Slashdot Mirror


MS Plans To Cooperate With Chinese TV Maker

zhangyong writes "Microsoft has signed a strategic cooperation pact with China's top television maker Sichuan Changhong Electric Appliances (which claims to be the world's number-two maker of colour TVs, OEM for APEX, etc.), the official Shanghai Securities News (in Chinese) (in English) said on Monday. 'Changhong would receive advanced IT technology and software from Microsoft to develop digital TV sets and other high-technology products.' What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

137 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. ...In a PERFECT world... by VinceWuzHere · · Score: 2, Funny
    "What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?" Um, HELLO, quality will drop, bugs in software will increase exponentially as a result and Micro$fot will finally die from the burdens of this load and the world will proliferate with GOOD software.

    **wakes up from dream**

    1. Re:...In a PERFECT world... by faust2097 · · Score: 1

      It's not like mainland China TVs are known for their high quality and reliability anywqay, they're aimed squarely at the "OMG I can get a 27" TV for $200!?!" crowd.

      I look at it like multiplying numbers less than one. If Apex is a 0.7 and Microsoft is a 0.8 [I'm feeling generous] then the resultant TVs will be 0.56.

    2. Re:...In a PERFECT world... by spike+hay · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nonsense. I have both an Apex TV and a DVD player. Both are quite high quality. The TV has an excellent picture. The DVD player can play MP3, SVCD, VCD, straight MPEG, just about anything. Chinese products are not universally shitty.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    3. Re:...In a PERFECT world... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      > It's not like mainland China TVs are known for their high quality and reliability anywqay,
      > they're aimed squarely at the "OMG I can get a 27" TV for $200!?!" crowd.

      For now. Ask your parent (or more likely, your grandparents). They can tell you all about when "Made in Japan" was a universal by-word for cheap, shoddy junk.

      Chris Mattern

    4. Re:...In a PERFECT world... by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      And if you don't trust them, just watch back to the future 3. movies never lie.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    5. Re:...In a PERFECT world... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Really? Check out the consumer surveys and you'llfind they are not very highly rated. Now add MS crap to the mix and you can get a BSOD on your TV,not to mention integrated DRM and now the MS Channel is the default station on your TV. Unless MS is giving away the software, wouldn't Linux have been a better choice? If you are trying to be the low cost provider wouldn't you love FREE? On a side note, IP protection in China for the MS software is pretty poor. How long before they clone the software for use in the $99 Chinese PCs with the stolen Intel chip technology? Then they sell the $99 PCs back to the USA, and damn it all we BUY them anyway!

    6. Re:...In a PERFECT world... by hiside · · Score: 1

      sorry to disagree but chinese do have excellent man power and i am sure the economy of the world will be ruled soon by them. good move from microsoft.

    7. Re:...In a PERFECT world... by gho · · Score: 1

      Nothing will happen, Microsoft is already exploiting low cost labor through the US privatised prison system.

    8. Re:...In a PERFECT world... by sbrown123 · · Score: 1

      I kept hearing people hyping the Apex units over and over again. So I went and purchased one over at the local Walmart. One word for it: crap. I had all sorts of problems with the unit. Some DVDs with advanded features were impossible to watch on the device. So I tried to return it and Walmart explained I could only exchange it for another. So I did thinking it was just ONE bad Apex. Wrongo again. Same problems. Returned the new one and demanded a in-store credit. Required the store manager to sign off on it but I was able to free myself from Apex hell.

      Im currently quite satisfied with my Sony. It states it can play the same number of formats as the Apex and I have not seen it having any problem actually living up to that claim.

    9. Re:...In a PERFECT world... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart? That was your first mistake. Crappy ugly stores, poor customer service, bad selection. They don't stand behind what they sell.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  2. What Will Happen by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Funny

    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

    Why, the phrase "Blue Screen Of Death" will take on a whole new meaning of course.

    1. Re:What Will Happen by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Hell.... it will be THE READ screen of death.

      --
      NO SIG
    2. Re:What Will Happen by Dulimano · · Score: 1

      "What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

      X-Box, that's what. They build the most of them in China.

    3. Re:What Will Happen by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Why, the phrase "Blue Screen Of Death" will take on a whole new meaning of course."

      Anonymous Coward called, his copyright on this joke hasn't expired yet.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:What Will Happen by slimyrubber · · Score: 1

      ...when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?

      We get more crap on tv!?

      --
      [ I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance ] -- Isaac Asimov
    5. Re:What Will Happen by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

  3. What will happen when... by kunudo · · Score: 5, Funny

    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

    Cheap + shit == Cheap shit.
    Funny, eh?

    1. Re:What will happen when... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Um, pick OS from column A, drivers from column B, and your choice of noodles, rice, or really bad tech support.

    2. Re:What will happen when... by medvezhatnik · · Score: 1

      this is funny !
      a little correction to your formula:

      Microsoft makes crap, and not the shit.

      so, Cheap + Crap == Cheap Crap

  4. What will happen... by lunarscape · · Score: 1

    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies? That's like throwing gasoline on a man on fire.

    1. Re:What will happen... by ePINOY · · Score: 1

      'Fix' as in get your ass raped by MS for being tainted by its code and trying to get any resultant code implemented into a linux distro or something else?

      I was under the assumption that supporters of linux were completely against looking at any MS code for fear of getting an SCO pulled on them. =P

      --
      suteki!
    2. Re:What will happen... by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about rather than joining 3 million other slashdotters in bitching about the rich guy down the street you actually contribute. If you think you can do better, than help an open source project. All of the programs you listed have an open source counterpart that in ways don't measure up to microsoft's "crap clones" as of yet. I'd rather you use your talent to help or at least donate to open office. Spreading FUD about microsoft's programs isn't going to help shit.

    3. Re:What will happen... by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

      The "we" was a very generic one. I don't actually write code, so I couldn't care less if I see MS source code. But the reality is that there are some exceptional coders out there. Heck, many of the reverse engineering wares (Samba, for example) are better than the original. I don't know that any Linux programmers would want to fix MS code. Heck, if MS wanted to go down that road, that could *leak* it themselves (maybe through BayStar to SCO to UnixWare) just to entrap Linux developers and finally snuff out Linux. Its the VB and C# guys that would probably want the code... and some large companies that would like to be better able to modify things for internal use.

    4. Re:What will happen... by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      If overpaid MS developers produce nothing but crap and clones of other people's ideas...

      This is not exactly correct;

      WordPerfect -> Word

      This should read;

      Wordstar(CP/M) => Wordperfect => Word

      Lotus 123 -> Excel

      VisiCalc (Apple) => MS Multiplan(CP/M) => Lotus123 => Excel

      Borland also had their "Quattro" spreadsheet mixed in there with Multiplan & Lotus 123 IIRC

      However, you're quite correct in pointing out that Microsoft was not the originator of any of these software concepts.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    5. Re:What will happen... by Nazadus · · Score: 1


      I agree and disagree with your opinoin. Just becuase someone complains about something, doesn't mean they should fix it or shut up. If that were the case, we would all be working on *tons* of things and it would most certainly overwelm us. I like open source stuff allot, but I still can't get my business to move ove becuase they aren't good enough. Microsoft is still better, or at least OO and other misc OS programs just aren't compatible enough yet. We use allot of the weird stuff, but I don't have the knowledge to even contribute into anything usefull. I'm willing to offer my opinion all day long and expertise in my field of choice (which is not *gasp* hardcore programming), sadly the OS community doesn't really need my advise so I'm not much use currently. Stop preaching, like the linux zealot that sits across from me. We all know where everyone stands. Everyone OS has it's advantage. Yes, even Windows has an advantage or two. Where am I going with this? I don't remember anymore *sigh* Lost track of thought.
      Anyways, you can call Microsofts software crap, but in reality it's good enough to dominate most of the world, and apprently better than OO for more places. I, personally, use whatever will get the job done the most effecient way. I'm willing to *pay* to make that happen. Microsoft produces products that will get my job done. Other linux distro's help as well. The grass is always greener...
      </rant>

      --
      "Do or do not. There is no try." -- Master Yoda (Half man, half muppet)
  5. Government DRM by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me guess

    Oh..oh I KNOW! Pick me.. PICK ME!!!

    Would it have anything to do with Government sponsored DRM so the CCP can control all that you see, hear and download at a more manageable level?

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Government DRM by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      what happened to the good old asking the kids at school what they watched in the family last night from tv?

      that was nasty. no need for drm either since this way you can catch those who go over the drm....

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Government DRM by qtp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't really matter if it's government mandated DRM, or if it's an industry wide agreement. Either way there is a group with a vested interest in controlling what news, ideas, and history we are exposed to controlling what we watch and what we can pass around freely.

      The interest of the two groups (government and industry) are remarkably similar (they depend on each other to remain in power) and dissenting voices will be quieted no matter who is at the reigns of DRM.

      I would not be surprised if the Chinese government is welcoming of this development. Government control over media content there seems to be commonplace there, and DRM appears to be a natural choice to further enforce control over the dissemination of ideas.

      --
      Read, L
    3. Re:Government DRM by kfg · · Score: 1

      I would not be surprised if the Chinese government is welcoming of this development.

      I would not be surprised if this has nothing to do with the Chinese government, you pirate scum you.

      KFG

    4. Re:Government DRM by Chops · · Score: 3, Interesting

      TV networks are about the easiest thing there is to government-control; it's both more efficient and more reliable to control the broadcaster. The Chinese gov't has also displayed a dismaying abundance of good sense when censoring their citizens' internet access: They filter the transmissions at well-chosen choke points, which is (again) efficient and reliable. The MS/RIAA route of controlling the individual computers/TVs is inefficient and unreliable, and it seems like they know it. I doubt they're interested in DRM-enabled TVs.

    5. Re:Government DRM by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Digital Rights Management will have a whole new meaning. It won't just apply to copyright, but to human rights .

    6. Re:Government DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Digital Rights Management will have a whole new meaning. It won't just apply to copyright, but to human rights .

      China still hasn't managed human rights. Neither has the US for that matter...

    7. Re:Government DRM by foidulus · · Score: 1

      hat happened to the good old asking the kids at school what they watched in the family last night from tv? that was nasty. no need for drm either since this way you can catch those who go over the drm....
      Granted, but people who force their kids to watch Mama's family should be forced to do hard labor :P

    8. Re:Government DRM by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Human rights start at the Human level. I do not trust my government to provide Human rights. Rather, they should be a God given right enforced by your fellow neighbors. But they are not, which is why we have laws to begin with.

      Ok, enough of my soapbox rant. I feel a little better now though.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:Government DRM by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Instead of going out for Dim Sum you stay home and watch DRM $um instead.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    10. Re:Government DRM by Dr.Hair · · Score: 1

      Check company profile at China Online.

      "Under Government/Regulatory Authority of: Sichuan Mianyang State-Owned Assets Bureau"

      I guess someone in the Chinese government has something to do with this.

    11. Re:Government DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well of course, since you can't enforce your human rights without being thrown in jail.

  6. Good question by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?

    Symantec and McAffee stock go orbital?

  7. What will happen... by XaviorPenguin · · Score: 1, Funny

    What will happen when low-cost labor in China (Speaking about the TV manufacturing and IT Technology) is combined with Microsoft technologies?

    Digital High Defination Blue Screens of Death?

    --
    Friends help you move...
    REAL Friends help you move dead bodies... ^_^
  8. MSNBC-Now I know what that acronym stands for by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft Now Backing Chinese

    Traitors!

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    1. Re:MSNBC-Now I know what that acronym stands for by Szentigrade · · Score: 1

      i think its the chinease that are the traitors!

      --
      When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up... reading.-Henny Youngman
  9. That was quick by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple announces a big monitor, suddenly this Msft innovation appears.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  10. DMCA Time by headkase · · Score: 1

    What would happen? I would hope that people could reverse engineer as the DMCA allows for interoperability the technologies in the TV's. It would be nice to have Windows Media 9 playback capability under Linux.
    Or not. :)

    --
    Shh.
  11. i18n by gokubi · · Score: 1

    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?

    Unicode friendly worms!

    --
    I'm much funnier now that I'm a subscriber.
  12. Spectrum trouble? by Atario · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surely you mean Red Screen Of Death?

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:Spectrum trouble? by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot to welcome our new Chinese-Speaking Paperclip overlords. :)

      --
      I'm an owl exterminator!
    2. Re:Spectrum trouble? by beacher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's what I see - No Support Here - Other goodies to expect can be found at Engrish.com's computer section

  13. FIX: Linux based TV. by headkase · · Score: 1

    Doh. Make that playback under your Linux based TV.

    --
    Shh.
  14. M$way? by midifarm · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Is M$ going the way of Gateway? Do they need TV's to turn a profit?

    Peace

    1. Re:M$way? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft has *always* been interested in muti-media, for example WebTV, MSN, Windows Media, and so on. We know from recent press that they wish to dominate the home "muti-media center". This China thing makes perfice sense for them. WOrld domination, you know.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  15. Red Star Linux... by Atario · · Score: 1

    ...becomes much more popular?

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  16. amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just poured an entire six-pack of Coke onto my monitor. Spitting is for barbarians.

    1. Re:amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In fact, it was so funny that I filled my bathtub with coke and dropped my monitor and keyboard into it.

    2. Re:amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. I'm in a hurry anyway. I just tucked all my monitors into my car and am now off to the Coke factory.

  17. Flame bait!!?? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    So you guys ARE in favor of Government sponsored DRM? Well christ on a stick, I'm floored!!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  18. It's obvious by Yurka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Massive quantities of hardware-based DRM, of severely crappy quality, which breaks in a couple of days. But at least it's going to be cheap.

    --
    I can assure you, the best way to get rid of dragons is to have one of your own.
  19. What'll Happen? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1, Interesting
    This:

    Microsoft gets to test its DRM in China on a huge populace that has no choice but to except to evil dictates of their pseudo-communist overlords. Once they get some of the major bugs worked out, and the almost major bugs can be papered over, they spring it on the USA just in time for broadcast HDTV, which will use MS DRM and the WMV format.

    Apple went to iTunes and music and won that battle handily, but they're losing the war big time, as the next generation of movie houses will use video projection and the WMV file format. The money is in the Big Things, and MS is cozying up to all the evil bastards and putting themselves in centre stage. As far as MS is concerned, the WMV format doesn't care if the DRM is locking down a movie theatre or a home theatre. It's all the same entertainment designed to keep your attention between commercials (TV) or your mind off the horrors of the nightmare we call post-industrial civilisation.

    Bread and Circuses, only this time the circuses have DRM owned by a monopoly.

    Heard it here first. Sort of.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:What'll Happen? by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the next generation of movie houses will use video projection and the WMV file format

      This doesn't really matter, IMO. Movie theatres are already so expensive that I end up going only once per year, and, then, I'm still dissapointed (people kicking my seat, looking through big hair, $5 popcorn, and all the other reasons why watching movies at home is 1000% better--and cheaper--than going to a theatre). If next-generation video discs go to WMA, then I'll most likely just stop watching new movies altogether (at least there's 50+ years of good movies already made).

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  20. MS TV's by SeanTobin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Something tells me that the tv's will have mysterious failures of both the red and green guns after they have been deployed.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    1. Re:MS TV's by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I would think that the Chinese would make sure the RED guns always worked. With Microsofts "help", the Red Screen of Death will be invented. ;-)

      I hope these guys are just going to take more of Microsofts money and walk away like they usually do. We really need to see more deals like the one AT&T got when MS was buying Windows CE into the market. In that deal, Microsoft paid AT&T $5 billion to use WinCE on a few million settop boxes. Which I don't think ever shipped. All the Chinese need to do is pull "The Penguin" out of their pocket and collect some cash from MS. IMO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  21. Not much difference... by tool462 · · Score: 5, Funny
    "What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

    Since a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, it won't be much different from high-cost labor in the US combined with Microsoft technologies.

  22. Wait a minute... by GeekZilla · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Changhong would receive advanced IT technology and software from Microsoft..."

    But where is Microsoft going to get the "...advanced IT technology...?

    --
    Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
    1. Re:Wait a minute... by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

      Same place they always have: Apple :-).

    2. Re:Wait a minute... by GeekZilla · · Score: 1

      hehe. That's what I was thinking too.

      --
      Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
  23. Jesus Christ by Stevyn · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Does there have to be a damn blue screen of death joke in every microsoft article? It was funny 2 years ago when people actually got them. Pull your head out of your ass or at least get a sense of humor that people in this century can relate to. Actually, the rating system of slashdot should have modded that down below my browsing level but someone decided to waste a whole mod point on thinking that was funny.

  24. Umm by sien · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?


    Umm, where do you think most PCs are made? The moon? Zimbabwe? Folks, this is the world we live in.

  25. Great by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    Changhong would receive advanced IT technology and software from Microsoft to develop digital TV sets and other high-technology products.
    Now where's Micro$oft gonna get this 'advanced technology' from?
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  26. Re:What will happen? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    [Tim Allen Mode][Bill Gates Modifier]More Profit![/Bill Gates Modifier][/Tim Allen Mode]

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  27. This just hype. by djupedal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?

    This 'combination' is far from the first time these two items have come together, and for the record, so far, the first attempts have been feeble - thru no fault of the Chinese, I assure you.

  28. owning a TV will never be the same by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unlike the old days, where you just unpacked your new TV, aimed the antenna, and turned it on, you now need to update your TV's operating system to Service Pack 2 as soon as you turn it on, in order to avoid catching a worm. Then you need to install antivirus software and a firewall. Lastly, in order to keep your TV working acceptably, you need to defrag it weekly, and regularly run software to remove spyware.

    Considering the crap on TV these days, it doesn't sound like it'll be worth the trouble.

    1. Re:owning a TV will never be the same by Col+Bat+Guano · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmmmm. Spyware.
      So in Communist China, TV will watch you?

  29. Jeanne Dixon, stand aside... by mr.+methane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I predict:

    * People will keep buying microsoft products because they like the products.

    * Slashdotters will continue to rant about the evils of microsoft (or whatever company happens to be doing well at the time)

    * Linux will continue being a useful and robust platform that's too complex for the average consumer and incompatible with popular applications.

    1. Re:Jeanne Dixon, stand aside... by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny
      finally a comment from someone without a tinfoil hat on.


      You mean that, if he had had his tinfoil hat on, then the Microsoft marketing ray gun wouldn't have melted his brain?

    2. Re:Jeanne Dixon, stand aside... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      * People will keep buying microsoft products because they like the products.

      People will keep using open source because they like the price, features, freedom, and quality.

      * Slashdotters will continue to rant about the evils of microsoft (or whatever company happens to be doing well at the time)

      Irrelevant. IBM is doing well and I don't hear too many rants around here. You seem to forget that Microsoft is a convicted monopolist. They have essentially been convicted of being evil.

      * Linux will continue being a useful and robust platform...

      It will continually improve and and add true innovation, filling the need of what people want. ...that's too complex for the average consumer and incompatible with popular applications.

      You didn't specify which task is too complex. For the end user, using Linux is mostly seamless.
      Name the popular applications Linux [distros] are incompatible with. Also, state how Microsoft has remained compatible or incompatible with these applications and versions.

    3. Re:Jeanne Dixon, stand aside... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      The OP missed point four:
      • the zealots will continue to stick their fingers in their ears and shout "LA LA LA CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    4. Re:Jeanne Dixon, stand aside... by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      The biggest application incompatibility problem for me personally is games. I am a sucker for new FPS games, and I also have acloset addiction for on-line games like Planetside.

      Yah, some are available for Linux - but the couple that I've looked at, I get to the part in the instructions where it mentions a few kernel hacks that might be required, and then I stick the CD into the windows box next to the linux box.

      In a work environment, the applications are mostly MS office. Open office is nice, but it does not have 100% compatibility with MS formats. We all know Outlook is a security nightmare, but, everybody knows it, knows how to use the calendar, knows how to make it work with their blackberry, etc. If they can't open a spreadsheet sent by a co-worker, the perception is that it's broken.

      Active Directory is the other element. Yes, I know it's a hack of LDAP, Radius and so on, but it looks the same and works the same on every system.

      Why do we have to pick just one? Linux is a hands-down winner in some areas, Windows does better at others. If I'm buying 100 laptops for sales guys who need to run Siebel and Outlook, gimme Win2k. If I'm building a group of machines as the back-end of a big network, gimme a handful of generic rackmount machines and the latest solid release of Fedora.

      And the reason IBM doesn't get bashed here is they don't sell much to twenty-something computer enthusiasts. You must have missed out on the wild cries of outrage when IBM shoved the evil MCA (micro channel architecture) down the throats of the helpless proletariat.

    5. Re:Jeanne Dixon, stand aside... by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Kernel hacks??? Now, THAT's odd. Unless you're referring to the extra stuff required for the graphics cards? If so, these days the major distros generally handle that for you when you first install the OS.

      That's been the only time I've ran across this particular issue. No big deal, really. Well worth it for the ability to play games like America's Army or UT2004 on Linux. :)

    6. Re:Jeanne Dixon, stand aside... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      The biggest application incompatibility problem for me personally is games. I am a sucker for new FPS games, and I also have acloset addiction for on-line games like Planetside.

      I'm not a big gamer so I can't comment much on this except that gaming doesn't apply to the business world, which Microsoft is trying hard to defend against Linux. Gaming titles made for Linux ought to run fine.

      In a work environment, the applications are mostly MS office. Open office is nice, but it does not have 100% compatibility with MS formats.

      I've also found the compatibility to be less than 100%, but that was the last time I tried (about a year ago). I remember noticing that it had improved a lot since the year before that. Try a recent copy of Open Office, or give StarOffice a try. Lots of people and businesses are using it. Anyone reading this who has used OO full time recently and can relay their experiences?

      Active Directory is the other element. Yes, I know it's a hack of LDAP, Radius and so on, but it looks the same and works the same on every system.

      Every system - what do you mean by that? I'm not sure compatibility is as smooth as you think. Read here for example.

      Why do we have to pick just one? Linux is a hands-down winner in some areas, Windows does better at others. If I'm buying 100 laptops for sales guys who need to run Siebel and Outlook, gimme Win2k. If I'm building a group of machines as the back-end of a big network, gimme a handful of generic rackmount machines and the latest solid release of Fedora.

      Exactly! Why just pick one? However, some people's or company's criteria might drive the use of a single solution for all areas (ie. freedom to modify the source code might be important, or Microsoft compatibility might be critical).

    7. Re:Jeanne Dixon, stand aside... by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm overlooking something pretty basic. I've tried a couple of different games - UT (original) and Quake3. Once on redhat (8.0 I think) and once on Fedora 1.

      First time, I followed the steps to download and compile the loadable modules for a Geforce4. Something went haywire in the new kernel, and it killed X to the point where I wiped and reloaded the machine from scratch.

      Is there supposed to be native 3d acceleration in the OS? Screensavers meant for OpenGL run slowly enough that I don't think they're using any hardware acceleration.

      The OS (at least since I've been looking) has always been good at detecting both the graphics card and even the display attached, but 3d never works for me.

    8. Re:Jeanne Dixon, stand aside... by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, for those cards the real issue are the patents that nVidia depends upon belong to someone else. They are not in a position to open source those. nVidia gets around it by creating a small shim that that needs to be compiled into the kernel, then building most of the rest of the functionality in a driver module that interfaces somehow with the shim.

      I've never built a kernel for Redhat or Fedora, so I can't speak to your experience. I have built them for Mandrake, Gentoo, and Debian. As long as I followed the directions, the only problems that I ran into were fat fingering the XF86Config-4 entries.

      While I haven't done it in a while, I understand that nVidia now has a .run script that is supposed to handle all of the stuff for you. It may be worth visiting their Web site if you get excited about decent Linux gaming again.

  30. Watch This Carefully by ewhac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems Microsoft is performing an end-run around the free market again.

    Not so very long ago, during the dawn of the x86 PC, machines were sold without operating systems. You had to buy your own copy. You were likely to ask friends or consult magazine reviews as to which OS was the best buy. As such, there was a possibility that you would buy, for example, CP/M-86 or Concurrent CP/M and not MS-DOS. In fact, there was a very good chance you wouldn't buy MS-DOS, because it was junk, and everyone knew it.

    Bill Gates knew it, too. He knew he couldn't win a fair fight on the retail shelf. So he did the same thing he'd done with BASIC: He took the choice out of the consumers' hands and made deals with PC manufacturers to bundle MS-DOS with the machine. Today, as a direct result of such deals, Microsoft is an oppressive illegal monopoly, and industry innovation has been provably stunted.

    It seems Microsoft intends to repeat the process, this time with in-TV software, in a country not yet familiar with their felonious behavior.

    Watch this carefully. Microsoft has proved repeatedly that they don't give a damn about the end-user, because that's not their customer -- the OEM is, and Microsoft has shown that they can bend OEMs over at will without repercussions. Personally, I don't think this bodes well at all for the future of TV receivers.

    Schwab

    1. Re:Watch This Carefully by necromonger · · Score: 1

      When your kids are watching barney, the TV will mysteriously show slides of barney sex toys in between and force you to install SP4 with TV-malware -detection tools

    2. Re:Watch This Carefully by Strudelkugel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      made deals with PC manufacturers to bundle MS-DOS with the machine

      You might want to read about the deal Gates "forced" on IBM. It was actually the other way around. Gates wanted to make a deal with IBM to include MS-BASIC with the PC, but IBM didn't have an OS for it, which they needed first. Gates suggested IBM go to Kildall of CPM fame. (Gates didn't want an OS business, he was more interested in languages) Kildall wasn't there; his wife and a laywer turned away "Big Evil IBM". IBM kept twisting Gates' arm, so Gates and Allen bought QDOS (quick-and-dirty-OS) from a guy in Seattle to make IBM happy.

      One concession Gates asked for was the ability to sell the OS to other vendors offering 808x boxes. No one thought this was necessarily worth very much since there were not many clones, and everyone thought IBM had the market locked up anyway.

      So many think Microsoft is were it is because it is big bad and evil, so there has to be legislation to box the company. Gates on the other hand, has stated that he is always wondering which garage is going to emit something that will undermine the business. I'm not an apologist for Microsoft. The company has done some stupid things. Just not as consistently as the competition

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    3. Re:Watch This Carefully by Souffle · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing one important point: If the OS were never bundled with PC's there wouldn't be such a huge consumer market for PC's. The bar would still be too high for many people who had never chosen or installed an OS, and didn't know someone who could do it for them.

      Pre-installing software isn't anti-competitive as long as your competitors are free to do it too.

    4. Re:Watch This Carefully by Locutus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think you are right in that IBM was the one which handed the monopoly to Microsoft. But, it was Bill and Steve who decided to use anti-competitive practices as the basis for doing business instead of competing by producing better products. MBA's love those guys but techies, mostly dispise them. Gershner once said that Microsoft was a great marketing company and a poor technology company and that REALLY REALLY pissed Bill Gates off. Because he THINKS he's a good geek. And he pays the people around him to make sure he keeps thinking that way. :/

      Anyway, so once the monopoly was established, Microsoft started pounding on anybody who didn't play THIER game and they did this with the OEMs and ISVs. Like the thread parent said, Microsoft want after the suppliers of the product and took the choice from the consumers since they held a bigger hammer over the heads of the suppliers.

      You were both right, just off on the time of the events.

      BTW, Bill Gates' paranoia has made him VERY wealthy, but only because he was handed the monopoly power by IBM( as you stated ). This does not make him a visionary or a genius in my book. Far smarter people built far better and useful tools then has ever come from Microsoft. But they were destroyed by Bill and Steves fear of being shown up. Gawd, just look at their "Facts" tour to see what bull they excrete and look at the state of Microsofts 3 year old Secure Computing Initiative. But that just IMHO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    5. Re:Watch This Carefully by mangu · · Score: 1
      MS-DOS was a fine OS for the 8088 CPU. It was well documented for the user, and there was a lot of documentation available for the developer. Given a choice between the CP/M systems and MS-DOS, people chose MS-DOS (or PC-DOS, as the system that came bundled with the original IBM-PC was called).


      I think where Microsoft first went bad was with MS-Windows 3.0. It was the chance to re-write the kernel and create a 386-aware system. But they gave preference to form over function. It worked. Now it's deeply ingrained in their whole corporative attitude, people don't care about performance, all they want is look-and-feel.

    6. Re:Watch This Carefully by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      windows 3.x wasn't an operating system. it was basically a gui for dos. think about the fact that you had to exit windows and go to dos before you could turn off the computer. there are other reasons as well, but that's the easiest to show.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    7. Re:Watch This Carefully by westlake · · Score: 1
      Not so very long ago, during the dawn of the x86 PC, machines were sold without operating systems

      Looking through my old copies of Creative Computing, I don't see adds for home, school or small business oriented systems that shipped without an O/S. Ever. No matter what the platform.

    8. Re:Watch This Carefully by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1
      Gates on the other hand, has stated that he is always wondering which garage is going to emit something that will undermine the business. I'm not an apologist for Microsoft. The company has done some stupid things. Just not as consistently as the competition.

      The reason he wants to know the location of the garage is so he can start to place pressure on the competition and preferably squeeze them out of the market any way he can. He is actively working against the current "garage" programmers who are working on Linux and other free technologies. Gates is not well known in the market for his good business ethics.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    9. Re:Watch This Carefully by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Your memory seems to be a little fuzzy here. We didn't choose to buy MS DOS. Each PC sold back then was required to be sold with an OS, and that was inevitably either PC-DOS or MS-DOS, with MS-DOS being the one most commonly available. Let me re-iterate, you could not purchase a PC without buying the OS at the time of purchase.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  31. This can't be true by melted · · Score: 1

    A voice of reason on slashdot. This site must have been spoofed or something.

  32. This unholy union will end in divorce by James+Turpin · · Score: 1

    I don't think that Microsoft will last very long in China after the party members are subjected to the blue screen of death a few times. The Party leaders will also want to back-stab Microsoft at every turn, which means Microsoft will want out as well. Expect this marriage to end in divorce.

    --
    Mathematics is not a crime.
    1. Re:This unholy union will end in divorce by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It won't take very long before the Party Leaders realize that it's cheaper to pirate than to license.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:This unholy union will end in divorce by James+Turpin · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the party leaders will pirate. However, I very much doubt that they will do a sophisticate cost/bennefit analysis. The Party leaders are in a position where they are allowed to ignore consequences because they have authority over the whole country with no checks and balances. All they have to do is decide not to enforce copyright laws, or only enforce them in a particular, limited, formulaic way as a token, and piracy is a done deal. For similare reasons, Microsoft will be extremely vulnerable to corporate espionage since the Party Leaders stand to bennefit from it. It is possible that the Party Leaders value their relationship with Microsoft enough to maintain the relationship for a while, but eventually the situation will degenerate once they are satisfied with the teechnology they have acquired and decide to become self-sufficient.

      --
      Mathematics is not a crime.
  33. The better question is... by DerProfi · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

    The better question is, "What will happen when Microsoft's technology meets China's total disregard for intellectual property rights?"

    The answer is, of course, "Hilarity ensues."

    --

    3000+ comments meta-modded. 0 mod points awarded.
    Lesson for other meta-suckers: Don't believe the hype!
  34. They won't know what hit them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    MS is in for a fun ride. The Chinese will figure out how to crack the DRM with Microsoft's unknowing help and then distribute sets/boxes/players that will allow you to disable the DRM. Mark my words - APEX made it's mark selling cheap machines that disabled Macrovision and region protection. Just wait and see.

    1. Re:They won't know what hit them by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, but as soon as they received a threatening letter from the DVD consortium they caved and released patched players that didn't have the little hidden menu. At least for the U.S. market. I got one of the last AD600A's a few years ago, one day before it was yanked from the market. So far as media is concerned, the DVD people have to kowtow to the MPAA and the CSS licensing people. That's precisely why China is looking developing a domestic DVD format so they won't have to deal with foreign licensing requirements.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  35. Color TVs? by Psymunn · · Score: 2, Funny

    which claims to be the world's number-two maker of colour TVs

    Silly Microsoft. Colour TVs are still experimental technology and will never take off. Far better for them to team up with developers of the tried, tested, and true, black and white televion set

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
  36. 1 Guess by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

    All I can say is that they had be better staffing up the Bangalore call center for this right now.

  37. Knowing Microsoft.... by Xshare · · Score: 1

    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies? Even higher priced Microsoft technologies? MS Assistant: Well sir, it costs us 60% less in labor to make these in China. Bill Gates: *excellent....* Have them raise the price by 60%! MS Assistant: But sir... it costs LESS to make it! Gates: DO NOT QUESTION ME, UNDERLING!!

  38. cheap products which don't work as expected by Locutus · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's what you'll get from a combined MS and Chinese product. But isn't that obvious by now. ;-)

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  39. Pay for Airwaves by bstadil · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As long as there is a requirement that the TV stations pay for the Spectrum they use, they can DRM the TV content until the cows comes home

    Make it expensive and cumbersome to watch TV and we will all be better off in the long run

    Only fools watch something where content and schedule is dictated by commercial interestes that do not have your welfare at heart.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  40. Hmmmm.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    webTV????

  41. My 2 favorite products. by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 2, Funny

    MS Windows and Apex Televisions.

    I tell ya... there's nothing better than the $89 20" flat screen Apex TV I picked up for xmas 2 years ago. Fantastic picture, well-thought out remote, top quality product. Just like MS Windows.

    I'm kidding.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  42. Where will this lead? Cheap TVs with reset buttons by maTRON · · Score: 1

    Not only will this lead to reset buttons, but for the first time your tv will get stuck in STANDBY mode.

    Also, cable TV access won't be available until sometime in 2005.

    Remote control is only suported with a "Professional" TV License. Wheee

    --
    Wheee!
  43. Borg by ryu1232 · · Score: 1

    shouldn't that read M$ plans to assimilate Chineese TV maker?

  44. In an Imperfect World by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Um, HELLO, quality will drop, bugs in software will increase exponentially as a result and Micro$fot will finally die from the burdens of this load and the world will proliferate with GOOD software.

    **wakes up from dream**

    Yeah. Dream is right. Television is the opiate of the masses these days and what better source of opiate than China, with a little help for a Yankee trader (Microsoft) to bring it to market around the world.

    As more technology is needed (or not needed but crammed in there anyway to obfuscate signals and control content distribution) TV moves further from a free medium into a medium locked down by content providers. Lovely.

    "Are you watching that Blue Screen show again?"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  45. China has no property laws now. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I got back from China a few months ago. There are American DVDs everywhere. There was a van going around with 'Intellectual Property Enforcement' written on it... in English only... quite obviously for display purposes. China is probably the biggest pirate nation in the world, maybe second to Russia, maybe not. Combine industrial capacity with a total disregard for property laws.

    I would not be surprised if this is a step by Microsoft to get some Chinese folks with clout ("guanxi" in Chinese or "connections" in English is even more important in China than in the U.S.) That's the only way for MS to protect its IP in China and head off a prospective haven of bootlegged media and DRM flaunting software.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:China has no property laws now. by qtp · · Score: 1

      Two sides, same coin.

      --
      Read, L
    2. Re:China has no property laws now. by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And this stuff's coming to the US too!

      Last weekend, I was at a mall (in the US), and there was a Russian guy with a stall (the ones usually selling picture-on-a-mug or Oakley sunglasses) selling these Chinese-made game controllers, which just happened to have 100 NES games loaded onto its ROM. Only $49.99 and you can plug this controller into any TV and play things like Mario, Duck Hunt, etc.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    3. Re:China has no property laws now. by weijiao · · Score: 1

      Really? There are two parties to a "pirate" transaction. Last time I was down at the market it was full of Americans stocking up on cheap software and other goods. MS has all the government connections it needs in the form of the US government. WJ

    4. Re:China has no property laws now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Despite Bill Gate's efforts to establish contact with chinese OEMs/manufacturers, in the OS business in particular, localized versions of linux are already available there. See Redflag linux, for instance.

      They are run by and for Chinese people with Chinese investments. They are not even partnership, meaning they have no obligations to do American corporations favors.

      Though MS is now attempting to get a good grip in China, I highly doubt their attempt will become as fruitful as they expect. Even though Windows is still on top of everyone else, selling MS products can be as tricky as selling cars built by Ford in Japan. With the current trend of Asian countries in considerartion, MS is just another foreign corporation with no understanding of the Chinese business.

    5. Re:China has no property laws now. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      "Needs" maybe. Wants? Definitely not. The US has tried to pressure China to respect US IP, brands, etc. China has smiled, nodded, pretended to comply, arrested one or two people in show trias and then ignored the problem.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  46. Re:I'll bet the blue works really well by homer_ca · · Score: 1

    It does happen. Roxio Easy CD Creator kept crashing my Windows XP until I installed the update. Gravis gamepad drivers (GRIP protocol) used to crash my Windows 2000 all the time, and they never did fix those drivers. OK, so buggy apps and drivers aren't Microsoft code, but still, it shouldn't be happening.

  47. obviously by louden+obscure · · Score: 2, Funny

    the BSOD will be replaced by a RSOD.

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
  48. MS is making a media deal just like apple did by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1
    I think that Microsoft is imitating Apple's moves in the Chinese market with their own media distribution method.

    MicroSoft's challenge to Apple's iPod is the Microsoft Portable Media Center.

    And just as the iPod synchronises with iTunes on a computer, the Portable Media Center synchronises with Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004 on a computer.

    And in the same way the iTunes Music Store can download music, the Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004 Online Spotlight allows you to download music and videos.

    Apple has already made a deal with Founder to bundle their PCs with iTunes, as mentioned on Slashdot before, and now Microsoft is teaming up with Sichuan Changhong Electric Appliances, who produce color televisions

    Microsoft may be teaming up with Sichuan Changhong Electric Appliances to produce Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition Television Sets as a method for video distibution, in opposition to Apples move to be a method for music distribution.

  49. Is This A Trick Question? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

    How about this result:

    1) The labor will get more expensive as they get pissed off working on crap and demand better wages and better working conditions - such as NOT working on crap.

    2) Everything will be over-engineered and quality will drop through the floor.

    3) Security will become even worse than it was.

    4) China will nuke Redmond in retaliation.

    Oh, okay, everything is fine.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  50. Ask a stupid question... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    "What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

    TVs that crash, freeze, and require reboots every so often?

    Seriously, this is GREAT news. The Chinese will steal every ounce of Microsoft's technology it can get its hands on. Then it will produce products based on that technology and sell it for a LOT less money. In other words, China will do for the United States' software industry what it earlier did for our electronics industry.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  51. Chinese TV sets from the crypto dreams go real? by BACbKA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I the only one that had to gulp on the article headline? In the crypto community, there is a notion of a "Chinese TV set" - a central-authority-controlled computing device that takes part in a distributed computation challenge unbeknowst to the owner, and informs him if he has to report the result suddenly printed on the screen to the authorities (smth along the lines "you've just been randomly selected by the central broadcasting authorities as a lottery winner. Please call this number and read them the following digits to verify your identity (broken key bits encoding follows) in order to claim XYZ Yuan prize"). Perhaps the Chinese govt. finally got the hint and decided to have this really implemented? :)

    --

    VKh

  52. I love the term M$ by chamblah · · Score: 1
    M$

    At least you're original.

  53. Overlords by BitKeeper · · Score: 1

    What happend to the *inux OS China was working on? How did the Govement let that one pass? I think Microsoft is running China. :D

  54. Re:I'll bet the blue works really well by suckmysav · · Score: 1

    I've been using XP since it was released, and W2K before that. I have not seen a BSOD since Windows ME

    That might be because Microsoft decided to "fix" the BSOD problem by replacing it with the "Instant reboot problem"

    --
    "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  55. MS Hardware already Made In China by sych · · Score: 1

    "What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?"

    Isn't a great deal of MS Hardware already made in China?

    *clicks 'Submit' with his made-in-china Microsoft Mouse...*

  56. Get in bed with me, said the elephant by Progman3K · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Only we're not too sure who the elephant is here.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  57. You forgot.. by bartok · · Score: 1

    You forgot:

    * Microsoft and other companies will continue to pay shills like you to astroturf for them here.

  58. But I thought the Xbox was already... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    What will happen when low-cost labor in China is combined with Microsoft technologies?

    Isn't the Xbox already made in China?

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  59. MS Guided Tank by BlakeLupa · · Score: 1

    I'll face down Tank with MS made targeting software anytime.

  60. who cares? by phi6180339 · · Score: 1

    99% of tv an is evil brain-rotting drug anyway (except for star trek, simpsons, and pbs). most people who watch it are already brainwashed, complacent sheep who could care less about being jacked into the matrix. !

  61. Re:I'll bet the blue works really well by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 1

    For those BSOD fans:

    Control Panel -> System -> Advanced tab

    Click "Startup and Recovery" button.

    In the System Recovery section, uncheck Automatically reboot

    Click OK button.

    There, we got BSOD baby!

  62. XBox2's backdoor to China!!! by taweili · · Score: 1

    Changhong is one of the largest TV maker and it's goverment own. To be precise, owned by Sichun government. Sichun government has been very actively attracting foreigner investor to the province and the province has a population over 100 millions. Intel has spent $400 millions building a packaging factory there and has recently announce to launch WiMax network in Chengdu (second largest city in Sichun).

    What are we looking at is a possible backdoor for Microsoft to introducing XBox2 into China walking the gray area of the Chinese regulation. Changhong's future relying on flat TV, HDTV sales and nothing is better then an attractive graphics of a game console to attract customers. Remember, most people in China have not seen a game console in their life. The graphics from XBox2 on a HDTV will like to blow their mind away.

    Development of Sichun is one of the major plan of China's "Go West" policy. If Microsoft can help, the government is very likely to make a exception of its no game console policy for Microsoft.

    With Microsoft's Xbox2 launch date setting in 2005, the timing is just perfect. Sony/Nintendo will not be able to react to this. Sony TV is a competitor to Changhong or any other TV makers in China so PS2 can't go the same direction. Nintendo may be able to do such thing but they are too stubborn to go with this route.

    1. Re:XBox2's backdoor to China!!! by zhangyong · · Score: 1

      Agree. Remember Microsoft's Venus plan in China? Microsoft has a big ambition in TV boxes long ago. I would guess this time it's towards the Xbox, too.

  63. very clever by carldot67 · · Score: 1

    MS has seen that Linux is gathering support in the far east. They have to stop that. They already know three things:

    1. Leveraging an installed base WORKS
    2. Embrace and extend WORKS
    3. Media and compute devices are coalescing
    4. TVs are more prevalent than computers in the East

    This is my theory:

    They have noticed that leveraging devices from the desktop has failed (by their standards) here in the West - see Windows CE, Stinger, Tablet edition and so on.

    Therefore they must try something else, such as leveraging desktop products from devices.

    By "working with Chinese Manufacturers" they can promote a large proprietary installed base of Windows codecs, firmware and so on.

    Later, when it's time to hook these thing to computers, guess what - only works with Windows Longhorn (or whatever) ring fenced by a minefield of dodgy IP. What is easier - flashing the firmwar or the desktop OS?

    I dont believe this is about inserting MS technology into devices destined for the west. I think its a strategic move towards the east.

    --
    I wish at was Friday, but I dont want to wish my life away. So I wish it was last Friday.
  64. "property" should read "intellectual property"-nt by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    No text. No text

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  65. MOD PARENT UP by Progman3K · · Score: 1

    Refers to the analogy of getting in bed (doing business) with a behemoth, and seems to be saying MS AND China are both so big, it's hard to tell which one would crush the other.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  66. Re:China has no IP property laws now. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    MS is just another foreign corporation with no understanding of the Chinese business.

    Perhaps. But I didn't see a single Linux machine in the 5 months I was there. Maybe in government computers or somthing. All desktops ran windows, and pirated MS CDs went for about 50 cents on the street. (One in three CDs actually worked. Of course, most were in Chineese, so it did me no good.)

    Because China doesn't even recognize domestic IP, Chinese programmers have a hard time making money unles they work for overseas business. Because China is a bad place for IP, the vast majority of Chinese software is designed for foreign markets where it does sell and is then imported, and probably pirated.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  67. Re:China has no IP property laws now. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming you're Chinese and living in China?

    I'm not sure how you can tell that the people were Americans just by looking at them, but I agree that most people don't care whether their DVD is pirated or not, so long as it runs. I don't know of a nation where that's not the case. Tourists snatch up plenty of DVDs. In Nanjing, where there aren't a lot of foreigners, there are also plenty of DVD shops and non-foreign buyers. I never claimed that people don't pirate IP in America. But my statements are still true; China doesn't enforce IP laws. it's a location where people can produce and distribute IP on an industrial scale, and this may be Microsoft's motivation for getting in the good graces of possibly influential Chinese businesspeople, in the hopes of stemming the flow at the source.

    I'm not supporting MS. I think they're too damn powerful in the US already, and a worldwide monopoly will be even worse. But that doesn't mean they won't make the effort. They have the means and they have the motivation. I'd be willing to bet they do whatever they can, politically and technolgically, to extract a few more dollars from the growing market that is the PRC.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  68. Innovative. by sbszine · · Score: 1

    Replying to yourself with 'MOD PARENT UP' is a refreshing new low in karma whoring. My nose cone is off to you, my friend.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling