a troll
thanks
2^3 * 31 * 647
This is one of those really cool things I used to think about as a kid, but in light of all the turmoil being caused by, Kazaa, the **AA, et al, I just can't get that excited about it.
Untill we get this Intellectual Property "saga" sorted out, we can pretty much count on any cool uses for tech like this being brought in through the "front door" getting the political axe.
As they continue to shut down stations and refuse to give out licenses ??
6 0%257E1965359,00.html
FCC sues to shut down rfb
http://www.reformer.com/Stories/0,1413,102%257E88
Clear Channel's attempt to keep restrictions where they are, if not to increase them. They probably would use some lame excuse about maintaining the value of their broadcast license. Taxi drivers in Chicago said the same thing, trying to stop the city from permitting more taxis to operate in the city. They wanted to maintain the value of their medallions, which costed up to 40,000 usd.
What?
Now I just need some BlackJack bubblegum and some old records and I can become HarryHardon!
Well doesn't that just take all the phun out of pirate radio?!!
With narrow bandwidth, limited geographic reach and poor sound quality, why haven't the alternatives to FM radio caught on? There is satellite radio, cable radio, internet radio, yet all combined the size of their audiences pale in comparison to those of good old FM, a technology that hasn't changed for decades.
While advancing leaps and bounds in personal mp3 players, are we skipping the next generation of broadcasted music?
I've been doing this for a while, and I've known a few guys to get busted, but mostly it's unenforceable as it is. Why not make the law reflect that?
If you chose to operate an FM transmitter outside these parameters, you would be considered a "pirate" in the eyes of the FCC, and you can be discovered, even though these rules are enforced unevenly. Sometimes a 1 watt station goes unnoticed by local licensed broadcasters, so a complaint is never filed and the FCC never finds out about it. Anecdotally, we have also heard of cases where FCC agents have turned a blind eye to 1 to 3 watt stations, if it seemed like they were not bothering any licensed broadcasters. At this level, despite operating at up to 75 times the legal limit, the actual power is so minuscule that the agent decided not to pursue the case. (This is akin to a cop pulling you over for speeding, but deciding to not give you the ticket because they think you're cute. You may be able to get away with it, but let no one fool you into thinking that it is actually legal.)
Some members of Prometheus Radio Radio Project were involved in pirate broadcasting. We did this because we believed that the broadcast regulations of this country are fundamentally unfair. We ran great community radio stations in defiance of the wealth-based structure of our broadcast system. The FCC eventually confiscated our stations, but announced that they had gotten the message of our -civil disobedience and that they were going to create a legalized low power fm radio service. We decided to stop pirating and work with the FCC to build a permanent new community radio service for this country. There is still a movement of unlicensed pirate stations that continues to operate in defiance of the broadcast regulations, which truthfully have only gotten slightly better as a result of LPFM. Morally we are sympathetic to these operations, but from a practical standpoint we do not devote our work to assisting them. We focus our efforts on the stations that are going to be able to become permanent fixtures in their communities, that are able to serve diverse communities because no one needs to worry about having their door busted down for operating without a license.
I just wish they would do the same in Sweden. They just issued a recall of those cool JOS mp3-players with builtin FM-transmitters even tho they come disabled.
English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska
The people who own congress in this area, NPR and NAB, will not let this happen.
They will haul out their so-called "engineers" that will prove that a 10 watt station interferes with the 100,000 watt station up on the hill. They will drag out their old engineering papers that contradict everything that the FCC has documented. As if the FCC engineers never went to grade school. And a congress person will then have an excuse to throw a wrench in the works. This will happen at the last moment, by attaching a rider to the omnibus funding bill, just like before.
Just remember, you're pledge money is going to buy off a senator somewhere.
Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
1. What the FCC is proposing - allowing low-power FM stations to locate just three channels away from full-power signals, instead of four channels as is now required - is status quo in most of the world. In Toronto, for instance, a high-power CBC transmitter on 94.1 at the CN Tower coexists just fine with a newer signal on 93.5 just a few blocks away at First Canadian Place. In other parts of the world, spacing is even tighter and yet it still works. London has signals stacked up at 105.2, 105.6, 106.0 and 106.4 with no problems.
2. What the FCC is proposing is already status quo in the U.S., albeit with a catch. Translator stations - signals of up to 250 watts that are only allowed to relay other stations and cannot originate their own programming - are governed by a different set of rules that allow them, in some cases, to nestle up as close as second-adjacent to (0.4 MHz away from) full-power signals. And the FCC recently had a filing window in which it received several thousand applications for such translators, the vast majority of them from a small handful of religious broadcasting networks that will feed them by satellite from Idaho and California. How does this benefit local listeners? You tell me...
3. Very little of what the FCC does is about engineering. Everything the FCC does is about politics, even the engineering parts. It has always been thus.
Scott Fybush - NorthEast Radio Watch
Just this week, the anti-monopoly watchdog in the Netherlands seized some company records of Mojo, who organise about 90% of all large gigs in this country. I was surprised to learn that ClearChannel now apparently owns a goodly chunk of Mojo, although a spokesman vehemently denied that 'America' had their fingers in the day-to-day operation of Mojo.
If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
Not to even mention internet radio, but you can rent time on WBCQ shortwave (transmitter located in Maine) at ridiculously low prices and broadcast to the entire planet. And you can say virtually anything you want, though your listeners are limited to those with enough perception to own a world-band radio. The funny thing is that the owner started out in pirate radio.
"Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
What's to keep ClearChannel from buying low-power stations? I mean, granted, in most situations such stations aren't significant enough to even bother, but I can see how they'd have incredible commercial potential in key metropolitan areas. A four- to seven-mile range in places like Boston or Miami... how would ClearChannel *not* want a piece of that?
the local College radio isn't even radio -- it's /internet/ radio!
/educational/ radio is left w/o the possibility of an audience.
Since we're near the border, the frequencies available are cut in half (half for the US, half for Mexico, mas o menos). This isn't a problem for CC, etc, though; they just go buy a (much more high powered) station in Mexico and send their signals all the way to LA. Meanwhile,
p.s. wasn't there a LPFM proposal like 4 years ago!? (didn't congress strike it down/ignore it?)
"Local radio listeners should not be subjected to the inevitable interference that would result from shoehorning more stations onto an already overcrowded radio dial," spokesman Dennis Wharton said.
As if what they're broadcasting is preferable to static. I love the idea that this will give more people a voice. Of course when you start giving out freedoms you have to give them to the weirdos too but that's a small price to pay.
...less of an issue with HD radio out right? I just got an add from Kenwood promoting their HD Radio receiver. So if AM/FM is now broadcast digitally encoded then you should either get 100% clear or not right?
Broadcast FM can have excellent sound quality. The reason that most stations sound like shit is the management's desire to sound "louder" than every other station on the dial.
Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
These tiny radio stations are no threat to the current broadcast system
Here's the only thing that matters. These tiny stations are no threat to the current system, either physically or economically.
Clear Channel doesn't give a damn, you can't touch them. You and your vast army of geeks can't touch them, and they know it.
I'm all for some area "flavor" on the FM band, but don't think for a second that it's going to touch the bottom line for CC.
I know for our local market at least there is NO open channels..
We are packed wall to wall..
Found this out trying to use one of those little 'mp3 to fm' transmitters.. we don't have any dead air..
But its a nice idea, letting the people express themselves and exercise their constitutional right of free speech.. and with the UHF 'public' tv channels going away soon, its only fair we have some outlet..
---- Booth was a patriot ----
LPFM stations are available to noncommercial educational entities and public safety and transportation organizations, but are not available to individuals or for commercial operations. Current broadcast licensees with interests in other media (broadcast or newspapers) are not eligible to obtain LPFM stations.
Now why on earth is it for non-commercial operation. Why can't I as a private citizen set up a radio station and sell advertising? Well I guess I know the reason for that (corporate interests). Now limiting HP broadcasting or media companys ability to do this makes perfect sense.
Got Code?
It sounds like unusually open-minded thinking by the FCC.
Unfortunately I can't imagine anything like that happening in the UK, the RA / DTI love their strangle-hold a little too much here.
Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
I don't know which excites me more--listening to uninformed opinions and bad music played over a college station run by pimply-faced students temporarily acting out their rebellion fantasies on their parents dollars before they cave in to corporate culture, or the flip side of those uninformed opinons and bad music played by those same people once they graduate and move to commercial stations. It's really hard to choose.
If Congress adopts the FCC's recommendations, it will loosen the stranglehold that companies like ClearChannel have on the airwaves.
ClearChannel has a stranglehold? If you live in the US is there a single, non public channel that isn't controlled by ClearChannel?
A list of ClearChannel stations.
Stranglehold? Nah!
My spoon is too big!
You have a mistake in your third paragraph. You accidentally typed "Allowing neighbourhood radio station, will detoriate the quality on frequencies that ClearChannel has control over." where you meant to say "Allowing neighbourhood radio station, will detoriate the listener ratings on frequencies that ClearChannel has control over."
Just because they are opening the channels back up to the people wont mean you can broadcast your MP3 collection..
That's still a ASCAP issue, as rebroadcast with out a license is still illegal.. And if you can afford that, you can afford a 'real' broadcaster's license + equipment.
But you can make your own music, or have 24/7 talk radio...
---- Booth was a patriot ----
Since I'm just out of range of RFB I was just scanning through the FM dial to find anything at all to listen to while the NH and VT public radio stations run their news drones. With a high-end receiver I got maybe 10 other stations, all on the same continuum from country to rock. The public interest simply isn't served by having more than three of these stations - the playlists overlap so completely that any three of 'em would be sufficient to rotate the entire playlist of all ten a couple times a week, at least. So what's this crap doing on my airwaves, when there are people literally ready to volunteer both time and transmitters to put better stuff up in the spaces between, or even right in its place?
If spectrum is so limited, why is it filled so redundantly with the same junk? When there's a true shortage of something, it's human nature to use it more carefully.
"with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
Hope the same happens in other countries.
-- Exposing the hype of Gentoo zealots. Modded into the ground to suppress opinion.
Clear Channel paid the FCC good money(hookers and drugs aren't cheap, y'know) to ensure total dominance over non-restricted airwaves. They sure as hell aren't going to give it up without a fight.
In-band on channel my ass.
I've been waiting for something like this - Grateful Dead, Phish, Widespread Panic, etc will be playing 24x7 in my area
I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
Phish? God they make me want to kiss a shotgun...
as usual slashdot gets it wrong. this has nothing to do with nieghborhood radio. it has to do with getting full nationwide coverage for spot watches.
"Talk Hard!" --Pump up the volume.
I love that movie. Always made me want to get my own little FM broadcast station.
This came up once before, but it was shot down in mid run. My area had 14 allowances for low power fm stations and I was waiting for the day to put in my application.
Unless things have significanly changed, the previous rules were not for a "Music" based radio station. Think solely talk radio. So, before you could not pay your ASCAP, BMI and any other fees to fire up a low cost low power neighborhood radio station.
It was justa more powerful version of the existing rules for amateur fm.
Anyone can grab a very low power fm transmitter and broadcast what you please.... well not really what you please. However, the power rules are less then a watt of output.
I wish I could recall specifics... I'll read up shortly and find out if this is a bit different.
"You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
As discussed on slashdot before - http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/14/165722 5&mode=thread
The FCC has had this report for quite some time. Especially in an election year don't look for your friendly neighborhood congress-critter to upset the NAB.
NPR was one of the many vocal corporate voices lobbying against LPFM. If I remember, NPR was one of the most vocal opponents.
The sounds of silence? - Haverford High's WHHS, around since 1949, must vacate its spot on the FM spectrum.
Editorial | Haverford High Radio -- In the wild, big eats little - or tramples it without noticing. In the world of broadcast radio, the existence of community and student-run school radio stations can be just as brutish and short.
All this non interference stuff is big bunch of horse shit. If my radio gear interferes with my neighbours internet how popular am I going to be? As far as I know amateur radio is the hobby of a minority.... And remember that this is a mobile problem, too. Some HAM comes driving down your lane keying his transmitter quite possibly there goes your internet....
The National Association of Broadcasters, however, went nuts over this idea. They lobbied congress hard, and circulated what they thought radio would sound like with all the added stations. The cds they pushed on uninformed congressmen wildly exagrated any problem and the idea was quickly killed.
One of the things that really angered me about this (and still does) is the fact that NPR fell in step with the NAB. The reasoning for this I can only assume is the fact that listeners of low-power fm would probably come from NPR's listener base and not from some crappy top-40 station. Realizing the possible loss of revenue (fewer pledge drive contributions) NPR acted in this reactionary manner. (I should note that I still support my local NPR stations, but not as happily as previously.)
Hopefully, congress will listen to the FCC on this instead of lobbyists for the NAB. The electro-magnetic spectrum is a public resource. If the public is not getting anything useful from the currently liscensed stations and are being blocked by these same stations when the public attempts to coexist with them, I say we take some of the spectrum back -- and now.
The Ezine Directory
By this time(2004), is there even any point to opening up small stations like this? Check your FM dial in the larger metropolises, places like NYC and such; there isn't an open slice of the airwaves left to broadcast on. The cynic in me says that this is the only reason a rule like this is being considered in the first place: there isn't any airspace to broadcast in, so it might as well be legal to make the FCC look good. One can't compete against ClearChannel if ClearChannel owns the entire spectrum.
Radio stations do indeed pay a royalty for every performance of a work. Its not "free".
The performer don't get rich from this, the royalties are typically biased towards the composer.
Don't believe me?
Visit the BMI and ASCAP website.
The radios are heading towards Digital, but I am willing to bet that the FCC will not allow the low broadcast in that area. IOW, it will be broadcasting in areas that have no relevence.
What is probably a bigger threat to these companies is the stream casting going on, that is starting to also be sent over Wifi.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
The article doesn't mention that this would allow thousands of these low power stations to go on the air as opposed to the hundreds under the current guidelines. The findings were exactly what the FCC originally recommended but the commercial broadcasters purchased a Congressional override (with NPR's support).
For this to pass pressure will have to be put on Congress. Its only a recommendation from the FCC, Congress will have to pass legislation to recind their original overriding of the FCC. The Senate will probably be ok, McCain is chairman of the Commerce Committee that has purview.
The house is more of a problem. Billy Tauzin from Louisana, chairman of the Commerce Committee, is one of the most corrupt industry shills you'll ever come across, the MPAA wanted him as their replacement for Valenti. Also, if you live in Michigan, the ranking Democrat on that Committee, John Dingell, was against LPFM last time, he needs to hear from you.
Please let your Congress critters know how you feel about this. Its one of the most blatant examples of big corporations stomping the little guy. Media consolidation and the state of radio has been in the news, so there's a small window of opportunity to put thousands of neighborhood radio stations on the air if you contact Congress.
via broadband and you could have a network of radio stations across the country.
"If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
If you're thinking about starting your own radio station, or just curious about the issues involved check-out http://www.radio4all.org/
Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
just last week there was a story in Sunday's Philadelphia Inquirer (that you can read here) about how Radio One is sinking WHHS 107.9 FMHavertown PA. WHHS is a 14 watt high-school station that has been a student station broadcasting on FM since 1949. For those of you that don't know, that's about how long FM has been around. The story talks about some new commercial station Radio One wants to put up in Jersey-hell and it would infect the Philadelphia region. WHHS and its class-d educational license is no match for the big bucks Class-A commercial station (even if it doesn't exist yet) so they must pack it in. There is a chance WHHS will find a new chunk of airwaves, but the Philadelphia market is #4 in the USA and incredibly packed. It's a shame when some new fly by night format piece of junk can kill off educational stations like this. I guess community stations are nothing compared to another station playing top 40 crap.
Shortwave could easily reach the entire country easily, but commercial shortwave licensed in the US technically cannot target the US itself.
I guess its another case of the FCC protecting big money interests at the expense of its citizens. Shocker.
Bush is in bed with ClearChannel and big business in general. Colin Powell's son is chairman of the FCC. Yet we get news like this.
Didn't the FCC drop a jackboot on this idea just a very few years ago? So I wonder what's up. Maybe they are now convinced that 90% of them will move the corner street preacher onto a microphone and only 10% of them will be liberal? But I can tell you Democracy Now comes to me from the community 100W station -- not the local Big 10 station. So it might open up some possibilities.
Would that this will provide a lot of interesting dialing, but I don't know that for a fact. _Many_ years ago, I heard the inaugural weekend of a college station probably seven miles away crow flies through metro. The very next weekend the MEGA-Rock!! station fired up their million watt antenna on top of the tallest downtown skyscraper and overloaded my tuner with harmonics across all empty space on the dial. So it is sort of ironic that the FCC's concern is that 100w stations might interfere with the big boys.
Google for a phrase in the above - e.g. this.
Why do people still believe the crap about 'Clear Channel Taking Over the World?'
In Houston, they are only allowed to have 8 (Count em) EIGHT stations, out of the 20 or 30 on both AM and FM...
How in the hell is 8 stations (the talk radio ones always make a big joke out of obeying their jewish and clear channel overlords) a vast majority?
Is some of the NPR resistence due to fear that they'll get drowned out by far-right small radio stations?
Could this be done?
If Congress adopts the FCC's recommendations, it will loosen the stranglehold that companies like ClearChannel have on the airwaves.
This statement seems a bit backwards to me.
It seems congress has had a stranglehold on the airwaves.
Who is it that actually stops you from speaking, er, broadcasting over the airwaves? It isn't ClearChannel. It's government authorities.
It's shocking to me that a country that values free speach so much can put so many restrictions on communication.
If radio had been known of during the crafting of the bill of rights, the first amendment would have no doubt included freedom of the airwaves as well as the press.
--quote--
Probably the best known such case concerning a noncommercial station involved WXPN-FM, a Philadelphia station licensed to the University of Pennsylvania. In December, 1975, WXPN-FM was fined two thousand dollars for the broadcast of obscene material in connection with a live, weekly, call-in program, "The Vegetable Report." Notice to Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 57 F.C.C. 2d 782 (1975). During the shows in question, callers carried on sexually explicit conversations with the disc jockeys that included the words "fuck," "piss," and "titties" and discussed "beating off" and "blow jobs." During one call, a three-year old boy was asked if he could say "fuck" and the mother of the boy was told that she should let her son "screw" her so he wouldn't turn out to be a rapist.
--end quote--
http://www.prometheusradio.org/
An AC replied to you, saying that you provided a link to an Opera browser killer. It's true - Opera/Linux i386 locked up, and I had to killall -TERM opera to get rid of it.
Fix your site.
"a talk show host who says stupid things argues with all of the tons of callers telling him he's wrong can still be a ratings hit"
This is really pretty stupid. The radio stuff looks easy, but I suspect its far harder to create a show that people will listen to every day over a period of years than you think.
I think Rush Limbo is a boob, but he's not stupid, and he doesn't get ratings by just being controversial. Nobody can say why he's successful, but its like all of show business... nobody understands why a thing is popular or a hit. It just is.
Perhaps this will also help out non-profit groups like churches and community theaters which use (or would like to use) LPFM to cheaply transmit their audio to Walkman-like radios to help their attendees who need hearing assistance. These typically reach no further than a block--just enough to get to the other side of a complex. They've been squeezed by regulations and restrictions designed to protect the large commercial interests.
Our group is currently not able to purchase a replacement transmitter because of current FCC regs; we can only continue using what we have because we bought before the most recent tightening, and when the old heap finally dies our older members who need a little help will be the ones getting the short end of the stick.
Perhaps KBLT, one of the best damn radio stations ever to broadcast in Los Angeles, will be able to legitimize and go back on the air. KBLT was a pirate radio station, but it was much beloved by the folks in Silverlake, Echo Park, Hollywood and Downtown LA who were within range.
At this point the only hope for good radio in Los Angeles is KXLU 88.9 out of Loyola Marymount University. KROQ sucks and has sucked for most of its lifespan, and Indie which holds the space Mars FM and Groove Radio used to take up is a Clear Channel station.
Maybe with low-power radio licenses *finally* making it out there, we might hear a little diversity. Maybe Valley College's station KVCM might even get some people listening to it. It's been on Adelphia Cable for years now but you can't listen to cable radio in your car or on your Walkman.
I wonder how much it costs to set up one of these low-power radio stations? I mean, KBLT wasn't exactly run by rich people...
Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
You'll still have to have a license for any music you want to play... assuming that its artists who are covered by restrictive contracts. You'all know about the fees that clubs, bars, and other venues have to pay to the good folks at ASCAP, SESAC and BMI... There really won't be any competition for clearchan-hell. On the other hand, if you've really wanted to see what AXELF sounds like on the "airwaves," this might be just the thing for you.
got anything newer? i cant find anything to back up the salo--THIS HAS BEEN SPONSORED BY ARBY's--n article...
Now maybe I can finally have an MP3 player broadcast FM with enough power that I don't have to go in and hack (as in the case of soldering a few bits in my Neuros) it to broadcast stronger than the FCC allows.
No, I don't think that's it. Listeners already know where to find the right on the radio dial if they find that to their taste (indeed, it's hard to miss).
What they are afraid of is that people might find intelligent discussion/local affairs programming that is actually interesting.
What that means is they are no longer listening to NPR. Subsequently NPR's revenue stream of pledges and ads (they have ads now, though they don't call it that) dries up.
Same with clear channel. Clear channel hates it when they can't control the music that you hear so they can receive payola. Before you know it the big record labels hurt too but all the indie stuff is flying off the shelves. Thus they (and the RIAA) also lose control and their steam dries up.
That's their real fear.
Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
Why do I, as a non-native english speaker, have to correct people who supposedly speak english as their native language?
Except for the fact that something like XM contains stations with content that anything short of the major major markets simply will not ever get. There's a lot to be said for that. Here in Fresno, CA (a city the size of Portland), there are exactly 0 electronica/techno stations, 0 jazz stations, 0 classical stations (save for the scant moments when NPR isn't Bush bashing or begging for funding), 0 stations for progressive rock (old or new), 0 metal stations, 0 other random experimental/avant-garde stations, 0 international/world/"ethnic" stations (except for music from the exotic paradise of Mexico), 0 blues statiopns, and 0 true urban/rap stations (just some canned MTV processed hip-hop). If it's not modern pop/rock, country hick, top 40, "Mexican", or classic rock, then you don't get it.
So, yeah, there is something to be said for what satellite radio has. Even if providers will be inherently limited, that doesn't have to bode poorly for the content. You don't hear much complaining about DirecTV, do you? I'd like a satellite solution that provides the kind of broad programming that clicking on Radio in iTunes gets me. Neither XM nor Sirius do that (they don't seem to "get" some of the less mainstream genres), but at least they're starting points. If either of them, or a newcomer, finally "gets" it, they'll get my money too.
So the FCC has discovered that low-power stations (10 to 100 watts, or 4 to 7 miles) *don't* interfere with large stations (aka ClearChannel).
But then we've still got the National Association of Broadcasters quoted as saying:
"Local radio listeners should not be subjected to the inevitable interference that would result from shoehorning more stations onto an already overcrowded radio dial."
_oh_. Shouldn't I? Thanks for making that so CLEAR to me; where WOULD I be if I didn't hear the same music and news everywhere I went. Sounds like the real 'interference' they're worried about is not so much from the low-power waves but the alternative message(s!) they'd carry.
dillie
He's the chairman of the House committee that oversees the FCC. He was owned and operated by the NAB and didn't deny it.
Fortunately for the public he's retiring at the end of this term to become a lobbyist (not in broadcasting). His leaving Congress is the country's gain.
Apparently he's taken himself out of the picture if both Congress and the FCC are all of a sudden in favor of low-power broadcasting.
Microsoft's VP of Customer Service is Helen Waite. If you are having problems with their products go to Helen Waite.
see http://www.freeradio.org