Slashdot Mirror


Robots in Hospitals

Dieppe writes "Robot couriers are being used in hospitals CNN. The robots are being used as delivery 'bots to deliver medicine and other hospital supplies. They are polite, and even can be overly cautious. I wonder if at night they supply them with saws, arms and other cutting devices and let them at each other? Turns out they're cost effective as well!"

190 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Oh, yeah. I can just see the original thinkers at Hollywood, Inc. making a movie about these. Robots, designed to serve and help mankind, a minor flaw, they think for themselves and start taking out the patients systematically until some tough macho cop, probably played by a typecast actor shows up and swaggers a lot and blows them apart with the kind of gun only SWAT teams and infantry are issued, all the while uttering expletives which only entertain juveniles. They'll probably rip off the title of some great sci-fi classic, too, just to promote the lousy thing.

    There was a comic I won at a school fair in the late 60's, with cover ripped off (probably return donated by distributor) Magnus Robot Fighter, which would fit the bill rather well.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. Workplace shortages by dg41 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suppose that the medical industry has to do SOMETHING about the lack of employees in the growing healthcare industry.

  3. Speaking Of Crappy Movies by lickalotapus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Uh, I think we all know what happens next.

    1. Re:Speaking Of Crappy Movies by uberslack · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would be more like this.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid does not mean that the world is not full of assholes.
  4. And...? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Robots are also being used in delicate surgeries, to ease hand tremors by the surgeon. They use various methods of control, but the basic idea is the doctor is in a different room and the robot in the operating room, weilding the scalpel, clamps, camera, etc.

    --
    ResidntGeek
    1. Re:And...? by lickalotapus · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't these hand tremors affect the joystick or whatever the doc in the other room is using to control the robot? Sheesh, somebody clearly didn't think this through...

    2. Re:And...? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, then the roobt detects the hand tremors and removes them, so that the doctor doesn't accidentally slice open an artery or whatever. I *think* it's called the Da Vinci Surgical System.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    3. Re:And...? by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not only that, but it can magnify the image, and reduce the doctors movements.

      That is, the doctor can do virtual surgery on a heart thats blown up to appear to him to be six feet across. He removes/cuts/does whatever to a managable six inch chunk of it, and the robot replicates that on the real heart, in sub-millimeter fashion.

      Pretty cool stuff. Still very much in development though, but there have been some early trials.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:And...? by lickalotapus · · Score: 1

      I hope no programmers get sued for claiming to write The Da Vinci Code.

    5. Re:And...? by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Informative

      They demo'd it at my med school. The guys who tested it were suitably impressed. Buy the stock, folks. (No, I have no connection to them.)

    6. Re:And...? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can actually filter that out.

      Other cool things would be to use force-feedback combined with imaging technologies so that surgeons could do stuff like make critically sensitive areas seem rigid, like brain tissue or blood vessels around a tumour.

      The VR aspects of it too also let you do image and motion scaling as well as work at weird angles, so that certain types of microsurgery become possible, you could sew arteries like pairs of jeans, or operate on a beating heart.

      Surgery is particularly a good application for this stuff because it's relatively easy to simulate the surgeon's tools.

    7. Re:And...? by seafortn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One current issue is feedback - when working with small vessels, like the coronary arteries, it's really easy to pull a stitch right through the wall of the vessel and (at worst) have to start all over again - so the surgeons doing this kind of work often rely heavily on their sense of touch and experience - not sure whether this system has a good fix for that - it's hard to tell with the eye how taut a suture is - maybe a gague to tell the surgeon how much force is on the suture would be a good idea...

      I am not a cardio thoracic surgeon, but I've watched a few bypasses...

    8. Re:And...? by Retric · · Score: 1

      Or just use force feed back. You could even improve on the old methiod by making it somewhat exponental aka it's easy to move when not cuting things but get harder when your cuting and takes a fair amount of force to "tear" somthing. aka doctor can tell when there cuting somthing as aposed to riping tisue.

    9. Re:And...? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nobody would claim to write that piece of crap.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    10. Re:And...? by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's a link to my old colleges CS department. They have surgical simulators with force feedback in the works when I was graduating. I did some minor work on the lumbar puncture simulator for a final semester project. Was really fun stuff.

      Millersville University's Research in Haptics and Surgical Simulation

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    11. Re:And...? by 224036583-1 · · Score: 1

      with Allan Snyder?

    12. Re:And...? by nastro · · Score: 1

      Keep feeding them Jameson, and the shakes go away naturally...really! No need for robots here. Talk about writing a thesis to answer 2+2.

    13. Re:And...? by xtype2.5 · · Score: 1

      The surgical system is called the da vinci and my father underwent prostrate removal with this system 4 weeks ago. Very impressive machine and pop is riding a bike now! The link for the system is here http://www.uchospitals.edu/specialties/minisurgery /benefits/davinci.php

  5. little has changed.. by tedtimmons · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The RoboCart has a fixed path determined by tape placed in a hallway

    So basically, nothing has changed since Tron?

    Or since the kit-based "line follower" robots, for that matter.

    .

    .

    (Yes, I know that most other bots are smarter than that, I used to live across the street from Pyxis. Get over it, I did RTFM.)

    1. Re:little has changed.. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

      So basically, nothing has changed since Tron?

      Wrong movie there, bub. Looker predated Tron by over a year, and it actually FEATURED the trash robots running around. Just watch out for the bad guys with their "invisio-flashy-thingy" guns.

    2. Re:little has changed.. by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      But think of the entertainment value in doing a Roadrunner-esque 'pick up the highway lines and point them at a cliff'! But seriously, once we get some kind of inexpenisve e-paper/vinyl, you could use something as simple as the line-following robot if the floor could rearrange the lines. Drawing a path between two points that avoids stationary objects is easy, as is making something follow a line and stop whenever something moves in its way. Having something figure out a viable path on the run, however, is more complicated.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    3. Re:little has changed.. by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      Hartford Hospital has robots to deliver meals to patients. I see them parked in the hallway near the kitchen everytime I pass by, although I have never actually seen one in action. I still see dining services bring up giant cabinets full of trays to the floors. I wouldn't imagine that robots will replace a human at wheeling a dinner cart in a busy hospital anytime soon.

  6. .oO by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doctor: Scalpel.

    Robot: Scalpel.

    Doctor: Domo arigato, Nurse Roboto.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  7. Well, it looks like the hackers have a new target by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 4, Funny

    The HelpMate asks people, "please examine my contents," when it makes a delivery.

    I can't wait to see what phrase gets hacked into the voice processsor to replace this informative gem.

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
  8. RoboDoc by yanestra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Germany, an US product called RoboDoc was working for several years doing pre-programmed hip joint operations. Several hundreds of victims are now preparing to sue the hospitals - the ensanguined operations have led to severe destructions in nerves, muscles and bones.

    1. Re:RoboDoc by lickalotapus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard that lawsuit is just limping along though.

    2. Re:RoboDoc by theCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just to show what a small world it is... I did some db development for the animal doctor/surgeon who perfected the technique on dogs in his vet practice, using technology developed by a guy who died just before it went gold.

      I guess hip problems are common in some canine species, so the technique go a lot of trial while doing some for animals. And dogs come in many sizes so the techniques once refined could scale easily according to mathematical models.

      This was about 10 years ago. If it's not the same outfit, then there was some parallel work going on. In any event, deploying robots to do hip replacements was a no-brainer; hips are done all the time and are very mechanical, yet are easy to screw up and often require re-tooling at a later date. The guy I worked for was very excited that "permanent" hip replacements were in the offing. Certainly the dogs seemed to do very well, running and jumping and the whole thing. Miracles, really, according to him.

      But dogs can't report the same kinds of subtle post-op issues a human could and would. Maybe it was a technology still not ready for prime time?

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    3. Re:RoboDoc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      RoboDoc has been used in somewhat over 6000 hip operations at the clinic in Frankfurt. Plese cite your source for "several hundred" complaints, as published news accounts say several dozen. What would you consider a high rate of complication in hip replacement?

  9. Great idea! by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too bad that they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Great idea! by cynic10508 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too bad that they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

      Not mine. I just checked and my Old Glory robot insurance policy is up to date.

    2. Re:Great idea! by Sunkist · · Score: 1

      Old glory...for when the metal ones come for you...and they will!

      Check out the ad for Old Glory Robot Insurance here.

      --
      No, Vern. They just let him in.
    3. Re:Great idea! by psoriac · · Score: 1

      Too bad that they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

      Too bad that they don't eat old people for fuel.

      --
      I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  10. Watch out! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the brave new world, the terrorists will come armed with coloured tape to control the robot hoards.

    --
    Evil people are out to get you.
    1. Re:Watch out! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      ObNitpick: A hoard is a stockpile of something hidden away for later use. A horde is a large collection of something (usually people.)

      I noticed you misspelled "colored" also ;)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by basil+montreal · · Score: 1

    Oh, yeah. I can just see the original thinkers at Hollywood, Inc. making a movie about these.

    Hey! We could call it "I Robot"! Man, I can hear Asimov rolling around in his coffin...

  12. Technology in hospitals by DoctorDeath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My mother (an RN) was recently complaining about the hospital she works in going to using computers in place of paper to do all the patient reports. She had a fit when I told her the local hospitals are using laptops and scanners in every room and medicines are kept lockedup until the nurse scans the patient ID. After the computer verifies the patient it then unlocks the proper drawer so the nurse can get the proper medicine. Now this comes along and she will end up in a nut house for sure.

    --
    Sig temporarily out of service.
    1. Re:Technology in hospitals by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      I really would like to know. Does she have some reason to feel this way? All those things sound like good ideas to me but maybe there is something I don't know.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    2. Re:Technology in hospitals by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 3, Informative

      My girlfriend is a RN too. She likes the tech (when it works) because it helps eliminate mistakes. The scanning of wrist bar codes for drugs seems to be helping with that. It's amazing how often the wrong drugs or dosages are given to patients. Especially since nurses are incredibly overworked - they frequently have to work 12+ hours. In some hospitals, if you don't put in the time, they'll fire you. Some how, they're getting around labor laws. And now, hospitals are trying to get foreign workers to become nurses ...I'm going on a rant. I'm stopping.

    3. Re:Technology in hospitals by DoctorDeath · · Score: 1

      Yeah she is old school thinking. She turned 61 this year and can barely handle email let alone a proprietary system that doesn't look anything like the old forms. Computers and technology scare the bejesus out of her.

      --
      Sig temporarily out of service.
    4. Re:Technology in hospitals by jjshoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you perhaps thinking of a pyxis machine? [link]http://www.pyxis.com/[/link] The idea is fairly simple. You enter a patient id and you are given drug options. A drawer opens and you count the current amount of items. You take your item out and re-count. done.

      Dr. Plummer brought a lot of technology to the health care industry that can be read here [link]http://www.mayo.edu/proceedings/2002/nov/771 1ir.pdf[/link]. One of the items it does not cover that Dr. Plummer did was an intercom system. He called the telco and told a sales person what he wanted. The sales person said it couldnt be done. Plummer demanded to speak to an engineer, who also said it could not be done. Dr. Plummer convinced the engineer that it could and will be done. vwala.

      The paging sytem at Mayo now is quite efficent. You have a pager, number 11, for when you are away from your desk. Your boss decides he wants to talk to you. He answers the phone and dials 11. Your pager goes off. You pick up the nearest phone and press #11 causing you to be connected to your boss. If you are unable to answer your pager it rolls over to either a pre-defined number or voice mail. Robots arnt the only/most efficent technology used in hospitals.

      Anoter fact from [link]http://www.mayoclinic.org/about/rochester.ht ml[/link] "Mayo Clinic occupies approximately 15 million square feet -- about 2.9 times the size of the Mall of America." hit the site, browse around, be amazed.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    5. Re:Technology in hospitals by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      pyxis
      Dr. Plummer
      Facts

      can you tell i was thinking orkut with my links?

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    6. Re:Technology in hospitals by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      That's not "vwala", but "voila" (or more precisely, with a grave on the 'a': "voilà").

      It's sad to see people bastardizing language over and over again...

    7. Re:Technology in hospitals by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      All that paper being handled by numerous people means it's probably carrying numerous pathogens around the hospital. A properly designed computer could be trivially sterilized (hopefully on a regular basis) and as such would be cleaner than paper, in addition to all the other benefits of using computers in the first place, like the fact that ASCII cannot be entered illegibly - it just won't enter at all in that case :)

      Keeping digital records of everything really ought to be mandatory for all health care facilities of any type. It's ridiculous that health care providers can keep your data hostage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Technology in hospitals by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      The machine should be subordinate to the human, not the other way around. Think HAL in 2001. I don't want my car to shut off in the middle of rush hour traffic because it thinks it might cause damage to keep running, and I don't want some machine telling my nurse that I can't have the medicine I need.

    9. Re:Technology in hospitals by mwood · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that digital records are way more legible. I often recall with shivers the time I handed in a prescription at the local pharmacy and watched while two experienced pharmacists held a mini-conference to try to figure out what the heck the physician had intended to write.

      These days, "doctor's orders" ought to be digitized, reviewed by expert systems, cryptographically signed, printed in barcode as well as $LOCAL_LANGUAGE, and offered as email or download to my smart token as an alternative to paper. Instead we get scraps of paper that look like they were cut from a seismogram. :-P

  13. Robo-sourcing? by manabadman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    University of Virginia Hospital could save as much as $218,000 a year if it replaced 15 human couriers with six HelpMate robots, which would pay for themselves in little over three years.

    Its not just IT workers that are in danger, and its not just Indian workers that are taking away jobs.

    But thats just how the world works. Invention brings about efficiency but it also opens new avenues for humans. After all H. Ford's assembly line has created a net gain in jobs, right?

    I for one welcome our new ... bah, hello nurse :)

    1. Re:Robo-sourcing? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      Ford's assembly line hasn't helped horse or carriage sales much, has it?

      --
      ResidntGeek
    2. Re:Robo-sourcing? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no good reason to defend industries tied tightly to obsolete technology.

      Unless you're a politician, of course.

    3. Re:Robo-sourcing? by 1c3mAn · · Score: 1

      Consider the fact that even in the article it states that 110,000 nursing jobs went unfilled last year. Another CNN article month ago shows that nursing will be the one of most in demand job in 10 years. Is it really outsourcing when a job that is unfilled gets replaced by a robot? Iceman

    4. Re:Robo-sourcing? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      NET gains. Meaning that the gains offset the losses. So a few people lost their jobs, more than enough jobs were probably created.

      I think the computer industry and the internet created a lot of jobs too. We are so used to having them that we can't do without them. I suspect that they drain our productivity a lot more than they help though. It seems contradictory, but the reason I say this is that it helps us do more things that we wouldn't have bothered doing before because they were so tedious. So rather than add to free time, for many, it might suck it up.

    5. Re:Robo-sourcing? by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      If there's a robot to empty bed-pans or colostomy bags, I don't think anybody would mind giving up that job.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    6. Re:Robo-sourcing? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      True first paragraph. My point, though, was that these robots are replacing people, while cars only replaced horses and carriages, which don't need their jobs to feed their families. This isn't going to open any avenues for humans, except maybe a few repairman jobs (which will be 1 technician for tens or hundreds of robots).

      --
      ResidntGeek
    7. Re:Robo-sourcing? by another_henry · · Score: 1

      You have to wonder how things will work out if this is carried through to its logical conclusion - all menial/unskilled jobs, and a lot of skilled ones, are replaced by robots that can do the job more efficiently. A lot of people are now out of work, or make-work positions for them have to be created. I think in these circumstances, a communist or socialist system begins to look good because now fewer people have to work and the benefits can be enjoyed by everyone. OTOH I don't think we're at this stage yet, nor will we be for some time.

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    8. Re:Robo-sourcing? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      These things aren't nurses, they're messengers.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    9. Re:Robo-sourcing? by Saeger · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This technological progress will unfold much faster than you might intuitively assume from the rate of TODAY'S progress. Read Marshall Brain's RoboticNation for a good look into the still-pre-singularity period of this coming robotic future. From fast-food, to trucking, to war, robots will be replacing many millions of jobs over the next decade or so, but until society adapts to this reality, humans will still need to 'work for a living' to justify their existence.

      I think in these circumstances, a communist or socialist system begins to look good

      You can't use the C-word anymore (no, not Cunt - I mean Communism). Even I wouldn't advocate pure communism or socialism, though, but instead a kind of capitalist meritocracy where there's still some ownership, but not to the outrageous excess we see today. Yeah, I'm for limits on personal and corporate wealth. *gasp*.

      In a future where the vast majority of work has been automated, the means of most production should be owned by the people, and all the newly technologically-unemployed "useless eaters" should get their fair share of this automated abundance (rather than starving and revolting), but if you're a little greedier and want a BIGGER PIECE OF THE RESOURCE PIE, then you've got to somehow earn the whuffie by being a 'better' human being than the other 6-billion well-fed humans. What will a leisure society value the most (that can't be automated and owned by a monopoly)?

      A little farther down the road and 'molecular manufacturing' enters the picture, in which the means of production can actually be owned by each and every person because there's no longer a need for a robotic infrastructure to move around the fruits of our old bulk-technology. With nanotech, each person could once again become a self-sufficient island, recycling 'garbage' molecules into food... bla bla.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    10. Re:Robo-sourcing? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      And the designers of these things will have to hired as will the people running the assembly lines, the marketing people to sell them, the programmers to write the firmware, the people who ship them, and so on.
      New tech means new jobs making, selling, operating, repairing and shipping the new tech.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    11. Re:Robo-sourcing? by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      Wasent there an anime movie about such a device. Some hospital bead power by a Military developed processor that went nuts?

    12. Re:Robo-sourcing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I find it interesting that, despite the obvious deficiencies of these robots (getting stuck, etc), six of them would be sufficient to replace fifteen human couriers. Are we meatbags really such inefficient workers?

    13. Re:Robo-sourcing? by mwood · · Score: 1

      Y'see, though, the jobs *shift*. Lose 2000 jobs, gain 3000, but they aren't the same jobs and the same people can't fill 'em. If the couriers could do engineering, most of them would have been engineers rather than couriers -- the pay's better.

    14. Re:Robo-sourcing? by mwood · · Score: 1

      Actually humans are too intelligent to make good couriers. We lose focus, we get tired or bored or preoccupied, we come to think we know better than whoever gives the orders. The robot, on the other hand, has only the motivations which we engineer into it. Taking stuff from here to there without thinking about *anything* else is clearly a job made for machines.

      Set up a complex of expert systems and try it against a few good diagnosticians, and see how quickly (on average) each group converges to a correct diagnosis, and you may get a different picture.

  14. Rx Bots Make Sense by grunt107 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These would be very useful in performing all the menial hospital tasks and free up nurses to do the more important stuff. For instance, why not have bots that empty bedpans, scrub/disinfect the floors (and vac up the occasional 'urp). It would also be beneficial to have 'bots for retrieving/turning the hefty or bedridden patients. This would also help in lowering the nursing staff injuries due to fatty-tossing (I have relatives that routinely lift 500+ lb'ers).

    1. Re:Rx Bots Make Sense by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1
      These would be very useful in performing all the menial hospital tasks and free up nurses to do the more important stuff

      Yeah,like coming into my room, unzipping her dress, unsnapping her garters, telling me how big I am, releasing her large ....what! this isn't Penthouse! Oops, my bad!

    2. Re:Rx Bots Make Sense by Hrrrg · · Score: 1

      The hospital I worked at was already using such robots back in 1994. Interesting to see, but sometimes there were annoying. The thing wouldn't let you share an elevator with it. Also, if you happened to need an x-ray quickly (say at 2 am when you wanted to go to bed) and it was stuck inside a robot somewhere, then you were screwed. (this was before the x-rays went digital)
      Also, if you intentionally blocked its path long enough, the security guards would come yell at you. :-)

    3. Re:Rx Bots Make Sense by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      You don't need a robot for that. You need a forklift...

    4. Re:Rx Bots Make Sense by alexmogil · · Score: 1
      Our hospital bought one this year. It's to keep some of the Rx techs busy in Pharmacy and not on the floors for deliveries. It's an automated system that can keep track of which stations need refilled. So, instead of using a person to fill the bins, the robot fills the bins.

      Except the robot can't fill narcotics.

      And he has a rather difficult time getting around.

      And he still has to have an Rx tech escort him throughout the hospital.

      So... the savings are, uh... negative.

      --
      A winner is you!
  15. Good Idea, Except For... by 00Sovereign · · Score: 4, Funny

    The day when the robots are seen searching the hospital records for a particular "Sarah Connor"

    --
    "Me fail English, that's unpossible." --Ralphie
  16. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1

    Ya know, some people made a lot of money with ideas that were half as good as yours.

  17. Robot gets raided by junkie by A+Boy+and+His+Blob · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine the doctor...

    "hmmm... I put in a order for morphine an hour ago I wonder what is taking the robot so long."

    I guess that is why arming these things is necessary.

    1. Re:Robot gets raided by junkie by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I guess that is why arming these things is necessary.

      Or have a few ampules of saline along with the real thing, only the robot knows which is which.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Robot gets raided by junkie by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Or just put the stuff in little drawers that only open when the robot reaches its destination[s]s.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Oh no by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    The HelpMate asks people, "please examine my contents," when it makes a delivery.

    Goatse-bot is one step closer to reality.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Oh no by Egekrusher2K · · Score: 1

      Just let it die man. Goatse was old 4 years ago.

      --
      Listen to my experimental-industrial-techno!
    2. Re:Oh no by karnal · · Score: 1

      sig- Listen to my crappy techno! Click Here [technologi...teland.com]

      From the sounds of it, so was your crappy techno.

      --
      Karnal
  19. Just a twist on warehouse robots. by elucubra · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They have been doing this kind of stuff, with heavy loads in automated factories and warehouses. What is new?

  20. More sterile? by saskboy · · Score: 1

    I would hope these things go through a daily or weekly cleaning routine. It isn't like a human that can wash their hands, robots don't give a darn about personal hygine.

    Perhaps they are even cleaner than humans, however they probably have a lot of people touching them.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:More sterile? by BelugaParty · · Score: 1

      ahem: I hope they are sterile, and I mean more than just the lysine contingency... if you know what I mean...

  21. or how about.... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    ... a minor flaw that allows the robots to think for themselves. They learn to do the doctor's jobs better than the doctors, and are about to replace them entirely when an angry mob of surgeons breaks into the hospital, smashes the robots optical receptors in with the blunt end of a bedpan and dismembers the helpeless helpful machines with operating room saws, and everything goes back to how God intended it to be.

    The end.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  22. This is news? by demonlapin · · Score: 5, Informative
    We've had one in my med school for, oh, four or five years. They even ginned up an ID badge for him, which necessitated a naming contest (the winning entry was "Rudy").

    Works just like the article says - takes drugs from the pharmacy to the floor. Fairly straightforward, really. I'm honestly surprised there aren't more in use - most hospitals (of any real size - I'm not counting all the rural 30- and 40-bed hospitals) use a pneumatic tube system of some sort to deliver meds to the floors, and those are notoriously difficult and expensive to maintain.

    1. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But pneumatic tubes are fast: fast enough to transport recently made radio-isotopes for radiopharmaceutical use. I can't see a robot going that fast.

    2. Re:This is news? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Routine meds only, of course. Stat orders are, I think, hand-delivered.

  23. Robots are used all over by bugnuts · · Score: 1

    I just saw that the Federal Reserve in NY uses robots to store gold. No security check, nobody to sue when a ton of bricks drops on them.

    In hospitals, they have to have more avoidance routines, but you could secure narcotics in a safe for delivery to wards and automatically track robot locations.

    They're a great win. But have been around for a while.

    Now, if they were in the shape of a giant penguin, I could see the relevance to slashdot!

    1. Re:Robots are used all over by blaberski · · Score: 1

      I should also mention that I saw one of these things get into what I can only call a "stand off" with an old person.

      The Old Lady was in the robots path, so it stoped and started beeping at her, and asked her to move. The lady was so scared by it that she just froze up. The Robot of course couldn't move so it just kept on asking her and beeping at her to move.

      This went on for about 3 minutes until a passing nurse saw her and got her to move out of the way of the robot, which then continued on it merry way.

  24. Hospitals will have robots everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    There are so many different ways that hospitals are using robots now - telerobotic doctors, specialized robotic surgeons, automated ICUs. This is a nice round-up:

    The arrival of the robotic hospital

  25. R.A.L.F. is that you? by funny-jack · · Score: 1

    Please tell me I'm not the only one who is reminded of R.A.L.F. (Robotic Assistant Labor Facilitator) from Flight of the Navigator?

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
    1. Re:R.A.L.F. is that you? by snooo53 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone happen to know if NASA actually has one of those?

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  26. Shh!! by sserendipity · · Score: 5, Funny

    >I wonder if at night they supply them with saws,
    >arms and other cutting devices and let them at each
    >other? Turns out they're cost effective as well!

    The first rule of Robot Club is _no_ talking about Robot Club.

    1. Re:Shh!! by awtbfb · · Score: 1

      The first rule of Robot Club is _no_ talking about Robot Club.

      Oops..

  27. Old news! by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    At least it was in Wichita, KS. I remember a co-worker getting run over as he tried to repair a printer and had his legs out in the hallway. The thing didn't catch him and he was semi-pinned between the door jam, the printer, and the robot. This was like 1996 or so.

    Sounds like they haven't changed much. These followed tape on the floor and asked you to move if they detected you. Maybe their detection has gotten a bit better :)

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    1. Re:Old news! by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't all use tape on the floor. We have one that apparently gets its bearings from radio - there are beacon antennas at the nursing stations and in front of the elevators.

  28. They don't even allow cell phones. by kerv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know about you guys, but our hospitals up in Canada don't allow the use of cell phones within the building. I guess they figure that they may interfere with some of the life support machinery. Now their allowing some robots to run around? Sounds a little iffy to me don't you think? I think I would be a little scared if I was half-a-wake and some nurse was giving me some needle that a robot just handed her. You might even think you were abducted by aliens!

    1. Re:They don't even allow cell phones. by jeffgeno · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: Don't allow the robots to use cell phones.

    2. Re:They don't even allow cell phones. by scrod98 · · Score: 1
      The one I am aware of only uses radio frequencies to communicate with the elevators (inside the shafts). Navigation is through memory, then radar and sonar for collision avoidance.

      Actually look a little like a dalek minus the gun.

      --
      LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
    3. Re:They don't even allow cell phones. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      You can certify that an exact model of robot has particular RF-generating characteristics. Maintaining a list of cell phone + 3rd-party antenna combinations and only allowing visitors to use approved ones just isn't feasible.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:They don't even allow cell phones. by Vypster · · Score: 1

      A recent BBC news article claims that there is no reason why mobile phones should be banned. I'm sure that these robots emit less interference than mobile phones, and they could even be programmed to avoid routes that would take them past extra sensitive medical equipment. And I think I'd trust a robot more than some of the odd people I've seen working in some hospitals in my lifetime.

    5. Re:They don't even allow cell phones. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The thing about medical equipment is that it is not required to be FCC licensed, and here I am talking about radio devices. I can dimly recall an anecdote where a city in TX (probably Houston) did a digital television test and set off all the heart monitors in a nearby medical facility, because they were using unlicensed frequencies which had formerly been vacant (or functionally so for their purposes) and were now being utilized.

      It's amazing all the kind of restrictions placed on medical hardware, like no exposed metal contacts even if they are electrically protected or even physically disconnected when not in use (to protect from sparks in an environment which occasionally contains dangerous O2 levels) yet they are willing to use FCC-unlicensed equipment. Seems like a big blind spot to me...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:They don't even allow cell phones. by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the Beeb has never seen a cardiac monitor go completely haywire because some nitwit visitor's phone call is more important than the cardiac patient he's trying to kill.

      Yes, I've seen it. My wife (a critical care nurse) has seen it often enough to recognise it instantly, which usually results in a cellphonectomy in the near vicinity within the next 30 seconds. If she's feeling nice, she doesn't permanently damage it before calling security to have the nitwit removed from the property.

    7. Re:They don't even allow cell phones. by mwood · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the dodgy monitor go back to Clinical Engineering for repair?

    8. Re:They don't even allow cell phones. by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      It's not dodgy. The telemetry units are very definitely affected by cell phone transmissions. Every unit on the ward is affected when one of these nitwits ignores the VERY conspicuously posted notices.

      These are probably the same folks saying that cell phones don't interfere with flight systems. Except that they often do.

      It really doesn't matter if you think it's poor design or not. You're on private property, subject to the property owner's restrictions. If you ignore it, you should be held accountable for your stupidity. In either of these cases, a charge of Reckless Endangerment would cover the situation nicely.

  29. I was kidnapped by one of those Robots! by blaberski · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, sort of anyway. I work in alot of hospitals all around the country. Anyway, at one of the hospitals, I get in the elivator on the first floor, push the button for the 3rd floor and the door closed.

    The elivator stops on the second floor and one of these robots get in. It took what seemed like forever for it to get in the elivator and get turned around. Once it had turned the right way in the elivator it then proceeded to make a bunch of tones.

    The doors closed, and the elivator began to move, it then bypassed my floor went all the way to the 8th floor. Where it got out and left me standing their.

    Apparently at this hospital the robots have priority on all elivator trafic. It simply overrode my selection and put in its own.

    Damn Robots.

    1. Re:I was kidnapped by one of those Robots! by pavon · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Just be happy you weren't standing at the top of the stairs, like I was. Protector robot my ass.

    2. Re:I was kidnapped by one of those Robots! by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      Or could leap from floor to floor like the bot in the new I, Robot movie. WAM!

  30. "Turns out they're cost effective as well!" by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    Therein lies the greatest potential for future trouble. One of the greatest fears of robots and machines in general, aside from them going out of control, has been that they are cheap labor and take away jobs. Yes, the same fears abounded when computers were first being introduced into the marketplace. Fortunately the shift was smoother than expected (though certainly not complete yet). Hopefully society can make the transition to increased robotics with as much ease as that one.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:"Turns out they're cost effective as well!" by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      There is a tale here. A tale about applying technowledge.

      In one of the old Gyro Gearloos cartoon 2 page strips. He was asked buy the Duckburg Ambasador to this country to come and improve some third world counter standard of living.

      When he got there he notist a lot of people carring water for the crops. Also a lot of water bufallos just standing around.

      He got the brillant idea of harnessing the water bufallos walking up and down a ramp that turned power generators to power pumps top pump water. Releaving the population of drugery.

      Well after it was built they started to move a heard through this wonder. Only problem was the bufallos did not want to go up! So they got men { ok Ducks } to push them up the ram. It took a lot of people to do it! When they reached the top they need even more people to get the bufallo to go down! As pessants we going mad trying to get it to work. Falling off and a lot of ticked off bufallo's. One of the pesants came over to Gyro and the Ambasador stating that it nice, but its taking more men than just carrying water to the fields! Well Gyro desided to leave in a hurry.

      Afer thing got back to normal with the bufallos relaxing and the men carring water again. The Ambasador said sorry that it did not work. The local pesant said but it did! It made a good scratching post for the Bufallos!

      IE: Just because you can make it does not mean you should do it.

      PS: You had to see the ending with ducks and water buffalos flying off of this thing!

  31. Re:More sterile? Yes by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At least you can auto-clave robot hands...
    And yes, I do realize you can auto-clave human hands too, but only once.
    Plus, the robot won't pick his nose between rooms.
    Perhaps the robot could be coated with one of the previously mentioned (here on /.) bacteria killing surfaces.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  32. Candy Stripers... by inkdesign · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While yes, these robots can replace a human for delivering supplies, keep in mind that hospitals have used volunteers for that job for years. These robots won't save a hospital 200,000 dollars a year until they replace the doctor. :0]

  33. Beffed up version of Cye by hoferbr · · Score: 2, Informative

    From another article:
    "Tug is a beefed up, industrial version of Cye with a patent-protected navigation/tracking system that slashes its price thousands of dollars below the competition, according to Thorne. Other differentiating factors include Tug's enormous 500-pound hauling capacity and a retrofit kit to pull existing hospital carts."
    You can find out more about Cye here.

  34. Re:security advantageous by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Funny

    No sexual harassment lawsuits
    No labor strikes
    No complaints from handling things that smell bad
    No danger from needlesticks or infections
    Less possibility of contamination from outside sources or recontamination from things like cell phones
    Easier to sterilize than live personel
    More privacy

    Unfortunatly, robots have been known to beat up old people and steal their medicine. And once they have you, you can't get away because robots are very strong. Fortunatly, they're coming out with insurance for people who are worried that they might become the victim of robots.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  35. Ancient news by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When I was transferred to Naval Hospital San Diego (now NavMedCenSD, I think), they'd had pretty much that exact system in use for several years. You'd occasional have to get out of the way of one of the little automatic carts as they followed their trails throughout the hospital. The freaky part was when you'd be walking down a long hallway, two little doors would slide open on opposite walls in front of you, a cart would come out from one wall and scoot into the other, and the doors would close behind it. I always wanted to duck in behind one but military chain-of-command is notoriously unsympathetic to tunnel hacking.

    Then again, military medicine seems to be quite a few years ahead of times. By the time I'd graduated from Operating Room Tech school in San Diego in 1993, I'd scrubbed in on many arthroscopic gall bladder removals and pretty much took them for granted. I was pretty surprised a couple of years ago to see a local newspaper bragging about how our hospital had recently acquired the equipment for "state-of-the-art arthroscopic gall bladder removal". One of my friends supervised the NHSD's digital imaging system in '94 or so, and the local civilian facility is just now completing a switchover to the same idea.

    I wouldn't do it again if I had the choice, but we definitely had the coolest toys to play with.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Ancient news by neillt · · Score: 1

      Yup... NMCSD has had the cart robots for a long time... I used to work IT there, got out last year. The nice thing about having an IT badge and all the keys was that you could go all over the complex and no one said anthing. There are lots of interesting places on the compound! Those tunnels are kinda creepy when no one else is around and the robots are just moving around by themselves in the dark. They now have newer ones that don't depend on the track, and can go directly onto the wards in the nursing tower instead of the central core. The new PACS system there by the way (was well as on the USNS Mercy) is sweet.

    2. Re:Ancient news by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There are lots of interesting places on the compound! Those tunnels are kinda creepy when no one else is around and the robots are just moving around by themselves in the dark.

      I'm glad I read this after losing the option of giving in to temptation!

      The new PACS system there by the way (was well as on the USNS Mercy) is sweet.

      I bet. My friend (Tom Sweet - do you read Slashdot?) showed me the old system with features like "Wanna see the EKG for room 563 at 1:14PM on the 23rd of February?" and I was pretty blown away by the scope of it. The only other network I'd ever seen was an old Xerox Star system and I still thought my little Amiga 2000 was pretty powerful.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Ancient news by steelheals · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to be a jerk but just informative: arthroscopic means you use the camera to look in a joint (arthro like arthritis or what an orthopedic surgeon would do to scope your joint/eg. knee). Laparoscopic is what you meant for looking in the abdomen for the gallbladder. Or thorascopic for chest, etc. Yes, IAAS (surgeon).

    4. Re:Ancient news by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      D'oh! You're absolutely correct, of course. I was thinking "fooscopic" and filled in the prefix I hear most often, mainly from my wife (who also IAS).

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  36. the kids ... the kids ... by XMichael · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This will make hosptials even more scary for an 8 year olds. I hope they make special effort to make the robots look cute!

    1. Re:the kids ... the kids ... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      What? I had an extended stay in the hospital when I was at that age and I would've absolutely spazzed with joy at the idea of robots running around doing robotty things.

      In reality, the robots are pretty dull. Imagine a featureless 2.5ft wide x 3.5ft long x 3ft tall box on wheels. If a kid's terrified of that, then you need to slap the Teletubbies out of 'em.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  37. 1920's technology by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pneumatic tubes would probably work better. If you REALLY want a robot, the robot could do the routing.

    1. Re:1920's technology by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Pneumatic tubes would probably work better.

      Nope. Pneumatic tubes suck at delivering cargo larger than, say, a small coffee can.

      On the other hand, labelling a cracked, leaking test tube filled with water, corn syrup, and red food coloring with a lab request sheet for Ebola and sticking it on a robot delivery unit for a random part of the hospital just isn't the same as delivering 10cc of terror-fueled hilarity to a friend's vacuum tube receiver.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:1920's technology by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      Basically died from laughter on that one! Reminde me of the charge cap we put in our electonic lockers to keep the unwarry out. Truly a shock for them wh find them!

      Some people musht have watch Monster Garage and the Pneumatic tube beer bottle delevery system they installed.

  38. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by foidulus · · Score: 1

    You forgot the part where the hero turns to the dark side and becomes a politician.

  39. Overly? by cardshark2001 · · Score: 2, Funny
    They are polite, and even can be overly cautious.

    Anyone who thinks a robot can be "overly cautious" hasn't watched enough Arnold movies. I mean, unless the robot makes you sign reams of bureaucratic forms before it will do anything, or something like that.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
  40. Need or hype by Alomex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quite a while ago I saw a presentation from three competing teams for a hospital robot. The first team, lead by AI types had spent quite a bit of time trying to program intelligence into the robot so that it would be able to navigate through the hospital and go around people. That team was bested by another who simply painted a magnetic stripe on the floor and had the robot stop whenever there was movement within two feet ratio. The winner of the competition placed train tracks hanging from the ceiling and used a simple real time controller that handled electric toy locomotives delivering medicines to the rooms. The cost was that of a few tyco sets.

  41. Re:security advantageous by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1
    For one thing, you don't have to worry about robots walking off with narcotics intended for the patients-which is more than you can say for a big chunk of doctors/nurses and other hospital staff.

    What hospital is that? Those things are monitored and the dispersement of the narcotics and other controlled substances has to go through a few people. Maybe years ago that was a problem, but now things are actually kind of draconian - to the point where Docs are afraid of giving enough medication. Which means, their patients are in pain.

  42. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

    >> Oh, yeah. I can just see the original thinkers at Hollywood, Inc. making a movie about these.
    > Hey! We could call it "I Robot"! Man, I can hear Asimov rolling around in his coffin...

    Wow, the way you connected the dots there is just scary insightful.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  43. Boy, I can't belive this thread's gone this far... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    without anyone saying "I'd MUCH prefer to have a surgeon that didn't have DTs, thank you very mouch."

    I draw the line at pilots.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  44. I've used one... by kevlar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hartford Hospital used one for their patient's food service. It would be loaded up with food trays and would autonomously call the elevator and drive down the hallway to deliver the trays. After the meal, it would drive all the empty trays back to the kitchen. My job at the time was to enter patients food intake into a database. This was circa 1996.

    Putnam Investments in Mass also has one that simply drives around reading a painted line that is only visible in ultra-violet light. It delivers the mail. Its pretty cool, but I have had a few isntances where it almost took my feet off going around a corner.

  45. I'm surprised... by Rellik66 · · Score: 1

    What? no Bender or "Robot Girlfriend" jokes yet?

    Or did they get modded down out of oblivion?

    --

    Too many zeros, not enough ones

  46. I'll scan my damn pet if a damn well please! by Zany+Paraclete · · Score: 1

    To hell with you! There's not a damn thing wrong with scanning pets! My dog would be DEAD now if a regular scan hadn't detected his throbmotic uiriosyntactic metascrofolosus of the anterior dithyramb!

    You cold-hearted son-of-a-bitch. I hope your kitty turns into a fucking alligator.

    --


    I've never yet met anybody who'll admit to posting on Slashdot. So who are all these people?!
  47. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm currently working on obtaining the patent for a Asimov/Dead Author generator.

    Preliminary tests show that as long as Hollywood exists they will churn out enough derivitive drivel to fuel the dead author's spin. By harnessing that spin we could do away with all other forms of electricity generation.

    A second patent has been filed to collect the fury of Harlen Ellison and turn it into useful energy. Although when he dies he'll be added to the Dead Author Energy Farm(tm).

    The final patent I have pending is to collect the energy spent for keystrokes from Slashdot users and turn it into something useful. I figure other garbage can be recycled into fuel - why not Slashdot posts.

  48. Not just at night by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I wonder if at night they supply them with saws, arms and other cutting devices and let them at each other?"

    From http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2002/302_bots.htm l

    "Two robotic surgical systems have received FDA clearance to be marketed in the United States: The da Vinci Surgical System, made by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. of Sunnyvale, Calif., is cleared to perform surgery under the direction of a surgeon. The ZEUS Robotic Surgical System, made by Computer Motion, Inc. of Goleta, Calif., has been cleared by the FDA to assist surgeons."

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  49. Replacing Doctors by Morris+Schneiderman · · Score: 1
    "As AI research progresses, we will be able to build robots capable of doing service jobs. The health care crisis will be 'solved' during the second half of the 21st century. Robots will replace, not only orderlies and nurses, but physicians and surgeons, too. The cost of producing these robots will be minimal. The valuable commodity will be the knowledge of how to program them to do what you want them to do.

    By the end of the 21st century, creativity -- the creation of intellectual property -- will be the only currently known role that will still be the domain of us humans. And the control of that creativity is what is being fought for now.

    That's the power struggle going on now. It's just started. One more thing. By the end of the 21st century, molecular genetics will have progressed to the point where most people will be able to live almost forever. Imagine living forever in a world where production and services basically cost nothing. The only thing of value will be control of the intellectual property behind it all.

    Imagine a world where material items sell for a dollar each and services are provided for ten cents an hour. It could be paradise if you have the money to pay for what you want. But if you don't, how do you compete against such prices?

    The challenge as we approach the 22nd century will be to rethink the issues of access. How will we reward innovation while making it possible for most people to survive and live reasonably good lives? Because, if most people cannot pay for those goods and services, there will be a revolution. If that revolution succeeds, those who were on top will be gone. If the revolution fails, the whole economic system will collapse from lack of customers.

    Hang onto your hat. It's going to be a wild ride."

    From: www.ProjectsDoneRight.com/pdr/pdrPapersIP.asp

  50. Re:security advantageous by puck01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Um, I'm not sure why this would be modded offtopic. I'm a doctor and work in hospitals quite a bit. This is a real problem. The human couriers are often paid little so competence is not the norm for many of these workers. There are often long delays gettin meds up to the floors as a result. Also, drug abuse or selling does occur among the staff and MDs despite many obsticals. Obviously, a robot has no interest in taking drugs for its own purposes so this is clearly a real advantange.

    We have one of these things in one of the hospitals I work in routinely. So far its done a good job. I haven't heard any complaints yet. Plus, its surprisingly entertaining to jump back and forth in its path forcing it to try and find a route around you. this doesn't help expediency however :)

  51. This is new? by cr0sh · · Score: 2, Informative
    As others have noted here, robots in hospitals are nothing new. What hasn't been mentioned is just how *old* this is.

    I have read several books published in the early 1980's which talked about these kind of robots. Most of them were about the size of a small chest freezer (about .75m x 1m x 1.5m), and followed a line on the floor, or a buried wire of some sort. Beacons or bar codes allowed the robots to recognize where they were at on the route.

    While I don't have any references for these books, one book I do own, entitled "The Robot Book" by Robert Malone (copyright 1978, ISBN 0-15-678452-1), shows on page 22 a picture of a robot called the "Lear Siegler Mailmobile" - looks basically like a large and mobile mail slot tray. I encourage anyone with an interest in robotics to get a copy of this book - lots of large, great imagery of various robots, real and fictional, as well as automata and other "automatic" machinery from earlier periods (it includes several large images of Hughes Aircraft Mobots, and a great picture of the GE Hardiman exoskeleton).

    Ever wonder why the "standard" test for a simple robot is a line following 'bot? Simply because this is a major industrial task used in a variety of robotic systems, even today (very robust if done properly). I remember taking a tour of a new newspaper publishing plant in my hometown when I was a kid - they had similar robots for loading large rolls of paper into the presses...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  52. helpful, but annoying by scrod98 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I remember having this in the mid 90's when my mother was in the hospital, used to deliver drugs from the pharmacy. The bad part was that it would come on the floor, stop in front of the nurses station and

    PING

    I HAVE A DELIVERY

    PING

    On a loop every 30 seconds until someone responded (annoying when you aren't well). IIRC it had numeric code and a different compartment for each nurses station, so no stealing from others.

    Funniest was when it would encounter a wet floor sign or similar, and didn't know the difference btw that and a human. Would say "Excuse me, I need to get thru" 2-3x, then back up and go around.

    Wonder if they had to pay royalties to Steven Hawking for having the robot simulate his voice?

    --
    LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
  53. Gee, if i had known these were STILL news... by hurfy · · Score: 1

    I would have given you the story years ago. The robot has been running at our hospital since i can remember. Dont really remember much else about it, was news at one point a long time ago in a gal......

  54. Slow news day? by asackett · · Score: 4, Interesting

    AGVS (Automatic Guided Vehicle Systems) have been in use in factories, hospitals, prisons, jails, mail rooms, etc. for a long time. The last real job I had (prior to becoming self employed) was as Service Manager for a robotics company that built AGVS with capacities ranging from 50lbs. to 6000lbs. and carried everything from the mundane mail and laundry to (exciting stuff!) explosives, and in one installation, people. Inmates, in fact, from the jail to the courthouse and back via an underground tunnel. Get busted, ride a robot!

    One client company who shall remain nameless (hint: starts with an "I" and ends with "ntel") had problems with jealous employees sabotaging and abusing the AGV's in their factories, believing that they were replacing human workers. Maybe they did replace human workers, maybe they were responsible for keeping more jobs in the US than would have been offshored without them. I dunno.

    Those AGV's all had voices, and were polite. If you were detected on or near the (buried) guidepath, the vehicle would slow and politely say, "Excuse me." If you didn't step away, the vehicle would stop and repeat "excuse me" every so often until you did. (It was comical to encounter a stalled machine asking a cardboard box to move.) Once you moved, it would say, "Thank you" and proceed on its way. Upon arriving at a destination where it expected human interaction, it would stop and say, "Hello."

    We built AGV's that could open and close doors, ride elevators, and accept their marching orders via wireless LAN or manual entry. The more complex installations had central controllers that could dispatch a vehicle from anywhere in the facility to anywhere else, tell it what to do at each stop along the way, route them on alternate paths to avoid congestion, etc. They were adept at avoiding collisions with other vehicles, and taking themselves out of service as they neared battery depletion -- when they'd seek an opportunity charger and put themselves on charge. Fun stuff.

    The mail delivery vehicle in our factory received far less maintenance than it ought to have, and sometimes wandered into a wall, where it would patiently ask, "excuse me", until it was rescued. So I named it Harvey (because it was a Wallbanger). One of our more powerful machines, during prototype testing, moved Harvey's favorite wall by several inches -- I wonder if they were involved in some kind of conspiracy.

    That company, Apogee Robotics, ceased operations ten years ago and certainly wasn't without competition. This stuff ain't news!

    --

    Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.

    1. Re:Slow news day? by digitalcowboy · · Score: 1

      Very interesting inside info.

      I agree this is hardly news. I had the worst IT job ever a few years ago at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas. I'm not sure when they got these robots but they had the very thing you and this article describe when I started there in 1997.

  55. Re:Well, it looks like the hackers have a new targ by wildwood · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't wait to see what phrase gets hacked into the voice processsor to replace this informative gem.


    "Hey, check out my package."

    "Somebody order a pizza?"

    "Does this smell funny to you?"

    "I swear to god, it was like that when I got it."

    And my personal favorite:

    "Hey, what'll you give me for this crap?"

    --
    normal(adj)- people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots [DECS]
  56. ping100 please! by deathcloset · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've always thought a good application of microsurgical robotics would be internet-based multi-surgeon environments.
    I would think having 5 or 6 neurosurgeons working simultaneously could acheive rather extrordianry things. Say, reattachment of much beloved body parts (that's always been my favorite sugical application).
    Or, multi-surgeon environments could simply make lenghty operations much more speedy (getting a surgery done as soon as safely possible is certainly benificial in most situations).
    Come to think of it, why stop at 5 sugeons? make it a 64 surgeon server. I'm sure the insurance companies will love footing the bill for 64 neurosurgeons :)
    Just make sure your hospital has installed punk-buster.

    1. Re:ping100 please! by Dr.+Weird · · Score: 1
      Surgeons.

      Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?

      ~Dr. Weird~

  57. They by bhsx · · Score: 1

    DEYTOOKOURJOBS!!!!

    (blatantly ripped-off of another /.er, but I couldn't find it to site)

    --
    put the what in the where?
  58. Mandatory "I, Robot" quote by XplosiveX · · Score: 1

    From the movie "I, Robot" starring Will Smith.

    Robots cannot harm humans.

    DUN DUN DA!

  59. If I was a patient, and one came into my room.... by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I'd ask, "Who goes there? Friend or Enema?"

  60. Robots with a future and their foot in the door. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Soon robots similar to this one will be in more places and become smarter and smarter. I work in a automation factory and get to see large stationary Fanuc robots in action. These thing could rip your arms off and not miss a line of programming. In 10 years, larger and smarter robots will be capable of waling with lege like Aismo, navigating with systems developed from all the autonamous navigation contests and have the strength of large factory robots. These things are scarry, and i just wanted to post my opinion

  61. Re:Ahead of times... maybe not by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    So much for "military medicine seems to be quite a few years ahead of times."

    AFAIK, all major military hospitals are teaching facilities, ala your local university medical center. You get some of the best and brightest, and you also get some that haven't figured out how to tie their own shoes but haven't been weeded from the system yet. I observed that the technology was pretty advanced, not that the occupants were any more intelligent.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  62. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, yeah. I can just see the original thinkers at Hollywood, Inc. making a movie about these. Robots, designed to serve and help mankind, a minor flaw,

    There was a short story I remember reading (but completely lost the name of the author/title), which feature a man who was the last human being on Earth. Something on the lines of cryogenic storage is used to store people with terminal illnesses until they can be cured. During this time of his storage, the entire human population declines, with robots replacing much of the manual work. By this time the entire human population has gone, the entire planet is run by machines which give themselves the purpose of working on curing the remaining humans of their terminal illneses, but the humans die from the shock of regaining consciousness and not seeing any other humans around. The last human manages to survive this shock and proceeds to first search the continent, then the planet, then the solar system, then finally the nearest stars in the hope of finding life, all the time while bouncing in and out of cryogenic sleep for the odd million years. By the time the reports from the first exo-solar planets have been returned, the only life found is slow-moving plant-life, which doesn't impress the guy. After several billion years, when the sun has gone into the red-giant phase, the machines have found intelligent human life, even if they do have a slight greenish hue to their skin. The guy ends up travelling at warp-speed to the new planet to land on a paradise. Well, at least it was a happy ending.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  63. Re:security advantageous by almostmanda · · Score: 1

    An insurance policy with a robot plan? Certainly, I'm too old.

  64. Do the bots say... by FirmWarez · · Score: 1

    "lithium is no longer available on credit"?

  65. Unions by bobthemuse · · Score: 1

    In a push to lower costs and free up workers for more critical tasks, hospital officials are turning more and more to robots like TUG to ply their hallways.

    I wonder what the unions will have to say about this? More and more they're dictating the overall operating terms of large organizations. Anything which reduces their impact must be bad.....

  66. Seen in '94 by menscher · · Score: 1

    Saw a robot courier in '93 or '94 (don't remember exactly when). Was at some large corporation. Pretty much followed a stripe on the floor and stopped whenever someone got close. As I recall, it could handle the elevators. Seemed pretty cool to a kid back then. Not sure it's slashdot-worthy a decade later.

  67. I would rather go for something XXX-reated ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    Robotic nurses make better lovers, eh?

  68. stroke rehab robots by trb · · Score: 1
    I am employed writing software for a company that makes robots that are used to help do physical therapy for stroke patients. We have been covered by ABC and BBC, among others. (We have robots in Canada, but I know of no coverage by CBC.) Anyway, some folks might wonder if these robots are replacing physical therapists (bad robots!). But this kind of physical therapy involves repetition of movement that is both boring and physically strenuous for therapists, so a tireless precise robot is a fine idea for this task. And the robot works somewhat like a very fancy force feedback joystick controlling a video game, which is fun for stroke patients, who are more used to therapy tasks like "squeeze the rubber ball" and "try to walk while holding the parallel bars."

    The hacking is fun, a combo of real time control and game programming, and it's gratifying to be involved in software work that is more beneficial to humanity than the usual "moving bits from here to there."

  69. The dirty work by realmolo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet all the protologists in the ENTIRE WORLD can't wait to be replaced by robots.

    /insert additional joke about working with assholes all day long

  70. Obligatory by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

  71. Other robots in healthcare by agristin · · Score: 1

    There are actually quite a few...

    Here is one:

    http://www.pyxis.com/products/helpmate.asp

    It is kinda cool to see them roaming around the building. They are used for delivery of medicine to different areas.

    They are programmed with a floor plan of the hospital, but do some of their own pathfinding.

    They have a little remote for opening doors and operating elevators. They can use 802.11b and other wireless for network. It is really a neat product, but in a way in its infancy.

    Disclaimer:

    I work for Cardinal Health and we do Automation and Information systems products including the robot in the above (Pyxis is a wholly owned subsidiary).

    -A

  72. Robots - had them since the 1970s! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Informative
    We had "robotic" delivery carts for linens, food and supplies in the 1970s.

    Their flaw: they could be stymied by standing in their way and refusing to move, which made them of limited use in pediatrics because the kids kept harassing the robots.

  73. BEAUTILFUL security hole by devphil · · Score: 1


    Damn, just wait until that building gets a "restricted" floor and people start hitching rides with the mulebot.

    Betcha the little guy's priority drops faster than a plummeting hospital elevator (think Resident Evil).

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  74. Robots in Hospitals by DrDebug · · Score: 1

    Just make sure Will Smith isn't a patient.

  75. Doubtful by devphil · · Score: 1
    Wonder if they had to pay royalties to Steven Hawking for having the robot simulate his voice?

    Dr. Hawking's original synthesizer was an off-the-shelf module. Much of the hardware was customized, but not the voice. Same voice shows up all over the place.

    Later, after voice customization became less freakishly expensive, he was asked whether he wanted to change it. He said no, because he and his family and colleagues had come to identify with that voice, and a change would be very difficult.

    And he's never changed since.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  76. Elevators a problem?! by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just retrofit a narrow robot sized elevator system, and/or a network of passageways they can use independant of hallways for them to use, which could increase their efficiency several fold (and possibly cost just slightly more than they save in manhours).

    In older hospitals, they used/use dumb waiter systems. A retrofit of those would be far less expensive.

    Another thought that crossed my mind, is that perhaps the bots are being used improperly. They do not require a floor to travel, that is a human need. They could run along the walls, or even the ceilings, without any slowdowns due to sharing the space with us gravity dependant beings.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  77. Cost Effective? Sarah Tonin says otherwise! by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 2, Informative

    The hospital my roomate works in has one of these. Its name is Sarah Tonin. It is damned money pit. For one, the thing is slow. Very Slow. It creeps up and down the hallways and when it requested the elevator, it blocks it for use by anyone else. Second, the thing is consistently broken. It spends more time in repairs than it does making rounds. All of this for a flat annual lease whose price is somewhat higher than the salary of the entry level support staff position the thing replaced. There is no way the thing is cost effective, and one of the hospital administrators admitted as much to me at party once. The robot is not about cost effectiveness or usefulness. Its about appearing progressive to patients. The patients see the robot and think "Gee! I must surely get top notch medical care here if they have such hi-tek stuff!" Its an extension of the modern medical fallacy that technology necessarily improves care. The patients would do alot better if the hospital ditched the damned robot and its related support costs and hired an entry level transporter to carry the specimens and a nurse anywhere in the place to lower patient-nurse loads.

  78. And am I the only one... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Who imagined some SA goons sneaking around a hospital, rerouting all the tape to the stairs, along with setting up the bots to play the MP3 of "Terrible Secret of Space"?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:And am I the only one... by mwood · · Score: 1

      Why would Nazi shock troops waste time fiddling with robot paths in hospitals?

  79. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

    I remember that series Magnum Robot Fighter 4000 AD. Not the retelling one but the orginal from the 60's.

    Actualy in the movie Runaway with Tom Select and the guy from Kiss. THere was a seen where a guard robot traped one of the character. Some lady. THey just turn on the sprinklers to stun it.

  80. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by PylonHead · · Score: 1

    So true. Trust slash dot to beat the subtlety out of any attempt at humor.

    --
    # (/.);;
    - : float -> float -> float =
  81. Re:flight of ... by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

    Sounds "Disney" to me.

  82. Don't forget new things! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    You'll also free up labor for usage in other things. More nursing care, maybe. More labor will be made available for industry as a whole, maybe allowing a new field that previously couldn't get workers to open up, providing new services, raising the standard of living.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Don't forget new things! by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Your point compliments mine well. Wish I'd said it.
      New tech new oportunities. And new toys as well.
      Plus the tech developed for this will have aplications in other fields and vice versa. Just look at all the nifty toys we got from space exploration. Things like solar blankets, gps, satelite communications and entertainment, Tang, etc.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  83. Re:security advantageous by Nurseman · · Score: 1
    " I'm guessing a nurse got mod points."

    You talking to me ? LOL
    Actually, I am a nurse, with over 15 years ER, and now 5 years substance abuse and pysch. Yes we do have a high rate of substance abuse problems, but no more or less than any other field. There is a lot of oversight of narcotics. And as far as the previous poster saying MD's were "afraid" of giving pain meds because of oversight, I call BS. MD's can be jerks with pain meds, but it has nothing to do with fear of the FDA. It has more to do with lack of compassion.
    Just my 2 cents

    --
    Save a Life. Donate Blood. Please.
  84. Very, very, very old tech by jridley · · Score: 2, Informative

    I went to DC as a high school student in 1978. We got a tour of the department of labor, and they had one of these. It followed a tape in the floor, hailed elevators with an RC signal, and used sonar to avoid running into people and stray junk. It sounds EXACTLY like these units, and pretty much looks the same too. I have a photo but can't find it right now.

    So it's getting into very limited commercial use now, some 26 years later.

  85. "Outrageous excess" by beakburke · · Score: 1
    You know it's kinda funny. One century's "outragous excesses" seem very equally distributed by the relative to other centuries. The problem with "leveling out the wealth" (aside from slowing down technological progress, (and yes it would, but that is a separate discussion) and slowing the general rise in our standard of living) is that the definition of "excess wealth" is entirely arbitrary and is redefined by the norms of the time.

    Basically, what you describe is meerly creeping socialism/communism as each new generation "levels" out the wealth more and more until you arrive at absolute communism. The reason is simple, I'm not just arguing slippery slope here.

    If you accept the premise that it's ok to redistribute wealth involuntarily through taxes (I'm not just talking about all government spending here, just things that would constitute transfer payments), then where is your logical stopping point?? Perfect equality, anywere in between those two points is simply not sustainable; since anyone that accepts the premise will always want marginally more redistribution of wealth than the current system provides. Of course this wouldn't likely work over a short period of time, as you need successive generations to be raised with ever higher expectations of wealth equality. It's a simple exercise of moving the goalposts, as it were, until an absolute limit is reached. Of course it would be difficult to make it to that point, since the larger the redistributional burden, the lower the overall level of productivity would fall. (as you admit you can't eliminate all incentives, but you seem to be willing to eliminate them for larger and larger groups).

    Actually, this is a great parallel to Eldred vs Ashcroft. If congress can retroactively extend copyrights, then you can legitimately argue that the time period for copyrighted works in unlimited and unconstitiutional. (unfortunately the court didn't rule in this manner).

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  86. The whole aguement, in short story form. by beakburke · · Score: 1

    Stolen from http://netec.mcc.ac.uk/JokEc.html Two stangers, a man and a woman, meet in a cafe, the man asks. "My Dear, would you go to bed with me for a million dollars?" "Well, yes, I guess I would." "How about $100?" "What kind of person do you think I am?" "My Dear, we have already established that. We are merely haggling over the price!" According to Ross Emmet, the story was told by George Bernard Shaw. The man and woman are Winston Churchill and Lady Astor and the incident allegedly did occur.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  87. Very old... by fitten · · Score: 1

    Over a decade ago, I saw robots (non-humanoid) delivering such things as laundry baskets to various parts of a hospital. The "brain" was some Micro-VAX computers and the robots looked like boxes that followed tracks in the floor.

  88. Re:Mods ? by yanestra · · Score: 1

    There's no news, except for those things the people didn't know before...

  89. is this related to the previos slashdot article... by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 1

    ...about beer delivery robots?

  90. Re:security advantageous by puck01 · · Score: 1

    Personally, I write opiates whenever I feel the situation is warrented and never give a thought to any sort of oversight or possible legal ramifications. If someone needes them, they need them. However, I do know a number of docs who are very concerned about this. I can't explain why, but its a real fear on their part.

  91. New series on TV ? by moro_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It seems likes Robocop has really bored the people,
    it's time to make a new serial for the tv,
    "Emergency Room 2, - RoboDoc arrives ..."

    i wonder how fast can a robot "learn-it-all" ?
    as for human doctors, it takes about 10 years ? or even more?
    and then they'll get a unprofitable job at a public hospital
    where they have a zero possibility to make a great career whatsoever.

    de facto, i'd better trust myself into the hands of
    ancient asian healers or western-culture witches than
    into the doctors hands we have nowadays. can robots bring
    a change in here ?

    an excellent AI with nanometer exact slicing'n'cutting
    techniques and no drinking'or'drugs problems surely does
    look much more promisin' than the doctors now.

    as for nurses, i think human nurses will always be better
    (more human), especially if they are from the opposite sex;)

    --

    I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    1. Re:New series on TV ? by mwood · · Score: 1

      We can build it as soon as you can tell us *precisely* how doctors do medicine.

  92. Special Delivery by OzPhIsH · · Score: 1

    Sweet. Now I can have beer delivery when I'm stuck in a hospital bed!

    --

    "To lead the people, you must walk behind them"

  93. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by Grab · · Score: 1

    A patent for a Dead Author Generator? I can see the application now...

    "This claim covers approaching an author of fictional or non-fictional works published in book, short-story collection, magazine or other form, pointing a pistol, machine-gun, revolver or similar firearm at them and pulling the trigger. Prior art exists for use of a knife or similar weapon (cf Julius Caesar) and burning alive (cf Catholic Church), so these methods are not claimed."

    Grab.

  94. The terrible secret of space by Jondo · · Score: 1

    Please be careful around the stairwells when these robots are about. Pak Chooie.

  95. Re:security advantageous by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 1

    You mention beating up old people. I think something like this would scare the crap out of old folks - patients and family members alike - in a hospital. It's just an invitation to have some crazy old woman come running down the hall dragging her IV behind her screaming, "The machines are coming! The machines are coming!"

    This sounds outrageous, but you wouldn't think so if you'd stood in a line of 20 people waiting in a non-moving post office line and listened to a similar rant from a 70+ year old woman. When a US postal worker asked if she'd like to save time and get her stamps from a vending machine only 3ft away, she did everything possible to avoid it.

    "Those machines charge more for the stamps."

    Sure -- the machines are out to rob us blind.

    "Thank you, but I just don't trust those machines."

    OK -- you're right, lady. They're out to steal your money AND eat you alive instead of giving you 20 stamps. Run for your life!

    I could just see one of these robots getting lost in a geriatric ward. It would be the night of a thousand coronaries! Hmmm...a great idea to get folks off Medicare is brewing here.

    My 2 cents.

    IronChefMorimoto

  96. Pneumatic tubes 4r3 teh 3v1L by WillWare · · Score: 2, Funny
    Pneumatic tubes have raised the bar for butlers and delivery boys everywhere. Who can run or bike as fast as compressed air? A system of slightly larger pneumatic tubes might obsolete taxicabs and city buses.

    If a weak flow of air can be made to switch a stronger one's direction, or switch it on and off, we're ALL screwed. Elaborate networks of air currents, switching one another on and off, could be designed using Boole's rules of logic, and BAM you've got a machine that thinks. Give it two weeks and it will take away all our jobs.

    Some may welcome our new pneumatic tube masters, but I say they 4r3 teh 3v1L and must be stopped! If you see a tube and you think there might be compressed air in it, try cutting it open. If anything besides air comes out, slap some duct tape on there real fast. But if only air comes out, you may have just allowed a family to eat dinner. If you're not sure it's air, examine the gas carefully with a lighter.

    One thing a lot of people don't know: those DIGSAFE signs in your neighborhood are part of a vast conspiracy, providing the pneumatic tubes an unseen underground haven to raise their young. Get your shovel, seek them out, and hammer nails into them. (But keep a defibrillator handy.)

    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
    1. Re:Pneumatic tubes 4r3 teh 3v1L by mwood · · Score: 1

      You *can* get fluid flows to do switching and even proportional control. See "fluidics". Rather old now.

    2. Re:Pneumatic tubes 4r3 teh 3v1L by WillWare · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with fluidics, thanks. It was all part of the joke. My brother, who's in mechanical engineering, tinkered with fluidics as an undergrad in the late 80s.

      --
      WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
  97. Mailbot by MacGod · · Score: 1

    Here at work, we have an automatic mailbot that brings around the mail twice a day.

    It's loaded up in the mailroom (by humans-we're not that advanced yet), operates the elevators and follows a line of ultraviolet paint around the building. It stops at known locations and waits to be unloaded, it stops it it hits something, and can also be stopped manually.

    I named him Marvin

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  98. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by mwood · · Score: 1

    But did you pick up the _Colossus: the Forbin Project_ reference in the article? :-)

  99. Re:Let's Make a Movie! Yow! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    I remember that series Magnum Robot Fighter 4000 AD. Not the retelling one but the orginal from the 60's.

    That old Magnus I read, I still remember pretty well. Had great noir artwork and a fairly interesting story, at least to a 6 year old. I think Magnus would make a decent subject for a film, but done in a similar style to Bladerunner.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  100. Re:security advantageous by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    lol. :) someone got it.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  101. Re:Fuck the couriers, how about a fuckin data syst by mwood · · Score: 1

    Maybe the world is waiting for *you* to write and publish the DTD for medical information.

  102. Re:Robots with a future and their foot in the door by mwood · · Score: 1

    And they can spell, too!

  103. Re:Boy, I can't belive this thread's gone this far by Retric · · Score: 1

    I would like to have the 10,000 people who can use a device that lets them operate as well as the 100,000 people who don't need it. Afterall with more posible surgeon either there price goes down or the quality goes up (as they become less overworked or the people who are not that great at it do something else.