Slashdot Mirror


Real Pain Dulled In Virtual Worlds

26199 writes "The BBC is reporting on a novel use of Virtual Reality: as a distraction for burn victims who suffer excruciating pain during daily dressing changes. What's most interesting is that it actually works. Another use of VR discussed is in the treatment of patients suffering Post Traumatic Stress Disorder; memories can be relived until they are accepted."

237 comments

  1. like dentists used to do with white noise by johnjosephbachir · · Score: 5, Informative

    iirc, dentists used to do something similar. patients would wear headphones while procedures were being done. i think they would play some sort of white noise.

    j

    1. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by gid13 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a feeling white noise would cause me a lot less trauma than those terrible radio stations that are always on in dentists' offices. Is it too much to ask to hear Comfortably Numb? It's THEMATIC, dammit!

    2. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Some would go so far as to play a movie with a tv built into the ceiling. I believe many still do it although I've never had the experience so I could be wrong.

    3. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by fenix+down · · Score: 3, Funny

      The dentist I used to go to had the little CD/tape/radio boom box right there in the room. You could bring in whatever you wanted if he was going to do something that would take awhile.

      Then they switched insurance companies on me and now I have to go to this 90 year old guy who's a half-hour away and keeps stabbing holes in my cheek with the tooth-buffer thing.

    4. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by shigelojoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      My dentist always played construction sounds over the headphones. You know, jackhammers, chainsaws, stuff like that.

      After a while I got tired of it, so a switched to a different dentist. This one only asks me "Is it safe?" before he polishes my teeth, which isn't too bad I suppose.

    5. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To calm myself down after a hard day of work i just switch on my TV.

      Within 20 minutes, gone are my annoying co-workers, my boss and even the worst troubles.

      But is this "therapy" really good?

      I makes me accept that my boss as a pain-in-the-..., but i can live with it? Does this mean that i will accept anykind of trouble during the day and the next morning i have forgotten it? - could this become the nightmare matrix of the future????

    6. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by first.last · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you traded a sadistic asshole for a paranoid schitzo... "Is WHAT safe?!?!"

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    7. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

      I really like my new dentist because they do offer this. I've only used the headphones and CD player for cleanings and other pretty routine stuff, but it definitly does work to distract you when the hygenist gets a little too agro with the hook thingy.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    8. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a dentist who had a hot assistant run a finger around my hand while he worked on me. No joke, and it worked like a charm.

    9. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine says, "It spits into the basin, it does this whenever it's told."

    10. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention the dentist I had when I was a kid, he said "It puts the toothpaste on the brush or else it gets the hose again."

    11. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by weileong · · Score: 1

      it's a reference to a movie with dustin hoffman, where dustin hoffman (due to mistaken identity) ends up getting tortured by a dentist

      he kept getting asked "is it safe?"

    12. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by thetaikung · · Score: 1

      It would take more than just my hand if you ask me...I hate dentists.

      --
      P226 .40cal
    13. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by psykax · · Score: 1

      My dentist has a video headset that you wear while he is working in your mouth (it only covers your eyes and ears). Mostly all he has are kids videos, but luckily he has a few copies of the simpsons for me to watch! It's quite interesting, laughing one moment, grimacing the next :)

    14. Re:like dentists used to do with white noise by encebollado · · Score: 1

      My dentist has a TV/VCR in the rooms and at the start of any work hands a set of headphones and a remote control to the patient. I can bring in movies or just watch TV. Its the most pleasant dental experience I've ever had.

  2. Amazing... by Vthornheart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This could present some fascinating implications for medicine... Post Traumatic Stress Disorder is often one of the more difficult psychological disorders to treat, and is pretty much tops in the category of "anxiety-related" disorders. It would be a wonderful thing if it actually is useful in treatment.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
    1. Re:Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mod parent down: commenting just for the sake of it!

    2. Re:Amazing... by fpga_guy · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I have a friend who works on a similar idea in the rteatment of schizophrenia and other hallucinatory mental illnesses.

      They use VR and graphics technology to simulate the visual and auditory hallucinations that sometimes accompany these diseases. NewScientist had a small writeup

    3. Re:Amazing... by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Didn't we read this story almost 3 years ago though?

      I always play Starcraft if I have too much pain to sleep. It works quite well. It works at least as well as two tylenol.

    4. Re:Amazing... by UpnAtom · · Score: 4, Informative

      Post Traumatic Stress Disorder is often one of the more difficult psychological disorders to treat,

      Difficult for whom to treat in what way?

      PTSD is one of the easiest to treat in my experience (7 years as a clinical hypnotherapist). You know exactly what the problem is (recurring memories), and you know what the therapeutic outcome is (ability to remember whilst remaning calm). Where's the difficulty?

      and is pretty much tops in the category of anxiety-related disorders.

      tops??? Who modded this up?

      It would be a wonderful thing if it actually is useful in treatment.

      The drug companies have a near stranglehold over psychiatry. Without big money to fund the trials and marketing, it will never reach mass-usage.

    5. Re:Amazing... by nizo · · Score: 1
      Actually they mention that in the article:


      In collaboration with Cornell University in New York, Hoffman has built a virtual reality programme that is a simulation of the events of 9/11 designed to desensitise the patient to the events of that day.

      As long as it is used to treat people who are actually suffering from PTSD this is a good thing, but I fear it will be used in other ways too, heck I feel like the evening news already does this.

    6. Re:Amazing... by Teechur007 · · Score: 1
      I have a friend who works on a similar idea in the rteatment of schizophrenia and other hallucinatory mental illnesses. They use VR and graphics technology to simulate the visual and auditory hallucinations that sometimes accompany these diseases.

      Um...isn't the point of schizophrenia that you ALREADY have "visual and auditory hallucinations"?! (Some forms of schizophrenia, at least, not all are alike)

    7. Re:Amazing... by Firehawk · · Score: 1

      yes, schizophrenia means you already have visual and auditory hallucinations (or some other problem with preceiving the world and thus have the concomitant problems with dealing with it) but if you can simulate the hallucinations, perhaps the patient can be trained to tell real from not real.

    8. Re:Amazing... by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm just working on what I learned in a project I did a few years ago. If I'm wrong, then I stand corrected... you act like it was an insult to post though.

      --
      -Vendal Thornheart
    9. Re:Amazing... by IronBlade · · Score: 1
      PTSD is one of the easiest to treat in my experience (7 years as a clinical hypnotherapist). You know exactly what the problem is (recurring memories), and you know what the therapeutic outcome is (ability to remember whilst remaning calm). Where's the difficulty?

      I'm curious to know how many treatments a PTSD client required to be 'cured'?
      Do you use NLP at all?
      --
      Important info:
      http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
      http://dieoff.org/synopsis.htm
      http://www.peakoil.net
    10. Re:Amazing... by thetaikung · · Score: 1

      For somebody who worked as a hypnotherapist (which I don't think requires any sort of license or medical degree or even a degree in psychology of any sort), you sure don't seem to know much about the field you spew your mindpuke about. If you knew anything about psychology, it's more than just "recurring memories". You sound like a therapist with a simplistic view of your patients.

      --
      P226 .40cal
  3. Safe? by CelticWhisper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Call me a skeptic, but it seems like there's still a lot of room for potential damage from this. PTSD patients reliving memories until they're accepted? Doesn't that seem a little like forced traumatic recollection? I mean...yes, I'm sure it would have some desensitizing factor, but is that really a good thing? I don't necessarily know that I'd be jumping to sign up...

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    1. Re:Safe? by Vthornheart · · Score: 5, Informative
      Well, the trick of PTSD is that, for most people, the daily struggle to not remember (and avoid things that remind them) is much more traumatic. Imagine walking down a street, and a certain type of tree or smell in the air sets you off. Between having that and having one extremely painful session of emotion-dulling via reliving the experience, I'll take emotion dulling. At least it will bring a somewhat permanent conclusion.

      This is, of course, assuming that it actually WORKS. =)

      --
      -Vendal Thornheart
    2. Re:Safe? by venicebeach · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exposure therapy is not pleasant, but it does tend to work. I don't know much about PTSD, but for anxiety disorders and phobias exposure is quite effective and virtual reality techniques have been becoming more and more popular for this. For treating someone with public speaking anxiety it's easier to get a virtual audience than to arrange for a bunch of people in a room...

    3. Re:Safe? by farquharsoncraig · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I mean...yes, I'm sure it would have some desensitizing factor, but is that really a good thing?
      It's not the desensitizing factor, but rather the acceptance/understand factor. It would be a dissapointing tragedy of the worst kind indeed were you not able to, over the course of your life, eventually overcome and have sovereign dominion over your own body and mind.
    4. Re:Safe? by chazwurth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess that depends what you mean by 'work.' I personally don't like the idea of getting over an emotional trauma by 'desensitizing' myself to it, as the article seems to suggest. Maybe I'm being sentimental, but it seems to me that what allows us to grow from painful experiences is having to come to terms with them, not getting desensitized.

      Physical pain (like that of the burn victims) is one thing; emotional pain is something else entirely.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    5. Re:Safe? by harvardian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I took an anxiety disorders class with one of the most famous voices in PTSD (McNally), so IANAP but IW a student of a psychologist.

      One of the aspects of virtual reality treatments for phobias (we didn't study its use for PTSD) is that the patient is always accompanied by their psychologist, and they always have the option of opting out, even mid-simulation. And a nice fact of psychology is that if you have a feeling of control (whether you have control or not), you're less likely to run away. So while many may be too fearful to go through with the treatment, it happens in a supportive, controled environment, and that can be very helpful. The result may well be better than what we've got now, since PTSD's not easy to treat.

    6. Re:Safe? by Vthornheart · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aye, PTSD is a type of Anxiety disorder... (I did a report on it once =) =) ) Treatments that work for Anxiety Disorders in general will tend to work for PTSD. PTSD is a hard one though, because of the things that can set it off, and how (at least up to now) the reliving of experiences had to be done pretty much in the domain of the mind or with a psychiatrist.

      --
      -Vendal Thornheart
    7. Re:Safe? by fenix+down · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's what therapy is. It's not about making you happier, it's about making you function properly. You can be all touchy-feely and come to terms with things, but your insurance will only pay to have someone kick you in the balls over and over until you promise to stop crying in your cubicle at work.

      Bitch.

    8. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How nice, one can be in control of their destiny...being a basket case forever.

    9. Re:Safe? by useosx · · Score: 4, Informative

      I really think I am going to regret bringing this up on Slashdot, as it is inevitably going to be misinterpreted.

      But... victims of sexual abuse sometimes sometimes end up having sexual fantasies about that abuse.

      I recommend the following three articles by Betty Dodson as she, I think, understands the issue well. WARNING EXPLICIT CONTENT for those who care.

    10. Re:Safe? by Muhammar · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What you do not want to get is an ambitious psychologist with 2 years of college and fresh councellor's certificate. (She is gonna cure your PTSD through re-living with you your trauma - no matter what's wrong with you).

      What helps is a private talk with a friend or mom, lot of sleep and active program. I can't see how virtual reality videogame-like setting can do any good for PTSD.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    11. Re:Safe? by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Physical pain (like that of the burn victims) is one thing; emotional pain is something else entirely. reason an organism feels physical pain, and the reason it feels emotional pain are pretty much the same: both serve to signal to the organism that its current activity, in its current environment, is detrimental to the organism. A burning pain in my finger tells me that either I should modify my activity -- by moving the finger --, or the the environment -- by moving the stove-top the finger is touching.

      Similarly, emotional pain -- feelings of guilt, or rejection, or etc., -- exist pretty much to tell me that I'm earning the ire of my fellows, and that my ancestors became my ancestors by virtue of not doing those ire-raising things. Those organisms that too often ignored pain, either physical or emotional, of course failed to become ancestors by virtue of that, and so the genes for ignoring pain tend not to have propagated as much as the genes for heeding pain.

      So if physical pain and emotional pain exists to do the same thing -- essentially behavior modification -- and if evidence exists that they are produced by the same structures in the brain, why do we tend to take for granted that they are not the same things?

      Part of the reason, of course, is that emotional pain can last far longer than (many forms of) physical pain. My guess is that this is partly because emotional behaviors -- such as social awkwardness or shyness -- are resistant to change, and part -- as with grief -- is due to reinforcement by memory. I'll further guess that this reinforcement by memory is to some degree an "unintended" side effect of the greater precision of human memory.

      Why are certain social behaviors resistant to change? Probably this is also an evolutionary adaptation -- research on pecking order in primates suggests that there are genetic components to social dominance hierarchies (proximally mediated by hormones, so that changes in hormone level by human researchers can subvert the hierarchy). Why is it adaptive to reinforce the social hierarchy even to the point of making the subordinates feel "bad"? Because feeling bad is preferable to challenging the hierarchy and literally having your head torn off. A geek who asks a girl who's "out of his league" for a date may only risk being laughed at today, but his reluctance may stem from an ancestor whose penalty for flirting with her might well have been death at the hands of the alpha male.

      But I also suspect that the main reason that we see physical and emotional pain as being different is that we see emotional pain as uniquely human, something that separates us from "the animals". This desire for separation from "animals" (scare quotes because, of course, humans are a kind of animal and not an image of God) seems to be a strongly engrained trait at least in the Judeo-Christian tradition -- as is the traditional Judeo-Christian belief in mind-body dualism. Since we know that animals feel physical pain but are less informed about the animals' psychological worlds, it perhaps predictable that we would see emotional pain as uniquely human and thus unconnected with "animalistic" physical pain, a malady of some uniquely human "soul" rather than the mundane -- literally mundane, earthly -- body.

      But both Judeo-Christian dualisms -- soul/body and human/animal -- are found to have less and less justification the more we learn about the brain and its genetic basis; I think the dichotomy of "physical" and "emotional" pain will similarly go away as we learn more about how the brain constructs pain.

    12. Re:Safe? by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please ignore the above comment in favor of the corrected comment below; I must learn not to post after having three beers, as I tend to mismatch HTML tags.

      As a bonus for your patience, I've added a few links that lend support for the idea that physical and emotional pain are similar.


      Physical pain (like that of the burn victims) is one thing; emotional pain is something else entirely.

      There was a recent study (posted here?) that suggests that both physical and emotional pain are produced by the same mechanisms in the brain.

      When you think about this, it makes sense: why would the organism produce -- and "pay" both the additional R&D on a species level, and the additional "construction" costs on an individual level -- an entirely separate faculty rather than adapt on already at hand?

      Not only that, the reason an organism feels physical pain, and the reason it feels emotional pain are pretty much the same: both serve to signal to the organism that its current activity, in its current environment, is detrimental to the organism. A burning pain in my finger tells me that either I should modify my activity -- by moving the finger --, or the environment -- by moving the stove-top the finger is touching.

      Similarly, emotional pain -- feelings of guilt, or rejection, or etc., -- exist pretty much to tell me that I'm earning the ire of my fellows, and that my ancestors became my ancestors by virtue of not doing those ire-raising things. Those organisms that too often ignored pain, either physical or emotional, of course failed to become ancestors by virtue of that, and so the genes for ignoring pain tend not to have propagated as much as the genes for heeding pain.

      So if physical pain and emotional pain exists to do the same thing -- essentially behavior modification -- and if evidence exists that they are produced by the same structures in the brain, why do we tend to take for granted that they are not the same things?

      Part of the reason, of course, is that emotional pain can last far longer than (many forms of) physical pain. My guess is that this is partly because emotional behaviors -- such as social awkwardness or shyness -- are resistant to change, and part -- as with grief -- is due to reinforcement by memory. I'll further guess that this reinforcement by memory is to some degree an "unintended" side effect of the greater precision of human memory.

      Why are certain social behaviors resistant to change? Probably this is also an evolutionary adaptation -- research on pecking order in primates suggests that there are genetic components to social dominance hierarchies (proximally mediated by hormones, so that changes in hormone level by human researchers can subvert the hierarchy). Why is it adaptive to reinforce the social hierarchy even to the point of making the subordinates feel "bad"? Because feeling bad is preferable to challenging the hierarchy and literally having your head torn off. A geek who asks a girl who's "out of his league" for a date may only risk being laughed at today, but his reluctance may stem from an ancestor whose penalty for flirting with her might well have been death at the hands of the alpha male.

      But I also suspect that the main reason that we see physical and emotional pain as being different is that we see emotional pain as uniquely human, something that separates us from "the animals". This desire for separation from "animals" (scare quotes because, of course, humans are a kind of animal and not an image of God) seems to be a strongly engrained trait at least in the Judeo-Christian tradition -- as is the traditional Judeo-Christian belief in mind-body dualism. Since we know that animals feel physical pain but are less informed about the animals' psychological worlds, it perhaps predictable that we would see emotional pain

    13. Re:Safe? by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      " I personally don't like the idea of getting over an emotional trauma by 'desensitizing' myself to it,"

      Well, I would say that depends on what the emotional trauma is.

      If it is fear of open spaces you should learn to cope with it. If it is being daily anally raped by a family member it is best to stop it, not become desensitised to it.

      "Maybe I'm being sentimental, but it seems to me that what allows us to grow from painful experiences is having to come to terms with them, not getting desensitized."

      To a certain extend the two are the same. To used the afore mentioned example, one is something that you will need to be exposed to everyday. Being in wide open spaces is a natural occurence and learning to come to terms with it is mostly being desensitized to it, many social experiences are simply thigs we have to get used to. In the case of being daily raped the solution is to stop it and come to terms with it and it never occuring again. Very different solutions and treatments. I would GREATLY question (read condemn) any treatment for physical abuse that required repeated virtual beatings, but think that desinsitizing people to who are afraid of heights using virtual heights as an OK thing.

      While I can not think of any right now I am sure that there are a few cases that are not as clear cut as the ones I mentioned.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    14. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we all experience something like a mild form of PTSD. Basically, we repress or supress emotions on a regular basis. It's very important for us to actually experience these emotions fully, otherwise we may exhibit symptoms which try to distract us from these repressed/supressed emtions.

      Read all this for one such application of this idea:
      Summary of Dr. John Sarno's ideas (Word document)

      Google cache if you don't want to load a Word document

      These ideas don't get enough attention and its suprising how few people understand them.

    15. Re:Safe? by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      If the emotial trauma is too painful for the victim to bear thinking about the incident, how can they come to terms with it until they have been somewhat desensitised?

    16. Re:Safe? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, running around in downtown Manhattan every day it's kind of hard to not remember.

      After all this time I still look up and expect to see those 2 buildings. Then I remember seeing the plane hit and all the fire.

      I don't think memories like this are supposed to go away.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    17. Re:Safe? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      I personally don't like the idea of getting over an emotional trauma by 'desensitizing' myself to it, as the article seems to suggest.

      Well, this article seems to indicate that fears like PTSD don't ever get totally "unlearned"; one has to learn how to suppress or overide the fear:

      Such relapses are among the evidence indicating that even though extinction training suppresses the original fear conditioning, the fear memory remains within an animal's brain... Quirk's group and other researchers have made the case that a brain area called the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) provides a home for the fear-inhibiting memories created by extinction training. It has the right connections to shut off the fear response... Several brain-imaging studies have suggested that people with posttraumatic stress disorder have an abnormally small or inactive mPFC.
      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    18. Re:Safe? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "What helps is a private talk with a friend or mom, lot of sleep and active program. I can't see how virtual reality videogame-like setting can do any good for PTSD." PThen you've never really had PTSD ... by definition, it's something that time, supportive friends and activity can't help you deal with in a few months. It's not the presence of bad memories and flashbacks, it's their continued and incapacitating existence screwing up your life months later.

    19. Re:Safe? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Well, the trick of PTSD is that, for most people, the daily struggle to not remember (and avoid things that remind them) is much more traumatic.

      Struggle to not remember a purple caterpillar wearing sunglasses. Really try not to remember that caterpillar.

      Imagine walking down a street, and a certain type of tree or smell in the air sets you off. Between having that and having one extremely painful session of emotion-dulling via reliving the experience, I'll take emotion dulling. At least it will bring a somewhat permanent conclusion.

      Sensible - however, there are much better, faster, cheaper and painless treatments eg Fast Phobia Cure, EFT, EMDR.

      Who is going to program the virtual reality machine for individual trauma reliving? What about rape cases? How are you going to program in that smell?

      This is, of course, assuming that it actually WORKS. =)

      How would you know if it did? Would you trust the same people who tell you frying your brain WORKS?

      And don't remember that caterpillar OK?

    20. Re:Safe? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm being sentimental, but it seems to me that what allows us to grow from painful experiences is having to come to terms with them, not getting desensitized.

      What's the difference? The pain is the main thing that's stopping you coming to terms with it.

    21. Re:Safe? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Exposure therapy is not pleasant, but it does tend to work. I don't know much about PTSD, but for anxiety disorders and phobias exposure is quite effective and virtual reality techniques have been becoming more and more popular for this.

      Yes, the less well rendered your spider is, the less scary it is. We all know this.

      But it also teaches you a more appropriate response to the visual stimulus. It is much easier to go from being calm in response to a clunky, pixelated spider to being calm with a real spider than it is from KNOWING you'll always being afraid of spiders.

      For treating someone with public speaking anxiety it's easier to get a virtual audience than to arrange for a bunch of people in a room...

      You still need the bunch of people in the room. Fear of public speaking is anticipatory anxiety - it is based on expecting to be anxious and make a mess of it.

      Without a real audience, that doubt will probably creep in and make the person anxious anyway.

      FWIW, I have 7 years clinical experience and a 90+% success rate with this sort of thing. I also offer a money-back guarantee.

    22. Re:Safe? by irokie · · Score: 0

      but a person is never going to be able to grow through the pain if they can't confront it. and that's a lot of the problem with PTSD... namely that the person suffering it constantly avoids dealing.
      while desensitising might seem unpalatable, the article isn't talking about turning the victims into emotionless robots, but merely taming their fear from something that completely overpowers them into something that they can potentially deal with.

      --
      and if you see me strut, remind me of what left this outlaw torn...
    23. Re:Safe? by chazwurth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to disagree. I'm pretty sure the reason I see physical and emotional pain as being different is because they don't feel anything alike one another; they're so dissimilar from a phenomenological perspective as to be almost incomparable. The only reason I can see to call them both 'pain' is because they are generally both unpleasant. Thus I think that as we move into the future, and dualisms are, as you put it, found to have less and less justification -- not that they've had any for the last few hundred years -- my view of physicality vs. emotion will change not at all. Learning about how the brain constructs pain is academic. Feeling pain is not, and I'm not going to talk about two distinctly (experientially) different feelings the same way regardless of what the brain is doing. This is because I'm not doing science when I'm worrying about my feelings, and there's no reason I should be.

      Don't get me wrong -- I'm not a dualist from a metaphysical perspective. But we simply don't experience what we call 'physical' and 'mental' events the same way, and that lends a hell of a lot more than judeo-christian mumbo jumbo to the list of dualist arguments. It also means that behaviorist and other reductionist arguments are extremely unsatisfying where talk about feelings is concerned -- yeah, it's just great that their philosophical agenda is so pure and clean and right, but they're a million miles away from anything that anyone actually feels.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    24. Re:Safe? by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have to disagree. I'm pretty sure the reason I see physical and emotional pain as being different is because they don't feel anything alike one another; they're so dissimilar from a phenomenological perspective as to be almost incomparable. ...I'm not doing science when I'm worrying about my feelings, and there's no reason I should be.

      Ah I get it.

      You're one of those people who believes that you're conscious!

      I mean, actually conscious, as opposed to being a pre-programmed, deterministic zombie with the illusion of consciousness a thin veneer painted over the ad hoc, jury-rigged, machinery of your essentially robotic being.

      Well!

      I'll have you know that I'm self-aware enough to know that my "self" is a mere convenient illusion. I know I'm a zombie, an empty mask on a ballistic trajectory through the world, a trajectory determined aeons before my birth by chemical interactions in my ancestor's genes.

      So there!

    25. Re:Safe? by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I think the idea is that you don't have post-traumatic stress syndrome because you aren't paralyzed and completely overcome every time you walk by ground zero. People with this syndrome don't need the memories necessarily to "go away", just not be incapacitating.

      IANAPsychiatrist.

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    26. Re:Safe? by chazwurth · · Score: 1

      That's all nice and good, but as far as language is concerned, it doesn't wash. We have words like 'feel' and 'think' and 'believe' and they all have meanings within a certain context. You can claim whatever you like about your belief system, but you use the words just like everyone else -- that is, within a context that assumes they have meaning. When you write 'You're one of those people who believes...', your use of the word 'believes' only has meaning in a context you claim to reject. Likewise when you say 'I know I'm a zombie.'

      In that context, biological analyses are interesting, even vital, but not final or satisfactory. I'm willing to bet that when close friends or relatives of yours die, your first reaction isn't "My evolutionary history is now determining the pain impulse I'm (not) experiencing (because there is no such thing as experience, because mentalism is a lie)." I also assume that when you buy a gift for a woman you care about, you don't sign a card "Sending this to you because my determined biological instinct to pass on my genes requires that I mount you later this evening, and this gift is likely to accomplish that goal."

      In conclusion -- the best way to guage what people actually believe is usually by how they act, regardless of the philosophical games they're willing to play. I'm reminded of the solipsist who's angered when no one else is willing to accept his or her solipsism. If a solipsist, why engage in the argument? Funny that. The proof, they say, is in the pudding.

      So there.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    27. Re:Safe? by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      That's all nice and good, but as far as language is concerned, it doesn't wash.

      As you probably realized, my grandparent post was a rather broad parody of a philosophical position that I think can be argued for but that I don't truly believe. (Although I do suspect that consciousness is more of a "good trick" than most people will allow.)

    28. Re:Safe? by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Yes, many victims of PTSD have PTSD only by definition.
      http://www.nybooks.com/articles/16951

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    29. Re:Safe? by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

      Caterpillar? I think you may have a distorted perspective on what PTSD actually is. It's an anxiety disorder caused by an actual event that occurred to the person in question. A purple caterpillar with sunglasses scenario... that probably falls more under the realm of Schizophrenia. =)

      --
      -Vendal Thornheart
    30. Re:Safe? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      I fail to see the relevance of that article, although it was interesting, it rambled a lot about the now discredited "repressed memory" movement and had little ot say about PTSD or phobias.

      ... what is your point?

      Flashbacks are a normal part of processing extremely unpleasant experiences. If you accept that, and realize that you aren't going crazy, just processing information, it makes the process easier.

    31. Re:Safe? by zobier · · Score: 1

      It's two letters and a space, Man.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    32. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like an Acid flashback to me.

    33. Re:Safe? by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Read the articles via meta-mod. Fairly good, but the third one makes it clear she's pretty leftist. Too bad no one can find a balance.

      Note to mod: meta-modded "fair".

  4. Detachment from Reality by laymil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what happens when they come to rely on these techniques - people develop addictions to VR, just like they develop addictions to painkillers?

    Sounds scary to me. Picture a person who can't live in the outside world because they have developed a psychological disorder based on the fact that the outside world only gives them pain.

    Or the Slashdot reader who wants to experience VR so badly that he lights himself on fire...
    that last one is definitely more likely, isn't it?

    1. Re:Detachment from Reality by Vthornheart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Some would say that people already suffer from the new disorder you describe.

      Like all medications, however, it stands to be abused. It's really up to the user to monitor themselves, or a doctor if such a system could be devised.

      --
      -Vendal Thornheart
    2. Re:Detachment from Reality by harvardian · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not like patients take their VR machines home with them and dope up when their doctor isn't looking :-P

      In all seriousness though, it's not like the simulation is of Cindy Crawford consoling you about your amazingly traumatic experience. It's an ACTUAL SIMULATION of your amazingly traumatic experience. How likely is it that people would turn away from normal life for the comfort of that?

    3. Re:Detachment from Reality by pacc · · Score: 1

      Of course, Steven Hawkins would be much better off if he faced the pain instead of digging himself deeper into those hypothetical science ideas noone can see anyway.

      Not VR? Maybe the Singing Detective can give you some insight. Shameless remake

    4. Re:Detachment from Reality by jdifool · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Try to light yourself on fire, and you then will see that even the strongest dependance to any kind of medicine will seem heavenly good compared to your fucking pain.

      Those people just don't wonder. They want it.

      Your reasonment is the one from a safe and non-burnt person.
      You have *no* idea how these people suffer.

      No offense to you, BTW.

      Regards,
      jdif

      --
      Let's overcome our weakness.
    5. Re:Detachment from Reality by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 5, Interesting
      While it is certainly possible to develop addictions to VR, it is a bit of a mistake to compare them to addictions to painkillers. Most of the painkillers that you hear about in terms of addiction are the in the family of natural or syntetic opioids. These drugs cause physical changes inside the body that lead to a dependency on the substance itself. This physical dependency is what is usually being talked about when you hear the term "addiction" concerning these products. This dependency can be so strong, that if you cut off the chemical altogether, the patient can die.

      Having said that the problem of addiction to the VR, as you mentioned, is a real one. People become addicted to all sorts of activities, gambling, extreme sports, and sex to name a few.

      VR is realtively new, and being used for a treatment for pain should undergo studies to check to see if addiction may be a problem, or if there are any other adverse effects...like the flaming slashdotter!

    6. Re:Detachment from Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Addiction to VR is possible but unlikely given fact that people who were given strong painkillers when they deservedly need, rarely develop such addiction.

    7. Re:Detachment from Reality by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So what happens when they come to rely on these techniques - people develop addictions to VR, just like they develop addictions to painkillers?"

      Oh just get on the damn transporter pad, Mr. Broccoli.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Detachment from Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sounds scary to me. Picture a person who can't live in the outside world because they have developed a psychological disorder based on the fact that the outside world only gives them pain."

      Sounds like the rationale for most internet use. :)

    9. Re:Detachment from Reality by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Addictions to VR.... isn't that EverQuest?

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    10. Re:Detachment from Reality by jafuser · · Score: 1

      You don't need a fancy machine in a doctor's office to get addicted to VR. There are a growing number of VR environments which you and play in at home.

      I'll admit I'm addicted to one, as I spend 90% of my free time within it. I know for a fact that it keeps me distracted from issues that I don't want to deal with in my RL (real life as we call it in-world); so I can see how it could be used effectively to distract people from other problems (even physical ones like burns) and help pass the time while they heal emotionally or physically.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    11. Re:Detachment from Reality by Rower · · Score: 1

      As a 40% burn I have to agree, you can't imagine the pain. It took me over a year to realize the problems I was having was from all the demeral I was given. The first book I read when I got out (six weeks, two operations) was One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest. I loved the line about how demeral was more addictive than heroin.

      The daily pain I went thru can't be described. It was four months before I had skin on my biceps and the left side of my chest.

      After my first surgery I went to the tank every day. they would shoot you full of demeral and then strip your dressings. They would wrap their knuckles with gause and SCRUB out your burns. All the demeral would do is make you limp as a wet rag so you couldn't fight back. God it hurt like hell.

      ANYTHING that would make a differnce is GREAT!

      --
      Hooo Son! This'uns a Hawg!
  5. burns-are-serious dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is the dept. for this story some sort of attempt to stem the tide of "OMG VR pr0n 4 teh burn vict1mx0rz" jokes?

  6. Somehow ... by RPI+Geek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... this part of the article rubs me the wrong way:
    In collaboration with Cornell University in New York, Hoffman has built a virtual reality programme that is a simulation of the events of 9/11 designed to desensitise the patient to the events of that day.
    It just seems too "Clockwork Orange" to me... :-/

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    1. Re:Somehow ... by westendgirl · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Unfortunately, I think CNN's constant running of WTC clips subtitled "American Under Attack" has already had this desensitizing effect. The images don't make me retch the way they used to. Is this the passage of time, or the effects of seeing the same thing several thousand times?

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

    2. Re:Somehow ... by fenix+down · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, Clockwork Orange had all that elegant Kubrick style. This looks like Microsoft Paint shit all over my Metroid cartridge.

    3. Re:Somehow ... by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      Ohh! I think I get it now!
      Thanks for the clarification :)

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    4. Re:Somehow ... by dtio · · Score: 1

      According to the National Institute of Mental Health exposing patients to the simulated event actually works, see:

      Treatments for PTSD

      PTSD can be extremely debilitating. Fortunately, research--including studies supported by NIMH and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)--has led to the development of treatments to help people with PTSD.

      Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy, group therapy, and exposure therapy, in which the person gradually and repeatedly re-lives the frightening experience under controlled conditions to help him or her work through the trauma. 6,7 Studies also have found that several types of medication, particularly the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants, can help relieve the symptoms of PTSD.

      Other research shows that giving people an opportunity to talk about their experiences very soon after a catastrophic event may reduce some of the symptoms of PTSD. A study of 12,000 schoolchildren who lived through a hurricane in Hawaii found that those who got counseling early on were doing much better 2 years later than those who did not.

    5. Re:Somehow ... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Funny
      Strangely, I find that I get more and more nauseous each time I hear the expression "9/11"... maybe it's the negative reinforcement.

      "In this post 9/11 world, we must-" BRZZAP!

    6. Re:Somehow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually even lower resolution graphics (which happen to be necessary to render the world at acceptable frame-rates) still evoke a substantial response from patients, and can be used to treat PTSD.

    7. Re:Somehow ... by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I didn't wretch the first time. No, I'm not a horrible monster, I just take everything in stride. Sure I played doom2 but I don't think that did it. I haven't seen a lot of scary movies so it's not that.
      Must we have an irrational reaction to a disgusting crime to be human?

  7. I need this for school by Flingles · · Score: 5, Funny

    This would be great for relieving all that "intense pain" that I experience during class/study time.

    --
    Karma: -2^0.5 . Mainly due to the imbibing of dihydrogen monoxide
    1. Re:I need this for school by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, that's just the pain of one of your neurons struggling to bridge the 4-inch gap to the neuron on the other side of your head ;-P

      "c'mon , feel the burn! no pain no gain!"

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  8. Dulls the Pain of Social Rejection by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists today discovered that Virtual Realities can dull the excruciating pain of social rejection suffered by millions of geeks and nerds on a daily basis. It also helped them recover from the Post Traumatic Stress of Wedgies, Wet Willies and the dreaded Rear Admiral. Lead Scientist Nelson Muntz claims 9 out of 10 nerds enjoyed a Virtual Rear Admiral far more than the real version.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Dulls the Pain of Social Rejection by real_smiff · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm British and i know what a Wedgie is, but i've never (AFAIK) experienced a Wet Willie - care to enlighten me? :) Also have you heard of the Atomic Wedgie - it's when they manage to get your paints hooked right over your head. Painful - i've heard, and yes, it *is* possible. Plus of course, there's always Posting - three men, two legs (apart), one post.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    2. Re:Dulls the Pain of Social Rejection by XorNand · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. Gratuitously slobber on your index finger.
      2. Insert said digit into closest, unsuspecting victim's ear.
      3. Rotate wrist.
      4. Cackle madly when they convulse at the sheer digust and horror of having to endure contact with your bodily fluids.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    3. Re:Dulls the Pain of Social Rejection by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 2, Funny
      1. Gratuitously slobber on your index finger.
      2. Insert said digit into closest, unspecting victim's ear.
      3. Rotate wrist.
      4. Cackle madly when they convulse at the sheer digust and horror of having to endure contact with your bodily fluids....

      5. ...Profit???????

  9. Does this remind you of anything? by ABaumann · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Clockwork Orange maybe?

    1. Re:Does this remind you of anything? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I too was wondering if they used any music by the great Ludwig van.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  10. Spiderworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hoffman's virtual worlds, which he calls by names such as SnowWorld or SpiderWorld

    Holy crap... tell me that name is just a coincidence.
  11. I wonder... by bersl2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    if this means that in the distant future, I won't occupy the whole nursing staff for 15 minutes, while they try to give me a shot?

    Yes, I still have this childish behavior, because I don't like needles, and I don't like going into shock, which is what happens every time; yet, I don't want to be a nuisance.

    My arm is hurting right now, just thinking about this whole topic...

    1. Re:I wonder... by achurch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Close your eyes (so you don't see the needle) and bite your tongue (fight pain with pain). I used to scream like the devil, until my mom taught me that; works for me every time.

    2. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I don't like going into shock, which is what happens every time

      Shock seems a bit of an over-reaction; have you tried limiting yourself to mild surprise?

    3. Re:I wonder... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Wrong definition of "shock," there. Try "A potentially fatal physiological reaction to a variety of conditions, including illness, injury, hemorrhage, and dehydration, usually characterized by marked loss of blood pressure, diminished blood circulation, and inadequate blood flow to the tissues."

    4. Re:I wonder... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Question. Does it actually HURT you, or do you THINK it hurts you? I've never understood the whole needle thing. I can't say that I enjoy being stuck with a nice long pointy thing, but I also don't recall it ever hurting so much as being an annoying feeling of pressure. Same with giving blood. The jab in the finger tip (when they grab blood to test for disease) hurts much more than the needle in the arm, although my arm always got sore when I was done. People always tell me how much it hurts though. I'm curious whether or not there's some physical difference between people that would cause it to hurt for some and not others.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    5. Re:I wonder... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Same here. I flinch when they tick your fingertip for the hemoglobin test, but having the actual needle put in (assuming a competent nurse) is just a stick followed by a wierd sensation as the needle slides in.

      Actaully, after giving blood regularly for several years, I have a theory that most fears of needles come from the person's childhood when they were stuck by a newbie or flat out incompetent. I've had needles put in so nicely I didn't realize they were there, and i've had some (all for giving blood mind you) that hurt like bloody hell going in and out. The difference? The person putting them in did it different ways and with differing finesse.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  12. Both sides shown by Mikmorg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just remember, as with all emergant technologies, there are ups and downs, depending at who's disposal the technology is used. This could be, and sounds like it is, helpful towards medical purposes, and as others have mentioned, sure it could have problems with making a person desensitized.

    I say, give it time, take it slowly, and just hope for the best.

    Speaking of downsides, I can't imagine what the government is thinking about doing with this sort of stuff :P

    --
    Codito, ergo sum.
  13. Hmmm ... by rholliday · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now, I wonder how interactive these VR sessions are. Could the burn patients injure themselves by getting too into it? How "real" are these memories for the PTS patients? Will they fell like observers, or participants?

    --
    Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    1. Re:Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, d00d, maybe like in the Matrix if they get shot or fall down, they'll really get hurt in reel life!!!!!111 (trinity is hawt)

  14. Why not slashdot by foidulus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not just have them read slashdot at -1, that usually makes me forget about my painful, painful life....ow...existance

  15. Spooky coincidence... by wiresquire · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here I was reading Tad Williams Otherland where one of the characters (Orlando Gardiner), is very ill and spends most of his time in a virtual world as an escape from reality.

    Is this science following fiction ?

    --

    So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

  16. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by Vthornheart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That also poses a point about the great benefits for Burn Victims... I've been focusing on the PTSD part of it a bit too much...

    Finding a way to distract patients from pain is a far greater solution than medication. No side effects, no expensive or addictive substances to use (well, those who really like MMORPGs would disagree with my "addictive" statement, but...), and in general would be preferred over medication.

    I mean, this daily dressing routine... it takes only a fraction of the day. Giving them morphine for it then ruins the majority of their day, as they spend it in a near-lifeless stupor. And without anything, those few minutes of the day would no doubt be torturous...

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  17. Distraction by ChimpyMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..how is this any different from when you were a child, your mother distracting you from injuries with a lollie/toy? I know it used to work on me, and it sure works on my girls. It seems a bit of a reach to claim this is anything new.

    1. Re:Distraction by Jackdaw+Rookery · · Score: 0

      Exactly, as any parent here knows. Best thing you can do is just pull the attention away from the cause of the trauma or pain. With a young child this is pretty easy, just jangle a bunch of keys if you've nothing else to hand, the reflected light and noise distracts pretty well.

      It strikes me though that is pretty bad that VR is used instead of reality. How about having enough staff around and use people to talk/distract patients? Damn my luddite ways.

    2. Re:Distraction by Mad+Alchemist · · Score: 1
      It also has some similarities to hypnosis. There are many people who hypnotize themselves to avoid pain in everything from routine dental work to surgery.

      The premise, as others have noted, is that the mind can only focus on one thing at a time. Also, all pain is in the mind (paralyzed people cannot feel pain when they're injured...because the brain never gets the signals). If the mind is taught not to "register" the pain, it doesn't happen. Pain is separate from injury.

      Before anyone dismisses this out-of-hand as quackery, consider that the NIH and JAMA have published studies on it (links found with a quick Google search and not comprehensive).

      Also, since someone else in a different thread brought up childbirth: HypnoBirthing.

    3. Re:Distraction by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      how is this any different from when you were a child, your mother distracting you from injuries with a lollie/toy? I know it used to work on me, and it sure works on my girls.

      Because I quickly learned to play up the boo-boos so that I could get something out of it.

      I know it used to work on my mom, and it sure will probably work on me when I have kids.

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    4. Re:Distraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " ..how is this any different from when you were a child, your mother distracting you from injuries with a lollie/toy? "

      Let's see... You aren't having twice-daily debriedments... You haven't lost all your fingers... you're able to breathe on your own... You need to understand what sort of people they're referring to when they talk about burn patients. Personally, I'd want euthenasia. I don't think I'd have some epiphany if I got into that condition either. I'd definitely want euthenasia.

    5. Re:Distraction by ZenEye · · Score: 1
      As far advanced as Western science is, it is remarkable how much more complete mothers' knowledge is.

      Western civilization is all about the brain; we are a very intellectually-driven society. Technology certainly exemplifies that quite well. But I find that mentality to be very limited; we glorify our knowledge, but neglect our minds.

      The human mind has such untapped potential. For centuries, philosophers have argued that how we interpret the world is how the world is. If we interpret pain, the world as we know it is painful.

      Distracting one's mind away from the objective present creates a new "reality," which seems/is as real as the "real" world. It is an overused reference, but this is at the heart of the Matrix. How do we know what is real? If we can tap into the power of our minds to create our own realities, people suffering from burns, or broken hearts, or even chicken pox, can change their reality into one in which they do are not experiencing their particular discomfort.

      This is exactly what mom was doing for us when she gave us a lollipop to take away our pain, or put a cartoon band-aid over a wound. Our definition of "reality" shifted into one where our pain doesn't exist.

      It is wonderful that technology can help people achieve these reality shifts, but man has the power to do that without technology.

  18. Everyone is talking about addicition by juebay · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am fearing that the sue-happy United States will take this too far someday. "Yes. I am suing the following landmarks: Colorado River, Niagra Falls, Victoria Falls, and the Atlantic Ocean shore located 2 miles south of Atlantic City for knowing full well the use of white noise generated at these locations were addiciting but still distributing these addicting items to minors, the handicapped, and the elderly"

  19. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok troll.

    I can tell you I just got out of the hospital after having a tension pnuemothorax (life threatening)and I can tell you that morphine is about as useless as a nun with two tits. Might as well just smoke some 7up (the *good* addicts will know what I mean).

    Morphine is useless. It does nothing but make you want better drugs. The pain is still there. A good hit of some BC Bud would do much better. Plus, I can't walk straight after morphine.

  20. Doom 2 did it for me by sam0ht · · Score: 2, Interesting


    When my mouth was aching like hell after a trip to the awful dentist (orthodontist), playing iD's finest kept my mind off the pain very effectively. No time to whimper when you're fragging your friends :)

    1. Re:Doom 2 did it for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had similar experiences - being home sick with a cold and a headache. Playing a really intense online FPS tends to temporarily relieve the headache, or make me forget it, somehow. But only while playing...

      Sometimes, however, my mind doesn't even cope with online shooting, leaving only one mind-numbing pain-killer as a last resort: Slashdot.

  21. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by beaverfever · · Score: 4, Informative

    "It's called morphine."

    Wow - that's quite a medical breakthrough you have made. I'm sure the global medical community would like to hear more about this as it seems this idea never occured to them to use painkillers before.

    Okay, enough with the sarcasm. If you had paid closer attention while reading the article you would recall this:

    "Dr Hunter Hoffman, research fellow at the Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, has tested his virtual worlds on victims of burns injuries who suffer excruciating pain during their daily dressing changes which conventional drug therapy fails to control."

    That's gotta be a lot of pain.

  22. Funny enough... by sunbeam60 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had a HGNS while taking my JKL, so HYSA and he LPHN'ed me.

  23. Works both ways by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Yeah, ppl in VR don't notice anything, you can try it yourself. Next time you see someone imagining they are a lawnmower man, use a burning match to see if they notice ;]

  24. Try it in OB/GYN! by sssmashy · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Pain requires conscious attention. Humans have a limited amount of this and it's hard to do two things at once," he said.

    I truly relish the day they give this VR "distraction therapy" to women giving birth...

    Wife: OH MY GOD, THE PAIN!

    Husband: Keep pushing, love! Keep pushing!

    Wife: I AM! I'm trying, but he won't come out! Enough of this natural childbirth shit, I WANT AN EPIDURAL... oooh... hey, look over there...

    Anxious Husband: What? What is it, honey?

    Wife: it's a polar bear!

  25. experience on a small scale by beaverfever · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dr Hoffman believes pain contains a significant psychological element which is why distracting thoughts by virtual reality lends itself so well to pain control.

    "Pain requires conscious attention..."


    I've bought into this idea ever since the day I was curious and watched a mosquito land on my shoulder, get into its stance and pierce my skin. I was really shocked at how much it hurt in that one instance.

    1. Re:experience on a small scale by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1
      I have had something similar, and I am sure anyone who has ever done physical work will have had an experience like it. One where you see blood, look all over to find it, and when you finally do, the cut starts hurting. Up until the point you find it, it doesn't hurt at all. Human beings are strange!

    2. Re:experience on a small scale by asr_man · · Score: 1

      > "Pain requires concious attention"

      But then there is phantom limb pain, which is in no way connected to one's objective reality.

    3. Re:experience on a small scale by beeplet · · Score: 1

      But isn't that the point? That pain has as much to do with the mind as with the body?

    4. Re:experience on a small scale by asr_man · · Score: 1

      It's more subtle than that. The mind comprises both conscious and unconscious processes. What I read in your post was that seeing and interpreting the physical effects of an injury is an essential part of registering the pain.

      I don't doubt that the magnitude of pain can be influenced by conscious processes; I just wanted to point out that it doesn't generalize. The genesis of phantom limb pain is a brain process of which one is not ever aware -- the pain spontaneously arises in the mind without one ever having observed or reasoned about a source first. The pain, often excruciating, has a totally subconscious origin (in the brain structure, not Freudian, sense).

      There are paticularly fascinating books about this. In "The Emotional Brain", LeDoux examines fear rather than other emotions because it presents a more tractable approach for research. He shows how the subconscous processing circuits for fear in the midbrain bring about somatic effects before you are even aware of feelings of fear. For phantom limb pain, blindsight, and other fascinating explanations of odd mind/body phenomena explained by basic brain structure, try "Phantoms in the Brain" by Ramachandran.

  26. This has been going on for quite a while by FisterBelvedere · · Score: 4, Informative
    I remember seeing a report on this probably around 10 years ago. The technology was in its infancy but was being used to adjust people with a fear of heights. A link with information along these lines (found it in 2 seconds on google) is here:

    Here

    even the screencaps look the same as in the story I remember, and they appear to have the look of 10 year old renderings.

    --

    FisterBelvedere -- Putting a whole new meaning to "streaks on the china" since 1996.

  27. What's the big deal? by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Funny

    Numbing the pain of not having a girlfriend. I've been doing this myself for years.

    1. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and now I'm feeling YOUR pain!

      thanks for nothing, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      maybe it could numb the pain of having a WIFE.

    3. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of websites for THAT too!

  28. Wonder if porn falls into this category... by chendo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've read that same thing happens with porn too... no need to make a whole VR world for pain relivers, just give them a slideshow full of porn :P

    I also heard that looking at porn uses much more energy than you would surfing the web. Can anyone verify this? (*sounds of millions of slashdotters putting on those calorie loss gadget-thingy and loading up their favourite sites*) And I mean 'looking', not doing other things ;)

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  29. Why the memory generation won't work by Lordofohio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The memory playback is a nice (but scary) idea, but I don't think it could ever be implemented correctly. If the plan is to play memories until a patient accepts what happened, a new memory program/video/experience would have to be generated for every patient.

    A shooting victim would need a different experience than a burning building survivor, who would need a different experience than the train wreck survivor that comes in the next day. Since the situations would have to be fairly specific for each individual case, this would be nearly impossible to implement.

    Also, if each different video/experience is produced, why not play it on a television? Even a big screen, if you want. I know the goal of the VR is to immerse the subject in the virtual world, but I don't know that it would be that much more effective than good old fashioned photos, videos, and psychiatry.

    1. Re:Why the memory generation won't work by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Yeh, I was wondering about that whole thing...

      It literally took me years to "get over" being cheated-on/dumped by a long-term ex-girlfriend. I'd say it could probably be classified as PTSD, and it had the usual side effects including depression, anxiety, and so on. I'm not convinced that re-living me visiting her workplace when she said she was working late but was really playing volleyball with her new b/f is going to help things. I don't think that seeing her slutting around with local personalities is going to make me feel better about being used and lied to by someone I trusted completely. Visuallising that shit hurts a little more eath time rather than making me feel better. The only thing that such repitition does is slowly desensitize me to that scenario. Hell, I've gone through it all in my head a bazillion times, and even now typing this my heart rate has gone up.

      So given that my little drama is nothing compared to someone who sees their family massacred in front of their eyes, or someone who has set themselves on fire, how on earth can reliving their worst moments help the recovery processes? How about instead of beating them into submission with it, teach them ways to put it behind them? Use the VR to show them a life *after* their problems.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:Why the memory generation won't work by BirdTracker · · Score: 1
      Since the technology is still fairly new, I believe that they will only be able to use it for a fairly narrow spectrum of problems.

      As the article said, they are attempting to make it customizable in some respects. So if you are a schizophrenic, you may end up in a VR room with distorted paintings of your grandma telling you to kill everyone around you.

    3. Re:Why the memory generation won't work by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "A shooting victim would need a different experience than a burning building survivor, who would need a different experience than the train wreck survivor that comes in the next day. Since the situations would have to be fairly specific for each individual case, this would be nearly impossible to implement."

      Not really. The problem with phobic reactions and PTSD is that the triggers have become generalized, and fear of stressful emotions becomes a major component of the problem.

      For example: let's say a person is attacked by a neighbor's dog on the sidewalk. The normal person will be VERY wary of that particular dog, but accept other dogs, and be a bit nervous about that location for a few days. A phobic person will "generalize" ... over time they spread the fear to all dogs of that breed, all live dogs, all dogs stuffed and live, pictures of dogs, that location, other sidewalks and in extreme cases be house-bound for fear of encountering a dog or a sidewalk. The desensitazation would start with the most remote trigger and work back. For most of the process, it would be a general "dog phobia" tape.

      Also, prompt help in dealing with traumatic expreiences minimizes later phobias and the possibility of PTSD. Talking it out, over and over, is as good as anything, and you don't need to be a shrink to listen.

    4. Re:Why the memory generation won't work by jnicholson · · Score: 1
      The treatment is designed to get to them beyond the point where they are unable to process what's currently going on, not to make them feel better about what happened. If your memories suddenly take over completely when you're walking across a road, the consequences to you are pretty severe. So someone suffering in this degree can't safely cross a road. The therapy would be designed to enable them to continue processing 'current input' rather than being completely overwhelmed by the memory.

      IANAPsychiatrist.

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
  30. The undertreatment of pain problem by ortholattice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While VR pain relief may work to some degree initially, once the novelty wears off, or on an off-day when you just can't get interested in its "game", you'll probably find yourself screaming with pain.

    Should I ever find myself in such an unfortunate situation, may God have mercy on me and set me up with an MD who will prescribe adequate opioid pain relievers. Currently that is the only thing that works, period.

    Too often these days MDs are paranoid about prescribing opioid pain killers, what with the DEA breathing down their necks. See The DEA's Disastrous War Against Pain-Treating Drugs for example. It is customary to encourage the patient to grin and bear it or to seek pain relief through alternative therapies like meditation etc.

    I myself have had minor surgery were they'll give you plenty of local anesthetic during the actual procedure; then they send you home with instructions to take tylenol. When the anesthetic wears off, the pain kicks in. It is only by whining and complaining that they'll prescribe an opioid painkiller, and unless you go to the ER (and sometimes even if you do) you'll be in pain for hours more until all the paperwork and procedures are done to get the prescription filled.

    Chronic pain patients are in a real bind these days. They cruelty towards them by denying them long-term opioid pain relief is unspeakable.

    1. Re:The undertreatment of pain problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The claim that VR Pain Control wears off is an unsubstantiated claim. Preliminary studies indicate indicate that the efficacy of virtual reality pain control did not diminish with repeated usage (Hoffman, H.G., Patterson, D.R., Carrougher, G.J., and Sharar, S.R. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based pain control with multiple treatments. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2001 17:229-235). You may read this at (http://www.hitl.washington.edu/research/burn/mult iplepain.htm).

    2. Re:The undertreatment of pain problem by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      and thats why medical marijuana should be allowed. I know when I was hungover as hell and have a killer morning after headache a bit of a toke will sort me right out.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    3. Re:The undertreatment of pain problem by ianturton · · Score: 1
      Should I ever find myself in such an unfortunate situation, may God have mercy on me and set me up with an MD who will prescribe adequate opioid pain relievers. Currently that is the only thing that works, period.

      Too often these days MDs are paranoid about prescribing opioid pain killers, what with the DEA breathing down their necks. See The DEA's Disastrous War Against Pain-Treating Drugs for example. It is customary to encourage the patient to grin and bear it or to seek pain relief through alternative therapies like meditation etc.

      Don't knock all alternative therapies with out trying them first. I was very sceptical about acupunture until I tried it for severe back pain BUT it really works. Much better pain relief than the drugs with no side effects.

      Ian

    4. Re:The undertreatment of pain problem by jnicholson · · Score: 1
      I was very sceptical about acupunture until I tried it for severe back pain BUT it really works. Much better pain relief than the drugs with no side effects.
      For you. Unfortunately, not everyone has the same result. One of the most frustrating things that can happen to a chronic pain patient is their friends telling them that visualization - or whatever else is currently in vogue - will make everything better for them.
      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
  31. What is a rear admiral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Taken from http://www.snpp.com/guides/rear.admiral.html

    OK, so everyone was asking what the hell a rear admiral was. It was
    first mentioned in 1F04, last year's hallowe'en special.

    > Bart: Milhouse...Milhouse, wake up, quick! Look out the window.
    >Milhouse: No way, Bart. If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies,
    > wet willies, or even the dreaded rear-admiral!
    >-- Covering his ass, so to speak, "Treehouse of Horror IV"

    Bill Oakley, who _wrote_ that part of the script with Josh Weinstein,
    emailed me the definitive answer as to what a rear admiral is.

    >Regarding "Rear Admiral," I think the answer is probably as
    >disappointing as you feared it might be: it doesn't exist. Here is
    >the actual first draft script excerpt from the Halloween show:
    >
    > BART
    >Milhouse. Milhouse, wake up. Quick, look out the window.
    > MILHOUSE
    >No way, Bart. If I lean over and put my face against the window,
    >you're gonna smash it, or maybe pinch my butt real hard.
    >
    >This was the first draft. In re-writing it, the writers wanted to go
    >for something a little funnier, something that would sound like it was
    >from the family of "flying wedgie," "purple nurple," etc. Someone, I
    >do not remember who, said "Rear Admiral." It sounds real, having the
    >word "rear" in it, but it was manufactured to sound real. As far as we
    >know, it doesn't really exist.

  32. virtual world view by tloh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of my friends is a practitioner of Christian Science. If I understand what he tells me, Christian Science teachs that we experience the world because we choose to give it all a realty. In other words, it's all in your head. Most would agree there is some figuratively truth to this, but Christian Science takes it literally and uses the idea as the central component of their system of health and well being by wrapping this metaphysical layer around the bible. I wonder how he would react to the article. On the one hand, there is validation in the fact that we can channel positive perception into better health and healing. On the other hand, Christ and Christianity is completely unnecessary as implemented by the doctors featured in the article. I've tried to point out you don't need the biblical stuff in numberous conversations, but now there is something concrete I can show him.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  33. Post Traumatic Stress and other usages of VR by rpiquepa · · Score: 4, Informative

    It just happened I wrote yesterday about the usages of VR to treat fears. A company named Virtually Better, based in Georgia, creates virtual environments mixing video images and computer-generated ones to help people deal with their fears and anxieties. In this article, the New York Times (free registration) writes this costs only 10 percent more than conventional therapy. The newspaper adds that therapists using this system claim a success rate exceeding 90 percent. Virtually Better "has created scenes of a glass elevator and a bridge to address fear of height, an airplane cabin for those who fear flying and a thunderstorm to diminish fear of bad weather." Other environments address the treatment of substance addiction or of post-traumatic stress. A (Virtual) Therapist's Dream contains selected excerpts. It also includes images on the virtual airplane environment.

  34. Lucid Dreams would be better and more realistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lucid Dreams would be better than VR, and more realistic.

    These are dreams where you are aware that you are dreaming, so one of the things you can do with them is this 'therapy' mentioned in this story. Even Dr Laberge mentioned a similar therapy.

    See www.ld4all.com for further information.

  35. If only . . by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    If only it'd work for PMS too . . .

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:If only . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then maybe your mother wouldn't bitch about you getting a real job and moving out of her basement.

      j/k

  36. I knew it! by Ludo.Sanders · · Score: 1

    My mother never beliefd me when I said that playing Quake, took me mind of the illness. When you can play video games, youre healthy enough for school, she always replied. Seems like I was right all along.

    --
    "It is not because no one sees the truth that it becomes a mistake" (Mahatma Gandhi)
  37. reliving by Tom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh yes, reliving a traumatic experience is one great way to cure people.

    The approach is quite controversial in psychology. There is enough indication that it will only dull instead of cure, and that in some cases it will increase the trauma.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  38. Survivor Guilt by malia8888 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Some years ago I wrote a small book for the V.A. for spouses and children of veterans with PTSD. I found in talking to soldiers and other victims of PTSD that survivor guilt was such a crippling part of the disorder. So, I found this snippet encouraging in the article: One patient overcame her sense of guilt at running away from the scene and failing to help others who subsequently died.

    If this treatment can truly help deal with survivor guilt, then it is a very useful therapy.

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
  39. Re:It's already happened by zachusaf · · Score: 1

    It's called Everquest.......

  40. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by jdifool · · Score: 1
    Poor boy.

    They just gave you aspirin, making you believe that it was morphin.
    Too bad the placebo effect is not working of you.

    More seriously, though, it is possible that, for some reasons, it wasn't efficient on you. It also depends on the way it was administered (oral, muscular, ...)

    But I can guarantee you that morphine has a huge effect on pain relief. It even has *such* a huge effect that at some point, you will forget to breathe.

    Disclaimer : if you think I am a troll, don't try it at home...

    Regards,
    jdif

    --
    Let's overcome our weakness.
  41. Memories can be relived until they are accepted by RyatNrrd · · Score: 5, Funny

    We found nuclear weapons in Iraq.
    We found nuclear weapons in Iraq.
    We found nuclear weapons in Iraq.

    1. Re:Memories can be relived until they are accepted by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean nuculur weapons?

      (for the comedy-impaired: yes, I know that it was spelled correctly in the parent post)

    2. Re:memories can be relived until they are accepted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched it for hours and hours. But it didn't do anything, so eventually I opened it up at the first page, and started reading.

  42. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re the forgot to breathe part... I guess you missed the good addict part... ;-) But thanks for the link.

    Anyway... administered via injection in the arm (vien or artery? not a doc here)

  43. Reliving memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't have PTSD, and I probably can't imagine how bad PTSD is.

    I do however have some painful memories. The last thing I want to do is relive them. Whenever they come up I try and "change the station" mentally.

    Is it really a good idea to get PTSD sufferers to relive the memories? I honestly would like to know.

    1. Re:Reliving memories by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "The last thing I want to do is relive them. Whenever they come up I try and "change the station" mentally. Is it really a good idea to get PTSD sufferers to relive the memories? I honestly would like to know."

      With PTSD, you DO relive the memories frequently and don't have any ability to "change the station" ... to such an extent that it messes up your life. This therapy can lead to fewer flashbacks and the ability to change the station.

  44. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by jdifool · · Score: 1
    Most probably muscular injection.

    Morphine is so far the most popular (because effective, easily administered, and with the fewest side-effects) pain-killer, for big pains (not only in the ass).

    Maybe they just didn't give you enough, though. A patient should *always* ask for pain-killers when he needs some. We live in societies where it shouldn't be normal to suffer anymore, with all the stuff we have at our disposal...

    Regards,
    jdif

    --
    Let's overcome our weakness.
  45. paints? pants by real_smiff · · Score: 1

    it's British for underwear. I just can't type this morning :/ that ruined that joke eh.

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  46. Is this a case? by deconvolution · · Score: 1

    Picture a person who can't live in the outside world because they have developed a psychological disorder based on the fact that the outside world only gives them pain.

    I wonder if I have developed a psychological disorder based on the fact that the most PCs in outside world are ruled by MS Windows, which only gives me pain... sounds scary...

  47. Video games dull the pain of the real world.But... by IvyMike · · Score: 1

    ...what can I turn to get over the pain I still feel when I remember the tragic death of my virtual tiger, Rainbow?

  48. Reliving most painful events in one's life? by loosenoodle · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, where do i sign up for that? I mean, it's not like it wasn't bad enough the first time. Let's analyze the psychoanalytic value of VR treatment for PTSD patients in a more C-esque manner:

    function dumbAssTherapyTechnique(you&) {
    while ( !you.cured ) {
    you.reliveWorstMomentInYourLife();
    if (!you.feelbetter) {
    dumbAssTherapyTechnique(you);
    } else {
    you.cured = true; //odds of this happening - 10000000000000 to 1
    }
    return I_THINK_IM_CURED;
    }

    The _only_ value in this VR idea is for treating chronic phobias, and even if at best, reducing the phobic reactions. PSTDs and phobias are are two completely different concepts and I HIGHLY doubt the value of this type of therapy for PSTD patients. If you'd like to test my theory, ask a rape victim if she'd like to relive the _experience_.
    Burn victims are one thing (physical pain translating into mental pain), but most (not all) PTSD are opposite in nature to burn victims. It's a nice idea and if it works for burn victims, great. But please, think just a minute before applying 1 minor progressive technique to other domains in psychology.

    --
    "We can never see past the choices we don't understand." -The Matrix Reloaded - The Oracle
    1. Re:Reliving most painful events in one's life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately if this was done using your function, after reliving the memories enough times, there would be a stack overflow and we'd get to stop reliving them then. :)

    2. Re:Reliving most painful events in one's life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, where do i sign up for that? I mean, it's not like it wasn't bad enough the first time. Let's analyze the psychoanalytic value of VR treatment for PTSD patients in a more C-esque manner:

      The idea is that the patient has repressed or supressed emotions from the traumatic event. In order for them to be cured, they must fully experience these emotions. One way of bringing out the repressed/supressed emotions is to have the patient relive the event.

      Until they deal with the repressed/supressed emotions, they will have symptoms which the mind creates as a distraction to prevent the emotions from surfacing.

      I think we all experience something like this at some level. Take a look at this:
      Summary of Dr. John Sarno's ideas (Word document)

      Google cache if you don't want to load a Word document

      These ideas don't get enough attention and its suprising how few people understand them. And I can vouch for it working myself.

  49. Spooky Not really... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Wake up bro, science always follows fiction. Think of an endeavour or a discovery and you'll be able to find someone who fantasised about it at sometime.

    Leonardo Da Vinci, HG Wells, Jules Verne, George Orwell... need I go on? Helicopters, men on the moon, deep sea exploration, dystopian societies and whatever else you care to mention have all been "predicted" by dreamers way before they became reality.

    Tad Williams (brilliant author though he is) would hardly be the first writer to find part of his fiction had become fact.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  50. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

    "in the treatment of patients suffering Post Traumatic Stress Disorder; memories can be relived until they are accepted."

    So... a guy having been tortured should be VR-tortured until he accepts it? Or someone having killed a bunch of kids in a war should relive that experience in VR until he accepts it? Color me sceptic, but I'm not sure thats a great idea.

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    1. Re:Post Traumatic Stress Disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read my comments here for my understanding of it.

    2. Re:Post Traumatic Stress Disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or someone having killed a bunch of kids in a war should relive that experience in VR until he accepts it?


      I'd play that sim!

  51. That's it; I'm going to my therapist right now. by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    I still can't get over them taking goatse off of the domain registry. Do you think they have a program that will allow me to relive the trauma?

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    1. Re:That's it; I'm going to my therapist right now. by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      There's always google cache and the wayback machine. I'm sure some idiot has a goatse archive too. Nothing that sinister can be killed so easily.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  52. Obviously you haven't been at your wife's bedside by melted · · Score: 1

    ... if you have a wife, that is.

    They don't see a damn thing within 10 inches of their face and hardly hear anything when they're pushing. On top of that, epidural will not be administered at the last stage because it takes some time to kick in. No fucking polar bear dancing naked will distract a woman from feeling "the bowling ball" going through her cervix and vagina and tearing it apart.

  53. Thank You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What a wonderful link/s!

    I was sexually abused repetdedly by my family dentist when I was six (he used a gas hose placed behind my head, but near my face, I can still hear the hissing sound...), I'm now 49, and have been dealing with the repercussions of those terrifying encounters for decades without actually realizing it (since my parents wouldn't believe that he was using gas on me, and I didn't know how to say I was being abused).

    Since I started working with a good therapist my life has just blossomed!

    But those fantasy's since I started to deal with this stuff... wow... and weird, to be sure!

    Glad to know I can get through it all, and move on.

    And that I'm not a nutter.

    Anyhow... thanks for the links, lots of neat stuffff here.

    Thanks a lot!

  54. Opiate Withdrawl by The+Tyro · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is not usually life-threatening (you'll certainly wish you were dead while you're going through it, but you don't usually die).

    Much more dangerous are the withdrawl syndromes associated with Alcohol and Benzos (diazepam, lorazepam, alprazolam... aka Valium, Ativan, and Xanax, respectively). Those folks have a much harder go of it than heroin and painkiller addicts, at least physiologically speaking... they get autonomic hyperactivity, refractory seizures, hallucinations... there's a very significant mortality if not medically treated.

    Stimulants tend not to have such a severe withdrawl syndrome, at least in a life-threatening sense. I'm referring to cocaine, methamphetamine... there's a crash when you come down, and they can deplete your body's stores of catecholamines and other neurotransmitters, leading to periods of agitation, depression, insomnia, etc, but that's typically after longer term use.

    A psychological addiction to VR should be a very minor issue compared to any of the above.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  55. They can knock themselves out by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    as far as I'm concerned... if a VR simulation takes a patient's mind off their pain, God bless 'em.

    Listen... I've spent my share of time in burn units, where the morphine flows like a mighty river; VR is far preferable to using drugs, with all their attendent side-effects. Also, contrary to popular wisdom, addiction isn't usually a problem... only a very very small percentage of burn unit denizens ever develop an addiction to their narcotics after they recover, and there's large studies and good research to back that up... anyone who tells you that narcotic use for severe pain makes normal people into addicts is about 20 years out of date.

    Honestly, we already use a pharmacological variant of VR in pediatric burn units... it's called Ketamine (or "Special K" to all you ravers out there stupid enough to use it). Ketamine creates a dissociative anesthesia, and is sometimes used in kids who are having their dressings changed.... it's not really recommended in adults because it can produce extremely vivid hallucinations... most kids I've used it on report nothing, or just say "I had a bad dream."... gotta love kids. I personally think the difference in experience between pedi & adult has to do with the amount of bad things adults carry around in their subconscious... there's something to be said for innocence.

    Whether it's distraction (I use that on kids all the time), the gate theory of pain, or whatever. If it works, I say use it... it's certainly preferable than risking the side-effects of mega-doses of narcotics.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:They can knock themselves out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Honestly, we already use a pharmacological variant of VR in pediatric burn units... it's called Ketamine (or "Special K" to all you ravers out there stupid enough to use it). Ketamine creates a dissociative anesthesia, and is sometimes used in kids who are having their dressings changed.... it's not really recommended in adults because it can produce extremely vivid hallucinations... most kids I've used it on report nothing, or just say "I had a bad dream."... gotta love kids. I personally think the difference in experience between pedi & adult has to do with the amount of bad things adults carry around in their subconscious... there's something to be said for innocence.

      I used to do this stuff for fun. It can produce very vivid hallucinations, but I've never had a bad experience with it. On one interesting "trip" I saw myself floating through a tunnel which lead to a room where I could see all my synapses firing like little flashes of light on the sides of the room. If I went to one neuron and touched it, it would trigger a memory of some sort, if I went to another neuron it would trigger another memory. Each memory was replayed with complete clarity although at this point, I don't even know if the memories were real or were hallucinations themselves.

      There, in the middle of the synaptic chamber stood Satan himself. I spoke with him and even touched him. Immediately after that the effects wore off and I came out of it. It sounds like a profoundly emotional experience, and it is, but it wasn't scary at all. Of course I can't remember any of the specifics but it always seemed that when I was on K, I knew the answer to everyting and all of a sudden everything made sense.

      Bottom line. In this state, someone could've amputated a limb and I wouldn't have cared.

  56. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

    Some of us would love to spend their days on morphine. Can I trade my VR time for morphine? Or hey, VR on morphine could be cool too...

  57. Neurolinguistic programming by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you heard about NLP (neurolinguistic programming)? NLP is a therapy method which is based on reliving a traumatic period - and yes, this is used on PSTD patients, such as refugees from war ravaged countries (see Dr. Richard Bolstad's work), or rape victims. The basic idea of NLP is that the patient replays the traumatic event inside his/her head multiple times, while varying the playback speed, colours, pitch of the sound et cetera. The goal is to replay the event in such a way that it is so ridiculous, that you cannot help laughing at it, thereby creating a more positive (or less negative) feeling towards the traumatic event.

    So:
    - NLP has been shown to work very well, and
    - NLP is very similar to the VR technique in that you relearn your response to a traumatic event with more positive feelings.

    By the way - where did you learn to program? You should get your money back...

    1. Re:Neurolinguistic programming by cr0sh · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I have three books on NLP - Frogs into PRINCES (by Richard Bandler and John Grinder - ISBN 0-911226-19-2), TRANCE-formations (by same - ISBN 0-911226-23-0), and Using Your Brain for a CHANGE (by Richard Bandler - ISBN 0-911226-27-3). These were all published between 1979-1985 - and are easily among the most strange of books I have in my occult collection.

      I found them at a garage sale at a house in Escondio, CA - being sold by a family that as far as I could tell, spoke no english at all. The titles and the covers looked interesting, and the subtitles detailing "Neuro-Linguistic Programming" seemed like they would fit right into my occult collection anyhow, so I purchased them.

      As I said, the covers were interesting - all of the book's covers have a strange, near psychedelic flavor to them - fanciful images of dragons and wizards (though the last book, which has the latest publication date, drops this look in favor of a more refined outdoor scene of gloomy mountains in the backdrop, a green meadow with colorful flowers and a waterfall in the foreground, with a "transparent" profile of a person where everything is tinted "lighter" through it). I only got about halfway through what I thought was likely the first book (being of the earliest publication date), "Frogs into PRINCES". I believe this to be the only book I have ever read that screwed with my mind, in a very strange way.

      As I was reading it, I was also trying to use some of the techniques, because they seemed like very powerful tools, for both internal and external use. As an example, one of these tools involved recognizing body language, and using that in opposition to what you were saying (simple example, nodding your head "yes" while discussing something in a negative tone, or disagreeing with someone) - this was a tool by which you could convey information to others to stimulate them to perform certain things in a certain manner. There were other techniques of a similar nature, some which you could use internally.

      As I read, my SO (now my wife) was telling my that I was changing - that I acted differently since starting to read the book. She asked me to stop reading the book, which I did, because I could feel this change as well - and it bothered me. After I stopped reading the book, I felt that a curtain or something had lifted, like a slight fog or something.

      Now, I realize that this is just a anecdotal story, and that it carries no weight from an objective standpoint - take it as you will. I have kept these books, though, and I intend one day to try reading them again, knowing my prior experience.

      What you describe of NLP I never got to in the books - perhaps it was in a later chapter or in one of the other volumes which I didn't read? The technique, though, sounds like something from NLP. I still don't know what or why these books are - they seem like self-help books, but if they tend to affect others like they did me, I wonder just what NLP really is about - and what its ultimate use could be? Personally, I wasn't looking for a self-help or self-change book - but I was interested in the idea of "hacking my mind", so to speak (yeah, I know that sounds like a contradiction. I was only looking for changing myself in a controlled manner for the hell of it and to learn how to do it in a different manner, not because I felt I needed it - probably not a good reason, now that I look back on it)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    2. Re:Neurolinguistic programming by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there are few or none truths in psychology - what works for one person is horribly horribly wrong for another. For example, psychoanalysis is not the tool for me, if I may put it diplomatically :-) Those that I know that have undergone therapy, have initially tried one method, but then quickly switched over to another. The methods has also been vastly different: psychoanalysis, dream analysis, mental training, cognitive behavioural herapy [commonly abbreviated as CBT]).

      NLP was developed during the 70's, so the books that you mention comes from its youth - perhaps that is why they were badly written and/or strange. If you seek a tool to hack your mind, and you are a overall healthy person, then I recommend mental training, similar to what ahtletes use. This involves, among other techniques, muscular relaxation, mental relaxation, stress handling, and goal pictures (and - incidentally - NLP). For more reading, see for example Coping.org, specifically Tools for Personal Growth.

      Some of the more known names in the field of positive mental training are Anthony Robbins, Brian Tracy, Barbra Waggoner (spelling?), Jim Rohn, and Lars-Eric Unestahl. Unfortunately, Unestahl is swedish, and has not been translated, to the best of my knowledge - but hey! Take this as your reason to learn swedish ;-)

      Argh! Some day I'm going to start my own company, teaching people motivational and coping strategies. Does anyone have some surplus money to invest in me?

  58. Tell me by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Informative

    you should see it from my perspective... I often get patients who have chronic pain, and show up in my ER looking for medication refills.

    I often can't help them, or at least, not the way they want... some of these people are prescribed monster doses of Oxycontin, MS-contin, Methadone, you name it. I treat acute pain in the ER, but I can't refill someone's 90-count bottle of 80mg Oxycontin tablets; it's inappropriate practice. I'm not trained or credentialed in chronic pain management, I've never seen the patient before, will probably never see them again, and those kind of medications at that kind of dose require follow-up (something I'm not set up to do), adjustments, documentation, etc... and I don't need to get "interviewed" by the DEA any more than the next doc. Ironically, some time ago the feds hauled away a physician in an area where I was practicing... then all his patients couldn't get their medications any more, and started coming to the ER looking for refills. Unfortunately, I'm ill-equipped to fill that void.

    Chronic pain is a real problem, not only for the docs who run the pain clinics and take care of these folks (they're well-advised to keep impeccable records), but for guys like me who get caught in the middle.

    And dont even get me started with the addicts and abusers who doctor shop... using the exact same stories as the chronic pain folks in an effort to get their party supplies for the weekend... those gomers are the bane of my existence.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  59. Pffffft... by Gil2796 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is old news! Every /.er knows that the Internet takes the mind away from the pain of real-world existence.

    Resume therapy!

  60. Re: Christian Science by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    I've tried to point out you don't need the biblical stuff in numberous conversations, but now there is something concrete I can show him.

    Yeah, that'll work. Who was it who said you can't reason somebody out of a position they didn't reason themselves into? If your friend's faith is strong enough, he'll maintain his beliefs to his (possibly early) grave, regardless of any evidence to the contrary. That's how it works.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  61. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

    Yes! I wonder why I, as a patient, more and more often have to ask for pain relief... When I had me most recent coloscopy, the discussion went like this:

    Nurse to me: Do you want pain relief beforehand?
    Me: Yes, definitely.
    The doctor (almost to himself): You should avoid taking pain relief. [pregnant pause]
    The doctor (to the nurse): Ok, give him 0.5 cc.

    Five minutes later, I got some additional pain relief, but even then it wasn't enough...

    Isn't it strange that a patient has to fight for, or beg for pain relief? As I understand, if you don't use pain relief, then moderate to high pain can create paths that makes it much easier for you to feel the pain again in the future.

    Of course, too much pain relief can be bad too - I can't tell you how embarassed I was after they shot me up with a big load of morphine, and I started insulting everybody to the left and to the right of me. A sailor would have blushed...

  62. Pain vs. pain by achurch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But I also suspect that the main reason that we see physical and emotional pain as being different is that we see emotional pain as uniquely human, something that separates us from "the animals".

    I can't speak for anyone else, but I always saw it as the difference between a point source (physical pain) and lack thereof (emotional pain). I agree some people may take the human/animal point of view, but I wouldn't go so far as saying that physical and emotional pain are "the same". To put it in /. terms, Windows and Linux are both "produced" by the same hardware, and have the same general purpose--but I don't think anyone would claim they're the same thing!

    As far as souls go, I'm reserving judgement for now--ask me again when you've got a human backup system working. ;)

  63. OT, but they still bother me by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    I was part of the relief effort after the towers were struck.

    Every time I start listening to some chowder-head talking about how 9/11 was not such a big deal, I remember sitting there in a parking lot with my surgical team, waiting/hoping there'd be some survivors pulled from the rubble that we could take care of...

    I'm not a PTSD candidate by any means, but 9/11 still bothers me, and I frankly hope it always will. When you witness the gruesome death of thousands of people and at some point in time it all becomes OK, or you just forget about it, or it doesn't bother you at all on some level... pain is part of being human; some things you should remember.

    That said, I certainly hope nobody makes a VR simulation of that time... I certainly have no desire to relive an experience like that in vivid detail.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:OT, but they still bother me by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      I lot of people keep missing the point. Remembering a terrible event for the sake of remembering how terrible it was in the context of understanding and prevention is not the same as remembering it in the context of PTSD. If you develop PTSD based on the experience, little things can set you off - smells, sounds, faces. At that point, the memory becomes so painfully vivid that it can be completely incapacitating. The moments in question come back so acutely that the victim is left totally unable to function until the memory passes again. Imagine what would happen if every time you saw something about 9/11 you were so acutely overcome with feelings of greif or helplessness that you couldn't react to people around you, move, or think clearly in any capacity what-so-ever.

      The point is to overcome this horrendous reaction, not make them "not care" or forget about it. Desensitizing the patient takes on the meaning of "allowing them to continue functioning normally when they recall the event(s) in question". They'll still care about it and may even continue to be burdened by it, but the memories won't bring them to a screeching halt and prevent them from functioning normally in society.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  64. +1 Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're right, I'm not enough of a moron to get anyone pregnant.

    That, and I'm gay :)

    1. Re:+1 Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more I know about women, the better that alternative seems. It's just too bad I don't like boys...

  65. oh great by woodhouse · · Score: 1

    So you're lying there, blissfully unaware of having your mouth gouged out with sharp pointy things, and then your fantasy world suddenly becomes a BSOD. That's not going to be a pleasant experience.

  66. Re:Obviously you haven't been at your wife's bedsi by leshert · · Score: 1

    Although the original poster was making a weak joke, he's not far from the mark.

    When our first kid was born, we did the whole childbirth class thing, followed all the advice, etc. One of the things we did which seemed really corny at the time was to take along some object to focus on during contractions to distract from the pain.

    It seemed pretty silly at the time, so the second time around, we didn't bother with the 'focus item'. The first time, my wife went through with only a bit of local at the very end; the second time she needed an epidural. So as goofy as it seemed, she says that it did work...

  67. Dianetics by the_1000th_Monkey · · Score: 1

    This "repeat until accepted" method sounds a lot to me like the Dianetics psuedo-science Hubbard invented before founding Scientology. Which makes me scared that it either won't work in the long term and will just damage the person's psyche, or will work and will give Scientologists fuel to claim the legitimacy of their "faith".

    See what I mean at Operation Clam Bake

    --
    where'd my typewriter go?
  68. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not strange, given today's litigious society.

  69. Been there (Burn units) and this is GOOD! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've worked in burn units, and had a couple of deep tissue burns as a kid, and even if this only works on 5% of the patients, it's worth using, starting NOW!
    • It doesn't add anything to the load of medications they are already on.
    • It has little chance of undesireable side effects, such as the breathing depression of opiates.
    • If it minimizes stress, it minimizes the biochemical load of stress hormones that interfere with healing.
    • It gives the patient control over something in an otherwise helpless situation (you have very few choices in a burn unit except maybe what to order for lunch, and that's hospital food)
    • It gives sensory stimulation in a very DULL environment of limited visitors, staff in biosuits for your protection ... nothing to do but think about how bad it hurts, contemplate your chances of permanent disfigurements, and hurt

    Creating more VR worlds for those that aren't helped by the action games would be a logicla next step.

  70. memories can be relived until they are accepted by nightterror · · Score: 1

    Didn't any of you watch Clockwork Orange? This could be used for some very bad stuff.

    --
    Photons have mass!!?? I didn't even know they were Catholic...
  71. It's retraining your brain to NOT panic by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 2, Informative
    PTSD patients reliving memories until they're accepted? Doesn't that seem a little like forced traumatic recollection?

    It works because it is under the PATIENT'S control. They can rerun the images, repeatedly stopping at a spot that makes them uncomfortable until they are comfortable there, then run a bit farther the next time. Similar to the "fear of flying" seminars that start with looking at pictures of planes. You help them push into an uncomfortable zone until they learn that fear won't kill, it's just unpleasant, and the memories no longer trigger excessively strong emotions.

    There is a portion of your brain called the amygdala that triggers fear way under the level of consciousness. It has a hair-trigger in persons with phobias and PTSD. It can be retrained to stop sounding the alarm so quickly, which is what various "exposure" therapies and hypnosis do.

  72. desensitized != no emotions by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "I personally don't like the idea of getting over an emotional trauma by 'desensitizing' myself to it, as the article seems to suggest. "

    The term "desensitized" has a specific meaning in psychiatry and psychology: it does not mean "callous" or "indifferent". It means that a certain stimulus no longer creates as strong an emotional reaction as it once did. And for PTSD and phobias, those emotions are so strong and incapacitating (they replay at the original intensity or even higher, and with the added fear of another attack or flashback) that the patient is unable to come to terms with them until they are desensitized.

    1. Re:desensitized != no emotions by chazwurth · · Score: 1

      Is it generally thought that helping the patient relive the experience again and again is the best way to accomplish this? I don't mean that as some kind of rhetorical question; I have no psychiatric training at all, and I'm actually interested. As a lay person, my instinct tells me that reliving an extremely painful experience over and over again with little time in between to stop and consider the feelings that are being brought up is a bad thing, and would lead to being 'desensitized' in precisely the 'callous' sense of the word. But I have no idea how these things play out in clinical situations.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    2. Re:desensitized != no emotions by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "As a lay person, my instinct tells me that reliving an extremely painful experience over and over again with little time in between to stop and consider the feelings that are being brought up is a bad thing"

      Right ... that would be a bad thing. But the problem with phobias and PTSD is that they tend to have "triggers" that are common things that set off instant replays at times when it causes the patient to such an extent that it interferes with necessary activities. It's never knowing when you will be hit with an attack that causes much of the problem ... The fear of a recurrrence of the emotions and memories is as paralysing as the emotions and memories, and the stress from the fear makes things worse.

      The desensitizaiton technique involves giving the patient control of the situation, by having the "OFF" button on the VR machine in their hands (or the ability to turn the picture of the dog face down - whatevre you ar etreating, it needs to be controlled by the patient, not forced on them by a therapist). They can approach the triggering situation as many times as they have to, in a controlled setting, quitting whenever they feel overwhelmed, until it loses its power to trigger memories or until they are calm enough to actually analyse their emotions, not just experience them. (you can't "deal" with things when you are in emotional hyperdrive)

      People who have been through something extremely traumatic will tend to volumtarily rehash the details trying to make sense of it: listening to them and helping them explore their emotions about it is the core idea behind crisis intrevention.

  73. Sounds like.. by NekoXP · · Score: 1


    "Repeat memories until they are accepted"? .. a Brave New World, for sure, where we can desensitise people to disasters and terrorism, and make promiscuity a citizen's duty!

  74. Frightening... by vrtsdaemon · · Score: 1
    Another use of VR discussed is in the treatment of patients suffering Post Traumatic Stress Disorder; memories can be relived until they are accepted.

    sure, this will be good for treating PTSD patients I guess...but what other possibilities might this have? living memories until they are accepted...as truth? this creates some very frightening possiblities. as much as I hate referencing it, it sounds like the Matrix.

  75. Messing peoples lives up by aminorex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why mess up peoples lives with this therapeutic
    crap when there are perfectly good drugs available
    that cure the problem?

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    1. Re:Messing peoples lives up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked in a burn unit.

      These people are literally begging to die.

      You can't possibly understand if you don't see it yourself. The only painkilling drugs that work on this type of pain, stop working very quickly. Then what? What do you do when sublethal doses of morphine stops working?

      I'm in favor of euthenasia, and it was seeing burn patients that swung me that way.

    2. Re:Messing peoples lives up by vrtsdaemon · · Score: 1

      becaues drugs tend to have negative side effects.

    3. Re:Messing peoples lives up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welll.... that would be BECAUSE there aren't perfectly good drugs available that cure the problem. Yes, we have some strong analgesics available, but they are FAR from "perfectly good." Many times they're not so much for treating the pain, as they are for sedating the patient so he doesn't remember the pain later, which doesn't help when he's crying right then. Or the doses required are so sedating that they may lose their airways. Drugs are good, but hardly perfect.

      Yes, I'm feeding the troll. But some times you just can't help it.

  76. also by SolemnDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    i'm on the other side: i'm a patient who works with other patients. Fibromyalgia, for example. And the first thing that they come crying for is, "How do i get my doctor to prescribe pain meds?"

    The first answer that we have to give- HAVE to, because we don't know them, either, is, "You don't."

    Plain and simple, unless they are doing EVERYthing else- the physical therapy, the exercise, the effort, the tests for concurrent/comorbid conditions, they shouldn't be given pain meds. It's a tough rule but a vital one, because it pushes them into a relationship with the doc, so that they can get checked out, make sure that they aren't just doc shopping.

    And we tell them that if the doc gives them a scrip on their first visit, something's wrong. We have to tell them the order of things that will be tried, and explain that some of them might help. It's hard because the perception in this country is that there's a pill for every problem, and with pain meds, that's just not always the case. When they get to the pain med stage, and find themselves with side effects, some of them get angry, because they wanted it to just be all better, why would these meds be held back unless they really fixed everything?

    But that's not how it works. So we end up with people getting depressed, and even when we explain all this up front, it still goes that way for some people. For others, the pain meds work, and we wish that they could actually get them when they needed them to start with, without all the secret personality testing.

    This looks like it's a great idea. One thing that i have to say for biofeedback and other therapies- they work on the biofeedback level, but they also work because they are something different. they can distract the person from their pain long enough for them to focus elsewhere, and if you're going to learn to live with chronic pain, that's a very important skill.

    I think this is a great idea. I know that they did a study a long time ago showing that people who exercised to music or some other distraction felt less workout pain than people who focused solely on their workout. I use that study all the time.

    I'll be very hapy when this makes it to take-home stage, and i'll be interested in seeing if it can be combined with workout equipment, for example, for some of the physical therapy that some of my fellow patients have to go through. When they haven't moved much for awhile, i get to see people cry when they try to start up again. And it's not because they're wimps, it's that extra 300-400% of pain chemicals along with the muscle atrophy.

    sol

  77. sounds like what the Church of Scientology does by gemtech · · Score: 1

    "Another use of VR discussed is in the treatment of patients suffering Post Traumatic Stress Disorder; memories can be relived until they are accepted." same stuff. I know from the technical side. not a member.

    --
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
  78. Pah, I've been doing this for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have very sensitive and dry skin and dark brown hair. I've been dying by hair
    to the lightest possible blonde for years and every time I get it done I *need*
    to have access to a computer immediately or the pain becomes overwhelming.
    Keep me in a chair and in about 20 minutes I'm crying my eyes out and
    shaking. Give my my laptop and within seconds the pain subsides, completely
    if I start an short game (like GTA2)...

  79. A question... by 0x1337 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who read that as "Real pain dubbed in Virtual Worlds??

  80. Yeah, well duh. by SyniK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    School sucks.
    I'll play a game instead.

    Work sucks.
    UT2K4 is nice.

    Girls are EViL...
    (X-Com) UFO is a nice distraction.

    Etc, etc, etc. Gamers have known the escapist and therapeutic benefits of games for years :).

    --
    -Tom
  81. study.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It needs more serious study, but I don't think online worlds are the cure for pain.

    Have you ever tried playing an mmorpg while you've got a toothache? Or a cold? I have and it was a miserable experience. Action games aren't too bad but the pain/discomfort really is too overwhelming for a gaming experience to help. At least that's my experience.

  82. Re: Stupid. Ever hear of hypnosis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The old "VR" is far better; its called hypnosis.
    I can see a hypnotist for $60 and have them put me anywhere. The VR gear costs more, sucks, and I'm sure insurance would charge more than the hardware cost for its use. (in USA it would...)

    It works so well they can operate on you at the same time. Try that with VR googles!

  83. Wet willie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's also the greasy willie -- Same as the wet willie, but more disgusting -- use butter instead of spit.

    1. Re:Wet willie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that more disgusting? Human spit is likely to give you hepatitis or any one of a huge array of other human diseases. Butter will give you a greasy ear. Oh no. Crippling, incurable viral infection or greasy ear?

  84. If VR can heal, it can harm. by yeggman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think a case can be made that First Person Shooters are VR. And from the articles descriptions of the VR they use with patients, I'd say PFSs are a hell of a lot more sophisticated than what their using on patients. So what are the effects on the human mind of going through 4 hours of virtual war a few nights a week? I think it's only a matter of time before we start seeing gamers come down with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. I should know I game. Have you had trouble sleeping after a long night of gaming? Can't close your eyes with out images of fire fights coming to your mind?
    Doesn't sound like a healthy mind to me.
    All things in moderation.

    1. Re:If VR can heal, it can harm. by nlindstrom · · Score: 1
      Yup. I've spent more than one night hearing "I need a medic!" yelled in my dreams. ;-)

      Me, I always use '\bind r "vsay FTReviveMe"'.

  85. Re:GO FUCK YOURSELVES (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody allowed you to open your mouse and say hi bitch.
    Go back to sucking my dick!

  86. Re: Christian Science by tloh · · Score: 1

    My motives are not as noble as you percieve. All I want to do is make him sqirm in embarassment to points he can't address. :-P We have a well established history of playing oneupmanship. His religious practice has afforded me endless amusement and it will continue to do so as he's as stubborn as you imagine. I'm a baaad man!

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  87. Obviously not a Linux based system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "SnowWorld, for instance, takes users on an absorbing virtual journey through glaciers and ice caves whilst having to defend themselves from attack by polar bears and penguins."

    On the other hand, this sounds like Darl's fantasy world :)

  88. I believe you have no clue by deacon · · Score: 1
    Yawn.

    If you had engaged a few brain cells, instead of just reading the article (WHICH DOES NOT MENTION MORPHINE) and taking it as gospel, you would have *possibly* come to a few conclusions:

    We already have drugs that are capable of eliminating pain while your (heart, just as a trivial example) is transplanted.

    Now, obviously, someone has chosen *NOT* to use these readily available medicines on burn patients.

    So, we have already shown that not all appropriate medicines are being use.

    So what the fark makes you think/claim that morphine is included in "conventional drug therapy"?

    Does it say so it that poor excuse of an article?

    No, it does not.

    Give thanks to Slick (War on Drugs) Willie and Janet (Crispy Branch Davidians) Reno on the way out.

    Bah.

  89. Electric Cube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way back in the late 60's a local amusment park had an attaraction called the "Electric Cube". It was a small building with a room inside that featured a very loud sound system playing things like Cream's "White Room" and a tune called "Horse". It also had a brilliant white strobe light and syncronized colored strobes. There was a very pronounced old time movie slow motion effect, and designes like footprints looked like they were being made in subjective real-time going up the wall. My friends and I discovered that the perception of pain didn't realy work in the Electric Cube. We would go in there and have good natured rumbles, a kick in the crotch didn't mean much (until you got outside, anyway). There was another attraction to the place, the hippy guy who took your money often gave back an amount of change that was greater than the amount you gave him. Stoned, random act of kindness, both? We really liked that place!

  90. It has nothing to do with VR... by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... it has to do with attention, specifically divided and focused attention. I've replicated some VR experimental work using VR vs. other techniques for redirecting attention. The techniques work according to how deeply the person can immerse themselves into the alternate stimulus context. Hypnosis is extremely good, but some people are better at hypnosis than others. Manipulating a physical object is exactly as effective as manipulating an object in VR (I got the same results with $20 worth of wooden blocks that someone else got with an SGI Indigio and complete submersion VR tank, worth $40K).

    The one technique I haven't got to try yet is implicit learning under anesthesia, which seems to work like hypnotic suggestion, but doesn't rely on the person's own ability; it works the same for everyone.

    Whenever you see any study claiming "VR does so and so" question why it took VR to do so, and what else might also work. There's nothing magical about VR that almost certainly can't be done as well for cheaper.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  91. Re:Obviously you haven't been at your wife's bedsi by melted · · Score: 1

    Our baby boy was 9 lb 14 oz at birth, and he has a big head. So there's no way in hell a polar bear (or breathing, or music) would change anything. :0)

  92. Penguin attacks in Seattle are therapeutic? by jayveekay · · Score: 1
    Dr Hunter Hoffman, research fellow at the Harborview Medical Center in Seattle ... [patients] defend themselves from attack by polar bears and penguins.

    I know at least one resident of Seattle who wouldn't find attacks by virtual penguins to be relaxing! ;)

  93. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Yes that is a lot of pain. I nine days in the UVa burn unit, admitted with 30% full thickness burns. You can ask "how bad is it on a scale of 1 to 10?" Well, I've injured myself pretty good over the years in various ways, mostly cuts & bruises from home remodeling, and have my share of minor scars. The scale expands when you have serious burns, and the typical 1 to 10 covers the span of, say, 1 to 2 when compared to burns. And that's if you consider the 1-10 scale logarithmic to begin with! Dressing changes and wound cleaning (aka pulling off your skin each day) are, without a doubt, the worst. Good opiates help during those times, and minor pain relievers (codene (sp), etc.) do an okay job the rest of the time, but distraction is critical. If you have nothing to do, you focus on the pain. Have you noticed that hospital TVs only ever seem to show soap operas and golf? Torture when your well, downright evil when you're a captive audience.

    Luckily, the my burn extent & thickness was overestimated. That and I'm an ornery b@astard and refuse to allow such things to slow me down. It still took two months for me to return to work. After six years there is no readily visible scarring.

    Here's my question: does this work to combat the absolutely infernal itching that occurs when the hair begins growing back? I could handle the cleaning and dressing with just a few ibuprofin in under two weeks, but - damnit - I couldn't take enough benedryl to keep my from wanting to scratch!

    Oh, and the positive (for me) side effect was that I don't have to listen to any labor pain whining from my wife. I'm willing to concede the pains of childbirth, but even my wife and I called a truce on who has experienced the worst pain. I don't wish either on any sane person.

    FWIW, when I hear news reports of very serious burn injuries it still makes me shiver. For those with 50-75%+ full thickness burns, I quitely hope that they don't make it through the first night. The suffering they will go through...no one should ever have to edure that.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  94. Probably off-topic but by multiplexo · · Score: 1

    This research is being done at Harborview Medical Center, which
    is run by the University of Washington Medical Center. Harborview is one of the best trauma centers in the United States, which makes it one of the best in the world When I was in a motorcycle accident that's where I went and even though they couldn't save my leg they did save my knee, which makes using a prosthetic much easier. Harborview isn't the body and fender shop you want to go there, they only send you there if you're seriously broken, but if you are seriously broken it's the best place to be. Even though it's a public hospital and ends up with the patients that no other hospital wants they still manage to do cutting edge research such as this or in the fields of rehabilitation and prosthetics.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  95. Repressed memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great, now it will be used by therapists to help people be open about being raped by hundreds of men with masks on.

  96. Re:I believe we already have a cure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Of all the problems you could find with morphine, such as addiction, or how quickly one develops a tolerance, you claim it doesn't work?

    When my father lost his legs to a land mine in Vietnam, morphine was the only thing that kept him from dying of shock. "Morphine is useless" indeed... you whine about a tension pnuemothorax? Try having your legs blown off in the service of your country. My father owes his life to morphine, yet you go so far as to tout marijuana as a better pain killer?

    Who's the real troll...