Slashdot Mirror


Matchbox Sized Color Projectors?

Justin Nolan sent in a very brief link about ultra small projectors which says "Upstream Engineering is willing to provide miniature color video projectors for use with portable video player, travel TV, laptops and handhelds next year. Upstream's patented technology, called Photon Vacuum, maximizes the amount of photons sent to the target from the light source in a minimum space and allows the creation of devices free of a variety of components currently used in projectors that unnecessarily waste energy. Photon Vacuum enables the smallest projector designs in the world, ultimately to a size of matchbox. The company says is going to push the power consumption of the whole device ultimately to below 4 watts while still gaining a travel-TV sized color projection" You can also read Upstream's website for almost as little information.

193 comments

  1. Cost by cartzworth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are they going to be 2k US+ like conventional projectors? Will they force the price of conventional projectors down?

    1. Re:Cost by surstrmming · · Score: 5, Informative

      The new Swedish "OptiLight" projector for should drive prices down later in 2004. It's expected to retail for $500.

    2. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The native resolution is 640x480. For anything more demanding than analog TV (HD, computer display, etc), that's horrible.

    3. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, their cheapest is. It's not like having more pixels is the biggest challange in projectors nowadays so it won't be that more expensive...

    4. Re:Cost by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, and at 700 lumens you'll have to climb in a cardboard box to see the thing.

      Other portables are around 1000-2000.

      Wall/ceiling mounts are 3000-4000 lumens.

      You get what you pay for, even if it is Swedish.

    5. Re:Cost by janbjurstrom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, at 640x480 I'm not so sure. Seems way too lo-rez, especially for vaporware, no matter the price... (And reading the articles in their archive, I'm Swedish -- too, Mr. nickname-from-nastiest-'food'-in-Swedish-cuisine ;) -- they claimed "600x800" in October 2002, article in Swedish.)

      Furthermore, their current data/spec. on rez and price are (still) their own "target values".

      From what I gather, they do have some new kind of cooling system (patents pending), which they claim is good enough to make next-generation projectors completely fanless. Time will tell, of course.

      --
      668.5
    6. Re:Cost by texaport · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anything that saves me from spending $350 on a friggin light bulb ($700 if you carry a spare) is a welcome trend.

      Even Thomas Edison could make a bulb that lasted beyond 70 hours with proper cooling...

    7. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She said that yesterday..

    8. Re:Cost by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the shop I work in we demo projectors regularly. 1000 lumens can be seen adequately when projected through a sheet of perspex onto a blue wall in full indoor lighting. On a proper white screen with the lights dimmed 700 lumens should be fine. Even better for lumen-optimisation is using it to project onto a sheet of paper from behind - looks like a nice flatscreen TV, very portable and doesn't depend on light conditions nearly so much.

      If I were buying a proper projector for home cinema I'd go for 1900+ but something cheap and portable to show up charts or a slideshow of my graphic work would work fine with 700.

    9. Re:Cost by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If I were buying a proper projector for home cinema I'd go for 1900+ but something cheap and portable to show up charts or a slideshow of my graphic work would work fine with 700.
      What light output is right for you really depends on several factors. Room lighting, the screen you project on, how large that screen is, these are all factors. Also, the display technology plays a part: if you get a DLP projector, you will need to have a bulb almost twice as bright as one in an LCD projector, if you want to have an equally bright image. Sounds like bullshit, but I have seen the difference in brightness between 1200 lumen LCD and DLP projectors.

      I settled on a 1200 lumen 800x600 LCD projector in the end, and I am very pleased with its performance. Sure, more lumens or more pixels is noticably nicer... but not so much more nice that I'd be willing to pay an additional $1000 for the extra quality. One very important aspect of the projector I settled on, is that it is really quiet. Bigger bulbs mean more noise, usually. It may also mean more expensive bulb replacements.

      The best advise I can give to people shopping for a projector is: go to a good store... preferably to a store like the one I went to, where the salesguy takes his time with you, and where they are able to show you two projectors at once side by side, so you can compare models. Lastly... get a proper screen to display it on, rather than projecting on a white wall.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  2. Cheap! by The+Real+Chrisjc · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does this mean that projectors will get smaller, cheaper and more high quality?
    The holy grail!

    Chris

    1. Re:Cheap! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Insightful
      get smaller, cheaper and more high quality?
      Pick 2. you can't have all three.
    2. Re:Cheap! by CaptainMunchies · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure you can. Just not right now.

      You think computers were destined to be the size of houses?

      --
      Spam removed for the Internet's pleasure ...
    3. Re:Cheap! by akuma(x86) · · Score: 1

      Pick 2. you can't have all three.

      Why?

    4. Re:Cheap! by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that projectors will get smaller, cheaper and more high quality?

      Yes, but you will have to replace the colour filters every three months, otherwise the screen will go blurry, your Powerpoint presentations will jam and your warranty will be invalidated.

  3. Already gone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Site says it's down for "software upgrade".

    Anyone got a mirror?

    1. Re:Already gone... by OwlWhacker · · Score: 1

      No, but I got a comb...

    2. Re:Already gone... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Anyone got a mirror?"

      I tried the mirror, but all I see is the unshaven face of an unemployeed IT worker.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Already gone... by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1
      I watched American Splendor last night. The best line from the movie, upon looking in the mirror, "There's a reliable disapointment"

      --
      My keyboads not woking popely.
  4. Now if only.... by penguinrenegade · · Score: 3, Funny

    They made the projectors to fit inside of a Matchbox car!!!

    1. Re:Now if only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they made it that small so it would fit inside your A S S.

  5. making a big screen by DavidDeLux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now, if lots of these min-projectors could be put together in a matrix, will this mean that, finally, big screen TVs can be produced more cheaply. (If one mini-projector does dead, just swap it out).

    1. Re:making a big screen by BlueTooth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They claim that a single unit can project a "TV Sized Image". Assuming they meen a small screen TV (32") you would probably want at least four of these to start giving you a big screen image. I somehow don't think that would be cheaper than buying a single unit, and you're multiplying your points of failure by four (any one of four units dies, and your image is pretty much useless).

      Now if this tech could be scaled up to make larger brighter projectors that are still small and low on power consumption, then we might be talkin'

      --
      SPAM
    2. Re:making a big screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Now, if lots of these min-projectors could be put together in a matrix

      Surely you meant:

      Now, if lots of these min-projectors could be put together in a beowulf cluster ...

    3. Re:making a big screen by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>small screen TV (32")

      I remember a time, not long ago that 32'' was considered big screen.....

      Now you need a room with an empty wall the size of Texas for a big screen TV. What's next, wrap around TV for 2 or more walls?

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    4. Re:making a big screen by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cough, um why would use use a bunch of mini projectors when you can use one normal projector? The resolution sucks but other than that it's a popular method.

    5. Re:making a big screen by DavidDeLux · · Score: 1

      Cough, um why would use use a bunch of mini projectors when you can use one normal projector? The resolution sucks but other than that it's a popular method

      Because you could then build a really BIG widescreen TV with decent resolution and brightness... instead of one big high-powered projector you have a matrix of many smaller medium-powered projectors.

    6. Re:making a big screen by yiantsbro · · Score: 1

      "...What's next, wrap around TV for 2 or more walls?"

      I would have to say yes, actually probably for all six surfaces (walls, ceiling, floor). This way you have surround video and sound. Of course shooting the video to take advantage would be different.

    7. Re:making a big screen by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

      Ooops...forgot to escape the "<" as < ... I meant to write that as (<32") ... I've alsways seen 32" as the midpoint between "big screen" and "small screen" according to national retailers. My TV is 32" and I consider it a big screen.

      --
      SPAM
    8. Re:making a big screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming they meen a small screen TV (32")

      What is this, land of the giants? A small screen TV is 12" or so. A 32" screen is known as "ludicrously big" here.

    9. Re:making a big screen by moviepig.com · · Score: 0
      Unless I overlooked something, the web site conspicuously omitted any discussion of resolution. And resolution is what matters for any display that's more than a glorified blinking light.

      As far as agglomerating lots of these devices into a big-screen TV, borders would presumably be as much of a problem as with current technologies...

      ...unless there are, say, 1000x1600 devices in the matrix, but that already works using (non-glorified) blinking lights.

      --
      Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    10. Re:making a big screen by ckedge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>small screen TV (32")
      >>> I remember a time, not long ago that 32'' was considered big screen...

      No kidding.

      I have a very different interpretation: On their website (if you go through all the links) you see them repeatedly mention "size of current mobile screens". Think of the mobile DVD players and current "mobile LCD" screens.

      That's right. 8-15 inches.

      Interesting little company, 5 people - 1 "manager" and 4 engineers.

    11. Re:making a big screen by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 1

      Dude, the website claims that they could scale the unit down to project a HAND-HELD screen with only four watts of power: That'd be 3.2 inches, NOT 32.

      --
      What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
    12. Re:making a big screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I bet a 4" dick is "ludicrously big" in your backwater part of the world, too.

    13. Re:making a big screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try 2.5 to 10 inches

    14. Re:making a big screen by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Now you need a room with an empty wall the size of Texas for a big screen TV. What's next, wrap around TV for 2 or more walls?

      Well, everyone knows that it's how big the TV is, not what's on it that counts.

    15. Re:making a big screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neat idea, but a horrible acronym: Redundant Array of Inexpensive Projectors.

    16. Re:making a big screen by jdray · · Score: 1
      8-15 inches

      When they said "portable TV," I was thinking of the 13" travel-trailer models that are so popular. Still, if something that fits in my pocket could combine a Stowaway keyboard and contain all the functionality of a stripped-down laptop (think current high-end handheld with maybe 5 GB of storage) and include the full-size keyboard that the Stowaway provides, as well as a projected 13" screen (rollup?), I'd be tickled.

      Sorry for the hellish run-on sentance. You know how it goes when an idea (dream) strikes...

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  6. Power Consumption by Jotaigna · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thats the spirit. Every electric and electronic appliance should go for that goal. While the effort to finally get a cheap, clean and reliable source of energy is good, we must for once pay attention to nature and reduce power consuption to a minimum, that would buy us some time or being able to rely in smaller sources of energy like wind or solar pannels. Size does matter!!,
    Although I dont know what im going to do whith such a tiny proyector, maybe i'll put it in my back pockent and sit on it afterwards and break it. Or have it stuck in a child's ear.

    --
    "The quality of life is inversely proportional to the number of keys on your keyring."
    1. Re:Power Consumption by Baumi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Every electric and electronic appliance should go for that goal.

      I don't know - my matchbox-sized fridge isn't selling too well...

      Jens

    2. Re:Power Consumption by spezz · · Score: 1
      my matchbox-sized fridge isn't selling too well...

      It's all about salesmanship.

      I sold 4 to a family of tiny Eskimos last week.

    3. Re:Power Consumption by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      we must for once pay attention to nature and reduce power consuption to a minimum
      That's already a major design criterium for many IC-designers. Mostly thanks to the popularity of portable gadgets like MP3 players and the lack of a powerfull portable energy source that's small and light enough.
      (While you could power a MP3 player with a 7.5Ah lead accu, it wouldn't be very popular because of it's weight and size)

      I've got 2 NiMH rechargeable batteries (AA; 1.2V; 1800mAh), these last for about 1.5h in my MP3-player, a (relatively) cheap MP3-player with CD's. 1.5h isn't much, and these were damn expensive batteries.
    4. Re:Power Consumption by EverDense · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Every electric and electronic appliance should go for that goal.

      I don't know - my matchbox-sized fridge isn't selling too well...


      Finally, a fridge that Ken can keep his beer cold with.
      Who needs a demanding, anorexic bitch like Barbie when you have cold beer.

      This explains their break-up.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    5. Re:Power Consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered marketing it as a dietary aide?

    6. Re:Power Consumption by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Finally, a fridge that Ken can keep his beer cold with. Who needs a demanding, anorexic bitch like Barbie when you have cold beer."

      But who's going to get the beer for Ken?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:Power Consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But who's going to get the beer for Ken?

      Posted AC since it's WAAAAAY off-topic.

      This reminds me of a joke:

      Why did the drummer from Def Leppard beat his wife?

      "Bitch brought me two beers and laughed at me."

      (Hint: the drummer of D.L. only has one arm)

      - Hesiod

  7. Vaporware! by jonnylawUSA · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like these guys will be up for the 2004 Wired Vaporware awards.

    1. Re:Vaporware! by booch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was thinking the same thing. The biggest tip-off is the talk about maximizing the amount of photons. Really, that's just techno-jargon saying that they want the screen to be bright. Any time you have to resort to techno-babble to explain simple things, it means that you probably can't even do the simple things, much less the difficult things.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    2. Re:Vaporware! by jackb_guppy · · Score: 3, Funny

      It can not be Vaporware, when it is about Photon Vacuum.

      Vapor can not exist in Vacuum.

    3. Re:Vaporware! by clone22 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just saw a similar device at Flashforward2004, a little laser based video projection device prototype from Symbol Technologies. The idea was that you could have a computer in your watch, but instead of having to read a tiny watch screen you would project the display onto any convenient flat surface.

      --
      Ask me about my vow of silence!
    4. Re:Vaporware! by Bagheera · · Score: 1

      While it may well be vaporware, I suspect the "Maximize the amount of photons" terminology is an effect of the translation. This is a Swedish company after all. We've all seen bad (or convoluted) translations before, and if you want to throw a little marketing spin on something, why not make it sound cooler than "Lots of visible light with little waste heat."

      The reason those projectors get so hot is that a lot of the light is in the Infrared band. Effectively just more photons, but at a useless wavelength.

      Add the word 'useful' between OF and PHOTONS and "Maximize the amount of photons" makes more sense, eh?

      Even if it may still be vaporware . . .

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
    5. Re:Vaporware! by k31bang · · Score: 1

      which means its vacumeware...which means it sucks.

      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    6. Re:Vaporware! by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      No, you're confused. This is a company that's making projections of future technology, not making a projector that uses futuristic technology.

  8. Re:Aw man... by hattig · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Shows how much Slashdot checks a post before it hits the front page ...

  9. It is up for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Upstream's unique and revolutionary technology, called Photon Vacuum, practically maximizes the amount of photons sent to the target from the light source in a minimum space. This is not an easy trick since the etendue law of light in physics requires more space for better efficiency. Our special technology enables us to get rid of a variety of components currently used in projectors that unnecessarily waste energy. The current table projectors extract typically only a few watts of light power out of 200W of input power.

    Photon Vacuum enables the smallest projector designs in the world, ultimately to a size of matchbox. It is possible to push the power consumption of the whole device ultimately to below 4 watts while still gaining a travel-TV sized color projection. There are a myriad of possible applications for this technology.

  10. Ubiquitous Projection by BlueTooth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Obviously this would hinge on cost, but I seems to me that this would make it much more practical to integrate projected images through a living or work space. A lot of futuristic concepts include projectors in their design, but these units are always large and ugly. Having projectors conveniently displaying information and entertainment (TV, artwork, notifications, etc.) on surfaces throughout the house would be "really neat"

    --
    SPAM
  11. I see only services offered... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... no product.

    I am sure something useful will come, eventually, but don't hold your breath waiting for anything cool to buy any time soon.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  12. I call BS by MythMoth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's nothing on that site to indicate that they're anything other than vapourware.

    It doesn't follow that it's impossible - on the contrary, I think this is a technology we'll be seeing very soon - I just doubt that it will be from this company.

    So why do I think we'll be seeing it soon ? Simple, grasshopper. Lasers. It's easy enough to build a poor quality monochrome vector display out of a laser diode and a couple of mirrors on motors. That's expensive and clunky.

    A laser diode and a couple of piezo-transducer-mounted mirrors would be a slightly more elegant mechanism, and if you can build a vector display with this, you ought just as easily to be able to build a raster display.

    So all we're missing is the cheap green laser diode and the cheap blue laser diode to complement the existing cheap red laser diode.

    Now, you CAN buy a green laser pointer that's only moderately painfully expensive - and now that there's an imminent demand for blue laser diodes for high density DVD players I'm hoping their cost will plummet.

    I don't have the skills to build this, but I'm hoping someone will get onto it soon.

    D.

    --
    --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
    1. Re:I call BS by srleffler · · Score: 5, Interesting
      There are blue laser diodes on the market now too, I believe. They're probably still too expensive.

      I don't actually expect laser projection displays to go anywhere. The advantage of a laser for projection is its high brightness (intensity in a small area). That's great for vector display where you want to "draw" bright lines. When you use a scanning laser for a raster display you lose this advantage, though. You need the same amount (intensity) of light with a laser as you would with ordinary projection. Unless the laser is more energy efficient than the ordinary projector, you're better off with the latter.

      There are also safety/legal issues with laser projection. Any laser bright enough for a large projection display is dangerous if it stops scanning. The projectors of course have interlocks that shut off the laser if the raster scan jams or stops, but such a system could fail or be defeated by someone with malicious intent.

    2. Re:I call BS by sbaker · · Score: 1

      You don't even need lasers - the current generation of desktop projectors use a half inch slab of silicon with a piezo-electric layer and about a million tiny mirrors. That part ought to be cheap. The problem is getting red/green/blue
      light sources (not lasers) that are bright enough, cheap enough and monochromatic enough. They currently use white light and coloured filters - but those lamps are EXPENSIVE and they break fairly frequently.

      Those devices are down to maybe six inches on a side and an inch or two thick.

      If we could find suitable (ie more reliable, cheaper and cooler-running) light
      sources then the existing projector technology would be useful in a lot of places
      where this matchbox-sized projector is applicable.

      The ultra-tiny projector has a place for things like virtual reality though. If they are reasonably light then a couple of these could be mounted into a headset to generate a nice high resolution stereo display projected into a couple of curved mirrors. That technology already exists - but it's hideously expensive.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    3. Re:I call BS by in7ane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's amazing how quickly any discussion reaches the point of worrying about "what if", "someone with malicious intent"...

      Is this going to be the new thing to stop the potential advancement of any new technology? Really this should be a non issue - the equivalent would be your local hardware store worrying about selling boards, nails, and hammers - all at once! And god forbid to the same person (what if someone with malicious intent combines the three to obtain a board with a nail at the end?).

    4. Re:I call BS by Cecil · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't actually expect laser projection displays to go anywhere. The advantage of a laser for projection is its high brightness (intensity in a small area). That's great for vector display where you want to "draw" bright lines. When you use a scanning laser for a raster display you lose this advantage, though.

      Funny, the same thing could be said of cathode ray tubes. You know, that technology that is only now starting to be supplanted by LCDs? CRTs were great for line-drawing applications like oscilloscopes.

      There are also safety/legal issues with laser projection. Any laser bright enough for a large projection display is dangerous if it stops scanning.

      I'm guessing you are implying by the 'stops scanning' bit that you are worried it will burn a hole in the wall or something. Do you really have any concept how powerful a laser it takes to even make something warm, much less be "dangerous" to anything other than your eyes? We're talking LASER DIODES here, not xenon/argon lasers.

      Granted it may still be dangerous to the human eye, whether it's scanning or not, but so are laser pointers, and they're a bit easier to aim at someone's eyes.

      The projectors of course have interlocks that shut off the laser if the raster scan jams or stops, but such a system could fail or be defeated by someone with malicious intent.

      Yeah, because THAT's not an unbelievable, overly elaborate way of trying to be malicious. Are you a James Bond Supervillain or something?

    5. Re:I call BS by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      You NEED at least 5-10 Watt laser power to create a bright image the size of a normal tv. You need a laster spot size smaller than 0.5 mm to avoid pixalation/preserve sharpness.
      A laser with this properties WILL burn holes in skin, wood, paper, cloth or eyes if he stop for more than a few doutzend ms on one spot.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    6. Re:I call BS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Thorlabs Inc. Laser Diodes (Top ad link in google's sidebar) shows two blue laser diodes as being $0.00 each. Maybe someone should try ordering a few thousand of them at that price and suing them when they raise the order cost :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just ordered one MILLION laser diodes bwahahaha

    8. Re:I call BS by srleffler · · Score: 1
      Do you really have any concept how powerful a laser it takes to even make something warm, much less be "dangerous" to anything other than your eyes? We're talking LASER DIODES here, not xenon/argon lasers.

      Do you really have any concept how powerful a laser it takes to project a large raster-scanned image on a screen, that is bright enough to see in a lit room?

      A few watts, properly focused, is easily enough to burn combustible materials (not to mention eyes).

      Granted it may still be dangerous to the human eye, whether it's scanning or not, but so are laser pointers, and they're a bit easier to aim at someone's eyes.

      Personally, I think most of the laser pointers on the market should be illegal. Most of them are class III lasers, easily able to damage a person's eye. Not something that should be in the hands of children, anyway.

      Yeah, because THAT's not an unbelievable, overly elaborate way of trying to be malicious.

      I'm not worried Al Queda is going to attack the Empire State Building with modified laser projectors strapped to sharks. I'm more worried about what a teenager with a soldering iron could do...

      Are you a James Bond Supervillain or something?

      No, just a laser physicist. But thanks for asking. Bwahahaha.

    9. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's already been done, but no products have hit the market yet.

    10. Re:I call BS by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Well when your CRT stops scanning it will burn up the phosphors at the center of your monitor, so obviously there is some safety mechanism that could be used to prevent this sort of problem...

      What about if you fire the laser through some sort of 'light fuse' that will cut it off if the laser stops scanning? Might be complicated to build but would eliminate the problem...

    11. Re:I call BS by GoRK · · Score: 1

      The other advantage is that you need fewer optics to perform correction tasks with a laser projection system. things like zoom and focus and perspective correction can all be taken care of in the software / firmware that controls the mirrors. Think of all the expensive and large optics they are putting into this latest round of "bigscreen" rear projection tv's (the ones thate are ~ 10in deep) -- most have gigantic parabolic mirrors in them and some very specialized lenses to deal with focus. With laser projection, that stuff is very nearly irrelevant...

    12. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Parent wrote "couple of piezo-transducer-mounted mirrors would be a slightly more elegant mechanism"

      You mean like TI's very popular DLP chips?

    13. Re:I call BS by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1

      what if someone with malicious intent combines the three to obtain a board with a nail at the end?/B>

      Especially with bigger boards and bigger nails.

      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
    14. Re:I call BS by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      With my CRT, there is a metal casing around everything between the electron gun and the screen. Electrons have a very limited range in glass, so they cannot penetrate it.
      With a projector, there is free space between the laser and the projection surface.
      How do you stop people from accidentially put their hand before the lens? Or looking into the projector to see if its on?

      I agree that completely stopping would be a rare case, but at those laser intensities EVERYTHING is awfully dangerous.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    15. Re:I call BS by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind there is also a big red anode right on top of your CRT that carries up to 20kV and in many monitors holds the charge after the thing is off and unplugged. If you don't know how to discharge a CRT, you can very easily kill yourself with most any monitor or a TV. I guess that you would stop them from sticking their hand/face in there the same way that you keep them from grabbing the big red wire inside a CRT -- build it into a box! With a laser projector you do have the luxury of being able to easily do rear projection at extreme angles without any expensive optics like are required in current model rear projection monitors..

    16. Re:I call BS by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      You need the same amount (intensity) of light with a laser as you would with ordinary projection. Unless the laser is more energy efficient than the ordinary projector, you're better off with the latter.

      For true energy efficiency, you'll need to go with single-wavelength light sources, whether they be LED, laser LED, or something equivalent. With the current projector technology, we will never break 33% efficiency - we filter white light through a variety of technologies (LCDs, color wheels, multiple bulbs with fixed filters) and display the remainder on the screen. But imagine a DLP projector with a few sufficiently bright single-wavelength light sources. This could very well be more energy-effieicnt than some of the existing technologies, right now. Now, how big are the main components? Hmm, LEDs, DLP chip, lenses. Think you could fit that into a matchbox-size package if you used a smaller lense? This may not rely on any new technology, just refinements of existing tech. They could have (expensive) prototypes right now.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    17. Re:I call BS by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Just out of curiosity, I know the green laser pointer for sale on ThinkGeek is visible as a beam because of the frequency of the color, and its a little souped up. Are there any cool properties like this that a blue laser has?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    18. Re:I call BS by srleffler · · Score: 1
      A green laser is much more visible than a red one because your eye is MUCH more sensitive to green light than it is to red light. ALL laser pointers should be green.

      The only cool property I can think of for a blue laser is that due to its higher frequency the beam can be focused more tightly, allowing more dense optical storage, etc. Someday soon we will use enhanced DVD's that are read by a blue laser diode.

  13. I could have some fun by pvt_medic · · Score: 1, Redundant

    with a pocket size projector and DVD players becoming increasingly smaller. I could project things anywhere. Now I just need a good set of small battery powered speakers (with a sub of course)

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  14. /.'d? by DrugCheese · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dear PDA LIVE Users, the server is currently down for Software Upgrading. We will be back with you in a while. Kindly bear with us.

    We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

    Yours,
    The PDA LIVE.com Team

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:/.'d? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to answer your question, no, the site isn't slashdotted. That's PDA LIVE's normal content. I think you under the unrealistic impression that editors only link to highly informative sites.

  15. Fake... by loony · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Little info and terms like "Photon Vacuum" make this thing sound like the next high end graphics card from the bitboys... If they had a usable product they would give you at least some information - especially since the design is according to them patent protected...

  16. Mirror from creators website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The projector:
    http://www.upstream.fi/index.html

    The Technology
    http://www.upstream.fi/technology.html

    Upstream's unique and revolutionary technology, called Photon Vacuum, practically maximizes the amount of photons sent to the target from the light source in a minimum space. This is not an easy trick since the etendue law of light in physics requires more space for better efficiency. Our special technology enables us to get rid of a variety of components currently used in projectors that unnecessarily waste energy. The current table projectors extract typically only a few watts of light power out of 200W of input power.

    Photon Vacuum enables the smallest projector designs in the world, ultimately to a size of matchbox. It is possible to push the power consumption of the whole device ultimately to below 4 watts while still gaining a travel-TV sized color projection. There are a myriad of possible applications for this technology.

    First in the world, Upstream Engineering introduces a revolutionary optical technology that will enable video projection from matchbox-sized device running on batteries.

    Our expertise covers all the necessary areas from micro-optics to low-power digital electronics. We design custom projectors based on our unique technology.

    1. Re:Mirror from creators website by Phekko · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have a look at their careers-section, you see this:

      We are constantly looking for talent in optical and electrical design.

      The requirements for Optical Engineers:
      - university degree in physics with good grades
      - experience with Matlab and optical design software
      - proven ability to learn fast
      - minimum 3 years of work experience

      The requirements for Electrical Engineers:
      - university degree in Electrical Eng. with good grades
      - experience in electronics design and preferably embedded software
      - proven ability to learn fast
      - minimum 3 years of work experience

      We offer competitive remuneration package and possibility to ownership in the company. Our nice office in downtown Oulu provides a cosy and innovative working environment. We also have a small office in Encinitas, CA, USA. Please send your application with current CV to careers@upstream.fi.

      Judging by this they are now in the stage of looking for the people that will actually make the product happen but maybe I'm just a doubting Thomas

      --

      Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  17. website down by Andreas(R) · · Score: 5, Funny
    The website is slashdotted, here's a screenshot of the projector:


    .

    1. Re:website down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pocket sized porn thrower!

    2. Re:website down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yea, something's gonna get "projected" into my pocket alright... and it ain't gonna be light!

  18. Pretty Nice by CrypticSpawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For people who are often going to meetings, this makes it pretty quick to set up, could go off your laptops power source so no need looking for an outlet, no need to adjust it, nice and fast. If it is priced correctly, I would even buy it just to have since, you never know when a gadget like this will come in handy. Ok okay, yes I was the one to buy the USB laptop lamp, and no I don't use it :(

    1. Re:Pretty Nice by russellh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it can really be that small, it could eventually be integrated with the laptop.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
  19. Won't be long. by blair1q · · Score: 3, Funny


    Pretty soon, when you fly on an airplane, every time someone leans back their seat you'll hear the person behind them whine "hey! you're keystoning my screen, man!"

  20. This + Cameraphone by Apreche · · Score: 4, Funny

    Put one of these in a cameraphone. You'll soon have people giving slideshows of the pictures they took on vacation straight from the phone. oy.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:This + Cameraphone by Phekko · · Score: 1

      Not likely to happen before there'll be advances in battery technology or else they'll be VERY short slideshows. Then again, given most holiday pics it's probably all for the best.

      --

      Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  21. Matchbox Sized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Matchbox Sized? how much mili-volkswagon-beetles are that?

  22. Vaporware? by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their website doesn't even feature a single photo, prototype, or past products. I'm surprised this article was even approved. It certainly looks like yet another one of those companies which try to persuade people to buy shares, counting on a 'revolutionary' product which the company is unlikely to ever succeed in producing.

  23. Its back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their website is online now - still not very much information.

  24. What technology? by arsenix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they sure they didn't mean photon vapor? I hear they are working on fusion as well...

    --
    (this is offended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:What technology? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative
      Are they sure they didn't mean photon vapor? I hear they are working on fusion as well...

      Perhaps they are trolling for VC cash, in which case it should be called wallet vaccuum.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  25. this is needed by RealBeanDip · · Score: 1

    First of all, I'm guessing PDALive is running a matchbook size webserver and it started to flame so they took it down.

    This product (if it's not vapor) looks like it could be a great advance in this technology. I use a "regular" size projector daily and it's a pain in the butt to move the whole setup when we go on the road.

    The other issue is price; a decent LCD project costs $2K. If they could get the price down to under $500, that would be big. As it is, we have to move projectors quite often due to the cost of buying new ones.

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

  26. Advertise with them! by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 2, Interesting

    oh boy. now when your rfid chip is read, the ads on the walls can change to entice you as you walk by only to change for the next person's "sale match" item.

    yes, this will be a great tool for on-the-go presenters, but damn, i can hear the smiles on the marketing dept's collective face.

    1. Re:Advertise with them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, hot_Karls_bad_cavern, you could use a Guiness!

  27. I predict Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A brief google of "photon vacuum" comes up with a series of papers in the realm of quantum physics http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0954-3899/29/1/311.

    I need to finish reading what papers I can find regarding this concept, but so far it looks like something still in the arena of pure science. One article also refers to carbon nano tubes, so if this isn't vapor ware it will be expensive.

  28. Not that vapor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I have seen it - at least the prototype in a Finnish magazine (Just can't remember which one..)

    It had a very small controlling electronics part and the actual projector part was itself very small compared to a matchbox next to it. In that picture it had no casing at all.

    For that size, they were able to project up to 1024x768 resolution. For larger sizes, projector had to be bigger.

    I try to find some network references if there are any..

  29. practical applications... by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Funny
    the mind boggles..
    take it on a plane that still uses 'large screen at the front' and show your own movies

    following a bus at night- project it on the rear of the bus, drive safely and watch a movie/tv (dear, your are getting to close to the screen)
    put one on the rear of your motorcycle- pointed at your jacket, for various phrases to roll through-- should realy confuse someone somewhere..
    inverted peeping tom- sneak around vidding porn into peoples houses-think what happened when laser pointers first came out- then multiply X the number of porn movies ever made

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  30. USB Lamp by quantaq · · Score: 1

    Hey, I have one of those too! And no, it isn't practical for anything. I do keep it in my pack, though, and whip it out as a coolness factor at LAN parties. The newbies are scared shitless of me for the fifteen minutes of a WC3 game. I also have a Microsoft Strategic Commander that serves the same function; I plug it up too if I want 'em to be scared for a good half hour. The truth, of course, is that I suck at WC3, but I'm pretty good at the mind game.

    1. Re:USB Lamp by quantaq · · Score: 1

      Adding a mini-projector to the mix could be dangerous, though. Probably give some teenager an anxiety attack and result in hospitalization.

  31. I thought science... by holizz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    was about discovery and making great things. But apparently it's about patenting the best ideas.

    Why can't science be for the good of all not just for the ruling class? I hate it when people come up with good ideas then think they have to patent them.

    What would we be allowed to know about physics if Einstein patented his ideas? We'd have to pay to use E=mc^2.

    Science is about profit not discovering great things and sharing them with the world.

    1. Re:I thought science... by djmurdoch · · Score: 2, Informative

      You completely miss the point of what patents are *supposed* to be for. They encourage the publication of new ideas, so that they'll be available to all (for a licensing fee now, for free when the patent expires in 20 years).

      The alternative is trade secrets: inventors keep their inventions secret to protect their financial gain, but lose everything when someone else figures out what they did.

      Nowadays the meaning of patents has been distorted badly, but they are a good thing in their original formulation.

    2. Re:I thought science... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Einstein was a patent clerk.

  32. It is vapor.. by beldraen · · Score: 1

    The definition of vaporware is not that things indicate that they could not exist but that there is not evidence that it does exist. I only visited a few pages because it was under a slashdotting, but I did not see anything suggest the means to this mechanism. So, does it mean it is impossible? Certainly not, just as it is possible for Ashcroft to spontaneously start break dancing; however, they have to "prove" they are not vaporware.

    Throw this in with the 1 terabyte removable drive promised a year ago and the Mr. Bubble Fusion desktop units--when it becomes available for purchase then figure out how it impacts your life.

    Is it just me or are people just too damned concerned about things that "could be" than "are?"

    --
    Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
    1. Re:It is vapor.. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > are people just too damned concerned about things that "could be" than "are?"

      If we were never concerened with what "could be," nothing would ever "be".... er... are.

  33. projectors are meant to be moved... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    they come in portable versions, with hard cases.

    at 500$- no one would buy large screen tv's ever again...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  34. Technical Detals? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Im curious how this 'photon vacuum' thing works.. perhaps they have a patent out, or some actual information ( besides the marketing fluff on their pages )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  35. argh! by MacJedi · · Score: 1

    As if theft of projectors isn't bad enough already!

    --
    2^5
    1. Re:argh! by lordsilence · · Score: 1

      Just buy one of those lock-wires :)
      Right.. doesn't really help when the part which is attached to the projector is easily broken or ripped-away..
      Which is true for all commercial "projector theft-protection".
      It's a good deal for the producers... and for the thieves.

    2. Re:argh! by karnal · · Score: 1

      I have thought about this with Projectors, Laptops, you name it.

      Why not make it so that if someone IS that determined, it actually breaks said device so it cannot be used...?

      Always thought that would be cool. I've had people break into my car to steal cheap stereos before, and always thought it would be neat do set the stereo up so that it was effectively "dead" if the person tried to use it.

      On the other hand, they'd probably just try to sell it to a pawn shop anyways.

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:argh! by lordsilence · · Score: 1

      Well, there are some anti-theft system for stereos where you bring a small part of the stereo with you if you want to be safe. Without this part the stereo is unusable. The part in question is the front (with buttons and display) which is like a snap-on module which only works for the counter-part left in the car.
      It should take some serious beating to remove the "safety-device". Then again, is it a reasonable solution to have the hardware break if you remove the anti-theft device? What if you lost the key? Will the insurance-companies replace the items if they get broken in this fashion?

    4. Re:argh! by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1

      because if you catch them, or if you get it back somehow, it will be worthless. i recomend taking a sledgehammer to it right now. Guaranteed no-one will try to steal it.

  36. Yeah! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Finally I'll be able to play Quake on big screen!

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  37. Great Space Coaster? by Jake73 · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever see the Great Space Coaster? A kids show back in the late 70's / early 80's. I remember thinking that someday we'll have projectors that small that take a match-sized video 'capsule' and played a movie. It seems only days away now...

  38. Pocket projectors from other projects by pacc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Optics.org had an article
    this summer about a pair of other pocket projector projects. These includes using an array of lasers to limit scanning or a single higher powered light-source. If 'pocket' is the only thing that matters you might also look into a development of normal bar-code scanners.

  39. Look at a calendar by Mononoke · · Score: 4, Funny
    April 1 is still weeks away.

    Someone jumped the gun here.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  40. Dream on! by Tchaik · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do you actually believe that you can project a reasonable image with _4 watts_ of power? You need energy to create photons. Even with zero heat loss, you can't get a luminous image out of 4 watts. This is vaporware at best.

    1. Re:Dream on! by mindstrm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really?

      So... at 100% conversion, how much power does, say, your average 17" monitor put out in terms of light? (not counting heat, etc)

      You might be surprised just how bright 4 watts of pure light is.

      a 100W tungsten incandescent light bulb is about 2.6% efficent.... or 17.5 lumens/watt so 1750 lumens.

      Good tungsten halogen bulbs, 3.6% (3.6W) or 2500 lumens for a 100W source.

      So.. a matchbox projector with 4W of output with a 100% luminous efficiency would give us, say, 650lm/W * 4W = 2600 lumens...

      If you google around for projectors, you'll find that for $2000 you can get around a 2200 lumen projector.

      That's a 200W lamp.

    2. Re:Dream on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only 4 Watts of power couldn't produce a luminous image? Why not look at the output from a 4 Watt laser?

      You could do it twice... once per eye. ;)

    3. Re:Dream on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Dream on! by Tchaik · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the numbers. I indeed didn't think that lights were that inneficient. Looking on the web I didn't find your numbers though. A website of the canadian government says about incandescent lights that they are efficient between 5 & 8 % (so a factor of three with your estimate) and two other site states 10%

      http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/english/media/articles_in do or_may99_shininglight.cfm

      http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:UkT0L5j_sI8 J: cipco.apogee.net/res/relinca.asp

      http://www.cleanenergy.org/pressroom/newsletter/ Vo l.1-2/energyefficiency.html

      So using your calculations, we get around 800 lumens, with 100% efficiency which is not possible.

    5. Re:Dream on! by rco3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Given: 4 watts of total consumption to achieve a travel-size TV projection.

      Assume: 2 watts of that are dedicated to the generation of light for that projection.

      Possibilities:

      1) Use a white light source, which means (for that size and power level) white LEDs. Those are commercially available at 25 lumens/watt. This gives us 50 lumens, which will not make for a wall-sized image viewable except perhaps in pitch-black darkness. However, for a smaller image... say, 16"x12"? ... this is equivalent in brightness to an 1800-lumen projector making an 8' x 6' image. That's fairly bright...

      By 2005, 60 lumens/watt white LEDs will be out of the lab and into the market. This allows for our hypothetical projector to realize 120 lumens, or roughly 1/10 the output power of an 1100 lumen projector. You could make a 32" x 24" (40" diagonal) image at the same brightness as that 1100 lumen projector makes an 8' x 6' image.

      2) use multiple colored light sources, again LEDs. Most of the 'brightness' comes from the green, less from the red, least from the blue. You can assume 50 lumens / watt off the shelf right now, which probably means a 32" - 40" diagonal image from those 2 watts, at the same brightness as an 1100 lumen projector making an 8' x 6' image.

      Conclusion: *current* technology allows for TV-sized images to be produced, at brightnesses similar to those of larger images from brighter projectors, from only 2 watts of input power to the optical source.

      Sources: Don's LED Page.

      Disclaimer: comment author has been an A/V professional since 1987, holds masters in EE.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    6. Re:Dream on! by stienman · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Why not look at the output from a 4 Watt laser?
      You could do it twice... once per eye. ;)
      "

      You know, I think he might have a hard time aiming the laser for the second try with a hole through his head. Just a thought.

      -Adam

    7. Re:Dream on! by Preston+Pfarner · · Score: 1

      When I used to work at the LIGO 40 meter prototype, the primary laser there put out 4 watts in its primary mode. That mode (frequency or color) was in the visible band, a brilliant green. If an object like a plastic pen crossed the beam, it would immediately start to smoke and melt. We did not experiment with fingers (or eyes!), but it was pretty target-independent.

      If one were to have a matchbox-sized battery-powered device that emits four watts of continuous focusable light energy in the visible band, I would call that device a weapon. Or at least a component in one. Even the (yes, fictional) laser rifle desired by the Terminator was a pulsed 40W; ten of your 4W projectors would make a continuous 40W beam. The military name for that weapon would probably be the Force Projector.

      The laser was really generating around 30 watts(!), but across a number of frequencies (colors). For the simple task of burning things (or lab workers) that small variation in frequencies wouldn't matter. Of course, this laser required 48000 watts (480 volts at 100 amps), so it wasn't exactly lossless, but it does give a sense that a 4W beam of light isn't exactly minor.

    8. Re:Dream on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were wrong, and called on it, and you respond with a half-admission, followed by some half-assed google "research"?

      God, you suck.

    9. Re:Dream on! by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. I See also there is a difference between lumens and ansi lumens....

      I was quoting lumens, which max out at 650lm/W (100% efficiency)

    10. Re:Dream on! by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      Aren't the little bulbs on the christmas lights 4 watts each? that's not much light.

      Also at 4 watts its producing a "travel-TV sized" projection. What's a travel TV? Like 13"? 5"?

      I don't think this is going after the powerpoint or home theater markets.

      --
      blog
    11. Re:Dream on! by Triffid_Hunter · · Score: 1

      right, so the 2.2v green led that consumes 10ma (10ma*2.2v = 22mw = 0.022w) thats shining out of the front of your computer doesn't light your whole room at night? (I know mine does...)

      so, assuming its as efficient as an LED (it seems to be reported as being more efficient than one), something potentially 160 times brighter over an area (as an example) 160 times bigger (approx 37mmx37mm) would output no visible light, even though its the same amount of watts (and lumens if just as efficient as an LED) per sq. mm as the green light in the front of your computer that lights your whole room at night, and is more than visible enough during any time of the day?

      I'd better go and sue all the companies that produce LEDs for fraud through breaches of the third law of thermodynamics then...

  41. someone mod that up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first time I've actually laughed out loud while reading slashdot!
    I totally want to sneak around projecting porn into people's living rooms. what a great social experiment...

  42. Remote control by paradaxiom · · Score: 1, Funny

    Image how small the remote control will be ...

    1. Re:Remote control by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Image how small the remote control will be ...

      Brings up an interesting question. If the projector is smaller than an AC power cord and a VGA cable, how do you plug anything into it? And since the cables will weigh more than the hardware, how to you keep it in one place? Won't it slide around every time you touch a wire near it?

  43. Photon vacuum or product vacuum by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 2, Funny

    They talk about a "photon vacuum" but all is see is an information vacuum and a product vacuum. There is no there there.

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  44. Re:Not Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, we all trust Bitboys very much...

  45. power per square inch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The size of the projection will be initially around the size of standard travel televisions."

    Does anyone have a figure for the amount of light needed per square foot for good visibility on a screen with normal meeting room lighting? Assume solid state light source efficiency levels.

    There are two interesting parts to their claims. One is reduction in size, the other is reduction in power requirements. The statement above from their website leads me to believe they're really just reducing the size of the device - the 4W figure is spread over just a few square inches. When they need to cover several square feet the power consumption will increase proportionally, and so will the size of the device to allow for adequate cooling.

    1. Re:power per square inch? by Snart+Barfunz · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that the screen of the average travel TV is not much bigger than a matchbox anyway. So maybe size is the only thing special about this - and how hard would it be to make a miniature projector with a halogen bulb and a DLP chip? If this were to live up to the hype, they would have had to have made significant advances in both light sources and optics. I would have thought lasers were not the way to go as they'd be raster scanning so fast that the aggregate brightness of the image would be low - they don't persist like CRT phosphors, or have a constant light source behind each pixel as LCDs, plasmas and conventional projectors do. Or maybe it's just the projector that's small and it has a 48' solar collector light-piped into the back!

      --
      --- Yx3 = Delilah ---
  46. Willing to provide??? by ILL+Robinson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Upstream Engineering is willing to provide miniature color video projectors...

    Willing to provide???

    Infinium is willing to provide Hard OCP a lawsuit. Television networks are willing to provide good entertainment. The government is willing to provide conclusive evidence of foreign WMD programs.

    A lot of people are willing to provide things -doesnt mean that it will happen.

    I think someone should be willing to provide Upstream an alternative to Babelfish.

  47. So what you're saying is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this a round-about way of saying "Imagine a Beowulf cluster..."?

    Admit it, you thought about skipping down Troll Lane, but lost your nerve ;)

    1. Re:So what you're saying is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHA pwn3d

    2. Re:So what you're saying is.. by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      Isn't this a round-about way of saying "Imagine a Beowulf cluster..."?
      Admit it, you thought about skipping down Troll Lane, but lost your nerve ;)
      You must be new here! :->

      Funny:
      • Natalie Portman and hot petrified grits
      • All your base are belong to us.
      • A Beowulf cluster of something
      • In Soviet Russia...
        1. Something
        2. ???
        3. Profit!
      Troll:
      • *BSD is dead
      • Apple Mac OS-X is God's OS
      • Linux is not ready for the desktop
      • Microsoft Windows is secure
      The distinctions are subtle, but if you waste enough time here you too will able to tell the difference!
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
  48. Proof by Un0r1g1nal · · Score: 1

    Whether this company is BSing or not, were still getting to the point where technology is getting smaller and smaller, Look how far computers have come along, even compared to 10 years ago, most of the stuff we have was just someones pipe dream, and compared to 30years ago, most of it was science fiction at best. The only things holding us back realisticly is major coprerations censoring the information that is available to the masses, technological advances that would revolutionalise industries and hence make them loose profits. Where would we be today if during the industrial revolution the protestors had won? We would still be in the dark ages, no electricity, no machines, no technology.

    --
    If at first you DON'T succeed, Skydiving is NOT for YOU!!
  49. Why? Check your math by TheophileEscargot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Assume I'm in a room with a 100 watt light bulb. Call it 5 x 5 x 5 metres: that's 150 square metres of wall. So, the background is 0.67 watts per square meter. They're talking about 4 watts for a "travel TV sized" screen. Assume 50cm by 50cm, that's 16 watts per square meter. The image should be easily visible in indoor light.

    Don't forget that while the projector won't be 100% efficient, neither is a light bulb.

    1. Re:Why? Check your math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will someone please mod parent up? (4 watts in more than adequate -- even in a less than 100% effecient system -- you know, like in the real world).

  50. 4W is possible. by Fzz · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    It is possible to push the power consumption of the whole device ultimately to below 4 watts while still gaining a travel-TV sized color projection.

    Well, a 15-inch LCD panel consumes about 30W, all in. I don't know how big a travel-TV is, but less say it's 7.5inches. Assuming power is proportional to area, then an LCD 7.5-inch travel TV would consume 7.5W. I assume some of that power is absorbed in the colour filters, and some more is lost in the polarizer, and some is used by the TFT itself. So it doesn't seem impossible to me to have a 7.5inch display that consumes 4W.

    Of course this could still be vaporware, but I don't think the 4W number is a dead giveaway.

  51. Minority Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or does this remind anyone of the advertising from Minority Report? You know - "Welcome back to the Gap, Mr. blah!"

  52. Willing to? Great! by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    Upstream Engineering is willing to provide miniature color video projectors for use with portable video player, travel TV, laptops and handhelds next year.

    Yeah, most companies would keep this kind of tech to themselves, to impress their friends!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  53. Danger Flag! by NickFusion · · Score: 1

    This is not an easy trick since the etendue law of light in physics requires more space for better efficiency. Our special technology enables us to get rid of a variety of components currently used in projectors that unnecessarily waste energy.

    I hope they are able to do what they claim, but I'm always wary of companies that claim to have overcome the laws of physics.

    Maybe I'm just bitter after getting burned on that anti-gravity skateboard deal.

    --
    What were you expecting?
  54. You Think Laptop Heat Dispersion is Bad? by dupper · · Score: 1

    Try an uncooled 4-watt bulb squeezed into half a cubic inch of space on your lap. Goodbye, sperm!

    1. Re:You Think Laptop Heat Dispersion is Bad? by man_ls · · Score: 1

      That's................nothing.

      A laptop dissipates upwards of 60w directly into your lap...your cell phone battery that warms up while talking, is probably about 4w of heat -- if even that. The battery is 3.3-some V, which means its pushing just over 1.2A of current.

    2. Re:You Think Laptop Heat Dispersion is Bad? by MrPBoy · · Score: 1

      I do a lot of product demos and we just got the most expensive/smallest projector we could find. It is roughly the heigth and width of a carton of cigarettes and about 2/3 as long. It is by far the smallest one I've ever seen.

      It has great resolution and brightness. The problem is, depending on ambient heat and air circulation in the room, the thing overheats and turns off after 1-2.5 hours. This is a real problem.

  55. Think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... you couldn't use a regular projector?

    1. Re:Think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $howmuch?

  56. Re:Aw man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shows how much Slashdot checks a post before it hits the front page ...

    Yeah, but if they checked stories and only published the real ones, we'd only see half a dozen per day or one every 4 hours on average. That goes against their economic self-interest of driving up ad-views by conditioning the SlashDot lemmings to refresh the home page every minute.

    So if even stupid stories generate ad-views... why should they stop?

  57. Waiting for this for ages! by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1
    This is the technology which is going to revolutionize mobile computing - and I have been waiting for it for quite some time!

    Traditional PDAs are about to make a real change, with both Input *AND* output projected.

    You'll place your PDA on a table and project the screen against a wall, or stretched vertically, onto the table ahead of it, while it simultaneously projects the keyboard onto the table.

    I also anticipate the keyboard projector will ultimately detect finger movements in a separate area, and act as a mouse also.

    How freaking cool will this technology be? VERY - but the bottleneck is *STILL* going to be battery power - so - come on you Fuel-cell freaks: crack that problem!!

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
  58. Sure you can by atrader42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    get smaller, cheaper and more high quality?
    Pick 2. you can't have all three.


    You can have just about anything you want for any price you want--you just have to be willing to wait until somebody comes up with it.

    1. Re:Sure you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I thought bumper-sticker mottos were immutable laws!!! What shall I tell my children!?

  59. R2D2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes! I can finally build a holo-projector to stick into the head of the full size R2D2 I am building at home!

    This truely is news for nerds and it really matters!

  60. Willing... by CySurflex · · Score: 1

    Upstream Engineering is willing to provide miniature color video projectors for use with portable video player, travel TV, laptops and handhelds next year.

    Now thats either really poorly translated from Japanese or something, or that's a really ego-centric business.. Willing? WILLING? I'm paying you money, you better be willing.

    1. Re:Willing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Willing? WILLING? I'm paying you money, you better be willing.

      You dirty little man!

  61. mini 3d projectors in the near future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Merge this technology with some other bleeding edge 3d/holographic technologies and some concepts that used to only exist in scifi suddenly have some real-world possibility.

    Palmtop holographic photos and/or projections could seem likely in the next few years?

  62. excellent.... by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    if these sell for computers, and at a good retail price, viewsonic's in deep shit, most of their projectors are fscking between $1500 and $3000

    this would be great to see in use for computers, then people with laptops need to show a quick presentation, they can plug one in quick and show it oog, or laptops with these built in.

    wouldnt be too shabby.

  63. Best I can figure... by stienman · · Score: 3, Informative

    They could be doing laser scanning, but I doubt it. I bet they're using LEDs as the light source. Possibly micro arrays for the actual image, but most likely still sticking with a small LED array that has the three colors, a special lensing system that focuses them through a monochrome LCD (cheap non-high temperature transmissive) and then another lens which then produces the output.

    This would provide several advantages. First, it would be fairly efficient since 4W of LED power is still fairly efficient (though still 'hot' and not close at all to the ideal 100%). The cheap LCD display due to the lower heat. Small size, especially if high index refrective lenses are used.

    Disadvantages are many. Traditional projectors use a bulb which, for all intents and purposes can be modelled as a point light source. Optics are easy, comparatively. For a LED array the optics would be...non trivial. I suppose they could be using single LEDs but even then the leds are seperated, which still makes the job difficult. Another is that the smaller the package, the smaller the optics. The smaller the optics the worse the image. There's a reason you'll never get 4 meter telescope pictures out of a 10cm telescope. The resolving power of the lenses is limited by their size. The LED element will be huge compared to the lens size, and the picture is simply going to be poor.

    It'll happen, through this speculative idea or through another, but real multimedia projectors for a given size projection have to be at least as large as the lens has to be for the quality you want. The only thing they might be able to make gains on without ruining the quality are lamp efficiency, lower heat output (these are coupled), and the design of the lens systems currently needed to throw a decent image across a room.

    -Adam

  64. Re:As envisaged by NEC by tieke · · Score: 1

    That's basically what the pen computer mentioned a week or so ago was on about - another example of a device looking at integrating a small-scale projector (Picture of pen computer in use). The keyboard was from canesta and the display was an LED projector. The article was a bit hazy on whether their display model contained a working version or not, but as the prototype did cost around $30,000, it might be a few weeks before it gets particularly cheap.

  65. the killer cable by Dr.Knackerator · · Score: 1

    with something that small the cable is going to outweigh the projector. you'd better be very careful how you set it up or your $5K projector could just go whizzing off the table if you've got some cable overhang.

    or maybe there's going to be a nice big rubber sucker on the bottom?

  66. Mini Projectors in Film by jhhl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the Boorman film ZARDOZ (1974), the futuristic denizens of that film use mini-projectors like these in their rings for interfaces. You can also see Charlotte Rampling and Sean connery in various states of undress.

    --
    -- Real Stupidity is the Artificial Intelligence of the 21st century
  67. The answer: Microdisplay and a high flux LED by thomastheo1 · · Score: 1

    Here's a possible solution. Use a an ultra-small LCD such as the kopin cyberdisplay (www.kopin.com), which is a transmissive display, and combine it with some optics and a luxeon 5watt LED. Voila, you have a VERY small projector, which is battery operable and cheap. I looked into it, and have discovered that it is feasible, if only I could find a cheaper source of microdisplays! Kopin caters to OEMS, and all other manufacturers of similar LCD's do as well. Samples and development boards are rediculously expensive. Any advice?

    1. Re:The answer: Microdisplay and a high flux LED by thomastheo1 · · Score: 1

      PS> I have checked the website, and there are some pictures on the site which clearly show a high dome Luxeon Star LED, and there is also a photo which shows a microdisplay with ribbon cable attached. This is clearly the way that the device works. Very simple, and also very cheap to make.

  68. Re:Best I can figure... by thomastheo1 · · Score: 1

    It is definitely not a new idea...

    There are several prototypes.

    for example:
    http://www.insightmedia.info/news/LumiLe dsDescribe sPocketProjector.htm

    PDF here:
    http://www.lumileds.com/pdfs/techpaperspres /MD2002 .pdf

    Globaldisplay even markets a mini-projector, although it does not use an LED.
    (http://www.globaldisplay.com.hk)

  69. Siemens already developed it in 2001!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Siemens already have this technology, working as a prototype... from 2001!? Upstream is a laggard!

    http://w4.siemens.de/FuI/en/archiv/pof/heft1_02/ ar tikel03/

    The miniature format is also of great interest in the field of projection technology. Siemens has developed a matchbox-sized daylight projector that can be plugged into a cell phone with a corresponding interface. The projector can be used for presentations in small meetings or for surfing the Internet. This projection cell phone was recently presented at the CeBIT 2002 computer show in Hannover, Germany. An LED array in the module lights up a microdisplay through a beam splitter. The light is modulated with the image information by the display, then exits through the projection lenses. Full-color pictures can be generated by rapidly illuminating the monochrome display with the red, blue and green LED colors in sequence. "This mini-projector can project onto any surface--even a piece of paper or the back of an airplane seat," says Marco Werner from Siemens Information and Communication Mobile. The projector currently generates 1.1 lm, enough to illuminate a postcard-sized surface. "But the prototype still offers enormous room for improvement," says Werner enthusiastically. With optimized design and equipped with more intense light-emitting diodes, it should be possible to improve the luminous efficiency by a factor of ten over the next two years.

    Of course, lasers have also been considered as a light source. Their use would make it possible to eliminate the focusing optics and to project onto curved surfaces. However, suitable miniature laser diodes are currently available only in red. The efficiency level of the blue and green solid-state lasers now on the market is still too low. In the distant future, Werner can also imagine 3D laser projectors that have no need of fixed projection screens. In such a situation, the image would then be created on a boundary surface like a patch of air whose density has been altered using ultrasound.

  70. PCMCIA projector by k4_pacific · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that be cool? Just stick it in your PCMCIA slot, then tilt the laptop so it points at the screen.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  71. patent office search by hellmarch · · Score: 1

    http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PT O2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch-bool.ht ml&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=photon+vacuum&FIELD1=&co1=AN D&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=ptxt

  72. Maybe.. by webteeth · · Score: 1

    Video iPod?

  73. Why not use HID for projectors? by tallpaul · · Score: 1


    I know I'm horribly ignorant about all of these things, but why not use HID bulbs for projectors? Everyone is so concerned about light output, heat, bulb life, etc. It seems like HID would be better on all of those counts.

  74. Pictures of the prototype by ken-guru · · Score: 2, Informative

    The local newspaper Kaleva here in Oulu Finland ran a story about them and their prototype:

    Kaleva's story

    Bigger picture

    The caption of the picture says: Prototype and a matchbox. World's smallest videoprojector consists of a lightning machine, which captures light more efficiently. There is also text about the future screen resolutions and the cost of the thing, 700? at first and later 250?.

    --
    jari / dj ken-guru
    1. Re:Pictures of the prototype by laalto · · Score: 1
      Here are some points translated from Kaleva's story:

      • They have been developing the device since last spring.
      • They believe they can push the efficiency to about 60 % (from 2 % in current projector designs).
      • The shape of light they produce is already rectangular. Traditionally a light source is cut into rectangular shape.
      • They estimate a initial price of 700 EUR and expect it to drop to 250 EUR.
      • The device does not have batteries of its own but it runs off a laptop battery for example.
      • The device is expected to hit the shops in 2005.
      • They had to come out the closet with this product because it was presented in Finnish Venture Forum in Helsinki last week.
  75. Think bigger by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Think bigger: How about the outside wall of the neighbours house?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.