Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Interior Dept. Unplugged... Again

IO ERROR writes "The U.S. District Court ordered the Department of Interior to take all its systems offline for the third time, saying that its systems were too insecure to be left open. Among the systems to go offline are those that process payments owed to American Indians and Internet access in schools on Indian reservations. DOI employees cannot use the Web or send or receive e-mail."

299 comments

  1. I wonder about the old paper systems by Ckwop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If people can't secure the computer systems i wonder how secure the old paper based systems were?

    I mean, with a physical system u need physical access but I bet those old systems were probably quite easy to subvert :P

    Simon.

    1. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by millahtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " I bet those old systems were probably quite easy to subvert"

      I doubt they were easy to subvert. First you have to gain access to the facility, then you have to have access to that area and then you have to have access to the files. It is not that easy to just stroll in there and get a copy of them.

      Secure data would be physically secure. It's not like you can just walk in a building and get that stuff that is locked up. It's pretty tough.

    2. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by jsprat · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Unless you're the garbage man...


      You'd be surprised what people will just throw in the trash.

    3. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by roboros · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If people can walk into a secure mainframe room and steal mainframes, a determined person should be able to steal papers. Social engineering can be very powerful, just ask Kevin.

    4. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Like a 24 port 10Base-T hub with 23 working ports that my friend found dumpster diving at a government building in 1997. Quite a find, at the time. Not sensative material, but still.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    5. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet those old systems were probably quite easy to subvert

      I'll bet you a thousand dollars that they were not.

    6. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by AllenChristopher · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Secure data would be physically secure. It's not like you can just walk in a building and get that stuff that is locked up. It's pretty tough."

      You need to read "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feyman." Feyman raids the safes that contain the plans for the atomic bomb repeatedly, both for entertainment and to get work done faster. He walks through a hole in the fence around Los Alamos repeatedly, always exiting through the gate. The guard doesn't catch on until he's done it many times.

      I was able to get almost anywhere in my university dorms with a penknife, despite locked doors at the end of every hall.

      The problem with locks and guard and secure areas is that they're so visually impressive, it's easy to assume that they will work. With bicycle couriers and janitors moving around all the time, workers get used to unfamiliar faces and forget to check ID.

    7. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by tambo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Holy crap, people, how often do we have to do this? It's UNSECURE, people, not INSECURE. Unsecure = vulnerable to unauthorized access or usage. Insecure = your 13-year-old sister whining about her social status.

      In tomorrow's episode: Everything you ever wanted to know about apostrophes but were too stupid to have learned in grade school...

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    8. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by zakezuke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You'd be surprised what people will just throw in the trash.

      "Ain't it a shame when folks throw away a perfectly good white boy like that" -- some john cusack film... perhaps better off dead

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    9. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Kronovohr · · Score: 2, Informative

      1 entry found for UNSECURE.

      UNSECURE

      \Un`se*cure"\, a. Insecure. [R.] --Milton.

      5 entries found for INSECURE.
      insecure adj.

      1. Not sure or certain; doubtful: unemployed and facing an insecure future.
      2. Inadequately guarded or protected; unsafe: A shortage of military police made the air base insecure.
      3. Not firm or fixed; unsteady: an insecure foothold.
      4.
      1. Lacking stability; troubled: an insecure relationship.
      2. Lacking self-confidence; plagued by anxiety: had always felt insecure at parties.

      holy crap indeed

    10. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      just ask Kevin

      Seeing as how Kevin was caught multiple times and eventually spent years rotting away in the lock up, I don't think that I'll be taking any advice from him. Usually you take advice from successful people not from failures. And yeah, I read his book, it was all common sense stuff, if he wasn't well known as a famous hacker (and I use that term loosley) he never would have been able to get that thing published.

    11. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by theodicey · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Everything about their facility was insecure.

      they were infiltrated by the judge's appointed special master, a lawyer named Alan Balaran, with only minimal social engineering.

    12. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by wytcld · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i wonder how secure the old paper based systems were

      That's the center of the legal case. DOI systematically lost records which - if kept and honored - would have resulted in billions of dollars in lease payments to Indian tribes for natural resources (mining and oil) extracted from their reservations by corporations contracted with DOI. The judge may be less concered with security from outside hackers, than with the likelihood of DOI insiders continuing to corrupt and alter the records by setting up the systems so that they themselves can continue to engage in behaviors which have already resulted in judges holding DOI in contempt of court.

      It's not enough that we took most of the Indians' land; we've been continuing (through our kindly federal government) to steal from under what little land they have left. Even under Clinton DOI wasn't playing straight on this; you can imagine how much better it's been under Bush. The problem is that under any reasonable estimate there are enough billions involved to qualify as a serious budget item. Of course, the Indians have oil and other natural resources, and in the past behaved as "terrorists," so if anything we're consistent....

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    13. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by rnturn · · Score: 1

      ``some john cusack film.''
      Nah. It was Estavez and Sheen
      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    14. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I don't know. There was a story on the news this morning that I heard before I left for work. Some dude (or dudette) broke into a major IRS facility, easily bypassing all the "security systems" that were in place. Interestingly, the reports indicate that no confidential tax information or anything else of consequence was stolen, however (and this is remarkable) the pop machines were ripped off. In any event, I'm not sure that your belief that physically secure is all that secure is true. This person or persons unknown could presumably have rifled all the file cabinets in the place if they had wanted to.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    15. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by akb · · Score: 1

      That's part of the point of the overall lawsuit. The government management of the trust fund has been abysmal for its entire live, ie 100 years or so. For instance, various Secretaries of the Interior have been held in contempt of court for not fixing problems in record storage, problems like having them eaten by rats and covered in feces. So, the heart of the problem is not technology, its DOI willingness to manage Native American assets competently.

    16. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Obfiscator · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The difference being, of course, that he was a trusted employee who happened to be working on the bomb, not just someone who came in off the street.


      But I dunno, maybe a bum just passing through town could have done the same thing.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
    17. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Genda · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently you've not read about the millions of dollars stolen from the American Indians by past operators of the BLM->Office of Indian Affairs... an office can only be as secure as the crooks, er, I mean beaurocrats that operate it...

      Genda

    18. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be sure to ask him as soon as he gets out of jail. ;-)

    19. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it wasn't. It was the scene from Better Off Dead where John Cusack wanted to commit suicide and fell off an overpass but landed in the trash truck that was passing underneath the overpass. A couple of black people saw him (now in the trash truck, having failed his suicide attempt) and made the comment that was quoted loosely above. Things I learned while a teenager during the 80s...

    20. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's the actual quote:
      "Ain't that a shame, throwin' away a perfectly good white boy."
      A link to a review on rottentomatoes.com as well as the imdb.com entry.
    21. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by johnjosephbachir · · Score: 1

      natural (human spoken) language is created by usage

      natural language dictionaries and grammars are prescriptive, not descriptive

      and regardless of that, the definition you gave for insecure (which i would paraphrase as "not secure") works just fine for the purpose of describing a system that is vulnerable to unauthorized access or usage.

    22. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by innerweb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      workers get used to unfamiliar faces

      Maybe in your experiences, but where I worked, that behaviour would have gotten that unfamiliar face shot. Noone messed with the rules. The SPs carried live loaded ammo. They did shoot one person while I was there. He lived, but went to jail.

      InnerWeb

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    23. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 1
      Sure it's easy... when you work there. I believe there's something on the order of billions of dollars that is unaccounted for in the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Honestly, I find it hard to believe someone on the inside isn't stealing them blind. I find it hard to believe they don't know that it's happening, and maybe even who it is that's doing it.

      In this regard, paper is more error-prone than electronic records, because it's generally easier to destroy paper records. At least when you're on the inside.

    24. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by k_head · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's amazing to me is how little of this has hit the maintsream press. Wasn't Gale Norton held in contempt byt he court? Imagine if a clinton cabinet secy was held in contempt how the press would pounce on it.

      Billions of dollars were literally stolen and the networks were ordered shut down at least three times and not a peep from the press.

      So much for the "liberal press" theory.

      --
      The best way to support the US war effort is to continue buying American products.
    25. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      natural language dictionaries and grammars are prescriptive, not descriptive

      That's only true of prescriptive (normative) grammars, descriptive grammars on the other hand are umm ... descriptive.

    26. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by .nuno · · Score: 1

      OK, this is not in the states, but it's still a government building...
      I did some consulting work for an European Government Agency, which, among other duties, was in charge of social security payments. On my second day of work I arrived earlier than I should, what meant that I needed a badge to get in the building. As a consultant it took 3 to 4 days to get the mentioned badge.
      I just walked to the garage, told the janitor I was an external consultant working since the day before and - without even asking me for an ID - he just opened the door and let me in.

      I'm not complaining, I was happy with it. But it also means I could be anyone else and at that time (around 06:30 AM) I would have virtually access to any office without being spotted.

      This happened about 6 months ago. I am sure in the US of A this would also be possible in some Gov buildings. Just make sure you look like a consultant, take your laptop bag with you and arrive very early, before the normal entrance is open.

      --
      .sig
    27. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [It's not enough that we took most of the Indians' land; we've been continuing (through our kindly federal government) to steal from under what little land they have left. Even under Clinton DOI wasn't playing straight on this; you can imagine how much better it's been under Bush.]

      One small point to ponder from an insider: the mishandling of paperwork associated with Indian Trust funds was carried out almost entirely within the BIA, the vast majority of whose employees are, by law, themselves Native American. In effect, then, Native Americans were cheating themselves. I've personally witnessed this on more than one occasion. That doesn't make it any more defensible, but it does perhaps shed a new light on the dynamics of the situation.

    28. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Conare · · Score: 1

      Both are correct. Estavez and Sheen stole it from Cusak.

      --
      Stop Continental Drift! Reunite Gondwanaland!
    29. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something like that yea... I don't actually own the movie. I imagine if I got the quote right I would have been moded up rather then down.

    30. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by johnjosephbachir · · Score: 1

      shit, i said it backwards. that's what i meant... that natural language dictionaries and grammars are _descriptive_.

  2. Groove.... by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 0, Funny

    Damnit, there goes my plan to leech off their p2p network...

    --
    "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
    "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
  3. No web at work ... the humanity ... by petabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

    DOI employees cannot use the Web or send or receive e-mail.

    *thinks about what he does at work*
    So they're letting everybody go home early then? :)

    1. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by SeinJunkie · · Score: 5, Funny

      So they're letting everybody go home early then?


      It's the government, they already left.
    2. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by b12arr0 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about all that lost spam. Orlando Soto would probably have to watch QVC or something to get his fix.

    3. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by WebMasterP · · Score: 3, Funny

      No QVC isn't invasive and annoying enough. He's probably calling up all the door-to-door sales men and Jehovah's Witnesses he knows.

      I wonder if I could make money with uselesscrapyouthinkyouwant.com...

    4. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by b12arr0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Either that or he has telemarketers as his backup plan.

    5. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by yoriknme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I work for the government, and I'm still here. Nothing like stereotypes.

    6. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by Quino · · Score: 2, Funny

      and you're on Slashdot.

      No broadband at home? :)

    7. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by micromoog · · Score: 1

      All government employees are overly defensive too.

    8. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well i'm not sure if this was meant to be a jab at government employees but think of it this way:

      I get to make my own schedule, work at home if i want, dress in t-shirt, shorts and sandals at work, go home around noon, and have people like you pay for my salary and retirement.

      I think I'ld rather be lazy (which is what I think you are implying) than stupid enough to pay someone else to live like this :)

    9. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      No they're not.

    10. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I wonder if I could make money with uselesscrapyouthinkyouwant.com...

      Calling the site that is poor marketing. You'll sell much more useless crap
      if you market it properly. Seriously, with the right advertising campaign,
      I'm convinced you can get people to buy used dental floss or anything, but
      probably not many will buy it if you call it "useless crap".

      There are different ways to spin ("market") the concept of useless crap.
      Calling it "Products You Never Knew Existed" or "Stuff You Didn't Know You
      Needed Until You Saw It" would be a little better, but these slogans are far
      too long to be really effective. "Awesome Stuff" is better, but it loses
      some of its punch due to being somewhat hackneyed. Probably what you want is
      to name your company something abstract and then advertise individual products
      or lines of products.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    11. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by SeinJunkie · · Score: 1

      I work for the government, and I'm still here. Nothing like stereotypes.

      I worked for the government 3 different times, I have a right to stereotype.
      Besides, we understand someone has to stay late some Tuesdays to justify taking an early weekend tomorrow. :)
    12. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      And you're sitting there reading Slashdot.

      No more proof of anything is needed. . .

      --
      ---
    13. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only mentally...

    14. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by goatan · · Score: 1
      And you're sitting there reading Slashdot. No more proof of anything is needed. . .

      He says whilst reading slashdot himself

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  4. Here's the original occurence by klipsch_gmx · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...as reported by internet.com. Interestingly it seems that even the previous time was not really the first?

    "For the second time in less than two years, a federal judge has ordered the Interior Department to disconnect from the Internet in order to protect $1 billion in American Indian money managed by the agency.

    U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth said Interior's refusal to cooperate with a court-appointed master who wanted to test the security of Interior's systems, prompted the decision. The government claimed it did not cooperate with Security Assurance Group of Annapolis, Md., because they could not agree on the "rules of engagement."

    1. Re:Here's the original occurence by skrysakj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are no such things as rules of engagement. All bets are off, all techniques are viable, no holds barred.

      Dress up as a tech guy and talk you way in? Go for it.
      Hack through someone's PC, why not?
      Send in a small remote control vehicle to snoop? Definitely.
      Fake some IDs, listen to employee conversations at a nearby bar after work, sleep with employees and get them to tell secrets, go through trash, make phone calls, take photos, plant bugs, rob, steal, cheat, lie.....

      That's how it's done "for real", so why not train that way? Why not TEST that way?

      What's wrong with "Train like you fight, fight like you train"?

      I'm glad they were shut down if they threw a hissy fit because they couldn't agree on "rules of engagement". Wake up to the real world ladies and gentlemen.

    2. Re:Here's the original occurence by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well that's not nessesarily what's meant by ROE, they may mean things like between hours X and Y no tests can be made because critical backups are being done. While no attacker will wait for backups to finish, this is a reasonable request unless the security people feel the need to test the backup software.

      There are a few legitimate rules that you need to set in place before you can do something like this, like a set of IP ranges to be used or something. They can find their way in, but there's no point in giving some poor sys admin a heart attack when a bunch of odd IPs start showing up.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Here's the original occurence by Piquan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fake some IDs, listen to employee conversations at a nearby bar after work, sleep with employees and get them to tell secrets, go through trash, make phone calls, take photos, plant bugs, rob, steal, cheat, lie.....

      ...mug the IT manager for his SecureID, blackmail the tape monkey for backups, assassinate the night guardsman, sure, whatever.

      Less severe? One part of a real attack might involve calling in a bomb threat to get one key employee away from his desk. I suspect that it may be better to simulate that part rather than panic the entire building: have one of the high-ups that you're working with call the employee away from his desk for a half hour. Or something.

      Yes, the real world doesn't play by rules. But if testing causes more harm than it would have prevented, then it shouldn't take place.

    4. Re:Here's the original occurence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fake some IDs, listen to employee conversations at a nearby bar after work, sleep with employees and get them to tell secrets, go through trash, make phone calls, take photos, plant bugs, rob, steal, cheat, lie.....

      Let me guess, you work for the Interior Department? Nice try.

    5. Re:Here's the original occurence by cmowire · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If critical backups get messed up because of security testing, that would be a security hole.

      Having the sys admin go spastic is a good thing for them, because that means that there's somebody watching for stuff. If they know the IP addresses, they can just block those addresses if they don't want the results to turn out bad.

    6. Re:Here's the original occurence by skrysakj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If critical backups get messed up because of security testing, that would be a security hole.

      Amen. My point in a nutshell.

      This a critical system, this is the real world. No holds barred. Now, abomb threat to clear the building as a "test" is severe, yes. It's costly, causes a panic, and may not be appropriate. But, it needs to be tested for as well (maybe in conversation, such as "What are your procedures for a bomb threat? Do you lock the doors behind you and log out?) or do it on a Saturday. Hell, even announced it is a TEST bomb scare, people will go through their routines and procedures and security holes will come to light. But make sure it is done at an unknown time, and with unknown factors to make it as real as possible.

    7. Re:Here's the original occurence by Bozdune · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, I've seen this kind of sissy fight before. Believe me, the "rules of engagement" were purely electronic. They were probably arguing that they didn't want any "disruptions" of their service. Now they have a big disruption shoved right up their asses, well-deservedly so IMO.

    8. Re:Here's the original occurence by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Mod this guy up. I mean ... if you really want to know how secure your systems are, you don't even begin to worry about "rules of engagement" unless you already know that you're a cakewalk, a pushover, a milk run. If you have any confidence at all in your security measures, you take an attitude similar to Captain Kirk's in The Wrath of Khan: "Khan ... I'm laughing at the "superior intellect". In other words, do your worst. And if it turns out that you're not as prepared as you thought you were ... well, that's the point of having your defenses tested, now isn't it. The fact that the DOI refused to allow themselves to suffer a "friendly fire" test indicates that they knew, perfectly well, that they were insecure. Too bad. My gut reaction (without knowing many details of the case) is that the the judge did the right thing. And just maybe this will send a very clear message to other government organs: secure your data or you'll be unplugged until you get it right.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Here's the original occurence by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but even if it is a hole there should be a specific day that that testing is run so that an additional backup can be made. Just because you are testing the security of your system doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to recover if you find a fatal problem.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    10. Re:Here's the original occurence by trick-knee · · Score: 1

      you are being much too responsible with taxpayer money.

  5. "Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Why would systems with access to funds be connected directly to the net? No system with that level of risk should ever be connected to the net unless there's a damn good reason. Even online banking webservers are throughouly isolated from the core banking systems. This is just sheer stupidity.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Firstly you can blame the system.

      What about when the people who spam fake PayPal, BofA, Fleet, etc. try their luck spamming for native americans, to con them out of their ID/Pin/Password, whatever to steal their money? At some point good security depends upon the end user.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by DR+SoB · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You really have no idea what your talking about. Insightful like an ass. "Even online banking webservers are 'throughouly' isolated from core banking systems", then how exactly do they update your bank account?? Your one of those bozo's that says "I'll never use my credit card online", ummm, moron, a good 40% of retailers use the INTERNET to connect to the bank, or connect there stores to a central service point. Also, MANY _BANKS_ use the internet for "settlement" purposes, online commerce, etc. Not to mention a number of "private" networks use the internet as a backbone. Not to mention credit bureau's, the BMV (or DMZ depending on your state), etc. etc.. Stop spreading your FUD

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    3. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


      then how exactly do they update your bank account?

      Online banking allows you to play with your accounts. If it's hacked it's your data they screw with. The entire bank doesn't become a victim.

      Your[sic] one of those bozo's that says "I'll never use my credit card online"

      I use my card online all the time.

      Not to mention a number of "private" networks use the internet as a backbone.

      They're called "VPNs". Good luck hacking a properly maintained one anytime soon.

      I know exactly what I'm speaking about. Go back to sleep.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by DR+SoB · · Score: 0

      "Online banking allows you to play with your accounts. If it's hacked it's your data they screw with. The entire bank doesn't become a victim."

      That has nothing to do with your original statement. You said they are not connected. Explain properly.

      "I use my card online all the time"

      Paypal?? Seriously, I know you do, we _all_ do.

      "They're called "VPNs". Good luck hacking a properly maintained one anytime soon."

      WOW, YOU KNOW WHAT A VPN IS? How impressive.

      "I know exactly what I'm speaking about. Go back to sleep."

      No you don't, and if I could sleep on the job I would, instead I'll just discredit you on /.

      Your statement:

      "Why would systems with access to funds be connected directly to the net? No system with that level of risk should ever be connected to the net "

      Is completely retarded. That's the point, and you have yet to prove otherwise, knowing what a VPN is doesn't quite make you smart. In fact, quite the opposite, it instead backfired and killed your original statement all with the line "Good luck trying to hack one", that's the point, if it is properly maintained/secured/monitored, why shouldn't it be on the internet..

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    5. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by IO+ERROR · · Score: 4, Informative
      Why would systems with access to funds be connected directly to the net? No system with that level of risk should ever be connected to the net unless there's a damn good reason. Even online banking webservers are throughouly isolated from the core banking systems. This is just sheer stupidity.

      My understanding of the history of this is that DOI has had the least secure computer systems of any U.S. government agency, and have been virtually overrun with cracker activity. It's pretty obvious that someone who knows little about information security, or knowing the government, a LOT of someones, led to this occurring, as I pointed out, for the third time.

      As you said, there's no excuse for sensitive systems such as that to be exposed to the Internet, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. In the book At Large, author David Freeman points out that at one point, the controls for the Hoover Dam were accessible from the Internet. That's asking for people to DIE, and that's not cool...

      Excuse me, someone's at the door. He says he's from Homeland Security...

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    6. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by grub · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      banks are MADE UP of PEOPLE'S ACCOUNTS

      Well duh. The whole point being if an account is compromised the entire bank isn't susceptible. Online anything presents a risk but I'll stick to the banking theme. When handled properly a bank minimizes the risks of an intrusion and minimizes the damage capable upon an intrusion.

      Shit, this is network security 101.

      you're an imbecile.

      Just call me a nazi so we can end this, you're embarassing yourself.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    7. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the old days it used to be hard to get small businesses to expose themselves to the net at all. They were paranoid about running so much as a webserver for simple customer services.

      Nowadays it's getting tough to convince them they need to keep a computer offline to protect sensitive core business data, even if it means a bit of sneaker netting now and again.

      Perhaps times will change again as they swing back to paranoid.

      Real men may upload their data to ftp and let everyone else mirror it. Smart men pull the ethernet cord. If nothing else you don't want the IRS/SEC to be able to pull your data off of someone else's server. You can't wipe what you don't have sole possession of.

      KFG

    8. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by bmwm3nut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...a good 40% of retailers use the INTERNET to connect to the bank...

      it's even worse than that. i know a guy who works at a credit union. his job is to do end-of-day, end-of-month, etc processing. one of his jobs, is to ftp the transactions to/from visa everynight. it's not sftp or any other encrypted connection. just plan text ftp right over the internet. no one at the place will listen to him about how insecure that is! and just think, if visa is doing that for this credit union, i imagine that they're doing it for all the banks/retailers they deal with.

    9. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative


      That has nothing to do with your original statement. You said they are not connected. Explain properly.

      Well, you asked nicely. When a customer connects to an online bank they aren't directly connected to the banking core. They're on a webserver that's isolated well enough to prevent compromising the main banking systems. The passwords and login credentials aren't usually stored on the web machines, rather the info is passed through to other secured machines. This way if the web server is comprimised the passwords are safe. There are usually firewalls or other security between all these systems.

      The key is to isolate the systems and only allow the bare minimum amount of talk to get the job done.

    10. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by DR+SoB · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You just keep digging your whole, and changing your story. We'll just keep correcting you..

      First off, you said if the SERVER was comprimised it wouldn't matter because it is isolated, WRONG. Now your saying if PEOPLE'S ACCOUNTS are compromised the entire bank isn't susceptible. Wow, nobel prize stuff. No shit sherlock, if 1 person's account is broken into the whole bank isn't cleared of billions of dollars, guess what, people's accounts are comprimised EVERDAY. Now back to your ORIGINAL statement, if the bank's online webserver was comprimised, that sure would put a lot of accounts at risk, and since that computer IS DEFINITELY connected to there accounts, then, well, you see, your point is mute.

      "Shit, this is network security 101."

      Your not talking about network security at all. Your talking about best practises. And you said people shouldn't put that sort of thing on the internet, just admit it, you were wrong originally.

      "Just call me a nazi so we can end this, you're embarassing yourself."

      Your the one who looks dumb. I've set up WAN software for banks before, what exactly is your qualification?? (I've set up server's that will translate TCP/IP to X.25, do you know what that is? A little more complicated then a VPN..).

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    11. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, that makes sense. Ok, I see your point now, thank you!! Seriously though, if you comprise a webserver for the bank, you won't need individual account numbers, your in deep enough at that point that you can cause serious damage, although you definitely don't have access to the banks mainframes completely, there's not much stopping you from installing backdoors, and password sniffers... Not to mention the fact that everyone that comes to that website is going to type there password in, and thereby, if you own the server, you own their password, I hope that clears up the points I was trying to make.

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    12. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're telling me is that ftp is risky and therefore Visa shouldn't allow it?

      Even when they require the files being transmitted to be pgp-encrypted first?

      Don't be an alarmist. Get the whole story or get an educated friend.

    13. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by iminplaya · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      you're an imbecile.

      Just call me a nazi so we can end this, you're embarassing yourself.


      Ladies, ladies, please. Let's keep it civilised. This isn't an AOL forum.

      --
      What?
    14. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what your talking about, but I'm sure the line between credit union and Visanet (now named Vital) is encrypted, Vital would _never_ allow plain text over on unencrypted channel. They don't care if it's plaintext as long as it's protected plaintext.

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    15. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention credit bureau's, the BMV (or DMZ depending on your state), etc. etc.. Stop spreading your FUD

      I've heard stories about people in Korea not seeing their family members for 50 years because of the DMZ, but I never realized they were just waiting in line for their driver's license. And I thought is was bad wasting a Saturday afternoon at the DMV/MVD/BMV/whatever. Guess I shouldn't complain.

    16. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      While your respondents sound like jackasses, you're still wrong if you think banks do this stuff perfectly (or even very well). I've had a few too many friends working in IT at banks to be so confident.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    17. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      First of all, welcome to my foe's list. I don't like people who flame the hell out of insightful statements like the one Grub made.

      Online bank servers are *very* well isolated from backbone servers so that they do not pose huge security risks to everyone's money in the database. This is done through the kind of "private" network you are speaking of.

      Many, MANY places actually do connect to the internet do to banking, but once again, they connect via secure tools (ssh; the school I work for uses Munis for financial works, all passed through a VPN tunnel), and a number of checkpoints are set up on both ends to detur hacking. As I understand it, very few of these kinds of security enhancements were installed on the DoI's computers, if any at all.

      So really now, who's spreading the FUD, the person who's trying to sell us that the internet's inheirently secure and should be trusted like any network, or the man who's saying that the security, or lack thereof, isn't good enough?

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    18. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by DR+SoB · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not quite. They _DON'T_ PGP encrypt it, it's sent plain text. EVER BANK I'VE WORKED WITH in USA uses plain text to transfer the file. I have seen the PGP encrypted file, but that's only for Canadian banks.

      Yes, FTP using Plaintext is risky. That's why Vital (Visanet) would force the LINK/LINE between the companies to be a. encrypted, or b. a VPN.

      No retailer want's to spend the $10,000USD on a business class version of PGP (I've investigated it before). Canadian retailers generally get the retail version and make it some guy's duty to manually encrypt the files.

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    19. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Even still, if you're in the local bank's computer system, you've now gotten a level of trust that you didn't have before. With time and work, you can run your way into the core, it's just a bit more roundabout.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    20. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Sweet, my first foe..

      I think you mean SSL not SSH. ;)

      "sell us that the internet's inheirently secure"

      That wasn't what I said at all, I said that it could be secured, not that it's "inheirently" secure.

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    21. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      my bad, i do mean ssl, 2 hours of sleep will do that to you....

      and secondly, a post that seriously flame baited, you cant be too sure what was said at all.. I appologize for putting words in your mouth, but I do seriously think you need to rethink what grub was saying.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    22. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not wishing to make you look any more of a numpty than I have to, let me just say that if you thought the servers were actually translating from TCP/IP to X.25, you're sadly mistaken. They may have sucked data in via TCP/IP, and squirted that data out over an X.25 network, but there's no direct correspondence between a TCP/IP packet and the X.25 frames sent on the other link.

      And X.25 isn't any more complicated than a VPN - if anything, it's simpler. I know. I've set up X.25 links on numerous occasions, and more than one server linking an IP network and an X.25 network.

      So don't make yourself look more stupid than you already have done with your inane ranting and trolling.

    23. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      I agree my original response was a over the edge, I need to be more neutral, I'll try harder next time. Try and understand I set up these networks for a living and having people saying all the time "Don't put anything finanical on the internet" causes me a lot of grief, when a CEO hears that and then finds out HIS network is on the internet it takes a long time for his network guys to explain that indeed, his network is secure..

      No worries, I'm tired too, and it's almost time to go home. Go ahead and leave me on your Foe's list, I've always wanted a foe that can keep me in check..

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    24. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by DR+SoB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not quite.. There is a translation that takes place, I'm not talking about X.25 over TCP, I'm talking about banks that have NO TCP connection available for there mainframes, so they had to buy a server that sits in front of the mainframe that listens on TCP takes the credit packet and translates it into the banks X.25 format. The reason is many retailers want to use TCP type POS's but the bank's (well, SOME in Canada) don't support a front end TCP. Does that make sense now? And yes, I've also worked on networks that run X.25 over TCP.

      X.25 is definitely more complicated then setting up a software VPN, and I'm not talking about simply typing in a DNA and connecting with pre-configured software. As for a hardware VPN there is no setup there, it's transparent to the end application, could it get simpler then that?

      Now, back to my inane ranting and trolling..

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    25. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by tanksalot · · Score: 1

      Damn... I guess that we will never hear from IO ERROR again...

      --
      "I am not denying the existence of stupidity, or of stupid people." - phyruxus
    26. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by Blackknight · · Score: 1

      But they're willing to spend thousands of dollars defending themselves against a class action law suit?

      Are they willing to eat the loss when somebody steals all those credit card numbers and orders a ton of stuff?

    27. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by daveb · · Score: 1

      Now you have proven beyond all doubt that you are an idiot - I mean ... willingly engaging in that? oooooo yucky

    28. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      Although I wish both of you could spell the word "compromise," this is actually an interesting point. Many security experts think that compromising "tier one" is "OK," because (to them) it means that the "big database" on some other server is still secure. Um, no. If I control your front end, I have you by the nuts, it's only a matter of how much information I decide to extract.

    29. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Online bank servers are *very* well isolated from backbone servers so that they do not pose huge security risks to everyone's money in the database. This is done through the kind of "private" network you are speaking of.

      While I agree that this is a pretty reasonable assumption to make, are you sure that this is actually the case?

    30. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that no ones out to get you

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    31. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Large banks hopefully.

      Our last exam certainly stressed internet security (from an examiner with precious little understanding past what the reg's say).

      The good news is that examiners get on their high horse after a few bad actors cause problems.

    32. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      To be honest, you don't need to own a bank server or computer system to do damage.

      You'd be amazed at what a little social engineering will do.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    33. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      That's credit unions for you.

      Do you know what servicer that they are dealing with?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    34. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      I am - this is my job and i am sure that (in our case at least) that this is the case.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    35. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by Dwarfgoat · · Score: 1

      the controls for the Hoover Dam were accessible from the Internet. That's asking for people to DIE

      Whoa there, turbo. Maybe turn down the power output, or cut off the water supply to Vegas, perhaps even lower the level of lake Mead...albeit slowly.

      Even with all flood control gates wide open, the only folks in danger would be a couple of unlucky rafters below the dam.

      Unless, of course, you're referring to the automatic self-destruct system (installed in all American public works since 1925). It's a big red button...just says "don't push!"

      cheers

      --
      That? That was a pigeon.
  6. Pale Face got open teepee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Pale Face let any brave look inside open teepee. You call it security, we call it maize.

    1. Re:Pale Face got open teepee by Cplus · · Score: 1

      You call it corn? How odd.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  7. Awww, man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There goes my sweet FTP server with the 0 day warez and the fat pipe!

  8. No OS mentioned in the article by $calar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder who the culprit is.

    1. Re:No OS mentioned in the article by ciroknight · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not to sound trollish, but why does it matter?

      If it were linux or one of the BSD's, the government would be up and at arms about it, screaming how linux was insecure, and that *we* needed to fix this and that and that and that.. If it's microsoft, well, nobody ever got fired for choosing microsoft. They'll politely call Tech support and M$ will offer to "Upgrade" their security for a large sum, and the government will agree like usual.

      Which, to you, sounds more likely to be the case?

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re:No OS mentioned in the article by karlo_ubc · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot, it was obviously MS

      --
      kb
    3. Re:No OS mentioned in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's an article from a recent incident. No Trust: Hacking the Department of Interior

    4. Re:No OS mentioned in the article by Tophorn · · Score: 1

      If by recent you mean: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2001 but it was a good read anyway.

  9. Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Does anyone know what system(s) they are running? What (if anything) are they using as firewall(s)? What types of servers are they using? What database(s)?

    Is their continuing failure to secure their system due to lack of will/lack of money/what they're using or some combo of the three?

    1. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by andih8u · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if you've ever contracted for the government, you'd know that trying to get anything done is close to impossible. Any step you take has to be combed through by several beurocrats who have no more interest in anything other than plodding through their days on the way to retirement. Even if you do manage to get all of the systems designed and get ready to roll the upgrades out, someone will just come along and axe the plan while they try to figure out if this move will make them risk their neck in the slightest.

      Trying to work for people who essentially can't be fired is a nightmare.

      --


      slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    2. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by spune · · Score: 1

      DOS 5.0, and they burn the wires if they detect intrusion.

    3. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by flacco · · Score: 1
      Does anyone know what system(s) they are running?

      the last time this happened it was Windows servers. it sounds like they're resistant to change so i wouldn't be surprised if it's still Microsoft Swiss Cheese Server.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    4. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by Lordrashmi · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, sounds like my job, everything takes a group of like 10 people to decide, then after 1300 man hours implementing it, they decided to throw it away (yes, all of it) and take an entirely different approach.

    5. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by Chester+K · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even if you do manage to get all of the systems designed and get ready to roll the upgrades out, someone will just come along and axe the plan while they try to figure out if this move will make them risk their neck in the slightest. Trying to work for people who essentially can't be fired is a nightmare.

      The above is absolutely true, and during some contracting work with the military, I was even told pretty much exactly what's said above.

      When it comes to Government IT, the only thing that can really get you fired is if you opened a new security vulnerability. The way the admins deal with that is by not allowing any changes to occur under their watch. It's extremely infuriating.

      --

      NO CARRIER
    6. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any step you take has to be combed through by several beurocrats who have no more interest in anything other than plodding through their days on the way to retirement

      You insensitive plod! I'm clodding through my days on the way to retirement!

    7. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 0

      As someone who has just spent the better part of a day trying to convince a large multi-national organisation (no prizes for guessing where) that security is not "release fast, and release often, and wonder when than might bite one in the ass" I've seen this time and time again.

      Corporates/Government just don't really get the security angle. They have been really lucky up till now with the 'you'll never work in this industry again' ruse.

      And how many of us fall for that.

      Heres an example:

      We've developed (not me, but someone in our department) a document management tool. They have been telling everyone that this tool is ultra secure - in emails, in internal product literature. This is the beef with our current boss.

      So why are we having to explicity say we think that 'the application is insecure?'. We have multiple people who have access to everything on the machine, where does that take the security? (Basically, our machine is accessed by everyone who has priviledges to code on the public site - normal stuff?')

      Well, from their point of view it takes the machine into 'never-never-land' - we have to expect that IP spoofing might occur, and that maybe what we have done just gives the 'level of access neccesary'.

      I'm sorry, but this just smacks of being unprofessional. Where are the 'security-audits' where are the 'attempted attacks'?

      The projects we are protecting here are something that potentially has billions of (something) profit?

      And they want us to give a thumbs up to 'good enough'?

      I mean come one, we can play the 'good enough' game until the cows come home.

      Huge organisations, its about 'do what you can, we'll deal with the enron when it happens'.

      Zero knowledge, zero accountabilty, And the techies get it in the head.

      Ok. I'm done.

      P.S. These opinions reflect nothing. Its total hot air, and quite frankly, none of it makes sense, and actually, none of it is true. None of it.

    8. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See, the problem was having 10 people involved in the initial decision-making.

      Having *feedback* from lots of people is okay. Having more than three people involved in actually making a decision is, IMHO, a bad idea.

    9. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      the only thing that can really get you fired is if you opened a new security vulnerability. The way the admins deal with that is by not allowing any changes to occur under their watch.
      ...Yeah, sounds like that policy is working out nicely for them...
      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  10. Looking Inward.. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dept of Interior can't get outside of itself.

    Seems rather appropriate. What software are they running?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Looking Inward.. by bastardsquadmuzz · · Score: 1

      Well their webservers at least are running Lotus-Domino/5.0.8 on NT4/Windows 98.

      --
      --Muzz
    2. Re:Looking Inward.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Well their webservers at least are running Lotus-Domino/5.0.8 on NT4/Windows 98.

      *sniff* *sniff* Hmm smells like summer job opportunity at the Dept of Interior. Any geeks up for a job moving them to a secure platform? ;-)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. silly silly Jessica... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny
    In a recent visit with Gale Norton (Secretary of the Interior) the following happened:

    Simpson, whose verbal gaffes are also legendary, pulled another one Sunday visiting the White House, our sources say. The singer was introduced to Interior Secretary Gale Norton and gushed: "You've done a nice job decorating the White House."

    Source: washingtonpost.com

    1. Re:silly silly Jessica... by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Nice to know Norton has done something right - as an observer from over the pond, all I ever see of the DOI is the litany of cock-ups and incompetence that this court case brings to light.

      Mind you, I bet she's used Windows Wallpaper for the decorating...

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  12. DOI understands Firewater instead of Firewalls by James+McP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is really sad. I first heard of the DOI's incredible mishandling of the Indian trust here on slashdot a few years ago when they were shut down the first time.

    I can understand having problems recompiling literally centuries of data for tens of thousands of people. But c'mon, you can't figure out how to set up firewalls with VPN connections between disparate groups?

    Could you imagine any private organization like a mutual fund or retirement investor leaving SSNs and customer information online on websites? Imagine the smack down from the government! But if it's the gov't itself nada. Thank god (or Great Spirit, whatever) that there's at least one judge willing to do the right thing.

    --
    I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
    1. Re:DOI understands Firewater instead of Firewalls by SoSueMe · · Score: 2
      They're really not shy about flaunting that ignorance either.
      "We are working closely with the Department of Justice to quickly respond to this order in the appropriate legal venue," the agency said in a faxed statement.
      How about quickly responding to the security order?
    2. Re:DOI understands Firewater instead of Firewalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not an issue of firewalls. there are firewalls. the issue is whether it should be physically connected to the same network at all.

    3. Re:DOI understands Firewater instead of Firewalls by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      No, see, that would require real work and maybe writing some checks. The lawyers are already on the payroll.

  13. Guess the Indians shot themselves in the foot ... by adamgreenfield · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Among the systems to go offline are those that process payments owed to American Indians and Internet access in schools on Indian reservations....

    The blackout stems from a class-action lawsuit between the agency and Indians who allege that it has mismanaged trust accounts set up in the late 19th century to handle proceeds from oil, gas and minerals extracted from Indian lands.

    Doesn't look like this will do anything positive for the Native Americans.

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
  14. Priorities by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Obviously the Secretary of the Interior needs to spend less time decorating the White House.

    1. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the below comment on Fark. Somehow I doubt this is what she had in mind though.

      Perhaps Jessica Simpson was referring to the role the Department of Interior's National Park Service plays in maintaining the grounds and structure of the White House, in its conducting of public tours of the White House, or the role it played in establishing the White House Historical Association, the organization which is responsible for decorating the White House.

    2. Re:Priorities by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Right. This from a girl who thought buffalo wings were made from buffalo meat?

      One might still hope she meant it as a joke.

    3. Re:Priorities by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Before I had ever seen or eaten buffalo wings (just heard the name), I thought that they were some kind of weird cut of buffalo meat. It's not that implausible of an assumption. Commercial production of bison meat, has made a big boom in the last couple of years, too, so bison meat has been in the news.

  15. Did anybody else read... by JBG667 · · Score: 0, Funny


    Department of Inferior?

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world > > Those who understand binary and those who don't
  16. The Internet eh? by goosebane · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think part of the problem with a lot of the corporations/departments having many security flaws, or systems open to the net that shouldnt be is the fact that many people still see the internet as an idealistic place for the exchange of ideas and commerce. People are still slow to realize the danger that lies in the internet, and the fact that it can be dangerous. If people knew more about the dangers of technology they might be more apt to work on protecting themselves.

    1. Re:The Internet eh? by kberg108 · · Score: 0

      FEAR FEAR FEAR spread the fear.

      --
      I like things that are sweet and not things that are lame. --
  17. As an Indian, I can say this by tacokill · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's cool. We'll just keep the casino money.

    1. Re:As an Indian, I can say this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't live in South Dakota do you? The region's not exactly bustling with gamers.

  18. No mention of their setup by Eberlin · · Score: 1

    Somehow this doesn't strike me as a bunch of linux boxen unfirewalled with the root password as "password."

    Just goes to show, though, that people can sing about security all they want, release whitepapers and HOWTOs on security, but if people don't follow nor enforce such rules PROPERLY, it amounts to jaque squat.

    Of course, their need for security is much greater than your average home user. We're not all carrying heuuuge amounts of sensitive information.

    1. Re:No mention of their setup by ehvoy · · Score: 1

      I think there environment was something like:

      \\DOI\Mineral_royalties (Everyone, Full Control)
      \\DOI\Energy_royalties (Everyone, Full Control)

      or something

    2. Re:No mention of their setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they took an idea from a recent slashdot poll and did chmod -R 777 /*

      or something like that. That would mean they were running a *nix though.

  19. WTF are you trying to insinuate here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a bit offended by this post's pandering to our intellect. Like we're supposed to view this is some sort infringement on Native American rights in the US. Sure, maybe it's interesting that the Dept of Interior, which shares the podium with the Dept of Homeland Security, needs to upgrade insecure servers. Nevermind Debian, GNU, Gentoo, and Microsoft have had just as much trouble with security, ti's no surprise the Feds might have trouble too.

    There's no news here. Don't try to make news where there isn't any.

  20. Only attack on port 3045... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that what they mean by "rules of engagement" ?
    Like they were boxers: No hitting below the belt. No eye gouging. ...

  21. I'm Here To Help The Government by SEWilco · · Score: 4, Funny
    Oops.
    I emailed the Department of the Interior, pointing out that they should consider selling any unsolicited copies of software so as to not waste the value of gifts. They shouldn't use gift material as that bypasses the intent of normal acquisition processes.

    Now I know why I got no response...

  22. ironically true by drivers · · Score: 4, Funny

    Coincidentally, The Dept of the Interior actually does decorate the White House.

    1. Re:ironically true by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Probably through the National Park Service or one of its other branches, I'd assume. I'd check it out on the web, but...

      I doubt the Interior secretary personally oversees it, though. More likely some sort of Undersecretary of Interior Decorating, I'd guess. =]

    2. Re:ironically true by rupert2000 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they can do an episode of trading spaces in November.

    3. Re:ironically true by blamanj · · Score: 1

      Gee, I thought it was the Department of Justice that was into re-decorating.

    4. Re:ironically true by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      The Undersecretary of the Interior of the Interior. I like it.

  23. Re:Technology vs. Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    learn about it. The money isn't reparations like most african americans are clamoring for. Unlike the bogus "40 acres and a mule" there are both actual treaties for how the natives should be handled, and then there's the mineral/gas/oil rights on reservation land that the US Govt is steward of. It's out of the billions of dollars earned off those rights that they are paying the natives.

  24. Anonymous Coward...how insecure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "its systems were too insecure to be left open"
    Well, I feel sorry for the systems. It is really rough working for the government and having self esteem issues. If I worked for the gov't, I would be a little insecure my self : P

  25. It's a political thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "The Interior Department said the order "is a new frontier in this court's efforts to run the operations of executive branch agencies."

    "We are working closely with the Department of Justice to quickly respond to this order in the appropriate legal venue," the agency said in a faxed statement. //

    It's a political thing. Probably not much of a technical problem here at all. Somebody's making a move for power somewhere and now all of this BS. They are punishing the Interior by taking down links with schools on them rather than just blocking traffic via access lists and firewalls.

    If they really had a problem with some of the services being provided as insecure they could have either firewalled those services or just blocked them at the router. Since, they did not take a rational approach to solving the problem, the problem is likely a political one from one greybearded idiot to another.

    Been a consultant for the government. Seen it. I once went almost 4 months doing nothing but earning good money while waiting for the Chicago Tollway to resolve some political infighting. 4 months of sitting at home, watching TV and basically chilling out on Illinois tax dollars.

    It was lovely.

    1. Re:It's a political thing by kberg108 · · Score: 1, Informative

      As someone close to this. You could not be more right.

      --
      I like things that are sweet and not things that are lame. --
  26. Re:Technology vs. Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There aren't enough pureblood indians left in the US to fill a 747. The people getting benefits only have to demonstrate a degree of Indian ancestry, which for many is a stretch.

  27. Maybe that Verizon Wireless doesn't look too bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DOI isn't the only place in DC where clueless PHBs make decisions like this.

  28. Re:Technology vs. Indians by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Much of the money that is handled 'for' the native americans is not federal money from taxes. It is money that is due native americans through things like mineral rights. Security should not even be at the top of the list though- plain mismanagement and incompentence that is criminal. But as is often the case- none of the big players are being held responsible to the extent they should. You can read about it all over the place - like this article

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  29. 2001? by klipsch_gmx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like the Interior Department has been having computer problems for a long time (December 2001!):

    "Web wanderers looking for information on national parks, government mapping services or geological disasters will need to get their information from non-official websites for a while.

    U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth issued the order late Wednesday after a report showed that the computer system which handles $500 million annually in royalties from Indian land has major security holes that make it easy to access the system, alter records and possibly divert funds."

    1. Re:2001? by jfmiller · · Score: 1

      The National Park Service seems to have it's stuff up still. as does the USGS

      --
      Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
  30. Re:Technology vs. Indians by gminks · · Score: 1

    Indians are not being reimbursed from attrocities committed in the past (not enough money in the world). The monies are from the tribes charging money for companies...mostly mining companies...for using their tribal lands. The lands are not owned by the Indian tribes, but are held in trust for them by the US govt (sorta like how we are doing now for the Iraquis...) so the tribes cannot contract directly with the mining companies. The govt holds onto the royalties made off these lucrative contracts and redistributes them to enrolled tribal members. Except their bookkeeping sucks. Just like it always had. We are talking about millions of dollars owed to the poorest people in America that just disappeared. The money that is lost was owed via contracts. No one was watching out for these people is the whole point.

  31. Re:Technology vs. Indians by El · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uh, do you know what a "treaty" is? It is a legally binding contract. Despite having repeatedly violated the treaties, the Interior Department is legally bound to try to honor them. These "payments" are usually part of ongoing compensation for having deprived people of land that they were legally entitled to. The priciple of Eminent Domain does allow the government to kick people off their land, but stipulates that they must be compensated.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  32. Re:Guess the Indians shot themselves in the foot . by Tihstae · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Doesn't look like this will do anything positive for the Native Americans.

    No, there is no way that protecting their privacy and keeping the money that is rightfully theirs from being stolen is doing anything good for them. Give me a break, read the article and not just the headline.

    Oops, this is Slashdot. (Rosanne Roseannadana Voice) Nevermind!!
  33. Job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does this mean there will be some positions opening up for new Sysadmins?

    --AC

    1. Re:Job? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      This is what I'm wondering. Where can I apply for the job of securing these connections?

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
  34. American Indian !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not "New Delhi" Indian !!!

    Furthermore, "outsourcing" and "H1-B" are not the same "Texas Hold 'Em" and "Black Jack". And yes you can keep the money ... until we wise up and START TAXING THE CRAP OUT OF IT.

    1. Re:American Indian !!! by tacokill · · Score: 1

      Yea, I got it.

      Proud member of the Cherokee Nation (no shit, I'm on the rolls).

  35. Arrgh... by ehintz · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's frustrating to be out of work and not getting offers, while knowing I'm considerably more competent than these fools who still seem to have jobs after b0rking it time and time again.

    --
    ehintz
    1. Re:Arrgh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the hiring procedures are the real problem.

      a few good people have been pulled into a few places there, but government hiring is a nightmare.

      just as an example, if a job is posted with a requirement for a B.S., one is not allowed to choose the applicant with a masters over the one with a bachelors.

      military get high privileges. disabled and minorities too. these are usually career government people. it's a very bad system.

      that said, there are some good people there now, trying to do good things, but they are in a small minority. bureaucracy, in the form of turf wars, is the problem.

  36. Re:Technology vs. Indians by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Informative

    You don't really understand what happened do you?

    Firstly, there is no Indian "race" or "nation" that was in conflict with the United States.

    There were many conflicts with many tribes and there are many settlements which differ in scope and letter of the agreement.

    Since the closing of the Frontier in 1890 and the end of major military action with the American Indians around the same time the rights of the American Indians have changed and the role of the government in thier lives has changed.

    The crux of this arguement between the DOI/BIA and the folks suing them isn't about monetarily reimbursing for "or practically annahilating their race" it's about mismangement of natural resources on lands which are on Reservations or were on Reservations which are held in trust by the United States Government who act as stewards of the resources, both discovered and undiscovered.

    Basicly the DOI/BIA has lost billions of dollars of money that should have been paid out to various tribes and various private citizens. Not only that, but they can't figure out a webserver that holds confidental information on the monies going out to private citizens that can't be exploited.

  37. US Interior Dept. Unplugged?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is MTV getting hard up for programming ideas or what?

  38. OFFTOPIC!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    what this diatribe has to do with computer security, i have no idea. Regardless, it is completely offtopic, and should be modded as such.

    This should be obvious to moderators, but there are quite a few wackos with points who would mod any anti-US, leftist claptrap up.

  39. my step dad works for the Dept of Interior by Squeezer · · Score: 4, Informative

    and just so everyone knows, the dept of interior is 100% standardized on Microsoft Windows. They do not use any Unix/Linux/BSD anywhere. everything is windows. thats part of the problem of why they are so insecure

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    1. Re:my step dad works for the Dept of Interior by kberg108 · · Score: 0

      You have not one fucking clue about what you are saying. The DOI has literaly thousands of *NIX servers. The DOI is a whole hell of a lot bigger than "where your dad works".

      --
      I like things that are sweet and not things that are lame. --
    2. Re:my step dad works for the Dept of Interior by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dept. of Homeland Security, meet Dept. of Homeland In-Security.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:my step dad works for the Dept of Interior by midol · · Score: 2, Informative

      Netcraft shows:

      NT4/Windows 98 Lotus-Domino/5.0.8 19-Jul-2001 198.183.146.15 U.S. Department of the Interior
      NT4/Windows 98 Lotus-Domino/5.07 30-Jun-2001 198.183.146.15 U.S. Department of the Interior
      NT4/Windows 98 Lotus-Domino/5.0.7 29-May-2001 198.183.146.15 U.S. Department of the Interior
      NT4/Windows 98 Lotus-Domino/5.0.6 18-Feb-2001 198.183.146.15 U.S. Department of the Interior
      NT4/Windows 98 Lotus-Domino/5.0.5 10-Jan-2001 198.183.146.15 U.S. Department of the Interior
      unknown Lotus-Domino/5.0.5 8-Jan-2001 198.183.146.15 U.S. Department of the Interior
      NT4/Windows 98 Lotus-Domino/5.0.5 1-Jan-2001 198.183.146.15 U.S. Department of the Interior
      unknown Lotus-Domino/5.0.5 31-Dec-2000 198.183.146.15 U.S. Department of the Interior
      NT4/Windows 98 Lotus-Domino/5.0.5 13-Nov-2000 198.183.146.15 U.S. Department of the Interior

    4. Re:my step dad works for the Dept of Interior by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Incorrect. I used to work for the US Geological Survey, and they used Data General unix systems about 10 years ago. I seriously doubt they've dropped all the unix machines as science has a strong history of using Unix. The Dept of Interior is also a huge department, so it'd be very difficult for them to have ONLY windows machines throughout the entire organization.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:my step dad works for the Dept of Interior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I work in DOI and I assure you that we use more than just Windows. Yes, we have an Enterprise agreement with Microsoft and we are "standardizing" on Windows, but our mainframes run many different OSes (AS400s, IBM 3090s, Unisys) and our desktops/LAN servers range from DOS 5 / Win 3.11 to WinXP / Win2k3 servers / Novell 3.x - Novell 6.x, Macs, SparcStations, -- we've got the works, and THAT's a big part of the problem.

      Poor centralized management and no money to properly upgrade hardware. Lucky if machines get replaced every 5-10 years, much less the business average refresh of 3 years.

      And yes, this is all political. The disconnect has been HURTING Tribes and Individual Indians, not helping them. People are starving because they can't get their money in a timely manner due to the workarounds needed.

      If the plaintiffs in the Cobell/BIA case really cared about Indian Country and not picking up some cash they'd settle the damn case, or drop it, now that they've got the spotlight on the issues and the audits and everything are happening.

    6. Re:my step dad works for the Dept of Interior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually depends on what Bureau you work for for.

      Hord Tipton, who used to be the CIO for the Bureau of Land Management, is very keen on making Interior an all-Microsoft shop, and so the BLM has shifted from an almost-all AIX environment in 1999 to an almost-all Windows environment by 2002.

      Barring any significant personnel shake-up, that trend seems likely to continue for the rest of the Department.

  40. Wow, an Indian! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you live in a teepee?

  41. May It Please The Court... by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Funny
    • The US Department of the Interior web site is not responding.
    • We Slashdot users are glad to assist in ensuring that DOI web servers can not function for the next 48 hours.
    • The DOI is required to accept gifts from Indian Tribes under several circumstances. Are the DOI mail servers and web servers properly accepting gifts from tribe representatives?

      "(g) No Refusal Gift Acceptance Policy
      All Department of the Interior employees may accept gifts offered to them by representatives of Indian Tribes, Alaska Native Organizations, Insular and foreign governments when refusal to accept such gifts would be likely to cause offense or embarrassment or otherwise adversely affect relations with the United States."

    • Are DOI machines accepting gifts from Indian Tribe servers which are equipped with generous worm programs?
  42. Re:hmmmm by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    Don't you know? Most crimes are inside jobs.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  43. Ironic by 1WingedAngel · · Score: 2, Funny

    If irony was made of strawberries, we'd all be drinking a lot of smoothies right now.

  44. article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interior Dept unplugged from the Net

    Judge orders agency to shut Internet system after concluding security holes are still a problem.
    March 16, 2004: 2:46 PM EST

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Wide swaths of the Interior Department were taken off the Internet again Tuesday after a federal judge concluded that the agency still has not fixed security holes that threaten payments owed to American Indians.

    It was the third such shutdown for the Interior Department since 2001, when an investigator found that hackers could easily steal money from a system that allocates energy and mineral royalties to 300,000 Indians for use of their land.

    U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth said the system still remained vulnerable despite the department's assurances to the contrary, and the agency could not be trusted to fix the problem by itself.

    "The feigned indignance of Interior aside, there is simply no other alternative. Interior brought this on themselves," Lamberth wrote in an opinion signed Monday.

    The Interior Department said the order "is a new frontier in this court's efforts to run the operations of executive branch agencies."

    "We are working closely with the Department of Justice to quickly respond to this order in the appropriate legal venue," the agency said in a faxed statement.

    Lamberth, who serves in Washington, ordered Interior to pull all its computer systems offline except for those involved in vital police and fire services.

    Bureaus that oversee national parks and provide geological information can also remain online as they have no relation to the trust data, he said.

    Divisions that oversee wildlife management, oil and gas royalty payments and Indian affairs were offline Tuesday. Employees are unable to access the Web or send e-mail to those outside the agency, spokesman Dan DuBray said.

    The order also shuts down a program that provides Internet access to schools on Indian reservations, the agency said.

    Interior could bring its systems back online if an independent reviewer certified them as secure and monitored them on a monthly basis, Lamberth said.

    The Interior Department consistently attracts failing computer-security grades from congressional reviewers.

    The blackout stems from a class-action lawsuit between the agency and Indians who allege that it has mismanaged trust accounts set up in the late 19th century to handle proceeds from oil, gas and minerals extracted from Indian lands.

    Lead plaintiff Elouise Cobell, a member of Montana's Blackfeet tribe, charges that the government has lost track of billions of dollars and wants the judge to transfer control of the accounts to a court-ordered receiver.

    Working with a court-appointed overseer, the agency had been able to bring nearly all of its systems back online within a year after Lamberth ordered them unplugged in 2001. But Lamberth ordered some systems offline again in July 2003 after a dispute between the agency and the overseer.

  45. Re:Technology vs. Indians by pongo000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I still find it funny that the US government pays current American Indians for it's actions in the past.

    And the gov't doesn't even recognize all tribes. They have set a very high bar for recognition, one that is too expensive for many tribes to pursue. Some of the richer tribes have taken to lobbying the gov't to prevent recognition of lesser tribes to keep them from enroaching on the fat profits many tribes are making from various endeavors like gambling and tobacco sales.

  46. Re:Technology vs. Indians by Toxygen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I don't know what the system's like in the US, and I'm not saying our ancestors (key word there) didn't do some terrible things to them, but in Canada the natives want nothing else but to reap the benefits of our hard work while they hunt endangered species with no regard for our environmental laws. They get free power, free housing, free money in addition to not paying taxes on the money they earn with and like the rest of us (assuming you can actually find one of the few that work for their living), free vehicles so long as they can prove they're using them to uphold their "traditional" way of life (no joke here). The list goes on much further than that, and it's absolutely ridiculous. They may have been a noble people once, but at this point most of them are nothing but spoiled beggars. If you want to live in the modern world then go to school and earn your keep, if not then go back your wigwams and wear your bearskins with pride. Believe me, there's no shortage of open wilderness here in Canada so it's not like they don't have the option. There's no reason we should still be paying penance for the actions of our ancestors. If my father went out and killed someone, I wouldn't get in any trouble for it, so why do natives still deserve the support we give them, and why do we still feel obligated to give it to them?

    From Eddie Vedder - "Those ignorant indians got nothing on me. Nothing! Why? It's evolution, baby!"

  47. Re:Technology vs. Indians by krosk · · Score: 1
    i stand corrected

    thank you

  48. Re:Guess the Indians shot themselves in the foot . by gpinzone · · Score: 1

    Oops, this is Slashdot. (Rosanne Roseannadana Voice) Nevermind!!

    Wrong character. Try again.

  49. Heh. Lowest Bidder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was talking last week to an Offshoring outfit who was crowing about the contract they had to supply these guys with cheap labor to handle their IT needs.

    I guess you get what you pay for. :)

  50. Am I suprised? No. by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1

    And this is exactly why you should not depend on the government to do anything with any degree of compentency. Every time someone suggests handing over some large project or economic or social program to the federal government, I cringe. Large organizations are inherently inefficent, and the larger they are, the more inefficent they are. Governments are some of the largest organizations out there, and in fact, the U.S. Government is the single largest organizational entity on the planet.

    Obviously, there are some things that can only be done by an entity of that size (going to the moon in 1969, for example), but to expect efficent and effective IT policy from the Department of Interior is like getting angry when your pet elephant tramples your flowers.

    1. Re:Am I suprised? No. by smcavoy · · Score: 1

      That analogy only works if you consider your personal information and monies owed to you as pretty little things that have no valule.
      If most other departments have compentent people putting together effective IT and security policy, should any thing less be expected of the department of the interior?

  51. Too busy picking wallpaper... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... to worry about security.

    [Jessica] Simpson, whose verbal gaffes are also legendary, pulled another one Sunday visiting the White House, our sources say. The singer was introduced to Interior Secretary Gale Norton and gushed: "You've done a nice job decorating the White House.

    (source, near the bottom, after W. refers to the Ford Theatre as the Lincoln Theatre.)

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  52. Re:Technology vs. Indians by krosk · · Score: 1
    Well, in America we've pretty much taken over all of the land suitable for settlement. In fact, way back when, oil companies would follow around behind tribes and wherever they would settle, the oil companies would immediately displace them again and start drilling for oil. The oil companies believed that Indians had a supernatural sense. And they tried to harness it.

    i feel terrible about what their culture has become, and I applaud those who try and uphold and continue the tradition. However, their culture antiquated and they are surrounded by one of the most technological advanced nations in the world.

  53. Not all of DOI is offline. by BubbaFett · · Score: 4, Informative

    It looks like the Park Service, USGS , and Office of Aircraft Services are still online. Yet there are some seemingly unrelated divisions offline that probably shouldn't be. I don't see why the National Interagency Fire Center is offline. It seems somewhat important!

    1. Re:Not all of DOI is offline. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine their phones still work.

  54. Missed One... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
  55. Re:Technology vs. Indians by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There's no reason we should still be paying penance for the actions of our ancestors. If my father went out and killed someone, I wouldn't get in any trouble for it, so why do natives still deserve the support we give them, and why do we still feel obligated to give it to them?

    If your grandfather killed my grandfather, I wouldn't expect you to be punished for it. On the other hand, if your grandfather stole my grandfather's property, and I'm my grandfather's rightful heir, were this fact uncovered, you should be expected to give me back the property that is now rightfully mine. That's not punishing you for a crime your grandfather committed, that's not penance, that's just doing what's right.

    Now, if we want to give the natives of North America back what rightfully is theirs, we European decendants need to get on ships and sail back to the Old Country, set up shop in London or whereever. Personally, I don't want to do it. So, if I'm not going to give back what is rightfully theirs, I should at least pay rent on it, no?

    Again, I'm not interest in punishment, which I don't deserve, or penance, when I don't need. What I'm interested in is doing what's right...

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  56. but you're posting on slashdot by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    and you're still at work. therefore your internet connection is back.... You don't work for the DOI do you?

  57. What right does the court have? by cheeser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is the court telling the DOI to unplug? Is there a lawsuit I'm missing? The court's job is to rule on lawsuits brought before not define public policy or run about ordering people around. So unless there's a lawsuit about the DOI's systems, the court should stfu.

    --

    --
    http://cheeser.blog-city.com

    1. Re:What right does the court have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are many lawsuits. most are by native american tribes suing over management of their trust funds. simply handling this litigation is a huge job there.

  58. Re:Technology vs. Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    End of major military action with the American Indians... So you had President Cleveland hang a MISSION ACCOMPLISHED on a... uhm... giant steam-powered mecha spider?

    (Look up the history of the Seminole sometime.)

  59. This is news? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    Government computers are insecure and Native Americans get the shaft from the federal government.

    Wow. In what way is this news?

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  60. But of course... by gosand · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know what system(s) they are running? What (if anything) are they using as firewall(s)? What types of servers are they using? What database(s)?

    I would venture: Yes, yes, and yes. Why do you think they are shut down? :-)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  61. Judge's Decsiion is Available Online by trimbach · · Score: 1

    in PDF format at the plantiff's website. It'll tell you all you ever wanted to know about the events that led up to yesterday's decision. There's some good zingers towards the end.

  62. Re:Evil Americans torture devout followers of Isla by BigBadBri · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    That's true, but the Brits released tell an entirely different tale.

    Mind you, they may well be a bunch of lying Pakis - the three from Tipton were apparently overheard planning to go and train in Afghanistan, but of course the authorities over here won't send the bastards back to Pakistan where they belong.

    Yes - I am a British nationalist. It's my country, and my right to object to it being diluted by multiculturalism.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  63. Re:Technology vs. Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "out of their land"

    It was not their land. You have a lot of thinking to do. Ask yourself, if they were entitled to a whole continent, why aren't others? Where's my America, for example? They're entitled to one, why aren't I? No, my friend, we are all heirs to the earth and we are all here now.

  64. recent exploit to DOI AS/400 systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A recent exploit documented on indianz.com was to a couple of AS/400 systems that had no password for database administrators. I know that MS SQL Server used to ship that way by default, but to my knowledge it doesn't run on AS/400. The article doesn't say, but DB/2 or Oracle would be my guess. Sounds like the admins are either way overworked or Just Plain Incompetent.

    1. Re:recent exploit to DOI AS/400 systems by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I'd say that not setting an admin password on a production server falls under "incompetent". That would only be the first thing you do when setting up such a server. I'll give a lot of leeway to "overworked", but not this.

    2. Re:recent exploit to DOI AS/400 systems by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Yep, agreed. BTW, here's a newsflash -- it's not just MS SQL Server that ships with a default password. Sybase does, too (and, from memory, it's the same as MS -- user name sa, no password). Oracle installs with a few of them.

      User -- Password

      System -- manager
      Sys -- change_on_install
      Internal -- Oracle
      Scott -- tiger

      Is a default blank password any less secure than a well-known non-blank password? Marginally, but who's counting?

      As a side point, later service packs for SQL Server 2000 (and, I believe, 7.0) detect a blank sa password and require you to explicitly check off a confirmation before allowing you to proceed if you don't set the password.

  65. Re:Evil Americans torture devout followers of Isla by BigBadBri · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    What about Tipton three are lying bastards?

    Send the buggers back, there are plenty of PIA flights every day.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  66. why am i here by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    It is the function of the One to bring the code you carry to the core...

  67. Re:Technology vs. Indians by rbotoms · · Score: 1

    >The money isn't reparations like most african >americans are clamoring for. Most African Americans? Right clown boy.

  68. Funky People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm posting this AC for obvious reasons.

    A few years back we had a run-in with the DOI. We found very strange things in our web and FTP logs and traced them back to a Denver office of the DOI. Basically what they were doing was spending hours every night (way after office hours) digging and digging and digging to see what they could find. There were tons of 501s because these guys would enumerate when directory listing was turned off.

    My colleage wrote to the DOI in Washington and asked 'what's up'. Because of the evidence we could show, the DOI Washington office decided to put a sniffer on the Denver line. Great, we thought, soon this wil be cleared up. As if.

    A week goes by, and the Washington DOI people contact us. Their sniffer thing didn't work. When they were about to install it, some dork went around the Denver office barking, 'OK EVERYBODY HAS TO GO HOME EARLY TONIGHT WE'RE INSTALLING A SNIFFER ON THE LINE'.

    Now if you believe that story (and that's how they told it) is another matter. We did not - and ever since, at regular intervals, they're back again.

    Funky group. Very funky!

  69. Re:Technology vs. Indians by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's some irony in Wyatt Earp setting the record straight here :)

  70. Culprit is... by bonch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...the sysadmins.

    Linux was shown as the most-breached OS on the net according to that study Slashdot posted, remember.

  71. Not completely true... by winstarman · · Score: 1

    The only thing turned off is essentially all outside connections to the internet, internal email within the DOI still works.

    My father works for the Fish & Wildlife Service and he says these stints without email are some of his most productive times.

    Imagine how much spam he's NOT getting :-)

    On a funny note, the first time they shut him off they only blocked heavily used ports (http/pop/smtp, etc.) but they left open ports for things like AIM etc. So for a few weeks we chatted using AIM despite the fact that he couldn't surf the web. Eventually they got wise and blocked all ports to the outside.

    R-

    --
    Hard loop..... huh?

    Dynamic Designs
  72. Re:Technology vs. Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "what rightfully is theirs"

    But what is "rightfully theirs"? You actually accept that they have a better "claim" to the continent than you do? They get a whole continent and you get pokey old England?!?! I think someone has laid a guilt trip on you, my friend, and as you get older, you will see it and build up your defenses to not let it happen again.

  73. Some government agencies.... by thewiz · · Score: 1

    like the NSA, DOD, and others that routinely deal with security know how to properly secure their systems. Yes, even they are human, make mistakes and get hacked.
    Agencies like the DOI that deal with issues that are deemed to be of less importance than National Security usually don't get the best-of-the-best when it comes to resources for data security. Also, these are the agencies that suckle the most at Microsoft's teat.
    IMHO, I think that the NSA should do the security for ALL government agencies, not just the spooks.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  74. Not a money problem... by utahjazz · · Score: 1

    My roommate worked for the Dept of Interior. He was always amazed at how the home network I had set up for us always 'just worked'. He said 'the internet' at work would go down at least once a week, and always on Monday morning.

    He brought me to work for a party once, I was amazed that everyone had a sweet computer with a big LCD monitor. The offices were huge so they didn't need LCD for the space. When I commented at how lucky they were he said "Actually the made us turn them all off becuase they aren't good enough". I was puzzled by that but didn't ask further, I was there for the free food and beer coutesy of my federal tax dollars.

    BTW, they ran a mirror under our car going in, but I was never asked for ID.

  75. Now why would you do that? by Elusive_Cure · · Score: 1

    Soooo by posting all three links to /. make sure to take them all offline ! Brilliant !!

    --
    Roses are red, violets are blue, most poems rhyme, but this one doesn't... ;^)
  76. Shred them, m'boy, shred them! by Evil+Schmoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Which is why secured government facilities are required to shred all classified documents. And as for Mr. Feynman's legendary escapades, Los Alamos was recently severely upbraided by the DOE for its lax security.

    Most government facilities have the lowest level of classified information ("Secret"). Very few have "Top Secret" or higher. And even with Secret, there are very extensive procedures in place in terms of document storage, personnel access, etc.; you're not going to be able to get in with a penknife, leastways not when the document is in a 2-ton graphite safe with 70-point rotary dial behind an armed guard gate.

    And as for the guy who found a 10-Base T hub? Dude. That's nothing. We throw old junk away all the time. I just threw 5 Betacam SP decks, worth about $6000 each, in the trash last week. Remember, the agencies can't sell equipment; only the GSA sells surplus, and that's at auction. And it's not like the agencies get credit for turning stuff in. So there is no financial incentive for the agencies to save old equipment, and the paperwork is far too much of a hassle to deal with, just to get it transferred off the books to surplus. (You have to verify condition and certify it, blah blah blah.) So we just get it written off as damaged beyond repair, and toss it.

    Believe me, I'd take the stuff home if I could, but then I'd technically be stealing. It has to be officially thrown away first.

    God Bless America.

    1. Re:Shred them, m'boy, shred them! by mr_sfstk8d · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Correction:
      The lowest level of secure materials is FOUO, For Official Use Only. It only has to be torn into quarters (printed doc. that is). Secret must be shredded, and TS or higher (wink, wink) must be pulverized, incinerated or both.
      Which is why in certain work places, they keep hatchets, sledgehammers and white phosphorous grenades handy. Spring cleaning, don't you know.

    2. Re:Shred them, m'boy, shred them! by Secrity · · Score: 1

      BULLSHIT The lowest security classification is "Confidential". The poster's description of the requirements for a security container is pure horseshit. The secure container requirements are wierd, and generally require a GSA-approved Security Container, but no where does it say to use graphite. There are different requirements if information is stored in a vault, which may be where the "armed gate" thing came in. A secure vault requires 8 inch thick concrete walls - still no mention of graphite. For info see chapter 8 of http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/5200-1r/ I couldn't find the authoritative requirements for a GSA-approved security container, but it appears that it must have a combination lock and that it must withstand the following: 10 man-minutes against forced entry. 20 man-hours against surreptitious entry And possibly 30 man-minutes against covert entry. No graphite requirents

    3. Re:Shred them, m'boy, shred them! by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      "Believe me, I'd take the stuff home if I could, but then I'd technically be stealing. It has to be officially thrown away first."

      So officially throw it away in the trash, take your id off, fish it from the trash as a civilian, put your id back on and move that reclaimed trash to your car.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    4. Re:Shred them, m'boy, shred them! by Evil+Schmoo · · Score: 1

      Forgot about FOUO, we don't have it here. We're Secret, TS, and, um, well, you know. I stand well corrected.

      And as for the incinerator ... I worked down the hall from it for a year. That sucks in mid-July when the AC's out.

      Thanks for keeping me in check.

    5. Re:Shred them, m'boy, shred them! by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      The poster's description of the requirements for a security container is pure horseshit.

      Are you saying that a government employee made a mistake? Terrorists like you make the US unsafe.

    6. Re:Shred them, m'boy, shred them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make up your mind man. Is it bullshit or horseshit?

  77. maybe memo should read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    take computer from the desk

    put the computer into the box it came in

    call vendor to get RMA number

    when they ask what's wrong simply give them the (un)expected response...

    "Sorry, our department is just to stupid to use these computers... we're just not worthy..."

  78. We can't pay because, uh.... by qtp · · Score: 2, Funny

    The computers are down for uh... (maintenance? No we cant say that... used it in 1980...)

    uh... (For updating to a new accounting system for this very account? Damn, used that in '92... there's got to be a good excuse here somewhere... I know!..)

    Oh, yeah it's a security issue! That's it, a security issue... can't mess with security now, can we? Not after 9-11!...

    (Good one!)

    Yes, we'll get back to you about that $700,000,000.00 we owe you after all of this is sorted out...

    Oh, sure. As soon as possible...

    Don't worry about it, we've got everything under control. Thanks for being so understanding...

    Oh yeah, I almost forgot, your access is going to be out for a while...

    That's right, no email, no web...

    Yes, there'll be no distance learning at the schools either for the time being...

    Really, that's not fair. Why don't you people just hire more teachers? ..

    What's that? ...

    $700 Million? ...

    It's funny how technical problems always plague the DOI every time this issue comes up.

    --
    Read, L
  79. A passing grade for security is not easy for Feds by donheff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know anything about Interior's problems with the Indian accounting systems, but I can assure you that the security scorecards for Federal systems are tough. OMB and the Hill have appropriately set a very high bar to push agencies to the limit. The intent is to make government systems a model for security best practices - they don't get marked "green" unless they jump through a lot of hoops. There are plenty of bright people on /. who could teach the Feds and anyone else a lot about secure systems. But there are also a whole lot of us who, truth be known, are running critical systems that couldn't come close to passing muster against the standards used to rate the Feds on security.

    I also haven't seen any specifics about why the Judge is hammering DOI. I wouldn't be surprised if they are simply battling with the Judge over the oversight processes she wants to impose - granted that might be a dumb battle to fight.

  80. nope by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 4, Informative

    i write software for many many many banks in Minnesota.

    Almost all of them use pgp for anything remotely confidential, and many use md5 checksums to make sure nothing got changed in-transit.

    I dont know the prices myself but im pretty sure its not $10k. Even if it is, thats peanuts for most banks, especially for something as critical as that.

    Plus, I have software out there that many companies dealing with credit cards use. If you apply for a Target credit card, your application (after it has been scanned) goes through my application. Guess what, coming into and going out of, its encrypted.

    Maybe you havent worked with banks lately, I'll agree it was pretty bad maybe 6 years ago, but they have got up to speed quickly and most are more secure than your average large company.

    1. Re:nope by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Maybe you just do a better job of implementing security than whoever was involved with the credit union that this guy was talking about.

    2. Re:nope by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Who do you work for up there?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    3. Re:nope by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      mmm why?

      we are a very small contract-type company, you've probably never heard of us.

      we deal with document imaging mostly

      i'd tell you all about it, but im really not sure exactly what i can and cant say....

  81. and only 916 days after 9/11 by koan · · Score: 0

    That homeland security department is fast =)

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  82. I work for the DOI (USGS) by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 2, Informative

    The computer security can be laughable sometimes. Those of us who develop software, use Linux whenever possible. I NEVER boot my pc into windows except to allow the IT people to update my antivirus defs. You wouldn't believe the grief I get if I don't boot into windows at least once a week.

  83. Maybe if the Fed paid more by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    The problem is that federal employees get lousy pay. If the Fed paid more, they might be able to get a half-decent set of admins in the DoI.

    Instead, it's a pretty good bet that it's MCSE central in there...

    1. Re:Maybe if the Fed paid more by alien666 · · Score: 1

      Public sector employees seem to be well paid. Some tend to become entrenched and lazy over time.

    2. Re:Maybe if the Fed paid more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The problem is that federal employees get lousy
      > pay.

      Starting pay is about like other entry-level jobs, but often quite a bit better. You get federal benefits. And you get raises and promotions like clockwork, whether you are effective or not.

      Federal work isn't bad at all, if you can get it, and if you stick around for a few years.

  84. I work for the DOI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    So I'm posting anonymously.

    We use mostly VAX here at the DOI for the fiancial servers; I'm in charge of maintaining the FORTRAN code that is run for the transfers (key point here: don't touch it! It's worked fine for over 15 years).

    On the desktops, its straight up Windows 98, and Office 97, and -- get this -- Netscape 4.7 (yeah, it was the standard for a while, and still is, unfortunately). We're supposed to get upgrades to Windows 2000 (and Office 2000, and Netscape 7.0) one of those days, but they've been saying that for a while now. We don't even run virus scanners on the desktop yet -- you should see some of the spyware installed on some clueless people's desktops. And firewall? Ha! I wish.

  85. Department of Interior? by mh101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And what exactly is a "Department of Interior"? Please enlighten this curious non-American. This is the first time I've ever seen the name Department of Interior...

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    1. Re:Department of Interior? by Warlok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Department of the Interior, in charge of everything outdoors in the U.S. of A. Like Gallagher said, they picked the word that didn't fit.

      --
      ...and you run and you run and you can't stop what's been done...
  86. DOI's OS by mroch · · Score: 1

    According to netcraft, doi.gov was running NT4 or Windows 98 when it was last updated 3-ish years ago. Does that mean that they still haven't upgraded from NT4?? If their web server is any indication of other servers at the DOI, it is no wonder they were pulled down...

  87. If they are looking for secure servers by rspress · · Score: 1

    If they are looking for secure servers, then they should move over to MacOS X server like other government agencies who want top notch security have.

    Of course the government hates spending less money than they already do, so the OS X servers would make too much sense.

  88. Re:Evil Americans torture devout followers of Isla by BigBadBri · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Lovely - you hide behind an AC to call me a Nazi.

    Come and argue when you've got a name, Mr nonentity.

    One of my best mates happens to be a Jamaican Muslim, and his views on Pakistanis are roughly the same as mine, only more extreme.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  89. The issue isn't copying information. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First you have to gain access to the facility, then you have to have access to that area and then you have to have access to the files. It is not that easy to just stroll in there and get a copy of them.

    At least in the case of the indian stuff it wasn't an issue of getting copies of the information.

    They "lost" essentially all of the indians' money - and the records were corrupted enough that it was no longer possible to trace who took it.

    The bureaucrats in charge (the likely suspects) then took advantage of the insecure network to finger-point away from themselves. And the systems were taken offline when it was shown that they were STILL wide open.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:The issue isn't copying information. by mpe · · Score: 1

      At least in the case of the indian stuff it wasn't an issue of getting copies of the information.
      They "lost" essentially all of the indians' money - and the records were corrupted enough that it was no longer possible to trace who took it.
      The bureaucrats in charge (the likely suspects) then took advantage of the insecure network to finger-point away from themselves.

      Even though the problems have been going on for more than a century. The problem has little to do with computers. The most likely explanation is that the current people are just the latest in a long line of crooks.

  90. DOI gets all the winners by miu · · Score: 1
    The best of the DOI has to be James Watt. Infamous for making the statement "I don't know how many future generations we can count on until the Lord returns." to a congressional committee while he served as Secretary of the Interior.

    Any level of incompetence and malfeasance displayed by the DOI would fail to surprise me.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  91. This whole thing fell out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when the security testing company decided to run a portscan on a server at the same time the server was scheduled for a reboot. (Yes, they have scheduled reboots. Windows servers.)

    When the security outfit saw the server disappear AS they were scanning it, they concluded that DOI had detected their portscan and pulled the plug on an insecure box.

    At least, that's the scuttlebut I've heard. But it's not like DOI hasn't done many other things to piss off this judge.

  92. NIPRNet? by griffjon · · Score: 1

    Why can't they beg access to use NIPRNET? From what I glean from scanning through all the conspiracy theories, it's basically a secure proxy for military and other sensitive-type peoples from the gummit to surf pr0n anonymously (I get hundreds of hits from *.NIPR.mil at griffjon.com each month, mostly looking at old shadowrun RPG junk).

    This isn't a total solution, obviosuly they have some serious internal security probs, but it'd at least get them back on the web/email, and take their productivity back down to more acceptable levels for gov't employees.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  93. Real information -- the actual shutdown order by mikery1 · · Score: 1

    For starters, only 1/2 of the interior is shut off. USGS, the Park Service and others are up. The Bureau of Reclamation, the Bureau of Indian affairs (duh), the Bureau of Land Management, and some other offices are down.

    The judge's order is archived
    here

    The kicker pages that say what Interior must do are pp. 26-29. The order does outline some intrusion attempts that were successful at parts of Interior.

    The Plantiff's site gives an overview of the case--it's written by the Indian Plantiff, so it's biased, but still pretty accurate.

    Background: this is all about trust fund monies that in the late 1800's the U.S. Government said to Indian tribes: "We'll manage the monies that are made from drilling, mining, etc. your reservation land. Trust Us! PS: You don't have a choice." Then, the Gov't took the money and said buzz off to the Indians. In the 1990's, some Indians sue, and say where's our money -- Interior says, I dunno.

    Is the judge vindictive -- probably. But it's not that different from Hanging Judge Jackson in the MS Anti-Trust case -- the judge may be pissed off, but he's got that way from years of dealing with the incompetence of Interior.

    M

  94. Hospitals are no better by k2r · · Score: 1

    I work for a hospital that sends excel files containing data of HIV positive patients unencrypted over SMTP to an external mailserver and receives this mail by (unencrypted) password-authorized POP3.
    To top this the POP3 password is the same as the one you need to access the hospital's database system.
    The complete network is a single subnet populated with some hundreds of Win2Kpro boxes, that are usually never updated and just waiting for the next virus/worm to distribute sensitive data.

    But they have very good locks at the doors...

    Sometimes I could cry about this level of ignorance, but since I'm just a freelancer and don't want to be told about their insecurity...

    k2r

  95. Tribal Colleges (bia.edu) by mccoma · · Score: 2, Interesting
    All of the Tribal Colleges that were hooked to the BIA now have no internet access. Most of the colleges are in rural areas that have no other avenue for internet access (well, barring spending a lot of $$$ which most of these tribes don't have - casinos only work if you have a large city next door).

    Any distance learning classes are going to have some problems. So the court ruling affects the education of the next generation. It looks like US Geological Survey (the group that administers the bia.edu part) will be going to court to get the order lifted for the colleges so they can go on without interference.

    PS
    Also, it is believed that the amount of lost money for mineral / grazing rights on the trust land total around $10 billion.

    1. Re:Tribal Colleges (bia.edu) by mccoma · · Score: 1
      It gets worse, I have just heard that all Tribal Colleges, regardless if they are on the DOI / BIA network or not must cut their connection.

      US Geological Survey can still have an internet access, but not students. great

  96. What is their problem? by Mr.+Certainly · · Score: 0

    Honestly, Uncle Sam, get your act together. If you have to shut down your computer systems (for the second time!!) because they are that insecure, what are our tax dollars truly going for? What aren't you doing right? I plan on contacting my Congressional Representatives about this issue to ask just why they screwed up this bad.

  97. Think thats bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just try selling computers and software services to the Canadian military. If you do not alow for corruption costs, then you have not got a prayer. Just ask HP about corruption and collusion in the support industry. What is going on in the American DOI is most likely along the same lines. There might be a software Mafia, after all just look at how much untraceable money got lost in the .dot com fiasco. I have a feeling that is where smart organised crime went during the Gotti et al years, if they were stupid enough to use Word.doc then maybe the whole thing will come crashing down on their heads, one can only hope that the FBI and the DOJ are already working on this. It is obvious that greed and crime might very well be involved.

  98. SuperDude to the rescue! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Funny, I just applied at a Info Tech Specialist for the DOI. Maybe I can work some mojo...

    "Watch as I use my crack squad of badgers (badgerbadgerbadger....) to fix servers and thwart evil! Watch as I bend plastic zip ties with only 4 fingers!"

    Oooh, I hope no hiring managers are reading this. Where's that delete button...

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  99. So what? by brucmack · · Score: 1

    ...and your point is what exactly? No, Windows isn't the most secure OS, but don't point the finger at Redmond when this is a case of sheer incompetence by the admins.

    Even if they are running 100% Windows (which I can see by other comments they are not), a competent admin can configure it and put it behind a good firewall to make it quite secure. Incidents might happen, but not enough to warrent cutting the whole office off the net.

  100. 3 TIMES! by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    If my computer systems were so insecure as to be shut down, I would be fired. FIRED, FIRED, FIRED. I would not be around long enough to make the same mistake thrice. How hard could it be to install a virus-scanner, proxy server (squid anyone?), and a firewall? Then only leave open necessary ports (25, 110, 443, 80, etc). How come government is given a free pass when it comes to incompetence? If stuff like this happened in the private sector, shareholders would be calling for heads on platters.

    --
    I hate sigs.
    1. Re:3 TIMES! by Antibozo · · Score: 1
      How hard could it be to install a virus-scanner, proxy server (squid anyone?), and a firewall? Then only leave open necessary ports (25, 110, 443, 80, etc). How come government is given a free pass when it comes to incompetence? If stuff like this happened in the private sector, shareholders would be calling for heads on platters.

      Right, that's why vulnerabilities are never reported in commercial software. Oh, wait -- they are.

      If you think .gov systems are so insecure, I suggest you pop on over to the zone-h defacement mirror and do some stats on .gov versus .com/.net/.org defacements.

      The fact is that the U.S. government is not so bad at security as a some folks seem to think. Yes, federal employees don't often get fired, but guess what: most IT systems management is done by contractors, who are quite easy to replace.

      Also, I have news for you: the techniques you have in mind don't protect you against a huge variety of attacks. Many compromises these days exploit vulnerabilities in vendor-supplied web-based products, which are totally exposed in your rudimentary protection regime. Your ideas about how to protect a network are fine when you've got one /24 under centralized management. The approach you're talking about doesn't work in the real world of trash vendor software. Unfortunately, .gov folks are at the mercy of vendors, and usually much more so than in the private sector because there aren't that many .gov positions for actual programmers, and the wages are often too low to attract people with even a clue about security.

    2. Re:3 TIMES! by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Security is a process, not a set of programs and systems, you and I know this. However, defacing a .gov or .mil site would be fucking retarded, the kind of attacks they would have to worry about would be less flashy/lower profile. Not all IT stuff is done by contractors, the installations and upgrades may be (believe me, I know), but the day-to-day is done by .gov folks, for the most part (save the NMCI, but let us please not mention that).

      --
      I hate sigs.
  101. Jack Tors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Hi, I'd like some security. Yes, I'm very insecure.

  102. Here's basically what has happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the breakdown of the judges' decree I read at work (at one of the DOI deparments) earlier today (and yes, internal email still works!)

    A couple years ago Cobell wanted to know how much money was in the trust fund. DOI stutters, says "uhhhh" and a lawsuit is filed. DOJ (Department of Justice) says to DOI "Your computers are not secure, you're cut off from the internet until they are secure." Internet is out for a few months. An appeal is filed, DOI says "We've fixed the problem!" DOJ says OK. Internet is restored, but as it happens nothing has really been secured. IBM is hired to hack at the servers, and for a month and a half of hacking NO ONE NOTICED or even attempted to take countermeasures.

    Here's a kicker: when a security audit was planned for one of the machines, DOI pulled the plug when they knew it would be getting scanned! Needless to say, the judge is rightfully upset with DOI, and we probably deserve to have our internet shut off.

    In the meantime, it really sucks to have to order stuff over phone and fax. I just hope this outage doesn't last for months. Today was long enough.... :)

    Cheers.

    1. Re:Here's basically what has happened by Antibozo · · Score: 1
      Here's a kicker: when a security audit was planned for one of the machines, DOI pulled the plug when they knew it would be getting scanned!

      Without knowing the rules of engagement, I'd say this sounds totally justified, based on the apparent equation of "security audit" with "scan". A lot of the bozo "security auditors" who rely on scanning (because it's cheap) instead of actual auditing don't bother to secure the traffic between their company's network and the target of the scan. Meanwhile, they may require you to poke a big hole in your perimeter just to let their scan in. Consequently, any vulnerabilities in the target system get exposed to any observer on the network path. In these cases, it's better to pull while the idiots scan, report the idiot to your local inspector general, and then do the audit yourself with the scant funds left over after the idiots (still) get paid.

      Furthermore, pulling the system in advance of the scan may have been the prescribed response to detecting the scan's imminence based on IDS logs or other activity. Again, we need to know the actual rules of engagement to know whether the admins were avoiding their duties or fulfilling them.

      Auditing security is a lot more complex than running nmap or Retina. Doing it properly is expensive and time-consuming, and involves understanding the system and network architecture, mapping out trust relationships, logging into systems and auditing their patch levels and network and process profiles, groveling through code, possibly lots of it, possibly incoherent and uncommented, etc. Too many vendors want to come in with scanners and charge a queen's ransom for a couple of hours of real work, without providing any real security.

  103. Survey: Any Offended Tribal Members? by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    Any tribal members offended at having the DOI turning a deaf ear, perhaps you should speak up here. The DOI isn't going to get your email.

    Well, I suppose you can send paper mail if you can find their address...

  104. Re:Technology vs. Indians by jasonditz · · Score: 1

    Just because they didn't own the whole continent doesn't mean taking what they did own was just.

  105. Cobell vs Norton by telly333 · · Score: 1

    at *least* $13 Billion

    Given that the government has been held in contempt for destroying records in violation of court order (some documents dating back to the 1800s)

    Its amazing that this case has not recieved more press coverage

    Theres some interesting information at www.indiantrust.com

  106. This is BS by TheSync · · Score: 1

    Just to make it clear, the whole shutting down the DOI Internet access thing is 100% BS, driven by lawyers looking for money who do not have the best interests of Native Americans in mind.

    1. Re:This is BS by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 1

      Probably true. The Bureau of Indian Affairs is an embarassment in Big Brother experimentation; the Indians get screwed by the Bureau, by the casino mafia, and by lawyers. I spent a lot of time on reservations and in Indian country; hell, I married an Apache. It is truly a sad, sad tale.

  107. surprised by MxReb0 · · Score: 1

    A few years back I was contracted to the DOI teaching agents PC field repair and troubleshooting. I thought their computer systems were very nice and well managed. I was however only in the Wildlife and Fisheries Department.

    --

    MAKE YOUR TIME
  108. Re:Technology vs. Indians by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    Wyatt Earp wasn't an Indian Fighter IRL, he was a "lawman" in Kansas and Arizona.

  109. Re:Maybe that Verizon Wireless doesn't look too ba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "DOI isn't the only place in DC where clueless PHBs make decisions like this."

    PHB's are rewarded with success, instead of, say, acts of violence against their persons. Are you part of the solution or part of the problem?

  110. Re:Evil Americans torture devout followers of Isla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Lovely - you hide behind an AC to call me a Nazi.

    I suppose that if I look in the phone book I'll find you under BigBadBri. Just because you post under a named account doesn't mean you're any less anonymous.

  111. American Indians by mrjb · · Score: 1

    they're the Indians in the news all the time for doing outsourced work for Americans right?

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  112. Graphite? by kahei · · Score: 1


    You mean the safe is made of a flaky, crumbly substance that can easily be broken with a hammer and tends to rub off onto nearby objects?

    Wow... cool.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Graphite? by Evil+Schmoo · · Score: 1

      Oops. "Granite". A "graphite" safe would be a little less secure, wouldn't it? Although it might make really pretty rubbings on the cinderblock wall behind it ... *grin* And in response to the other "gentleman", no, I was not implying that it was a requirement. That's just what our particular facility has (with the caveat that I wrote the wrong substance, as per above). And yes, the GSA regs are confusing, but you shouldn't let it get you so upset. Bad for your blood pressure.

  113. What could they have? by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

    If you listen to Jessica Simpson, the DOI is charge of decorating. What kind of confidential/secret/classified information could they have?

    1. Re:What could they have? by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 1

      DOI maintains private financial and health records for Native Americans. For those people who think Big Brother is a myth, I suggest seeing what a wonderful job the Bureau of Indian Affairs (DOI) has done in "tracking"M the lives of Indians. A sad tale...

  114. Re:Technology vs. Indians by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    don't feel bad- when I first heard about this a while back I didn't really understand it either. The only reason I did hear about it at all is because I live in Arizona. We have the largest Indian Reservations in the U.S. Plus one of the people who has been involved in the whole thing is Bruce Babbitt. He was governor of AZ before he was secretary of the interior. So this stuff made the local news here.

    And you just have to remember that when ever you are talking about government and native americans that things are going to be wierd. It will be a while before things get straightened out- due to the things you mentioned in your original post. How do you make up for treachery and lies? How do you keep agreements that were made when killing failed- but don't make a lot of sense now? It is all very complicated.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  115. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DOI employees cannot use the Web or send or receive e-mail

    If they lose their phones, maybe they will get some work done...

  116. Re:Evil Americans torture devout followers of Isla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One said an American girl had smeared menstrual blood across his face in an act of humiliation!

    FYI: That isn't possable.

    And I might add men who have a hard time maintaining control on seeing a womans FACE is hardly a religous man... At least not one of Islam.

    A diet of foul water and food up to 10 years out-of-date has left inmates malnourished.

    I guess your channeling the dead? Eating food that is a mear 6 months past due will KILL you.
    Foul water has the same effect... IE killing you.. and in some cases you don't even need to drink it.

    I guess you could say sex is to you as lying is to Americans...
    IE: It makes us sick, we hate it, we can't help but do it anyway.... (WoMD my ass).

    Were as Sex is to us as lying is to you...
    IE: Got no problems doing it. Think it's great. Do it often. Pitty those who don't.

  117. Timing is everything by AlphaSys · · Score: 1

    It is a ploy to keep the Interior from mounting any defense before the Bush-Cheney Energy Bill gets a vote.

    The first thing Clinton ever vetoed was the Taylor-Dicks amendment to something else -- oh, yeah it was the budget bill for the year -- anyways, that amendment was tagged onto something that the distinguished genetlemen had assumed the president had to sign... trying to force the concept down the throat of the taxpayer that it was a Good Thing (TM) to let the oil and lumber industry come in and rape what's left of our pristine wildernesses in the west and northwest and that it was an even better idea to have the taxpayer foot the bill for all the infrastructre (roads, bridges, etc.) required to do it. Well, like I said, it became the first thing Clinton ever vetoed (up to that point he had been viewed as strangely cooperative and non-partisan). Well, when the budget crisis ensued and the entire gov't threatened to shut itself down (remember that? how many of us hoped it would?) the first agency to get the axe was the EPA and Congress even went so far as to repeal the Environmental Protection Act for a period of three years and the work in the forests went on as planned.

    This is just more of the same, business as usual. Ony this time, they're cutting the Interior Department off at the knees before they have a chance to mount opposition. If you make sure it doesn't meet opposition to begin with, you won't have to resort to more obvious dirty tricks later on. Nobody shut down the Democrats' systems in the Congress for insecurity... they pilfered them for all they were worth. Not really news here. Nothing to see here folks, move along...

    --
    Can I bum a sig? I left mine at the office.