Slashdot Mirror


Tracking The (English) Words We Use

Zugok writes "Wordcount.org has an interactive presentation of the 86,800 most frequently used English words. In addition they have Query Count which is a dynamic database of what are the most queried words on Wword Count. Then there is the conspiracy corner where certain words seems to end up in some sort of eerie order. Cowboy comes 14834 and Neal comes 18928. Bebop comes 70673."

332 comments

  1. another word by mrpuffypants · · Score: 4, Informative

    fuck is number 5598

    Actually, I expected this to be higher since I watched Goodfellas last night.

    1. Re:another word by Rosyna · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bite: 5922
      My: 69
      Shiny: 8590
      Daffodil: 27591
      Ass: 15036

      I am actually quite disappointed that this wasn't from the bite-my-shiny-daffodil-ass dept. Tsk, tsk. Hemos.

    2. Re:another word by sgant · · Score: 0

      King Arthur: What...."is"?

      Knight who says Ni: No not "is". We would get very far in life without saying "is".

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    3. Re:another word by Hinhule · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it just went up quite a bit since the hosts realized their servers had been slashdotted.

    4. Re:another word by gorre · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The post *is* redundant since the fact that "fuck is number 5598" is in the article, which, surprisingly enough, comes before the first post. The post is now at '4, Informative' - just goes to show that the best way to gain karma is to get in quick and state the obvious, or even better: quote the article back at the mods, don't worry they won't have read it.

      --
      "Madness is something rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, peoples, ages it is the rule." -- Nietzsche
    5. Re:another word by Tanktalus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Note to anonymouse cowards: first posts can be redundant if it repeats anything that is a trivial rewording of the FA. First posts aren't first posts - they're first comments to a post, and thus already second.

      I'm not saying that this qualified .. 'cuz I haven't RTFA'd yet. But the general statement made still is incorrect.

    6. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure that would make sense, if that was what redundant actually meant. That reminds me, I should go metamod to look for other mislabeled non-redundancies.

    7. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:

      Redundant \Re*dun"dant\ (-dant), a. [L. redundans, -antis, p.
      pr. of redundare: cf. F. redondant. See {Redound}.]
      1. Exceeding what is natural or necessary; superabundant;
      exuberant; as, a redundant quantity of bile or food.

      Notwithstanding the redundant oil in fishes, they do
      not increase fat so much as flesh. --Arbuthnot.

      2. Using more words or images than are necessary or useful;
      pleonastic.

      Where an suthor is redundant, mark those paragraphs
      to be retrenched. --I. Watts.

      Syn: Superfluous; superabundant; excessive; exuberant;
      overflowing; plentiful; copious.

      In the context of the Slashdot moderation system I think the word "redundant" would (and should) be interpreted to mean: "This comment is superfluous since the poster only rephrases what is in the article or what is in a previous post". What else could you possibly mean by moderating a post "redundant"?
    8. Re:another word by essreenim · · Score: 0, Redundant

      fuck is number 5598
      I'll sort that out: fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, .. Now its around 2297 - woohoo

    9. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question: how can a post be overrated when it doesn't even have a rating yet?

    10. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It COULD mean the mod intended to mod-bomb someone, looked into the magical /. 8-ball, and saw "redundant".

    11. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely then they would choose "Overrated" since (at least according to what I've read) "overrated" and "underrated" moderations are not meta-moderated.

    12. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From the slashdot FAQ:
      Redundant -- Redundant posts are ones which add no new information, but instead take up space with repeating information either in the Slashdot post, the attached links, or lots of previous comments. For instance, some posters cut and paste otherwise legitimate comments in multiple places in the same discussion; the pasted versions are Redundant.
      [emphasis mine]
    13. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After a good slashdotting, they just updated their site to include a 5-way tie for first:
      1) The
      2) Page
      3) Cannot
      4) Be
      5) Displayed

    14. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh! But that is what distinguishes between smart and dumb mod-bombers.

    15. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, about 95% of the posts, and about 15% of the stories posted. Got it.

    16. Re:another word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the moderator is overrated. happens to me all the time and they don't get meta moderated for being idiots with their mod points that way.

    17. Re:another word by xombo · · Score: 1

      I wonder where antiquing ranks.

  2. I like my tin foil in the microwave please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Cowboy comes 14834 and Neal comes 18928

    Yet google and slashdot hasn't even been indexed yet... hmm tin foil anyone?

    1. Re:I like my tin foil in the microwave please by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Funny that you mention this, because they'll definitely be adding the verb "slashdotted" after today.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    2. Re:I like my tin foil in the microwave please by FairlyFast · · Score: 1, Funny

      Arrgh! wibble's not in the database either

    3. Re:I like my tin foil in the microwave please by liparis · · Score: 1

      And now, the most frequent word is NaN from a database of NaN words.

    4. Re:I like my tin foil in the microwave please by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Funny that you mention this, because they'll definitely be adding the verb "slashdotted" after today.
      "After today", hell. After 6AM this morning.

      root@number27:~# apachectl slashdotted
      apachectl: httpd stopped and stabbed repeatedly
      apachectl: Good luck!
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  3. Nice flash by bizpile · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That has to be the coolest use of Flash I have ever seen that wasn't simply an animation. I guess I won't adblock it.

    1. Re:Nice flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except it is one of the most annoying interfaces I've used. There's no way to know what you're suppose to click on, and there's limited space that displays like 3 words at a time in a giant font. I would prefer to see even the most rudimentary HTML so I could scroll through a list of 100's or 1000's of words at a time.

    2. Re:Nice flash by rdc_uk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pretty,
      but possibly the most useless UI for list-format data ever; I can only read the first (counts) 19 entries, (can't read the numbers after 10). After that you have to do random sampling.

      Browsable Lists - the past and future of basic data presentation!

    3. Re:Nice flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you adblock flash? (Using FireFox of course). When I reinstalled the latest Firefox, I never installed Flash because I haven't been able to block flash ads.

    4. Re:Nice flash by masterQba · · Score: 1

      http://eco.adnec.com/eco/ecotonoha2.html
      this one ia also pretty cool. come on slashdot how big a tree can you build?

      --
      xb0x
    5. Re:Nice flash by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, very cool.

      "A script in this movie is causing Macromedia Flash Player 6 to run slowly. If it continues to run your computer may become unresponsive. Do you want to abort this script?"

    6. Re:Nice flash by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      Install the Adblock extention.

    7. Re:Nice flash by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Oh please don't mention Flash on here, the Flash-bashers will be on to you in a flash denouncing this Flash-based interface because it's implemented in Flash.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  4. I have looked up all the rude words: by irn_bru · · Score: 1, Informative

    Fu*k = 5598 (unbelieveably)
    Cu*t = 18636
    Bush = 2629
    Microsoft = 4304

    1. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by gazbo · · Score: 3, Funny
      You seem to have posted a couple of typos - I've figured out what you meant by looking up the words by rank:

      Fuck = 5598
      Cunt = 18636

      HTH.

    2. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, if people could write fuck, cunt, bitch, motherfucker, ect in the web without being censored by "lets be nice" moderatores, irc-bots, php-bbses,ect, their rank would be quite a bit higher.
      I guess fuck should be at least in the top 1000.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 1

      Not bad for 'funk' and 'cult'... or perhaps you meant some other words?

    4. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by kaleco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't have Flash. A couple of non-php static html pages generated once a day could have handled a league table, with a PHP search.
      Did the Conspiracy page report a coincidence of the words 'Fu*c' and 'Microsoft'? :)

      --
      Prosperity is only an instrument to be used, not a deity to be worshipped. Calvin Coolidge
    5. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by ceeam · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow! Someone uses word #4304 without some form of word #5598 as an attribute? I'm amazed.

    6. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Oh give him/her a break. He/she is obviously an American - you know how innocent and fragile they are. Just look at Janet's breast flash, they almost went nuts over it, and not in the good way.

      Though I'm not sure that a people who consciously votes for Bush could ever be accused of having innocense...

    7. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on...give them a break. They do quite good porn movies in the US.

    8. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by pboulang · · Score: 1
      umm, those are called adjectives, you #5598'ing geek!

      Of course, I would also have accepted the word "interface".

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    9. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      This American is all for more bare breasts on Broadcast TV. I don't get what the big deal was (and neither do a lot of other people). When I was a kid my parents didn't shelter me from tits on TV (like a movie with a shower scene).

    10. Re:I have looked up all the rude words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And see what a screw up you turned out to be? Thanks for proving our point.

  5. gee.. by g-to-the-o-to-the-g · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hm...I would have thought things like "the", "and" or "or" would have beat out "dog" "pussy" "sex".

    1. Re:gee.. by drunkennewfiemidget · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're grossly over-estimating the general public. ;)

    2. Re:gee.. by g-to-the-o-to-the-g · · Score: 1

      Yeah...apparently I was looking at the wrong thing anyways. It was only with the query count that I saw this, but it's still amusing.

    3. Re:gee.. by jimmytango829 · · Score: 1

      No no...You're grossly over-estimating sex general public.

    4. Re:gee.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      mmmmm....dog pussy sex........

    5. Re:gee.. by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I would have thought things like "the", "and" or "or"

      "the" isn't nearly as common in English as the definite article in many other
      languages. We tend to use it once where other languages would use it several
      times. For example, what might be "the words the common the most" in another
      language comes out as "the most common words" in English -- so the article
      occurs only once instead of three times. This hurts its rank considerably.
      Also we don't use it on proper nouns, and sometimes we just leave it off and
      let the reader figure out from context that the word is definite. (Having
      indefinite articles helps here; if we wanted the word to be indefinite we
      could explicitely tag it as indefinite, so with no article at all the word's
      definiteness is ambiguous.)

      "and" is fairly common, but I would think it would be beat out by words like
      "to", "for", "from", and "that". ("that" has an unfair advantage because it's
      actually about several different words spelled and pronounced the same way;
      most notably it's a relative pronoun ("the word that introduces a relative
      clause"), the most common of the demonstratives ("yes, that word"), and a
      very common subordinating adverb ("I provided examples so that you might know
      what I mean."); it would probably be _the_ most commonly used word in the
      language if we didn't elide it more than half the time.)

      Also, some of the uses of "and" are picked up by other words. English has
      separate words for "even", "also", and half a dozen other concepts that tend
      to be the same word as "and" in some languages.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    6. Re:gee.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind if you could name an example of a language where they say anything like 'the most the common the words'. Why would they use the definite article in front of an adjective, for example?

    7. Re:gee.. by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I wouldn't mind if you could name an example of a language where they say
      > anything like 'the most the common the words'.

      Greek might say it that way. Or it might say "the words the common the most",
      or "the words the most the common". Understand that this is a literal
      word-for-word rendering, not a translation; you wouldn't say it that way in
      English, and so a translator would make the appropriate adjustments.

      > Why would they use the definite article in front of an adjective, for
      > example?

      To place the adjective in the attributive position. If the adjective does
      not have the article, and the noun does, that places the adjective in the
      predicate position (i.e., you would translate it "the words are most common"
      in English rather than "the most common words" -- that would be confusing
      and inappropriate in a sentence that also has a verb).

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  6. Love Hate by richardoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least love @384 ranks above hate @3107

    I think the world isn't so bad...

    --
    All the worlds indeed a .sig, and we are mearly players..
    1. Re:Love Hate by bizpile · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At least love @384 ranks above hate @3107

      But war(304) beats peace(1155).

    2. Re:Love Hate by KRYnosemg33 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Sure, but what you fail to realize is that the word is most often used in the following cases:
      "I love Britney Spears"
      "I love M. Jackson"
      "I loved Gigli"
      "I love [insert political candidate] because of [insert extremely dumbass reason]"

      You realize the world isn't the poetic and romantic place you think it is.

    3. Re:Love Hate by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it's just overused in english, so overused that "i love *" has barely any meaning above "at just this second i quite like..".

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Love Hate by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I loved Gigli"

      I suspect that yours is the first use of this phrase, ever.

    5. Re:Love Hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's cause it's hard to wage peace.

      And it's easier to make love than make hate -- 'less of course your are GW who has made more terrorists than any other person on the planet.

    6. Re:Love Hate by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yet people are still terrified of saying "I love you".

    7. Re:Love Hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except maybe Martin Luther or Jesus Christ or Mohammed?

    8. Re:Love Hate by Bertie · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, it's no wonder - she'll follow you around like a bad smell for years after as soon as you do...

    9. Re:Love Hate by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Naw, Mrs. Lopez (JL's mother) probably used it. Once. To her daughter. To cheer her up. Then added "Really!"

    10. Re:Love Hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you... deeply

    11. Re:Love Hate by The+Wannabe+King · · Score: 1

      Not so strange, and not necessarily negative. We use expressions like the "Iraq War" and the "Vietnam War", but we don't usually talk about the "Swiss Peace" or the "Norwegian Peace". Peace is considered the natural state, thus we do not need to name it that often, it's presumed.

    12. Re:Love Hate by mnewton32 · · Score: 1

      I read an interview with Ben Affleck in The Georgia Straight a couple of months back. IIRC he called the movie "dogshit." When the star of a movie says that, you gotta know that nobody liked it.

  7. They missed a big one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Goatse is not found in the list!

  8. NSFW! by welshwaterloo · · Score: 5, Informative
    In case anyone's curious at work - don't click the link to see what other people are searching for.

    I mean, I guess I should've known, but I didn't expect the font size to be so damned *large*!


    (Not, of course that anyone would waste work time by reading /.)

    1. Re:NSFW! by Cederic · · Score: 3, Funny


      Hmm. Thing is, there's pretty few words likely to appear high on the search list that I don't use verbally every day anyway.

      Unless lots of people are searching for 'theocratic'. I don't use that one much.

      ~Cederic

    2. Re:NSFW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I get now:

      Visitors
      We are sorry but this site is experiencing difficulties at this time.
      Please return shortly!
      Thank you for your patience.

      Webmaster - please contact support as soon as possible.

    3. Re:NSFW! by mykdavies · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fortunately, the webmaster's decision to use Flash means that that wasn't a problem for anyone with Flash disabled.

      But, using Flash to display a list of words???

      --
      The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
  9. You know this world is in trouble by Lispy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when the word "money" makes place 227 while "love" is at 384. Or maybe I am just turning into some sort of postmodern hippie. ;-)

    1. Re:You know this world is in trouble by ceeam · · Score: 5, Funny

      I love money.

    2. Re:You know this world is in trouble by PMuse · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It takes somewhat of a long time to get past all the pronouns, articles, prepositions, to-be verbs, etc. Once we do, we can start to see what things people are talking about.

      people (81)

      first (86)

      down (97)

      think (102)

      work (103)

      years (106), year (122)

      right (112)

      government (140)

      day (141)

      man (142)

      world (149)

      ...and it was at that point that the slashdot effect killed the flash app

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    3. Re:You know this world is in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but money won't buy you love...

    4. Re:You know this world is in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yes, but money won't buy you love..."

      But it'll sure rent it for a little while...

    5. Re:You know this world is in trouble by deblau · · Score: 1

      Money isn't the root of all evil, it's just a tool like your computer. The root of all evil is the heart of the person who would abuse that tool for destructive ends. You wouldn't complain if #1 were "computer", or "hammer", or "flashlight" would you? Read Ayn Rand.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    6. Re:You know this world is in trouble by Potlucker · · Score: 1

      i love lamp.

    7. Re:You know this world is in trouble by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I tried reading Ayn Rand. Once. I damn' near gnawed my own head off, it was so awful.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  10. Conquistador (86800) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the last place word, as you can see, because I'm sure this Flash database will survive a /.ing.

    1. Re:Conquistador (86800) by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I also looked at the end of the list. But what's Lauro (rank 86794)?

      I guess it's a name. Heehee my name's in there as well.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  11. no flash, please by latroM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is so bad. No one should make their information to depend on non-free software. I will not install flash to see this.

    1. Re:no flash, please by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Uhm, AFAIK flash viewer is free...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:no flash, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck?
      Flash viewers are free you fucking moron. Don't install it, people of your intelligence wouldn't have a clue about what it's about anyway, and probably wouldn't understand the vast majority of the words. You dumbass!

    3. Re:no flash, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's free as in beer, not free as in speech. There's a difference... not one that I particularly agree with, but there is one.

  12. 86,800 most frequently used English words??? by ceeam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bloody hell, I wonder what other words are _not_ so frequently used then.

    1. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Not "Wword", I guess.

      How ironic is that a story submission about language and word usage, featuring a website called WordCount.org can't even get the word "word" spelt correctly in the story summary?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by shadowcabbit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gigarectum is one that's probably not so frequently used. Same goes for Xenomorph, flagellate, moribund, logorrhea, sialoquent, genetrix, and bolection.

      (Most of these I got from here: http://phrontistery.50megs.com/ihlstart.html)

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    3. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spelt?

    4. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by mrmagos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, considering that is somewhere in the neighborhood of 1/10th of the words estimated to be in the English language, there are quite a few not in the list. The actual number varies by source however, estimated between approximately 800,000 and 1,000,000 words.

      --
      Never start vast projects with half-vast ideas.
    5. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      type of wheat / flour.

      can't see why it's relevant in the context of the grandparent post though...

    6. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Spelt?

      How the English and most of the English-speaking word spell the word that Americans insist on spelling "spelled".

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Shakespeare was said to only user about 30,000 words in all of his works... The average human, in his lifetime, uses far fewer.

    8. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by MasterOfUniverse · · Score: 1
      Bloody hell, I wonder what other words are _not_ so frequently used then.

      bloody hell..;)

      --
      "There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people."--Howard Zinn
    9. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by maxpublic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How the English and most of the English-speaking word spell the word that Americans insist on spelling "spelled".

      Damn, you Brits are funny. Still going on about how the entire world speaks British English rather than American English. Compensating for the fact that your 'Empire' consists of nothing more than some two-bit second-rate island off the coast of France now, I guess.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    10. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by pboulang · · Score: 1
      Gigarectum is one that's probably not so frequently used
      Well, yeah, I'd say so as it wasn't even defined in the link you included. Also not frequently used are glorbershistenfook and whyareyoustillreadingthisyouslashdotfuckwads, the latter being what I think you meant as the definition of gigarectum?

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    11. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      No, what's funny here is that someone bothered to look up "spelt" in a dictionary, found an alternative meaning of the word but couldn't find anything other meanings of the word.

      As for an empire, well, empires are meant to fall, I'll be the first to tell you that. Every great civilisation in history learnt that lesson (most of them the hard way) but it seems that the US is insistant on having a go at it too. From the looks of the situation in Iraq, it doesn't seem to be working to plan.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    12. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Gigarectum is one that's probably not so frequently used.

      Sure it isn't. It's been superceeded by "hello". If you know what I mean.

    13. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. You got the point and decided to stab as many people as you could with it. Bravo. (claps)

    14. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by jonadab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > I wonder what other words are _not_ so frequently used then.

      Use Google, and try to get the lowest number you can get for the number of
      pages. Yes, this is a variant on GoogleWhacking, but with only one word.

      Some quick attempts: Google finds 76,500 pages using 'rotund' (round),
      31,000 for 'pneumatology' (the study of the [sS]pirit), 13,900 for 'cromulent'
      (valid), 818 for 'pimola' (a stuffed olive), 242 for 'anatopism' (something
      that is out of place), and only 31 for 'propretonic' (preceding the syllable
      before the accent).

      I chose "pimola" because I happen to know that it's not listed in the OED, so
      I figured it was fairly uncommon, but it turns out that a couple of the other
      words I tried are even less common. I was surprised that "propretonic" isn't
      used more often. FWIW, the sites that do use it probably use it numerous
      times each.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    15. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by ceeam · · Score: 1

      There's quite a load of "pretonic" though. Is there a difference between "propretonic" and "pretonic"?

    16. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by McDutchie · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is actually a major problem with English's status as "the" international language: the absurd number of words you have to learn in order to be proficient. This is one of the reasons English is not at all an easy language to learn.

    17. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Well as a New Zealander who now lives in Australia, I'm actually agreeing with the Pom. (and that's saying something).

      Yes, the rest of the English speaking world pretty much does speak British English.
      More or less - considering that most of the UK can't even agree on what British English is, there's always some variation.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    18. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      What? You post to /. and have never flagellated a moribund equine?

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    19. Re:86,800 most frequently used English words??? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Is there a difference between "propretonic" and "pretonic"?

      Yes. The pretonic syllable is the one _after_ the propretonic syllable, i.e.,
      the syllable directly before the tonic (accented) syllable. Here's an example
      of both words being used in the same paragraph:

      "In adjectives, with the addition of inflectional endings, a changeable long
      vowel (Qamets or Tsere) in an open, propretonic syllable will reduce to Vocal
      Shewa. This type of change occurs when the open, pretonic syllable of the
      masculine singular adjective becomes propretonic with the addition of
      inflectional endings." — Pratico & Van Pelt, BBHG, p68

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  13. Linux is currently not in the archive... by Lispy · · Score: 4, Funny

    but Windows ranks at a disturbing 1169. ;-)

    1. Re:Linux is currently not in the archive... by pknoll · · Score: 1, Redundant
      but Windows ranks at a disturbing 1169. ;-)

      Everyone has windows in their house. And office building or other workplace. And their car. Etc., so on and so forth.

      Could be they're not talking about MS Windows when they say "windows".

    2. Re:Linux is currently not in the archive... by Lispy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Noticed that smiling face at the end of my post?? You know, this means that I might be kidding.

    3. Re:Linux is currently not in the archive... by ehiris · · Score: 1

      Not that disturbing considering:

      Windows crash
      Windows virus removal tool
      Windows error x
      Windows problems
      Windows .... ............

  14. Flash!? by avalys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be nice if the list were available in plaintext form, instead of this slow and miserable Flash presentation.

    This is a prime example of Flash being misused. It's not needed at all, and only serves to slow things down. It also makes it impossible to use the data for anything useful.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Flash!? by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that there should be a simple listing of it (although any half-decent programmer could try packet catching and watch what it requests.. its probably very easy to make a bespoke script to go get the data)....

      BUT.. the flash implementation is very clear, easy to use and a good bit of coding. So Ner.

    2. Re:Flash!? by Angostura · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's ART goddamit. It's not meant to be FUNCTIONAL :-)

    3. Re:Flash!? by julesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BUT.. the flash implementation is very clear, easy to use and a good bit of coding. So Ner.

      Sorry, according to the copy I've just downloaded, there are NaN words in the archive, and the word I've just clicked on (""), is at position NaN.

      I wouldn't say it was exactly the greatest coding in the world.

    4. Re:Flash!? by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too, and I've now decided that I could code better actionscript than that with one arm behind my back & my eyes covered with a blindfold :-).

    5. Re:Flash!? by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 1

      It also makes it impossible to use the data for anything useful.

      I think that's the point. Hide the text in a Flash file, and no one will be able to steal it. Of course, this is akin to putting programs om audio-CDs to prevent people from copying music; it only hurts the honest people.

      --
      "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
    6. Re:Flash!? by xmp_phrack · · Score: 1

      My AOL cracker needs a plaintext file!

    7. Re:Flash!? by jfdawes · · Score: 1
      This is a prime example of Flash being misused. It's not needed at all, and only serves to slow things down. It also makes it impossible to use the data for anything useful.


      You might be correct, but you've made at least one assumption that could easily be incorrect. You're assuming "Make it really hard for anyone else to use the data" was not among the requirements.
  15. Re:Flash? by Astrorunner · · Score: 5, Funny

    "WordCount was designed with a minimalist aesthetic, to let the information speak for itself."

    Which explains their logical use of Flash.

  16. Re:Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have Flash 6?

    Are you using the click to play extension? Click it quickly.

  17. QueryCounter Abuse by oddsheep · · Score: 1

    Having looked at the top ranking content in the query counter, I am willing to hazard that it has been subjected to a compaign of repetative queries from a group of tourettes syndrome sufferers. Or possibly just bored students. Or both.

    1. Re:QueryCounter Abuse by Staos · · Score: 1

      You don't know what tourettes is, do you?

      In only a few cases does involuntary swearing occur.

      --
      In Soviet russia, only old Koreans profit from pictures of Natalie Portman stored on Beowulf Clusters.
    2. Re:QueryCounter Abuse by julesh · · Score: 1

      Or slashdotters, perhaps?

    3. Re:QueryCounter Abuse by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1


      or it's just been slashdotted..... where else would you find a vast army of DDOS clients willing to request lewd content from arbitary web sites on demand :-)

    4. Re:QueryCounter Abuse by pboulang · · Score: 1

      Well, shit. Now his post wasn't nearly as funny. Thankyouverymuch.

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

  18. words we DO NOT use by theMerovingian · · Score: 4, Funny


    1) que
    2) centre
    3) colour
    4) dialogue
    5) program
    6) pyjamas

    Why yes, I am american :)

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:words we DO NOT use by theMerovingian · · Score: 0

      5) programme

      grr, ruined my +5 funny

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    2. Re:words we DO NOT use by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1, Funny

      que?

    3. Re:words we DO NOT use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Don't you mean "programme" in your obvious dig at the Queen's English? And "que" is French.

      Bloody illiterate Yanks ;-)

    4. Re:words we DO NOT use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think he means "queue", you know, that thing us Brits are so good at- standing in line and waiting patiently.

      "cheque" is another i've noticed many Americans not using, they can pay for things with a "check" instead *shrugs* i mean, i can understand "checking" you have enough money to pay for the product, but last time i checked (pun intended), checking things was not a substitute to legal tender

    5. Re:words we DO NOT use by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      Que? is Spanish.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    6. Re:words we DO NOT use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Que

      The correct spelling is queue. I presume that's what you meant.

      That speaks nothing about your "American Spelling".

    7. Re:words we DO NOT use by bheerssen · · Score: 1


      You misspelled programme ;)

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    8. Re:words we DO NOT use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bar-be-que - Americans say Bar-B-Q... :o)

      That reminds me; was boxen on there? How about Beowulf? Soviet?

    9. Re:words we DO NOT use by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hehehehe... My favourite is when I phone American hillbillies and have to spell something with "z" in it. I get a response "zed"? What's "zed"? (in the rest of the world, the letter zee is reall the letter zed)

      It gets even better. These same hillbillies spell my fiance's last name Cadezed when she spells it to them - read "C-A-D-E-Z(ed)".

      And it would be okay if it was only in America, but then they come to Canada and as such stupid questions too! "zed"? What's "zed"? "Oh you mean zee!"... No we didn't mean "zee". If we meant "zee" would have said "zee".

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:words we DO NOT use by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      I'm so gonna lose mod points for that post lol!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    11. Re:words we DO NOT use by iantri · · Score: 2, Funny
      What do Americans have against pyjamas?

      IAC(Canadian).

    12. Re:words we DO NOT use by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I've said 'zed' before and it completely freaked everyone out. By that I mean no one got it, and once I told them that's what the letter Z is actually called, they had to go to a dictionary before they believed me. I bet they changed it to 'zee' in this country so our alphabet would rhyme. Zed is also nice because you won't confuse it with C. That being said, English (uhh.. hillbillies?) folk hardly use Z at all. I admit that we don't use it all the time when we should either (phase? no phaze. ~ism? no, izm, etc). The English language is so screwed up anyway I don't think there's any sense trying to save any part of it. We can't even get our units right.

    13. Re:words we DO NOT use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that happened to me too

      i was reading off a code of some sort and i said 'ZED' and she was like im sorry and im like zed you know Z. and shes like i dont understand you - speaking slower she was - - and i says i says, you know zed, the LAST LETTER OF THE ALPHABET and she said - oh you mean zee and im like no, no i dont mean zee i mean zed im not pronoucing it wrong FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR MIND YOU MOTHERFUCKER!!!!

    14. Re:words we DO NOT use by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      "Behold! For now I wear the human pants!"

      so thats what they call pyjamas in america. i had no idea!!

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    15. Re:words we DO NOT use by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      By Hillbillies I meant southern folks who takl really slowly and aren't aware of any other country other than good ol' america and believe it's normal to own assault rifles :)

      Anyway, I know what you mean about units; I can tell speed in KM/H, weight and height in pounds, but distances in Km, volume in ml / l, and temperature in Celcius.

      I have no idea what 173cm tall is, and how much 77kg is without using a conversino tool. Likewise, I have no clue what 104 Farenheit is - is that hot? :)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    16. Re:words we DO NOT use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      104 Farenheit is too hot for anything but shorts and short sleeves. It is rather cold for tea, though.

    17. Re:words we DO NOT use by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      So how tall would I be if I were 10 pounds tall?

      Also, you forgot stone. I love that unit.

    18. Re:words we DO NOT use by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      We don't have any opposition to them as an article of clothing, we just use the spelling 'pajamas'. I guess it's because that looks more like the way we say it ('puh-jamas') to us than the other way.

      I've always wondered, do you commonwealth folk say 'pie-jamas'?

    19. Re:words we DO NOT use by temojen · · Score: 1

      Que:

      The braid all chinese men were required to wear during the Qing dynasty.

    20. Re:words we DO NOT use by radish · · Score: 1

      I think the pronunciation is about the same on both sides of the pond.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    21. Re:words we DO NOT use by radish · · Score: 1

      What's "que"? Do you mean "queue"? And if so, does that mean American Comp Sci students learn about "Line Theory"? I'm British, my GF is American, but she understands queue when I say it just fine.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    22. Re:words we DO NOT use by ESqVIP · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an open-source project developed in Python.

    23. Re:words we DO NOT use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how tall would I be if I were 10 pounds tall?

      About the size of one Calista Flockhart.

    24. Re:words we DO NOT use by iantri · · Score: 1
      pih-jah-mahs. (with all long a's. Some Canadians will use all short a's, or the first short and the second semi-long. Sorry, I don't know any of the standardized systems for transcribing pronunciation in ASCII).

      But I'm Canadian, so I'm not entirely answering your question.. (although judging by the the episode of Are You Being Served? I just watched yesterday I would say that the pronunciation is much like what I described above).

    25. Re:words we DO NOT use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      metamodding your comment whic1h explains the post delay. - I'm Canadian. I say zed, my kids say zed, their school teaches zed. I would say zed is much more common than zee up here. However, my Canadian wife persists in using 'erb rather than herb.

  19. Compression by SavedLinuXgeeK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know there are already types of compression that take the most common letters of a document, and then builds a binary dictionary off of it, to create the most efficient way of storing the data. Perhaps this database could be used, as a static dictionary, and compressing documents could be even better, though the db queries might slow it down.

    --
    je suis parce que j'aime
    1. Re:Compression by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      The problem with a central lookup dictionary is which dictionary do you use?

      For compressing Shakespeare your english dictionary may be very efficient, but consider how it would cope compressing a BMP image, or a webpage. A general compressor (like winzip) has to be adaptive, and locking itself to specific dictionaries would not be optimal.

      You are right about the encoding scheme, but its usually better to build the dictionary directly from the uncompressed data stream itself.

      With a database, the biggest problem is not how compressed the data is, it is how quickly you can return results. With this in mind, clever algorythms and fancy hashing functions really come into their own (search for bloom filters), but thats moving OT.

      Any scheme to compress it inhouse will usually increase the time to search. Most servers can compress the data between points anyway, there generally isnt a problem with it.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Compression by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I know there are already types of compression that take the most common
      > letters of a document, and then builds a binary dictionary off of it, to
      > create the most efficient way of storing the data. Perhaps this database
      > could be used, as a static dictionary, and compressing documents could be
      > even better, though the db queries might slow it down.

      It's not likely to gain you much. The idea of adding multiletter sequences
      to a Huffman tree has been explored at length, but in practice there are
      precious few multiletter sequences common enough to warrant an entry in the
      tree. Increasing the size of the tree very much will substantially worsen
      the compression, by increasing the lengths of the bit sequences for some of
      the characters. Even very common sequences like "ed" and "es" usually turn
      out to be better encoded as individual letters.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:Compression by tepples · · Score: 1

      The idea of adding multiletter sequences to a Huffman tree has been explored at length, but in practice there are precious few multiletter sequences common enough to warrant an entry in the tree.

      I read in Managing Gigabytes (ISBN 1-55860-570-3) of the "huffword" algorithm, which assigns a Huffman code to each word with pretty good results.

      Increasing the size of the tree very much will substantially worsen the compression, by increasing the lengths of the bit sequences for some of the characters.

      If the escape code meaning "uncommon word" is short enough (and given a proper construction of the Huffman tree it will be short enough), then escaping to a letter-by-letter Huffman code and back shouldn't take too many bits. In addition, an escape code meaning "globally uncommon but locally common word" would help, especially in documents that discuss proper names or technical issues.

  20. I think Edward Tufte ... by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

    ... you know, the information visualization/presentation guy, might like their display.

    1. Re:I think Edward Tufte ... by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

      you know, the information visualization/presentation guy [edwardtufte.com], might like their display

      Aspects of it are elegant, such as the histogram along the bottom edge. The main text display is I think the opposite of what Tufte would advocate. "Less is more", says Tufte. The Flash UI adds nothing there except limitations to display and performance so do without.

  21. Huh? by brianjcain · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Grok is not currently in the archive"

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is "glark". Although that's more like jargon, but has a similar meaning. But if "OMG" can make it to the list, surely jargon can too.

  22. Very curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the counts are for "slash" and "dot" ever since this bloody site came online.

  23. Does anyone know... by Suit_N_Tie · · Score: 2, Funny

    what the ranking is for the word /.?

  24. Reminds me of flaming logos by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nice concept for a web site, but the gratuitous use of technology gets in the way.

  25. "Wword"? by Speare · · Score: 1
    In addition they have Query Count which is a dynamic database of what are the most queried words on Wword Count.

    So, how often do people look up the word, 'Wword'?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  26. I wonder what rank by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Slashdot" and "effect" are located at?

    1. Re:I wonder what rank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is a question informative? Wow, I'm informed of this exciting question someone didn't bother to check?

  27. hmmm... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    we're driven:
    "work" is #103
    "play" is #443

    and imaginative: "what if" (45&46)

    77-81 seem to portend humanoids or clones "may these new also people"

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new Also People overlords.

  28. where are.... by bob_herzog · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...teh, noob, and haxor... I have trouble believing they aren't ranked heheh

    --
    "I'll waste 'em with my crossbow!" ~Bob Herzog, Power Gamer
  29. Interesting by chendo · · Score: 1

    1337: becomes. I 'becomes 1337'?
    31337-31338: Redeeming brothels.
    666: easy workers?

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  30. Re:Flash? by alatesystems · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really am sick of sites that require flash to get actual information. It should be part of the usability guidelines of the web that information be required to be in at least format.

    Take these two sites for example. I work in the healthcare profession and we don't run our machines as administrators, and flash isn't installed default on Win2k. When you go to Ochsner's Health Plan website, you can't do anything unless we, as administrators, log in and install flash for them from the activex control, just to log in as a provider.

    Also, Houston RoadRunner is the exact same.

    I hate flash, a lot, and It annoys me because you can't manipulate fonts, you can't use scroll wheel most of the time, all the control is taken AWAY from the user. I love flash when used for hilarious web cartoons, but using it for content is ridiculous.

    Chris

  31. Word flashmobs by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps sites like this will encourage the creation of word flashmobs. A group of people would conspire to overuse some obscure word to boost its rating. Bombing the word within blogs, web pages, and postings might help the word spread into wider use and rise in the rankings. It could even be a competitive sport -- two teams pick two words of adjacent rank and the team whose word rises the most wins.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Word flashmobs by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Fark does this with surveys.

      The last one I remember involved a survey on letting a bunch of cows loose in Edmonton streets as part of a "run with the bulls" type of event.

    2. Re:Word flashmobs by pipingguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      What a craptacular idea!

    3. Re:Word flashmobs by burns210 · · Score: 1

      You want to Google Bomb a dictionary?

    4. Re:Word flashmobs by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Woah! "craptacular" has moved up 1138 places since your post!

      -Peter

    5. Re:Word flashmobs by Deagol · · Score: 1

      Don't be an asshat!

    6. Re:Word flashmobs by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      What a craptacular idea!
      Nonsense. It's a perfectly cromulent idea.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  32. But.. by geordie_loz · · Score: 0

    this is a list of 86,800 words, so naturally this includes words used by people with larger vocabularies than yourself.. otherwise it would be a list of about 100 words, if that..

    1. Re:But.. by imsabbel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Never even try to estimate the vocabulary of other people. Im not even a native speaker, but i really doubt that i would lose to a little asshole like you in that department.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  33. I wonder by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    when the words "to slashdot", "slashdotting", and "slashbot will be included in the English dictionaries...

    How about we post a front-page story to Merriam-Webster's and Oxford's?

    1. Re:I wonder by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 0

      They probably should, and in due course, will be. "To slashdot" has become a generic term, even when the traffic in question is coming from a link posted on another site (b3ta.com is a good example).

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  34. Found one for the conspiracy corner. by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Funny
    Troll: discarding coexistence.

    Words 29350-29352.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  35. About 40,000? by levell · · Score: 1

    It seems there's a little over 40,000 words (excluding proper nouns etc.) in use in the sample text (whole english-written web?). I'm making that estimate based on the completely unscientific observation that after that point, most of the words seem to be place names etc.

    I know there are proper nouns before that point, but they're presumably balanced by the non-proper noun words after that point.

    --
    Struggling to find a day everyone can make? WhenShallWe.com
    1. Re:About 40,000? by levell · · Score: 1

      To correct myself (didn't notice the link in the bottom right) the sample isn't the web but the British National Corpus, a collection of writing from different sources. Which explains why Slashot and Firefox aren't high in the list and why colour (867) is much higher than color (27077). It would be interesting to compare to a web sampled version, which they are planning for the future.

      --
      Struggling to find a day everyone can make? WhenShallWe.com
    2. Re:About 40,000? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > It seems there's a little over 40,000 words (excluding proper nouns etc.)
      > in use in the sample text (whole english-written web?)

      I don't know about the sample text, but there are *WAY* more than 40000 English
      words in use on the web. Probably more than ten times that many.

      Most of them, however, occur a relatively paltry number of times. If you did
      Google searches for most of the words on the list, the number of results for
      each would be in the tens of thousands or higher. There are many, many words
      that get only a few hundred results.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  36. Did their sources include AIM and ICQ? by Mordaximus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I half expected this wordcount thing to, well, count real English words. OMG ranks at 43712.

    P.S. WTF Did not rank :/

    1. Re:Did their sources include AIM and ICQ? by The+Unabageler · · Score: 1

      wtf mate?!?!

      --
      perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
  37. Well duh. by Yaztromo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The archive bills itself as "...an interactive presentation of the 86,800 most frequently used English words."

    Last I checked, "Linux" is not a word in the english language.

    For the same reason, you're not going to find "Slashdot", "jSyncManager", or "iPod", regardless of how many times they're used online.

    Yaz.

    1. Re:Well duh. by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is not in the English language either... unless you are using Word's spellchecker.

      --

      Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
    2. Re:Well duh. by EvilOpie · · Score: 1

      True, Linux is not an actual word, but interestingly enough, "unix" does appear in the list. And ranks in at 2380.

      That's really not that far down from Windows, given that it is only a 1,211 difference in a list of 86,800 words.

      --
      -Through the server, over the router, off the firewall... Nothing but 'Net!
  38. Computer by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

    Computer is #705, immediately followed by security at #706....

    "Yes, Alex, I'll take 'Curious Coincidences' for $200."

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  39. Are these words really English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a test I looked up the word "revile" but noticed that it is flanked by some words that I've never seen in my life. Before it comes "herbes" and two after it comes "karkason". Neither of these appear in dictionary.com. Some other of it's rather colourful neighbours include "travertine" and "lucchese".
    Call me cynical but I'm pretty sure that they just made these up to make up the numbers ;-)

    1. Re:Are these words really English? by julesh · · Score: 1

      English frequently absorbs foreign words that are used as part of a phrase. For instance, my local supermarket stocks "Herbes de Provence" in their herbs section.

      OTOH, I have no idea what the rest of those are about.

    2. Re:Are these words really English? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Karkason is a surname. Travertine is a kind of marble. Lucchese is a kind of boot. Herbes is probably also a surname.

    3. Re:Are these words really English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herbes is that thing u get when ur thingy has a bunch of weird sores on it and it smells down there after spending the night with the skank from the parking lot.

    4. Re:Are these words really English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Travertine is a kind of limestone used to build the colliseum in Rome.

  40. Mofo makes it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Motherfucker is #76086! Congrats to all who keep it alive!

  41. I need this for German. by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to learn German. I need the 86,000 most-commonly used German words. This would give me a nice target of words to get to know in the process of learning it ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re: I need this for German. by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

      Leo: http://dict.leo.org/ is your friend!

    2. Re:I need this for German. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having been in a similar situation, I can recommend the resources below. The key thing here is that you should find materials that have context -- a vocabulary book is just a list of words for you to memorize.

      www.german.tv
      Pretty cheap really, and lots of diverse programming. The best way to learn a language is to insert yourself into the culture. If you don't have the time/money to do that, this is a good alternative.

      German magazines -- Der Spiegel, zum Beispiel...
      You can certainly get subscriptions to German magazines, or (more affordably) you should be able to find an international book/magazine/newspaper shop if you are near an urban area. Alternatively, there are lots of free news websites like www.welt.de

      International Radio
      Try something like RealPlayer (www.real.com) and pick up some of the online radio stations. www.inforadio.de is a great way to learn vocabulary by listening to the traffic report, weather report, news, etc. This is a great way to get quick at comprehension and to hear the language being pronounced.

      Childrens books
      Seriously. Even after 10+ years of German and having studied at a German university, I still find childrens books a great way to pick up vocabulary. Think about how you learned your native toungue -- probably by having a parent read children's books to you. This is good too because you can kind of figure out what your "level" is, so you can see yourself progress. www.powells.com and www.amazon.de have childrens books in German.

      Viel Spass!

  42. CoS by lovebyte · · Score: 4, Funny

    1941-1945:
    faith establish facts requires membership

    Tom Cruise hacked their website!

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  43. Wordcount.org database query oneliner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $ GET 'http://www.wordcount.org/dbquery.php?toFind= slashdot &method=SEARCH%5FBY%5FNAME' | perl -pne 's/&/\n/g;s/=/\t/g' | less

    1. Re:Wordcount.org database query oneliner by julesh · · Score: 1

      $ GET 'http://www.wordcount.org/dbquery.php?toFind= slashdot &method=SEARCH%5FBY%5FNAME' | perl -pne 's/&/\n/g;s/=/\t/g' | less

      Thank you. That's very useful, as the damned flash didn't work for me. Kept saying words were ranked 'NaN'...

  44. is it just me... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

    ..or has someone hacked the query count part?

  45. Something wrong? by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 3, Funny
    There must be something wrong with this.

    Book comes in at 357, Television comes in at 1022 and TV comes in at 1577.

    Ah, now I know what's wrong with it... It's "Artistic" so it doesn't have to mean anything. I mean, nobody would find it useful if the number of occurrences of a word was given.

    Here's the bit that would make you choke on your cornflakes...
    WordCount recently won AIGA's (American Institute of Graphic Arts) 2003 Award for Information Design.
    Tell me, what was the award trophy? A chocolate tea pot?
    --
    Where's the Kaboom?
    There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    1. Re:Something wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Book comes in at 357, Television comes in at 1022 and TV comes in at 1577.

      Well, do keep in mind that people Book a Flight or, if they're being retro, Book Out of a Room.... or talk about Shepherd Book from Firefly. Rarely does someone TV a Flight to London or comment on How Good Television was last night. :)

      Perhaps we should be more concerned that TV/television doesn't have a higher ranking because it's so ingrained in our minds now - you don't often hear "Did you see that ER television show last night?" 'cause now it's just "Did you see ER last night?" and everyone knows what you're talking about.

  46. Believe... by ArnIIe · · Score: 1

    God = 376
    Satan = 12864

    encoraging !

    1. Re:Believe... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      God = 376

      Yeah, but most of those uses were immediately followed by "damn", "damned" or "dammit"; or preceded by "Oh my".

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    2. Re:Believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god dammit!

  47. Cool idea by wombatmobile · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That has to be the coolest use of Flash

    It is a cool idea and it has been implemented with Flash.

    I'd like to see it implemented without Flash. What is cool would then be more accessible and available faster. That would be more compelling.

    1. Re:Cool idea by eofpi · · Score: 1

      A non-flash form might've also allowed their shared hosting account to stand up to the slashdotting for about 3 more seconds....

      --
      Y'know, you blow up one sun and suddenly everyone expects you to walk on water.
  48. True but... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. 'Microsoft' is at a disturbing 4304 which puts this word ahead of 'Fuck' at 5589!

    This means that either:

    1) That people at large think more about Microsoft than copulating. (Unlikely)

    2) They used a bunch of /. readers as a basis for working out their word collection.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:True but... by The+Slashdotted · · Score: 1

      3) The word windows has a use that Slashdotters are unaware of:

      Windows: glass panes used to look outside their parents basement.

    2. Re:True but... by ndogg · · Score: 1

      Microsoft' is at a disturbing 4304 which puts this word ahead of 'Fuck' at 5589!

      This just means there aren't enough quotes from Boondock Saints online.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    3. Re:True but... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > That people at large think more about Microsoft than copulating. (Unlikely)

      s/think(.*)Un/talk$1/; HTH.HAND.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  49. Somewhat dishonest by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    From the web site: "WordCount data currently comes from the British National Corpus, a 100 million word collection of samples of written and spoken language from a wide range of sources, designed to represent an accurate cross-section of current English usage."

    The BNC gives British English usage, not English usage. It does not reflect U.S. English usage. Britain has only 59 million people. The United States has 294 million people. Britain has a small percentage of the total number of English speakers.

    This is just an ad agency attempting to advertise to prospective clients. The agency is trying to impress people who aren't very knowledgeable about advertising. A knowledgeable person would be very negative about the agency's misuse of facts.

    --
    24 wars since WW2: Creating fear so rich people can profit.

    1. Re:Somewhat dishonest by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Considering they're the BNC, it only makes sense that they would be mostly concerned with the use of English within Britian.

      From the BNC themselves:

      "The British National Corpus (BNC) is a 100 million word collection of samples of written and spoken language from a wide range of sources, designed to represent a wide cross-section of current British English, both spoken and written."

      Actually, now that I've typed this comment, it does appear that WordCount is misrepresenting their data; the BNC is quite clear about it's origins, and WordCourt seems to purport that it covers the entire cross-section of current English usage.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Somewhat dishonest by Peyna · · Score: 1

      it's = its

      Cut me some slack, I had to watch da Bears beat the Packers yesterday, and as a consequence, had to stay up an extra few hours doing schoolwork.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Somewhat dishonest by Bill_Mische · · Score: 1

      Of course most of our 59 million are actually English so perhaps you should refer to "English English"? On the other hand that would sound silly. As a suggestion why not let the English speak "English" and the residents of the US speak "American".

      A more rational complaint is that the whole thing reflects the relative staid written rather than the more vibrant spoken form of English.

      --
      Boring Old Fart (40, married, 3 kids...er no...make that 49, married, 3 grown up kids...it's been a long time)
    4. Re:Somewhat dishonest by julesh · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say _dishonest_. To most British people (and I suspect those in English speaking nations other than the USA), "English" refers to the language we speak, and "US (or American) English" refers to the language you speak.

      So, the point is that the description is written in English (as in what British people speak) so "English" in it refers to the British concept of it. If the site had been written in US English, I would understand your objection...

    5. Re:Somewhat dishonest by eamonman · · Score: 1

      The United States has 294 million [brillig.com] people. Britain has a small percentage of the total number of English speakers.

      I don't know, but based on my experiences here in L.A., 294 mil is a bit generous for the U.S. Just go to a department store sometime here; you will most likely hear (depending where you are) at least 3-4 different languages during your trip there.

      --
      0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
  50. like is #67 by chyne · · Score: 2, Funny

    What happened to the days when only California teenagers/surfers used 'like' for every second word. I really noticed this when I went back to university recently. It's really, like, annoying to listen to, like, the kids today, like, use the word 'like', like, five times in one, like, sentence.

    1. Re:like is #67 by ElvenMonkey · · Score: 1

      But, like, what other, like, word would they use, likeyouknow, to fill in the, like, blanks of the coversations, like, whilst their brains are, like, youknow, catching up with, like, their mouths?

      A friend of mine regularly talks like this, and at times I just want to strangle him. It takes him twice as long to say something, and I'm sure he's got no idea just how much it irritates everyone. The BBC Comedy series "Little Britain" does a superb series of sketches using a character who is rather prone to speaking like that

      --
      "Joy is not in things; it is in us." Richard Wagner
    2. Re:like is #67 by igny · · Score: 1

      In Russian we call such words parasites. Interestingly in USA noone ever heard of 'word-parasites' even though lots of people have them. My favorite english phrase-parasite was 'if you will'.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  51. Shennanigans! by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    ... the word porn is not in the archive. I mean, how the fuck did that happen? Is this the vice that dare not speak its name?

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    1. Re:Shennanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's 17,245 on the list. Search by rank and you'll find it.

  52. Encoraging by UncleRage · · Score: 1

    Encoraging = 0

    Reassuring.

    --
    #SickNotWeak
    1. Re:Encoraging by ArnIIe · · Score: 1

      damn, i wish i could spell !

    2. Re:Encoraging by UncleRage · · Score: 1

      =)

      I posted before finishing my first coffee... I was definitely hoping that I didn't come across like a complete prick.

      --
      #SickNotWeak
    3. Re:Encoraging by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      " I was definitely hoping that I didn't come across like a complete prick"

      Naw, that was a rather incomplete prickishness :)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  53. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  54. "Ear" isn't in the archive? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    This shit is broken or it's so 1337 that only other geeks losers and nerds can use it.

  55. I looked for this word... by laejoh · · Score: 2, Funny
    but couldn't find it, which seems appropriate

    The word is
    semprini


    More info on Just the words (Monty Python)
    1. Re:I looked for this word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A common suggestion on the Python (Monty) newsgroups is that it refers to the pianist Alberto Semprini, famous for his series "Semprini Serenade" on the light/easy listening radio station Radio 2 in the late 1950s.

  56. NaN! by Swedentom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apparently, the 'word' NaN is used a lot! :-)
    NaNNaNNaNNaNNaN

    Slashdotted?

    --
    Sig Nature
    1. Re:NaN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or just big Steam fans ?

    2. Re:NaN! by a24061 · · Score: 1

      The official standard for words should include NaW (not a word).

  57. Slow news day? by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 2, Informative
    I submitted a story about WordCount way way back in August.

    It was rejected.

    "Word Count Tuesday August 03, @06:04AM Rejected "

    992-995 america ensure oil opportunity
    3046-3051 iraq winner, fucking smooth, nick votes

    1. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I submitted a story about WordCount way way back in August.

      It was rejected.

      "Word Count Tuesday August 03, @06:04AM Rejected


      You are neither Cmdr nor Taco.

    2. Re:Slow news day? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      Yea that happens a lot. Stuff I submit frequently ends up as an article later in the day or in the following weeks. Of course submitted by someone else, whilst mine is rejected. Their's usually has included misspellings, where I spellcheck. I keep good references in the body, they usually don't, and yet somehow, my articles are ALWAYS rejected. Can't figure it out myself. I just gave up after awhile.

    3. Re:Slow news day? by Darby · · Score: 1

      Stuff I submit frequently ends up as an article later in the day or in the following weeks. Of course submitted by someone else, whilst mine is rejected.

      Well, let's see if we can figure out why.

      Their's usually has included misspellings, where I spellcheck.

      Bingo!

      You see, the editors can't spell at all, so they assume that your words are misspelled. Given how concerned they are about keeping the quality of language up on this site, that's a clear reason to reject your posts ;-)

    4. Re:Slow news day? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      lol, I thinks your rights! (maybe this will makes it.)

  58. centralization! by ShecoDu · · Score: 1

    I don't speak english you insensitive clod.

  59. Re:Love Hate (and Mom) by bheerssen · · Score: 1

    In the immortal words of the Butthole Surfers:

    "This here a song, is about John W Smoke Junior
    It's about bein' in love and lovin' the love that's hatin' the love
    the love and the love and the hate that's lovin with all
    It's around the love that's hate that's the hate that's the love
    And the love is the love that is the hate that's hatin' the love,
    it's lovin' the hate
    It's about John W Smoke's mom, it's with his mom
    it's about his mom it's about his mom it's about lovin his mom
    and bein' without his mom and lovin' the hate that's hatin' the love
    and his mom and all the time they're there
    Hatin' the hate that's lovin' the hate it's love it's the love that's hate
    And it goes somethin' about like this"

    --
    (Score: -1, Stupid)
  60. Quirkafleeg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wanted to say it, that is all.

  61. Get a pocket dictionary by sczimme · · Score: 1


    Langenscheidt, Oxford-Duden, and Berlitz (among others) publish small paperback Deutsche Worterbucher. The Langenscheidt version on Amazon.com is described as containing "55,000 references" while the Oxford-Duden has around 70,000 entries.

    I was an exchange student in Germany *mumble* years ago and the Langenscheidt dictionary was extremely useful.

    /likes typing 'Langenscheidt'

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Get a pocket dictionary by torpor · · Score: 1

      thanks for the advice; i've already got tons of dictionaries. what i want to do is increase my vocabulary, and doing that by plowing through 10,000 or so 'most commonly used words' over the course of 3 months seems to me to be the way to go ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Get a pocket dictionary by MatthewB79 · · Score: 1

      I used the flash cards from the Uni bookstore, they had 2000 of the most commonly used words on them. I believe they are made by Vis-Ed of Springfield Ohio.

    3. Re:Get a pocket dictionary by salm · · Score: 1

      If you are lookinf for a book containing 10,000 German words suitable for learning the language then I suggest the book:

      Collins Pocket 10000 German Words
      (available from Amazon)

      They do similar books for other languages. We used the French and German versions at school, and I now need the Italian to talk to my parents-in-law.

      They are partnered with similar pocketsized grammar books, and verb tables, as well as Collins pocket dictionaries, and are handy enough to take on trips to the appropriate country.

      --
      no time, no sig
  62. Not at all dishonest !! by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

    The BNC gives British English usage, not English usage.

    English:- " of or relating to or characteristic of England or its culture".

    Use of terms such as British English is a tautology!!.

    If you're going to differentiate between the English language and that variation spoken in the US [and in many places across the globe], feel free, but at least be honest about it and refer to your [linguistic] deviations as American "English".

    1. Re:Not at all dishonest !! by Eric119 · · Score: 1

      This is totally wrong. The definition of "English" you provided is an adjective, while in "British English" is it used as a noun.

    2. Re:Not at all dishonest !! by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

      I disagree - it is an adjectival noun (if you prefer an acceptable shortening of "English Language").

      As Oscar Wide remarked, the UK and US are two nations divided by a common language ;-)

  63. WordCount Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hi everybody!

    Jon Harris here, the creator of WordCount. The server got slammed by SlashDot (thanks guys!) and and my server is down. There is a mirror of WordCount up at: http://www.fabrica.it/wordcount

    Enjoy!

    Best,
    Jon

  64. ooops by rozz · · Score: 1

    looks like they got out-of-words lately

    "
    Visitors
    We are sorry but this site is experiencing difficulties at this time.
    Please return shortly!
    Thank you for your patience.

    Webmaster - please contact support as soon as possible.
    "

    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  65. Like is a weasel-word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nearly everyone uses conversational particles that serve the purpose of inserting pauses into the flow of words. For the most part, they exist to allow a moment to think about wording. With a few exceptions, they aren't words and have no meaning in themselves.

    One of the problems with "like" is that its meaning serves to dilute the meaning of the words that follow it. Consider the difference between saying that your coworker is an expert in XML vs. saying that he is like an expert in XML. Most of the time, "like" is simply verbal whitespace. Unfortunately, it can be used as a weasel-word to avoid committing oneself to a definite statement. And the choice between those two options can be made after the fact.

  66. www.number27.org? Conspiracy? 23? Hellllllo? by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    How can they have something called Conspiracy Corner in a site called number27.org? 7-2=5, but still, it's ungainly :(

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  67. Nigritude Ultramarine by emilng · · Score: 1
  68. I think these words are moving up rapidly... by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

    Visitors
    We are sorry but this site is experiencing difficulties at this time.
    Please return shortly!
    Thank you for your patience.

    Webmaster - please contact support as soon as possible.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  69. for the record, the 7 dirty words not allowed by gemtech · · Score: 2, Informative

    on TV (according to George Carlin) are: shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.

    --
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
  70. In that case... by sczimme · · Score: 1


    you might want to look at one of the phrase books, usually available in the pocket dictionary form factor. It sounds like you have learned some of the Grammatik already, so you will actually understand the sentences once you get the Vokabeln down. The phrase books I have seen/used have sections for travel, restaurants, etc. - everyday situations one might face while in-country. I believe the Berlitz phrase books (vice their dictionaries) are for people who don't speak the language at all, and may do more harm than good if the translations aren't precise.

    I haven't studied German for quite a few years, and I find that the grammar still makes sense but I have forgotten a lot of the vocabulary. D'oh.

    Viel Glueck and viel Spass! :-)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  71. Website Down! by earthstar · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Visitors
    We are sorry but this site is experiencing difficulties at this time.
    Please return shortly!
    Thank you for your patience. Webmaster - please contact support as soon as possible.

    LMAO!
    Any Mirror?

  72. English words by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 1

    This list only has ENGLISH words, and as we all know, "grok" is Martian.

    --
    "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    1. Re:English words by julesh · · Score: 1

      This list only has ENGLISH words, and as we all know, "grok" is Martian.

      I believe it has been officially adopted, see this FAQ item.

      (Although they seem to think Heinlein invented it...)

    2. Re:English words by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 1

      It was a joke :-P Grok was first used in Heinlein's "Stranger in a Strange Land" as far as I know.

      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    3. Re:English words by julesh · · Score: 1

      Same here ;). That was a great book.

  73. Also, by ambrosen · · Score: 2, Informative

    The BNC only goes up to 1990, as well. Linux wasn't a word then. Microsoft ranks 5293 on the list I've got, occurring 1704 times in 100 million words

  74. Spam filter uses? by danharan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To fight keyword stuffing, I believe keeping track of the word use distribution in an email would help us judge the spam potential.

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  75. Actually I did/ do by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Although I am American, I often catch myself using the Brittish spellings. When I was in highschool, we didn't have wordperfect or MS word on our computer, we had some silly bargin bin $5 "Easy working word processor" And it's spell check perffered the brittish spellings. I blame it for my poor grades in english. My teacher qould not accept "colour" or "Centre", or "programme" or any other brittish spellings.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  76. floccinaucinihilipilification by the_twisted_pair · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..means 'the act of estimating as worthless.'

    -To you and me, it means calling something shit.

    (teehee. finally found a way to post that one)

  77. Except... by PornMaster · · Score: 1

    Except 'fuck' is often found *before* 'Microsoft' on Slashdot.

  78. How many people speak English? by Jonti · · Score: 2, Informative
    Well over a billion people speak English. Sure, around a quarter of them live in the US, but that still means most do not.

    Even so, I kinda agree with what you say, that the site is close to misrepresenting itself. But the greater dishonesty is surely that the bloody thing is just grandstanding with public data -- it's almost useless, presumably by design, for practical purposes. So, yes, I too would rather the authors had been clear about their American background.

    Here's some stats ...

    • English has official or special status in at least seventy five countries with a total population of over two billion
    • English is spoken as a first language by around 375 million and as a second language by around 375 million speakers in the world
    • speakers of English as a second language probably outnumber those who speak it as a first language
    • around 750 million people are believed to speak English as a foreign language
    • one out of four of the world's population speak English to some level of competence; demand from the other three-quarters is increasing.
    • It looks to me as if the sums work like this:
      375m (1st language)
      375m (2nd language)
      750m (learned English as a foreign language)
      -----
      1500m

      http://www.britishcouncil.org/english/engfaqs.htm

  79. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there are at least nine priors.

  80. The conspiracy works, heh heh heh: by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 1
    The conspirary corner page now reads:
    Visitors
    We are sorry but this site is experiencing difficulties at this time.
    Please return shortly!
    Thank you for your patience.

    Webmaster - please contact support as soon as possible.
    And the Slashdot Conspiracy continues...
    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  81. History of the English language by siskbc · · Score: 4, Informative
    If it helps, think of American English as a foreign language. You wouldn't call someone in Spain on the phone and insist on speaking English, would you? Similarly, when calling an American, it would serve you well to make accomodations for their knowledge of your language, particularly if you expect that you are more knowledgeable of American English than the person to whom you are speaking is of UK English.

    Also, it's not as if you are "correct" and the American "incorrect." Languages are fluid. Languages evolve, including English. Brits (I include Canadians here, having severed ties only quite recently) have really screwed up the proper German you were taught ~1500 years ago too. And the Norwegian you were taught ~1200 years ago. And the French you were taught 968 years ago. As such, would you consider the entire English language "incorrect?" Many words had various spellings in the 1600s when English was brought to America. As such, it's not accurate to claim that the American spelling is incorrect, when we simply chose one of the accepted spellings at the time and the Brits chose the other. It might be different if the English language had an established spelling for a certain word by 1500 and Americans changed, but this is not the case. For all the pedantic spelling and grammar correction, many Brits (and Canadians) seem to be ignorant of the history of their own language.

    One might also suggest that you not engage in such displays of self-superiority - "When in Rome..." one might say. You seem to share the attitude of tourists in foreign lands who expect to have waiters (for example) speak their own native language and become irate when the waiter can't or won't. Admittedly, Americans are one of the major contributors to the image of the self-righteous tourist, and I find that disgusting too. Ultimately, one can adapt to your host nation - even if it's simply over the phone - or one can maintain self-righteousness and deal with the inevitable inaccuracies. What does one gain from this exchange, anyway?

    As for the Americans in Canada you cite, their mistakes are borne of ignorance rather than self-righteousness. The difference borne of ignorance is correctable. I would politely, without condescencion, inform them that the letter they refer to as "zee" is called "zed" by the rest of the English speaking world. If they insist on maintaining their behavior, then your ire would be well-placed - if you didn't insist on doing the same, that is.

    All in all, there's really no need for this "whose language is correct" debate. Language is a tool. If you can effectively with the other party, you have no problem. Your problem is you intentionally choose not to simply due to ego, which I find baffling.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:History of the English language by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Actually most English words have Greek and Latin descent. Very few find their roots in German.

      As for the ignorance; you're right that it's correctable, but it's ironic that we know enough to explain the differences to the ignorant individuals. I honestly attribute that to the permeation of US culture in the rest of the english speaking world. We undnestand the differences between US culture and our own, far more than Americans understand the differences between their culture and others'...

      The only things some Americans probably only know about Canada is 1)beer, 2)hockey and 3)eh!

      And I pity the poor soul who hasn't had Canadian beer :)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re: History of the English language by gidds · · Score: 1
      Actually most English words have Greek and Latin descent.

      Depends how you count them. Just over a quarter are from French, a similar amount from Latin, a quarter Germanic (from Middle English, Old English, Old Norse, and Dutch), and the rest from Greek, proper names, and elsewhere.

      However, those words aren't spread evenly. The 'core' vocabulary is mostly Germanic -- the short, simple, blunt, everyday words. Prepositions, conjunctions, pronouns, demonstratives, and lots of concrete nouns and physical verbs are all Germanic in origin. Much of the Latinate vocabulary is stuck in technical, professional, and formal contexts.

      Anyway, siskbc was right about that.

      (More at Wikipedia, of course. There's a good short history, highlighting the difference between Latinate and Germanic branches, here.)

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    3. Re: History of the English language by gidds · · Score: 1
      Many words had various spellings in the 1600s when English was brought to America... we simply chose one of the accepted spellings at the time and the Brits chose the other.

      Actually, I think that most of the differences between US and UK English are words which have changed in British English over the last few centuries, and US English still has the older form. (Most of the few cases where US English has changed are due to Noah Webster.)

      I find it interesting that British English seems to be a fraction more precise. For example, it distinguishes:

      • a measuring device ('meter') from the unit of length ('metre');
      • the side of a road ('kerb') from restraint ('curb');
      • a floor of a building ('storey') from a tale ('story');
      • a test or restraint ('check') from an order to pay ('cheque') and a V-shaped mark ('tick');
      • grow weary ('tire') from a wheel rim ('tyre');
      • a rough version ('draft') from a movement of fluid ('draught');
      • some verbs from nouns: license/licence, practise/practice, and prophesy/prophecy; and more recently,
      • a computer storage medium ('disk') from any other round flat object ('disc'); and
      • computer instructions ('program') from a broadcast or list of events ('programme').
      But I don't know of any cases the other way around, where US English makes a distinction that British English doesn't.

      (I know a little about this, as I've written a tool to convert text from US to British English. Cases like those are tiresome and need user intervention to distinguish.)

      The most confusing cases are words which are current in both languages, but with different meanings. 'Pavement', for example, means a pedestrian path at the side of a road here in the UK (US 'sidewalk'), but the surface of the road itself in the US (UK 'road', 'tarmac', 'asphalt' &c). 'Pants' and 'suspenders' are also ripe with hilarious possibilities!

      Oh, and as I discovered a few years ago, what we call 'tea', you call 'hot tea'. I was extremely non-plussed the first couple of times I asked for tea and got something cold and sugary with lemon! Anyone who prefers that strange concoction should see this H2G2 article...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    4. Re: History of the English language by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Nice link eh... I stand corrected :)

      I almost sounded like the guy from My BIg Fat Greek Wedding :)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    5. Re:History of the English language by OldeClegg · · Score: 1

      "Admittedly, Americans are one of the major contributors to the image of the self-righteous tourist, and I find that disgusting too."



      I wonder if perhaps this perception of the boorish US tourist has more to do with there being more of them than any other kind.



  82. They've struck again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All your word are belong to us!"
    -- Microsoft

  83. NaN by ciderbob · · Score: 1

    Is NaN actually a word? It seems to be the most and least common

    1. Re:NaN by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're not trying to be funny, it stands for 'Not a Number' and is the IEEE standard designation for a failed floating point operation (e.g.: divide by zero).

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  84. Slashdot Effect by lullabud · · Score: 1

    I wonder how often those two words are used, especially in that particular order.

  85. Slashdotted by msaulters · · Score: 1

    But the popups still work... Hmmm....

    --
    These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
  86. Re:Flash? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've refuted this line of 'reasoning' in my jounral. Have a look. Flash, when implemented properly, is the perfect tool for delivering content in certain applications where a lot of interaction is required. It is a lot more efficient than re-loading a whole page of HTML just for the sake of updating a few words on it. If the whole page changes, then HTML begins to have an advantage.

    Please don't present an argument about technical issues based on how you 'hate' a technology. We have to examine technologies and their implementation on their own merits, not based on emotion.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  87. Re: Monkey Island by CdBee · · Score: 1

    Guybrush Threepwood doesn't even feature in the list, so I bet you have a lot of mod points left...

    Oh look, I mentioned him.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  88. NaN NaN NaN.... by astro128 · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else getting this strange response for any inquire? This happens when I click on the occurance graph, when i type in a field, nothing happens. Is it just that my browser is out of date? or is it slashdotted to errors now.

  89. downed server by PCN · · Score: 1

    All I know is that is /. is not in there yet, it will be after [they] realized it was /. who F'd their servers

    --
    Holy shit, and you thought the guy down the hall was crazy!
  90. Here's a new word for their list... by pfurlong · · Score: 1

    ...Slashdotted.

  91. ObSimpQuote by Dirtside · · Score: 1
    "I loved Gigli"
    I know all those words, but that phrase makes no sense.
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  92. Not to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frank's frank.

  93. Re:Flash? by prockcore · · Score: 1

    I really am sick of sites that require flash to get actual information. It should be part of the usability guidelines of the web that information be required to be in at least format.

    I'm really sick of people bitching about other people's websites.

    "It should be required", hah!

  94. Another one of those sites that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...disables the back button in IE. I have a few words I could use to describe how I feel about that.

    Why do they do that? Do they really think that I'm going to hang out on their site just because the back button won't work?

  95. i tried ... by geraint-nz · · Score: 1

    two words "obstinate" and "obscure" and got the result that they are not in the archive. What has happened to the language?

    1. Re:i tried ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! "Gullible" isn't in the list either! Check it yourself!

  96. Gigarectum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everybody calls it goatse...

  97. Canada, America, Beer by siskbc · · Score: 1
    Actually most English words have Greek and Latin descent. Very few find their roots in German.

    Actually that's in fact not true. English is placed in the Germanic language group by linguists. Of course it has a strong French influence (as indicated), but it's primarily a Germanic language. Having studied German (and obviously speaking English), there are many similarities between the languages. And this was even more the case for (old?) English, particularly before the French invasion in 1066.

    As for the ignorance; you're right that it's correctable, but it's ironic that we know enough to explain the differences to the ignorant individuals. I honestly attribute that to the permeation of US culture in the rest of the english speaking world. We undnestand the differences between US culture and our own, far more than Americans understand the differences between their culture and others'...

    There are various reasons for this. First, 90% of Canada's population lies less than 100 miles from an American border; the same cannot be said for America. As such, it is understandable that the average Canadian comes into contact with Americans more than the other way around. Also, for right or wrong, America is large and rather powerful, with many large businesses. Canada is a major trade partner with the US, but I believe we're more a part of your trade than you are ours. Again, not a right or wrong argument, but the way it is. Since we're bigger, and dabble in world politics more, it's unavoidable that we're more on your radar.

    The only things some Americans probably only know about Canada is 1)beer, 2)hockey and 3)eh!

    See, we do know everything about Canada. ;) You're probably right, though. Although, Americans who live near Canada know your legal drinking age is lower than ours. So that's four things.

    And I pity the poor soul who hasn't had Canadian beer :)

    I keep hearing about good Canadian beer, but have never had it (All we get is Molson - I'm not impressed). As a major brew-o-phile, I'm certainly interested in better Canadian beers if they exist. I've never had good experience with Canadian beers, but I expect the Canadian beers I have available are like the American beers you have available: ie, mass-produced shit. For what it's worth, America's starting to (in the last 5-10 years) to make some GREAT beer. One of my favorites is Stone Brewing Co. I realize American beer gets a bad rap - deservedly so - but it's changing dramatically, and I'd say most of the innovation in beers today is in America - ironically enough, because we have little beer tradition to maintain.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  98. Obligatory Futurama Ref by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bender's Top Ten most frequently uttered words (and their comparison to Wordcount):

    10. Chump (#60954)
    9. Chumpette (not found)
    8. Yours (#2376)
    7. Up (#56)
    6. Pimpmobile (not found)
    5. Bite (#5922)
    4. My (#69)
    3. Shiny (#8590)
    2. Daffodil (#27591)
    1. Ass (#15036)

  99. It's garbage by rfc1394 · · Score: 1

    I looked up the most serious and well known obscenity in English, the 4-letter one beginning with "f", and it was not present, but that might be a choice they made. However, the most-defined word in the English language, run is not present. Two major and significant words and neither are found. So that means the system is garbage as far as I'm concerned.

    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    1. Re:It's garbage by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      Nan, er, nah, it just appears to be borken/slashdotted. Apparently, slashdotters have entered enough words to bring the database up to NaN words.

      And I was looking forward to seeing how Fab and Cool compare to the currently popular young person's adjective, Awesome.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  100. White Wolf - teaching adverbs to Americans by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    Some years ago, I used ot be involved in the Camarilla roleplaying organisation (I got better). Their Mind's Eye Theatre system used disciplines based on what were reasonably obscure words - such as obfuscate, protean, auspex, diablorie, etc.... We used to refer to the system as teaching adverbs to Americans

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  101. "Tits" obscenity went tits up by tepples · · Score: 1

    And then the U.S. Congress went and tried to replace "tits" with "asshole" in its most recent list of seven (HR 3687).

    1. Re:"Tits" obscenity went tits up by gemtech · · Score: 1

      asshole may be valid, Geoge Carlin's routine was from the the early '70s. I'll be that you can say tits on TV now.

      --
      Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
  102. Re:Flash? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'm really sick of people bitching about other people's websites.

    Then vote out the legislators who created your jurisdiction's counterpart to section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, which mandates web accessibility for businesses that do business with the United States Government.

  103. Re:Flash? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Flash, when implemented properly

    What I've seen of Flash, other than satirical or otherwise comical animation pieces (such as what is seen on web sites such as newgrounds, killfrog, jibjab, joecartoon, etc), is seldom implemented properly.

    It is a lot more efficient than re-loading a whole page of HTML

    But is it accessible to users with disabilities?

  104. Alternate url if your getting NaN by linuxmeltz · · Score: 1

    a quick google search reveals: http://www.fabrica.it/wordcount/main.php

  105. Re:Flash? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    I don't know why you were modded down for that, it's a perfectly reasonable comment which I happen to agree with.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  106. Google "Zipf filter" by Randym · · Score: 1
    Zipf filter.

    It's already been done.

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
    1. Re:Google "Zipf filter" by danharan · · Score: 1
      It's already been done.
      Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to respond, this looks like some very interesting references. :)
      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  107. American != English by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1
    If it helps, think of American English as a foreign language. You wouldn't call someone in Spain on the phone and insist on speaking English, would you? Similarly, when calling an American, it would serve you well to make accomodations for their knowledge of your language, particularly if you expect that you are more knowledgeable of American English than the person to whom you are speaking is of UK English.

    It is a foreign language. However the issue I take is that you Americans insist that you are speaking English - you are not, you are speaking American. When I'm talking to a non-English speaker, if they try speaking English and they make a mistake I might correct them (assuming its a situation where it's polite to do so). Similarly if you, as an American, insist that you are speaking English I will correct you when you make a mistake. However, tell me that you are speaking American and I'll treat it with the respect due any foreign language.

    There are plenty of examples where two languages are very close but have different names e.g. Norwegian and Danish. I think that this is a good thing since it prevents the feeling that foreigners are coming in and telling you how to speak in your own country, which is something that is clearly ticking you off.

  108. Who woulda known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    31337 = redeeming
    86800 (least used word) = conquistador

  109. Pay attention by siskbc · · Score: 1
    It is a foreign language. However the issue I take is that you Americans insist that you are speaking English - you are not, you are speaking American.

    As I mentioned, I suggest learning the history of your own language before engaging in any more of your pedantic rants. American English is no less correct than British English. Alternatively, if ours is incorrect because it doesn't resemble yours, then both are incorrect because neither really resembles late Middle/early late English. Read Shakespeare sometime, and realize that was the state of the language when America was founded (the first colony in 1607 was contemporaneous with Shakespeare's work). Both American English and British English have changed substantially since then, particularly with spellings. Again, had English been a non-fluid language before that time, you would have a case. As it is, you don't - I know of very few differences between American and British English that can't be found in common, accepted use in English as of 1600.

    English is a language that has, in computer science terms, forked. That doesn't mean either branch is "right." Insisting otherwise really makes one come off as arrogant and condescending.

    I understand that, as the British "Empire" has collapsed, you have very few opportunities to condescend toward America these days. However, if the differences in your spellings are all you have to cling to, I might abandon the idea entirely.

    Or put it this way - I'll claim to speaking "American" when you claim to speak "British." Until then, you might educate yourself on linguistics and learn the difference between a dialect and a language.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Pay attention by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1
      However, if the differences in your spellings are all you have to cling to, I might abandon the idea entirely.

      For someone who seems to consider themselves a linguistic expert you have an astounding lack of knowledge of the differences between American and English. It goes considerably beyond spelling. Not only are words completely different (e.g. lift and elevator - which presumably come after the 1600's given the invention date) but turns of phrase are different as well "neighbourhood kids" vs. "local kids" etc.

      Or put it this way - I'll claim to speaking "American" when you claim to speak "British." Until then, you might educate yourself on linguistics and learn the difference between a dialect and a language.

      So tell me - what do I call the English spoken in England vs. the English spoken in Scotland? Both are parts of Britain but in Scotland it is common to use "wee" for small along with other minor differences. Perhaps we should call it English English and you call yours American English. However in the interests of removing unneeded clutter let's call our language English and your language American. There we go that wasn't so hard was it?

      What I don't understand is why you are so hung up over having your language called English? You aren't English, you don't live in England, you fought and won a war to be separate from England so why do you seem to want to tell everyone that you speak English? Finding out the president George is even worse than King George? :-)