Slashdot Mirror


City Officials Almost Ban Foam Cups

localhost00 writes "The city of Aliso Viejo, CA nearly banned foam cups when they learned they are produced from a substance known as 'dihydrogen monoxide.' A paralegal working for the city apparantly found a professionally designed web site put up to describe the dangerous properties of this chemical. Apparantly, the report about Dihydrogen Monoxide was written by a then 14-year-old Nathan Zohner who was researching the gullibility of fifty ninth graders."

125 of 1,055 comments (clear)

  1. Come on CA by nberardi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tricked by a 14 year old, what is the government in CA comming too.

    1. Re:Come on CA by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Apparantly, the report about Dihydrogen Monoxide was written by a then 14-year-old Nathan Zohner who was researching the gullibility of fifty ninth graders.

      Nice, law making officials have been put on the same level of discerning information as a class of high school freshman. This gives me great confidence in our legaslative bodies.

    2. Re:Come on CA by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Funny

      well hey dont yell at us!!! I mean really who would want to live in a state that has mudslides, Earthquakes, and fires ON A GOOD YEAR

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    3. Re:Come on CA by mattlary · · Score: 5, Funny

      From the state who wants to ban the use of "Master" and "Slave" in hard drive designations... God I hate California

    4. Re:Come on CA by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty easy to take potshots at elected officials. In cases like this one, they're well deserved. However, I submit that expecting perfect decision-making 100% of the time from leaders is akin to expecting coders to write non-trivial code that works perfectly on first execution.
      Which is not a blank check to politicians, letting them go out and debug their way to a reasonable course of action.
      Ultimately, if we're that pissed off about stuff, we have to get involved, whereupon we'll see some of the complexities involved.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    5. Re:Come on CA by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'll find that when they ban water and legalize marijuana, they're actually on crack.

      --
      ...
    6. Re:Come on CA by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's hell, living behind the Tofu Curtain. It's even tougher being the laughingstock of the nation. It's a good thing that we have Hollywood...the rest of the world actually *wants* to be like us.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Come on CA by mdielmann · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're pretty optimistic. The article on snopes says one of the ninth-graders recognized it as water. Apparently, none of the officials did, otherwise it would have been stopped before they made complete asses of themselves.

      I, OTOH, had my faith (or lack thereof) in bureaucrats confirmed.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    8. Re:Come on CA by aborchers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It was an unelected paralegal doing the research who fell for the DHMO joke. Did you consider that along the way, someone (quite possibly an elected official) spotted the bad research and stopped the monkey business?

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    9. Re:Come on CA by GMC-jimmy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I submit that expecting perfect decision-making 100% of the time from leaders is akin to expecting coders to write non-trivial code that works perfectly on first execution.

      I'm not worried about honest mistakes, but unhonest exploitation of the gullible does worry me. Legal professionals (the wealthy ones) understand all too well how to exaggerate the truth and worse, how to sugar-coat a lie.

      Honest mistakes are forgivable. But, exaggeration on the other hand, well I'm not so sure about that.
      --
      __________________________________
      Free your mind - Flush your toilet
    10. Re:Come on CA by hedge_death_shootout · · Score: 5, Funny

      Honest mistakes are forgivable. But, exaggeration on the other hand, well I'm not so sure about that.

      In fact, exaggeration is utterly unforgivable in all circumstances.

    11. Re:Come on CA by clambake · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nice, law making officials have been put on the same level of discerning information as a class of high school freshman. This gives me great confidence in our legaslative bodies.

      I KNOW! Isn't it great!?! I never in my life expected them to be as on the ball as high school kids.

    12. Re:Come on CA by troc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Look, I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate

      Troc.

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    13. Re:Come on CA by robertjw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, and my first thought is that they were going to vote something a paralegal brought to them into law without checking it out???? I think that's an even worse reflection on these public officials.

    14. Re:Come on CA by bluprint · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that politicians see themselves as capable of correctly legislating everything (proof: They legislate things all the time they can't possibly be educated about). I also see this as proof that politicians aren't generally interested in truth, but rather are more interested in looking important/effective.

      And for the record, even though I did very well in high school and college chemistry, I missed the "dihydrogen monoxide" reference at first. However, I never presumed to be knowledgable enough to actually make a policy creating decision on the matter either...they did.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    15. Re:Come on CA by Ryosen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, in just about any law firm, it's the paralegal who is responsible for the research. Paralegals are the unsung heros of the legal profession, doing all of the work and getting none of the credit. The basic difference between a (good) paralegal and an attorney is a couple years of school (although some go up through getting their Masters degree), a bar exam, and paralegals don't litigate in court.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    16. Re:Come on CA by bigpat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "However, I submit that expecting perfect decision-making 100% of the time from leaders is akin to expecting coders to write non-trivial code that works perfectly on first execution."

      If people are writing code that has similar effects to laws, ie people go to jail or get executed, get money taken from them by force in the form of fines, or otherwise effect people's lives in a nonvoluntary way, then they better damn well get it right on first execution after its release.

    17. Re:Come on CA by GMC-jimmy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It was an unelected paralegal doing the research who fell for the DHMO joke. Did you consider that along the way, someone (quite possibly an elected official) spotted the bad research and stopped the monkey business?

      Did you consider that the paralegal could've been the patsy to save face for the elected official ?
      --
      __________________________________
      Free your mind - Flush your toilet
    18. Re:Come on CA by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its never happened, as far as the medical lit. I know about is concerned. It has a self-limiting factor: you'll get so high that you'll pass out or be unable to move well before you're able to consume enough THC to cause any sort of fatal overdose effect (excluding, of course, asphixiating because you pass out on your face or something along those lines).

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    19. Re:Come on CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      History records one fatality attributable to marijuana.

      The unlucky fellow was unloading bales from a truck, when the whole lot came crashing down on him.

    20. Re:Come on CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, this should be a cautionary tale in so many ways:

      1. Just because it's on the Internet does not make it an authoritative source. I find the Internet to be a large shallow source, good for getting a direction and possible further sources for research, but not a replacement for libraries, technical journals/publications and a thousand other, more traditional, knowledge resources.
      2. In the words of Mark Twain, "common sense isn't!"
      3. Intelligence is not a prime prerequisite for paralegals or politicians.

      Pretty easy to take potshots at elected officials...

      Politicians make it soooo easy to take potshots at them! If they don't like being shot at, maybe they should quit painting targets on themselves. In other words, if they don't like being called stupid, they should stop doing stupid things!

    21. Re:Come on CA by lp-habu · · Score: 5, Insightful
      However, I submit that expecting perfect decision-making 100% of the time from leaders is akin to expecting coders to write non-trivial code that works perfectly on first execution.
      Good analogy. There is, however, a major difference: whcn a coder writes code with bugs, the bugs eventually get fixed. When legislators make laws, the bugs are almost never corrected. That is the greatest argument for requiring a hard expiration date on all laws.
    22. Re:Come on CA by biglig2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No-one is expecting them to know chemistry, they are expecting them to want more than a slick website as proof that a substance needs a ban.

      Otherwise you could just make a slick web page saying that Windows gives you cancer, and they'd ban it too!

      Hey, wait a minute....

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    23. Re:Come on CA by palmpunk · · Score: 3, Informative

      My PDR from '86 or so, under Marinol, lists two cases of death from marijuana injestion. In unrelated events, these guys ate a lot of hash

    24. Re:Come on CA by forii · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, I submit that expecting perfect decision-making 100% of the time from leaders is akin to expecting coders to write non-trivial code that works perfectly on first execution.

      Exactly the reason why government should be kept as small as possible. Just as a reasonable operating system doesn't give every user super-user access, we shouldn't entrust the people's freedoms and rights to the government.

    25. Re:Come on CA by dbc001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmmm... Maybe it would help if a few extra eyes checked over that legislation before it gets released? Any chance of getting pre-release legislation published on sourceforge? I have to admit that I like the idea of open-source legislation. Not sure how it would work though...

    26. Re:Come on CA by Sepper · · Score: 4, Funny

      From the /usr/games/fortune database:

      "Oxygen is a very toxic gas and an extreme fire hazard. It is fatal in
      concentrations of as little as 0.000001 p.p.m. Humans exposed to the
      oxygen concentrations die within a few minutes. Symptoms resemble very
      much those of cyanide poisoning (blue face, etc.). In higher
      concentrations, e.g. 20%, the toxic effect is somewhat delayed and it
      takes about 2.5 billion inhalations before death takes place. The reason
      for the delay is the difference in the mechanism of the toxic effect of
      oxygen in 20% concentration. It apparently contributes to a complex
      process called aging, of which very little is known, except that it is
      always fatal.

      However, the main disadvantage of the 20% oxygen concentration is in the
      fact it is habit forming. The first inhalation (occurring at birth) is
      sufficient to make oxygen addiction permanent. After that, any
      considerable decrease in the daily oxygen doses results in death with
      symptoms resembling those of cyanide poisoning.

      Oxygen is an extreme fire hazard. All of the fires that were reported in
      the continental U.S. for the period of the past 25 years were found to be
      due to the presence of this gas in the atmosphere surrounding the buildings
      in question.

      Oxygen is especially dangerous because it is odorless, colorless and
      tasteless, so that its presence can not be readily detected until it is
      too late.
      -- Chemical & Engineering News February 6, 1956"

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    27. Re:Come on CA by STrinity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not just politicians. On their series Bullshit, Penn and Teller sent a petition to ban DHMO to a Greenpeace rally. The only thing more disturbing than the people who were willing to sign after hearing selected facts about water, was the number of people who signed without even hearing the pitch.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    28. Re:Come on CA by pz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ... well before you're able to consume enough THC ...

      You're assuming consumption is by inhalation; by ingestion, especially in concentrated form (hashish or THC tablets), it is surely possible.

      Just as it is difficult to achieve alcohol poisoning when drinking normally because of the same self-limiting effects (although it is possible), it is also possible to chug a litre of pure ethanol and likely induce death.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    29. Re:Come on CA by nate1138 · · Score: 3, Funny

      California is the little kid who's parents never ever told him "no". Lex Luthor was right. Arizona Bay sounds like a dandy place to visit.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    30. Re:Come on CA by lp-habu · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If all laws had a definite (and short term -- perhaps no more than five years) expiration date, the legislators would be so busy trying to repass existing laws that they wouldn't have time to inflict any additional mischief on us.

      I think all laws passed should have two mandatory features: a list of clearly defined goals with deadlines, and a maximum cost. If any deadline passed without the goal being met, or if the maximum cost had been exceeded at any deadline, the law would immediately terminate. It could of course be repassed, but again only with the list of goals and costs.

    31. Re:Come on CA by zdislaw · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This isn't as much about lack of basic science knowledge as it is about close reading skills and the psychology behind accepting statements at face value when they come from sources you trust.

      I'm sure that, had a few people taken the time to really think about what they were reading they would get it. Dihydrogen Monoxide is the kind of word that people scan quickly without stopping. I'm fairly certain that those council members would know that H2O is water, and even taking a few minutes to really read what they just scanned, could determine that Dihydrogen Monoxide is H2O

      It's like that joke:
      A plane crashes on the US/Canada border and half the people fall to the ground in the US and half in Canada.
      Where do you bury the survivors?

      Giving an incorrect answer does not mean that you don't know international law, it means that you, like most people, assume the good faith of the questioner and don't pay attention to the details.

      But I could be wrong. I mean, if you guys say so, then you're probably right. And since millions of people bought their records, then surely I'm wrong and Hootie and the Blowfish don't suck.

      --
      bad sig...no donut.
    32. Re:Come on CA by Feanturi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I dont care what any study says on that. ive smoked plenty of pot to know that i wouldn't be safe driving if i was high on it.

      hahahaha, heehehehehehe, hahaha, there's a tree, hee hee hee, CRASH!

      you get the idea.


      Yes, I get the idea that you're probably one of the ones that shouldn't be smoking pot. You know, in about 18 years of smoking the stuff and being around people who do, I have never met ONE person that would behave like your described scenario. The dumb-ass giggly shtick, I always took that to be a hollywood fabrication. "Reefer Madness" and its influence springs to mind. But I guess some people just can't handle mind-altering substances.

      I recall hearing about a study that tested (in simulators) driving abilities of straight, stoned, and drunk people. Guess what? The stoners tended to be the more careful, better drivers. Part of that I think is that when you're high, you know you're high, you know you need to compensate for attention-span etc. When your piss-drunk, you tend to forget that you're drunk, and figure being a complete idiot is just normal behavior.

      I got 150 on an IQ test right after sucking down a huge bowl of weed. I would never have been able to do that while drunk.

    33. Re:Come on CA by mattcolemanrules · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure if this is what you are referring (reefering??) to but I have only come across one documented death by marijuana consumption. And it was not caused by toxic levels of THC. I read the article over a year ago so it's a bit hazy, but basically some guy had oodles of weed and found out the cops knew about him. So he ate it all.

      Apparently it was so much that he caused his stomach to burst. Therefor the death was marijuana related, however it was really just death by eating too much. The THC probably just made the whole death thing slightly more bearable, but it's not what killed him.

    34. Re:Come on CA by vandemar · · Score: 3, Funny
      Exageration, unforgivable?! Where is your appreciation for stories?

      It all makes sense now. All that stuff from Bush and co. about WMDs was really their contribution to the magical world of storytelling. Tuly a labor of love. The rest of the world should be so fortunate to have literary geniuses such as them in power.

    35. Re:Come on CA by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, smoking one pack of cigarettes may not kill you, but if you extract the nicotine from it and inject it, you'd be dead in minutes. So it looks like we need to ban cigarettes.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    36. Re:Come on CA by LMariachi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Obviously, not a single biochemist was consulted before deciding to bring this issue to a vote. Shoot, they could have just asked a high school chem teacher.

      I guess they must have asked someone, since they figured out what dihydrogen monoxide is and the scheduled vote was removed from the agenda. I'd say whatever error-checking system they have in place worked pretty well. The issue never came to a vote.

  2. You know they forgot... by Azadre · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know they forgot to put the word gullible in the dictionary right?

    1. Re:You know they forgot... by EvanED · · Score: 3, Funny

      It really isn't in Dictionary.com..

      No entry found for gullibl.

      Did you mean gull ibl?
      Suggestions:
      gull ibl
      gull-ibl
      cullible
      glibly

    2. Re:You know they forgot... by LO0G · · Score: 5, Funny

      My wife's 5/6 grade class couldn't believe that it was a hoax when they went to http://www.buydehydratedwater.com so they ended up ordering some :)

      It's sad what people will believe.

    3. Re:You know they forgot... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


      Heh, semi-related true story.

      Years back I was a starving student working at a paint store. We jugged our own 4L paint thinners from large holding tanks out back. Anyhow, I jugged a few 4L containers of tap water. Then I printed out some nice labels that said "LATEX PAINT THINNER" with the usual comments about adding slowly, stirring well, etc.

      Priced them at $3.99/4L and people would actually bring the up to the cashier. We'd tell them there that it was a joke so there was no ripping off done.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:You know they forgot... by NMerriam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I should note (as an artist) that different kinds of water behave differently in paint. I would have just assumed it was distilled water had I seen the bottles. Not that you would need particularly pure water for latex paint, but some people like to buy the Rolls Royce of everything.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    5. Re:You know they forgot... by justanyone · · Score: 4, Interesting
      These sites are very funny!

      Of course they're scams / humor sites, but they look really real!

      I'm somewhat surprised by these, too. I believe they're encouraging people to commit a felony (identity theft), as well as fraud (not paying debts). I believe this may mean they are engaging in a criminal conspiracy, even if they don't know the other parties to the conspiracy. IANAL, someone please review and respond?

      Here's some links:


    6. Re:You know they forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


      Well THAT was Un-American of you!

      Yeah.. I'm a Canadian.. :)

    7. Re:You know they forgot... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Years ago one of my biology teachers decided to crack a joke. After spending a long time explaining multi-cellular organisms and their evolution from single-cell organisms he asked the class:

      "Will all the single cell organisms in the room please raise their hands!"

      I was amazed to find my self as one of three kids not to do so, the entire rest of the class had a hand in the air. And people wonder why teachers suffer under a constant nagging feeling that they are wasting their time.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
  3. Dihydrogen Monoxide *is* dangerous by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thousands of people die on beaches every year from DHM inhalation.

    --
    Everything seemed to be going so nice
    'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
    1. Re:Dihydrogen Monoxide *is* dangerous by mgs1000 · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...and 100% of all people who died last year were found to have significant levels of it in their bloodstream.

      (That was a great episode of Penn & Teller's show,btw)

    2. Re:Dihydrogen Monoxide *is* dangerous by sosume · · Score: 3, Funny

      Real geeks have known for long that getting DHMO on the skin can cause serious irritations and should therefore be avoided at all costs..

    3. Re:Dihydrogen Monoxide *is* dangerous by Brahmastra · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, there really is something called water overdose and apparently it can kill you.

    4. Re:Dihydrogen Monoxide *is* dangerous by Fishstick · · Score: 5, Funny
      We should ban it!! It is a major component of another hazardous product



      1: More than 98 percent of convicted felons are bread eaters.

      2: Fully HALF of all children who grow up in bread-consuming households score below average on standardized tests.

      3: In the 18th century, when virtually all bread was baked in the home, the average life expectancy was less than 50 years; infant mortality rates were unacceptably high; many women died in childbirth; and diseases such as typhoid, yellow fever and influenza ravaged whole nations.

      4: More than 90 percent of violent crimes are committed within 24 hours of eating bread.

      5: Bread is made from a substance called "dough." It has been proven that as little as one pound of dough can be used to suffocate a mouse. The average American eats more bread than that in one month!

      6: Primitive tribal societies that have no bread exhibit a low occurrence of cancer, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease and osteoporosis.

      7: Bread has been proven to be addictive. Subjects deprived of bread and given only water to eat begged for bread after only two days.

      8: Bread is often a "gateway" food item, leading the user to "harder" items such as butter, jelly, peanut butter and even cold cuts.

      9: Bread has been proven to absorb water. Since the human body is more than 90 percent water, it follows that eating bread could lead to your body being taken over by this absorptive food product, turning you into a soggy, gooey bread-pudding person.

      10: Newborn babies can choke on bread.

      11: Bread is baked at temperatures as high as 400 degrees Fahrenheit! That kind of heat can kill an adult in less than one minute.

      12: Most American bread eaters are utterly unable to distinguish between significant scientific fact and meaningless statistical babbling.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    5. Re:Dihydrogen Monoxide *is* dangerous by ajs318 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Leah Betts died of drinking too much water. She took an Ecstasy tablet while her {rabidly anti-some-drugs} dad was out -- then heard he was due back before she would wear off. Fearful of a bollocking on his early return, she drank several litres of water in a misguided attempt to counteract the effects of the drug. This caused an electrolyte imbalance, leading to multiple organ failure -- including the brain -- and eventual death.

      Legal ecstasy tablets probably would include an information sheet detailing safe usage practicesm and this would never have happened. However, the government, breweries and the tobacco companies all would prefer for you to believe that she was killed by a tab of ecstasy.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  4. Wow by mdarksbane · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope no one tells them about the Pacific. We could be in serious trouble.

  5. This stuff is nothing...l by BigForbis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dihydrogen Monoxide is nothing. It's not very dangerous. The real kill is the Hydrogen Hydroxide. Closely related but much more dangerous. We should ban it first.

    --
    Remember, 50% of people are below average...
    1. Re:This stuff is nothing...l by Mateito · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah.. get enough Hydrogen Hydroxide together and you end up with a shit load of H+ and OH- ions... effectively like burning yourself with acid then pouring bleach over the wound.

  6. It MUST be true! by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Funny

    In my experience they dont allow things on the internet that are not true. Case in point I will be getting a check from Bill Gates real soon as I have done my part and forwarded his email.

    1. Re:It MUST be true! by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The beauty of this site and the others that perpetuate this is that it is 100% factual. Exposed inhalation will kill you, you'll drown. It is a critical ingredient in acid rain, it does react explosively with certain chemicals etc.

      Its designed to catch people with knee jerk reactions that cant be bothered to do even a brief investigation of the facts. Its a way of showing the people that are always claiming the sky is falling for the fools that they are.

    2. Re:It MUST be true! by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.zippynet.com/pages/bandhmo.htm

      I believe this is the original. The page slashdot linked to is just someone rehashing the idea and putting up a different take on it. The person running the link I provided claims to have had their page up for a decade and on gopher for several years before that. So yes, you could say fraud for the slashdot linked website, but the original is 100% factual, and I give them the credit.

  7. Why does this surprise me it is in California? by eljasbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Come on people. This is the state that wanted to make oreo cookies an age restrictred item, and the state that required electronic equipment not to use the master/slave nomenclature because it offended only one person. Obviously they did zero research on this before they had their knee-jerk reaction. I bet we will soon see warnings on bottled water like we do some other items... "This product is known to the state of California to cause an unknown disease.." Remind me never to live there.

    1. Re:Why does this surprise me it is in California? by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reminds me of an oxygen canister I saw at home depot a little bit ago. It carried a warning label on it stating that oxygen was known to cause cancer in the state of california. This label was about as big as the one letting you know that it was flammable.

    2. Re:Why does this surprise me it is in California? by Mad_Rain · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of the advice of one of my professors - "Live on the East Coast for a while, but be prepared to leave, because for every year you live out there, you get more cynical. Live on the West Coast for a while, but be prepared to leave, because for every year you live out there, you lose an IQ point."

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    3. Re:Why does this surprise me it is in California? by whiteranger99x · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah quit your bitching! As a Californian speaking, I'm proud to say that our state will literally break off from the rest of the US anyway....maybe to hang out with Hawaii. Alaska can come too.

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    4. Re:Why does this surprise me it is in California? by _marshall · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is obviously a blatant attempt at california(n) flamage, but...

      With a small amount of research I'm sure you can pull up stupid laws and occurences for just about every state in the union. You want to know why people love california? Let me list some reasons without trying to sound like a tourist commercial:
      - Extremely varying climates all within a relatively small area (i.e. Desert, Beach, Mountains all within a hour or so of each other)
      - Strong cultural heritage throughout the state
      - Southern california has some of the best weather in the US, bar-none.
      - Napa Valley, Big Bear, Hollywood, Alcatraz, Catalina Island, Sea World, just to name a few

      If you're looking for real reasons not to move to California, I can give you those too:
      - Everything is expensive
      - California traffic has been compared to a day in hell
      - major metropolitan areas are very crowded.
      - no smoking in bars or restaurants (seriously)

      Obviously they did zero research on this before they had their knee-jerk reaction
      I think the irony in that statement has been accurately summed up =)

    5. Re:Why does this surprise me it is in California? by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Reminds me of an oxygen canister I saw at home depot a little bit ago. [...] This label was about as big as the one letting you know that it was flammable.

      Of course, oxygen isn't flammable. Was that supposed to be part of the humorous part, too, or did it really say that?

    6. Re:Why does this surprise me it is in California? by SiMac · · Score: 4, Informative

      Technically, the oxygen itself isn't flammable, the match is. The definition of flammable is that something readily combines with oxygen in an exothermic reaction producing fire. Oxygen does not combine with oxygen, but when more oxygen is present, it does have a tendency to increase the strength of a fire as the reactant is more readily available.

  8. Just came in by ziggamon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Latest news: the 14-year old has just been hired by SCO as their new "information minister"

  9. Worker's Comp by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need to sue my employer now. I've been exposed to DHM for many years now, and I fear that it may be taking its toll on me. I've noticed many more wrinkles after particularly long sessions, not to mention a slickness to my skin.

    Ah, the perils of lifeguarding.

  10. DHM by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 3, Funny
    I though SCO had a patent on DHM? Then again, maybe it was IBM?

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  11. Content on the Web by zalas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe this is why people shouldn't take any document on the Web at face value unless they check the sources or credentials. Not only can there be research study oriented "fake web pages", but there also can be pranks and out of date information (many pages do not have timestamps). I know many professors at my university view Web references as something that you use at last resort, when all other reference sources fail. However, another problem is that there IS a lot of good content on the web, and sometimes they disappear and can never be located again, unless they were lucky enough to have been crawled over by archive.org

  12. Just like falling for stories at Slashdot by damitbill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People react here just the same as ninth graders, it would seem.

  13. Re:Please allow me by NemosomeN · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But seriously, they shouldn't name that stuff so dangerously. I can understand the confusion. Erm, that's a standard naming convention for molecules. (IUPEC Naming maybe? Can't remember.)

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  14. Scientifically illiterate population by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find it worrying that any kind of person in government (even local government) could be so
    pig ignorant of basic science that they'd fall for
    this hoax. Didn't they listen AT ALL at school? But this seems to be a general problem in the population as a whole , even amongst suppposed intellectuals (read: arts & MBA
    graduates) and yet amazingly they're not even usually embarrsed about it. The only reason they are in this story is because it was made public. If their ignorance was revealed in private
    they probably wouldn't give a damn , yet if they'd found to be wanting in knowledge of business or the humanities they'd probably go red faced.

    1. Re:Scientifically illiterate population by nomadic · · Score: 5, Informative

      I can't even think of an example where someone with that background would involve themselves in politics.

      Jimmy Carter.

  15. Google News to the rescue by frankie · · Score: 4, Informative
    The MSN link displays as a blank page, so here's some more references. Alison Viejo CA has officially claimed the heavyweight title for stupidest local government. I suspect they probably won't be dethroned until November 2nd at the earliest.

    --
    Google News is fun

  16. Almost... by steveorama · · Score: 5, Funny

    "City Officials Almost Ban Foam Cups"

    And this is almost news...

    1. Re:Almost... by wintermute740 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "And this is almost news..."

      Almost news for almost nerds. Stuff that almost matters???

  17. They SHOULD ban styrofoam by percepto · · Score: 5, Informative

    That stuff is nasty. Not only is it made from petroleum (America's crack), but it doesn't biodegrade and may leach toxins into the food it holds. Also, if it burns, it releases toxic particulates into the air.

    --

    The term "outside the box" is squarely within the box at this point.

    1. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by Lord_Frederick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but it keeps my coffee so toasty warm!

    2. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by Phisbut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a classy inox cup that does the same thing, and that is reusable. We do depend on styrofoam too much.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    3. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by frankie · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yeah, Intentionally Disposable + Non-biodegradeable = A Bad Thing.

      But on the bright side, you can dissolve styrofoam in gasoline (or other hydrocarbons). When you add enough, the solution becomes viscous and sticky (just like honey). If you love the smell of napalm in the morning, styrofoam is your friend. :)

    4. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by p4ul13 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Explaining the joke: Effectively sucking the humor out of a gag since 1982.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    5. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by LarsWestergren · · Score: 4, Informative

      Styrofoam should be a preferred material based on how well it can be recycled.

      Perhaps it can be recycled well in theory, but it is rare for it to be recycled, especially when used for fast food containers.

      A lot of people just throw it wherever, and once out in nature it lasts virtually forever, unlike products made from alternative materials like paper and starch.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    6. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by Tassach · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget the aluminum and/or magnesium powder in your recipe. Without that addition, your sticky gas/styrofoam mixture isn't particuarly effective.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    7. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But on the bright side, you can dissolve styrofoam in gasoline (or other hydrocarbons). When you add enough, the solution becomes viscous and sticky (just like honey). If you love the smell of napalm in the morning, styrofoam is your friend. :)

      We used to do this in the boy scouts. We'd then pour/mold the mixture onto a newspaper, twist the newspaper around the stuff, and make a "starter log" for camping. Make 'em two or three inches thick, throw a couple into your fire pit, and you've got a great way to start a fire. Very good for drying out damp wood and getting a blaze going.

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    8. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by ajs318 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But corrugated paper is easier to recycle if you have a bloody great big cooking range to hand .....

      Cardboard soaked with organic grease burns fairly cleanly, especially if it isn't the only thing drawing the fire. It's made from plants, so it's not going to add any more CO2 to the atmosphere. It reduces the amount of fossil fuels used for cooking. It reduces the need to transport used containers to recycling plants {which often uses as much or more energy than initial manufacture}.

      Burning food packaging in the stoves used to cook the food seems to make perfect sense ..... as long as the packaging is made with due regard for its secondary purpose {burning certain plastics in a cooking range would not be such a good idea}. You'll never have enough packaging to run on that alone, of course, but that's not quite the intention.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    9. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by hankwang · · Score: 4, Informative
      I remembered being told that this released some toxic gas in the process of being dissolved.

      Styrofoam is the polymer polystyrene in foam form, that is, with a lot of small gas bubbles. Google tells me that commonly used gases are ethylene, CFCs (not commonly anymore), and HCFCs. These gases are not particularly toxic to humans, but can be an environmental issue (i.e., the hole in the ozone layer), especially CFCs and HCFCs.

    10. Re:They SHOULD ban styrofoam by Peale · · Score: 5, Funny

      Christ, do I have a story about that. Luckily nothing bad came of it.

      I used to have this idiot friend Mike when I was a kid (14 or so). I was a freshman in high school, and he was a grade below me (in middle school).

      One day I was showing him just that; taking styrofoam and disolving it in gasoline makes a pretty nice fire display. We had our fun in the backyard, and left the rest in a bucket outside.

      A month goes by. Mike calls me up asking if he can have what's left in the bucket. I say sure, why not.

      Now the styrofoam we used was the green stuff that veggies and meat are served in, so when we started it was a nice green slime. Now it had the consistency of Play-Doh.

      I thought nothing of this, until the next day, @ lunch, when there was a schoolwide announcement: "WOULD ARTHUR PEALE PLEASE COME TO THE PRINCIPAL'S OFFICE IMMEDIATELY!" yes, those capital letters are there to display the fact that they were SHOUTING into the microphone, as well as having turned the volume almost all the way up on the PA system.

      I head to the main office, and the secretary looks at me and says, "Oh, you're in trouble now, Arthur! Go see Mr. Perry, the Vice Principal."

      I enter his office, and that's when I notice the two uniformed police officers standing there. They invite me to have a seat.

      At this point I have no clue what's going on, until one officer says "Arthur, I'd like to see your license to make explosives, please."

      I, of course, being 14, did not have one. I was clueless about what was going on, until they mentioned a green substance that a "Mike Parsons" had brought to school, and had been lighting out in the parking lot with some friends of his.

      Aparently word got around to what he was doing, someone approached a teacher, the police and fire department were called, along with a bomb unit. The stuff looked so strange and alien they had no clue what kind of explosive it was. It was being treated very gingerly.

      After I told the officers what it was, they told me that they weren't going to press charges. Mike got a week suspension, and I went back to class.

  18. A poem. by eigerface · · Score: 5, Funny


    Little Johnny was a chemist.

    Little Johnny is no more.

    'Cause what he thought was H2O.

    Was really H2SO4

  19. Ummm, the state of California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This product is known to the state of California to cause an unknown disease.

    The state of California is an unknown disease.

  20. The funny thing is, DHMO isn't even the right name by sirwired · · Score: 3, Informative

    Di-Hydrogen Monoxide isn't the proper name for water. That would imply a H2 ion bonded to a O ion. IIRC, this is not correcct. It's been ten years since I took chemistry, but shouldn't it really be Hydrogen Hydroxide? (H bonded to OH)

    SirWired

  21. Honestly, though... by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This couldn't have even come close to being a surprise. If you've EVER watched Jay Leno more than a few times, you've seen JayWalking or Battle of the Jaywalkers. Or heck, even Street Smarts.

    So before you start lambasting Kawhlefornia (Terminator speak for California), remember these shows prove it happens everywhere.

    Oh look a puppy!

  22. A sad example of our times by tribulation2004 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny, as a teenager I always thought of myself as being a lot more intelligent than the average adult (much to their chagrin) - and up until now (as I approach 30) I haven't seen much evidence showing I was wrong. I'm constantly running into cashiers who cannot make change without their cash register, salespeople who have no clue about the products they are selling, people who can barely spell (a visit to nearly any chat board is enough to turn my stomach). Seems like despite all the progress we seem to be making, the bottom half (two-thirds?) of our population seems to be regressing further and further. My Grandfather (who had to quit school in grade two to help his Dad on the farm) has writing and math skills that make him look like a scholar relative to the average McDonald's cashier with a high school diploma.
    I think our approach to designing products aimed at the lowest common denominator might actually be responsible for all of this. Think about it the next time you pick up a cup of coffee with a warning on it stating that coffee is hot. If a paralegal (a "research expert" if you will) can be fooled by a smart 14-year old, what does that say about our society?

    1. Re:A sad example of our times by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm not sure one can blame education or general intelligence for this -- at least not directly.

      What we may have lost is the ability to detect bullshit. The tendency seems to be for adults to accept official looking information presented in an expected manner, or to believe statements from someone holding a microphone in front of a video camera.

      I say "adults" only because I've seen a few "man on the street" spoofs where adults are caught up while their children look on in disbelief just before calling bullshit on the so-called interviewer. Some of Rick Mercer's "Talking to Americans" segments are particularly memorable examples.

      Of course, this is completely anecdotal on my part. Not to mention some of the folks who got caught on this particular hoax were young adults. Adult enough, perhaps, to start believing what "experts" suggest to them without thinking critically about what is being presented to them.

      The problem is a lack of critical thinking, I suggest, and not some arbitary level of intelligence (which is impossible to measure and compare, anyway).

      Examples about making change or spelling may be a bit misleading. I've never been strong with arithmetic (not mathematics) even though I worked for years in the service industry. I never learned the tricks and shortcuts people use to quickly calculate change or percentages. I'm not sure there is much my schooling could have provided to help this. After 35 years I just know I should use a calculator, and check my figures twice.

      Many people find spelling problematic. Especially English spelling, which is hardly a normalized language; being a good English speller requires a fair amount of sheer memorization. In fact, new research suggests that some so-called learning disabilities have almost nothing to do with intelligence or ability to learn. Dyslexics have different brains that may actually be better at some tasks than non-dyslexic brains. Dyslexics can read and comprehend letters and words the same as everyone else, but the part of the brain the recognizes words shapes and establishes a lexicon "buffer" is the problem.

      --
      -- clvrmnky
  23. Took them long enough by fantastic+max · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The DHMO site is at least 6 years old. I used to have it linked on my science education web site. I was smart enough to put it under the category of "weird science" or "science humor". Can't remember which as it is no longer active. Thought it was funny and didn't think anyone would ever buy into it... well anyone who actually graduated the 7th grade, at least.

  24. The fifty-ninth grade by Chillum · · Score: 5, Funny
    "...researching the gullibility of fifty ninth graders."

    You'd think when they'd been in school THAT long, they wouldn't be so gullible!

  25. Ban by 0x41 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the first thing they should ban is that paralegal, from ever having access to politicians enough to convince them of crap like that.

    But, Seriouslly, they really should ban styrofoam cups, those things take forever to degrade, and are nasty pollutants. USe paper cups instead!

  26. but.... by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You shouldn't take ANY document at face value... it doesn't matter if it's on the web or not.

    this isn't an Internet thing... get a grip.

    --

    Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
  27. Nah. The really deadly stuff by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hydroxylic acid...

    It makes dihydrogen monoxide look like water in comparison...

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Nah. The really deadly stuff by nallen · · Score: 3, Informative

      now get your chemical nomenclature right: it's hydrohydroxic acid.

      Just like HCl is hydrochloric acid and not Chloric Acid...

    2. Re:Nah. The really deadly stuff by SiMac · · Score: 4, Informative

      HCl is hydrochloric acid because it doesn't involve a polyatomic ion. HClO3 is chloric acid, which does involve a polyatomic ion. However, since hydroxide (OH-) is a polyatomic, it is hydroxic acid.

  28. Re:Trying to remember Chem I... by p3d0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think the naming depends on which radical donates the electron, but I'm not a chemist.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  29. My new career: Supermodel by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Funny


    I learned a lot from the recent election in California. I learned that you can get a job even when you have no qualifications. So, I've decided to be a supermodel.

  30. Old joke, maybe? by dthree · · Score: 5, Informative

    They list a 1986 MSDS on the site, and a search confirms the entry. However, a search for the manufacturer points back to the hoax website. I think maybe msdsonline has falled for it, probably through lack of due diligence.

    --
    "I forgot my mantra."
  31. Re:The funny thing is, DHMO isn't even the right n by agent+dero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Duh, it's a hoax.

    Since when have hoaxes needed accurate info?

    Only geeks or /.'ers would look into something this much, i'm proud to be one of them :-p

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
  32. Styrofoam is easy to recycle by Stonent1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always place it on the head of an unsuspecting river otter and pour acetone on it. It instantly disintegrates and the otter whisks the remains away to a recycling center.

  33. Penn and Teller did a simaliar trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Penn and Teller, on thier Showtime show 'Bullshit' did a similair trick to expose the ridiculous ignorance of the liberals at this earth-day type event. They went around and got a tons of signatures from people for thier support in the ban of 'dihydrogen-monoxide'. it was pretty damn funny and it did well in exposing the lack of credibility on the part of these groups.

  34. hyponatremia by mec · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's right. Marathon runners are vulnerable to hyponatremia. Massive sweat + intake of unsalted water leads to sodium ion imbalance inside the body. It's one of those nasty conditions where the brain gets disoriented so the victim doesn't realize that they are headed for death.

    Hyponatremia a Concern for Marathon Runners

    I know the Slashdot stereotype is that nobody *here* has to worry about such things, but actually, I bet there are people in the Slashdot community who run this far and this hard.

    1. Re:hyponatremia by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A friend of mine with a sweating problem drank enough water to do that to himself once. He didn't die though, he just had a seizure, and a free trip to the hospital. When I used to work for Roaring Camp narrow gauge railroad at the tender age of 15 (at which time I was about 6'4") I was the trackwalker, meaning I followed the narrow gauge steam train up the hill to make sure it didn't toss anything out of the firebox or the stack that was going to catch the forest on fire. I drank a lot of water, and I took salt tablets on the hottest days. I don't know if it was necessary, but I'm not dead, and it got well over 100 several times, and I was hauling my chubby ass up hill five times a day on hot, busy days. My only compensation was minimum wage and being in umpteen zillion japanese tourist videos.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. Re:The funny thing is, DHMO isn't even the right n by Graff · · Score: 4, Informative
    Di-Hydrogen Monoxide isn't the proper name for water. That would imply a H2 ion bonded to a O ion. IIRC, this is not correcct.

    No, it is actually technically correct. (The best kind of correct!) In chemistry naming conventions you usually use this sort of naming convention for binary nonmetal-nonmetal chemicals.

    For example:
    NO2 - nitrogen dioxide
    N2O - dinitrogen monoxide
    N2O5 - dinitrogen pentoxide
    CO2 - carbon dioxide

    So it does make sense to say:
    H2O - dihydrogen monoxide

    However the name hydrogen hydroxide is incorrect since that would indicate that the OH part of HOH (H2O ) is an ion and that the extra hydrogen is ionically bonded to it. This is not the case, in H2O both hydrogens are covalently bonded to the central oxygen atom.

    You can see more about chemical naming conventions here.
  36. It is nasty stuff unless properly diluted by jhines · · Score: 5, Funny

    dihydrogen monoxide is nasty thing, which can harbor bacteria and other nasty things to you.

    It is best to dilute it slightly with ethanol, as this kills the bugs.

    Adding hops, barley, yeast, and letting it mix for a while is a very good way of adding the ethanol.

  37. Re:The funny thing is, DHMO isn't even the right n by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 3, Informative

    IAAC...

    The correct name is "dihydrogen oxide". Theres no need to put the "mono" on the oxygen. If you dont believe me, you can look at NIST's chemistry webbook...

    http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?Name=Dihydro gen+oxide&Units=SI

    --
    the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
  38. CA environmental stuff is wayyyy over the top by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I heard a story from the guys at Experimental Rocket Propulsion Society who were playing with high purity hydrogen peroxide (85% compared to the 3% you typically get in chemists).

    Anyway the inspectors came around to check them out; and insisted on knowing what their cleanup method would be if they spilled the stuff.

    "We don't need one."

    At this point the inspector went into rant mode, threatening extensive punitive penalties if a cleanup methodology wasn't produced immediately.

    ... which was terminated only when the team pointed out that hydrogen peroxide, of this strength, when spilled on the local desert, immediately "pssssssssh" decomposed into a) steam b) oxygen... and they merely asked if they needed to worry about either contaminating the local groundwater. Upon careful consideration, the official waived this requirement, and elected not to penalise them.

    (Indeed so effective was the desert at catalysing the peroxide, the team were jokingly considering abandoning their expensive silver catalysts, and using desert instead... but I digress.)

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  39. Our education is responsible for this, not designs by Chemisor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > I think our approach to designing products aimed at the lowest common denominator

    This is a consequence, not the cause. The problem is our education system and the way it encourages stupidity. Read about that and the solution to it in th
    Montessori Method. It's old and, sadly, is the sort of stuff nobody teaches children any more.

  40. tree huggin' by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Those old styrofoam containers were also much easier to recycle than the corrogated paper that they use now. A good example of the destructive power of clueless tree huggers and the PR obsessed corps that listen to them.

    I don't mean to be pedantic, but your point does expose a rift between different sorts of environmentalists. A true "tree hugger" would far prefer the use of styrofoam to that of paper which comes from - dare I say - trees!

    Another great battle is over wind power. You'd think all the environmentalists would be on top of that one. Not so - it disrupts migratory patterns and splatters a lot of birds, so many conservationists are against it. Same with things like tidal power (similar effect on fish).

    Again, pedanticism aside, the environmental "faction" is far more fractured than you might think. Frequently the anti-global-warming, conservation, and wilderness camps take diametrically opposing views.

  41. You have you facts confused by Hungus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    However the name hydrogen hydroxide is incorrect since that would indicate that the OH part of HOH (H2O ) is an ion and that the extra hydrogen is ionically bonded to it. This is not the case, in H2O both hydrogens are covalently bonded to the central oxygen atom.
    Actually the OH- pair is considered to be ionicly bonded to the H+ ion (or really to an H3O+). Where do yo think we get pH from? pH is defined as the inverse exponent of H3O+ concentration. example: Pure water has a concentration of 1x10(-7) (sorry cant do superscripts) and thus has a pH of 7, NaOH 4% has a concentration of 1x10(-13) and so a pH of 13 and HCl 4% aqueus a concentration of 1x10(-0) thus a pH of 0.
    You really should check your electronegativies before saying bonds are covalent. This is pretty basic chemistry and explains amongst other things why water is liquid at livable temperatures for we humans and many other phenomenon.
    You can find more about naming of chemical structures via IUPAC the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemists
    --
    Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    1. Re:You have you facts confused by Graff · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually the OH- pair is considered to be ionicly bonded to the H+ ion (or really to an H3O+).

      Just because a molecule can dissociate that does not mean that it is bonded ionically. Each hydrogen in H2O is bonded equally to the oxygen atom in what is called a sp^3 hybrid orbital, where the 2s orbital of the oxygen atom combines with the three 2p orbitals of the same atom in order to form four sp^3 hybrid orbitals. Two of those orbitals are taken up with unbonded electron pairs and each of the other two orbitals are covalently bonded to a hydrogen atom. You can see more about this on this web site.

      Electronegativity really does not enter the picture here. Yes, oxygen is highly electronegative and it will tend to "pull" the electrons toward itself but that only means that the water molecule will be highly polar (and only because the charge separation is not symmetrical about all of the axis of the molecule). It is true that more highly electronegative atoms tend to form more ionic compounds than less highly electronegative atoms, but there are other factors at work here. For example, if you look at this web page you will see that the difference between the Pauling elecronegativities of hydrogen and oxygen is 3.5 - 2.1 = 1.4. By most definitions an ionic compound should have a difference in elecronegativity of at least 2.0. So water is a covalent molecule even by that definition.

      By the way, IAAC (I Am A Chemist) ;-)
  42. Scientific Illiteracy is tragic by aqui · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is simply an indication that 95% of the population is scientifically illiterate.

    Unfortunately science education is not mandatory like english and basic math are. Nor is it taught in a manner that supports curiousity and interest.

    Given that we live in an increasingly technical dependent society it's scary to find pseudoscience and scientific ignorance so rapidly on the rise. For those struggling to separate science and pseudoscience, a good book putting science's role into a clearer perspective is Carl Sagan's book: "The Demon Haunted World, Science as a Candle in the Dark." I have a few copies and lend it to people when they need it. (Note: there are other good books too this is just one that comes to mind).

    The underlying skills of critical thought and a healthy dose of skepticism are the basis of good science. Even basic concepts like Occam's razor are not widely understood or accepted. People need to be made to understand that science is not just ugly formulas in physics class, but that it forms the basis for all things that define our modern high standard of living.

    If less than 1% of congress men ever elected have any scientific background how do you expect them to put forth a meaningful policy on scientific education or even understand basic issues.

    Rather than sitting here in self congratulatory bliss about other people ignorance, we should take our responsibility as the scientifically literate (to some degree anyway) seriously and do what we can to educate people around us. Take an active role in science outreach programs, or at the very least lobby your elected representatives.

    Yes, it is a slow difficult up hill battle, but 300 years ago 95% of the population was illiterate, today most can read and write. This is mostly due to a number of dedicated individuals that convinced their government of the need for literacy.

    Ignorance is bliss... Unfortunately for me its to late...

    --
    ----- "Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand."
  43. Re:The funny thing is, DHMO isn't even the right n by nallen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually Chemistry nomenclature is a fun game, as a number of different systems are valid. The catch all rule with things like water is it goes by a "common" name, like ammonia or methane or salt.
    For your amusement some other ways of naming water:
    Hydrogen oxide (the isotope of hydrogen, duetrium has duetrium oxide)

    dihydrogen monoxide (it is valid by one sytem which is used to name binary compounds of nonmetals. ex:
    N2O5 = dinitrogen pentoxide)

    Hydrohydroxic acid (in the acid system, like HCl)

    hydrogen hydroxide (base nomenclature, like Sodium hydroxide)

    hydroxic acid (like H2S is hydrosulfuric acid)

    Hydronium hydroxide (like ammonium hydroxide)

    anyhows, I think you get the point. From a practical stand point this exact problem makes it a pain to order chemicals from a catalog often times!

  44. Even for non-runners by The+Tyro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hyponatremia can be a problem, though rarely in a normal person (IIAD, BTW).

    The most common scenario where I've seen symptomatic hyponatremia in a non-athlete is in a syndrome called SIADH (AKA: Syndrome of Inappropriate Anti-Diuretic Hormone). I've rarely seen it in psychiatric patients who compulsively drink massive quantities of fluids as part of their psychosis... Believe it or not, it's actually possible to drink enough water that you dilute out your electrolytes.

    Anti-Diuretic Hormone is what determines the final concentration of your urine (ie. how much free water your kidneys scavenge from the filtrate in your kidneys)... it works in the kidney's distal tubules. Interestingly, ADH is inhibited by ethanol. Ever wonder how beer seems to go through you so quickly? Well, the answer is that it really doesn't... part of that massive urination is from the alcohol inhibiting ADH secretion, your kidneys start dumping free water, and you start peeing like a racehorse. The result? You get dehydrated; one of the major contributors to the discomfort of hangovers. Heh... a bag or two of IV fluids does wonders for a hangover.

    Dilutional Hyponatremia is relatively easy to fix (obviously depending on severity)... just restrict fluid intake. In the case of SIADH, you also have to hunt for the cause... some lung cancers are notorious for secreting excess Anti-Diuretic Hormone.

    Note that severe hyponatremia is life-threatening... you can have refractory seizures, coma, and profound mental status changes. Fixing it too quickly is also dangerous, and can cause a nasty (and permanent) condition called Central Pontine Myelinolysis... definitely not on the top-ten-diseases-to-have list.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  45. Mod Parent Up by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most people are wholly unaware of the fact that Jimmy Carter went to Georgia Tech and became a nuclear engineer for the Navy. Sam Nunn also started out as an industrial engineer at Georgia Tech before heading off to Emory & Emory Law to eventually graduate with a law degree.

    Besides, the grandparent poster short-changes those of us who do have science/math backgrounds, who are passionate about politics, and who have considered getting more involved.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  46. Wait a minute by The+Tyro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't pitch Ecstasy like it's a harmless medication... it is not. (Disclaimer: I'm an ER physician, and I've treated ecstasy users)

    Ecstasy (MDMA) is chemically related to the amphetamine family, and has many of the same effects. One of the side-effects of Ecstasy is hyperthermia... an elevation of body temperature that can lead to rhabdomyolysis (mass breakdown of muscle tissue, often leading to kidney failure), brain damage, and death.

    Ecstasy acts primarily on the serotonergic and dopaminergic neurons in the CNS, and appears to irreversably harm the former (documented pathologically in animal studies, and observationally in humans). Interestingly, Prozac and some of the SSRI drugs seem to partially antagonize the effects of Ecstasy (but if you're planning on stopping your anti-depressant so you can get a better buzz on the weekend, you need serious help).

    There's another problem: you never know what you're getting when you buy street drugs. Unless you have a degree in organic chemistry and are making your own (which can be done), it pays to be cautious.

    Maybe you've taken ecstasy hundreds of times and had no problem... good for you. But ecstasy is not harmless... I've seen it go wrong, and it's not pretty.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Wait a minute by TGK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps a portion of your argument that was left out would go as follows.

      Alcohol and many other legalized drugs have been around not just for decades but for centuries. We have a solid and firm knowledge of the health risks these drugs present and how to manage those health risks.

      MDMA [Ecstasy] has been in common usage for only the past few decades at the outside. There have not yet been adequate tests preformed to gauge the effect MDMA will have on users over a long period of time, particularly recreational users as opposed to prescription users.

      One strong argument against many kinds of drug legalization is that it is well and truly possible to kill yourself with an overdose without trying very hard. The only legal RECREATIONAL drug this is possible with at the moment is alcohol, which requires a fair bit of effort to actually induce alcohol poisoning.

      Note -- I am aware that impaired judgment can kill and that Alcohol may cause judgment to be impaired. Of course, getting a blowjob can also cause judgment to be impaired. Neither is really safe while driving. Care should be exercised when under the influence of any mind altering susbstance (booze, pot, sorority chicks, Bawls, etc)

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  47. Wrong name.... by tiger99 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If I remember my chemistry correctly, dihydrogen monoxide is incorrect because the molecule splits into H+ and OH- ions. It should be hydrogen hydroxide. I made the same mistake in chemistry class in 1964.

  48. Symptoms by phorm · · Score: 3, Funny

    After long sessions of dealing with infected MS machines, I can tell you truthfully that they do cause extreme illness with symptoms including:

    a) Increased heartrate, anger
    b) Sweaty palms
    c) Migraines
    d) Vision impairment

    Of course, other OS's aren't so great either... I've noticed a trend of body odour and poor social tendancies that seem to afflict Linux users, and the Mac users generally seem to suffer from some form of uncomfortable constipation issue.

  49. Obligatory Rebuttal by localhost00 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Perhaps you've heard of it: a colorless, odorless liquid; a powerful coolant and solvent; an easily- synthesized compound which is used by industry, the military, commercial operations, and even private individuals.

    Yes, we are talking about hydrogen hydroxide, also known as dihydrogen monoxide, and we are here to tell you that what you've heard about DHMO is probably not the whole truth. There are forces out there, such as the Coalition to Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide, who would seek to legislate its use and availability, placing heavy limitations on it-- and eventually, eradicating it entirely.

    In the interest of fairness, we invite you to see their argument, and then we urge you to return here, to learn the truth. Their subversive agenda must not be allowed to prevail.

    Hydrogen hydroxide is beneficial!

    It has been shown that hydrogen hydroxide enhances the functionality, growth, and health of many forms of life-- including humans!-- and current research suggests that it has become an integral part of our planet's ecological balance. Hydrogen hydroxide is environmentally safe! Opponents of dihydrogen monoxide would have you believe that it is some kind of uber-toxin, that it wreaks caustic terror on anything it touches. This couldn't be farther from the truth; when handled properly, it enhances nature rather than destroys it, and even a worst-case scenario DHMO accident would be a trifle for the natural cycles of our world to handle. Hydrogen hydroxide is benign! The Coalition and others have popularized the label "dihydrogen monoxide" over the more chemically-accurate "hydrogen hydroxide" because they know how loaded the former name is. "Monoxide" has become synonymous with pollution, toxic gases, industrial waste-- and while hydrogen hydroxide is sometimes a factor in these problems facing our world today, it is rarely the dangerous element. Hydrogen hydroxide occurs in nature! To hear its naysayers' descriptions, one would think hydrogen hydroxide was solely the product of industrial technology; that it came from years of research in clandestine labs. This is not the case! Hydrogen hydroxide has been a part of nature longer than we have; what gives us the right to eliminate it? We need hydrogen hydroxide! Don't let an uneducated and terror-stricken mob of fanatics railroad you into giving up your right to choose!

    Support the use and distribution of hydrogen hydroxide in your neighborhood, city, state, and country!

    --

    Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

  50. Re:You know they forgot one more by Phat_Tony · · Score: 3, Funny

    One more similar hilarious joke site:

    Creationist Science Fair

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?