Slashdot Mirror


Mars Rovers Find More Evidence of Water

loconet writes "Space.com and JPL are reporting that the Mars Rovers might be on the verge of confirming that large amounts of water once flowed in a region of Mars that has looked curiously dry until now. Such a finding could be comparable to their discovery earlier this year of an ancient shallow sea on the other side of the red planet. Opportunity has found lumpy, odd rock unlike anything its seen to date. The rock concentration seems much rougher than the 'blueberries' found earlier on in the mission. Researchers hope to swing by the rock on the way out of Endurance for further study. 'It could just be one big mass of concretions,' Squyres said. 'I just don't know.' Meanwhile, Spirit, which has now climbed about 10 yards up a hillside, getting above the Gusev plain, found an interesting rock dubbed 'Longhorn'. Both rovers have been exploring more than twice as long as they were designed to last. And even though the Martian winter is at its coldest, engineers are confident that the rovers will continue, despite showing signs of mortality."

220 comments

  1. In other news, by La_Boca · · Score: 5, Funny

    Martians took over the rover and programmed it with an ominous message:

    "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

    1. Re:In other news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      These aren't the rovers you're looking for.

    2. Re:In other news, by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      Martians took over the rover and programmed it with an ominous message:
      "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

      Then they went on to demonstrate their superiour intellegence by holding tea and no tea at the same time.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:In other news, by Rollaj · · Score: 0, Redundant

      All your base are blong to us puny mortal!

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of DRAGONS for thou art CRUNCHY and taste good with KETCHUP.
    4. Re:In other news, by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Not unless Martians are now Big Nosed Penguins (see the first three strips in the newly revived version of Bloom County: OPUS!)

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:In other news, by T'hain+Esh+Kelch · · Score: 0

      "This is not the water you are looking for. Please move on!"

    6. Re:In other news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll let you in on a little secret: when you make jokes that requires context, there are 3 case:

      - Everybody knows the context, and it may not be that funny. If you feel the need to explain the joke, it offends people.

      - Nobody knows the context, the joke is obscure and you're definitely not funny. If you explain the joke, you look like a dork.

      - Enough people know the context that it becomes funny for them, and entices those who don't get it to understand by researching the bits in your joke. When you manage to tread on that thin line, you've cracked a good one. But if you explain the joke, you blow it.

      You, sir, are a dork...

  2. Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they could just find some bottle it, then they'd never need to worry about government funding again.

  3. This Headline Is Not for Sale by dmayle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, I want to know, is this Longhorn rock a symptom of this? And if so, is Microsoft giving money to OSDN, or have they gone straight to NASA to participate in "the growing trend of inserting ads more directly into online content"

    It's funny... laugh... Please...?

    1. Re:This Headline Is Not for Sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they diddn't put a Longhorn CD on the rover lander petal like Lego shamelessly did... Oh Wait, that's because it wasn't out yet!

  4. oh no, its happened... by civman2 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Meanwhile, Spirit, which has now climbed about 10 yards up a hillside, getting above the Gusev plain, found an interesting rock dubbed 'Longhorn'.
    Microsoft now has products on TWO PLANETS! We need to find a rock somewhere and name it Sunbird, quick!
    1. Re:oh no, its happened... by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 1

      * Names the face on Mars Linus. *

      --
      Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
    2. Re:oh no, its happened... by Schrambo · · Score: 1

      Today its a rock. Tomorrow its a planet.

    3. Re:oh no, its happened... by d474 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Meanwhile, Spirit, which has now climbed about 10 yards up a hillside, getting above the Gusev plain, found an interesting rock dubbed 'Longhorn'.
      And in other News...today the Mars Spirit rover, after spotting an interesting rock dubbed 'Longhorn', experienced a massive failure and is now permanently transmitting back to Earth what is known in the IT world as the 'Blue Screen of Death'.
      JPL engineers have tried to correct the problem by renaming the interesting rock to 'Red Hat Linux 8.0'. They have no response from the catatonic rover as of yet.
      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    4. Re:oh no, its happened... by trophyangler · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, Spirit, which has now climbed about 10 yards up a hillside, getting above the Gusev plain, found an interesting rock dubbed 'Longhorn'. ...............Oh I thought it said "Meanwhile, Spirit, which has now climbed about 10 yards up a hillside, getting above the Gusev plain, found something dubbed 'Longhorn' an interesting rock." So that's where Microsoft hid it.....

    5. Re:oh no, its happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. This has nothing to do with Microsoft. The rock in the center of the 3rd frame looks a bit like a penis. The engineer was naming it after his 'lil buddy.

    6. Re:oh no, its happened... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "JPL engineers have tried to correct the problem by renaming the interesting rock to 'Red Hat Linux 8.0'. They have no response from the catatonic rover as of yet."

      Sadly, a phone call to Redhat surprisingly turned unhelpful when they suddenly announced they were no longer going to support 8.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:oh no, its happened... by WyldDot · · Score: 1

      and a Firefox, and a Mozilla boulder ... maybe an Opera House, after we go on Safari ...

      --
      Question Authority before it questions YOU ...
  5. So that's where it is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile, Spirit, which has now climbed about 10 yards up a hillside, getting above the Gusev plain, found an interesting rock dubbed 'Longhorn'.

    No wonder it's taken MS so long to get Longhorn out. They've got to haul it from Mars!

    1. Re:So that's where it is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's part of their new security initiative...

      MS Longhorn EULA ... Software must be run exclusivly on mars while connected to the public network ...

    2. Re:So that's where it is! by essreenim · · Score: 1

      Surely its just amatter of time before they discover XP Service Pack 2..

    3. Re:So that's where it is! by melted+keyboard · · Score: 1

      I too noticed the reference to Longhorn in the article, and I was just waiting for someone to make a crack about it.

      I guess I didn't have to wait long...

    4. Re:So that's where it is! by EpsCylonB · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No wonder it's taken MS so long to get Longhorn out. They've got to haul it from Mars!

      Couldn't see that joke coming from a mile away...

    5. Re:So that's where it is! by pnaro · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but only one is shipping!

      --
      If we can't fix it, we'll fix it so nobody else can!
  6. I still want to see. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the remains of the parachute and heat shield which were seen in other photos early on.

    Yeah, not the most exciting thing but you could send the rover(s) on a long trip to see the remnants and examine stuff along the way.

    Checking the remains would provide information for future designs regarding heat shield and parachute technology.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:I still want to see. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once MER-B Clarke is done at Endurance Crater, it is going to do just as you wish, examine the heat shield and its fresh crater, and then head south for the chaotic terrain there.

    2. Re:I still want to see. . . by Devar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Although it would be interesting to see, there's no way they'd do it. We can test heat shield technology and parachutes here on earth any day. And it's a proven design anyhow. Sending the rover back to have a look at them wouldn't reveal any scientific data that we don't already know or can extrapolate.

      --
      It's a Bagel.
    3. Re:I still want to see. . . by ToshiroOC · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Opportunity is planned to go to its heatshield after it has finished geological surveys of the Endurance Crater and winter is over - the crater is shielding it somewhat from cooling winds, and since heating the rover to compensate for these winds is very expensive electrically, it is likely that the heatshield will only be seen if the rover survives the winter fully operational and something more interesting outside of Endurance crater hasn't been found.

    4. Re:I still want to see. . . by Zerbey · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason they had planned to visit the heat shield was to see if its impact had turned up any interesting underground material for study.

      The plan had been to visit it after studying Endurance crater but they've not mentioned anything about it on the web site for some time now.

  7. more evidence... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 5, Informative

    more evidence from a diff perspective. It seems pretty likely now that water *did* or perhaps is even still, on Mars. cool.

    CB)(*&^%$

    1. Re:more evidence... by Jesrad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are the rovers equipped to identify traces of life if there are some around ? Or would that specifically require an entirely different mission ? I know Beagle2 was built for this purpose but the poor thing slept to its death on the way down...

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    2. Re:more evidence... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      hey, it's a long trip, I'd be tired too when I got there. anyway the first day of your vacation is always a wash anyway.

      CV*BBb

    3. Re:more evidence... by brainstyle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And Arthur C. Clarke believes Martian life exists to this day. It's easy to see that the so-called spiders look life-like, and I'd like very much for that to turn out to be the case. Mind you, the human brain is pretty good forming patterns out of just about anything.

      --
      "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
      "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
    4. Re:more evidence... by Lispy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. Beagle was on a mission for life, but the Rovers are a geological lab on wheels. They are unable to search for life. This annoys me now since the mission is on. I really hope NASA will send another rover now that the first ones were such a huge success.

    5. Re:more evidence... by tjmcgee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen those images and while they are impressive, I think what they are showing are artifacts from image compression. Have any of the probes taken high resolution images of this area. I would think the EU probe could provide some resolution to this issue.

    6. Re:more evidence... by Madcapjack · · Score: 1

      Well, not unless it sees a tree or something. ( :

    7. Re:more evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ziggy Stardust plays with the Spiders from Mars.

    8. Re:more evidence... by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've seen the spiders before, and never thought they looked at all like vegetation. Looking at the pictures again, my impression was they are one of:
      1. Some sort of errosion pattern
      2. Pattern formed by soil shifting as ice/dry ice forms and melts/sublimates
      3. Result of some sort of erruption of gases trapped in the soil during the winter
      I went to the homepage of the spider site you linked, and they had links to papers suggesting the third point. While I like his short stories, I think Clarke is looney on this one.
    9. Re:more evidence... by Chuck1318 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I really hope NASA will send another rover now that the first ones were such a huge success.

      In today's news, there is a description of research into a next generation rover designed to search for life, which will be tested in Chile's Atacama Desert. It is currently designed only to detect DNA-based life as we know it. This may be good enough for Mars, considering the meteorite-carried exchanges of material between Earth and Mars.

    10. Re:more evidence... by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the image data being transferred was compressed losslessly; TIFFs are available on the NASA site. I've skimmed through a number of the images, and I have to say that they look nothing like images compression artifacts I've ever seen.

    11. Re:more evidence... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are some form of tumbleweed or bush. Would be interesting to take a look though up close just to be sure.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:more evidence... by hplasm · · Score: 0

      George W Tumbleweed? Who he?

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    13. Re:more evidence... by brainstyle · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to agree. Still, this really does look like the top view of some sort of growing structure. We have to assume it's abiological, of course; unless there's nothing that can create these without invoking life, it's probably something like you suggested.

      It's funny how on Earth, of course, one would see those pictures and say, "Oh, hey, it's a forest" before invoking a gelological explanation. But here, life is the rule, of course.

      --
      "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
      "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
    14. Re:more evidence... by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      Brainstyle's picture I agree with. It does look a lot like a forest or brush patch. You're right as well about it being logical to assume it's abiological. We don't even have precedence on Mars for small life...certainly not for anything that large scale...unless perhaps it's something related to coral. If you look carefully at the full-res picture, you'll notice lines radiating from the center of each "grove," which definitely supports something like a geyser or outgasing, but still doesn't completely rule out coral-like life.

    15. Re:more evidence... by red+tiger · · Score: 1

      Actually its (Mössbauer) spectrometers are quite qood at determining the molecules they encounter. So, if they met a protein or even DNA...

  8. Longhorn by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    found an interesting rock dubbed 'Longhorn'.

    Sheesh, when NASA works faster than Microsoft, there's a cause for concern...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Longhorn by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just assumed they named it after a Microsoft product because it was full of holes.

    2. Re:Longhorn by Shazow · · Score: 3, Funny

      "In other news, Microsoft sues NASA over trademark infringement, forcing NASA to change the rock's name from 'Longhorn' to 'Longspire'."

      - shazow

    3. Re:Longhorn by tarsi210 · · Score: 1

      So that's where Longhorn has been! Golly...developing a project that huge over a network with that much latency must really suck.

  9. Rocks on the Surface by Launch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't it possible, since Mars does not have a thick atmosphere like earth, that rocks that are found on Mars's surface are not nessicarly from mars?

    --
    Your mammas flamebait.
    1. Re:Rocks on the Surface by sploo22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In theory it's possible, but that's where the geologists come in. I would think that they can analyze the rocks and come to a pretty reliable conclusion as to whether they're meteorites, volcanic, or (fingers crossed) sedimentary.

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    2. Re:Rocks on the Surface by dave420 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Atmosphere or not, "alien" rocks can end up on the surface of a planet quite easily. Of course, if the rocks are all uniform, chances are they are local, and not from somewhere far away. The dead giveaway of a meteorite is that it's very different from the rocks around it. (and usually in a hole :))

    3. Re:Rocks on the Surface by Wun+Hung+Lo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm fairly certain that NASA's scientists are quite able to tell the difference from a rock that's been formed from volcanic or sedimentary activity from one that fell from space. Stop and think about it, please.

    4. Re:Rocks on the Surface by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Informative

      Isn't it possible, since Mars does not have a thick atmosphere like earth, that rocks that are found on Mars's surface are not nessicarly from mars?

      Anything that fell from orbit would still end up partly melted, probably fragmented, and showing signs of shock and heating from impact in its mineral structure. This is partly how we identify things like the antarctic Mars rocks as being from Mars.

      By contrast, conglomerates like the rock found now are weak and brittle, and wouldn't survive re-entry and impact intact. The other sedimentary minerals found have structures that would also have been changed by something as traumatic as falling from space.

      So, minerals on Mars that look like they were formed in water, almost certainly had to have formed in water that was on Mars.

    5. Re:Rocks on the Surface by herrison · · Score: 1

      Certainly is, but given the nearness of much larger planets, stray lumps of rock will tend to be drawn elsewhere.

      --
      You know what I miss? Leeches.
    6. Re:Rocks on the Surface by Launch · · Score: 1

      Thanks, and this one should be modd'ed up, I obviously am not very space savvy and that's why I was asking the question.

      --
      Your mammas flamebait.
    7. Re:Rocks on the Surface by ToshiroOC · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, it is possible, but keep in mind that the vast majority of the rocks being observed by the two rovers are bedrock - very large underground formations that have an exposed surface at the surface. Therefore, the chances of bedrock actually being a buried-and-then-exposed foreign body are reasonably slim. If we do find a foreign rock on Mars, though, we would probably be able to tell because we have a general baseline for what the majority of rocks on Mars look like spectrally - and we can be pretty confident that the vast majority of rocks we're looking at on the surface are NOT foreign because there are no impact craters in the sand around them - and many of these rocks are far too large to not have a visible impact crater, if they really were foreign.

    8. Re:Rocks on the Surface by Madcapjack · · Score: 1

      Well true true true. Actually, what has struck me is the uniformity of the martian surface/geology at any particular location. On earth, you may go to a place and see a multiplicity of different kinds of rocks, even if one kind predominates.

    9. Re:Rocks on the Surface by Madcapjack · · Score: 1
      Therefore, the chances of bedrock actually being a buried-and-then-exposed foreign body are reasonably slim.

      Quite right. However, I believe that we weren't really talking about bedrock, but the various loose stones scattered around. Now, if its in an impact crater then we should expect that traces of the meteor would be somewhere, even if it had been pulverised.

    10. Re:Rocks on the Surface by ToshiroOC · · Score: 1

      Again, with the loose stones, many of them can be identified as non-foreign because they are too large to not have an impact crater, wind erosion or not - and yet they're still there by one process or another. As for traces of the meteor being around - we'll never know for Endurance. The sand dunes in the middle of Endurance are far too soft and slippery for a rover to be able to drive out into them, and the furthest down we might go to the center will be to catch one of three very long tendrils of sand dune stretching out near Karatepe - a far sight from walking into the middle and poking about.

    11. Re:Rocks on the Surface by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your sig reads "Your mammas flamebait"

      I reckon you mean "Your mamma's flamebait."

      Have a nice day.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    12. Re:Rocks on the Surface by geeber · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess since the odd rocks was found in Endurance crater, that pretty much covers the big hole requirement.

    13. Re:Rocks on the Surface by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Actually, the vast majority of rocks observed by Spirit thusfar was not bedrock at all. That was one of the biggest reasons to try to climb the hills, to find bedrock.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    14. Re:Rocks on the Surface by ToshiroOC · · Score: 1

      I work on Opportunity* (summer job), so I normally concentrate on Opportunity's side - and the rover literally opened up the lander right in front of bedrock. Spirit is definitely a different issue - they're just starting on their first good outcrop of bedrock out in the Columbia Hills. Even so, no one sees any indication in the Spirit data to show that we're not looking at Martian rocks, but something else like a LOT of meteors. *Insert Standard Disclaimer - my opinions, not [list of agencies affiliated with the rovers].

    15. Re:Rocks on the Surface by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      You are right, I wasn't arguing about the meteorite part.. just the bedrock thingy with Spirit :)

      Congrats on your summer job, would love to work there. Damn ocean... :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    16. Re:Rocks on the Surface by Launch · · Score: 1

      I didn't want anyone to think it was possessive.

      --
      Your mammas flamebait.
    17. Re:Rocks on the Surface by timjdot · · Score: 1

      Looks like it was formed in a watery animal. Scat (such as Dinosaur coprolite) is what it looks like. Mars poop Ca poop Earth poop

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    18. Re:Rocks on the Surface by G00F · · Score: 1

      That is because we have water. Kinda need a liquid like water to form, shape, and create those other rocks.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    19. Re:Rocks on the Surface by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Anything that fell from orbit would still end up partly melted, probably fragmented, and showing signs of shock and heating from impact in its mineral structure.

      But Mars has almost no atmosphere, so there'd be very little friction to heat up any incoming meteorites, so one shouldn't expect to find much evidence of thermal shock or melting (unless of course the meteorite fell back when Mars had a real atmosphere, if such a time ever existed).

    20. Re:Rocks on the Surface by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1
      But Mars has almost no atmosphere, so there'd be very little friction to heat up any incoming meteorites, so one shouldn't expect to find much evidence of thermal shock or melting

      Two reasons why this this turns out not to be the case:
      • Mars has enough atmosphere that we can use parachutes in it and float balloon-borne probes in it. That's enough for some heating.

      • Even when impacting an airless body, a meteorite will heat up plenty when striking the _surface_. This collision is largely inelastic - turning kinetic energy into deformation, shock effects, and heat, not just returning the impact energy as kinetic energy to the projectile.

        This is where most of the shock and heating effects will come from for a meteorite striking Mars, and where most of the effects come from for a large meteorite hitting Earth's surface, for that matter.
  10. In other news by Celt · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Mars roover has discovered water after a flash flood sweeped it away,

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " The Mars roover has discovered water after a flash flood sweeped it away,"

      ...and another enlightened Slashdotter demonstrates his ineptitude with the English language.

    2. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You completely missed "roover".

    3. Re:In other news by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      The Mars rover "Spirit" found more new
      evidence of the existance of water there.
      Mineral deposits found part way up a large
      basin was determined to be soap scum.
      Apparently, this large basin was used by
      ancient Martians as a "Roman bath". Several
      artifacts blasted with 2 million years worth
      of micronmeteors were determined to be
      rubber duckies.

  11. What about the mysterious slashdot rock? by IGTeRR0r · · Score: 1, Funny

    There IS evidence of slashdot on mars:
    Slashdot Rock

    1. Re:What about the mysterious slashdot rock? by IGTeRR0r · · Score: 1

      My bad, I think I linked it wrong:

      Slashdot Rock

    2. Re:What about the mysterious slashdot rock? by balster+neb · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can almost imagine that. Rover uncovers martian rock, and guess what's written on it?

      First Post!

    3. Re:What about the mysterious slashdot rock? by golgotha007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The entry in the afformentioned website was posted after the slashdot story broke. its obvious intention was to get free advertising on Slashdot.

      In fact, this is the third story I've seen today with an advertisement for illuminedgaming.com

    4. Re:What about the mysterious slashdot rock? by IGTeRR0r · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What's your point? Yeah, I made the image, posted it on my site, and linked it from here. Something wrong with that? And link me to another story advertising my site...yeah, my signature contains the link, but who freaking cares?

  12. Where is all the water now? by Percent+Man · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is fascinating news, and seems to confirm many astronomer's / xenogeologist's wildest hopes for the Red Planet. But, and forgive my ignorance, where has the water all gone? The atmosphere is mostly CO2, I believe... so, somewhere, there's a bunch of H2 missing. And whether or not Mars ever supported life, I doubt it ever hosted an ecosystem on a scale large enough to convert that much water. Where'd it go? How'd it get there? Anyone?

    1. Re:Where is all the water now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When whatever destroyed the atmosphere of Mars destroyed the atmosphere of Mars, the water boiled away.

    2. Re:Where is all the water now? by Laivincolmo · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think that the leading theory is that the water is locked up beneath the surface as permafrost.

    3. Re:Where is all the water now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Silly theory, and someone will probably prove me wrong, but if there was some form of stratification in the atmosphere, where the CO2 stayed on the bottom layer and H2 on the top, couldn't solar wind blow most of the H2 away while leaving the more massive (heavier) CO2 near the martian surface?
      Water could still easily exist trapped beneath the surface while a majority of the H2 was stripped from the atmosphere.
      There are likely a few loopholes in this idea, but it's not meant to be absolutely correct.

    4. Re:Where is all the water now? by forsetti · · Score: 1

      Maybe if we find Kuato, we can find a way to release that into the aptmosphere!!

      But first, we have to pull that probe out of our nose ...

      --
      10b||~10b -- aah, what a question!
    5. Re:Where is all the water now? by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Hmm...
      Guess the Barbarians of Halas should get deep into the permafrost and slay Lady Vox to get to the water.

      (If you don't get it, just ignore it)

    6. Re:Where is all the water now? by goatbar · · Score: 3, Informative

      How about solar wind stripping? Hydrogen is super light and rapidly ends up at the top of the atmosphere which is being hit by the solar wind (no magnetic field to shield the atmosphere).

    7. Re:Where is all the water now? by cazzazullu · · Score: 2, Informative
      Your theory could have a ground of truth in it. For instance, when you release helium in our atmosphere, it doesn't stay there, it eventually wanders off in the universe, because it isn't heavy enough to stay ("not sticky enough" is probably better since we are talking about a totally inert gas here). The moon has no atmosphere at all, it gets blown away or gets too hot (too fast) to stay in its gravitational attraction. Mars is somewhere in between regarding mass and has a very thin (5% of our pressure) but heavy (co2 is very heavy but molecular small) atmosphere.

      But regarding the water: first of all it requires a lot of energy to make H2 out of water, so existence of H2O does not imply existence of H2 in large amounts. Second of all, liquid water boils immediately at those pressures and temperatures. So the water probably boiled away when the atmosphere became thinner or is locked somewhere in solid form.

      --
      int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
    8. Re:Where is all the water now? by Madcapjack · · Score: 1

      Sadly yes. And what would this imply for a terraforming effort?

    9. Re:Where is all the water now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But, and forgive my ignorance, where has the water all gone? The atmosphere is mostly CO2, I believe... so, somewhere, there's a bunch of H2 missing."

      Well, see, the Martians had a fossil fuel based society. When it became apparent that the long term effects of this was leading to a drastic
      change in the atmosphere they developed fuel cells. The fuels cell where bigger than the fossil fuel engines the Martians were using to power their SUVs, and so the fuel cell SUVs had to get bigger, which was a marketing bonanza.

      With the abundance of water there wasn't a natural check in place like the fossil fuels engine SUV had, bigger meant less fuel efficient and
      more expensive to drive. The Martians seem to have gotten into an escalation of "bigger is safer" as the Martian marketing departments
      pressed the issue. Soon every Martian was driving around in the equivalent of an earth semi truck.

      This was very wasteful, but as the only apparent issue was the production of a by-product the Martians called blueberries, a rock like
      residue from the fuel cells, no one was watching when the climate tippedinto a process where the Martians exterminated themselves.

      For years the Martian oceans had been absorbing the C0 that the burning of fossil fuels created. When the incredible amounts of water necessary
      to feed the giant SUVs where taken from the oceans, there was less and less of the oceans to hold the trapped gas. When the balance tipped, the
      oceans let loose, in one giant release, the incredible amount of CO that was absorbed. Most Martians died of immediate suffocation with their
      last act being a look of moral outrage at the person sitting next to them and issueing of a stern "excuse you".to that person. No one had
      time to guess the loud burp was not from their loser friend with the mullet.

      The giant SUVs when exposed to the massive amounts of C0 started to rust away and in a final turn discolored and polluted the Martian landscape.

    10. Re:Where is all the water now? by kippy · · Score: 1

      Another theory is that a lot of the hydrogen got stripped from the water by UV radiation and knocked out of the atmosphere by soler wind. The lack of a strong, uniform magnetosphere could account for that.

      I'm hoping it's all in permafrost though. It would make terraforming a lot easier.

  13. Re:Funny messages by Laivincolmo · · Score: 4, Informative

    The rovers are taking some wear from the martian environment. At one point I heard that one of the wheels on one of the rovers began experiencing more resistance to moving. I suppose the dust and dirt are begining to clog and gum parts up on the rover.

  14. That explains things yesterday.... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Opportunity has found lumpy

    I was wondering why I felt like someone was following me yesterday....

    This is not going to help my paranoia one bit.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:That explains things yesterday.... by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      Congrats, opportunity knocked on my door once, but I was in the shower :-/

  15. The way the tin foil hat crowd will see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "There is no way NASA can lead us to believe that THIS [http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mer/images.cfm?i d=787] is a rock! It is very obviously organic. Just LOOK at it. It is some sort of fleshy, wrinkly creature, or remnant of one. Anyone with two eyes and half a brain can plainly see that.

    Now the question is, why is NASA trying to mislead the public YET AGAIN [link to moon landing hoax website] [link to mars face page]!

    blah blah blah..." ;-)

    1. Re:The way the tin foil hat crowd will see it... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      So that's where the Beagle ended up!

    2. Re:The way the tin foil hat crowd will see it... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny
      Anyone with two eyes and half a brain can plainly see that.

      I've only got one eye, you insensitive clod!

      .^(

    3. Re:The way the tin foil hat crowd will see it... by Ztream · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Anyone with two eyes and half a brain can plainly see that.

      At first reading I thought it said "Anyone with two and a half brain..."

  16. Wopmay by mikael · · Score: 1

    This image taken by the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity shows a bizarre, lumpy rock dubbed "Wopmay" on the inner slopes of "Endurance Crater.

    Man, it looks like a fossilised elephant!

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Wopmay by jonr · · Score: 1

      Looks like poop to me.

    2. Re:Wopmay by bmalia · · Score: 1

      That was my thought too. Its a fossilzed martian terd.

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    3. Re:Wopmay by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

      It looks like a sitting Pinky beast (half-robot/half-demon bull looking beast) from Doom#.....god I gotta stop playing that infernal game...

  17. Scientists say... by charlie763 · · Score: 3, Funny

    that the release of the pictures of the Longhorn rock are delayed and will not be available until 2007.

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
  18. Re:Finally, the secret weapon is discovered! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next you'll be saying that Gates purchased the U of Texas.
    It's just a project name. They're not going to sell the next version of Windows as Microsoft Longhorn. Get over yourselves.

  19. Re:Funny messages by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Modify the score for "funny" in your preferences to something like -6. That should guarantee that they'll always fall below your threshold.

  20. Re:Funny messages by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

    Actually yes. Look here: and set Funny to -6. Just keep in mind some stuff that's interesting get's modded Funny and you won't see it.

  21. Re:Funny messages by EddieBurkett · · Score: 4, Informative
    Anyway, what does the article mean by "showing signs of mortality"? I haven't heard anything about this except for the initial mishap they had when they had to reprogram one of the rovers.
    Reading the article, my guess is this is what they were referring to:
    During the briefing researchers added that Spirit's twin, Opportunity, is suffering from a jammed drill.
    --
    The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
  22. Ironic by MikeMacK · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the previous story, "Writing Software Worldwide Proves Difficult", it said 23 of 56 people couldn't find the Pacific Ocean on a map, and yet we can find water on other planets. Looks like all the people who got A's in geography work at NASA.

    1. Re:Ironic by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless of coarse they are still looking for the Pacific Ocean.

  23. Re:Finally, the secret weapon is discovered! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Next you'll be saying that Gates purchased the U of Texas.

    No, but he did purchase Standford.

  24. I'm the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    ... who read

    '... It could just be one big mass of excretions,'

    I think it's related with noticing the word "Longhorn" somewhere in the article

  25. Re:Finally, the secret weapon is discovered! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Next you'll be saying that Gates purchased the U of Texas.
    No, but he did purchase Standford.


    Really? I cand barely stan the thought...

  26. Nice! by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny
    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Nice! by vi+(editor) · · Score: 1

      If you want Dasani you can just travel to a village near Liverpool and try any watertap.

    2. Re:Nice! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Ah. That would explain these strange Close Encounter-style signals from Mars then.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  27. Re:Finally, the secret weapon is discovered! by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

    And , the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada.

  28. Trace of Dinosaurus Rex on Mars by denisbergeron · · Score: 4, Funny

    This picture of Endurance rook look realy like Dinosaurus Rex feces
    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mer/images .cfm?id =787
    May be this can explain why Dinosaurus was extinguish!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:Trace of Dinosaurus Rex on Mars by timjdot · · Score: 1

      that's what I thought... coprolite. I was thinking a meter was huge but maybe not for a huge animal. Maybe that corresponds to surviving on a cold planet. Another idea is that of an underground animal who left it. It just does not look worn alot so it is hard to say it if it is old. We need closer pictures but I guess by the time the pictures come to NASA it is too late to head back for more? Peculiarities are the stretching in the first half and compression in the second half and that it is not even 1/2 way buried. The picture looks like a slope goes down to the rock from the foregound. Weird and interesting stuff. The lay of the ground looks like a bottom of a wash rather than a sandy area to me. I guess a hot impact would vaporize the gases and maybe leave something like that?
      BTW, how does the rover take animated gifs? Tring to find pictures of surrounding area.

      --
      Expect Freedom.
  29. Stromatolite ? by Jesrad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could that "lumpy" rock be a fossil of a ?

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
    1. Re:Stromatolite ? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Impossible, question marks don't leave fossils, they only raise more questions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  30. That doesn't quite look like a rock by dexterpexter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about anyone else, but when I first saw the picture, my reaction was not "Oh, it's a rock!"

    In fact, not that I believe it is as such necessarily, it looks like a fossilized organic somethingoranother. The back end looks something like a frog. Now, this is probably proposterous (it is most likely a volcanic-produced rock), but I sure wouldn't mind being (accidentally) correct.

    With the casual way that they mention that they *might* go by and check it out, I certainly hope that they do! Of all of the "rocks" that they have studied so far, I think that this one merits a much less casual reaction. I find their treatment of this discovery a bit odd.

    Who knows...

    --

    *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
    "We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms."
    1. Re:That doesn't quite look like a rock by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be a lot more fun if the rock wasn't there in the morning.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  31. Re:Finally, the secret weapon is discovered! by vi+(editor) · · Score: 1

    Nonsense, it's just a cube that speaks.

  32. Winter on Mars? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Sorry , but you can't have the whole planet in winter. If its winter in one hemisphere its summer in another and AFAIK the rovers are both near the equator anyway (just on opposite sides of the planet). Can anyone explain what they're talking about?

    1. Re:Winter on Mars? by cplusplus · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You are correct, kinda. Mars is a little different than Earth if you examine its orbit and its tilt, which has a lot to do with the 'global winter' that everyone seems to be talking about.
      This might help:
      http://cmex-www.arc.nasa.gov/CMEX/data/MarsEssy/se asons/seasons.htm

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Winter on Mars? by throughthewire · · Score: 5, Informative
      Sorry , but you can't have the whole planet in winter.

      You could if there was no tilt to its axis of rotation relative to its orbital plane.

      Mars, though, tilts about the same as Earth - 25 degrees or so. But its orbital eccentricity has a 19% variance, versus Earth's 2%. The 'Southern Winter' is much longer and colder than the 'Northern Winter,' and the whole planet is colder. The Martian Southern hemisphere experiences much greater temperature variance than any point on Earth.

      Seasons on Mars

    3. Re:Winter on Mars? by Fishstick · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I think that the tilt of the earth's axis relative to the orbital plane causing winter/summer is not the same mechanism on mars.

      I think it probably has more to do with Mars having a somewhat eliptical orbit:

      http://www.nhm.ac.uk/mineralogy/mars/Marshtml/2orb italparameters.html

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:Winter on Mars? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I recall a documentary narrator saying:

      "It must be a windy day in Arizona..." (on the movie set...) ... ...when the US flag was waving "on the Moon", when or after the astronauts planted it.

      David Syes

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  33. Re:The M$ Connection by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

    I think you meant to say that the other way round

    --
    No but, yeah but, no but...
  34. now if only... by m2bord · · Score: 1, Funny

    nasa can find evidence of beer on mars, we'll know for sure there was intelligent life.

    --
    Is it 5:30 yet?
  35. Re:off topic by SammysIsland · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    sorry... i forgot the link
    Bear story

  36. Big Deal by El_Smack · · Score: 1


    Yesterday I was exploring Mars and found religious artifacts from a long dead civilization in a place called "Site 2". Now if you'll excuse me, I have some Imps to kill.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  37. It looks like... by Whatthehellever · · Score: 1

    It looks like someone dropped their liver.

    --

    ---
    IMHO, of course.
    May the SOURCE be with you.
    1. Re:It looks like... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Gone from liver bad to liver worst...

      DOH!!!

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    2. Re:It looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the wurst pun I've ever heard.

    3. Re:It looks like... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't get called "Atilla da Pun" for nuthin'...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    4. Re:It looks like... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      And, if you think THAT's bad, then see:

      Pentagon goes from Ka-Boom, to Da-Bust:

      "Pentagon breast implant policy draws fire":

      http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/2004 08 19/od_uk_nm/oukoe_life_breasts

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  38. Evidence by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 1

    Arguably the most convincing piece of evidence that water exists on Mars surface has just been revealed.
    After further maginication NASA observers were disappointed to find chewed gum blocking the faucet head's water hole.

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  39. Re:Finally, the secret weapon is discovered! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So even Gates will have his Waterloo?

  40. Who paid for this gig? by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the engineers would like to see how their entry and descent gear fared, but the scientists who are running the show at this point care about the history of Mars. Time spent checking out hardware is time wasted.

  41. Worthwhile by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Both rovers have been exploring more than twice as long as they were designed to last. And even though the Martian winter is at its coldest, engineers are confident that the rovers will continue, despite showing signs of mortality."

    I'd definitely say the rovers have been money well spent. I'm impressed by how long they've lived past their estimated KIA date. Most impressive. If only more NASA projects could be as successful.

    1. Re:Worthwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm impressed as well with the rovers. Distinctly unimpressive, though, is NASA's miserable failure in estimating the life-span of the rovers. Sure, it's nice that they underestimated in this case (but perhaps skewing the cost/benefit upward by estimating a lesser benefit), but never let them, say, train folks at CDC to estimate the infectious period of SARS or sell pets.

  42. slashbot ignorance prevails once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "...found an interesting rock dubbed 'Longhorn'."

    I can't even begin to count the number of anti-MS comments, but you have all overlooked the most likely explanation for this: a member of the Rover team is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin, whose mascot happens to be the longhorn.

  43. Still waiting.... by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 1

    Still waiting for the Mars Rover to find evidence of water on the face of Mars Volta

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  44. thin atmosphere has hot re-entry by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The hottest parts of rentry in both the Terran and Martian atmosphere happen when it is much thinner than at the Martian surface. This is partly due to that the craft id moving at orbital velocities 10-20 the speed of sound. The Martian probes all had entry heat shields.

  45. Martian Longhorn by scottyboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    A NASA spokesperson said that the rover was projected to reach the Longhorn rock "sometime in 2005... no wait! 2006... um... 2007?"

  46. Screw water -- where are the killer DNA bacteria? by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 4, Funny

    Screw this "NASA found water today" and "Spirit discovered more water this month" and "scientists believe there's water in this rock" crap.

    When is NASA going to bring back a sample of killer DNA bacteria back to Earth from Mars, clone a fast-growing horny chick in a glass box, and then let her loose to find the first guy to fuck hard and nasty before ripping his groin in two with her alien scissor legs?

    'cause I'm waiting on that kind of woman, and I think it'd be a great way to go out in a blaze of...wait...never mind. I'm a computer nerd with a gut, pale white skin, and a rash that we won't talk about here. She'll be hunting a prime specimen with whom to sow her seed.

    Back to Far Cry and /. news. Sigh...

    IronChefMorimoto

  47. Go little guys! by eXoXe · · Score: 0

    I didn't know these two little guys were still working. I guess the martian dust hasn't ruined them yet. It's great to see several million(or billion?) of tax dollars/funding spent, and actually have the equipment last for a good length of time. It's quite exciting to hear that they're still kicking..dust!

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  48. oh my by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm glad you're smart enough to dismiss your observations of a video sent from thousands of miles away as wishful thinking- there are millions that look at that and see God.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:oh my by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "there are millions that look at that and see God."

      Hey, I look at *anything* and see God.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  49. JPL link by chaosmage42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the JPL press release the link i sposed to point to is here

    --

    done
  50. Does it have to be water? by Tokerat · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Everyone is so excited about the possibility of liquid water on Mars, but has anyone considered that it might be some other type of liquid? Something with different properties that would explain the odd patterns?

    This article intrigued me, but why is everyone so focused on water? Could the carbon dioxide or some other atmospheric gas be condensing in the cold north to form the odd runoff channels on the rock. This rock faces away from the sun and would therefore be one of Mars' coldest points. Could that be why there is little other than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? Could wind erosion and perhaps even blast shockwaves from meteorites have been causing the errosive-looking paterns in such an enviroment? With the atmosphere being lighter, wouldn't meteorites hit harder and more frequently than Earth? Finally, can we draw any similarities to our own moon's surface, a place which we know much more about?

    (I ask because I have no idea)

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:Does it have to be water? by adamh526 · · Score: 1

      People, even NASA it seems, don't want to consider the idea it is some other type of liquid because we're all locked into the idea that liquid water is an absolutely necessary ingredient for life. We're still only looking for life that exists or existed elsewhere exactly like it does here on Earth. And we're still so far away from finding this kind of life that it would be useless to even consider some other life paradigm.

    2. Re:Does it have to be water? by ToshiroOC · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Mars Odyssey mission found water within a meter of the surface in many places on Mars. Aeolian (wind) erosion processes are noticably different from water erosion processes (at least, that's what the geologists say - I won't pretend I can tell the difference myself just looking at something). Carbon dioxide freezes into a solid and then sublimes - liquid CO2 requires very high pressures, and the Martian atmosphere has a pressure some 1% of earth's. Other possible liquids such as methane require significantly colder temperatures to condense than what are available on Mars. Meterorite impact frequency isn't a function of atmospheric density - just they'll burn up less before hitting the ground, and then, yes, hit harder - but blast shockwaves aren't going to create the 'razorback' structures found in some of the cracks of the rocks at Endurance crater. Also, elements in the correct ratio to be particular salts are being found in the rocks, and some of these salts are known as ones that would be carried in water. We can draw similarities to the moon, but not many - again, aeolian processes will influence martian geology strongly, and there is no atmosphere or carbon dioxide ice or water ice on the moon (minus some possible craters, look up DoD/Clementine's recent moon imaging).

    3. Re:Does it have to be water? by ToshiroOC · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but wrong - we're looking for life or possible life-sustaining environments on Titan with the Huygens probe on Cassini, since Titan has an atmosphere and possibly liquid methane. Places like Titan (methane) and Europa (water) are under investigation because they have liquids - and all life as we know it require some form of liquid - but we aren't ruling out non-water organisms.

    4. Re:Does it have to be water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing.

      Especially about this new "odd rock". It looks a lot like a piece of molten rock from a meteorite impact, not water formed.

    5. Re:Does it have to be water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really.

    6. Re:Does it have to be water? by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      If millions of years ago was so different ie: watery world on Mars, couldnt also the pressure as well as the atmosphere be a lot different as well, thus making it a slight possibility that it could be liquid CO2, or some other substance?

    7. Re:Does it have to be water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If millions of years ago was so different ie: watery world on Mars, couldnt also the pressure as well as the atmosphere be a lot different as well, thus making it a slight possibility that it could be liquid CO2, or some other substance?

      Well, I would consider it unlikely. Recall that frozen CO2 is often called "dry ice" on Earth. There isn't enough pressure to have liquid CO2 in Earth's atmosphere, so instead of melting frozen CO2 sublimates. You have to have great deal more pressure (as well as a low temperature) to keep CO2 in a liquid state. Given that, I'd say it is far more likely that Mars at one time had liquid water than liquid CO2.

    8. Re:Does it have to be water? by ToshiroOC · · Score: 1

      In a word, no. Mars simply doesn't have the gravity needed to have a high enough pressure at its surface - its got about 1/3rd the gravity of Earth. And while its low gravity does rule out liquid CO2, it doesn't rule out a larger and higher pressure past atmosphere, now blasted away by some means (one theory: Mars has no magnetosphere, so it has no shielding from the solar wind, so possibly billions of years of constant weak pushing from the sun slowly removed the atmosphere).

    9. Re:Does it have to be water? by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      We've found chunks of Mars in the Arctic (IIRC), could there have been some kind of huge collision that fragmented a huge chunk of the planet away and left the rest of Mars to slowly collapse into a sphere again?

      Of course, that doesn't explain the markings on the present formation...ahh theorizing is so difficult ;-)

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  51. Longhorn misnomer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Meanwhile, Spirit, which has now climbed about 10 yards up a hillside, getting above the Gusev plain, found an interesting rock dubbed 'Longhorn'."

    Actually they called it Longhorn because it's not what it appears to be.

  52. No conclusive evidence... by thepeete · · Score: 0

    ...of water on Mars.

    On totally unrelated news, NASA will equip their next generation rover with snow tires.

    --
    My Karma is so low that even my own postings are beyond my current threshold
  53. Re:Screw water -- where are the killer DNA bacteri by ToshiroOC · · Score: 1

    To give a serious answer to a non-serious question, there will be a Mars Science Laboratory (rover) approximately the size of a VW bug landing on Mars in the 2011 launch window that is supposed to look for life in the ostensibly wetter northern areas of Mars, and a sample return back to Earth sometime in the 2013+ area. There is a window to send a mission to Mars every 2 years or so, since Martian years are ~2x longer than ours. This is actually an interesting problem, since Mars getting to be at its furthest point from Earth about now - and will be getting closer next year.

  54. Re:Screw water -- where are the killer DNA bacteri by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I think Captain Kirk is game for this...

    Kirk: Are you lonley? Is there anyone like you... on this... planet?

    Slim-girl with deadly hands: I am for YOU... James KIRK.

    (Kirk-fighting-while-making-whoopee-Music:

    thuh-thuh thuh-thuh thuh-thuh thuh-thuh thuh-thuh thuh-thuh thuh...)

    David Syes

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  55. Re:Funny messages by ToshiroOC · · Score: 1

    Jammed drills aren't the least of the problems - both Spirit and Opportunity have been collecting sun-blocking dust on their solar arrays since Sol 1, and the available power is getting lower by the day.

  56. Re:Funny messages by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Troll

    I guess that little robot's pecker/drill got dulled humpin' rocks..., or maybe it drilled a rock, couldn't get it off, and maybe instead of a stuck wheel, it's dragging a rock from it's little bit...

    Just an idea...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  57. laughable story summary by nusratt · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    "water once flowed in a region of Mars that has looked curiously dry until now"

    um, excuse me, but what is "curious" about any part of Mars looking dry?

    1. Re:laughable story summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I guess it used to say "ironically" but some pedant just had to have it changed. Blame the elitist pedants of the world.

  58. Re:Funny messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Interesting. One might ask why someone would bother to enter 'whiney bitch' messages - just shut up.

    Can't the moderators delete those users with no sense of humor, so the rest of us don't have to listen to their plaintive mewling?

  59. not off topic, it's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you fascist moderator fuckup

    get a godamned funny bone

    (OOoooO big suprise this one's a troll)

    1. Re:not off topic, it's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the joke, but I agree with the "offtopic" mod because it has nothing to do with this article. You should've waited for some article about drunk driving.

  60. Is it me or does that odd rock look like .... by 1shooter · · Score: 1

    a fossilize cow pie?

    --
    6F 9E A9 1E 96 9F 74 27 ED B8 81 6D 0C 4E 1E 78
    My other Sig is a 229.
  61. Rock named "Longhorn" by mr.+mulder · · Score: 1, Funny

    Upon examining the rock, did the rover suffer from an unexplained BSOD?

  62. Why are we looking for water? by ZipR · · Score: 1

    Don't we already have enough here? If NASA needs water, they should just get it by hijacking an iceberg, like that guy on Salvage 1 did over 20 years ago.

  63. Name the next rover by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    Opportunity has found lumpy, odd rock unlike anything its seen to date.

    I think they should name the next rover "Sheer Dumb Luck"

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  64. Re:Screw water -- where are the killer DNA bacteri by sharkey · · Score: 1
    then let her loose to find the first guy to fuck hard and nasty before ripping his groin in two with her alien scissor legs?

    Snoo-snoo!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  65. Woohoo! by PretzelWagon · · Score: 2, Interesting
  66. "might be on the verge of confirming" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait and tell us when they have actually found the fucking water.. why all this "on the verge of confirming" crap?

  67. Water is nice but ... by loconet · · Score: 1

    What would really be interesting is if they find a soulcube!

    --
    [alk]
  68. After Galileo, battles still to fight by panurge · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The thing I find seriously interesting is that so much effort has to be put into demonstrating the presence of water on Mars. Starting from the philosophical standard we apply to most things, we would expect to find it there (we live on a planet, it has water, it has life, why would we not expect to find it on the next planet out?)

    I have a feeling that we are still fighting Galileo's battle. A particular strand of Christian thought - medieval Aristotelianism - is still making the running. Aristotle, on no particular evidence, thought that the planets were perfect, lifeless and unchanging - the Schoolmen adopted this as dogma - and scientists and engineers at Nasa are still trying to demonstrate that we occupy what is probably a very ordinary little planet, with a very ordinary set of dominant life forms, against people who think we are unique and very important in this huge universe. You know who you are.

    You can still see the lens of Galileo's original telescope, which actually destroyed Aristotle's ideas for anyone with an open mind. I hope one day someone brings the Mars Rovers back to Earth, perhaps along with the Hasselblad left on the Moon. They are signs of a human achievement bigger than the Pyramids, St. Peter's or the Great Wall of China - and an achievement which is under threat from fundamentalists, whether Islamic or Christian. I still find it amazing that the country that has produced insitutions like NASA and Woods Hole has places that mandate the teaching of Creationism, and I find that far more worrying than a survey that suggests that only a minority can find the Pacific.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:After Galileo, battles still to fight by ivoras · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have a feeling that we are still fighting Galileo's battle. A particular strand of Christian thought - medieval Aristotelianism - is still making the running. Aristotle, on no particular evidence, thought that the planets were perfect, lifeless and unchanging - the Schoolmen adopted this as dogma - and scientists and engineers at Nasa are still trying to demonstrate that we occupy what is probably a very ordinary little planet, with a very ordinary set of dominant life forms, against people who think we are unique and very important in this huge universe. You know who you are.
      How about plain old *scientific* reasoning? A true scientist cannot say "we live on a planet, it has water, it has life, why would we not expect to find it on the next planet out?" - that's where experiments come into view: you can't (for example) assume there's water on Mars just because it "feels right"!

      For all we knew before landing on Moon, it just *could* have been made of cheese![*]

      [*] Well, actually, odds were certainly against it, as primeval cheese seems to be pretty scarce in a huge lump of a planet next to it we call Earth :))) But that's not the point! The point is: we had to check. There are (or should be) pretty good SciFi/Alternative History stories about *what if* the moon landings had shown it beeing made of chese or something like that - what would *that* do to the entire science/religion climate at the end of millenium? :)

      --
      -- Sig down
    2. Re:After Galileo, battles still to fight by Vexar · · Score: 1
      I'll give Aristotle Perfect and Lifeless, but unchanging we've already wiped out. Lifeless might take a bit of work to prove or otherwise alter, but perfect is a tough word to manage. Perfectly smooth/sphere(oid|ic)al? Perfectly boring?

      I think it is safe to say, at this point, we are the only planet teeming with indigenous life in the solar system.

      On the other side of your comments, when are the alien-life seekers going to call it quits? Every planet in the milky-way? The universe? Talk about faith! I, for one, would rather see our space dollars go a little more on the side of business/hard sciences. Get a little ROI. Like Velcro, Tang, and multitasking computers...

  69. I suppose... by dekeji · · Score: 1

    if there are elephant turds, then there are elephants. And where there are elephants, there must be water. Ergo, there must be water on Mars.

  70. That odd rock is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  71. um, WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has anybody ever said exactly WHY the two rovers are going to fail? Don't they have solar power? Seems like they would be able to recharge their batteries and keep going longer than this. What other parts fail just from becoming old?

    1. Re:um, WHY? by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why will the rovers fail?
      Here's the likelyest causes.
      1. The solar cells accumulate dust and their efficiency reduces.
      2. Heating and cooling cycles cause micro-fracturing of the crystals in those solar cells. Their power production decreases for sure, AND the cracks increase how much dust clings to them, so if #1 isn't a problem, it possibly will become one.
      3. Flexable materials will outgass some of their lubricants and plasticisers. Plastic parts are particularly vulnerable to multiple combinations of thermal cycling, low pressure and the daytime UV. Greases and oils will eventually break down for similar reasons, causing moving parts to stick.
      4. Many electronic components are mounted on plasticized boards, not that different from the ones used in commercial designs, although the NASA ones are ruggidized quite a bit. The boards are still vulnerable to the thermal cycling and outgassing problems, although their mostly being buried deep inside the spacecraft helps with thermal cycling problems.

      I'd expect to see the craft brought down eventuallly by a wheel lock-up, though either of them may be able to drag one wheel at reduced efficiency for a time.
      Before the main control circuits in the craft's center fail, I'd guesstimate that we will hear of boards in the peripherals (like out in a camera arm), going out and taking down those functions.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  72. Also not mentioned... by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

    When the rover first disembarked, there was a strange scene awaiting them which never reached the eyes of the public. Evidently a slender, white arm was portruding through the dust clutching a sword- The Sword- Excalibur! More on NASA's plans to conquer*cough* put a base on Mars later.

    --


    The power of Christ compiles you.
    A Random Blog
  73. Forgot to mention by Thrymm · · Score: 1

    Perhaps that a cosmic collision zapped the atmosphere to its current day position. Reguardless, something drastic happened.

  74. What is it really? by doggiesnot · · Score: 1

    Watch the strange rock turn out to be martian feces.

    Or even...sperm whale carnage!

  75. Sure, whatever you say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So expecting real evidence for scientific claims is somehow some peculiar and unfortunate leftover from the Middle Ages?

    And we are supposed to be more comfortable with "expecting" things we intuit from first principles (just different ones)?

    And skepticism towards such "expectations" is supposedly a sign that we are still stuck in the Dark Ages?

    Dude, you seriously need a history lesson.

  76. Re:Funny messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    one got a jammed drill so the other went looking for a longhorn? but all found was some of those tasty blueberry things and the red-coated ones...

  77. Re:Funny messages by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    One of Spirit's wheels isn't behaving properly--causing them to actually drive Spirit backwards most of the time; both have shown some temporary software glitches (which have been resolved pretty quickly.)

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  78. But it wasn't a rock.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a rock lobster.

  79. Dinosaurus extinguish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  80. When Mariner 9 arrived in 1971.... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ....And showed some amazing geological formations that looked like dried riverbeds and water-carved deep canyons, most serious planetary astronomers assumed that some time in the distant past water flowed on Mars. The fact that the two Mars Exploration Rovers has shown that it's more than likely we did once have liquid water on Mars means that the chances are good that life of some sort did evolve on that planet, though when the planet's atmosphere thinned the surface water vanished and what water is left on that planet is likely found about 1 meter or more under the surface of the planet.

    My guess is that right now what the two MER's have seen will help guide the final design of the Mars Science Laboratory lander, a larger lander (about the size of a subcompact car) powered by a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) for operations lasting over a year and fitted with all kinds of highly advanced probes, including possibly a soil sampler that uses a special drill to probe up to 1,000 mm into the ground for soil samples. I believe that MSL will likely provide the definite answer on just how much simple lifeforms are still existing on Mars living off the water trapped in the soil.

  81. Semantics or proper distinction by gerardrj · · Score: 1

    The scientist in me dislikes this talk of "evidence of water".

    Isn't it more accurate to say that the rovers are finding more evidence that a relatively dense fluid was present at some point?

    Couldn't it be some other liquified substance that didn't freeze at the temperatures we see now on the planet, or perhaps lower? Could liquid nitrogen or carbon dioxide have eroded these structures in a manner similar to liquid water and then boiled away over time to settle at the poles, or form Earth's atmosphere?

    As far as I can tell, the only reason we're talking about water is because that's the only fluid we've seen form these structures on Earth so far.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  82. It's worse than we thought! by mrph · · Score: 1
    What about Mars?
    And what about Rover?

    Can't you see? It's everywhere! Soon, there won't be anything but advertising left!!

    Oh, crap, I seem to be doing it too! Close your eyes, it's the only safe way!

  83. Re:Funny messages by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Troll?

    Loll,

    lmao

    lmgdao

    lmmfgdao...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"