Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Spammers Infiltrate Private Online Spam Clubs

Angry_Admin writes " Spammers are now trying to find out which antispammers have infiltrated their ranks and are sharing "sensitive" info with fellow antispammers. According to the story at The Register: 'Online spammer forums like the Pro Bulk Club the Bulk Club and bulkmails.org have been gatecrashed by activists from organisations like Spamhaus. Steve Linford of Spamhaus said spammers know this already but they don't know who amongst their number is working for the other side. In theory the members-only forums of these sites is accessible only by invitation and only to individuals who have a proven track record in spamming. Apart from playing with the paranoia of spammers, the undercover investigation cast light on the latest spammer techniques.' Hopefully the spammers aren't that bright and the antispammers stick around long enough to bring them down."

113 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. Tsk tsk... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Someone forgot the first rule of Spam Club...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Tsk tsk... by Bluetrust25 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "After a night in bulk club, everything in the real world gets the volume turned down. Nothing can piss you off. Your word is law, and if other people break that law or question you, even that doesn't piss you off."

      Maybe this parody of Fight Club helps shine insight on how spammers can sleep peacefully knowing full well that millions of barbs of dislike and spite are pointed their way. What do they care? They've got the bulk club.

      Go play at AloofHosting.com, free web hosting that makes sense.

    2. Re:Tsk tsk... by macshune · · Score: 4, Funny

      >Someone forgot the first rule of Spam Club...

      If it's your first night, you have to spam?

    3. Re:Tsk tsk... by Mesaeus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it's because we've all got his sig blocked due to spam ? ;)

    4. Re:Tsk tsk... by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it's because we've all got his sig blocked due to spam ? ;)

      I can't block sigs... otherwise I'll never know who wrote the comment! Seriously, other than my friends/fans icons I never remember names, I always remember sigs, am I the only one? hehe.

      -matt

    5. Re:Tsk tsk... by jnicholson · · Score: 2, Funny
      You're not.

      It's because the name's at the top. When I read the name, I haven't yet been able to determine whether the comment's worth reading. After I've read the comment, then I read the sig. That's when I make the snap judgement about the poster.

      All subconscious, of course. But I'm sure that's why I remember the sigs and not the names.

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
  2. James Bond of the Spam world? by Xshare · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well 3 cheers to these fellows! I wonder how they got in if it's invitation only.

    1. Re:James Bond of the Spam world? by SnowDeath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Post your email address and I'll tell you ;)

    2. Re:James Bond of the Spam world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > I wonder how they got in if it's invitation only.

      I imagine they received many invitations, and simply didn't opt-out by clicking on the handy links at the bottom.

    3. Re:James Bond of the Spam world? by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny
      "Well 3 cheers to these fellows! I wonder how they got in if it's invitation only."

      The same way I keep getting added to all these "opt-in" spam lists.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:James Bond of the Spam world? by schon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder how they got in if it's invitation only.

      One would assume they got invited. :o)

      Seriously, only "known" spammers get invites - but the question is - what constitutes "known"?

      How hard would it be for an anti-spammer to set up a bogus online identity, list themselves as spammers, and then sent spam-like emails to the spammers' email addresses, and then wait for an invite?

    5. Re:James Bond of the Spam world? by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder how they got in if it's invitation only.

      Dress in dark camoflage.

      Shoot grappling hook to rail around roof.

      Get to rooftop, shoot guard on balcony with silenced .22

      Remove camoflage.

      Use suction cup on skylight, cut out pane of glass and discard.

      Secure rope and drop into upper floor office.

      Climb down rope.

      Use chloroform-soaked rag on guard outside office door.'

      Pull out CDR with "email addresses" written in Sharpie Marker on it.

      Walk down to party, take glass of champagne from waiter.

      Send signal to antispammers telling them you're in.

      Duh, how else do you think they did it?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    6. Re:James Bond of the Spam world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This begs the question: If you're a top-notch spammer, how can you build a reputation? Isn't staying anonymous part of being a pro?

    7. Re:James Bond of the Spam world? by pyros · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well 3 cheers to these fellows! I wonder how they got in if it's invitation only.

      Well, Sir Gallahad, Sir Lancelot, and I hid inside a giant wooden Hormel crate in front of the castle ....

    8. Re:James Bond of the Spam world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're a top-notch spammer, how can you build a reputation? Isn't staying anonymous part of being a pro?

      Scott Richter. Enough said.

  3. For Spammers By Spammers by SirChris · · Score: 4, Funny

    So there are forums out there for spammers by spammers? Do these forums get spammed also? I, personally, would love to leave a few choice words on those forums.

    1. Re:For Spammers By Spammers by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 5, Funny
      What gets to me about spammers... They obviously feel they are doing the world a favor by offering sexual deficiency drugs, pain-killers of questionable legality and mortgages for those with bad credit.

      I always picture spammers as bereft of libedo and credit, with drug abuse problems. Really, wouldn't that explain a lot?

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    2. Re:For Spammers By Spammers by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Funny

      I imagine when they review the forum postings and see "DIE YOU EVIL SPAMMING SCUM!" they just say "tsk, tsk, I don't want to see this crap in my forums... I wonder if there is software that can prevent people from sending me this crap? There should be a way to opt out of this! Why, this return e-mail is fake so I can't even complain! There should be a law!"...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:For Spammers By Spammers by secolactico · · Score: 2, Funny

      They obviously feel they are doing the world a favor by offering sexual deficiency drugs, pain-killers of questionable legality and mortgages for those with bad credit.

      They probably don't. They are simply making (or trying to make) a buck out of people ingenuity. I doubt they are so self deluded as to believe in a weight loss method that involves neither drugs, surgery, diet or exercise (must be magic, I guess), or similar products.

      My favorite is the one where they offer to erase my bad credit history. Will they give me a new identity as well? How about a criminal record? Can they make those go away too?

      --
      No sig
  4. Just a list of names is all we need... by mobiux · · Score: 5, Funny

    If someone could get that, we could, at least temporarily, reduce this problem.

    I've got a baseball bat and loads of free time.

    1. Re:Just a list of names is all we need... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny
      I've got a baseball bat and loads of free time.

      Make sure you leave the bat at the scene so it looks like a suicide.

  5. Spammers by cynicalmoose · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hold on, to join you must need an e-mail address. Surely that means that this is a wonderful harvesting opportunity (or even better, does it allow people to avoid being spammed if the spammers believe them to be on 'their' side).

    --
    Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
  6. Not just a tree house club by nelsonal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have to ask where does the money come from in spamming? I could understand back in the mortgage boom when brokers were paying lot's of hard cash for leads, but this and other stories make spamming seem like a pretty big business which is rather surprising. Ultimately the money has to come from somewhere (the spam lists can only be sold so many times).

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    1. Re:Not just a tree house club by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

      Companies need some way to sell their sugar pills, I mean H3r84L V149r4!!!!!!

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Not just a tree house club by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to be overly obvious, but the money comes from the people who buy the advertised stuff. They do indeed exist. Some of them may buy regularly. (Think anatomical enhancement pills that you need to "re-fill" every month)

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    3. Re:Not just a tree house club by mkraft · · Score: 2, Redundant

      The money comes from people who actually buy the products being peddled by spammers. If only a handful of people respond out of the millions of emails sent, the spammer turned a profit. Believe me if spamming wasn't profitable people wouldn't do it.

      If we could only get these few people to stop buying spam products, spam would all but disappear.

    4. Re:Not just a tree house club by nelsonal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was thinking about that, back in the refi days a broker would pay upwards of $25 per lead for refinancing leads. I could see how a spammer would easily clear some decent money. Selling jars of pills for what $10-$20 means the markup has to be pretty steep to cover their costs. Considering that they are now swaping zombie PCs to cover their tracks, one would think that there was some real money in this business. I haven't seen a cellular spam in some time (another source of high dollar commissions). I'm surprised that there is that much money in p3nIs 3nI@rgm3nt and other cheapo items. I wouldn't think that the spammer would be in the business of the refil, and the commission wouldn't be as large. Perhaps I should get to cracking on ebay or with some ad sense words.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    5. Re:Not just a tree house club by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, you're thinking high margin, I'm thinking volume selling. I don't know how many email addresses exist, but we're obviously talking hundreds of millions and up (let's play with 500 mil). You get a decent chunk of that number in a list (say 20%), assume small .1% success rate and you get 100,000 orders. That may be unrealistic, but it does show that things can add up quickly.

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    6. Re:Not just a tree house club by waterwheel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I believe spammers in many cases make their money by collecting a portion of sales. So in that sense, it's normal enterprise and must work for some industries. And I'm sure it still works in the drugs/sex industries.

      They can resell the list as many times as they want, by my email I'd guess some of these are being sold dozens of times every day. Plus, when one customer drops off, there's probably two more waiting to take their place. $XX for 10 million email addresses just sounds too good for many people.

      I've had customers ask me about this, and I've had customers send out spam - they've told me they did. Of course, it wasn't spam, it was a double opt in list. Really? you've got a million people's emails who asked to be sent important information on life insurance? Nevertheless, some continue to try it once. And the new customers I'm sure are substantial.

    7. Re:Not just a tree house club by maximilln · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't say that I am impressed by the knee-jerk responses of "the revenue comes from the people who buy the stuff." Clearly there's a statistical chance that the profit from this junk feeds the machine but, if that were so, the spam machine would be little more than the local flea market. As we all know the spammers can often be very upscale and sophisticated sometimes have multiple server and router banks with which to turn on and off IP address ranges as they get caught, targeted, shut down, or blacklisted.

      So the question remains: Where really does the funding for this stuff come from?

      People are going to slam me for presenting this possibility and, well, bring it on. Personally, I think that a good amount of spam is funded by us--you and me. Go ahead. Get enraged. Gnash your teeth. Call me a paranoid hippie tree loving freak. I could give a shit.

      Face reality. It's a business game. A good portion of the taxpayer subsidized/backed loans for technological advancement and small business loans probably go to shmucks like this. These are people who are buddy-buddy with politicians and existing business heads. These are the people who sit on top of brokerage houses and know where to get the startup funding. These are people who have been proven time and again to have no scruples about working over every pyramid scheme possible to get their hands on your money. These are people who can conjure up numbers generated from spam mailings, work the statistical analysis over to their favor, and pitch it to some new investment broker who is scraping to fill his quota and willing to take a chance. Whose money is he willing to take a chance with? Why, once again its yours and mine. 401k funds, IRA funds, generic stock investment funds.

      Go ahead. Say its not possible. Mod me down as stupid. If anyone could ever really use the FOIA and manage to get enough of the tax records from these spam organizations to track it all down you can bet that I'm right.

      Go on. Get mad. Come on... you know you can do it... be mad at me for being the messenger... let it all out.

      I can take it.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    8. Re:Not just a tree house club by UrgleHoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      If past observations are any guide, then I'd say the answer is a mix of money made selling lists and actual product sales. In the 90's I used to do IT work for an informercial/900 number infomercial outfit. The pitch was "Make money with 900 numbers." Any normal thinking person is going to say BS. And by an large it is BS. But add greed and a low entry cost, and a hard selling telemarketer, through objection/rebuttal rounds can sell "money making guides" (read legal but shady get rich quick scheme) to lots of people. In a nutshell, the infomercial marketeer made a bundle selling info packets and lists. A few who followed the formula made money, but most didn't.

      I don't like the business so I got out of doing IT support for it, but I learned a heck of a lot about the informercial/telemarketing biz.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    9. Re:Not just a tree house club by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The money might come in part from laundering. There's really nothing to show that you didn't do $100,000,000 of business in a year, when you might have really done $1000. The balance of the fictional business on the books might actually be sourced in illegal drug, gambling, or terrorism money.

      John Ashcroft should lay off the Internet bong sellers and the purveyors of porn. If he wants to hit the terrorists in the wallet, he'll close down all the money laundering possibilities that exist. Spam operations are a huge gaping hole that everyone seems to be ignoring.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    10. Re:Not just a tree house club by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There must be a fair amount of profit above the cost price in these pills, or they sell way more than I would imagine - if you look at the front page featured part of eBay (which costs something like 50GBP to be listed in) it is comprised mainly of 'Buy it Now' dutch listings with 500 bottles of pills for around 10 pounds each. There are sellers who hold 20 or more front page listings at a time, selling only pills. If you can afford to repeatedly invest 1000GBP as well as the cost on the products themselves you'd have to be fairly confident in making a considerable amount more than that.

    11. Re:Not just a tree house club by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why was the parent modded up? It doesn't even make sense. I'm a bit bothered by the people here (probably including these moderators) who seem to be in denial and refuse to believe that people buy things from spammers. Well guess what: they do. You may want to believe that we live in a world where no one would do such a thing and come up with crazy alternate explanations as to why spam exists, but sadly the simple explanation sometimes really is the correct one, even if it makes you feel superior to write it off as "naive" or "knee-jerk".

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    12. Re:Not just a tree house club by Chibi · · Score: 4, Informative

      There was a Slashdot article a while back about a guy who actually wanted more spam. So, people like Mr. Orlando Soto are the reason why the rest of us must suffer. :)

      Mr. Soto routinely comes home to some 150 e-mail pitches, and he loves getting them all. The 45-year-old grandfather opens most of them. He answers spam questionnaires. And he buys stuff pitched in spam e-mail -- again and again. "Everyday people call it spam," says Mr. Soto, who prefers calling it "unsolicited" e-mail. "But I'm open to everything."
      --
      If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
    13. Re:Not just a tree house club by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks for relieving me of being the only one with that thought. I made a similar post a while back and boy, did I get slammed! Not by the mods but by others who refuse to see the connection. Like so many property crimes, this is a two way street, and this problem would hardly be noticable if it weren't for the customers. If nobody buys from fences or spammers or anybody like them, the problem will damn near disappear. I'm for any tech that can minimize spam,(and I do like this infiltration thing. We should apply this to gov't. Y'know, change it from the inside) but we need to address the social problem that their customers represent. This goes for many things like theft, drugs(if your into prohibition), etc.

      --
      What?
    14. Re:Not just a tree house club by medelliadegray · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and the sad thing about the enhancement pills is that people who buy them truely believe they are working--a significant number of problems males can have will be the resuly of purely phyochological issues. confidence, esteem, etc.

      So their having problems in bed, and they decide "what do i have to lose if i try these, the worse that will happen is they wont work." So they buy the enhancement pills, and their confidence rises with expectation that the pills will in fact work. Next thing the guy knows, he's a stallion with the libedo of a young bull.

      1+1=2, right? i bought the pills, i can stay up! These pills ARE enhancement pills!

      wrong.

      If anything out there truely worked, and didnt require a perscription, viagra would NOT cost $15 per pill--or whatever obscene cost it is right now.

      --
      Troll, Troll, go away and flame again some other day
    15. Re:Not just a tree house club by maximilln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think that the spam operations themselves are legitimately publicly traded businesses. I forward the hypothesis that they are run by people who have set up legitimate, possibly publicly traded businesses as fronts.

      It's the same complex business pyramid cycle that led to the .com boom-bust, only this is a cycle that propagates and lives and dies on a 3-6 month basis. Like mosquitos. Do you watch the news? You see that guy in the suit in the back room reading papers at his desk? What do you think he does when he goes home at night? He dabbles in penny stocks. Where does the money from those penny stocks come from? If you believe news stories you'll think it's his own private money. In reality there are thousands of people dabbling in penny stocks using money that they receive on short term loan from other brokerage houses dealing in penny stocks. What are all of these penny stocks? They're junk bonds, to vaporous businesses, some with little more than a PO Box and a telephone number which may or may not work. What do these businesses do? They do nothing but subcontract and subcontract services over and over to each other. They're cleaners. They're nothing but numbers on a ledger or in a spreadsheet through which to push money. These small businesses have two things of interest to the brokerage houses: a bank account and an insurance policy. If the business lives or dies it's not a concern for the brokerage house or the lender. They'll collect on the insurance policy and the insurance company will tack the losses to your auto, home, life, and health premiums. What do these small businesses really do? A person with an in depth knowledge of the business world can put together a convincing business plan and use short-term exploratory investments to set up two servers and a business net connection. What does he do with that? He pitches the business to some brokerage house that's trying to put together a cohesive portfolio in "grass roots small business subsidies" or some other apple pie, feel good propaganda pitch. This brokerage house then goes out and sells its feel good apple pie line to a larger brokerage firm.

      These are not just turkeys that live down the block and work at the local foundry. These are people who graduated with MBAs and formed the social connections necessary to know where the paperwork goes, who has to sign it, and how it has to be filled out to look legit. The people running these operations don't always know that they're funding spammers. Have you seen the subcontracting breakdown for a federal building or renovation project? It's the same on the stock market. The major houses go to the mid houses. The mid houses go to the major and minor houses. The minor houses service anyone they can, including banks, credit unions, and local investment brokers. The banks, credit unions, and local investment brokers are watching applications for business licenses and applications for business loans. The people monitoring the applications are often feeding info to their cousin/brother/aunt/old roomie working in the major and mid houses. All of these people are working at their own desks, pushing nothing but paper, and no one knows that the guy who walked in the door to give a 15-minute presentation for a legit "desktop advertising clearinghouse" is really using 85% of the business investment to feed his old fraternity brother with enough money to send out spam for three months. Then they'll junk the business and the bank won't care because they had a valid insurance policy before they ever signed the loan.

      If spam were as illegal as the CANSPAM Act and all the hype and hoopla makes it seem shouldn't it be easy enough for credit agencies to latch onto these people and refuse to run their funds? Sure, it should, so why don't they? Because no one gives a flying rats bottom. They're all pushing paper, and getting paid, and as long as the business insurance is good then no one cares that the business only lasted three months. I'm sorry

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    16. Re:Not just a tree house club by JuggleGeek · · Score: 2, Informative
      Once again you're assuming that I'm hiding my e-mail address. I'm not.

      In that case, it's getting harvested, and you're getting spam. You can tell me that you get no spam, and don't use a filter, and I'll believe you - but only if you hide that address. If it's public, it will get spammed.

      How did businesses get dragged into this?

      Because they use email too. It's not just used by individuals. No where have I ever seen the complaints that the "webmaster@" or "abuse@" accounts are getting spammed out of control.

      Register a web site (personal or business) and the address in the WhoIs will end up on spam lists. Stick a "webmaster@" address on a website, it will end up on spam lists. I run a personal domain, just for myself, and I get spam to "abuse@". You can pretend it doesn't happen, but that doesn't change facts.

      In short, I don't believe your claims. You claim that you can, and have, put your email out in public and receive no spam. I say that you are lying.

      You also pretend that spam all comes because because people gave their address to the spammers. Quote: I simply choose not to send my e-mail address to every vacation offer, free credit report check, home mortgage counselor, customer service registration, and free trial of Super New Cheerios.

      I don't give my address out for that kind of crap either. And having a domain, when I do give an address out to a business, it's simple for me to set up a new email address just for them. I log it locally, and if that account starts receiving spam, I know which business sold my address. It's *very rare* for those addresses to receive spam - legitimate businesses don't want that reputation.

      But I do receive a lot to addresses harvested from my website, and to an address used in WhoIs.

      You can spout off whatever you want in reply. I think I'm done, as your claims are unreasonable, and I don't believe you. So it's unlikely I'll bother to reply - you appear to be trolling.

    17. Re:Not just a tree house club by Steve+B · · Score: 4, Insightful
      John Ashcroft should lay off the Internet bong sellers and the purveyors of porn. If he wants to hit the terrorists in the wallet, he'll close down all the money laundering possibilities that exist. Spam operations are a huge gaping hole that everyone seems to be ignoring.

      That's the least of the problem. The filter-poisoning junk appended to spam messages (which ought to be prosecuted under the computer crime laws as an attack in and of itself... but I digress) is a perfect terrorist comm channel that is effectively immune to traffic analysis (i.e. there's no way to identify the intended recipient).

      I was reluctant to mention this when it first occurred to me, but after thinking it through I'm morally certain that terrorists have already figured this out.

      Maybe the FBI has also figured it out, and is already planning to scoop up some spammers and use their violations of existing laws to lean on them and anal-probe their business records... and maybe not. If this turns out to be the next failure to "connect the dots"... well, you heard it here first.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    18. Re:Not just a tree house club by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The filter-poisoning junk appended to spam messages [...] is a perfect terrorist comm channel that is effectively immune to traffic analysis (i.e. there's no way to identify the intended recipient).
      I was reluctant to mention this when it first occurred to me, but after thinking it through I'm morally certain that terrorists have already figured this out.

      There's an awful lot of overhead in that approach, and it seems to me that it's unreliable. For it to work, you would need:

      1. an agreed-upon set of code words -- could fall into enemy hands.
      2. the ability to send spam reliably -- if you test, you risk getting shut down; if you don't test, you risk failure at an important moment.
      3. an excuse to send spam -- probably not a major problem, since a ficticious product or some random Web site would presumably suffice.
      4. the ability to receive spam reliably -- if your operatives don't see the encoded message, they can't act on it.

      Using code spam complicates existing tricks like "numbers stations" on short-wave, coded classified ads in major publications, dead drops, plain old clandestine meetings, and spoken messages passed from a guy who knows a guy who knows somebody.

      A few layers of no-tech sneakiness are bound to isolate the people at the top from everyone else, in any case.

    19. Re:Not just a tree house club by Steve+B · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For it to work, you would need:
      an agreed-upon set of code words -- could fall into enemy hands.

      No, you don't -- all you need is a fairly simple steganography program to hide a few bits in each word (for each string of, say, four bits, randomly generate a word that checksums to that target).

      the ability to send spam reliably -- if you test, you risk getting shut down; if you don't test, you risk failure at an important moment.

      Put your real recipients fairly early in the queue (but still far enough down that they'll be untraceable; number 27,347 or thereabouts out of millions ought to be good enough). If spammers were being shut down fast enough to cut the flow before that point, spam wouldn't be the problem it is.

      And, just in case, have a couple of backup throwaway accounts.

      an excuse to send spam -- probably not a major problem, since a ficticious product or some random Web site would presumably suffice.

      As you say, this one is trivial.

      the ability to receive spam reliably -- if your operatives don't see the encoded message, they can't act on it.

      You gotta be kidding me. The difficult thing is not receiving spam.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  7. Re:Anti-spammers will never infiltrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anti-spammers will never infiltrate ...slashdot FP's.

    and unfortunately, neither will you!

  8. hmmm by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 2, Funny

    *builds a facility strangely resembling a german concentration camp*

    *puts up a sign that says "Spammers Only Club"*

    *rubs hands devilishly*

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    1. Re:hmmm by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting nit to pick.
      The people of Germany did very little to stop the Nazis. Silence is consent is a very old principle of law. If you know someone is going to kill someone but you do nothing to stop it, you are an accessory to that crime.

      While the vast majority of Germans have no guilt in this mannor because they where children or not even born yet. A very large number of German adults and I would even say a majority knew what was happening. I would say that German in this context is a fair use of the word. Nazi would work as well.
      BTW my father servied in the US Army in Germany in the 50s. He loved the German people but could never understand how they let Nazis come to power and do the things they did.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  9. Don't doubt the Spammers IQ by tekiegreg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're bypassing the zillions of filters I have set up like they're bound and determined to enlarge my penis, and bypassing my filters at a rate of 30 messages/day these days. The Spammer is just as smart as the anti-spammer IMHO. Play your enemy as your equal people....

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:Don't doubt the Spammers IQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "They're bypassing the zillions of filters I have set up like they're bound and determined to enlarge my penis"

      If they're trying that hard, it must be a "can't lose" business opporunity.

    2. Re:Don't doubt the Spammers IQ by mobiux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You don't have to be smart to be a spammer
      You just have to lack morals in general.

      I think that it actually shows that the anti-spammer is winning. Spammers have to resort to trojanned machines and illegal tactics to get thier job done.

      Which makes me wonder, if it were a wild west situation where anything goes, and anti-spammers were allows to break the law in the same manner, would these spammers still be in business, or would there basically be a bounty on the heads of spammers.

    3. Re:Don't doubt the Spammers IQ by Glamdrlng · · Score: 4, Funny
      Which makes me wonder, if it were a wild west situation where anything goes, and anti-spammers were allows to break the law in the same manner, would these spammers still be in business, or would there basically be a bounty on the heads of spammers.
      The first thought that comes to mind is, take the source code for phatbot (it is GPL'd after all), strip out the bits about exploiting microsoft vulnerabilities, but leave in the code that exploits machines listening on the backdoors left by bagel, netsky, and mydoom, and give it a payload that shuts the machine down.

      No, it's not very nice, and yes, it would piss people off. But this is the anything goes solution.
      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
    4. Re:Don't doubt the Spammers IQ by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's been discussed before, but why not just do a forced patch of the OS? Kill the virus and immunize the machine...

  10. Did Anyone.... by StacyWebb · · Score: 2, Funny

    notice the ad at the bottom of the article?

  11. Optimists by mikehunt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Hopefully the spammers aren't that bright and the antispammers stick around long enough to bring them down."

    Just because someone does something you don't like, since when did that make them more stupid (or less intelligent) than you?

    Sounds like the same tired argument that anti-virus companies and virus writers use.

  12. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


    Some of the "infiltrators" are actually people working at the ISPs hosting these private forums.

    1. Re:FYI by cft_128 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Some of the "infiltrators" are actually people working at the ISPs hosting these private forums.

      Not any more....

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  13. Not so bright Spammers by sameerdesai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Hopefully the spammers aren't that bright and the antispammers stick around long enough to bring them down." Yea right!! Do you imply everyone is so stupid to get spammed everyday and can't stop these "not so bright" spammers.

  14. Knowing your enemy... by StressGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's see, what were the club names?

    Pro Bulk Club

    The Bulk Club

    bulkmails.org

    Egads, with such a raw display of creative thinking, we don't stand a chance. [grin]

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  15. invitations? by Cska+Sofia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd surely like to know how these people figure out where to send invitations to spammers. I have a mailbox heaving with spam, just begging to be returned to sender...

  16. Bundled spamware and spyware by Bonewalker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This isn't one hundred percent on topic, but I wish someone could answer this question. Why would producers of legitimate software, e.g. Kazaa, Weatherbug, etc. bundle their stuff with known spamware, ad-serving crap, and general spyware bullshit? Don't they realize that before long users will figure out where it is coming from and then stop downloading and installing their software all together? What kind of fees do they usually command for allowing this type of bundling?

    1. Re:Bundled spamware and spyware by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would producers of legitimate software, e.g. Kazaa, Weatherbug, etc. bundle their stuff with known spamware, ad-serving crap, and general spyware bullshit?

      Because they're not legitimate software, of course.

      Kazaa, for example, makes a dubiously legal P2P app that it distribute(d) for the express purpose of getting a free-to-use grid to run various programs on.

      And, unfortuantely, it'll be awhile before the Flynn effect makes all of us smart enough not to use spyware.

    2. Re:Bundled spamware and spyware by jonbryce · · Score: 5, Informative

      But the most popular download these days isn't Kazaa, it is Adaware. http://download.com.com/3101-2001-0-1.html?tag=pop Spybot is No. 3 in the rankings.

    3. Re:Bundled spamware and spyware by jpop32 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would producers of legitimate software, e.g. Kazaa, Weatherbug, etc. bundle their stuff with known spamware, ad-serving crap, and general spyware bullshit?

      Isn't it obvious why? Because it makes money, and right now. Do spammers care if they kill the medium they use? Nope, because they're making money from it, right now.

      Who cares, it works for me, at least for now.

      It's shortsighted but unfortunately it fits the general profile of human behaviour. I don't see the way spammers or malware producers behave any differently than the way big companies or governments behave, just on a different level. So, I think it's safe to say that things like this will go on for the forseable future.

  17. Did I leave out "The Incredible Bulk"? by StressGuy · · Score: 5, Funny


    sorry, I'll get back to work now....

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  18. Honor among thieves? by e9th · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given the ethics of spammers, is it any wonder that one of their own might "betray" them?

    1. Re:Honor among thieves? by Vexler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's interesting the reasons that some people would resort to spam. In an article recently on Tech Republic, the author interviewed several spammers on the reason(s) they started out as spammers. One had college tuitions to pay off, another just wants quick cash with no regards as to what topics are/aren't off-limits. When you consider why people spam, the knowledge can be used against them in one way or another.

  19. If only the people who READ spam weren't so stupid by hpulley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a tired old argument but if no one clicked the links in spam and no one bought the products in spam, perhaps we wouldn't have spam. The people spamming aren't stupid, they know a sucker is born every minute and they hope those suckers click their links. If the clickers would grow a brain we might not have this problem.

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
  20. Spam club invitations are available here... by joelparker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Sir/Madam, I approach you with this offer due to the recent death of [county] Minister of Justice [name] because there is a secret bank deposit box, containing the sum of two (2) invitations to spam club. Half of these can be yours, generously. Email for details. P.S. the box also has six p3n!s enl.ar.ge.rs, five bottles of the blu* pi11 C:@l:s, and the absolute L0WEST *R*A*T*E*S for yr. m-ort-ga-ge & /\UTO W@rrn+iez.

  21. The Register and funny ad placement... by Ratfactor · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article:
    "People selling these fresh proxies are either the virus writers themselves or someone very close to them. I don't know how ties between spammers and virus writers was first forged but there is clearly a strong link there," he added.

    Followed immediately by:
    "The new Microsoft Partner Programme is here."
    Good stuff.
  22. The virus/spam connection by Roached · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "People selling these fresh proxies are either the virus writers themselves or someone very close to them. I don't know how ties between spammers and virus writers was first forged but there is clearly a strong link there"

    ...and maybe this is the bit of information that will encourage aggressive prosecution of these spammers.

  23. why does Mandrake open a port 80 proxy? by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I just noticed the other day, when Slashdot stopped accepting my posts due to an open proxy on my IP, that my Mandrake 9.2 installation had some kind of proxy configured in Apache. What in the hell? Why does the default installation of Makdrake do this? Absolutely ridiculous. I had also installed it at work and had to disable it there, too.

    Not that this is directly pertinent to spamming, but it is a built-in security hole that allows criminals to use default mandrake webservers as conduits for nefarious deeds.
  24. Good, this is progress. by Vthornheart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, just give me a shotgun, a case of ammo, and a list of related addresses. It's about time we sent unsolicited E-Mailers some unsolicited lead pellets.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  25. Spammers not smart? by neilcSD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >>Hopefully the spammers aren't that bright

    Most spammers arent terribly sophisticated. Let's face it though, a handful are extremely smart and capable, otherwise we'd have gotten rid of them a long time ago.

  26. The Almighty Buch by VernonNemitz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since $ (or yen, marks, rubles, lira, etc) is all that any spammer wants in the first place, it logically follows that any of them can be bribed to spill all the secrets (like how to gatecrash, or instead to formally invite an antispammer, etc).

  27. Strange thing by bizitch · · Score: 4, Funny

    I cant seem to get to that website "bulkmails.org"

    I keep hitting my refresh button over and over and over and over and over again - but it doesn't come up ....

    hmmmmmm....

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  28. Once You're In... by tds67 · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...you can never leave the Spamafia.

    You'll know you're in trouble when you find a penis enlarger or a bottle of Viagra pills on your pillow.

    1. Re:Once You're In... by hambonewilkins · · Score: 2, Funny
      Viagra? All I'm familiar with is V!_agra or Herbal V I A G5A.

      Is Viagra some generic version?

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
  29. Invitation-only is very easy to get around by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All Spamhaus would have to do was include a couple of false spammer names on its officials lists, use those false identities to complain on more generic forums about the ridiculousness of laws like CAN-SPAM, and wait for the invites to show up. Almost every group, no matter how exclusive, has members who are more gullible and willing to make the invite. (C'mon - the only reason spamming is profitable is because the broader group of computer users has so many gullible people who are willing to believe they can gain an inch, lose a pound, and refinance for a much lower rate.)

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
  30. I heard of something like this once... by tokachu(k) · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Sometime back in 2002, a guy who worked for LeadClick (a spamhaus) downloaded a file called
    "teen sex.mpg.scr"
    (notice the extension) that turned out to be a backdoor. The screen shots are somewhere on Freenet (you have to download and run Freenet first).

    What the screenshots reveal are, to say the least, scary. It turns out that an employee named "Greg" (greg@leadclick.com), who works as an e-mail harvesting database manager, also manages databases for SpamCop!

    I kid you not. A spammer who works for SpamCop. I can't post links to the freesite (that's kinda pointless), but at least the incriminating screenshots are safe on Freenet.
    1. Re:I heard of something like this once... by eaolson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I kid you not. A spammer who works for SpamCop. I can't post links to the freesite (that's kinda pointless), but at least the incriminating screenshots are safe on Freenet.
      I'm sorry, but I call bullshit. I know of three employees of SpamCop, none of which are named Greg. If photos of John Kerry and Jane Fonda can be Photoshopped, so can a screenshot.

      Evidence, please.

    2. Re:I heard of something like this once... by tokachu(k) · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here's the freesite key:
      SSK@oPGDxwEwLFkxMh0qAPA4tvmdAC4PAgM/leadclick/1//
      (hopefully Slashdot won't mess up the key)
  31. Re:What now? by almostmanda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's good because spammers, in the privacy of their own little club, exchange spamming tricks. if we know their evil plan, we may be able to tweak filters to block it before it arrives. the whole point of spam filters is prevention, and knowing who it's coming from and how they plan to send it might be very helpful.

  32. Gee by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if they have a 'No Spam' rule in the forum rules to try and keep down the mass amounts of spam posts. But then the forums would be stifling it's own members.

    What a dilemma!

  33. Flynn Effect by m000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Flynn Effect is the reason why IQ tests are routinely recalibrated. Basically, information and ways of thinking that start out the purview of an elite few eventually become the norm for the average individual in a sort of intellectual trickle-down.

    1. Re:Flynn Effect by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought the Flynn Effect was about hacking into the Master Control Program...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  34. Re:Thunderbird 0.6 released by SwansonMarpalum · · Score: 3, Informative

    FYI Bayesian Filtering isn't quite the same as a Neural network, a notable difference being that with bayes a much greater portion of the behavior learned by the system is easily available for analysis.

    --
    "Give away the stone, let the oceans take and transmutate this cold and faded anchor." - Maynard James Keenan
  35. Spammer websites are funny by kettch · · Score: 3, Funny

    I found this quote on one of the websites (http://www.emaillistclub.com/)

    We will arm you with the knowledge to make killer sales copy so you can convert a lot of those who open your sales letter into sales today!

    Oh, yEaH, sPaMmers write the best ad copy of anybody !!!!!!!!!!

    Just 5 minutes, a monkey, a pound of salt, three feet of cat-5, 1 match, a can of orange paint (oil base), a magnet, a ream of copy paper, 1 square meter of bubble wrap, a laser pointer, one spammer, and a small room. That's all I ask.

    --
    Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  36. Now that you mention it ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was at a party the other night and got into a conversation with a guy who wanted some advice from me, as a Web developer, on setting up a commercial Web site. At first the conversation was pretty normal -- we talked about the choice of servers, languages, back-end databases, etc. Then he asked me, "How can I make sure people go to my site?"

    So I talked about Google PageRank, targeted vs. untargeted advertising, making his site attractive enough to inspire users to stay on it, making sure it's simple enough that it loads quickly and works on different browsers, etc. And he seemed to be listening, but after a while he asked me, "No, I mean when I send people e-mail advertising my site, how do I make sure they go to it?"

    I had to talk to him for a while to make sure he was saying what I thought he was saying, but after a while it became pretty clear that the deal is this: he's going to be running a site selling Brazilian sex tours, and he wants to know how to send spam that will a) get people to go to his site, and b) get through spam filters.

    Needless to say, the conversation didn't last long after that, but it did provide some insight into the mind of the spammer. He really didn't see anything wrong with spamming, or even with trying to be deceptive to get past spam filters. As far as he's concerned, he's selling a service people will want if only he can get his message through. I'd say he was an aggressively normal guy -- a bit of a yuppie, with a backwards baseball cap and a lite (sic) beer, definitely not a geek, probably watches lots of football and drives an SUV.

    These are the people who are crapflooding your mailbox. They're not mysterious creeps living in caves. They're your neighbors. Be aware. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty ...

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:Now that you mention it ... by bladernr · · Score: 5, Funny
      but after a while it became pretty clear that the deal is this: he's going to be running a site selling Brazilian sex tours

      Did you get the URL for that? For research I mean, so I can block mail... or something... whatever... WHAT'S THE URL?!

      (note to self... don't forget to click AC box).. DAMN

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    2. Re:Now that you mention it ... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 3, Funny

      Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty ... ...and a really, really sharp knife.

    3. Re:Now that you mention it ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, yes, that did occur to me. We were pretty close to the grill, with assorted metal implements lying around; BBQ'ed spam would have made for a great addition to the food table! But he was a friend of the host, and I thought it would be rude. ;)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:Now that you mention it ... by Mateito · · Score: 4, Informative

      > he's going to be running a site selling Brazilian sex tours.
      > he was an aggressively normal guy

      Sorry, but "normal guys", aggressive or otherwize, don't sell sex tours to brazil.

      And, as somebody who knows brazil quite well, I advise you about taking a sex tour there. The rate of HIV is rediculous, and if you are going there to play among prostitutes you have almost a perfect chance of coming into contact with it.

      However, Brazillians are very very friendly people, and a lot of them see sex as something to be shared freely (in comparison to Europe and all of the US except for Daytona beach). Unless you are really ugly, you could go out to any night club and meet a nice girl who will want to play with you*. Or a nice boy if you are so inclined. Why pay a spamming yuppy to be the middle man?

      But if you are going there to party, take a balloon.

      (I met a lot, but I didn't, because I have one of those spouse things, and it just aint worth putting the relationship on the line for 7 minutes of slap and tickle. No, she doesn't read /.)

  37. What would be nice... by bobsled · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...would be to have a way to break into these open relays and infected/zombie/otherwise compromised PC's and disable relaying... but whoever tried would certainly get busted...or the opposite effect would take palce - something like the virus that was written to get rid of a virus (was it to get rid of Blaster? Can't recall... too many brain cells gone...)...more harm done than good...

    Of course, even if possible, it would probably be like trying to kill fire ants one at a time...
    (tedious and VERY painful). Maybe if we could just find the queen spammer...

    --
    Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code...
  38. SPAM = DDOS by DrugCheese · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just a random thought:
    Isn't this just a distributed denial of service attack on my inbox?

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  39. Re:Bombs by easter1916 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's unwanted email, for heaven's sake. Calm down and stop talking nonsense about bombs.

  40. Re:hmmm On picking nits. by _xeno_ · · Score: 3, Insightful
    (Strangely, those of germanic descent weren't detained.)

    Germans are white, and some even immigrated before the nation was the United States (the Pennsylvania Dutch, where Dutch is really Deutsch).

    Japanese are "yellow" or whatever. They immigrated only more recently, since around 1850 or whenever Japan's borders were opened to foreigners. (At WWII, that still would have been about three generations or so for those here the longest.)

    According to one of my Japanese co-workers, those of Japanese or Asian descent are still discriminated against when it comes to security clearances and government jobs. (I wouldn't know, I'm a white male from a small town, I got my clearance fairly quickly once the paperwork was through.)

    Today, it's just those of Arab descent we round up and imprison.

    I'm sure you already knew that, though - it just really ought to be said. Racism is hardly dead in America - we've come a long way, but we aren't even near the finish line yet.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  41. I have seen the enemy, and they are ... Us by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Hi, I once wrote a bulk mailer for a DotCom. I was young. I needed the money. They collected addresses the old fashioned way: free stuff. People would be more than happy to fill out a little questionaire for a discount drink, or (gasp) to get ONTO the mailing list.

    To my credit I had written into the system a very simple and effective opt-out. Click, click, we were out of your life. Everyone on the list had taken the time to fill something out to get on the list. It wasn't really spam.

    At least that's what I tell the voice in my head.

    I also wrote the web statistic reporting engine, so I do know that pageviews to the website would skyrocket following a bulk mail. And no, most of the traffic wasn't for the "opt out" bin.

    This was back in '98, when spam was a joke, not a fact of life. I recently turned down a job reverse engineering a web-database of a certain annoying industry to generate targetted mailing lists.

    And that was from my brother.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  42. How to increase spammers' marketing budgets by prostoalex · · Score: 2

    Yahoo search for bulk e-mail
    Google search for bulk e-mail

    clickety clickety on sponsored links

  43. Selling Advertising vs. Selling Products vs. Fraud by billstewart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Some spammers do make their money retailing the junk they advertise to suckers. They typically make their money by marking up junk, though if the products don't work, they have to find new suckers every month.

    Many spammers make their money by selling advertising service to retailers by promising to deliver eyeballs which can be turned into sales, but don't handle delivery of the product. Sometimes they're getting paid a commission, so they make money if and only if they're successful at attracting suckers to the retailer's products or websites - whether that's pills or pr0n.

    But for many other spammers, the sucker is the retailer who's expecting to get high-quality sales leads, rather than the spammees. Retailers who've learned from the experience usually don't provide repeat business, or at least not without changing the price structure to only pay for actual sales.

    And many spammers make money from fraud. Besides the currently popular Nigerian 419 and the pump&dump stock scammers, there's the old-fashioned pyramid game in its many guises. That used to be more popular than it is today, but it still seems to work. One variation on this is selling spamware to wannabee spammers.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  44. Re:If only the people who READ spam weren't so stu by mikehunt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Err...sorry, but did you ever look at the HTML code included in the spam you receive? In any e-mail client that loads images from HTML messages by default, some spammers are smart enough that the request for the image confirms your e-mail address without you (or the "suckers" that you complain about) lifting a finger.

  45. Can they invite other covert anti-spammers? by billstewart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once a couple of anti-spammers get into one of these clubs, can they go conspire to invite other anti-spammers, or "trusted" writers of "31337" spamware products which leak out useful information (e.g. it does send the spam but it also sends a message to Spamhaus with the IP address and to Vipul's Razor with the message signature?)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  46. Yahoo Mail's "evolution" in spam filtering by ReyTFox · · Score: 2, Informative

    First, I think it was, they had the "Bulk mail" box.

    Then they added an option to report messages that got through the filter, by opening the message, then a listbox, where one of the options was "this is spam."

    Recently they changed it so that now you press a button labeled "spam" rather than open a listbox.

    I'm fairly certain their next step will be to make the button bigger and in capital letters.

  47. So Where Are the Cops? by StormyMonday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's see. Class III narcotics? Check. Stock market pump 'n dump? Check. Nigerian scams? Check. Hijacked machines? Check.

    All of these are seriously illegal.

    So where are the cops?

    It'd be amusing (yes, I have a sick sense of humor) to find out that everybody in the chat room was a cop, just waiting for a real spammer to log in ...

    --
    Welcome to the Turing Tarpit, where everything is possible but nothing interesting is easy.
  48. Strategies by azav · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was thinking about this.

    If a spammer is a repeated spammer, some of the reporting services like spamcop should report them to their registrar. The registrar should revoke their domain and point their domain to a page explaining why this page is unavailable.

    If the registrar does not revoke their domain, the registrar should have their operation suspended by the master registrar.

    If a registrar has a habit of being a registrar for spammers, they will be shut down.

    This seems able to shut down spammers and if this process is fit into the business model of a registrar, may be able to make it more difficult for these assholes to do business.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  49. Re:If only the people who READ spam weren't so stu by bhmit1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unfortunately, that specific mob of suckers that clicks on the spam messages isn't reading slashdot (we happen to be a completely different mob of suckers) and it's doubtful that they even know a "dot head". Therefore, telling us they should know better isn't going to do the least bit of good.

    On the other hand, a different old argument would be appropriate for this group. Simply go to all those URL's (by retyping the top level url, clicking on them probably sends them a key to identify your email address), and submit lots and lots of fake orders. Heck, automate it if you can, with some kind of randomizer that picks odd names from a list so there's no easy way for the spammers to filter them out, and even better if you can impersonate a large network. Suddenly, to get one legit customer, you have to go through thousands of pieces of crap, and the business model no longer works.

    Now, if someone could make a distribute app that accepts some kind of template (go to this url, put a name here, cc number there, etc) to automatically fill in and bang on a spam supported site, I'd be more than happy to run it.

  50. Just like everyone else by tuxlove · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hopefully the spammers aren't that bright...

    This is hopeless wishful thinking. Spammers are just as bright as anyone else. In addition, they generally seem to have a fair share of low cunning. Don't underestimate them.

  51. Not that I advocate vigilantism... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...

    but it would be pretty easy to write a little script that searched for "spam-friendly" and similar search terms on Overture, Google, etc, and clicked through those links.

    Pretty soon, ISPs would have to stop advertising those services. They'd have to resort to mis$pelling s+earch Te(rms like in a SP.AM mess(age, thereby cutting down the effectiveness considerably.

    Of course, anti-spam services would probably take a lot of collateral damage from an approach like this. Innocents getting caught and torn apart by the mob show the fundamental problem with the vigilante approach.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  52. Bounty on your box $.05 by darkonc · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Register article points to another article which talks about how the arrest of the PhatBot worm creator may provide some information on the rental of hordes of compromised machine as networks of spam zombies. It lists a common price of $500 for 10,000 machines -- In other words, your box is worth $.05 to a spammer.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  53. Heck, if you want vigilante justice... by jhantin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    why not tap into the vast nets of compromised machines yourself, to distributedly spam the spammers' order forms with false orders? The spammers' own weapons turned against them... there's something fitting about that.

    Unfortunately, that way lies madness, federal marshals, and another spiraling arms race -- and in any arms race worthy of the title, the only winners are the arms dealers.

    --
    ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
  54. Cumulative effects by adb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quick ethics quiz: if I send out a thousand spams, each of which reaches ten million people and wastes ten seconds of their lives (between deleting and earning the money to pay the marginal cost of services to deal with my shit), I've wasted over three thousand man-years of other people's time. Given that the average human lifespan is on the order of 100 years, am I

    (a) better than,
    (b) worse than, or
    (c) about the same as

    someone who murders 30 people?

    Please explain your answer in a detailed but concise fashion.

    1. Re:Cumulative effects by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would argue that you are better than Mr. Axe murderer (of the 30th degree).

      Why? Because ethics isn't measured by hours of time lost. If it was, then traffic jams "kill" 15,000 people a year! (66 hours a person, say 150 million commuters).

      In fact, we can think of spam as traffic jams of the internet. And I bet people spend much more time in traffic than deleting spam.

      Also, the harm is spread out amongst people, just like insurance spreads about the cost of living amongst people.

      That doesn't mean spam is OK, but it is not murder by any stretch of the imagination.

      But it is most likely fraud, and is annoying.

  55. When Spammers and Anti-Spammers Collide by ChopsMIDI · · Score: 2, Funny

    When a spammer and an anti-spammer collide, they annihilate each other.

    --

    How could I say to men: "Speak louder, shout! For I am deaf!"? -Ludwig van Beethoven
  56. You CAN make money with 900 numbers... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Old phreaking scam. Get yourself a nice 900 number, charge like $10 a minute or some obscene amount like that. Post it on the internet (BBSs at the time) to give it some legitimacy, then beige box a buncha houses (homeade linemans handset into the exterior TNI) to your 900 number, kaching!

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  57. Spammer techniques by jcuervo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've always wondered: why don't spammers just run their messages through SpamAssassin or something before they send out the spam? Just keep tweaking it until it gets a satisfactorily low score, then blast it out to the net.

    I know they're not that bright (Nigerian twits, especially), but this should be a no-brainer.

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  58. how to fix this by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Informative


    I didn't have time to adequately post earlier, and since there seems to be interest, I'll follow up with a solution.

    To close the proxy that is left open in a default installation of Mandrake 9.2, you can add these lines to /etc/httpd/conf/httpd2.conf

    <Proxy *>
    Order Deny,Allow
    Deny from all
    Allow from 192.168.0
    </Proxy>


    After you've edited the file, you'll need to reload the config files in apache.

    apachectl reload