Slashdot Mirror


Time Warner To Comply With Wiretap Law

rekkanoryo writes "Time Warner Cable is taking steps to comply with the Communications Assistance For Law Enforcement Act, which requires telecommunications providers 'to help police conduct electronic surveilance.' Note that broadband providers are not yet required to comply with the law, but the FBI has stated its desire to force broadband providers under the law's jurisdiction. Invasion of privacy anyone?"

97 of 452 comments (clear)

  1. Just another step closer by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to 1984.

    --
    I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    1. Re:Just another step closer by criscooil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah.
      What ever happened to "... the land of the free, and the home of the brave" ? Sure looks good on a bumper sticker, but are we gonna have to learn to chuckle when we see that?

      --

      My life is an open book ... up to a point.

    2. Re:Just another step closer by Tassach · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Everything transmitted over any public network (be it the telephone system or the internet) is insecure. This is not news. Let big brother monitor the internet and the phone system to his heart's content; anyone who cares about security already uses encryption.

      I'm all for *more* monitoring -- I want it so widespread that everyone knows that every phone call they make and every email they send *will* be monitored by big brother at some point. The more awareness people have about how easily the government can listen in on their private conversations, the more they will demand that transparent encryption be built in to their phones and email programs. Wholesale wiretapping will make encryption mainstream.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:Just another step closer by Shalda · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt it. It's not a big effort for an ISP or the Feds to record all packets being sent from a given IP end point. And since computer traffic is a lot easier to encrypt then phone traffic, if you're paranoid, it's easy to hide what you're doing. Use good crypto and what's the government know? that you sent and recieved packets from a select number of hosts.

    4. Re:Just another step closer by FLEB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and the resultant inability to wiretap will make encryption illegal.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    5. Re:Just another step closer by RKBA · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "... the land of the free, and the home of the brave"

      Didn't you mean "... the land of the fee, and the home of the [tax] slave"?

    6. Re:Just another step closer by kramer2718 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right that encryption is an option, but as a consumer, I don't want to pay for the FBI's backdoors. Furthermore, this request will have NO effect on terrorists (who are the supposed target). Terrorists already use encryption. It's more likely to make J. Edgar Hoover style tricks easier.

      It MIGHT help nab criminals who are well less organized than terrorists, but is that really reason enough to re-engineer our routers?

  2. Canadian laws by Lordofohio · · Score: 5, Funny


    That's funny, on my other tabbed paged right now I'm reading about the formalities of moving to Canada :-)

    1. Re:Canadian laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Canada that's working on abolishing anonymity on the net? That Canada?

    2. Re:Canadian laws by Fishead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Take a job in construction.

      The housing market is so hot right now that we don't have enough labourers to build houses fast enough so we are outsourcing. I just read in the paper the other day that Ottawa is allowing Canadian companies to hire Americans.

      Best thing about being in Canada is that our politicians are all crooked (sponsorship scandal?) but at least we are not scared of them.

      Rule #1 if you want to work in Canada?

      Roof rhymes with Goof

    3. Re:Canadian laws by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Informative

      How is this insightful? Sure, the Canadian Recording Industry would love that, but there's no indication that the government is going to allow it (and if past behaviour is an indicator, the GC will probably just tell 'em to piss off), and all the ISPs in Canada, save one, are rejecting any attempts to open their records.

    4. Re:Canadian laws by Frymaster · · Score: 2, Interesting
      move to canada? sure.

      when the us had strict crypto laws, the openbsd team made canada their home. so moving to a "warmer" legal climate has worked in the past.

      except... since both canada and the united states are members of the wto and signatories to the ftaa a more "relaxed" set of privacy laws in one country could be construed as an unfair subsidy and taken up with either of the two trade organizations dispute resolution bodies.

    5. Re:Canadian laws by DR+SoB · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a Canadian. Big Brother is here, watching. CSIS works hand-in-hand with the CIA.

      We now have anti-biker laws that go wayyyyy beyond what is happening in USA right now. Being part of a criminal organization here is harmful to your health! The CIA/DEA/FBI _ALL_ have offices in Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, Halifax, etc.

      If I could suggest a place to move it would be Holland, so far they are BY FAR the most Liberal, free country on earth. I'm not talking about drug laws either.

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    6. Re:Canadian laws by saforrest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm a Canadian. Big Brother is here, watching. CSIS works hand-in-hand with the CIA.

      As does the RCMP, apparently:

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/arar/

      That said, we have only so much tolerance for Big Brother, and especially for the wishes of our southern brethren. CSIS may do the CIA's bidding, but when an issue is outed and has popular support, they will often back down.

      Plus, CSIS has a reputation for being bloody incompetent. It may be unjustified, but it's true.

    7. Re:Canadian laws by mdielmann · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's kind of ironic. Before 9/11, I would have been interested in moving to the U.S.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    8. Re:Canadian laws by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Great! I'll join you. Want to start up an IT business up there? ;)"

      Interesting thought, however, make sure you have a plan to somehow get all your drives, and CDR's bought in the US and smuggled up there somehow to avoid all the 'piracy' tarrifs they have there...

      :-)

      Actually that would be interesting...could you get around the tarriff laws, by having a US based office...and you just 'moved office supplies' between offices in US and Canada?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Canadian laws by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "I'll be off to Costa Rica if Dubya gets another term."

      But, you know...seriously...while no huge fan of Pres. Bush....from what I hear from Kerry...and the more I learn of him and his views. I don't really see him making ANY kind of difference over issues like this (privacy)...or most the others. I think both parties are so owned by big money obligations to corporate interests...that nothing will change.

      At this point...the only real difference I see is in who wants to raise my taxes...and even that isn't a sure thing on either side to bet on...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Canadian laws by Bull999999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And people in Europe thought that they were safe from US-like patent laws but look at what's happening in EU now. Many US laws have tendency to migrate to other countries so if you want privacy, take a stand and fight for your rights insteading of just fleeing.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    11. Re:Canadian laws by Frymaster · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How on earth could that be construed as an "unfair subsidy"? Honestly?

      as a tbt (technical barrier to trade). despite the wto's fluffy wording about not wanting to impose standards on member nations, the definition of tbt's is very loosely worded. the mitigating factor to this are a series of special case exceptions that deal with: human and animal health, the environment and a few other areas. i spent 20 minutes looking for anything on privacy as an escape from tbt action and came up with zilch. it may be there, but i doubt it.

      now, for this to happen, a nation would have to launch a complaint with the wto and go through the whole rigamarole. it's not like the wto keeps it's own watch dog. however, given the united states' recent, uh, "committment to domestic security" i suspect that this issue is more likely to find itself at the top of the pile than the bottom.

      lastly, the wto likes for complaining nations to be able to present a dollar value for damages. but it is not required. the entire dispute procedure can be followed through without the complaining nation ever formally stating how much money was lost due to a tbt.

      Moreover, as the US's behaviour regarding soft wood and Canadian wheat has shown, these "dispute resolution bodies" have, apparently, no teeth, anyway, so who gives a damn?

      no teeth? if you're the united states, maybe. if you're a smaller nation you often can't afford economically to piss off the big players. nobody wants to give the ustr an excuse to retalliate. and don't forget that the dsb can get member nations to impose sanctions. technically these sanctions do not even need to be limited the same sector as the disagreement.

    12. Re:Canadian laws by Unregistered · · Score: 3, Funny

      If I could suggest a place to move it would be Holland, so far they are BY FAR the most Liberal, free country on earth. I'm not talking about drug laws either.

      Can you own guns? Can you get GM car parts easily? If so, i'm there.

  3. PGP by slavefishy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now would be the time to get using PGP and similar software.

    1. Re:PGP by e9th · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder how long it will be before we have mandatory key escrow? "To protect us against the terrorists," of course.

    2. Re:PGP by jagilbertvt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've seriously considered offering a service providing ssh tunneling from say, a pc on a cable modem to a server at a remote location, which would then route the traffic as requested. This should be plenty feasible, as you should be able to use ssh tunneling w/ just about any application.

      Now might be a good time to look into this further.

    3. Re:PGP by chihowa · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So the obvious follow-up is:

      I use gpg in Evolution to clearsign messages. A few of my Windows packing friends and family have expressed an interest in using encryption in their email. Not having a Windows system at my disposal, I haven't found any good drop-in PGP (or gpg) plugin for Outlook Express or Mozilla Mail. Of course, I haven't spent a hell of a lot of time looking.

      Yeah, yeah... I should tell them to ditch OE, but doing that implies that I'll be their tech support until the end of time (and I have a problem saying no).

      Anyone found a good solution? It should look good and require little interaction. I think Evolution's support of gpg is fantastic.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    4. Re:PGP by corbettw · · Score: 2

      I haven't found any good drop-in PGP (or gpg) plugin for Outlook Express

      That's odd, since according to this page, PGP Personal "includes the personal versions of PGP Mail and PGP Disk, which integrate with mainstream email applications (Outlook, Outlook Express, Eudora, Entourage, and Apple Mail)...."

      It would seem your search is at an end, grasshopper.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:PGP by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure you realize it, but you are seriously considering getting the FBI to bother you. If you provide a centralized service that makes it impossible for them to wiretap people, they will focus their efforts on your service. Centralizing people's encryption gives them a single point of failure.

      I'd also point out that if you are a lone individual and not a corporation with a pack of lawyers, the FBI can lean on you hard. Real hard. It doesn't matter if their actions are illegal if you can't prove it. Lots of luck.

    6. Re:PGP by kiolbasa · · Score: 2, Informative

      For Mozilla Mail, there is Enigmail.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
    7. Re:PGP by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now would be the time to get using PGP and similar software.

      Not a bad point at all - Such tools have existed for well over a decade, yet very few people use them. Time to really get on the ball and start teaching our friends and relatives - Even if we make it totally automated at their end, the goal has changed somewhat. Thanks to this new law, it doesn't really matter if physical access to either end compromises the connection, we just need to make sure nothing goes out in cleartext. So, even something as simple as "Okay Mom, if a little box pops up saying something about GPG, just type my birthday, okay?" would represent a dramatic improvement over our current situation.

      However, we need to make the use of encryption more ubiquitous than just email. For example, almost no traffic leaves my house that doesn't use SSL. However, for *incoming*, therein we have the biggest flaw in security. Currently, we have almost no way to prevent our ISP (or the feds through them) from watching our web browsing. Even using an anonymizing proxy doesn't help much, if the traffic itself comes to me in the clear.

      Ah, I babble a bit. Overall, I just want to make the point that we need to stop talking about how we can get around stupid laws like this with encryption, and start doing so, before it becomes a real problem. So, anyone reading this... Don't put it off until tomorrow. Install GPG on the PCs of everyone you know today. Tell their browser to use an anonymizing proxy that always uses https (Do any? If you know of one, please reply with a link). Outright remove any telnet and FTP clients from their machine, and replace them with SSH and SFTP clients. Kill AIM, and replace it with the encryption-enabled version of Trillian.

      We need to make sure that everything going in or out uses encryption.


      As an aside, if everyone used encrypted email, spam would cease to exist. It just costs to much CPU time for the spammers to encrypt ten million messages, thus making a "perfect" email filter as simple as dumping any unencrypted messages. Who needs Bill Gates? We just need to start using the tools already available.

    8. Re:PGP by ryanjensen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows Privacy Tray and GnuPG Made Easy libraries. Works for me, except for a bug when I try to sign and encrypt at the same time ... the clipboard tools work for that.

    9. Re:PGP by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All this crypto stuff is real nice and all, but if "they" want the info, you will be locked up until you give up the key. Besides just watching where the traffic goes tells them more than you can hide with crypto. In this war on privacy, the ISP can be a real weak link in privacy protection. So we need to ditch the ISP. The only way I know how is going truly wireless in some P2P kind of way. This could stop any tracing of traffic. I'm aware of the latency involved with all the "island hopping" that would be necessary to carry this out, but I think things like that can be worked out over time. Of course, another solution would be to send out so much "chaf", they could never sort it out. Disinformation can work both ways.

      --
      What?
    10. Re:PGP by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Nope...nym.alias.net was still there last I checked...several mixmaster sites...

      Go check here:

      Farout Remailer stats/links

      anon.efga.org

      Freedom Project

      And for more nym information: Nym creation for mere mortals

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:PGP by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All this crypto stuff is real nice and all, but if "they" want the info, you will be locked up until you give up the key.

      True enough. However, at least currently, locking a person up until they reveal their key would require at least a court order (or even an actual trial? Not sure on that one).

      Providing an easy passive backdoor into every ISP, on the other hand, makes it far to easy to casually snoop around looking for illegal material to follow up on.

      If the FBI needs to investigate someone for an actual crime, I have no problem with them having the ability to obtain all relevant evidence. Having all the evidence available can prove innocence (funny idea, in a system that presumes innocence until proven guilty) just as readily as it can prove guilt. Not a problem.

      Without an active investigation, probably cause, and a court order, however, we formerly had protection under the fourth amendment from precisely the activities such ISP backdoors would permit. that I have a problem with.


      just watching where the traffic goes tells them more than you can hide with crypto

      A number of remailers, similar to anonymizing HTTP proxies, already exist to deal with that problem. Not exactly perfect, but it at least means the government will (probably) only bother working backward through the chain of redirections to catch someone they really want.

      Obviously, though, you have the right idea - If "they" want you, kiss yer anal virginity goodbye. But that doesn't mean we need to make what amounts to government-sanctioned voyeurism any easier.

  4. Globalization + due process by lichen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Broadband providers say the FBI's request would, for the first time, force cable providers that sell broadband to come under the jurisdiction of 1994's Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), which further defined the already existing statutory obligations of telecommunications carriers to help police conduct electronic surveillance. Telephone companies that use their networks to sell broadband have already been following CALEA rules.

    Ok, fair enough I suppose. But the fact however, as has been pointed out here, is that not all programs are being written in the US. To make IM, VoIP, IRC, and or whatever other type of program that allows communication over IP have backdoors is bad enough. But to expect that every program on the planet has one is just downright silly. But, thats not really the bad part...

    Under CALEA, police must still follow legal procedures when wiretapping Internet communications. Depending on the situation, such wiretaps do not always require court approval, in part because of expanded wiretapping powers put in place by the USA Patriot Act.

    Bad, bad, bad. Is it so much to ask for due process here? I mean it's part of our own set of friggen laws. Is it so much to ask that the Feds follow the laws before they make new ones?

    1. Re:Globalization + due process by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bad, bad, bad. Is it so much to ask for due process here?

      Yes! They need to stop terrorists now! Imagine if they had to wait for a warrant! A terrorist could blow up your car! Or your child's daycare! Think of it, all those children, dead! Think of the children! For god sake, won't somebody think of the children!

    2. Re:Globalization + due process by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok would someone please please please point out the relevant sections which indicate that any wiretaps can be obtained without a court permission? I haven't found it yet.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Globalization + due process by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You really think that 128 bit SSL can't be cracked in real-time...nonsense?...maybe not?...given various mathematical shorcuts combined with large amounts of memory, SSL may not be as secure as most folks are led to believe.

      But even if 128 bit SSL is as secure as folks believe, unless one encrypts everything, they are still likely vulnerable.

      For example, you may check your email from a SSL secure site, but I'd bet much of that email you receive was sent in the "clear" at some point...and how do you send encrypted email...or don't you? Unless you are encrypting most everything, eventually enough little bits and pieces will leak out in the "clear". Do you encrypt your URLs...if not, that alone will reveal a lot about you to eavesdroppers.

      In short, the only real answer is for people to rise up and demand better legal protections of their rights for technical measures alone won't do it...

      Ron

    4. Re:Globalization + due process by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      the only real answer is for people to rise up and demand better legal protections
      That doesn't work. The government isn't your only threat. The other threats are going to ignore the law. Maybe if you pass a law that LEOs need a warrant to snoop, they'll obey. But organized crime won't obey. The pervert who works at your mistress' ISP who is going to show your love letters to your wife unless you pay him $500, won't obey. B1FF the 31337 H4XX0R won't obey.

      Legal protections aren't enough. You have to technologically secure your communications.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  5. The law, anyone? by SunPin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What happens if they don't comply? This is a serious case of "resistance is futile." Time Warner and the FBI are just playing their proper roles. Congress is the group that needs a clue.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:The law, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would think that is his point. The FBI is only enforcing laws created by the Legislative branch. It is not their job to create laws or overturn laws (which is the judicial branch's responsibility). You can't whine about the laws to the FBI. Write your senator instead.

  6. What about satellite ISP? by YetAnotherAnonymousC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the article mentions new laws for cable and DSL. I wonder if they have covered their bases with wiretap laws for satellite ISPs?
    I know little about how staellite internet access is set up beyond the cost and latency specs. Anyone know if there's less/more/similar difficulty involved something like direcway traffic? I would imagine they can still stick something like our friend "carnivore" at the direcway base station?

  7. That's why I use DECNET for my networking needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm really lonely since all I can talk to are my other friends who have VAX & VMS in their basement, but by golly nobody is wiretapping me!
    None of this Tee Cee Pee Eye Pee for me!

    Thomas

  8. Alright, I understand the privacy issue... by ERJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But is this really Time Warners fault? They are making provisions to comply with a law. Yes, it does not yet apply to them, but there is a good chance that it will and they are preparing for that. Shouldn't the real issue here be with the law, not the company?

    1. Re:Alright, I understand the privacy issue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are making provisions to comply with a law.


      It's not a law, it's a proposed law. Doing a preemptive strike on privacy does not equate to lawful compliance.

      just my sqrt(0.004) worth
  9. Amazing. by musingmelpomene · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Megacorporations, for once, have amazing power to do a huge amount of good for freedom in this country - by refusing to comply. They wield enough political power to shut this ridiculous new measure down. Their "pull" could be used to make sure this law never took effect.

    But instead, they're kowtowing to the government, ensuring that we lose another of the few shreds of privacy we had left.

    Organized resistance by individuals is great - but organized resistance by corporations (who should realize that, with all the corporate scandals, may be hurting themselves by giving more wiretap power to the government) would be fantastic and pretty much unstoppable.

    Let's see a show of corporate brute force! Who's with me?

    1. Re:Amazing. by cybermace5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Be careful what you wish for.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Amazing. by RLiegh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, megacorporations -by nature of their international status- do not feel any moral obligation.

      Also, given the hefty $ handouts to the corporations from the government, it's not likely that any of them are giong to stand up for the little guy, either.

      What's good for the government, is good for the coporations, what's good for the corporations, is good for the government. We do not figure into it. At all.

    3. Re:Amazing. by seanmcelroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Organizations are powerful in this regard, but by taking voluntary measures, even if they are to the detriment to the consumer, they can show due dilegence both in court cases that relate to criminal activities that occur over their networks and for public relation issues that call for increased monitoring.

      Also, by taking such preemptive actions, they may offset legislative controls which would in the end be more costly to implement. God knows I'd pick voluntary measures over the hours I spend trying to figure out how to comply with vague Congressional regulations and rules.

      (I for one will be switching to DSL. I believe my money talks, and I'll send e-mails letting corporate management know why they lost my $420/year in fees. If enough people did this, the populace could become just as powerful of a force as any organization or government agency.)

      --
      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. -Thomas Cardinal Wolsey
    4. Re:Amazing. by Ytsejam-03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Great idea, but how exactly to you plan to motivate these corporations to use their "pull" with the government? Corporations are in business to make money, and unless money is involved then they won't do a thing. Why take a business risk by refusing to comply with the law if you have nothing to gain from it?

      Sure, all of us in the Slashdot crowd can "vote with our wallets," and switch from Time/Warner to some other ISP that respects our privacy. But chances are that Joe Sixpack is not going to know or care what Time Warner is doing, and there are a lot more Joe Sixpacks out there than Slashdotters.

    5. Re:Amazing. by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Megacorporations, for once, have amazing power to do a huge amount of good for freedom in this country - by refusing to comply.

      Oh god no. The day corporations stop complying with the laws you don't like is the day they'll stop complying with the laws you do like.

      Environmental regulations? Out the window. OSHA laws? Gone. Child labor? Hiya kids, grab a pick and head to the mines. We can go back to the early part of the century when companies could spy on their workers' private lives in order to ensure they were living "morally".

    6. Re:Amazing. by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We can go back to the early part of the century when companies could spy on their workers' private lives in order to ensure they were living "morally".

      "We strive to be a drug-free workplace."

  10. encrypted by millahtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, how do you tap something with 128bit or better encryption???? What happens when it gets to 512bit encryption???? Can the FBI really decrypt that to tap it???

    1. Re:encrypted by gnuzip · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think it'd be pretty difficult or impossible (depending on what you do) to encrypt all internet transactions. Email should be pretty straightforward, but what do you do about HTTP, FTP, IRC, and all the other protocols which are completely built around unencrypted transmission? The best rule to go by, it seems, is: "If you don't want someone to read it, don't send/receive it".

    2. Re:encrypted by kableh · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's what stunnel is for.

    3. Re:encrypted by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's a totally different type of threat. It's not something they can passively use on everybody. Adding a keystroke logger requires that they commit to breaking and entering, and all the legal checks and risks of detection that entails.

      Of course, when they can fly some invisible nano-bug spy into your house, I'm going to have to change my opinion on the matter... Bloody hell, is that going to complicate things. (Remember, if government gets technology like that, then crooks, voyeurs, etc will have it too.)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  11. Verint AKA Comverse InfoSys by ka9dgx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Oh great, more contracts for Verint A.K.A. Comverse InfoSys, the Israeli company suspected of leaving backdoors for themselves. How much more can be possibly do to make ourselves puppets for other nations?

    --Mike--

    1. Re:Verint AKA Comverse InfoSys by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 5, Funny

      How much more can be possibly do to make ourselves puppets for other nations?

      Well, we could outsource all of our coding work overseas, putting actual coding and QA in the hands of a foreign government. That'd be a good start.

      What? What's everyone looking at?

      Oh.

  12. There is nothing about invasion here by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Move along people.

    It was possible to wiretap anything 10 years ago. At about that time Cisco started shipping some cards that were too fast for capturing traffic on them in real time.

    In 3-4 more years they deployed CEF which made NATing traffic to a remote server for collection not work either. Search the net for people swearing about D.O.S.track not working anymore.

    The only reason for doing so was profit and that their gear did not have enough CPU. There was nothing about any bloody privacy.

    As for one thing I will be very happy if the routers will be forced to have a working debug mode by law.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  13. Invasion of Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Invasion of privacy anyone?

    Hurm... a quote from AskCALEA

    "The law further defines the existing statutory obligation of telecommunications carriers to assist Law Enforcement in executing electronic surveillance pursuant to court order or other lawful authorization." (Emphasis mine)

    Has pretty much the same restrictions as a phone tap, just applied to different media.

    And you if think ** anything ** going across the internet is private you are quite mistaken.

  14. Encryption by lofoforabr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That kind of thing won't work. At least not for the more sophisticated criminal networks, who will surely use encryption to do away with wiretapping.
    It's like banning guns in the hope that criminals won't get them either. They will still do what they are used to do, but by other means.

  15. Tired of it. by robslimo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good Dog. I'm tired of this erosion of my rights. Yeah, 9-11 was a Bad Thing (tm) and something had to be done, but the situation is getting out of hand. It ain't just GWB, either. The lawmakers as a whole are either reacting to or catering to the fear factor.

    Wiretapping has worked pretty well in the past... but with the proper legal steps taken first (court orders, whatever). Even this has been abused, but I can't see how wholesale wiretapping can be a good thing, ever.

  16. Come To My Country! by osewa77 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, guys, you prefer an environment where nothing is regulated, where criminals can do their jobs in peace without their privacy being invaded by the 'big bad guys' in law enforcement. Well, come to my country; we are new to democracy, I am sure you would feel more at home!

    1. Re:Come To My Country! by danlyke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So in your country, are the criminals and the law enforcement often one and the same?

      Yep. Thought so.

    2. Re:Come To My Country! by mdielmann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm, would that be Columbia, or Cuba?

      There are two extremes in governmental interference. No control at all, and you're at the mercy of the bullies, whether they be big business, organized crime, or social pressure (maintaining the 'status quo'). Too much control, and you're at the mercy of the government, and you may not be able to tell the difference compared to the other extreme. But there's this medium, where government does those things that individuals can't do easily, like provide a police force, and maintain infrastructure. Stray too far from that medium, and that thing we call freedom disappears.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  17. Business idea. by grub · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I'm convinced that a promising business venture would be a non-US ISP which would sell IPSec tunnels to anyone. The termination point would be outside the US and would preserve privacy.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  18. Questions... by vchoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Quote: "Legal experts said the 85-page filing includes language that could be interpreted as forcing companies to build back doors into everything..."

    How would they enforce this with regards to encryption technologies?
    My point is if people have something to hide, then they will use whatever mechanism there is out there to hide it. Can authorities really achieve their goals by simply imposing wiretapping laws on broadband providers?

  19. Re:said it before, and i'll say it again.... by millahtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, it's ok to tap the phone but if the communication goes over the internet it's not ok to tap???? Why is one ok but not the other???

    To tap either one they would still need a court order. The same approval process. It's not like they can just go monitor anyone they want whenever they want.

  20. Re:Get Bush Out! by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You seriously think any democratic candidate is going to CHANGE this? They're getting even bigger kickbacks from the media companies than the current administration.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  21. would be required to by Phrack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given some previous announcements of Time Warner to get into the phone biz (http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/36287 for one example), they would already be required to comply with wiretap laws. Nothing surprising here.

    Don't blame the provider for the law. Blame your lawmaker.

    --
    Dump the IRS - http://www.fairtax.org
  22. None of their business. Period. by adpsk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's none of their business what I or anybody else does with a network. Just another great reason to encrypt your traffic. Seems like their just shooting themselves in the foot to me. My first instinct is to say let them go for it, but then the idea of "your tax dollars at work" comes to mind and on second thought I think it's a rather lame waste of money as all they'll see from me is line noise ;)

  23. Cameras in their homes... by ferralis · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hell, we've already got 'em (webcams)... and in our phones. And we're doing it to ourselves! Microsoft even wants to sell us a cool toy to make it easier.

    Some people are even using 'em to record themselves performing illegal acts. I'm against further invasion of privacy, but if we continue in this declared war without a visible end we'll see more and more of this. At no time in the US does the Executive Branch of government have more time than when the country is at war- hence the "war on drugs" and "war on terror" which cause people to let their common sense blow away on the winds of excessive brain-dead so-called patriotism.

    Blech. Ok- now for the backlash!

    Turn on those webcams! Stream video of everyone's life into the public domain! Record EVERYTHING YOU SEE and do! The information glut we could generate would overwhelm any monitoring system that could come out, I'm thinking. :) With the increased visibility of conduct and day-by-day infractions, maybe we could effect some reforms. Kind of hard to complain about the splinter in someones eye when you can see the timber in your own on HDTV.

    An interesting novel, "Light of Other Days" by Arthur C Clarke and Stephen Baxter, explores the ramifications of such a system- most painful, but generally positive.

    Makes ya think, which is almost never a bad thing. :)

    --
    Any generalization is a stupid one.
    1. Re:Cameras in their homes... by surprise_audit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Turn on those webcams! Stream video of everyone's life into the public domain! Record EVERYTHING YOU SEE and do!

      Better yet, point those webcams out the window and let "The Man" watch the cars going down your street... Out of focus, of course, because you wouldn't want to broadcast someone's license plate... Let them watch your grass grow, or squirrels playing with their nuts in the trees...

  24. use encryption... by iwadasn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, I'm officially the crackpot at work, because I tell them to USE ENCRYPTION! Encryption costs basically nothing, there's no reason why anyone would host a website that didn't use, or at least offer SSL. Everyone out there should use encryption for everything. Get rid of telnet, use ssh, and sftp rather than ftp. Use SSL on your websites, etc.... Encryption literally costs nothing, there is no advantage to not using it, WHY DON'T YOU USE IT? If you're too stupid to protect yourself when doing costs you nothing, then maybe you never really needed rights to begin with.

    I just don't understand. It's so incredibly easy to protect your rights in this area, do you want someone else to do it for you. Clicking a button renders all their BS moot. With the effort you spend complaining you could solve the problem, it's just a button click away.

    If you want untappable phones, use VPN to run your VOIP from another jurisdiction, simple as that.

    1. Re:use encryption... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Funny
      OK, I'm officially the crackpot at work...

      Damn. Everyone has a better job than me. :-(

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  25. Daleks versus the Borg by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Funny

    AOLTIMEWARNER: We are AOLTIMEWARNER. Resistance is futile.

    FBI: Exterminate! Exterminate!

    AOLTIMEWARNER: Your unique markets will be added to our own until all media is an even gray mass of mediocrity.

    FBI: Exterminate! Exterminate!

    AOLTIMEWARNER: And, um, we, uh, you know. Customer privacy and, um.

    FBI: The only interest we have in privacy is its total extermination!

    AOLTIMEWARNER: Yeeeah. Um, look, we're going to go over there for a while and-

    FBI: Obey all FBI commands! Obey instantly! Obey without question! Obey! Obey! Obey! Obey! Obey! Obey! Obey!

    AOLTIMEWARNER: Uh, OK.

    FCC: Breasts are evil!

    To quote the great Kurt Vonnegut, "...and so on."

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  26. These regulations are going to allow... by donnyspi · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Gary Winston to spy on me now when I'm writing code. Then he's going to steal my work so he can finish Synapse.

  27. Re:said it before, and i'll say it again.... by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well , the can. All they have to do is 'pinky swear' that it is part of a National Security Matter. Just like they said the USA PATRIOT act would be used only against terrorists. Well, till they used it against that strip club owener is Vegas who has NO TERRORIST TIES>

    In short, they lie.

  28. Privacy? Over PUBLIC wires? by blcamp · · Score: 5, Insightful


    C'mon people.

    The internet is a PUBLIC network of public content. Where the hell does anyone get the idea that there is a concept of privacy involved here?

    (This is not intended to be sarcastic, rhetorical, nor trolling.)

    If you have (or seek) private information, encrypt it (or have it encrypted), (have it) wrap(ped) it in a .zip or other file, and encrypt the thing again.

    If you don't want the Government to watch what you are saying and/or doing, then don't give them anything to watch.

    This isn't a Bush or Ashcroft thing... this is a technology thing. Any time technology is seen as capable of doing something, ANYTHING, you can bet someone will try do do so... without regard to whom is in charge.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    1. Re:Privacy? Over PUBLIC wires? by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The internet is a PUBLIC network of public content. Where the hell does anyone get the idea that there is a concept of privacy involved here?

      Yes and if you go out on the PUBLIC street and down to the PUBLIC store and make some purchases and maybe a cash withdrawal at a PUBLIC ATM, and meet some friends in a PUBLIC cafe, you wouldn't have any problems with a government agent following you 2 steps behind all around would you?

      If you don't want the Government to watch what you are saying and/or doing, then don't give them anything to watch.

      And in order to prove there's not anything to watch, you need to have them watching you 24/7. Otherwise, what are you hiding?

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  29. Re:said it before, and i'll say it again.... by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
    > the US is becoming the feared bohemoth, in George Orwell's 1984. Soon, everyone will have a camera in their homes, and there will be no escaping Big Brother.

    If you really believed that, would you post such a thing to a public message board whose contents are archived by anyone (and everyone)?

  30. I want to know one thing by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 3, Funny
    You know, I often hear people holler "invasion of privacy" everytime the government suggests that they may monitor communications. Does anyone stop to think that while they are monitoring your phone sex calls, they're also monitoring Abdul "bomber-of-buildings" Akmed?

    Geez, with a nickname like that, you hardly have to tap his phone, eh? Bwah ha ha haaaa! Heee! I crack me up! I think I'll be Harvey "Destroyer Of Worlds" Birdman. Woo hoo!

    I need to know one thing. Will all of this lead to me having phone sex with hot FBI babes? If so, then I support this product and/or service.

    Yeah. Hot federal agentette on federal agentette action. Want me summa dat stuff. kupo.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  31. This may be illegal by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    Check out the Cable TV Privacy Act of 1984.
    • (h) Disclosure of information to governmental entity pursuant to court order

      A governmental entity may obtain personally identifiable information concerning a cable subscriber pursuant to a court order only if, in the court proceeding relevant to such court order -

      (1) such entity offers clear and convincing evidence that the subject of the information is reasonably suspected of engaging in criminal activity and that the information sought would be material evidence in the case; and

      (2) the subject of the information is afforded the opportunity to appear and contest such entity's claim.

    This is stronger than the laws on wiretapping. This applies to both cable TV and "other services" provided by a cable TV operator.

    If the cable operator owns its own ISP, then that ISP may also be subject to these restrictions.

  32. Re:said it before, and i'll say it again.... by rabbot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I missed the post where someone said it was ok to randomly tap phone lines.

  33. Shut Up and Pay Your Taxes, Suspect by ddelrio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting.. It seemed so wrong when it was happening to my grandparents in Cuba. As a child, I was told to watch what I say (I was nine) when writing to my grandparents because my mail would be read by the Cuban government. At the time, I thought it was the craziest thing in the world--but it seems Americans are getting used to this sort of thing. Unfortunately, encryption wasn't an option. The Cuban government took my grandfather's secret decoder ring.

  34. Re:said it before, and i'll say it again.... by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well that's something that needs to be adressed that the law isn't being implimented properly. But anyone who reads the patriot act will note that all wiretaps still require court authority AND any taps under the PATRIOT act have to be part of an already ongoing investigation. Here are the relevant sections:

    www.thebaka.com/rants/patriot

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  35. Umm.. by destiney · · Score: 2, Informative


    Invasion of privacy anyone?

    Use Freenet.

  36. Government == terrorists ? by northwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "access to communications infrastructure they need to protect our nation."

    This phrase has been used before. Interesting - I thought the terrorist threat came from outside - not inside?

    Could it be because of the old lame Shogun effect? The common enemy. Protect yourself by paying me to find problems that should worry you.

    Are we still free? Are we still allowed to think that we are free?

    Beware of the killer tomatoes.....

  37. 4th ammendment by TR0GD0RtheBURNiNAT0R · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It seems the writers of the "patriot" act (and many other laws, for that matter) have forgotten the constraints on their power that are written in to the document they are sworn to protect!!!

    *sigh* guess its time to break out the tin-foil hats...

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  38. Re:Business idea - covered by AnonX by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't this exactly what AnonX promises? For $6/month, you can tunnel all of your traffic over an encrypted VPN to Vanatua and then to the Internet at large. Vanatua has excellent privacy protection, and AnonX doesn't keep any logs, anyway. The FBI's pressure on ISP's makes AnonX seem even more attractive.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  39. All for the low, low price of... by gumpish · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fifty bucks.

    Perhaps PGP Freeware would fit the bill for the budget-minded slashdotter. (Also integrates with popular mail clients.)

  40. Re:why are you fearful? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's wrong with mandatory body cavity searches? Unless you are participating in some criminal activity violating federal rules of contraband and controlled substances, how does this affect you?

    Well, it's called 'innocent until proven guilty,' 'due process,' and 'unreasonable search and seizure.'

    Not that America cares all that much about the Constitution; just wait until that bill passes which allows Congress to supercede the SCOTUS...

    Checks and balances; here's the check, now my balance is bigger. Here's your new law, sir, would you like freedom fries with that?

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  41. Watching the Sun Set on the USA by serutan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Face it people, all this surveillance is going to happen. The government is going to have complete information about you and contrl over you in a few short years. The Internet can be a great tool for communication and education, just like television could have been. It can also be a tool for control, just like television is.

    America is in the hands of the bad guys, and within our lifetimes we will have a totalitarian government ruling a flock of consumer/workers who generate wealth for the top 2%. Just like in the good old days, only with HDTV. It's pretty much that way now, but in the future it won't be a secret, and people won't really care as long as the can buy cheap gas, eat Big Macs and watch American Idol on a 42-incher.

    I've come to the conclusion that it's just the way the human race works. Some people take charge because the rest let them. Unless you are one of those take-charge types, the best thing you can hope to do is take care of yourself, your family and other people you care about, stay under the radar and live as well as possible. Democracy is like every other good thing that survives until They Who Must Own Everything figure out how to hack it.

  42. It's Called Convience by Andy_w715 · · Score: 2

    People are so quick to give up privacy for convience. Maybe people should read the agreements that they agree to. They (the people) regularly give up thier privacy everyday. If you don't have anything to hide; who cares?

  43. Yeah, keep dreaming by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I live in holland. Drugs are here more or less legal. So what do we do with a person who deals LEGAL drugs in holland and just happens to sell stuff to american tourists who themselves smuggle it to the US?

    Hand them over ofcourse. Despite the fact people in america do not get a fair trial. If you believe they do look a little bit closer at the system of plea bargaining, people are in jail in america without ever having been found guilty or even have had a trial in front of a jury or judge. Nice eh? Oh sure you can refuse the plea bargain. couple of years in jail vs life when you got no money and no experience with the legal system.

    No I am afraid that the worst thing in the world that ever happened was the collapse of the soviet union. At least when they were around america had some opposition. Sure sucked if you lived in the soviet union but now the whole world is living in the US.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  44. I wouldn't be surprised by abolith · · Score: 2, Insightful
    if the FBI stated that they would like powers rivaling those held by the SS and the Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo). hell a few more patriot acts and they just might....

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  45. Good News by mattlary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, the good news is we all have access to encryption software-- but then again, the govt may already have quantum computing or something. Yeah, we're all screwed.

  46. Problem is no court is now required by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is the crux of the issue. Yes it should be Ok to tap, if you get a signed court order from a judge. ( ie, having to make a case for the tap )

    The problem is with these new 'taps' is that all the FBI/CIA/etc have to do is claim it has something to do with national security ( they dont even have to explain why ) and they get full access to your private transactions, papers, home, etc.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  47. carnivor by presmike · · Score: 2, Funny

    bomb, plane, terrorist, nuclear, osama, arab, isreal, pakastan, iraq, sadam, bilogical weapons, anarchy.... *waits for knock on door by the FBI...*

    --
    presmike