Slashdot Mirror


Nation's First City-Wide WiFi Network Completed

According to a reader rockwellpa, Grand Haven, Michigan has recently completed the United States' first truly city-wide WiFi nework. According to the press release, "Other cities have announced intent to build similar networks or have announced partial deployments; in contrast, the Grand Haven implementation, by Ottawa Wireless Inc., is the first full and complete city-wide WiFi deployment in the country. 'As the first WiFi city in America, Grand Haven has truly lived up to its name in the Internet era, as we now allow anyone anywhere to connect to the Internet and roam the city and waterways in a completely secure computing environment'"

163 comments

  1. Public Access Locations by artlu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone know the logistics of where they placed the access points? Were they connected to telephone polls or traffic lights? How about weather? Michigan does get snow and if the access points are outside, what type of protection do they have.
    Finally, if one access point crashes do the rest break as well?

    GroupShares Inc. - A Free and Interactive Stock Market Community

    --
    -------
    artlu.net
    1. Re:Public Access Locations by Syncrou · · Score: 5, Informative

      They attached them to telephone poles across the city. They're hoping to widen the range over the next couple of years. One cool thing: You can surf the web in your boat off the coast of Lake Michigan. I forget how far off the beach, but I want to try it.

    2. Re:Public Access Locations by wayward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Illinois also gets snow, though not as much as Michigan, so our community wireless project makes a point of waterproofing nodes. The card is enclosed in a really tough container, and they're using a combination of electrical tape and plumbers goo to waterproof the connections.

    3. Re:Public Access Locations by detritus. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's a picture I took of one of the access points a few months ago. They are in NEMA weatherproof enclosures, with a support bar attached to an omnidirectional whip antenna (quite ugly - unfortunately I couldn't fit it all in the same picture). In addition, there's a flat directional antenna that obviously connects to another access point. I have also discovered the majority of the access points since they started to appear last fall, and have posted them to WiGLE .

    4. Re:Public Access Locations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      artlu@artlu.net

  2. In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Grand Haven also has the highest ratio of brain cancer anywhere.

    - brandannnnnn

  3. How does this affect local ISP? by rice0067 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the idea of city wide WIFI is nice, but how is it paid for? Do people still have cable modem at home? (or that silly phone line thing)
    With whole city wifi.. will people even use land lines for home telephone?

    1. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by siliconjunkie · · Score: 1

      With VOIP over WiFi still in it's infancy, that's highly unlikely at the moment, but the potential is there.

      The question is: Will the Telcos allow such a thing to happen?

    2. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by AhabTheArab · · Score: 1

      I suspect it is a pay service, similar to "T Mobile Hotspots" and hotel wi-fi. But if you're always getting reception, i imagine it would be easy for anyone to crack.

    3. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by rice0067 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I personally think it would be great if somehow you paid whichever company provided the WIFI that you can access from you house (probably where you would use the "internet" most.) Then, if you feel the need to roam about the city and use internet, you would have free roaming access. This way it remains economically viable for the service to be provided, and convenient for people to use.
      I would be against this sort of thing being provided by the local government. This is not the purpose of government.

    4. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When wifi becomes as critical to life as roads are, will it then become the purpose of government? Or is this just one of those "if ther government does it, I don't like it" kind of reactions.

    5. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      OK, I'll bite. What is the purpose of government?

    6. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by Kphrak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would be against this sort of thing being provided by the local government. This is not the purpose of government.

      The local government is actually the perfect place for it if enough people in the city actually want it. There is nothing wrong with a small government, participated in at a local level, voting for a convenience for the city.

      Of course, the above is in a perfect world. City governments are often owned by special interests such as corporations, or even a local mafia -- both of whom try to get the voted-on service outsourced to themselves. In my city, the local city council often votes for the most expensive and least useful things it can get (right now, for instance, there's a movement to get a major league baseball team, and a multi-billion-dollar project to bury all the reservoirs in a knee-jerk reaction to 9/11 just got cancelled -- but not after spending 4 million dollars on preparation for it). It really depends on how involved the citizens of the city were in the decision.

      --

      There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
    7. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      With whole city wifi.. will people even use land lines for home telephone?


      no, they wont
      they will use their wifi phones

      the first comment was nice, second third ok...fourth downright retarded

    8. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by rice0067 · · Score: 1

      Now I wasn't meaning to Troll by saying that providing WIFI was not the purpose of government.
      That being said, its like electricity. Providing of electricity is also not the purpose of government. Government is for the protection of citizens and the facilitation of trade. (and a few other things like social services that no one else would do because its not profitable.) Like education.
      On the other hand. If, as one poster hinted at, all the citizens go together and said that the city should provide this out of the tax revenue, (or bake sale..whatever) then yeah, go for it.

    9. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Do people still have cable modem at home? (or that silly phone line thing)

      Silly phone line thing as in DSL or silly phone line thing as in POTS modem?

    10. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      In Philadelphia they have several hotspots now that are completely free to use and all have pretty decent bandwidth. The two most notable areas are Love Park and Reading Terminal, both which have wifi supported I guess by taxes. Each area has big signs letting people know it too, and how to set it up. Its pretty sweet, the only down side is that if I wanted to do something illegal, then what better area then a free public access point used by tons of people in the center of a very large city everyday. If you spoof your MAC address, I don't see how you could ever be tracked down. But then again all good things have bad uses. Free wifi though is an awesome thing.
      Regards,
      Steve

    11. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by sadler121 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The question is: Will the Telcos allow such a thing to happen?

      I know in Utah, (of all places where the vile Orin Hatch is elected into office by Republician Religious sheep (yeah yeah, Flamebait I know)), both the local phone company (QWest) and Comcast are loobying HARD in the Utah legeslature to stop UTOPIA (a coallition of local cities to impliemnt FTTH).

      bout the only good thing Provo is doing is implimenting there own seperate FTTH system that is a basis for the more generalized UTOPIA FTTH that other Utah cities are attempting to impliment.

    12. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, will that be when we have no bodies and we're all literally bits in a computer? As opposed to now where we're only virtually as such?

    13. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      Some courteous RTFA quotes:
      1. "Some hotels and marinas subsidize the wireless service, offering it free to guests."

      2. "Monthly prices for always-on broadband Internet starts at $19.99 for 256 kbps, and unlimited mobile VoIP calling is $29.99. Connections up to 1 Mbps and per-day pricing options are also available."

      take care.

    14. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      Right - as long as the government emplementation actually costs less than private emplementation.

      The trouble is that it is much more expensive to PAY for WiFi than it is to install it.

      In other words, other overhead of billing and collecting the money exceeds the cost of service - that is generally a good time for government to provide a service.

      there is another argument for ubiquitous serviec.

      Trash collection - when private - everybody has a choice either to pay for pickup - or (find some other way to get rid of trash) The truth of course, is that in the end, even people who don't pay for trash pickup - do get rid of their trash - usually be "borrowing" someone elses service.

      So when "borrowing" is likily and everyone needs, it - or benefits from it - its a good idea.

      An argument could be made that most cities provide ubiquitous communication anyway - for their police and fire units - and that using a shareable protocol - for everyone would cost less anyway.

      Most police units have networked computers in them - so cities are in fact solving this problem already.

      AIK

    15. Re:How does this affect local ISP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      governments are not "for" anything in particular, they can do whatever they decide to, however they decide to.

      different things governments might do might yield different results, and results different than were intended, or results that optimize for different qualities.

      but nowhere is it written, except in various ideological religions, that governments are "for" some set of things.

  4. Releasing viruses into the wild... by NeoGeo64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This town will soon become a favorite stop for people looking to anonymously release viruses into the wild.

    1. Re:Releasing viruses into the wild... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Which will in turn be used as a means of installing a London-esque CCTV system. "Okay, our logs show that the virus was sent from the corner of 1st and 8th at 12:04PM. Let's go back to our surveillance video. Oh, yeah..we have a plate number now."

    2. Re:Releasing viruses into the wild... by wayward · · Score: 1

      Why would virus writers bother to go to Michigan when there are coffee shops, etc, with free, anonymous access? (Of course, I'm sure that nobody on Slashdot would ever think of wardriving so we won't even consider that.)

    3. Re:Releasing viruses into the wild... by Pirogoeth · · Score: 1

      Nah, they're just there to see the Fountain...

      --
      Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
  5. LOL by Beuno · · Score: 5, Funny

    "completely secure computing environment". Hahhahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahaha... *whipes tears*

  6. Potential Risk? by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 0

    Could a hacker crash the system and therefore put the city in chaos? Or could terrorists connect bombs that operate based on the network? Either way, we're only about 3 years from the invention of PET (cookies if you get this).

    1. Re:Potential Risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      PET = Polyethylene terephthalate

      It's been around for a long time . . .

      People used to make lesiure suits out of it and its still used as tire cord in most tires in the US.

      But perhaps its more familiar by a tradename . . .

      polyester

    2. Re:Potential Risk? by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      Not what I was looking for, but it works. Mark my words, we're gonna be living Rockman.EXE by 2007.

  7. Is it me, or is this service really... by iammaxus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... slow. If you go to http://www.ottawawireless.net/services/pricing.htm l, you see that they offer 256kbps for regular users. That's only about 5 times dialup. With modern websites, that really doesnt cut it.

    1. Re:Is it me, or is this service really... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I think the big feature of WiFi is the Wi part.

      In any case the "modern websites" demand is sorta baseless - what features of modern websites demands high bandwidth? Flash intros? Unless you're downloading ISOs or getting Windows Update files, it really is barely different.

    2. Re:Is it me, or is this service really... by mrscorpio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know, but if I needed this service, I'd probably still have my cable internet at home for all my downloading and stuff. This is just going to let me conduct my business activities anywhere.

    3. Re:Is it me, or is this service really... by anothy · · Score: 1

      what? we're talking about 256Kb pretty much anywhere. that's amazing. you can keep struggling with your flash intros and animated gif laden pages, if you like - me, i'll be doing streaming full motion video chat (using iChat, of course). i've done it over worse links. that's huge.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    4. Re:Is it me, or is this service really... by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      It still beats dial up. Just because you and I have brioadband, does not mean everyone does.

      besides, for this and VoIP, you can fully eliminate your local phone company. For many, this is a Really Big Deal(tm).

      If you are stuck in an apartment complex w/really old and crappy phone lines, this 256 will kick arse.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  8. Breaking monopoly by usefool · · Score: 3, Informative

    always-on broadband Internet starts at $19.99 for 256 kbps, and unlimited mobile VoIP calling is $29.99

    In countries where there is only one telo, this kind of deployment might be one way to get around the telephone grid and compete in the once-me-only market.

    --
    Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
  9. secure? by Squeezer · · Score: 1

    how is it secure? is ipsec required to join and use the wireless network?

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    1. Re:secure? by Scythr0x0rs · · Score: 1

      the subscriptions might be secure, but what stops someone stealing all those roaming microwaves and using them to cook lunch?

  10. phone numbers from the article by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

    616-842-2763 and 847-549-1677

    VoIP for $30 a month? you'd better hope that's unlimitted.

    1. Re:phone numbers from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it is unlimited - you can access it 24 hours a day all year long. Now, bandwidth caps.... I dunno.

  11. So it begins by Fryth · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As more cities follow suit, and wireless bandwidth and security are improved, we are going to be living in a connected world beyond yours or my dreams. Mark my words.

  12. Dear moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    This post is not interesting, although it may inspire an interesting response.

    To reiterate - do not moderate up some factless karma whore drivel just because the unanswered questions would be interesting if answered. Wait for the followup you eager little beavers.

    1. Re:Dear moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to mention he posted it just to show his GroupShares spam ad.

      artlu@artlu.net

      Eric Karch
      eric.karch@lawyer.com
      1221 Brickell Ave. Suite 900
      Miami, FL 33131
      (305) 377 8767 (FAX)

      Heh, the IP his site resolves to reverse-resolves to some Miami bail bonds company.

      Of course, seeing as how the company is in Florida, it would not be wise for anyone to do business with stock scam artists.

    2. Re:Dear moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you please shove your head up your ass just a little bit farther?

  13. Not True by JonahDark1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Aspen Colorado had the first city-wide WiFi Network running in 1997. It was a private network built by Sun Microsystems. It was running 802.11 (not a/b/g) at 2Mbps.

    1. Re:Not True by fatboy · · Score: 1

      Aspen Colorado had the first city-wide WiFi Network running in 1997. It was a private network built by Sun Microsystems. It was running 802.11 (not a/b/g) at 2Mbps.

      WiFi didn't exist in 1997. WiFi is a set of standards that allow WiFi compliant devices to interoperate.

      --
      --fatboy
    2. Re:Not True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in fact it was 1999, but WiFi did exist in 1997, which is when the 802.11 spec was released.

      Next time check your facts before you spout off-- both of you.

    3. Re:Not True by ttuegel · · Score: 1

      Right about Aspen, CO, but wrong about the year and the provider. It was in the early 00's. I can't find the actual date, but a 2003 Wired article says "several years ago." The network, engineered by Jim Selby covers 120 square miles in Aspen and the ski resorts around it. I saw something on TechTV about it a few years ago, but I can't find anything on their website. Here are some links I found:

      http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0807/p17s01-stct.htm l?related http://defactowireless.com/jimselby.shtml http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,60118,00 .html

      A quick Google for aspen wireless jim selby returns 268 results.

    4. Re:Not True by fatboy · · Score: 1

      Well, in fact it was 1999, but WiFi did exist in 1997, which is when the 802.11 spec was released.

      The Wi-Fi Alliance is a nonprofit international association formed in 1999 to certify interoperability of wireless Local Area Network products based on IEEE 802.11 specification.

      Next time check your facts before you spout off-- both of you.

      Looks like you should do so yourself. There was no such thing as Wi-Fi in 1997. There was 802.11, but Wi-Fi is a certification that certifies that products from different vendors interoperate.

      --
      --fatboy
  14. Standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What standard are they using?

  15. No Kidding! by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't it inherently insecure since the public can access it? What are they going to do... register MAC addresses of adapters? What are they going to do when those are spoofed? I think that wide ranging public access to the internet via 802.11 anything is a bad idea. Is anyone else with me on this? What's the motivation for doing this to an entire town?

    1. Re:No Kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like every slashdot story... they do it because... it's "geek", see? :)

  16. Muskegon by Smokin+Goat+McGruff · · Score: 1

    Great. Those ruffians to the North in Muskegon are going to infest Grand Haven now.

    --
    "There are no cool guys in musicals." -- Coach McGuirk
  17. Haven for Computer Crime by iendedi · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, Grand Haven, Michigan has been experiencing an unusually large growth rate in specialty computer stores, comic book stores and other geeky novelty stores. Asked about this unusual growth, mayor Gaven Hrand replied, "We don't understand it either, but we have noticed that most of the operators of these stores know each other and lug around quite a bit of equipment when they aren't watching their shops."

    On an unrelated but also interesting note, the FBI recently decided to place a district office in Grand Haven, citing the nice weather.

    --

    It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
  18. how many APs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know how many access points they used to do this? At a guess one hell of a lot. Also I wonder if they use wireless or wired (or both) to link them all together.

  19. Network Neighborhood? by moankey · · Score: 4, Funny

    So how many computers will be cached up in my network neighborhood under "Workgroup" or "MSHome"?

    1. Re:Network Neighborhood? by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      I think the more pertinant question is, how many of those will have their default password set to "password", and even more pertinant, how quickly can I map out and search those drives for, ahem, certain, er, uh, ah...porn...

      ...

      I know I know, it's shameless! but still! Gigs and gigs of porn, warez, all for the taking! But there are OTHER applications, you know...

      You know, if most of that town is running win boxes, and insecure ones at that, with a perminant internet connection through a wireless host...now there's a script kiddies playground. Can we say, wardriving?

      It's going to be a real travesty to those who don't know how to secure their systems. Seriously; cc cards, free data, personal info, diaries, writing, not to mention what mischief you could have with some moron and subseven.

      I can think of other applications, however...

      "Oh, this asshole with this IP and MAC has kiddie porn, lets see where the signal is the strongest. Oh, that green house over there." I don't think the cops wouldn't mind a nice tipoff...or the RIAA For that matter.

      Now the name of the game is encryption, heavy, weapons-grade encryption.

  20. Vague press release by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The press release seems rather lacking. It doesn't say anything about whether the intention of this project was to get wireless into homes or residential areas or not. It only cites an area of 6 square miles as the goal. Was this in residential, government, or business areas? Is this the entire city limits or a small portion? Is it only in public areas (streets, parks & goverement buildings)? Are there holes in the coverage? 'Citywide' could mean that a significant areas is covered across the city but that there might still be significant gaps in the coverage.

    I for one am unimpressed. The press release is simply too ambiguous.

    1. Re:Vague press release by scottking · · Score: 3, Informative

      this answered a lot of the questions i had...http://www.walkersands.com/Grand-Haven-WiFi- FAQ.htm what kinda web publisher puts the FAQ at the top, above the title in "ad space"?

      makes it very skippable.

      --
      scott king
    2. Re:Vague press release by billstewart · · Score: 1
      The city has 12000 people. That's half the population of Ithaca NY, so 6 square miles sounds realistic for the whole city (that's roughly 2.5 miles square) - it's certainly bigger than just downtown business area.

      But yeah, I couldn't tell if it was free for the residents, or cheap for the residents, and if it was free for visitors (implied by the "several hotels sponsoring it" part) what were they charging residents for - faster connections?

      And if it's free, what happens when visitors (or residents, but they're easier to track) start spamming?

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    3. Re:Vague press release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire city is covered, and coverage is beginning to be provided in neighboring areas.

      By definition, "entire city" includes residential, business and government areas.

      There are no gaps in coverage within the city, hence the phrase "entire city".

      Be impressed. Be very impressed.

  21. Modern Websites Requiring More than 256kbps need.. by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 2, Funny

    New developers... Well actually I guess there is an exception, and from that I can infer that you're browsing for a whole lotta porn!

  22. Not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in Chaska Minnesota and we have had city run wifi internet access for a few months now. It's run by the City and it costs $15.99 a month. If you'd like more information, check out http://www.chaska.net/

    1. Re:Not so fast by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      but have you had *full* city-wide coverage. That's the point. Judging by the coverage maps, no you don't.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  23. John Lennon by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Imagine a volunteer adhoc city/country/world-wide wifi network with spare net bandwidth donated by thousends of people from homes to universities to city authorities and decent wifi bandwidth, signal and security. Now imagine everyone with really cheap massproduced wifi-PDAs or just wifi-enabled phones and laptops that could handle VOIP and web/email. And finally imagine the icing on the cake - the pissed off mobile phone carriers' faces :) oh that would be so good:) one day it will surely be a reality?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:John Lennon by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      ...but you're not the only one.


      I'd really love to see this happen. Forget connecting to the "real" Internet; we could form a separate "wireless Internet". We have the routing protocols and such that would be necessary for such a dynamic network. What we don't have, for the most part, is the hardware. WiFi is pretty short range, unless you know where you're aiming. It would require massive coordination of effort and still a fairly high population density. Germany (or Japan, I suppose) would be a good country for such a project, because of its high population density and tech-inclination.


      Again, the missing factor is the hardware. Especially cheap hardware. The WRT54G is pretty good, but I don't think it would have enough memory to function as a router like this. The soon-to-come nano-ITX would be great, but also quite expensive. Even if you did everything right, I think the bandwidth and latency would be quite bad more than ~100 miles away.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  24. Public Access Locations by GHertZ · · Score: 1

    i live about 40 minutes away, so i will have to take my wifi scanner and see how that goes...yes, there is alot of snow here, so who knows whats gonna happen comes winter, could everything freeze? who knows, we will just have to wait. the rest of the country will most likely use this as testing

  25. Free? by toetagger1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Do they also provide free Electricyt, Phone, Water, and Garbage Removal up there? I don't understand why people think that having FREE wirless internet access is something that is a required thing of the future. It wouldn't surprise me of seeing wirless companies picking up the trend and offering wirless internet service (either through the same band as the voice service, or a different one), and people would pay a monthly subscrcription. That sounds more plausible than FREE.

    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
  26. Let the fun begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mount signal jammers in the vehicles and drive around stickin to the ISP when you get tired of their crap.

  27. I doubt it. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Anonymous? I don't think so. It's not a free service, so I imagine they have a client that identifies the user for billing purposes. That's no more anonymous than dialup or cable operations. Nor are those other more expensive alternatives any more secure. As the waves of spam, virus and malware continue to be released without any accountability at all, it's clear that all commercial and government attempts to follow users around only affect honest people. Real criminals have armies of broken Windoze boxes on cable modem services to do their bidding.

    The problem is not wifi or the internet, it's Windoze.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I doubt it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not wifi or the internet, it's Windoze.

      WTF is "Windoze"??

      Is it anything like Loonix?

  28. Different definitions of "secure" by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Does it just mean they're using WEP to protect connections?
    Can anybody send your wireless device an unsolicited ping or not?
    Is that different for traffic from the outside world vs. other wireless nodes?
    If your computer's not secure, then either your wireless network isn't "secure", or else your wireless network is actively blocking traffic from the outside world using a firewall and also blocking user-to-user traffic that doesn't go through the firewall.

    MS-DOS was perfectly secure, because its security model was that there was only one User in the universe, who's allowed to do whatever she wants, but other security models may be a bit more interesting or useful.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Different definitions of "secure" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MS-DOS was perfectly secure, because its security model was that there was only one User in the universe, who's allowed to do whatever she wants, but other security models may be a bit more interesting or useful.
      um, what about boot sector viruses?
  29. Not even the second by voidref · · Score: 3, Informative

    Half Moon Bay, in California was had this at least a year ago, and there was even a story on the Science Channel about it!

    1. Re:Not even the second by gunnmjk · · Score: 0

      Half Moon Bay? I don't beleive it. The place is filled with some of California's finest tractor tugging rednecks. The place gets most of their money from pumpkins and christmas trees. I live about 30 minutes south of there, and only visit for the beaches.
      /flamebait

      anyways, here's an article. It seems to only be talking about a 5 block area of the downtown area, unlike the place this article is about, Grand Haven, Michigan, where the WiFi is city-wide.

  30. Redaction by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Gee, a bunch of stories seem to have disappeared.

  31. Champaign-Urbana Community Wireless Network by wayward · · Score: 1

    Champaign-Urbana also has a community wireless project http://www.cuwireless.net/. We're thinking hard about some of the issues brought up in other posts, e.g. security and other ISPs. Providing access to our community is important to us, but we're not oblivious to the risk of abuse. We're currently discussing some possible approaches to addressing this, though I don't think that there will be any silver bullets.

  32. so, just who "owns" this? by scooviduvoctagon · · Score: 0

    How was it paid for? Tax payers money? Who exactly owns and controls the service? The city? And thus: the State? Sounds subversive to me.

  33. Ask the RIAA by twitter · · Score: 1
    how is it secure?

    It identifies the user and makes sure they pay! In the future, that identity and network control will be used to stop music sharing, broadcast flag violating, free software terrorists and force them to join the Napster paying slaves on Windoze only intranets with great big flashing Adverts taking up 1/2 of your bandwith and no mute or off buttons. Ah, the future, it's so much like the broadcasting present and past. 24/7, buy more soap!

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  34. Big deal! by MSBob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fredericton (capital of Canadian province of New Brunswick) has WiFi acces throughout the city and best of all it's free! http://www.muniwireless.com/archives/000169.html

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    1. Re:Big deal! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Fredericton
      That's not a city, it's the morning state of my buddy Freddy!
      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  35. Free as in.... by microcars · · Score: 3, Informative
    "...Monthly prices for always-on broadband Internet starts at $19.99 for 256 kbps, and unlimited mobile VoIP calling is $29.99.
    Connections up to 1 Mbps and per-day pricing options are also available."

    RTFA

    --
    I like microcars
  36. this works on...? by scottking · · Score: 1

    this is pretty interesting, i'd like to see this kind of thing happen in more and more cities across the continent.

    there seems to be a preconception among some of the posters that this system runs on some ad-hoc of residential equipment, essentially turning the place into a big lan, but were they really that naive?

    i would think that this would have been set up in similar fashion to high speed cable internet access, where publically routed ip's are handed out via dhcp and safeguards are placed to prevent people from browsing each other in Network Neighborhood and My Network Places.

    at least i hope so.

    i see that WiMAX is involved (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wimax) so that makes it seem a little less like a 1000 d-link Ap's plunked out on the street.

    it would be nice to see a little more information about how the network was constructed... since it seems more or less "by the people for the people"... maybe other cities will be better equpped to follow suit.

    --
    scott king
  37. Imagine the Terms of Service enforcement actions. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Imagine a volunteer adhoc city/country/world-wide wifi network with spare net bandwidth donated by thousends of people from homes [...]

    Imagine the bills to and/or disconnects of the home "donors" for violations of their Terms of Service agreements.

    If you wanna do this you need to do your interconnect by peering with a backbone provider - which means paying a fee for their long-haul if you don't have long-haul facilities of your own (like among three or more well-separated major cities) to contribute to the backbone.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  38. Big city! by LightningBolt! · · Score: 1

    Now both residents of Grand Haven, Michigan have wireless access!

    --
    Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
    1. Re:Big city! by jmays · · Score: 1

      Was that an attempt at humor?

      Grand Haven Population: 11,168

      --
      KARMA TAG! You're it.
    2. Re:Big city! by LightningBolt! · · Score: 1


      Was that an attempt at humor?

      Grand Haven Population: 11,168


      OK, so it's larger than 2 people. But not much. Sorry if I offended your little village there.

      --
      Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
    3. Re:Big city! by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 1
      I am one of them!

      BTW now that everybody knows about the wifi, I may as well tell you we have great coffee, food, bars, and beaches that used to be filled with really hot chicks... that is before all the geeks moved in!

      So with this I will leave you the wifi, coffee, food, and bars to go follow the hotties in bikini's, anyone want to buy a house?

      Cheers

    4. Re:Big city! by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      Actually, its a really great town that most could learn a lot from. Its small, but it draws visitors from all around. ps. Not a resident. Originally from Muskegon (to the north) and live in Kalamazoo (to the east).

    5. Re:Big city! by RussR42 · · Score: 0
      >and beaches that used to be filled with really hot chicks... that is before all the geeks moved in!

      Yeah, those geeks move in and take up all the hot chicks... I can't explain my girlfriend otherwise... yeah, that's it.

  39. Wilton Manors, FL by mike3k · · Score: 1

    They're also planning city wide WiFi in Wilton Manors, FL (http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sf l-cwireless01feb01,0,3650838.story). There are already several hot spots in the city, which is only 2.5 mile square.

  40. Free wifi? Already have that! by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Free wifi is already available. Just connect to your neighbors wifi and surf the Internet over his cable connection. Works great and it is free.

    At least until they catch on and setup encryption, but then that can be broken given a little time.

  41. Are they really the first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was skeptical for their "first evar!" claim but they seem to have responded with a special page that debunks many of the other "first" cities and point out that Grand Haven is the first to truly cover every block of the city with coverage.

    Read for yourself, http://www.walkersands.com/Was-Grand-Haven-Really- First.htm

    so are they really the first?

    1. Re:Are they really the first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Are they really the first? by Sxerks · · Score: 1

      No.
      I work for a WISP in northern MN and we have had full coverage for 3 cities (not really large cities, but still cities) for the last 2 years, and the surrounding rural areas as well.

  42. Re:Modern Websites Requiring More than 256kbps nee by iammaxus · · Score: 1

    Maybe to web developers like me (and you?) a website means an bunch of text based markup and stylesheets with the occasional image, but for the average user, it doesn't matter wether the site is flash based or not, wether it uses a ridiculous amount of images that it shouldn't or that it contains high bandwidth video, they just want to see the website quickly. 256 kbps really isn't fast anymore.

  43. Seattle Wireless by supersat · · Score: 1

    It's being attempted in Seattle.

  44. Maybe this color scheme would look better in WiFi by scruffy · · Score: 1, Troll
    City-wide WiFi is cool, "completely secure" is so unlikely that it's a good joke, and this color scheme sucks.

    Or maybe this color scheme is a /. joke that I don't get.

  45. Wireless broadband for Vivian, LA & Linden, TX by Entity1633 · · Score: 0

    Locustworld Mesh is all i have to say. They have the best 802.11b/g MEsh AP technology Period. If you want to build a wireless network I suggest trying Locustworld Its pretty damm secure, cheap as fuck, and highly scalable and manages bandwidth very very nice. Latency on my wireless network is 3-5ms per hop using senao 200mw cards!!

  46. First? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lots of small cities/town have done this.


    Hermiston, Oregon (popultion about 13,000, a litte larger than Grand Haven,) has had this for over a year. Newsweek even proclaimed that town the most Unwired back in June.


    Oh, I see. Because it's not done by the city of Hermiston, but rather covers the entire 600 square-mile county, it's just the first county, not the first city. After all, Grand Haven only covers *SIX* square miles, not six hundred.


    The second phase is just finishing, which will add another 200 square miles, and another seven cities. So maybe being the first 'seven city area' doesn't qualify each of the seven to be the 'first city', as Grand Haven is claminig.


    Psh. Just some grandstanding. Being the first to claim you're first does not mean you are first.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Re:Imagine the Terms of Service enforcement action by wayward · · Score: 1

    Apparently, SBC prohibits their members from sharing bandwidth, but their access points are so loud that this might happen anyhow.

  49. It only covers 6 square miles!! by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    The entire time I read the post all I could think is how easy it'd be to cover a small city with WiFi. Then I read the article:
    "...the system uses several hundred WiFi (802.11a, b, g) radios strategically located upon the city infrastructure to blanket its six square miles..."
    SIX SQUARE MILES?!? That's not a city, that's a oversized postage stamp. I'm not impressed, how many of is, or for that matter own computers?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:It only covers 6 square miles!! by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      sorry, problems with dial-up and it posted before I was ready, the last sentence was suppose to say: "I'm not impressed, how many of the 12,000 residents even know what WiFi is, or for that matter own computers?"

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    2. Re:It only covers 6 square miles!! by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      I would say that nearly every household has at least one computer. Its not a poor city. If you look around the marinas on Spring Lake (connected to Lake Michigan) there are hundreds of $100,000++ boats.

    3. Re:It only covers 6 square miles!! by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      the average size for cities in this area of michigan is six miles by six miles. what are you comparing the size to?

    4. Re:It only covers 6 square miles!! by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "the average size for cities in this area of michigan is six miles by six miles."

      six miles by six miles is 36 square miles.

      6 square miles is 2.45 mi by 2.45 mi, or 2 mi by 3 mi, etc. I've been on larger college campuses.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    5. Re:It only covers 6 square miles!! by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      my mistake. blame my bad basic math skills. :( i could always do calculus eaisly, id just mess up the easy math.

  50. Tropos Networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that system using mesh AP from Tropos Networks?

  51. Re:Maybe this color scheme would look better in Wi by realdpk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Replace "it" with "games" (or as someone else pointed out "shit") and it will go back to a sane color scheme. Works with any story, apparently.

  52. Wait for ICOM's 10 Watt, 1.2 GHz, 128 kb/s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Digital/Data Radio, ie if you want more reliable
    mobile Internet connections & point-to-point
    data connections

    Oh, you'll have to get a Ham Radio license
    to use one legally... (easy, these days...)

    Digital Voice (4.8 kb/s) / Data (128 kb/s) /
    Analog Voice (for backward compatibility..?)

    Look up ICOM's D*Star for system details, &
    look in the ID-1 radio's manual for spec's.

    (My guess is that ID-1 stands for Integrated
    Digital radio... it's a small, mobile or base
    mountable box - about the size of Uniden's
    UBC 780XLT mobile trunking-capable scanner,
    with a USB port, an RJ-45 network connector,
    & an N-type antenna connector for your 1.2 GHz
    antenna. Compare 10 Watts transmit power with
    any other [legal] WiFi box around... ;-)

    D-STAR system with some of its components are
    here:

    http://www.icomamerica.com/amateur/dstar/

  53. Re:Modern Websites Requiring More than 256kbps nee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a troll, but man...what's up with all the bitching about "256kbps is not fast enough" posts? ANYTHING is faster when there is no other alternative in the area they serve. Try to lug your dsl or cable to your boat...oh wait, you can't! But you have your cellphone right? Oops, barely 56Kbps (and that's with the 3G technology)

  54. DOOM 3 IS OUT YOU BUNCHA GIRLIE MEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.photodump.com/direct/aranyx/Doom3.jpg
    OWNED

  55. First? Not even close... by kennybain · · Score: 3, Informative

    I see the post referencing my deployments in LA & TX - thanks Entity1633. Actually - not to toot my own horn, there are several towns in this region of the US that have city-wide WiFi. In addition to the TWO citywide Fastline http://www.fastlineinternet.com/ networks that have been running for over a year now(Vivian, LA & Linden, TX) another group NETWI http://www.netwi.org/ has deployed city-wide WiFi across Queen City & Atlanta, Texas. NETWI are working on other cities in East Texas. In addition, there are at least three other WISP's in this region actively deploying citywide WiFi. All of us use LocustWorld software & off-the-shelf hardware. Still, I applaud these guys. What they have done is to be commended.

  56. Another local WISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This WISP http://www.sirisonline.com/ has been serving 4 counties countywide for the last ~3 years.
    You can surf while you combine corn! Don't laugh, it probably happens.
    I had it for a few years and it was good service, although a little pricey.
    When it came to town it was the only broadband available here. It is not blindingly fast but a big step up from dialup.

  57. Mr. TACO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I bet your wishing you hadn't moved to the wrong side of the state now! You could have been updating /. from the deck at Snug Harbor while enjoying a beverage and watching the wild life! Too bad the big headlines in your town are all about the one lane parking lot running the length of i-94.

  58. why do people think this is insecure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so its no different to have a bunch of unknown people on wired ISP's as unwired.
    Why does everyone say 'o, wireless, this will be insecure'.
    who cares? protect the machine you connect with.
    having someone anonymously joining a wireless network really is no different than them being on some link of some isp somewhere else.

  59. I would do the same! by miscellaneous_havoc · · Score: 1

    I would like to do the same to my small town (1600 pop.); however, I suppose putting up a nice big antenna in the center and saying "Have Fun!" wouldn't qualify, eh?

    --

    -----
    Make Love not [Browser] War!
  60. Heh by Steamhead · · Score: 1

    I bet this was already done... in japan.

    Wow this does work :).

  61. The Real Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I live in Grand Haven and work in IT. This service is nice, but not all it is cracked up to be. First, it is relatively slow, second, there are big holes in the coverage, at least for now. I've spent some time snooping around with my Powerbook, and there are many locations inside the city boundaries where there is no signal.

    I use the service because it lets me go down to my favorite coffee shop and use my Powerbook, and because it is a great idea. I hope it gets better (faster, better coverage) as it matures.

  62. The Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW, Grand Haven, MI has one of the best beaches in the Midwest.

    I found this in Grand Haven, last summer....hmmmm, strawberries.

    http://mishami.image.pbase.com/u13/az/upload/19997 024.CRW_3145copy.jpg/

  63. Not because it isn't profitable... by taped2thedesk · · Score: 2
    (and a few other things like social services that no one else would do because its not profitable.) Like education.

    Uh... I believe the purpose of public education was to make sure everyone had access to education, not because it wasn't profitable. There are plenty of private schools that do/could make a fortune if they wanted to. (Especially in areas where the public schools aren't so great) It's also the same idea that's behind universal health care - it's a basic need that everyone should have access to regardless of income, and there are plenty of private hospitals that are making a ton of money.

    1. Re:Not because it isn't profitable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore him, taped. He's a libertarian weenie looking for a sympathetic ear. Anyone who says "facilitation of trade" is a more important social provision than education or access to information is just trolling.

  64. Windoze by twitter · · Score: 1
    An AC asks:

    WTF is "Windoze"??

    Assuming WTF stands for "What the fuck" I'll answer the foul mouthed crap flooder. I may be talking to a robot, but I enjoy the definition. This stuff is just too easy.

    Windoze 1. (noun) an insecure collection of software used by indolent market droids, often cracked and used by spammers, scammers, script kiddies and porn site operators. Little changed since the 8 bit version was acquired in the early 80s but extensively added to by further acquisitions, it is now more of a distribution than an operating system 2. (verb) the futile effort of using 1 to get actual work done. A little click, a little nothing, a little click, a little crash. It generally ends like this.

    Chances are, the AC fits both definitions.

    Linux, a kernel that does what it should well, is nothing like Windoze.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Windoze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is "Windoze"??

    2. Re:Windoze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      foul mouthed

      Really now. "Foul mouthed" indeed. Hmmm. Is this part of your retard "i havening teh morall higg ground" act?

      Awwww, don't know what the fuck "WTF" means. Awwww, poor innocent twitter.

      Poor, poor innocent twitter, followed everywhere by a phalanx of "trolls" because he's one of the starz of "free software", a legend in his own mind if nothing else. What, with all the "free softwarez" he's written.

      Awwww, poor, poor little innocent twitter.

  65. Nation? by ernstp · · Score: 1

    Which nation?

  66. My first-hand security analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happened to be in west michigan a few days ago and happened to know someone who subscribes to the service. I was appalled by how inheritently insecure their network is. They appear to have no concern for the security of their customers whatsoever.

    Deploying 802.11b was a stupid idea. It appears they utilize the majority of the 802.11b channels on the allocated 2.4ghz spectrum. What if i'm a customer, and the neighbor kid who has his shiny new 802.11b (or g) access point and is transferring files like mad? CSMA/CD tells us that there is huge potential for latency and connection issues, not to mention the interference from 2.4ghz phones and microwaves. Additionally, IEEE 802.11b channels 1-6 fall totally within the 2.4 GHz HAM band. Piss off an FCC licensed amateur radio user and watch the FCC come down on these guys. Not to mention the fact that one doesn't even have to connect to the network to intercept what their neighbors are downloading (802.11 monitor mode).

    They also appear to have no countermeasures against ARP poisoning, and from all the traffic I analyzed, it appears that all the subscribers (and non-subscribers for that matter, just with no Internet) are behind NAT.

    When a (non)subscriber connects to the network and attempts to access a site, a login page to authenticate appears. No SSL for the login form, nor any SSL for IMAP/POP3 authentication.

    In addition, being anyone can connect and get a DHCP lease, it seems to be possible to connect from one internal IP address to another on the network -- citywide LAN parties/file sharing for free, or a gateway on to the internet by bridging someone's broadband link. I wouldn't use this service even if they gave it to me for free.

  67. RIAA will shut this down by f0rt0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    The day after the City-wide Wlan was completed, it was shut down under a court injunction in response to a complaint the RIAA filed stating "Some part of this network may possible one day maybe used to for illegal sharing of copyrighted filed." When asked for proof, an RIAA official was cited as saying "I found a file called Mike_Jackson.doc on a wireless users 'My Shared Documents' folder, and most likely it is a cleverly renamed mp3 file of a Michael Jackson track."

    When we asked a judge why the court responded to the complaint so quickly without due process, all we got was a "no comment" as he climbed into a new Mercedes Benz vehicle with license plate that read "luvriaa".

    --
    I can't afford a sig!
  68. "Nation's First City-Wide WiFi Network Completed" by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1
  69. leiden netherlands wifi by smittyman · · Score: 1

    Is it me or are there at least a few other cities that already run WIFI. I happen to live in Leiden, Netherlands and we have a wifi network for a few years now. Btw, WIFI and secure in the same sentence is not a smart thing :)

    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/09/2 13 6222&tid=193&tid=215&tid=95

    Maby original title should be: first city in the US with WIFI. Start looking across your borders my friends.

    --
    Message from god, Please logoff, rebooting the Universe
  70. Re:Imagine the Terms of Service enforcement action by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Thats what the new protocol would be for - some kind of system that would allow people to use their home connections without the pigs sorry ISPs finding out. It would be kinda like NAT, the ISP is just gonna see a request for xx/yy they wont know that those packets are actually gonna be transmitted somewhere else afterwards. The system would need to unsure security aswell - if you're VOIPing someone across town and dont want it being listened too, and a way to fairly distribute and manage the bandwidth. Its not that far out.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  71. Roaming? by skaag · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How do these guys handle roaming? What happens when I move out of one access point and into another? Anyone here has an idea what happens (or lives in Grand Haven and can give us all a report from first hand experience?)

    I want to start an underground movement in my country where people all grant access to their accesspoints to the public, but then without roaming it's kinda silly.

    Thanks! :-)

    Skaag

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

  72. America's first... by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Subject sayes it all really, and then I'll go mumbling as to why people write national stories for international press.

  73. can you say.. by ashot · · Score: 1

    penis envy?

    --
    -ashot
  74. Public-private Partnership? by grumling · · Score: 1
    Why do these new technology providers all seem to be able to sell our public servants on the idea that there is no way they can build out a network without public funding, while the incumbent players end up paying taxes and fees to the government? I thought communications laws were being changed to level the playing field.

    In an indirect way, the existing infrastructure players are paying for their competition - cable companies pay franchise fees and phone companies pay universal access fees. What taxes are being collected by this WI-FI company? Is there a way for the local government to recover their investment? Will the ISP become a department of the local GVT? If the old comm companies upgrade their lines to compete, will the ISP go back to the government and ask for more funding to compete?

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  75. Rockapella?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait - those guys that used to sing on Carmen Sandiego post to Slashdot now?

  76. Beach by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

    Plus, they have a damn fine beach. Or it was a fine beach, until everybody started bringing their laptops there...

  77. DAMN by simontek2 · · Score: 1

    I grew up in Muskegon, next town over from Grand Haven, Its nice seeing them on slashdot. Savannah, will be probably completed withing a year or so. Pics of some of the equipment are available at www.simontek.net/pics/G8

    --
    SimonTek
  78. Half Moon Bay - no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half Moon Bay is NOT fully covered by a citywide WiFi network. Next.

  79. Chaska? Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chaska is NOT covered by a city-wide WiFi network.

  80. Fredericton? Nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ENTIRE city of Fredericton is NOT covered by WiFi. There are significant gaps in coverage.

  81. Hermiston? Try again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hermiston isn't fully covered. Remember, the city has to be covered from border to border (to border, to border) with NO gaps in coverage. Hermiston cannot say that.

  82. Australia != USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no claim that Grand Haven was the first in the world with citywide WiFi coverage, so your post has no relevance.

  83. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The entire cities weren't covered. Grand Haven is covered from top to bottom, end to end, and a little beyond.