Slashdot Mirror


71% of Spam Servers are Located in China

aspelling writes " We all know that majority of consumer electronics and other goods sold in US stores is produced in China. But China specialty extends beyond consumer electronics, clothes and automotive components. According to Commtouch Software research 71% of all spam servers are located in this People Republic. "Since Jan. 1, we've seen probably a 30% to 40% increase" in spam traffic" Commtouch CEO says. BusinessWeek reports about this issue."

87 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. Obligitory.... by Rooked_One · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't 71% of everything made in China? I've always thought all spam, both meat and annoyance flavors, were made in China...

    1. Re:Obligitory.... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meat-flavored spam? I might actually like it...

    2. Re:Obligitory.... by Tagham_Vidar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm time for liberation from Weapons of Mail Destruction. Let's take away their internet rights!!!

    3. Re:Obligitory.... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

      63% of statistics are made up in China.

    4. Re:Obligitory.... by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's do the Chinese government a favor. Since they put so much effort into censoring the internet, let's give em a hand and unplug them on our end :)

    5. Re:Obligitory.... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Look here.

  2. Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by ericspinder · · Score: 4, Informative
    The direct link want your e-mail address (*shudder*)
    Go to the press release (it is listed on the page) and click on the link for the white paper

    But surprise, surprise, the "best solution" is the one they sell, but it's still an interesting read.

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    1. Re:Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by Yokaze · · Score: 5, Informative

      Question: How does "71% percent of spam servers are located in China" quoted in the article correlate with the whitepaper stating "Figure 1: North America and International Spam Messages Sent Daily" depicting 2005: North America 8.5 billion, International 11 billion?

      Maybe it is in the subtle difference of spam messages sent, and servers used to send them.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  3. Use blacklists... by grub · · Score: 5, Interesting


    If you don't know anyone in China (or Asia) you can use a blacklist for the whole region. My firewall with OpenBSD's awesome spamd autoupdates its tarpit blacklists every couple of hours. One good list for Asian IPs is here.

    I love the idea of tarpitting, seeing spammers connections being tied up for ~3300 seconds (my highest) warms my heart. If more people did it that'd mean less overall spam traffic.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Use blacklists... by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe 71% of Spam Servers are Located in China, but are 71% of the chinese spammers? I doubt it. That would be lot of spam!

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Use blacklists... by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't matter. The source machine is all I care about. If it's in China I don't care if the spammer is American, Chinese or Martian.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Use blacklists... by Bob+Zer+Fish · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just for other people's info... since I didn't know:
      Tarpitting discourages spamming without permanently blocking an offending IP address. Tarpitting works by monitoring traffic and applying sluggish responses to remote IPs showing spam-like behavior. For example, if an IP sends too many messages to users during an email session, tarpitting starts slowing MDaemon's response. If the spam-like behavior includes excessive unknown addresses during a session, the remote server can be suspended from access for a user-specified amount of time.

    4. Re:Use blacklists... by Cecil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's just something that seems fundamentally wrong about connecting to a global network and then blacklisting half of it.

      It's like buying Lucky Charms cereal, then filtering out all the marshmallows and throwing them in the garbage because they're not healthy. Very true, but if that's how you feel, why bother buying Lucky Charms?

      Surely it would be more effective to implement challenge-response, or simply boycott email in favour of IM or a secure messageboard/contact form, or whatever you prefer. The problem is with email, not with Asia.

      Besides, I think this study is bogus. All the studies I've previously seen pointed squarely at the USA as the primary source of spam. Empirical evidence from my own email box bears this out. Most of the spam I receive tends to come from residential cable modem/DSL lines in various countries, predominantly the states. I suspect that these are either virus-hijacked boxes, or people being paid to send spam through their home connection (ie, the ads placed on telephone polls: "Have an internet connection at home? Make up to $4,000/month with no effort required! Call now!")

    5. Re:Use blacklists... by realdpk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. This is a common misunderstanding. The majority of spammers are from the US.

    6. Re:Use blacklists... by Mysticode · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not going to help too much. According to the article, 71% of the URLs appearing in spam messages point to websites hosted in China however 60% of spam messages are sent from the US. In fact, China (although second) is only the location of the mail servers sending about 6% of the spam messages that they analyzed. The post was not too clear on that but the source article is.

    7. Re:Use blacklists... by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Funny

      Spam is all Bush's fault. I didn't get this much spam when clinton was president. And when Carter was president I didn't get any spam at all!

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    8. Re:Use blacklists... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except, it's more like buying a box of lucky charms expecting to find marshmallows and the regular oats (or whatever it is) cereal and finding a bunch of dirty needles in it as well. SPAM is not supposed to be a part of the web. It's an unwelcome, criminal blight on it and it's being perpetrated by people who are actively trying to ruin a good thing for everyone else. I find it perfectly acceptable that these people be relegated to their own corner and thrown off the web.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    9. Re:Use blacklists... by jaeson · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't care if the spammer is American, Chinese or Martian. Well, considering that the Martian addresses are non-routable, I'd say you won't be receiving much spam from there.

    10. Re:Use blacklists... by Cecil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may find it perfectly acceptable now, but what about if they turn around and start doing the same thing to us? I, for one, don't even find it acceptable as a one-way thing. People in Asian countries have as much right to email me as anyone else. Isolationist tactics will destroy the internet as we know it, and negate much of the good that it has done and is doing around the world. This is not the path we want to go down. It's a poor solution, and it's certainly not the right solution.

    11. Re:Use blacklists... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh baloney. There are a bunch of open relays in China, so block them. If the admin's too dumb to close the relay, that's the admin's problem and we shouldn't suffer for their inability to maintain their server properly. In fact, I support blacklisting ANY open relay that's being used by spammers regardless of what country it's in.

      Besides, you don't have to block them altogether. You can blacklist the IP blocks in your mail server and not in your web server. If the IP block can't use e-mail responsibly, I see no reason to let them be a part of my section of the e-mail chain. It's my house, and if I don't want to let you in, I'm not going to. All the better if I actually have a good reason to keep you out, such as your past abusive behavior.

      The Internet's not some big, hippy love-in where we have to be completely tolerant of every imbecile's idiotic behavior just to avoid confrontation. Stomp on my toes, I'll break your nose. Deal with it.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    12. Re:Use blacklists... by tacocat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You didn't read the article did you?

      It doesn't claim that the source of spam is 71% China. It claims that the indicated web server in the spam is located in China 71% of the time.

      You can blacklist the entire Asian world and you won't guarantee any reduction in spam itself.

      Challenge - Response is the most fucked up solution I've ever seen. I tried and it got spammed heavily for using it. It doesn't work. It's a resource pig and it pisses a lot of people off.

      The problem isn't Asia or anyone else. The problem is that SPAM makes people money to the tune of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR. There is no way you will ever turn the tide of that financial force with an RBL or a Challenge-Response solution. It will take more than that.

      Unfortunately it will probably cost all of us a lot of money and a lot of freedoms. I hope I'm wrong.

  4. The Great (fire)Wall of China by kent_eh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If China can keep much of the rest of the internet inaccessable to their citizens, why can't the rest of the world block the polution that China is transmitting?

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    1. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by MMaestro · · Score: 2, Insightful
      why can't the rest of the world block the polution that China is transmitting?

      Because the moment the world accidently blocks John Chang's e-mail from China to his son in the USA, people would start bitching about 'censorship of the internet' and how 'the first amendment was being trampled on because they can't chose to recieve thousands of spam messages.' The only reason China can get away with this is because they have a communist government. The moment it falls apart (if ever) you can expect to see the filters fall away too, a la Berlin Wall.

    2. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by WwWonka · · Score: 3, Funny

      why can't the rest of the world block the polution that China is transmitting?

      What, and deny ourselves the email equivalent of B grade Kung Fu movies?

      "Do Viagra need you? Make man you strong and sexy you. Click please link here below."

  5. Great by crumbz · · Score: 5, Funny


    Yet another IT service being outsourced overseas........

    Write your congressperson and demand that SPAM jobs be kept at home!

  6. blacklist the netblocks? by apachetoolbox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have no reason to ever get traffic from china when I'm talkin about my own personal servers.

    First question is what netblocks can I block to effectivley ban all of china?

    1. Re:blacklist the netblocks? by y3wn1ck5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, right out of my pf.conf:

      # All China netblocks [ http://www.apnic.net/apnic-bin/ipv4-by-country.pl? country=cn }

      table <china> { 61.28.0.0/15, 61.48.0.0/13, 61.128.0.0/10, 61.232.0.0/13, 202.0.110.0/24, 202.0.160.0/20, 202.0.176.0/22, 202.4.128.0/19, 202.4.252.0/22, 202.14.88.0/24, 202.14.235.0/24, 202.14.236.0/23, 202.14.238.0/24, 202.20.120.0/24, 202.22.248.0/21, 202.38.0.0/20, 202.38.32.0/19, 202.38.64.0/18, 202.38.128.0/17, 202.90.0.0/22, 202.90.252.0/22, 202.91.0.0/22, 202.91.128.0/22, 202.92.0.0/22, 202.92.252.0/22, 202.93.0.0/22, 202.93.252.0/22, 202.94.0.0/19, 202.95.0.0/19, 202.95.252.0/22, 202.96.0.0/12, 202.112.0.0/13, 202.120.0.0/15, 202.122.0.0/19, 202.122.32.0/21, 202.122.128.0/24, 202.127.0.0/18, 202.127.128.0/17, 202.130.0.0/19, 202.130.224.0/19, 202.131.160.0/19, 202.131.192.0/19, 202.136.252.0/22, 202.192.0.0/12, 203.81.16.0/20, 203.87.224.0/19, 203.88.0.0/18, 203.89.0.0/18, 203.90.0.0/18, 203.91.0.0/18, 203.92.0.0/18, 203.93.0.0/16, 203.94.0.0/18, 203.95.0.0/18, 203.128.128.0/19, 203.184.0.0/19, 203.192.0.0/19, 203.196.0.0/18, 203.207.64.0/18, 203.207.128.0/17, 203.208.0.0/18, 203.212.0.0/18, 203.222.192.0/18, 203.223.0.0/20, 210.5.0.0/16, 210.12.0.0/15, 210.14.128.0/17, 210.15.0.0/17, 210.15.128.0/18, 210.21.0.0/16, 210.22.0.0/16, 210.25.0.0/16, 210.26.0.0/15, 210.28.0.0/14, 210.32.0.0/12, 210.51.0.0/16, 210.52.0.0/15, 210.72.0.0/14, 210.76.0.0/15, 210.78.0.0/16, 210.79.224.0/19, 210.82.0.0/15, 211.64.0.0/13, 211.80.0.0/12, 211.96.0.0/13, 211.136.0.0/13, 211.144.0.0/12, 211.160.0.0/13 }

      You would be amazed how many hits I get from this rule alone.

    2. Re:blacklist the netblocks? by benzapp · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    3. Re:blacklist the netblocks? by sk8king · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why on earth would anyone be amazed? The /10's and /12's you give cover MILLIONS of computers. Of course you're going to get lots of hits. The addresses probably contain millions of dynamically assigned addresses that get assigned to compromised machines..... Just like everywhere else on the planet that has internet.

      Try blocking dynamic ranges and you'll probably do as well. Probably better because you'll end up blocking all the dynamic DSL connections from the big guys in North America like Comcast, Verizon and Bell etc.

  7. That's the thing... by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hardly surprising, since as soon as you spam a million people, an hour later you're hungry to spam a million more. ;)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  8. Firewalling? by essiescreet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about the big firewall stuff that China uses to restrict access? I guess it doesen't affect email?, or maybe it's government approved?

  9. Re:Taiwan by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That brings up an interesting point about the difference (or lack thereof) between Taiwan and the mainland PRC.

    Does the story differentiate between the two?

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  10. Old Joke by nightsweat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Me Chinese, me play joke, me send ads for erectile disfunction drugs, marital aids, sites with farm animals, septic tank cleaning, unlimited monthly income potential, hot stock tips, offers to meet girls in your area, and tiny little remote control cars to your inbox.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  11. C'mon... by Adam+Booth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, It's China. Give them a break. Almost all of our stuff comes from China, why not the spam? We still owe them for Chinese food.

  12. This may seem like an easy answer... by peterdaly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not start blocking IP addresses for SMTP from China? Also start some sort of whitelist of known good STMP servers to help the legit email users in China. If the country can get (or doesn't care to) get spammers under control, like has happened in other counties, then the rest of the world should take matters into their own hands.

    If China is really the source of much of it, we would see a dramatic decrease.

    Or am I missing something?

    1. Re:This may seem like an easy answer... by hopemafia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, you are missing that the e-mails themselves are not coming from China. The website the e-mails point to are hosted in China.

      --
      If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
    2. Re:This may seem like an easy answer... by asavage · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup the spammers are still mostly americans.

  13. remember what Russia used to say by samantha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was along the lines of "the capitalist countries will sell us the rope the hang them with". Those driven to financial gain eschewing possible ethical concerns will at best impose a lot of friction and drag on the system. They may end up poisoning the internet sufficiently to end a lot of net freedom we take for granted. I am sure China is more than happy to take our money as we bury ourselves.

  14. blackholes by Feyr · · Score: 5, Informative

    there was a tip posted to NANOG this morning. you can use china.blackholes.us as a RBL (look at their page, they have other lists) to effectively block all mail from china's IPs

  15. Word to that... by Adam+Booth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I too have gotten tired of spam, and run my own mail server on my domain. I have complete control over my email, and complete control over the spam. I get less than 1% spam. However, it's sad that it has to come to that. Not everyone can run their own email servers. What about my mom or grandmother who can't even manage to set up their email account under M$ Outlook? For anyone who has the skill/interest, setting up your own email service is a good idea.

    1. Re:Word to that... by Progman3K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I [...] run my own mail server on my domain.
      >Not everyone can run their own email servers. What about my mom or grandmother

      Why don't you give them e-mail accounts on your domain and they'll get spam-free e-mail.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  16. Why block China? by Unnngh! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Several people have mentioned blocking all of China, but what good will this do? Okay, most of the spam originates from there, but this wouldn't be an interesting study if most of the spam were obviously from China. I would imagine that most spammers are using relays of some sort and have a pretty good idea what they are doing. The country-wide blacklist may not be a bad idea but I question its effectiveness.

    1. Re:Why block China? by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you don't have any correspondence with anyone in China, blocking shouldn't hurt a thing. The article even states that they doubt all of the spammers are from China and rather the majority are in the US and Europe. This means that, obviously, the spammers are using a relay through Chinese servers. Blacklisting China would stop the mail coming from that country... As was already mentioned, this would only make sense if you are not dealing with any people or companies from there.

      --
      Hmmm.
    2. Re:Why block China? by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Reply to you and the 10 other people saying this -- it's not a question of moral blame, it's a question of a technical solution. If you have no reason to expect mail from a .cn domain, then blocking all .cn mail makes a huge dent in your spam problem. The fact that the spammer might be your next-door neighbor is irrelevant.

      I face a *huge* spam problem, mostly from .ru, and dumping everything from that domain makes an enormous difference.

  17. How Ironic by 2names · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it is that 71% of a form of communication originates from a country that tries its damndest to stifle the voice of its people.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:How Ironic by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 5, Insightful
      China is not trying to stifle the voices of their people as much as it is trying to prevent them from reading certain things. Supressing speech inside of China is simply an easy way to limit what people can read.

      They don't really care that much about what the outside world can read about China, as long as that information doesn't get back into the country.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    2. Re:How Ironic by glenalec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sadly, this isn't too far off the truth. That's from someone living here the past 5 years.

      Keep in mind, also, that the Chinese you see as tourists are the rich ones (the ones living like kings) and they are the REALLY obnoxious ones (with a few exceptions). Having money is the only goal of most people around here and they don't understand or respect anything else. If you are rich enough to own a car (and hence choke the atmosphere for your own grandchildren) over here, you are a mini-emperor and you expect all people on bicycle or foot to clear away from your blaring horn and bow down to your superior wealth. Then you will drive to the zoo for an afternoon of laughter at spitting at the monkeys (the monkeys have learned to spit back, which really is funny). Barbarians with cash -- middle-class Chinese (with a few exceptions).

      You want to see an extremely class-stratified society? Here it is!

      Of course, 70% of the foreigners living over here make me cringe over their obnoxious attitudes and behaviour too.

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
  18. But most of my email... by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Funny

    lately seems to originate in Africa. Nigeria to be exact.

    Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  19. Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Spam, the food, is made right in our very own third world city of Austin, Minnesota at the Hormel plant. (also Nebraska, Denmark, Korea and The Phillipines.) See the Spam museum.

    (Funny on slashdot how I have to qualify Spam as a food product...)

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
    1. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Insightful
      (Funny on slashdot how I have to qualify Spam as a food product...)

      That might be because the food product is properly called SPAM. (Follow your own links!)

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are referring of course to "SPAM®" the registered trademark. Although, instructions for use of the mark are not on the site as you suggest.

      They are found here:

      Proper Trademark Use Guidelines.

      Please Do:

      Always put the trademark SPAM in all capital letters. Follow SPAM with "Luncheon Meat" or other descriptor. Remember, a trademark is a formal adjective and as such, should always be followed by a noun.


      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    3. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Snakes, Possums And Mice

      But we all knew that anyhow.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  20. Where are the banks? by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you put a credit card number into a site, what bank gets the transaction? That's how to track spammers.

  21. Another source by broothal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Strange, because USA is still #1 in all 3 categories listed (scroll down) on spamhaus.org
    Besides - who cares where the exploited servers are? Soon (my guess is - less than 6 months) the majority of spams will be sent via zombies taken over by some worm or virus. These computers will be spread all over the world. The only solution is to nip it in the butt. Make spam illegal (as it is in Europe) and sue the pants of the spammers. Enough of those stupid atempts to pretend something is being done. We all know that the spammers are from Gods own country - hijacking machines whereever it's easiest.
    /me sets mode -rant

    1. Re:Another source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just had to laugh at your "nip it in the butt" statement. I can never understand why people use these metaphors without even understanding them; "touch basis" and "for all intensive purposes" are two other examples that come to mind.

      In your case, you mangled a very old metaphor used to imply destroying something before it reaches maturity; the actual phrase is "nip it in the bud." It is a reference to state of a flower before it reaches full bloom. This "nip it in the butt" error was so hilarious that I'll ignore all your spelling errors for now.

  22. Bullshit by nnnneedles · · Score: 4, Interesting

    75% of spam is american. American lowlifes selling american products..

    At least according to my own experience, and according to research conducted outside of america..

    I don't believe for a minute that the spammers are actually chinese.. You can recognize the writing of a typical american "internet entrepeneur" in most spam mail..

    And the servers? Sure, but most spam servers are innocent infected computers anyway...and if you look at the number of american computers in the world compared to the number of asian numbers..it would surprize me if the majority of servers aren't american..

    I have never seen a single spam email with chinese letters..why?

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
  23. Don't jump so quickly on the Chinese by smr2x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spam may be coming from Chinese _servers_, but I doubt 71% of the spammers are Chinese. Everyone in this thread seems to think that actual Chinese people are doing the spamming. I don't think this is the case.

    --
    .
  24. Its a small business by CdBee · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Since Jan. 1, we've seen probably a 30% to 40% increase" in spam traffic" Commtouch CEO say"

    This accurately mirrors what I've noted, I run the mail sweeper for a medium-sized enterprise and analyse spam to improve the quality of our filtering.
    I note a lot of the spam has similar formats (apart from the 419 scammers, but they're easy to filter out), leading me to suggest that spamming is dominated by a relatively small clique of big-time mailers

    This does at least make it easier to write rules to stop it. We don't use Bayesian filtering, a human-monitored system can be more efficient if done right.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  25. just say NO by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would be perfectly willing to not receive any e-mail from China, or even all of Asia for that matter. Unfortunately, not running my own mail server, I can't block their addresses direcly, but it would be nice if someone mapped out the IP addresses to block and came up with some good mail server rules. Clearly this would have to be done as an option on an acount-by-acount basis, so it has to be done in the mail server and not the firewall, but I expect enough people would opt-out of Chinese oriinated e-mail to make it worth while for any system that supported such an option and coul long-term have a significant impact on this source of spam.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:just say NO by taustin · · Score: 3, Informative

      www.blackholes.us has zone files to block, by country, all the major sources of spam (except the US, and there is has the major spamhaus ISPs).

      Implementing it by mailbox would be up to your ISP. The tools they need are readily available.

    2. Re:just say NO by taustin · · Score: 2

      How would that work for Colo servers?

      For example, my friend's site is located in Asia (don't know exactly where), but he's been born and raised on the American Continent. If you blocked the whole of Asia as you so diligently say we should, he could not run his site.


      Then perhaps your friend should stop doing business with criminals. (In this case, they are criminals because they knowingly sell services to cirminals, because all spammers are criminals. If your friend is willing to support criminals, I have no interest in his web site, and never, ever will.

      Besides, aren't we for freedom of speech? Or is it that only ourselves are allowed to say anything we want and if it originates outside the borders of the 'first' world it must be bad/propaganda/whatever.

      Your freedom of speech ends at my firewall. When you're willing to pay for my mail server, and my bandwidth, and my electricity, then you can tell me what I have to do with them. In the meantime, I do block all mail from China (and Korea, and Nigera, and Russia, and a number of other criminal gangs pretending to be nations), and I will continue to do so.

      Only spammers talk about freedom of speech in discussions about blocking spam. Which spammer are you?

    3. Re:just say NO by aelbric · · Score: 3, Informative

      You sir or ma'am, are my hero.

      "Your freedom of speech ends at my firewall" is a variation of something that I have said for years. These people who pull out the Bill of Rights to defend deplorable behavior disgust me. I don't care if they do it, just do it the hell away from me.

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
  26. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by Grax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't speak for the accuracy of the assertion that the web servers linked to in spam messages are located in China 71% of the time.

    But I can say that of 3413 spam messages I received only 185 of them came from China.

  27. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by i88i · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, what's holding us off from just blackholing the entire country until they get their political act together?

    i think thats a horrible idea, it could possibly silence the best form of free speech the people there have.
    besides, if some other country was to blacklist US based servers, purely because of the US's politics, im sure everyone would be crying foul. You shouldn't let politics dictate what happens with the internet.

  28. That's funny because... by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... most of my email seems to be coming from these hot, single, girls that all want to meet ME! I blush everytime!

    --
    Hmmm.
  29. ahhh...so clear now... by justforaday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, that explains why so much of spam is for penis enlargement products... :-p

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  30. Re:would tarpit help? by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The problem with tarpitting is that it only ties up ONE PROCESS in the spammer server. A good server will have multiple delivery threads, and you'd have to tarpit all (or most) of them to affect the server significantly.

    That said, our system takes 2 minutes to ACK requests after the first error, expanding to 10 minutes/error, just before it hangs up at 20 errors. It isn't much, but it makes ME feel better.

  31. Re:Taiwan by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Taiwanese servers use the tw code, cn is used by the Reds. It's not technically hard to disambiguate the two countries-- so the question then becomes-- did the authors of the study at some point take the "One China" myth seriously?

  32. Re:Block .cn! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

    You have to know what IP addresses are physically located in China and block those.

    Here you go:
    http://www.okean.com/asianspamblocks.html

  33. Re:Taiwan by Yokaze · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about reading the story?

    They are talking about the Peoples Republic (of China), captial Beijing, "China is notorious for its Internet censorship efforts".

    This doesn't sound like they are talking about Taiwan/Republic of China, (provisional) capital Taipei.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  34. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by name773 · · Score: 2, Funny

    so greed is stopping the U.S. from stopping communism... that made my day :)

  35. How nice of them to block-list my ISP then! by Dman33 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Our Chinese clients started complaining that they no longer had access to our US based FTP server and e-mail addresses just last week. Turns out, China blocked the DNS servers that our ISP uses! Great... yippee.

    We are switching ISPs anyway, so I am not terribly concerned, I just think this is wildly hypocritical.

  36. The reason by mldqj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of the spams I receive are from companies in US or other English-speaking countries. The reason why many spams come from China is that there are many free email service providers there that give SMTP/POP access to users (unlike MSN and Yahoo, which only provide web access), so it's extremely easy to get a free account and start sending bulk emails.

  37. RTFA! by koehn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Doesn't anyone read the article?

    It said that 71% of the URLs in spam go to web servers in China, not that 71% of spam comes from China!

    The vast majority of spam that hits my mail server comes from the US (comcast, rr.com, etc) machines that have been compromised.

    Tools like bigevil.cf (SpamAssassin plugin) help me to filter those spams with Chinese URLs.

  38. here are proves: by dunkelfalke · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://sophos.com/spaminfo/articles/dirtydozen.htm l

    --
    Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  39. Semi-funny ways to deal with spammers! by xmas2003 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I HATE Email spammers ... here's a couple of links on my home page (Mod down if you think over-the-top links, but I thought some folks might appreciate the humor) that basically sum up my thoughts:

    First, lets use an M-1 Carbine to hunt 'em like rats!
    After that, have the Three Shotgun Dudes shoot 'em up!
    If the spammer is still kick'in, fire an RPG at 'em!
    And finally, to finish 'em off, use these weapons of mass destruction!

    Put whatever is left of the spammer on my back yard, and I'll have The Incredible Hulk drop off my roof and SMASH 'em!

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
  40. What's really happening out there ... by gd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... is that those servers are used by spammers as open relay, not that those spams are originated there.

    There're just too many clueless email admins over there. They lack the skills of configuring a well behaved MTA (it's a pretty tough job these days indeed), and the language barrier is just making things worse. Most of the people are just configuring their mail servers according to howto-like articles written by some clueful guys, and those articles are mostly just laying out the steps, no how and why things should work that way. If you hop to any of the tech forums' email section, you'll find it's full of questions like:

    "Help, I just configured my email server according to XXX but things didn't work out ..."

    "Help, why my smtp auth doesn't work? It'll accept any username/password ..."

    "Help, why I can send out email by can't receive?"

    "Help, I got blacklisted by XXX, how can I get myself out?"

    etc., etc. ...

    So, it's a matter of educating them how to do things right. As a Chinese myself, I am trying hard to help out those poor guys by answering questions on those forums, and by helping them out translating the documentations to Chinese.

    So please, don't shut the door to them, they just need to be educated.

    --
    gd
  41. Cut Spam: Block the APNIC IP's to your mailserver by Kili · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I went to: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space and greped it for APNIC. I tarpitted all these address blocks on port 25 so my mail-server never sees them. If we get asian clients some day I guess I'll have to specifically white-list their MX(s).

    Relevant portion of the file at iana.org:
    058/8 Apr 04 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    059/8 Apr 04 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    060/8 Apr 03 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    061/8 Apr 97 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    202/8 May 93 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    203/8 May 93 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    210/8 Jun 96 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    211/8 Jun 96 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    218/8 Dec 00 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    219/8 Sep 01 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    220/8 Dec 01 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    221/8 Jul 02 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    222/8 Feb 03 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
  42. The products/services are mostly from the U.S. by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those are the people we should be going after. Spam, even under the recent federal law should be enforced against the people paying for the service.

    Do you sell the penis pills advertised? Yeah? Did you request the advertisement? SLAM!

    Forget about blocking all of China. I feel safe in the belief that it wouldn't stop the spam at all.

  43. It works like this... by Xenographic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, it works like this:

    1) The top spammers (the people) are from the USA.

    2) They like to use relays (computers) in China, since most of the ISPs here don't like spammers and spamhauses (ISPs set up to do nothing but host spammers, they may even pretend to take down accounts while just shifting them to different ones, etc. Evil, really.)

    3) They're also now using worm/virus-infected hosts as relays. I recently helped a friend clean out a rather nasty infestation which was being used as a spam relay without their knowledge, and which had been reported at SpamCop (this, I believe, was how we first found out about the evil relay, actually).

    4) Oddly enough, today I got my first compliant spam under the FTC's rules. It actually had 'Sexually Explicit:' in the subject line unmunged. I was fairly impressed. Naturally, it was deleted immediately along with all other spam in the spamtrap.

    5) Even if we don't get all (or very many of them), I think that the new spam law may do some good, though it surely won't stop spam. I would just love it if we could take out the top dozen or so US spammers, which would decrease the spam volume by an order of magnitude, I should think. Spam relays don't send spam on their own, folks (at least, not yet... hrm, hope I don't give them any ideas...). Even if the law doesn't really do much of anything, I still wouldn't mind seeing spammers in jail...

  44. Spam museum by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Funny

    * a tour guide walks through the SPAM museum with a tour group, and points to a can on a pedestal *

    This is the first can of spam that was ever produced by Hormel. It was made in 1937 in Austin, Minn.

    Not too long after, it was shipped in mass quantities to Allied forces in Europe, who found it a delicious alternative to starvation.

    *Picks up the can on the pedestal, pops it open, sticks a fork in and takes a bite. *

    Mmmm. Fresh as the day it was made!

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  45. Blackholing China, Korea Helps, Not Cure by cmholm · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I've been using some of the national block lists from http://www.blackholes.us/ for about a year. My logs show quite a few blocks from these alone, so it's worth your while. The result is that virtually all of my spam sources from the US or Eastern Europe. A little nmap'ing of the US IPs leads me to believe these are mostly unsecured Windows boxes on broadband.

    As a result, I may soon start looking around for rbls of zombie PCs, or consider running a bot to sniff these out myself. Thumb in the dike? Sure, but it beats doing nothing.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  46. Spam not the only Chinese problem by randall_burns · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I was involved as a DBA in the first database integration for Falcon, which eventually became the world's most popular credit card fraud detection system. According the the fraud analysts that I worked with, the lion's share of counterfeit credit cards were manufactured in China. This is the type of business that takes a fair amount of operational support-you need to create factories and the kind of things that it is impossible to do without the local authorities knowing something is up. What this has in common with spam: in both cases these are profitable businesses that require protection from the authorities to stay in--and that protection can be bought for a reasonable price.


    Ultimately, I think we'll need smarter spam filters. That isn't too different than what we were doing at HNC. IF the letter is from someone you don't know and talks about Human growth hormone or altering of bodily parts, it is a pretty good bet it is spam. It is really just a matter of good pattern recognition.

  47. That's fine by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are allowed to ban whomever you like. There are servers I control that are accessable from as little as one subnet (and others that are on a physically private network). That's my right.

    It also could work to help force people to get their shit straight. Many ISPs (domestic and foriegn) are just non-responsive to SPAM/hacking complaints. One proven tactic that works is the threat of mass bans. Between a proposed UPD and a ban by the members of Nanog, UUNET was convinced to become more responsive to complains of network abuse.

    The Internet does not have a police force so the community polices itself. If a group won't play by the rules, they shouldn't be supprised to find themselves excluded from a large part of it.

  48. Just what they want? by Pascal666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hear complaints all the time about how much censorship of the Internet is done by the Chinese government, then what do we do? We add all of China to our RBLs to block the spam, and end up blocking what legitimate e-mail does get through. Sounds like we are doing just what the Chinese government wants us to.

    -Pascal

  49. Willing participants or innocent victims? by kbahey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many of the comments here are anti-China, which we can understand, because SPAM is so much hated by all of us.

    However, there is differentiator that needs to be made here: how many of these servers are actually run by spammers, vs. how many are hijacked by spammers without the owners' consent?

    Isn't this an over generalization that demonizes entire people like: "All Arabs hate us!" or "All terrorists are Muslims!" or "All Jews are evil!"?

    Another point is a differentiation between the people and the government. What the government does is not necessarily the same as what the people want or like.

    Think about how G. W. Bush is behaving abroad (in your name) and even domestically, and ask yourself do you want everything he does to be actually in your name.

  50. Mmmmm by DigitalSpyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    71% of spam originates from China
    yet...
    80% of the worlds spammers operate from the USA?

    Maybe non-tech people will finally start drawing the connection on how spam is delivered.

    Then again maybe pigs will fly too...