Slashdot Mirror


UFO Streaks Through Martian sky

lkatz writes "The BBC is reporting that the Spirit rover has observed an object streaking across the Martian sky. They believe it was either a meteor or possibly the Viking 2 probe which still orbits Mars."

292 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. Or perhaps... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the Earthlings and they've come to give the Martians anal probes! (or whatever organ is worth probing on a martian)

    1. Re:Or perhaps... by aliens · · Score: 4, Funny

      Keep your damn probes to yourselves! We all know it's those nasty Venusians who enjoy probing everything they can find.

      It got so bad we turned mars into a desert because we realized they prefer wet worlds. (Probably something to do with the lubing of the probes or something equally disgusting)

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    2. Re:Or perhaps... by Trikenstein · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      or whatever organ is worth probing on a martian

      organ or orifice?

    3. Re:Or perhaps... by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

      I could see if this was happening on Uranus but certainly not on Mars... As martian as that might seem.

    4. Re:Or perhaps... by JHromadka · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or it's an overexposed pic of the Earth.

      --
      "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
    5. Re:Or perhaps... by Shoten · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't be silly. Aliens wouldn't be going to Mars to do anal probes...there aren't any rednecks there!

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    6. Re:Or perhaps... by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      are you telling me you would not probe one of these
      http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&i e=UTF-8 &oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=nice+ass&sa=N&tab =wi

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    7. Re:Or perhaps... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      are you telling me you would not probe one of these
      http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&i e=UTF-8 &oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=nice+ass&sa=N&tab =wi


      i won't probe Google with safe=off while at work, thats for damn sure.

    8. Re:Or perhaps... by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Don't be silly. Aliens wouldn't be going to Mars to do anal probes...there aren't any rednecks there!
      ---
      Aliens?
      Aren't rednecks probed by sheep?
      Or was that the other way 'round?

    9. Re:Or perhaps... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      It is the Red planet, maybe they got confused.

      --
      Sig it.
    10. Re:Or perhaps... by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and is of course just pasted in there so anybody with half a clue could easily see that that is what it does. It was a joke. gawd some people are uptight.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    11. Re:Or perhaps... by horos2c · · Score: 4, Funny

      ok, fine.. an obligatory KITH quote comes to mind:

      "No, I don't think I should. I don't think I should question the leadership of our Great Leader"

      "Oh, come on! I mean, we've been coming here for 50 years and performing anal probes and all that we have learned is that 1 in 10 doesn't really seem to mind."

      "oh really? and you have a better plan in mind than our great leader?"

      "yes. yes I do. My plan is to have no plan. That we don't travel 250,000 light years, we don't come here. And the best part is that we don't do any anal probes."

    12. Re:Or perhaps... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 5, Funny

      On Red Mars, rednecks probe YOU!

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    13. Re:Or perhaps... by RiscIt · · Score: 1


      Maybe if you line up spirit and opportunity side by side they look like a trailer park from above.....

    14. Re:Or perhaps... by mlush · · Score: 1
      On Red Mars, rednecks probe YOU!

      On Earth the rednecks probe YOU as well

    15. Re:Or perhaps... by meanween · · Score: 1

      Even better.... ;) Kevin: "Well, I don't like to toot my own horn, but I'm a pretty good amateur rectal photographer. Would you like to see my portfolio?" Dave: "No. I would hate to."

      --
      http://www.guster.net : Mmmmm fresh Guster.
    16. Re:Or perhaps... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > On Earth the rednecks probe YOU as well

      Cue the Deliverance music...

    17. Re:Or perhaps... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > if you line up spirit and opportunity side by side they look like a trailer park

      That's why we need manned missions! When a rover dies, who will take off the wheels & put it on cinderblocks in the front yard? Where will all the old appliances come from?

    18. Re:Or perhaps... by I_am_Syrinx · · Score: 1

      OSQ...

      Homer : I suppose you want to probe me. Well, you might as well get it over with.
      Aliens : Stop! We have reached the limits of what rectal probing can teach us.

      --
      Shadows on the road behind, shadows on the road ahead...
    19. Re:Or perhaps... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Hence the term: Venereal Disease.

  2. Meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Could it be that meteor that is coming near to Earth today?

    Blogzine.net

    1. Re:Meteor? by turgid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Could it be that meteor that is coming near to Earth today?

      Absolutely. It skimmed the atmosphere of Mars and bounced off and then travelled to Earth at a substantial fraction of the speed of light, to miss Earth by a few Earth radii. Rocket Scientists call this "Vogon pin-ball." It's one of those geeky jokes.

    2. Re:Meteor? by rjelks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Considering Mars is about 86 million miles from earth today, that rock would have to be hurling at about 3.5 million mph to get near (26,000 miles) earth in a day.

      -

    3. Re:Meteor? by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It skimmed the atmosphere of Mars and bounced off and then travelled to Earth at a substantial fraction of the speed of light, to miss Earth by a few Earth radii.

      joke? immanuel velikovsky has made himself quite a reputation positing such events. calling himself a "scientist" he's claimed that venus was "ejected" from jupiter 3500 or so years ago whereupon it cruised around the solar system with a whole bunch of near misses of larger bodies before settling into its current orbit.

      the majority of his "proof" for all this are biblical stories about astrological events. for instance, velikovsky posits that the friction of venus passing closeby earth raised the surface temperature of this planet " sufficient to make the vermin of the earth propagate at a very feverish rate" thus resulting in the plagues in exodus. that's just a sample.

      wildly improbable to say the least - but velikovsky has managed to sell millions of books to the heroically undereducated public flogging this theory. a nutbar... but a rich nutbar.

      right. sensical talk about velikovsky can be had here.

    4. Re:Meteor? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Since the speed of light is approximately 670,616,629 mph, a mere 3,500,000 mph seems quite stately in comparison. (although still a nice percentage of c)

    5. Re:Meteor? by rjelks · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the speed range would fall around 100,000 to 200,000 mph though. For it to be going 3.5 million mph, it would have had to be hurled at us by large insectoid aliens. Damn bugs.

      -

    6. Re:Meteor? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I make a basically content-free but technical post, and it gets rated up. When I post something with a point (but no impressive numbers), it just gets ignored. Ahh, the vagaries of / moderation.

    7. Re:Meteor? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      If you are going to make a post without numbers or facts then at least bash SCO or Microsoft. (j/k)

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    8. Re:Meteor? by rjelks · · Score: 1

      I had a post earlier today that was supposed to be funny....somehow it got modded a +3 insightful. Maybe the meteor is influencing the mods. :)

    9. Re:Meteor? by l810c · · Score: 1

      I can't believe none of the mods have noticed this, but the speed of light is 186,000miles(300000km) per second.

    10. Re:Meteor? by l810c · · Score: 1

      Doh!; Never mind me, I can't read the difference between an h and an s

  3. Hmmm. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny

    This could be a flying cup from Earth!!!!

  4. Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by The+I+Shing · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd better charge up the batteries in my Subetha signalling device and hope the Dentressi are feeling like a bit of company for the voyage back!

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember your towel!

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    2. Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by SashaM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? (Score:4, Insightful)
      by Stile 65 (722451) on Thursday March 18, @11:29PM (#8603357)
      (http://www.freestateproject.org/)
      Remember your towel!


      Only on slashdot :-)

    3. Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? (Score:4, Insightful) by Stile 65 (722451) on Thursday March 18, @11:29PM (#8603357) (http://www.freestateproject.org/) Remember your towel!

      Only on slashdot :-)

      .... would such a lame thread actually exist. You know, Douglas Adams was funny for a lot of reasons, but he was never predictable.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:Or was it the Vogon Constructor Fleet? by ectoraige · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like the fact that this was marked 'Insightful', as opposed to 'Funny'...

      --
      Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
  5. Re:Misleading title by Venner · · Score: 5, Informative

    Um, UFO = Unidentified Flying Object?

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
  6. Now who are we going to blame the UFO's on....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously can't blame the martians for this one....

    1. Re:Now who are we going to blame the UFO's on....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously can't blame the martians for this one....

      Why not? Seeing a UFO on mars proves that that's where UFO's come from. And I find it very interesting that you start trying to cover it all up, mr anonymous spook.

    2. Re:Now who are we going to blame the UFO's on....? by the_1000th_Monkey · · Score: 1

      The Spirit rover, for one, welcomes the Mars' new alien overlords.

      --
      where'd my typewriter go?
  7. Well... by Boing · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it was Viking 2, let's hope those martian conspiracy theorists only got a blurry picture. We wouldn't want to let them know that there's extramartian intelligence just yet. First we have to set up the slave camps.

    1. Re:Well... by YanceyAI · · Score: 4, Funny
      extramartian intelligence

      Wouldn't that be us?

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    2. Re:Well... by the_consumer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, that would be us.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    3. Re:Well... by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not necessarily. Just as extraterrestrial doesn't meen martian, extramartian doesn't mean terrestrian.

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    4. Re:Well... by be-fan · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are presuming that there is intelligence on earth...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:Well... by Lispy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "extramartian intelligence"

      Actually yes! But then again I'd say this would exclude you!

    6. Re:Well... by nexex · · Score: 4, Funny

      its a fly in the studio that they are 'filming' this in!!!

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
    7. Re:Well... by Zareste · · Score: 1

      >>let's hope those martian conspiracy theorists only got a blurry picture.

      Heh, babbling is fun to listen to sometimes but I don't think these 'martian conspiracy theorists' of yours exist anywhere. Still, I guess it was a nice shout for attention, as far as those go.

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
    8. Re:Well... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was Tom Cruise visiting the Fourth Invader Force implant stations on Mars, and scouting locations for the WoTW movie?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:Well... by ArseneLuppin · · Score: 1
      Shouldn't that be:

      IT'S A KOOKBOOC!

      ssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

    10. Re:Well... by MouseR · · Score: 1

      We wouldn't want to let them know that there's extramartian intelligence just yet

      I think we covered our tracks pretty well on that with Beagle 2, Surveyor 98, Amundsen & Scott, Phobos, Mars Observer, Zond 2 and countless others.

    11. Re:Well... by Boing · · Score: 1

      No, they'll probably just think leaders of their ancient civilizations are buried inside, if we're any indication. :)

    12. Re:Well... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Nope, you're wrong. I ain't married.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    13. Re:Well... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Hahah, you just insulted one of the mere 1000's of actual women on this site who will admit it ever. Your chances of reproducing dropped .6% percentage points.

  8. Re:Misleading title by Tango42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they don't know what it is, then it is a UFO, by definition. Why should we avoid using the correct terminology, just because some people jump to conclusions?

  9. The Administration has declared ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    this is proof that Al-Quaeda is using Mars as a base of operations in their development of WMD, requiring a 50-fold expansion of funding for the Mars liberation effort.

    1. Re:The Administration has declared ... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Funny

      If anything needs to be liberated, it's the "u" in "Quaeda". Honestly, do people go around pronouncing it "All Kwida"?

    2. Re:The Administration has declared ... by tiger99 · · Score: 1

      Which administration, the non-elected non-president (who tries to act as if he is) with no brain, or Tory B. Liar, the elected non-president (who acts as if he is) with no integrity?

  10. Either a UFO or.. by broothal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or Steven Spielbergs special effects team working on his next SciFi movie

  11. And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...3... 2... 1....

    I predict the wackos at Enterprise Mission will have some far fetched explanation for it by the end of the day.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah HA! Clearly they are being stopped from speaking... must be a conspiracy.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    2. Re:And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by scrytch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow. That site is ... wow. I just have one question? Why can't kooks put together a decent website? It's not like they need expensive software or publishing apparatuses that their shoestring budget couldn't absorb ... and they are trying to "get their message out" ... so why are their sites invariably so heinously ugly?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    3. Re:And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by Xzzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      The intent is similar in effect to moths or butterflies that have scary patterns on their wings, it tries to scare off birds that would be hunting them.

      Swap "moths" with "foil hat wearing kooks" and "birds" with "us" to understand the point.

      It's a defense mechanism, plain and simple.

    4. Re:And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by shawnce · · Score: 1
    5. Re:And the kooks will be yapping about it in.... by freezerboy · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're right! :-)

  12. Hurry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    AHEM! I, for one, welcome our new Martian overlords! Really I do!!
    I always knew they were watching, waiting, ready for the final moment...

  13. It could be Dick Cheney by spidergoat2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Headed for yet another undisclosed location.

    1. Re:It could be Dick Cheney by applef00 · · Score: 1

      I think it's far more probable that it's Dick Cheney's gall stones headed for an undisclosed location.

  14. Aliens! by Zardus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its those damn Earthlians trying to take over Mars! Run for your life!

    --
    You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    1. Re:Aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually...at the rate the mars rover moves I think we can walk.

  15. Its A Bird, Its a Plane Its..... by DarthTeufel · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Infinium Phantom Gaming console. Finally a prototype is seen

  16. I was wondering where my spaceship was by dcstimm · · Score: 1

    if its shaped like a giant tux penguin dont be afraid.

  17. Delusional kooks. by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


    It was only the Enterprise going back to the 23rd century with a whale from Earth. Anyone screaming "UFO!" tells me that some idiots will believe anything...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Delusional kooks. by hopemafia · · Score: 4, Informative

      It couldn't be Enterprise, since it was a stolen Klingon Bird of Prey that they used to get the whales....and that was in the 80's.

      --
      If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
    2. Re:Delusional kooks. by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not only was it a Bird-of-Prey they were in, and it was the 80's as someone else mentioned, but they slingshotted around the Sun, so they would have approached Earth from the inner Solar System and would not have flown by Mars.

      My girlfriend just called and called me a dork for watching Star Trek, and now I feel like one.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    3. Re:Delusional kooks. by Psmylie · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it could still be the Enterprise during one of the many times they wound up in the 20th century.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    4. Re:Delusional kooks. by and+by · · Score: 1

      We're in the 21st century. Did they ever visit then?

    5. Re:Delusional kooks. by Psmylie · · Score: 1

      Whoops, that we are (d'oh!).
      And, if they haven't visited the 21st century yet, just wait... they will if Enterprise has a long enough run.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    6. Re:Delusional kooks. by Romeozulu · · Score: 1

      Dude...you need a new girlfriend.

    7. Re:Delusional kooks. by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Ya well, you haven't seen her, you gotta take the good with the bad. And the good is very very good. Everyone calls me a dork or some variation of it, so its not some earth shattering, absolutely terrible insult.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    8. Re:Delusional kooks. by edalytical · · Score: 1

      Didn't they visit the 21st century in First Contact.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    9. Re:Delusional kooks. by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Don't know about NCC-1701, but NX-01 did.

    10. Re:Delusional kooks. by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it could still be the Enterprise during one of the many times they wound up in the 20th century.

      Except that it's currently the 21st century. :)

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    11. Re:Delusional kooks. by tim1724 · · Score: 1

      The NX-01 didn't do any time traveling in that episode. Only a few characters were sent back in time, not the whole ship.

      --
      -- Tim Buchheim
    12. Re:Delusional kooks. by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Anyone screaming "UFO!" tells me that some idiots will believe anything...

      UFO == Unidentified Flying Object.

      There was an object, in the atmosphere, that the scientists could not positively identify. Ergo, it was a UFO. Though you're right, it certainly wasn't a UFO in the sense that the Art Bell crowd would like to believe.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    13. Re:Delusional kooks. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Anyone screaming "UFO!" tells me that some idiots will believe anything...

      Problem is, they're usually right when they say they saw an object flying and that it was unidentified to them. Where they get nutty is where they decide that any flying object that does not identify itself to them must contain aliens that are coming to do some anal probing or something or other.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    14. Re:Delusional kooks. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Star Trek 8: First Contact :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    15. Re:Delusional kooks. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Nononono, you need to get rid of the chick that doesn't like Star Trek. My wife's hot and she likes star trek, so there's no need for you to sell your soul. There are plenty of other women you could have.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    16. Re:Delusional kooks. by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's the Next Gen-crew? Ever seen the intro to the series? Notice just how MANY times they streak past the camera. They're obviously lost, trying to find their way home.

      Then try to remember just how many times Enterprise managed to get taken over.

      They're not the best of the best. They're the luckiest sons of bitches Starfleet have ever put on a ship.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    17. Re:Delusional kooks. by cravian · · Score: 1


      Couldn't it be Voyager seen just after kidnapping Steve Jobs shortly before encountering a Federation Timeship from the 29th Century?

      --
      The obvious is blinding, that's why no-one sees it coming.
  18. streaking, eh? by donnyspi · · Score: 4, Funny
    "streaking across the Martian sky"

    How indecent, call the FCC.

    1. Re:streaking, eh? by AnonymousKev · · Score: 5, Funny
      "streaking across the Martian sky"

      I called out "Don't look Ethel!", but it was too late -- she'd been MOONED

      Or would that be PHOBOS'ED in this case?

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
  19. LGM by BWJones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nah, its the little green men shooting at one another in an epic battle of water rights. You thought that water rights in the American West were a hot button topic, well on Mars.....

    Seriously though, at the very least, the cool thing is that we have seen a "shooting star" from the surface of another planet for the first time. The timing of NASA and JPL on both Spirit and Opportunity so far has been impeccable. Let's hope their luck continues.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:LGM by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      that makes sense... astronauts wouldn't have seen a shooting star on the moon because there is no atmosphere -- and they'd have to be a lot luckier to see an impact.

  20. hah hah! by torpor · · Score: 1

    its 2004, and we're seeing UFO's ... on MARS!!

    cool. :P}

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  21. UFO? by mcnut · · Score: 2, Funny

    [tinfoil hat] Perhaps it wasn't unidentified, and even further- Mars could be where Saddam has been hiding those weapons of mass destruction all this time. We're just witnessing it making its loop around before aiming straight for my house. [/tinfoil hat]

    --
    ok.. so heads you lose tails I win. right?
  22. If UFOs on earth are from mars... by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

    Then the UFO on Mars was from earth?

    -Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  23. here goes by 2names · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I for one welcome our Mars-invading overlords.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  24. In related news by shaka999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There has been an unexplainable surge in the price of Aluminum foil. Representative of the Aluminum manufactures of America are at a loss to explain the sudden demand.

    --
    One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    1. Re:In related news by MajorDick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aluminum is for posers.

      Us who are REALLY in the know , know you can only buy the good Tin at a supply house.

    2. Re:In related news by ChadM · · Score: 1

      besides, you need tin foil to make the hats work properly, not aluminum.....

    3. Re:In related news by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      The government is now putting chemicals into tin foil that allows them to mind control anyone who uses it as a hat!!!! Quick! Put all that tin foil into a lead safe to keep it from happening to you!

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
  25. Good old BBC by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmm.. what took them so long? That picture was out a week ago.

    1. Re:Good old BBC by goatan · · Score: 1

      Probably saving for a slow news day

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  26. You have to wonder... by idgrad · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see the war of the worlds remake done from a martian perspective, since it's us invading mars this century- "lets go into the hills there jeb and get us some earthlinings! Damn interplanetary invaders!" - I can see the next scene of the movie, as Oportunity readies the deadly RAT to grind Jeb to bits....

    --
    "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, now would it?' -Albert Einstein-
  27. What could it be? by myownkidney · · Score: 2, Funny

    5. Laryonov's Space Advertising
    4. John Kerry on Campaigning on Mars
    3. North Koreans Test-firing missiles
    2. Superman coming back from vacation
    1. Martians getting ready to invade earth

  28. Fodder for future conspiracies by kjfitz · · Score: 2, Insightful


    You just KNOW this is going to go down in the books as PROOF of

  29. where's the kaboom? by understyled · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  30. where is my UFOOPL? by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    come on, News for Nerds here. we know what a UFO is.

    Was it unidentified? yes. Give me a "U"!
    Was it flying? ok, maybe falling, but still.. Give me an "F"!
    Was it an object? yes. Give me an "O"!

    what's that spell? UFO!

    UFOOPL: Unidentified Flying Object Oriented Programming Language?

  31. The BBC is behind the times by robslimo · · Score: 1

    This image is from March 11, same day as Slashdot article about the image of the earth as seen from Mars.

    March 11

    1. Re:The BBC is behind the times by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      Aw crap.

      What am I more surprised at:

      a) UFO's seen from Mars? or
      2) Today isn't still March 11th?

      I'm fsck'd, I better start getting out more often.

  32. Re:Misleading title by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he objects to "flying" and that, unless it is proven to be staying aloft, it should be an unidentified "falling" object.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  33. This is the sign by sleepnmojo · · Score: 1

    time to commit suicide so they will take me aboard

  34. UFO? by hike2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So it's unidentified, on a distant planet ...
    We have trouble identifying everything flying our own skies but now we have to worry about aliens invading our "yet to be conquered" planet.
    That should bolster the arguments for building that interplanetary cannon so shoot down asteroids and other mean things coming our way. Wait, it could be a terrorist plot to take over Mars, better establish a base there, pronto.

    --
    Fourty-two!
  35. Beagle 2 by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's obviously Beagle 2, trying to phone home.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
  36. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    URL, of cource, being a TLA for U niversal R etard L ocator...

  37. Beagle 2? by zeux · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm surprised nobody yet did a joke about this flying object being Beagle2 that is just still bouncing on the Mars surface...

    1. Re:Beagle 2? by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      Noone makes a comment about Beagle 2 and then you two post at exactly the same time a comment about it.

      If this, together with the picture of the martian UFO is not some sort of divine sign I don't know what it is.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:Beagle 2? by BrynM · · Score: 1
      Hahahaha
      Beagle 2 (Score:3, Interesting) by Devil's BSD (562630) on 2004.03.18 13:30 (#8603379) (http://devilsbsd.mg2.org/) It's obviously Beagle 2, trying to phone home.
      At the same time as your
      Beagle 2? (Score:3, Funny) by zeux (129034) * on 2004.03.18 13:30 (#8603387) I'm surprised nobody yet did a joke about this flying object being Beagle2 that is just still bouncing on the Mars surface...
      Damned mind readers...First the martians, then you... where's that tin-foil hat of mine? Bastards are everywhere!
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    3. Re:Beagle 2? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Actually, I found this to be amusing.

    4. Re:Beagle 2? by asr_man · · Score: 1

      Next on AP Newswire: reports of a hastily convened news conference where Yukon Pillinger declares,

      "Didn't I tell you? Beagles bounce!"

  38. Streaking was actually due to long exposure by Performer+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    As detailed in the initial NASA article the streaking was actually the result of a 15 second exposure of the sensor. It is likely that the actual object appeared as a bright moving dot against a dark sky. The length of the streak and exposure time gives NASA an estimate of speed for various theories based on the angle covered across the sensor in that 15 seconds. The data doesn't rule out a Viking orbiter but does rule out all other orbiters.

    Likely origin of the "UFO" - Earth. Cool, there's finally real evidence that the UFO sighted is actually from another planet. Unfortunately if it's true then it would really be an identified flying object, not an unidentified one.

    1. Re:Streaking was actually due to long exposure by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      As detailed in the initial NASA article the streaking was actually the result of a 15 second exposure of the sensor. It is likely that the actual object appeared as a bright moving dot against a dark sky.

      Normally artificial satellites are not that bright unless the sun gleams off of a panel or something, but usually it is just for a second or two as the reflection points and moves to a different spot. Thus, this thing seems a little brighter than a Viking orbiter would appear over 15 seconds. A glint off panels would probably produce a smaller streak.

      After all, there are tons of artificial satellites orbiting our planet, far more than Mars, but they are usually hard to see with the naked eye, which is roughly the resolution of the Mars rovers. A little odd.

    2. Re:Streaking was actually due to long exposure by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I've never seen the viking orbiter from the surface of Mars, & neither have you. OTOH it could have been a mateorite, or even little green men. Take your pick, I'll wait for them to refine the data on the Viking orbiter.

    3. Re:Streaking was actually due to long exposure by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      BBC is kinda late with this story, this picture was shown during the NASA Marsrover briefing of thursday last week, and the article says nothing more than was already said at that briefing. You can watch reruns of the briefings here and here. Real format only :-/

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    4. Re:Streaking was actually due to long exposure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      After all, there are tons of artificial satellites orbiting our planet, far more than Mars, but they are usually hard to see with the naked eye, which is roughly the resolution of the Mars rovers.

      The difference is the atmosphere. The Earth's atmosphere is a /lot/ thicker than that of Mars, so there's a lot more refraction - leading to small objects like satellites being much harder to see.

      Also, due to Mars being smaller than the Earth, satellites tend to orbit it at a significantly closer distance. The radius of Mars is about half of that of the Earth.

    5. Re:Streaking was actually due to long exposure by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The difference is the atmosphere. The Earth's atmosphere is a /lot/ thicker than that of Mars, so there's a lot more refraction - leading to small objects like satellites being much harder to see.

      I don't think it is a significant factor. More than 90% of the visible light gets through IIRC (except maybe near the very horizon). Thus, any dimming is only slight on Earth. Plus, Mars has a dusty atmophere. The Earth's atmosphere only causes viewing problems when you try to magnify things, and this is because it scatters the light a bit away from a straight path, rather than absorbing it.

      Also, due to Mars being smaller than the Earth, satellites tend to orbit it at a significantly closer distance. The radius of Mars is about half of that of the Earth.

      That is probably true to some extent. I wonder what the lowest orbit point is on Mars. But, Viking did not orbit that close IIRC because they didn't have the camera technology to compensate for the orbital motion back them. But I could be wrong.

    6. Re:Streaking was actually due to long exposure by J05H · · Score: 1

      The thinner atmosphere should make a huge difference in observability. Weaker sunlight would be a minus, but compared to Earth sat-obs, anything in orbit should be more visible. If it's a probeb in Low Mars Orbit, it would also be somewhat closer to the MER/Spirit camera, again compared to Earth.

      -Josh

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    7. Re:Streaking was actually due to long exposure by Asahi+Super+Dry · · Score: 1

      Your subject line lends itself so easily to a dumb joke that I find I just don't have the heart...

  39. Uhm... by l0wland · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...didn't I post this a couple of days ago, when a snapshot of earth was taken from Mars?

    Thank you.

    --

    "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
    1. Re:Uhm... by l0wland · · Score: 1
      OK, I am not going to reply to some anonymous cowards who use the F-word gainst me (to them: GFY).

      Perhaps I should have left off the "Thank you" statement. Sorry for that people!!! All I wanted to say was that I had seen this news when the item about earth being visible from Mars was posted.

      Modding me with Trolls is really nonsense. It was NOT meant to be like that.

      --

      "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
    2. Re:Uhm... by l0wland · · Score: 1

      Fully agree that it should not be +5. It was never my intenstion too. And troll? Perhaps you're a native speaker. Well, I am not, and I might read it different than others. :-)

      --

      "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
  40. Re:Misleading title by catbutt · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has always had purposefully sensationalist titles. It's funny, laugh.

  41. well by rabbot · · Score: 2, Funny

    did it look like a giant vacuum cleaner?

    1. Re:well by goatan · · Score: 1

      Yes it's mega maid come to take our air.

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

    2. Re:well by rabbot · · Score: 1

      Thats right! I forgot it was a maid too hah. its been so long since i've seen the movie.

  42. Re:Misleading title by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's all the UFO/Area 51 hype that has made the term UFO synonymous with alien space ships. It's kind of like RAID 0 - which is not a RAID per its own definition.

    --

    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

  43. Asteriod? by IO+ERROR · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't that the asteroid that's headed towards Earth?

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  44. Marvin by Legal+Penguin · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was my Illudium Q-35 Explosive Space Modulator. I was wondering where it got to.

    -Marvin

    P.S. Where was the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.

    --
    "The true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government." - George Washington
    1. Re:Marvin by bludstone · · Score: 3, Informative

      Noone _EVER_ gets this right.

      "The Illudium Pew 36 Explosive Space Modulator"

      http://looneytunes.warnerbros.com/stars_of_the_s ho w/marvin_the_martian/marvin_story.html

      Unless the WB site has it wrong, which wouldnt suprise me either.

      --

      no .sig
    2. Re:Marvin by daves · · Score: 2, Funny

      OOOO. That makes me very angry!

      --
      People who disagree with you are not automatically evil, greedy, or stupid.
    3. Re:Marvin by Jaywalk · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, you're kind of both right:
      • 1948; Haredevil Hare - It's a "Uranium Pew-36 Explosive Space Modulator."
      • 1953; Duck Dodger's in the 24 1/2 Century - Duck Dodgers (a.k.a. Daffy) and Marvin both try to obtain the only known quantity of "Illudium Phosdex", the shaving cream atom and our first exposure to Illudium.
      • 1958; Hare-way to the Stars - Now we finally have the "Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator."
      I think the third one is the one you want since it contains the the line, "Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!"
      --
      ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  45. It wasn't a UFO, it was ... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... just another weather balloon.

    1. Re:It wasn't a UFO, it was ... by Ztream · · Score: 1

      You mean swamp gas.

    2. Re:It wasn't a UFO, it was ... by shawnce · · Score: 1

      no no no... it is OBVIOUSLY swamp gas.

      Any government official would know that, so what are you really?

    3. Re:It wasn't a UFO, it was ... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      no no no... it is OBVIOUSLY swamp gas.

      "No other object has been misidentified as a flying saucer more often than the planet Venus."

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  46. Re:Misleading title by ooby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But there are alien vessels on Mars. Well, ones that are alien to Mars.

  47. Could it be!? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've had a 1989 Yugo in orbit around Mars for about 10 years now! I miss that car.

  48. Use the Photoshop, Luke! by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    If you blow it up with Photoshop, you clearly see it's a Piper pulling a flying banner that reads "Welcome to Amity Island!"

  49. I submit by maxbang · · Score: 1

    that it's Halman.

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
  50. BBC getting a little too jazzed about this? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    I would see a dozen or so shooting stars over the course of a few hours on a clear night.

    Why would it be any different on mars?

    You should see a lot more, even, no light pollution or pesky patches of water vapor to block them out.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  51. Martian "Star Wars" by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    It was a misfire of Mars' Strategic Defense Initiative to intercept incoming ballistics. Still, you have to admit that they've been pretty darn accurate so far.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  52. In other news... by Archalien · · Score: 3, Funny

    Future Mars rovers will come equipped with special space-age tinfoil hats.

  53. Let me get this straight... by Grip3n · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, if it was an alien vehicle, but we're aliens on that planet, is it alien? Or do we just call it a vehicle because we're actually the aliens? Then are we being called the aliens by the people in the vehicle? Do we call our vehicle up there the alien vehicle?

    I'm so confused!...

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by andr0meda · · Score: 2, Funny



      Shh.. hush.. come here.. let me give you a taste of injecting weird stuff in a freaky way in rather special places after I abduct you first, and it will all be allright soon.

      --
      With great power comes great electricity bills.
    2. Re:Let me get this straight... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      " Ok, if it was an alien vehicle, but we're aliens on that planet, is it alien?"

      Should we call INS?

    3. Re:Let me get this straight... by Chancellorgriffin · · Score: 1

      Yes that was an alien vehical, the proof of UFO`s has been found. Maybe all theve got at roswell is a very onld meartin probe, exept that we sent it :)

  54. Re:Misleading title by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Well gol-durn! Them NASA boys be sayin' that dem der Martians be zipping around up there with their a-flyin' saucers!"

    Yeesh, just because our faith-based edumactional system ("we believe you've got a chance to graduate...") doesn't teach important critical reasoning skills, like reading comprehension, that doesn't mean that slashdot should play down to that level. Doing so makes life to easier for the trolls.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  55. X-Prize test flight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's just SpaceShipOne in an X-Prize test flight gone horribly wrong.

    1. Re:X-Prize test flight? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      It's just SpaceShipOne in an X-Prize test flight gone horribly wrong.


      I'd say its gone horribly right...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  56. When streaking is outlawed... by GojiraDeMonstah · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only outlaws will streak.

    --
    "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!" - George W. Bush Nov. 2005
  57. If you are going to probe anything on Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    make it Dejah Thoris.

    1. Re:If you are going to probe anything on Mars... by bfg9000 · · Score: 1, Informative

      A helpful Google lands a couple dandy images for the uninformed (like myself).

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  58. Then again... by Gorimek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be different on Mars because there is hardly any atmosphere for the meteorites to burn in.

    Mars has about 0.5% of Earths atmosphere. I suspect that means that virtually every rock that would burn in our atmosphere to become a "shooting star", ends up instead hitting the ground and becomes a "crater".

  59. Offtopic - Dyson sphere by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Freeman Dyson (Freeman Dyson!) had no trouble believing in the Ringworld

    believing in what sense? That one had been observed? I don't think so.

    That it could be built? You'll need nearly Jupiter's mass of a substance with the same tensile strength as an atomic nucleus. In sort, not known to our physical theories (I'll stop just short of saying it's impossible). And then to spin the thing up to 1 gravity, you'll need the amount of energy that our sun puts out in 1000 years. In short, extremely difficult. Even then it's unstable.

    His concept of the "Dyson Sphere" was very different from the SF concept of "a solid shell around the sun". He merely observed that the end-point of putting stuff in space to soak up the sunlight, is that all the sunlight is soaked up by millions upon millions of things, and all that gets out is the waste heat.

    More info here

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

    1. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Play the game "Halo" Way cool extension of the Ringworld idea

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    2. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by Skip666Kent · · Score: 1

      You don't build it and then get it up to spin, silly. You build it spinning, period, using tethers or whatever to maintain the discrete components in orbit around the sun from the git-go.

      --
      **>>BELCH
    3. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 4, Informative

      You build it spinning ... maintain the discrete components in orbit around the sun from the git-go

      There's info at the end of the link given. Sorry it's long, but the gist re that idea is that in order to provide 1g gravity on the innder surface, a ringworld rotates a lot faster than earth orbits the sun. A point on Niven's ringworld goes right around the sun every 9.3 days. This is one of the reasons why it has to be so strong. Orbital speed is a small fraction of what you need

      If it breaks, the fragments have escape velocity from thier solar system.

      It doesn't matter at what phase of the construction you spin it up, you still need to put in heaps of energy.

      I had to have this explained to me too, but the ringworld is not actually in orbit. That's why it's in constant danger of falling into its star. For more info, follow the link or read The Ringworld Engineers

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    4. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by Skip666Kent · · Score: 1

      Oh [i]kukka[/i].

      I always hated science anyways.

      ; )

      --
      **>>BELCH
    5. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More info here, including a calculation that the energy required to spin the ringworld is roughly the amount put out by our sun in 130,000 years. Yikes.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    6. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Provided you could harness enough energy (big iff) you could probably build the ring a little larger than design radius, then cause the ring to shrink a bit by contraction of the ring material or it's microcrystalline structure. Perhaps by drawing in open lattices (like closing the gaps in a woven or perforated material). Conservation of momentum would increase the spin rate. (Sorry, I'm not up to the calcs with the caffinometer so far into the red (where's my caffinated shower soap...)).

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    7. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The line "Freeman Dyson (Freeman Dyson!) had no trouble believing in the Ringworld" is a direct quote from the forward of the 2nd edition of "The Ringworld Engineers"

      Larry Niven was talking about the fact that he orginally had no plans to go back to ringworld, but the amazing amount of interest that his story had generated had made it very palitable to him. (I would love to see a recording of the MIT students chanting "the ringworld is unstable" in the halls)

      Either way, when Freeman Dyson says something along the lines of "Hmmmm, I like it, but why not do build a lot of little ones instead?" it certainly would get a pen in my hand.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    8. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by joggle · · Score: 1
      That's kind of silly when you think about how fast you're trying to spin it. The whole point is that the thing will be under tremendous tension, trying to generate 9.8m/s^2 acceleration accross the entire interior of the ring. Such a ring would probably be built under moderate tension, then accelerated to an even greater speed, causing the ring to expand not contract.

      Unless you built the ring at an orbit deep within the gravity well of a star, there's no way it would contract. At that point, the acceleration due to the star's gravity would be greater than 9.8m/s^2, pulling anything off of the surface towards it as well, sort of defeating the purpose n'est pas?

      Maybe you meant that the ring would be built at an even MORE tremendous tension than it is designed for, but that also seems pretty preposterous to me, even using 100% pure unobtanium. Besides, artificially keeping it at such a high tension would take tremendous energy and make construction even more difficult.

    9. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'll need nearly Jupiter's mass of a substance with the same tensile strength as an atomic nucleus. In sort, not known to our physical theories (I'll stop just short of saying it's impossible). And then to spin the thing up to 1 gravity, you'll need the amount of energy that our sun puts out in 1000 years. In short, extremely difficult. Even then it's unstable.

      Hmm, that all seems to depend on the size of the sun. What if you build your ring around a white dwarf? Since it's not technically in orbit around the sun, the size of your ring is only determined by the distance the surface needs to be from the sun to get earthlike sunlight, which is determined both by the size and type of the sun. A small sun means a small ring. Also, you'd need less spin to get 1g for a smaller ring.

      I'd like to see someone do the math for the smallest stars we know.

    10. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by ubrayj02 · · Score: 1


      If it breaks, the fragments have escape velocity from thier solar system.

      It doesn't matter at what phase of the construction you spin it up, you still need to put in heaps of energy.


      uh, if the bits are supposed to be "orbiting" at escape velocity, then it *does* matter what phase of construction you speed it up. meaning, speeding them up before it is assembled would cause them to go far, far away very quickly.

    11. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by PS2+INFORMANT · · Score: 1

      surprisingly enough the episode of Star Trek:TNG that deals with them finding a sci-fi style Dyson Sphere is now being shown on TNN 7:00 P.M. eastern time.

    12. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Of course, but the entire thing is silly, isn't it?

      However, since we're in the market for a cheap supply of pure unobtanium, we might as well insist on the variant that thinks it's moving to a lower energy state while the glue cures & contracts, increasing the radial velocity by decreasing the moment arm.

      Unobtanium is going to be hard to procure, it's true -- but I'm sure the necessary Impossibilium we're buying to glue it all together will only take a little longer.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    13. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by Snaller · · Score: 2

      I'll stop just short of saying it's impossible

      Oh why stop - we humans know everything there is to know about what is possible or not possible.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    14. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

      but I'm sure the necessary Impossibilium we're buying to glue it all together will only take a little longer.

      Dude, don't use the name brands. Improbabilium is just as good and a helluva lot cheaper.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    15. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that their entire civilization packed up and moved in, perhaps their civilization had managed to gain the require patience?

    16. Re:Offtopic - Dyson sphere by jafac · · Score: 1

      And then to spin the thing up to 1 gravity, you'll need the amount of energy that our sun puts out in 1000 years. In short, extremely difficult. Even then it's unstable.

      Not that this is really any less difficult;
      You would construct segments in a much further out orbit, and then maneuver them closer to the sun, into the desired target orbit. The resulting conservation of momentum would result in the required velocity - but you'd need some way of attaching all the fragments together in a very short amount of time as they approach the desired target orbit, and prevent them from overshooting.

      In the Ringworld Engineers book, they talked about how much of the manipulation was done by using the solar magnetic field, and there's proven science behind that. Just nowhere near on the scale necessary. My question is - how does one then build realistic terrain and weather systems (both of which were present on Ringworld), generate atmospheres, and establish a life-sustaining system without actual tectonics, which requires a spherical world, gravitational pressure, decaying radioactive elements, a molten core, all that good earthy stuff that spews gasses into our atmosphere, and gives us a nice magnetic field the keep it protected from the solar wind. Without that mechanism, you have a very high-maintenance system to deal with to preserve livability. (and even on our spherical neighbor, Mars, you can see that livability of any given rock doesn't last forever).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  60. I smell trouble... by MoeMoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I really hope none of the Martian life caught it on home video... Or they're gonna have an hour long mini-series based on the event with the title "We're Not Alone"...

    **cue X-Files Theme**

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
    1. Re:I smell trouble... by descentr · · Score: 1

      Great, the last thing we need, more reality TV!

  61. Re:Atmospheric phenomenon? by kippy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's an event similar to what we experience with the northern lights

    Huh? I thought the Northern Lights were due to solar wind hitting out magnetosphere. Mars lacks a magnetosphere so I don't think it's the same event. Are you perhaps thinking of something different?

  62. Re:Misleading title by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure it is, you are just using the redundant channels for performance.

  63. Silly /.ers... by thrillbert · · Score: 4, Funny
    Don't you know that there is no such thing as a ship that travels from one planet to another.. err...

    ---
    "Just once, I wish we would encounter an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets"
    • -- The Brigader, "Dr. Who"
  64. Re:Misleading title by Virtex · · Score: 4, Funny

    But UFO means unidentified flying object. If it's falling out of the sky, it's not really flying. Maybe we should call it an unidentified falling object. Now we just need to figure out the acronym for it.

    --
    For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
  65. reduced drag by EaterOfDog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Satellites in low and medium orbits around earth are slowed by the earth's thick atmosphere. The relatively thin atmosphere of Mars would allow a spacecraft to orbit for MUCH longer at lower orbits due to reduced drag.

    --

    Crushing my karma one post at a time.
    1. Re:reduced drag by TWX · · Score: 1

      "...allow a spacecraft to orbit for MUCH longer at lower orbits due to reduced drag."

      Oh yeah? Tell that to this guy...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  66. Ghost ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's kind of cool--it's almost the 21st century of a 'ghost ship' if it's actually Viking. I expect we'll see more of this type of stuff in the future. Furthermore, I think it may be prudent to initiate a self-destruct capability on future probes, because you certainly don't want some extant hunk of metal slamming into your manned Mars lander some day.

    The thing about real ghost ships, and abandoned cars, etc., is that they either sink or rust or are towed away in the end. Interplanetary space probes generally do not.

    1. Re:Ghost ship by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      The thing about real ghost ships, and abandoned cars, etc., is that they either sink or rust or are towed away in the end. Interplanetary space probes generally do not.

      No, they do not. I think this explains the Beagle lander thing. It probably ran into the equivalent of a '76 Camaro on cinder blocks - lying in the middle of the street (or in this case, the orbital plane).

      The last transmission from the orbiter was a blurred image of a bumber sticker that read "My rover was a JPL Honor Student!".

  67. Re:Misleading title by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Um, UFO = Unidentified Flying *Object*?

    Oh no! The whole galaxy is filled with OOP fanatics? Damn! We need more Unidentfied Flying Functions: UFF and UFD: Unidentfied Flying Databases.

    Next are you gonna tell me that aliens use UML and .NET?

  68. Or a manhole cover... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... which achieved Mars orbit after reaching escape velocity during nuclear bomb tests in the 1950's.

  69. Couldn't be Viking 2 by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    since the Martians shot down the orbiters many years ago.

  70. On Russian Mars... by Jtheletter · · Score: 1

    UFO sees you!

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  71. Re:Would you think up something new already? by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The jokes won't be old until at least a month after Bush confesses that he was wrong about the WMD. Until then, it's fair game.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  72. In other news... by interociter · · Score: 1

    In what NASA officials stress was a completely unrelated story, the Spirit rover stopped functioning immediately after photographing the object. A NASA spokesman was quoted as saying "Nope, the events have no relation at all. A total coincidence. Really. Whoops! Gotta go..."

    --
    Interociter
    -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
  73. Re:Misleading title by jamshid42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA is lucky that the UFO's Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator wasn't charged up!

    --
    /. - Proof that Sturgeon's Law is true...
  74. Quaid! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    We should ask Cuato what to do about this!

  75. Re:Misleading title by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1, Troll

    "-1, Insightful"!? Almost as strange as that "4, Troll" (or was it 5?) I saw a while back....

  76. YOUR TOO EARLY by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

    Dont you Vulcans know your like 50 years too early to be making your check of earth to see if we have warpdrive!!!

    god damn green blooded aliens!!!!

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  77. reminds me of a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ripped from Jokedump
    When NASA was preparing for the Apollo Project, it took the astronauts to a Navajo reservation in Arizona for training. One day, a Navajo elder and his son came across the space crew walking among the rocks. The elder, who spoke only Navajo, asked a question. His son translated for the NASA people:
    "What are these guys in the big suits doing?" One of the astronauts said
    that they were practicing for a trip to the moon. When his son relayed this comment the Navajo elder got all excited and asked if it would be possible to give to the astronauts a message to deliver to the moon.
    Recognizing a promotional opportunity when he saw one, a NASA official accompanying the astronauts said, "Why certainly!" and told an underling to get a tape recorder. The Navajo elder's comments into the microphone were brief. The NASA official asked the son if he would translate what his father had said. The son listened to the recording and laughed uproariously. But he refused to translate.
    So the NASA people took the tape to a nearby Navajo village and played it for other members of the tribe. They too laughed long and loudly but also refused to translate the elder's message to the moon.
    Finally, an official government translator was summoned. After he finally stopped laughing the translator relayed the message: "Watch out for these assholes - they have come to steal your land."

  78. Murphy rules Mars too by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Maybe lint on the lens? You never know.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Murphy rules Mars too by genner · · Score: 1

      Martain lint would be sginificant. What alien laudry did it peel off of?

    2. Re:Murphy rules Mars too by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      Lint left on the lens from giving it a quick wipe before take off would perhaps be less significant.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
  79. Makes me curious... by bl8n8r · · Score: 4, Funny

    to what is is happening when Opportunitites' back is turned, looking at the ground.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  80. Re:Misleading title by athakur999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unidentified Not On The Ground Object (UNOTGO)

    Even has a pronounable acronym. You not go!

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  81. Iridium flare. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

    When I saw the picture I thought it looked a lot like an Iridium flare- a glint from the solar panels from the Iriduim communications satellites.

  82. It must be... by ChronoWiz · · Score: 1

    part of the ISS that broke off!

  83. Re:In UNrelated news by Spock_NPA · · Score: 1

    It's unrelated news, not related. If it was related, then the relationship would be presented in the story.

    --
    Regards,
    Spock_NPA
  84. What it really was. by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    It is actually the beginnings of the Martian Invasion.

    CNN Reports. Marvin Martian seen hovering over the Martian surface.

    Upon closer inspection the rover took this snapshot which leading scientists believe to be Marvin's butt.

    ( | )

    When asked about the incident NASA spokesman Seymor Butts said, "We have no comment on the matter whatsoever."

    Act of war or Martian prank? Tune in to your local news affiliate tonight for the full story.

    *Commercial*

    On an all new racy video they show it all |CENSORED|.
    Buy it now, through this television offer.
    Aliens gone wild.
    See wild out of control aliens flash the camera.
    They bear it all.
    A bevvy of green, blue, and orange women, who can't be tamed.
    These aliens want to have some fun.
    With special guest appearance by Captain James Tiberius Kirk.
    Aliens gone wild.
    GET IT TODAY!

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:What it really was. by utopyr · · Score: 1
      Here's the earlier report taken from our correspondent, H.G. Wells:
      The storm burst upon us six years ago now. As Mars approached opposition, Lavelle of Java set the wires of the astronomical exchange palpitating with the amazing intelligence of a huge outbreak of incandescent gas upon the planet. It had occurred towards midnight of the twelfth; and the spectroscope, to which he had at once resorted, indicated a mass of flaming gas, chiefly hydrogen, moving with an enormous velocity towards this earth. This jet of fire had become invisible about a quarter past twelve. He compared it to a colossal puff of flame suddenly and violently squirted out of the planet, "as flaming gases rushed out of a gun."

      A singularly appropriate phrase it proved.
      There is a bit more after that.
  85. Ice on Mars by Mr.+Certainly · · Score: 1

    Why are we on Mars again? To discover if there is water there? Doesn't Mars have ice caps or something? Gasp.....does that mean water is already there?

    1. Re:Ice on Mars by Kahnza · · Score: 1

      Actually the ice on Mars is made up of frozen CO2. AKA Dry Ice

    2. Re:Ice on Mars by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Cool... let's open a disco!

  86. I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so... by bbowers · · Score: 1

    AHAH! I knew it, they're slowly releasing the martian pics that they didn't want us to see! Like in the pepsi commercial, the little aliens stealing the wheels off the rover. I wonder what else they'll show us now...

    Previous comment here...

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
  87. It's a balloon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    C'mon, it's just a weather balloon.

  88. NASA could use it to gain public interest in Mars by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the Viking satellite took a picture of the famous "Face On Mars," scientists figured it was just a rock formation. But NASA revealed pictures of it to the public in an attempt to spark in interest in the space program. And the response was incredible. Books, conspiracy theories and other things were devoted to it. The people wanted the truth about the Face on Mars and NASA delivered it. The so-called Face On Mars was really just a Mesa. I'm sure that many people will think that the UFO really is extraterrestial in nature, even though it most likely is not. But if it gets the public more interested in Mars, it might be worth some publicity.

  89. Goof up on the URL by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the double post Was really just a mesa

  90. A way to check for repeated sighted by waynegoode · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Although orbital mechanics is not my specialty, I think NASA should be able to calculate an approximate orbit and take more images to see if it might be Viking 2.

    The height of the streak in the image, the distance away and the orientation of camera will give the position. Put this with velocity to get the orbit. So, we just need to know distance away and velocity. The length of the streak plus the exposure time can give them a equation of velocity vs. distance away. Orbital mechanics gives another equation for velocity vs. height. Use these 2 equations to solve for the orbit, assuming the object is in orbit and not just passing by. NASA knows the orbital elements of Viking 2 when it was in use and can use these to see if the calculated orbit is reasonable.

    Then using the orbit, calculate times the object would be visible to either rover and make some long exposures at the predicted times to look for it again. The only problem I can see is that the measurement error might be too much to make accurate predictions about future approaches.

    This assumes NASA cares whether it's Viking 2.

    1. Re:A way to check for repeated sighted by Via_Patrino · · Score: 1

      That's really interesting idea, hope NASA is listeanig.
      But there'are other aspects involved, the orbit of the object may don't cross the same spot soon, light conditions: must be day and reflecting the sun against a dark background.
      Mybe they are already doing, they're just afraid of expectaion and a latter false positive (image not there, for whatever reason

  91. Maybe it was a Beagle! by MeatEntity · · Score: 1

    Have we found one of the lost landers still looking for a place to park, close to the entrance?

  92. And in the rest of the English Speaking world by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sales of Aluminium were up.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:And in the rest of the English Speaking world by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      And in the rest of the English Speaking world

      Dude, a little diversity is good. The rest of the world does *not* speak English. ANd that's good....

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:And in the rest of the English Speaking world by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      That sounds suspiciously like the line "Cattle mutilations are up," out of a certain geek-oriented movie.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  93. Doubt it..... by NIN1385 · · Score: 1

    I doubt a UFO would fly right in front of one of our cameras that they would defineately know was there if they were around. I am a very open minded person, but I would say it is more likely to have something like this happen on earth, with just one witness so they could spray him/her with rum so nobody would believe their story.

    --

    If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
    1. Re:Doubt it..... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      OTOH mars is uninhabited... perhaps they got careless?

      It's more likely to be a meteorite or possibly viking.. but the little green men theory has a certain appeal.

  94. Astronomical odds? by LesPaul75 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone else find this bizzarre? What are the odds that the rover happened taking a picture of that part of the sky at that exact instant? Isn't it even more mind boggling that the streak is roughly dead-center in the picture Has anyone ever attempted to snap a picture of a meteor, even when you're expecting a meteor shower that night? It's damned hard... the only way to really do it is to use a long exposure and just wait.

    The odds against this kind of coincidence must be staggering. Any math geniuses want to take a stab at it? We could estimate how often the half-dozen (?) satellites around mars would pass through that particular section of the sky, and we know roughly how many photos the rovers take in a given day... The odds must be something like one in a billion, or worse. I can't help but think of the slashdot sig I see once in a while... something like "The face of the moon is covered with the results of astronomical odds."

    1. Re:Astronomical odds? by BTWR · · Score: 3, Informative

      actually, yes.

      It is VERY easy (relatively) to photohgraph a meteor, especially, as you asked "when you're expecting a meteor shower that night." Go to any local amateur astronomy "star party" next time there's a meteor shower. You should see at least half a dozen cameras attached to the scopes, which will take plenty of pics that night. Quite lovely pics too.

    2. Re:Astronomical odds? by BiggerBoat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't find it bizarre at all, if it is the Viking orbiter. As has been mentioned elsewhere, the exposure was a full 15 seconds, during which time the object appears to have moved four degrees of an arc - hence the streak. So, we're not talking about an "instant" at all.

    3. Re:Astronomical odds? by EdHead2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I entirely agree - are they really suggesting this could be one of the Vikings re-entering? The odds against that happening while Spirit was looking there have to be *eye-wateringly* high. Even assuming that the field of view of the entire image is a good bit wider. The US sticks this in orbit in 1974ish (whatever) and 30 years later a surface probe with an operational life of a few months happens to be looking the correct part of the sky when it re-enters?!?

      Is it conceivable that NASA knew enough about the Vikings' last-reported position and orbital decay to predict this? Sorry, thats got to be less likely - they'd have crowed about it for a start.

    4. Re:Astronomical odds? by EdHead2003 · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute.. I've been dim. They're saying the Viking orbiter is visible from the ground... But the thing is tiny! Anyone know what kind of magnitude they're claiming this had?

    5. Re:Astronomical odds? by berkleyidiot · · Score: 1

      Go to any local amateur astronomy "star party" next time there's a meteor shower.

      just don't drink the kool aid...

  95. No one's mentioned by whovian · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's Superman!

    Well, we've seen:
    Superman fly in counter-orbit, the evil trio fly from the Phantom Zone disk to Earth, and I think there's mention somewhere of Superman flying to Krypton.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    1. Re:No one's mentioned by whovian · · Score: 1

      Really!? Hmm...seems that there are two versions of Krypton's fate. In either case there is no civilization left for superman to find. Wonder what I was thinking....

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  96. Re:Would you think up something new already? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 2, Informative
    Will you stop? I swear to God, the childishness and lack of social development evident in the antiwar movement is pushing me further and further to the right every day.

    And now you're beginning to discover what the rest of us did.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  97. Aaahahahah. by FilthPig · · Score: 1

    I think it's just awesome that this thing might be our own damn space litter and we can't tell for sure. Money well spent.

    --
    We eat the pig and then together we BURN!!!
  98. Re:Misleading title by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

    Splitting hairs but actually no it's not. Disk striping (commonly called RAID0) is not redundant, therefore it's not technically a form of "__Redundant__ Array of Independent Disks".

    --
    Be happy. Nothing else matters.
  99. Velikovsky serves a purpose... by vudufixit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And that purpose is to challenge the basic assumptions we've made about the universe and how it behaves.
    I'm not saying that anyone should junk the work that we've been building on since the Greeks through Galileo, Kepler and the like up till today.
    But when someone comes along like him I think that instead of outright dismissal, it's helpful and healthy to re-examine and re-articulate those assumptions.
    When speculative and sensational shows like the Fox "alien autopsy" and "faked moon landing" appear, it's a perfect time to re-explain that there hasn't been a single verifiable piece of evidence that UFOs are actually alien spacecraft, and that we DID go to the moon, and went there after creating an amazing space launch infrastructure in a very short time.
    Somewhat tangenitally, I sincerely believe we need heretics in any field to shake up orthodoxies and make people think a bit, even about how the basic assumptions came to be.

    1. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      and that we DID go to the moon, and went there after creating an amazing space launch infrastructure in a very short time.

      Merely asserting something doesn't necessarily make it true. I seriously believe that the moon landing may have been faked, not based on nit picky evidence and counter-evidence. Instead, I base it on the fact that supposedly we did all this in the 60s and early 70s with such great success. Since then, NASA hasn't taken a human outside of earth orbit and has killed a lot of people with the Space Shuttle.

      Plus, I just don't trust the US government not to lie big time. They had the means, motive, and opportunity to fake the moon landing. That plus the fact that the US hasn't been back, or done anything significant with human space flight since the suppoed moon missions leads me to believe that it was fake.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    2. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
      Problem: The Laser Reflectors left behind by the Apollo missions.

      Scientists have been bouncing lasers off of them since the lunar landings, scientists all around the world. So either:

      A. The USA did manage to send men to the moon.

      B. The USA has a vast conspiracy organized encompassing a significant percentage of the international scientific community.

      C. The USA engaged in a huge cover-up; filming fake lunar missions somewhere, while sending a half dozen robots to moon, to plant the reflectors. All (almost, except for 13) of which worked flawlessly, and has maintained a significant cover-up of the filming.

      Regardless, I think it's clear that NASA at the very least sent significant amounts of stuff to the moon. This plus the HUGE amount of internally consistent data from the missions, some of which can/has been verified independently contributes to a high probability that the moon missions really happened.

    3. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is not a chance in hell the Russians would have let the US government get away with lying.

      The only explanation is that they managed to con the entire Russian security/intelligence structure. It'd be easier to go to the moon, so I have to assume they did.

      Also, I know people who worked on Apollo, and I tend to believe their word.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    4. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't believe for one second the landings were faked, and all the arguments they were faked are scientifically illiterate.

      but... how are the laser reflectors evidence for manned landings? Couldn't they have been placed by a robot?

    5. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That would be point C in the grandparent post then.

      Putting together a robotic mission that could emplace laser reflectors and return samples of lunar regolith would have been as technically challenging in the 60s as sending a manned mission. Automation and/or remote operation were very primitive back then.

      The technical problems would have been different challenges of course, but still bloody awkward; plus the technology and engineering spin-offs from Apollo would have been very different.

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    6. Re:Velikovsky serves a purpose... by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1
      Merely asserting something doesn't necessarily make it true. I seriously believe that the moon landing may have been faked, not based on nit picky evidence and counter-evidence.


      Its easy to believe stupid things if you ignore the evidence.

      Breaking news - the world isn't flat, human beings evolved from savannah-dwelling apes, several million people were murdered by the Nazi regime in Germany and the 9/11 atrocities weren't a Mossad plot.

      Now, having come perilously close to Godwin-ing this thread, I'd better shut up.

      Regards
      Luke
      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
  100. Yeah but this was on _Mars_ by Imperator · · Score: 1

    It's just Dick Cheney heading home.

    --

    Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  101. it was CowboyNeal by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 1

    now can we move on...

  102. better left unsaid, sorry by emc · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our new Earthling Overlords

  103. In A.D. 2004 by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Funny

    War was beginning...

    Martian Captain: What Happened?

    Martian Soldier: Somebody set us up the bomb!

    Martian Soldier: We get signal!

    Martian Captain: Main Screen Turn On!

    Martian Captain: It's you!

    Viking: How are you gentlemen!!
    Viking: All your rover are belong to us
    Viking: You are on the way to destruction

    Martian Captain:What you say!!

    Viking: You have no chance to survive make your time
    Viking: HA HA HA HA...

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:In A.D. 2004 by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      - Deliberate(check the title)...meh.
      - meh.
      - meh.
      - Deliberate.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    2. Re:In A.D. 2004 by Prune · · Score: 1

      Deliberate I understand, but what the hell is meh??

      I ask Google:
      define: meh
      Google says:
      No definitions were found for meh.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    3. Re:In A.D. 2004 by dave1212 · · Score: 1

      Obviously they haven't. A throwaway word, 'meh' comes from the Canadian 'eh', which can be used many different ways in regular speech. Meh is an expression of not caring, basically saying, "like I give a shit".

      Matt and Trey picked it up and liked it, as did I. Thinking about it, it's probably been about 10 years at least.

  104. No Shit Sherlock!!!! by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course its a damned UFO... They do not know what it is and its 'flying'. SO of couse its a U nidentified F lying O bject! :)

    1. Re:No Shit Sherlock!!!! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  105. there's a point though by newsdee · · Score: 1

    There is a (far-fetched) point to that link though. Several reports of "alien" abductions turn out to be nothing more than traumatizing experiences of regular abductions (by humans) during either childhood, teenage years, or under the influence of some drug or alcohol.

  106. UFO streaks through Martian sky by zephyrfalcon · · Score: 1

    Probably just a weather balloon... :-)

  107. Re:Misleading title by spun · · Score: 1

    LOL. I was trying to make that same joke earlier. I mean, I knew there was a joke in there somewhere about it not being flying, but I overlooked falling. I couldn't find the punchline and I knew someone else would, so I gave up and cancelled my post. I've got no mod points to give you, but hey, aren't compliments nicer anyway?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  108. I've had it with you UFO experts.. by andr0meda · · Score: 1


    No one has proven that UFO's doesn't come from earth itself. So maybe they left earth and hovering over Mars now.

    Ok, so first they're here, but we're not suppose to know or that they come from mars, right. Then when we do find out, they're suddenly seen on mars, which we were not supposed to find out. AND THEN YOU TELL ME THEY FRIGGIN COME FROM EARTH?

    --
    With great power comes great electricity bills.
  109. Several billions to one... by Marnhinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its not all that unlikely. Simply think about it like this. Things with odds that are millions to one happen on a day to day basis. We simply don't notice them because they don't seem out of the ordinary. (to quote Dead Poet's Society).

    So yes - while the chances of Spirit taking that photo are millions to one, the chances of something odd happening like this are probably pretty darn good.

    --
    There is always a frontier where there is an open and willing mind
  110. Re:Misleading title by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    It's not falling out of the sky. The picture was taken with a 15-second exposure, causing the streak.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  111. Re:Misleading title by Unnngh! · · Score: 1

    You see, you have this mat, with different CONCLUSIONS written on it that you could JUMP TO!

  112. Re:Would you think up something new already? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

    So, when is Clinton going to do the same thing?

    --
    'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  113. Re:Misleading title by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    If it's in orbit it's still not flying. It's falling...

  114. Re:Misleading title by arose · · Score: 1
    Unidentified Not On The Ground Object (UNOTGO) Even has a pronounable acronym. You not go!
    Which is entirely correct -- you can't go, if you aren't on the ground...
    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  115. Re:Would you think up something new already? by anagama · · Score: 1, Funny


    The day it's proven that having getting a blow job by a chubby intern directly resulted in the deaths of many people.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  116. Sorry! by CycoChuck · · Score: 1

    The object is my fault. Its the Windows PC that I launched into space a few months ago.

    --
    Windows is as solid as quicksand.
  117. shooting star? by multi+io · · Score: 1

    Was this really a shooting star, or just a streak caused by a too long exposure time? Normal orbiting satelites don't appear as shooting stars, but as bright dots moving straight across the sky (and even that only when they're in direct sunlight). Shooting stars are objects burning up in the upper athmosphere. How likely would it be that Spirit just accidentally witnessed the burn-up of a man-made object that had been orbiting Mars for the past 25 years?

  118. Its Bin Laden by gstaines · · Score: 1

    Well, you never know...

  119. Matrioshka Brain by Saeger · · Score: 1
    An updated version of the Dyson Sphere is known as a Matrioshka Brain - named after those russian matrioshka dolls because instead of being a single sphere, it's shells are nested.

    Rather than linearly extrapolating a boring anthropomorphic future where biological creatures are physically living on the surface(s) of such a sphere (StarTrek-style), it's much more likely that the sphere would actually be the processing substrate of a post-biological existence (i.e. a big, optimal "Matrix").

    Some have gone so far as to attribute the "missing mass" problem to the idea that there might in fact already be millions of advanced civilizations' stars which are visibly hidden by these shells.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Matrioshka Brain by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Forgot the matrioshka brain linkage.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  120. Was it leaving chemtrails? by JamieF · · Score: 1

    You know, those things that can't possibly be regular contrails, because this guy I know said that they don't look right. It's obviously a government plot to spray us all with secret chemicals.

    I saw a web site about it so it must be true.

  121. umm... by ChefDuJour · · Score: 1
    That's acutally my mother! She said she was hitting up the grocery store. Don't fuck with her when she gets lost.

    Until she gets back, I can leave the basement sans regret!

  122. Insensitive to Venusians! by Sensitive+Claude · · Score: 2, Funny

    extramartian intelligence

    Wouldn't that be us?


    Assuming that Venusians exist then I think you are being insensitive to them.
    --
    Promote Sensitivity on Slashdot, make me your friend.
  123. Re:Misleading title by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

    Plenty flying... It's falling with style.

  124. Ooops by lnxpilot · · Score: 1

    they got me on camera...

  125. In reality, what it was by rcjhawk · · Score: 1

    was Michael Shanks post-Stargate SG-1 acting career.

  126. Re:Uranus by macdaddy357 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah! And it didn't even include the standard goatse link to make the newbies toss their cookies either.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  127. {Juvenile} Well now it's a good thing... by chadjg · · Score: 1

    that Mr. Ashcroft and the FCC doesn't have jurisdiction over inner planetary space just yet. The UFO could get in trouble for showing it's WMD in public.

    Maybe it was a cloaking malfunction. {/juvenile}

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  128. Odds are: by -noefordeg- · · Score: 1

    One in a million!

  129. Re:Misleading title by KeithManning · · Score: 1

    Thats the worst idea I've ever heard!

  130. Beagle by Steve+megehey · · Score: 1

    Hey, Maybe Beagle II has finally turned up. :-) Steve

  131. Kang and Kodos visit Mars by OH-58aKiowa · · Score: 1

    Kodos: Looks Kang, Mars has a new SUV Kang: That doesn't mean we have to trade up! Kodos: But I'm tried of flying around the universe looking like Rigellian Grey Trash! Kang: Why don't you pick up the space phone and call someone who gives a frakinin' snit?

  132. Re:Misleading title by Rip!ey · · Score: 1

    Unidentified Flying Object?

    If the object is a redundant orbiter, then it's not within Mar's atmosphere, and is therefore not, by definition, flying. Which would mean that the original parent poster has a good point.

  133. Just shows by afeeney · · Score: 1

    Let a Beagle off the leash and it goes tearing off after a scent...

  134. ..or Beagle 2! by tiger99 · · Score: 1
    Maybe the lander didn't land? It might be still in orbit.

    Or maybe not, but its remains must certainly be somewhere.

  135. Re: Vogon Constructor Fleet? (Warning Spoiler) by Walrus99 · · Score: 1

    The answer is 42.

  136. Space Junk by tamills · · Score: 1

    So not only do we litter Earth orbit, now we're littering Mars orbit too! I wonder if the NASA rednecks ever put their old satellites up on cinder-blocks?

    (The article says there are seven non-working craft orbiting Mars now).

    --

    Be careful what you wish for...

    Where your treasure is there is your heart also...

  137. It's THE ONE by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

    wakeup `whoami`
    It's neo surfing around

  138. That's all [insert name here] bullship by Via_Patrino · · Score: 1

    That's all [insert name here] bullship. Don't know who to blame but I searched for more data and found several pictures like that.
    Like this (don't know exposition time) and this (five minute exposition, march 11).
    All have similar streaks, the only difference is the streak on the "UFO" picture seens to be alone and probably move faster (since it's a 15 seconds exposition) or that's just zoom effect. And probably was the first to be photographed, so that's might be the reason it created so much hype between NASA people.
    This is what I belive to be the original image, taken from this page.
    There is some discussion here but I didn't read it all.

  139. Re:No. We won't stop. by rotor · · Score: 1

    AH, but if you make the assumption that this was the same pair of AC's posting over and over, you missed one thing... The one that was being more childish (and yeah - they both were) said that he was liberal - not that he was right wing. He's just being pushed that way by the anti-war movement.

    --
    Addlepated - punk & metal
  140. UFOs over Mars by BungyMC · · Score: 1

    Apparently it was trailing a banner which read "YANKEES GO HOME!!!"