Slashdot Mirror


Netflix to Offer Movie Downloads

kev0153 writes "Over at CNN Money they are reporting on a story about Netflix offering a video on demand over the web service in '05. They are also eyeing the multibillion-dollar video game market. "We're playing it a little defensively, because if we lose the digital download market, you'll soon be hearing about the rise and fall of Netflix," said Netflix CEO Reed Hastings."

205 comments

  1. They must be... by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are also eyeing the multibillion-dollar video game market video game market.

    They must be eyeing it with both eyes.

    1. Re:They must be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why the hell is this redundant? It was the first time someone said anything about the error.. May be troll but not redundant

    2. Re:They must be... by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Or just very drunken ones...

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    3. Re:They must be... by gilrain · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They certainly seem alert enough to be using both eyes!

      I think it's really refreshing to see a CEO doing more than spouting positive press for their stock holders. NetFlix isn't scared to say it like it is: "Yeah, we've got this market covered; but competition is heating up, and we need to expand or things could get rocky!" Way to go, NetFlix.

      'Course, I'm a big NetFlix fan. Love seeing those red envelopes in the mail. :)

    4. Re:They must be... by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Heh, you mean like ConsoleClassix, which has been posted on here before?

      That's where I get my Final Fantasy/Metriod/Zelda/etc. fix... :]

    5. Re:They must be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah.

      It's like the fools who don't know the difference between "its" and "it's", "your" and "you're", etc.

      They're trying so hard to impress everyone and be quick about it then can't hang on; i.e., they lose their focus...it's the electronic version of premature ejaculation.

    6. Re:They must be... by OrbNobz · · Score: 1

      Maybe there's a market for video games in which you run a video game market! How neat would THAT be?!? We could call it Video Game Market Tycoon.
      Crap.
      Can I at least get my name in the credits?

      - Orbnobz
      ("The mind is geek.") && ("The mind is not geek.")

  2. No matter how flexible the DRM by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone will still be upset about the DRM and decide to crack it. Then again movies are harder to distribute then mp3s. At least high quality ones.

    1. Re:No matter how flexible the DRM by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone will still be upset about the DRM and decide to crack it. Then again movies are harder to distribute then mp3s. At least high quality ones. ....And cue the people who say it HAS to work on every platform, be completely open, and so on, ad infinitum. If you don't like it, you can vote with your wallet, and not buy it.

    2. Re:No matter how flexible the DRM by maxbang · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dude, I hear what you're saying, but there's a difference between voting with your wallet and a company making a product that works properly from the get-go. It doesn't make sense to me that a coporation would make something closed and spend billions of dollars defending their product from crackers, anti-trust lawsuits, and constant requirements for upgrades. The way it works today is any closed proprietary format _will_ be broken and made available to the public. Why fight it? Just create something that works for everyone and you'll save yourself a lot of hassle and dollars in the long run. And you'll look good to the hacker community and the public, to boot. Then again, I'm not a corporate vice president of legal affairs/development/marketing/etc., so I have zero badges to wear that will allow me to crow about this with any credibility.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    3. Re:No matter how flexible the DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh... to be naive. Somehow I doubt an open-source DRM standard (If one would ever be developed), would last very long. DRM is essential in these kinds of situations and it makes no difference whether the DRM is proprietary or not. People will always try and most likely succeed in cracking it.

    4. Re:No matter how flexible the DRM by LupusUF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think this will really be a problem. DVD's still are around, even though their encryption has been cracked. It is fairly easy to either rip or copy DVDs anymore. Distributing them is what is difficult. Someone who set up enough bandwith to distribute DVDs would not be able to stay under the radar of the MPAA...so it would limit illegal distribution. Of course there are those who will download lower quality pictures off of slow connections, but they are in the minority. Of course as bandwith gets cheaper this will be more of a problem for the movie industry. They will have to do a better job than the music industry of making a product that people want to buy, rather than depending on DRM.

    5. Re:No matter how flexible the DRM by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      DRM is essential in these kinds of situations and it makes no difference whether the DRM is proprietary or not. People will always try and most likely succeed in cracking it.

      Sure, till all you have is "trusted hardware". Then it will be much more difficult to crack, I imagine.

    6. Re:No matter how flexible the DRM by zaffir · · Score: 1

      That won't make a difference to the warez community. I can get just about any movie i want on bittorrent/overnet/edonkey/irc the day it's released in dvd format, and the more popular ones are available well before home release as dvd-screener rips. Cracking the DRM would serve no purpose, other than letting the people who actually paid enjoy their movie to the fullest.

      Of course, that's all moot if anyone can download the movies but they're only viewable if you pay for a license. It'll be interesting to see how they handle this - pay before you download is susceptable to connection interruptions, which are a much bigger problem with 600+ meg files vs. 3 meg songs.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    7. Re:No matter how flexible the DRM by gglaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes, exactly...

      take my XBox for example...

      um, nevermind...gotta go!

    8. Re:No matter how flexible the DRM by Shai-kun · · Score: 1

      Generic CEO: "What is this 'in the long run' you speak of?"
      Nowadays there seems to be a tendency for make-money-now-clean-up-our-mistakes-later. If there is a 'later', ofcourse. Alas, this is completely off-topic so please ignore =)

      --
      ...or so I've been told.
    9. Re:No matter how flexible the DRM by javaman83 · · Score: 1

      I really don't think the trusted computing thing is ever really going to happen as microsoft wants it to.

      But if it does, I'm sure there will be modchips/black market parts.

  3. Video-on-demand, eh? by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The servers with the porn titles better have some mighty good hardware.

    1. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Netflix doesn't rent porn.

    2. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Bobdoer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Netflix doesn't rent porn.
      They will once they look at the numbers. Porn is one of the best selling things ever, and nobody would want to lose an opportunity that large. Except, possibly, some religious or morally incensed people, but greed should rule those out.

    3. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      Netflix doesn't rent porn.

      Does anyone know why this is? They have such a large selection of movies that it's hard to imagine carrying some porn movies hasn't occurred to them. So it must be a conscious choice not to carry any. This doesn't seem like a good business decision on the face of it, but they must have their reasons. What are they?
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    4. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it's BDSM porn, it'll be demand-on-video on video-on-demand.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Cranky_92109 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Netflix used to carry 'Mature' titles. Softcore type stuff. I suspect that either they figured it was too easy for kids to get a hold of or perhaps people kept renting it and not returning it. I know that most of the titles were always listed as 'Long Wait'. Errrr.... not that I ever had any in my queue or anything......gotta go!

    6. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by longhairedgnome · · Score: 0

      This isn't entirely true, you can see some pretty good bdsm sex vids, such as Ilsa She wolf of the SS

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    7. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it's open with pr0n, you can watch BDSM on BSD!

    8. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Manfre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess they realized that it was too hard to compete with newsgroups and p2p programs. Why go to your door to pick up the porn you ordered, it's too much effort!

    9. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia the video spanks you!

    10. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by bill0755 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They will once they look at the numbers. Porn is one of the best selling things ever, and nobody would want to lose an opportunity that large. Except, possibly, some religious or morally incensed people, but greed should rule those out.

      I seriously doubt they will rent porn just because it is a big market. Blockbuster doesn't and I wouldn't categorize them as religious or morally incensed.

      They are merely image concious. That is to say, they are not willing to give up the family market just to grab the extra sales in the porn market. And being new at this (movie downloads) makes them very visible and extra sensitive to their image.

    11. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Three words: Wholly owned subsidiary

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    12. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pr0n is why video tape machines became so popular and massive sales brought the cost down. People no longer were required to rent|buy 8mm movies in an adult book store; they also didn't have to visit the nasty adult theaters.

      Besides, what NetFlix wants to do is not that far off.

      And for those who are new to the game, Microsoft tried to do something similar to this in the '92-'93 timeframe, codenamed "Tiger". IIRC, it never made it to beta.

    13. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by prescot6 · · Score: 1

      Why go to your door to pick up the porn you ordered, it's too much effort!

      That's exactly the issue that this story addresses!

    14. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      The problem with p2p programs is that they mostly have generic stuff. Stuff like "*some famous pornstar with ugly fake tits* eats out *another famous pornstar with nice tits*".

      If you're looking for a collection of your favorite actress, or something more off the beaten path (sorry) p2p is no good.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    15. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by jwilloug · · Score: 1

      Netflix stopped renting porn when Reed Hastings, thier CEO, joined the California Board of Education. I doubt it will change while he still holds both positions, you can't be school board president and national porn king at the same time.

    16. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Netflix used to, it doesn't anymore. Probably too many damaged discs.

      --

      mbbac

    17. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by yerfatma · · Score: 1

      Oh, well that's settled then. 'Cause everybody wants to get off to a harcore version of "Triumph of the Will".

    18. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by FingerDemon · · Score: 1

      I don't know but this commentator on CNN/Money seemed to think it would be a good idea. CNN/Money Netflix commentary

      --

      "Contrarily the lookaside buffer might not be the panacea... "
    19. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Netflix doesn't rent porn-porn, but they do rent movies like Kentucky Fried Movie and Eyes Wide Shut. You may have to sit through some storyline, but they definatly aren't total prudes.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    20. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blockbuster doesn't and I wouldn't categorize them as religious or morally incensed.

      You should. They edit scenes out of movies that they find objectionable. Check Google.

    21. Re:Video-on-demand, eh? by darc · · Score: 1

      That's ironic. If BSD is dying, BDSM is basically doing everything short of dying, isn't it?

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
  4. Recursion? by spellraiser · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are also eyeing the multibillion-dollar video game market video game market.

    Hmmm - so they are going to market video games inside video games? Wow - that's like, so cool!

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Recursion? by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      clearly you have not played the Sims.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:Recursion? by gerf · · Score: 1

      Hmmm - so they are going to market video games inside video games? Wow - that's like, so cool!

      Those crazy a$s Sims players!

    3. Re:Recursion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow - it's like I'm really playing virtual skeeball!

  5. I don't know about you, by Bobdoer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but I don't want to download PS2 games on demand. They're freaking huge! I've only got 512 down, and it would take forever to download some of those four disk RPGs. But if I could make a backup copy...

    1. Re:I don't know about you, by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. I think the U.S. market is trying to push too much through the bandwidth. This ain't exactly Japan where everyone lives 3 inches away from each other with 100baseT networks.

    2. Re:I don't know about you, by erpbridge · · Score: 1

      Well, just wait until they start selling copies of Final Fantasy 11. Granted, it's only 1 DVD-ROM, but its the game that keeps on giving (or downloading, if you prefer that euphemism...)

    3. Re:I don't know about you, by Legionairre · · Score: 1

      They could make your download speed fast if your donwloading a movie up to about 400-500+ kbs if they wanted, but because of the demand they would have to pay their asses out for so much bandwith. Then inturn us so they can affort the bandwith will be paying a hell load to get what we want. I bet that this amount will be close if not more than you would normaly pay for a movie.

    4. Re:I don't know about you, by retto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure they mean renting the actual disc, like they do for movies. I doubt that games would be downloadable, at least for the current generation of consoles.

      Sony seems to be pretty interested in it as a future distribution method, so I wouldn't be surprised to see it in a couple of years. The story-driven, linear RPGs popular in Japan could work, if you are able to download the content as you go. Each night download the next few levels, and unless you run through a lot of the game in one sitting it wouldn't be a problem.

    5. Re:I don't know about you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your typical 1.5mb down can download 4-6 ps2 games a day. so figure at least a couple a day for 512k. at least... umm... that's just what i hear anyway... /me heads back to suprnova and my newsgroups like nothing happened.

    6. Re:I don't know about you, by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "but I don't want to download PS2 games on demand. They're freaking huge! I've only got 512 down, and it would take forever to download some of those four disk RPGs."

      It wouldn't work that way. They'd send the data down as needed. I beta tested a PC game service like that a while back. It wasn't bad. I have a 3 megabit connection, though.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:I don't know about you, by wronskyMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      The story-driven, linear RPGs popular in Japan could work,
      Or the rocket-driven (but also linear) RPGs popular in Soviet Russia...

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
    8. Re:I don't know about you, by NineNine · · Score: 2, Informative

      But if I could make a backup copy...

      Rumor has it [cough] that PS2 mod chips work very, very well. And from what I've heard [ahem], you can get a good chip + installation + shipping for about $100. Of course, this is just heresay...

    9. Re:I don't know about you, by mandalayx · · Score: 1
      I'm sure they mean renting the actual disc, like they do for movies. I doubt that games would be downloadable, at least for the current generation of consoles.

      Sony seems to be pretty interested in it as a future distribution method, so I wouldn't be surprised to see it in a couple of years. The story-driven, linear RPGs popular in Japan could work, if you are able to download the content as you go. Each night download the next few levels, and unless you run through a lot of the game in one sitting it wouldn't be a problem.


      Two words:

      Watch Steam.
    10. Re:I don't know about you, by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Well, I've downloaded many many xbox games from Usenet. Queue up a couple, and the next morning voala, they're done.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  6. Bandwidth? by agent+dero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really wonder how they ever expect to have this idea profit, while shooting GB's worth of files constantly down the pipes, and if I can download it off bit torrent, why would I want to pay for it?

    Cool idea, but some questions should be answered first

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
    1. Re:Bandwidth? by longhairedgnome · · Score: 0

      MANY people aren't into pirating , this would be a good way for families with broadband to get movies for their kids.

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    2. Re:Bandwidth? by bigberk · · Score: 1
      I really wonder how they ever expect to have this idea profit
      Seriously: when it's cheaper, faster, and more feasible to distribute movies using a grey-market P2P system, then you know the "industry" is in trouble. In fact, they's screwed! 'Cause what they want to do can't be commercialized!
    3. Re:Bandwidth? by Bagels · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The obvious answer is that they'll take a leaf out of BitTorrent's book and have people that are downloading/viewing the movie share with each other (maybe they could even give you a little discount if you provide enough bandwidth). Only, of course, it would be a closed, DRM-encumbered system...

      --
      --- Bwah?
    4. Re:Bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if I can download it off bit torrent, why would I want to pay for it?

      Maybe so that you wouldn't be a greedy, free-loading, pirating, ass hat leeching off of other people's creativity?

    5. Re:Bandwidth? by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      of course downloading it off bittorrent isnt exactly legal is it?

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    6. Re:Bandwidth? by grotgrot · · Score: 4, Insightful
      and if I can download it off bit torrent, why would I want to pay for it?

      Some of us do have the notion that that is stealing, and actually do make an effort to pay for what we watch and play.

      Actually I think if the music/film industry had treated people well, instead of treating everyone like a thief just because some are thieves, then there would be little need for DRM and people would play nice. (The vast majority of people are fundamentally honest).

    7. Re:Bandwidth? by retto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if I can download it off bit torrent, why would I want to pay for it?

      Because the movies on a lot of the torrent sites (when you can FIND what you are looking for) can be low quality, mislabeled, and a lot of mainstream users aren't up for looking around to download and install the right codec. And that's assuming the tracker and seeder is up long enough to download it.

      A lot of the same reasons people use iTunes.

    8. Re:Bandwidth? by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nice troll. Lotta bites today.

      --
      True story.
    9. Re:Bandwidth? by athakur999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Technically, the music industry DID treat everyone as being honest. Until fairly recently, audio CDs had no protection on them whatsoever. That didn't stop Napster and Kazaa from booming as these "fundamentally honest" people began trading files in mass quantities.

      Not that I support the RIAA or their actions, but it is important to remember that things WERE all rosy and DRM free at one time and it got abused.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    10. Re:Bandwidth? by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not that I support the RIAA or their actions, but it is important to remember that things WERE all rosy and DRM free at one time and it got abused.

      Perhaps, then, you could explain Macrovision to us, in light of this "rosy" world of the past?

      Or why DAT uses 48KHz, while CDs use 44.1KHz?

      Or why Jack Valenti uttered his now-famous quote, "The VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston Strangler is to the woman alone"?


      Sorry, but that mythical rosy world simply does not, did not, and will never, exist. Content producers have fought with the public over control issues since the very first round of suits involving Edison himself. And before that, even Gutenberg took quite a lot of heat, from both the church and governments, for making mass-distribution of media possible. I suppose I have to grant you that, before Gutenberg, we didn't have problems with the idea of copyrights (though I have little doubt isolated incidents still arose on occasion). But since then? We have lived in a literally epic struggle between over who has the right to make copies of what.

      The "digital age" has simply brought this problem into the spotlight - With luck, perhaps that means we can look forward to some solution to the issue in the next few decades, rather than another 600+ years of little-known skirmishes.


      Until fairly recently, audio CDs had no protection on them whatsoever.

      Disingenuous, at best. True, CDs didn't start having copy protection until recently (actually, they still don't - Because Phillips refuses to allow "broken" audio discs to call themselves CDs). But that had nothing to do with trusting the consumers, and everything to do with the simple infeasibility of copying them until a few years ago. Sure, we had the ability to rip a CD for perhaps 15 years, but to do what? Even as a geek myself, I didn't get a burner until perhaps 5-7 years ago (I suppose they existed before then, but for a pretty hefty price... I bought mine when they finally broke $250). And without the ability to copy a CD, what would we have done with a rip? You couldn't fit a lot of MP3s on a 1.5GB HDD. You can'd download them very fast at 28.8kbps. So what threat did the technical feasibility of copying a CD pose, when practical issues made it irrelevant?

      Or to add to my above comments, perhaps you have a good explanation (other than assuming their target market as thieves) for the RIAA tax on blank cassette tapes?

    11. Re:Bandwidth? by grotgrot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      WERE all rosy and DRM free

      I think you will find that all the DRM nonsense did exist on DAT long before Napster/Kazaa. The RIAA had long signalled that they believed all customers were thieves. Look at blank "Music" CDs vs "Data" CDs, the taxes on blank tapes and attempts at other media in order to recover money from "pirating". The only reason there was no "protection" on audio CDs was because they couldn't think of a way to do it without breaking compatibility with standard players. Even that hasn't stopped them in recent years.

      What Napster and Kazaa showed is that people wanted to buy music online, but the music industry refused to sell online. In the absence of any way to preview music, buy music online (especially back catalog/less popular stuff not available in retail stores), people did the second best thing which is stole.

      I think many honest people considered it a form of "fair use" to listen to music beforehand, and when the music industry (whose primary purpose is to sell music) provided no way to give them money for music, just took what they wanted.

    12. Re:Bandwidth? by VegetariMan · · Score: 1

      Sorry to sound like the troll... but do you really think there is any business that is pinning its future on cheapskate slackers like yourself?

      Obviously there are people thay pay money for media products delivered via a variety of mediums & formats. It seems that the point of this article is that Netflix is making a high-profile leap into the future of film distribution and they see a profit in it.

      --
      --Nick
  7. Download Speed by Luminari · · Score: 5, Informative

    Download speeds for files as large as full games and video are still too slow. Video download services are going to be a niche market until that can be improved. I hope netflix isn't staking their near term future on this.

    1. Re:Download Speed by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be too worried, I'm pretty sure they're raking in the dough as it is. Everybody and their brother has a Netflix account these days, or at least it seems that way. I've had one for years.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    2. Re:Download Speed by jfengel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt it. Reed Hastings seems to be a pretty smart guy. I think he's just hedging his bets against a technology improvement that would make his business model obsolete.

      Technology improvements, actually. First there's the fact that even DSL bandwidth is too little for a real movie.

      Second is the fact that the market for watching a movie on a computer screen is really, really small. People want to watch TV in their home theater, not their office. Even movies-on-laptops is, in my experience, a thing to stave off boredom on long trips, not a major way of viewing films. Perhaps he's expecting there to be some sort of household entertainment bridge, like the MP3 receivers currently on the market.

      Netflix real improvement in life came from offering subscription-based movie access, which made the whole thing convenient. It depended on a technological improvement: DVDs. You couldn't really do Netflix with VHS; they're too big and fragile. It's nice that Netflix postage is prepaid, which is one fewer thing to fiddle with when you receive movies.

      That was pretty clever, and it wasn't the first thing Hastings thought of. He had tried plain rentals first, but it didn't work. Maybe he's looking for something clever in VOD, too. We'll see.

    3. Re:Download Speed by DA-MAN · · Score: 1
      Technology improvements, actually. First there's the fact that even DSL bandwidth is too little for a real movie.

      I'm not so sure about that. There aren't any real limitations with the DSL technology as far as bandwidth is concerned. If you click here, you will see that people in other countries have 45 mbps DSL for approximately $40 US

      LINK

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
  8. Download speeds... by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hastings expects that Internet VOD market is still relatively small, with relatively long download times for even those with cable or DSL Internet connections.

    Is there a rental timeframe? Wouldn't it suck if your download didn't finish before the period was up?

    "Just 5K more to go! Just -- "
    "Sorry. Your rental period for 'My Pipes Need Cleaning' has expired. Thank you and please come again."

    1. Re:Download speeds... by MCherry · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a bit of information about Netflix, but the whole point of it is that there are no rental times. Currently, one monthly fee (about $20 for three movies at a time) lets you hang on to a set number of DVDs for as long as you want. You get an online queue, and each disc you send back prompts the next one to be sent to you. No late fees, a vast collection (all of Star Trek, M*A*S*H, etc.), I haven't been to a Blockbuster etc. for a very long time.

  9. That's just a bug by Toxygen · · Score: 1

    They're still developing their Video-On-Demand system. That probably should read:

    They are also eyeing the multibillion-dollar video game market.

    1. Re:That's just a bug by Toxygen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uhh, the previous post should probably read:

      They're still developing their Video-On-Demand system. That probably should read:

      They are also eyeing the multibillion-dollar bufferring...bufferring... video game market.

  10. Netflix? by neoform · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I supposed i'd have to know what netflix is before i can't hear of it's rise and fall..

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:Netflix? by Patik · · Score: 5, Informative
      Come out from under your rock.

      It's an online DVD rental system -- you pick out DVDs to rent, they mail them to you. You can keep them as long as you want, no late fees -- but you can only have three checked out at a time. $20/month, they pay for shipping both ways (USPS first class). Huge selection, lots of hard to find movies, in ~20 warehouses around the U.S.

    2. Re:Netflix? by brand+bendy · · Score: 1, Informative

      What about the boulder that you are under?
      Try Greencine. They actualy do have "lots of hard to find movies" (unlike Netflix). They also have a user forum and far more personalized service. Pricing is about the same. Oh yeah, and they already have a small amount of VOD movies.

      --
      I use phrases like "darn good" and "rootin' tootin'", but only when there's a darn good, rootin tootin' reason!
  11. Three at a time? by SnappleMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Variety said the VOD offering will expand that to allow for up to three physical DVD or digital downloads at a time.

    Yeah... how are they gonna restrict you to three downloads at a time? Good luck with that, my friend! As we've seen just today, no protection scheme will ever be anywhere close to secure.

    --
    Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    1. Re:Three at a time? by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      How are they gonna keep you from ripping the DVDs? I think they'll be fine...

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    2. Re:Three at a time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A certain user ID is paid for by a credit card. That account is allowed 3 streams downloading at a pre determined and fixed data rate.

      If you mean someone will hack the server and abuse the bandwidth rate, with any kind of administration and logging the numbers will not add up and the bug will be found and squashed.

  12. On second thought... by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    They could just set the period to begin after the download was complete... but by then, "My Pipes Need Cleaning: The New Rod" would be out.

  13. Competitor by kilocomp · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess they want to take on the currently established market leader....Kazza. I just hope Netflix edits out those annoying messages, the ones that say this is a screener copy only so call this number if you are not suppose to be watching this.

    1. Re:Competitor by BlueCup · · Score: 5, Funny

      *whistles*

      I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

      Absolutely no idea at all...

      *whistles*

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
  14. DVD Writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DVD writers probably have something to do with this. With the release of personal dual layer DVD writers, the world of (DVD) movie rentals will change.

    1. Re:DVD Writers by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      It may actually dramatically increase DVD rentals for a while as people start just ripping DVD's and sending them back/returning them. With a service like Netflix and a careful schedule, you could get movies in the mail, rip them and return them the next day, burn the ripped copies during the mail delay and start the cycle over, getting movies for $1 + your monthly fee. Even with Blockbuster pricing, you could rent a DVD for $4, rip and burn it to an $0.80 DVD-R and have a copy for under $5.

      Where this process breaks down is if new DVD's themselves drop below that $5 mark. At that point, it's not worth the effort to make a copy.

      I actually feel that way about music and don't download anything off of the p2p services, not necessarily because of any legal or moral issue (though they do exist), but because I can buy used CD's cheap enough that it's not worth the effort. I mean, if I can buy a disc for $4-6 and get the entire album, there's no way I'm going to find all of the songs on the album, consistently ripped and encoded on any of the available services in any reasonable amount of time that compares.

  15. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    All I got to do is hook my 42 Optical connections together and ill be blazing at.....142 kbs a sec from their servers. Damn.

    Damn bandwidth throtling! GRRRRR

  16. Not likely to work... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think anybody can launch a Hollywood-movies-on-demand without having the cable companies on board. They can place servers closer to their users, and have the advantage of being able to allocate more bandwidth to themselves on their cable systems. They're going to have an advantage over any outside provider...

    1. Re:Not likely to work... by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And why would the cable companies want to help Netflix out? They've got their own video-on-demand services to push. Netflix is just more competition...

      --
      ~ Aero
    2. Re:Not likely to work... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I don't think anybody can launch a Hollywood-movies-on-demand without having the cable companies on board. They can place servers closer to their users, and have the advantage of being able to allocate more bandwidth to themselves on their cable systems. They're going to have an advantage over any outside provider..."

      Their biggest advantage is that it's out today. I would assume not in all areas, but in Portland it is. I've already watched a few movies on it. Not too bad at all. They just stream the digital signal down to my TV over the cable. Frankly, I have NFI how Netflix can beat that unless they make it cheaper. Right now it's $4 a movie streamed right to my TV. If they had some movies for $1 to view, I'd watch some of the movies I'm less excited about on my laptop. No biggie.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Not likely to work... by Moofie · · Score: 0

      Uh, right. Way to home in on the exact point the grandparent is making.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Not likely to work... by nvrrobx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The satellite companies would be better off to partner with Netflix and offer deals along with your satellite service.

      Satellite companies just do not have the bandwidth to do movies on demand like the cable companies do.

    5. Re:Not likely to work... by invckb · · Score: 1
      The satellite companies need to push Tivo like devices with big hard drives. They currently stream 15-20 movies, looping them every hour and a half or so.

      If they took one channel and played them all in series, an 80Gb drive could store them all. The viewer would have 20 movies available for VOD.

  17. first step in playing defensivly by miradu2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is not announcing your product an entire year ahead of launch - giving your competitors plenty of time to catch up.

    Case in point: Apple suprising everyone with iTMS - and than not getting a windows version out until all the other win music stores were released.

    1. Re:first step in playing defensivly by harveyswik · · Score: 1

      I guess it'd be bad form to point out that apple still ownz that maket, eh?

    2. Re:first step in playing defensivly by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's because Apple was lucky enough to have none of their competitors match their quality. No matter how good you are, you can always be better, and as such, somebody else might actually outdo you.

    3. Re:first step in playing defensivly by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe it's a trick. Netflix could be making noises about getting into a market that they know is pointless to enter, causing other companies to waste time and energy trying to beat Netflix to market, when Netflix has no actual plans to go there. Mwa ha ha ha! And so forth.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    4. Re:first step in playing defensivly by harveyswik · · Score: 1

      Not true. There is a limited amount of capital in the economy. Capital drives quality, there is an upper limit on quality. consequently, there's also a lower limit on quality - and that's the one we tend to seek out.

    5. Re:first step in playing defensivly by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Capital is not always proportional to the quality of output, especially in the world of software. Not only do I know the laws of economics, I also know that they frequently fail completely to predict the real world, and that the frequency is increasing constantly.

  18. Video games...VERY smart by TrentL · · Score: 5, Informative

    I read an article about 6 months ago where the Netflix guys said they weren't interested in the video game market. I'm glad they've wised up.

    In the meantime, Gamefly is an excellent video game rental service. The pricing and service are almost identical to Netflix.

    1. Re:Video games...VERY smart by Ducati_749S · · Score: 1

      I have actually found Gamefly to be a better service overall than Netflix, but it's not for everyone. On the up side, their turnaround is pretty quick, the games come well protected in their packaging, and the ability to keep the games you have out in one click (and have the case & materials shipped to you along with your next game) are all great. However, at about $20 a month, you have to be a pretty avid game player to get the most out of the service. They let you keep 2 games at once, so as long as you are beating 1 game a month on average, it is a sound choice. We primarily use the service for games that have little replay value, or to try games that aren't a sure thing. That alone has saved us a ton of cash. :)

      --
      What about the twinkie? - Dr. Peter Venkman, PHD
    2. Re:Video games...VERY smart by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Around here Blockbuster does the same thing for $20/month. No waiting times either, you just have to go down to the store and swap the games out. The selection isn't always the best though (especially for older games)

      --
      -no broken link
    3. Re:Video games...VERY smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Article headline:

      "Netflix to offer movie downloads
      Company to start video on demand over the web in '05; DVD rental firm also eyes video game market."


      Excerpt from article:

      "Netflix CEO Reed Hastings also told entertainment industry trade publication Variety that the multibillion-dollar video game market is another related field that Netflix may or may not enter in the future."

      Troll.

    4. Re:Video games...VERY smart by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      Actually, $20/month seems about perfect, even if you only play 3-4 hours per week. Think of it this way, $20 per month is $240 per year. New games are $50 each. Therefore, $20/month is the equivalent of 5 games per year. I don't know about you, but I buy a little more than 5 games per year (probably about 6-7) and rarely play them more than two months. Thus, the service would be perfect. I keep the game as long as I want. When I finish a game or get bored of it, I turn it in. No hassles of Ebaying the used game or getting $5-10 for it at Gamestop.

      Damn. I think I just convinced myself to sign up.

    5. Re:Video games...VERY smart by Xeo+024 · · Score: 1

      VeeGeez also recently launched their video game rental service.

    6. Re:Video games...VERY smart by TrentL · · Score: 1

      Also, on Gamefly, you can decide to keep the game and pay a used price for it. So it's kinda nice in that regard.

  19. If the movie streams to my cache can I keep it? by darthcamaro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So I get a video on demand over the internet - and I assume that it'll stream and make use of my cache (or some other temp file). If I keep the cache/temp file, does that mean I can keep/own the movie??
    Or will these guys have some kind of no-cache proxy in place?

    1. Re:If the movie streams to my cache can I keep it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So I get a video on demand over the internet - and I assume that it'll stream and make use of my cache (or some other temp file). If I keep the cache/temp file, does that mean I can keep/own the movie??

      Or will these guys have some kind of no-cache proxy in place?

      If you rent the DVD (netflix or otherwise, or buy it copy it and sell it), and you have a DVD player ($20 bucks for a generic best buy special), any one of countless programs can store the video files on your computer.

      It seems like you are saying "Because the 0's and 1's come through my internet connection instead of the U.S. postal service, this is something significant." It's possible to drive to a video store, rent and copy. There is a law against it. That is why you should not do this.

      I see no reason why they should be forced to invent some bullshit scheme. The most generic DVD image format is what I would use. I'd probably even use tar, gzip, split, and par2 for the distribution method with a cheesy homebrew graphical interface to distribute the files.

  20. Hehehe... by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    You said "hardware."

    (What? It was in the context of the joke.)

    1. Re:Hehehe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That WAS the joke...

  21. I hope they do game rentals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm already copying and burning DVDs from netflix as fast as I can get them. Game rentals will be awesome for my stock pile.

    Getting ready for the day when everyones dead, except me. And the power is still on. Oh yeah, and my girlfriend will be there too.

    Yea for piracy. I love piracy. It feels like I'm making money!

    1. Re:I hope they do game rentals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Heh, the joke's on you buddy! You THINK you're saving money, when in the meantime you're buying blanks, bigger hard drives, faster burners, more shelves to hold your growing DVD/game collection, markers & stickers to label your collection, a bigger TV to watch it all on...

      Which goes to show you, in the end, money DOES get spent after all. "Piracy" doesn't damage the economy - it merely displaces where the money goes. In this case, it goes to Netflix, to the people who produced the DVDs (they probably have a contract with Netflix, giving them a percentage), the people who make DVD blanks (along with the whole import chain that delivered them into your hands), the Post Office...

      I wonder if there's a restriction against lending Netflix movies to friends before you return em?

    2. Re:I hope they do game rentals by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I'm already copying and burning DVDs from netflix as fast as I can get them."

      What's the point? How many of those movies are you going to watch more than once in the next year? Seems like a huge waste of time to me. If I really want a movie, I'm $15 and a 5 minute drive away. Renting the movie from Netflix, and waiting for it to arrive in the mail.. well how much are you really saving?

      Maybe you're just joking, I dunno. But I can tell you that you're putting way too much energy into being a pirate. Maybe if movies cost $30.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:I hope they do game rentals by Mitleid · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that this came, as I've been thinking about the reality of piracy (DVD, console game, pc game) a lot more lately in the sense that it has changed quite a bit. When I was a kid, I'd "pirate" an occasional game from my friend or what have you because I wanted to play it and I was a kid WITHOUT ANY MONEY. Now that I'm what's legally considered an adult, it seems that pirating mentality is more based upon getting as much as you can as fast as you can, and not really enjoying it. It's essentially become a fetish; "I have a bigger MP3 collection than you do" or "I ripped 5 XBOX games last week while you only nabbed 3". Just as NanoGator pointed out, when the hell is ANYONE going to have time to play any of these? Like the original poster (jokingly) stated, it's like pirates are storing up for some kind of apocolypse that will miraculously leave the power grid and supplies of tasty food intact so that all the entertainment fetishists can bask in the glory of their hours and hours of renting and ripping from NetFlix.

      --

      --
      Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    4. Re:I hope they do game rentals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm out of games to play. PC ones at least. I've beaten them all, or gotten sick of the flaws in a few. Sigh.

    5. Re:I hope they do game rentals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I did a back of the envelop calculation when Netflix came out, and I decided it wasn't worth it. I just didn't watch that many movies. But now I have a Netflix subscription. I burn one DVD per night, usually while watching my two hours of TV. It's still not worth it, but I figure after three months I'll have enough DVDs to last me a year. A years worth of entertainment for $100, plus occasional DVD swaps and mousing.

      It's definatly worth it if you don't run a continuous subscription. And no, I don't have cable either.

    6. Re:I hope they do game rentals by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If I really want a movie, I'm $15 and a 5 minute drive away. Renting the movie from Netflix, and waiting for it to arrive in the mail.. well how much are you really saving?

      A lot really. Buying all the DVDs I'm interested in seeing would cost me a fortune (and I don't mean a small one). Most aren't worth watching twice, so you return them and don't think twice. The ones that are worth watching only cost a few cents for the blanks to makke a copy since I've already got the rented DVD there with me. And that few cents saves a lot, considering just how expensive MOST DVDs cost. I would be buying a lot more if DVDs were going for $5 (like a lot of VHS tapes), but at $10 I only buy a good one once in a long while, and at anything above $10 for a movie less than 3 hours, I feel like I'm being raped where I stand, so I don't ever buy them.

      And as long as there are idiots like you out there, willing to pay whatever price the MPAA demands of you to see their latest crappy movie, there is no incentive for them to drop the prices.

      That's why the MPAA and RIAA are still going strong. Most people act like a bunch of idiots on a sinking ship. All of them demand that they get to take their luggage aboard the life raft, so they collectively sink, instead of making a small sacrifice, and being infinitely better off for it.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:I hope they do game rentals by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "And as long as there are idiots like you out there, willing to pay whatever price the MPAA demands of you to see their latest crappy movie, there is no incentive for them to drop the prices."

      I got news for ya, the DVD prices have dropped. They used to be $30 for a new release, then it dropped to a little over $20, now it's at $15.

      As for calling me an idiot, bit presumptuous, dontcha think? Even in light of the recent price drop?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:I hope they do game rentals by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I got news for ya, the DVD prices have dropped.

      Yes, years ago, but not in the past couple years now. I've been buying DVDs from the beginning, and I've been watching prices since the beginning as well. Prices were very high to start, but now they've settled into a price they've stayed at for years. New DVDs come out at $15-20, and only after a year or more do they potentially drop close to $10. Prices have NOT dropped recently by any means, and $15 isn't a sane price, or a market-driven price.

      As for calling me an idiot, bit presumptuous, dontcha think?

      If you are buying movies for $15, you are an idiot in my book.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  22. Won't be easy... by ccnull · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It won't be easy to pull all of this off. VOD is going to require a wholly new infrastructure and business model for them. Renting video games might be a problem too, when people start "losing" the games. A DVD probably runs about $5 in bulk... a game will probably cost them $30 or more.

    Still, it's great to see some innovation left in the dot-coms of the world....

    1. Re:Won't be easy... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " Renting video games might be a problem too, when people start "losing" the games. A DVD probably runs about $5 in bulk... a game will probably cost them $30 or more."

      That wouldn't be such a big deal. they have to pay $20 a month for the service anyway, right? Well they have to keep paying that until they get their game back. If it cannot be returned, then Netflix should just charge them a fee to recoup the costs.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Won't be easy... by gct · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Renting video games might be a problem too, when people start "losing" the games. ... a game will probably cost them $30 or more.

      Nah. You will just have to sign a contract that states that lost games cost full retail price to replace. They'll make money on that too.

    3. Re:Won't be easy... by ccnull · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Netflix has a problem now with discs that are broken in the mail or otherwise go lost. When this happens, they apologize and send you another disc. Only rarely is the consumer blamed for this -- and when he is, there's no fine assessed, the account is simply closed. So Netflix is currently eating 100% of the cost of lost, broken, and stolen discs, which by some accounts has hit 1% of all shipments. Charging a fee is loaded with problems, since the US Mail service is probably responsible most of the time, and if Netflix tried to bill me for something that wasn't my fault, I'd cancel my account immediately.

      The problem here is not just that games will cost the company more, but they're probably more likely to be stolen than DVDs, and there's not a lot the company can do about it. With a brick and mortar Blockbuster, there's no intermediary to blame, so they can get away with charging you for losing the game.

    4. Re:Won't be easy... by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Do you think the people are Netflix are really that dumb? The US Postal Service has insured mail. Netflix just insures that DVD that they paid $5 for at $10 and if it gets lost or stolen, Netflix profits! I am not sure how the USPO handles large scale mail order business, though I doubt the USPO would have Netflix (or any other mail order company) eat those costs, it probably just comes out of our taxes : )

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    5. Re:Won't be easy... by ccnull · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If that made any sense, why doesn't Netflix insure shipments already? The USPO would absolutely not give insurance to Netflix for free, that would be ludicrous. They may give a nice discount as they do with all bulk mail, but it won't be more than 30% or so... In any event, postal insurance costs (retail) $1.20 per shipment minimum -- and that would be $2.40 to ship both ways. Considering the current shipment cost to Netflix is about $.60 round trip, bumping that up to $3.00 per shipment would quickly kill the company. Even at $2.00 per shipment, there's no way the company could make money without dramatically raising costs -- which, in the case of games, they may have to do. My theory is that they would return to standard $X per rental pricing where you are entitled to have it out for Y number of days... or possibly X number of rentals per month for fee $Y (vs. all you can eat).

      In any event if a disc got stolen, Netflix would break even; they wouldn't profit, as they would have to prove the cost of the disc they insured.

    6. Re:Won't be easy... by WoTG · · Score: 1

      There's not that big of a difference between games and DVD's for rentals. NetFlix is NOT paying $5 for a DVD. In the old VHS rental days it was more like $50 (conservatively) for a movie with a commercial rental license. I'm not sure what the premium for rental games would be, but I'm sure it's pretty hefty as well.
      In the end, I don't think it's significantly different enough from their current business to be worth worrying about.

  23. Does downloading games require a mod chip? by ispcay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How can games be downloaded from netflix or any other place. For instance X-Box games have to ripped from the DVD and converted into a ISO using something like XISO. Then you have to burn it to a CD so that you can play it on your X-Box. Or you can FTP over to your X-Box which in either case require a mod-chip. Are they honestly expecting us to delete the game once we done "renting" it. I mean I'm not going to pay $0.75 for a DVD that I just burned a very good game, just to throw it away after a few days.

    The other side is are you required to have a mod-chip on your gaming console so that you can download and play these games. In either case I think the gaming downloads will fail miserably but the movie downloads will be huge hit.

    1. Re:Does downloading games require a mod chip? by Gabriele+Capone · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article doesn't say that they are going to offer downloadable video games. It just says that they may enter the market for renting them.

    2. Re:Does downloading games require a mod chip? by ispcay · · Score: 1

      All I know is once they offer downloads there will be all sorts of lawyers on their butts claiming their company is causing loss of sales

    3. Re:Does downloading games require a mod chip? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "How can games be downloaded from netflix or any other place."

      There's a relatively simple way, well simple if Microsoft lends a hand. XBOX's have a network port. Connect that to broadband. Then, create a disc that alters things on the XBOX a bit, where the data that should be coming through the optical drive is instead pulled in from the network connection. So, in essence, the data is pulled down from the net in real time as if the disc is in the drive. There are obvious issues here, but I've seen a variant of this technique done on the PC before. It'd require broadband and a special disc.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  24. i don't understand by maxbang · · Score: 5, Funny

    will they be starting abm.netflix? or maybe #netflix on some dcc friendly irc network??

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
    1. Re:i don't understand by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      !list
      !list, damn it!

      --
      hey!
    2. Re:i don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      @hardassop> There's no list here, dumbass. RTFT - !list again and you're banned for a year.

  25. Greencine already does this by CanSpice · · Score: 2, Informative

    Greencine already does this for select films. They do WMP streaming for Video On Demand (FAQ here). I can't say that I've tried it though, since I prefer watching movies on my TV than on my computer.

    1. Re:Greencine already does this by bill0755 · · Score: 1

      Movielink also has video downloads in either Real or Windows media format (though Linux is not supported).

      The complete download takes about 90 minutes over an SBC supplied DSL though you can begin viewing after about 20 minutes of buffering.

  26. Worry about the important things first. by Infernon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't say that I'm exactly super-pleased with Netflix. The past three DVD's that I've sent back haven't even arrived in time for the next weekend when they were mailed out on the previous Sunday and it's not even like I rent a ton of movies-- these three were over the course of 5 weeks!

    1. Re:Worry about the important things first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is asking a lot of the post office. First of all, how did you send them out on a Sunday? No post office that I know of is open on a Sunday, with the exception of the one at San Francisco International Airport.

      So, your DVD goes out on a Monday. Then, if it only takes two days to get there, it gets there on a Wednesday. Then allow them 24 hours to process it and get the next one out in the mail to you. That means it goes out on a Thursday. If you are lucky, it will take another two days and get to your place on a Saturday. Or maybe if you are lucky, they will process it the same day, within only a few hours, and it'll be mailed out on Wednesday as well, in which case it might make it through the USPS in two days and get there on a Friday.

      Bottom line is, when you are working with Netflix, the wait time between sending a movie back and getting another in its place is going to be at least twice whatever the round trip time is for the post office. And the post office makes no guarantees about delivery time. They shoot for 2 days, but I've had stuff take easily a week. (With mail forwarding, I've seen it take a month.)

      Also, if you are only renting 3 movies over the course of 5 weeks, and if you have the standard Netflix 3-at-a-time plan, then you can easily solve this problem yourself. Just don't keep any movies pending in your queue, and keep only two movies out at a time. Then put a movie in your queue right when you mail back another movie. This way, they can send the movie you desire to you right away, putting you at your 3-at-a-time limit. But when they receive the one you mailed back, you'll only have two out, and you'll be back to the point where you can put another one in the queue and have it sent instantly.

    2. Re:Worry about the important things first. by Spyky · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that's surprising, I've been a member for 2 months now and I'm astounded how quick they send movies. Delivery often takes a single day, turn-around is maybe 3 days if I have the disc out in time for the morning pickup.

      Are you in a rural area? I notice that the delivery address on returns is local, that's how they can offer such quick service

      -Spyky

    3. Re:Worry about the important things first. by Infernon · · Score: 1

      i'm on the east cost near philadelphia. when i originally joined, i got my movies back much faster, but it seems as time went on, the service itself started to degrade. probably getting more subscribers than they're willing to compensate for?
      it's still a cool service, but i don't count on having my movies for the weekends anymore.

  27. We tried VOD at Enron Broadband with Blockbuster by GodBlessTexas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And it failed miserably. They're going to have a very hard time convincing the MPAA and the studios to allow them to stream the content without some serious consideration to DRM.

    --
    Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas...
  28. Netscaped by (exu)+$viality$ · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Whatever they try, they better watch out for Microsoft copying the idea.

    Microsoft Windows Media Player with 99 cent downloadable songs and videos on demand!

    --
    "I know kung-fu" -Neo, The Matrix
  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. Fuck the Sims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For video games within a video game, GBA's WarioWare is where it's at.

  31. no thanks by asv108 · · Score: 0

    I will continue to rip my netflix movies and watch them when i want using the encoding I want. (OGM and OGG for audio). I would be interested in this service is the files were portable (ie multiple platforms and the ability to burn on to a DVD-r's). So far any of the pay-per-download movie service ideas I've seen require windows and require that you watch it on a computer. The market for people who want to watch movies only on a computer and are willing to pay for it is exteremly small.

  32. Other services already do this by kamapuaa · · Score: 3, Informative
    Another DVD-by-mail service, Greencine already does this, with WMA and DivX - I've only done the video preview, but it appears to work pretty well. The problem is that movies are apparently hard to license for online viewing - mostly just obscurish indie movies, and porn.

    To be honest, I can't see movies being so much quicker to license these rights to Netflix, even if it is larger than Greencine.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. The same way Apple does it: Akamai. by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't think anybody can launch a Hollywood-movies-on-demand without having the cable companies on board. They can place servers closer to their users

    "Akamai" is not a four-letter word. It's a media delivery network. Apple has used it to distribute QuickTime trailers for feature films over the Internet. Netflix may contract with Akamai or with Conxion, who handles (or handled) Windows Update delivery for Microsoft.

    1. Re:The same way Apple does it: Akamai. by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      I used to think that Microsoft (Conxion) servers were some of the biggest/fattest on earth. At work (a University) I get a 4MB/sec (big 'B') connection to them whenever I download.

      Amazingly, I have found something that is faster.

      Gamespot- yes, Gamespot, downloads at almost 5MB/sec. This is with the 'Gamespot Complete' membership. It's really nice when downloading a 200+MB file takes less than a minute. And I *always* get that speed from them.

      Makes me wonder where the bottleneck is though- I should look into that.

      --
      No reason to lie.
  35. Why the hell can't people spell Kazaa? by dstillz · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why the hell can't people spell Kazaa? I mean, it's 5 letters, 2 of which are uncommon.

    1. Re:Why the hell can't people spell Kazaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot. The only words that get spelled right consistently are "linux", "free", and "open".

      Personally, I think most of it is intentional. There's just no way someone can accidentally hit the wrong key nearly half the time. That, or most Slashdotters are in kindergarten and can't read without slowly sounding out the syllables first or write without spelling everything fonetticklee.

  36. CinemaNow's hard to beat. by agslashdot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lion's Gate (LGF ) owns a majority stake in CinemaNow, the closest competition. LGF stock has been all over the place in the past few months due to Video-On-Demand deals with major studios. Unlike LGF, which grew from strength to strength after acquiring Artisan Films, is based in Hollywood, and has exclusive rights to several hundred movies as well as ties with the major players in the entertainment business, Netflix is more a rental mall for DVDs.
    otoh, Netflix's CEO has been predicting his entry into the VOD market for the past few years, and they did trails with sample footage for most DVDs.
    Competition's always beneficial to the consumer.

    1. Re:CinemaNow's hard to beat. by allout · · Score: 1

      Are they joking??? I just checked out CinemaNow, and PPV rentals are $4 and 'download to own' sets you back $15. My local Mom-and-pop video store can beat that rental price by almost a factor of 2, and many stores (Target/BestBuy/CircuitCity/etc) sell DVDs for $15 or less. Of course, the movies on CinemaNow are a bit obscure (which is a plus) but I would think that they would at least need to be competitive with local outlets (not to mention Netflix). How many people far from a metropolitain area have high speed internet access anyways?

    2. Re:CinemaNow's hard to beat. by gglaze · · Score: 1

      "Hard to beat"?

      Last time I checked out CinemaNow (actually that was like 6 months ago, but looks like they haven't changed dramatically), the selection was horrible (new releases were limited to films that usually go straight to video, and the overall selection was also poor), and quality/portability/drm restrictions were a joke. I found that quality didn't even seem to have a standard - different films came with entirely different encodings, so you never knew what you would get.

      Hard to beat indeed...

  37. Netflix? (yes. that's a valid question.) by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 1

    .. so you're saying the entire world, with the exception of the U.S. lives under a rock? Did you have to insult the person you're trying to inform?

    --
    click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.
    1. Re:Netflix? (yes. that's a valid question.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's saying that he's a lazy dumb fucker, who could have at least used google to look it up, before coming here and shooting his lame mouth off. /. is a US centric site. And most of us don't like walking on eggshells so we don't insult anyone. Don't forget, this is /. Home of goatse, the penis bird, and statues of Natalie Portman. The entire place is an insult.

    2. Re:Netflix? (yes. that's a valid question.) by Patik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Netflix has been on Slashdot a couple times before, and it's been a popular online business for years. And, as someone else pointed out, Slashdot is a predominantly American site. iTunes is U.S.-only, but you know what that is, right?

    3. Re:Netflix? (yes. that's a valid question.) by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 1
      My problem is not with the explanation, but its accompanying insult. Yes, we're constantly illuminated to the fact slashdot's US-centric and the majority of readers are based in the US, but I don't see why others (in the minority or otherwise) need to be mocked for inquiring about something which occurs in the US outside of their daily stream of information.

      Netflix is US-only as is iTunes for the most part, but business practices have a habit of being copied and adapted to other markets. I'm quite interested to see how the digital delivery pans out, despite the fact I won't have the opportunity to try it out.

      --
      click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.
    4. Re:Netflix? (yes. that's a valid question.) by EulerX07 · · Score: 1

      I've heard of netflix because I live in Canada even though it's not available here to my knowledge. Assuming that the rest of the world (what 4-5 billion) should know every american business is a bit of a stretch.

    5. Re:Netflix? (yes. that's a valid question.) by Patik · · Score: 1

      As I said, Netflix has been featured on Slashdot before. I wasn't talking about 4-5 billion people, I was talking about non-American Slashdot readers. I know plenty about non-American businesses that are reported here.

    6. Re:Netflix? (yes. that's a valid question.) by birder · · Score: 1

      We have a few NetFlix clones in Canada

      http://www.moviesforme.ca/
      http://www.dvd-renta l.ca/
      http://www.relayrentals.com/

  38. High Definition by ed1park · · Score: 1

    If they could make hi def versions of movies available for rent, i'd be down in a heartbeat. for download or whatever...

  39. Great for games, wonder about quality. by natelr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great news with the video games. Depending on how it will work, it could kill off gamefly. Why pay to just rent games when you can also get movies, right? I'm wondering what quality the ondemand will be. Some how I dont think it would look the same on my HD 61 inch screen with 5.1. If not, I would rather wait the day it takes them to mail me my movies.

  40. Legal/history question ... by cpu_fusion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If I recall correctly, at some point the music industry was able to successfully push through legislation that put music-rental stores out of business. In other words, there's a legal (not marketing) reason why you can't go and rent a CD for a few bucks like you can rent a DVD/VHS.

    How did the MPAA not managed to shove similar legislation down our throats?

    Has the video industry just not been successful at squashing Netflix via "senators-in-the-pocket", or are they actually embracing these rentals?

    1. Re:Legal/history question ... by huchida · · Score: 1
      ... Because, it's a completely different situation. At least it was when the courts made the decision. Movie rentals are most often viewed only once. (Yeah I know you saw Star Wars 100 times but you know what I mean.) Music is meant to be listened to over and over, so a rented CD would most certainly be duplicated (you could say you were "trying it out", but we know how the RIAA likes that defense.)

      Also note, at the time of the decision, VHS tapes weren't priced for consumers. As anyone who ever lost a Blockbuster rental could tell you, the stores paid $70, even $100 and up for their rental tapes. As opposed to $15 for a new CD.

  41. This isn't new... by sailracer6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can think of three companies that are offering, or have offered, major movies-on-demand. My university (Duke) had a distribution deal, no longer in effect, with a company called Cflix last year.

    There was also a company that was forced out of business by the MPAA so they could push their own services. I forget its name.

    Then there's Movielink, also being heavily promoted on college campuses right now. I believe it was started by one of the major companies.

    Of course, I can remember Yahoo! Movies trying to do VOD four years ago, but they couldn't license anything big.

    So, in conclusion, this is nothing new, except maybe this time the advertising will get to the people who care (geeks). Most people don't want to watch a movie on their computer and can't figure out TV-out video cards.

  42. Netflix + Video Games = Teh Win. by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for this for a long time. Blockbuster is trying to do this with their "Freedom Pass" ($15/mo), but their limited stock, policy of tying you to a single store, and unwillingness to allow you to check out movies or games interchangably has zero appeal to me. I've tried NetFlix before, and I liked it, but I don't rent enough movies per month to make it worthwhile. However, between games and movies, I could definitely justify $20, maybe $30/mo for buffet-style entertainment.

  43. It's about f**king time! by Shafe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are other attempts to provide movies on demand like Movielink or whatever, but I haven't heard great things about their qualities. How amazing would it be to have a pipeline of 3 to 4 movies downloading on your machine when you're at work, or hell, when you're at home preparing to watch one! And all for $20 per month. With high-speed broadband services, this is all possible. And this will all be arriving once I probably end up buying my first HDTV. I'll have a DVR, HDTV cable, and videos on demand through Netflix. I love this world! All we need now is antigravity & ZPE and I'm set!

  44. DVD REVolution by Johnso · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The future is services like DVD REVolution.

    They deliver DVDs and games to your door in under an hour. Order your movies or games online or by phone and they'll be at your door before a pizza would.

    Their trick is they have vans driving around with all of their inventory inside. Talk about bandwidth!

    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    1. Re:DVD REVolution by Alystair · · Score: 4, Funny

      Watch me go from zero to dvd collector in one swift car heist!

    2. Re:DVD REVolution by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The future is services like DVD REVolution.

      Actually, I'd say it's the past.

      I know I can go and pickup a movie quicker than that, and I'm sure a LOT cheaper as well. The reasons Netflix is popular are not applicable to this service. They are not cheaper, they do not have infinite rental times, unlimited number of rentals.

      Besides all that, downloading movies is almost certainly the future. Bandwidth is cheap, and it won't be long before many homes have pipes fast enough to download a 2 hour movie in less than 2 hours (ie. You can start playing it instantly). MPEG4 isn't quite effecient enough with current bandwidth, but H.264 might be just good enough to make instant, realtime, near-DVD-quality playback (over Cable/DSL) feasable. And no more need to worry that the movie you got is damaged!

      And lets not forget that KISS already has a networkable DVD-player that plays MPEG4, so instant gratification for even the tech un-savvy could be just around the corner.

      Then again, I hope Netlix doesn't screw this up. I like them because DVDs are very platform agnostic, so if their download system is Windows-only, I'll be quite unhappy.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  45. Macs by justinkim · · Score: 1

    What are the odds that this service will work on Macs? Not good, I'd say.

  46. Communistcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just see the flood of all the "You have exceeded your limit" letters from Comcast now.

    Good thing I have 6Mb DSL with SBC.

  47. Netflix Are SPAMMERS by Erbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I decided not to do business with Netflix a while back, because they send spam. (That's not my page, but the guy who posted it apparently got the same spam messages I did.) I encourage everybody to avoid doing business with them until they stop abusing our inboxes.

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  48. greencine... by yulek · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...has been doing video on demand for several months now. and they have a much more interesting selection of movies.

    greencine > netflix

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
  49. Seems like an obvious Tivo feature to me. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Add an extra "on demand" shows menu which TiVo keeps updated with the latest and greatest. Start playing the video and it downloads and buffers the film as it plays. I'd have thought the cable companies would be dead keen. Course it'd only be feasable on something like DirecTivo, digital cable or fast ADSL.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Seems like an obvious Tivo feature to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not on a DirecTiVo, because Netflix is unlikely to get DirecTV to agree to using their bandwidth to download movies from a rival service (their bandwidth being limited as it is), and DirecTV has also not allowed TiVo to activate the USB ports or to update to 4.0 software or to add HMO to the DirecTiVo units, so no dice.

      However, standalone TiVos series 2 with 4.0 and HMO would be ideal candidates for a Netflix download service. In fact people on the TiVo community forum have been discussing this idea for quite some time; here's their most recent thread on the subject: http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.ph p?s=&threadid=168949.

  50. multibillion-dollar video game market by arclightfire · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They are also eyeing the multibillion-dollar video game market.

    Sony is also looking to get in the downloading act: "Crucially Reeves [A Sony Big Boss] also mentioned Sony's 'ultimate goal' for PlayStation 3: 'To get into electronic broadband distribution'. By 2006, when Reeves anticipates that all of Sony's currently in-development hardware products should be available, Sony hopes users will have always available online access along with viable broadband distribution....This massive statement has huge potential ramifications for the industry at large and is likely to cause a storm among retailers, with the suggestion that Sony plans eventually to sell its games as downloads, cutting overheads, cutting out the middle men and, ultimately, cutting the cost to the consumer." http://www.plugincinema.com/plugin/news/newslist1. php

  51. gameznflix by kjeldor · · Score: 1

    For a service nearly identical to Netflix...yet also offering video games. Check out gameznflix.com. It is also a tad cheaper than Netflix. And they just signed the Dell Dude as their spokesman too. Competition...

  52. Are you stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More to the point, are the people moderating you stupid? Netflix doesn't rent out the DVDs you buy at Walmart, dumbass; they rent out the $100 rental copies that all video rental places are forced to buy. The bigger problem with renting out video games is that they have to ship out a potentially thick manual as well as the disc.

    1. Re:Are you stupid? by coop0030 · · Score: 1

      They would just print a shortened manual on a single sheet of paper. There is no reason to ship the whole manual. An old rental place called Video Update did that exact same thing for many years.

  53. Re:Netflix Are not SPAMMERS by PalmerEldritch42 · · Score: 1

    I've been using netflix for months and have yet to receive a single spam from them. I do get notes that they send telling me that the movies I ordered are shipped. I also get notes from them telling me that the movies I send back to them are received. Neither of these fall into the spam category, and I am happy to get emails like this so I know things are working properly. There is probably a checkbox on the sign up form that your friend checked that puts them on a mailing list or something. But I have never been spammed by them ever.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.

    :wq!

  54. This is Inevitable by Shafe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While other people have tried similar ideas, no one has really brought it into the spotlight as successful, probably due to download speeds. However, perhaps if Netflix uses an improved transmission system such as the proposed FAST TCP, it will make the downloads a bit easier. Furthermore, we are seeing continuous increases in bandwidth by the broadband ISPs who are conforming to pressures of competition. I'm thinking with a 3 Mbps pipe, downloading several movies per week should be no problem, as long as your ISP doesn't mind.

    But think about it: we're in the digital age of downloading everything. iTunes has shown to be a tremendous success, and it's only a short while before movies are all downloaded as well. Someone will have to nail the movie download market, and Netflix already has an enormous user population. While people rip and burn Netflix DVD's in a pipelined fashion, there would be no need for such efforts if you could, say, begin watching a movie that's still downloading after only, say, 15 minutes of starting the process. Why would people need to pirate DVD's if they could get whatever they want whenever they want? I'm a big fan of this system and will happily use it, assuming I have a very nice high speed connection.

    I'm just hoping they put up archives of Discovery Channel. Movies on Demand -- I love it!

  55. Er... no by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 1

    What you mention is the first step in playing OFFENSIVELY. Apple being a perfect exemple.

    Here, Netflix is playing defensively. They basically prepare for the worst while dissuading competitors. Think about it, VOD needs huge investments, is a risky shot, will not be a big market before 3-5 years, and there's already Netflix. Not exactly what I call a great investment opportunity for a competitor.

    --

    It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
  56. True cost of bandwidth by AllanLembo · · Score: 1

    I think the old adage "never under estimate the bandwidth of a lorry load of backup tapes" applies in this situation.

    Why on earth would anyone want to get their films like this when the cost of burning a DVD and sticking it in the post is orders of magnitude lower than pulling the same data over a domestic internet connection? What's a DVD cost to burn and post? A pound or so? And that gets you, what, 4GB? Well, to send that over a 25 pound per month 512kpbs ADSL line with a 50:1 contention ratio would cost nearly 40 quid!

    We should be looking for more ways to use the throughput of the Post Office, not trying to port thier killer apps to an obviously unsuitable medium.

  57. From RTFA, it seems by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

    From RTFA, it seems that Netflix doesn't feel that this is something that they need to do to get more business or replace their current model. Instead, they seem to be doing this defensively. They can foresee a time when people would prefer to download the movies rather than get the discs mailed to them. They want to be sure to have the technology established as theirs when this happens.

    I would also point out that that time may already be arriving. If I have a choice between going on a "Long Wait" queue or doing a six hour download that can occur when I'm not home or asleep... I think that I would do the download. Yes, a 6 hour wait, but without the mailing time or queued time. The next day I can watch my movie through my TV out (or a separate PVR machine; expect a Tivo version shortly after release, perhaps even before the PC release).

    I think that a lot of people are getting confused between download then watch (which can be done now) and stream while watching (which requires extremely high guaranteed bandwidth). Stream while watching is only barely possible now and uses tremendous resources. Download then watch allows the resources to be spread out over time and can certainly be done now (heck, I once downloaded an episode of Sliders over dial up -- my burstable 1.5 mbps connection should do much better, even with a higher definition picture). Also, given the increasing market share of TV out cards (my video card came with it; even some motherboards come with TV out now) and PVRs, there is no reason to think that people will watch on their computer screens.

  58. With downloads... by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

    With downloads, returns are instant (just turn off the DRM enabling), and sending out just takes the download time. Short of adding a new warehouse that is closer to you, I don't know that they can fix the mailing system (which is mostly USPS). This is in fact one thing that they can do to fix your problem.

    Unrelated to your issue, but won't this make them international as well? Any reason why anyone with a credit card couldn't get the downloads?

  59. Re:Netflix Are Indeed SPAMMERS by Erbo · · Score: 1
    Well, I personally have gotten spam from them (or, if not technically "from" them, at least, it was advertising their services), and I've never been a customer of theirs, or filled out any forms on their site, or had anything to do with them. And, until I see some evidence that they're not spamming, I never will be a customer of theirs, either.

    You're right, the E-mails you've gotten from them aren't spam. Doesn't mean they're blameless, though, as we're clearly talking about two different things.

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  60. then ask next time by eberry · · Score: 1

    I supposed i'd have to know what netflix is before i can't hear of it's rise and fall..

    This comment is derogatory plain and simple. If he really wanted to know what it was he would have googled "Netflix." This person is merely trying to relish in his own ignorance.

    --
    Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Lois, this isn't my Batman glass. - Peter
  61. How about Video Almost on Demand?. by phlack · · Score: 1
    The advantage satellite has, though, is the ability to get to many users simultaneously.

    Several channels can be reserved. Users can make their selections the night (or several days) beforehand. The information gets uploaded. Then, the satellite company tallies up who wanted what. Presumably new releases will be asked for by more than one person.

    The TiVo will know to turn into a specific channel at a specific time to record the requested movie. Users can also pay more for priority delivery. Say I want to watch LOTR but I don't care if I get it tonight, or the next week...so I can give it low priority. The company will send it out when it has spare bandwidth, or when a certain threshhold of users request it (thereby sending it to more than one person).

    Sure there are kinks (bad weather in one area preventing reception, etc) but I think it's doable.

  62. Re:Netflix Are Indeed SPAMMERS by elemental23 · · Score: 1

    Netflix has an affiliate program, so your (and probably everyone else's) spam actually likely came from some lowlife attempting to drive traffic to his affiliate redirect page. This problem seems to plague just about every legit business with an affiliate program.

    --
    I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  63. Re:Netflix Are Indeed SPAMMERS by acceleriter · · Score: 1

    Which is why these business should be boycotted. They know full well that affiliate programs like that promote spam.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  64. greencine.com by toastednut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i'm surprised no one has mentioned that greencine.com has had video-on-demand available to its members since last year, including adult titles.

  65. So BSD _isn't_ dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's just chained up in a dungeon.