Slashdot Mirror


Our Man In Black

bot writes "A recent Slate article covers the onerous responsibilites of the Planetary Protection Officer. He is tasked with preventing contamination of earth by alien organisms, and 'forward contamination' (contamination of other planets with earth germs). There is also a published protocol (PDF link) for avoiding Martian bugs."

179 comments

  1. Ok... by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would be the job to have, if only for the right to list "Planetary Protection Office" on your resume.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Ok... by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      BTW, something that should have been in the original submission: Planetary Protection Office website

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Ok... by cybermace5 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well that made a lot of sense, considering that it is indeed in the original submission. Never mind me....

      --
      ...
    3. Re:Ok... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 2, Funny

      I saw a job advert in the newspaper the other day for a Planetary Protection Officer. You had to be willing to empty trash cans into the back of a big truck, though.

      On a serious note, (and for the insightful mod), does this not sound like one of those dressed up job descriptions that are oh-so popular in today's job market?

      "Would you like fries with that?" - Uniformed Solids and Liquids Nutritional Engineer Officer. Thing.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    4. Re:Ok... by cybermace5 · · Score: 2, Redundant

      I take that back! Mind me! Mind me! I went back a few refreshes in my browser cache, and it definitely wasn't linked before. Stupid timothy, trying to convince me I'm going senile at 25!

      --
      ...
    5. Re:Ok... by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's true: I guess the less glamorous version of the title would be "Spacecraft Maid" or something.

      --
      ...
    6. Re:Ok... by simoniker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I'll take responsibility for that one, sorry about that - it _was_ a relevant link.

    7. Re:Ok... by Lattitude · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe someone nailed you with the "little flashy thingy", and you forgot.

    8. Re:Ok... by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, do I get a cookie then?

      *looks in Firefox's Cookie Manager*

      Oh yes I do!

      --
      ...
    9. Re:Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Plus, the chicks love a man in uniform...uh, unless it's a Star Trek uniform, and you're there for the convention.

    10. Re:Ok... by moviepig.com · · Score: 4, Funny
      That would be the job to have, if only for the right to list "Planetary Protection Office" on your resume.

      Maybe not, since "protectionism" is ill-regarded nowadays. But it is an important step on the career path to "Interplanetary Tariff Collector".

      --
      Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    11. Re:Ok... by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2, Funny
      ..and you're there for the convention.


      Yep, because the ladies sure loves a guy in a Star Trek uniform in any other situation.
      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    12. Re:Ok... by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah, i imagine his job to be less "men in black" and more "maytag man"...

    13. Re:Ok... by algoyo · · Score: 1

      It'd be much cheaper if you employed a cleaner with a bottle of chlorox.

  2. Does he have the... by Uber+Banker · · Score: 0, Funny

    Will of Smith?

    1. Re:Does he have the... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      or the Lee(way) of Jones, Tommy?

      Fuck it, this play on words thing is harder than I thought!

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  3. I vote for . . . by Goobermunch · · Score: 2, Funny

    James T. Kirk.

    --AC

    1. Re:I vote for . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      we come in peace shot to kill shoot to kill
      we come in peace shoot to kill shoot to kill men

    2. Re:I vote for . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way! Kirk will screw any alien chick the first chance he get.

    3. Re:I vote for . . . by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, Planetary Protection Officer. Oh I remember, he was in the movie Dr. Strangelove as General Jack D. Ripper. "...conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids..."

    4. Re:I vote for . . . by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Pfft! He's got nothing on Doctor Who.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    5. Re:I vote for . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that, he's dead Jim!
      Dead Jim!
      Dead Jim!

      It's worse than that, he's dead Jim!
      Dead Jim!
      Dead!

    6. Re:I vote for . . . by Noofus · · Score: 1

      Best....
      Song....
      Ever.... :)

  4. Wildfire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay. Anybody suddenly thinking of the Andromeda Strain now? :)

    1. Re:Wildfire? by Seoulstriker · · Score: 1

      Anybody suddenly thinking of the Andromeda Strain [amazon.com] now? :)

      Me: Should I have?
      You: It's the coolest book in the galaxy! It made the Amazon top 100 list... She's interesting enough for you, old man.

      --
      I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
    2. Re:Wildfire? by Gorobei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The chance of an alien microbe getting a toehold on Earth is pretty much zero. Most every niche is filled by a lifeform that has four billion years worth of ancestors that didn't die before they breed.

      If a Martian microbe shows up, it gets eaten in 30 seconds by some terrestrial super-optimised (for earth) bug. The martian bug's super radiation protection, cold-protection, etc, just means it has misallocated resources for the terrestrial environment.

      Notice that people get infected by bugs that have evolved attacking animals similar to people (e.g. primates, mammals, some birds.) The nasty ones come from animals similar to us. We have little to fear from reptile bug, less from plant bugs, and nothing to fear from things that attack fungi. Martian bugs would be like tourists from Iowa trying to infect New York City.

    3. Re:Wildfire? by jandersen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apart from the fact that the worst flu comes from birds (which are more closely related to dinosaurs than mammals), that is.

      Your argument, while well formulated, is wrong - an organism isn't fundamentatlly better protected against microbes that are specific to their own species. The immune system is best at protecting against attacks from enemies it already knows from previous experience, it's as simple as that. That is why emerging diseases are so devastating.

      It is true that eg. a virus is best at attacking certain hosts, but as we have seen many times in the past, they can evolve and jump to another species, and we know of no reson why a virus shouldn't be able to jump between widely seperated species. We simply don't know.

      As for whether a Martian microbe would be able to get a foothold on Earth: there are places on Earth that might be favourable to it - a dry, cold valley on Antartica, for instance. Again, we simply have no knowledge about it. And while some - like the Bush administration - seem to be in favour of just rushing in and get stung, I personally think it is better to at least try to think a little ahead and avoid some of the most obvious risks.

    4. Re:Wildfire? by not_a_product_id · · Score: 0
      "The chance of an alien microbe getting a toehold on Earth is pretty much zero"

      The key issue here is that it is NOT ACTUALLY ZERO. Even though the probability is that an alien microbe will be at a disadvantage on earth, there is still the possibilty that it will have a big disadvantage. More than worth the extra trouble in my book

      --

      ---
      We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

    5. Re:Wildfire? by hey! · · Score: 5, Informative

      OK, IANAE but here goes.

      The chance of an alien microbe getting a toehold on Earth is pretty much zero. Most every niche is filled by a lifeform that has four billion years worth of ancestors that didn't die before they breed.

      Too optimistic, not based on actual experience.

      Examples: fragmities, cane toad, zebra mussel, weird and untreatable hospital infections. West Nile Virus.

      Actually, being highly tuned to a particular ecological niche doesn't protect an organism from anything but incremental changes in local fauna or flora. In point of fact, alien organisms (in the sense of from different ecological systems), if they can survive often end up growing explosively.

      Why? pertty much everything in a mature ecology is food for something else. Animals on the top of the food chain are food for microbes. Usually microbes aren't a limiting factor in an undisturbed ecosystem because these animals also usually have evolved a conservative reproductive strategy: modest litters at infrequent places. WHich is what makes top level predators easy to endanger.

      However, if you take an critter from the middle of the deck, or worse yet the bottom, their strategy tends to be predation limited or resource (therefore competition limited) or both, not reproductively limited. They are also limited by specific competitive defenses evolved by cohabitors of their particular niche. Which is why you don't see only one kind of critter or one kind of plant occupying a niche exclusively (which by your logic should be the norm), but usually there are many varieties predators, grazers, trees whatever, although one may be predominant. For example in the woods near my house there is both hickory and sumac, although they have overlapping niches.

      The problem with an alien organism is that if it is naturally resource limited rather than reproductively limited, and has resoruces to exploit in its new home, there will be no factor checking its growth until it consumes all of the available resources.

      I happen to work in the public health field, although I am not an epidemiolgist. We often remark that the unprecedently huge population of the human race is a microbe's bangquet. Space microbes do not concern me unduly, and the steps being taken by NASA seem prudent and sufficient. However we DO face potential threat from "alien" microbes that are released by ecological disruption. There are cases of permanent benign infections in remote populations that form a kind of symbiotic biological defense against incursion. Hanta virus definitely fits this pattern, it is possible the Ebola may as well.

      The destruction particularly of tropical habitat, with its greater biodiversity and fiercer competition, is a public health concern. These places in past were avoided by humans because they were "pestilential". People who explored these regions often came down with infections, usually malaria but very often some unnamed agent. In addition to the loss of biolgical resource, the things that are released by these incursions, combined with rapid global travel, should be a serious concern. Ebola is, in a sense, too aggressive to be a global danger, but a bug like the 1918 influenza in its characteristics would be very dangerous indeed. Expect over the next decade a number of new stories about novel tropical infections, hopefully none spreading too far beyond their origin.

      So, in short, from an ecological perspective your optimism is not warranted. Yes, the most likely situation is that a new bug will die out. However, if it doesn't die out it will very likely be a major problem, although not necessarily to human health.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Wildfire? by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

      "We have little to fear from reptile bug, less from plant bugs, and nothing to fear from things that attack fungi.".

      this is not entirely right. the original host of ebola is not known yet, and there are theories that it is actualy a plant virus.

      the next thing is, that a lifeform from mars cannot be infectious or pathogenic, simply because there is nothing (known) living on mars, that can be infected. so when some microorganism inhabits mars, it has to be autotrophic (like a plant or cyanophyta), not heterotrophic (like an animal or pathogenic bacteria).

      --
      Ni.
    7. Re:Wildfire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      tourists from Iowa trying to infect New York City.
      Then we're all doomed! (Have you tried walking around NYC lately? Goddamn tourists.)
  5. Men In Black by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't the Men In Black remove their fingerprints? But what if this guy makes a bomb that will kill us all?

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  6. Simple by tdemark · · Score: 2, Funny

    He is tasked with preventing contamination of earth by alien organisms

    Couldn't he just watch this movie?

    - Tony

    1. Re:Simple by ShallowThroat · · Score: 2, Funny

      well i guess, but if he really wants to be same he had better watch this one too.

      --
      The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
    2. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is tasked with preventing contamination of earth by alien organisms

      Well, I for one welcome our new alien microbe overlords!

    3. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is tasked with

      every noun must be verbed.

  7. . . .and he chants the mantra . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "sterilize, sterilize. . ."

    Wow, this could be an old Star Trek Movie. . .

  8. But... by TexasDex · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it's too late! The ailiens are already here! See?! They left this mark on me! I must do their bidding...

    --
    The Cheese Stands Alone.
    1. Re:But... by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1

      Now that I've seen this modded up informative, I'm really starting to wonder just what kind of a community this is...

    2. Re:But... by TexasDex · · Score: 1
      What are you talking about? It is informative!

      </mindcontrol entity="ailiens">
      <sanity>

      You should already know what kind of community this is... and it should be no surprise.

      All informative means in this case is that somebody with mod points has a sense of humor.

      --
      The Cheese Stands Alone.
    3. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All hail the Hypno-Toad!

    4. Re:But... by AaronStJ · · Score: 3, Funny

      "...it's too late! The ailiens are already here! See?! They left this mark on me! I must do their bidding...
      </sanity>"

      Looks to me like you actually closed your sanity tag well before the start of you post...

      --
      Stupid like a fox!
  9. You'd think I'd learn... by ibullard · · Score: 5, Funny

    First I find out that being a spy isn't all about gadgets and women. Then I find out being an archaeologist isn't all about running from traps and nazis'. Now I find out that protecting the earth from alien life forms doesn't involve talking to alien dogs and bug guns.

    WHY DO YOU LIE TO ME, HOLLYWOOD!!!
    *sob*

    1. Re:You'd think I'd learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only allowed to gripe if you *paid* to see the movies.

    2. Re:You'd think I'd learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Actually, being a spy IS all about gadgets and women. And archaeologists certainly have a lot of hazards when working in ancient structures, and they sometimes do land in trouble with authorities in different regions, depending on who's controlling it and who you are.

      I'm with you on the alien thing though, I was looking forward to having a good conversation with a bug gun.

    3. Re:You'd think I'd learn... by trentblase · · Score: 4, Funny

      And apparently being a computer programmer does not entail hacking into the Pentagon ever couple days... right? ... guys? .... is this thing on?

    4. Re:You'd think I'd learn... by ibullard · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell, I'd settle for a blowjob because I'm a programmer.

    5. Re:You'd think I'd learn... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Are you making fun of the potential typo?

      I'll have you know that Starship Troopers had an ample supply of organic alien firearms. Organic planetary defense systems, even. Bug Guns. Big Bug Guns.

    6. Re:You'd think I'd learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Bug Butt Guns, neh?

  10. I want this job by unformed · · Score: 5, Funny

    What better way to pick up chicks than "It is my civil duty to protect you from alien lifeforms."

    1. Re:I want this job by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, and the neuralizer doesn't hurt, either, cuz, you know, "damn." :)

    2. Re:I want this job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      What better way to pick up chicks than "It is my civil duty to protect you from alien lifeforms."

      Anyone that thinks that line could help them... can't be helped.

    3. Re:I want this job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Alright, let's practice.

      You: It is my civil duty to protect you from alien lifeforms.

      Girl: Umm... okay...

      You:

    4. Re:I want this job by Zeebs · · Score: 2, Funny

      What better way to pick up chicks than "It is my civil duty to protect you from alien lifeforms."

      Just about anyway I'm guessing.

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    5. Re:I want this job by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 3, Funny
      To which the expected reply would be "Ohh! Ironic!"

      ;^)

    6. Re:I want this job by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      How about I work for NASA and make X number of $$ per year and can buy you stuff if you pleasure me. Then give her a few hundred bucks to "buy you a drink".

  11. Does NASA have too much money? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since 1998, the space agency's planetary protection officer, or PPO, has been John D. Rummel, an astrobiologist and a commander in the U.S. Naval Reserve. This is actually his second tour of duty at NASA

    So, he's protecting which planet from the threat of contamination from whom exactly? Ok, I'm sure NASA would be wise to think of the consequences of landing man-made things on Mars, but as long as real flesh-and-blood humans don't set foot on the planet, isn't bathing probes in radiation enough to render their outer shells and innards sterile?

    I mean, it's like if I hired a lawyer for when I plan to be very rich, but I'm not yet and yet I pay the lawyer right now. How bizarre, I say having a full time "planetary protection officer" is a feel-good-look-good measure that's just a waste of taxpayer's dollars in reality.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Does NASA have too much money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think you quite get the jist of his job. Say a probe lands on Mars and brings back some rock samples to Earth. Unfortunately, the probe stepped in something nasty, and brought back Mars Anthrax as well.
      In addition, some benign fungus got attached to the probe just before we packed it up and sent it to mars. Unfortunately, the fungus is not so benign to the Martian plant life and wiped out entire ecosystems there.

    2. Re:Does NASA have too much money? by the+arbiter · · Score: 5, Informative

      1. No, bathing probes in radiation is not enough to sterilize them, unfortunately. 2. NASA's planning on sending back samples from space and from the surface of Mars. Better have a protocol and procedure by then! Pay some now, pay much more later.

      --
      Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
    3. Re:Does NASA have too much money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say a probe lands on Mars and brings back some rock samples to Earth.

      But that's the point: why pay someone to protect our planet when no probe have been sent to Mars that can bring stuff back yet? time enough to hire him when we do, don't you think?

      As for sterilizing probes so we don't contaminate anything on Mars, NASA can do what without somebody to tell them how to do it.

    4. Re:Does NASA have too much money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Carl Sagan (as well as a few other prominent astronomers in the 60s) was one of the initial supporters of this - especially when they started sending missions to the moon. His big fear was that we would destroy any other-worldly life forms before we had a chance to detect them (forward contamination). As quoted in his biography, in the 60s they would basically just burn all the germs off probes going up by heating all the components, problem was this made missions more expensive and difficult, especially sterilizing things like cameras and such.

      Initially there was a plan to keep all astronauts quarantined for a time period after their return to earth (backward contamination), but that went out the window in part for PR reasons. When those 'superman' astronauts came popping out of their capsule for the TV cameras, they didn't want to show them being hustled off in decontamination chambers. So much for safety first!

    5. Re:Does NASA have too much money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you have got to admit, he's doing a great job.

    6. Re:Does NASA have too much money? by Flexagon · · Score: 1

      Seriously, how realistic are these goals, and how realistic are they (NASA) being in pursuing them?

      Let's start with the lunar landings in the late 60's. As I recall, there was concern about bringing back some lunar germ (however unlikely), so they quarantined the crew -- after they exited from the craft, walked in the open (with lunar-exposed gear), and only then entered the quarantine trailer.

      Next, how sterile is the stuff we've been sending various places? In various documentaries and reports, there are people in bunny suits capable of keeping dust to a minimum, but hardly capable of preventing a wide range of organisms or even interesting large molecules. Have they been doing / are they doing significantly more than this?

      Next, recent articles posted here and elsewhere have raised the probability by quite a bit that nature (via asteroid impacts) is already mixing up the material between us and Mars, including possibly the same interesting organisms and molecules. So the "contamination" may have already occurred naturally.

      Next, there are already interesting isolated pockets here that have evolved independently for a very long time, with various amounts of isolation. Ebola, say, on one end and stuff buried deep in Antarctica or near undersea vents on the other end. How closely are the PPO's efforts associated with any efforts associated with these?

    7. Re:Does NASA have too much money? by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 3, Informative

      a friend of mine once worked at a place that does sterilization for hospitals. catheters, needles, that sort of thing.

      their treatments were extreme: ethylene oxide (nasty compound), cobalt 60 radiation, ultraviolet, antiobiotic sprays, you name it. they would place swabs of bacterial samples through out the items to see if indeed they were getting sterilized.

      the fact is, they were never able to kill everything; this is a well known fact within that little niche industry. there are simply bacteria that cannot be killed, end of story.

      so no, it is not simply a matter of "bathing probes in radiation" since it all depends upon how you define "sterility".

    8. Re:Does NASA have too much money? by Jodka · · Score: 1

      Mars: 1
      Earth: 1

      Looks to me like tie.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    9. Re:Does NASA have too much money? by Scott+Carnahan · · Score: 1

      the fact is, they were never able to kill everything; this is a well known fact within that little niche industry. there are simply bacteria that cannot be killed, end of story.

      An extended bake at sufficiently high temperatures will destroy all life, and in fact all high-molecular-weight compounds. The problem arises when the equipment you are sterilizing is made of insufficiently thermally robust materials (e.g. sensors on a mars probe).

      --
      "Your notation sucks!" -- Serge Lang (1927-2005)
  12. So... by rasafras · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...what's his letter?

    Perhaps.... N?

  13. Removing fingerprints doesn't work by pklong · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Criminals have already tried removing their fingerprints already.

    The resulting lack of fingerprints and scaring is actually more distinctive than the criminals original fingerprints.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

    1. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, some people really hate to wear gloves...

      Hmm. Wear some thin gloves while commiting the crime, or burn off my fingertips with acid... Hard choice. :)

    2. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two by two, hands blue ...

    3. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Informative
      Criminals have already tried removing their fingerprints already. The resulting lack of fingerprints and scaring is actually more distinctive than the criminals original fingerprints.

      What's more, the unique pattern of lines that make up your fingerprints actually cover much of hands. A good palm print left at the scene of a crime will get you convicted just as easily...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by daxomatic · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "Fingerprints",... what about 'the white gloves'????

    5. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's more, the unique pattern of lines that make up your fingerprints actually cover much of hands. A good palm print left at the scene of a crime will get you convicted just as easily...
      What would Cthulhu do?


      Eat his hands?

    6. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      What would Cthulhu do?

      Eat his hands?

      Nah, he'd just drive mad and devour alive anyone looking at his hands

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    7. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you can match a palm print found at the scene of a crime or on evidence to that of a suspect, BUT you don't have palm prints in a database to compare your findings to. Likewise, scars may be more distinctive, but if you don't have record of them it doesn't do you much good, unless you already found the guy.

    8. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Hands of blue, surely?

      Damn, that was a good show...

    9. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      I do believe you are correct; on both counts, even. :)

    10. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Criminals have also been identified from their Ear Prints and from Lip Prints.

    11. Re:Removing fingerprints doesn't work by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I kept eating the replacement fingerprints that the lab made from melted down gummi bears, and the acid was on special offer...

  14. Avoiding??? by El_Smack · · Score: 5, Funny

    "protocol for avoiding Martian bugs"?!?

    Didn't NASA just spend a couple hundred million bucks trying to *FIND* Martian Bugs? Crap, when a few ice crystals were found, JPL wet itself. Had we found an actual bug, who knows what kind of party would have been thrown?

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    1. Re:Avoiding??? by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      So far, no one has noticed the big paper ring around Mars that says "Sanitized for Your Protection".

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Avoiding??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Didn't NASA just spend a couple hundred million bucks trying to *FIND* Martian Bugs? Crap, when a few ice crystals were found, JPL wet itself. Had we found an actual bug, who knows what kind of party would have been thrown?
      Oh man... They'd throw a party in your mouth and everyone would be coming!
    3. Re:Avoiding??? by nizo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There is also a published protocol (PDF link) for avoiding Martian bugs.

      Sadly, at the rate we are preparing to actually send people to Mars and bringing them back, I am betting this won't be a problem for the current holder of the officer, or his next eight successors.

    4. Re:Avoiding??? by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 1

      What do you think they'll do if they run out of toilet paper when they get there?

  15. Big problem... by Bigman · · Score: 4, Funny
    That meant not only protecting the Earth from extraterrestrial microbes that could cause disease, but also protecting other planets and cosmic objects from organisms native to our world.
    Well that's going to put a crimp in my plans for terraforming Mars & Venus.. Anyone want to buy some cheap land??
    --
    *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
  16. at first glance by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought it said something to the effect of "he is tasked with spreading Earth germs to other worlds". Talk about spreading your seed!

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
  17. Forget the Mars mission by xs650 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Rummel has two primary tasks: to ensure that outbound spacecraft aren't contaminated with biological material from Earth "

    Humans are biological material. So much for the manned mission to Mars.

    1. Re:Forget the Mars mission by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Rummel has two primary tasks: to ensure that outbound spacecraft aren't contaminated with biological material from Earth ....... Humans are biological material. So much for the manned mission to Mars

      Not to mention all the crap that falls off everybody in our day to day existence.

      And don't troll me with "speak for yourself", all humans shed skin cells and hair without knowing it. Not to mention what happens when you sneeze or cough. Or flu season etc. etc.

      Doubt me still? Try cleaning your keyboard sometime or turn it upside down and shake it. It can truly be a revolting experience.

      Even though we have been taking precautions about sending germs to mars, other coutries have not. Russia probably didn't give a care about their spacecraft they sent to Mars.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Forget the Mars mission by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      He'll make sure to heavily radiate manned missions, and then he'll hand the PR off to NASA TV for all the studio shots of Mars when they "arrive".

  18. Ants in the Apollo 11 Crew Quarantine Module by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this person has an impossible job.

    Years later, astronaut Buzz Aldrin said in a television interview that the mobile quarantine trailer in which the Apollo 11 crew was isolated had one serious flaw: Ants appeared to be going into and out of the trailer (37). If there were any Moon bugs, they would have gotten out with the ants. -- from The dilemma of Mars sample return

    Add to that all the meteorites that fail to stop at the agricultural station on their way in, and I'd think the Earth is already pretty contaminated.

    I'm not saying that he should not try to reduce cross-contamination, only that its not an easy job.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Ants in the Apollo 11 Crew Quarantine Module by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who knows, maybe life on Earth is the contamination from another planet.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Ants in the Apollo 11 Crew Quarantine Module by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 1

      Don't meteorites get hot enough as they enter the atmosphere to destroy any life-form of a similar nature to those on earth?

    3. Re:Ants in the Apollo 11 Crew Quarantine Module by eth00 · · Score: 1

      Read the parents website, apparently the heat alone is not enough to sterilize it. Apparently even though 1/4 of Vikings budget was spend on sterilization they still think that some viable spores survived the entire trip to mars. It really makes you think after reading that article how very possible it is to really be safe from extraterestial material.

    4. Re:Ants in the Apollo 11 Crew Quarantine Module by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Who knows, maybe life on Earth is the contamination from another planet.

      Which is another argument for being very careful about forward contamination. "There Exists Life On Mars" is a Very Big Hypothesis.

      As much as I'd like to see human exploration of mars, if I go to Mars, and I find bacteria there, I'm going to have a hard time proving they're Marsbugs, not Humanbugs.

      If I radiation-bake a robot, and send it to Mars, and it finds bacteria that aren't rad-hardened, the case for life on Mars is much stronger.

      If you've established life on Mars (tough), you have another question: Did life originate independently on Mars and Earth, or were lifeforms transferred by means of meteorites blasted off the surface of one planet and landing on the other?

      If the Marsbugs aren't based on DNA, or use a wildly-different set of amino acids, odds are good that life originated independently. If the Marsbugs are based on the same chemical processes as those on Earth, the fact that Mars has a shallower gravity well than Earth would suggest that it's more likely that life originated on Mars and was transported to Earth.

      If you want to prove that hypothesis, forward contamination is even more important to prevent, because that's a Really Fucking Gargantuan Hypothesis, and the simpler hypothesis may well be "yeah, life exists on mars -- because we put it there. Some bugs hitched a ride from Earth on a probe we didn't sterilize, and it survived when the Martian Air Defense Force shot it down in the early 21st century."

    5. Re:Ants in the Apollo 11 Crew Quarantine Module by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      It would be a damned shame if one of the Big Questions was never answered because someone got sloppy just once.

      And not just for now, for all time. If some other race ever evolved on Earth, "We thought that life of Earth and Mars had a common origin, but it turned out that 35 million years ago some monkey-boys got careless, so we'll never know. That wasn't the only thing they got careless about, good-riddance!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  19. Our "Man in Black"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So is he Raven Alder's boyfriend or what?

    +++

    Raven: Pick up Cheetos on the way home!

    MiB: Yes dear...

    Raven: And don't forget the Mountain Dew!

    MiB: No dear...

    Raven: Last time you forgot the Mountain Dew!

    MiB: Yes dear. Sorry dear...

    Raven: And I need new boot laces!

    MiB: Yes dear...

    Raven: LONG bootlaces, you retard! The last pair you got were only 12 feet long! I need LONG laces! Jesus!

    MiB: Yes dear...

    Raven: Oh, and pickup a copy of 'Firewalls for Dummies'! But make sure they put it in a brown paper bag this time! When you bought me 'Linux for Dummies' you carried it around in the open! I had to tell people it was for my mom!

    MiB: Yes dear...

    1. Re:Our "Man in Black"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raven. How blaqve.

  20. Trip to mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So what now? When I get back from my trip to Mars am I going to be met with a trafic jam and need to get my shipped checked for aliens hidding in the engine, and stashes of martian drugs?

    1. Re:Trip to mars by Lanzah · · Score: 0

      Do what I do, choose the "nothing to declare" lane.

  21. Forward Contamination by LooseChanj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it'll be a bit hard to prevent when sending people. And no doubt there will be some jerks protesting a Mars landing on the infintesmal chance that there *might* be some particles of pre-animate matter laying around just waiting to get wiped out by human diseases.

    --
    Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
    1. Re:Forward Contamination by enosys · · Score: 2, Informative

      The people will be in spacesuits. That makes it easier. I guess the main problem would be stuff coming out of the spaceship or base as people exit from it. Perhaps disinfection of the outside of the space suit, tools and on the way back samples can be done in the airlock. I certainly don't think it's unsolvable.

    2. Re:Forward Contamination by LooseChanj · · Score: 1

      The people are going to be *outside* those suits, and in a position to contaminate them at some point. I suppose you could "sterilize" an entire airlock with suits inside, but that would probably only be good for one EVA.

      --
      Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
  22. Pod People by eclectro · · Score: 1

    No, but Invasion of the Body Snatchers comes to mind.

    It's interesting from the perspective that when the fungus comes to earth it is already too late to do anything about it.

    I haven't seen the latest version though.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Pod People by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I've seen the latest version. The aliens always have a distracted look that gives them away.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  23. The Reason For Lies by notcreative · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think Mr. Nimoy said it best:
    The following tale of alien encounters is true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies, but they're entertaining lies, and in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer...is 'no.' - Leonard Nimoy
    1. Re:The Reason For Lies by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Uh, Mr. Nimoy, we have ten minutes left.

      Oh. Uh, fine. Let me, uh, just get something out of my car. ... ...

      I don't think he's coming back.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:The Reason For Lies by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Keep watching the skiis!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  24. Solution for this problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We should outlaw fingerprints! This way, only outlaws will have fingerprints!

    1. Re:Solution for this problem by psoriac · · Score: 1

      Well, if that were the case, it would sure make identifying the culprit a lot easier.

      --
      I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  25. Well, yes, it was mentioned in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And one of my favorite movies when I was a kid. Good book that I read later. Has that great line in it for getting into the underground base, which I can't remember correctly at the moment.

    Other pages to checkout:

    http://sqn.com/andromst.html

    1. Re:Well, yes, it was mentioned in the article by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "Has that great line in it for getting into the underground base, which I can't remember correctly at the moment."

      IIRC

      "Can I help you folks?"

      "Just passing through. On the way to Rome"

      "Do you have the time"

      "My watch stopped at noon."

      "Durn shame"

      "Musta been the heat"

  26. What kind of a position is this, exactly? by LithiumX · · Score: 3, Funny

    So is this guy considered a respectable functionary at Nasa who provides insurance over an uncertain but scientifically-possible threat? ... Or is he the guy who got stuck with the weird job? The sort of post they give someone who got caught stinking of the restroom one time too many?

    --
    Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
  27. Re:some people by obey13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The need to prevent forward contaimination is a legitament concern. What happens in the future when we do find some kind of organism on mars, and it simply came from earth?

    Plus, we simply do not know enough about the planet from our limited excursions to discount anything.

    --
    Oh my, I think Dave just turned into a bear.
  28. Re:some people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Also makes me wonder if the rest of the world is in on this. Shouldn't we elect this guy ??

    Well, if you read the article carefully you'll learn that the UN's COSPAR Panel on Planetary Protection is actually responsible for setting the policies -- so, the rest of the world is "in on this". This guy does happen to chair that panel; however, in his capacity as NASA's Planetary Protection Officer, his only role is to implement guidelines established under the auspices of the UN.

  29. Mars Terraforming Debate by Voivod · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw him not too long ago since he participated in the Mars Terraforming Debate in Mountain View CA covered on Slashdot. It's great to see that NASA not only has someone on the job, but they are participating in public conversations about these questions. Very smart, funny guy. This must be one of the coolest job titles on the planet.

  30. First Draft of the Prime Directive? by David+Hume · · Score: 4, Informative

    The NASA Requirements for Protecting Life on Other Bodies could be the First Draft of the Prime Directive:

    As suggested by NASA's Michael Meyer, there is an ethical component to decisions we make as we move outward from our planet to explore other worlds. As such, NASA's Planetary Protection Advisory Committee has a bioethicist on it. The first cases of interaction between life from two worlds could happen as we explore Mars, or perhaps Europa. This will likely be limited to simple lifeforms. At some point we'll have to deal with more complex issues.


    As indicated, dealing with simple life forms does not present many of the issues addressed in the Prime Directive:

    As the right of each sentient species to live in accordance with its normal cultural evolution is considered sacred, no Star Fleet personnel may interfere with the healthy development of alien life and culture. Such interference includes the introduction of superior knowledge, strength, or technology to a world whose society is incapable of handling such advantages wisely. Star Fleet personnel may not violate this Prime Directive, even to save their lives and/or their ship unless they are acting to right an earlier violation or an accidental contamination of said culture. This directive takes precedence over any and all other considerations, and carries with it the highest moral obligation.


    1. Re:First Draft of the Prime Directive? by Jodka · · Score: 1

      "no Star Fleet personnel may interfere with the healthy development of alien life and culture."

      The Prime Directive is an ethical cop out. It cherry picks the issue of interference, making the easy decision of whether to intervene when intervention is unneccessary, in the case of "healthy development". It avoids the moral dilema of how to act in the case of unhealthy development. It does not address the truly difficult eithical questions: How are we to distinquish healthy from unhealthy development ? By what right do we judge what is healthy for an alien species and what is not ? Should we intervene when our own standards indicate that development is unhealthy ?

      I once believed that the Prime Directive was an atrocious work of design by the architects of the Star Trek Universe. A more forgiving interpretation would be that it consititutes deliberate and cyncial comentary on the perpetual unwillingess of politicians to address the hard issues. Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    2. Re:First Draft of the Prime Directive? by a24061 · · Score: 1
      The Prime Directive is an ethical cop out.

      Kirk certainly agreed with that! He violated it several times and each time it all worked out in the end.

  31. I wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he'll make racist comments like Will "gettin jiggy widdit" Smith and sing that "wiki wiki wah wah" tune ...

    Personally I welcome our new martian ... oh whatever.

  32. Worst jobs in science by farnerup · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is #17 in The worst jobs in science list.

  33. I'll bet the poor guy is underappreciated by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Funny

    Greenpeace sinks ships and stages disruptive protests, but I'll bet they've never so much as sent a nice thank you card to their Planetary Protection Officer.

    1. Re:I'll bet the poor guy is underappreciated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont lpretend greenpeace is a bunch of vandals looking to destroy everything.

      they protest. and those are disruptive (thats the fricking point of a protest, get attention and disrupt activities)

      im sure there are some extremists in greenpeace, but dont blame that organization.
      they add balance.

  34. How is this a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh, wait...

  35. Disaster by Luguber123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine what he's got to do to get fired from such a position.

    1. Re:Disaster by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Imagine what he's got to do to get fired from such a position.

      Something along the lines of "missed a step during Martian rock decontamination; 5 billion people dead" will probably get him a verbal warning at least.

    2. Re:Disaster by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

      He won't get fired, his job will likely just get "outsourced".

      To where, I'm not sure, but I'm guessing there's SOMEONE out there willing to work for four or five human brains a day.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  36. Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you look arabic

    1. Re:Depends by Lanzah · · Score: 0

      or marsian

  37. RTFA by boarder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, as impossible as the job might be, this position wasn't around during the Apollo days. The article clearly states that NASA didn't consider Lunar bugs to be much of an issue, since it is a very hostile place for life. It wasn't until the Viking landers leaving for Mars that this position was developed.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  38. Heh. by Trejkaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    The resulting lack of fingerprints and scaring is actually more distinctive than the criminals original fingerprints.

    I'm not an expert, but I'd say when the criminal runs up to the cops and shouts "BOO!", that it pretty much gives the game away.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it with you fucktards jumping on every little spelling error? Go have sex with yourself, asshole.

    2. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly, because it was funny.

      Get a sense of humour, bud.

    3. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointing out a spelling error and using it out of context isn't funny.

      OMG you spelled "humor" like "humour" you must be the icecream man like "good humour" lolz!!!111

      Shit like this is retarded. PS. go have sex with yourself, asshole.

    4. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. But the absurdity of criminals running up to the cops and yelling 'BOO!' was the funny part.

      The fact that the joke found it's origin in a spelling mistake wasn't the point

      And maybe I am the Good Humour Man. You'll never know.

  39. I, for one by Progman3K · · Score: 1

    welcome our ant overlords

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  40. NY Times article from Sunday by Tiro · · Score: 0
    There was a guest opinion article that explained why we shouldn't go to Mars because we could bring back life that fucks up our ecosystem.

    I think its was sad ignorance; articles like this one show that people who think NASA is that stupid are morons themselves.

  41. Re: who lies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They are not martian bugs.
    They are not extraterrestrial bugs.

    They are transgenetic bugs from USofA's laboratories.

    open4free

  42. oh i know! by aqui10 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So i guess thats bye bye dennis rodman!

  43. Re: it's for good joke, wonderful!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will make this false eXperiment and somebody could follow the NASA's protocol.

    Mommy!! Mommy!! i've found a RAT bug!!! call to NASA!!!

  44. Re:Forward Contamination = family entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    I think it'll be a bit hard to prevent when sending people. And no doubt there will be some jerks protesting a Mars landing on the infintesmal chance that there *might* be some particles of pre-animate matter laying around just waiting to get wiped out by human diseases.
    Yes, but the surviving particles of pre-animate matter can take solace in knowing that gambling casino concessions are coming their way. (After a hundred years or so of being forced to live on pre-animate matter reservations, of course.)
  45. so when this happens... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... and everyone is keeling over from martianthrax, we can sue the guy?

    that's cool, I guess... ya,that should work....

  46. hmmm...germ duty by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    Ritual hazing in the MIB agency or the alternative to desk duty when on suspension if u'r an MIB agent?

  47. This is outrageous by aled · · Score: 3, Funny

    I do program my own bugs, thank you very much. I don't think we need some outshored martians to do it.

    --

    "I think this line is mostly filler"
  48. Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Imagine what he's got to do to get fired from such a position.

    He'd have to... wiz on the electric fence?

  49. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought we were going to take mars over.

  50. USA, don't forget to stop the CO2 contamination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First, more important is the Kyoto protocol about Earth contamination.
    The second more important is the NASA's protocol approved *only* for USA.

    Third, it's the another UnitedNations's protocol approved for the world.

    open4free

  51. Long Acronymn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The article mentions the "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Bodies". So does our space officer have to write "ToPGtAoSitEaUoOSItMaOB" on memos he writes in reference to it? And how would one pronounce such an acronymn?

    1. Re:Long Acronymn by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I dunno, but gimme some beans, and I bet I could pronounce it with my ass. :-)

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
  52. Hmmm.. by Teclis · · Score: 1

    "an astrobiologist and a commander in the U.S. Naval Reserve"

    Umm, do you see the relationship? What kind of education do you need to be a commander in the U.S. Naval Reserve? For that matter, what is the education to be an astrobiologist? If you ask me, This guy found a good way to make a few extra bucks from NASA. Wouldn't be surprised if he has a buddy somewhere in NASA who somehow got him this job.

    I am not impressed.

    --
    Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what's right. --Isaac Asimov
    1. Re:Hmmm.. by affreca101 · · Score: 1

      Well, for the CDR in the USNR part, he probably has a bachelors (requirement for regular commision in US military) and been through OCS or OIS. As for being astrobiologist, I don't know of any certifying authority, as it is a rather small community. I'm guessing he probably has a PhD as he was in the astronaut program. Which I think is the relationship between his other two careers and the buddy to get him this job with NASA. It is an issue that I think NASA wants to deal with before they get slapped for it, and it sounds like he has a wide range of applicable expierence (as much as anyone does).

    2. Re:Hmmm.. by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      Most of the 0-5's I've known at least had a Master's... that's mostly active duty, not reserves, but I'd make the assumption he's in the scientific cadre and not in the regular command structure...

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    3. Re:Hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John has a PhD. He is a well-respected biological oceanographer who has a position at the Marine Biological Laboratory. Before serving as the Planetary Protection Officer (no, he didn't get issued a spandex suit with the title although he should have!), he managed the Exobiology Program. That's a research grants program that funds the study of the origin, evolution and distribution of life on earth and the potential for life elsewhere. I manage that program currently.

    4. Re:Hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John was an active duty Naval Flight Officer for a long time before even coming to NASA...probably gave some sneaky Russian subs a run for their money back in the day too. Smart, funny guy, gold wings, ecology doctorate, etc. too bad Slashdot Science likes to rag on people before actually sizing them up.

    5. Re:Hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think he was in the active duty Navy before this job at some point, since I heard aviation was involved...remember that "reserve" may mean you transfer from active duty to work another job, just like someone might go from flying planes in the military to working in R&D. I know someone who went into the Reserve from the active duty Army to get a doctorate after driving tanks for a living.

  53. Great job title, but bad for traffic stops... by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would feel bad for this guy whenever he gets stopped by a cop......

    Cop: Are you are aware you were doing 45 in a 40 - zone?

    The NASA guy: ummm. no, but if you say so...

    Cop: Where were you going ?

    The NASA guy: home - I'm going home from work

    Cop: So, where do you work?

    The NASA guy: I'm the planetary protection officer - it's my job to protect the earth from interplanetary biologicals and contamination

    Cop: OK buddy, we're going downtown....

  54. OT: wrt to your sig by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.

    you are over-generalizing. Three lefts make a right only if they are right angle lefts (or if the sum of the angles of the three lefts equals the sum of three right angles).

    Heh, heh. Karma burning time.

    1. Re:OT: wrt to your sig by G4from128k · · Score: 1

      you are over-generalizing. Three lefts make a right only if they are right angle lefts (or if the sum of the angles of the three lefts equals the sum of three right angles).

      Too true. But then so are you. If a left can be any leftward turn, then a right can be any rightward turn. Drivers in Boston and Britain will probably agree with me that there are no right angles (so will Einstein and other non-Euclideans). Lets assume that the definition of right and left is an appropriate 90 degree angle +/- 45 degrees. With such a wide range of possible turning angles as few as two lefts and as many as 5 lefts are required to make a right. And with curved space, the required number of lefts may be undefined.

      Of course the true Bostonian will correct me and say that no amount of lefts make a right, because you just can't get there from here. British drivers will point to roundabouts as evidence of 2 lefts making a right. And if Britain has any cloverleaf interchanges, then one left can make a right.

      Heh, heh. Karma burning time.

      What's the point of Karma if you can't have a little pyromaniacal fun with it occasionally.

      You have come to the end of the post. There you find an over-generalized message... ;)

      --
      Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  55. Excellent! by GerritHoll · · Score: 1

    I finally feel safe now.

  56. raven is 1337. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she must be coz she wears black clothes and she uses computers. all goth chicks who use computers are 1337.

  57. There are some humorless fucks at /.! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    modding this down as offtopic? christ! what a fucking anal retentive fuckwad!

    1. Re:There are some humorless fucks at /.! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, didn't you know that Raven Alder is the (hoped-to-be) girlfriend of one of the Slashdot editors? That explains an awful lot about the Raven-mania here recently.

  58. As They Say On Slashdot.org... by Shturmovik · · Score: 1
    ..."You must be new here"!

    :-)

  59. Planetery protection officer by sshtome · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Am I right in thinking that this man has the job of protecting us all from the invasion of microscopic organisms that have never been discovered?

    That NASA have spend astronimical amounts of money only to fail to discover anything more dramatic than a prehistoric sea on mars.

    Despite, the possibility to the contrary, and the fact that it fits with the current scientific trend of "you are not special", there is actually a good chance that there is no life on mars.

    I understood that all of the evidence of life on mars (ie the rocks with 'fossils' in) were found to be aincient air bubbles or something.

    I quite like the idea of life on other planets, and "forward contamination" sounds like a bad thing... but really! is there anything that this man can do to protect us against aliens currently have only been found in science fiction books?

    I bet he reads slashdot alot at work (flame me!).

  60. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK, there's no pre-crime (heh! minority report! no, I'm not ADD) record of fingerprints either, unless your birth certificate has them (in which case they have palm prints too.

    I seem to have some memory of seeing my birth certificate with foot prints on it. Maybe I'm crazy.

    1. Re:So? by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 2, Funny

      I seem to have some memory of seeing my birth certificate with foot prints on it. Maybe I'm crazy

      Maybe you left your birth certificate on the floor.

  61. Welcome by iceborer · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new microbial overlords.

  62. Sure by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    > terraforming Mars & Venus... Anyone want to buy some cheap land??

    Sure. As soon as you can have it surveyed and marked by a licensed professional.

  63. Where to quarantine? by cyways · · Score: 1

    Are they building quarantine facilities at Guantanamo Bay? Certainly we must be "at war" with invasive alien lifeforms.