Slashdot Mirror


Cheap PC Oscilloscopes - Any Recommendations?

Missionary Man asks: "I'm an electronics teacher looking for a good (but reasonably cheap) PC based oscilloscope for classroom demonstration purposes. I've done a reasonable amount of research and come up with a few contenders. Ideally I'd like something with a bandwidth of up to 40MHz and 2 channels. Does anyone have any tales to tell regarding the use of any of these scopes (or any others I haven't found or mentioned) and can recommend a suitable device?"

"Here's the list of my findings so far:

  • The DS2200C from USB Instruments will do 2 channels at 12 bit resolution, but only to 200KHz.
  • The PCS100 from Velleman at QKits runs to 12MHz, but only 1 channel. It has a bigger brother, the PCS500, that has 2 channels and 50MHz bandwidth, but is a lot more expensive.
  • Picotech do cheaper ones, like the ADC-40/42, but these only operate in the KHz ranges.
  • Link Instruments sell the DSO-2102S that runs to 60MHz with 2 channels, but it's a bit out of my price range.
  • Finally, I found the bitscope which seems to be just what I'm looking for, combining a 2 channel scope and an 8 channel logic analyzer for a reasonable price.
I'm hoping to spend US$300-$400. I recognize the software is a fundamental part of the successful operation of these units and any comments regarding the bundled programs would be most helpful too!"

321 comments

  1. Hello? Any editors at work tonight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Picotech do cheaper ones

    What does this mean?

    1. Re:Hello? Any editors at work tonight? by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 1
      It means that you are ignorant of conventions of English outside the United States. British usage considers a company name as denoting a plural entity, thus "Picotech do" rather than "Picotech does."

      Though I am American, I have adopted this usage, not out of affectation, but in recognition of the fact that companies are groups of human individuals, organized and operating in one portion of their lives toward some common purpose.

  2. Some places to check out... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 3, Informative

    I see them on case modding sites occasionally. As far as your use, I'm not sure how they would measure up. Knowing the thriftiness of many modders, you may be able to find a decent recommendation there.

  3. Here's one to check out -Price page is unreachable by MikeDawg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check this one out. . . I don't know the price because their price page is broken. . . It looks like everything you need in a PC Oscillioscope.

    --

    YOU'RE WINNER !
    Another lame blog

  4. winamp? by VegetariMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think my media player has an oscilloscope...

    --
    --Nick
    1. Re:winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That brings up an interesting question. Could a circuit be devised that would take an external frequency outside of hearing range, and enable it to be fed into the audio input of a soundcard, so a media player's oscilloscope would work?

    2. Re:winamp? by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, for classroom demonstrations a sound card should be perfectly acceptable for all kinds of things... especially considering that there is also very nice free spectrum analyzer software available. On top of that, students can easily repeat experiments on their systems at home. Of course with a max sampling rate of 48KHz there's only so much you can do, but low speed osciallators, R/C circuits, switching power supplies and all sorts of things can still be seen to a useful extent.

    3. Re:winamp? by FredGray · · Score: 5, Informative
      You know, for classroom demonstrations a sound card should be perfectly acceptable for all kinds of things...

      My understanding is that sound card inputs are AC coupled, so you won't be able to see anything much slower than about 20 Hz. That might be OK, but it's not quite an oscilloscope.

    4. Re:winamp? by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Good point... I think you could probably address that by bypassing the cap on the input, but then your "zero" level would probably be 1.15V.

    5. Re:winamp? by unitron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Beat it against a local oscillator set to a frequency such that the difference of the two lands between zero and 20 thousand cycles per second (Hz). It's called heterodyning and has been used to shift frequencies since the early days of radio if not before.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    6. Re:winamp? by kiatoa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Could a circuit be devised that would take an external frequency outside of hearing range, and enable it to be fed into the audio input of a soundcard, so a media player's oscilloscope would work?

      A sample-hold should do it. Run the sample-hold at the same frequency that you are running the sound card sampling. Essentially you fold the higher frequencies into the sound cards range and since you are doing an ocilloscope you use software to offset each cycle of sampling and build up your picture of a cycle over several cycles. By the time you had that all figured out you'd be better off with the scope card and software. Especially since the sound card won't do DC-30Hz. Interesting idea though.

      --
      90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
    7. Re:winamp? by p3tersen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can do all kinds of cool things! At my old university we taught a second year physics laboratory in which the students measured the johnson noise temperature of a resistor using a low-noise amplifier plugged into the mic port of the old imacs in the lab. The amplifier transfer functions were determined by feeding the LNA's white noise from the headphone jack! I thought it was such a cool idea to use the sound card in this way.

    8. Re:winamp? by keeboo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      plus i don't know any "winamp-like osciloscope" that stabilizes the waveform.. so what you see is not a pretty standing waveform but something chaotic and not really useful.

      not mentioning that you don't have the V measurement (ok.. i guess you can write in the monitor using a soft pen ;)

      since the guy is mentioning software i assume he doesn't feel (or is not able to) write one himself, so the soundcard option is not a good option for him.

    9. Re:winamp? by Rebar · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Depends on the size of the capacitors on the input side of the sound card - the larger the RC time constant, the lower the frequency signal that can be observed. My old SB compatible card could pick up as low as 3hz signals really easily - I had an animometer hooked directly to it and counted zero-crossings to determine the wind speed. The signal may not be that linear under 20hz, but it's still really easy to see.


      I agree with the parent post about a sound card being a nice classroom demonstration scope. For higher mhz, you can pick up a real scope from Ebay for much cheaper than a PC card solution.

    10. Re:winamp? by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You described a stroboscopic (sampling) oscilloscope. However it has a serious, theoretical flaw - the bandwidth of the signal is still limited to the 20 kHz that the sound card can take in.

      What you are doing is basically undersampling the incoming signal and then assuming that the original falls into one of many aliases that the undersampling generated.

      In other words, if the signal changes while you are sampling and reconstructing it, the change is lost and results in incorrect reconstruction.

      The original poster's question assumes that the PC-based scope is the best solution to his problem. My EE experience tells me that generally you want a standalone scope (you want as many screens as you can get, space be damned.) Teacher's needs, of course, may benefit from the PC-based scope (multicasting the readings to students' computers, for one.)

    11. Re:winamp? by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      Also,

      Because you need sampling at least 5 times the rise time of the signal you want to see. This further limits this technique to a mere 5Mhz.

      Me? I bought a Fluke Scopemeter for $900. Why tie up your laptop?

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    12. Re:winamp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      what you can do is make an 'audio chopper'(easy to make.. see google). get the DC from your electronics and reverse polarity every 1KHz from the DC to make it AC. software can then reconstruct the original DC signal. Works ok (minus some chirps every 1KHz)...

  5. Bankruptcy Auctions! by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Search google for bankruptcy auctions. I'm sure you can find what you're looking for. I work for a biotech that saved 75% of our initial budget by acquiring medical laboratory supplies from six other biotechs that went bankrupt in recent months. We did such a good job, our VC company gave us more than we asked for to buy the rest of what we needed.

    The only thing necessary for Micro$oft to triumph is for a few good programmers to do nothing". North County Computers

    1. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! by bigberk · · Score: 5, Funny
      I work for a biotech that saved 75% of our initial budget by acquiring medical laboratory supplies from six other biotechs that went bankrupt in recent months
      Six others? OMG, and that didn't in the least suggest to you that maybe you're in the wrong kind of business?
    2. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out our business - www.genvault.com. We aren't going anywhere. We're the future of DNA storage. We have medical and biotech companies beating down our doors. GenVault

      The only thing necessary for Micro$oft to triumph is for a few good programmers to do nothing". North County Computers

    3. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 4, Funny
      Six others? OMG, and that didn't in the least suggest to you that maybe you're in the wrong kind of business?
      How many IT companies have gone out of business in recent years? Does that dictate that the upstart firms with financial discipline and valuable products/services should pack up shop and close their doors? Because it's an industry many have failed in?

      Sorry to go off-topic but since the question was about oscilloscopes I felt I had to add a logic probe!

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    4. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least the equipment ended up at auction. Hope none of the biotech "development" ended up in the dumpster out back. Dawn of the Drosophila Melanogaster!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! by MadBiologist · · Score: 1

      Looks like a neat concept...

      Are you hiring? ... j/k, actually I like my job at a pharma...

      Peace!

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    6. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! by MadBiologist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      God.... please don't remind me of them damn things.... everything I know about Developmental Genetics was learned by studing them damn things...

      Only good thing that came of it, was that I realized that biologists are more cracked than IT people... I mean, really, who names genes Spetzle, or Sonic Hedgehog?

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    7. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's wrong in being in the liquidation business? ;)

    8. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm i end up storing most of my DNA in a tissue or old sock sitting around.....

    9. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! by sbb · · Score: 1

      since the question was about oscilloscopes I felt I had to add a logic probe!

      Nice. damn shame I used up my mod points.

  6. Here's a good one by cscx · · Score: 0, Funny

    Here's a good one, I think it's reasonably priced, too! :)

    1. Re:Here's a good one by rco3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Err... I came up with a 5-figure, used, standalone HP.
      Was that supposed to be funny?

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    2. Re:Here's a good one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is not an informative comment - the budget is between $300-$400, and the oscilloscope linked is $21,500 list price - I doubt the used price would be within the budget. Mods, let me remind you that moderation is not a race. Follow the link and pay attention before you assume it's informative. I'll gladly take the karma hit for this if the mods resposnible for this can wake up.

    3. Re:Here's a good one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Coward said:

      I'll gladly take the karma hit for this if the mods resposnible for this can wake up.


      Uh... yeah, whats up with your karma, dude? I allways see you posting at 0. And you post a lot, too..... :rolleyes:

    4. Re:Here's a good one by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Funny

      They've got to be kidding. $21,500 for a machine that runs on Windows? Why would I want an oscilloscope that blue-screens?

    5. Re:Here's a good one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm too busy watching unemployed actors in a spelling bee.

      Hey, that's a great movie! I remember that one. That's when all the unemployed guys compete against each other in a spelling bee, then fuck each other in the ass! Classic comedy right there my friend!

    6. Re:Here's a good one by John+Miles · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Quite a few scopes by both Tektronix and Agilent run Windows these days. Windows can be a reasonable embedded platform. It provides a consistent user interface, saving the equipment manufacturer a lot of software work that's outside their core competency. System stability isn't too bad since the OEM maintains tight control over the drivers and only run one application.

      Not a bad solution, all in all, at least until you hook up an Ethernet cable to transfer some plots and your $20,000 scope gets r00tz0red and drafted into service in the war against SCO.com.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    7. Re:Here's a good one by cscx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't make me tell you about the time a lab full of $70k Tek logic analyzers for a class I took had to be shut down because the douchenozzle sysadmins put the LAs on the Internet with external IPs (no firewall even), yet never thought of patching them. They all got infected with one of the worms.

    8. Re:Here's a good one by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point; Windows obviously does NOT make a reasonable embedded platform when you're dealing with network-connected devices. So why are these hardware manufacturers still using it when so many other options exist? Hell, throw OpenBSD on there and you won't have to worry about security problems.

      For $20,000+, I would expect a lot more than this.

    9. Re:Here's a good one by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quite a few scopes by both Tektronix and Agilent run Windows these days.

      Yeah, and they take just about as long to boot up. It's ridiculous. Anything longer than 2 seconds is unacceptable. I can imagine that a bic lighter will soon be computerized and will require a 30 second boot up just to light a joint...err...cigarette...yeah, that's it.

      --
      What?
    10. Re:Here's a good one by cscx · · Score: 1

      Anything longer than 2 seconds is unacceptable.

      Uhh, most modern scopes that run on even just a small uC will still take 15-20 seconds to run through the self tests.

    11. Re:Here's a good one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't have been very happy with one of these, then...

    12. Re:Here's a good one by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Heh...really...At least it didn't this to run.

      --
      What?
    13. Re:Here's a good one by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      New they are at least 4x that, and yes it is crazy to put a windows 9x device which you can't patch on the network. What we did is put ours on a vlan with the only other device being our SAN device. Then the data dumps were pulled off the SAN device for analysis on either the lab network or engineers desktop workstations.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    14. Re:Here's a good one by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let me re-word that...At least it doesn't need this to run.

      --
      What?
    15. Re:Here's a good one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably runs windows, dosnt have the balls to admit it and trys to pretend he is in some mythical cool crowd by dropping some lame ass old joke.

      I run multiple os's to include windows. frankly how much does it matter, each will do what i want. none is no better than the other. Honestly- i prefer to code on windows- Better return on my time. thats is what matters.

      For those who want open source windows. roll your own. & stop crying. its so damn old

    16. Re:Here's a good one by Endive4Ever · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Back in the day, with even the highest quality most expensive analog scopes, you didn't trust any measurements off them before at least a twenty minute warmup.

      Boy, have things gotten twitchy in tech these days, if a 30 second startup isn't fast enough. Nintendo has spoiled a whole generation.

      --
      ---
    17. Re:Here's a good one by grep_who · · Score: 0

      i havent laughed like this in years!

      on a slightly more serious note: `http://ni.com/dataacquisition/`

    18. Re:Here's a good one by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I work for a company that used to be part of Tektronix (now part of Thomson). Those guys put Windows on everything. It sucks, and it's unstable, but it beats the crap out of whatever they used on their older equipment. Try using a Tek VM700 sometime. We "affectionately" called it the Vomit 700 because it was always puking. Of course then there was the VM700T, the 'T' standing for "Turbo", which just means it pukes faster.

      Seriously, there were some test suites that were so bad that we wouldn't call the Unit Under Test bad unless it failed 3 times in a row. By comparison, Windows isn't so bad.

      In their defense, though, this isn't a consumer electronics company. Their product lines have a long developement time, and to a large extent they're constrained to what was available at the start of the project. For many of them Windows was about all there was if you wanted a nice gui, and in most cases Windows is just the user interface, with all the work actually being done on something like VxWorks or Phar Lapp. The alternative on the ex-Tek products I deal with, which first hit the market in 1996, would have been something like QNX4 or Xenix: functional, but certainly not pretty.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    19. Re:Here's a good one by seadd · · Score: 1
      Windows can be a reasonable embedded platform. It provides a consistent user interface, saving the equipment manufacturer a lot of software work that's outside their core competency. System stability isn't too bad since the OEM maintains tight control over the drivers and only run one application.
      Not always. Take for example recent General Electric ultrasound units - in a hospital where my company installed some software, they had several ultrasounds connected to a local hospital network. As soon as they got connected, they acquired Blaster and promptly stopped functioning, and I'm talking about 100000$ ultrasound machine. Of course, GE had to be contacted and they upgraded the software.
      Still, I'm rather sceptical regarding machines which use embedded Windows, at least until I get firm assurances from service guys.
    20. Re:Here's a good one by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then you can just stick a Linux boot floppy into it and fix it yourself (try it, it really works)!

      --
      On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
    21. Re:Here's a good one by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Did that really happen? It should be +50 funny if it did.

    22. Re:Here's a good one by cscx · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    23. Re:Here's a good one by maduro55 · · Score: 1

      Would that be the douchenozzle ex-sysadmins?

    24. Re:Here's a good one by maduro55 · · Score: 1

      Only if MicroSoft builds it. But i'm sure they would make it user friendly and easily upgradeable to BIC v2.0.

  7. Tax purposes... by teledyne · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a little bit OT, but you can write off any purchases required for work, this includes education. Perhaps writing off that expensive oscilloscope would be equivalent to not writing off a less featured model.

    1. Re:Tax purposes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A = price of the oscillo

      writing off A from your income != writing off A from the tax you have to pay

    2. Re:Tax purposes... by cbelt3 · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could add wheels to the huge rackmount system, and write it off (like the "Free Hummer" ads say). It would have to weigh more than 3 tons (US) e-Trucker.com article

  8. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by msgmonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Price page is here but it looks like it's around $900.

  9. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the link to the price page

  10. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by Kenja · · Score: 1

    They cost a lot.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  11. Try the sound inputs for a demo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For cheap demo purposes, consider using the analog sound ports (line-in). I have had good success doing that for lower speed (44.1K).

    I was looking for a PC based scope but couldn't find quite what I wanted.. I recently bought a used Tektronix 2215 for $50.

    1. Re:Try the sound inputs for a demo by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Informative

      For cheap demo purposes, consider using the analog sound ports (line-in). I have had good success doing that for lower speed (44.1K).

      That's not going to help you display DC and very low frequency signals. In fact, a soundcard's frequency response is un-linear enough that you really don't want to use one for demo purposes.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Try the sound inputs for a demo by sahonen · · Score: 1

      RTFA, he's looking for a scope that will do nearly a thousands times the frequency that your sound card will handle (40 MHz as opposed to 44.1KHz).

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    3. Re:Try the sound inputs for a demo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, a soundcard's frequency response is un-linear enough

      Hrm. Now that would make for an interesting classroom project -- compensating for the non-linear aspects of your equipment. Give it a constant sine wave at all frequencies at the same amplitude and figure out how to compensate for it.

      In fact, I would say that's a better project than hooking up a "real" scope. With this one you actually have to know what's going on and the limits of your equipment.

      It will also teach the students that nothing can be measured with 100% accuracy.

  12. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

    You can get to the price page by clicking the Shop link in the upper right. Looks like US $875.

  13. Like Skee Lo, I wish... by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I sometimes think back to my college days and really regret that I didn't focus more on the hardware side of computer engineering, primarily delving into the Computer Science land of algorithms and language design. In the last several years of my employment in the embedded space, I have come into contact with more hardware than you could shake a stick at, and without that grounding in hardware that I should have gotten in school I feel a little overwhelmed when faced with anything deeper than a block diagram.

    I also wish that teachers like yourself didn't have to worry about providing materials like this within such a tight budget. It doesn't sound like this is just for this year's class, but something that can be used year after year. $300 for a material that can be used multiple times seems very cheap, especially considering the intrinsic value of the tool. Schools should be at liberty to spend what is necessary to bring the classes up to exceptional levels. Considering how the U.S. lags behind most other modern Western nations in Math and Science, such tight-fisting seems to be one significant factor in this drop off.

    Good luck in finding the right tool.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  14. Educational device by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Two thoughts about your question:

    - Do you really need 40MHz for educational purposes? Unless this is a device to be used in a college or higher education class , you can display sub-10KHz signals to teach a class how to use a scope.

    - When I was at school, I learned how to use a real scope, with knobs and buttons and a not-so-perfect green screen, and I reckon it was way better to touch these dials and controls and have a direct feel for what they did on the screen than set some virtual thing and grab perfect-looking samples, to understand how things actually worked.

    In short, any old regular scope that's well explained by the teacher is probably better than any interface+software setup that "isolate" the student from whatever electrical phenomenon he's trying to expose.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Educational device by VegetariMan · · Score: 1

      Tricky balancing cost & needs. On the one hand, it's cool when kids get to learn with the best equipment. On the other hand, something just good enough would still work and leave some cash for the next cool class experiment.

      Of course, then there's always showing up the rival science teacher... :)

      --
      --Nick
    2. Re:Educational device by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the one hand, it's cool when kids get to learn with the best equipment.

      I'm afraid this is one of the greatest misconception in the world education. It's definitely not cool when kids get to learn with the best equipment : kids should learn the basics on simple, self-explanatory equipment. Complication and better equipment can come later, when the basics are understood.

      That's the same reason why, after universities have taught CS students Java, C++ and Visual Basic before C and assembler, and churned out unfinished computer "engineers" for years, us low-level programmers still get high-paying jobs doing the old non-object-oriented, boring un-cool engineering the right way.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:Educational device by Enuteez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you really need 40MHz for educational purposes? Unless this is a device to be used in a college or higher education class , you can display sub-10KHz signals to teach a class how to use a scope.

      They might need the higher bandwidth - seeing what the kids these days are doing in every aspect of technology, blows away anything I ever came close to. A good tech teacher won't stick to old curriculum, but try to expand the class as close to the leading edge as they can.

      As far as getting a scope, I too suggest the "real thing". I bought a 20 Mhz scope at a local utility auction last year, great shape, $100.

      --
      [Protect Deez N-U-Teez]
    4. Re:Educational device by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah! Where do I find one of these "uncool" jobs? I spit upon VB. *spit*

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    5. Re:Educational device by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Informative
      Scope bandwidth - you can never have enough. If your budget is limited, you're better off with a good old analog scope. Digital bandwidth is too expensive. Calculate 10 samples per Hz of the signal that you're sampling. So, if you're looking at a 40 MHz sinewave, you need 400 MSPS. And that's just to roughly make out the shape of the waveform, 800 MSPS would be better. Just imagine what a single period of a sinewave looks like when it's divided into only 10 discrete levels. Looks like a staircase.

      The other thing to consider is the input amplifier bandwidth (this applies both to analog and digital scopes). This is also known as slew rate. It describes how fast the input amp can follow a signal change. Imagine an ideal square wave with zero rise time. It has infinite bandwidth. What does this mean? If the signal has a faster riset time than your input amp, your edges will be smoothed out. If I look at the output of a 40 MHz TTL oscillator (which outputs a squarewave) with my 60 MHz scope, I see what is almost a sinewave. "60 MHz scope" means the scope can display a 60 MHz sinewave. The sinewave is the waveform with the slowest slew rate. All other 60 MHz waveforms will also look like a sinewave on this scope. If you want to analyze square waves, your scope will only show a halfway accurate depiction of the signal if it has upwards of ten times the bandwidth of the signal.

      There are also problems when measuring high bandwidth signals. Above about 80 MHz, you need to use BNC jacks on both sides, properly terminated with 50 Ohms, or the stuff you see on your scope screen will have very little to do with the actual signal. Not many outputs can drive 50 Ohms. You need to build special prototypes of your stuff that are intended for scope measurements. You can't just take a scope to your CPU or stuff like that.

      If I had to make a recommendation, get a 60-100 MHz analog scope in good condition. Tek 465 is a good model.

      If you want to look at digital stuff, get a logic analyzer. There are some interesting DIY projects on the web.

      For higher frequency or RF stuff, a spectrum analyser can't be beat. But good ones cost more than a luxury car. If you're really serious, there are DIY projects on the net for that, too.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    6. Re:Educational device by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Only one problem with what you said there, it almost sounds as if your saying VB, Java, and C++ are the best equiptment and C is not ;) He'll you'd at least be able to get away with it if you took VB out of the list ;)

    7. Re:Educational device by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Very off-topic, but I remember seeing a demonstration 10-15 years ago of the latest Spectrum Analyser, where the salesman made a big deal of the battery backed RAM saving the settings when the device was switched off. One of the older engineers said "we've got that on the analogue spec analysers, we call it a knob."

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    8. Re:Educational device by Aussie · · Score: 3, Funny

      I spit upon VB. *spit*

      no no. Spit on Fosters, VB is drinkable.

    9. Re:Educational device by p3tersen · · Score: 1

      er... so C and assembler are simple and self-explanatory? well, if you say so.... : )

    10. Re:Educational device by gemtech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yep, the last 2 places that I setup a lab in, I've bought a decent digital scope AND a Tek 465 or 475. Sometimes you've got to see the REAL signal, glitches and all.

      --
      Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
    11. Re:Educational device by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Good thing I learned COBOL and JCL before I moved on to C++ and Java. :)

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    12. Re:Educational device by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      For used scopes:http://sphere.bc.ca/test/

      While you are at it, grab some slide rules and Nixie tubes.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    13. Re:Educational device by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

      Starting with assembly language (at the time, there was no other choice for programming embedded devices, which is what I was doing) really gave me an appreciation for the hardware and for what a compiler was actually generating. That's the way I'd begin if I were starting out again today.

    14. Re:Educational device by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1, Informative

      Calculate 10 samples per Hz of the signal that you're sampling
      Why? Remember Nyquist theorem? Yes, you can't get perfectly square filters, but a 10x oversampling is a big overkill.

    15. Re:Educational device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Why wouldn't you begin laying everything out in terms of logic gates? That should really give you an appreciation for what those opcodes are actually doing.

    16. Re:Educational device by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...interface+software setup that "isolate" the student from whatever electrical phenomenon...

      Well... there are certain high-voltage phenomenons I *prefer* to be isolated from. ;)

    17. Re:Educational device by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Informative

      A 465 is good, but a 465B is better. The Tek 465 is about 30 years old now, and the 465B is only 20 years old. I was able to pick up a nice 465B with all manuals and accessories on eBay for $100 recently.

      If the poster really wants a digital oscilloscope, head on over to fpga4fun.com. There's some neat little FPGA projects, based on a little FPGA board the guy designed and is now selling for $50. One of the applications is a digital sampling oscilloscope; it actually looks pretty neat. With the FPGA board and ADC board, it's pretty cheap too.

      --
      ...
    18. Re:Educational device by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The parent poster is correct. The bandwidth of any signal that is not wave goes beyond its lowest spectrum spike. Nyquist equation must be applied to the highest frequency that you want to see.

    19. Re:Educational device by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      The bandwidth of any signal that is not wave goes beyond its lowest spectrum spike.
      I would love to respond, but I couldn't parse this sentence. Could you rephrase?

    20. Re:Educational device by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I accidentally deleted 'sine' after previewing. The sentence should read thus:

      The bandwidth of any signal that is not a sine wave goes beyond its lowest spectrum spike.

    21. Re:Educational device by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it's not. You don't buy digital scope to analyse perfect sinewaves. When you're looking at complex waveforms that might include single events and glitches, you need at least a sampling rate ten times your signal frequency. The only way you get your original signal back if it's been sampled at or near the Nyquist frequency is through interpolation. That might be ok for audio applications, but when you need to extract secondary information from the signal, there's just no way. Ten times is the bare minimum, and Tektronix advertise their scope bandwidth as 1/10th the sample rate.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    22. Re:Educational device by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm wrong about how the "bandwidth" of the oscilloscope is described then. What I had in mind was a signal with bandwidth of 40Mhz. i,e, the highest fourier component would be 40Mhz.

    23. Re:Educational device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did. (I started my degree in 97). The first thing they taught us was logical gates (in electronics), while they were teaching us Pascal in programming.

      It got me a job writing embedded software (ok, not only that but the top guy in the company was impressed that I had actually started with gates instead of going directly into microporcessors).

    24. Re:Educational device by Fizzl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, IMO, that fits to this analogy.
      I too learned using oscilloscope 'the hard way'.

      I think the old analog oscilloscopes are to frequency analysis as assembler is to programming.
      When you use an old oscilloscope you get the feeling you know what you are looking because you have to tune it carefully and actually beforehand know something about what you are trying to look.

      I learned programming first with BASIC on Commodore 64. Then with Visual basic some years later. After that some C. At this point I knew something about how computers (processors namely) work. I gave assembler a shot. I'm not very proficient with it, but I learned more about memory management, registers and other low level stuff. Nowadays learning a new programming language is not a problem. Instruction sets, stack orders, OO theory and procedural theory (to name a few) are just components of programming as a whole. Language doesn't matter.
      I haven't done any project where I would necessarily need assembler to anything, but it eases atleast debugging when you know what the processor is supposed to do when you do a loop, comparison, manage a C structure or class members.

      I'm a curious person. I sometimes reverse engineer binaries just to have a glimpse at some particularly interesting phenomenon in a program. I found it very pleasing when I actually understood the output of a disassembler on the first try.

      I'm also getting increasingly offtopic here, so I'll shut up now. :)

    25. Re:Educational device by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "Why? Remember Nyquist theorem?"

      Nyquist assumes a sine-wave. If your signal has a 1MHz repetition but isn't a sine wave, its highest frequency will be many times larger than 1MHz

    26. Re:Educational device by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      There must be more aussie mods around here than I thought!

      --Joey

    27. Re:Educational device by rjshields · · Score: 1

      That's the same reason why, after universities have taught CS students Java, C++ and Visual Basic before C and assembler

      You seem to have that logic the wrong way round. By that logic, C++ would have to be simpler than C and easier to learn. This is simply not the case, no matter which way you look at it. Surely the fundamentals would be best learned by teaching C and assembly langauge first, then moving on to higher level languages.

      I think you overestimate the skill required to program in C (not the skill required to program well in C, but the skill required to write simple programs). C is a very simple language and does not take a long time to learn. Look at the slim K & R book - it says exactly this in the preface.

      Assembler, on the other hand, is far more difficult and requires an understanding of computer arcitecture - surely this would be the best language to learn first, as the fundamental knowledge aquired would be benificial if one was serious about going on to learn higher level languages.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    28. Re:Educational device by jelle · · Score: 2, Informative

      When people say 'a 40 Mhz scope',they mean a scope with which you can measure signals up to 40Mhz. Sure, nyquist says that you'll need only 80Mhz to sample a 40Mhz bandwith. But for measuring that isn't really what you want:

      The reason why people say you need 10 samples is because if you sample at 80Mhz and view the difference between a 40 and 39 Mhz signal, then the 40Mhz signal will look like a perfect 40Mhz square block signal (*1), and the 39 Mhz signal will look like a 40Mhz square block signal, but where one in every fourty blocks takes twice as long. That is not a good representation of the clean 39Mhz signal at all and it is precisely the reason why you need more than 2 samples per period of the maximum frequency you want to measure with a digital oscilloscope.

      Plus, if you sample a wideband signal at 80Mhz, then you'll either have a lot of aliasing problems around 30-40Mhz, or you will have to deal with the signal attenuation of the lowpass filters in the analog frontend.

      *1: only if the 40Mhz is exactly in phase with the 80Mhz clock of the oscilloscope, which is never the case, hence even the 40Mhz signal will look bad.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  15. Link to 'buy it' page is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try this: http://www.softdsp.com/howtobuy.php

  16. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by Psychotext · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some more info:
    http://www.redacom.ch/messtechnik/softdsp/s ds_more infos.htm

    This site lists the price as US $930.
    http://www.techonline.com/community/tech_gr oup/tan dm/news/31646

    --
    People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
  17. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Here's the price page...

  18. 3 times the highest frequency being measured by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative


    Remember that the oscilloscope bandwidth close to the frequency of the waveform being measured distorts that waveform. (In phase if the frequency being measured is a sine wave.) You need an oscilloscope bandwidth maybe 3 times the highest frequency being measured.

    ICs often have very high potential bandwidths, and, when something goes wrong, even an audio IC can have sometimes have parasitic oscillations at extremely high frequencies. If you are working on a circuit, you need to be able to see those parasitic signals.

    I don't like this fact, because it is expensive, but 100 MHz seems to be a good oscilloscope bandwidth. I bought a very old Tektronix scope to get the needed bandwidth at a reasonable price.

    1. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      it's *5* times the signal.

      see the tektronix documentation, for ex. 2x is the standard shannon-nyquist theory, but to get proper results, go 5x. tek has a huge document on it, quite informative.

    2. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "audio IC can have sometimes have parasitic oscillations at extremely high frequencies. If you are working on a circuit, you need to be able to see those parasitic signals."

      Bah. The highest audio frequencies are around 20KHz. Any used scope you'll find still working probably has a bandwidth of at least 20 MHz. If you're getting oscillations that high, seeing exactly what megahertz frequency is there, ain't gonna help you. Just seeing that the oscillations are there is enough to know where to start looking for problems...

    3. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by MKaufmann · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think it's at least 10 times the signal.

      Imagine a sine wave.
      If you do 2 samples/period, you measure at 0 and 180 degrees and you get a flat line.
      If you do 4 samples/period, you measure at 0, 90, 270 and 360 - resulting in triangular waves.
      If you do 6 samples/period, you measure at 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360 - the result is more like a sine wave, still the amplitude is about 30% off.
      If you do 10 samples/period, the result finally resembles the original (to a certain degree).

      Just take a calc sheet and play around with the values.

    4. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Informative

      The previous poster's logic is flawed. Just because an IC is USED in an audio circuit does not mean the bandwidth of the IC is LIMITED to audio. Case in point, many high gain high bandwidth op amps can and do oscillate at frequencies well above audio if the physical circuit layout supports it. Having an idea of what frequency things are happening at is useful in analyzing what the problem is. And even being able to see the waveshape can give a clue to what is happening. But if it's an RF oscillation, you need good bandwidth on the scope to see details.

    5. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think it's at least 10 times the signal.

      Imagine a sine wave.
      If you do 2 samples/period, you measure at 0 and 180 degrees and you get a flat line.
      If you do 4 samples/period, you measure at 0, 90, 270 and 360 - resulting in triangular waves.
      If you do 6 samples/period, you measure at 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360 - the result is more like a sine wave, still the amplitude is about 30% off.
      If you do 10 samples/period, the result finally resembles the original (to a certain degree).

      Who the fuck modded this Informative?

      This is flat out wrong.

      The sampling theorem is, strictly:
      If a continuous function only contains frequencies within a bandwidth B, it is completely determined by its value at a series of points spaced less than 1/(2B) seconds apart.

      This means that with anything greater than 2 samples you can theoretically reconstruct the continuous bandwidth limited signal. So, your first example is somewhat right, and is why we say "less than 1/(2B)" rather than "less than or equal to" This means 2.1 samples/period or even 2.00001 samples/period is enough.

      You are making a common misconception that the reconstruction of sampled signals is done by plotting points and connecting the dots with a line. This is not the ideal way. Ideal reconstruction looks something like this:
      Sigma(i=0, K, x_i*sinc(pi*(t-t_i)/dt)). Of course this is not a practical reconstruction in real time applications because of the need for "future" data, but with it you can mathematically prove to yourself that one can reconstruct perfectly with any sampling rate greater than twice the maximum frequency.

      You should read up on signal processing.

      The OP was talking about bandwidths as it applies to practical devices which involves stuff having to do with clock jitter and SNR (oversampling can be used to increase effective SNR).

    6. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's 20.

      No, I think it's 40.

      No.. .

    7. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is seemingly logical but incorrect if the sampling is done correctly. If your highest frequency is definately 20 kHz and you sample at 40kHz you can fully reconstruct the original waveform. The reason for this is due to Fourier's observation that ALL periodic signals can be represented by a group of sinusoids.

      Take your example for instance, you take 4 samples per period. Say we sample a sine wave at 100kHz which means the period of the wave would be 25kHz. This results in a plot that looks very much like a triangle wave if one connected the data points with straight lines. However Fourier showed that even waves with points are simply the correct collections of sinusoids with the correct amplitudes. You can see this yourself here. In order to approximate a triangle wave you need quite a few sinusoids starting in frequency at the period of the triangle wave. Thus the only way we could conclude our series of points represent a triangle wave is if there are frequency components in the wave higher than twice what we sampled at.
      To fix this we to remove all the high frequency components. This is the reason when you build a sampling system, you use an anti-alias filter which blocks all frequencies above 1/2 your sampling rate. This way, you know that if the above points are read, they represent a sine wave, and not a triangle wave.

    8. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by sbaker · · Score: 4, Informative

      THe frequency rating of something like a scope refers to the highest frequency sinewave it can reconstruct. Nyquists sampling theorem says that you need MORE than twice the frequency. If you have exactly two samples for one cycle of a sinewave, you can't reconstruct it. However, if you have 2.1 samples - you can.

      You are concerned about reconstructing the details of the shape of the waveform - but that's not at issue here. We're only promising that if you look at a fourier transform of your signal - then the highest component of that that we'll reconstruct must be less than half of our sampling frequency.

      When we are way up there where we have only two-and-a-bit samples, the only shape we can possibly see is a sine wave because anything else would have higher frequency components - and then we are off the hook - we don't have to reproduce those kinds of waves accurately.

      So - the issue is whether you can deduce the phase, amplitude and frequency of a sine wave from just two-and-a-bit samples. Nyquist says you can - and he's right.

      Stop thinking about how you'd draw graphics of a sinewave using only three numbers - this is signal processing - not graph plotting.

      If you want to see a 40MHz square wave, you may well need a 400MHz scope - but for a 40MHz sine wave, a 40MHz scope (which samples at a little over 80Msamples/sec) should be plenty.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    9. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Compuser · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you in most cases but not for this
      application. This is intended for teaching, so it needs
      to be simple, hence reconstructing signals is out.
      There is little simpler than saying: kids, here are
      the dots, connect the dots and you get the waveform.

      The other thing is that the scope is often used in
      situations where it is a causal device, i.e. future
      data is unavailable.

      Lastly, whenever I buy anything related to bandwidth
      I always follow the rule to carefully estimate
      what I need and then buy 2*pi times that. Whether
      you talk about filter boxes, scopes, spectrum
      analyzers or what have you, that extra bandwidth
      or that extra decade attenuation will help somewhere.

    10. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      What happens when the sine wave is sampled at the zero crossing? You'd have no data to reconstruct the original signal.

    11. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      Note that the parent said the samples must be less than one half the wavelength apart. Less than, not less than or equal to.

    12. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you would go read the information on the Bitscope website, you'd learn why it is perfectly possible to view waveforms on a sampling oscilloscope when the sampling frequency is a *fraction* of the waveform bandwidth.

    13. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by calidoscope · · Score: 3, Informative
      The sampling theorem is, strictly:
      If a continuous function only contains frequencies within a bandwidth B, it is completely determined by its value at a series of points spaced less than 1/(2B) seconds apart.

      The key assumption is that the frequencies contained by a signal are indeed limited to a bandwidth B. For example, an NMR Free Induction Decay signal may have a linewidth of 1 kHz, but if you try to use a 1 kHz filter on the signal, it is going to look very distorted (even with a gaussian or bessel filter). The key issue here is that while the decay may have a bandwidth of 1 kHz, the initial rise may have a 50 kHz bandwidth.

      Basically any time you want to maintain reasonable time domain response, you need to use either a gaussian or bessel filter. Neither of these filters has a particularly rapid roll-off and it ends up that a sample rate of 10X of the bandwidth is useful to minimize aliasing.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    14. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly Fourier claimed that all functions had convergent Fourier series. This is false. Dirichlet later proved that a convergent Fourier series existed for functions which had a finite number of discontinuities, and a finite number of maxima and minima on an interval [a, b] with a and b real. Note in particular that continuous is not a sufficient condition.

    15. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by tjb · · Score: 1

      Thank you for saving me the time of pointing out in excruciating detail that most (all, maybe) commercial modems wouldn't work if we needed 10x the Nyquist to reconstruct the waveform.

      Really folks - you only need a touch more than than 2x the Nyquist. If the highest frequency we're interested in is 2 Mhz, then all we need to reconstruct a sine wave at that frequency is a sample rate of 4MHz + some infinitely small amount.

      If you disagree, please take up your argument with the ghost of Claude Shannon.

      Tim

    16. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by spongman · · Score: 1

      Nyquist only works in general if you consider a long duraition (T = 1/lcd(Fin,Fsamp)) of the input. An oscilooscope doesn't have this mathematical luxury, it has to show what it sees right now, hence the innacuracy.

    17. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most informative post ever.

      How could anything as simple as the Nyquist theorem be so widely misunderstoof?

    18. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "many high gain high bandwidth op amps can and do oscillate at frequencies well above audio if the physical circuit layout supports it"

      Bandwidth being inversely proportional to gain when you design that physical op-amp circuit...

    19. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      Nyquists sampling theorem says that you need MORE than twice the frequency. If you have exactly two samples for one cycle of a sinewave, you can't reconstruct it. However, if you have 2.1 samples - you can.

      Actually, you need just twice the sample rate. If you have two samples for a cycle of a sine wave you can reconstruct it. Even if you happen to sample at the zero crossings. See this postingfor a crash course in what's going on. (And I do mean crash.)

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    20. Re:3 times the highest frequency being measured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Grief Charlie Brown!
      Nyquist limit and 2x sample rate is base on the
      knowledge of the waveform you are gonna sample and
      that it's highest frequency component is a sine
      wave.
      If your (thought to be) highest frequency
      component is not a signwave then it is not your
      highest frequency component!!!

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. Not PC by linuxwrangler · · Score: 4, Informative

    OK, I know you asked about PC based scopes but if a plain old scope will do the job consider used.

    A friend of mine bought a couple at a ham radio swap meet from a guy who buys surplus lots. IIRC they were dual-trace and something like 20MHz (he ended up getting one for me and for several other interested friends).

    They were selling for ~$20 which means you could have a scope for every student in a class of 20 and still stay in your budget.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Not PC by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was thinking that one advantage of a PC scope is that you could project it. It would be neat to project that, and then next to it project an enlarged view of what you're doing, say probing a PC board. I don't know if this person is doing this or not but it's certainly one option to consider. Projectors are getting cheaper all the time, they're pretty readily available now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Not PC by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that one advantage of a PC scope is that you could project it

      Ok, an analog scope, an iSight and a projector. You're still much cheaper and you can project any other thing that you might want.

    3. Re:Not PC by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      You can also take a webcam and fix it against the scope screen, then project the webcam image. I did something similar when I need a consultation with an overseas colleague (though it wasn't realtime but sending digital photographs of the scope screen, but it wouldn't be a problem to make it into streaming video).

  21. Must it be PC-based? by Hayzeus · · Score: 5, Informative
    You can generally get excellent deals on analog, non-pc based scopes on eBay. I use a Tektronix 2235 100mz dual trace unit that only ran me around USD $200 -- and this was a few years ago.

    I also have an Ozi-Fox handheld that has a PC and/or palm-based interface. It only does 20mhz and is single trace, but they are fairly inexpensive (< $90.00 USD) -- you could buy multiple units for classroom use. The display on the unit itself is not great, but works well for quick-and-dirty work.

    Good luck -- m

    1. Re:Must it be PC-based? by per+unit+analyzer · · Score: 1
      Ditto on the Tek 2235 recomendation, or any 2200 series 'scope for that matter. I learned on a 2235 in high school. (Of course it was one of the newest portable 'scopes available at that time...) I've used a lot of different scopes, both analog and digital, and the 2235 is still hands down my favorite. It's a great general-purpose instrument that is easy to use, perfect to learn and grow on.

      I know the original poster asked for a PC-based instument and he may have a good reason, but I obviously fall into the non-PC-based crowd. Good used scopes are available at cheap prices, there's no reason the kids can't use the real thing. Yes, PC-based instruments have some unique capabilities, but most of those features are overkill or a distraction in a high school classroom.

      --zawada

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the Beowulf cluster imagines you!
    2. Re:Must it be PC-based? by Technician · · Score: 1

      Don't overlook the inexpensive DSO's. The Tektronix TDS200 series can take a communications module. With it you can easly printscreen directly to a printer or a file. (Tektronics wanted a small fortune for the software to export the screen captures, but search the web for 3rd party free utilities.) I use mine for comparison of long term drift of aging. Printing to a file or transparancies makes overlays of pre-failure signal degradition a simple matter. Using it to produce classroom materials would be simple as the screen prints include all the on screen markers and sweep and gain settings. It makes student set-up of the scope for matching expected results an easly understood concept.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  22. How bad are "soundcard" o-scopes? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I haven't messed with it in a while, so I don't even know if there is software out there for modern OS's. But back in the day, if you are willing to use a real pc as your input device, and get a "good" sound card; with a high SN ratio and some software to be a "cheap scope".

    After all, a DSO is "just" a D/A, and the input of sound cards is the same.

    Maybe the sample rate on sound cards is not high enough, but the specs on some of the latest SoundBlaster (creative labs) cards are impressive (106dB...).

    If you really need a good scope, you'll likely have to spend money. But if you are a hobbiest who just needs to see basic waveforms, maybe there is some good, cheap software out there that takes advantage of commodity soundcard hardware?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:How bad are "soundcard" o-scopes? by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 2, Informative

      106dB isn't a sample rate, that's gain...

      I think the real issue with using a soundcard *is* the sampling frequency (44kHz? 96kHz maybe?) and you'll probably let out the magic smoke if you plug more than a few volts into it so you need some sort of voltage divider there for many signals. Plus I don't know how much filtering is done on the line-in side.

      That said I'd say it may be more cost effective to get some used stuff. I spent about $100 on ebay for an old Tek 465. 100MHz, good condition. And I can jam the probes into a wall socket with no worries. Good enough for most of my purposes. In college we had nice digital storage scopes (and at work we've got the fancy color ones) so now I've been spoiled. But I think if you're gonna teach kids how to use a scope it's best to use the real thing. I like the nice clicky knobs on the old Teks.

    2. Re:How bad are "soundcard" o-scopes? by genixia · · Score: 2, Informative
      One thing that everyone overlooks with a soundcard 'scope'. It's AC coupled only - there is no way to measure DC offsets.
      The other thing that should be mentioned is the fact that the line input doesn't exactly qualify as calibrated. Whilst this doesn't always matter too much, it is still a limitation. You'd need a good known signal level (AC signal, obviously) to provide any form of (non-NIST-traceable) calibration.

      Also, don't forget that the input range is very limited. In order to provide a useful voltage range you'd need to build an instrumentation amplifier. This entails time, money and effort. By the time you've added a couple of useable probes, you've spent over $100 for a 2 channel 22KHz bandwidth non-calibrated AC-coupled only scope.And we haven't even discussed software :o

      Personally, I think that trawling ebay is a much better proposition. I know from experience, having built a soundcard scope previously. After a few months trawling ebay I hit the jackpot and won a poorly described auction resulting in a Tek TDS360 for about $150. It also came with a Tek PS280 power supply and a BK Precision 4040A. Yep, about $3200 from reputable dealers...

      Granted, that was a case of extreme luck, but if you're patient and you brush up on your ebay searchfu you should still do way better than a soundcard scope.

      There are some reasonable PC-based scopes, (eg the Bitscope mentioned in the submitted article), but second hand Tektronix scopes from ebay are still better value IMO.

    3. Re:How bad are "soundcard" o-scopes? by dfranks · · Score: 1

      The other problem with sound card o-scopes is that most sound cards have a high pass filter on the inputs (dc blocking). This creates weird phase at low frequencies and makes them totally useless at DC -> 20hz or so.

    4. Re:How bad are "soundcard" o-scopes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      106dB in the case he's mentioning is actually most likely the quoted signal/noise ratio.

      dB is a logarithmic measure of a ratio; sometimes it measures gain, sometimes it doesn't.

    5. Re:How bad are "soundcard" o-scopes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After a few months trawling ebay I hit the jackpot and won a poorly described auction resulting in a Tek TDS360 for about $150.


      I hope you choke.

      j/k

    6. Re:How bad are "soundcard" o-scopes? by genixia · · Score: 1

      Hehe, You have no idea how good it felt when that auction finished. I wasn't the only bidder, but the other bidders obviously weren't that interested or had forgotten. I was convinced that I was going to get sniped well beyond my maximum in the final minutes. I know I got lucky.

    7. Re:How bad are "soundcard" o-scopes? by tftp · · Score: 1
      Plus I don't know how much filtering is done on the line-in side.

      Most likely, the LPF cuts away everything above 20 kHz. This is because when sampling at 44.1 kSa/s you can't allow anything faster than 22.05 kHz to come through - this will mess up your A/D process in no time.

      The proper solution is to have switchable filters before the A/D. The filter must be matched to the A/D sampling rate. However I don't think anyone makes it this way, it's awfully expensive and won't be appreciated (or even comprehended!) by 99.999% of computer users out there. Musicians, OTOH, are served by a completely different breed of hardware, and they sample at 96 kSa/s.

  23. Why PC tethered? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems people on slashdot are a bit overeager to buy PC based devices that can't be used as a standalone device. So far that I've seen, the benefits are mostly just cost, at the expense of portability, usability and quality.

    I'd just find a real scope on surplus somewhere.

    I just have a 'scope on "loan" from a local EE guy. Just an analog one. Effectively it is mostly a gift, but there are times he wants an analog scope so he wanted the understanding that he can get it back on occasion. For most uses, a digital one does fine.

    1. Re:Why PC tethered? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      At work back in the mid 80's my boss got the great idea of using the money budgeted for a Digital Storage Oscilloscope on an ISA card 'scope and a PC instead. He figured 'we get a PC out of the deal, then, too.'

      The software that came with the card was really pathetic. I remember it having sluggish response and just sorta jumping the resolution by big increments.

      And the PC that we got with it was a very overpriced AST 10 MHz 286 job. Obsolete within a year of us getting it.

      If we'd bought a real DSO it would probably still be being used somewhere. Instead we bought a junk card (which I actually have stored away somewhere). The card was like $4000 when it was new.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Why PC tethered? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A good PC-based device allows storing the waveform. This makes documentation much easier. Scope cameras are a nuisance and using them a lot runs into significant film costs. Standalone digital oscilloscopes with storage capabilities are less convenient and not cheap.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:Why PC tethered? by Technician · · Score: 1

      My non-tethered scope is a DSO (budget Tektronics TDS series) that can save internaly two waveforms that can later be downloaded to a PC for student material creation.

      Look for a TDS 200 series. Mine is dual channel, dual timebase, with onscreen markers and settings. It's a few years old now. Look for them on the used market. I spent the extra to get the printer/communications module. It doens't mean a PC tether. The save/retrieve is one of the more useful functions.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Why PC tethered? by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Did some smaller-scale experiments with taking pictures of the scope screen by a digital camera. If you got a camera that allows manual setting of the exposition time, you're set. No film costs.

  24. Did you look all that hard? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is not difficult to find a veritable mount of cheap oscilloscopes on eBay. You say you only need it for demonstration purposes, so why do you need something shiny and new? It can even be argued that the older analog oscilloscopes are better than newer digital ones. As always, resort to eBay if you need something not so good, and fairly cheap. Chances are you can find it there.

    1. Re:Did you look all that hard? by Kludge · · Score: 1

      It can even be argued that the older analog oscilloscopes are better than newer digital ones.

      I think that would be a pretty damn hard argument. When I went to school the only thing they had were analog scopes. Now as a professional I use only digital scopes, and there is no comparison. Having storable digital data far exceeds the usefulness of a flash on the screen in every way.

  25. Found their price list by Professor_Quail · · Score: 2, Informative

    I found their price list page through the google cache...seems like their stuff is out of his price range, but here's the link anyhow:
    SoftDSP Price List

  26. Audio Frequency Freebie by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Informative

    If a 2 channel audio frequency scope is all you need, then Oscilloscope 2.5 for Windows might do the trick. It uses the inputs on a standard sound card to grab 2 channels at up to 20 kHz. Disclaimer: I've not used it and a bit of Googling may find better alternatives.

    Its slow, but is free (assuming you have the sound card).

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Audio Frequency Freebie by unfies · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've got limited voltages when using a sound card based solution. Free is good, but it's usability is near nil. Not to mention that a sound card's dsp may muddle the input.

      RS232 is 9-11 volt in of itself...

      Also, if they're doing PIC or 8051 work, having at least a MHz or 10MHz scope is handy to follow any of the bus / etc lines.

  27. MHz vs. MSPS by MKaufmann · · Score: 1

    What do you mean with "40 MHz"? 40 million samples per secord (MSPS) or signals with 40 MHz?

    Did you know, that for displaying an 40MHz signal you need a DigiScope with at least(!) 400MSPS? If you go below, you can only display the frequency, but not the waveform (and for just measuring frequencies there are cheaper devices).

    Markus

    1. Re:MHz vs. MSPS by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't need 10x samples for most things. You need around 5x to catch most transient events. You only need 2x to make a waveform per Nyquist.

      Most digital scopes do a sort of interpolation when the frequency is above Nyquist, they will sample the signal for several periods and reconstruct what the waveform looks like, this works with any repeating signal, but when you use this you can't catch transient events, for that you do need a sampling rate several times the base frequency.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:MHz vs. MSPS by MKaufmann · · Score: 1

      Nyquist is not about waveforms but about frequencies. I still think you need 10x samples, especially for a school where many unexperienced people are.

      These interpolation (subsampling) is a nice feature - if you have repeating signals. But why would one buy a digiscope for repeating signals?

    3. Re:MHz vs. MSPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nyquist is about waveforms. If you don't understand the relation between waveforms and frequencies, then you and I are just going to have to drop this conversation right now.

      You need 2x samples to capture a waveform. Mathematically. However, we are in the real world, and 5x is considered generally adequate. Truthfully, most engineers won't let a 40MHz scope anywhere near a 40MHz signal; equipment doesn't tend to perform optimally at its edges.

      As to why buy a digiscope for repeating signals: data capture is nice. Especially when you can capture raw sample values and spit them into MATLAB to do some serious data analysis. Also, there's the fact that you can't buy new analog scopes anymore. Finally: most DSOs will also function as a spectrum analyzer. Which is great on your repeating signals.

    4. Re:MHz vs. MSPS by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Heh, well I was going to reply, but the AC summed it up nicely.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:MHz vs. MSPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's looking for an analog scope your question is irrelevant.

    6. Re:MHz vs. MSPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Truthfully, most engineers won't let a 40MHz scope anywhere near a 40MHz signal; equipment doesn't tend to perform optimally at its edges.


      I tend to be conservative when specing and err on the side of safety.

      That being said, the bandwidth of a scope is typically not the 3db point it is like 1db or thereabouts (at least with Tek specs).

    7. Re:MHz vs. MSPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Nyquist is not about waveforms but about frequencies.

      These interpolation (subsampling) is a nice feature - if you have repeating signals. But why would one buy a digiscope for repeating signals?


      You need to read a book on signals. You sound like an idiot (you made some other nonsense claims in an earlier post).

      Mathematically (forget scopes for a second), one can reconstruct a bandwidth limited continuous function perfectly (exactly) from anything more than 2 samples per hertz. Anything greater than 2 samples (2.00000000000000000001 samples for example, 3 samples, 4 samples) is enough to reconstruct a continuous signal. You don't need 5 or 10 or 20.

      Read this and stop sounding like a moron

      You need to learn the math about signal reconstruction. Hint: you don't reconstruct a sampled signal by connecting the samples with lines (though this is one way to do it, you have already discovered it is limited) Instead, you feed the samples through a general reconstruction which you can derive. The ideal reconstruction function requires an indeterminate amount of data from the future which means that it cannot be used for realtime processing applications. There are other reconstruction formulas that are well suited to realtime or computing constrained applications. You should look at the Proakis book or some other good signal processing book for information.

    8. Re:MHz vs. MSPS by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 1
      It is all too frequent to confuse the bandwidth of a scope (or the frequency of a sampling process) with the fundamental operating frequency of the system under test.

      If I have a digital system running with a 50MHz (nominally square wave) clock, and I put a 50MHz bandwidth scope onto the clock, I will see a 50MHz sine wave. That gives me some information, but not much more than the fact that the signal is present, and has some approximate amplitude.

      To actually see the squareness (or lack of it) of the 50MHz square wave, I need to add an infinite series of odd harmonics (150MHz, 250MHz, 350MHz, ...) of decreasing amplitude: sin(n*x)/n, n=1, 3, 5, ...

      To get a meaningful idea of whether I have impedance mismatches between source, transmission line, and load (causing reflections and thus clock glitches, or clock to signal skew or jitter), I could need a scope with at least 350MHz bandwidth to see what is really happening in those crucial few nanoseconds of the signal transitions. In digital terms, this would mean a sampling rate of at least 700MHz.

    9. Re:MHz vs. MSPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truthfully, I would expect a 40MHz scope to sample at 2-400MSa/s.

      aQazaQa

  28. Windoze luzers with Tektronix 2400-series DSOs.... by John+Miles · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... can download free/open-source plotter emulation software at http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx/misc/7470.zip. This may be helpful to you if you buy an older scope from eBay. It will let you grab screenshots, overlay them, print them, and save them in several formats including their original HP/GL-2 plotter language. You can see some typical screen captures at http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx/synth.html.

    I use a Tek 2430A on my own bench. These are great scopes -- you can get 150 MHz bandwidth for about $400-$600. A National Instruments GPIB adapter to interface it to the PC will set you back another $100.

    I'm trying to add support for as many instruments as I can to this package. Any interested parties should feel free to email me...

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  29. Try the USRP by gustaffo · · Score: 5, Informative

    If my understand is correct, some of the guys from the GNU Radio Project have developed a USB based software radio device that works with in linux. It is called the Universal Software Radio Peripheral. I think the first prototypes have shipped. The cost is pretty close to your price range. You can see it in action running an oscope program here. And of course it can be extended to do many more exciting things.

    1. Re:Try the USRP by dfranks · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except that afaik it will not provide any triggering capability (other than software pseudo-trigger). This may be partially offset by the ability to record really long sample sequences.

  30. Bitscope by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since no one who's replied has answered your question, instead choosing to talk about unrelated things, I have to say that I'd go with the Bitscope.

    Visit #electronics (our electronics+open source channel) on irc.freenode.net if you want to discuss.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Bitscope by jpetts · · Score: 1

      I was just about to suggest this one myself, so
      mod me -1 redundant if you wish. However, feel free to balance the mods as I give the link to the BitScope. A great instrument...

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    2. Re:Bitscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The network adapter option is very cool as well. Plus the interface protocol is well documented and easy to use.

  31. nyquist frequency by jonniesmokes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Missionary Man asks: "I'm an electronics teacher... ...Ideally I'd like something with a bandwidth of up to 40MHz and 2 channels.


    The bitscope only has a 40MS/s data aquisition rate. Assuming that that's for both channels - 20MS/s each, then your left with a nyquist of 10Mhz. And you really need to oversample a waveform a lot more than x2 to see what it looks like. The analog bandwidth of the bitscope is high, but the A/D conversion will result in a lot of aliasing. That said. Its a really impressive unit for $400.00. I didn't think you could find something nearly that fast for under $700. Not exactly what you're looking for.

    The software for a scope is pretty important - but without the raw A/D speed and resolution you won't get very far.

    1. Re:nyquist frequency by levin · · Score: 1

      Actually, the _nyquist_ freqency would be 20MHz, the maximum you should be able to sample would be 10MHz (1/2 the nyquist freqency). But you're right, you need significantly more than this to prevent fold aliasing. I'd guess ~ 7MHz actual maximum sampling frequency.

      --

      `which fortune`
  32. ATTENTION MR. SENSE OF HUMOR by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, that was supposed to be a joke. That is probably one of the highest-end oscilloscope anywhere in the world.

    It's funny. Laugh.

    1. Re:ATTENTION MR. SENSE OF HUMOR by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Oh, sorry. I work with a rack full of $20,000 scopes, and didn't realize that there was anything special about that one. 50 GHz is nice, though.

      Perhaps, next time, parent poster could include some sort of sign that it was supposed to be funny; perhaps, say, some humor? Just a suggestion...

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    2. Re:ATTENTION MR. SENSE OF HUMOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, sorry. I work with a rack full of $20,000 scopes, and didn't realize that there was anything special about that one. 50 GHz is nice, though.

      Perhaps, next time, parent poster could include some sort of sign that it was supposed to be funny; perhaps, say, some humor? Just a suggestion...


      rco3 just needs a hug.

    3. Re:ATTENTION MR. SENSE OF HUMOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      So the smiley at the end of his comment didn't tip you off to the potential for humorous content?

    4. Re:ATTENTION MR. SENSE OF HUMOR by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Smiley? Hell, he could have included a link to a laugh track - it still wasn't funny.

      "Dear Slashdot - I'm looking for a basic commuter car, good gas mileage, my budget is less than $1000. Any suggestions?"

      Grandparent poster: " Here's one! [links to 1959 Cadillac Hearse, ground-up restoration, $30,000] Bwa-ha-HA! Made you look!"

      See? Not funny there, either. Unless you're 8 years old.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  33. Re:Educator? by NoseBag · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ya left one out. Write/go to any local company doing e-tech type manufacturing or engineering. Ask if they'll donate their old obsolete eqpt that they've already written off. I've never been in an engineering lab yet that didn't have at least one dinosaur in it.

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  34. Hey - can anyone find the price page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think that somone could and would post a link.

  35. Try DRMO for some HPIB/GPIB compatible gear by pvera · · Score: 4, Informative

    DRMO = Defense Reutilization Marketing Office

    This is the military agency that sells surplus equipment to the public. They usually have stuff like what you need.

    If you can find something that has a HPIB/GPIB bus connector (IEEE-488) then you can connect it to a PC and use program your own interface (the libraries are very simple and very well documented). We did this both in the Army and also at a commercial satellite communications company (ours was to interface with HP spectrum analyzers thru IEEE-488).

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
    1. Re:Try DRMO for some HPIB/GPIB compatible gear by lovswr · · Score: 1

      I wanted to suggest the DRMO but I just could not remember those damn initials. BAck in 91' when I was stationed in the Deutschelande, we (367th Signal Company) got to evaluate the then top of the line Hp & Tektronix 'scopes. We ended up keeping them both. they were about 40,000 US then (if memory serves) & I would imagine that the DRMO must have ample supply of those & similar such beasts. As an aside we also got a top of the line HP FM generator. Since we were on top of a mountain the implulse to jam AFN (at O' dark-thirty on a Saturday night) was irresistable.

    2. Re:Try DRMO for some HPIB/GPIB compatible gear by rainwalker · · Score: 1

      You do have to be careful with the DRMO...my former analytic chem professor bought a GC from them two years ago, spent hundreds of dollars having the huge crate shipped to the university, and it turned out to be a broken FT-IR. They also don't do returns, so he was just screwed. They have good prices, though...

    3. Re:Try DRMO for some HPIB/GPIB compatible gear by cnvogel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and the old PCIIa GPIB-interface cards for the PC (they have a 8bit ISA bus!) are supported by linux-gpib since not long ago!

      http://linux-gpib.sourceforge.net/

      They are no longer supported by national instruments since windows 3.11/DOS, so you can get them very cheap (or for free) and they work very well under linux!

    4. Re:Try DRMO for some HPIB/GPIB compatible gear by pvera · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right, I was stationed in Landstuhl (in Kaiserslautern) in '93-'97 and our HP Spectrum Analyzers were $60K or worse.

      We also were tempted to jam the satellites but the problem was that the guy at DISA that ran the SATCOM network was a legendary ass and it was not worth the trouble to mess with him. His teletype initials were "HB" which we interpreted for "Hairy Balls."

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    5. Re:Try DRMO for some HPIB/GPIB compatible gear by pvera · · Score: 1

      They also work well on older versions of Windows, since the card did most of the hard work you never really needed a very strong PC. We were doing satellite network analysis on a P133 with a little bit of ram and it ran beautifully, and this was on VB6 which was super bloated!

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
  36. 2340A ... by __aadkms7016 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Happy memories of my 2340A, but I dunno if I
    would recommend spending cash to buy one on
    the used market ... they ran so hot, and their
    mean-time-to-failure reflected it. We had a few
    dozen under our control (research lab + class lab),
    and there would always be a few with little yellow
    Post-Its on them waiting to be sent out for repair.

    1. Re:2340A ... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      None of the Tek 2400 series scopes are worth buying unless you already have one you're trying to keep going. The line that produced the Integrated Circuits in the 2400 series was shut down years ago and none of the custom ICs in that series have been available for that many years. You see people on sci.electronics.equipment once in awhile trying to keep a Tek 24xx 'scope going. Why bother? They were nice, as in 'slick while on a maintenance contract at a business', but a nightmare and a serious mistake for a hobbyist to have anything to do with. Unless, as I said, you've got a storeroom full of them.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:2340A ... by John+Miles · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, my 2467 has 12,000 operating hours on it. But I'm sure it will vanish in a puff of smoke any day now.

      (The 2430s occasionally have CCD or trigger hybrid failures, but they're nowhere near as common as the U800 failures in the analog 2400 scopes. Whole different kettle of fish.)

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  37. Re:Like Skee Lo, I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a recient High school graduate, I think a schoool even haveing a program that teaches about electronics is an improvement. Hell my chemistry class was all books, they couldn't even afford to buy the chemicals! If this isn't bad enough we also have the highest school tax in the state!

  38. SoftDSP Digital Oscilliscope by francisew · · Score: 5, Informative

    softdsp.com
    I bought one two years ago (around 800$ canadian)
    it's pretty good, does 200 MHz / (5 GigaSamplesPerSecond equiv., whatever that means), two channel, USB.
    The software isn't great. I don't think there is a linux port... I'm lazy, haven't checked recently.
    The actual device is really sweet. If I haven't blown it up in two years, it is pretty solid! (I'm a chemist, and I do things like attach 400V power supplies to it randomly, I'll feel bad if it dies. Or me.)
    Good luck!

    1. Re:SoftDSP Digital Oscilliscope by sploxx · · Score: 1

      > GigaSamplesPerSecond equiv.
      IMHO, this means that for *periodic* signals, the time resolution is 5GSPS. This "equivalent" rating works only for periodic signals. You sample a well-triggered periodic signal with, say, 100MSPS but each sampling step, you shift the trigger point by a few ns. By combining all the traces (done by the software in your scope/PC), you can get a high virtual resolution.

      But for me, these "equivalent" ratings sound like "interpolated Pixel" ratings - marketing speak.

  39. Re:Cheap PC Oscilloscopes by unitron · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...type "Cheap PC Oscilloscopes" into the search box and click "Search".


    If you google for "Cheap PC Oscilloscopes" with the quote marks included all you get is a link to this article.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  40. Labview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you really want to give your students a head start, I'd suggest finding any cheap scope with a GPIB interface and get an educational copy of the LabView software

    http://www.ni.com/academic/edu_dsct.htm

    (you should double check that the educational version actually supports GPIB because I don't recall if it does).

    There's a hell of a lot of corporations out there that use LabView for all their test equipment, so there's a good chance your students will run into it when they get jobs.

    1. Re:Labview by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Noooo! Noooo! LabView is kinda the Visual Basic of automated instrumentation.

      It looks slick on the surface, and you can do a heck of a lot with it, but it's layer-ware, meaning that people start something, then just glop more on top of it. Makes it a horrible nightmare to have to go in after-the-fact and figure out what the hell they were doing. And it's like 100% GUI-diddle. You have to poke around with your mouse to use it.

      There are good free software alternatives based on regular coding. Use Gnuplot for waveform display, for instance.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Labview by sensei_brandon · · Score: 1

      I fucking hate labview! The programming style is obfuscating as hell and yeah, it is 100% gui twiddling. That and a GPIB card is hella expensive, IIRC. But the student version of labview DOES support GPIB, as I had to use it in my EE 102 class.

    3. Re:Labview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >corporations out there...use LabView...
      >your students will run into it...

      Unfortuneately.

  41. two words by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    Schools should be at liberty to spend what is necessary to bring the classes up to exceptional levels.

    I have two words for you: lowest bidder.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
    1. Re:two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have two words for you: lowest bidder.

      Hey, well counted! You didn't go to an American school then ;-)

  42. PCI based oscope by Triode · · Score: 5, Informative

    Many people make them, and they are real oscopes on
    a PCI card... but the ones I have used were GaGe...

    http://www.gage-applied.com/

    Should not be too pricey, and I think they have
    educational discounts. They are the best option
    I have seen to get a real oscope in a computer, and
    the sampling rate and digitization will beat a sound card hands down.

  43. Take a trip down to your local electronics swap... by Ho+Kooshy+Fly · · Score: 4, Informative

    Personally you have to be careful about many of the "PC" based scopes that are out there. They usually suffer from bad analog bandwidth and short memory depth. Also you have to pay particular attention to many of the voltage/impendance limits of "PC" scopes.

    Personally taking a trip down to your local electronics swap meet is not a bad idea if you have one nearby. Hear in SiValley there are a few around on the weekends where you get some older Tek/HP *cough* Agilent scopes for pennies on the dollar. Sometimes they need some work but most people are honest about it.

    -Ho

  44. It's at the top of your range by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    This looks like a decent hardware version of what you wanted, they say it takes a bit of time to warm up, but you can't beat the price. Oh and hardware o-scopes rule, but cost a ton. There are lots of other o-scopes for sale on ebay. It's one of the few tech areas that seems to have some regular bargains, that and old workstations from anyone other than SGI, who has more sex appeal than apple.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  45. PCS500 **is** $400 USD!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the prices for the PCS500 that you put the link with... it's $535 CDN, which is approx $411 USD... right in your price range!!!

  46. National Instruments LabVIEW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are planning on using this setup for educational purposes try getting in touch with National Instruments. They may be able to get you set up with a data aquisition card and copy of their LabVIEW software.

    I was a TA for junior and senoir level mechanical engineering laboratory courses at a major university where students used this type of system for many applications and a minimal cost to the univesity. The LabVIEW software makes it very easy to design your own "virtual instruments" as well.

  47. I don't get it. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Why do you need 40 MHz?

    There isn't anything you can do at 40 MHz on an o-scope that you can't do at 2 MHz that won't be sufficient as a demo for the kids.

  48. Old dupe by JohnMadison · · Score: 1

    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/07/19 1220&mode=thread

    --
    ciao
  49. Radio Shack (don't laugh) by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember some years back that radio shack had a serial (DB-9 interface) probe with oscilloscope PC software - for about $100.

    I don't think that this would have the range that you wanted, but I am sure that this would have it's place.

    By the way, did anyone here have one ?

    http://www.iamsam.com

  50. Bitscope bandwidth to 100MHz with 40MS/s ??? by dgmckay · · Score: 1

    I looked at the Bitscope web site, and they claim a bandwidth of 100MHz but they sample at a maximum of 40MS/s. This doesn't even make sense by the lower limit of Nyquist, where you need to sample at twice the frequency. In this case, the bandwidth would be only 20MHz. Am I missing something?

    1. Re:Bitscope bandwidth to 100MHz with 40MS/s ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep; equivalent-time sampling. Nyquist only applies to one-shot sampling.

    2. Re:Bitscope bandwidth to 100MHz with 40MS/s ??? by dgmckay · · Score: 1

      OK, so there's an apples and oranges thing going on with the specifications. For equivalent time sampling, the signal needs to be periodic (ie. no audio waveforms, well... maybe techno, hehe).

    3. Re:Bitscope bandwidth to 100MHz with 40MS/s ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears they discuss this issue at the BitScope website here

  51. Used Scopes by photonX · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know if you are considering used or not, but if you are...

    SurplusShed is a site where I've bought optics from time to time, but they carry some electronics also.

    To quote the website:

    http://www.surplusshed.com/pages/item/r1456.html

    This is a powerful 100 Mhz oscilloscope with 5 channels and 12 traces. It has a four way trigger off either channels 1, 2, 3, or ALT. Trigger lock for stable automatic triggering for complex signals such as video waveforms. Can display several Lissajous patterns at the same time. 5 mV to 5 V per division (1 mV with magnifier) and 2% accuracy. Sweep speeds are 20 ns to 500 ms. This is the scope that is being used in production, testing, R&D, and home shops because of its versatility and portability. Tested and in good working condition. Complete manual copy included. Only have a few."

    Oops, forgot to grab the price, but it is around US $225

    --
    Anti-gravity? That was *my* little secret! But I never patented it! Boy, was *that* dumb!
  52. Reaktor by plams · · Score: 2, Informative
    Native Instrument's Reaktor may be a musicians tool, but it includes most of the building blocks for making oscillatory tools, too. It's like LEGO, but for making DSP thingies. Since most soundcards record at least 44.1 khz (and you need 40khz) it may be a solution. Of course, if you're trying to analyze signals stronger than signals within "line signal" range (+/- a few volts) your soundcard may not be appropiate - though you should be able to normalize the signal with some rudimentary electronics :-). Also, if you need a log of the recorded signal, Reaktor can't help you. Otherwise, it probably shouldn't take long to write an ALSA application for your needs.

    That's what a hacker do - take some existing tech and use it in new ways. If you can live within the frequency range of sound (up to 96khz, for most cards) a sound card is an excellent tool for signal analysis. Plus: there's already many tools and libraries out there for audio manipulation - Heck! you could probably even write the software for you needs in Python!

    1. Re:Reaktor by plams · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Mod me down. I read 40Mhz as 40Khz. Sound cards wont do any good here. I must be drunk or something:)

  53. Bitscope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Bitscope is an excellent choice. 100Mhz, net enabled, also has a built-in function generator, deep capture, logic analyzier. Very cool.

  54. Labview and a DAC Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    You can try using Labview and one of their DAC cards. Labview comes with a bunch of oscilloscopes already pre-made, it will also do fourier transforms for you as well. I don't know the bandwidth off the top of my head, but I don't understand why you would need something with a huge bandwidth...

    I've almost done an electrical engineering degree, and we've never had to use a scope to measure something that would exceed the normal bandwidth of an oscilloscope! Surely to teach electronics you wouldn't need something that big either. : /

    Labview is a powerful too in the right hands, and could be useful for many things beyond a simple oscilloscope!

  55. Yeah, Um... by dupper · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have no experience or contact with oscilloscopes, so would someone please inform me why they cost so damned much, even used (and up to friggin $20K, new!). Yeah, thanks.

    1. Re:Yeah, Um... by jjsjeff · · Score: 1

      Because the quality of your instrument determines how well you engineer the product. Same way w/ hardware programmers. The faster you can program the chips the more money you can make since the market is based on volume not selling 1 product ata time.

      -J

    2. Re:Yeah, Um... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Generally, good oscilloscopes need to be of a significantly higher quality than the usual electronics most people are exposed to. Therefore, they are expensive. It also helps keep the price up that they're a much lower-volume product than consumer electronics.

      What I'm amazed at is how cheap older 'scopes are these days. I got a fast 7000 series mainframe, a few fast dual trace plugins, and even the fast differential-comparator plugin recently at auction. The mainframe was $5 and the plugins were $5 apiece. I sold off a half dozen of the plugins on eBay for more than that and paid for the whole purchase.\

      I remember us paying more than $13,000 for a similar medium-end 7000 series scope back in the 80's.

      I guess I like it that they're not teaching the twitch-generation how to use good old analog scopes, since it means they're considered 'worthless' in today's commercial labs, and I get them for almost nothing. Still it's sad, because digital 'scopes suck at so many things.

      --
      ---
    3. Re:Yeah, Um... by plcurechax · · Score: 1

      I have no experience or contact with oscilloscopes, so would someone please inform me why they cost so damned much, even used (and up to friggin $20K, new!).

      Target market: High end 'scopes like a digital storage oscilloscopes are made for a target market of an electronic engineering company, or electronic test centres, not your local (radio) ham or TV repair person. So does a company worry about spending $20K for a piece of equipment to sit on the desk of a $75-150K EE who is desinging something expected to make millions of dollars profit? No.

      Oscilloscopes are built to last, the 100MHz analog one I own is older than I am I think.

      Tektronic and HP/Agilent build them to not be obsolete, and the replacement cycle is likely about 5 years or longer depending on what electronics market segement your in.

  56. The parent comment is exactly correct. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    The parent comment is exactly correct. You need 10 times the bandwidth if you want to see the waveform.

    I said 3 times because, in my experience, that is the minimum at which I can extract any useful information. (Mostly you are looking for parasitic oscillations.)

    1. Re:The parent comment is exactly correct. by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      Sorry,

      You need 5 times the rise time of the fastest signal you want to see, in order to faithfully reproduce it. Not only did I learn this in school, I have a shelf full of analysis texts that back me up on this one. Never, besides Slashdot, have I seen 10x mentioned.

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
  57. One to Avoid by certsoft · · Score: 4, Informative
    I bought a PC Multiscope from Jameco and found out that it didn't actually sample both channels simultaneously, making it basically worthless. One of the things you want to be able to do is to look at clock and data lines and measure the timing between them, and for that you need simultaneous sampling. Needless to say, that pile went back to Jameco.

    I bought a DSO-2100 from Link Instruments and have been very pleased with it. Probably one of the best investments I've ever made.

  58. Optascope by GarthSweet · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have an Optascope 81M USB scope from
    http://www.optascope.com
    I recommend it highly. Nice software and really works well for me. Also only $189.00!

    Specs are:
    1 Ms/S Maximum Sample Rate (500Ks/s 2 channels)
    200 KHz Bandwidth
    20Vpp Max Input for CH1 & CH2
    8 Bit Vertical Resolution
    2 Channel
    External Trigger Source
    Trigger on Rising or Falling Edge at Any Voltage
    Variable Trigger Voltage on DSO channels
    10%, 50% and 90% Horizontal Trigger Position
    Auto or Normal trigger modes
    USB interface

    1. Re:Optascope by dgmckay · · Score: 2, Informative

      TIP: If you buy these through Parallax there's a volume discount that cuts the price down to about $170.

  59. Use your sound card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the signals are relatively low use your sound card!

    44khz 16 bit precision.

  60. Dupe! by bishr · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was covered a few years ago; no surprise that most people forgot. The answers are mostly the same; still a good read though: http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/07/19 1220&mode=thread
    -----
    Trogdor the Burninator!

  61. Cheap, but not PC, scope: Tektronix 1002 by pingswept · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can get a new Tektronix 1002 (two channels, 60 MHz) scope for $995 without any educational discount. If I were in the market for a scope, I'd try to find one of those used. They're small, reliable, and inexpensive for their abilities. $400 is a probably low, but I wouldn't be too surprised to find one for $600. To me, learning to use the controls on a standard scope is worth quite a bit. (An extra $200? You be the judge.)

  62. Re:Educator? by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Good point. I know my last client was a wireless equipment manufacturer and when they went from 900MHz for 802.11 to 2.4 Ghz for 802.11b their old equipment was worthless because it mostly topped out at 1GHz. The old equipment was sold off to employees but they probably would have been just as happy to give it to an educational institution if they had been asked.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  63. Let's Go Old-School... by FreonTrip · · Score: 1

    Cthugha, baby!

  64. Tie Pie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the HandyScope 3

    http://www.tiepie.nl/

  65. Here's a REAL O-scope on ebay for $400 by Mr.Surly · · Score: 0

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =2597976348&category=45005&sspagename=STRK%3AMEBBI %3AIT&rd=1

    Tectronix 2245A 100 Mhz, dual chan.

    It's a good scope.

  66. I second: Better off with used *real* scope. by rarose · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there's deals to be had on used Tektronix "Lunchbox LCD" scopes (the TDS3000 series), especially now that the enhanced TDS3000b series is out.

    My 4-channel, 100MHz TDS-3014 cost me about $4k back in 2000 when they were the latest and greatest... seems like the 2 channel version was about $2500 then. You could probably find a used TDS-3012 for about your price range.

    --
    --Rob
    1. Re:I second: Better off with used *real* scope. by rarose · · Score: 1

      Here's a Black and white version for $207. Guaranteed it'll be better than any PC based "scope" you find.

      --
      --Rob
    2. Re:I second: Better off with used *real* scope. by pingswept · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have the 3014b, and it is *SWEET*. It is easily my most valued possession after my car.

      Also, the Tektronix 2000 series is great too. I might go for the 2014 instead of the 3014b if I were buying it now. I'd also consider a used Agilent 54622D-- 2 scope channels plus a 16 channel logic analyzer for ~$5k new.

      Let me recommend Tucker Electronics as the cheapest, reliable used scopes source in the US (although it doesn't look like they have any used 2014's in stock right now, though they also have a lot of stuff not listed on their website). (No, I don't work for them.)

    3. Re:I second: Better off with used *real* scope. by rarose · · Score: 1

      I agree totally. I do BIOS development for a living and my most common hardware issues fall into:
      -Are GPIOs being set correctly?
      -Are programmable clocks running at the right frequencies?
      -What's happening on the I2C/SMBUS?
      -Is my write getting to the LPC bus?

      And the TDS3014 has been a perfect fit for the job. It's small enough to keep on my desk in my cube, it's got enough bandwidth for everything I need, the DPO part allows me to freeze an I2C transaction on screen to decode, 4 channels is enough to do rough sanity checking on LPC cycles. And the ability to capture a screen to disk which I forward to the hardware engineers in email...

      I bought mine at a substantial discount through Beta-Lambda over the internet, and had a great transaction with them. Good prices, quick delivery, friendly folks on answering questions.

      --
      --Rob
  67. Why not a real oscilloscope? by Wansu · · Score: 2, Informative


    There are a quite a few used Tektronix 465 scopes going for about $200. Check newsgroups, eBay and go to some Hamfests.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  68. cheap 40 MHz scope by RadioDude · · Score: 5, Informative

    The most common source for these type of PC-card "instruments" is National Instruments.

    If you are teaching about electronics, you would be better off buying a used Tek 475 (or similar) analog scope, you can get a very good one for $300-400. They can learn about the actual circutry, timing, measurement error, etc. without
    getting heavily into sampling theory and digitial
    signal processing.

    If you want the students to learn "the new way" of
    electronic instruments, check with National Instruments about used/traded in cards, and software; they may have an educational discount.

    There are also some "poor man's" type of scopes made of surplus parts, old TV's, etc.. that you can find in the back pages of Nuts& volts magazine; I don't recommend these if you want the students to learn what they will use in the future, in real-world engineering applications.

    Finally, there are mixed-mode instruments that are analog with analog storage, analog with digital storage, analog with digital readouts added, various standard instruments with serial or GPIB interfaces, and s/w from the mfr or 3d party for
    control and analysis.

    See if you can find on some engineer's shelf a catalog/book from Tek or HP, say, from the 1980s
    or 90's, this is about the vintage that will work and be in your price range.

  69. Have you considered eBay? by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you were considering PC-based scopes just to get the cost down, perhaps you might consider an actual used oscilloscope. There are many used ones for sale on eBay, and there appear to be some that would more than fit your criteria. For example, this one.

  70. If you done need the speed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try here for $25 for 4 chan stripchart
    http://www.dataq.com/

  71. Check out National Instruments by Spikeorama · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out the PCI/PXI/AT/USB/PCMCIA-5102 from National Instruments. I think they're about $1200 or so and 20 MHz 2-channel 8-bit, a little more than you wanted to pay but it's good stuff.

    1. Re:Check out National Instruments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Also, NI's Virtual Instrumentation software (LabVIEW) is second to none. Since you are an educator, you should be able to take advantage of their educational discounts: 75% on software, 10-25% on hardware.

  72. ebay #3800131274 by Compuser · · Score: 1

    Sounds like your kinda thing. Although I personally
    am allergic to the name HC Protec because the first
    scope I bought was theirs and it started to fall
    apart about a year after we bought it.
    For serious work, Tek or Agilent are still what
    I would buy. For two days a year teaching duty,
    the above will do.

  73. http://www.optascope.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they have a inexpensive 200$ pc based scope. Uses USB 2.0.
    designed mostly for learning.

  74. Everything oscillates. Okay, a small exaggeration. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative


    Modern circuits are not so well controlled as someone might guess. To have 20 kHz output with little phase distortion, it is necessary to pass more than 200 kHz.

    But that's not the issue. ICs allow the design of circuits with bandwidths that are literally physically impossible with discrete components. The fundamental bandwidth limitations of the transistors used in the IC may be 200 MHz or more, or even 1.5 gigahertz. Any small problem can cause a circuit to oscillate at 50 MHz, even if the IC is supposedly limited to far less than this.

    All you need for oscillation is gain and some positive feedback. In the real world, circuits try all possible combinations almost instantaneously, and begin oscillating for reasons the designer never foresaw. For example, maybe there is capacitive coupling through the IC packaging, and the output circuit alone is oscillating.

    This is only a slight exaggeration: There are 4 steps toward making a new electronic device: 1) Build the circuit. 2) Supply power for the first time. 3) Apply an oscilloscope probe and begin discovering all the reasons the circuit is oscillating when it shouldn't. 4) Then discover all the other reasons the circuit isn't working correctly, if any.

    I was never a person who thought that killing people and destroying their property was a good way to resolve social problems, but at one time it was my job to repair the automatic flight control systems of fighter-interceptors in the U.S. Air Force's Air Defense Command.

    These aircraft required 250 hours of maintenance per hour of flight. (Aircraft meant to be sold to other nations, also, required 15 hours of maintenance per hour of flight. I've followed the development of weapons systems ever since, and my opinion of what is actually delivered is that it is often fraud, or close to fraud. United States taxpayers: Your assigned duty is to find the money to pay, and to avoid thinking.)

    Anyhow, during training flights it was required to pull several g's. Sometimes at high accelerations the electronics would go completely crazy, and all inertial reference would be lost. The only fix for this at the time was to land, regain stability, and take off again. The aircraft that had this problem were therefore not much use for any situation actually requiring defense. Worse, the problem seemed to have nothing to do with any particular aircraft, but seemed random.

    One day while trying to make a faulty system work on my bench test mockup, I discovered the reason. Some of the amplifiers that controlled the gyros had high frequency parasitic oscillations at perhaps 100 times the normal frequency of operation. You couldn't see the oscillations with normal equipment because the frequency was too high. I had borrowed an oscilloscope from some co-workers who worked on faster electronics.

    The design of the amplifiers was acceptable, but many of the amplifiers had bad solder joints. Those with bad solder joints would oscillate; oscillating amplifiers would amplify at the required low frequency, but had a much smaller dynamic range than amplifiers that were not oscillating. (Yes, that bad solder joints could cause this doesn't make much logical sense, but most parasitic oscillations don't make much logical sense.)

    The amplifiers had other defects that caused them to have a high failure rate. Every time an amplifier was pulled from an aircraft for a conventional repair, an amplifier was drawn from stock and put in the waiting aircraft so that the aircraft would be immediately operational. That was the reason the instability problems kept moving from aircraft to aircraft.

    I drew a circuit diagram of my test setup, wrote an article about the problem, had a photographer take photos of the test setup, took screen photos of the parasitic oscillations, and sent everything to those who review such things. This had several effects. Someone at Air Defense Command headquarters wrote a letter praising my work. When everyone was reviewed for p

  75. Go with a PC based 'scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on what you're trying to teach, an analog 'scope might be a fine way to go. However, if I could have only one 'scope to teach with it would be digital. ie. I think you're right to want a pc based 'scope.
    Digitize a waveform - bring it into Matlab or Scilab or even Excel (ok OpenOffice). Apply an FFT. Look at all the neat frequencies. Analyze the output of a modem - 'Holy trellis Batman' or "Gee look at the nice constellation" for QAM.
    With an analog 'scope you are stuck in the boring old time domain.

  76. My 1960's scope takes about 30 seconds by lhaeh · · Score: 3, Funny

    You kids and your fancy new transistorized scopes'

    My 1968 Tek 453 took ~two hours to warm up, and when a tube died we had to walk twenty miles in the snow just to get a new one!

    1. Re:My 1960's scope takes about 30 seconds by CTalkobt · · Score: 1

      Fortunatly we didn't have to walk in the snow but back in my day, we had to go to the glass blower - get the tube shelling made and then go to the local "ship in a bottle" gift shop to get somebody to put all those metal bits inside the tube.

      It took hours and we ended up having to get the guy to do it about 10-12 times, for each tube. He was much more used to how ships were supposed to be put together.

      --
      There's a gorilla from Manilla whose a fella that stinks of vanilla and has salmonella.
  77. AC coupling isn't a problem by rsw · · Score: 4, Informative

    So modulate in hardware and demod to baseband in software.

    With a simple analog multipler (for example, the Analog Devices AD834) and e.g. a 5 KHz oscillator, you can AM a band-limited (say, DC-500 Hz) signal, put it in your sound card, then do the demod in software (another multiplication will work).

    This will cost you, in total, about $5 (you can get free samples of the AD834 and you'll need some resistors, some caps, a couple op-amps, and some wire) and will give you DC-500Hz through your modulator or 20Hz-24KHz without it. Not too shabby, especially compared with $500.

    By the way, if you're going to spend $500ish anyway, why not pick up a Tektronix 2445 or 2465 on EBay? The 2465 has 350MHz bandwidth and is, IMHO, one of the nicest all-around scopes out there.

    1. Re:AC coupling isn't a problem by ajohn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "By the way, if you're going to spend $500ish anyway, why not pick up a Tektronix 2445 or 2465 on EBay? The 2465 has 350MHz bandwidth and is, IMHO, one of the nicest all-around scopes out there." This is the best idea of the lot. In real life they will use a stand alone scope 90% of the time. The instruments on eBay are dirt cheap! When the break - and they will - trash them. Any of the 2000 series from Tek will do the job. The added benefit is that you get a REAL instrument not just a simulation or another piece of software that clogs up your DOS machines.

  78. Check out Interface's Boards by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might want to check out the boards put out by Interface, a Japanese company. Specifically, their PAZ-3161 board supports up to 40 MHz sampling rate (one channel; 20 MHz if you sample both channels). Not only does this company make excellent boards (my lab has several), they provide both Windows and Linux drivers for the boards.

    I've done some preliminary work on writing signal-analyzer software for their PCI-3525 board, which I would be happy to share (it's not close to being fully-functional yet, but we've got a student who may be using these boards, so that might change soon). I'm also happy to try to adapt this code to more general use. With these boards and existing code, your task might be much easier than you originally thought. Also, their sales engineers are very willing to help solve problems. I don't know the prices on their boards (ours were donated), but they are excellent devices.

    --
    On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
  79. Re:Everything oscillates. Okay, a small exaggerati by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

    That's a great story. I wish I had some mod points left. I think that hearing things like that makes me almost wish I had gone into ee instead of cs. On the other hand, considering my worse-than-usual grades in my analog electronics class, maybe it wasn't such a bad idea to go into software. :-)

    --
    Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  80. Old T.V. set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my day we used to build our own from old television sets. We called them silly scopes (kids).
    You have to make a few adjustments if you do this. but save the big capacitors, I hear you can use 'em to train your pets. (Anyone know how many farads one should use on a medium sized dog that won't stop barking?)

  81. I own a Velleman PC Scope PCS500 by rknize · · Score: 1

    I also own their K8016 function generator. The two were made to work together (for Bode plots, among other things) and I find that they work quite well. The only trouble I had was noise on the scope due to an inadequate power supply. It was rated 9V @ 1A, but actually dropped to 7V at that current. The scope draws 1A easily. I built a better PSU for it and now it is fine.

    For that money, you can maybe do better but the Vellemans fit my needs nicely.

    --
    Russ W. Knize
  82. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by scotti · · Score: 1

    Between $875 and $950. I fiddled around with the URL and found the page. http://www.softdsp.com/howtobuy.php

  83. PC based vs analog 'scopes by snowbird · · Score: 1

    Well, the bitscope and similar ilk should do fine for a teacher's (canned) demo/dog & pony role, but thay have some real limitations that must be considered.

    First, is the limited range of input signals for the analog inputs, and how rugged the inputs are. Can you safely input a large signal without damage? Can you control the bandwidth of signals/triggers to provide stable/good displays? Another is the rate of screen refresh under dynamic/live conditions.

    Troubleshooting can turn into a big time-eater as you struggle to figure out what's wrong. Is it broken? Miss-wired? Settings wrong?

    These are areas where basic analog 'scopes along the lines of Tektronix 223x family really shine. eBay is your friend! A Tek 2236A is an excellent model, I have one and love it. If you must have digital capture, then a 2230/2232 will probably do fine, and can be found for not too much more.

    Regardless of the chosen gear, probes are another part of the system to consider.

    Keep in mind that a good set of probes can be a substantial investment if the equipment doesn't come with any. There is no better probes than Tek in my experience. It's those little things like the tip clips and miscellaneous goodies that take the hassle out of probing signals. Tek probes/accessories are very expensive ($100+ for basic probe kit), but they excel.

    All of the cheap after-market probes I've used are horrid in the probe goodies department.

    Oh, don't knock the bazillion knob & button 'scopes. I find them far easier to use than the soft key/menu based gear. Just reach over and push/twist the desired control. Instant response and direct feedback as you adjust the controls to see what you want.

    For durability, don't knock that old lab gear. It's built like a tank and can take a lot of use/abuse.

    You won't have to worry too much about the kids playing around and blowing the gear up if they are given the chance to explore for themselves.

    You ARE going to be a GOOD teacher and let the kids explore on their own with some hands-on experience once in a while, aren't you?

    Otherwise, you might as well buy an "educational" video and sit in the back cleaning your nails while the tape plays and the kids throw spit-wads between isles.

  84. winamp?-External. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I agree with the parent post about a sound card being a nice classroom demonstration scope. For higher mhz, you can pick up a real scope from Ebay for much cheaper than a PC card solution."

    I think this is the better solution IMHO. Plus a lot of Oscopes can be hooked to a computer for processing of the output, and control.

  85. Maybe you could have your students build them? by tech_savvy_guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You could have your students build a fairly good PC based O-Scope with eight 5-Mhz sample-and-hold A/D converters, a 40Mhz clock, a small bank of SRAM, and some glue logic to blast all the data back to the PC. Maybe get together with the Computer Science professors, and have their students write the PC software. Then your school would only have to shell out for the parts, and the project itself would teach your students a lot about how real-world design works. Tech

  86. National Instruments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NI has some great PC based scopes for a range of prices. Check them out at ni.com

  87. Your sig. by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Do you have a source for your sig? A google search only turns up your posts on /.

    1. Re:Your sig. by kiatoa · · Score: 1

      It comes up in a quiz at www.henrygeorge.org

      --
      90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
    2. Re:Your sig. by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      Remember the 80/20 Rule: 80% of statistics are made up, and the other 20% are wrong.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  88. How about selling them? by bigmattana · · Score: 1

    Since there is obviously not a single well known place for selling electronic test equipment, does anyone know where the most popular place for buying and selling would be? (Not necessarily for finding the cheapest ones.) I have several older power supplies, dmms, etc., but I haven't sold them because I do not think I would be able to get much on Ebay or anywhere else I know of where people would actually look for them.

    Any ideas?

  89. Good Mac software? by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a good PC oscilloscope with Mac support?

    (since we're already talking about PC oscilloscopes)

  90. Re:Like Skee Lo, I wish... by aastanna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds to me like the question is from a high school teacher. I seriously doubt spending any more on a scope would be worthwhile, since I'd bet it's primarily going to be used to show students wavy lines, or maybe as a glorified multimeter (he's only buying one, so it's not like the students will be using it regularly). I wish the poster gave a few examples of the types of projects his class works on.

    That said, I wish schools would stop blowing their entire budgets on computer labs. I hate to see a school paying for a computer that isn't at least two years old when the money could be going to text books that aren't twenty years old and falling apart.

    It would be really nice to see high school electronics courses teaching students how to properly work a scope, but you'd need enough for an entire class. It's amazing how many engineering students get 2 years into a computer/electrical engineering program and don't know how to use a scope to read important parameters from a circuit.

  91. A good scope is tough to design by rarose · · Score: 1

    For high bandwidth it needs to react quickly. But that is hard to get without self-induced oscillations.

    For high sensitivity it needs large amplification. But that is hard to get without amplifying noise as well.

    It needs both accuracy and precision. Indeed most scopes are calibrated against a precision standard that is tracable back to the Federal Government's standards reference (the so called "tracable certificate of NIST calibration")

    Remember that an oscilloscope needs to be much more accurate than anything it's used to design/test. Best analogy: Would you want somebody grinding eyeglass lenses for you to have 20/20 vision or somebody with cateracts?

    --
    --Rob
  92. Another use for that old gameboy by Ultra64 · · Score: 3, Interesting
  93. You can buy a real 2-ch 30 MHz scope for $400 by dubious_1 · · Score: 1

    If you have a $300-400 budget, you should look into buying a real oscilloscope and scrap the PC based idea. Outpost has a 30MHz scope with dual channel inputs for $369.
    If you need a digital scope (unlikely for what you described doing), then the cost rises sharply.

  94. Please... Don't go the PC route for this... by KC7GR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For the amount of money you're specifying, you can easily pick up a much better built and far more versatile O-scope in the form of an older Tektronix instrument.

    In fact, that price range will easily get you a 475 or 475A, good to 200 or 250MHz, respectively. It will also put you well within reach of a nice Tektronix 7000 series benchtop 'scope, like a 7704 or even a 7904.

    No matter what you may hear, the PC was never designed to be an O-scope, and no amount of external hardware, I believe, will ever turn it into anything that can compare, in terms of value for the $$ and quality of construction, with early Tektronix hardware.

    I believe it's also EXTREMELY important to teach would-be technicians and engineers that the PC is not the be-all and end-all of test gear. Never has been, never will be. Oh, it can be useful as an instrument CONTROLLER in automated test setups, yes, but it was never intended to replace the functionality of actual made-for-purpose test equipment.

    Give your students a real education. Get a real oscilloscope.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  95. Acqiris by CaptainPhoton · · Score: 1

    Try looking at some Acqiris digitizers. I like these better than the National Instruments and the Gage scopes.

  96. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.softdsp.com/howtobuy.php &
    http://www.softdsp.com/sds200_download.php

    They even do not check their web as the link is still local!!

  97. Yes, theoretically, a rise time of 1/5... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Yes, theoretically, a rise time of 1/5 that of the fastest signal. However, usually at the upper bandwidth limit, there is phase distortion and amplitude reduction. So, it seems to me that the rule of thumb might hold true. I seem to remember that some fast rise times are achieved by providing resonance near the upper bandwidth limit, or some other synthetic method, so that there is overshoot. I don't remember much about this. It that possibly an explanation for the different estimates?

  98. Re:Like Skee Lo, I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I'm glad that my school only offers an Electrical Engineering with Computer Option major. Basically, we focus most of our time on hardware design, then our last two years we split off and focus more on either digital or analog, and possibly expand our programming knowledge. It's really a good program, and as much as I hate the amount of work I have to put in it, I love the things I am learning.

  99. PCS500 - highly recommended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've probably stopped reading by now, but just in case...
    I use a PCS500 and am very pleased with it. Whilst people have made good points about the relative value of analogue scopes, don't underestimate the usefulness of it being PC-based. The single shot digital storage capability combined with easy printout is really nice to have. The data logger facility is likely to be useful too. I use mine primarily for working on valve audio amps, so I'm a big fan of the true RMS measurement and FFT mode.
    On the downside: it's a shame they don't include a pair of probes in the box, and it would be nice if they updated the design to use USB instead of the parallel port. Also, with the timebase set for low frequencies, it can take an annoyingly long time to refresh the display. I suspect if fills a large buffer with measurements before updating the image, and at low sample rates that means long delays. Switching to data logger mode is often the easiest solution as this updates the display incrementally.

    Regards,
    James.

  100. For those saying analog by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    No doubt about it, analog scopes are great in most situations (even superior). However, in some situations a digital storage scope can be extremely helpful. Standalone digital scopes tend to be very expensive. So, if storage is an important feature to the poster, then PC based scopes might actually be the best option. If storage isn't that big of a deal, then analog would probably be a better option.

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  101. Re:Bankruptcy Auctions! ebay by qromodyn · · Score: 1

    Get a standalone digital scope on ebay. I got a 400 MHz HP (Agilent) for about $450. They have cheaper digital scopes for cheaper.

  102. RALE Analyzer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nice and cheap, dunno if it'd be good enough for you.

  103. Picotech supplies buggy software by throwaway18 · · Score: 1
    I don't reccomend picotech. My boss bought a ADC-216 when we needed an 50KHz spectrum analyser. I'd seen picotech equipment before and reccommended buying a spectrum analyser off ebay instead. When the picotech unit arrived I connected it in parallel with a conventional scope and tried it out.

    I found several serious software bugs. I can't remember them all now. It has an AC voltmeter function, the spec page claims 1% accuracy. It worked ok up to about 10KHz and above that the reading were completly wrong. The hardware is just a fast ADC so the PC software did the task of adding up the area of the voltage versus time graph.

    A picotech support person reproduced the problems I found and promised to send a new version of the software. Months later after a few reminders they finally emailed me some software, the same buggy software I'd already been supplied with the unit.

  104. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by kcelery · · Score: 1

    I have seen portable LCD dual channel oscope with 1G sample/s for less than $900. So it might be the 'price' is unreachable.

  105. Mod up the parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the thought of using a GameBoy for anything serious tickles your funny bone but I followed the link. It is quite serious and useful.

  106. Re:Like Skee Lo, I wish... by Neophytus · · Score: 1

    Our high school physics lab had at least an oscilliscope between three people (classes of 20), and they were used intermittantly from age 14 up to teach basic concepts.

  107. OptaScope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the optascope? This unit has open specs,open source support, and a reasonable price.

    www.optascope.com

    I've never used one, but it looks like a good option. (for lower bandwidth applications)

  108. Re:Everything oscillates. Okay, a small exaggerati by logpoacher · · Score: 1

    Thank you, good story! Makes me remember why I read /.

  109. Try TINA and TINALab II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TINA is a circuit analysis program, and TINALab II is a superb PC-based lab with oscilloscope, multimeter, etc. functionality. They work together like charm, but can be used separately as well. www.tina.com

  110. Great scope tutorial by AgentPhunk · · Score: 2, Informative
  111. Does it *Have* To Be PC-Based? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    Just wondering, if the purpose is just a cheap O-scope, or if it being PC-based is the point. If all that is needed is a cheap, high-quality O-scope, I'd check Fair Radio Sales, http://www.fairradio.com/oscill.htm
    They have an awesome selection of surplus electronics and test equipment. The URL I listed has listed on that page, a Tektronix 7603N11S Checked, for $400 USD. If PC-based is what you have to have, down the same page:

    PCS500 is a digital storage oscilloscope that uses a computer to display waveforms. All standard oscilloscope functions are available through the supplied Windows program. All normal oscilloscope funtions can be selected with the mouse. Optically isolated connections are made through the computers parallel port. The oscilloscope and transient recorder have two independent channels with a sampling frequency up to 1GHz. Any waveform displayed on the screen can be stored for later use. Timebase: 20ns to 100ms per division. trigger source: CH1, CH2, EXT or free run. sampling frequency - real-time: 1.25KHz to 50MHz, repetitive: 1GHz. Spectrum analyzer frequency range: 0...1.2KHz to 25MHz. Transient recorder: time scale: 20ms/div to 2000s/div. max. recording time: 9.4hours/screen. 2 channels, 1 external trigger input. Input impedance: 1Mohm // 30pF. Frequency response: 0Hz to 50MHz (+/- 3dB). Max. input voltage : 100V (AC + DC). Input coupling: DC, AC and GND. Supply voltage: 9-10Vdc / 1000mA. Includes: PCS500 unit, 2 test leads, PC parallel cable, practical manual, CD with software. #PCS500, New, $497.00

    Granted, it's Windows-based, but there it is. I love Fair Radio..great people, super deals..learned of them from my Amateur Radio days.

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  112. Votes for a GNU style open hardware Scope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Fluke puts out a fairly decent Digital oscilloscope product that links to your PC.
    But for the price you want, even a good DSP based data logger from National Instruments may prove elusive. But if you're skilled with MatLAB IEEE488.1 HPIB or GBIB card control library, you may be able to find an older but decent scope with the ports (this is old school technology, beware of the time costs...).


    Personally, I never mix digital logic with analog problems, although there are notable exceptions like those new mixed systems-on-a-chip ;-) I use an old analog scope I purchased surplus years ago, and use a highs-peed In Circuit Emulated controller to run digital test and monitoring problems. A simple excel doc with 'choke' vb capable rs232 serial comm object downloads the loggers data (macro automatically does this two-step dance).


    A nice project perhaps would use rtLinux or the rtLAB live CD to do the "Real Time" data capture from a 12bit high speed PCI data capture card from National Instruments. Should be able to do the system's bus speed with two low res. channels (any RTLinux C philanthropists out there that could write a GUI ?)


    Note this too, most current A/D converters generally use a ramp/trigger or V to F converter model that limits bit-depth at higher frequencies. I think there are other options...


    Votes for a GNU style open hardware Scope? I'm interested...

  113. Dynon Instruments ELAB-080 by badvilbel · · Score: 1

    I came across Dynon Instruments the other day. They seem to have a solid product (although it's not available yet). It's got a scope, an arbitrary waveform generator, a programmable power supply and a few other things. Looks interesting...

  114. Re:Like Skee Lo, I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're completely missing the point, which is that he used the phrase "tight-fisting" [giggle giggle].

  115. Dual 40MHz 12 bit Scope with sample & hold = $ by asbestos_tophat · · Score: 0
    Dual 40MHz 12 bit Scope with sample & hold = $249
    national.com - a/d eval borad comes with wave vision java based gui ;-) A simple high speed op-amp input with a gain adjust will make it possible to adjust for 10-bit at any gain (base 10 makes the software easy to adapt).

    ADC08200EVAL $249.00 Out Of Stock ADC08200 Evaluation Board


    http://www.national.com/appinfo/adc/files/12D040 ma c.pdf



    Don't reinvent the wheel, its already patented ;-)

  116. Other stuff for physics class by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

    What should be installed in a laptop that physics teacher carries around? well, almost anything could be simulated by a program. For example radio receiver. Fractal creation.

    Any free package to start?

  117. Re:Bruce is right (So is John Miles) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John's comment (Tek 2400 series):
    http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid= 98603&cid= 8413630
    If you need to digitize it (GPIB), do it AFTER the scope has captured it.

    gewg_

  118. Elab-800 by leov211 · · Score: 2, Informative

    A new pc-based scope with these functions, at US$495:
    - Digital Storage Oscilloscope (DSO) 2-channels 80Msamples/sec
    - Logic Analyzer (LA) 16-channels
    - Arbitrary Waveform Generator (AWG)
    - User Programmable Power Supply (UPPS) +/- 10V
    - Programmable Clock Output (1kHz - 150MHz)

    http://www.dynoninstruments.com/docs/elab-080featu res.html

  119. How about a used Oscilloscope? by RKBA · · Score: 2, Interesting
    How about C&H Sales in Pasadena, CA? They sell used lab equipment.

  120. Re:Here's one to check out -Price page is unreacha by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    Price page is here but it looks like it's around $900.

    Yeah, but these are retail pricing. If you're using the scopes for the classroom (and especially if you're purchasing them with a school PO), they should be willing to give you a really nice discount. Back when 1GB drives (the full-height 5.25inch 1Gig drives) were around $3,000, we were regularly getting them at 1/3 the retail price. That sort of discount would put this thing in the requestor's price range.

    Death and taxes may be inevitable, but even those can sometimes be negotiated.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  121. Re:Like Skee Lo, I wish... by kumokasumi · · Score: 1

    Heh. I'm in high school, and I'm taking my third semester of electronics courses (digital, microprocessor [wiring Motorola 6802's from scratch -- classy], and audio); everyone has a scope at their workstation, and using them to analyze and debug our circuits is fundamental to the course. It's a great class.

  122. PC O'scope by rick57 · · Score: 1

    Hi, Cliff. I saw your request for suggestions on low-cost PC o'scopes for classroom instruction. I'd suggest you check out the following link. It's not for a PC o'scope per se, but for a complete lab set for teaching electronics and RF for a small class that includes demo circuit boards, multimeters, and yes, even a PC o'scope. The whole kit is available from the American Radio Relay League as part of their Education and Technology Program. I'm not positive, but I believe the kits are free to qualifying schools. The kit was designed to supplement a curriculum available free to anyone. http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/02/12/3/?nc= 1

  123. DSO?? by asianigma · · Score: 1

    Try this link:
    http://www.aplab.com/tmi/3660d.htm

    This isn't a PC based scope; its a 60 MHZ DSO that I bought for the equivalent of $380 little less than a year back during an inventory clearance sale. I've used it extensively during field trips, and have found the unit to be extremely rugged. Doesn't offer as many features as Tek or other better known brands, but for the price its worth buying. Comes with an optional "Ultrascope" software package for importing the waveforms onto your PC and doing some analysis.

  124. Re:Cheap PC Oscilloscopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. Actually, you kinda sound like a 10 year old yourself; either that or you're just *really* immature for your age. Oh, and CHRIST probably doesn't read /., so stop complaining to Him here.

  125. Re:Like Skee Lo, I wish... by Giggle+Stick · · Score: 1
    It's amazing how many engineering students get 2 years into a computer/electrical engineering program and don't know how to use a scope to read important parameters from a circuit.

    That is amazing. I took the first circuits class when I was trying to get a minor in EE (Major was Comp Sci) and we had a lab portion where we used scopes right away. I don't see how you could be learning anything in EE without touching a scope for 2 years. You did say just 'Engineering', perhaps you were talking about the Civil Engineers.

  126. Re:Like Skee Lo, I wish... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    I did the same stuff in highschool, very cool. It should be standard highschool stuff, it will serve you well. It's surprising how few schools have qualified teachers who can create the programs and teach the material.

    My school didn't specialize in technology though... it was just big enough to keep a strange instructor and support the program. After the instructor retired, the course disappeared.

  127. That, Sir, is very cool by fliptout · · Score: 1

    nt

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  128. Scope specifically for classrooms (NSF approved) by ClockChaos · · Score: 1

    Missionary Man,
    If you're looking for something specifically for the classroom, there is this great device sold by JDR that appears to come with a set of integrated labs for students to do. It is NSF (Nat'l Sci. Foundation) sponsored, and you may get a discount if you become a beta college/university partner.

    http://mission-technology.com/

    Hope this helps!