Slashdot Mirror


HardOCP Wins Against Infinium Labs

An anonymous reader writes "HardOCP has won a huge legal round against Infinium Labs. The WhereIsPhantom website has all the details, straight from the court dockets. There is a list of orders a mile long for Infinium Labs and owner Tim Roberts to comply with by Sept. 30th."

92 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. 0 posts by Phosphor3k · · Score: 4, Funny

    And that website is as non-existant as the console.

    1. Re:0 posts by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, to be fair, I didn't expect this to show up on the front page of Slashdot either. We're just a two-bit operation over at Whereisphantom.com trying to bring the truth to light.

      It didn't make it to this article, but four employees quit yesterday from Infinium Labs for various reasons including a late paycheck. The Sarasota office is expected to close (the one with the $300,000 sign) and all operations move to Seattle. There'll be more tomorrow I promise. (And hopefully that'll include more bandwidth.)

    2. Re:0 posts by bluewee · · Score: 5, Informative

      This should be of intrest

      --
      [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    3. Re:0 posts by miikrr · · Score: 5, Informative

      You should have included all of the previous Slashdot coverage of Infinium's and HardOCP's quarrells.

    4. Re:0 posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I found these pictures on the Infinium Labs Forums site:

      At Night

      In the Day

      Color changing signs cost $300k?

      Peace

    5. Re:0 posts by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While you have a point to be sure, I still haven't seen any proof of a console. When they actually start spitting them out I'll pay attention. Still won't buy one unless we find out they're easy to hack, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:0 posts by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 5, Informative

      In my original submission, I spread the love around a bit. In all honesty, I'd rather be slashdotted to kingdom come and have the word get around, rather than have the site up and running and no one paying attention.

      Just be sure to come back later and visit. We've got over 200 articles covering the entire saga from beginning to end. The tale includes money trails, court intrigue, drugs, hackers and phreakers... you just can't make this stuff up.

    7. Re:0 posts by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually as far as I can see the phantom would be great for MMORPG players, they just pay their bill to the same company every month and don't need to juggle different companies.

      Furthermore it would avoid the ripoff factor of purchasing a game for $80 or whatever and then having to pay a monthly subscription, you could just download it.

    8. Re:0 posts by mcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Summary, Hard[OCP] is far from an impartial reporter in this, they finally get proof of a real phantom and dis it as much as they can for being exactly what Infinium have always said it was.

      Actually if you were following this early on, they were pretty reasonable at first, seeming to take a "we're curious to see what this company has to offer, but it's hard to get information" sort of tack. They didn't really get bitter and spiteful and start smashing machines with sledgehammers or anything until they started getting vitriolic legal threats from Infinium and public attacks on the Phantom website just for having done their jobs as reporters. I kind of have to say, I can't find this totally unreasonable.

      The "hatchet piece" on the CEO you mention was totally legitimate investigative reporting. Was it negative? Yes. But it was also accurate and supported by documentation.

    9. Re:0 posts by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      well, to be fair hardocp's conclusion on that article includes "Let me start off by once again reminding you that what you have seen here is not current generation technology by Infinium Labs. You can head over to their website to see what they are currently representing to the public. It now looks more like some of the bigger laptops on the market sans keyboard and screen. There is no doubt that it is certainly different than what we have shown you here."

      yes it's just a plastic box and a very early prototype.. but what was intresting that IL could gain substantial amounts of money by just showing a pc in a box to potential investors - and here we thought that .com years were over. seriously, they're pitching that they've got something unique and show proof of it by having a pc in a custom job case(money needed to ).

      though, it would be nice if IL could produce _some_ list of games available at launch... and display their slightly more unique technology parts(like the supposed downloader thingy).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:0 posts by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful


      The worst part of the whole thing was that it was self fulfilling. An article like that at the wrong time could actually cause Infinium to fail. Building a console business is all about building confidence in your product, your momentum and the likelyhood of success.


      The same thing can be said about a confidence game too.
    11. Re:0 posts by TheLink · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I think Phantom real enough and the intentions are there,"

      I hear you brother.

      BTW could I interest you in a USD34.99 coupon for Duke Nukem Forever? It's a once in a lifetime deal.

      j'king ;).

      --
    12. Re:0 posts by Zeriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was more interested in the fact that half the ports on the back weren't connected to anything inside the case. THAT seems like a scam job to me.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    13. Re:0 posts by AbbyNormal · · Score: 2, Funny

      "money trails, court intrigue, drugs, hackers and phreakers.."

      But no hookers? Boring.

      --
      Sig it.
    14. Re:0 posts by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "We're just a two-bit operation over at Whereisphantom.com trying to bring the truth to light."

      I'm watching the E3 footage from infinium, and there does seem to be a prototype, but I'm astounded by the amount they want; $29.99 for a minimum committment of two years comes out at $730, which is a hell of a thing and tends to suggest that they're trying to get behind a subscription model.

      So the question is, was this basically a repackaged PC in a nice box?

      Hmm...yes, the UI does look suspiciously 'flash', and his language is very evasive, not to mention that the games used are PC.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  2. That's... by Trikenstein · · Score: 2, Informative

    one of the hardest to read sites I've seen.
    They need to lose the fine horizontal lines.
    Or maybe I need to get my eyes tested...

    1. Re:That's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      one of the hardest to read sites I've seen.

      Obviously you haven't been to the IT section lately...

    2. Re:That's... by Trikenstein · · Score: 4, Funny

      I recognize that color.
      It's called *infants first crap*.

    3. Re:That's... by gatzke · · Score: 4, Informative


      You can get rid of it by removing the first part of the URL, like chage games.slashdot.org to slashdot.org.

      The following is from another comment to help you in mozilla automatically drop the it. or games. part:

      Create New bookmark.
      Label something useful - "/. it fix"
      In location insert this
      javascript:void(location.hostname = "slashdot.org");

    4. Re:That's... by Gurezaemon · · Score: 3, Informative


      Actually, infants' first crap (tm) is green / black. Meconium. Horrible stuff to clean up. It turns that attractive mustard color after a couple of days.
      </pedant>

    5. Re:That's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      you actually leave it there for a couple of days?

    6. Re:That's... by Trikenstein · · Score: 5, Funny
      Ahh, a connoisseur of infant crap.
      I salute you sir!




      From a distance.

    7. Re:That's... by FyRE666 · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...or maybe you should use the right tool for the job? Just install squidGuard, add a rewrite section as so:
      rew slashdot {
      s@it.slashdot.org@slashdot.org@
      log slashdot.log
      }
      and add it to your acl section. Then whenever your proxy encounters it.slashdot.org/blah, it's rewritten as slashdot.org/blah. You can obviously do this for any section, and you don't need to set up all your web browsers with an ugly javascript hack!
  3. In other news by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Infineon got smacked down for price fixing its chips.

    Not a good week for Infin*.

    Anyone got a link that works? The phantom site seems to have disappeared into thin air.

    1. Re:In other news by realdpk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Drugs, like those that make you misunderstand the use of the * wildcard? :)

    2. Re:In other news by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if it was a SQL joke, it's clearly a shellscript/perl joke ;->

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  4. WhereIsPhantom? by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you mean, "Where is website?"

  5. In case it's slashdoted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    404 Not Found

    1. Re:In case it's slashdoted by servognome · · Score: 2, Funny

      You need more energy in your 404

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:In case it's slashdoted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean this?

  6. Can we just ignore infinium by goneutt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Infinium is a bit like a scab, if you pick at it it'll only get worse.

    Isn't this company/product the original vapor ware. Comments... Even the website is vapor.

    --
    Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    1. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Isn't this company/product the original vapor
      > ware. Comments... Even the website is vapor.

      Hmmm, the Infinium Labs website is actually very
      well done and professional so I don't know what
      you mean by a "vapor" website. But besides that,
      could someone explain what the uproar about this
      company is about? It seems the "slashdot"
      community has had a bug in it's ass about the
      company from day one. What gives? I don't know
      anything about this company but looking at its
      product literture it seems that they have a good
      idea and the latest incarnation of the product is
      actually pretty nice. So, someone please
      enlighten me.

    2. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by sahrss · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Infinium are trying to pull off something very difficult from a business perspective and Hard[OCP] stuck the boot in..."

      What the hell? Where did you come from? Nice misinformation. Go read some of the evidence in these threads:

      http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/27/ 1430211&tid=123&tid=127&tid=10
      http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/04/ 0017209&tid=123&tid=127&tid=10

      -1 Troll. Mods, this guy made another comment here: http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=122123&c id=10273433

    3. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, HardOCP sued first instead of buckling under the threats and taking the piece of their website. They were being threatened with lawsuits and they sued to have a judgment made, ie: "You're threatening to sue us, well let's see if a judge thinks you have any ground to stand on."
      Isn't it odd: someone fighting back when a company threatens to sue them?

    4. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by cynic10508 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't this company/product the original vapor ware.

      Well, they did send me a promise that they would release Duke Nukem Forever. It was handwritten in the blood of virgins. Strange how it smelled like ketchup though...

    5. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by nursedave · · Score: 4, Interesting
      First, I am not pro-hardOCP. I am just anti-stupid.

      Second, I am not pretending it was factual; it was factual. I did read the article, and I presume you have, too. Does it not bother you that the "company" received mail at a Mailboxes, ETC. type place for 8 months, after securing some $25 million in funding? That when they did claim to get an office, someone checked and it was vacant? Dude, all these things SCREAM scam; factor in the fact that the CEO has a history of such shadiness, and it was a vital piece serving the public interest, not a hatchet piece. I'd hope such activities would always be brought to the attention of people who might think of investing or purchasing something like this.

      Third, your remark on suing in Texas was hardly a neutral observation, you made your own assumptions, which you have the right to do, but please, don't call it neutral and insult our intelligence. And that remark didn't make sense anyway - Kyle lives in Texas, Infinium had a business presence in Texas - where the hell should Kyle have files suit? Alabama? I'm in Texas, and if I want to sue Cocacola, I'm doing it right here.

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    6. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article wasn't trying to be unbiased or nice, however it also wasn't a hatchet piece imho. Sure it speculated however it didn't outright lie or make up facts, and that's probably why IL hated it: they couldn't respond to it. If facts weren't right then you can reply by pointing it out, and even if speculation is way off you can do the same however IL simply threatened to sue (needless to say if you can do the first two then you can probably sue as well, although sending an e-mail first is cheaper)..
      There are peaceful ways to try and resolve such things however IL didn't do either, it didn't try to clear up the mess but simply sent a threat (most likely assuming HardOCP would cave in). Hell, you can even ignore the editorial, and in all honesty after 4 months that's probably the best solution. It was simply a horrible PR move on ILs part, and now they're paying for it.
      And if anyone is wondering, if I remember correctly around the time the [H] editorial came out there was a lot of speculation about IL. Mostly it wasn't the good kind either, and Kyle, I guess, decided to use it to his advantage and look into IL. Whatever the final story was it would give him readers (hell, finding out the thing is legit may have given him more immediate publicity)..

    7. Re:Can we just ignore infinium by Disevidence · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Either a) You work for Infinium
      b) You're related to someone who works for them
      c) You're sleeping with someone who works their

      OCP basically reported facts, straight down the line, they didn't misrepresent anything (please point out where, in specific detail, they did?)

      You're the only one posting bullshit around here, mate.

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  7. Text of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just in at the courthouse, an order regarding KB Network's Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions. Upon review of Plaintiff's Motion, the court finds that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part. Read on for the details...

    Judge Kaplan has ordered Infinium Labs to prudce a series of documents by September 30th. These include:

    1) "Documents reflecting the identity and location of potential investors, venture capitalists, investors, partners, shareholders to whom private placement memorandums were provided, or other stake or equity holders in Infinium Labs who are located in the state of Texas other than shareholders that acquired Infinium stock on the public market, and the transactions, proposed or consummated with same."

    2) "Pleadings and final judgments from any Court of any Jurisdiction in which Timothy Roberts was or is a Defendant between the dates of August 1, 2001 and February 29, 2004; and; the 2003 Tax Return of Timothy Roberts when filed."

    3) "All documents in their possession, custody, or control that evidence, reflect, relate to financial transactions (including any beneficial transaction) between Infinium and Roberts from August 2002 to the present, including but not limited to printouts of all bank, credit card, and other financial transactions currently maintained in electronic form."

    4) "All emails sent or received by Infinium's Texas employees."

    5) "All year-to-date payroll information and records for 2003-2004 for all of Infinium's Texas employees.

    6) "All documents reviewed by Kevin Bachus in preparing the declaration submitted in support of Defendant's motion to dismiss that have not otherwise been produced."

    7) "All loan documents between Infinium and Roberts, including but not limited to documents pertaining to the $50,000 loan Roberts testified about in his deposition."

    8) "All archival data and all forum postings from Infinium's websites."

    9) "A complete and unaltered copy of the 'Who's We' agreement."

    10) "All Infinium board of directors minutes and resolutions, with the substance of the resolution redacted unless it pertains to Roberts. Defendants are also ordered to make unredacted copies of its board of directors minutes and resolutions available for inspection by Plaintiffs' counsel at the office of Defendants' counsel. Defendants shall make such documents available for inspection on or before September 30, 2004. If, after inspection, Plaintiffs believe that any redacted portions of these documents should be produced, they may seek appropriate relief from the court."

    11) "Plaintiffs' may re-depose Infinium and Roberts, with questioning at the second depositions limited to documents and information not produced to Plaintiffs prior to the first depositions. The combined duration of the first and second depositions shall not exceed seven hours per witness. Additionally, at the option of defendants, the depositions may proceed by telephone... . Plantiffs shall pay the costs of the second depositions and each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees. The second depositions shall be completed by November 5, 2004."

    Now, once you've digested all that you'll remember that the court also ruled against KB Networks in some parts. That is actually only one item which is: "Plantiffs' request for sanctions is denied."

    Analysis

    It appears that HardOCP came away with a large victory. Without the transcriptions from the first depositions, we can only speculate based on subsequent motions on what transpired that day. It's quite obvious that the focus is purely on Tim Roberts and following the extensive money trail that has resulted. Section Six is of interest since it's the only one dealing with Kevin Bachus. What did Bachus say (or not say) during his deposition that piqued the interest of Kyle's lawyers?

    We now have mention of a $50,000 loan that Roberts testified to in his deposition. What is the significance of this money? Further, will the production of emails, the old website and payroll be enough to prove Infinium can indeed be rightfully sued in Texas?

  8. Copied from HardOCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://hardocp.com/

    HardOCP Vs. Infinium Update:
    WhereIsPhantom.com has one of the latest documents filed in our case on-line for you to download and of course gives their thoughts on what IL's lawyers have to say about coverage of the case. To quote the filed motion from IL's attorneys:

    Infinium is concerned about the tactics of the Plaintiffs and their lawyers in this case. This case has received an unusual amount of publicity for a case of its type. In fact, Plaintiffs' counsel has issued their own press release announcing the institution of this action and that the Plaintiffs stand behind their negative statements about Infinium and Roberts. Likewise, the plaintiffs run a website called www.hardocp.com wherein they continue to publicize this lawsuit. Additionally, a website has been established called www.whereisphantom.com which "exists for the sole purpose of brining to light as many details as [it] can uncover about Infinium Labs, the lawsuit with KB Networks, and anything else that IL is involved in.

    It is my personal opinion that if they did not want this case to be publicized on the Web, they should have not threatened to sue a website multiple times.

    Just as a note, all documents that WhereIsPhantom.com posts are a matter of public record. You just have to pay to download them. Sounds like a pretty solid "tactic" to me. Just wait till it gets exciting.

  9. Guess Infinium got what they wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nobody's going to visit HardOCP for a while.
    Isn't that what Infinium wanted? :)

  10. HardOCP Article by sbszine · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFA is Slashdotted, but there's a small news article at HardOCP if you're interested.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  11. I like [H]ard OCP by category_five · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I like [H]ard OCP because they stay true to their roots and post mostly about motherboards and stories interesting to the [H]ardware community while other hardware sites are now posting useless reviews of webcams, PDA's and wireless routers which have little to do with making your game machine be all it can be.(anandtech and tomshardwareguide).

  12. A little background please? by servoled · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are these two in court exactly? It would be nice to provide some basic background for those of us out there who don't religiously follow HardOCP.

    --
    "I have a porkchop, you have a porkchop. I have a veal, you have a veal".
    1. Re:A little background please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      They posted an "expose" on Infinium - shady history of CEO, their "offices" being nonexistant, their shady employees, etc etc. Infinium threatened to sue, sent them a C&D, so HardOCP sued them to get a statement from the court saying they are in the clear and legal and not committing libel/slander

    2. Re:A little background please? by category_five · · Score: 4, Informative

      [H]ard OCP posted a review of the phantom console detailing Phantoms liberal use of Hot glue in its construction and the lack of appeal of a subscription based console among other things. http://hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjU3 Also [H]ardOCP posted an editorial about the failed history of other ventures that the CEO of Infinium Labs, Timothy M. Roberts, has attempted. http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTEyLDE= This during the time when Infinium Labs was (and still is) attempting to raise capitol to start production of the Phantom. Understandably Infinium Labs sued [H]ardOCP for slander.

    3. Re:A little background please? by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Informative

      HardOCP is a gaming website. Last year, they ran an article questioning the Infinium Phantom Console which had been announced, but no one had yet seen.

      The article did some probing into the company, and some of their claims, such as the history of the president of Infinium.

      Infinium stated they would sue HardOCP over the letter, and sent e-mail to tell HardOCP to change or remove parts of the article. HardOCP didn't cave, and so, there was a lawsuit, and now it's progressed to this (which isn't really a win).

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    4. Re:A little background please? by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I remember, Infinium sued (or threatened to sue, I can't remember which) [H]ard OCP a while back for a negative article about the vaporware Phantom, some other interesting factoids, like the "storefront" being an empty office, etc...

      I can't remember what HOCP was suing them back for, though.

    5. Re:A little background please? by JInterest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Understandably Infinium Labs sued [H]ardOCP for slander.

      Not so understandably. Actually HardOCP pre-empted Infineum by filing for a declaratory judgment. Infinium is thus in an ugly position of having things they have been trying to gloss over proved in court. Tim Roberts must be a SCO-quality knucklehead. This is a lawsuit he didn't need to be involved in.

    6. Re:A little background please? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Informative

      they tried to pull a fast one and sue in Florida [with the super-sloppy business courts] when both parties "clearly" [again according to Infinium's own info!] had business presence in Texas. So Kyle counter-sued in Texas, where the site is, for "harassment" or the legal equivelant to nulify their suit.

    7. Re:A little background please? by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      This isn't about the hotglue article, it never was, it's about this peice . and HardOCP actually sued Infinium, so which lawsuit this is is not exactly clear to me. There were lawsuits in different jusisdictions flying both ways.

  13. Past slashdot articles. by Llynix · · Score: 5, Informative

    For some background information you might want to check back to these past articles.

  14. I guess it's too late by miikrr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=14577 Damn I hope that company dies.

  15. Who did what to who in the what now? by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, I am not one to generally criticize Slashdot for it's mistakes, dupes, slant or whatever. It is what it is. I just wish that the posters or the editors would give just a little background on the stories submitted, even if it is just a review from the last time it was discussed.

    There are people on this forum with a great deal of different backgrounds that may not always be familiar with the names, companies, and situations involved in stories that might interest a causal reader, without him or her having to dig up research just to know what the story is even about.

    1. Re:Who did what to who in the what now? by miikrr · · Score: 2, Informative
  16. Excellent news by H_Fisher · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm glad the court seems to have taken a no B.S. approach here, in response to the piles of it Infinium & its lawyers produced. That lawfirm especially needed its gonads ground into the dirt for the unprofessional way they tried to handle this.

    Kudos also to HardOCP for not running scared when faced with legal threats. If more of the "little guys" were able to stand strong against frivolous or iffy strong-armed legal challenges, the world might not be perfect but we'd be headed in a better direction.

    1. Re:Excellent news by D.+Book · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kudos also to HardOCP for not running scared when faced with legal threats. If more of the "little guys" were able to stand strong against frivolous or iffy strong-armed legal challenges, the world might not be perfect but we'd be headed in a better direction.

      While it is a victory for truth, it's a pretty small one, as it is hardly a case of David v. Goliath. Indeed, I suspect the whole matter is primarily an ego thing for HardOCP, having gained some insight into the personality of the owner after an e-mail exchange several years ago. Yes, Infinium was dishonest, but the key factor was that they were weak--as mentioned by others, they didn't even have a storefront--so it wouldn't surprise me if HardOCP saw it as a perfect opportunity to kick some butt and show off. It actaully reminds me a bit of the kind of small-target consumer advocacy that sensationalist current affairs programmes love. They go after individuals and small, shonky businesses that can't fight back, while large companies that screw their customers get more conciliatory treatment.

      So we should see it for what it is. If a website goes to court against a major peripheral manufacturer to defend their rights, that will be noteworthy and deserving of our respect and admiration.

  17. In related news.... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Funny

    3D Realms threatens to sue the next person to compare them to Infinium.

  18. Re:Look! Signs of a computer! by Foxxz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forgot to mention HardOCP actually DOES open the thing up. Its just a p4 with all the cards connected to the back with hot glue.

    -Foxxz

  19. what this is all about. (informative) by blackest_k · · Score: 3, Informative

    HardOCP won a battle against infinium in court.
    Ok whats the battle about?
    stolen from CNN

    (CNN) -- A few weeks ago a new game console was unveiled on the Web called Phantom.

    Its developer, Infinium Labs, promises it will be the "must-have high performance game console," and that the Phantom will provide "more access to more games of every genre than any competing product," all "with blazing speed."

    Six months ago, it was only a rumor among hardcore gamers. In fact, it seemed Phantom was, as the American Heritage dictionary put it, "an image that appears only in the mind; an illusion."

    The juiciest rumor was that there never would be a console called Phantom. The conspiracy theory went that the whole thing was a hoax, concocted as a PR stunt.

    Looks like Hardocp called bullshit and now a judge is agreeing with them and infinium is getting slapped.
    now read on...

    1. Re:what this is all about. (informative) by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Kyle called "bullshit" back in september of last year. Don't know why, but Kyle wrote a ripping piece on them from out of nowhere...maybe they had some of his money!! [haha] but for some reason they pulled his chain and he went digging...and found free and clear public knowlage that they weren't what they said they were...hell their stated office address at the time was a vacant rundown store!

      For some reason they tried to sue HIM to take the article down like 4 months later!!! He corrected matters of fact...silly stuff that didn't change any of the article's real information. They tried to drag him to court in Florida...so he "counter" sued in Texas court [where Kyle lives and supposedly they had an office also!] to have a case dismissed... they then preceded to sue him again.

      I can't say why this is such a big deal. The only thing I can see is that Roberts appears to be a serial "scammer" [but then 50% of VC seekers are anyway] and it was just too easy a target for Kyle to pass up...and if you read the forums or letters replys, Kyle LOVES a good Flame war! can you say recipe for trouble!!!

    2. Re:what this is all about. (informative) by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's probably been a while since you've read the original article, but you messed up on a fact or two. I'm not picking on you. I just believe facts are important, and when someone inadvertently misses a few details, we can easily clear it up by checking the facts. ...hell their stated office address at the time was a vacant rundown store!

      In actuality, the address was a Mailboxes Etc mailbox. The vacant storefront just happened to be in the same strip mall, thus the initial confusion.

      Another fact that you got wrong is that Kyle didn't counter sue, he sued pre-emptively (justifiably, imo) after receiving various legal threats. Read about it here.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  20. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by His+Nastiness · · Score: 5, Funny

    No I think the system would fail 1) becuase the world does NOT need another console (and I challenge anyone to prove to me that consumers have been crying for another system) 2) because of its shit content delivery system (do we really want this, really? Most people want their games on media if for no other reason than to trade the crap/old games for credit at a store) 3) because people love an underdog, unless ofcourse, it's a boastful, litigious, ill-conceived underdog in which case you could sell tickets for front row seats to an exclusive showing of its spectacular and fiery failure. I personally can't wait for this thing to end in a smoldering ruin and bring shame upon everyone involved. Even if it is a good idea my wallet only allows for so many good ideas.

  21. Re:Coral doesn't work 1/2 the damn time by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Informative

    They don't work because by the time somebody posts a Coral link, the site is already down.

    Coral is a cacheing solution; unless it can get a copy of the site to cache it, it can't serve it up.

    This is why Coral needs to be used beforehand (IE, in the slashdot post) in order to be of any use. And even then, it works best on sites that have relative URLs on the images.

    A suggestion to the owner of said site: Coralize as much of your site as you can, and enable HTTP compression (mod_gzip, mod_deflate, IIS6's compression, etc) for whatever else you can. With all that combined even a home connection should be able to handle a slashdotting.

  22. Infinium wants to be on the ASE... by Artifex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how these lawsuits are going to look in their planned filing with the American Stock Exchange?

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  23. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are you a shill, or do you honestly not know the history?

    [H] simply called bullshit on IL's claims about the phantom. IL responded in the fashion that Mark Felchstain, Spammer Lawyer, would be proud of: a SLAPP suit. That kind of garbage sure justifies the "dick up [Kyle's] ass." You don't see that kind of crap lawsuit flying around whenever someone makes a crack about DNF.

  24. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But They're trying to "sell snow to eskimos" so to speak. True, it's just a PC..but that's what they've always said. It's a PC with lots of DRM, [you can't open it or run regular software, store bought stuff, or anything like that] required to be online to download last year's pc titles for Full price ... Plus subscription for the "service". The hardware's not hot enough to run something like DOOM3 so it's not even viable for 75% of the PC game market.

    originally the unit was "demo'd" nearly 2 years ago...it was nearly 1 year of vapor before kyle ripped on it...and the guy hawking it is still getting VC funding!!! WTF It's a failed business right from the start...any /.r would recognize that from the start... but when a pro starts hawking "computer", "broadband", "pay per play", "Secure" and such terms the VCs still see the $$ no matter how logic seems to fail the situation!!

  25. Re:NO, NO, NO by finkployd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know what, no matter how many times you rant in this thread about the "hachet job", everything HardOCP posted is true about Infinium and the CEO.

    Was it in strong? Yes. Was it perhaps a bit tactless? Yes. Was it all true and provable? Yes.

    Oh, and when you threaten someone, except the possibility of getting sued. Most companies and people do not take legal threats lightly.

  26. Bitch Slap by Shihar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason why they are so nasty to each other is because HardOCP originally ran a piece calling bullshit against Infinuim. That in it of itself is not "having a dick up one's ass". That is just a little journalism. What happened next was that Infinium then said that they were going to sue if HardOCP didn't get rid of the story. Now, it is true the American thing to do is to sue when someone pisses you off. However, it is also very much the American thing to tell someone who is being an ass to go fuck themselves and continue to piss them off just out of spite. Hence you the posting you see today today.

    All of that said, I have a great deal of respect for HardOCP. People throw threaten lawsuits over dumb shit like this too often. It is nice to see someone punch these fuckers back.

  27. The ultimate evil plan against the Phantom by British · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's a fun idea.

    1. get a linux system together with some good hardware. Make it mini-itx
    2. Take out all non-game-console-specific stuff out. Make it a small distro
    3. Buy a game controller from the store, get drivers working for it
    4. Setup some crude kiosk frontend that might be what the Phantom would have
    5. Install MAME on it or something and pretend the arcade ROMs ae the games Phantom would be selling(this is just an example)
    6. Put a fancy plastic case around it.

    Then realize you have some crude implmentation of what might have been a Phantom console, only for the cost of hardware, and people's free time to slap together a fancy front end with a Linux engine(not unlike TiVo)

    7. wait for lawsuits from Infinium labs to roll in saying you copied their idea

    8. brag about it on here and HardOCP. They have a plastic box and hype, you have a somewhat crude , working implementation of what they have promised, but never delivered.

    Whee

  28. Cite for original post by gatzke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I should have cited the original comment where I got this from:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=120887&thres ho ld=1&commentsort=3&tid=124&mode=thread&cid=1018654 6

    This trick was originally posted by tqft (619476), but tqft cited Jesse Rudderman (Moz/FF/etc guy) as the original source.

    Now if taco (or some outsource programmer in Mumbai) could just get us a nice little "use normal /. colors on all pages" check box in our prefs...

  29. Boilerroom by threedays · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone else been getting spam promoting the purchase of infinium labs stock? Too lazy to look for one of them, but its on one of those non sec stock markets.

    Has infinium turned into one of those fake boilerroom companies, with some people trying to cash out real quick?

    1. Re:Boilerroom by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's traded on the OTCBB, which falls under Nasdaq.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  30. pretty obvious by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once they released the specs for that box it seemed pretty obvious that it was just a scan to pull in a few extra VC dollars. All this time with nary a peep coupled with [H]ard ops investigative work and the cover is revealed. In allot of ways the Internet *is* the great equalizer.

    CB

  31. Re:HardOCP Disingenuous? by Lonath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would seem that you
    have adopted someting of a Luddite mentality. It
    is people such as yourself which impede technical
    progress. Subscription based software delivery
    via high-speed data pipes *is* the future.


    I doubt there are any true "Luddites" on slashdot. Opposing some kinds of technology does not make you a Luddite. Opposing all kinds of technology does. There are very few technological things that /. readers oppose en masse, and perhaps the reason those things are opposed is that advancing those few bad technologies makes advancing the rest of the good ones bad. IMO the DRM people are more the Luddites since they essentially need to make computers illegal to protect their content.

  32. Phantom Launch Title by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Duke Nukem Forever ...

    It's like a modern-day "which came first?"

  33. Re:Suspicious to say the least by Sir+Homer · · Score: 2, Informative

    HardOCP is one of the largest hardware sites on the net, and generates over six figures of revenue a year. They aren't exactly your sister's personal website.

  34. I applied for a job with them by TiggertheMad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ..right when this whole feud started. They seemed like nice enough people. The were set up in temp offices in Seattle's bank of America building. Most of the PMs are ex-Microsoft (No MS jokes please, we are torching IL right now...) and at the time they were looking to hire a ton of people. They had the hardware done (Although I never saw it, being a first interiew), and were looking at the software delivery system. The ranking manager came off as a bit odd, but I didn't get and sense of shysters trying to pull a fast one or clueless idiots who couldn't pull it off. If all the negative press about the president being totally evil/inept isn't true, I'd give the console a fifty percent chance of seeing the light of day.

    The guys I talked to even thought that PA's shot at them was funny, so they have a sense of humor about all the press. I'm sort of glad I wasn't offered a job, though. Too much wierd stuff was happening.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:I applied for a job with them by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They seemed like nice enough people.

      Has it actually escaped your attention that the good con artists always do? It's their primary stock in trade.

      Has it also actually escaped your attention that the employees of a good con artist are often as not just as much dupes of the scam as the customers?

      "But they seemed so nice!" is the nearly universal cry of the suckered.

      KFG

  35. The Phantom at E3 2004 by MrGeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw the Phantom at E3 2004. Played it for a little bit. I've never seen a system get that much of a poor reception anywhere, ever, by anyone. It was funny as hell to see them try to explain it crashing so much and they wouldn't show us the "cool things it could do" that they kept talking about. They did have the biggest individual booth of the show, though. Maybe they thought gamers had no standards?

    --
    John Pippin - Managing Editor, PsxNation.com
  36. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, IL (an unknown company at the time) made some big claims about their product. But the whole operation was shrouded in mystery and no-one seemed to know what was going on. So [H] did some investigating, and found out some "interesting" stuff. End result was that IL sued them.

    Why did [H] write an article about IL? because they made huge claims and people were interested, that's why.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  37. Re:NO, NO, NO by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    HardOCP did a hatchet job on the CEO and Infinium threatened them legally, HardOCP then sued Infinium. Quite amazing really.

    What is amazing? Infinium threatened legal action, and HardOCP responded in kind. This is what you should expect if you threaten to sue someone. Mmmkay?

  38. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by LookSharp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look, I don't know if you have thought about it from this angle or not, but Kyle was doing something to protect not only the gaming industry, but also potential investors.

    When that article was posted 12 months ago, Infinium had burned through several million dollars in venture capital with nothing to show but some renders and a glossy page of marketing lingo. They were "quite anxious" to get their hands on another 25-50 million US dollars. And it was pretty evident to those who were trying to get info on the console that- not only was it vaporware, it was vaporware hawked by a guy with a really shady history of business dealings.

    Kyle's article, while written in a sophomoric style, was very enlightening. It was truthful and Infinium's complaint is that it chased away potential investors. Damn right it it did, and rightfully so!

  39. From the website: by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Phantom website

    Infinium Labs, Inc. was founded by a management team...

    That's all I need to hear.

  40. Here's my two cents... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Originally Tim Roberts intended to bilk a bunch of investors by pretending to create a gaming console, spending the money, then getting out of dodge. As HardOCP has pointed out, he's done that before.

    However, the online gaming community took notice and started asking real questions, e.g., where is an actual product? What companies will actually be writing games? Etc.

    Suddenly Roberts had to prove to the investors, and to future investors that the console was real, so he was forced to hire Kevin Bachus, former Microsoft Xbox employee. And worse of all for Roberts, he was actually forced to create a real product.

    Now that the online gaming community has put Roberts in a spotlight, he is no longer free to lurk in the dark. Now he's forced to either admit it was a scam or to go forward and fail with an asinine business plan. Mmmm... I wonder what he'll do?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  41. Amusing dead-account message by bittmann · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's quite a stretch, CowboyNeal, somehow turning "This Account Has Been Suspended / Please contact the billing/support department as soon as possible." into "HardOCP Wins BIG against Infinium Labs". Maybe I don't have the right one-time encryption pad?

  42. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by madprof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are talking total shit.
    He did what many many journalists would do and investigated.
    I suggest you go learn about good journalism.
    I, for one, applaud what he's done.

  43. Link to the orginal HardOCP article by dlapine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's the link to the orignal HardOCP article detailing their investigation.
    Link to Original HardOCP article
    This looks a good piece of investigative journalism by a website. Kudos to them for providing the public an unbiased set of facts.

    --
    The Internet has no garbage collection
  44. Re:Poof by JofCoRe · · Score: 2, Informative
    --

    Place sig here.
  45. Re: Seems pretty childish, Kyle [H]... by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Informative
    No, if it fails out of the gates, this will be the main reason why
    1. It costs $30 US / month to play, PLUS any fees for games you want to play on it.
    2. Multiplayer, if present, is online only, unlike other consoles, which allow you to play with friends
    3. It has no "killer app" games, it only runs PC games...
    4. ...but not PC games you already own. Oh no, you need to buy them again
    5. Although it is a PC, you cannot upgrade it. (Although this is true of any console, such as X-Box, you will continue to get games tweaked for the console. Not so here, new games for the phantom will continue to have higher and higher requirements, and will not be optimized)
    6. You don't install the games, they all stream from the IL server
    7. Even if your games are cached, you still need to authenticate with the IL server
    8. If your internet connection goes down, you cannot play games.
    9. Regardless of their claims, I don't see how they can possible stream such large games in the background as you play them. As Tom's Hardware pointed out, most games have all of their music and such in one big file, and it is quite difficult to only select the stuff you need for the current level
    Want a good point? If you can hack the DRM, you can get a pretty sweet Linux box for $199. Athlon XP 2500+, 256 MB DDR RAM, GeForce 5700 PRO, 40 gb HD. But even if they sell millions as a result of this, it will still go bad, because I bet they are eating a loss and hoping to make it back on subscriptions (And so will probably be quick to DMCA any hint of hacking it)
    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  46. Re:INVESTOR FRAUD by HarvardAce · · Score: 2, Informative
    If it shows that Roberts is benefitting directly from IL outside of corporate guidelines, there is going to be an Enron-esque shitstorm.

    Somehow I don't think that VC's losing 10-25 million dollars is quite on the same level as thousands of employees and investors losing billions upon billions of dollars.

    I don't want to say that the VC's who stand to lose their money on IL deserve what's coming, but they at least know (or at least should know) the risk of being a VC, especially when you are investing in a new company and haven't done any research on them. I am surprised that people will invest millions on a company without doing the research that HardOCP did, and I can't really feel sorry for those who did.

    Enron investors, on the other hand, were investing because they were employees of what they thought was a successful company and/or they believed all the documents that the company was filing with the SEC and the NYSE. To make matters worse, they were also misled (deliberately, in some cases) by their financial advisors, who were also looking to make a profit on the whole ordeal.

    Bottom line, while this is an unfortunate situation for the VC's who invested in IL, it is by no means even remotely comparable to the whole Enron debacle.

    --
    Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
  47. Re: Why was IL attacked in the first place, tho? by madprof · · Score: 2, Informative

    If they are truly hucksters they won't meet a product launch date!
    There was no commercial gain from this journalism worth the risk of getting it all wrong and making enemies of future industry players.
    It's good to see this sort of questioning in the games industry. Often journalists write trite fawning nonsense or rehash press releases.