Slashdot Mirror


UFO Streaks Through Martian sky

lkatz writes "The BBC is reporting that the Spirit rover has observed an object streaking across the Martian sky. They believe it was either a meteor or possibly the Viking 2 probe which still orbits Mars."

123 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. Or perhaps... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the Earthlings and they've come to give the Martians anal probes! (or whatever organ is worth probing on a martian)

    1. Re:Or perhaps... by aliens · · Score: 4, Funny

      Keep your damn probes to yourselves! We all know it's those nasty Venusians who enjoy probing everything they can find.

      It got so bad we turned mars into a desert because we realized they prefer wet worlds. (Probably something to do with the lubing of the probes or something equally disgusting)

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    2. Re:Or perhaps... by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

      I could see if this was happening on Uranus but certainly not on Mars... As martian as that might seem.

    3. Re:Or perhaps... by JHromadka · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or it's an overexposed pic of the Earth.

      --
      "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
    4. Re:Or perhaps... by Shoten · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't be silly. Aliens wouldn't be going to Mars to do anal probes...there aren't any rednecks there!

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    5. Re:Or perhaps... by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      are you telling me you would not probe one of these
      http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&i e=UTF-8 &oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=nice+ass&sa=N&tab =wi

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    6. Re:Or perhaps... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      are you telling me you would not probe one of these
      http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&i e=UTF-8 &oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=nice+ass&sa=N&tab =wi


      i won't probe Google with safe=off while at work, thats for damn sure.

    7. Re:Or perhaps... by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Don't be silly. Aliens wouldn't be going to Mars to do anal probes...there aren't any rednecks there!
      ---
      Aliens?
      Aren't rednecks probed by sheep?
      Or was that the other way 'round?

    8. Re:Or perhaps... by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and is of course just pasted in there so anybody with half a clue could easily see that that is what it does. It was a joke. gawd some people are uptight.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    9. Re:Or perhaps... by horos2c · · Score: 4, Funny

      ok, fine.. an obligatory KITH quote comes to mind:

      "No, I don't think I should. I don't think I should question the leadership of our Great Leader"

      "Oh, come on! I mean, we've been coming here for 50 years and performing anal probes and all that we have learned is that 1 in 10 doesn't really seem to mind."

      "oh really? and you have a better plan in mind than our great leader?"

      "yes. yes I do. My plan is to have no plan. That we don't travel 250,000 light years, we don't come here. And the best part is that we don't do any anal probes."

    10. Re:Or perhaps... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 5, Funny

      On Red Mars, rednecks probe YOU!

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  2. Meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Could it be that meteor that is coming near to Earth today?

    Blogzine.net

    1. Re:Meteor? by turgid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Could it be that meteor that is coming near to Earth today?

      Absolutely. It skimmed the atmosphere of Mars and bounced off and then travelled to Earth at a substantial fraction of the speed of light, to miss Earth by a few Earth radii. Rocket Scientists call this "Vogon pin-ball." It's one of those geeky jokes.

    2. Re:Meteor? by rjelks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Considering Mars is about 86 million miles from earth today, that rock would have to be hurling at about 3.5 million mph to get near (26,000 miles) earth in a day.

      -

    3. Re:Meteor? by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It skimmed the atmosphere of Mars and bounced off and then travelled to Earth at a substantial fraction of the speed of light, to miss Earth by a few Earth radii.

      joke? immanuel velikovsky has made himself quite a reputation positing such events. calling himself a "scientist" he's claimed that venus was "ejected" from jupiter 3500 or so years ago whereupon it cruised around the solar system with a whole bunch of near misses of larger bodies before settling into its current orbit.

      the majority of his "proof" for all this are biblical stories about astrological events. for instance, velikovsky posits that the friction of venus passing closeby earth raised the surface temperature of this planet " sufficient to make the vermin of the earth propagate at a very feverish rate" thus resulting in the plagues in exodus. that's just a sample.

      wildly improbable to say the least - but velikovsky has managed to sell millions of books to the heroically undereducated public flogging this theory. a nutbar... but a rich nutbar.

      right. sensical talk about velikovsky can be had here.

    4. Re:Meteor? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Since the speed of light is approximately 670,616,629 mph, a mere 3,500,000 mph seems quite stately in comparison. (although still a nice percentage of c)

    5. Re:Meteor? by rjelks · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the speed range would fall around 100,000 to 200,000 mph though. For it to be going 3.5 million mph, it would have had to be hurled at us by large insectoid aliens. Damn bugs.

      -

    6. Re:Meteor? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I make a basically content-free but technical post, and it gets rated up. When I post something with a point (but no impressive numbers), it just gets ignored. Ahh, the vagaries of / moderation.

  3. Hmmm. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny

    This could be a flying cup from Earth!!!!

  4. Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by The+I+Shing · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd better charge up the batteries in my Subetha signalling device and hope the Dentressi are feeling like a bit of company for the voyage back!

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember your towel!

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    2. Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by SashaM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? (Score:4, Insightful)
      by Stile 65 (722451) on Thursday March 18, @11:29PM (#8603357)
      (http://www.freestateproject.org/)
      Remember your towel!


      Only on slashdot :-)

    3. Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? (Score:4, Insightful) by Stile 65 (722451) on Thursday March 18, @11:29PM (#8603357) (http://www.freestateproject.org/) Remember your towel!

      Only on slashdot :-)

      .... would such a lame thread actually exist. You know, Douglas Adams was funny for a lot of reasons, but he was never predictable.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by ectoraige · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like the fact that this was marked 'Insightful', as opposed to 'Funny'...

      --
      Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
  5. Re:Misleading title by Venner · · Score: 5, Informative

    Um, UFO = Unidentified Flying Object?

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
  6. Now who are we going to blame the UFO's on....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously can't blame the martians for this one....

    1. Re:Now who are we going to blame the UFO's on....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously can't blame the martians for this one....

      Why not? Seeing a UFO on mars proves that that's where UFO's come from. And I find it very interesting that you start trying to cover it all up, mr anonymous spook.

  7. Well... by Boing · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it was Viking 2, let's hope those martian conspiracy theorists only got a blurry picture. We wouldn't want to let them know that there's extramartian intelligence just yet. First we have to set up the slave camps.

    1. Re:Well... by YanceyAI · · Score: 4, Funny
      extramartian intelligence

      Wouldn't that be us?

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    2. Re:Well... by the_consumer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, that would be us.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    3. Re:Well... by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not necessarily. Just as extraterrestrial doesn't meen martian, extramartian doesn't mean terrestrian.

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    4. Re:Well... by be-fan · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are presuming that there is intelligence on earth...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:Well... by Lispy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "extramartian intelligence"

      Actually yes! But then again I'd say this would exclude you!

    6. Re:Well... by nexex · · Score: 4, Funny

      its a fly in the studio that they are 'filming' this in!!!

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
  8. Re:Misleading title by Tango42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they don't know what it is, then it is a UFO, by definition. Why should we avoid using the correct terminology, just because some people jump to conclusions?

  9. The Administration has declared ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    this is proof that Al-Quaeda is using Mars as a base of operations in their development of WMD, requiring a 50-fold expansion of funding for the Mars liberation effort.

    1. Re:The Administration has declared ... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Funny

      If anything needs to be liberated, it's the "u" in "Quaeda". Honestly, do people go around pronouncing it "All Kwida"?

  10. Either a UFO or.. by broothal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or Steven Spielbergs special effects team working on his next SciFi movie

  11. And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...3... 2... 1....

    I predict the wackos at Enterprise Mission will have some far fetched explanation for it by the end of the day.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah HA! Clearly they are being stopped from speaking... must be a conspiracy.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    2. Re:And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by scrytch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow. That site is ... wow. I just have one question? Why can't kooks put together a decent website? It's not like they need expensive software or publishing apparatuses that their shoestring budget couldn't absorb ... and they are trying to "get their message out" ... so why are their sites invariably so heinously ugly?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    3. Re:And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by Xzzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      The intent is similar in effect to moths or butterflies that have scary patterns on their wings, it tries to scare off birds that would be hunting them.

      Swap "moths" with "foil hat wearing kooks" and "birds" with "us" to understand the point.

      It's a defense mechanism, plain and simple.

  12. It could be Dick Cheney by spidergoat2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Headed for yet another undisclosed location.

  13. Aliens! by Zardus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its those damn Earthlians trying to take over Mars! Run for your life!

    --
    You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    1. Re:Aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually...at the rate the mars rover moves I think we can walk.

  14. Its A Bird, Its a Plane Its..... by DarthTeufel · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Infinium Phantom Gaming console. Finally a prototype is seen

  15. Delusional kooks. by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


    It was only the Enterprise going back to the 23rd century with a whale from Earth. Anyone screaming "UFO!" tells me that some idiots will believe anything...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Delusional kooks. by hopemafia · · Score: 4, Informative

      It couldn't be Enterprise, since it was a stolen Klingon Bird of Prey that they used to get the whales....and that was in the 80's.

      --
      If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
    2. Re:Delusional kooks. by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not only was it a Bird-of-Prey they were in, and it was the 80's as someone else mentioned, but they slingshotted around the Sun, so they would have approached Earth from the inner Solar System and would not have flown by Mars.

      My girlfriend just called and called me a dork for watching Star Trek, and now I feel like one.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    3. Re:Delusional kooks. by Psmylie · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it could still be the Enterprise during one of the many times they wound up in the 20th century.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    4. Re:Delusional kooks. by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it could still be the Enterprise during one of the many times they wound up in the 20th century.

      Except that it's currently the 21st century. :)

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  16. streaking, eh? by donnyspi · · Score: 4, Funny
    "streaking across the Martian sky"

    How indecent, call the FCC.

    1. Re:streaking, eh? by AnonymousKev · · Score: 5, Funny
      "streaking across the Martian sky"

      I called out "Don't look Ethel!", but it was too late -- she'd been MOONED

      Or would that be PHOBOS'ED in this case?

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
  17. LGM by BWJones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nah, its the little green men shooting at one another in an epic battle of water rights. You thought that water rights in the American West were a hot button topic, well on Mars.....

    Seriously though, at the very least, the cool thing is that we have seen a "shooting star" from the surface of another planet for the first time. The timing of NASA and JPL on both Spirit and Opportunity so far has been impeccable. Let's hope their luck continues.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  18. UFO? by mcnut · · Score: 2, Funny

    [tinfoil hat] Perhaps it wasn't unidentified, and even further- Mars could be where Saddam has been hiding those weapons of mass destruction all this time. We're just witnessing it making its loop around before aiming straight for my house. [/tinfoil hat]

    --
    ok.. so heads you lose tails I win. right?
  19. In related news by shaka999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There has been an unexplainable surge in the price of Aluminum foil. Representative of the Aluminum manufactures of America are at a loss to explain the sudden demand.

    --
    One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    1. Re:In related news by MajorDick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aluminum is for posers.

      Us who are REALLY in the know , know you can only buy the good Tin at a supply house.

  20. Good old BBC by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmm.. what took them so long? That picture was out a week ago.

  21. What could it be? by myownkidney · · Score: 2, Funny

    5. Laryonov's Space Advertising
    4. John Kerry on Campaigning on Mars
    3. North Koreans Test-firing missiles
    2. Superman coming back from vacation
    1. Martians getting ready to invade earth

  22. Fodder for future conspiracies by kjfitz · · Score: 2, Insightful


    You just KNOW this is going to go down in the books as PROOF of

  23. where's the kaboom? by understyled · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  24. UFO? by hike2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So it's unidentified, on a distant planet ...
    We have trouble identifying everything flying our own skies but now we have to worry about aliens invading our "yet to be conquered" planet.
    That should bolster the arguments for building that interplanetary cannon so shoot down asteroids and other mean things coming our way. Wait, it could be a terrorist plot to take over Mars, better establish a base there, pronto.

    --
    Fourty-two!
  25. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    URL, of cource, being a TLA for U niversal R etard L ocator...

  26. Beagle 2? by zeux · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm surprised nobody yet did a joke about this flying object being Beagle2 that is just still bouncing on the Mars surface...

  27. Streaking was actually due to long exposure by Performer+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    As detailed in the initial NASA article the streaking was actually the result of a 15 second exposure of the sensor. It is likely that the actual object appeared as a bright moving dot against a dark sky. The length of the streak and exposure time gives NASA an estimate of speed for various theories based on the angle covered across the sensor in that 15 seconds. The data doesn't rule out a Viking orbiter but does rule out all other orbiters.

    Likely origin of the "UFO" - Earth. Cool, there's finally real evidence that the UFO sighted is actually from another planet. Unfortunately if it's true then it would really be an identified flying object, not an unidentified one.

  28. Uhm... by l0wland · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...didn't I post this a couple of days ago, when a snapshot of earth was taken from Mars?

    Thank you.

    --

    "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
  29. well by rabbot · · Score: 2, Funny

    did it look like a giant vacuum cleaner?

  30. Re:Misleading title by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's all the UFO/Area 51 hype that has made the term UFO synonymous with alien space ships. It's kind of like RAID 0 - which is not a RAID per its own definition.

    --

    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

  31. Asteriod? by IO+ERROR · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't that the asteroid that's headed towards Earth?

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  32. Marvin by Legal+Penguin · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was my Illudium Q-35 Explosive Space Modulator. I was wondering where it got to.

    -Marvin

    P.S. Where was the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.

    --
    "The true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government." - George Washington
    1. Re:Marvin by bludstone · · Score: 3, Informative

      Noone _EVER_ gets this right.

      "The Illudium Pew 36 Explosive Space Modulator"

      http://looneytunes.warnerbros.com/stars_of_the_s ho w/marvin_the_martian/marvin_story.html

      Unless the WB site has it wrong, which wouldnt suprise me either.

      --

      no .sig
    2. Re:Marvin by daves · · Score: 2, Funny

      OOOO. That makes me very angry!

      --
      People who disagree with you are not automatically evil, greedy, or stupid.
    3. Re:Marvin by Jaywalk · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, you're kind of both right:
      • 1948; Haredevil Hare - It's a "Uranium Pew-36 Explosive Space Modulator."
      • 1953; Duck Dodger's in the 24 1/2 Century - Duck Dodgers (a.k.a. Daffy) and Marvin both try to obtain the only known quantity of "Illudium Phosdex", the shaving cream atom and our first exposure to Illudium.
      • 1958; Hare-way to the Stars - Now we finally have the "Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator."
      I think the third one is the one you want since it contains the the line, "Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!"
      --
      ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  33. It wasn't a UFO, it was ... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... just another weather balloon.

  34. Re:Misleading title by ooby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But there are alien vessels on Mars. Well, ones that are alien to Mars.

  35. Could it be!? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've had a 1989 Yugo in orbit around Mars for about 10 years now! I miss that car.

  36. In other news... by Archalien · · Score: 3, Funny

    Future Mars rovers will come equipped with special space-age tinfoil hats.

  37. Let me get this straight... by Grip3n · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, if it was an alien vehicle, but we're aliens on that planet, is it alien? Or do we just call it a vehicle because we're actually the aliens? Then are we being called the aliens by the people in the vehicle? Do we call our vehicle up there the alien vehicle?

    I'm so confused!...

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by andr0meda · · Score: 2, Funny



      Shh.. hush.. come here.. let me give you a taste of injecting weird stuff in a freaky way in rather special places after I abduct you first, and it will all be allright soon.

      --
      With great power comes great electricity bills.
  38. Re:Misleading title by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Well gol-durn! Them NASA boys be sayin' that dem der Martians be zipping around up there with their a-flyin' saucers!"

    Yeesh, just because our faith-based edumactional system ("we believe you've got a chance to graduate...") doesn't teach important critical reasoning skills, like reading comprehension, that doesn't mean that slashdot should play down to that level. Doing so makes life to easier for the trolls.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  39. X-Prize test flight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's just SpaceShipOne in an X-Prize test flight gone horribly wrong.

  40. When streaking is outlawed... by GojiraDeMonstah · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only outlaws will streak.

    --
    "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!" - George W. Bush Nov. 2005
  41. If you are going to probe anything on Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    make it Dejah Thoris.

  42. Then again... by Gorimek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be different on Mars because there is hardly any atmosphere for the meteorites to burn in.

    Mars has about 0.5% of Earths atmosphere. I suspect that means that virtually every rock that would burn in our atmosphere to become a "shooting star", ends up instead hitting the ground and becomes a "crater".

  43. Offtopic - Dyson sphere by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Freeman Dyson (Freeman Dyson!) had no trouble believing in the Ringworld

    believing in what sense? That one had been observed? I don't think so.

    That it could be built? You'll need nearly Jupiter's mass of a substance with the same tensile strength as an atomic nucleus. In sort, not known to our physical theories (I'll stop just short of saying it's impossible). And then to spin the thing up to 1 gravity, you'll need the amount of energy that our sun puts out in 1000 years. In short, extremely difficult. Even then it's unstable.

    His concept of the "Dyson Sphere" was very different from the SF concept of "a solid shell around the sun". He merely observed that the end-point of putting stuff in space to soak up the sunlight, is that all the sunlight is soaked up by millions upon millions of things, and all that gets out is the waste heat.

    More info here

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

    1. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 4, Informative

      You build it spinning ... maintain the discrete components in orbit around the sun from the git-go

      There's info at the end of the link given. Sorry it's long, but the gist re that idea is that in order to provide 1g gravity on the innder surface, a ringworld rotates a lot faster than earth orbits the sun. A point on Niven's ringworld goes right around the sun every 9.3 days. This is one of the reasons why it has to be so strong. Orbital speed is a small fraction of what you need

      If it breaks, the fragments have escape velocity from thier solar system.

      It doesn't matter at what phase of the construction you spin it up, you still need to put in heaps of energy.

      I had to have this explained to me too, but the ringworld is not actually in orbit. That's why it's in constant danger of falling into its star. For more info, follow the link or read The Ringworld Engineers

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    2. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More info here, including a calculation that the energy required to spin the ringworld is roughly the amount put out by our sun in 130,000 years. Yikes.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    3. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The line "Freeman Dyson (Freeman Dyson!) had no trouble believing in the Ringworld" is a direct quote from the forward of the 2nd edition of "The Ringworld Engineers"

      Larry Niven was talking about the fact that he orginally had no plans to go back to ringworld, but the amazing amount of interest that his story had generated had made it very palitable to him. (I would love to see a recording of the MIT students chanting "the ringworld is unstable" in the halls)

      Either way, when Freeman Dyson says something along the lines of "Hmmmm, I like it, but why not do build a lot of little ones instead?" it certainly would get a pen in my hand.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    4. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'll need nearly Jupiter's mass of a substance with the same tensile strength as an atomic nucleus. In sort, not known to our physical theories (I'll stop just short of saying it's impossible). And then to spin the thing up to 1 gravity, you'll need the amount of energy that our sun puts out in 1000 years. In short, extremely difficult. Even then it's unstable.

      Hmm, that all seems to depend on the size of the sun. What if you build your ring around a white dwarf? Since it's not technically in orbit around the sun, the size of your ring is only determined by the distance the surface needs to be from the sun to get earthlike sunlight, which is determined both by the size and type of the sun. A small sun means a small ring. Also, you'd need less spin to get 1g for a smaller ring.

      I'd like to see someone do the math for the smallest stars we know.

    5. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by Snaller · · Score: 2

      I'll stop just short of saying it's impossible

      Oh why stop - we humans know everything there is to know about what is possible or not possible.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    6. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

      but I'm sure the necessary Impossibilium we're buying to glue it all together will only take a little longer.

      Dude, don't use the name brands. Improbabilium is just as good and a helluva lot cheaper.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  44. I smell trouble... by MoeMoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I really hope none of the Martian life caught it on home video... Or they're gonna have an hour long mini-series based on the event with the title "We're Not Alone"...

    **cue X-Files Theme**

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  45. Re:Atmospheric phenomenon? by kippy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's an event similar to what we experience with the northern lights

    Huh? I thought the Northern Lights were due to solar wind hitting out magnetosphere. Mars lacks a magnetosphere so I don't think it's the same event. Are you perhaps thinking of something different?

  46. Re:Misleading title by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure it is, you are just using the redundant channels for performance.

  47. Silly /.ers... by thrillbert · · Score: 4, Funny
    Don't you know that there is no such thing as a ship that travels from one planet to another.. err...

    ---
    "Just once, I wish we would encounter an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets"
    • -- The Brigader, "Dr. Who"
  48. Re:Misleading title by Virtex · · Score: 4, Funny

    But UFO means unidentified flying object. If it's falling out of the sky, it's not really flying. Maybe we should call it an unidentified falling object. Now we just need to figure out the acronym for it.

    --
    For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
  49. reduced drag by EaterOfDog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Satellites in low and medium orbits around earth are slowed by the earth's thick atmosphere. The relatively thin atmosphere of Mars would allow a spacecraft to orbit for MUCH longer at lower orbits due to reduced drag.

    --

    Crushing my karma one post at a time.
  50. Ghost ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's kind of cool--it's almost the 21st century of a 'ghost ship' if it's actually Viking. I expect we'll see more of this type of stuff in the future. Furthermore, I think it may be prudent to initiate a self-destruct capability on future probes, because you certainly don't want some extant hunk of metal slamming into your manned Mars lander some day.

    The thing about real ghost ships, and abandoned cars, etc., is that they either sink or rust or are towed away in the end. Interplanetary space probes generally do not.

  51. Or a manhole cover... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... which achieved Mars orbit after reaching escape velocity during nuclear bomb tests in the 1950's.

  52. Re:Would you think up something new already? by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The jokes won't be old until at least a month after Bush confesses that he was wrong about the WMD. Until then, it's fair game.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  53. Re:Misleading title by jamshid42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA is lucky that the UFO's Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator wasn't charged up!

    --
    /. - Proof that Sturgeon's Law is true...
  54. reminds me of a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ripped from Jokedump
    When NASA was preparing for the Apollo Project, it took the astronauts to a Navajo reservation in Arizona for training. One day, a Navajo elder and his son came across the space crew walking among the rocks. The elder, who spoke only Navajo, asked a question. His son translated for the NASA people:
    "What are these guys in the big suits doing?" One of the astronauts said
    that they were practicing for a trip to the moon. When his son relayed this comment the Navajo elder got all excited and asked if it would be possible to give to the astronauts a message to deliver to the moon.
    Recognizing a promotional opportunity when he saw one, a NASA official accompanying the astronauts said, "Why certainly!" and told an underling to get a tape recorder. The Navajo elder's comments into the microphone were brief. The NASA official asked the son if he would translate what his father had said. The son listened to the recording and laughed uproariously. But he refused to translate.
    So the NASA people took the tape to a nearby Navajo village and played it for other members of the tribe. They too laughed long and loudly but also refused to translate the elder's message to the moon.
    Finally, an official government translator was summoned. After he finally stopped laughing the translator relayed the message: "Watch out for these assholes - they have come to steal your land."

  55. Makes me curious... by bl8n8r · · Score: 4, Funny

    to what is is happening when Opportunitites' back is turned, looking at the ground.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  56. Re:Misleading title by athakur999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unidentified Not On The Ground Object (UNOTGO)

    Even has a pronounable acronym. You not go!

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  57. NASA could use it to gain public interest in Mars by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the Viking satellite took a picture of the famous "Face On Mars," scientists figured it was just a rock formation. But NASA revealed pictures of it to the public in an attempt to spark in interest in the space program. And the response was incredible. Books, conspiracy theories and other things were devoted to it. The people wanted the truth about the Face on Mars and NASA delivered it. The so-called Face On Mars was really just a Mesa. I'm sure that many people will think that the UFO really is extraterrestial in nature, even though it most likely is not. But if it gets the public more interested in Mars, it might be worth some publicity.

  58. A way to check for repeated sighted by waynegoode · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Although orbital mechanics is not my specialty, I think NASA should be able to calculate an approximate orbit and take more images to see if it might be Viking 2.

    The height of the streak in the image, the distance away and the orientation of camera will give the position. Put this with velocity to get the orbit. So, we just need to know distance away and velocity. The length of the streak plus the exposure time can give them a equation of velocity vs. distance away. Orbital mechanics gives another equation for velocity vs. height. Use these 2 equations to solve for the orbit, assuming the object is in orbit and not just passing by. NASA knows the orbital elements of Viking 2 when it was in use and can use these to see if the calculated orbit is reasonable.

    Then using the orbit, calculate times the object would be visible to either rover and make some long exposures at the predicted times to look for it again. The only problem I can see is that the measurement error might be too much to make accurate predictions about future approaches.

    This assumes NASA cares whether it's Viking 2.

  59. And in the rest of the English Speaking world by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sales of Aluminium were up.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  60. Astronomical odds? by LesPaul75 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone else find this bizzarre? What are the odds that the rover happened taking a picture of that part of the sky at that exact instant? Isn't it even more mind boggling that the streak is roughly dead-center in the picture Has anyone ever attempted to snap a picture of a meteor, even when you're expecting a meteor shower that night? It's damned hard... the only way to really do it is to use a long exposure and just wait.

    The odds against this kind of coincidence must be staggering. Any math geniuses want to take a stab at it? We could estimate how often the half-dozen (?) satellites around mars would pass through that particular section of the sky, and we know roughly how many photos the rovers take in a given day... The odds must be something like one in a billion, or worse. I can't help but think of the slashdot sig I see once in a while... something like "The face of the moon is covered with the results of astronomical odds."

    1. Re:Astronomical odds? by BTWR · · Score: 3, Informative

      actually, yes.

      It is VERY easy (relatively) to photohgraph a meteor, especially, as you asked "when you're expecting a meteor shower that night." Go to any local amateur astronomy "star party" next time there's a meteor shower. You should see at least half a dozen cameras attached to the scopes, which will take plenty of pics that night. Quite lovely pics too.

    2. Re:Astronomical odds? by BiggerBoat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't find it bizarre at all, if it is the Viking orbiter. As has been mentioned elsewhere, the exposure was a full 15 seconds, during which time the object appears to have moved four degrees of an arc - hence the streak. So, we're not talking about an "instant" at all.

    3. Re:Astronomical odds? by EdHead2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I entirely agree - are they really suggesting this could be one of the Vikings re-entering? The odds against that happening while Spirit was looking there have to be *eye-wateringly* high. Even assuming that the field of view of the entire image is a good bit wider. The US sticks this in orbit in 1974ish (whatever) and 30 years later a surface probe with an operational life of a few months happens to be looking the correct part of the sky when it re-enters?!?

      Is it conceivable that NASA knew enough about the Vikings' last-reported position and orbital decay to predict this? Sorry, thats got to be less likely - they'd have crowed about it for a start.

  61. Re:Would you think up something new already? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 2, Informative
    Will you stop? I swear to God, the childishness and lack of social development evident in the antiwar movement is pushing me further and further to the right every day.

    And now you're beginning to discover what the rest of us did.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  62. Velikovsky serves a purpose... by vudufixit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And that purpose is to challenge the basic assumptions we've made about the universe and how it behaves.
    I'm not saying that anyone should junk the work that we've been building on since the Greeks through Galileo, Kepler and the like up till today.
    But when someone comes along like him I think that instead of outright dismissal, it's helpful and healthy to re-examine and re-articulate those assumptions.
    When speculative and sensational shows like the Fox "alien autopsy" and "faked moon landing" appear, it's a perfect time to re-explain that there hasn't been a single verifiable piece of evidence that UFOs are actually alien spacecraft, and that we DID go to the moon, and went there after creating an amazing space launch infrastructure in a very short time.
    Somewhat tangenitally, I sincerely believe we need heretics in any field to shake up orthodoxies and make people think a bit, even about how the basic assumptions came to be.

    1. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      and that we DID go to the moon, and went there after creating an amazing space launch infrastructure in a very short time.

      Merely asserting something doesn't necessarily make it true. I seriously believe that the moon landing may have been faked, not based on nit picky evidence and counter-evidence. Instead, I base it on the fact that supposedly we did all this in the 60s and early 70s with such great success. Since then, NASA hasn't taken a human outside of earth orbit and has killed a lot of people with the Space Shuttle.

      Plus, I just don't trust the US government not to lie big time. They had the means, motive, and opportunity to fake the moon landing. That plus the fact that the US hasn't been back, or done anything significant with human space flight since the suppoed moon missions leads me to believe that it was fake.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    2. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
      Problem: The Laser Reflectors left behind by the Apollo missions.

      Scientists have been bouncing lasers off of them since the lunar landings, scientists all around the world. So either:

      A. The USA did manage to send men to the moon.

      B. The USA has a vast conspiracy organized encompassing a significant percentage of the international scientific community.

      C. The USA engaged in a huge cover-up; filming fake lunar missions somewhere, while sending a half dozen robots to moon, to plant the reflectors. All (almost, except for 13) of which worked flawlessly, and has maintained a significant cover-up of the filming.

      Regardless, I think it's clear that NASA at the very least sent significant amounts of stuff to the moon. This plus the HUGE amount of internally consistent data from the missions, some of which can/has been verified independently contributes to a high probability that the moon missions really happened.

    3. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is not a chance in hell the Russians would have let the US government get away with lying.

      The only explanation is that they managed to con the entire Russian security/intelligence structure. It'd be easier to go to the moon, so I have to assume they did.

      Also, I know people who worked on Apollo, and I tend to believe their word.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    4. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't believe for one second the landings were faked, and all the arguments they were faked are scientifically illiterate.

      but... how are the laser reflectors evidence for manned landings? Couldn't they have been placed by a robot?

    5. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That would be point C in the grandparent post then.

      Putting together a robotic mission that could emplace laser reflectors and return samples of lunar regolith would have been as technically challenging in the 60s as sending a manned mission. Automation and/or remote operation were very primitive back then.

      The technical problems would have been different challenges of course, but still bloody awkward; plus the technology and engineering spin-offs from Apollo would have been very different.

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
  63. better left unsaid, sorry by emc · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our new Earthling Overlords

  64. In A.D. 2004 by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Funny

    War was beginning...

    Martian Captain: What Happened?

    Martian Soldier: Somebody set us up the bomb!

    Martian Soldier: We get signal!

    Martian Captain: Main Screen Turn On!

    Martian Captain: It's you!

    Viking: How are you gentlemen!!
    Viking: All your rover are belong to us
    Viking: You are on the way to destruction

    Martian Captain:What you say!!

    Viking: You have no chance to survive make your time
    Viking: HA HA HA HA...

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  65. Several billions to one... by Marnhinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its not all that unlikely. Simply think about it like this. Things with odds that are millions to one happen on a day to day basis. We simply don't notice them because they don't seem out of the ordinary. (to quote Dead Poet's Society).

    So yes - while the chances of Spirit taking that photo are millions to one, the chances of something odd happening like this are probably pretty darn good.

    --
    There is always a frontier where there is an open and willing mind
  66. Insensitive to Venusians! by Sensitive+Claude · · Score: 2, Funny

    extramartian intelligence

    Wouldn't that be us?


    Assuming that Venusians exist then I think you are being insensitive to them.
    --
    Promote Sensitivity on Slashdot, make me your friend.
  67. Re:Uranus by macdaddy357 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah! And it didn't even include the standard goatse link to make the newbies toss their cookies either.

    --
    How ya like dat?