Slashdot Mirror


China Sending Two People Into Space

henrypijames writes "As reported widely in Chinese media, China has began production of and launch preparations for it's new Shenzhou ("divine ship") 6 spaceship. While being roughly equal in design to Shenzhou 5 which sent the first Chinese into space last year (although having capacity for three persons), Shenzhou 6 is supposed to carry two "Taikonaut" next year."

391 comments

  1. Yay for variety.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Shenzhou 6 is supposed to carry two "Taikonaut" next year."

    I bet the people on the space station were getting tired of american and russian food. I never had taikonaut but its probably good...

    1. Re:Yay for variety.. by c1ay · · Score: 3, Funny
      This just means that the space station will now have a choice of either Mandarin or Szechuan style when they order chinese take-out.

      --

    2. Re:Yay for variety.. by Stargoat · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      That's great that the Chinese astronauts get so much wonderful food. Maybe the Chinese government could then focus on getting the millions in Henan with AIDS some food as well. Or do something about the rioting peasants in the countryside aside from running them over with trains. Maybe, just maybe, the Chinese government could show some responsibility, and try to keep all 900 million peasants fed.

      Chairman Mao and his cronies killed more Chinese peasants than the Russians killed Russians, the Japanese killed Chinese, and the Germans killed Jews and other races combined.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    3. Re:Yay for variety.. by Siphre · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe the Russians should focus on stable economy and try to stop government corruption. Maybe they should turn their efforts towards ratifying the Kyoto accord. Maybe the U.S. should focus their funds on 27 million children that still live below the poverty line instead of maintaining their nuclear stockpiles or stop destroying countries then giving them 87 billion dollars. Maybe the U.S. should reform their foreign policy to be compassionate and open. Maybe the European Union can focus on treating less developed countries, that were formally colonized by them, would treat them fairly and give them preferential treatment on imports. Give them an economic break and forgive their debt load. Maybe we should make this world a better place before we leave? Maybe not...

    4. Re:Yay for variety.. by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The poverty line in the US isn't set as the same level as most other countries. It is set at a much higher level. Most people under the poverty line in the US have phone service, cable and a place to live (rent or own). Food can be provided by our food stamp program.

    5. Re:Yay for variety.. by jabberjaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting, is China allowed to dock at the ISS? If they were allowed to can they given the orbit etc..? A quick google did not turn much up. I for one think it would be a great step in the right direction for the Chinese to be allowed to join the Americans and Russians aboard the ISS in future missions.

    6. Re:Yay for variety.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do they get the cats up into space though?

    7. Re:Yay for variety.. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you wait to solve all problems before exploring further, you never end up exploring further - EVER.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    8. Re:Yay for variety.. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Informative

      The poverty line in the US isn't set as the same level as most other countries. It is set at a much higher level. Most people under the poverty line in the US have phone service, cable and a place to live (rent or own). Food can be provided by our food stamp program.

    9. Re:Yay for variety.. by mickwd · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Maybe the European Union can focus on treating less developed countries, that were formally colonized by them, would treat them fairly and give them preferential treatment on imports."

      Funny you should mention this. I believe the EU tried to do this with bananas imported from poor countries in the caribbean. The USA, prompted by large american banana companies, took them to the WTO to prevent it.

      Link here.

      That said, the EU is still too much like a rich man's club.

    10. Re:Yay for variety.. by juniorkindergarten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well that was the arguement for cutting back the space program years ago. Focus on domestic issues, spend the money on domestic problems.
      Unfortunately nothing has changed, but you currently enjoy the benefits of the space program, such as that computer you're currently typing on. How about a more efficient care (computer controlled fuel injection). How about better communications?
      As for the Russians, tell me there isn't instances of corruption in any democracy? Hm? The Russians are only a short time into a democracy in comparison to the US, "stability" takes time. Ans speaking of economies, there is no such thing as a stable economy per se, as an economy is constantly in a state of flux - new ideas constantly change the financial landscape
      Maybe the US should ratify Kyoto, since they effectivly killed it.
      Sure lets turn the US into the world's largest welfare state - I'll bet you bitch come tax time, and I'll bet you'd bitch even louder if your taxes went up.
      If you don't like US foreign policy vote for a different president.
      If the US stopped meddling in other people's countries to serve their own self interest the world would be a better place.

      --
      "Every security scheme that is based on secrets eventually fails." - Steve Jobs
    11. Re:Yay for variety.. by ilctoh · · Score: 1

      Apparently you havn't walked through downtown Chicago, Boston, New York, or any other city with more that 15000 people lately. True, some people below the "poverty line" have all these nice things you mention, though those who are in true poverty do not.

      --
      How many slashes would a slashdot dot, if a slashdot could dot slashes?
    12. Re:Yay for variety.. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I have, and it isn't my fault that they do not apply for all the private and public assistance they can get. It is their fault and they should do something about it. In the USA most of them live that way because they want to, not because they have to.

    13. Re:Yay for variety.. by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if "allow" is the problem. First there must be the will to do it, the wish for cooperation. A very nice read is the SP-4209 The Partnership: A History of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project website. There is a lot of info on that mission there, the first real cooperation in space between USA and USSR, AFAIK. I guess it's more or less applicable to the China situation too..

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    14. Re:Yay for variety.. by Tremanhil · · Score: 0

      "I never had taikonaut but its probably good..."

      With two you get eggroll!

    15. Re:Yay for variety.. by tloh · · Score: 1

      maybe you should post something that is on topic.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    16. Re:Yay for variety.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the USA most of them live that way because they want to, not because they have to.

      Which country are you from again?

    17. Re:Yay for variety.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the Shenzhou crafts are an evolution of russian Soyuz, the docking systems are incompatible.

    18. Re:Yay for variety.. by alkali · · Score: 2, Funny
      This just means that the space station will now have a choice of either Mandarin or Szechuan style when they order chinese take-out.

      The problem with dehydrated Chinese space food packets is that .021 Earth revolutions later, you're hungry again.

    19. Re:Yay for variety.. by DAldredge · · Score: 1


      The USA. And I know of what I speak.

    20. Re:Yay for variety.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China can launch a men into space and safely bring them back. What has America done lately? I, for one, welcome our new overlords, and remind them that an anonymous coward could be useful in rounding up other anonymous cowards and helping them grow beards so we can imprison them in Gitmo for something they haven't done yet but it must be pretty bad; trust me. I'm Cuban and should know.

    21. Re:Yay for variety.. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      In the USA most of them live that way because they want to, not because they have to.

      You can tell a conservative from a million light years away with that comment...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    22. Re:Yay for variety.. by Herkules · · Score: 0

      "That said, the EU is still too much like a rich man's club."

      Well not as much any more with the 10 new countrys joning the EU.

      --
      CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
    23. Re:Yay for variety.. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > You can tell a conservative from a million light years away with that comment...

      Taking into consideration that you do not live in the U.S., you haven't a clue what you are talking about. I live in the second-poorest state in the U.S., about 50% of my friends are now & grew up under the poverty line. They still make fun of people with no cable, which is very few. "Poverty" in the U.S. is nowhere near poverty elsewhere.

      This could have a part in why the U.S. population is seen as having little idea of the value of a dollar -- we think that making $10,000/yr is near slavery.

      There are government programs that exist. They are extremely easy to get. All it takes is a trip to an office. Don't have a car? Ask someone on the street for the $10 cab fare, or ride the bus.

      This has nothing to do with conservative/liberal.

    24. Re:Yay for variety.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they did. Forcing the US to pay for preferential treatment of former colonies is insane.

      Dropping protectionist agricultural trade barriers and debt forgiveness would help the former colonies and not effectively be economic warfare with the US.

      But countries act in their own self-interest, despite trying to pretend that it is all the US's fault.

  2. China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    God Bless America

    God Bless America, with the worst crime levels in the first world
    God Bless America, where "democracy" means a rich, white male as President
    God Bless America, the biggest consumer of the world's natural resources
    God Bless America, so happy to violate international laws
    God Bless America, where "freedom of speech" means race-hate groups like KKK
    God Bless America, and its massive and ever-growing poverty gap
    God Bless America, with barely 300 years of dire history and culture
    God Bless America, all its appalling "sitcoms" with no grasp of irony
    God Bless America, with the highest obesity levels in the developed world
    God Bless America, because corporations should be allowed to run amok
    God Bless America, wasting billions to attack foreign countries

    God Bless America, and thank God I don't have to live there.

    -

    1. Re:China: still better than America! by cartzworth · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Are you from China? It apparent you can't speak ill of where ever you are from.

    2. Re:China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God bless the men and women who died fighting for freedom in Tienamen Square.

    3. Re:China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has:

      1) A long tragic history of authoritarianism and violence.

      2) A culture that is partially stuck in the previous century and partially crumbling.

      3) Starving people who lack the ability to think for themselves.

      4) A national inferiority complex that will cause it to start a war that will lead to its own destruction.

    4. Re:China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God Bless America, wasting billions to attack foreign countries

      It makes better economic sense to take out evil tin-plated dictatorships than to provide them with aid and support, like China does.

    5. Re:China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with the worst crime levels in the first world

      God save China, a country which is and always has been ruled by criminals.

      God save China, a top exporter of people to countries like, um, America. Must be due to the excellent quality of life back in the motherland.

    6. Re:China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God Bless America, so happy to violate international laws

      ...which helps to explain why China behaves like they own Taiwan and the surrounding international waters.

    7. Re:China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and its massive and ever-growing poverty gap

      New York city welcomes people from all parts of the USA and the world. Shanghai welcomes people from all parts of the world (as long as they're rich and not desperately poor people from the Chinese heartland).

    8. Re:China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God Bless America, with barely 300 years of dire history and culture

      Quite right. A country that has achieved what China could not achieve over the course of over 1,000 years.

    9. Re:China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't need God to give us education. In fact, we had to throw him and his braindead followers out first.

    10. Re:China: still better than America! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It makes better economic sense to take out evil tin-plated dictatorships than to provide them with aid and support, like China does.

      Likewise, the United States has a long and proud history of propping up evil tin-plated dictatorships. The US only knocks them over when they start causing more problems than they solve.

    11. Re:China: still better than America! by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      China DOES own Taiwan. If not them, who? USA? Recall that Taiwan is not a seperate country. It never declared independence.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    12. Re:China: still better than America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If china had a copyright/patent system like the USA has your country wouldnt have got off the ground. Instead china shared their technology/ideas of papermoney/glasses/fireworks/compasses etc.
      whats that you say? the copyright would have run out a long time ago? By the way the USA is going it's doesnt look like copyright is going to expire ever.

    13. Re:China: still better than America! by BenBenBen · · Score: 1
      China DOES own Taiwan. If not them, who? USA? Recall that Taiwan is not a seperate country. It never declared independence
      By your logic, Taiwan is the only Chinese province protected from China by the US.

      It doesn't make much sense to say that, today, Taiwan is Chinese.
      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    14. Re:China: still better than America! by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      USA is an imperial power. Therefore, it protects whatever serves its interest. In that sense, Taiwan is (somewhat) protected by USA (although I don't think USA will intervene if China invades Taiwan). USA "protecting" other countries is well known. Other examples include Panama, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and so forth.

      I'm not exactly saying Taiwan is Chinese. But it isn't independent in any sense either. The UN does not recognize it. Most countries don't. It doesn't really have an independent foreign policy of any sort.

      In a way, Taiwan is more of a half-state, like Palestine. People are free in one sense but at the same time, they aren't truly free.

      Until Taiwan declares independence (at which point the UN will recognize it), I don't consider it as a seperate country.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    15. Re:China: still better than America! by BenBenBen · · Score: 1
      I'm not exactly saying Taiwan is Chinese. But it isn't independent in any sense either. The UN does not recognize it. Most countries don't. It doesn't really have an independent foreign policy of any sort.
      As I understand the situation, Taiwan is being excruciatingly polite about the whole affair. They acknowledge their limited independence, and would probably consider being ruled under a similar "one nation, two systems" regime as Hong Kong.

      They realise that as soon as they make overtures to the UN, or overtly declare independence, it will poison relations with Beijing irreperably. All they want *is* a limited independence, and note that almost entirely the hardware sold to Taiwan by the US is defensive.

      Palestine is probably a good example, in effect but not cause; the cause is almost diametrically oppposed - Israel forces the status on them, whereas Taiwan assumes it itself. But that's a whole other can of worms (albeit also one in my personal top-three-reasons-we'll-all-vaporise-one-day list)
      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    16. Re:China: still better than America! by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      As I understand the situation, Taiwan is being excruciatingly polite about the whole affair. They acknowledge their limited independence, and would probably consider being ruled under a similar "one nation, two systems" regime as Hong Kong.

      Yes, Taiwan is being very polite. I think it's because they know China will invade them if they declare independence. I'm sure they would want a totally independent country--who doesn't?

      I'm not really sure if Taiwan wants the 'one nation, two systems.' I am also not sure if that really works. Hong Kong is being forced to change. In the long term, I see the following. China will switch from totalitarianism to some democracy-like system. China will become powerful and wealthy. Taiwan will merge with China and end up as one country. If China becomes a big economic power, Taiwan will likely want to join China.

      So, overall, I think Taiwan will end up with China--hopefully, peacefully.

      All they want *is* a limited independence, and note that almost entirely the hardware sold to Taiwan by the US is defensive.

      There is no such thing as "defensive" hardware. Ever since governments changed their name from war department to defense department (circa mid 1900's), the whole notion of "defense" became meaningless. The "defensive" that Taiwan has can be used to bomb China. Conversely, the "defensive" ships China uses to patrol can be used to attack Taiwanese cities. As far as I'm concerned, defense is nothing more than doublespeak!

      But that's a whole other can of worms (albeit also one in my personal top-three-reasons-we'll-all-vaporise-one-day list)

      Don't be so pessimistic about the Middle East situation :) There are other more probable vaporize-everything scenarios :( I don't really think the Isreali/Palestinian conflict will lead to a nuclear war. Even if there are nuclear bombs being unleashed, they will be isolated and won't really do much damage (I'm talking about dirty bombs.)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    17. Re:China: still better than America! by BenBenBen · · Score: 1
      There is no such thing as "defensive" hardware.
      As with all things, it's a scale. I'd argue that it's fairly hard to attack China with an Aegis system though, unless you want to fry them a dozen at a time. Ditto Patriot and other systems bought.
      Don't be so pessimistic about the Middle East situation :) There are other more probable vaporize-everything scenarios :( I don't really think the Isreali/Palestinian conflict will lead to a nuclear war. Even if there are nuclear bombs being unleashed, they will be isolated and won't really do much damage (I'm talking about dirty bombs.)
      'Suitcase nuke' in Jerusalem [where better to hit at the 'Zionist crusaders'?]
      Tel Aviv hits Mecca + Medina [This one's a bit of a stretch, but I'd imagine the plans exist]
      Islamabad hits Tel Aviv
      It all goes downhill from here...

      I agree that Stumpy McNutjob (AKA Kim Jong Il) is probably more of a worry though, depending on how far he thinks he can push - unless the Northern Resource Area concept takes off... I think Moscow should fill out those NATO forms now and keep them in a drawer, just in case...
      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    18. Re:China: still better than America! by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      As with all things, it's a scale. I'd argue that it's fairly hard to attack China with an Aegis system though, unless you want to fry them a dozen at a time. Ditto Patriot and other systems bought.

      USA probably sells more jets (in dollar value) than the these so-called defensive systems. The same jets can be used to attack China (or any other country). Even the AEGIS system is somewhat offensive. It will be used to prevent submarines from attacking ships. It will probably be more useful when you are attacking another country than defending one.

      'Suitcase nuke' in Jerusalem [where better to hit at the 'Zionist crusaders'?] Tel Aviv hits Mecca + Medina [This one's a bit of a stretch, but I'd imagine the plans exist] Islamabad hits Tel Aviv It all goes downhill from here...

      The muslim fundamentalists won't bomb Jerusalem since it is holy to muslims (and there are probably more Palestinians there than "Isrealis.")... As well, Pakistan probably doesn't have missiles that can hit Isreal (their missiles don't even cover all of India, for example). In any case, these are minor points.

      If you are an Isreal (or anywhere in the Middle East), you have a point. I was thinking from a global point of view. I'm thinking more a World War III (this won't happen under that scenario).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  3. Space Race!! by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully this will get the US to start a space race with China! Just to make sure, everyone tell Bush that if China gets a man on Mars first, that proves that the president of China has a bigger penis than the president of the US.

    1. Re:Space Race!! by JeffHeatonDotCom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, that won't do it, there is no OIL on Mars.

      Jeff

    2. Re:Space Race!! by Sogol · · Score: 3, Funny

      maybe, but the president of the US is still a bigger penis

    3. Re:Space Race!! by HD+Webdev · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Just to make sure, everyone tell Bush that if China gets a man on Mars first, that proves that the president of China has a bigger penis than the president of the US.

      That could get Bush out of the WMD fiasco.

      He can cite intelligence sources about the impending doom and get us all concentrated on stopping the Chinese PMD's. "Intelligence Sources tell us that the Chinese PMD program is an immediate threat to our top national insecurity and the threat is growing larger every day!"

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    4. Re:Space Race!! by Buster+Chan · · Score: 0

      Your speculation is based on an ethnic steriotype. You can't know for sure if you're correct. This is a matter for the CIA to investigate.

      --
      "I am a fictional character."
    5. Re:Space Race!! by redKrane · · Score: 0

      The truth is often ironic and funny, certainly in this case.

      --
      that's my word, holla...
    6. Re:Space Race!! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Since Bush is so keen on multibillion dollar Mars project, I suggest you guys send Bush to Mars, one way. Much cheaper that way. Everyone happy, maybe even Bush.

      Heck it could be cheaper if he stops on the moon first and somehow misses his connecting flight.

      --
    7. Re:Space Race!! by Luscious868 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Well I'm afraid that I have bad news for you buddy. With Nader in, Kerry can't win. I hope your ready for 4 more years of George.

    8. Re:Space Race!! by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .there is no OIL on Mars.

      Don't be daft man, it's right over there, next to the chemical weapons and shit.

      We knew we'd find them someplace, if we looked hard enough.

      KFG

  4. China Sending Two People Into Space by Mononoke · · Score: 4, Funny

    I notice that nothing is said about bringing them back.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    1. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by Hao+Wu · · Score: 0
      This is very serious operation. You should not make joke, Monoke.

      I am happy for renewed drive to send China to its rightful place atop of space achievement, but crude and racist jokes abound here. I am begining to think Slashdot is all bigot. (Not you, Monoke, you are my Friend.)

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    2. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by Anonymovs+Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You should not make joke, Monoke.

      Lighten up. This is nothing compared to the Bush jokes you'll see here. And for all Bush's defects, his government is still a shade less totalitarian than the Chinese one, most people would agree.

    3. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by mafeesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except that it *does* mention bringing them back.

      He said astronauts would stay aboard the orbiting lab for short periods, with spacecraft ferrying them back and forth.

    4. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      true, true.. but I've never heard Chinese claiming they're the "land of the free" or they have "best democracy"... and I've never heard Chinese trying to teach the others about human rights, free trade etc.

    5. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by flewp · · Score: 1

      I didn't see it as racist at all. He didn't say anything about "Good, I'm glad they make no mention of bringing them back" or anything like that.

      Lighten the fuck up and stop being so goddamned sensitive. That goes for *everyone*.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    6. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wonder if we can help them choose which two? ;)

      Hmmm...

      Darl McBride
      Steve Ballamer
      Bill Gates
      Rosie O'Donnel ...

      Why is this reminding me of a Simpson's episode? Maybe if we have their rocket go into the sun...

    7. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an idiot, or just a terrible comedian? Honestly, I can't tell.

    8. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by bobbuck · · Score: 1
      Anonymous: Wonder if we can help them choose which two? ;)
      Hmmm...
      Darl McBride, Steve Ballamer, Bill Gates, Rosie O'Donnel ...

      If price per pound to space are a factor, I'd say Darl and Bill are safe.

    9. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way for anyone to fit with Rosi O'Donnel (or even have enough food for her)...

    10. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      the ship can hold 3.
      What the chinese really mean is that there will be 2 survivors.

      Rosie is to be feed. It is very efficient this way. Take some food along, feed it to rosie. Then you take each limb off one week at a time. Gives a month of fresh food before they have to resort to the...freeze dried stuff.

      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    11. Re:China Sending Two People Into Space by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Yes, most *Americans* would agree, but that is almost a result deduced by definition (after all, they voted for their government didn't they?).

      But I doubt most Chinese would agree on your point.

      The American system is more free and democratic, but that doesn't necessarily make the government better. And it doesn't necessarily makes the people happier.

      The converse holds.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  5. Re:chinee by Buster+Chan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your offensive, racist comment, should not have been moderated "Funny."

    --
    "I am a fictional character."
  6. Fast lane by savagedome · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shenzhou 5 which sent the first Chinese into space last year (although having capacity for three persons), Shenzhou 6 is supposed to carry two "Taikonaut" next year."

    They are sending two people so that they can drive the carpool lane. (HOV lane) !!

  7. Re:Lotsa Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, the US has already build a home for americans in space. Can't wait till they start to move away from our daily lifes and we can start to care about something else than FUD, selfmade terrorism and invisible WMD's.

  8. Good for manned spaceflights by October_30th · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Excellent.

    Hopefully this will revive the manned spaceflight programs all over the world, preferably in the form of true collaboration and not just let's-all-keep-reinventing-the-wheel kind of silly competition.

    We need to get off this planet sooner or later and unmanned probes won't do that.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by ktanmay · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not! This isn't about manned spaceflight, more about national prestige, anyway, if you really want to feel sad today, read this.

    2. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know, this could result in space getting overwhelmed - at least if one recalls the old Benny Hill joke:

      "Once upon a time, there were two Chinamen...

      Now look how many!"

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by shokk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, China building their own space station and planning their own moon mission is real collaborative of them. Sounds like we have more collaboration going on here on Earth than I thought!

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    4. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by magarity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      preferably in the form of true collaboration and not just let's-all-keep-reinventing-the-wheel kind of silly competition

      Let's see... collaboration came up with the ISS, an over budget, behind schedule, understaffed white elephant. Competition put men on the moon in less than 10 years from (almost) scratch.

    5. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      It'll be the same form of collaboration you find in any pissin' contest.

    6. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by zeux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes but as soon as it was over everything vanished totally.

      Nobody can go to the moon now and we really have to 'reinvent the wheel' to go back there.

    7. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what cost?

      ISS went "over budget" because it's budget was fraction of the Apollo program budget.

      And what about benefits? What did Apollo program did for the science in addition of bringin couple of rocks? There is at least some useful research going in the ISS.

    8. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by flewp · · Score: 1

      I don't even want to know how two Chinamen resulted in their now massive population.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    9. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are kinda moving at a snail's pace with over a year between launches. I hope they pick up soon and do something interesting.

    10. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by Greeneland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Consider the fact that ISS will also vanish totally not long after it finally gets finished.

    11. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      We need to get off this planet sooner or later and unmanned probes won't do that.


      Actually, no we don't. If a meteor comes to get us, all we need do is dig some VERY deep holes with years of food stored within.

      From a human survival standpoint, it's effectively the SAME thing as going to Mars except it costs a BUTTLOAD less money.

      I suggest that those interested in interstellar travel can poney the money up from a subscription program. Dedicate your $5,000 per year over a couple hundred thousand and you MAY have enough to go to the moon in ten years. THAT's the democratic way.

      You GET the cool, you pay for the cool. The rest of us think it's a waste of money!!!!!

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    12. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by tloh · · Score: 1

      Here! Here! mod parent up!
      However, I don't think reinventing the wheel is such a bad idea. Let us remember diversity is supposed to be healthy. Whatever the Chinese end up doing, this is a good opportunity for NASA, ESA, and the Russians to see if something they have *not* choosen or concieved would work well. Then let *everyone* learn from that experience and reinvent a better wheel. :-)

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    13. Re:Good for manned spaceflights by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      well, there's no telling how many Chinawomen were involved...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  9. Me-too technology by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'd be more impressed if China managed to provide a decent standard of living for all of its billion+ population. This is just me-too technology, the USSR did it (and its population suffered as a result, since it wasn't a rich country), the USA did it and more (and its population paid the price in taxes, but it could afford it, being a truly rich country), and now China is about to do just like the USSR and further starve its population to go up-diddly-up-up and perform stunts to impress other countries and amaze the press.

    They're a bunch of circus clown, and putting priorities like that above their nation's welfare shows how much Chinese leaders are disconnected with the reality of their country.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Me-too technology by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're a bunch of circus clown, and putting priorities like that above their nation's welfare shows how much Chinese leaders are disconnected with the reality of their country.

      Here goes my karma, but its worth pointing out that exactly the same allegations can be levelled at the current administration of the USA. How precisely has the expenditiure of over $100 billion for the war in Iraq helped the nation's welfare?

      Certainly, the war it may have advanced the geopolitical goals of the administration -- much like China's space race will advance the geopolitical goals of their administration. However, the war has done nothing to advance the USA's welfare.

      I'm very much in favour of China's forays into space; I think the USA can only benefit from having a competitor in space. Its not coincidence that the US manned space program has declined heavily since the height of the cold war.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:Me-too technology by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      USSR was a very rich country but the majority of the population were not rich. But they also were not that poor, they did have roofs about their heads and food on the table, noone starved, people could afford to go to vacations up to a month in a year for most professions. Most of them could not afford big items like cars or extra housing, but in general the country could be seen as populated by a middle class, even though the standard of living of middle class was lower than middle class in the States for example.

      The reason why the space program and the millitary programs were quite successful in that country was exactly because most of the wealth of the country was spent on that.

    3. Re:Me-too technology by dalutong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who grew up in China I have some insight into the welfare of the Chinese people. In short: it could get a lot better. But that doesn't mean China shouldn't go into space.

      We went to war during the great depression. A war that wasn't directly against us (until Pearl Harbor). Should we have? We had millions of starving Americans.

      When we went into space we still had people without jobs and without food. Today we have people without jobs and without food. Why are we doing anything but feeding them?

      Because that's not how economies work. If China can develop a computer industry jobs will come. If china can develop a science industry jobs will come.

      If China just spent its time trying to feed its people then no one would get fed and the government would collapse. You have to make the economy boom and then move on from there. For instance, people are doing a hell of a lot better today then they were in 1979 or even ten years ago. Why? Because China invested in its markets and in its economy and in its peoples sense of national pride.

      BTW, China is nothing like the USSR. The USSR never had the world's fastest growing major economy. It certainly never had it for years running as China has.

      China can afford going to space. They shouldn't get consumed by it; but I doubt that is what is happening. There is still a lot more money outside the space race than inside the space race.

      So they are paying a little for some national pride, so what?

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    4. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...putting priorities like that above their nation's welfare shows how much Chinese leaders are disconnected with the reality of their country."

      Sounds a lot like the US, though, doesn't it? Let's invade another country and send a man to Mars, despite the state of the nation...

    5. Re:Me-too technology by gloth · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The USA did it and more, [...] but it could afford it, being a truly rich country.

      I hope you realize that there's more people in the US today without medical insurance than there were in the USSR during the space race? That there's now more people in the US not receiving a reasonable education than in the USSE back then?

      It's your "We're awesome, so we have the right to kick ass, everyone else doesn't really deserve it" attitude that made the US a lot of enemies...

      Oh, and before you mod this as flamebait, maybe at least try to make an effort to prove me wrong!

    6. Re:Me-too technology by rmarll · · Score: 1

      You could apply *exactly* the same argument about the US and USSR.

      Don't forget when you pass that homeless guy on the street that it was US that were playing the "me too" game 40 years ago. Fact is putting something in space isn't that expensive in the grand scheme of things and it's good for nationalism.

    7. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact is putting something in space isn't that expensive in the grand scheme of things and it's good for nationalism.

      1- it's horribly expensive and
      2- like we need more nationalism

    8. Re:Me-too technology by zeux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The space program could have a good return on the Chinese living standard. This pumps government money in the economy, accelerates progress and gives the citizens a 'pride'.

      The space program is not a lot of money in comparison of the government budget. It wouldn't improve life of the citizens much anyway.

      And the USA is doing the same financing a very expensive war with a very bad budget and huge dept. Read my sig to understand the effect of the national debt.

    9. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymovs+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      the USA did it and more (and its population paid the price in taxes, but it could afford it, being a truly rich country)

      Yeah, tell that to the chap sleeping on the streets outside my doorstep, the people begging on the subway, the wretched homes in the Bronx and New Jersey, people living in shantytowns all over the midwest, south, etc.

      Oh yes, "welfare" is only a dirty word if the US Government says about it, no?

      Really -- assuming you're an american and have been brought up in the American way of thinking -- do you seriously think the government can "provide" a standard of living to a billion people? No government has that kind of money. You improve the standard of living by stimulating the economy and creating jobs. You do that, in part, by spurring science and technological research. The post-war defence and space programmes are a big reason for the US's economic superpower status today. (You also need a market economy, which the USSR didn't have, but China's developing one.)

    10. Re:Me-too technology by shokk · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Encourage them to do this. It will only accelerate their impoverishment and send them tumbling the way of the USSR. Their economy is about as bad off as the old Soviet Union, full of positive reports to keep ministers from being executed. They've got lots of bank scandals starting to appear showing that their currency is not worth what they say. They've got entire villages infected with AIDS that are about to disappear, because they can only deal with these things by hiding them from public view in the hopes no one will notice before they disappear. Things are going very wrong and have all the earmarks of a government without enough resources to handle it all. They ignore it all to produce a few gems like cavitation torpedoes, a space program, and a couple of capitalist sector cities.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    11. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't the US provide decent standard of living to those millions living below a povetry line and to those millions children which don't have decent education at the moment, instead of wasting billions on military and war.

      Putting priorities like that above their nation's welfare shows how much US leaders are disconnected with the reality of their country.

    12. Re:Me-too technology by use_compress · · Score: 1

      you seriously think the government can "provide" a standard of living to a billion people

      It's a communist government. That's their job :)

    13. Re:Me-too technology by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      China should allow private ownership of property before they do shit like this. I know the are talking about doing it, but this is the 21st century and they still don't allow their people to own land.

    14. Re:Me-too technology by shfted! · · Score: 5, Informative

      The USA is less rich than it appears. A lot of the high lifestyle that even the lowest classes live is all financed on consumer debt. People are already reaching their credit limits. Once people can no longer finance new things, they can't purchase new things, and you know where that leads. Like any venture financed with debt, it must return enough to more than compensate for the cost of servicing the debt. As consumer tend to only buy things which don't make money, they're taken on huge amounts of debt that will reduce their buying power for many years to come.

      The only difference between the USSR and the USA is that the debt is riding more on the individual consumers in the US. Either way, the people owe lots. The US hasn't provided a decent standard of living for its quater billion citizens.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    15. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here goes my karma, but its worth pointing out that exactly the same allegations can be levelled at the current administration of the USA. How precisely has the expenditiure of over $100 billion for the war in Iraq helped the nation's welfare?

      Our reasons for going into Iraq were primarily strategic ones (Syria to the NW and Iran to the east). But you do have a valid point nonetheless.

    16. Re:Me-too technology by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      american way of thinking? uhm...

    17. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymovs+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      We went to war during the great depression. A war that wasn't directly against us (until Pearl Harbor).

      I'm not sure what they teach in history classes these days. The US went to war only after Pearl Harbour. Until then, which means when France and most of Western Europe had been occupied and the Nazis had been at Britain's doorstep for several months, the US was neutral---precisely because the war "wasn't directly against us".

    18. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymovs+Coward · · Score: 1
      you seriously think the government can "provide" a standard of living to a billion people

      It's a communist government. That's their job :)

      That's exactly what's wrong with communism. The government's only source of income is taxes. If 80% of the population is rich, you can tax them and provide welfare to the remaining 20% (like in Europe), but if 80% are poor, you cannot possibly give them handouts by taxing the remaining 20% to any rational degree. And if you impose ridiculous tax rates like 80% on the rich, you kill their incentive to earn and destroy the economy.

      BTW, the Chinese govt has realised this for a couple of decades now; today China is communist only politically, not economically.

    19. Re:Me-too technology by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The *last* thing in the US that we need right now is something good for nationalism.

      We don't need another wave of morons feeling superior to everyone else just because some very great people live (and lived) on the same 3.5 million square mile land mass as they do.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    20. Re:Me-too technology by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Oh, and before you mod this as flamebait, maybe at least try to make an effort to prove me wrong!

      'Don't know if this is your sig or you meant to attach this to your post, but the onus should be on *you* as the one that asserts the point to prove yourself right. Just saying 'education was better in Russia than is in the US now' and 'more people were covered than they are in the US now' doesn't make it so.

      So I'll turn it back to you -- I'd like to see figures that prove that the *quality of care* for all those Soviets covered by the national healthcare plan was equal -- or even in the same stratosphere -- as the equivalent US citizen on private health insurance. I won't comment either way on the education stance, which is highly subjective, except to say that a reasonable education is available to as vast majority of Americans. You can lead a horse to water...

      As for the question as to whether the US should spend money on a space race when we have so many that don't have insurance, as so many other posters said, this isn't how an economy works. If there were as many people *starving* in the US, living at the absolute bottommost percent of the poverty level when compared to the poorest of the poor countries, the gov't would be abandoning these kinds of cultural/scientific milestones, and pursuing social programs. Wait -- I believe they did already. Look at the state of the union in the 30's. Little programs started like the WPA and the SSA. If JFK faced similar times, you can certainly bet the Apollo money would've gone directly to the soup kitchens.

    21. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, anyone spending $100 billion _anywhere_ generally yields good economic effects... not that i agree with the motives of this particular $100 billion, but i can't argue the basic economics of it.

      The american economy has certainly benefited from this, and from their tax cuts, and would benefit from spending big money to go to mars. Of course, maybe thats' at the expense of a weak dollar, but even that isn't all that bad (see recent G7 discussions).

    22. Re:Me-too technology by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Actually, the US implemented an oil embargo against Japan, cutting off aprox. 80% of Japan's oil supply. Doesn't sound like a very "neutral" country to me. One of the major reasons why Japan invaded South east Asia and to Indochina was for the oil fields that were there.

    23. Re:Me-too technology by dalutong · · Score: 1

      Sept 16, 1940 - United States military conscription bill passed. More than a year before Pearl Harbor.

      We might not have "entered" until Pearl Harbor (and then shortly after Germany declaring war on us), but we were preparing for it. Would we have gone to war if they hadn't bombed us? No one knows.

      But -- point taken. I'll watch my wording next time.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    24. Re:Me-too technology by gloth · · Score: 1
      The "flamebait" line is not a signature. It was part of the actual posting. Anyway, you've asked me to bring forward evidence for my claims, and I will try to show something here.

      I found it difficult to get data about the 60s, which I consider the hay-day of the Soviet Union. Even so, according to the CIA, the illiteracy rate in the US is considerably higher than in Russia.. Of course, the numbers are from different years, and a lot of other things are to be considered here (immigration, for example), but for all I know it is generally agreed, that the Soviet Union had a literacy rate of close to 100%.

      As far as health care goes, this was a constitutional right in the Soviet Union, so things are quite different than in the US. Thus, there was no such thing as being to poor for health services.

      Now, having this said, my point was not that everything was great in the Soviet Union back then. Lack of freedom and democracy come to mind, and of course the crimes of the Stalin era alone can fill volumes.

      What I was trying to say was that the reasoning of the original poster, (Many Chinese are poor, so their country shouldn't engage in space flight), could just as well have been made against the US during NASAs finest days. That's all.

    25. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least 7 million Ukranians died of forced starvation in the 30's. It really wasn't such a nice country.

      In one year in the US, I was able to save up enough $ for a 4 1/2 month vacation in Central America. . . working as a manager in a pizzaria.

    26. Re:Me-too technology by nineoneone · · Score: 1

      You are joking, right?

      --
      sig under development
    27. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how you use evidence that doesnt support what you originally said...

      That there's now more people in the US not receiving a reasonable education than in the USSE back then?

      Then you go ahead and use data from 2003 for Russia and data from 1979 for the US.

      I would mod you a troll if I had any points.

    28. Re:Me-too technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's that whole Saddam thing and the disbanding of a major terrorist ring, but that's got nothing to do with a nation's welfare. Overrated.

    29. Re:Me-too technology by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, there's that whole Saddam thing and the disbanding of a major terrorist ring, but that's got nothing to do with a nation's welfare.

      A putative link between Saddam and al-Qaida has yet to be proven. You obviously have obediently swallowed all the crap that the administration has been pumping out. You fool.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    30. Re:Me-too technology by tloh · · Score: 1

      With all the aid the US was providing to the allies in Europe up until Pearl Harbor, we were effectively at war long before Pearl Harbor. I think parent post is speaking in the context of national resources and industrial capacity during the Great Depression, so this is very relevant as it shows the ability of a nation to produce under stress.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    31. Re:Me-too technology by tloh · · Score: 1

      Man! There are so many things wrong with your post I don't even know where to begin.

      It will only accelerate their impoverishment and send them tumbling the way of the USSR. Their economy is about as bad off as the old Soviet Union, full of positive reports to keep ministers from being executed.

      The economies of Russia (past and present) and China are fundamentally different in many ways. First, China's economy has been evolving toward capitalism for more than 20 years since Deng Xiao Ping was in charge. As with any kind of change of this magnitude, growing pains are to be expected. A hickup every now and then should be expected. Banking scandals? We've got Enron, Worldcom, Martha Stewrt, etc. No big deal. Regardless, the point is that it is all moving forward at a managable pace. For a little historic perspective, it is worth noting that China was actually one of the Anchors that kept the Asian Economy from crashing even harder many years ago. The Soviet Union, had no control over the economic changes that occured in the aftermath of the breakup. It was basically a free for all, everyone for themselves kind of situation.

      They've got entire villages infected with AIDS that are about to disappear

      Like urban legends, this is just one of those things that won't die. The villagers who contracted AIDS by selling their blood has been reported so much by major media, it feels like O.J. Simpson all over again. Let it go, there's no point in beating a dead horse. At the very least, the article details medical aid being given to the villagers. That is a great deal better than how US treated many southern blacks who were intentially infected with syphillis a few decades ago.

      They ignore it all to produce a few gems like cavitation torpedoes, a space program, and a couple of capitalist sector cities.

      You need to get your facts straight. Cavitation torpedoes are not Chinese, they are Russian . With regards to "a couple of capitalist sector cities." - I was born in a part of China which when I left could very properly be described as the boonies. Rice paddies and water buffalos everywhere. As little as 10 years ago, , everything I had known was gone. The rural quietness bulldozed over and replaced with freeways and automobiles. Modernization is not just happening in Shanghai and ShenZhen, it is happening to the whole country. A great deal of the news you get from the American press in really no better than supermart tabloid reporting. I guess no matter how outlandish it is, there are still those who would swallow it all hook line and sinker.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    32. Re:Me-too technology by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I was born in Ukraine and I lived there for over 11 years in total, and I lived in Russia, and I am sure that in my time this has not happened, in the 30th, sure it happened, but those were the times of change and in the times of change shit happens. For the last 13-15 years it also have been times of change for the former Soviet countries and now most of the population can be called poor with some 1-2% rich who are at the top and almost no middle class.

      From about the 1955 to about 1989 USSR was mostly populated by middle class city folks and farmers.

    33. Re:Me-too technology by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      USSR's population did not suffer because of the space program. USSR had a higher standard of living than even now. It was certainly above the so-called third world (whereas Russia is part of the 3rd world now). Very few Soviets actually starved to death because of the space program. The reason millions died in USSR was because they were purposely killed. That is, they died due to political reasons. Even starvations in Ukraine were done purposely by Stalin. There is no reason why USSR couldn't have maintained its standard of living without killing these people, while keeping all their space programs.

      As far as China is concerned, it spends VERY LITTLE on their space program. Even if they spent it on social welfare, it wouldn't make much of a difference. What you CAN argue against, however, is their spending on military. They, like all superpower-wannabe, spends a lot on their military.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    34. Re:Me-too technology by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      What terrorist ring is this? The one manufactured in your fantasy world by Bush and his neoconservative friends of his?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    35. Re:Me-too technology by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1
      I think the shame of it is that China's basically following the US' pattern of success. Following WWII, the States had a huge manufacturing machine. Programs like Apollo, basically fueled by cold-war competitive feelings, continued to allow the gigantic military-industrial complex that is the US economy grow even further. We see now, as America tranforms slowly into a tertiary economy, that this might not be the best way to do things.

      The shame of it is that China could do some interesting things, and not just reinvent the wheel, as another poster suggests. I suggest that this 'reinvention' isn't in technology, but economic development. Instead of following the footsteps of the Americans, why not become powerhouse agricultural experts, or energy technologists for that matter? They certainly have the land to erect multi-acre solar arrays. These would give China a huge advantage in the world, and have the added bonus of feeding its people.

      I've been to China, and I've been to the poorer neighborhoods in the States. You just can't compare the two, 1960's or now. IMHO, the class division there is much more prominent than in the West.

  10. Wikipedia, as usual, rocks by another+misanthrope · · Score: 5, Informative

    snippet from Wikipedia's listing for the Shenzhou - lots more in the link!

    Design

    Like the Soyuz, the Shenzhou consists of three modules; a forward "orbital" module, a reentry capsule in the middle, and an aft service module. This division is based on the principle of minimizing the amount of material to be returned to Earth. Anything placed in the orbital or service modules does not require heat shielding, and this greatly increases the space available to the spacecraft without increasing weight as much as it would if those modules were also able to withstand reentry.

    The orbital module contains space for experiments, crew-serviced or operated equipment, and in-orbit habitation. The reentry capsule contains seating for the crew, and is the only portion of the Shenzhou which returns to Earth's surface. The aft service module contains life support and other equipment required for the functioning of the Shenzhou. Two pairs of solar panels, one pair on the service module and the other pair on the orbital module, have a total area of over 40 square metres, indicating average electrical power over 1.5 kW (three times that of Soyuz and greater than that of the original Mir base module).

    Unlike the Soyuz, the orbital module was equipped with its own propulsion, solar power, and control systems, allowing autonomous flight. In the future the orbital modules could also be left behind on a Chinese space station as additional station modules. In the unmanned test flights launched so far, the orbital module of each Shenzhou was left functioning in orbit for several days after the reentry capsule's return.

    1. Re:Wikipedia, as usual, rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant move. Now trolls delete it all and replace it with "Mao touched my junk liberally" stories

    2. Re:Wikipedia, as usual, rocks by zeux · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the future the orbital modules could also be left behind on a Chinese space station as additional station modules.

      This part is really interesting. It means that a Chinese space station could grow up very fast and for very cheaply.

      Do you have any more information on this?

  11. Re:taikonaut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer Takhomasak myself.

  12. all of this leads to future Chinese Space Station? by Neuropol · · Score: 0, Funny

    Don't we have a huge self-contained, furnished, International Room With a View in orbit already? Why don't they plan to just build on to that and add at least a recroom. Ping pong in 0g.

    It would be a great way to ease the tension of this whole nuke issue.

  13. Re:Uh Oh ... by curne · · Score: 0, Informative

    You know those Chinese multiply like rabbits: 2, 4, 8, 16 ...

    Technically, that's not "breeding like rabbits".
    Your series is polynomic. A rabbit population will increase exponentially, given the resources and space.

    --
    All interpreted languages are abstractions over Lisp
  14. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope they drive spaceships better than cars...

    I think you meant "hope they ride spaceships as well as bicycles". I wonder how many people they have in the rocket's body pedalling like crazy during launch...

  15. FYI space programs = nuke programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK I know I'm gonna get labeled as a troll, but I still think the fact is that Kennedy's race to the moon had nothing to do with the desire for space exploration and everything to do with advancing and keeping one up on ICMB technology. The space program was just a nice side effect. The same could even be said of the hubble telescope, where I hear they have 6 of them up there, but rather than pointing up are pointing down as spy telescopes.
    Now the same is true of China. They wanted space weapons cababilities, so they created a space program. It has more to do with Tiwan than space, and the US mission to Marz and the new recent push back into space has from Bush has more to do with China than any real interest or value they see in space.
    I'm sorry, but that's just the way it is.

    1. Re:FYI space programs = nuke programs by Maverick2219 · · Score: 1

      What's Marz? Is that a new planet?

      --
      I try to make everyone's day a little more surreal.
    2. Re:FYI space programs = nuke programs by tloh · · Score: 1

      A really big stretch you're making, but I will ask a very simple question:

      Would you rather have the Chinese military building human-tipped space capsules or Nuclear-tipped missiles?

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    3. Re:FYI space programs = nuke programs by Uplore · · Score: 0

      everything to do with advancing and keeping one up on ICMB technology

      Gotta keep up with that good old Intercontinental Mallistic Bissile technology.

      --
      I couldn't think of a sig.
    4. Re:FYI space programs = nuke programs by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > The same could even be said of the hubble telescope, where I hear they have 6 of them up there, but rather than pointing up are pointing down as spy telescopes.

      Isn't the Earth FAAAAAAAR too close for a Hubble-style telescope to focus on anything?

  16. Re:taikonaut? by Kong99 · · Score: 0

    Naa... 'Chinaut' is best one!

  17. Re:chinee by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh, really? I swear I witness so many bad chineese drivers, and I know some guys from China who agree with me on this one. They just don't know how to drive and when they cause some problem or an accident they don't even understand why it was their fault. There are other bad drivers too, but I most of the ones I see are Chineese. Now, you can moderate this as much as you want, but I take a stand, this is my imperical evidence.

  18. I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hope china builds a nuclear powered rocket like some of the designs discussed at http://www.nuclearspace.com/ . Then the defence industry in the US would overide the environmentalists.

    Just like a submarine, its crazy not to use nuclear.

    1. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by Zordas · · Score: 1

      Excellent post !! I wish we had usd plutonium in the Mars Rovers as well. Then we could have used then for 6-7 years instead of -1 year.

    2. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, and you are welcome to live under the launch and re-entry footprints, I'll pass; I'd rather not live out the rest of my short-ass life with lungs full of uranium particles from one of those crazy accidents that 'couldn't happen'.

    3. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There are now large ships that launch rockets. Use those in the middle of the ocean. Also, these nuclear rockets would be so overpowered by comparison they could launch AND LAND vertically (also in the middle of the ocean). Landing in such a way the re-entry footprint is very small.

    4. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by S3D · · Score: 5, Informative

      In fact there 2 type of Nuclear propulsion : Without fallout (Nuclear Termal Rocket (NTR) - basically just flying reactor) and with fallout ( Orion - nuclear bomp explosion pushed ship, Nuclear salt water rocket NSWR). AFAIK there is still no usable "build now" NTR design, and overall NTR probably couldn't make one stage to orbit and back reusable trip. NSWR is a radioactive disaster, usable only in space. Orion - battleship sized spaceship on the pushing plate, pushed by nuke explosion probaly most realistic nuclear design, and probaly could be built now. If launched in the Antarctica, radioactive pollution wouldn't be quite disastrous, but still costing one cancer death per launch (for all the world), by some estimation. So until the progress with NTR nuclear propulsion is better used in space (and there is no electromagnetic pulse in space for nuke too)

    5. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by loqi · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between a rocket and a submarine, the biggest being that rockets have a history of blowing up in the air. Where there's wind. Ever wonder why we don't invest in blasting our millions of gallons of radioactive waste into space instead of just leaving it in leaky containers?

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    6. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and there is no electromagnetic pulse in space for nuke too
      You lost me here.... the EM pulse is generated from all that energy being released and doesn't need a medium to travel in, as it is electromagnetic (as in photons and light). So what proof do you have that all this EM energy produced from a fission reaction magically doesn't happen in space? The sun pumps out a lot of EM through thermonuclear reactions which we are protected from by the earth's EM field. So while the EFFECTS of a nuke going off in orbit in terms of EM would be minimal to zero here on Earth, we are still sending out those EM pulses with every explosion.
    7. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the reason they blow up is that they're full of explosive chemical fuel. A nuclear rocket would not HAVE this problem. Not any sane design of nuclear rocket, anyway. It might have an engine stall and fall to the ground, but it would never blow up the way current chemical rockets do.

    8. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by S3D · · Score: 2, Informative

      You lost me here.... the EM pulse is generated from all that energy being released and doesn't need a medium to travel in, as it is electromagnetic AFAIK ECM is not produced by explosion itself, but a result of air ionization by the radiation produced by explosion. There is no air to ionize in the vacuum, so no ECM.

    9. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by S3D · · Score: 1

      err, EMP not ECM ! (Freudian misspel)

    10. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you scrub the exhaust for neutron radiation exactly how?

    11. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your profound understanding of orbital mechanics has left me speechless.

    12. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't actually activate your reactor until you reach a safe orbit, the amount of radioactivity is small.

      Once you start the thing and get all the active fission products, well then it gets messy.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    13. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by BenBenBen · · Score: 1
      As long as you don't actually activate your reactor until you reach a safe orbit, the amount of radioactivity is small
      The only worrying part is that you have to choose a launch area where you are on the right latitude for the orbit you're after and where an exploding nuclear reactor at 60,000 feet won't scatter dirt all over everywhere. AFAIK, it's not technology holding back nuclear space flight, it's the fact no-one's brave enough to loft several kilos of fissible material upwards attached to several dozen tons of rocket fuel.
      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    14. Re:I hope china builds a nuclear rocket by BenBenBen · · Score: 1

      Of course, after writing this, I remembered the Soviet RORSAT series of satellites, that are powered by reactors. I think there's US hardware up there with similar setups, also for surveillance.

      So launching a reactor not a first, but using it for propulsion would be. I'd bet it takes a much bigger hunk of U238 to get to Mars than to take pictures of navy bases from space though.

      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
  19. Re:Lotsa Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a dual citizen of America and China, you insensitive clod.

  20. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny? I know I'm not the first to speak up, as I have been beaten to the punch, but still--where do the moderators get off moderating this racist drivel as being funny? Mod me as a troll or redundant or whatever other crap you may, but when things like racism are funny while standing up for a sense of respect and tolerance for other cultures goes unnoticed or is determined to be trolling... that's just sad.

  21. Two Chinese, an American, and Ruskie... by 9Nails · · Score: 5, Funny

    So two Chinese, seven Americans, and a Russian were flying in space...

    1. Re:Two Chinese, an American, and Ruskie... by zeux · · Score: 1

      Where are the seven Americans?

    2. Re:Two Chinese, an American, and Ruskie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need closure on that anecdote. It's a federal crime to tease a slashdot reader.

    3. Re:Two Chinese, an American, and Ruskie... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I suppose that's the joke :)

  22. Why Taikonaut ? by rholliday · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case you were wondering like me ...

    "Taikong" is a Chinese word that means space or cosmos. The resulted prefix "taiko-" is similar to "astro-" and "cosmo-" that makes three words perfectly symmetric, both in meaning and in form. Removing "g" from "taikong" is to make the word short and easy to pronounce. On the other side, its pronounciation is also close to "taikong ren", the Chinese words "space men".

    --
    Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    1. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      I understand if chinese speaking persons prefer to call them for taikonauts, but why can't they be referred to as astronauts in english?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by rholliday · · Score: 1

      I suppose we could call them "Chinese astronauts," as some people call cosmonauts "Russian astronauts." I'm sure the Chinese will start to call everyone else's space travelers "Laowai Taikonauts." :)

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    3. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      Call it tradition. Prefixed "nauts" have been used to identify the space pilots of their respective countries for little over 50 years now, to stop in this day and age would be to end a rather novel and respectable nomenclature.

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    4. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I am aware of that silly tradition. :-) Well, apparently people still think it's nice to hang on to.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by Uber+Banker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Taikonaut was a word that was coined for Western audiences as it would fit in with the terms Cosmonaut and Astronaut. The term Taikonaut is not used in China, instead the word 'yuhangyuan' (literally 'astro-navigator') is used - which refers to Astronauts, Cosmonauts and 'Taikonauts' without distinction of nationality.

    6. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      IMO it is neither respectful nor even logical. First, why should their job title need to mention their nationality? I'm not naive enough to suggest that we should be beyond such matters, but it would be nice. After all, a programmer or a teacher or a lawyer doesn't get a prefix on his title to indicate what country he's from, nor should he.

      About the logic part, cosmo is Russian so cosmonauts are from Russia, Taiko is Chinese so taikonauts are from China, and astro is Greek, so astronauts are from... whoops.

      But oh well, it's not going to change.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    7. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Insightful
      First, why should their job title need to mention their nationality?

      Maybe it's because nationalism is the primary motivation for manned space missions?

    8. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Spationauts from Europ.

    9. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

      I just use "chinese astronaut" myself. Taikonaut does sound cooler though.

      --

      What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    10. Re:Why Taikonaut ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! Laowai, indeed. Thanks, I needed a good laugh. Too bad Chinese colloquialism is lost on most slashdotters.

  23. paranoia creeps... coming up slowly by Nadsat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bomb them all from the moon! We must not allow a mine shaft gap!

    1. Re:paranoia creeps... coming up slowly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey there is no fighting in the war room!

  24. Re:Uh Oh ... by Aardpig · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know those Chinese multiply like rabbits: 2, 4, 8, 16 ...

    If you were well-informed enough to hear of the Chinese one-child policy, you would have written "1, 1, 1, 1, 1...". And even then, you'd be leaving out all the instances where children were killed because they were girls.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  25. Uh, what? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Read the mini article, but it sure didn't say much...

    - Five to seven day mission doing what?

    - Their coming space station will be carrying out what experiments?

    - Why aren't they using the already functional International Space Station?

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Uh, what? by Buster+Chan · · Score: 0

      Five to seven days of being a figurehead for progress!

      --
      "I am a fictional character."
    2. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -Five to seven day mission ---dreaming up ways of stealing your watch!

      - Their coming space station will be carrying out what experiments? --conducting experiments on how best to steal your watch!

      - Why aren't they using the already functional International Space Station? Because they got screwed over by other countries for several hundred years and are playing the game "Screw me over for 200 years, shame on you, screw me over for another 200 years, shame on me."

    3. Re:Uh, what? by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

      Why aren't they using the already functional International Space Station?

      Probably for the same reason they'd rather not use closed source from Microsoft? There's the issues of trustworthiness, national pride, etc. Not to mention that if I were the Chinese government, I sure wouldn't want my fledgling space program to in any way get tied up in the present troubles of NASA.

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    4. Re:Uh, what? by genmanath · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would suppose that the 5-7 day mission is meant to "test the waters", as it were, and perhaps to set a milestone, have the taikonauts talk to school-children, etc. The first few times that the USA and USSR put manned capsules into orbit, they did nothing more than orbit and re-enter. However, that's been done a lot (technology is proven, etc), so the Chinese may have to skip the orbiting for the sake of orbiting's sake and get right to work on whatever-they'll-do.

      --
      G. M. Manath

      Go not to the Elves for counsel, for they will say both 'Yes' and 'No.'

    5. Re:Uh, what? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this crossed my mind too... They might not do anything particularly interesting while they're still a bit inexperienced space travellers :-)

      However, it was basically this I was wondering about:

      [...] may have to skip the orbiting for the sake of orbiting's sake and get right to work on whatever-they'll-do.

      What that last part actually is. I have really no good idea about what the chinese space programme will involve. I think it's exciting to get more countries to space, but it would be sure nice to know what they're going to do out there. :-) OK if a lot of it is PR and place China on the map of technologically advanced countries, but surely they aren't just launching a bunch of "taikonauts" just to return?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Uh, what? by genmanath · · Score: 1

      This is just me thinking aloud, really, rather than answering your question, because I have no hope of doing so with any authority. I wonder how much of the scientific research done by NASA, ESA, et al. would be freely available to the Chinese aerospace industry and how much they would have to repeat for themselves. I'm thinking specifically about things like growing plants in orbit, the effects of null gee on bone density, etc. Some of that is fairly important, and if they don't have access to it (for whatever reason), then they may have to spend time re-inventing the wheel.

      On the other hand, I don't think it unreasonable for them to launch Shenzhou 6 with little greater expectation than that it will return. They may intend for their crews to gain orbit experience by flying missions with increasingly longer orbit times. (I would suppose that one encounters situations during 5 days in orbit that one might never face during 36 hours in orbit. For one thing, the hardware has more exposure to micro-meteors, extreme temperature, etc.) Speaking in terms of the American manned space program, China seems to have skipped the Mercury and Gemini phases of the program entirely. They're on currently Apollo 4 or 5 without any of the experience the Americans accrued through the earlier programs. Even with the best hardware and most current research, they've still got some catching up to do.

      --
      G. M. Manath

      Go not to the Elves for counsel, for they will say both 'Yes' and 'No.'

  26. Re:Uh Oh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless you have a government restriction of the number of rabbit births and a social stigma against giving births to female rabbits.

  27. they're not *sending*... by -O.ster_66 · · Score: 1

    they're *blasting*...

    China, which last year became the third nation to blast a man into space...

    it's funnier.

    --
    "You get all the fun of sitting still, being quiet, writing down numbers, paying attention...science has it all."
  28. inevitable dr strangelove quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    not a troll

    1. Re:inevitable dr strangelove quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not a post

  29. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't they be better of building rails into space? They have much experience at this.

  30. Re:Uh Oh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2^1 2^2 2^3 2^4

    His series is exponential too, making your statement meaningless.
    What you really meant to say, perhaps, is that rabbits use a different exponential series. Perhaps not exactly a Fibonacci series, but something similar.

  31. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly do you figure that's racist? Racism is the belief that one race of people is geneticly superior to another. How does making a comment about the skill with which Chinese people drive cars imply that Chinese are geneticly inferior?

  32. Oh no, not another one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should convince UN to form a special conflic-resolution commission for cases like that and put, um, I dunno, maybe Monical Lewinsky in charge.

  33. Re:Uh Oh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, doesn't a rabbit population follow a fibonacci sequence? I know that's always the example that's used when you learn about fibonacci sequences. so, 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34...

  34. why "divine ship" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did you get the translation "divine ship" from? I bet it's not official. For it's hard to imagine a communist country with such "divine" nomenclature.

    In fact, "Shenzhou" rhymed with "Shenzhou", which literally means "China".

    1. Re:why "divine ship" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      stupid slashdot doesn't allow post in gb2312, anyway there are Chinese words sounded Shenzhou. One is divine places (that means China), another is divine vessel

      Chinese divine is not the same divine in your bible, we don't have God with human shape .

    2. Re:why "divine ship" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell are you talking about?

      China in chinese is zoon-shall or jung-gort meaning middle country. Shenzhou does not mean divine place.

    3. Re:why "divine ship" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As others have already mentioned, it's more like "magic ship" than "divine ship".

      But there *is* a meaning of "divine" in the word (and interpretation). Not exactly meaning "holy and good and almighty", but more like "supernatural, magical, and mysterious". Unlike "divine", the word "Shen" can be positive or negative depending on context.

      Perhaps to put it another way: it's "divine" without the religious meaning.

      And actually there *is* relgion in China, but it's different from what the west would call religion. It's more philosphical instead of relying on faith. Actually the mainstream Chinese belief is that blind faith is harmful. Even those who take religion as profession (eg. monks) wouldn't advise believing and relying too much on supernatural things, but instead focus on the philosophical aspects of the religion. Chinese "relgions" do not require people to "believe", instead they ask people to "understand". No Chinese "god" demands worship, instead they earn it.

      I think what China opposes to most is the political implications of the relgions. Traditional Chinese religions (as mentioned above) don't have this problem.

  35. Re:Yay... go china.... by Blaskowicz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    bah!
    Russia has a 40-year-old soyouz, China has the most advanced manned space ship.. and America has NOTHING to put man into space!! only useless shuttles that are a dysmal failure.

  36. Re:Yay... go china.... by d3faultus3r · · Score: 1

    If by the rest of the world you mean Russia and the US then yes. But otherwise they're ahead.

    --
    read my blog
    musings on politics and technol
  37. Re:Yay... go china.... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    "The rest of the world"? Come on.

    43 years behind Russia? Sure.

    43 years behind the USA? Sure.

    But nobody else has put anybody into space. Aside from Russia and the USA, China is ahead of the rest of the world. Whee!

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  38. They've got to hurry... by ahh · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... as space is the ultimate high ground on military thinking and United States is publicly touting to build space-based weaponry to maintain supremecy.

    This is just the beginning of next arms race, even India is building nuclear attack platform in space.

    Arms control is dead, welcome new instability.

    1. Re:They've got to hurry... by Yenhsrav_Keviv · · Score: 0

      That website you pointed to is a pakistani one....from my experience, Pakistani press and media have never been honest, so i'm hard pressed to believe them this time around. I'll wait until a credible site reports on whether India is building a nuclear attack platform in space before I'll believe it.

      Just my $.02

    2. Re:They've got to hurry... by squarooticus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Arms control is dead, welcome new instability.

      Arms control works only when the most powerful parties are rational: back when the US and USSR were the only major nuclear powers, this was a true statement, as much as it pains me to say the USSR was "rational." :)

      This is not true anymore: there are too many nuclear powers now, not all of whom want to sacrifice the benefits of being a major nuclear power on the altar of "arms control." Please tell me what you think is in it for them?

      --
      [ home ]
    3. Re:They've got to hurry... by ahh · · Score: 1

      The Pakistani web site was just first one I had in my link-list on this subject.
      My bad, here's some additional links that should be more verifiable.

      The Hindu : IAF working on weapon platforms in space
      CDI: Developments in Military Space: Movement toward space weapons? [PDF]

    4. Re:They've got to hurry... by ahh · · Score: 1

      Eh, like decreasing the possibity of nuclear war trough checks and balances?

      Unfortunately established nuclear powers didn't honor their commitment (even partly) to Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty after cold war, so it was only matter of time before others started to build bombs just to balace the board.

      Which brings us to current situation that is quickly getting out of hand. Space-based weaponry and similair "toys" are only accelerating the process instead of trying to calm the situation down and stabilize it with diplomacy.

    5. Re:They've got to hurry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need those space weapons. Look what happened when 2 chiense got together on earth. Next year they will be sending two chiense into space and soon they will multiply and overtake a small portion of it. The high population density makes them a perfect space target.

    6. Re:They've got to hurry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arms control is dead, welcome new instability

      IIRC, the United States has never signed or agreed to any treaty, nor made any statement saying we won't deploy conventional weapons in space. We did sign a treaty stating we won't put nukes in space, but the current plan is for conventional weapons.

    7. Re:They've got to hurry... by merdark · · Score: 1

      Most notably, the USA decided that the nuclear arms treaty it sign all those years ago is not worth anything anymore. This of course gave the go ahead for pretty much every one else who wasn't already building new bombs, to start.

      Now, not only has the USA accelerated the failure of nuclear treaties by leading by example, but they are also accelrating, or even initiating, a new space based nuclear cold war.

      If even one nuclear missle goes off in orbit, it could seal us off from space for millenia. The debrea from the blown up satillites would act as bullets detroying further satillites and eventually creating a wall of space junk. Any ships, or new satillites would fly into the debrea field and be destroyed. We might be looking at a new dark age soon. A very very long one.

    8. Re:They've got to hurry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It pains me to see you say the US is "rational" too...

  39. Re:Yay... go china.... by miketang16 · · Score: 1

    OK, screwed that one up a bit. By rest of the world I did mean the USSR and US.

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
  40. Re:Uh Oh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only imaginary rabits do. Real rabbits create litters of more than 1. There *are* similarities though.

  41. Re:Yay... go china.... by krumms · · Score: 3, Funny

    By rest of the world I did mean the USSR and US.

    You failed geography, didn't you?

  42. Reuter/CNN report by henrypijames · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a Reuter report on CNN online, with practically the same information as the Xinhua report.

  43. Damn It!!! by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have told you people to stop making fun of Karl Rove!!!!

    Show more respect!

  44. One question...Make that two... by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    1: Is the charge of delivering the bill added to the cost of the bullet used to execute someone?

    2: Why does China continue to destroy/level churches that it doesn't like?

    1. Re:One question...Make that two... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As mentioned by another poster, it's offtopic.

      But if you really want to know the answer:

      1. The US has more executions than that of China (per person).

      2. A lot of "Churches" that are harassed are actually political entities bearing the name of religion in disguise. And don't pretend that these cults don't exist. And I guess everybody has a different opinion of the exact definition of "cults".

      And actually there is no "religion" in China, there are beliefs, but no "mainstream" organized religion. IMHO it's not necessarily a bad thing, you can easily see the problems caused by zealotic religions (see middle east). China wants none of that.

  45. Re:chinee by krumms · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I swear I witness so many bad chineese drivers, and I know some guys from China who agree with me on this one. They just don't know how to drive and when they cause some problem or an accident they don't even understand why it was their fault. There are other bad drivers too, but I most of the ones I see are Chineese

    Yeah. All "Chineese" are bad drivers. Though I'd bet my last dollar that they could write in their native language better than you write in yours.

    Now, you can moderate this as much as you want, but I take a stand, this is my imperical evidence.

    You mean "empirical" right? And how is the act of "taking a stand" empirical evidence?

    Oh wait, it's just your fucked up grammar.

  46. Thank you, america! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Post about china and watch how american act like americans on slashdot.

    I'm not only from europe, no, I'm also deeply impressed by your "funny" (+5, Troll) and your "Insightful" (+5, Flamebait) posts.

    Truly a great moment for the american karma and how the rest of the world shall interpret it.

    1. Re:Thank you, america! by FooGoo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I didn't see the post that you are referring to but here in America we have something called the first amendment. It's part of our constitution. It states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Which basically means that in the US you can say pretty much what ever you unless it falls under the fighting words doctrine that is usually interpreted very narrowly by the courts.

      Now, the EU on the other hand doesn't have a constitution yet but article 54 of the proposed EU constitution provides no such "absolute" guarantee of free speech.

      I can see how you might find this disturbing since our constitution is over 200 years old and you haven't got one yet and you probably won't be able to enjoy the same rights that we have in America.

      So if we offend you it's not our problem. It's how we where raised. Blame our parents, their parents, and so on. But eventually you will have to blame yourselves. If I recall correctly America was a colony at one time founded by people fleeing oppression in Europe. It's a shame that that oppression is still going on today. You might want to consider fleeing as well.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    2. Re:Thank you, america! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here in America we have something called the first amendment

      Indeed. The freedom to rant like a raving imbacile is most certainly something to be proud of.

      cheers.

    3. Re:Thank you, america! by Lakers · · Score: 1
      Indeed. The freedom to rant like a raving imbacile is most certainly something to be proud of.


      You're god damn right!
    4. Re:Thank you, america! by jezzzzza · · Score: 1

      It really is a bit rich for Americans to criticise the 'draconian' laws in other countries.

      Is it not true that oral sex is banned in some states? You might argue that it is just a terribly old law that no one bothered updating. But what about all your death sentences?

      I lived in the US for two years and I really fail to see how the people living in "the land of the free" is more free than citizens of some countries in Europe and Australasia.

      If you are aware of the common criticisms towards Americans (granted they are not always fair) it really has more to do with your mindsets than your laws.

    5. Re:Thank you, america! by pclminion · · Score: 1
      So your defense for being an asshole is "I say these things because I'm allowed to?" If beating your girlfriend suddenly became legal, would you do that to, just because there's no law to stop you?

      This isn't a matter of free speech or censorship. I don't see anyone trying to silence your opinion here. It's a matter of a lot of Americans being assholes. You're perfectly free to make moronic statements, and we are also perfectly free to call you an idiot with his head up his ass.

      And if you think it's illegal to crack Chinese jokes in Europe, you're an idiot.

  47. Return Missions Considered Capitalist by Vagary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know you're kidding but Eastern and especially Communist collectivism is precisely why China could easily beat the West to a manned Mars mission: get the taikonauts to Mars without worrying how to bring them back. If you figure it out later: great, then you get to tell the West "I told you so". If not, give them the Order of Labour Glory or whatever.

    1. Re:Return Missions Considered Capitalist by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      (I could have modded you flamebait/troll, but I decided to reply.)

      Do you have any proof to back that up? Last time China sent a man into orbit, the whole nation was axious and concerned about the astronaut's safety, and rejoiced when he came back safely.

      Compare that with the "western" countries sending their men to war. "Yeah, some of our men died, but they died for a noble cause. And btw, we won. YEAH!" AFAIK more number of troops in Iraq die every day than the number of atronauts that would be put on a spacecraft to Mars. Of course it would be bad if something went wrong, but who could really ensure a 100% safe journey?

      The Chinese *does* take into consideration the safety of the people put on mission. Rightfully so, too, otherwise who would be willing to step onboard that ship of doom?

      I honestly don't understand why people (especially Americans) have such a warped idea about China. Perhaps your statements would be true half a century ago, but I still doubt it. And that's half a century ago when the nation was pillaged by raging wars and social instability. It's unfair to judge them by today's values.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    2. Re:Return Missions Considered Capitalist by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > who would be willing to step onboard that ship of doom?

      I would. There are plenty of random people that would jump on it in a second. Almost none (if any) would be qualified to do any work. So, the appropriate question is "What qualified astronaut would be willing to step onboard that ship of doom?"

    3. Re:Return Missions Considered Capitalist by Vagary · · Score: 1

      You're right, I haven't actually asked any taikonauts how they'd feel about a one-way trip. But from what I've read about Eastern Philosophy, and from what I know about the sacrifices made in the USSR space program, I think it's reasonable to conclude that the Chinese would be *more likely* to accept a one-way solution than the US.

  48. -1, Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Give me a break, moderators

  49. MOD PARENT DOWN!! by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I find it offensive that the first thing slashdot thinks of in a case like this is delivery food!

    -B

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thanks for your input. No one cares.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither did I, I just had karma to burn :)

      -B

  50. Bad Chinese Drivers? by perdelucena · · Score: 2, Funny

    Me too. I also had this problem with my video card. I'm not sure if the drivers were chinese or made in Taiwan, but sure they didn't work as expected!

    1. Re:Bad Chinese Drivers? by CrystalChronicles · · Score: 1

      Yea cause the 2 most powerful 3d chip makers make their cards in china/taiwan and the CEOs of both companies are chinese immigrants so anything touched by chinese must suck. //sarcasm

  51. Re:chinee by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How the hell do you figure that English is my first language, asshole? Russian and Ukrainian are though, so fuck off, ok?

  52. Soon... by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 3, Funny

    "All your planets are belong to us!"

  53. Space Exploration with Chinese Characteristics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes, that's right. It's the year of the monkey, and the sons and daughters of the dragon will soon be sending the next Wong Fei Hung and Fong Sai Yuk into space to demonstrate the greatness of the Chinese nation and make it plainly obvious for all that China is not the sick man of Asia.

    1. Re:Space Exploration with Chinese Characteristics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...absolutely, positively-perish the thought- NOT the sick man of Asia.

  54. Re:chinee by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
    while standing up for a sense of respect and tolerance for other cultures goes unnoticed or is determined to be trolling
    Because most of the time it is trolling.
    You speak of tolerance, but none of the anti-racists is tolerant. Either you completely agree with them without questioning, or you're a racist.
    These days you need to reread everything you write several times to make sure it can't be possible interprete as "racism" especialy when there are anti-racists around.

    Would you have complained if his joke had been about white people?
  55. Moderators on crack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 Offtopic, not +1 Informative,
    plus, it wasn't even accurate. 2,4,8,16 *is* exponential. Sure the series can be viewed in a variety of ways given it is so short, but one of the obvious ways is exponential.

  56. Re:Yay... go china.... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    I am Jewish, you moron.

    Israel has not put anybody into space.

    The US has put an Israeli into space. Not the same thing.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  57. Let me get this straight... by FooGoo · · Score: 2, Troll

    The US can't afford to send people to Mars but we can afford to send 2 chinese into space?

    62 percent of all shoes and sneakers imported to the United States are made in China. So are 83 percent of all toys and sporting goods, 54 percent of all leather products, 76 percent of all umbrellas, 30 percent of all furniture, and one in four caps and hats.

    The US China trade deficit is about $82 billion dollars (last time I checked) and the Apollo program only cost about $25 Billion.

    I'm not sure what my point is but I'm sure there is one.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by ErikZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ever hear of inflation?

      25 billion in 1963 dollars is 143 billion in 2002 dollars.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Let me get this straight... by tloh · · Score: 1

      How did this get modded up? Parent post is connecting phantom dots drawing relationships where none exist.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    3. Re:Let me get this straight... by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      Maybe if George Bush wasn't spending money like water runs, we'd be able to afford sending people to Mars.

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
  58. Re:Yay... go china.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha..

    Good thing he died before he could make his way back to Earth.

    That's God speaking to you Jews. God's Choosen my cock.

  59. Astronaut-wrong word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody goes to stars but in space, therefore astronaut is a wrong and misleading word.
    Spacenaut or Cosmonaut are better words, after all, people go into space (cosmos).

    What does Taiko mean? (space or star?)

    What is the Chinese equivalent of Spacenaut?

    1. Re:Astronaut-wrong word by maliabu · · Score: 1

      Tai Kong means Space (literally "Too Empty"). For astronauts, they would have called theirs sinsinauts (Xing Xing = stars)

      having said that, in China they called these taikonauts "Yu (Universe) Hang (Navigate) Yuan (Person)".

  60. anecdote cont'd by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... with only one landing module designed for three people...

    (someone has to come up with an ending now)

    1. Re:anecdote cont'd by nounderscores · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...when the chinese commander says "For the Glory of the People's Republic we will stay in the Orbital module, sitting in the cold darkness enduring hardships and awaiting resupply, thus allowing the other space travelers a chance to reenter."

      The Ruskie says: "While we of the CCCP do not fear firey death in re-entry, there is only one of me and seven of you Americans, how will we choose which two of you will acompany me to earth?"

      Whereapon the American Commander says: "Hey, I thought that in SOVIET RUSSIA the Earth Re-enters YOU?"

      So they threw the american crew out of the airlock and the three communists took the capsule home.

    2. Re:anecdote cont'd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love stories with happy endings

  61. Yeah, but they'll want two more an hour later... by schof · · Score: 1

    Ouch!

  62. Cosmos is Greek, not Russian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cosmos is a Greek word not a Russian word

    Astro comes from Latin not from English

    Naut comes from Greek (Navigator, Navigation, all these words come from Greek)

    1. Re:Cosmos is Greek, not Russian by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

      Astro also comes from Greek. The difference is "astro-" means "star", while "cosmo-" means "space/universe". Since the earliest astronauts didn't go to other stars (come to think of it, neither have any others since), the word "cosmonaut" would probably have been a better choice; in addition, we wouldn't have this silly policy that gives two people two different names for the same job based on the nationality of said person (unless the Russians had decided they wanted to use a different word from that the USians were using).

      --
      one hundred twenty
      is just enough characters
      to write a haiku
  63. Re:chinee by krumms · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How the hell do you figure that English is my first language, asshole? Russian and Ukrainian are though, so fuck off, ok?

    Oh, well that explains it then. You see, my empirical evidence seems to indicate that those with a Ukrainian background have terrible difficulty spelling "Chinese" and "empirical", and sometimes just darn well fuck up sentences all together!

    Honestly dude, you're making sweeping generalizations as to a person's driving ability with respect to their race. People are people. Some people can drive well, others frequently fuck up. Some people can spell the names of the race they're trying to insult, others frequently fuck up.

    So what's your deal?

  64. Funny is an opinion by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Troll
    Insightful? Where do the moderators get off moderating knee-jerk political correctness as being Insightful? Mod me as a troll or redundant or whatever crap you may, but when this kind of intolerance for the wrong of sense of humor is considered Insightful while just having a normal sense of humor is attacked is just sad.

    Racial based humor is not, logically, indictive of racism.

    In other words, the answer to the question where do the moderators get off moderating this racist drivel as being funny? is; Because the think it is funny!

    Get some looser shorts, man. I am guessing that one of the differences between my post and the parent, was that I smiled more while writing mine.

    Moderators: Mod this however you like, it's your mod point.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Funny is an opinion by SevenTowers · · Score: 1

      MOD this guy up, his arguments are as valid and based on as much logic as those presented above. Why do we never cry wolf when a joke is about a caucasian person, but speak of abominable racism when color is factored in? A small number of vocal people who think its their responsability to protect eveybody are ruining it for the vast majority. Learn the difference between humor and verbal violence. Damn.

      --
      Imperium et libertas
      Autocracy and freedom
    2. Re:Funny is an opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have to agree with this guy - ever go see live comedy? Every ethnic comedian I have seen plays off their own group's stereotypes.


      I see this is modded as a "Troll", which I guess means "politically incorrect".


      Mod the parent up, if there are any fair-minded moderators reading at -1, like the guidelines suggest - so you can spot just this kind of "abuse".

    3. Re:Funny is an opinion by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Racial based humor is not, logically, indictive of racism.

      It promotes racism though. That's why I'm against it. People do it (especially stand-up comedians) but I don't think it is really the right way of doing it.

      The problem is not that the comedian is racist (in most cases, he/she isn't). The problem is with the audience viewing certain things as true. A lot of people view the stereotype as being true at all times. THAT is where the problem is.

      Obvious examples include people who live in rural communities (with no contact with other ethnic groups) basing their whole opinion on comedy. If someone makes a joke that immigrants are selfish and are liers, then when you try buying a house, the sellers may have the same opinion (I just made up this example so don't assume it happens all the time). This doesn't just apply to comedy either. It could apply to drama (music, movies) just as well.

      Perhaps the classic example would be the treatment of blacks between the late 1800's and the mid 1900's in USA (i.e. after slavery but before true equality). There were a lot of plays, jokes, etc that were popular about blacks ( look into Jim Crow if you want to know). The Jim Crow "musicals/plays" were stereotypes but they were all popular--just like how "racist" comedians are popular. Most sociologists point how much of an influence this travelling "musical/play" had on Americans (in particular the South). The vast majority of white Americans' view of blacks was formed from these "plays/musicals". It was so bad that laws and other important things were based solely on these stereotypes. Since slavery was abolished at this point, most whites only knew blacks through these plays/musicals.

      Modern comedians using stereotypes is very similar to the Jim Crow plays/musicals. Both use stereotypes (often exaggerated and blatantly false--otherwise it wouldn't be so funny) to project humour, drama, and so forth. There is a difference however. Nowadays, society (particularly Canada and most parts of USA) are multicultural. Therefore, these things aren't THAT big of a deal (multicultural supporters are automatically support equality). So I don't really have a problem with these things for the most part. I come from Toronto, one of hte most multicultural cities, and I could care less about these things (whether you are black, white, whatever, people have a better understanding of each other). HOWEVER, what does worry me are people who live in rural areas with no contact with differing ethnic groups. These people will form opinions solely based on popular media (including comedies). That is where the problem is.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  65. IHBT IHL HAND? by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Private land ownership has been legal in China since 1987. Yes, that's right, before it was legal in Russia.

    1. Re:IHBT IHL HAND? by DAldredge · · Score: 1


      NEWS HEADLINES: 8 Ki-

      Private property among changes China's leaders to debate
      By Associated Press
      Published October 12, 2003

      BEIJING - Promising economic and political change, China's new leaders opened a meeting Saturday to debate reforms that will move the country closer to capitalism, including the first guarantee of private property under communist rule.

      President Hu Jintao and communist party leaders at the four-day meeting also were expected to consider a more stable legal system and measures to encourage private investment, diplomats and foreign analysts said.

      The meeting coincides with final preparations for China's first manned space mission next week and reflects the party's desire to link itself to the nationalistic fervor of a historymaking triumph, helping to repair a reputation battered by corruption scandals.

      Details of the agenda of the plenum of the 16th Communist Party Congress weren't immediately released. But the official Xinhua News Agency said it would push ahead economic reforms that have let millions of Chinese lift themselves out of poverty.

      It marks "another turning point and a new starting point in China's reform process," Xinhua said.

      The meeting comes as Hu, little understood after nearly a year as party general secretary, tries to establish himself as China's leader after the 13-year rule of Jiang Zemin.

      Hu, 60, has moved cautiously as he tries to consolidate power, sharing control with Jiang allies on the party's ruling nine-member Standing Committee. Jiang, 77, remains influential as chairman of the commission that runs China's military.

      Though Hu has called for a more accountable and responsive government, he hasn't offered a detailed vision.

      As the plenum began Saturday, Xinhua said the 24-member ruling Politburo would present a report on its work to the lower-ranking, 356-member Central Committee - the first time the closed, secretive elite has submitted to outside scrutiny, even by another party body.

      Party leaders who with Hu took office in November also face a wide array of other problems: rural poverty, banks mired in bad loans and job losses at state industry.

      Though incomes have risen sharply, the average Chinese earns only about $700 a year. Communist leaders worry that anger at poverty and official abuses could spin out of control, threatening the party's monopoly on power.

      The proposed constitutional change that outsiders say would protect private property comes after a 1999 amendment that declared private business an "important component" of the economy.

      The amendment could enshrine the thinking of Jiang, the former leader who invited capitalists into the party, according to earlier reports by state media.

      Jiang's ideology is aimed at keeping the party relevant and entrenching its control amid a growing private economy by drawing entrepreneurs into its ranks.

  66. Re:Yay... go china.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? America has four... no, wait I mean THREE 30-year-old shuttles... that will be gone in six years. Plus a functioning space station... oh wait, no, that's finished and abandoned by 2010 or so as well... Well there's the fancy new spaceship... kind of like an apollo capsule really... likely to be finished by, well, eventually... After 2010 America's only way of getting into space will be to hitch a ride with Russia. Kind of like right now... I think the fat lady has sung...

  67. Go China..... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

    Go China,
    Go China,
    It's your birthday,
    It's your birthday..............

  68. "Divine ship" eh? by be-fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For a supposedly atheist country?

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:"Divine ship" eh? by rangek · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think a better translation is "magic ship".

      http://www.sworld.com.au/steven/space/shenzhou/

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1892598.stm

      And others... IANACT (I am not a Chinese translator). Maybe some one who speaks Chinese could comment?

    2. Re:"Divine ship" eh? by x0n · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, "divine ship" (or "devine vessel" as some have called it) is only a western interpretation of the word "Shen-Zhou", and a stereotypical one at that. "Shen" can also mean magic as well as divine, and "zhou" can mean boat, vessel or ship.

      We as westerners, are all caught up with the image of the Chinese as mystical people selling us Mogwai/Gremlins and rubbing ground rhino horn into their heads each morning. This is just not true. I'd say most Chinese would prefer to translate "Shen-Zhou" as "Magic Boat/Ship". I mean, the Chinese for Aladdin's Magic Carpet could also be translated as his "Divine Floorcovering"; it doesn't really work, does it?

      - Oisin

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    3. Re:"Divine ship" eh? by hao520 · · Score: 1

      This is actually a very interesting question.

      There is a real word "shenzhou" (with a different second character but pronounced exactly the same in Mandarin) originally meaning "fairy land" in classical literature. Over time, the word has acquired another meaning (which is now more frequently used), which roughly translates to "beloved, wonderful land/state." In other words, the word "shenzhou" becomes a way of representing the concept of "China" or "motherland" figuratively (with extremely positive affection).

      Replacing the second character of the original word "shenzhou" with the character for "vessel/ship," and you get a really nice name for a spacecraft.

    4. Re:"Divine ship" eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am chinese,
      Shen . A direct translation
      should be "God", "Divine", but it acctually
      means powerful, great.

      Zhou means " ship, vessel"

      Bush means " oil and war"

      Amercian means "arrogant robber"

    5. Re:"Divine ship" eh? by Uplore · · Score: 0

      Aladdin's Magic Carpet could also be translated as his "Divine Floorcovering"; it doesn't really work, does it?

      It becomes a divine floor covering after an unsuccessful re-entry.

      --
      I couldn't think of a sig.
    6. Re:"Divine ship" eh? by taweili · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the naming came from the traditional of China to make offering to god while they are putting the faith of something in the hand of god. Man made everything they can but the success will depends on the Heaven. Men are too humble to take the divine system.

      The searches for truth in the universe doesn't started right now. Why one has abanden traditional belief to be "scientific?" What's wrong with "divine ship?"

    7. Re:"Divine ship" eh? by jezzzzza · · Score: 1

      Shen can have a wide range of meanings depending on the context. Divine, magical, mystery, spiritual, etc. Divine or magical is probably not too far from the mark in this case though. Shen on its own also means "god", no not THAT god. In fact, come to think of it, maybe it IS that god in Chinese Christianity but I am unsure. Deity is probably a better word. You're right though. It is a very mystic name from an atheist government.

    8. Re:"Divine ship" eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really an atheist country. Just that the concept of "God" is different. It's a complex blend of legends, tales, with the divination of ancestors and great hero/thinkers of the past, and buddism, confusism, and Taoism. The result is that the concept of god(s) vaguely resembles that of the greek mythologies. And there's no "one" religion, everybody is free to interpret the "religion" differently, and the learned are very unlikely to become zealotic about their beliefs.

      In a sense, there *is* diversity of religion, and much more diverse than most other "religious" countries.

    9. Re:"Divine ship" eh? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      But I thought the communist government was officialy athiest?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  69. Re:chinee by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 1

    No, you've seen at least one chinese person drive badly and THAT'S your empirical evidence. Even if you've seen 100 chinese people drive "like shit", that's insignificant compared to the number of chinese people worldwide. I'm going to be charitable and assume that it's an ignorance of statistics that is behind your racist opinions - nevertheless, they are nonsense.

  70. Re:chinee by krumms · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well then, it's all peachy, but my spelling abilities do not, in any way, cause unnecessary accidents on the roads, do they?

    Every time you spell something wrong, a kitten dies.

    When some fuckhead tries to make an illegal turn into your car because they have no fucking peripheral or any fucking vision, then you can fucking talk

    Well the obvious response would be to say that because of this unfortunate incident you've gone sour and now make a point of noting the poor efforts of Chinese drivers.

    But eh, it's all subjective anyway, and you've pretty much completely missed the point of what I was on about. Sorry to have to piss you off to prove a point to myself.

    Have a nice night/day/whatever it is where you are.

  71. Bzzt! Wrong. by Vagary · · Score: 1

    The US was very close to entering the war when Pearl Harbor occured. The only reason Yamamoto permitted Pearl Harbor is that he was hoping it would take out enough US hardware that Japan could hold out. If the Japanese believed that the US were going to stay out of the war, they would have happily let them.

    1. Re:Bzzt! Wrong. by Sam+Gibson · · Score: 1

      Actually, the reason that Yamamoto attacked Pearl Harbor is becuase the US had just recently refused to sign a trade agreement with the Japanese over iron exports. Because of this, the Japanese feared that they would run out of natural resources required for waging war.

  72. You Do Realise Money's Just Paper, Right? by Vagary · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only reason capitalist governments need taxes, is that they need to buy stuff that's being produced by private industry. If all the production is public, then the government doesn't need to use money internally at all. A communist government redistributes the gains of labour the same way a socialist government redistributes income.

  73. well said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well said.

  74. Going to Space Improves Quality of Life by Vagary · · Score: 3, Informative

    Standard of living is an ends in itself (well, maybe for Americans), it's a measure of quality of life potential. However, quality of life can be raised by factors other than increase of income; factors such as a better environment or more available technology.

    You don't try and feed a billion people by having them all sustinence farm -- you have a few of them farm and a few of them build fertilizer to help the farmers and a few of them build computers to help the chemists build the fertilizer to help the farmers and a few of them to build shiny things to trade for resources the engineers need to build the computers to help the chemists build the fertilizer to help the farmers. And how do you get better at building shiny things? Go to space.

  75. In China by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Back in soviet china anyone can fly to space.

  76. Re:this is why i hate slashdot.. by FooGoo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Atleast, I am not an anonymous coward. You see thats another part of freedom of speech. I don't have to worry about the gov kicking in my door for what I say. As current history shows most europeans are anonymous cowards.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  77. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new Taikonaut overlords.

  78. Re:this is why i hate slashdot.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    yes, quite.

    start raving about you much you love islam and bombs - let's see how free your speech really is.

  79. Good Point, But... by Vagary · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good point, although the reason the US enacted the embargos was because they were planning for the inevitability of war with Japan. It could also be argued that the embargos were effectively an act of war just as OPEC cutting off US oil supply would be today.

    And Yamamoto's intention was that Pearl Harbor would destabilize and demoralize the US enough that when they entered the war they would not be able to quickly pose a threat. The reason he was authorized to do this was because of the embargo.

    1. Re:Good Point, But... by BenBenBen · · Score: 1
      It could also be argued that the embargos were effectively an act of war just as OPEC cutting off US oil supply would be today


      Why would OPEC cutting off the US oil supply be an act of war?

      If OPEC picketed your ports, attacked your supply convoys and blockaded your allies, that would be an act of war. A trade group deciding not to sell their product to a certain country, whatever the political reasons, is not an act of war, no matter how much a lot of people in the US might like it to be.

      Then again, if Bush has managed to declare The War Against Terror to be a legitimate war, despite there being no enemy and not even any substantiated proof of who attacked the US in 2001, then maybe he can declare war against a group of men in suits too?
      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
  80. Re:Uh Oh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    er, yeah, but you should start the sequence from 2, unless your 1 rabbit is cloned or spontaneously divides in to two rabits :-)

  81. Dissidents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are these dissidents?

    How many are they planning on bringing back?

  82. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm up for the challenge. One question, what form of my native language do you want? Also, I need to know if "better" is defined as correct syntax, clarity, etc. A definition of "better" is required.

    In case you didn't know, language is used to communicate. Obviously his communication is excellent less you could/would not comment on his improper usage of a word. This thread (including my post) is silly, so I'll finish it now:

    1) Chinese are smarter than Americans.
    2) Europeans are smarter than Americans.
    3) Americans are smarter than people from any other country.
    4) Liar.
    5) No, you are. ...
    11) My dick is bigger than yours.
    12) Prove it. ...
    20) This is silly. There is no credible way to prove anyone's dick is bigger than anyone else's on the internet. This is also slightly sexist, but we're being altogether too sensitive and that is also stupid.

    21) The End. (Move along to the next thread. Nothing to see here.)

  83. Re:Yay... go china.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most advanced? It's interesting how you know the secrets of NASA, the ESA, and the Chinese equivilent. You also seem to be forgetting the rocket program NASA developed some 40 years BEFORE the Chinese.

    This is bothering me. I was going to quote you in a counterpoint about the unmatched records of the Space Shuttle program, but your grammar is so horrid that I can not.

    Try this:
    "Only useless shuttles that are dismal failures."

  84. From the Chinese constitution. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I. The Constitutional System

    The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state.

    The existing Constitution was adopted for implementation by the 5th Session of the 5th National People's Congress on December 4, 1982. Amendments were made to the Constitution respectively at the 1st Session of the 7th National People's Congress on April 12, 1988, the 1st Session of the 8th National People's Congress on March 29, 1993 and the 2nd Session of the 9th National People's Congress on March 15, 1999.

    I. Major stipulations in the Constitution in regard to China's political system

    1. Major political principles in China

    (1) The Communist Party of China is the country's sole political party in power.

    The People's Republic of China was founded by the Communist Party of China which is the leader of the Chinese people.

    (2) The socialist system

    The socialist system led by the working class and based on the alliance of the workers and farmers is the fundamental system of the People's Republic of China

    (3) All rights belong to the people

    All the power in the country belongs to the people who exercise their power through the National People's Congress and local people's congresses at all levels.

    The people manage the state, economy, culture and other social affairs through a multitude of means and forms.

    (4) The fundamental task and goals of the state

    To concentrate on the socialist modernization drive along the road of building socialism with Chinese characteristics; to adhere to the socialist road, persist in the reform and opening up program, improve the socialist system in all aspects, develop the market economy, expand democracy, and improve the rule of law; to be self-reliance and work hard to gradually realize the modernization of the industry, agriculture, national defense, science and technology so as to build China into a strong and democratic socialist country with a high degree of cultural development.

    (5) Democratic centralism

    The organizational principle for the state organs is democratic centralism.

    (6) The armed forces of the people

    The armed forces of the People's Republic of China belong to the people.

    The tasks of the armed forces are to consolidate national defense, resist invasion, defend the country, safeguard the people in their peaceful work and life, take part in the country's economic construction and strive to serves the people.

    (7) To govern the country through the rule of law

    All individuals, political parties and social organizations must abide by the Constitution in all their actions and shall not be privileged to be above the Constitution or the law.

    All acts in violation of the Constitution and law must be investigated.

    The rule of law is practiced to build China into a socialist country with the rule of law.

    (8) The system of ethnic regional autonomy

    All ethnic groups are equal.

    All prejudice and oppression against any ethnic group is forbidden. All behaviors harmful to ethnic unity and aimed at ethnic separation are forbidden.

    2. The position and rights of the citizen in the political life of the country

    (1) All citizens are equal before the law.

    (2) The right to vote and stand for election

    All citizens who have reached the age of 18 have the right to vote and stand for election, regardless of ethnic status, race, sex, occupation, family background, religious belief, education, property status or length of residence, except persons deprived of political rights according to law.

    (3) The freedom of speech and thought

    All citizens enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, or assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration

    (4) The freedom of religious belief

    Citizens enjoy the freedom of religious belief.

    No state organ, public organization or individual may compel citizens to believe in, or not to believe in, any religion.

    (

    1. Re:From the Chinese constitution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your point is?

  85. Re:Yay... go china.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was this guy modded troll when there are legitmate trolls all over /. getting modded funny or underrated. I see nothing that's trollish in his post. Moderators are just racist when it comes to someone who is jewish and wish to proclaim so. Isn't that a bit fascist?

    Disclamer: I'm jewish born, but don't live in Israel.

  86. 27 million children is not possible! by bluGill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Simple Math: about 300 million people in the US total. (280 or 297 or something as of the last census) 27 is about 30. Now divide that out: 1 in 10 people in the US is a child living in poverty. For the sake of ease in math lets assume that the current life expectancy is 80 (it is about 76 last I checked) and define child as anyone 20 or less (close enough to 18). Which means 1 in 4 people in the US is a child. Combine that with 1 in 10, and that means half the children in the US are living in poverty! (Yes I rounded, but there is a spike in the US population of the baby boomer years, so rounding down to 1/2 makes more sense than up 1/3 in this case)

    In short: I don't believe your numbers. They just don't fit in with the US I know.

  87. Re:Uh Oh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can now modify your signature to read

    "Slashdot: where racism against Indians and Chinese is OK... "

  88. With or without Nader by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    I have an irrational feeling that Kerry will be a bad President.

    Unfortunately, I don't see a good Democratic candidate this season.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:With or without Nader by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Given that the alternative is GWB, what exactly is "a bad president"?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    2. Re:With or without Nader by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      Frankly speaking, it is just a hunch.

      Trying to rationalize, I'll tell:
      1) One that does not move us towards certain outcome. The goal for the President is to:
      - Curb the bastards at law ( www.triallawyersinc.com ) ;
      - Change the exchange rates with China and India in order to make American economy more competitive;
      - Move the troops out of Iraq, but AT THE RIGHT MOMENT and RIGHT WAY. If you do it wrong way, you can get long-lasting negative consequences (as Israel learned after running from Lebanon).

      2) Kerry looks too much of a populist. He might not be able to do what needs to be done but what the population does not understand.

      Other candidates - Dean is leftist, Edwards is a trial lawyer. Others most people haven't heard of ;-).

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    3. Re:With or without Nader by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > what exactly is "a bad president"?

      Al Sharpton.

    4. Re:With or without Nader by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1
      Change the exchange rates with China and India in order to make American economy more competitive
      You expect too much. Governments can fuck an economy up, but they can't do all that much to make things better.

      The exchange rates reflect the underlying problems (the US is worth less than everyone thought, all that external investment is turning to dust). How do you think they can change the exchange rates? Are you prepared for >10% interest rates?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    5. Re:With or without Nader by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      Governments' power has declined because of NAFTA and WTO (they can't even make a tariff without getting slapped), but it still can do a lot.

      My guess is that if Bush starts druilling oil in Alaska, the dollar will fall (I hate the idea of drilling there though).

      The exchange rate reflects different problem.
      In any economy that depends a lot on foreighn trade there are experters and importers. Exporters prefer weak national currency whether importers prefer the strong one.

      Most of Clintanomics was in raising this exchange rate and trading cheap foreign-made goods for jobs going out of the country. consumers thrived because of the first and some people suffered because of the second.

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  89. Iraq by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    You tell it yourself - it was for geopolitical goals.

    And it is a long term investment that will allow USA to survive in 20 to 40 years prospective.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:Iraq by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      And it is a long term investment that will allow USA to survive in 20 to 40 years prospective.

      But it doesn't affect the immediate welfare of US citizens -- in much the same way that the Chinese space program doesn't. That was my point.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:Iraq by Poligraf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One problem with the modern American mentality (as I find it) is inability to think long term.

      It looks like fscked lawyers affected not just the corporate policies (where blowing a couple of thousand employees after a bad quarter is pretty much necessary in order to avoid getting sued by vultures like this: http://www.wfu.edu/users/palmitar/Courses/SecReg-P almiter/Handout/Articles/Elkind-Lerach-King-Dead.h tm ).

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  90. A couple of Russian jokes about Chinese space prog by Poligraf · · Score: 2, Funny

    These are really old.

    1. TASS news - there was a collision in the orbit between Soviet and Chinese spaceships. Two cosmonauts have died on the Soviet ship; three cosmonauts and twenty two stokers/firemen died on the Chinese one ;-).

    2. China has launched a new satellite.
    Two thousand people strained themselves during that launch ;-).

    While this message sounds like a flaimbait, it really isn't. I personally admire Chinese civilization, and hope that the West will adopt a bit more than just Chinese food. For example, qigong and Daoist sexual techniques.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  91. First Space porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Na, just make sure that the two crew members are Either a real hot woman and some guy, or two hot lesbians and the mission will pay for it self:-)

    P>s Include full motion steaming vidio.

  92. Nothing "sad" about it! by solarrhino · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Great link, but be sure to read the whole article. At the end of the second page:
    President Bush is right. The space shuttle and the space station deserve termination. The true heart of his proposal is the elimination of these programs, and the substitution of robotic exploration. We will look before we leap--that is, fly telescopes built for visible, infrared, ultraviolet, microwave, x-ray, and gamma ray wavelengths--to see what we can see from Earth orbit. Then we will send robots to explore whatever robots can explore. Hold back on the astronauts until we have goals that need them. Let science be the guide, rather than a presumed human need to step off the surface of the Earth.

    Some people will say I am too optimistic, that I am reading too much in between the lines. I think I am just ignoring the headlines to read the actual lines themselves. President Bush gave us a great plan. Let's recognize that and go with it. But let's be careful to make sure that politicians and bureaucrats do not hijack President Bush's wonderful vision of robotic space exploration and degrade it into a listless program that merely launches astronauts to places where telescopes and probes could do a safer, quicker, better, and cheaper job.

    Finally! Somebody gets it! Heaving humans into the heavens is mostly vanity. Instead, let's use the tools that we've created and explore every possible corner of this solar system as quickly, safely, and cheaply as possible!
    --
    "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
  93. fuzzy math? by univgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If 1 in 10 ppl in the US is a 'child in poverty', that makes approx 27 million children in poverty. Why go through the rest of the math? You seem to be taking the fraction of the answer itself.

    And why is this figure a problem if there are only 70 million children in the US ?( source. Mostly poor people have more children than rich people, which is why you will have more than half the children in poverty.

    --
    All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
    1. Re:fuzzy math? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Poverty(from kdict):
      1. The quality or state of being poor or indigent; want or scarcity of means of subsistence; indigence; need.
      2. Any deficiency of elements or resources that are needed or desired, or that constitute richness; as, poverty of soil; poverty of the blood; poverty of ideas.
      (from a different source) n : the state of having little or no money and few or no material possessions
      I've looked at other sources, and they say essentially the same thing.

      If you look around you don't see that. Okay, maybe definition 2 applies if you use the desired part. I see a lot of people without plenty of money. They have enough to get by though, failing all the other parts of the above definition.

      To say 27 million live in poverty is a emotional statement that doesn't fit with the above definitions. At least not in the US where the poor have TVs, food on the table 3 times a day (in most cases including meat, an expensive luxury in most cultures), and a warm bed at night.

      Sure poverty is relative, but if you want to go down that road you better be willing to compare children in the poor areas of Africa.

      Definitions 1 and 2 above are from Webster's Revides Unabridged Dictionary (1913). The next from WordNet. Rights are reserved by various owners.

  94. Grow up. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Can I get "Wah-fucking-Wah" moderated as "Insightful" please?

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  95. Re:chinee by he-sk · · Score: 1

    Racism has nothing to do with genetics of people, but rather with their ethnic origin. Thus, the remark is racist. It is also mildly amusing in a very shallow way, and I for one would err on the side of humor.

    Exercise for the interested reader: Does that make me a shallow person? Am I a racist?

    --
    Free Manning, jail Obama.
  96. Re:chinee by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Screw racist shit, is was to fucking funny. Hell, I hope they make spaceships better than fucking VCR's.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  97. Why they send only one on a three person craft by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    Why did they send only one on a three person craft ?
    Obviously, to return with aliens in the free seats.

    You understand now, Scully ?

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  98. Re:chinee by he-sk · · Score: 1

    Even racist talk can be funny. In fact, humor transcends everything. That's why it is so useful. In Germany (how appropriate!) we have a saying: "Humor ist, wenn man trotzdem lacht." It means: "Humor is, when you laugh nonetheless." And yes, the borked grammar is there on purpose.

    That doesn't mean that I support racial humor, but denying that you did laugh (or smile) about it doesn't help fighting the racist cause.

    OTOH, I have mod priviledges right now and would not have moderated the post as funny, because it's not.

    --
    Free Manning, jail Obama.
  99. Re:chinee by he-sk · · Score: 1

    > You speak of tolerance, but none of the anti-racists is tolerant.

    Huh? Your so-called anti-racists only extend tolerance to people who extend this tolerance in return. It's an application of the Golden Rule. Thus your anti-racists have no tolerance towards racists. I mean, that's the whole point.

    Also regarding your fear about political correctness in what you're writing: If you say e.g. "women can't drive", then I can assure you that this is not racist.

    --
    Free Manning, jail Obama.
  100. Why go???? by willtsmith · · Score: 0


    There are far more natural and strategic resources in Antarctica. And shit ... you can sail THERE.

    I have YET to see any serious proposals to colonize antarctica despite being heavily laden with resources, containing a natural breathing atmoshpere, being WAY warmer than the moon, and being MILLIONS of times cheaper to exploit.

    Manned space travel IS cool. That's about the extent to it's benefits.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Why go???? by tloh · · Score: 1

      You know, I've thought of this very question for a long time. I eventually realized that aside from being a chilly place to live and work, any industrialization down there would likely increase the ambient temperature enough to melt some ice. I don't know if enough would be melted to raise the oceans, but why take that risk? Feasibility aside, it might also spark a land grab by world governments as no nation-state have yet made serious territorial claims there.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  101. SPACE ELEVATOR!!!! by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    A space elevator could eventually make it safe and affordable to jettison nuclear waste it the cosmos!!!!

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:SPACE ELEVATOR!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, if you can keep the damn thing from shaking itself to pieces.

  102. Glad to see ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    I'm glad to see that the US isn't the ONLY country willing to waste BILLIONS on useless weapons technology.

    Whats the difference between a satellite nuclear launcher and a submarine launcher ??????

    Give up ... You always know where the satellite launcher is :-)

    Oh yeah, and a couple hundred billion dollars ;-)

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  103. Re:this is why i hate slashdot.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As current history shows most europeans are anonymous cowards.

    really? care to prove that?
    Am I a European?

  104. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I guess you'll just have to develop a sense of humor.

  105. Re:Trollkore sending two penises into space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hell is this crap doing here ? Goddamn idiots on keyboards

  106. Re:One question...which is enough.... by tloh · · Score: 1

    What does any of this have to do with space technology?

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  107. Re:Uh Oh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were well-informed enough to hear of the Chinese one-child policy, you would have written "1, 1, 1, 1, 1...".

    You are very, very smart. i hope you know this.

  108. and? by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    this is just speculation. nader will doubtless get far fewer votes than last time. It's too early to tell how people will vote; but by all indications nader is going to get a FAR smaller vote than last time around.

    --
    Photos.
  109. Re:Uh Oh ... by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    You are very, very smart. i hope you know this.

    Thanks, I reassure myself of this every time I look in the mirror, but its nice when the dolts who post to /. reconfirm my presumptions of genius.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  110. Hey, Someone Else Reads CNN.COM??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I also read that editorial column that you whored for a little karma. No sources cited. Shame, shame on you.

    1. Re:Hey, Someone Else Reads CNN.COM??? by x0n · · Score: 1

      I couldn't remember where I'd read it, but figured it was interesting enough to repeat. Whore I am.

      - Oisin

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
  111. short term memory, eh by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    from the google cache
    http://216.239.39.104/search?q=cache:0f7VP4 MQexkJ: msnbc.msn.com/id/3131128/+%22chinese+food%22+taiko nauts&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

    From an article dated October 14, 2003:

    The mission will also herald the debut of authentic Chinese food in space, another Web site reported.

    "They'll be able to eat shredded pork with garlic sauce and kungpao chicken," China.com, said. "It will be more tasty than Western food. After the meal, green tea will be available to increase the astronaut's spirits."

    1. Re:short term memory, eh by kcelery · · Score: 1

      The fact that the last Chinese Taikonaunt is up there for about 24 hours only, he has the option to eat whatever tasty food to his content. That might include fried chicken by his mother. Its because whatever you eat, you'll shit 24 hours later. Now if you know shitting in the space suit is a tough issue, you'll carefully monitor the food and its final future.

  112. Re:chinee by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I swear I witness so many bad chineese drivers, and I know some guys from China who agree with me on this one.

    You know... the #1 way to propagate discrimination is by claiming that you know some guys who fit into the particular group in question and who say the same thing. That neither advances your argument nor does it make it right! What people--even those that belong to the group--say is totally irrelevant. This is true because some people are self-haters or feel subordinate to others (A good example are some blacks who were actually brainwashed to believe that they were inferior to whites in the 50's).

    All blacks are dumb because I know some blacks who say so.
    All whites are warmongers because I know some whites who say so.
    All Asians are selfish because I know some who say so.
    All women are idiots because some women admit it.
    All Americans are dumb because I know some Americans who say so.
    All Canadians are stupid because I know some who admit it.
    All Latinos are criminals because I know some Latinos who agree with me on this one.
    All Russians are corrupt because I know some Russians who agree with me on this one.
    All Jews are greedy because I know some Jews who agree with me.
    All Christians are dumb because I know some who agree with me.
    ...


    I hope you see what I mean...

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  113. Mod Parent Up by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 1

    How can this be modded to zero! You have got to be kidding me! Mod parent up. This is not flaiming! This is a legitimate point of view which makes perfect sense. Don't mod down just because it is a negative view. This needs to be there to balance the represented view points.

  114. Re:chinee by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    It IS racism, but it is milder than say what is typical put forth by fascists. Think of it this way... Here is a thought experiment:

    Consider a hypothetical society where everyone was equal in all traits except driving. In such a case, you are basically claiming that the Chinese are inferior to others when it comes to driving (without any proof, and without considering environmental/societal factors). People advocating such views in that hypothetical society are basically calling for a fascist society of "good drivers" and "bad drivers". The Chinese will take the role of the inferior people in that society.

    Now, come to our real society. Everything stays the same, driving isn't a "big" issue. Since driving cars isn't so "valuable", you don't care. But the principle stays the same. It IS racist. It isn't as severe as, say, someone claiming all Chinese are dumb and stupid and hence should not be allowed to have any professional jobs. Nevertheless, the ideal is the same.

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  115. Re:chinee by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    SARS is sooo yesterday... I think you mean Avian Flu?

    BTW, it's a funny post hehe :)

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  116. Re:chinee by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    I am not making generalizations, I am stating my fucking experiences. When some fuckhead tries to make an illegal turn into your car because they have no fucking peripheral or any fucking vision, then you can fucking talk, and this is not only me, this is now folklore.

    It's called racism but don't worry... many have a habit of being in denial over it.

    Having said that, you may just be trolling. Is this your attempt to get TrollKore (aka TK) or GNAA to accept you? ;)

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  117. Re:chinee by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    It's called racism but don't worry... many have a habit of being in denial over it. - sure it's called racism, I am not in denial over it, I admit it freely. However, I worked with many outstanding Chinese guys and girls and I have Chinese friends, but can easily be partially racist when I say that in my experience Chinese driving is the worst (today on the roads I saw another few examples.) So what was your question again?

  118. Re:A couple of Russian jokes about Chinese space p by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    Stupid troll, you know nothing about the Chinese society.

    These techniques were for the aristocrats only, and it is your luck that you can read about them in a book that you can get from a regular bookstore.

    However, you're so dumb that you won't use this opportunity to improve yourself.

    And here about the causes of the overpopulation: http://sqft87.pisem.net/tiger/civilwar.html

    Their culture has not shifted towards the K-strategy yet. Actually, it has pretty much shifted because of the Communists' policies, and current growth happens not because of the fertility rate but because people live longer.

    Another couple of dosens years, and the population there will start slowly shrinking.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  119. Try disputing what I said. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    No, you can go to the fed aid sites and see what programs are offered. 100-200+ per month in food stamps, medical care for your kids, aid from community/religios orgs, Goverment housing assistance and other related programs.

    In the past I have been rather poor so I know what it is like? How about you, every been there?

    1. Re:Try disputing what I said. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      No I haven't faced the terrible situation of many. I'm glad you got out of your past situation.

      USA is a total joke compared to other rich countries. First of all, you have to ignore the religious organizations. Most of them are out there to convert you to their religion. Atheists like me will avoid those (unless if I'm really desperate). There is nothing worse than being forced to follow a religion in return for wealth.

      The money you get for food, etc are not enough. The greatest cost is perhaps housing. That is where most of the problem lies. You need affordable housing. A couple of hundread dollars in food and clothing is nothing compared to $1000/month in rent.

      Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, you need the social structures and institutions that provide a decent environment to live. By this I'm talking about libraries, community centers, athletic facilities, daycare, and so on. People spiral down into a pit when these things aren't there. Choosing a dark path is easy when these things aren't present. Countries like USA don't spend enough on such matters. That is why USA is worse than most European countries that even poorer than USA.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:Try disputing what I said. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Have you every been to the US? Because it sure doesn't sound like it.

    3. Re:Try disputing what I said. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > A couple of hundread dollars in food and clothing is nothing compared to $1000/month in rent.

      Fucking hell, man, try living in something other than a mansion. My rent is $300 a month (very small place), and that is a bit too much. Granted, I don't live in NYC, but if you don't have a place to live, it's pretty easy to move to where you CAN afford housing.

    4. Re:Try disputing what I said. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      If you're paying $1000 a month in rent, you aren't poor. If you're poor you'll move somewhere cheaper than that.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  120. Re:chinee by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    I responded to you in another post but to reiterate: just because you have friends of a particular group doesn't mean that you can be discriminatory towards them.

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  121. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the problem with crap electronics is mainly due to design and not manufacturing. So which country is it designed in? I bet you'll find its not designed in China unless its some unknown brand. and if you buy unknown brands you only got yourself to blame.

  122. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh nice a person from a minority group making fun of others. I bet you wouldnt like it if someone made sweeping generalizations on you, would you? cunt.

  123. Re:Uh Oh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He forgot to add that you're an ass as well.

  124. Oooh, look at the Slashdot boys run! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Off topic? What? Space exploration is not a sign of economic power and growing international superiority?

    I think there's something else frightening away the silly moderators. . . At least I rate bad moderation rather than ridicule this round. That's usually a sign that I got past the first layer of, "NO, NO! DO NOT THINK," programming.

    Anybody too frightened to consider whole idea sets is a coward on a leash.


    -FL

  125. The world pays for China's space program by billtom · · Score: 1


    I recall that The Economist (amoung others) made the interesting point that the best estimates for the cost of the Chinese space program is pretty much the same as the amount of direct foreign aid given to China by other nations.

  126. I live in USA! by Herkules · · Score: 0

    "In the USA most of them live that way because they want to"

    Yaaa! I live in the USA and i know all poor people are poor because they want to!

    --
    CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
    1. Re:I live in USA! by Herkules · · Score: 0

      Sorry that should be "most" and not "all". So sorry so sorry....

      --
      CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
  127. will overtake NASA in 2010s by peter303 · · Score: 1

    At the rate NASA is deteriorating and the China space programming, China will the the pre-eminent space power in 10-15 years.

  128. two Chinese-Americans on space station by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Ed Lu was up there for six months n 2003; Leroy Chiao is going up in the next round.

  129. US space vs. war deaths by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

    The US has had 17 deaths in US spacecraft (3 in the launch pad fire, 7 on Challenger, 7 on Columbia), and 280 people have flown in US spacecraft. (seeAmerican Astronauts )
    Death rate for those flying in US spacecraft:
    6.0%

    6% is an EXTREMELY high death rate for any "safe" activity. Sure, when something breaks, NASA tells us that space travel is still unsafe and experimental, but their actions belie their words: they think it's safe enough to fly three senators and a teacher.

    By comparison, I did some checking on US wars back to the Civil War; the killed-in-action rate for the war is lower than 6% in every case. That's right, boys and girls, you're more likely to be killed in a US spacecraft than by an enemy bullet in a war. In the US civil war, if you consider deaths from disease, and if you consider the Confederate army also, the death rate is a whopping 19%, so war is not all fun and games.

    On the other hand, since a failure generally kills everyone aboard and doesn't leave you wounded, we could look at the percentage of "dead" missions. I'm not sure exactly what to count as dead; would Apollo 13 count, for example? A quick and dirty calculation for the shuttle program is 2 (number of destroyed shuttles / 107 (number of shuttle missions). This is less than 2% and is comparable to the KIA rate in the Viet Nam war.

  130. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe some indians stinks because some indians said so

  131. Re:A couple of Russian jokes about Chinese space p by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    I'm glad you think I'm so stupid. It was actually a joke. And I don't care if it IS offensive.

    I could really give a shit LESS about what caused deeper socialoligal phenomenon influencing China's overpopulation. But I'm still 100% sure it was too much fucking.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  132. Re:Nostradamus said. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're being a bit onesided about sex here. It isn't always the male, it can just as well be the female who needs it. Just as some societies perform ritual "cutting out" of female pleasure zones in order to prohibit them from feeling pleasure, so do others tend to instill emotions of guilt on feeling pleasure. It's just another way of "cutting out" the pleasure zones. All it adds up to is that some women need to feel forced before they can surrender to pleasure; they don't allow themselves to take pleasure from the pure desire of sharing because they've been taught it's a sin to like something like that whereas it is the most natural thing you can like and share with the one you love. I'm not saying it's good, but I am saying you shouldn't be onesided, even if trying to make a point, or trying to make other people make a point by response.

  133. Re:chinee by sakyamuni · · Score: 1

    This is mostly caused by cultural differences and lack of proper driver training.

    • many chinese drivers are recent immigrants and have had only a few years' driving practice
    • language and cultural differences make it harder for immigrants to learn to drive
    • traffic laws in China are not as diligently observed as in the U.S.

    I agree that many Asian immigrants have poor driving skills. However, at best it's impolite to joke about it. It's such a cheap shot, too. Come up with something clever!

  134. Re:chinee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ukrainians speak broken English even after they've been here for years. I have a Ukranian friend who says so too.