Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo DS To Allow Free VoIP Calls

sm4kxd writes "Gamespot is reporting that the Nintendo DS will use "built-in wireless 802.11b networking capabilities to offer voice-over-IP chat--in effect, allowing gamers to use the DS to make free phone calls at wireless network hotspots." There's also mention of a headset, so you won't look ridiculous while doing so." The article doesn't have much more information, but the "in effect" seems important; this may only allow unit-to-unit conversations, not VoIP calls to the regular telephone network.

195 comments

  1. Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous by joeldixon66 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "There's also mention of a headset, so you won't look ridiculous while doing so."

    I'm sorry - but is it just me that thinks the sight of someone talking to their Gameboy would look ridiculous? People using hands free kits already look like dopes IMO.

    1. Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I'm sorry - but is it just me that thinks the sight of someone talking to their Gameboy would look ridiculous? People using hands free kits already look like dopes IMO. "

      You've never seen somebody play their Gameboy lookin like they're talkin to Al?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although this entire topic is really silly speculation, I have to thank the original poster for making me 3 clicks away from this. Click "Look Ridiculous"->"View the...Pictures"->"Page Ladies" And scroll about 4/5 of the way down... http://www.sidetalkin.com/Images-Girl/sidetalking- holland.jpg Thanks again...

    3. Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous by accelleron · · Score: 1

      I've had a luddite tell me headphones look ridiculous...

      there are people willing to ridicule everything.

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    4. Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous by Bega · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry - but is it just me that thinks the sight of someone talking to their Gameboy would look ridiculous?
      People have been sidetalking in their N-gages (well, the ones that got one at least) for some while now, so there's no way talking into a Nintendo DS will look ridiculous.
      --

      THIS IS THE INTERNET. PLEASE PICK UP YOUR SERIOUS BUSINESS SUIT AT THE FRONT COUNTER.
    5. Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous by Teh+Anonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I'm sorry - but is it just me that thinks the sight of someone talking to their Gameboy would look ridiculous? People using hands free kits already look like dopes IMO."


      Making fun of ppl on /. makes you look like a dope, IMO!

      ZING!!!!!!!!

      --

      If I throw a stick, will you go away?
    6. Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't they look like they're talking to Sam?

    7. Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a rumored Headset/Mic for the DS heres a link http://dsmedia.ign.com/ds/image/headset_083104_spo tlight.jpg

      Im not up to fancy linking copy it and paste it into a browser

    8. Re:Early Adapters tend to look ridiculous by cfuse · · Score: 1
      People using hands free kits already look like dopes IMO.

      When they first came out I'd call handsfrees 'psycho' kits. People would get on the train and be talking to themselves, etc.

  2. hell yes by uberrhino · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    just another reason I want one of these babies! Nintendo rules! All my base are belong to the N!

    --
    By reading this sig, you are now pwnd.
    1. Re:hell yes by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      just another reason I want one of these babies! Nintendo rules! All my base are belong to the N!

      I think a phone is cheaper, unless it's long distance.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:hell yes by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      I think a phone is cheaper, unless it's long distance.

      hmmm... ever tried to play a quality video game on a cell phone? Those games aren't worthy of even being compared to what Nintendo makes with portable games.

      VoIP is just an additional cool feature to an already cool device.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
  3. I need more though by Stevyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I still need an online music store, place to get stock quotes, a free webmail account...and something else. I can't put my finger on what it is. Oh yeah, instant messenging through AOL. Alright, now we got a hot product.

    1. Re:I need more though by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 5, Funny

      heh, i read that last bit as 'Hot Pocket' for some reason and got terribly confused.

    2. Re:I need more though by slipperman · · Score: 1

      Dont forget about the built in TiVo!

    3. Re:I need more though by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great idea!

      It should be able to cook them. Think about it. Kids love nintendo and hot pockets. These things create some heat. I think I see something good here.

    4. Re:I need more though by antifoidulus · · Score: 0

      It would be better if it were also edible.

    5. Re:I need more though by memco · · Score: 1

      They'd have to be really cheap then, cus I'd wanna eat one while I play. However, if they had some that wallpaper from the Willy Wanka movie that might work better.

      --
      Get me a meat pie floater!
    6. Re:I need more though by accelleron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      with built-in WiFi and the munching power to render n64-level apps at smooth (20+) framerates, I would think none of the above are impossible. What would really put this unit over the top, though, is a decent web browser, an e-book reader, and video-chat for AIM.

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    7. Re:I need more though by wampus · · Score: 1

      The shnozberries taste like... shnozberries.

    8. Re:I need more though by jseale · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, since Sony's already sorta' doing this on the PSP (and they've got the better hardware for it IMHO), I don't think Nintendo's gonna' try this anytime soon. Not unless they want to again revamp their entire portable architecture which would of course hike up the price of this thing which would in turn bring it out of kids' price range.

    9. Re:I need more though by Jazu · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it the schnazbarries taste like schnozberries?

      --
      My joke got modded as Insightful and my insight got modded as Funny.
    10. Re:I need more though by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Well, since Sony's already sorta' doing this on the PSP (and they've got the better hardware for it IMHO)"

      Except for the stylus interface.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:I need more though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're seriously implying that the DX is more stylish than the PSP?

      in hardware design - perhaps... the whole dual screen idea is intriguing. In general design, though, the DS is about as stylish as a pet rock on a chain.

    12. Re:I need more though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said "stylus", not "stylish."

      Words mean things, you know.

    13. Re:I need more though by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      All of that shit going on will require a cpu that will put out some heat...In your pocket.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    14. Re:I need more though by jseale · · Score: 1
      Ahem! Other way around, my friend. PSP is built more like a cell phone (albeit horizontal layout, and with no mike), so running communications apps on it would make sense. Nintendo's dual-screen idea just KILLS any communications possibilities outside gaming.

      Now if Nokia would get the A/V innards in the N-Gage QD up to par, they'd definitely have a PSP contender unlike Nintendo.

    15. Re:I need more though by Chi+Hsuan+Men · · Score: 1

      And more cowbell....

      Definitely needs more cowbell.

      --
      Respect It.
  4. Standards by bfree · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe they might use some standard to do it so you can make calls to any compliant device (including pstn via services)? But then again this is Nintendo, I don't imagine it's very likely!

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    1. Re:Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe they might use some standard to do it so you can make calls to any compliant device (including pstn via services)? But then again this is Nintendo, I don't imagine it's very likely!
      For a moment there, I thought you were talking about Sony. Sorry.
    2. Re:Standards by rabbot · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's a shame isn't it? Nintendo always concentrates on the video game aspect of a handheld game system. It's hard to believe they've always dominated the handheld market doing business like that! *end sarcasm*

      What's even funnier is the fact that you bash Nintendo when Sony (i'm sure you're "fanb0i" #1) doesn't offer any online capability on the PSP.

      Fascinating.

    3. Re:Standards by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      True but all you need is something to dynamically monitor I.P. Addy's and distribute that info intelligently.

      May I suggest ICQ?

  5. Look at it this way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    couldn't be worse then the first N-Gage

  6. This is good by zoloto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and not subject to regulatory agencies. very nice, and useful as well! just think about being able to communicate with a useful tool (and toy) and you're gaming or in range of someone elses public network!

    not that I'll be buying one yet, however - this idea is very cool.

    1. Re:This is good by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure that if this actually works, Asscroft will make them add wiretapping capabilities. And if the telecom monopolies have their way, Universal Service Fees as well. And then it's just an overhyped telephone. We can't have people making things that are too revolutionary, now can we?

    2. Re:This is good by v1x · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> not subject to regulatory agencies That will likely change within the next few years. The situation is analogous to taxation of online purchases. Sooner or later, it will reach a threshold so that governments would start considering legislation to somehow collect taxes or regulate that sector somewhat. According to an eweek article, some states are already moving in that direction.

    3. Re:This is good by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      We need an encrypting codec that without the right key just outputs a continuous stream of Asscroft jokes.

    4. Re:This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame the "telecom monopolies" (never mind that the term is an oxymoron) for that socialist Universal Service Fee.

    5. Re:This is good by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Idealism is calling, and it wants its invisible hand back, thanks.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    6. Re:This is good by Agent__Smith · · Score: 0

      Gee, Asscroft huh?? Wow, how clever you are!!

      --
      "It seems that we are at the age where life stops giving us things, and starts taking them away..." Indiana Jones
    7. Re:This is good by mr_e_cat · · Score: 1

      I don't think we are fighting the Taliban. I mean we only have about 10 soldiers in Afghanistan. We are fighting the Iraqis. But of course you Neo-Cons don't know the difference, or are you just pretending ignorance? Do you really think the Taliban live in Iraq?

  7. Nope. by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Nintendo doesn't like those "all in one" things that do everything (convergence). I would be amazed if Nintendo allowed you to use the DS as a phone. It's just not going to happen.

    I think it's there to allow voice chat when playing against other people wirelessly, ala X-Box Live. I don't see what else it could be used for. Nice that the support is there. I'd like to see what else companies come up with for a way to use it, I certanly can't think of anything.

    Now all that said, I fully expect some company to release a piece of software for the DS to let you use it as a phone. I just don't think it will be built in, or that the software will be released by the big N.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Nope. by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Give it a few months. There's video conferencing for the EyeToy, XBoxes running Linux, cell phones playing NGage games...

      If the hack can be done, it will be done. Otherwise, we can't call ourselves geeks anymore. :)

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    2. Re:Nope. by memco · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly. If it's not already setup to be used as a phone, it will be soon. The bigger question is will it do a good job or be worth the hassles that come with it?

      --
      Get me a meat pie floater!
    3. Re:Nope. by justforaday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      one problem i see with the voicechat theory...isn't the whole wifi thing with the DS so you can play wirelessly with people who are in close proximity to you? why would you need a voicechat feature to talk to someone who's standing 5 feet away from you?

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    4. Re:Nope. by jx100 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It has 2 wireless networks. One is either completely proprietary, or some derivative of bluetooth, and is basically meant to replace the gameboy link cable directly. The other is regular 802.11b Wifi, and this'll be used to connect to other people over the internet. The second is what this is meant to be used over.

    5. Re:Nope. by MBCook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like I said, I expect it to be done. But it WON'T be Nintendo to do it. The EyeToy is a video game peripheral, it wasn't made specifically for videoconferencing.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:Nope. by suckmysav · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I would be amazed if Nintendo allowed you to use the DS as a phone. It's just not going to happen. I think it's there to allow voice chat when playing against other people wirelessly, ala X-Box Live."

      Agreed. There is no way in hell that you will ever make "free phone calls" on your DS. For you to make a telephone call, by definition your call must enter the PSTN at some point or other, and Telco companies are simply not in the habit of letting people terminate calls on their networks for free.

      This so-called "story" is a load of 100% pure, unadulterated bullcrap. The best anybody should hope for is free DS to DS calls and nothing more, and even then Nintendo or somebody else is going to need to maintain a network for users to call each other over, unless people want to be dialling each other via whatever IP they have been currently allocated by the wifi hotspot operator and assuming that they actually have a real, non NAT IP address. I am thinking that they will need to do something along the lines of Skype, and I doubt very much that they would do that for free.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    7. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god they're not incorporating it then.

      But, like the Gameboy Camera, and Gameboy Printer, its there if you need it.

      Dont expect Nintendo to make an All in One device. However, expect the peripheral market to take full advantage of its features.

    8. Re:Nope. by imperialstormtrooper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      great. now when some 10 year old white 50cent wanna be whoops your ass at yu gi oh or pokemon on the nintendo ds you can hear them talk trash to you, just like when the 13 year old white 50cent wanna be whoops your ass at halo and unreal tournament on the xbox and talks trash.

    9. Re:Nope. by vitaflo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have to realize that Nintendo, being a Japanese company, is getting hit hard by cell phone providers in Japan. Gaming on phones in Japan has become a big thing, much bigger than it is here in the states. I can see why Nintendo would want a slice of that pie, given the downward trend in Japanese console gaming as of late. It's a smart move.

    10. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can play N-Gage games on a CELLPHONE?!?
      (Somewhere, a Nokia executive bangs his head rhythmically against a desk).

    11. Re:Nope. by SirSlud · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I love the big N to death, but remember, this is the company that made sure its last media format was

      a) nonstandard in size
      b) spinning the opposite way of virtually every other optical drive out there

      just to discourage armchair hacking that much more.

      I think in the world of hacks, Nintendo isn't a particularly attractive target for many enthousiasts due to the streamlined and single-purposed nature of their hardware, and as a gamer, I really don't mind. The Gamecube is a game machine and isn't really suited to be much more. The XBox is a freakin PC sold at a loss, and deserved to be hacked .. lets face it, hacking these days tends often tends to involve just tricking the hardware into doing what it was capable of doing in the first place. Hacking as a form of finding new creative uses for existing technology doesn't seem to make the news as often as hacking for the purpose of circumventing manufacturer-imposed limits on usage of hardware.

      It really does bother me when companies cripple their own products in order to preserve the market share of their other offerings. Just make the best thing at the cheapest price, please. I think those are the two distinct intentions behind hacking (creativity and unlocking crippled functionality) and there isn't much reason on either count to do it on Nintendo platforms.

      Mind you, I guess that might be changing, what with Warp Pipe and all.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    12. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree totally, but Nintendo does things right, they go for the broad market and then focus in on the adult and/or the nitch (sic).

      My take on all things Nintendo is this, "Wait and see what happens and be prepared to buy!"

      I remember telling my son, "No way are we getting a dreamcast, it will fail, it is just another lame saturn resurection." A few days later I saw Sonic and bought it on the spot. I still love my dreamcast.

      Point is, /. folk will buy the DS, they must, oh yes...

    13. Re:Nope. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Otherwise, we can't call ourselves geeks anymore. :) "

      I thought we lost our right to do that when we started modding up people for thinking cell phones shouldn't have cool gizmos on them.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:Nope. by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      that, sir or madame, is one of the funniest comments of the day. bravo indeed.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    15. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of Nintendo's nonstandardness in the past was aimed at preventing piracy. I doubt they'd do anything to prevent people from using the DS as a communication device unless they felt they could be held liable for something. One of their demos when they unveiled the DS at E3 was chat software, after all.

  8. Targetting new customers? by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Seeing how many games of Nintendo are aimed at kids (ahem. CHIMPOKOMON!), is this a sign that they want to make the DS a device for all ages seeing how I can't imagine a 12 yr old calling his friend in Mongolia after playing a game of pokemon rockemon.

    1. Re:Targetting new customers? by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      Either your a sony fanboy or you haven't actually played the GBA before. AFAIK a very large (possibly 50%+) of the GBA users are 15+, up to adults.

    2. Re:Targetting new customers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you don't know very many 12 year olds, do you?

    3. Re:Targetting new customers? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I don't know why the original poster got a 0 flamebait. This is a valid arguement. You nintendo fanboys are just flaming people at random. If nintendo supports turning the DS into a bomb, you fanboys will still clap.

      Face it, the marketing scheme doesn't make sense. One day this thing will support watching porn. And parents will realize their kids weren't really playing pokemon for 12 hrs.

    4. Re:Targetting new customers? by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      For your information, I don't care much about consoles. I strictly game on PC since I need a good multiplayer gaming experience.

      Seeing how owners of consoles are usually teens, you have to admit the age-range of the customers targetted by nintendo with VOip in their DS is different than what it was before when their (or any Company for that matter) past consoles/devices and portable consoles were strictly for gaming. Today, I'm not even sure what a console is. All I understand is companies love to shove in all these features in the box which was made to game and boost it's price in order to profit from.

      I'm not sure if Professor Frink is a myth or if theres actually one like him but we need his sarcasm detector so the modders can mod some topics right.

      I'm sorry but I was simply pointing out how they are shifting from "teens/young people" to "everybody"

    5. Re:Targetting new customers? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Nintendo stated that because they already have the GBA for kids the DS will be aimed for an older demographic.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:Targetting new customers? by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      You nintendo fanboys are just flaming people at random

      Are you saying that Sony fanboys and Microsoft fanboys aren't flaming at random either? If I had a dime for every time I heard someone throw a flame at Nintendo without ever having played a GBA or a GameCube game, I'd be quite rich today.

      Just because games like Pokémon and Yu-Gi-Oh exist doesn't mean other good games don't exist. Pokémon is aimed at kids. You're not a kid? then don't play it, but don't say it's shit just because YOU don't like it. Adults (most of them) don't play with Tonka trucks and dolls and micro-machines, but that doesn't mean it's crap.

      One day this thing will support watching porn

      AFAIK, your PC supports that, does that make your PC evil? I think your TV does that too. Heck, even your neighbour's bedroom window supports that. Your porn argument totally missed the point.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    7. Re:Targetting new customers? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure you're right about "owners of consoles are teens" anymore; I think just as many 20-somethings own consoles as kids. The majority of GameCube owners might be teens/kids, the majority of GBA owners maybe, but consoles as a whole is not specifically a youth market anymore.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    8. Re:Targetting new customers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not believe the poster means gameboy is presenting it evil via porn. It's just clear that people are turning the new Gameboy into every toaster appliance possible. Yet on the other hand nintendo japan is trying to aim hard at kids. It's a fair contradiction. Take no experts to recognize.

  9. What The Fish? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, for those of us who've never seen a Nokia N-GAGE in action, what is the big lament over? Why the webpage towards eulogizing the whole deal?

    1. Re:What The Fish? by 3)+profit!!! · · Score: 1

      The web page is a joke. ;)

  10. That's not likely to come from Nintendo by chrispyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With Nintendo's current "only about games" attitude, I highly doubt the DS will be able to be used as a WiFi VoIP phone out of the box. However, that does sound like some killer product that some 3rd party will/could come out with.

    1. Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo by BW_Nuprin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nintendo's press footage at E3 showed the DS being used for many other purposes besides games. People taking notes, people chatting with each other via some kind of whiteboard program, etc. While I still doubt the DS will be able to make VoIP calls for free and all that that entails, I tend to think that the "only about games" attitude is merely Gamecube centric.

    2. Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " I tend to think that the "only about games" attitude is merely Gamecube centric. "

      No, it's hardware centric. This is not at all incongruous with Nintendo's views on making 'simply a gaming machine'. The hardware is all about gaming. The wireless connection is for gaming. THe stylus screen is for gaming. ETc. All it takes to make it do something like VOIP is software. If somebody wants to make a 'phone' cartridge for the DS, then by all means! You'll notice, though, that this unit has no MP3 or movie capabilities. (Yet there is an MP3 player for GBA that somebody else made...)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo by TheBot · · Score: 1

      I think it will be used right out of the box with friends at hotspots. Maybe in college dorms? High schools, Jr Highs, etc. I think before everybody says, whats the point/thats a dumb idea, we really need to think about what innovations can be brought up from these new add-ons to our handheld systems.

    4. Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, cell-phones are very different in Japan. Most plans only come with like 20 minutes a month, and voice communication is extremely expensive. On the other hand, you can send text messages for just a few yen, so texting has taken off there big-time. Now imagine if you can introduce a portable device that, as long as you have a network connection, can make free calls and send text messages (probably could be part of the same software). That could really corner the market.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    5. Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo by h0mer · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see some linkage to back up your claims that most plans only come with "like 20 minutes per month." Considering Japan has real a real 3G infrastructure and all that. Seems like voice communication would be pretty simple and cheap to do.

      --


      I'm on top of my game like I'm standin' on Xbox.
    6. Re:That's not likely to come from Nintendo by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      Unfortuately, I don't read Japanese well enough to back that up with a NTT Docomo page, but I got the figure from a friend in a foreign exchange program when he was deciding which cell phone to purchase in Japan. He said that most of the plans there only come with around 20 minutes, and that it was because voice communication was considered a luxury.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
  11. Killer app? by sploo22 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always thought that wireless connectivity would be the killer app for handheld game consoles. Platforms like the GBA have always had a lot of restrictions - like needing specially-designed link cables, headphones, etc. Now that Nintendo is coming under pressure from products like the N-Gage, it seems that they're finally going to unleash their secret weapon.

    I'm just hoping that the DS will have all the appropriate goodies to go with this capability, like wireless multiplayer games, Jabber, maybe even a web browser and media player.

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    1. Re:Killer app? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always thought that wireless connectivity would be the killer app for handheld game consoles.

      Thats why the Sony PSP will come with built in Wifi and Bluetooth. Playing games on this will be amazing..

    2. Re:Killer app? by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have to wonder just how much of a killer app it is, though.

      The idea of being able to play another person wirelessly is a good one, obviously, but outside of young adults, are there really that many opportunities for the rest of us to use this feature all that often?

      Your social group may be different from mine, but rarely do I find myself in situations where I have multiple friends around who want to play a game, but don't have a console or pc LAN involved.

      Most of the times I'm using my GBA, it's when on a commute, where I'm not quite convinced I'd fell the need to play random strangers.

    3. Re:Killer app? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There are other benefits to having wireless in your handheld gaming platform, though. It can become a useful internet appliance as well, picking up bundles of data whenever you pass a hotspot. For those people who carry a gaming system around with them a lot (I'd be one of them if I were utilizing public transportation) this could be quite a bonus. Plus, you could have some kind of dating game where people raise badly-modeled mythical creatures (for instance, like this game - like those guys could get girlfriends) and then use them as some sort of pathetic excuse for near-human interaction. And really, isn't that what computers are all about, helping people with no social skills overcome their awkwardness so they can fuck and fulfill their generic imperative?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Killer app? by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      I'm not quite convinced I'd fell the need to play random strangers.

      Although you might not, maybe lots of people might. After all, when you play a PC game online, or on Xbox live, you'll likely be playing with a bunch of random strangers. What's so different between that and playing on the bus (other than if you drop the connection when you're about to lose the game, the other guy can actually stand up and go punch you in the face...)?

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    5. Re:Killer app? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now that Nintendo is coming under pressure from products like the N-Gage

      I didn't realise that a vacuum was considered a pressure?

    6. Re:Killer app? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Um do you play games on the internet? Other people do.

      We can play any time if we don't care who we play with.

  12. Re: offtopic by Tezkah · · Score: 2, Funny

    because you had to hold it like a taco to talk!

    and the games were crap version of GBA games, or PSX games with worse graphics.

  13. VOIP tapping? by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought the US Gov had to mandate that all VOIP systems are to be tapped when needed? I guess this COULD be used by terrorists according to the patriot act.

    Sorry Nintendo, I guess it's game over for all of us.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:VOIP tapping? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 3, Informative

      The government only mandates that VoIP services that act like traditional phone service must support wiretaps.

    2. Re:VOIP tapping? by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      Damnit, why did they have to rain on our parade man?

      THAT'S IT MAN.... GAME OVER MAN! GAME OVER!

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    3. Re:VOIP tapping? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I think Nintendo will be prepared for that and ship the US version without VoIP.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:VOIP tapping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traditional phone service allows people in different locations to carry on real-time voice conversatons through an electrical network. Seems essentially similar to me. So yes, they should be required to provide wiretap capability.

  14. IT'S THE *OPINION* OF AN *ANALYST* by mcc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Note to the 98% of the Slashdot populace who does not read the article: Actually, no, in fact, all that Gamestop is reporting is that an analyst named "Boris Markovich" has the THEORY that the Nintendo DS will support voice over IP. There is however no support for this theory whatsoever.

    Nintendo representatives have publically stated they think it would be neat if there were a DS web browser that used the DS's built-in wireless ethernet to connect to the internet; however this does not mean that such a browser will ever actually occur, to my knowlege they've said nothing whatsoever about internet voice chat.

    1. Re:IT'S THE *OPINION* OF AN *ANALYST* by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      "Nintendo representatives have publically stated they think it would be neat if there were a DS web browser that used the DS's built-in wireless ethernet to connect to the internet; however this does not mean that such a browser will ever actually occur, to my knowlege they've said nothing whatsoever about internet voice chat."

      And then there was sourceforge, and (deity:God, Allah, Buddha, Linus) said "Holy crap it's good!"

  15. Multiplayer voip by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think in order to call someone on a POTS network you would need a service to ultimately make that connection.

    This certainly could be used in conjunction with network play to be able to trash talk to anyone you're playing though :) "omg u hax tetris!"

  16. I thought phones were getting smaller. by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soon we will be back to the 80's brick cell phone.

    1. Re:I thought phones were getting smaller. by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Zach Morris would be so proud of us...

      And possibly Screech.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    2. Re:I thought phones were getting smaller. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:I thought phones were getting smaller. by Hens · · Score: 1

      i was under the impression that the ds was smaller then a "brick" phone.

    4. Re:I thought phones were getting smaller. by Teh+Anonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Screech is my boyfriend, twice removed.

      --

      If I throw a stick, will you go away?
    5. Re:I thought phones were getting smaller. by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      um headset. Pocket problem solved.

      Though this might bring us some of that good old fashioned video phone lovin' remember even the orignal gameboy came with a camera.

  17. While I could be wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what this means is that VoIP services which connect to and allow you to place phone calls into the traditional phone network must provide tapping at the point at which the VoIP service links with the traditional phone network. Is this correct?

    1. Re:While I could be wrong by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's basically correct AFAIK.

  18. Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Studies have shown that there is nothing "older folk" would love more than to wear a battery pack strapped to their arm so they can play ports of PS2 games and listen to their minidisc collections.

    The DS, meanwhile, is just a device for playing video games, which as everyone knows are only for children.

  19. Sounds pointless without gaming... by tktk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I know it's still speculation but multiplayer over IP better be there also. If it's only VOIP, then the DS is mimicking the functions of a highly crippled cell phone. Why would I use my DS to call my friend on his DS even if it were free? We'd both have to be in range of a free access point, or have some subscription to a paid AP, and the DS would have to be standby mode to receive calls. My friends and I already have cell phones. If I was concerned about the price of making a call with my cell phone, I probably wouldn't have a DS.

    I'm getting tired of this 'featuritis' where both Sony and Nintendo are adding features like mad. I just want new portable system to play games, play games wirelessly, and play games over IP via Gameboy Live or PS Live.

    1. Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... by jd · · Score: 3, Informative
      Multiplayer over IP, even on "regular" machines, is a pain. The problem is that you really do need multicasting, if you're doing anything more than very trivial stuff, when linked to more than a very few machines.


      The reason is simple. Let's say you're using a regular (ie: unicast) connection to link everyone to everyone else. For N players, you need N * (N-1) connections to link every player's machine to everyone else's. (Remember, you need to pipe data both ways.) The number of streams is rising almost with the square of the number of users. With that kind of exponential explosion in bandwidth needs, it doesn't take much to saturate even a broadband connection.


      For multicast, one person transmits once to a virtual address, and all subscribers receive a copy of that transmission. Growth is therefore linear. N users, N streams and no more. That's at worst, however. Multicasting doesn't duplicate over a LAN, so if you have multiple computers on the same LAN, they don't each need those N streams. The one copy of all of the data will be visible to all of the users' machines.


      The day that regular ISPs give everyone native multicast will be the day that multiuser gaming explodes from 2-player or 4-player (on the same high-speed LAN) to being 16-player or 32-player over the entire Internet.


      (Ob. Netrek reference: Yes, 16-player games over the entire Internet already exist, and they don't need multicasting. They aren't exactly sophisticated, though. Netrek played with the graphics and gameplay sophistication of Doom 3 would likely chew up rather more bandwidth.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... by Jerf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let's say you're using a regular (ie: unicast) connection to link everyone to everyone else. For N players, you need N * (N-1) connections to link every player's machine to everyone else's.

      Yes, it's a real pity this is true, or we could create massive IM networks with millions of simultaneous users. That would be so cool.

      Wait a minute...

      Hey, I've got an idea! Let's designate one of the machines as a server, and have it collect and transmit all the data from a centralized source! Then the overall bandwidth needed still goes up effectively linearly, and only one machine needs a lot of bandwidth! That just might work!

      Oh damn, looks like somebody already came up with that general idea.

      </sarcasm>

      Multicast is cool and all, but let's not overstate the problem it is solving. People play 64-player games of Quake 2 or 3 or various Unreals all the time, today (and I'm not into that scene so there may be even more), because a 64-player game of Unreal is a mere 64 bi-directional connections, not the 4,032 (unidirectional) you are claiming. I think you need to spend some more time studying real networking before pitching obscure solutions that by and large have yet to be needed by the common man. (You do realize that Quake et al doesn't ship the entire graphics load over the network, right? Your last paragraph seems to strongly hint otherwise...)

    3. Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Why would I use my DS to call my friend on his DS even if it were free?"

      You wouldn't because you're not 10 years old and playing with a friend of yours.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Centralised servers work for games like UT or Quake but it doesn't work well for other gametypes because they don't have dedicated servers.

      Let's take your standard RTS. What happens when you lose the server ? Everybody quits the game. What if the player which is the server quits because he lost in the five first minutes ? Since there is no dedicated server, the game must select one of the players for that. What of the likely case that there is no player on a T1 for that ? And why should that poor guy be forced to stay online even after he lost for the game to keep going for the others ?

    5. Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Multicasting is very cool. I think that you underestimate the usefulness of it.

      It's (supposedly) easy for, say, AOL/TW to start a large-scale chat system with millions of users.

      Is it easy for you and me? Of course not. My cable modem's upstream tops out at 384kbps. Multicast would alleviate that bottleneck.

      Streaming audio and video is hideously expensive to operate currently. Multicast eliminates that problem.

      Even distributing programs or other data is more efficient. BitTorrent is cool, but horribly inefficient on every link involved except for the last mile. It's not smart enough to know that it's cheaper to get its data from Jimmy, next door, than it is from Thom in Brazil[1]. Multicast solves that problem.

      It's Way More Funner(tm) to do any sort of point-to-multipoint communication with multicast, and it will even help you play Quake (by eliminating the need for the server to issue the same data multiple times to multiple clients, thus saving the operater's bandwidth, thus increasing the likelihood that they'll keep the server running and reducing ping for everyone).

      The reason it hasn't happened yet is financial, not because of any particular technical difficulty or irrational "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality.

      All of this cheaper-and-easier that multicast (and IPV6, for that matter) provides will affect, quite dramatically, the revenue models currently employed by ISPs.

      In the end, there will be less bandwidth consumed and fewer dollars floating around, and they'll all be flowing from different directions. ISPs will be downsized, or at least slow in growth, much like is happening with traditional telcos right now as people and companies begin using the networks more efficiently (ala VoIP and cellular phones).

      [1]: Someone's paying Real Money to maintain that transcontinental link, and that person is, ultimately, you and I. We pay for it monthly, as part of our ISP service fee. We pay for it in the cost of the products we buy, to sustain the advertising-supported Web. We pay for it by having salaries which are lower than they might potentially be, were it not for the fucking T1 line at the office. Using the network more efficiently directly equates to more available bandwidth, and/or money in everyone's pocket.

    6. Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any idea what having multicast capability across millions of subscribers would do? Even in small corporate networks we segment our switches into smaller VLANs because of the traffic and security concerns of multi/broadcast. Just think about millions of infected Windows boxes, able to spew garbage directed at large numbers of other hosts on the network. Unless we implemented amazing limitations on multicast that sort of capability could prove very dangerous.

    7. Re:Sounds pointless without gaming... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Well since major cities are putting wireless on subways airplanes are adding it as a free feature and pretty soon every mcdonalds and starbucks will have free wireless let alone just about every networked house (Recent security issues are balony) it will basically mean free phone to anyone.

      Not a big deal for those with a cell phone but for those who realize that cell phones are ridiculously expensive this is a godsend.

      Once this takes off it will have software to quickly switch between hotspots and use cell capability in between (Cell networks are basically wireless anyway).

      It just brings the cost down and makes wireless more attractive which is a good thing for everyone.

      There will be free servers, it's just a matter of time.

      Pretty soon the only connecion you will have to pay for is high speed net access at home.

  20. if you're by Rotkiv · · Score: 0

    looking for mobile voip, i say just go with a ppc with skype mobile. on the other hand, if this thing uses hotspots for phone, it must use hotspots for multiplayer gaming. short term i'm sure it's fun, but really get a computer and go to lan party's!

    --
    RArr!
  21. Gateways are only a matter of time by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting
    When VoIP first appeared for actual telephony, rather than just machine-to-machine calls, the telecom companies were absolutely livid. They even pushed for ISPs to be charged as "long distance carriers", even if no VoIP took place, because it could.


    (This would have meant that you would have paid long-distance rates to dial into dial-up ISPs - possibly more as Mom-and-Pop ISPs just wouldn't have the clout to arrange the kind of deals that most long-distance providers work out with the local telephone companies.)


    What really got to the telecos was not the idea of computer-to-computer chat, which had been around for some time, but the gateways linking the Internet to the regular telephone exchanges. A lot of people were buying such exchanges, hooking them up, and basically allowing any Internet user (for a fee the guy with the exchange could set) to dial ANYONE in the local calling area of that gateway.


    I'm going to predict that Nintendo geeks'll have similar gateways rigged up (with the cries and screams of telecos & Nintendo ringing in their ears) within a year. It's just a case of breaking the protocol and writing a simple translator for one of the myriad of modular gateways that now exist.


    With British Telecom switching to a pure IP-based telephone network (they're abandoning the dedicated switched-circuit approach completely), and where Nintendo's encumbering licenses are largely considered invalid (there are independent software developers for Nintendo in the UK, and Nintendo has failed in efforts to stop them), I am going to predict that the UK will have the greatest interest in such a gateway and will likely see some of the earliest attempts at one.


    The US, with its DMCA and other assorted copyright extensions, is simply not friendly to that kind of R&D. The risks are high and the benefits are low.


    India and China have a good tech industry, fewer problems with copyright, etc, but don't really have enough high-speed infrastructure to make VoIP realistic, right now.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Gateways are only a matter of time by pinchhazard · · Score: 0

      India and China have a good tech industry, fewer problems with copyright, etc, but don't really have enough high-speed infrastructure to make VoIP realistic, right now.

      That's pretty much false, with regards to India anyway. I work for a small telecommunications company. About 95% of our business is in sending minutes to India. There's a shitload of people there running "gray" routes - gray meaning it's not legal for them to run these routes in India. In any case, with a couple-to-a-few thousand dollars startup, one can set up a VoIP route anywhere in the world that they can get broadband. And no matter where in India your route is located, you can make calls to anywhere within India for pretty cheap.

      As for your statement, broadband is prevalent in urban and suburban areas in India, but uncommon in rural areas. Much like in the US.

      --
      Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
    2. Re:Gateways are only a matter of time by robbot · · Score: 1

      um telus here in Canada announced a year or so back they were going all IP too. Probably why their dsl service rocks, seriously I've used so much bandwidth and never gotten a call or complaint. ...hmmm I should set up an open wi-fi gateway....

  22. KISS by EodLabs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    God, Keep it Simple Stupid. If you wanna shock the game crowd.... Big one here... Give them eye candy, not a new phone.

    1. Re:KISS by EodLabs · · Score: 1

      Should have added this to my above post as well, but maybe a lesson from gamepark32 ? I'm not an open source zeliot but I don't think this would be a bad option for them ? (waits for DRM blasting :)...)

  23. What will my Nintendo DS phone number be? by jmcmunn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So can people call me through VoIP as well, if I am at home using my DS or at a hotspot somewhere looking like a dork playing games? Will I be able to have it ring me while in the middle of a lonely single player game of pacman, when one of my buddies wants to get his ass kicked in mario party or whatever multiplayer game?

    Let's hope that Nintendo does the "phone thing" better than N-Gage did the "game thing". I wonder if those two markets of portable electronics are ready to merge just yet. Maybe we're close...

    1. Re:What will my Nintendo DS phone number be? by jmcmunn · · Score: 1

      Wow, you just popped my "linux insult" cherry dude. I must say, I have never been the recipient of random outbursts of stupidity before here on Slashdot. I have never run linux and likely never will. I know it is a decent alternative to Windows (which I use) but I can't play the games I want to on it. It's WinXP Pro for me I'm afraid, bear that in mind when you post here...not everyone is a Linux lover and not everyone is posting AC

  24. so what's the new price with tax? by Romancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the Govt. can request that they be able to wiretap your new DS and the price will jump.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  25. Headsets by Nostafa · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Long ago I worked for a company that made headsets. Everone had one as well. We used to network game over an internal confrence call. Even if its just for communications its still a fun toy.

  26. Headset? by A+Boy+and+His+Blob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hopefully this doesn't look anything like the last Nintendo headset I owned. Otherwise I doubt that I "won't look ridiculous."

    1. Re:Headset? by Stick_Fig · · Score: 1, Funny

      But dude, it gave you the ability to laser-pinpoint your rage at the dog at duck hunt! All you had to say was FUCK YOU DOG, and the dog rolled over to his death, right in the middle of a laugh.
      Konami was years ahead of the curve. If the new headset allowed me the ability to walk around and shoot people that I don't like just by saying something, they would have a murder machine that would beat the shit out of any handgun.

      --
      ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
  27. Forget the headset! by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1
    Folding Side Talking for everyone!

    Anyhow, the DS pics show the microphone (built in) is just under the bottom screen, close to the directional pad. Speakers are next to the top screen.

    Yes, you will need a headset.

    The DS is shaping up to be pretty rocking. I'm waiting for some word on possible web browsers / IM clients, which would rock pretty hard. Will it run Linux?

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  28. Can you say Warboy? by Lurk3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "built-in wireless 802.11b networking"

    How long do you think it will take for people to start wardriving with one of these. Can you say Warboy?

    1. Re:Can you say Warboy? by keeleysam · · Score: 1

      That would kickass! So much easier to fit a wardriving Gameboy in your pocket than a 10 pound PC. Lets just hope they dont lockout homebrew.

      --
      Nothing for you to see here, Please move along.
  29. I use the skype (Free VOIP) on my linux box now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    What's the big deal? Free box-to-box VOIP is kinda old news at this point.

    Skype.com is the only cross platform solution I'm aware of. Free for skype-to-skype PC calls. Also has an IM client built in.

    They also sell "phone cards" to dial POTS from your PC. The gui has a typical touchpad interface.

    They don't have POTS-to-skype yet, which needs some type of "DYN-dns" infrastructure underneath, but they are planning on offering this add-on for some monthly cost later on.

  30. What about... by Adam+Avangelist · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    emacs so we can have a kitchen sink too.

    1. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet your wife hates it when it's your turn to do the dishes.

  31. Wont look ridiculous? by nmoog · · Score: 1

    "There's also mention of a headset, so you won't look ridiculous..."

    I'm no fashion guru, but I can tell you that people talking using a headset most certainly do look ridiculous. It didn't look cool in the 80's. It doesnt look cool now.

    1. Re:Wont look ridiculous? by Babbster · · Score: 1
      This whole fear of looking ridiculous when using a headset, talking to an N-Gage, playing Gameboy, etc. is just pathetic.

      Let's take the N-Gage first, since it's a /. favorite. The biggest reason talking into an N-Gage looks ridiculous has nothing to do with how the phone is held (the "taco" side-talking deal). It's because the N-Gage is a crappy device. Bad gaming (controls and content), mediocre phone (there are so damn many better options) and boring old memory card MP3 (there are memory card MP3 players barely bigger than the card itself). Anyone "in the know" (like visitors to /.) would be aware of what a piece of shit the N-Gage is and it therefore magnifies how stupid it looks talking into the classic model. Then again, those thinking that much about it should see below.

      Portable gaming: People who think portable gaming looks ridiculous are either a) people who are insecure about their hobby (pathetic) or b) people who think gaming is for little kids (their loss). Me, I'll enjoy a nice game of Sonic Pinball Party or FFTA and feel quite good that I'm enjoying myself, while any person ridiculing my playing of same can go hang.

      Headsets: If you think a headset looks ridiculous then you're just beyond dumb. Modern headsets tend to be one-piece, microphone barely coming out of the ear, with a cord. They can be as unobtrusive as one wants. MAYBE if someone is carring around a classic headset the size of old on-ear Walkman headphones, there's a case to be made. Otherwise, when I see someone using a headset my only potential thought (if I give it a thought) is "That's somebody who knows how to use a phone comfortably" - certainly far more comfortably than wandering around with one's arm bent as if in a half-hearted "hear no evil" maneuver.

      If you're walking around thinking people with their electronic devices look ridiculous, you're being an over-critical jackass. I recommend going into the entertainment review field - they seem to love giving jobs to your kind of idiots.

      If you're walking around being self-conscious about your own gadgetry, get over it. The over-critical jackasses are probably just jealous that they can't afford what you have and are missing out on gadget fun themselves.

    2. Re:Wont look ridiculous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, seriously dude. You look stupid.

  32. Looking ridiculous? by carcosa30 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since when did looking ridiculous matter to the sorts of people who use this kind of thing?

    Actually though this sounds like a really sweet product...

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    1. Re:Looking ridiculous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know, people realize, you could be looking pimp like me

      Or even more stylish, like a good friend of mine...

  33. Smart move, although probably not what we expect by CodeMaster · · Score: 4, Informative

    Smart move Nintendo. Use a proven technology, and enable better GAMING experience.

    Did anyone really think that this will be done just so we can make free calls in hotspots?

    1. Nintendo, gaming, voice chat... rings a bell? The main application will probably be to connect to other unites so people can talk to each other while they play.
    2. VOIP to any number will require a gateway to the POTS which costs $$$ (where Vonage makes their money on...).

    Nevertheless - pretty slick!

    get a free ipod! This really works...

  34. Re:Maybe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    obviously not!

  35. Doesn't Xbox Live already have a form of VoIP? by mhh5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No mention of Xbox Live's chat here? Am I missing something?

    1. Re:Doesn't Xbox Live already have a form of VoIP? by bakawally · · Score: 2, Funny

      is xbox a portable?

    2. Re:Doesn't Xbox Live already have a form of VoIP? by Rii · · Score: 0

      is xbox a portable?

      Can you play fetch with an immovable rod?

  36. Agreed by themoodykid · · Score: 1
    What I'd like to know, however, is if there really will be voice recognition as the big N's website says. From http://www.nintendo.com/e3_2004/ds/index.jsp:

    But capabilities like a touch-screen input, voice recognition and wireless communication set it apart from every other game device...


    I'm not sure how voice recognition would work in a game scenario, though.
    1. Re:Agreed by typobox43 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Voice recognition... like Mario Party 6? Or, a bit farther back, Hey You, Pikachu?

  37. Nintendo Hacking! by jatic · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nintendo is making a wi-fi phone? This from the same company that said "Our customers are not interested in online gaming." I guess they think we want to talk to each other instead of playing against each other. Also this could open up some very interesting possibilitys with the system being able to connect to a wi-fi network. I guess this means we're going to have to buy firewalls for our Gameboys.

    1. Re:Nintendo Hacking! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Naw, just multiplayer wireless with voice chat. That's not 'online gaming', which I define in my mind as "pay us 40 bucks a month/year to play".

      Their customers aren't interested in online gaming, I know 'cause I'm one of 'em.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  38. Re:Smart move, although probably not what we expec by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Yes, but more people using Voip, will mean fewer people using POTS. Major phone companies are gearing up(or have geared up) to offer those services.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. free trade works by chuckfucter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you consider the GBA a console, which it really is, the gba is the best selling console ever. Constant renovation and competition is what pushes this company. Nintendo started out making arcade games and after the mario brothers hit they kept that same character, in fact almost any game with him in it goes gold. With n-gage starting to appeal to the masses it's kinda common sense that nintendo would have to redesign in product to keep ahead. Nintendo is actually a great company and I'm glad that they are testing new and cool waters.

    1. Re:free trade works by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      n-gage appeals to the masses? I must have missed the slashdot article about it. Did NetCraft confirm it, or was it an SCO sponsored study?

      Seriously, do you know anyone who owns an n-gage? I don't, and I know a whole lot of nerds with severe gadget fetishes. Hell, I have one myself but I've never seen anything remotely compelling about it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:free trade works by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      With n-gage starting to appeal to the masses


      Does 'appeal' mean something different in your version of English? They were awful devices, not exactly much competition for the GBA SP. Very few people bought them because they were clearly badly designed. A shop near me is trying to get rid of their Ngage game stock at less than half price and still not selling them.

    3. Re:free trade works by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see an ngage in use outside a store.
      I see GBAs daily.

    4. Re:free trade works by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Actually, IIRC, the original Gameboy still holds that record, but in the current generation, the GBA's probably the best seller.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  40. Exposure by prozaic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The headset is encouraging.
    Holding a 2.4GHz emitter against the side of your skull does not sound like a good idea.

    1. Re:Exposure by Lapzilla · · Score: 1

      What do you think a bluetooth headset or bluetooth phone is duders?

    2. Re:Exposure by prozaic · · Score: 1

      I think that a Bluetooth headset is a transmitter in the order of 1mW, and that 802.11 is often around 100mW.

      2 Orders of magnitude more power. No comparison.

  41. Only unit to unit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "this may only allow unit-to-unit conversations, not VoIP calls to the regular telephone network."

    If it's technically possible, I'm sure there will be "solutions" to circumvent this limitation. ;-)

  42. Voice recognition by mcc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Previous examples of voice recognition in a video game can be seen in the Dreamcast's Seaman, which I have heard nothing but excellent things about, and in the N64's "Hey You Pikachu", which I have heard nothing at all about.

    A somewhat more directly relevant example of how we might see voice recognition used in the DS might perhaps be teased from the news about Nintendo's upcoming Mario Party 6, which will contain about eighty-something multiplayer minigames, all entirely based around the useage of a microphone peripheral that will come with the game, and some of which will incorporate voice recognition.

  43. bets until pstn gateway by sPaKr · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Lets start taking bets on how long it will take to hack up a ptsn gateway. This migtht force private VOIP into critical mass?

  44. DS Token Features by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Gamespot is reporting that the Nintendo DS will use "built-in wireless 802.11b networking capabilities to offer voice-over-IP chat--in effect, allowing gamers to use the DS to make free phone calls at wireless network hotspots."

    Ok, that's nifty, but nifty doesn't sell consoles or handhelds. I'd wager that 80% (conservatively) of their buyers could care less, especially when Nintendo's target audience has tradionally been pre-teens. Same with the second touch screen. It's as if they're trying to compensate for their lack of innovation and poor market performance lately with nifty features, without realizing their impact on sales will be negilable in lieu of the former and a break from Mario 12.

    I'd be more excited if I thought this was actually going to do anything in the course of my regular gaming, but I suspect it'll be more along the lines of gameboy to gamecube connectivity-- Big fat deal. I know some of you will be happy, but most gamers are going to care less unless you see some real application here. That, and I really don't see too many people ditching the cell phones they already have and hunting down a hotspot just to make a free call by dialing down the center with 1-800-leftrightright-downupAB.

    With the PSP on the horizon, I smell serious blood in the water because the DS is shaping up to be pretty weak from initial reports.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  45. Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I guess this means we're going to have to buy firewalls for our Gameboys.
    So Game Boy runs Windows now?
  46. Re:UNIVERSAL SERVICE FEES ARE A GOOD THING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, there's that good old socialism "Shut up and do what we say, because we want your money for our convenience regardless of your needs."

  47. sorry cant find the video by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    I ran across a video at the beginning of August (I tried to find it, but no luck) that demo'd a bunch of Nintendo DS software. It was a pretty cool vid, some of the stuff on there was amazing. One of the things they showed was a stylus based IM chat of some sort. One screen had incoming messages, teh stylus screen was for outgoing. The video was kind of neat: "Draw Mario!", and whoever was piloting the thing was drawing Mario for their guest.

    Okay, not the most mind blowing thing in the world, but I can see why some would theorize about the DS's capabilities down the road including VOIP. All it takes is for one to make a cartridge for it.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  48. VOIP IMPORTNt by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My wife just asked me if we could get a 'web phone'. I showed her the vonage page, she's into it.

    So seriously, does the shit actually work or not? I'm in no position to bring home another 3DO or WebTV.

    Gameboys are fuckin cool, cooler than slashdot. harder to play at work though. Way better than iPods.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  49. Re:UNIVERSAL SERVICE FEES ARE A GOOD THING!!! by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

    Not only is the fee about $6 now, but the rural lines were in place well before the Universal Socialism Fee. All it is now is a gravy train for politically connected telecom providers. Previous slashdot discussions have addressed the issue of contractors making insane amounts of money for providing basic internet connections to schools. Schools themselves have pilfered funds to be used for just about anything computer related or not. Besides, if urban residents have to pay a lot more for housing, food, and just about everything else, why shouldn't rural people have to pay more for phone service? When they subsidize my rent, I'll feel right about subsidizing their phones.

  50. *yawn* by kermit6306 · · Score: 1

    wake me when i can get a good viop+wifi celly

    zzzz.. *snore*

  51. I hate to troll, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck should I have to pitch in so that some redneck down in Shithole Falls can get 20 miles of phone line pulled/repaired for him.

    It would be much more fair if that farmer was burdened with his own damned $15,000, as should most such cases be handled, or if the phone company took this as expense out of their profits.

    My point is:

    Suppose the average phone company makes $2,000,000 per month off of Shithole Falls [all-inclusive, total profit]. If they have an extra $100,000 from the USF for that month, for just that reason, they can afford to waste $15,000 on the redneck to avoid a DoS scandal, and they have some of it left over for fixing phone lines, etc.

    OTOH, if they were not charging the USF, they would still have done neccessary repairs, to avoid losing customers, but would be more wary of spending $15k so that Cottontooth Joe could seduce his 12-year-old cousin in Kentucky. As for expansion, that would as well be better thought-out if it was for their own money.

  52. They don't? by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the Famicom billed as a "family computer" complete with keyboard and disk drive? Didn't they sell endless add-on accessories to extend the functionality of the NES? I can even use my Gamecube as a Gameboy if I want to.

    Unless you mean that they don't like putting it all in one product because then they can't sell seperate add-ons--in that case, you would be right.

  53. Re:UNIVERSAL SERVICE FEES ARE A GOOD THING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow you people really have no idea how the world works, do you? I'm just slightly to the right of Hitler..but this "JoeBob doesn't deserve a phone anyway" attitude is just unbelieveable. So you're saying if Billybob out in the sticks has a heart attack, he shouldn't be able to have a phone to call 911 without paying $15k to pull a line out there? It is a bit socialist, but in this case it worked extremely well--just about everyone in the US has the same access to phone service. By the way, I just checked my Pac Bell bill (I REFUSE to call them SBC), and the actual "universal service" fee was a whopping 84 cents. All the other taxes and crap was 7 or 8 bucks, but the actual universal charge wasn't even a dollar. Shit..what a gravy train that is for those eeeevil telcos. We should just disband them all right this second and run VoIP over 802.11b wireless...then we'd be the communications envy of fourth-world nations the world over.

  54. Chalk up another one by rd_syringe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's been like this day after day--at least one or two articles posted in which the headline and summary are 100% exagerrated or downright wrong.

    I'm still laughing over "MS Says Windows Not Secure Until 2011." Geez.

  55. Nowhere does it state the DS will support this by rd_syringe · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article is merely the opinion of an "analyst" guessing that the DS will support VoIP. There is no official confirmation or news.

    Well, except on Slashot where it gets reported as such...

  56. Changing the face of government by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that technology is changing at such a fast pace that not even all the lawyers in the world can keep the government up to speed. And honestly, this bothers me.

    Such changes in our world will make or break the effectiveness of national security. I can only imagine some form of preemptive laws and agencies put into place to limit our freedoms in the name of national security. If my fears come to pass, I'm afraid terrorism has won the war.

    Then again, I have heard voices in the wind (sort of speak) about a new Patriot Act II...

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  57. BULLSHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so obvious you don't own one. a) 8cm discs ARE a standard size! b) GC discs DO NOT spin in the opposite direction, they go clockwise like everything else*. * not tested in southern hemisphere

    1. Re:BULLSHIT by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      well, I do, but I was wrong on both counts, so touche

      a) you're right (tho the 8cm discs arn't as readily available as blank DVDs, you're right, its not tough to get ahold of black media of this variety)

      b) you're right, but media is read from the outside in. xbox does this too, apparently, both companies choosing to do so in order to discourage piracy?

      doh

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  58. There's also mention of a headset by PhotoBoy · · Score: 0, Troll

    What!?!? No side talking?!?!

    1. Re:There's also mention of a headset by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      Lol! How is this trolling, it's funny!

  59. Re:I use the skype (Free VOIP) on my linux box now by Andy_R · · Score: 1

    The big deal is that (if it's true) half the kids in your street are going to have this, and when they do they wil laugh at the idea of paying for mobile phone calls. I know lots of children who spend MOST of their pocket money on phone calls at the moment (we don't have free local calls here in Britain).

    I think it might be the biggest news story this year.

    Nintendo have historically had few serious competitors in he mobile gaming market, and they got off very lightly against the N-Gage, but they know that given time, one of the mobile phone companies will build a a device that rivals their handhelds.

    So what do they do? They knock out the whole pricing structure that mobile phones work on. Mobile phone companies work on a 'discount the phones to hell, then rip off people for the calls' basis, which will collapse if people have a dfferent way of making free calls.

    If half the people I know have a DS, and I can call them for free, it's worth me getting one *just to save money on calls*.

    If Nintendo can pull this off, they could kill the entire mobile phone industry stone dead.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  60. Re:UNIVERSAL SERVICE FEES ARE A GOOD THING!!! by Troed · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try going to another country..Europe, Japan, etc...their phone system is so useless they have to use cell phones for everything.

    Troll. Many european countries have vastly superior phone systems compared to the US. You might want to read up on a little company called Ericsson, what they've done, which country they're from etc.

    That said, the former socialist monopoly of Televerket/Telia in Sweden is the reason why that's so.

  61. Re:Smart move, although probably not what we expec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  62. VOIP Answers by RipTides9x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Best place to go ask that would be over at DSLreports.com aka BroadbandReports. The have specialists over in their forums who can answer most questions regarding almost all VoIP providers. Only thing i can remember about reading up on Vonage is that some people have had problems with their tech support/billing.

    I'm currently trying to get SpeakEasy's ONELink DSL service where Covad has their own phone line run to your house to provide DRY pair DSL. You don't have to pay for that line (its inclusive in the $55.95 monthly DSL price) and you can get VoIP on it and drop your POTS line. If i can get the OneLink I am considering doing this.

    You can also connect more than one phone to the VoIP blackbox, in fact it can be wired into your homes phone system if you are savvy enough. It does have limitations on how many phones can be hooked up and have ringers on, too many and none of the phones will ring. But if you have one of those cordless base stations that can handle several handsets then you are golden.

  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. On an unrelated note... by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

    ...the pictures in the Side Talking website the poster linked to is bloody hilarious.

  65. Why are you here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... when you obviously hate /. so much? You endlessly harp on how bad a job the editors do, you hate the stories that get posted, you hate the users...

    Why are you here, other than to troll?

  66. Go Kevin Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man... Captain N must be stoked. Mother Brain is so going down.

  67. Hah. What ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Just like YOU are probably a Sony fan boy.

    I find it funny how all the 12 to 17 year old KIDS seem to hate Nintendo because they think it's for KIDS? Some how playing the same game on a PS2 makes them an adult. Duh. I'm sure Zelda was designed for 8 year olds. Yeah, that's it.

    As for the adults who bash Nintendo for that reason? I find that funny as well. They have no problem at all eating at McDonalds or maybe watching some Anime/Cartoons and playing video games all day long. LOL what a joke.

    If you ask MOST of the worlds population I bet they would say video games in general ARE for kids.

  68. Actually practically every single by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    game yet announced for the DS will incorporate multiplayer via wireless ethernet. This is hardly "nifty". This is going to be the chief selling point of the console.

    Meanwhile a number of interesting new game concepts have been proposed centering around the touch screen, and it appears developers will be making good use of it.

    I'm a bit perplexed by your statement, which seems to be saying that instead of innovating, Nintendo will be introducing new features. ... huh?

    1. Re:Actually practically every single by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      And I guess it goes without saying that you're perplexed as to why Nintendo's dominance has faded in it's home market, japan, let alone world wide. Perplexed as to why they are now trailing both Sony and Microsoft- MICROSOFT for crying out loud -I'll bet. It's an undeniable fact called consumer confidence and it's failing when it comes to Nintendo. Sure, I believe them when they say VoIP will come in all kinds of handy... Just like that that little robot did for the NES. And GBA to Cube connectivity. And the Virtual Boy. And...

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    2. Re:Actually practically every single by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up you fucking Sony fanboi, nintendo has owned the handheld gaming market for years, and as far as I can see they are still dominating Japan in all areas

  69. Phone by Barryke · · Score: 1

    A feature like this on any one of them mobile phones would SELL. Guarentied. I'd be a buyer. Please. Make one.

    For the pattent, contact me :P Its MINE!
    Muhahahahahaaaaah...

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  70. IDIOT ALERT! IDIOT ALERT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Are you some kind of idiot? Didn't you see that the STORY ITSELF linked to that site?

    Fucking moron.

  71. ASSHOLE ALERT! ASSHOLE ALERT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooo, it's easy to flame as an AC isn't it? It's people like you that give Slashdot a bad name. There are y'know polite ways to tell someone they've made a mistake, rather than calling them a "fucking moron".

  72. Re:Smart move, although probably not what we expec by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Until someone offers a free server and someone hacks the software?

    Who cares what the dummies get the goods will be on /.