Slashdot Mirror


Spirit Takes Snapshot of Earth

ControlFreal writes "On its 66th Sol on Mars, Mars Exploration Rover Spirit has obtained its first full view of crater Bonneville. In doing so, Spirit achieved its primary travel destination, as set out in its initial itinerary. Furthermore, Spirit has now travelled more than 300 meters, thereby fulfilling its minimum mission success criteria. With this, and Opportunity halfway through its primary mission, and having discovered very strong indications of a wet Martian past, NASA has truly many an astonishing interplanetary succes story! See the overview at the Mars Rover site for more details." Another reader writes "Among the 'money-shots' from the Mars rovers would have to rank the 'pale blue dot' image released today--a view looking back towards Earth. The larger image also includes the horizon and Sun, which because the Earth is seen as an inner planet closer in towards the Sun from a martian perspective, is difficult to photograph without saturation by solar glare."

257 comments

  1. Congratulations! by tizzyD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From all of us out here that dreamed of stepping on the Martian surface at one time or another, thanks for taking me there--at least in spirit.

    Good job all!

    --
    ...tizzyd
    1. Re:Congratulations! by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 5, Funny

      thanks for taking me there--at least in spirit.

      So you were a stow-away on Spirit?? How is your internet conncetion up there?

      --

      Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
    2. Re:Congratulations! by (void*) · · Score: 0, Funny

      So grateful for the opportunity to be there, in spirit.

    3. Re:Congratulations! by CoolVibe · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think he gets decent speeds, but the latency must be a bitch.

    4. Re:Congratulations! by dave420 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      +5,Cheese more like!

      How the heck is that insightful? It's a guy, clearly off his rocker, trying to thank NASA for sending something to mars, which apparently makes the fact he never went to mars OK. Even though NASA won't read it, and looking at JPEGs of something on the net isn't the same as seeing it in person... sheesh.

    5. Re:Congratulations! by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      and looking at JPEGs of something on the net isn't the same as seeing it in person

      It isn't?? There goes my love-life then.

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    6. Re:Congratulations! by dave420 · · Score: 0
      Apart from that, obviously. I mean, that goes without saying.

      :-P

    7. Re:Congratulations! by dave420 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Modded as OVERRATED?? The mind boggles...

    8. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think I see my house...

    9. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your cynicism will serve you well in life my friend. Here's hoping your therapist will be able to eventually help you....

    10. Re:Congratulations! by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was taking a picture of Mars at the exact same time this photo was taken. This gives me the distance record for a photo-of-you-taking-a-picture-of-me-taking-a-pictu re-of-you-taking-a-picture-of-me.

    11. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is ALL Bush's fault!

      Sorry just getting ready for the next /. article.

    12. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would relativity and simultaneity do to these photos?

      What kind of exposure times would you need to get a photo-of-you-taking-a-picture-of-me-taking-a-pictu re-of-you-taking-a-picture-of-me with the light having to travel from Earth to Mars to Earth ...

  2. YAY by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 4, Funny

    I CAN SEE MY HOUSE FROM HERE :D

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
    1. Re:YAY by zangdesign · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I CAN SEE MY HOUSE FROM HERE :D

      And so can any Martians that are hiding out there in the desert.

      I'm lamer than you! Wait ... uh ...

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  3. hmmm by bbowers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Feels a little bit humbling... I feel so small and insignificant :-\

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
    1. Re:hmmm by BillFarber · · Score: 4, Funny

      Based on your slashdot Friends list, I'd say that's about right. ;)

    2. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are insignificant, troll-boy.

    3. Re:hmmm by GoofyBoy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How is this insightful?

      Because before he saw this photo and was told that dot was earth, he had a big ego and though too much of himself?

      Just post a degrading comment bashing SCO/MS/RIAA and ego will be inflated right back up there. Seems to work with lots of /.ers.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:hmmm by dalamarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Voyager 1 took a very similiar image as it was leaving the solar system in 1990. Carl Sagan, one of the key contributors to the project, used it for inspiration to title his book Pale Blue Dot. I agree with the humbling factor, just like I did then. But I feel that I am more a part of something larger and more grand, makes me happy.

    5. Re:hmmm by Clinoti · · Score: 1
      It's insightful because it's a genuine human reaction to seeing that in the reality of the big picture (- pun) our idea of being kings/queens of the world means little or nothing when the scope is no longer limited to terra.

      I think when looking at the image with an understanding of what it may mean can depending on ones mindset, conjour up feelings of insignificance or spark up that MetaEgo to make a difference.

      --

      Let's keep in mind that patents are in place to keep lawyers employed and keep them litigating. -CatGrep

    6. Re:hmmm by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >our idea of being kings/queens of the world means little or nothing when the scope is no longer limited to terra.

      Our ideas of kings and queens are pretty small when our scope IS limited to earth.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    7. Re:hmmm by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere out in space,
      'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    8. Re:hmmm by jxs2151 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mr Sagan probably said it better than any of us can.

    9. Re:hmmm by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah.

      Can we have yer liver then?

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    10. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I should have a small friends list here. The list of contacts of real people on my cell phone is much much larger I assure you. Just goes to show I don't sit on my ass on the computer all day :-)

      Thats very true... I have a small friends list here because I sit here all day and no one likes me. I try to make snide remarks but they never seem to fill that hole that we call loneliness. If you really want to see how much of a loser I am, then come check out MY friends list:

      http://slashdot.org/~BillFarber/friends

      Please excuse me while I go whack the pud.

  4. They're not fooling anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    we all know the earth is flat and the "moon landings" were faked.

    1. Re:They're not fooling anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Oh come on!

      We all know the earth is a disc on the back of a turtle.

    2. Re:They're not fooling anyone... by l0wland · · Score: 0, Redundant

      And if you take a close look at the background of the Bonneville crater, you can actually see an empty can of Coke blinking in the sunlight.

      --

      "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
    3. Re:They're not fooling anyone... by nebaz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      But what is the turtle standing on?

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    4. Re:They're not fooling anyone... by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

      Ha, nice try young man, but it's turtles all the way down!

      --
      That's right. All your base.
    5. Re:They're not fooling anyone... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

      another turtle... ad infinitum...

    6. Re:They're not fooling anyone... by mog007 · · Score: 1

      That's just foolish. The Universe was created by a giant beast that just sneezed it out. BEWARE THE COMING OF THE GIANT WHITE HANDERCHIEF!

  5. Check it out... by loserbert · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you turn down your screen resolution so everything is bigger, you can see yourself waving.

    1. Re:Check it out... by iammrjvo · · Score: 1

      I use Opera. I just zommed in until I could see my dog.

      --
      Ha, ha! Nobody ever says Italy.
    2. Re:Check it out... by ideatrack · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was blinking, can they take it again?

    3. Re:Check it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you turn down your screen resolution so everything is bigger, you can see yourself waving.

      Now let me get this straight. You're telling me that if I turn down my screen resolution, it will make my screen bigger?! This must be too good to be true. Did you get any inside tips from the guy who wrote the article about doubling the size of a hard drive? Please give me all the details, I am going to write a Howto ASAP.

      And to top it off you can see yourself waiving... Truely amazing.

  6. Infinite perspective vortex? by CoolVibe · · Score: 1, Funny

    Heck, and I thought it involved fairy cake. Turns out you need to travel to mars first. Oh well.

  7. Important missions on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The news coverage of the exciting explots of these plucky extra-terrestrial rovers seems to have diminished. No pictures (well no original pictures) of aliens in the foreground of the Megabytes of images, no puddles, no golf-balls. Not very inspiring viewing.

    I think the realisation that the missions were not going to be highly inspirational came when it occurred to me that the first rover landed on a plain and the chosen mission was to drive over to a crater and look in while the second rover landed in a crater and its chosen mission is to take a picture of the plain just over the rim.

    Seems that getting there was the easy bit, achieving something meaningful has been a bit harder.

    1. Re:Important missions on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it has proven meaningful..they've found evidence that mars was once a lot like this planet. wouldnt you find that meaningful?

    2. Re:Important missions on Mars by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      That really depends on what meaning you infer from what the rovers originally set out to accomplish. What I find inspirational is that they found bulletproof evidence that water once existed on Mars and may still exist in the form of brine.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    3. Re:Important missions on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      realisation

      Hm... your missions weren't highly inspirational because your rover blew up.

      Spirit and Opportunity, OTOH, captured the American imagination for weeks and still contribute to front page news of major newspapers at least once a month. NASA's websites have experienced record domestic accesses since the landings. We saw Isidis, of Frank Black songs and Kim Robinson novels, come to life. We looked on deserts eerily similar to our own. We discovered probable evidence of water on Mars. There was drama and suspense as both rovers malfunctioned. There was national joy as it was hacked back into functionality.

      You can tell this was an idea that the public was interested in by looking at one simple thing - politicians' reactions. Mars this, Mars that, has been the word of the day, and it all started with the rovers. Even if the conspiracy theorists are right and it's only cover to militarize the moon, the fact is that politicians wrapped their true intentions in a cloak of Mars, because that's what people wanted to hear. That's a big step. Nobody gave a crap about Mars before the rovers.

    4. Re:Important missions on Mars by l0wland · · Score: 3, Informative
      " The news coverage of the exciting explots of these plucky extra-terrestrial rovers seems to have diminished."

      When the press-conference of NASA was given about their revolutionairy findings, CNN was the only channel (at least here in The Netherlands) that paid attention to it. But as soon as it became clear that they had found indications for water, and NOT little green man, they immediately switched to other news. I think they only showed about 4 minutes of the press-conference. That shows how much (or lack of) interest the press and most of the public have in this mission. And I think it's sad, looking at the importance of it all.

      --

      "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
    5. Re:Important missions on Mars by danila · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems that getting there was the easy bit, achieving something meaningful has been a bit harder.
      Like having Janet Jackson show a breast or what? The definition of "meaningful" that general public (and mass media) uses differs a lot from what intelligent people consider meaningful. Most people are idiots and sheeps, that's a fact of life. They want big explosions, deaths and sex. If NASA manages to crash their next spaceship into Paris, destroying the Eiffel Tower, I guarantee it will be a hot topic longer than anything related to the twin rovers. If a senior NASA officer (female) poses for Hustler, this will drive more traffic to nasa.gov than any photo they can shoot on Mars. That's a sad reality, but to stand on the position of the public and claim that rover missions were not really meaningful is totally wrong.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    6. Re:Important missions on Mars by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      When the press-conference of NASA was given about their revolutionairy findings, CNN was the only channel (at least here in The Netherlands) that paid attention to it. But as soon as it became clear that they had found indications for water, and NOT little green man, they immediately switched to other news. I think they only showed about 4 minutes of the press-conference. That shows how much (or lack of) interest the press and most of the public have in this mission. And I think it's sad, looking at the importance of it all.

      No, that's not sad, that is an appropriate response. Water? I thought we already know there was water there, in the polar ice caps. How is this new information, really? If they had found even the remnants of even the most basic bacteria, everybody would still be talking about it. Instead they said that there used to be water in that area. Big deal. Why don't they hold a press conference and announce their big huge discovery: "Ladies and gentleman, after hundreds of millions of dollars and years of effort, we have discovered that Mars has rocks." And just 300 meters? That is about the length of a city block. The vast majority of people who watch CNN are more interested in Laci Peterson, and that might not be something wrong with the people watching CNN. If NASA wants press coverage, they should do something worth that press coverage, like Air Force test pilots, all named "Buzz", playing golf on mars: now that would be cool.

    7. Re:Important missions on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it meaningful yes, but it is a question of whether this is popularly meaningful. Does the American public feel it is getting its tax dollars' worth? I imagine that there is a good deal of science data which has been downloaded that we haven't seen. I expect that the interpretation of this data is equivocal right now. I realise that publishing raw science data to Jo public is about as useful as publishing statistics, and so I'm sure do the fine folk at Nasa.

      I remain concerned that the public isn't staying engaged with the whole project. Yes, we got beautiful pictures (Hey look, this dot is the Earth), but simple mistakes have been made along the way because the public perception of the project has been misjudged. The colour correction problem for starters, just how difficult can it be? Oh we goofed, we used IR instead of visible red in the mix, duh.

      OK, Spirit and Opportunity landed, Beagle didn't. I think though that the British public were as inspired by their failed attempt to land a disposable camera on Mars as the Americans have been to land a pair with wheels.

      Oh, the original comment was flamebait, well spotted whoever it was.

    8. Re:Important missions on Mars by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "No pictures (well no original pictures) of aliens in the foreground of the Megabytes of images,"

      I dunno... There are a few pics that seem to have small worms in them.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    9. Re:Important missions on Mars by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      Wow. Bitter much?

      I hope you feel better now.

  8. Insignificance by xneilj · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Socrates, you are very convincing and I would believe you if only I hadn't heard of the Total Perspective Vortex That's where you see the whole infinity of creation and a tiny speck showing yourself in relation to it. The shock of one's insignificance is enough to kill most people."

    -- Arthur Dent.

    --
    rm -rf / is the evil of all root
  9. It's really sad that image is monochrome. by zzztkf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As I has seen masr last summer, it looked so big and red. I wonder when looked back from Mars, what color is earth.

    I have seen pitcure from interplanetory orbit to take Earth and Moon in a single pitcture. Color contrast between them has impressed me a lot.

  10. I am surprised by UltimaGuy · · Score: 1

    I thought this will also be a total failure, but I am really happy to know that I am wrong. Now, bush has another supporter for his *travel to mars* plans. PS : Have any of you read the Edgar Rice Burroughs fiction books about life on Mars. I really liked them. Now to know that they were all false....

    --
    "In questions of science the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual."
  11. In case the image gets /. 'd: by Jase_000 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Here's the image in ASCII representation:

    . <-- You are here
    1. Re:In case the image gets /. 'd: by itsme1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok, but where's the Moon ?

    2. Re:In case the image gets /. 'd: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moon --> . o <-- You are here

    3. Re:In case the image gets /. 'd: by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      . <-- You are here

      I knew the Earth was getting polluted, but this is sad!

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    4. Re:In case the image gets /. 'd: by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1
      Ok, but where's the Moon ?

      Maybe it was eclipsed?

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
    5. Re:In case the image gets /. 'd: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh great, next will see dirty pictures of the earth mooning the cosmos! Cosmic smut.

    6. Re:In case the image gets /. 'd: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      .

      I changed the font and knocked Earth off its axis. Ascii has made me a god!

    7. Re:In case the image gets /. 'd: by LMCBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Moon is 384,000 km from Earth. Mars is 329,000,000 km from Earth. Therefore, as seen from Mars, the Earth and Moon are separated by, at most, 4 arcseconds. That means that without a telescope, you cannot resolve the Earth-Moon system from Mars.

      In other words, that dot is *both* Earth and Moon.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  12. Pic of Earth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dang. They could have told us when to say cheese.

    1. Re:Pic of Earth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks guys.. I've been trying to get a +5 Funny for years... finally made it!

  13. Slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mysql://astronaut:@localhost.localdomain/astrobio failed to connect
    User astronaut@astrobio.net has already more than 'max_user_connections' active connections

    It's not the astrobio's first time...

  14. But the cultural impact... by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... I don't think this will be very important. It's a dot in the sky like any other, with just an arrow pointing to it to say that it's Earth. There's no real visceral connection there.

    I doubt any image returned by space exploration in the next few thousand years will change our perspective on things as much as the Earthrise photographs from Apollo 8. Our first view of Earth from the Moon, and it showed so much. It was large and clear enough to connect with, it was plainly Earth with oceans and continents and clouds, and it was tiny - all of human history and culture, all our achievements, in that small spot. Now that's quite a culture shock.

    But 'pale blue dot' images? It's just a dot. It might just as well be Venus for all the emotional impact I get from it. Maybe if we could see _two_ dots from Mars - Earth and Moon - then we'd get the same sense of smallness we got from the Apollo views, because that would establish identity at the gut level.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:But the cultural impact... by oneiron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that's the bigger impact... Earth as a small dot can help to show humans just exactly how insignificant our planet can be in the grand scale of the universe. Sounds like the small dot doesn't feed your ego in quite the same way as the pictures from Apollo 8 did. Well good... If you want a big emotional impact, take a look at the recent "deepest space picture ever" taken by hubble. Then count the galaxies you can see in a picture that shows an area about the size of what you would see if you looked at the sky through a drinking straw.

    2. Re:But the cultural impact... by altairmaine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You make a very interesting point here, one that sent me running to look up some numbers and find a calculator. My fast crappy math seems to suggest that we could very plausibly see the moon from Mars with a decent camera.

      When the rovers were launched, Mars was about 78 million km from Earth. The average distance from Earth to the moon is roughly 400000 km. So assuming the angles are right, there would be a maximum angular separation of about s/r = 0.005 radians or 0.3 degrees - more than enough to distinguish with the naked eye. The moon is fairly large; its diameter is about 3/4 that of Mercury. Although it is not as brightly illuminated due to greater distance from the sun, my intuition is that it ought to be visible to the naked eye.

      I don't know if the Spirit or the Opportunity cameras are up to it, or if the orbital configurations are so convenient right now, but a photo of the Earth and moon like that you suggest seems entirely plausible.

    3. Re:But the cultural impact... by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Sounds like the small dot doesn't feed your ego in quite the same way as the pictures from Apollo 8 did.

      It's not quite that. With Apollo 8's images, you look at it and it's Earth, obviously and plainly Earth. With the images from Mars, it's a dot. I know intellectually that it's Earth, but that's just not the same. If the picture was detailed enough that I could _see_ that it was Earth - as I mentioned, maybe if we could see the Moon beside it - then I might feel something for it.

      If I only know that it's Earth because it's in the position in the Martian sky where Earth is calculated to be, then it's just another manifestation of mathematics.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:But the cultural impact... by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      It wasn't enough of a culture shock to stop us bombing the fuck out of each other at the least provocation ever since. So much for "brotherhood of man" "small speck in the universe" "no borders visible from space" stuff that a lot of people were spouting at the time.

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    5. Re:But the cultural impact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately if you look back at the Earth you're looking towards the sun.

      While the cameras are probably good enough, the Moon isn't well lit and there's a lot of glare. It doesn't surprise me that you can't make out the Moon (although it probably is in the photo).

    6. Re:But the cultural impact... by hetairoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      then it's just another manifestation of mathematics.

      No, seriously, turn it your geek badge now. And take that patch off your jacket. If you can't see the significance and 'cultural impact' of taking a look at ourselves from another planet then I think you lean more to the side of our culture that watches Jerry Springer, certainly not the 'news for nerds' side.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    7. Re:But the cultural impact... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately if you look back at the Earth you're looking towards the sun. While the cameras are probably good enough, the Moon isn't well lit and there's a lot of glare.

      What's the maximum angular separation of Earth and Sun, as seen from Mars? Venus - as we see in the night sky right now - can get a long way from the sun and become very, very prominent in the evening sky. Spirit can't see the Moon now, but perhaps in a couple of months?...

      Our big problem will probably be that the Moon is a very dark body. Earth is covered with highly reflective seawater, and bright white clouds, but the Moon is dull rock all over. Perhaps the big problem in seeing the Moon would be the glare of Earth, not the Sun?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:But the cultural impact... by TrackerChamp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, you could - for example - look at the photo of Earth and moon together that was taken from the European Mars Express half way enroute to Mars. You can clearly see Earth & moon as small spots in the universe. Very interesting photo, I think!

    9. Re:But the cultural impact... by Target+Practice · · Score: 1

      It might just as well be Venus for all the emotional impact I get from it.

      And that's the impact. Suddenly, we're lost in the view of the universe. Our significant planet Earth is not too significant when you step a certain distance away, is it? It's just a blue dot.

      --
      There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
    10. Re:But the cultural impact... by binarybum · · Score: 1

      what are you talking about? There is a huge overlap between the occult interstellar sci-fi wackos who include an interplanetary cultural viewpoint in everything they do and the Springer crowd. I think Springer has probably had more Raeliens on his show and in his audience than anyone else.
      Anyway, the previous poster was correct, a dot in some haze holds about as much impact as the ascii jokes posted here (not to say that either is completely devoid of impact, but since we all already know how far earth is from mars, and the relative limits of the imaging technology being used, it isn't too difficult to conjure up the image of a dot in your head). Would a hazy version of the mona lisa hold any impact for you from a mile away?

      --
      ôó
    11. Re:But the cultural impact... by jaxdahl · · Score: 1

      It was actually a 8 foot long drinking straw, if I remember the quote correctly.

    12. Re:But the cultural impact... by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately if you look back at the Earth you're looking towards the sun.

      Sheesh - all they have to do is wait till it's night and take the picture! I hear that's how they're gonna make the first solar landing - might work you know - everything cools down when the sun goes down... :)

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    13. Re:But the cultural impact... by Fedallah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But 'pale blue dot' images? It's just a dot. It might just as well be Venus for all the emotional impact I get from it.

      Somehow, that aspect of the images is what hit me emotionally. This is the first time I've actually realized what has been accomplished here: there is something (a robot, in this case) on that pale red dot I kept staring up at last autumn that is looking back at us and seeing us as a pale blue dot.

      Images from the Moon are pretty, I'll grant you that. But it's still our moon; to me, it doesn't feel like anything more than hop, skip, and a jump away. This is another planet. This is an entirely different world, with its own orbit and autonomy.

      We think so grandly of our history and our oceans and our continents and our clouds. But from our nearest neighboring planet, we're just another dot in the sky. So no, there's probably not much cultural impact here, since our culture is centered completely on our planet. This is a different world, and the emotional impact of seeing us from that world, at least to me, is plentiful.

    14. Re:But the cultural impact... by Fedallah · · Score: 2, Informative

      But from our nearest neighboring planet, we're just another dot in the sky.

      Make that second nearest neighboring planet. I knew something looked wrong with that statement. =)

    15. Re:But the cultural impact... by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      There is a huge overlap between the occult interstellar sci-fi wackos who include an interplanetary cultural viewpoint in everything they do and the Springer crowd

      It was a generalization, get over it.

      a dot in some haze holds about as much impact as the ascii jokes posted here

      Your right about that, what I took issue with was the comment 'it's just another manifestation of mathematics.' What meringuoid seems to be saying is 'if you can only prove it with math it's not real to me' which is utterly ridiculous. I hated math as much as the next guy, but to say it's insignificant seems, to me, to be an extreme view and I'm sure some of the more profound math folk around here would agree with me.

      If ignoring math and science is your thing, fine, I've got no problem with that, but don't get upset when I say I disagree with you.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    16. Re:But the cultural impact... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I doubt that it'll sell as many posters and be used as much as the classic Earth from orbit centered on Africa shot, or the Earthrise ones from the Moon. Lugging a telescope along to Mars to get a better picture of Earth might seem stupid, but it definitely is a "money-shot" (as they say in the porn industry).

      We'll know we're exploring far when it's an arrow labeled "Place where the Earth would be if you could see it from there, but you just can't."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    17. Re:But the cultural impact... by ultrasound · · Score: 1
      ...Although it is not as brightly illuminated due to greater distance from the sun, my intuition is that it ought to be visible to the naked eye.

      Yup. Just gone sunset here and I can plainly see the moon with the naked eye. Well done for an excellent bit of applied maths.

    18. Re:But the cultural impact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have a picture of the earth and the moon - here's a shot from the mars orbital camera - which probably has a higher resolution / capability than the rovers:

      http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modl oa d&name=News&file=article&sid=472

      Although I'd have to admit, the shots from Galileo in the early 90s had more pizzaz:

      http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/gal_e ar thmo2_big.gif

    19. Re:But the cultural impact... by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      Except that the Earth is currently more like 330 million km from Mars, so the angle between Earth and Moon is at most about 3 arcminutes (about 0.05 degrees). Also, when the Earth and Mars are close together, the Earth is also necessarily also more nearly lined up with the Sun. Not saying that resolving the Moon couldn't be done, but it would be difficult, I think, without a telescope.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    20. Re:But the cultural impact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    21. Re:But the cultural impact... by miyoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think your calculations are about right, but the Earth as seen from Mars doesn't reflect all of the Sun's light; it has phases the same way the Moon does as seen from Earth. When Earth is closest to Mars it (and the Moon) is reflecting all of the sunlight away from Mars ("new Earth"?). All you see is the nighttime side of Earth and the dark side of the Moon. When Earth and the Moon are bright enough to be seen on Mars, they'll probably be much closer together. Without doing calculations similar to yours, I'd guess that if there is an orbital configuration where the Earth and Moon would both be visible from the surface of Mars with the naked eye, it would be fairly rare.

      I agree that such a picture would have a much more visceral meaning though. I really liked the shot of Earth and Jupiter together that was taken by one of the current mars missions (I forget which) that was posted a while back. It does give you some feeling of the vast emptiness that is the Universe.

    22. Re:But the cultural impact... by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      Except that the Earth is currently more like 330 million km from Mars

      Actually, we just went through the minimum disatance seperation between earth and mars... it should be currently around 60 million km from mars. Got my info here Nasa

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    23. Re:But the cultural impact... by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      We're both wrong, it's more like 1.765 AU, or 264 million km.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    24. Re:But the cultural impact... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Given how large the moon is relative to the earth, you might even say Mars is the *third* nearest planet to earth. The earth/moon system is more like a double-planet than a planet with a subordinate satellite.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    25. Re:But the cultural impact... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      I doubt any image returned by space exploration in the next few thousand years will change our perspective on things as much as the Earthrise photographs from Apollo 8.

      I really wish there was a web-cam on the moon. It would be so cool to see the Earth rotating from the Moon.

    26. Re:But the cultural impact... by rueba · · Score: 1

      Thanks,

      I just got a new desktop background.

      --
      The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
    27. Re:But the cultural impact... by avisolo · · Score: 1

      You might be referring to neglegted masterpieces of Earth from space such as the following which do provide a emotional connection: Apollo 17 view of earth from moon surface: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17 /as17-137-20957HR.jpg Alan Bean's 'Kissing the Earth': http://www.alanbeangallery.com/kissing.html Mars Global Surveyor view of earth: http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2003/05/22/ Mars Express view of Earth & moon: http://www.esa.int/export/mex_mm/images/Erde_Mond_ PR_030707f.jpg Cheers! Avi

    28. Re:But the cultural impact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, seriously, turn it your geek badge now. And take that patch off your jacket. If you can't see the significance and 'cultural impact' of taking a look at ourselves from another planet then I think you lean more to the side of our culture that watches Jerry Springer, certainly not the 'news for nerds' side.

      It was an opinion, get over it.

  15. Re:Congratulations! But... by turnstyle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's totally cool that Spirit made it to Bonneville crater (I've been waiting!), BUT I can't help but wonder if it wasn't a little disappointing that there doesn't seem to be any exposed bedrock as over at the Opportunity site...

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
  16. Appropriate advert by larien · · Score: 1
    In a coincidence, the Sun advert about Java being in the Spirit Rover was showing at the top of the front page (and on this page as I write this post).

    As the advert says, find out at Sun.com/mars

    1. Re:Appropriate advert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subscribe, cheapskate. :)

    2. Re:Appropriate advert by larien · · Score: 0

      I do, but I read Slashdot too much and keep running out of free pages :)

    3. Re:Appropriate advert by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Subscribe, cheapskate.
      > > by larien (5608) *

      Funny, I wonder what that asterisk means...

  17. It's a breath taking picture by emo+boy · · Score: 1

    It really makes you wonder if there is intelligent life elsewhere staring at us in the same way wondering if we are staring back.

    1. Re:It's a breath taking picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think that there is intelligent here?

    2. Re:It's a breath taking picture by basingwerk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Judging by your post, there isn't.

      --
      I stole this .sig
  18. Hmm, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA has truly many an astonishing interplanetary succes story!

    Damn I thought it was going well :(

  19. Zooming in... by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... you can see the Great Wall of China! No, really! Just use the zooming software used in shows like CSI or movies like Blade Runner.

    Before I get mail...

    1. Re:Zooming in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no that's not good enough! For such an application only TRUE pseudo-science will do. We obviously need whatever imaging software they used in Charlie's Angels and/or Enemy of the State.

    2. Re:Zooming in... by RealErmine · · Score: 1

      Just use the zooming software used in shows like CSI or movies like Blade Runner.

      I keep saying "Enhance" while viewing the picture, but it doesn't seem to have any effect.

      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
  20. Slashdotted to Oblivion... by the+pickle · · Score: 0, Informative
    So here's some cheap karma-whoring, a repost of the Astrobio.net article.

    You Are Here

    Earth as Viewed from the Martian Surface
    by Astrobiology Magazine staffwriter

    Consistently highly rated among those memorable 'money-shots' from the current Mars' surface exploration is a view looking back towards the Earth. On Thursday, the Spirit rover team released the banner image showing the Earth as a tiny gray dot in the martian sky near the horizon.

    The history of such views backwards towards the home planet, Terra Firma, have captivated the imagination for a generation of astronomers. This glimpse from the surface of another planet offers an unrivalled perspective that stretches beyond just seeing our home as one of many planets, or the only pale blue dot in our solar system.

    As Carl Sagan's widow, Anne Druyan , described this perspective image to Astrobiology Magazine, such earth views make "us look at this tiny planet, at the pale blue dot, and to see it in its real context, in its actual circumstances, in its true tininess. I don't know anyone who's able to really see that one-pixel Earth and not feel like they want to protect the Earth; that we have much more in common with each other than we're likely to have with anyone anywhere else."

    The evocative phrase describing the Earth as a 'pale blue dot' was coined by Carl Sagan after seeing our planet as a single pixel. The view was taken from the departing Voyager spacecraft. The entire earth could be encompassed as a flicker of light. The first image of Earth ever taken from another planet that actually shows our home as a planetary disk was captured by the Mars Orbital Camera on May 8th.

    One question that might be answerable from such a world-view is could a scientist on Mars identify from such a perspective that the Earth harbored life. In 1993, a team of researchers inspired by Carl Sagan, used an Earth fly-by of the Galileo spacecraft on its way to Jupiter to catch a glimpse of how the Earth might appear from afar. For astrobiologists, Sagan's results were surprising.

    Rather than seeing the Earth as an obvious candidate for life, the Galileo pictures gave surprisingly few clues of the biological potential of our own planet.

    From afar, how Galileo missed the obvious signs of terrestrial life as we would have expected to see them, was at first disconcerting to the scientific community, because future missions aim to observe more distant extrasolar planets and detect what would be visible in the spectra--the 'pale blue dot' scenario.

    One answer may lie in the fact that the spacecraft made its observations while still quite close to the Earth.

    "The spectrograph was designed to look at small areas of Jupiter, so the field of view of the spectrograph was quite small," said Nick Woolf of Arizona, in earlier discussions with the Astrobiology Magazine.

    "Also, since the surface brightness of Jupiter [the Gaileo's intended visual target] is far less than the Earth, the spectrograph detectors saturated except when the spectrograph was pointed at the darkest area of Earth - a cloud-free section of sea," Woolf noted. The cloud-free sea is considered very dark relative to the dominance of bright clouds in a global picture of Earth. Thus it should come as no surprise that Galileo was successful in only imaging a relatively dark and lifeless planet, mainly because its design was not intended to look at Earth, but to probe Jupiter instead.

    A spectroscope that might detect infrared or visible light looking back on Earth or outwards to other planets might focus mainly on four gases that are found in Earth's atmosphere and linked to life:
    • Water vapor - A baseline sign, indicating the presence of liquid water, a requirement of known life.
    • Carbon dioxide - Can be created by biological and non-biological processes. Because it is necessary for photosynthesis, it would indicate the possible presence of green plants.
    • Methane - Considered suggestive
    1. Re:Slashdotted to Oblivion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that is cheap karma whoring. The site isn't even running slow, and even if it was you could've posted as AC to avoid karma whoring anyways.

      Because of that I assumed you were a troll, but after looking at your post history I realized you weren't.

    2. Re:Slashdotted to Oblivion... by the+pickle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, that is rather amusing.

      And sad, because most of the time, the site doesn't magically resurrect itself five minutes after giving massive MySQL timeouts, and the people who browse at anything above 0 never see the truly informative article text.

      p

  21. Ahhh Great by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    Brace yourselves for another wave of those not so funny mars pictures, featuring Marvin the Martian.

    --
    Sig it.
  22. Amazing... by Monoliath · · Score: 1

    Wow. Technology at it's best :)

    Go Sun!

    1. Re:Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Technology at it's best

      Yes, it really is amazing that you posted a five word comment with no value whatsoever. And yet, with that meager material, you were able to fashion a Grade A grammar error.

      I think congratulations are in order.

  23. The Little Dot in The Sky by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many of us have looked up at the night sky all our lives, some have bought or made telescopes to see even more. We've beheld some amazing and beautiful things as we gazed at the heavens. We've seen the bright stars in our sky that turned out to be separate worlds, but they still remained just little points of light as we rested comfortably on our unimaginably huge earth.

    But now we see another little dot hovering above a brightening horizon.

    That's our planet.

    Our home.

    Seen from the surface of another world.

    We are now just the little dot in the sky.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:The Little Dot in The Sky by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Enough with the waxing poetic! It's a blue dot! It could be any blue dot! We know we're on a planet. We know how tiny our planet is. This isn't news, and your post certainly isn't insightful :-P

    2. Re:The Little Dot in The Sky by KingJoshi · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, why the hell do people need to see a damn spec to realize how small the planet is in comparison to tha vastness of space? Yeah, it's something new if you're a kid but it shouldn't take such a picture to "bring it home". It just shows me that people don't do much thinking, or if they did think, they don't grasp what they're thinking.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    3. Re:The Little Dot in The Sky by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Do they look at the picture, go "duh!", slap their heads and suddenly realise that all the "earth is a planet" stuff was actually true?. I find it truly strange that people need a JPG to realsie that. I'm glad I'm not the only one :-P

    4. Re:The Little Dot in The Sky by hesiod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > why the hell do people need to see a damn spec to realize how small the planet is in comparison to tha vastness of space?

      Because insanely large spans are easy to say, but very difficult to grasp, if you aren't already into astronomy. 1 million miles: wow, that's a lot. Travel one million miles and it just seemed to get a WHOLE LOT FURTHER.

    5. Re:The Little Dot in The Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's not just any blue dot, it's our blue dot. And the photo lets us see that it looks like a dot.

      Yeah, someone can know something, but that's not the same as experiencing it, even third hand like this.

    6. Re:The Little Dot in The Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The picture just serves as a reminder ... most folks don't go around thinking about the relative size of the Earth.

    7. Re:The Little Dot in The Sky by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Some people react more emotionally to pictures than to descriptions. That's all there is to it. It's like the difference between *hearing* about over a hundred people being killed in Madrid versus actually seeing the pictures.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    8. Re:The Little Dot in The Sky by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Ok. Let me bring this to terms you non-philos can understand....

      "root"

      MMmmkay?

      Play along nice like.... us old folks will give you candy.

  24. Shiny! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've noticed in some of the images of Spirit there is what seems to be a very shiny object at the opposite end of the crater:

    Here (top right), here (top left) and here (middle).

    Could it be a piece of Spirits entry/descent stage? In that last image it looks like an oddly shaped rock. If it is a rock, what could have made it so reflective?

    1. Re:Shiny! by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure but it appears to be just a trick of the light. The close rock seems to have the same effect. It would be good to have a professional opinion on this. Although if it wasn't mentioned in any articles it could just be an optical illusion - it appears to be the only big rock in the distance.

      --
      Stay tuned for new sig...
    2. Re:Shiny! by brownpau · · Score: 5, Informative

      Shamelessy reposted with some edits from Metafilter... ....But what is that glint to the left side?

      I thought at first it was just a digital photo artifact, but seeing as how the flash of white appears in several photos from Spirit's navcam on Sol66, my next thought was ALIEN BUILDINGS!!!

      Okay, not really. My next thought was that it might be the lander's backshell or heatshield. So I looked up a map of the rover's intended route, and orbital images of the landing site with labels. Take a look at the photos, the maps, and the scales. Apparently the lander's heatshield had impacted a nearby crater; that's Bonneville.

    3. Re:Shiny! by Bob_Slob · · Score: 1

      If you look at the DIMES combo images in the press release section, you will see the heat shield impact seems to have occurred on the far side of the Bonneville crater. That is probably the shiny object seen in these pictures of the crater. I hope they drive around the crater to see the hole they made with the shield. Bob Slob

    4. Re:Shiny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's my tinfoil hat!

    5. Re:Shiny! by avkillick · · Score: 1

      If you look at this image - it seems to me the bright artifical object may be the heatshield.

      --
      OpenOffice tips:richhillsoftware.com
    6. Re:Shiny! by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Beagle 2 or one of the other "lost" probes? :)

    7. Re:Shiny! by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > If you look at the DIMES combo images in the press release section, you will see the heat shield impact seems to have occurred on the far side of the Bonneville crater. That is probably the shiny object seen in these pictures of the crater. I hope they drive around the crater to see the hole they made with the shield.

      Likewise.

      Seems obvious to my layman's mind that it'd be interesting -- we know how much mass the heatshield had, we know its composition, we know its altitude at the time of separation, and therefore we know how fast it was going on impact and what sort of energy it delivered to the ground. The heatshield is the closest thing to a "hammer" that this mission could provide. Seems to me that observing how deep it burrowed into the ground, or if it cracked a rock (or was cracked/dented by a rock) on impact, would tell us things that we'd be unable to learn through use of the RAT or through trenching with a wheel.

      Any NASA geeks know if there are plans to check out the heatshield impact site?

      If not, why not?

    8. Re:Shiny! by Bob_Slob · · Score: 1

      Interesting point about the hammer effect on a rock. It might be more interesting than the crater itself. I guess being a big swallow bowl collects the dust over the eons....

      Slob

  25. Re:In case it is slashdotted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cique? How do you pronounce that? :-)

  26. Kairos by Hungus · · Score: 2, Funny

    The place where the Thirteenth Tribe of Man lives "on a shining planet known as Earth."

    --
    Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
  27. Yes, but... by Wun+Hung+Lo · · Score: 2

    when is the rover going to give us a picture of J'onn J'onzz old house? That would be impressive!

  28. Well.. by hookedup · · Score: 4, Funny

    You have to love the "You are here" caption on that image of earth from mars.

    Who says nasa scientists dont have a sense of humor.

    1. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they know how retarded human beings can be so they -had- to point out where earth was.

    2. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You have to love the "You are here" caption on that image of earth from mars.

      I wish I could mod this comment "+1 sarcastic" ...

  29. How about those rabbit ears pics? by BigGerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    bunny
    Some reports said this thing was actually moving ;-)

    1. Re:How about those rabbit ears pics? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      That's Big Bunny to you...

      Those aren't "blueberries" - they're petrified rabbit droppings!

  30. Seriously... by Phidoux · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry about the silly offtopic 1st post but I just couldn't resist.

    More seriously, I have been following the twin rover missions with great interest and I think it's absolutely amazing what they (And the JPL team of course) have achieved. I looked with great interest at the pic of our "pale blue (Even though the pic is monochrome) dot"

    Even on the relatively tiny (In relation to astronomical standards) scale of a view from our nearest neighbour, it is truly humbling to realise just how insignificant our rock, in the greater scheme of things, really is.

    Some of you might be interested in visiting a site that I visit on a daily basis to get and update on the latest images from Mars - photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov

  31. Link if the site is /. by UltimaGuy · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here is a link if the original site is /. http://linux.iconrate.net/gallery/11-ml-02-earth-A 067R1.jpg

    --
    "In questions of science the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual."
  32. But After Alexander Lavrynov has his way.... by amigoro · · Score: 1

    The view of earth would look like this , according to this slashdot story.

    --


    Nothing to see here
  33. Why link to astrobio.net by psychofox · · Score: 1

    Why link to astrobio.net in the article instead of the jpl? The jpl has the bandwidth to handle the load from slashdot etc, it appears astrobio.net does not..

  34. I hope I'm not the only one by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am still astounded at the pictures that are sent back from Mars. I think the world is a little jaded at the monumentous task that was accomplished with this mission. This is historic stuff that should be in the press every day! If landing on the moon was big this should be justa as big if not bigger!!!

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
    1. Re:I hope I'm not the only one by MyHair · · Score: 0

      Tell that to this guy and his moderators. :p

    2. Re:I hope I'm not the only one by KingJoshi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For one, humans made it to the moon, while that has not yet been accomplished with Mars. Second, we did have a rover back in 1997 so it doesn't have the "new" feeling. Third, this is an election year. Fourth, there were major attacks in Spain and there is this fight with terrirists.

      People think about issues that affect them and what they're "close" to. We're not in a cold war with national pride on the line. Most people have their attention elsewhere and while this is a major accomplishment, this may be one of those things that many will not appreciate until much later.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
  35. Earth Photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a version of the Earth photo without the dopey "You Are Here" graphic?

    1. Re:Earth Photo by robertarctor · · Score: 1

      Right here:
      http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/pres s/spiri t/20040311a/Earth_Sol63A_Nav_Pan-A067R1.jpg

      --
      "Once a guy stood all day shaking bugs from his hair." A Scanner Darkly, by Philip K. Dick
    2. Re:Earth Photo by nucal · · Score: 1
  36. Heatshield by brownpau · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know why JPL isn't playing up the coolness factor of this a bit more, but in this panoramic navcam montage of Bonneville, you can clearly see the lander's heatshield to the left, glinting in the sun.

    (Later on preview) Okay, now MSNBC is mentioning it.

  37. Better take another picture... by GlassMaster · · Score: 1

    I think I blinked.

  38. But where... by jcoleman · · Score: 1

    Where is the food court? And more importantly, the arcade?

  39. Mars Wiggles by brownpau · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Inspired by danielroot's and kokogiak's Martian stereo wiggles I've made a few Mars Wiggles of my own. No funny colored glasses required.

  40. Very humbling indeed by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The last image with the earth showing as a small star in the sky made me feel very small indeed.

    Consider that the human life span of about 80 years is but an instant compared to the lifecycle of the stars/galaxies/etc.

    And we spend a significant amount of that time destructively (fighting/quarreling/warring/killing/spiting). Feels kinda weird...even destruction is bad only from our point of view....who knows what's actually "good" or "bad". Our knowledge and lives are just insignificant specks in the vastness of the Universe.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Very humbling indeed by Lispy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Worse yet, we spend most of it asleep or working. ;-/

    2. Re:Very humbling indeed by Eccles · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can we have your liver, then?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  41. It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's a... Spacecraft? by l0wland · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Scroll down on todays Press Release Images-page, and check this picture (400kb).

    I think that's even more interesting, and might draw people's interest as well.

    --

    "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
  42. http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.h by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reminds one of Carl Sagan's words:

    Pale Blue Dot ... Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

    The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors, so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.

    The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.

    It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

  43. Time will tell? by bbowers · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it takes them to release to the public the pictures they DON'T want us to see?

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
    1. Re:Time will tell? by OwlWhacker · · Score: 5, Funny

      That would depend on how long it takes them to edit out the Martians laughing at our puny attempts to look at their planet.

      You can imagine them all standing around spirit and saying stuff like:

      Martian 1: "Look! It's moving!"

      Martian 2: "Where? I can't see anything..."

      Martian 1: "It's slow, but it is moving, can't you see?"

      Martian 3: "Geez! Haven't you guys got anything better to do than poke around with that thing?"

    2. Re:Time will tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh you mean stuff like:

      http://www.balloonpop.com/joke.jpg

  44. I'm not a Conspiracy Theorist, but... by buzzoff · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Look at the picture of the crater. Do you see the white speck in the middle of the upper left quadrant? What is that? Whatever it is, it jumped out at me as soon as I saw the photograph.

    --
    "Never tell me the odds"
    1. Re:I'm not a Conspiracy Theorist, but... by Karem+Lore · · Score: 1

      I wreckon this is the landing pod of the robot and he either crossed the crater, turned round and took a holiday snap of his tent, or went around the crater and did the same...

      --
      When all is said and done, nothing changes...
    2. Re:I'm not a Conspiracy Theorist, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you were a good nerd like me and followed the mission closely, you'd realize that it is the heat shield. They showed it way at the beginning of the mission from the MGS cameras, it was right at the edge of the crater

  45. Or click on it.... by l0wland · · Score: 1
    ...here.

    Although I don't expect the NASA-servers to go down that easily. ;-)

    --

    "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
  46. Re:It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's a... Spacecraft by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wow... a genuine UFO picture from NASA. Who'd have thought it?

    Then again, with the number of dead spaceprobes around Mars it's perhaps not so surprising if they've spotted one of them. Now, if they could find the Beagle we'd be tremendously pleased...

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  47. Re:Waste of Time and Money by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
    Imagine the night sky on Titan!

    OK, I'm imagining it. I'm imagining sitting there on Titan and really kicking myself for going all that way for a closeup view of Saturn and then picking as my vantage point the one and only moon in the entire Solar System with a thick smoggy atmosphere so that I can't see a damn thing ;-)

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  48. Pale Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a pity it's only a monochrome pic

    speaking of pale blue: when the shuttle is in orbit it gets this really awesome looking pale blue light reflected from the earth. Does anyone know what that color is (nm, whatever)? I'd like to have one of my lamps put out that same color, or make one that does.

  49. Ugh. by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    The image from Voyager was the same thing, some really tiny dot. Puts things in perspective and blah, blah, blah.

    What I want to see is this image and then three or four ultra-zoomed in images in sequence, to see just how detailed the cameras are.

    This is a good idea. Right?

  50. Titan drop by Hayzeus · · Score: 2, Informative
    The ESA has piggy-backed a probe (Huygens) onto Cassini, due to drop into Titan's surface around Jan/2005. Assuming it makes it to the surface, the expected lifetime of the probe will only be around 3 minutes or so (on the surface) but it will be relaying pictures back. For more info see:

    The Huygens mission page at NASA

  51. Picture is obviously a fake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, how on earth could NASA position such a large arrow, big letters and a magnifier in space?

    1. Re:Picture is obviously a fake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how on earth

      You keep using those words...

    2. Re:Picture is obviously a fake! by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >I mean, how on earth could...

      That's the point, it wasn't on earth!

  52. NASA has lost the edge to the ESA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems that NASA has actually lost the edge in robotic space exploration. Remember this little gem of a story submitted by someone from Switzerland and posted by Michael(who else).

  53. Can see... by FraggedSquid · · Score: 0

    Neither my house nor the Great Wall of China

    --
    You don't need a lab to make mud.
  54. What?! by rafael_es_son · · Score: 1

    That is one _very_ crappy image. I want my money back.

    --
    HAD
    1. Re:What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. Next time I see you I'll give you a nickle.

  55. "All of you on the Good Earth" by dpilot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember that broadcast. There was something visceral as they read Genesis with the picture on TV, as fuzzy as it was. Publication of the true photo only amplified it, and I still get the feeling thinking about it, decades later.

    IMHO what we need MOST at the ISS is a conference room. From what I've heard, EVERY astronaut or cosmonaut has come back to Earth with his/her world view adjusted by the experience. World leaders need to understand, that viscerally, that we all share this little island in space. (Unfortunately I suspect that some world leaders are so jaded and full of themselves that they'd see the vision and instead think "I want it ALL!")

    I was similarly struck by a sequence during the movie, "Master and Commander." The scene began of people on the ship, then pulled back an up, until you began to realize that this was a tiny little ship on a huge ocean. I wished we could get a similarly powerful sequence of a spacecraft. Part of the effectiveness of the movie sequence was that the ocean was active, and that can't be captured in space.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  56. Indications, schmindications... by bojanb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    having discovered very strong indications of a wet Martian past

    I thought the mission(s) were concieved because we already had very strong indications of a wet Martian past. Is this just marketspeak for not finding anything, ie. mission failure? Every press release from NASA that I read talks about indications and strong indications, there is nothing substantial so far.

    Or maybe this is just hedging for another mission, to finally determine if these indications are true?

  57. Re:Waste of Time and Money by digitalhermit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really. Let's all admit it finally. Those pictures from mars are as boring as hell!

    Interesting attitude.

    I, for one, find the pictures fascinating and awe-inspiring on many levels.

    At first it was just an appreciation for the mere fact that NASA was able to get the rovers onto the Martian surface. When I think of how f***ing far away Mars is, and how they were able to hit the target, I'm pretty much in awe. Yeah, the physics are well understood and software exists to determine everything about the mission (I can download such software for my home PC), but actually doing it is still pretty amazing.

    Then there's the whole rover itself. It's a semi-autonomous machine, thousands of miles from home base, and it can send back some pretty detailed images of the surface, drill rocks, sample the environment. Hell, sometimes getting cams in the other room to work properly can be a task. That they could do this, troubleshoot and re-program the machine from that distance, and do it *twice* gives me a tremendous feeling of well-being.

    Then there are the pictures themselves. We're peering at a f***ing other planet, man! Never before in human history have we seen the Martian surface with this much detail and this much information. I know it doesn't mean much to many people, but this is the spirit of exploration, the pure f***ing joy of discovery that pushed our forefathers to new worlds, new medicines, new art. Pushing the bounds, ripping apart the g*ddamned envelope, reaching beyond our grasp, is what makes us human and differentiates us from some cockroach or mindless automaton.

    Mod me as a dork, but I am happy to be alive at this time.

  58. Re:http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_do by buzzoff · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.

    God will save those who embrace Him. All one has to do is answer the call. So there is a hint. In fact, there is hope.

    It does make a person reevaluate everything. It makes you wonder what things will be like in another 10,000 years. By then, maybe we'll have colonies on hundreds of planets. Our descendants will find it hard to believe that we lived on a single planet for so long. Maybe Earth won't even exist anymore.

    Can you imagine what it will be like if we see colonies on Mars in our lifetimes? Even if it is only five people, it will be unbelievable. To know that we are living in the generation that is recognizing the dream of ancient civilizations is no less than thrilling.

    --
    "Never tell me the odds"
  59. Martian Money Shots by mykepredko · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe because of porn thread yesterday, when I saw the term Money-Shots in the introduction, I immediately got a vision of appolectic Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson when they find out that not only is there life on Mars but their reproductive processes are similar to ours (with the same predillictions for watching them).

    Spam of the 21st century: "Grateful, teenaged Martian sluts eager to thank you for taking them away from their dry, cold, dark homes."

    Laugh - it's friday.

    myke

  60. dotty by kyw · · Score: 1

    A dot
    Lost in space
    At least we are somewhere.
    Since I am a dot on a bigger dot in the middle of huge dots and other dots
    I must be dotty

    (I feel fine ;))

    This is all about relativity of matter

  61. I feel so insignificant by Woogiemonger · · Score: 2, Funny

    We are infinitesimal specks on an infinitesimal dot amongst the infinite expanse of our universe. How ever did Zaphod Beeblebrox cope with such a horrific concept?

  62. They should have announced when the pic... by Trikenstein · · Score: 1
    was going to be taken

    Then we all could have shot back with our laser pointers
    Or mooned.

    Either would have really brightend things up

    Hunderds of thousands of bright laser lights
    Or Hundreds of thousands of dead fish belly white butts pointed at the sky.

  63. Can they see... by darkfus · · Score: 1

    Any signs of intelligent life?

    --
    [sig]darkfus[/sig]
  64. NASA is misguided (IMHO) by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    I know I'm going to take a lot of flak for saying this, but it seems NASA is misguided. The way things work, first you build a prototype, then you develop the prototype. The shuttle program was the prototype, the proof that we could build a reusable space craft. The follow up should have been focusing on a way to make space flight cheap, based on what we'd learned.
    NASA shouldn't be planning a mission to Mars. It should be working on technology to make leaving the Earth's atmosphere cheap enough that it can be done recreationally and industrially by a variety of research labs, companies and private citizens.

    People used to say 'if we can put a man on the moon, why can't we...' fill in the blank with the cure for your favorite social ill.

    The answer, of course, was that we had the technology to put a handful of people on the moon, but we didn't have the technology to put a thousand or even a hundred people on the moon.
    For that, NASA needs to change gears. And they haven't.

    Sagan's book "Contact" had an interesting bit about the psychological effect of having the wealthiest people in the world seeing, in person, the earth as a single, blue, borderless orb.

    Why can't we work on mass drivers, revive the X11 and concentrate on making space flight a more accessable reality?

    PCR allowed "DNA fingerprinting" to be useful by making DNA replication cheap so that you only needed a follicle or a drop of blood. Theoretically, you could have done DNA fingerprinting and DNA replication before that, but it would have been very expensive because you'd use up a lot of expensive polymerase in the process. So it didn't happen. This is one of the most underappreciated lessons from the history of science. The technological breakthroughs that matter most are the ones which make technology cheap enough for everyone to afford.

    Take care of this, and Mars missons, when we're ready for them, will be far less costly. If there's water there now, there will still be water there in a decade or two. Not much is likely to change until Mars' moon crashes into the surface, but we still have a few decades before that happens.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:NASA is misguided (IMHO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't we work on mass drivers, revive the X11 and concentrate on making space flight a more accessable reality?

      'cause X11 sucks! Display PDF is SOOOOO much better!

  65. Re:Waste of Time and Money by jskiff · · Score: 1

    +1, Dork. But I like your style...

    --
    It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
  66. Re:Congratulations! But... by WorkEmail · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, and a huge group of Awesome Aliens partying it up on a houseboat with ton's of Miller Light would have been cool too.

  67. ObPython: by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative

    (With thanks to Eric Idle)

    Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving
    And revolving at nine hundred miles an hour,
    That's orbiting at nineteen miles a second, so it's reckoned,
    A sun that is the source of all our power.
    The sun and you and me and all the stars that we can see
    Are moving at a million miles a day
    In an outer spiral arm, at forty thousand miles an hour,
    Of the galaxy we call the 'Milky Way'.

    Our galaxy itself contains a hundred billion stars.
    It's a hundred thousand light years side to side.
    It bulges in the middle, sixteen thousand light years thick,
    But out by us, it's just three thousand light years wide.
    We're thirty thousand light years from galactic central point.
    We go 'round every two hundred million years,
    And our galaxy is only one of millions of billions
    In this amazing and expanding universe.

    The universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding
    In all of the directions it can whizz
    As fast as it can go, at the speed of light, you know,
    Twelve million miles a minute, and that's the fastest speed there is.
    So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure,
    How amazingly unlikely is your birth,
    And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space,
    'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  68. what's wrong at NASA? by kyshtock · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    C'mon guys! NASA is able to put a rover on a distant planet, navigate it around, and still can't stitch together seamlessly a few pictures? What's wrong here? Can't they aford slightly better stitch software? or they just don't care about PR?

    --
    Bite my shiny metal... oops... Nevermind!
  69. How far we've come by b-baggins · · Score: 1

    In 1969, an American stood on the surface of the moon. In 2004, a golf cart travels 300 yards, and another finds what MAY have been mud.

    Guess which one we're more excited about?

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  70. Re:Waste of Time and Money by snatchitup · · Score: 1

    I'm not trying to take anything away from the awesomeness of the accomplishment. I'm totally for space exploration. But, if we could just land somewhere that doesn't remind me of Nebraska with no Corn, just dirt... I think it would really help the cause.

    Imagine finding a cool man, with an area we can land right next to some Huge Mountain with some freaky shaped Outcroppings, then, picture the night sky almost completely taken up by a Saturn and its Rings.

    Everyone on Earth would go Ape sh$t for that. I'd probably wet my shorts if I saw that.

    And further, a smaller moon would have much less gravity, easier to land on. Plus, easier to conceive of a manned mission there because of much lower Escape Velocity.

    I messed up with Titan (gaseous)... Just find some other rocky chunk of dirt.

  71. DNA by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Funny

    If only they'd put 'Mostly Harmless' instead of 'You Are Here'.

  72. Stars by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just out of curiosity, is Mars far away from us that the constelations look different?

    I know that it's a relatively small distance, from a galactic perspective, but is it still enough to make some difference?

    Anyone?

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Stars by jswhitten · · Score: 1

      No. The difference in the position of the nearest stars would be just detectable with a telescope, but it would be tiny.

      On a scale model where the Earth is orbiting the Sun at a distance of 1 inch, Mars would be in a slightly larger orbit with a radius of 1.5 inches. Mars would be 0.5 to 2.5 inches away from Earth, depending on where the planets are in their orbit. The closest stars, however, would be over 4 miles away.

      --
      -Jed
    2. Re:Stars by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Somehow, I doubt it. Just a little perspective. Based on the current position of Earth and Mars:

      Distance from Earth to the closest star in Orion (HD 30652): 26.176 lightyears

      Distance from Earth to Mars: 0.0000278306 lightyears.

      So, the distance from Earth or Mars is 0.00010632% the distance from Earth to 30652.

      Basically, we're so damned far from Orion that, no matter where you were in the *solar system*, it would probably look the same.

      Incidentally, if you want to check this out for yourself (ie, look at the constellations from orbit around Mars), and you have a hardware-accelerated 3D card, I would highly recommend trying out Celestia, a very impressive space simulator

    3. Re:Stars by mpthompson · · Score: 1

      Another way of looking at this is that the diameter of Earth's orbit is on the order of 190 million miles or so. The current distance from Earth to Mars is roughly in this same range and it can be reasoned that the change in the appearance of constellations from Earth and Mars would be no different than they appear from Summer to Winter on Earth (from one side of Earth's orbit to the other). In other words, no difference in the constellations would be visible to the human eye. They are just too far away -- as the parent post indicated.

  73. Blame it on light pollution by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People just don't spend the amount of time they used to looking up at the sky's wonder and glory.

    It takes a bit of experience to be able see what is dramatic. People are usually underwhelmed by what they see in a small telescope, they much less likely to be able to take in the magnificence of an unmagified image of the sky. I look at Alberio through my little 90mm refractor, and it's absolutely stunning to me. However for most people it's a yawn. The only sky object that uniformly gets a "wow" is the Moon.

    If you're accustomed to looking at the sky quite a bit, you'll find that planets are dramatically different from stars: they look like little holes punched out of the sky. Once you've learned to really see planets, the idea of seeing Earth the same way will have more resonance for you.

    Mars also has kind of a creamy color when viewed from Earth; it's a bit too faint to look as dramaticall red as it is close up. Earth is a larger planet and might be a bit brighter. I wonder if the picture were in color, whether Earth might be a pale blue. A tiny sapphire glowing in a reddish dawn might be a bit more dramatic. However, the delights of naked eye and low magnification sky viewing are subtle, sometimes in hints of color, or tiny but striking arrangements. It takes a certain number of hours to be able to even perceive them.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  74. Re:http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_do by b-baggins · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sagan's ghost writer was quite good.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  75. And in the meantime, on CNN... by Kinniken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...I see endless pictures of the senseless Madrid bombings, two hundred civilians killed by madmen for religious or pseudo-political reasons.

    How strange a thing is humanity, which is capable of such horrors and yet can move rovers on an other planet and look up in awe at the pale blue dot that is Earth.

    --
    What do you know about World Politic? Find out in this quiz
    1. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The key thing to remember is that the people capable of such horrors and the people moving rovers on another planet are different people.

      Your experience is not another person's.

      The goal is to make everyone's experience as pleasant as those who look up in awe at Earth from millions of miles away.

    2. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by Tassach · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Humanity is indeed pretty fucked up... Politics and Religion (which are often the same thing) have caused more suffering than any plague or catastrophy.

      <irony>
      What a piece of work is man!
      How noble in reason! How infinite in faculty!
      In form and moving, how express and admirable!
      In action, how like an angel! In apprehension, how like a god!
      </irony>

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by Kinniken · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The key thing to remember is that the people capable of such horrors and the people moving rovers on another planet are different people.

      I would love to believe that, but I can't. Remember Von Braun, whose V2 killed thousands of British during WW2 and were the start of the exploration of space? Remember the leaders of the Soviet Union, behind both the first pictures of Earth in space and one of the most oppressive dictatorship ever?
      I can't help feeling that between yesterday's terrorists and the scientists operating Spirit and Opportunity, the gap is not as large as I would like to believe.

      --
      What do you know about World Politic? Find out in this quiz
    4. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by Docrates · · Score: 3, Informative

      And that quote, for the un-initiated, is from Hamlet. Made famous in the geek community because Picrad liked it.

      Oh you don't know who Picard is? Taco, remove his account, now!

      --

      There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
    5. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Does this mean we should discount the gap between you and terrorists, perhaps downplay your contributions to society?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    6. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Yeah, technology has it's bad purposes, and is sometimes invented specifically for bad purposes, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't press on. As technology advances, perhaps we will re-discover our own sort of modern techno-Darwinism, where the selfish and cruel will die off because no matter how they try, technology will always defeat them.

      And I, personally, am so mind-bendingly awe inspired by that image, it's too bad I don't have the resources to get my ass up there. I really hope that I get an oppportunity to witness a sight like that with my own two eyes. Seeing earth from over 50 million kilometers away... amazing.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    7. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by yeremein · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Remember Von Braun, whose V2 killed thousands of British during WW2 and were the start of the exploration of space?
      Maybe what I've read about von Braun is too apologetic, but I understood that manned space exploration was von Braun's inspiration from the beginning. However, once Hitler took notice of the military potential of his work, von Braun grudgingly worked for the German military.

      But his loyalties did not remain with the Third Reich. Once it was clear Germany was going to fall, von Braun disobeyed orders to destroy V2 technology and surrendered himself and other engineers working with him, along with a trainload of rocket parts and plans, to US forces. While in the US, he oversaw the design of both the Redstone which lifted the first American into space, and the massive Saturn V, which took men to the moon.

      I don't think it's fair to paint von Braun in the same brush as the senseless killers that bombed Madrid yesterday.

    8. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean pseudo-religious or political reasons. Got it the wrong way around there.

    9. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      whose V2 killed thousands of British

      Are you sure it was thousands? I thought they didn't really have that much of an effect overall. More died in a single night of conventional bombing during the blitz than the sum total of all V2 victims put together.

      Now, if Germany had made progress on their attempts to figure out atom bombs, and combined *that* with the v2 rockets.... that would have been bad.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    10. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by Buran · · Score: 1

      Korolev and von Braun were dreamers who realized that the only way to achieve those dreams was to accept government funding, and to get that, they had to build the things the government hired them to build.

      Yes, some of the things they built were used to kill people -- but many more of the things they built made us better, gave us new dreams to dream.

      Unfortunately, it's all too easy to overlook those facts and dump people like Korolev and Goddard (and also note that Ferdinand Porsche, who designed the VW Beetle, the best-selling car for many decades, and the car loved by millions of VW enthusiasts worldwide -- designed the Strength-Through-Joy Car by order of none other than Adolf Hitler) and lump them in with "Germans" or "Soviets" or what-have-you.

    11. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only wish the distance from the terrorists to a V2 rocket was much smaller.....

    12. Re:And in the meantime, on CNN... by mistaMAN · · Score: 1

      well war was really only implanted in our mind as a somewhat inneficient way of settling caveman pack disputes. or so i think. there must be some kink in the evolution. perhaps, since animals have the need to hunt and dominate, when we had no more animals to dominate, we turned our weopons on ourselves

  76. Correction by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    That should have been x-33.
    I did a little checking up and apparently the x-33 was succeeded by the x-34, but both were scrapped due to problems and cost overruns. The decision was 'internal' to NASA and was not based in Washington. Lockheed, which was part of a joint venture on the deal, went ahead and used the technology to make its own single stage to orbit vehicle, the VentureStar. So that takes care of that. My apologies for the outdated information.

    http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/business /v enturestar_000105.html

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  77. My house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see my house from here!

  78. Picture of Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's me waving in the corner!

  79. God will save? So says you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Where do you get this stuff?

  80. Oh come on. by Lanboy · · Score: 1

    They took it with an RC from MARS. Just admit how ballsy that is.

  81. Did anyone find the image of Orion more striking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are also images of Orion.

    For some reason, I found these shots more emotionally salient. They are just stars, but there was something unexpectedly touching to me about seeing Orion in the night sky just as I see it here. The idea that I might see on Mars something that is so familiar to me in winters here on Earth resonated with me.

    I guess I'm just as capable of realizing that Mars occupies the same space as me by making Mars more familiar, as it is by making Earth seem more alien.

  82. rats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I had my eyes closed. Could we get a re-shoot?

  83. Re:http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_do by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...this is /., you forgot to include "...and George Bush and the Republicans are wrecking it all!!!!" (insert Dean manic scream here)

    Wait, what was your point again?

    --
    -Styopa
  84. Re:It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's a... Spacecraft by Zerbey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's a... Spacecraft?

    What your seeing is the result of a slow exposure camera watching a objecting moving across the sky. It's probably the Mars Odyssey orbiter which the Rovers both use as a communications relay. You can simulate that on earth too, wait for the ISS to fly over your house, point your camera at it and leave the shutter open for a few minutes.

  85. Re:It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's a... Spacecraft by Zerbey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And a quick look at NASA's website shows that NASA think's that it's the Viking 2 orbiter, so I was close :-)

  86. Whoops! by LMCBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I forgot to convert from radians to degrees. The actual Earth-Moon separation as seen from Mars now is about 4 arcmin, not 4 arcsec. Still not resolvable in this wide-field image, but I thought that my trifling factor-of-60 error was worth a correction :)

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  87. Bonneville by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    So Spirit is going for the martian land speed record? It might already have it, if Opportunity is a little slower.

    --
    What?
  88. Obligatory Monty Python by jasenj1 · · Score: 1

    Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving
    And revolving at nine hundred miles an hour,
    That's orbiting at nineteen miles a second, so it's reckoned,
    A sun that is the source of all our power.
    The sun and you and me and all the stars that we can see
    Are moving at a million miles a day
    In an outer spiral arm, at forty thousand miles an hour,
    Of the galaxy we call the 'Milky Way'.

    Our galaxy itself contains a hundred billion stars.
    It's a hundred thousand light years side to side.
    It bulges in the middle, sixteen thousand light years thick,
    But out by us, it's just three thousand light years wide.
    We're thirty thousand light years from galactic central point.
    We go 'round every two hundred million years,
    And our galaxy is only one of millions of billions
    In this amazing and expanding universe.

    The universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding
    In all of the directions it can whizz
    As fast as it can go, at the speed of light, you know,
    Twelve million miles a minute, and that's the fastest speed there is.
    So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure,
    How amazingly unlikely is your birth,
    And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space,
    'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth.

  89. Re:Waste of Time and Money by moltar77 · · Score: 2, Funny

    As someone who lives in Nebraska, I can tell you these pictures are far more exciting. I mean, there's HILLS on Mars!!

  90. Obligatory Animaniacs by jasenj1 · · Score: 1

    YAKKO'S UNIVERSE (Episode 3)
    Music and lyrics by Randy Rogel.

    Yakko: Everybody lives on a street in a city
    Or a village or a town for what it's worth.
    And they're all inside a country which is part of a continent
    That sits upon a planet known as Earth.
    And the Earth is a ball full of oceans and some mountains
    Which is out there spinning silently in space.
    And living on that Earth are the plants and the animals
    And also the entire human race.

    It's a great big universe
    And we're all really puny
    We're just tiny little specks
    About the size of Mickey Rooney.
    It's big and black and inky
    And we are small and dinky
    It's a big universe and we're not.

    And we're part of a vast interplanetary system
    Stretching seven hundred billion miles long.
    With nine planets and a sun; we think the Earth's the only one
    That has life on it, although we could be wrong.
    Across the interstellar voids are a billion asteroids
    Including meteors and Halley's Comet too.
    And there's over fifty moons floating out there like balloons
    In a panoramic trillion-mile view.

    And still it's all a speck amid a hundred billion stars
    In a galaxy we call the Milky Way.
    It's sixty thousand trillion miles from one end to the other
    And still that's just a fraction of the way.
    'Cause there's a hundred billion galaxies that stretch across the sky
    Filled with constellations, planets, moons and stars.
    And still the universe extends to a place that never ends
    Which is maybe just inside a little jar!

    YW+D : It's a great big universe
    And we're all really puny
    We're just tiny little specks
    About the size of Mickey Rooney.
    * Though we don't know how it got here
    * We're an important part here
    * It's a big universe and it's ours!

    * - In the original script, these lines were:

    YW+D : You might think that you're essential
    Try inconsequential
    It's a small world after all!

  91. You and Hubble... by mahler3 · · Score: 1
    Feels a little bit humbling... I feel so small and insignificant :-\

    Oh yeah? Well just think how the how the Hubble Space Telescope feels.

  92. "Rover sees stars" by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I saw a headline something like that at space.com, and was thinking, "Oh no, spirit bumped its flash brain and is seeing stars again."

  93. What phase is the Earth in? by crem_d_genes · · Score: 1

    Planets on an inside orbit can not be seen in opposition, so their true size doesn't show in a shot like this. Like Venus and Mercury are always in crescent phases seen from Earth. Venus and Earth about equal in size - I wonder how the Earth would look from there (if you could see through the clouds) - it would be a lot closer too...

  94. Crater by TheBadger · · Score: 1

    Don't go down the crater I reckon it's got the martian equivalent of quicksand at the bottom (I also reckon that's what happened to Beagle2), although if NASA could get Opportunity to pop over and take some pics of it sinking that could be worth a laugh....

  95. Try Celestia by core+plexus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ever try Celestia? This is one cool app. Download it for free, and park yourself wherever you want to see the view from 'there'.

    On a related note, I'd love to see some details such as this (i.e. view from Spirit, etc) integrated into it. I wonder how much space (no pun intended) to integrate GIS data into it? I'd be kinda neat to fly from Alaska to the Spirit rover, and since it is unlikely I'll get to do that for real, this is the next best thing.

    -cp-

    Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets!

  96. uhmm... by newsdee · · Score: 1

    All this commotion for a dead pixel on the CCD???

  97. Re:Waste of Time and Money by lars · · Score: 1

    I know you're joking, but I don't think that's entirely accurate. Titan's atmospheric pressure is only 1.5 times that of Earth. It's definitely no Venus. Here is a page with some info on Titan, including artists renderings that depict a spectacular sky.

  98. Re:Waste of Time and Money by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Or, perhaps, somewhere next to Uranus.

    You said that just for the joke responses, didn't you?

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  99. You should have read the rovers' blogs... by devphil · · Score: 1


    ...over at livejournal. They would have given you warning, I'm sure! Spirit's is here and little sister Opportunity's is here. They link to the blogs of other space probes and sats as well, including the Voyagers (who don't say much).

    Yes, I mean the rovers' blogs, not the rovers' engineers' blogs.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  100. Re:Waste of Time and Money by snatchitup · · Score: 1

    I guess in a slight pun sort of way.

    But hey, it was totally apropos, so you have to use it..

    It's like.. When I'm in conference with the development team. There are EJB developers, and Web front-end developers.

    The EJB's are the "back-end". So, everytime somebody says... "I'm having problems with my back-end". I typically reply with something like... "Yeah, I was having problems with the back-end last night... Nothing a few Pepto's couldn't take care of though... No worrys."

    Or, if I'm in all male company... I'll respond with... "Yeah, your mom is having backend problems today... after I finished with her last night!!!

  101. Re:It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's a... Spacecraft by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

    Is the sucker still operable?

  102. Re:It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's a... Spacecraft by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    No, Viking 2's orbiter ran out of fuel in August 1980. Have a look at this website for more information.

  103. But... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if the little green men hacking on the rover are insulted by the "You Are Here" caption?!

  104. I want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what that huge arrow thing is heading right toward the earth! It makes the earth look tiny. I hope that isn't the mothership.