Slashdot Mirror


Mobo for Vertically Challenged Devices

An anonymous reader writes "VIA is shipping an ultra-low profile mini-ITX mainboard suitable for flat TVs, LCD-panel computers, and other vertically challenged devices. The Epia MS uses a minimalistic I/O backplate and SODIMM memory for a slimmer form-factor, and is VIA's first mini-ITX board available with a fanless 1GHz Eden embedded processor. The board has several processor options, but they all include the PadLock Ace hardware RNG and AES encrypt/decrypt features that are now supported by the Linux and BSD kernels."

197 comments

  1. Oh no not in there!? by Braingoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    now we can install computers in the most ungodly places!

    1. Re:Oh no not in there!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      now we can install computers in the most ungodly places!

      What, like in the back of a Volkswagen?

    2. Re:Oh no not in there!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Atheist churches?

    3. Re:Oh no not in there!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I've been here too long.

      First thing I thought of was Goatse.

      I'm going outside now.

    4. Re:Oh no not in there!? by fermion · · Score: 1
      Good! Now MS Windows can be run in the appropriate environment!

      That leaves all the sacred places for Macs, and all the mundane places for *nix.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Oh no not in there!? by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      Macs run UNIX too, silly!

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    6. Re:Oh no not in there!? by Foolhardy · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Surely you mean in the front: the engine is in the back!

      Or is the new model different?

    7. Re:Oh no not in there!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant "the backseat" (although the new ones are front-engine FWD).

      But now that you mention it, anything to do with volkswagon is ungodly (including the front, the back, and everything in between).

    8. Re:Oh no not in there!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a reference to the movie "Mallrats", moran.

    9. Re:Oh no not in there!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can put this new technology into our clocks around the world, and give a new meaning to the phrase "overclocking". heck, it may even invent a way to travel through time...ya never know

  2. Sounds like the mean horizontally chalenged by kryptKnight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Theres plenty of room in a flat screen TV if you place the card verticly, am I missing something??

    --
    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Sounds like the mean horizontally chalenged by cynic10508 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Theres plenty of room in a flat screen TV if you place the card verticly, am I missing something??

      Yeup. The "al" in "vertically".

    2. Re:Sounds like the mean horizontally chalenged by enosys · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think they mean the height of the board if it was placed horizontally. Stuff like the CPU heat sink and fan makes it pretty high then. If the board was placed vertically in a flat screen TV the TV would have to be thicker because of that.

  3. Re:Hahahaha by Mz6 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "I fucking hate Slashdot. Go to hell."

    If you hate it then don't come... Why is it so hard for people to understand that? Instead you come here, refresh the page 1000 times just to get your comment at or near the top. You are probably reading this site more than people who actually like this site... How twisted is that?

    Screw my karma on this one...

    --
    Hmmm.
  4. Words, lingo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are a few new words I see popping up that I find entirely disagreeable, such as blog, mebi, gibi, etc. But mobo I can handle.

    1. Re:Words, lingo. by Reivec · · Score: 1

      mobo is hardly new. I have been using that term for like 10 years now.

    2. Re:Words, lingo. by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Very true... I've been using it as far back as 96

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    3. Re:Words, lingo. by errxn · · Score: 1

      How about "vertically challenged?" It doesn't get much more annoying than that.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    4. Re:Words, lingo. by Anepthia · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that could make an interesting bumper sticker: My other mobo's a mofo too!

  5. Thickness??! by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Informative

    For a board that concentrates on being thin, I find it surprising that that dimension isn't listed. It's not on Via's product listing for this board and it's not in the user's manual (pdf).

    Visually, i'm guessing that it is thicker than the 0.75" base of my PowerBook, but I'd like to know the real size...

    1. Re:Thickness??! by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

      I think the thickness is not listed as it could be variable depending on what's plugged into the board: PCI card, IDE cables, power cables, etc.

    2. Re:Thickness??! by Kenja · · Score: 2, Informative

      Based on the big ass heat sink I'm betting its around 1.5" tall. This is not a very "low profile" looking board. In fact I think my older 600mhz fanless VIA Mini-ITX board is shorter.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Thickness??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The current mini-itx motherboards, in case, are only 1-5/8" thick, I think you can expect the MS model, due in September, to be a LOT less thick.

    4. Re:Thickness??! by sCreeD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to the _article_, there are two CPU models : one requiring the "fansink" (oy!) and one without (800MHz).

      What perfect timing! I had a Netgear modem gateway die on me and its metal case is small (7" x 10")and sturdy. However, it's a skosh too shallow to fit an Epia 800 because of the serial and parallel ports (stupid legacy ports!!!!).

      Screed

    5. Re:Thickness??! by slashjames · · Score: 1

      I've always just used a riser card to get a PCI card to run parallel to the motherboard. What's so special about this?

    6. Re:Thickness??! by kfg · · Score: 1

      I had a Netgear modem gateway die on me. . .

      I had a box of La Fincas "die" on me. The box is small, but actual measurement tells me that it's just a hair too small to fit an ITX board inside.

      Bummer, because I really was looking forward to a nice little cigar box PC gaming "console."

      Well, guess I'll just have to go through another box with a larger ring gauge.

      KFG

  6. ummm.......? by Osgyth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Aren't flat TVs depth challenged rather then vertically challenged? Unless of course you lay it on the ground and stand over it to watch it.....

    1. Re:ummm.......? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Or mount it on the ceiling and lay in bed and watch it.

    2. Re:ummm.......? by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 4, Funny

      All televisions are depth challenged, no matter what their dimensions. You need only turn them on to see the problem!

    3. Re:ummm.......? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cant do that, it'll get in the way of the mirror!

      [puts on his leisure suit]

    4. Re:ummm.......? by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      tv can be quite deep, depending on what you are watching. nothing on prime-time TV, of course

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    5. Re:ummm.......? by foo23 · · Score: 1

      There is also this knob calles brightness, but it doesn't work either.

    6. Re:ummm.......? by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      Panelling the ceiling with mirrors is old-tech. With the advances that modern audio-visual technology brings, you can also do:

      * Select viewing angle
      * Slow-motion replay
      * Rewind, fast-forward, and skip to event or time-mark
      * Watch a re-run of last week's performance

      Just think of the possibilities!

    7. Re:ummm.......? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Or mount it on the ceiling and lay in bed and watch it.

      You couldn't pay me enough to sleep under one of those. I met the guy who installed one like that for Shaquille O'Neil, and although he claimed it was mounted good n' solid, I noticed that the man never had his shoes tied. I'd never hang a 300 pound flat screen over my head in earthquake country, trusting that the guy assembling 500 TV mounts an hour for ten cents a day was doing a good job, and trusting that a guy who can't figure out simple shoelace knots knows enough not to hang such a thing with 2" drywall screws.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:ummm.......? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      The best way to do it would be to set up a projector beside your bed pointing upwards. Same effect, but much less likely to cause a fatal injury.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  7. Very PC of you, /. by SkyWalk423 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's so nice to see that you finally quit referring to them as "midget" devices and went with the much more PC "vertically challenged" devices.

    1. Re:Very PC of you, /. by AviLazar · · Score: 2

      And when I first read the title of this article I thought they came out with PC devices made for those who are vertically challenged - and then the bells started flying "Do vertically challenged people need specially made computers? Don't they just put it on a desk that fits their size?"
      Damn misleading title

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  8. Yay! by MacGoldstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now we can finally build our own WiFi Surfboards!!! Apart from the crazy ones, mobos like this will probably open up a whole slew of new uses.

    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? OMG what has happened to the moderators?

    2. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THEY WERE GIVING ME GOOD KARMA UNTIL YOU CAME ALONG BIZNATCH. NOW CRAWL BACK INTO THE HOLE FROM WHENCE YOU CAME AND DIE. abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyznowiknowmyabcsnexttimewo ntyousingwithme abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyznowiknowmyabcsnexttimewo ntyousingwithme

  9. Nice little board by nizo · · Score: 4, Informative

    This would be an excellent board for a quiet mini-system. Toss in something like a thumb drive or whatever and it would stay quiet. BTW Toms hardware said they will sell for around $180 too, which is pretty reasonable.

    1. Re:Nice little board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming the integrated compact flash slot that some models will have, if you could put a big enough one in there, say 256MB, enough for a root partition at least (with enough to get it to BOOT and then mount everything else over nfs or samba, why bother with the hassle of net booting?)

      It would make a very nice little thing to sit in the living room. Plenty enough to rip DVD's off to the media server, and play them back. Probably wouldn't have the ability to do PVR functionality without some sort of hardware assistance.

      Its going to be a while yet before everything is seemless. It seems to me the whole media server arena is kind of half-baked still. Give it some time for it to become seemless. Apple's AirPort Express is obviously a nice concept, and if it expands to more functions :D yeah.

    2. Re:Nice little board by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Good idea with the thumb drive: Why not have it boot from the USB 2.0 slot? That's 512 meg right there, which should be enough for an OS and associated media player.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    3. Re:Nice little board by steveha · · Score: 1

      Give it 1 GB of RAM, and have it do a net boot. The various EPIA motherboards all can net boot.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  10. Could this lead by foidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To a linux-y iMac? IE a very small, compact all in one computer that runs linux? Could make some serious inroads for linux on the desktop. A think the appeal of the iMac lies in that it is small, easy to hook up(no rats nest), and has astehtic value.
    Making a cheap version of this could definatly have market potential(esp. since you can control the hardware, it makes plug and play linux even easier)

    1. Re:Could this lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ack, sorry, that has the worst grammar of any of my posts ever. It's not A think, it's I think, and tons of spelling errors.
      Pardon moi.

    2. Re:Could this lead by marnargulus · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mean something like the Cubit or the T-Cube (a little down the page in orange) with a monitor slapped on? Been done. Many times.

    3. Re:Could this lead by foidulus · · Score: 1

      You mean something like the Cubit or the T-Cube (a little down the page in orange) with a monitor slapped on? Been done. Many times.
      I'm not sure that you know what an iMac is...an iMac has a lcd arm that is attatched to the computer WITHOUT cables(it is also adjustable). All you need to plug in 1 power cord(optionally keyboard, mouse and ethernet but you can get those wireless.) It also makes it very easy to transport between rooms or to put into a kitchen etc. The small form factors are nice, but lack the asthetic value(and transportability) of an all-in-one solution.

    4. Re:Could this lead by grahams · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being that the iMac can run Linux, I believe the iMac itself is a linux-y iMac.

    5. Re:Could this lead by foidulus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they aren't cheap.
      I should have qualified that by saying a cheap linux iMac type device. Though the rumored G5 iMacs may be worth the money.

    6. Re:Could this lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually the iMac was those big bulgy looking hthings with decrative plastic. (that would fade and colect dust )
      what you described is known as the iLamp.

    7. Re:Could this lead by marnargulus · · Score: 1

      The matter of putting an LCD monitor onto one of these and designing a new case has already been done. For an example of the wireless idea, look at the Radiosphere (one of my favorites). All the designer would have needed to do it enclose the monitor as well, putting in a splitter for the power cord wouldn't be that much trouble, and I can't recall, but I believe he modified the power cord and ran it thru in that model as I described.

    8. Re:Could this lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want a cheap MAC? Use a $200 mini-itx computer to open a remote x Window on a MAC client application somewhere on the network. That's a Free MAC. It won't get cheaper than that anytime soon.

    9. Re:Could this lead by dr.badass · · Score: 5, Funny

      A think the appeal of the iMac lies in that it is small, easy to hook up(no rats nest), and has astehtic value.

      You just listed three things that are not true about Linux.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    10. Re:Could this lead by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      The next iMac has been redesigned with the motherboard behind the LCD, but don't tell anyone.

      While I completely agree with you, the biggest draw of the iMac to me is OS X. But I'd have to say that it would be cool to have an all-in-one machine with an LCD that was cheap, linux or OS X. The iMac is not cheap at 1200 dollars. The flat screen accounts for just 300-ish dollars of the price.

    11. Re:Could this lead by foidulus · · Score: 1

      hmmm...the discussion boards on macrumors.com has been floating with all sorts of different ideas. I like the current design of the iMac(or as people dub it the iLamp) because it's small, and you can adjust the screen easily, ie when I am sitting at the desk I can look directly at the monitor, or if I am lazy I can lay on the couch with my wireless keyboard(mouse a little bit more difficult) and play a game if I want.

    12. Re:Could this lead by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Gateway has all in one systems too and with full powered desktop processors too. I don't see this being very useful for PCs. The base on most LCD monitors is already big and heavy enough to fit some decent desktop CPU hardware. Have you looked at a monitor base? It's all dead weight to balance to LCD panel.

    13. Re:Could this lead by mebob · · Score: 1

      NEC Z1 I have one of these as my linux box. I've got slackware 9.1 running on it, even plays DVD just wish it was a little faster. the Keyboard kinda sucks but everything else is sweet. Has IR, PCMCIA, PCI, DVD, flat panel, and uses standard memory. If any one knows where I might find some more please let me know.

      --
      =1000101
    14. Re:Could this lead by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Right. Because a company is going to invest millions in developing a computer that no-one wants to buy, except you and your mates.

      I'm all for linux on the desktop, but I can't stand all this "it's just round the corner!" nonsense. linux has come a long way, but it's still MILES away from mainstream. The only people who turn to it do so because it's cheap, not because of any ideology. Certainly not because linux is "cool". People want to run office and play games. OpenOffice is good, but not as fast or as compatible as MSOffice. Games on linux are terrible. Multimedia support is also not as polished as windows.

      Don't get me wrong - I'll be singing from the rooftops when linux gets a decent foothold, but a small motherboard and pretty PC are the least of linux's worries at the moment. Disparate development, in-fighting and overlapping of resources are more of a problem. Everyone needs to pull together and stop re-inventing the wheel by writing another mp3 player for linux. Microsoft has great power because it pulls together as one organisation. every linux developer around the world has their own agenda, and that means lots and lots of wasted time and resources. The only way linux will reach the mainstream is if a company steps in to invest millions in pulling it round to a single destination. It's hardly rocket science.

  11. 1 ghz by paxmark1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What with the aes padlock - does the chip have a FPU? Are they going to start bringing the prices down. The ECS Ubuddy was dirt cheap, but ECS abandoned ITX. I spent 12 weeks in RIA hell, finally got a Ubuddy with a new mobo that I had to put a P-4 in. Oh well. Is their linux drivers better - was hell getting Mndrake 8.2 and 9.1 up on the 733 mhz mobo? I finally got a machine that rocked, and then the fan was spluttering and ECS eventually said they abandoned that mobo due to the voltage regulator. Oh well, Mark

    1. Re:1 ghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What with the aes padlock

      From VIA:
      PadLock ACE provides world-class performance for the US government approved Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), performing cryptographic functions for securing e-mails, personal files, online transactions, and networks, including the latest high-bandwidth 802.11g wireless networks. PadLock ACE encrypts at rates of up to 12.5 Gigabits per second (Gbps) with a 1GHz VIA C3 processor, more than eight times faster than the best software AES implementation from a power hungry 3GHz Intel® Pentium® 4 processor based system that encrypts at a rate of a mere 1.5 Gbps.

      does the chip have a FPU?

      Of course. It also has SSE instruction compatability and a 16 stage pipeline.

    2. Re:1 ghz by marmite · · Score: 1

      The chip has a full speed FPU. More information on the AES support can be found in this interview, previously reported on slashdot...

      http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT2656883479.html

      --ralpht

      --
      I do not represent myself.
  12. Firewall? Please? by SpootFinallyRegister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i love the small, quiet, cool boards, but why cant anyone make an EPIA board with two network interfaces? VIA, are you listening?

    1. Re:Firewall? Please? by Aliencow · · Score: 3, Informative

      What the hell do you think an Epia CL-10000 Dual Lan is ?

    2. Re:Firewall? Please? by CaptnMArk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      check out CL 6000 or 10000 (I have one)

      the fan on 10000 was quite loud until I used a resistor

    3. Re:Firewall? Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      They already do..

      http://www.viavpsd.com/product/epia_cl_spec.jsp? motherboardId=181

    4. Re:Firewall? Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://mini-itx.com/

    5. Re:Firewall? Please? by tokul · · Score: 5, Informative

      Epia CL

      I think they do listen.

    6. Re:Firewall? Please? by bracher · · Score: 2, Informative

      umm, I've already got two...

    7. Re:Firewall? Please? by vk2 · · Score: 1

      For the cut-paste challenged - click here

      --
      No Sig for you.!
    8. Re:Firewall? Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You give this guy 5 points for being ignorant? That's slashdot for you.

      Visit lex.com.tw and buy a mini-itx with 4 wired network ports and 2 wireless network ports. Oh, and order Gigbit LAN if you want it.

      Want one with 4 physical video in or 16 time sliced video in? You got it.

    9. Re:Firewall? Please? by Brian+Blessed · · Score: 1

      On that subject, I'd like to make a wireless router for my parents' network. I don't want an off the shelf one, so that it can contain a harddrive and I can use it remotely.

      I could use a case large enough to fit a PCI wireless card, or I've noticed that some of VIA's boards have a Cardbus slot, although I can't help thinking that it isn't a good idea to have the 802.11b/g card inside the metal case.

      I'm aware of the nice Soekris boards, but they are much more expensive that VIA's. It's just a shame VIA don't offer a miniPCI slot.

      I'd like to know what other people who've done this used.

      - Brian.

    10. Re:Firewall? Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you google openbrick.

    11. Re:Firewall? Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this what you're looking for?
      http://www.viaembedded.com/product/epia_cl_s pec.js p?motherboardId=181

    12. Re:Firewall? Please? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Use a PCMCIA card with an external antenna.

      You'd probably want an ext antenna anyway, for a base station.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    13. Re:Firewall? Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I would like is a board with 4 intergrated lan ports. (one for wireless DMZ, one for LAN, and one for modem, 4th would be a luxury, maybe for another backup connection or duplexing or whatever).

      I'd use my 4 port adaptec card, but it's a 64 bit card. It would work fine in a 32bit slot, don't get me wrong--The only problem is that VIA puts the jumpers on the very end of the only PCI slot that's available, and a 64bit card won't fit.

      Otherwise, one would make a kickass firewall/mini-router.

    14. Re:Firewall? Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OpenBrick costs EUR 300 to 400, while you can get a Soekris for US $135 to $240 depending on the model. The Soekris boards have RAM included (AFAIK, OpenBrick and VIA boards don't), and the optional cases are cheap, so they're not as expensive as they seem.

      The WRAP and RouterBoard are the only things I've seen which are comparable to Soekrises in terms of features and price.

    15. Re:Firewall? Please? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      From the AC a few posts above you:

      Visit lex.com.tw and buy a mini-itx with 4 wired network ports and 2 wireless network ports. Oh, and order Gigbit LAN if you want it.

      Want one with 4 physical video in or 16 time sliced video in? You got it.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    16. Re:Firewall? Please? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for a router/firewall, you're going the wrong way.

      Here: http://www.soekris.com/net4501.htm

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  13. Vertically challenged? by SushiFugu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me, or wouldn't Vertically challanged tend to mean something that has a hard time standing up, or something that is horizontal most of the time? Seems like flat panel monitors and the like are horizontally challanged, if anything.

  14. Re:Vertically challenged? by Garion+Maki · · Score: 1

    I dont know, but from the image, the board does seem a bit fat...
    it could yust be the fact that the mobo is smaller on the 2 flat axes tho.

    --
    All indicators show that the human race is selectively breeding itself for stupidity.
  15. Offended with "Vertically Challenged" by lacrymology.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Vertically Challenged"

    I'm a dwarf you insensitive clod!

    --

    #
    # Modus Ponens
    #
    1. Re:Offended with "Vertically Challenged" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yeah, and I'm a clod, you insensitive dwarf!

  16. not good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not small enough, not quiet enough. I can see a fan on that website. Fans are evil. But thank heavens at least VIA is doing this kind of thing... keep going VIA!

    1. Re:not good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see a fan on that website.

      Very good, you can look at pictures. If you RTFA, you'll see the 800MHz version uses a fanless VIA Eden-N processor.

    2. Re:not good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you read the news you'll know that the 17 cm square mb will be available in a 12 cm square mb in September. It's a race to see whether the VIA motherboards are shrinking faster than your brain is, but there's no question that the VIA PCs, made with Austin's Centaur CPUs are the fastest selling PCs on the planet today.

    3. Re:not good enough by ModernGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      RTFA, there is a version that doesn't need a fan, the 800 Mhz one, you only need a fan if you get the 1.2 Ghz processor.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    4. Re:not good enough by argent · · Score: 1

      If they really wanted to make it suitable for vertically challenged devices, they'd have mounted the PCI connector in a right-angle socket so you could actually use a PCI card in a slim case.

    5. Re:not good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think 12cm is good enough? And what makes you think bothering to read the article has anything to do with brain size, when there is always a guaranteed moron like you to provide the answer?

    6. Re:not good enough by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Would a 'guaranteed moron' have managed to give you the right answer?

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  17. What about Nano-ITX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Besides, the MS is a passively cooled 1GHz processor that performs as well as a 200 GHz pentium. The only thing these EPIA boards are good for is data encryption/decryption. Home users want the kind of power that will decode an Mpeg-4 stream smoothly.

    I must admit, the VIA boards/procs severely beat even a 2.4 pentium (and up) and the 32bit XP processors when it comes to data encrypt/decrypt

    1. Re:What about Nano-ITX? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Home users want the kind of power that will decode an Mpeg-4 stream smoothly.

      Some of us want enough power to decode MP3s.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:What about Nano-ITX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the MS is a passively cooled 1GHz processor that performs as well as a 200 GHz pentium

      That is quite impressive. Wait until IBM and Apple find out about this supercomputer at 200GHz that doesn't even need much cooling.

    3. Re:What about Nano-ITX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are so full of shit you stink.

      EPIA boards benchmark and run closer to 800mhz for the 1ghz processor. and that is compared to a Pentium III. I can easily decode and dispaly a DVD or mpeg stream on one without much processor load (no the XV extensions are not working yet so it's 100% software display/decode.)

      also lots of other multimedia things are easily done on them.

      why dont you quit pulling bullshit out of your ass and give us some real figures. funny how all the sites benchmarking them DISAGREE WITH YOU.

      maybe it's that you are incapable and incompetent with working on computers?

    4. Re:What about Nano-ITX? by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I have a Celeron 600 laptop and I am able to play DivX movies no problem

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    5. Re:What about Nano-ITX? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      this new chipset has mpeg-4 decode hardware built in.

    6. Re:What about Nano-ITX? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Tha parent AC poster seems to have his facts mixed up.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    7. Re:What about Nano-ITX? by troon · · Score: 1

      Besides, the MS is a passively cooled 1GHz processor that performs as well as a 200 GHz pentium.

      That sounds a good deal faster than anything else available. ;-)

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  18. Thinner yes, but on a diet? by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

    My question is this - this PC is slimmer, so we can cram them in to some rather unthinkable places... but what will the power requirements be for such a box? Likely quite a bit less, and if they are so much less that we could use start jamming them into cars (without causing a significant power drain, that is), then I don't see why we couldn't have them pump their video into the mini LCD screens already built in to many vehicles nowadays.

    Of course, as soon as some dumbass causes an accident because he was playing Nascar 2k4 alongside his REAL driving, then we'll really get to start throwing out the bad puns.
    "He crashed his 'puter! OMGLOLWTFBBQ!!!11one1"

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    1. Re:Thinner yes, but on a diet? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      well that's teh big advantage to these mobo's besides just size... lower power requirements (compared to intel/AMD)... although at lower performance... I just put up a review (sorry for the plug...) of the not quite as horizontally challenged VIA EPIA M10000 Review

      summary: small, quiet, low power comsumption, slightly underpowered compared to intel/amd, but surprisingly usable.

      *shrug*

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    2. Re:Thinner yes, but on a diet? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They take less power, and there already exists a (several in fact) DC-DC converter for them. It's a daughterboard/PSU that clips right on the mobo's atx connector, and takes 12VDC in. Ie; wire it right up to your car, or the 12V line of another PSU (ie embed another computer in an open drive bay), or a wall-wart, etc.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Thinner yes, but on a diet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to order a version of the Mobo that has LVDS instead of VGA. That would be the MS, of course, or one of the lex.com.tw mobo's.

    4. Re:Thinner yes, but on a diet? by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      so we can cram them in to some rather unthinkable places.

      What, like the back of a Volkswagen?

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    5. Re:Thinner yes, but on a diet? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      What kind of power supply do these things take?

      I'm not that interested in using it in a car (though it is an intriguing thought for a car MP3 player) but would like to keep a really small footprint by limiting the size of the power supply.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  19. Cool, but... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    So this is a laptop mobo without the lap?

    oh, you can put it sideways (as if the electrons would fall out)?

    So it's a lap-side?

    Am I missing something here?

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    1. Re:Cool, but... by rleibman · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh, you can put it sideways (as if the electrons would fall out)?

      My personal theory...
      The layout and orientation of the computer can affect the speed of same. If the drives are above the processor the electrons going to the drives have gravity assist, so the processor reads faster (or is it the opposite? depending on the flow of electricity), of course when writing to the drive this is the opposite effect, so depending on the type of operation you're performing it'd be cool to see a computer that can rotate to change the relative position of different components.

  20. Um ... *vertically* challenged? by magefile · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aren't flat-panel monitors and TVs *horizontally* challenged?

  21. Buyer Beware by Meniconi,Nando · · Score: 4, Informative
    I am the not-so-proud owner of a VIA M10000 motherboard.

    The CPU is barely equivalent to a Celeron 600, the video quality (s-video) is quite low, the control panel (Windows, sorry) for the surround sound is brain-damaged, and the tiny fan is much noiser than one would expect.

    That board does not come with any sort of hardware monitor app, and I had to replace the CPU fan with a larger, slower one to cut down the noise to the originally promised "whisper" level.

    Not a bad board, but if fails to meet any of the expectations it sets in its specs. Make sure to read the hardware reviews, and buy from a seller with a money-back guarantee.

    1. Re:Buyer Beware by Lontas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, the linux 3D drivers are useless. You must be running one of their "approved" distos, and even then there is no support for vsync. This renders the board practically useless for running emulators, unless you like having the screen-flicker tear your eyeballs out.

      I bought the M10000 to build a small, quiet, reasonably powerful machine. Instead the box is big, loud, expensive, and doesn't support vsync! Grrrr!

      Methinks these smaller boards just aren't quite there yet.

    2. Re:Buyer Beware by tktk · · Score: 1
      Don't you need get the epia-kernel patch to have vsync support?

      EpiaKernelAbout

      Sorry if it's the wrong answer. Just yesterday I thought about installing linux on my M10000 and found this. But I haven't installed linux and applied the patch yet.

      Course, having the wrong answer never stopped me from posting on /. before.

    3. Re:Buyer Beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had an M9000 and donated it to my parents. It couldnt run VMWare because the processor lacks the CMOV instruction and the linux support by VIA is crap.

    4. Re:Buyer Beware by puetzk · · Score: 1

      The DRM (kernel) bits are in the DRI-trunk cvs (and probably snapshots) now, so you can build for any kernel you want. Thus no need for the 'approved' distro.

      unichrome.sf.net has the 2d driver (sources, and binary snapshots) and is much more up-to-date than what VIA distributes.

      The 3d bits source is floating around for, but I've not attempted to build - the via_dri.o as shipped works fine with the unichrome 2d driver and the DRI-trunk modules.

      Unfortunately getting all this checked in seems to have gotten waylaid by the xfree86 implosion, so distros aren't doing very well at having it all, but the pieces exist.

      I'll agree the 3d is fairly useless though, just because it's so underpowered. But I've been extremely happy with mine (M10000 in a fanless case from scythe) - as a second, non-gaming machine that sits in a place where I wanted no noise.

      --
      The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
    5. Re:Buyer Beware by steveha · · Score: 1

      I have an M10000 motherboard. I consider it a great board for a Linux server.

      I built a computer with Linux software RAID, and for a server it's pretty darn quiet.

      Maybe it's not what you are looking for in a desktop workstation, but you might like it better if you convert it to a server.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  22. Hardware RNG and AES, huh? by Benanov · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like a good fit for a lot of security-related applications--rackmount DMZ servers, firewalls, central controller for various physical security devices (biometrics controlling electronic locks on doors, etc.) I knew that the hardware RNG and AES-encrypt/decrypt functions were supported by OpenBSD a while ago (don't ask me when...I think by the time 3.4 came around. Confirmation?) It's no small feat to have them in other kernels, and bodes well for OSS applications. I'd assume it's also low-power due to the small form factor, which is another plus. Can't check the article, as my manager's about to breathe down my neck. :)

    1. Re:Hardware RNG and AES, huh? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Sounds like a good fit for a lot of security-related applications--... firewalls...

      A firewall with one built-in nic??? I'd rather use a soekris board. http://www.soekris.com/

    2. Re:Hardware RNG and AES, huh? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Sounds like a good fit for a lot of security-related applications

      Why? You can put a $100 PCI crypto card in ANY system, and have multiple forms of strong encryption (AES, 3DES, Perhaps SHA1, RC4, RC5, etc) as well as insanely fast random number generation.

      This hardware AES encryption is no reason to use an otherwise completely crappy CPU.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  23. Looks too familiar by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    That big ass heatsink is reminiscent of old Sun hardware. Perhaps I should go drag those Sparc 2s out of the dumpster.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  24. Fanless? As in no fan? by Rick.C · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "Please pay no attention to the pictures. These were taken from a weird camera angle the produced a fan-shaped distortion in the heatsink grid." - a deep booming voice from behind the curtain.

    While there are indeed fanless mini-ITX systems, this ain't one of them.

    --
    You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
    "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    1. Re:Fanless? As in no fan? by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 3, Informative

      You need to read the article instead of just looking at the pictures. If you put in an Eden processor, the board is fanless. If you put in a C3 processor, you get the "fansink". The photos in the Linuxdevices article is of the C3 processor model.

    2. Re:Fanless? As in no fan? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      According to Via's site, the board is available fanless when used with a 8000MHz or 1GHz CPUs. The 1.2GHz CPU model was the one unfortunately pictured. Might I add, that is one TALL fansink. I hope the slower models have a much thinner one.

    3. Re:Fanless? As in no fan? by Siderite · · Score: 1
      From the article:

      The Epia MS is the first VIA mainboard available with the fanless 1GHz VIA Eden ESP processor announced last February. The board is also available with a fanless 800MHz VIA Eden ESP processor, or with a "fansink" equipped 1.2GHz VIA C3.

    4. Re:Fanless? As in no fan? by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      Wow. I would have thought that the 8000MHz model would need a fan if any of them do.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  25. Shame, onboard connectors... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Via needs to get rid of all onboard connectors and replace them all with handy-dandy pinouts on the mainboard instead. Would make for some WAY easier modifications, as you can mount the connectors wherever the hell you want them and then wire them to the mainboard, instead of trying to force the mainboard into some awkward angle just so you can plug in the mouse and keyboard...

    1. Re:Shame, onboard connectors... by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      what do you think they did with this one? nic and video only, everything else is a pin header take a look at some of the older boards, everything was onboard, that took one entire side and was a little taller than the HS is on this one

    2. Re:Shame, onboard connectors... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      what you are looking for is the PC104 formfactor.

      it's been around for over 20 years now.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Shame, onboard connectors... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      I know, I know... But that's still two rather vital connectors. I want to be able to wire something as I please, which includes pinouts for both the VGA signal and the NIC. Granted, VGA pinout will be a nasty mess of 15 pins, but a NIC pinout would be only 8 pins... Maybe even 4 pins.

    4. Re:Shame, onboard connectors... by hbackert · · Score: 1

      The two on-board connectors are "high speed" devices, which don't like to be transported by a cheap cable/connector. Don't think about connecting a monitor via a flat ribbon cable to a VGA header as the signal will be messy. The only way to get a descent signal quality, it to use a solid connector and a good cable. Both of them are way more expensive than an on-board VGA plug.

      I personally think their choice is well chosen. VGA/network is something you want on the back as it's ugly, but needed. Anything else (e.g. USB ports) can be relocated to whereever you please it.

    5. Re:Shame, onboard connectors... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      Yes, good points, but there are certain objects that simply don't have a backside or a back side which is unreachable. Still though, allot can be achieved with some high-quality cable and some soldering if it were that important... So the VGA cable is doable. However, the network cable might prove difficult. Still though, it OUGHT to be possible to use ribbon cables. Think of those 80-wire IDE ribbon cables that allow ( in theory ) full ATA-133 speeds by spacing an unused wire between each active wire. That's 133mB/s, so the network cable ought to be easily extended. I don't know how much traffic a VGA cable has to handle, but a 30 pin ribbon cable ought to work, I believe. Hell, ribbon cables have achieves faster then 133mB/s speeds, for example, SCSI cables.

      Then again, only one way to find out... Now I first need some keyboard adapter from Amiga keyboard to PS/2 keyboard... Hrm...

  26. Those nit picking about vertical vs horizontal by cartzworth · · Score: 1

    It is vertically challenged. I rarely see anyone put an HS(F) on something while it's mounted sideways.

  27. Fanless? Thin? by Karamchand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the pictures on Linuxdevices.com this board is neither specially thin (why make only one row of I/Os on the backplate if the power connector and CPU cooler are thicker?) nor fanless (apart from the fact that a fan needs room above it as well!)

    1. Re:Fanless? Thin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good, you can look at pictures. Now go back and read the article to understand the fanless part.

  28. What ever happened to Padlock SL WASTE? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    VIA pulled their version of WASTE from the webpage. Their version had an alternate encryption library which was GPL-licensed, but it was still non-GPL-compliant because they did not GPL all the interface code or something. I did of course preserve the source... But the point is, where did it go? Is it coming back? Et cetera.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:What ever happened to Padlock SL WASTE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WASTE is full of security holes anyway; I'm surprised VIA even touched it. (Before anyone says "but it uses crypto!', remember that crypto does not imply security.)

  29. darn it has the CLE266 northbridge by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish they'd gone with the CN400 northbridge instead... oh well maybe for the Epia MS II =)

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  30. Great Idea by hattig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But ... that heatsink it quite large, they might as well have put all the interfaces on the back panel!

    Maybe it they removed the PCI slot and put some of the other interfaces along that side of the board they could truly make it an expandable thin system? Also if they upgraded to the CN400 chipset in addition...

    * reasonably happy owner of a VIA Epia800 - mainly because I got it 20 months ago and it hasn't depreciated one bit since *

  31. Re:Vertically challenged? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not fat.
    It's just big-boned.

  32. Proving Randomness by mscalora · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From VIA's PR on RNG:
    ... for instance, [using] mouse or keyboard timing input [as a source of entropy] ...
    While these physical activities may look random, their randomness cannot be proven, and they run the risk of generating poor entropy (or no entropy) if the sampled physical activity is dormant or repetitive. ...

    Quantum Mechanism
    The only truly random generator is a mechanism that detects quantum behavior at the sub-atomic level. This is because randomness is inherent in the behavior of sub-atomic particles.

    Has someone really proven that the apparent quantum randomness is really random?

    -Mike
    1. Re:Proving Randomness by Erik+Lindahl · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Has someone really proven that the apparent quantum randomness is really random?
      That depends on what you mean by random. In principle the answer is no, since there is no such thing as "random" in physics. The question is rather if it is possible to predict an observation.

      The heisenberg uncertainty principle (which can be proved if you accept the postulates of quantum mechanics) means you cannot observe both position and momentum (velocity) of a particle exactly. If there are small errors in any measurement, it will be impossible to make a perfect prediction of the future motion - no matter how expensive your equipment is.

      However, even if quantum mechanics is somedays proven wrong, statistical mechanics saves you, and this relies on basic mathematical properties rather than physical models: If you consider the 10^23 atoms in a gram of matter and take millions of random samples of their thermal noise (velocities) I think you'll agree that it's perfectly random for all intents and purposes - much more so than throwing a dice, which is considered random in normal life.

      Nevertheless, in contrast to mathematics physics relies on models that might be incorrect, so you can never really "prove" anything in physics (apart from within the scope of a certain theory, like quantum mechanics).

      Cheers,

      Erik
    2. Re:Proving Randomness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The only truly random generator is a mechanism that detects quantum behavior at the sub-atomic level. This is because randomness is inherent in the behavior of sub-atomic particles.

      Even if randomness is inherent in the behavior of sub-atomic particles, this doesn't mean that this mechanism is the only truly random generator [sic]!

      "The only true computer is the Amiga. This is because the Amiga has a CPU and inherently computes things."

  33. The quiet and small PC movement by Zoinks · · Score: 5, Informative

    It may come as a surprise to some, but there's quite a lot of interest in very small and very quiet PCs. Just check out this site as a for instance. And there's also this review on Tom's Hardware site.

    1. Re:The quiet and small PC movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or check out these very small Linux Point of Sale X terminals that use VIA motherboards.

  34. 1U by Ann+Coulter · · Score: 1

    Just look at the way they do 1U rackmount servers. They are I think 1.75 inches deep, which is about 10%-50% thicker than a laptop. Or perhaps use a laptop motherboard.

    1. Re:1U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you really ann coulter?

      if so, you're hot...but too fundamentalist.

    2. Re:1U by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      1U mobos and components are EXPENSIVE. This is a cheap alternative for consumer level devices. Ie; I don't need a quad-Xeon blade with built-in RAID-5 fibre channel array, I just want a box that can play DVDs and check emails... ...and fits inside my greased up yoda doll.

      Go linux!

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  35. SHIPPING NOT !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The shipping date is September. It is not shipping now. Ditto for the Nano-ITX.

    I spit on people who won't spend 60 seconds doing fact checking.

  36. i thought you said morbo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cower before morbo puny earthlings!

  37. Re:Fanless? Sometimes by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you put an Eden processor into the board, it's fanless and requires just a heatsink. If you stick in a C3 processor, it requires the "fansink" shown in the Linuxdevices article photos.

    See either chapter 2 of the manual or the paragraph below the second photo of the motherboard on the Linuxdevices article: The Epia MS is the first VIA mainboard available with the fanless 1GHz VIA Eden ESP processor announced last February. The board is also available with a fanless 800MHz VIA Eden ESP processor, or with a "fansink" equipped 1.2GHz VIA C3.

  38. IE is certainly not small by apachetoolbox · · Score: 2, Funny

    IE a very small, compact all in one computer that runs linux?

    and it doesn't run on linux either

  39. 'Padlock' -- Quantum RNG??! by fw3 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I gotta say I'm dubious on this claim.

    Great idea, but I'd want to see some serious validation of the claim that their RNG is 'quantum' based.

    In fact, looking at the report on the RNG operation (Paid for by Via) here's how it works:

    http://www.via.com.tw/en/viac3/via_c3_padlock_eval uation.pdf "3.1. Entropy Source The RNG hardware comprises two parts: a raw-bit generator that serves as an entropy source and digital post-processing circuitry. The raw-bit generator produces somewhat random bits which the design assumes will have imperfect statistical properties. The post-processing circuitry then uses .whitening. and bit discarding to improve the statistical properties of the imperfect random bits. .... "

    The paper concludes that the VIA RNG is well suited, but says *nothing* about it's being 'quantum' based.

    Sounds like some marketdroid really didn't talk to the engineering people before writing the ad copy for this puppy.

    --
    Linux is Linux, if One need clarify their dist: <Dist>/GNU Linux
    bsds are of course just BSD
    1. Re:'Padlock' -- Quantum RNG??! by torpor · · Score: 1


      maybe 'quantum' is another way to interpret 'design assumes imperfect stat property' ... thus there are 'two stages'.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:'Padlock' -- Quantum RNG??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The raw random bits come from thermal noise in a diode, which is caused by quantum-mechanical processes.

    3. Re:'Padlock' -- Quantum RNG??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If so the paper does not mention it.

      It does mention the thermal noise, not anything about quantum effects and goes on at considerable length about the predictability of the resultant data stream (which is apparently not 0)

  40. the way digital tv and devices should be by timts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    as normal PC components get smaller and cheaper, why not just let them use standard device? so that we can hook the digital tv to the internet, which will update its codec periodically in case there's something new out.

  41. DIY laptops for soon? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Will we see DIY laptops soon?

    The first guy who will come out with a laptop-form factor chassis for those motherboards will make a killing, a bit like the "lunchbox" chassis of yesteryear.

    We'll be able to crank-out custom laptops make to suit our desires without having to contend with proprietary crap which won't properly run [insert favourite non-proprietary open-source/subversive operating system]...

    1. Re:DIY laptops for soon? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      No, he won't make a killing - people want thinner than 2" thick without screen, and lighter than 10lbs. Also, the performance is DREADFUL on these. Don't take this as a troll, but they just don't perform as well as the Pentium III they're classed against, and they only ramp to 1.2GHz so far (VIA is migrating to a 200MHz bus, though, which should help).

      I think a formfactor FOR LAPTOPS needs to be developed. Lots of technicalities though - for one, we have to pick AXIOM (ATI PCI-E mobile graphics, also accepts other PCI-E devices) or MXM (NVIDIA PCI-E mobile graphics, ONLY accepts graphics).

  42. My god...it's full of.....heatsinks! by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Real real thin - except of course for the LOX chiller pump !

  43. weird by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    Okay, so what's with this 'fanless' claim? Fully half of the mobo is covered by a heatsink, yet there IS a fan right there in the picture. I'm confused.

    Also - can this thing boot from that CF connector? That's the problem with several of these things lately - no bootie from CF.

    I'm fully intending to make a nice MAME box out of a system like that, booting a massively stripped-down Win98/ME hybrid off a CF card.

    1. Re:weird by stevel · · Score: 1

      Apparently there's an alternate version without a fan, using a variant of the processor.

  44. I don't understand this product... by stvangel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I own several of the VIA boards ( M10000's in particular ) and this doesn't seem to be any smaller than what I've already got. The size of the heatsink and fan in the pictures seems to make it about he same height as any of the other motherboards. It looks even a little bigger if you consider you've now got a separate SODIMM socket on the bottom for the memory. It looks like if you just went with a regular memory socket on the top, it'd still be shorter than that huge chunk of aluminum.

    I also don't understand the "minimalist backpanel" with only a VGA, Ethernet, and cardbus connectors. Everything else ( all the usual suspects - audio, USB, TV-out, etc ) are headers on the motherboard. I'd be much happier if they made -everything- use sockets or pin headers on the motherboard. This way you could mount the motherboard and sockets separately any way you wanted, without having to have access to the edge of the board. I ran into this problem with one of my projects where I was trying to mount a motherboard flat in the bottom of a toolbox. The motherboard fit fine, but I didn't have room to plug the cables into the motherboard backpanel. This was an unusual project that is trying to be as small and unobtrusive as possible and keep all cables hidden inside the case, which is a tupperware type storage container. I would have loved to be able to plug all of them directly into the top of the motherboard. As it is, I had to mount the motherboard on edge with the backpanel facing up, because that was the only way I could get the room to plug the cables in ( VGA, USB and network ). Made the whole thing a lot bigger than it had to be.

  45. USB wireless adapter by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    I'd use a USB adapter for that- not only does it allow you to avoid size limitations, but you can adjust the antenna position to your liking very easily. USB wireless adapters are about 50 bucks these days, and are probably a better idea than PCI wireless devices in a desktop machine, anyway.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  46. me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could not believe the noise the fan made. I got the same motherboard to make a new server, silent that is.
    I got another fan that helped and have been running that for some months. But I just finished installing a new heatsink 2 hours ago that are 3 times higher. It seemed to help with the bigger heatsink and fan, and I finally got what I wanted in the first place. Just too bad it should be so much trouble.

  47. DVD Playback Ability? by Knight2K · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anybody have any experience using the VIA EPIA boards for DVD and video playback? I'm specifically interested in the MII 12000 for creating a MythTV box. I was also thinking MicroATX, but Pentium 4's and Athlon XPs run hotter and draw more power than the C3. I'd like to keep the power supply and CPU Fan and as quiet as possible.

    Extreme Tech was decidedly underwhelmed by the M10000 while mini-itx.com seems to think is fine. The mini-itx review seemed a little hand-wavy though.

    --
    ======
    In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
    1. Re:DVD Playback Ability? by Meniconi,Nando · · Score: 2, Interesting

      DVD playback under Windows (sorry!) it's fine; AC3 ok, too. Video quality is a bit poor IMHO (not very sharp). XVID, DIVX are fine, too, but software AC3 decoding will result in many skipped frames and video/audio desynch. For some reasons, the hw Dolby decoding is active only when using PowerDvd or WinDVD playing a "real" DVD. Go figure.

    2. Re:DVD Playback Ability? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      here's my review of the VIA EPIA M10000 (the earlier revision before the MII's)

      the M10k (and presumably the faster/better MII12000's) handles DVD's fine assuming you have a software DVD decoder/player that lets you enable "hardware assist/accelleration"

      *shrug* YMMV =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    3. Re:DVD Playback Ability? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I'm specifically interested in the MII 12000 for creating a MythTV box.

      DVD playback should work since the video card has hardware MPEG-2 playback. However, the CPU is otherwise quite slow, and it'll have a hard time with MPEG-4/Divx playback, Theora, etc. And I'm sure it doesn't have the horse power to do MPEG-4 encoding for MythTV.

      Pentium 4's and Athlon XPs run hotter and draw more power than the C3.

      First off, C3s perform like AMD/Intel CPUs at half the MHz, and have the equivalent electrical/heat ratings. So, buying an old Intel/AMD processor would give you the same effect.

      More than just the fact that C3 processors suck terribly, you have options. My own system with 1.2GHz AMD processor and 40GB hard drive only uses 40watts of power when nearly idle, thanks to fvcool (read my latest journal entry for all the info on making AMD processors use far less power).

      And more interesting still, are AMD's Geode processors. They are x86 compatible embedded processors, and use a smaller ammount of power than you would dream. 1500@6watts or 1750@14W... Fanless, and amazingly low power for the performance.

      I don't know of any online store that sells them, but it would be worth looking.

      BTW, even with very hot systems, you can get a better heatsink, and very nearly silent fans for your processor, power supply, etc. I prefer Enermax 80mm thermo-controlled fans, but others are available as well. Even with several in one system, it's very quiet. Quiet to the point that I'm no longer looking to quiet the fans, but rather I have been trying to get a significantly quieter DVD-ROM. hdparm doesn't support downgrading speeds, and it seems impossible to find a 1X or 2X DVD Rom these days.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:DVD Playback Ability? by steveha · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should build a system with an Athlon, but just underclock and undervolt the heck out of it. In previous Slashdot discussions of the C3, I have read claims that an Athlon running at around 600 MHz is drastically more powerful than a C3 running at full speed.

      I did a quick google and found a howto from 2002:

      Ultimate Underclock & Undervolt Project

      Here's a really cool resource: a list of processors and their electrical and heat numbers.

      http://users.erols.com/chare/elec.htm

      If you want to try this, I suggest you use a Barton core Athlon. If you want to use an Intel chip, the best would be if you could get a Pentium M somehow (the laptop CPU) but maybe if you could find a 130 nm version of the Pentium 4 it would be okay. But Athlons should be better for an underclocking project because they get more done per clock cycle.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  48. Money back gunarantee? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    Think of how an online store would have to handle this. This would be awful for them, and would destroy any small business distributing these things, it is best to have a manufacturer warrenty, since it isn't the warehouses fault, and then you would probably expect them to cover shipping it back, and pay your original shipping too? You people need to look at the source of the problem, not the wholesaler.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:Money back gunarantee? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Um, if you're selling something that gets brought back so often it's not doing any profit you stop selling that crap, not continue till you've got nothing left and let yourself be destroyed.

      Manufacturer warranty is fine, but the warehouse was one who sold YOU the product and it's they you are doing the business with. Warehouse can then deal with the people who sold them the faulty thing (manufacturer, or import company) and ask for compensation or whatever.

      Every mail-order company (and yes, that includes online stores) here is bound by law to have 14-day return policy, and funnily they seem to be handling it just fine... not sure if shipping is supposed to be covered, but usually it isn't.

      Besides, few minor losses taken from a return here and there are far outweighted by free PR you get, there are so many online stores they can't drive prices down any more so reputation is one thing left they can compete with...

  49. Yes 'Quantum' by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the linked to page.

    Quantum Mechanism
    The only truly random generator is a mechanism that detects quantum behavior at the sub-atomic level. This is because randomness is inherent in the behavior of sub-atomic particles.
    A quantum based hardware generator is practical, with examples that have been used including:

    • The interval between the emission of particles during radioactive decay. This source generates only 30 bytes per second and requires a cumbersome (and dangerous?) collection of hardware.
    • The thermal noise across a semiconductor diode or resistor. This is the approach most often used in add-on PC hardware.
      The charge developed on a capacitor during a particular time period.
    • The frequency instabilities of multiple free running oscillators. This approach is the basis of the VIA PadLock RNG approach. While implemented differently than the resistor based approach, ultimately, the source of randomness is the same.
    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Yes 'Quantum' by fw3 · · Score: 1
      The frequency instabilities of multiple free running oscillators. This approach is the basis of the VIA PadLock RNG approach. While implemented differently than the resistor based approach, ultimately, the source of randomness is the same.

      Well this is *Via's statement* and sounds to me more like a 'Lorenz attractor' - based system.

      From the Via-paid Cryptography Research 'preliminary evaluation' http://www.via.com.tw/en/viac3/via_c3_padlock_eval uation.pdf: (start at section 2.2 'Sources of Randomness'):

      Quantum Phenomena. Devices have been specifically designed to translate quantum-mechanical uncertainty into random digits, typically harnessing radioactive decay
      ...
      Thermal Noise. Excluding quantum mechanics, the behavior of physical systems is deterministic (e.g. given a complete description of a system, one can compute its future behavior). While this appears to make random number generation impossible, the fact that matter is composed of particles endowed with disorganized thermal motion makes it impossible, for practical purposes, to achieve a complete description of a system. Accordingly, the places where thermal motion affects a circuit's behavior offer sources of effective randomness.
      So we are looking at systems which fall short of the 'Qantum' methods of making RNGs - according to Via's own consultant -- The then reduces to the following approach:

      Section 3.1 - Entropy Source

      The RNG hardware comprises two parts: a raw-bit generator that serves as an entropy source and digital post-processing circuitry. The raw-bit generator produces somewhat random bits which the design assumes will have imperfect statistical properties. my emphasis The post-processing circuitry then uses "whitening" and bit discarding to improve the statistical properties of the imperfect random bits.
      ...
      Raw bits are generated by using a slow freewheeling oscillator (configured by bias inputs to 20-68 MHz) to clock the sampling of a fast freewheeling oscillator (configured by bias inputs to 450-810 MHz). This approach is good if the jitter in the slow oscillator (i.e.,
      ...
      Thermal noise, manufacturing variations, temperature, software settings, and local electrical conditions are expected to cause oscillator variations and contribute entropy to the sampled output.
      Thus, the bits are not what you'd get from a quantum technique. *And* If an attacker can influence local electrical variations, software settings .... then it might very well be possible to introduce predictable data into the trusted random bitstream.

      I'm not saying it's not a good tool, I am standing by my assertion that Via's website and claims take considerable liberties with the technology as described by their own consultants.

      --
      Linux is Linux, if One need clarify their dist: <Dist>/GNU Linux
      bsds are of course just BSD
  50. Make Your Own Laptops!!! by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

    How come there aren't mobos and cases to make your own laptops (that I know of...)?

    With the clock rates climbing above what the *average* user needs, the next push should be into making the whole smaller.

    I'd love to be able to buy an empty case and LCD and slip my own choice of mobo/system in and go. The case could have knockouts for various different configs.

    Fritz

    ___________

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Make Your Own Laptops!!! by kniemczak · · Score: 1

      Try here. I dont think it has cases, but it has a lot of other stuff.

      Laptop Parts

  51. ENTIRELY OFF TOPIC by liquidsin · · Score: 1

    I couldn't help but follow the link in your sig. Quite honestly, I'm sure that site must make some relevant points somewhere, and I'm sure that Moore is no perfect saint, but how are we supposed to take it seriously when they can't even veil their political leanings? The man makes a movie that bashes the current administration, and the response to that is a website saying he's cracked, and plastered with ads for Bush / Cheney bumperstickers, t-shirts, playing cards, a petition for a Reagan dollar, and a link to a site entitled "the museum of left wing lunacy". It makes it rather difficult for me to even *read* their articles, and even more difficult to believe them.

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  52. You mean the Eye-Opener? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    You mean like that flat-panel I-Opener internet appliance that everyone hacked into Linux boxes a few years back?

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  53. The size by WWWAvenger · · Score: 1


    Does anyone else find it ironic that an article touting the low-profileness of a product doesn't actually state the HEIGHT? It can't help but remind us of the 6.7"x6.7" dimension of the standard.

  54. ATX Connector by reality-bytes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems a bit daft that it still uses a vertical ATX power connecter, as once you have plugged it in, you will have the combined height of the plug and the curvature of the cable increasing the overall height.

    Surely they could have come up with some means of side-mounting the ATX connector?

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  55. New Life for old machines by oldstrat · · Score: 1


    Finally those old Emachines E-One computers can get an upgrade.

  56. What about the heatsink? by kidlinux · · Score: 1

    The heatsink on that thing looks bleedin humongous. And then what if I wanted to use that pci slot? I could put a card directly in it, eliminating the whole purpose behind the design of the mobo, or I could get a huge riser and place the card parallel to the heatsink, which would still make it pretty high, I would think. And then what about the heat from the sink on the pci card?

    The only interesting thing about that mobo is the elimination of the backplane, but what difference does it make if the heatsink takes up that much height anyway?

    It's about damn time they got rid of parallel and serial ports, imho. The only systems using those kinds of mobos and ports are POS (point of sale). For the rest of us, the ports aren't really useful.

    --
    -kidlinux.
  57. Re:Vertically challenged? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or wouldn't Vertically challanged tend to mean something that has a hard time standing up, or something that is horizontal most of the time?

    I think it's P.C. for "midget"

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  58. Graphics ? by subStance · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the more important question about this motherboard (rather than the RNG) is the Video Controller. You can live without a properly configured RNG, but given that the kernel support for the CLE266 that came with the earlier EPIA boards is still little more than token, I would suspect not much will be different here.

    The DRM support is non-existant, and the X drivers are always so old that they prevent you from using Gentoo. At least NVidia's graphics drivers work (because of the OSS adapter module), but the CLE266 ones are dreadful.

    This has latest supported distros ... you'll see what I'm talking about:
    http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=325#cle266

    After owning the EPIA boards for 2 years, I've given up trying to get X to work with the VIA drivers, and gone back to console only or VESA X11 driver - which means movies are not really an option. Kinda pointless really isn't it ?

    --
    Servlet v2.4 container in a single 161KB jar file ? Try Winstone
  59. Silent computing by apharov · · Score: 1

    In case you want to know more about silent PC systems www.silentpcreview.com is a great resource. I'm in no way affiliated with that site, I just think it has LOTS of good information about this subject :)

  60. Redundant PCI Slot by ChiperSoft · · Score: 1

    Interesting that a board designed for low profile would have a vertically mounted PCI slot. Doesn't it make more sense for the slot to go horizontally?

    Huh, guess they didn't think of that.

  61. LCD iMac isn't small by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It's cute, but that's a big honking base on it. Some of its size constraints include having enough weight to balance the monitor (otherwise you'd probably have to screw or clamp it to the desk), room for disk drives, and room for CD/DVD/etc which are non-trivial size.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks