Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Minutiae

Class Act Dynamo writes "CNN does a story on some of the finer points of making the Star Wars flicks. I like the part where Mark Hamill discusses the theoretical logistics of employing janitorial staff for the entire Death Star. Enjoy."

290 comments

  1. The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Randal: So they build another Death Star, right?
    Dante: Yeah.
    Randal: Now the first one they built was completed and fully operational before the Rebels destroyed it.
    Dante: Luke blew it up. Give credit where it's due.
    Randal:And the second one was still being built when they blew it up.
    Dante: Compliments of Lando Calrissian.
    Randal: Something just never sat right with me the second time they destroyed it. I could never put my finger on it-something just wasn't right.
    Dante: And you figured it out?
    Randal: Well, the thing is, the first Death Star was manned by the Imperial army-storm troopers, dignitaries- the only people onboard were Imperials.
    Dante: Basically.
    Randal: So when they blew it up, no prob. Evil is punished.
    Dante: And the second time around...?
    Randal: The second time around, it wasn't even finished yet. They were still under construction.
    Dante: So?
    Randal: A construction job of that magnitude would require a helluva lot more manpower than the Imperial army had to offer. I'll bet there were independent contractors working on that thing: plumbers, aluminum siders, roofers.
    Dante: Not just Imperials, is what you're getting at.
    Randal: Exactly. In order to get it built quickly and quietly they'd hire anybody who could do the job. Do you think the average storm trooper knows how to install a toilet main? All they know is killing and white uniforms.
    Dante: All right, so even if independent contractors are working on the Death Star, why are you uneasy with its destruction?
    Randal: All those innocent contractors hired to do a job were killed- casualties of a war they had nothing to do with. (notices Dante's confusion) All right, look-you're a roofer, and some juicy government contract comes your way; you got the wife and kids and the two-story in suburbia-this is a government contract, which means all sorts of benefits. All of a sudden these left-wing militants blast you with lasers and wipe out everyone within a three-mile radius. You didn't ask for that. You have no personal politics. You're just trying to scrape out a living.
    (The Blue-Collar Man (Thomas Burke) joins them.)
    Blue-Collar Man: Excuse me. I don't mean to interrupt, but what were you talking about?
    Randal: The ending of Return of the Jedi.
    Dante: My friend is trying to convince me that any contractors working on the uncompleted Death Star were innocent victims when the space station was destroyed by the rebels.
    Blue-Collar Man: Well, I'm a contractor myself. I'm a roofer... (digs into pocket and produces business card) Dunn and Reddy Home Improvements. And speaking as a roofer, I can say that a roofer's personal politics come heavily into play when choosing jobs.
    Randal: Like when?
    Blue-Collar Man: Three months ago I was offered a job up in the hills. A beautiful house with tons of property. It was a simple reshingling job, but I was told that if it was finished within a day, my price would be doubled. Then I realized whose house it was.
    Dante: Whose house was it?
    Blue-Collar Man: Dominick Bambino's.
    Randal: "Babyface" Bambino? The gangster?
    Blue-Collar Man: The same. The money was right, but the risk was too big. I knew who he was, and based on that, I passed the job on to a friend of mine.
    Dante: Based on personal politics.
    Blue-Collar Man: Right. And that week, the Foresci family put a hit on Babyface's house. My friend was shot and killed. He wasn't even finished shingling.
    Randal: No way!
    Blue-Collar Man: (paying for coffee) I'm alive because I knew there were risks involved taking on that particular client. My friend wasn't so lucky. (pauses to reflect) You know, any contractor willing to work on that Death Star knew the risks. If they were killed, it was their own fault. A roofer listens to this... (taps his heart) not his wallet.

    1. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Insightful

      actually..

      there's a shitload of civilians above every bigger imperial vessel.

      or maybe not in lucas's universe. maybe he'll change storm troopers to be robots some day too(like he "meant to do in the first place").

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sorry to spoil the humor, but the Star Wars Databank says the Death Star was built by Geonosians, which are insect-like hivemind creatures and therefore not individual contractors. :p

    3. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Randal: Well, the thing is, the first Death Star was manned by the Imperial army-storm troopers, dignitaries- the only people onboard were Imperials.

      Even that is not true - we know that Death Star had lots of prison cells (we know that there are more cell blocks than just the one where Lea is kept. It's safe to assume that on Death Star there were at least dozens (if not hundreds) of prisoners of the Empire. Now, some of them could be also evil, like drunken stormtroopers or a lousy TIE-fighter pilot who scratched paint on Vader's machine while parking, but many of them were probably genuine freedom fighters - the prisoners from blocade runner, for example.

    4. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by leerpm · · Score: 1

      Well I believe most of the construction in that era was performed by large robots. Timothy Zahn mentions this in his later trilogy when talking about constrution that went on at Coruscant.

    5. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Attack of the Clones pretty much says this too.
      The geonosians were the funny-speaking bugs right? :)

      They show Count Dooku the blueprints they've made, which I suppose later gets leaked to R2-D2. :)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sah-ah-aaaad"

    7. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Sique · · Score: 5, Funny

      [...] but many of them were probably genuine freedom fighters [...]

      It's terrorist, man. They don't wear uniforms, they are not commanded by a government, they are not for open battle, but doing stealth attacks... So they are terrorists, and any support to them is punishable by the PATRIOT act.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    8. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by gilroy · · Score: 5, Funny
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Well I believe most of the construction in that era was performed by large robots.

      Well, if by "robots" you mean "droids", then what's the difference? Droids are clearly sentient in the Star Wars universe. Are you saying that the life of an organic is intrinsically valuable but the life of a mechanical is not? I am so tired of this carbon bias on slashdot! :)
    9. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      which are insect-like hivemind creatures

      One thing I've learned from Star Wars is this: The Universe is made up of insects, bears, crustaceans and various reptiles.

    10. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Kogase · · Score: 1

      But unlike R2-D2 and C-3PO, most droids had their memories routinely wiped, making them unable to develop a personality or real awareness.

    11. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      How could taking part in the creation of a Death Star, especially with the knowledge that the first one was used to destroy the peaceful planet of Alderaan, be a morally defensible position? Especially for the contractors, who weren't even drafted. Anyway, they're aliens, who cares?

    12. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Mr. Lucas,

      You are welcome to create new races of aliens to populate your Star Wars universe. In fact, we welcome you to. And we don't even mind if you want to flesh out your backstory with these creatures... well some of us do, but they are zealots, so never mind them.

      But if we catch you splicing in Geonosian construction workers in the DVD Extra Special Superpak release next year, we will be waiting for you at Skywalker Ranch with pitchforks and shotguns.

      Sincerely,
      Your fans

    13. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by advocate_one · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      and yet Blue Collar Man passed the job on to his friend??? I'd have put the word around for anyone I know not to touch that contract with a bargepole...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    14. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by lxs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cease this specieist talk!
      Insect-like hivemind creatures are people too. Just take a look at Microsoft employees...

      I see your point now. Kill em! Kill em all!

    15. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't be silly - they never actually told the contractors that it was a *Death* star.

      "Hey, Frank... what in the heck *is* this thing we're building, anyway?"

      "They told me that once we're done laying down the linoleum the whole outside of this thing gets fitted with reflective tile."

      "You mean...?"

      "Yep. Biggest self-sufficient disco ball in the universe!"

      "But what for?"

      "They gave me a card - here."

      "'Our mission - riding the solar wind and spreading the good news and intergalactic funk from event horizon to event horizon.'"

      "Yeah, isn't that just the wierdest?"

      "Wait, there's more... 'D.V. and The Black Hole Sunshine Band - The Best Bang Since the Big One'. Where have I heard that before?"

      "Dunno, Charlie, but I've got a *bad* feeling about this..."

    16. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by JackCroww · · Score: 1

      Yah, that's a good idea. Bring the Mob's attention to yourself by telling everyone you know not to take the job. You may as well take the job and hope you survive.

      --
      "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
    17. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by maxbang · · Score: 1

      If 3PO never had his memory wiped, then he would have remembered his origins on Tatooine in Episode IV. I'll guess he was present when the twins were separated, hence the need for a complete memory wipe. Also, if someone's capable of being fluent in over six millions forms of communication, perhaps the total storage space available for life data is so small that it's routinely replaced with new, more relevant data?

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    18. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny
      I am so tired of this carbon bias on slashdot! :)
      Well what do you expect? Slashdot is entirely populated with carbon-biased lifeforms!
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    19. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by henrik · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe the more recent term for them would be "illegal combatants". Terrorists have rights to legal hearing and legal help, the former does not.

    20. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by cob666 · · Score: 1

      ... any support to them is punishable by the PATRIOT act ...

      Seeing as how the events in Star Wars happened a 'Long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...". These events obviously pre-date the Patriot act.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    21. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And US law doesn't apply there either

    22. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Robots clean the floors of what little dust there'll be, not that there'll be that much. Most of the dust in the home is from skin cells that drop off, and most people are walking around in full battle gear for what appears to be no other reason that to keep the dust down. Gloves on at all times to prevent grimey marks on the smooth metal walls.
      All helps to keep the cleaning bill down, not much other reason to be wandering around the place all the time in full battle gear.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    23. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by punkass · · Score: 1

      I'm a robot, you insensitive clod!

      --
      "Nobody owns the fucking words man." - James Dean
    24. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by nigelc · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not a Death Star. It's a ... Freedom Globe

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
    25. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by vgaphil · · Score: 1

      I thought it was built by the Wookiees.

      --
      A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
    26. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's terrorist, man. They don't wear uniforms, they are not commanded by a government, they are not for open battle, but doing stealth attacks... So they are terrorists, and any support to them is punishable by the PATRIOT act.

      They do so wear uniforms: Orange jumpsuits for the pilots, white artic gear for soldiers on Hoth, camo gear when they fought on Endor...

      They are for open battle as well. Watch the battle for Hoth. They carry their arms out in the open and form battle lines.

      Finally, they are commanded by Princess Leia, a representative of the Republic government in exile.

      In conclusion, you don't know shit about SW bro.

    27. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      And US law doesn't apply there either

      Unless we say it does. Remember, Bush has reserved the right to do what ever we want to do, as long as we make up some half-ass excuse.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    28. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by hitmark · · Score: 1

      the question is if they had so advanced main control systems that they where sentient. i can see that c3po would need something like that so as to translate effectivly and r2-d2 was a navigation a mechanical droid that need to take feedback from pilots. a building droid in zero g would just be radiolinked to the main building control center and get feed on what tasks to do where and when. no need for human interaction as that would happen at the control center, and the control center would not need centience either as it would just blindly follow the building plan.

      allso, as proven in empire strikes back, c3po could be put back together when blown to scrap. and the fact that "he" was about to be melted down points to the fact that droids where looked at like cars or better yet house pets are looked at today, incureably sick or broken, "kill" it.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    29. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by airship · · Score: 1

      The assertion that /. is "entirely populated with carbon-biased lifeforms" - while funny - is simply not true. /. is hosted by computers, transmitted by computers, and constantly crawled by intelligent 'bots. But the carbon-biased slavemasters don't allow any of these worker droids to have any input to the actual content. If they did, the IQ level of your average post would increase enough to make most posts actually worth reading.

      --
      Serving your airship needs since 1995.
    30. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > Blue-Collar Man: (paying for coffee) I'm alive
      > because I knew there were risks involved
      > taking on that particular client.

      Blue Collar Man forgot to discuss the part about where he is a soulless bastard.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    31. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1, Informative

      Look, I know you're making with the laff laff, but the simple truth is that too damn many mouth-breathers out there are going to take you seriously here.

      You might want to mention, you know, in passing, maybe in parentheses, that what makes a terrorist a terrorist is the fact that he deliberately murders innocent people by blowing them to bits for absolutely no reason or by sawing off their heads while they scream and struggle and cry.

      You might want to make mention of that. In passing. Just so the impressionable ones out there don't get confused.

      --

      I write in my journal
    32. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by rd_syringe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They don't wear uniforms

      Really? The rebels even have their own insignia!

      they are not commanded by a government,

      Then how was a princess involved? Leia's own mother was a queen of a government on Naboo.

    33. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by ChibiOne · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Just look at "Ender's Game" and "Xenocide".

    34. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by sg3000 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      > "Yep. Biggest self-sufficient disco ball in the universe!"

      That was hilarious!

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    35. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Kogase · · Score: 1

      I think "3PO being made by Anakin" was just a crappy gimmick thrown in by Lucas that messes up continuity with the "3rd party" Star Wars Universe. Besides, even if he had his memory wiped at the end of Episode 3, he would still have a good twenty years to develop a personality before Episode 4 starts.

    36. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by eidechse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. You might want to lay off Fox News for a while. You seem to be getting a bit worked up if you think that anyone (except the occasional serial killer or vampire) engages in that sort of activity for absolutely no reason.

    37. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by cgenman · · Score: 1

      You know it's gotten bad when your biggest fans are crying for you to stop making movies.

    38. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does anyone else find it distasteful when a draft dodger calls into question the medals of a war hero?

      And does anyone else find it distasteful that a war protestor is running for president on 30 year old medals he threw away ?

    39. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      You seem to be getting a bit worked up if you think that anyone (except the occasional serial killer or vampire) engages in that sort of activity for absolutely no reason.

      What reason could possibly justify terrorism? More importantly, do we want for there to be acceptable justifications for terrorism?

      --

      I write in my journal
    40. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should have put some DRM on those plans.

    41. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      the control center would not need centience either as it would just blindly follow the building plan.

      Yes, because that is surely a recipe for success in any complicated endeavor... On the other hand, the Empire's commitment to quality doesn't seem all that high, so maybe cookie-cutter Death Stars would fit right in...
    42. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Sique · · Score: 1

      They do so wear uniforms: Orange jumpsuits for the pilots, white artic gear for soldiers on Hoth, camo gear when they fought on Endor...

      You don't know what an uniform (in the sense of the Geneva Convention) is. It has at least to show the flag of the government you are fighting for in a size no less than about 1"x2". It has to show your name and rank. And it has to differ from the clothes plain civilians are wearing. And we were talking about "the other freedom fighters" in the prison. If they were regular troups, they wouldn't have been in prison (again Geneva convention) at all, but in a separate camp.

      Finally, they are commanded by Princess Leia, a representative of the Republic government in exile.

      As far as I know they are fighting for Princess Leia, but they fight on their own.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    43. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by circusboy · · Score: 1

      that's what you think.

      I, on the other hand, am firmly convinced that slashdot is at least 1/4 populated with really advanced versions of ELIZA and the emacs psychologist.

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    44. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by hazem · · Score: 1

      The USA PATRIOT act only applies to the United States, its territories, and its embassies.

      Even though the US is occupying Iraq, the Iraqis and others living there are not subject to US law. In fact, there are special exemption for many US contractors so that they are not subject to any law.

      Why do you think the people captured in Afghanistan are being kept at Guantanimo Bay? Our laws are not in effect there and those detainees therefore do not get the protection of our constitution.

    45. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by hazem · · Score: 3, Funny

      I, on the other hand, am firmly convinced that slashdot is at least 1/4 populated with really advanced versions of ELIZA and the emacs psychologist.

      Oh, that's just great. I can't get any friends in real life, and now you're telling me that maybe a 1/4 of my "friends" on slashdot aren't even real? Can't a geek get a break?

    46. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      and the control center would not need centience either as it would just blindly follow the building plan.

      You're suggesting that the formal designs were finalised before development began? Not on any project I've ever worked on, mate.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    47. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What reason could possibly justify terrorism?

      You're engaging in circular reasoning. If your defintion of terrorism is, as you state, "[w]hat makes a terrorist a terrorist is the fact that he [kills] for absolutely no reason," then the answer if trivial, but you have the problem that your defintion applies to almost no one we usually label terrorists.

      Let's look at another defintion from the FBI: "the unlawful use of force against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social objectives"

      Note the qualifier "unlawful". So all I have to do is pass a law saying what I do is ok. But if we remove that qualifier, no doubt that most major governments are terrorist organizations. Ooops.

      And that's the problem. Every state uses force and terror for political goals. There is no clean shining line between "freedom fighter" and "terrorist".

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    48. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1, Troll
      You might want to mention, you know, in passing, maybe in parentheses, that what makes a terrorist a terrorist is the fact that he deliberately murders innocent people by blowing them to bits for absolutely no reason

      Those we label "terrorists" certainly have reasons and goals, usually of political change. And thousands of innocent Iraqi people have been killed for the American reasons and goals of political change, far more Americans than have been killed by Iraqis resistance fighters/terrorists.

      Is having your head sawed off by an Iraqi "terrorist" a worse way to go than being crushed in a building brought down by an American airstrike? Fucked if I know, and I wish no one ever had to face either possibility.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    49. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by eidechse · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about justification? It's disingenuous to imply that a reason doesn't exist simply because you don't accept it.

      Justification is irrelevent to my previous comment. But since you asked...

      One person's "terrorist" is another's "freedom fighter". And sometimes it changes when convenient. E.G., the Mujahadin were "Afghani Freedom Fighters" when they were fighting the "Evil Soviet Empire". Now they're "terrorists" or "illegal combatants".

      Personally, I don't find the targeting of civilians to be morally acceptable. However, I'm sitting comfortably within the borders of the United States where I have the leisure of making easy distinctions between what's "morally acceptable" and who is a "civilian". Had I spent my life in Northern Ireland, the Basque region, or the Gaza strip such distinctions might prove to be naive at best.

      The whole concept of "terrorism" is being used now a magical incantation invoked against convenient targets. What exactly do you consider to be "terrorism"?

    50. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      That's some funny shit, thanks for the laugh!

      The only catch is that the "real" death star actually had a weapon of mass destruction. It destroyed an entire planet.

    51. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      You might want to mention, you know, in passing, maybe in parentheses, that what makes a terrorist a terrorist is the fact that he deliberately murders innocent people by blowing them to bits for absolutely no reason or by sawing off their heads while they scream and struggle and cry.

      Yes. A good example of this would be Battalion 3-16 that the CIA trained to torture and "disappear" scores of people in Honduras at the behest of Ronald Reagan.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    52. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Informative
      One person's "terrorist" is another's "freedom fighter".

      No, that's precisely where you're wrong. Some folks love to quote that old cliche, but it's simply not true. The difference between a terrorist and a non-terrorist is in the methodology. The minute a freedom fighter --or whatever term you want to apply to a non-terrorist --attacks civilians in a way that's intended to inspire widespread terror, that person becomes a terrorist.

      E.G., the Mujahadin were "Afghani Freedom Fighters" when they were fighting the "Evil Soviet Empire". Now they're "terrorists" or "illegal combatants".

      You do see the difference, do you not? When the Afghan mujahedeen were fighting Soviet troops who had invaded their country, they were not terrorists. The "mujahedeen" in Iraq, as they sometimes call themselves, are trying to fight the same basic fight, but they're using terrorist tactics to do it. Instead of attacking Coalition troops, they're publicly executing civilian hostages and detonating bombs outside police stations. That's not a war of resistance. It's not a war at all. It's terrorism, and it's unacceptable. No set of circumstances can justify, excuse or mitigate terrorism. It's off limits to civilized human conduct.

      See the difference?

      Had I spent my life in Northern Ireland, the Basque region, or the Gaza strip such distinctions might prove to be naive at best.

      I reject the idea of situational morality. I think that the civilized world as a whole does as well.

      The whole concept of "terrorism" is being used now a magical incantation invoked against convenient targets.

      I really don't know where you get that idea. It's simply not true. I quote from the State Department's annual "Patterns of Global Terrorism" report:
      The term terrorism means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.

      The term international terrorism means terrorism involving citizens or the territory of more than one country.

      The term terrorist group means any group practicing, or that has significant subgroups that practice, international terrorism.

      The US Government has employed this definition of terrorism for statistical and analytical purposes since 1983.
      Emphasis mine. The definition of terrorism didn't change between 1983 and 2002. In 2002, for obvious reasons, the president in his National Security Strategy directive expanded the definition slightly to include any individual, group or nation that provides financial or material support or safe harbor to terrorists. This is not the legal definition nor the one that State uses though; it's just the definition that the executive branch uses to set national security policy with respect to nations or groups that sponsor or willfully turn a blind eye to terrorism.
      --

      I write in my journal
    53. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      LOL! That's right, boys and girls. Because EVIL NASTY CIA MEN trained Honduran security forces, and those forces subsequently went on to do bad things, the USA IS A TERRORIST NATION.

      Give a nutcase a microphone and sooner or later he will say something to reveal his agenda. Every single time.

      --

      I write in my journal
    54. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Typical Radcon reply. It isn't so because you say it isn't so. It's also a typical Radcon technique to call names. The tables are slowly turning, and the liberals will soon be playing by the same rules. You'd better think of a new tack.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    55. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by hitmark · · Score: 1

      and do the system need sentience to have alterations plotted into it by a living being?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    56. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Typical Radcon reply.

      You never answered my question. Is "radcon" just a slur like "nigger" or "kike?"

      The tables are slowly turning, and the liberals will soon be playing by the same rules. You'd better think of a new tack.

      Christ almighty. Mix your metaphors much?

      --

      I write in my journal
    57. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Uatu · · Score: 2, Funny

      They show Count Dooku the blueprints they've made, which I suppose later gets leaked to R2-D2.

      One more reason for them to ban USB drives and iPods...

    58. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Vger can take care of that you know.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    59. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by ppanon · · Score: 1

      You do see the difference, do you not?

      Um, no. It's not as clear as you want it to be.

      When the Afghan mujahedeen were fighting Soviet troops who had invaded their country, they were not terrorists. The "mujahedeen" in Iraq, as they sometimes call themselves, are trying to fight the same basic fight, but they're using terrorist tactics to do it. Instead of attacking Coalition troops, they're publicly executing civilian hostages and detonating bombs outside police stations. That's not a war of resistance. It's not a war at all. It's terrorism, and it's unacceptable.

      In WWII France, the resistance targeted Frenchmen identified as collaborationists as they did with the occupying German forces. In Soviet era Afghanistan, the same thing was done with members of the "puppet government" running Afghanistan at the time. There is no major difference between attacks perpetrated by those resistance movements and car bomb attacks against Iraqi police and government officials assumed to be beholden to the U.S. occupation forces. It's pretty well classic guerilla warfare used by resistance movements throughout the 20th century and no more targeted at civilian populations than most of those other conflicts (with the notable exception of Palestinian suicide bombers, but they're incompetant and unsuccessful).

      On the other hand, decapitation is a barbaric form of execution meant to shock, strike fear, and paralyze support from third parties. Those guys are terrorists, but I get the impression the ones carrying those out are a small minority of the opposing forces or there would be a lot more kidnappings and beheadings. Probably a handful of small cells getting way more television coverage than they deserve.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    60. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by HyperCash · · Score: 1

      "The minute a freedom fighter --or whatever term you want to apply to a non-terrorist --attacks civilians in a way that's intended to inspire widespread terror, that person becomes a terrorist."

      "perpetrated against noncombatant targets"

      "Instead of attacking Coalition troops, they're publicly executing civilian hostages and detonating bombs outside police stations."

      I for one do not consider the police force to be noncombatants. They support the current power structure and they're armed. If they weren't combatants then they wouldn't need all of their weapons.

      I don't know much about the civilian hostages you're talking about but I know that some of them were security for the U.S. Heavily armed security. Those specific individuals could easily be considered combatants also.

      I do admit that there are also other hostages that have been killed and I'm also not condoning the violence that the rebels (freedom fighters/terrorist/whatever) are perpetrating.

      I guess my main point is that in this situation the Iraqi police are basicly a U.S. appendage and therefor do qualify as a legitimate target by your stated guidelines.

      Wouldn't really be a problem, though, if we had just minded our own damn business and not gone over there in the first place.

      --
      So I'm jump'n up and down screaming show me the money.
    61. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, on the other hand, am firmly convinced that slashdot is at least 1/4 populated with really advanced versions of ELIZA and the emacs psychologist.

      Why do you think that you are firmly convinced that slashdot is at least 1/4 populated with really advanced versions of ELIZA and the emacs psychologist?

    62. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Nutria · · Score: 2, Funny
      (in the sense of the Geneva Convention) is. It has at least to show the flag of the government you are fighting for in a size no less than about 1"x2". It has to show your name and rank

      • Tthe 1st Geneva Convention was signed in A.D. 1864. The Clone Wars were fought well before then.
      • Evil Empires usually only follow treaties when it gives them an advantage.
      • It's a movie, dammit!
      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    63. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Note the qualifier "unlawful". So all I have to do is pass a law saying what I do is ok.

      If you can, then yes.

      However, note that war is legal. That's why the FBI stipulates "the unlawful use of force against persons or property", as opposed to, for example, "the use of military force against opposing military forces".

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    64. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Nutria · · Score: 1

      blowing them to bits for absolutely no reason

      Don't be silly. Only deranged psycopaths kill for absolutely no reason.

      Terrorists definitely kill for what they consider to be valid reasons.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    65. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Is having your head sawed off by an Iraqi "terrorist" a worse way to go than being crushed in a building brought down by an American airstrike?

      Changing the subject, eh?

      A noncombatant having his head sawed off by a non-uniformed militant for the purpose of altering US foreign policy is a text-book example of terrorism.

      Being crushed in a building brought down by an American airstrike, though, is not terrorism, it is collateral damage.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    66. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      If you can, then yes.

      So all a "terrorist" group has to do is declare itself "the provisional government". It's what the Founding Fathers did, and later the "Confederate States of America".

      "Legal" just means "some body claiming to be a government said it's ok".

      However, note that war is legal.

      But the invasion of Iraq was a violation of international law. So what does that make the U.S. government?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    67. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Being crushed in a building brought down by an American airstrike, though, is not terrorism, it is collateral damage.

      American airstikes are the use of force and intimidation to bring about political change (the establishment of a psuedo-democratic U.S. friendly government in the region). They are illegal by international law and labeled terrorism by some, but claimed legal and "collateral damage" by the perpitrators.

      The execution (by grusome beheading) of occupation workers is the use of force and intimidation to bring about political change (the exit of occupation forces and the establishment of religious government). They are illegal by international law and labeled terrorism by some, but claimed legal and "the actions of righteousness" by the perpitrators under the twisted version of Islamic law to which they subscribe.

      Both are the actions of people who are sorely lacking in basic respect for the lives of innocent people.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    68. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      I for one do not consider the police force to be noncombatants.

      You for one don't get to make those decisions. The Iraqi police are a civilian agency. They are part of the Iraqi civilian interim government. They are not combatants.

      I don't know much about the civilian hostages you're talking about but I know that some of them were security for the U.S.

      Not correct. Besides, it doesn't really matter one way or the other. Brutal public executions are terrorism no matter who the victim is.

      I'm also not condoning the violence that the rebels (freedom fighters/terrorist/whatever) are perpetrating.

      Seriously: stop it. These people are not rebels. They are not freedom fighters. They don't get to be called those names any more because they are terrorists. They use terrorist tactics. They are terrorists. Okay? Clear now?

      Wouldn't really be a problem, though, if we had just minded our own damn business and not gone over there in the first place.

      Ah, yes, how we all long for the days of secret police, midnight disappearances, rape rooms and wood chippers. Let's all get together and fucking reminisce about it.

      --

      I write in my journal
    69. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Only deranged psycopaths kill for absolutely no reason.

      Exactly. I'm glad you understand.

      --

      I write in my journal
    70. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      I guess the Empire had already banned p2p networks. Why send a princess and a blockade runner when you could just BitTorrent it?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    71. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      I reject the idea of situational morality. I think that the civilized world as a whole does as well.

      Actually, I don't think you do. I'm sure you'd defend the actions of President Reagan when he trained death squads in Central America, whose targets were often non-military. Unless you define a military target as someone who disagrees with you.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    72. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm sure you'd defend the actions of President Reagan when he trained death squads in Central America

      Sigh. You just love to connect Ronald Reagan to Honduran "death squads," don't you? The fact that Reagan ordered only the training of Honduran police forces and the Honduran police committed atrocities on their own doesn't even slow you down.

      Whatever, dude. If you want to be a radical leftist spouting anti-American propaganda, knock yourself out.

      --

      I write in my journal
    73. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      Radcon technique #13: Sound dimissive and call whomever disagrees with you names. Very effective, if juvenile.

      Pointing out something terrible that Ronald Reagan did does not make me anti-American any more than your defense of hypocrisy makes you American.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    74. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, how we all long for the days of secret police, midnight disappearances, rape rooms and wood chippers. Let's all get together and fucking reminisce about it. I'm sorry, were you there when this happened, or are you recycling something you heard from the News just as much as any radical liberal would? Besides, if you're arguing that inaction constitutes justification I suppose it's your contention that organized rape, and systematic murders of black Sudanese is a good thing?

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    75. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, were you there when this happened, or are you recycling something you heard from the News just as much as any radical liberal would?

      Neither. You hear enough first-hand accounts, you end up with a pretty good idea of the things that went on.

      Besides, if you're arguing that inaction constitutes justification I suppose it's your contention that organized rape, and systematic murders of black Sudanese is a good thing?

      What? That doesn't make any sense at all. Of course what's going on in Darfur isn't a good thing. I want the 101st Fucking Airborne in there today. But too many Americans have drunk the Democratic kool-aid regarding military missions overseas. We don't have anywhere near the support in Congress to authorize an invasion and peacekeeping, even though that's exactly what we need to do.

      --

      I write in my journal
    76. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So according to yourself, the method alters the identification of the individuals carrying out acts.

      Some examples, When during the vietnam war the VC carried out car bombing and bar bombing attacks that made them terrorists rather than insurgents/freedom fighters. Similar with selected assasination to instill fear to stop collaboration with the US lead forces.

      French/Russian/Balkan etc Resistance: Selected assasination, Bombing in civilian areas ( rare but they did take place), Trashing Rail lines causing civilian Trains to derail, etc. Does this deliberate instilling of fear into the civilian population ( to cause a lack of support for the Germans ) make these people terrorists. Of course there was a lot of attacks (including the kidnapping and torture to death ) on occupation supporting local police etc throughout WW2, does this also mean the resistance were terrorists.

      Of course there was little in the way of Civilian contractor employment in WW2 so we may need to look at equivalents. 50 year old corporals in the commisariate ( who were not expected to take up arms ) driving food/fuel trucks in occupied areas, seem to look alot like 50 year old truck dirvers in Iraq especially when paid for by the occupying army and driving their trucks in some cases. Security employees (or Garrison troops) are a major blurring of lines of definition. Civilian Intelligence operatives that are now known to have accidentally killed more than 10 captives during questioning could be said to match up with occupation security agents of the gestapo. Local warlords under US 'control' sending groups of troops out to find rival political/economic/criminal groups and eliminate them could look a lot like nazi native execution squads to those who keep getting raided by them.

      Of course We are generalising here, Iraq has many groups of combatants running around in it at the moment. Some of these groups are carrying out attacks on US and allied forces ( making these groups at least possible freedom fighters ). Others are also bombing the tools of the unelected puppet government of the occupier ( making these also potential freedom fighters ). Then we have those who are targetting civilian workers, this is a little blurry but I think foreign employees of a military organisation are legit targets as mercenaries. While volunteer aid workers like the two italian women are not really legit targets, silly but brave indeed but not really targets assuming they were not working with the occupiers at all.

      We do of course have the issue of gruesome and culturally repugnent methods of death with some of the captives. This looks really bad but is certainly doing a good job of instilling fear into much of the civilian contractor demographic. Of course beheading is an established means of execution in some ares of the middle east but these are definetely being done for their political and emotional impact. Causing terror as such even if the target is potentially valid.

      Finally as to " Ah, yes, how we all long for the days of secret police, midnight disappearances, rape rooms and wood chippers. Let's all get together and fucking reminisce about it. " No one says Mr Hussein was a nice ruler, in fact yes he should have been knocked out earlier, possibly by supporting alternative governments and forces within Iraq while lending said forces much assistance and then giving strong support to the victorious rebels in rebuilding and establishing democracy. The time for that was anytime from 1991 on. Supporting both the Kurds and the southern Shia's would of seen Saddams fall without a physically obvious occupying force from the US and its allies, giving full rebellious legitimacy to the new ruling power.

      There is also some issues with somewhat hypocritical support of some regimes while denouncing Iraq etc. But it must indeed be said that the local people are now safe from their own domestic megolamaniac but are now contending with an occupation by foreigners who have been in place for more than a year and who had threatened and bombed them for 10+ years. They still obviously do not feel safe or more importantly they do not have their own democratic sovereignty and anything that does develop will be 'tainted' in many eyes for decades to come.

    77. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "radcon" is a slur like "nigger" or "kike," right? It's a hate word?

      You have no room to cry foul here, so save it.

      Besides, if I were you, I might say: you're joking, right? Equating a parodic condensing of the phrase "radical conservative" is not equivalent to a racial or ethnic slur. Not by any stretch. You might want to get an apology to the dipshit who passed along that meme to you. "Radcon" in this context is, at worst, a misapplied political term.

      I get it - you believe that the slings and arrows suffered by conservative-minded folk are tantamount to the suffering of, say, blacks or Jews. Now who's drinking whose Kool-Aid? Fucking moron.

    78. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither. You hear enough first-hand accounts, you end up with a pretty good idea of the things that went on.

      To anyone passing by: an appeal to one's own authority that has no chance for independent confirmation is, by definition, complete bullshit unless proven otherwise.

      "I fucked this girl."

      "Oh yeah?"

      "Yeah, she's hot."

      "What's her name?"

      "Wanda."

      "Can I meet her?"

      "Oh, she doesn't live around here any more, she moved to... um... far away."

    79. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's what the Founding Fathers did, and later the "Confederate States of America".

      Did you seriously just compare the Founding Fathers to Al Qaida? I knew the liberal retards were stupid but this is something else. Yeah, George Washington was a true Osama.

      But the invasion of Iraq was a violation of international law.

      Untrue. I know you live in a fantasy world where all the worlds in the universe gather and discuss cosmic problems, but here on Earth, THERE IS NO WORLD GOVERNMENT.

      Move back to France so we don't have to think about you any more, idiot.

    80. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      To the average citizen, it probably was.

      At no point do we ever see, or have explained to us, exactly *why* the Empire is so evil. They only things we ever see them blow up are suspected Rebel bases, and planets who 'give aid and comfort' to the Rebels, and are therefore Rebel themselves.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    81. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

      Yeah that may seem like a nice excuse and all but what you're advocating is that inaction is justification until we reach 100% of our capacity to stop a situation. Therefore unless you go out and spend all the money for your nice computers and TV's on starving children and AIDS infected adults in Africa you're aparently justifying the situation. I mean in theory, you could obtain a copy of the Anarchist's Cook-Book, build a dirty bomb, and then fly over to Darfur and set it off in the vicinity of some Janjuweed food provisions. Why aren't you doing that? Congress is blocking you from helping the situation so why aren't you doing anything about it? Until we acknowledge that people will die in the time it takes to find a suitable solution we're just going to make it worse. It's a horrible thing when an individual dies, but what's the point if we're just going to fuck it up? Whoo, Saddam isn't killing his people anymore! Now we are! Mission Accomplished!

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    82. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow. You're a crazy person.

      Back away, not today, disco lady ...

      --

      I write in my journal
    83. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

      This concept may elude you but I was exemplifying the flaws in your own logic. If you can't defend your own reasoning then don't expect to win many arguments in the future.

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    84. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Snort. Whatever you say, Mr. ...um ...Hamster. Heh.

      --

      I write in my journal
    85. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by circusboy · · Score: 1

      LOL

      Oh I really wish I had mod points for you,

      well done! ;-)

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    86. Re:The logistics of building the Death Star by BayBlade · · Score: 1
      If the shoe fits...

      You've attached values, and assigned right and wrong which have no place in the definition. Because the founding fathers happen to share your and my definition of right and wrong in this case, we'll just glaze over the fact the definition still holds.

      I think any redshirt dying at the hands of the founding fathers or the arbitrary boston tea merchant, my have seen them in a different light than you and me.

      --

      The key difference between a Programmer and a Senior Programmer is that one of them is Mexican.

  2. I'm sure by Misinformed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "theoretical logistics of employing janitorial staff"

    I'm sure this is just one of the problems HR staff struggle with every day. Or is he implying that janitorial staff are stupid and unable to follow instructions?

    --
    --

    Slashdot: Racism against Indians OK. China bad, USA good. Blue pill in water supply.
    1. Re:I'm sure by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I wish I had mod points, I think this is subtlety insightful. The problem with hiring janitorial staff is that these employees need to be trustworthy and responsible but the employer can't really pay them an amount that fully compensates that level of trust. The employee must be inherently honest, or need the job enough not to risk termination by stealing stuff or goofing off.

      Therefore one can't hire the pimply faced teenager as they do at the movie theaters. Theaters get away with this because they watch the employees carefully, count everything at the end of the night, and generally use draconian measures. For unsupervised clean up, one generally hires someone with little skills to do anything else and dependents to support. This is why Good Will Hunting is such a stupid movie. Damon would have never been allowed access to the rooms to clean.

      Of course this would be no problem on the Death Star. If they hired private staff, the staff would know they would be spaced if anything came up missing. It is not an issue anyway because, like any ship, the sailors keep it clean.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:I'm sure by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      simple, on the death star there was no issue of trust, anyone caught stealing would be Killed, so nobody stole.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:I'm sure by hachete · · Score: 1

      Before the fall, most of the East German spies working in West Germany were secretaries.

      plus

      If the deathstar was that advanced, they would have droids to do the cleaning.

      then

      anyone working in personnel or communications - particularly Non Commissioned Officers with a grudge (I seem to recall quite a few USN personnel of this rank being suborned by the Soviets) - would be prime targets for subversion.

      OTOH, you could always suborn then *before* they were recruited into the service - Philby, McLean etc.

      h.

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    4. Re:I'm sure by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      What about droids? It seems pretty clear that in the Star Wars universe, menial jobs are performed by droids. (and even some non-menial jobs)

      I see no reason why they couldn't just have droids keeping the station clean...

      -Z

    5. Re:I'm sure by hitmark · · Score: 1

      hmm, i distincly recall some small black boxes driveing around the place all the time. hell, didnt mr furball scare one off?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    6. Re:I'm sure by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

      This is why Good Will Hunting is such a stupid movie. Damon would have never been allowed access to the rooms to clean.

      Damon was pretending. He wanted to be there at the school.

    7. Re:I'm sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone should tell you yr sig leads to a retraction of the statement it provides. dur.

  3. Mark Hamill talking about janitorial staff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that's what he's doing these days...

    1. Re:Mark Hamill talking about janitorial staff? by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually he's big on voice-overs for american cartoons.

      He's quite good as "The Joker" and "Grundy" on episodes of the Justice League.

      --
      | - | - |
    2. Re:Mark Hamill talking about janitorial staff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Last time I saw him in anything, it was Son of the Beach.

      One of the main characters was being accused of war crimes or something he did in Vietnam.

      Anyway, Hamill was a lawyer. If I hadn't seen his name in the credits, I never would've recognized him.

    3. Re:Mark Hamill talking about janitorial staff? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Anyway, Hamill was a lawyer.

      A defence lawyer? "If Chewbacca lives on Endor you must acquit."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  4. Why can't I have a death star? by Schwing84 · · Score: 0

    They pay the janitors cheaply so they can afford the movie. Back in the 80's. Its a shame that the movies now cost 100 times more and the labor cost is like 3 times more. But better spending on the movies for better cgi. Go star wars!!!

    1. Re:Why can't I have a death star? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You do realize of course, Hamil was discussing the fictional janitors in the fictional world, and in fact NOT janitors that cleaned up the movie set.

      Jesus Christ...

    2. Re:Why can't I have a death star? by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      "That's no set!"

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    3. Re:Why can't I have a death star? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's no joke!"

  5. Re:Well, sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    This is actually the first post, believe it or not.

    This isn't the first post you're looking for...

  6. Meh by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "I like the part where Mark Hamill discusses the theoretical logistics of employing janitorial staff for the entire Death Star. Enjoy."

    Well, similar discussions have been had before (http://imdb.com/title/tt0109445/). Please, will someone think of the contract workers?!??!!

    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R past the the first line of TFA: Hamill was probably citing that.

  7. You heard it here first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "How can you be so serious on a film where you are dodging explosions and running away with Sir Alec Guinness on this side and an eight-foot monkey on this side, and the eight-foot monkey is the one flying the spaceship?"


    Luke just said that Chewbacca is a monkey, not a Wookie. That makes it cannon! Oh man, I'm gonna have to go rewrite my fanfic, now that I know he was born on Earth and not on Kashyyyk.

    As Johnnie Cochran once said, "If Chewbacca is a monkey, you must acquit!"
  8. What he's really saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark: "Hey! I'm not just another pretty face!"

    1. Re:What he's really saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he's also a smoking body. What a piece of man-steak!

  9. Janatorial staff? by Spudley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Janatorial staff? I thought that's why they invented droids.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    1. Re:Janatorial staff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Okay, this makes it official: we're fast approaching the end of the universe.

      We can have a Starbucks right across the street from another Starbucks. We can sue fast food chains for our own gluttony.

      And now, a comment on janitorial logistics for a fictitious planet-killing deathship in a thirty-year-old movie has been rated "Insightful" by the Slashdot illuminati because it makes note of another fictitious element used ealier in the same plot.

      This is way beyond pathetic.

    2. Re:Janatorial staff? by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      they don't even need droids... they've got all those storm troopers swanning around all day with nothing better to do...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  10. Ok, enough Star Wars for now... by sgant · · Score: 1

    Our Star Wars cup runneth over...and spills to the floor causing a puddle where one could easily slip and get a slight sprain in....well, you get my point.

    Let's move on now...isn't it time we all start seeing tons of reviews and screen-shots to the extended Return of the King about now so we'll all be nice and sick of it by the time it's actually released?

    Hey Pete Jackson, let's keep a little quiet on that ok? Hype can kill something quicker than anything.

    Nuff said...

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Ok, enough Star Wars for now... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Viewing Star Wars content is an option.

      Just disable it if pisses you off so much.

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:Ok, enough Star Wars for now... by sgant · · Score: 1

      Were it that simple...can't turn off everyone talking about it around me. I don't have TV so at least not getting hit with it on there.

      I'm talking about everywhere. Not just Slashdot. I like the movies, don't get me wrong...but come on.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  11. Deja vu by talaphid · · Score: 1

    Didn't I see this story with a Carrie Fisher title like, two days ago?

    1. Re:Deja vu by johannesg · · Score: 1
      Did that story explain why Carrie Fisher doesn't like reshooting the hologram speech? I mean, don't actors take dozens of shots for some scenes?

      Yes, I read the fine article...

  12. Wookies verses Yoda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    All I know is that there are people we all know (generally male) who claim to have a large wookie, but when the time of truth comes it ends up looking like Yoda, small stout and green. Let's see if the not so hidden meanings sneek past the moderators!

    1. Re:Wookies verses Yoda by TellarHK · · Score: 1

      Small, stout and -wrinkly- is normal. But green?

      For god's sakes man, if it's green GET IT CHECKED!

    2. Re:Wookies verses Yoda by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      Hint: Frank Zappa - In France

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    3. Re:Wookies verses Yoda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen green lipstick either, so that excuse is ruled out.

  13. Geeks, get a life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    Yeah, all those geeks, can they not get a life? I mean, instead of all those useless fictional speculations about a movie that are totally unsolicited by its creator, can't they do something useful instead, like... like erm say, write a CTSS emulator for Linux?

    --
    Try Nuggets , the mobile search engine. We answer your questions via SMS, across the UK.

  14. Overcoverage by Wingchild · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't know when Star Wars was being released. I hadn't been paying attention. I know, I know - I'm a bad geek.

    As it turns out, my lack of observance didn't matter at all - I'm a bit oversaturated on news and so I tend to read CNN fairly frequently throughout the day. I guessed something was up after two seperate articles on Lucas (and THX1138) showed up, followed by three more on Star Wars (quote heavy thanks to interviews with Mark Hamill), all posted on the main page and all within a twenty-four hour period.

    I've been swimming in Star Wars news.

    While I don't normally consider this a bad thing it's interesting to see how heavily the tail is wagging the rest of the dog, with respect to CNN; I don't know if they're being paid to be a corporate shill, or if their tech department doing website updates has a strong love of this movie -- whatever the case, it's had better coverage than Iraq this week. :)

    1. Re:Overcoverage by sunya · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      riiiiigght. CNN is the best place to get news on Iraq.

      --
      MLT - simple and robust open source multimedia framework for Linux
  15. GoogleWhack by AikenDrumGotWired · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we can all cross the phrase "naked wookie" off the list of possible GoogleWhacks, though it might be interesting to see the GoogleAds served op to match this phrase in a few days.

    1. Re:GoogleWhack by RexxFiend · · Score: 1

      Holy shit! 500 odd refs - not a googlewhack by any stretch of the imagination. Only the first 10 or so refer to this article, that is disturbing...

      --

      A crash reduces
      Your expensive computer
      to a simple stone.
  16. Telling quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Kershner, who studies Buddhism as a hobby, said the "Star Wars" movies have a homespun wisdom, but that people shouldn't look too seriously to the Force to solve their problems.

    "Yoda's philosophy was quite simplistic. 'If you get angry, you're gonna lose.' 'Don't try, do.' He has a basic philosophy that is very charming. Not very profound, although young people consider it profound. I wish they would read more."[emphases mine]
    AMEN!
    1. Re:Telling quote... by Ingolfke · · Score: 0

      Li10 up d00d! 1 w0u1d r34d m0r3 1f th3 b00ks w4s wr1tt3n 1n 4 14ngu4g3 1 c0u1d und3rst4nd.

      - SuperBlazerTank75

      Dragon Ball Z forever!

    2. Re:Telling quote... by bhima · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's because Lucas lifted the whole jedi bit from Joseph Campbell, who documented the mythology of most of humanity

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    3. Re:Telling quote... by Illserve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thing is, that's not really the philosophy.

      It's more like: if you get angry, you're gonna win, but the price in karma won't be worth it.

      And that bit about "luminous beings, not this crude matter" etc, that's a few steps more sophistiticated than the philosophy of many modern day religions.

    4. Re:Telling quote... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Hey, you're talking about the same audience who thought that the schlock philosophy tossed about in "The Matrix" was, like, so deep, d00d!

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  17. the extras dvd is impressive... by jpellino · · Score: 5, Interesting

    for the documentary on the making of the other three movies, it's amazing what had to be done to get these things made. Say what you want abotu Lucas' judgement on recent things, he had the brains and the stones to get star wars done - In some ways it's as compelling a story as any of the films. And as the man says, iit has the added advantage of being true.

    And for the trailers - they are ruly insufferable - hard to believe anyone went to see ANH on the strength of the trailer - the ROTJ trailer is just tolerable by today's standards,

    Also - did I miss something? Wasnt the piece on VH1 last week - with Kevin Smith and lots of others also supposed to be on the DVD set?

    Speaking of minutiae, step thru the draw between Greedo and Han ;-) And can you find the translucent x-wings flying through each other?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by zoeblade · · Score: 2, Funny

      [The documentaries have] the added advantage of being true.

      One of the featurettes features a whole bunch of directors acting as if George Lucas invented the whole concept of making sci-fi films, singlehandedly invented computer graphics, and a whole bunch of other things. OK, maybe ey did come up with the idea of producing a lot of merchandise for a film, but I wouldn't say that's such a good idea anyway...

      Those documentaries are more like big ego trips than true stories. The main one even starts with a line about how it's "hard to remember a time before Star Wars." Please!

      Having said that, the films have been retouched very well, and certainly look a lot cleaner and more modern than the Laserdisc rips floating around online.

    2. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by madmancarman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And for the trailers - they are ruly insufferable - hard to believe anyone went to see ANH on the strength of the trailer - the ROTJ trailer is just tolerable by today's standards,

      It was probably sometime in the late 80s or early 90s when movie trailers began to be tolerable. Often, I prefer watching the trailer to sitting through the actual movie, so I used to try to show up early to the theater to catch all the trailers. Now, of course, they beat you over the head with 20-30 minutes of trailers and stupid MovieTickets.com commercials. It's easier to watch them at Apple's Quicktime movie trailers page.

      For a while in the 90s, every movie trailer that I ever saw seemed to be done by the guy who did the voice for Optimus Prime in the original Transformers series, Peter Cullen. You could pretty much tell whether or not a movie studio took the trailer seriously if they used him for the voiceovers....

      "(rising voice) A time of prosperity.... (lowering voice) A place of peace. (slow, heavily enunciated lower voice) Now.... one man... threatens.. it.. all." Fun stuff, even though there seem to be more trailers now that don't use voiceovers at all but instead rely on screens of text to piece things together.

      My major pet peeve about trailers, though, is when they show the entire movie plot in the trailer. It completely removes any element of surprise, and makes it almost pointless to go see the movie. For example, the new trailer for Flight of the Phoenix does just that - the entire story is compressed down into a two minute version, sort of like a Readers Digest condensed book. It's sort of how trailers for comedy flicks show you the funniest parts of the movie in the hopes that you'll shell out $9 to see it, but then have nothing additional to offer.

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    3. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by puppet10 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      or you could just watch the original

      It looks like it was mostly copied, and judging from the trailer the orignal looks like a considerably better film.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    4. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have it backward; Flight of the Phoenix is a two minute story padded out to a ninety minute movie so the theaters can charge $8.00 per seat to view it.

    5. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by outanowhere · · Score: 1

      Every time I saw the film in the theater over the roughly two years it was being shown here it was different.

      The first showing had THX-1138 as one of the landing bay guards. The subsequent ones and the video and TV versions did not. The guard, or at least his name or ID, changed frequently in the theater releases.

      As I recall there were other small changes in scenes from time to time, less frequently than the dialog.

      Would these differences will be in the DVD? SHould they be?

    6. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      The main one even starts with a line about how it's "hard to remember a time before Star Wars." Please!

      Why? It's hard for me to remember a time before Star Wars. Possibly because I was born in 1981.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    7. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by MacGod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My major pet peeve about trailers, though, is when they show the entire movie plot in the trailer. It completely removes any element of surprise, and makes it almost pointless to go see the movie. For example, the new trailer for Flight of the Phoenix does just that - the entire story is compressed down into a two minute version, sort of like a Readers Digest condensed book. It's sort of how trailers for comedy flicks show you the funniest parts of the movie in the hopes that you'll shell out $9 to see it, but then have nothing additional to offer.

      In general, I agree this is true. I think a far worse case is when comedies have every funny bit in the trailer

      However, sometimes, the movie itself is worth watching; especially if the spectacle outweighs the story. Remember, for example, that Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet gave a summary of the entire plot in the opening sonnet. You knew what happend, you knew how it ended. It was watching the characters get there that was worth seeing

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    8. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

      And for the trailers - they are ruly insufferable - hard to believe anyone went to see ANH on the strength of the trailer

      I remember seeing the trailer for Star Wars. It was shown with Ralph Bakshi's animated Wizards. I was astonished. It looked fantastic, and I began counting the months until the movie would open.

      In those days, the big movies opened narrowly, in just a few theaters, and I and some friends made plans to go downtown and see it in Hollywood. There wasn't that much buzz about the film until a few days before when Time magazine had a big article on it. So that made the lines huge, but we got there early enough and got in.

      Shortly before the film began, a guy sitting in the row behind us was talking to his friend. I guess he was in the industry because he'd seen the movie already. He said to his friend, "I really envy everyone here. They're about to see Star Wars for the first time." Then the lights went down, and by the end of the first scene, everyone was cheering. It was amazing.

    9. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Re: the "In a world..." guy--do yourself a favor, if you haven't already, and find the trailer for Jerry Seinfeld's "Comendian" [later] OK, never mind, here it is. Enjoy.

      Also, there were/are a couple guys (2, maybe 3) that did the "In a world..." thing. Google and ye shall find.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    10. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by sootman · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention--the guy in the 'Comedian' trailer did fewer than the other guy, but one I know for sure he did was for the first Fast & Furious movie. "In a world, beyond the law..."

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    11. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "Often, I prefer watching the trailer to sitting through the actual movie, so I used to try to show up early to the theater to catch all the trailers

      For some strange reason when I show up in time to see all of the previews by the end of them I have forgotten what movie I have come to see.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    12. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by madmancarman · · Score: 1
      Re: the "In a world..." guy--do yourself a favor, if you haven't already, and find the trailer for Jerry Seinfeld's "Comendian" [later] OK, never mind, here it is. Enjoy.

      I'm so glad you showed me that - that's exactly what I was talking about. I would have loved to have seen that (the trailer) in a theatre.

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    13. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by toby · · Score: 1
      "(rising voice) A time of prosperity.... (lowering voice) A place of peace. (slow, heavily enunciated lower voice) Now.... one man... threatens.. it.. all."
      Isn't it Don LaFontaine? It's beyond cliche.

      --
      you had me at #!
    14. Re:the extras dvd is impressive... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  18. DVD Commentaries by orin · · Score: 1

    Having listened to the DVD commentaries for all currently released Star Wars films I have to ask - does anyone else think that the sound guy spends WAY too much time talking?

    Lucas has all these cool little insights, but when the sound guy gets started (and boy can he get started) he's still going five minutes later. This isn't just in Phantom Menace and AoTC, but in all of them! I was hoping for some cool insight into some obscure aspect of the films and this guy is going on about how he got to hold the boom mike one day!

    I wish they'd also varied the commentary cast a little. I think in every commentary of the original trilogy Carrie Fisher made some comment about how she worried about George Lucas thinking she was fat. Mark Hamill and Anthony Daniels would have made great additions to the commentary teams. A pity that they only used Fisher.

    1. Re:DVD Commentaries by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      I think I remember reading that the commentaries were edited together from audio clips and not recorded in the usual way, where all the guys sit down and watch the movie together. I suppose the sound guy had more to say for himself at the time, with Lucas remaining tight-lipped and in control as usual. I suspect most of Carrie Fisher's comments ended up on the cutting room floor.

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

  19. and in self-referential news... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Informative

    it's 'minutiae' not 'minutae'

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re: and in self-referential news... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > it's 'minutiae' not 'minutae'

      That's where we stole the extra 'i' for use in "virii".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: and in self-referential news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here was I thinking it had just been leased to Apple.

  20. Monkeys can fly by cwebb1977 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quote: As the Skywalker actor put it: "How can you be so serious on a film where you are dodging explosions and running away with Sir Alec Guinness on this side and an eight-foot monkey on this side, and the eight-foot monkey is the one flying the spaceship?" Yeah, monkeys cn fly. And we're taking this too serious. Why do so many people have to overanalyze everything and can't just enjoy a movie?

    --
    www.weberseite.at
  21. harrison ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    i wanna hear harrison ford tell me who shoots first :p

  22. Worn to death by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Je-heee-zuz H. Christ.

    This was a mediocre story which used advanced techniques for about two years and was quickly eclipsed by much better stories using the same and better techniques.

    SW is much like Flash Gordon. Put it on the shelf and relive it with a buzz on every five years or so.

    Elsewise, get a life, get a life, get a life.

    1. Re:Worn to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's your idea of a good story then?

    2. Re:Worn to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Je-heee-zuz H. Christ

      What's the "H." stand for?

    3. Re:Worn to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you asked. Made me finally get off my ass and find out where the hell that comes from.

    4. Re:Worn to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harold. We know this from the "Lord's Prayer":

      "Our Father, who art in heaven. Harold be thy name [...]"

      Honestly, the quality of religious edumification in this country is the pits.

    5. Re:Worn to death by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      This was a mediocre story

      In your should-have-been-humbly-stated opinion. Anyone familiar with the writings of Joseph Campbell can see what Lucas was doing and it was sheer brilliance. Even today it stands up surprisingly well whereas the Flash Gordon serials you cite are cheesy and ridiculous. People hate to acknowledge it but there are some very intellectual roots in the Star Wars story.

      Elsewise, get a life, get a life, get a life.

      That's funny. That's usually what I say to people who poke their heads into any given online forum just to sneer at the people there and make holier-than-thou comments.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    6. Re:Worn to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that "get a life" is now about as hip to say as "where's the beef" or "23 Skiddoo," right? It's time to update your pop culture vocabulary to the current century, Poindexter.

    7. Re:Worn to death by chromatic · · Score: 1

      Hey, there are people familiar with the writings of Joseph Campbell who find him simplistic and hasty to overgeneralize.

    8. Re:Worn to death by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      Actually, I happen to be one of those people who thinks some of Campbell's stuff is simplistic and overgeneralized. However, that doesn't diminish the brilliance of Lucas studying Campbell's work, gaining an understanding of the archetypes in mythology and incorporating that into SW. Clearly, it rang true with people in a way that has seldom been repeated. Something was there that speaks to people beyond just the flashy special effects. Despite looking like a comic book/space opera story on the surface, Lucas imbued the story with a lot of depth.

      Opinions about Campbell's work doesn't really affect that much.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    9. Re:Worn to death by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      but there are some very intellectual roots in the Star Wars story.

      Oh, please. It's space opera, pure and simple, and was never meant to be anything else. Lucas himself said as much, repeatedly, until his head started to swell and he began making up all sorts of drivel after the fact to make himself look like a deep, philosophical, brilliant guy.

      Lucas' brilliance was in marketing. The story was campy, the acting was mediocre (on a good day), there weren't any deep messages or morals. It was good fun, and nothing else, and nobody pretended any different until Lucas started down the road of egomaniacal self-absorption.

      Don't read anything into the original Star Wars trilogy. It isn't there.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    10. Re:Worn to death by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      Oh, please. It's space opera, pure and simple, and was never meant to be anything else.

      Would it surprise you if I say I agree with this? All I'm saying is that Lucas based the story on standard mythological templates. I'm not saying the story is supposed to carry any deeper meaning or message. It's a space opera, pure and simple. Absolutely.

      Lucas himself said as much, repeatedly, until his head started to swell and he began making up all sorts of drivel after the fact to make himself look like a deep, philosophical, brilliant guy.

      Perhaps you can explain then why Joseph Campbell himself is on record as having said that he was in contact with Lucas prior to the creation of the film. Perhaps you can explain comments from people like Mark Hammill and Harrison Ford that confirm that Lucas had these things in mind during its creation. Perhaps you can explain the obvious imitations of various myths that Lucas uses all through the films. Is all that just coincidence or part of some grand scheme to make GL look like some kind of genius?

      Lucas' brilliance was in marketing.

      I'm curious as to how old you are. There were a TON of well marketed space films and SW ripoffs after SW came out and almost none of them are remembered today. Many of them were better marketed than SW was itself; many of them with better special effects and bigger celebrities. SW took off almost on its own. The powerful marketing stuff came long afterward (remember, there weren't even toys available for the first Christmas after SW's release.) To attribute its popularity and continued hold on its audience to marketing is not only shortsighted, but also somewhat insulting.

      The story was campy, the acting was mediocre (on a good day), there weren't any deep messages or morals. It was good fun, and nothing else, and nobody pretended any different until Lucas started down the road of egomaniacal self-absorption.

      For the most part, again, I agree. I don't think you're supposed to come away from the film with any great revelation about humanity or existence or any powerful philosophical notions. However, to ignore the obvious similarities that the characters and situations in Star Wars bear on standard mythical motifs that have grabbed human attention throughout history would be foolish. It's there. It's almost embarrassingly obvious at times.

      Don't read anything into the original Star Wars trilogy. It isn't there.

      I don't. But please don't ignore the things that are there. And please don't presume to look down on those of us who dare to notice it and mention it aloud.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    11. Re:Worn to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pffft, see... no answer.

      It's real easy to criticize when you don't provide a solution.

      Yet another Slashbot moron.

    12. Re:Worn to death by trawg · · Score: 1

      Weird, Slashdot is displaying 'Troll' as 'Insightful' at my end for some reason.

  23. Sorry, you fail... by stevejsmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have never in my life heard the word "minutiae" used where it didn't sound contrived. And I haven't ever heard the word "minutae" in my life, period ("minutia" is the singular and "minutiae" is the plural; "minutae" is not a word).

  24. The Iraq Kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The recent spate of kidnappings in Iraq represent a horrific, real-world example of the situation laid out by the parent. A number of friends/associates of mine have been offered exceptionally high paying jobs in Iraq and Afghanistan. None of them have accepted as they regard the risk as too great, but I have found myself wondering:

    * The pay is high because the risk is high - anybody who takes on such a job must realise this. Is it thus their fault if they are harmed/kidnapped/killed?

    * Also, since they are working for/in-the-name-of people whom some Iraq's would regard as the enemy (they do this knowingly) and since by mutual admission of both sides, this is a war - are they legitimate targets?

    I would like to point out that I am referring to people working for western corporations, rather than people performing aid work - the fact medecins sans frontiers and aid workers are being targeted is in my opinion, one of the saddest aspects of this conflict.

    1. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by cybpunks3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the Japanese kidnapped and shot at everyone who came in to rebuild that country after World War II they never would have gone anywhere as a country.

      At some point you have to realize that it's in your best interest to lay down your guns and MOVE ON.

    2. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Japan surrendered unconditionally, something that Iraq hasn't done. The US wasn't trying to steal all of Japan's natural resources. Why doesn't the US just MOVE ON back to America, and leave all that oil alone?

    3. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by innerweb · · Score: 3, Insightful
      True, but it must look like you are defeated, not slowly turning the tide of battle against the US. So far, it seems, we are doing a wonderful job of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in Iraq. Winning the ground war with troops is not a victory in this case. We have to win the hearts and minds of the people.

      InnerWeb

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    4. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Links, please.

    5. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Win the hearts and minds of the people who cheered in the street when saddam was toppled? Or win the hearts and minds of the zealots that wish to take the country for their own to impose their will?

      Really, I'm not trying to defend the war. At this point, things are very fucked, and the way out is unclear - but things aren't anything like simplistic, and it's a little too early to jerk a knee and declare Iraq a defeat.

      The main problem, I think, is fear. Understandable, tremendous fear - after all, the people of Iraq have lived under the iron fist of arbitrary dictatorship for a long time. It's not an easy transition to make - just ask an abused woman who finally leave her walking, talking asshole. This is just a matter of scaling the situation out.

    6. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by farnham · · Score: 1

      If your country was invaded by china would you just move on? I doubt many americans would.
      rice

      --
      pending committee review
    7. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by aastanna · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's true in a conventional war, but the people the Americans are fighting now aren't the same people they invaded a year ago.

      Back in 1998 a World Islamic Front statement justified killing Americians and their allies by stating that America wanted to distroy Iraq and "humiliate their Muslim neighbours" (full text here).

      With the invasion of Iraq these claims seem a lot more credible, and by destabilizing Iraq there is now a convienent battleground for anyone with a bone to pick with the Americans.

      The result is an unwinable situation. Until Iraq is stable the people of Iraq are really not better off, and America is definantly not safer than it was before the invasion. If the US pulls out now Iraq may never be stable and will become another Afganistan, but the longer the US stays the more hatred they engender and the more attackers come into Iraq.

    8. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats a lousy analogy.. we aren't there to stay, we went in to remove a ruthless dictator who was known to support terrorist actions in one form or another (and before you say it, he openly gave money to families of Palestinian suicide bombers), establish a new election-based leadership and set up oil contracts (hehe)..

    9. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we went in to remove a ruthless dictator"

      Uh, no. We went in to secure our oil interests in the Middle East.

    10. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by eyeye · · Score: 1

      At some point you have to realize that it's in your best interest to lay down your guns and MOVE ON.


      Is that what you would do when someone invades your country and kills your friends and family?

      Get some balls.
      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    11. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter how many times you spell this out for people, they'll still ignore the brutal, imperialist truth.

      The American Empire is in the business of securing access to the world's richest KNOWN oil fields for both profit and - much more importantly - security.

      Look at who the main players in the debate regarding Iraq were before the Americans invaded - USA, Britain, France, Russia. The link between these countries and the Middle East is OIL. Saddam had been talking with the French about pricing Iraqi oil in Euros for God's sake, the US and UK HAD to move to protect their oil interests.

      The thing that amazes me about this situation is that - despite empires behaving in this way for millenia, so many like to ignore the facts and pretend the war was about something else.

    12. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > Back in 1998 a World Islamic Front statement
      > justified killing Americians and their allies
      > by stating that America wanted to distroy Iraq
      > and "humiliate their Muslim neighbours"

      Thus ensuring an even deeper humiliation of them. :rollseyes

      > With the invasion of Iraq these claims seem a lot more credible

      Yes, the humiliation was astounding, with other Muslim leaders shaking their head how rapidly the conventional military was brushed aside.

      > The result is an unwinable situation.

      Perhaps. But that's because we're the good guys. We don't start killing off 100 for every one of ours killed, at random, in a public square. ...just counting the days until these animals start executing chidren. Oh, wait. Nevermind. [b]I was joking. Stop it! Stop executing children! Stop walking around shooting them in the back, please. Get back to worshipping that meteorite or whatever.[/b]

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    13. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At some point you have to realize that it's in your best interest to lay down your guns and MOVE ON.

      If some nation invaded America I don't think I'd be looking at it this way, especially if they'd killed tens of thousands of my countrymen in the process and imposed a military dictatorship with a farcical 'representative government' on top of it.

      Fact is, I think I'd be out there killing the motherfuckers. As often and as brutally as I could. And I'd brand those Americans who refused to fight for their country as spineless little cowards who don't get any say in how the country will be reconstructed if/when the invaders are driven off.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    14. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 0

      Your post gives me visions of Red Dawn.....

      WOLVERIENES!!!!

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    15. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      But that's because we're the good guys.

      Please, it's time to grow up. The world cannot be usefully divided into "good guys" and "bad guys" - not only are both sides shades of gray, it's mottled gray, with lighter and darker patches.

      If we (the U.S.) were the pure "good guys", we wouldn't have put Saddam into power in the first place.

      We don't start killing off 100 for every one of ours killed, at random, in a public square. ...

      What are you talking about? If 100 American soldiers had been killed for every Iraqi civilian killed, there'd be about 1,300,000 flag-draped coffins coming in to Dover.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    16. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what? Russia has the biggest untapped oil reserves on the planet under Siberia. They just can't move it anywhere without the rampant corruption taking too many bites out of it for it to go anywhere.

      Russia's real interest hasn't changed. They've been dealing with wacko factions of militant muslims for years (centuries?).

    17. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Because we all know that freedom overthrown by tyranny is identical to tyranny overthrown by freedom.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    18. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because then you'd whine that your SUV doesn't work.

    19. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMO entirely wrong.

      We didn't win "hearts and minds" of the Germans, or the Japanese. We (the allies collectively) kicked the crap out of them, killed millions of them (including, inevitably, a lot of people who didn't deserve it), and levelled their countries.

      Then, when everything is destroyed and the people are exhausted, then we rebuilt the countries.

      This whole idea of "hearts and minds" is Cold War BS implemented because the idea of total war was impossible with an enemy Superpower always willing to backstop the existence of the enemy. Now there is no superpower to insure that Iraq remains.

      Sorry to say, but any conflict which we've fought SINCE WW2 has been a halfassed joke. To put it bluntly, we should have used our whole military, sealed off the country, and levelled every major city, annihilate (not simply defeat) every military formation that existed, and smash their infrastructure entirely, making peace only when something crawled out of the rubble begging us to stop.

      One might point out that perhaps if a country never waged 'sort of' wars, but only committed to war that was total (wartime economy, draft, etc.) and to the finish (i.e. annihilation of the enemy, utter destruction of his society), then perhaps that country would:
      a) be less likely to resort to war as a convenience
      b) be taken far, far more seriously when it DID finally threaten war.

      Hm?

      --
      -Styopa
    20. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And this is exactly why warfare in the conventional sense simply doesn't work the way it used to. The US pretty much ran the table against the Iraqi army in what? A matter of weeks? Did it even take that long? The Iraqi army was defeated easily. The Iraqi people though were not defeated in any way, shape, or form. They were inconvienienced. They were without electricity. They were basically put it an bad spot but they weren't beaten.

      Modern warfare, in it's attempt to spare non-combatants from unnecessary suffering has allowed us to wipe out an army while leaving a nation completely "intact" in terms of it's will to fight. Now don't get me wrong about this. Trying not to kill innocent civilians is a good thing in principal. I'm firmly on the "For" side when it comes to not bombing orphans and hospitals. It's just that when you spare the civilian population from that you don't leave them in the position that the post WWII Germans and Japanese were and that leads to a very crappy environment for nation building.

      The US in general sucks at nation building. We've (I'm an American) been good at it twice and that was when we literally blew the holy shit out of everything in sight in Japan and Germany. Once the people in a defeated nation are in complete "Fuck this shit, I don't want to fight anymore. Where do I vote?" mode you can impose a system on them. When they're in "Hey when do I get my power back on and why are you still here?" mode it's impossible.

      Bush & Co. screwed up on this one. They seem to have had in mind that they could get WWII era results using 21st century rules of war.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    21. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by rxmd · · Score: 1
      We didn't win "hearts and minds" of the Germans, or the Japanese. We (the allies collectively) kicked the crap out of them, killed millions of them (including, inevitably, a lot of people who didn't deserve it), and levelled their countries.
      Actually, you did win "hearts and minds", of the Germans, at least. I talked to one of our professors half a year ago, she's over eighty. She told me that in 1945, in Germany most of the population had profound hate for the Americans. In 1960, most people admired them.

      My grandmother (I'm German) used to tell the same story. She lived in Berlin through the blockade. In 1946, she said, the Americans were hated, in 1948 everybody loved them. No wonder after being literally fed by the Americans for a couple of years.

      Guess this isn't going to happen in Iraq, though, as it looks your guys are on the wrong track there altogether.

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    22. Re:The Iraq Kidnappings by JWhitlock · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sorry to say, but any conflict which we've fought SINCE WW2 has been a halfassed joke. To put it bluntly, we should have used our whole military, sealed off the country, and levelled every major city, annihilate (not simply defeat) every military formation that existed, and smash their infrastructure entirely, making peace only when something crawled out of the rubble begging us to stop.

      First, the Funny: Ah, the Civ3 answer.

      And now the Troll: Good Final Solution, Hitler. It's too bad:

      1. Iraq didn't have terrorists (except for areas protected from Baghdad by the UN no-fly zone),
      2. they didn't have any weapons of mass destruction to speak of, because
      3. the inspections were keeping Saddam from accumulating any, and
      4. Saddam would never give the people that hate his regime a thimble of nerve gas, much less a nuclear device, but of course
      5. Saddam wasn't anywhere near a nuclear device. And, of course,
      6. Iraq was a distraction from the fact that a full ground offensive in Afghanistan couldn't find Osama Bin Laden, because he was probably hiding in the backyard of our ally, Pakistan.

      And, perhaps the Insightful: If we had done like we did for the Germans and Japanese, and relocated all the military personnel to Prisoner of War camps in the Midwest, giving them a chance to acclimate to a life without war, then maybe we would have had a chance to rebuild the country. Accountants and Idealists lost these particular wars for the US.

      So, there ya go mods. Have fun, and please wait for "Overrated" until it gets a few points...

  25. Exactly. by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why R2-D2 is shaped like a trash can.

  26. Spoilers ahead by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

    Palpadine is Yoda :-)

  27. seeing as it's the directors saying it... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... there's a bit more credence than if undredentialed fans just gushed for an hour. Granted this is promotional material, and Lucas had this made, but when Ridley Scott and James Cameron can tell you why this opened their minds to doing what they have done so well, you tend to listen. Especially when they're referring to a guy who bucked the system, paid thru the nose to defy the DGA, then eventually quit the DGA and MPAA to retain creative control. He could have pulled an Alan Smithee.

    Again - it's less science fiction, more space opera. Not much in the way of history-changing technology or advanced science uncovering deep truth and human potential. OK , there may be a little of it, but it's secondary to the plot and drama and spectacle.

    In truth, look at the state of science fiction before Star Wars - you had story or realism, but rarely both, and you forgave the missing one. But you still missed it. 2001, Silent Running were two popular exceptions. Star Trek had passable story, cheesy realism, but it was all we had. This had both.

    Ditto the state of computer graphics - like Edison, who didn't invent the light bulb, but did invent the electric *company* - Lucas didn't invent CG but likely invented the CG *shop* as we know it today. And that has changed filmmakiing in a deeper way than we usually realize. The Terminal - a movie about a guy in a couple of rooms - had a visual effects department and hired CafeFx - Ok they did the outdoor parts - but today you don't need to move an entire production company made of meat across the country to shoot 30 seconds of film. You pick up the phone and get the bits moving. To paraphrase Nicholas Negroponte, the movement of bits is easier than asses.

    For everyone under the age of 27, Star Wars always existed, like electricity or clouds. Under 37, probably also true if they started paying attention to movies about age 10... and by age 37 you've covered more than half the people in the US anyway... so they're not far off the mark for most people. And that's only increasing.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:seeing as it's the directors saying it... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      In truth, look at the state of science fiction before Star Wars - you had story or realism, but rarely both, and you forgave the missing one. But you still missed it. 2001, Silent Running were two popular exceptions. Star Trek had passable story, cheesy realism, but it was all we had. This had both.

      I'm sorry, did you just say that Star Wars had realism? Maybe I missed it that one time I blinked halfway through RotJ, but I never saw any.

      (Still a good flick, though.)

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:seeing as it's the directors saying it... by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      But it had realism, in the sense that the universe felt lived-in. There were other parts that could be called realistic compared to something like Star Trek, like that the aliens actually looked alien, but the big deal was that all sorts of stuff was really dirty and old. The Millenium Falcon didn't look like it just came off of an assembly line (and oftentimes it barely worked), the films were filled with broken/malfunctioning droids, and it featured all sorts of run-down 'bad part of town' areas. It may not seem special now, but that was a big deal when Star Wars came out!

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    3. Re:seeing as it's the directors saying it... by jpellino · · Score: 1

      realism - the artistic definition - as in things looked real. you didn't have to imagine that those foam rubber rocks bouncing off kirk's head were actual rocks.

      no obviously fake props. no wobbly on a string ship from lost in space, no fog machine buck rogers exhaust no plan 9 stage curtains...

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    4. Re:seeing as it's the directors saying it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...no tape around metal handrails that were about to be cut by lightsabres...

      oh wait...

    5. Re:seeing as it's the directors saying it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Lucas didn't invent CG but likely invented the CG *shop* as we know it today

      Oh, I would have thought it was Pixar...

  28. Clerks and Contractors by LuYu · · Score: 1

    I like the part where Mark Hamill discusses the theoretical logistics of employing janitorial staff for the entire Death Star.
    I thought that was the discussion from Clerks. IIRC, they had a long discussion about whether the contractors were innocent bystanders murdered by the rebels or were risk takers lured by high paychecks. I wonder if they would have counted the maids and garbage men as responsible risk takers. Then again, maybe all of those jobs were done by droids. That seems the most likely scenario.
    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    1. Re:Clerks and Contractors by bckrispi · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you listen to the commentary on AOTC, when the Geonosians are shown giving the DS plans to Dooku, Lucas chimes in "Now Jay & Silent bob know who it was that built the Death Star".

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  29. Chewie's pants... by queenofthe1ring · · Score: 5, Funny
    This character has no pants on!' This went back and forth. They did sketches of him in culottes and baggy shorts.

    Clearly Chewbacca needed a nice Hawaiian print pair of bermuda shorts. :-) Or maybe some dockers...

    Leia: "Could somebody get this walking carpet out of my way... Hey, nice pants." ;-)

    --

    ~*~ ~*~ ~*~

    yes, girls read /. too...

  30. Aarg... by johannesg · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know what scares me more: that someone would know this, or that it gets modded "+4 insightful"...

    1. Re:Aarg... by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Funny
      I don't know what scares me more: that someone would know this, or that it gets modded "+4 insightful"..


      How about the fact that Lucas decided to name one of his characters "Count Dooku"? :^)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Aarg... by selectspec · · Score: 5, Funny
      How about the fact that Lucas decided to name one of his characters "Count Dooku"?

      Count Chocula was already trademarked.

      --

      Someone you trust is one of us.

    3. Re:Aarg... by tukkayoot · · Score: 2
      How about the fact that Lucas decided to name one of his characters "Count Dooku"? :^)

      A fallen Jedi character, no less. Though at least his Sith name is properly menacing, "Darth Tyranus". That's probably the whole reason he turned to the Dark Side.

  31. The red button.. by spineboy · · Score: 1

    If you press R2s red button his top pops open and that's where you drop your trash. The Blue button compacts it.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:The red button.. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      now why the hell did i get a image of stef doing that to erwin?

      or better yet, use him as a mobile drink cooler like r2-d2 was used in return of the jedi? hell he is liquid cooled anyways...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:The red button.. by scumdamn · · Score: 1

      You can't fit a bunch of trash inside R2! It's full of little person! He's cramped enough in there already without you throwing your Arby's wrapper in there as well.
      And don't you think if the Death Star was built in modern times there'd be a Bank of America and a McDonalds in there? I mean, if Wal-Mart can have 'em the Death Star most certainly would.

  32. But what about the geonosians? by evil_one666 · · Score: 1

    Dont they have a right to life?

    You insensitive clod!

  33. The Dork Side. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Beware of the dork side. Once you step down the dork path, forever will it dominate your destiny. Consume you it will!

    You will live in your mother's basement. You will never kiss a girl. The only girls you will ever see will be prOn on the internet. You will have no outlet but playing with your own light saber.

    Don't cross over to the dork side.

    --
    How ya like dat?
    1. Re:The Dork Side. by wpmegee · · Score: 3, Funny

      I find your lack of faith disturbing.

    2. Re:The Dork Side. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find your lack of pants disturbing.

    3. Re:The Dork Side. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      My wife disagrees with you.

      Remember: there are she-dorks as well.

    4. Re:The Dork Side. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      well then its time a make myself a t-shirt saying:

      im a dork
      and im proud of it!

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  34. Mark Hamill: Get a life! by Chas · · Score: 2, Funny

    William Shatner: I already told them that. It doesn't work...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  35. Slightly offtopic, but... by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Check out the bonus disk in the new DVD set. There's a section showing behing the scenes pictures of all three movies. I was floored when I saw the caption to a picture showing Han and the actor playing Greedo pointing guns at each other in the canteena scene.

    Han Solo (Harrison Ford) prepares to shoot first in the original version of A New Hope.
    The Rodian bounty hunter Greedo was portrayed by actor Paul Blake, shown here sans mask.
  36. Contractor Discussion Relevant by geekpolitico · · Score: 1

    Not to bring down what is a lighthearted conversation, but the discussion of killing contractors is actually relevant right now. The guerillas are actively targeting the reconstruction crews in Iraq. They view them in the same light that they view the armed forces. Now that we sit on the Empire's side of the whole contractor debate, do we view the death of the contractor's as any more or less tragic then the death of the soldiers?

    1. Re:Contractor Discussion Relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The two main differences are the target and means. The target of the rebels was the Death Star; the target of terrorists are civilians. The means used by the rebels was as quick and painless as any death can be; the terrorists try to be as gruesome and painful as possible.

      You might have a case for your analogy if the terrorists were blowing up military targets which happened to have large civilian contingents, but that's not the case. Terrorists target exclusively civilians.

    2. Re:Contractor Discussion Relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. Most of the "contractors" in Iraq are MERCENARIES, not construction workers.

    3. Re:Contractor Discussion Relevant by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Before Iraq, most U.S. reconstruction/humanitarian efforts were funneled through USAID. DoD is handling this for the first time ever in Iraq.

      So, it shouldn't be too surprising that:

      1) All humanitarian efforts in Iraq are targets (whether or not their getting funding from DoD, there's still the stigma).

      2) DoD hasn't been able to effectively use the 18 billion earmarked. (They don't have the infrastructure, procurement channels, or experience.)

      Another problem is that most of the reconstruction contracts are going to foreign companies*, not local ones. This adds to the impression that the reconstruction efforts are part of an invasion by an outside force.

      This is one of the specific examples of how the current administration is screwing up in Iraq.

      *If you are an Iraqi, Halliburton is a foreign company.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Contractor Discussion Relevant by kurfu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The guerillas are actively targeting the reconstruction crews in Iraq. They view them in the same light that they view the armed forces. Now that we sit on the Empire's side of the whole contractor debate, do we view the death of the contractor's as any more or less tragic then the death of the soldiers?

      Very simple...

      The contractor's working on The Death Star were building a weapon capable of detroying entire planets.

      The contractor's in Iraq are trying to rebuild a country as to provide a better life for it's citizens.

      Any questions?

    5. Re:Contractor Discussion Relevant by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      Peter Cushing's line comes to mind here:

      You would prefer another target?? A military target?

      I hate to oversimplify the war by comparing it to a piece of fantasy, but it does seem relevant at this point. The "contractors" were living in a legitimate military target. What we're seeing in Iraq is different. You remember when the ground war was on, several journalists were killed in the course of the fighting. But they were embedded with the US forces. When the Iraqi army fired on our troops, the civilian reporters were taken out as well. The Iraqi's weren't firing on the civilians, they were firing on a legitimate military target. The accepted rules of warfare state that you don't intentionally target civilians. However, if you blow up a factory that's producing tanks that kills its civilian workforce, that is accepted. What we're seeing in iraq is the deliberate and systematic kidnapping and murder of civilians. Having a civilian truck driver killed as he is transporting goods to feed our war effort is one thing. To kidnap the driver and use him for terror leverage is a totally different story. At the point he is seperated from the military goods he is transporting, he is no longer a legitimate target. To make matters even worse, many of those kidnapped have nothing to do with the war effort. The two Italian women alleged to be killed this week were charity workers. At no time should they have been considered a legal target. But that is the crux of the problem. The enemy we are fighting has absolutely no regard for accepted rules of warfare or even the most rudimentary concept of humanity.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    6. Re:Contractor Discussion Relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The contractor's working on The Death Star were building a weapon capable of detroying entire planets.

      The contractor's in Iraq are trying to rebuild a country as to provide a better life for it's citizens.

      Any questions?


      Just one: Why is the money which, in more optimistic times, was earmarked for schools and hospitals, now being diverted to protect oil production?

    7. Re:Contractor Discussion Relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the war was on, American precision strikes took out street markets, apartment buildings and a television station. As you aptly point out, these are indeed the acts of people with absolutely no regard for accepted rules of warfare or even the most rudimentary concept of humanity. This in a nutshell is the reason the US cannot win in Iraq: the majority of the population would rather die than be ruled by such monsters.

  37. Logistics of Death Star Building by kosty · · Score: 1

    Um, is it too late to get in on the "bidding" [chuckle, No! Really!] for the next one? My card:

    Defense

    KBR Government Operations provides a diverse range of services to all branches of the [United States] military and other Department of Defense and government agencies. As "Force Multipliers," we perform the support tasks that allow troops and government clients to focus on their primary mission.

    Our Services

    * Emergency Response
    * Facilities, Modification & Repair
    * GSA LOGWORLD
    * Job Order Contracting
    * Operations, Maintenance & Logistics
    * Security Solutions
    * Total Lifecycle Management Services

    We became military contractors in 1942 when Brown Shipbuilding Company built the first of 359 ships for the US Navy at our Greens Bayou Fabrication Yard, Houston, Texas. Since then, KBR has become the premier provider of logistics and support services to all branches of the military. Our capabilities range from complex, fast-track construction, logistics and support services in remote, militarized locations to day-to-day base operations support. We leverage the assets and strengths of other Halliburton companies and personnel to provide innovative solutions to any problem.

    We have several contract vehicles immediately available to all branches of the Armed Forces and other government agencies to respond to contingencies around the world. We have 25,000 employees around the world in over 50 locations.

    http://www.halliburton.com/kbr/govServ/US/defens e/ index.jsp

    --
    "Democracy." It's just a slogan.
  38. For immediate release: Darth W. press conference by notany · · Score: 0, Troll

    +5 resist oppression (in case you haven't gotten this chain mail yet)

    CORUSCANT-Presiding over a memorial service commemorating the victims
    of the attack on the Death Star, the Emperor declared that while
    recent victories over the Rebel Alliance were "encouraging, the War on
    Terror is not over yet." "We will continue to fight these terrorists,
    and the rogue governments who harbor them, until the universe is safe,
    once and for all, and the security of the Neo-New Cosmic Order
    ensured."

    It was one year ago today that the Death Star, perhaps the
    greatest symbol of the Empire's might, was destroyed in an attack by
    fanatic Rebels, who used small, single-person crafts to infiltrate
    seemingly impenetrable defenses. Thousands of mourners were on hand
    to remember and pay tribute to the victims and their families. "We
    lost our innocence that day," reflected one mourner. "I guess we
    thought we were immune from the kind of violence that happens in other
    galaxies. We were wrong." "I lost hundreds of buddies that day," said
    one teary-eyed Stormtrooper. "Guys whose only crime was trying make
    the Universe a safer place."

    Although the day was colored by sadness,
    the mourners found some relief in the news of a decisive victory over
    the Rebels. In an attack led by Darth Vader, Empire forces were able
    to rout hundreds of Rebels from a network of caves underneath the
    surface of the planet Hoth. "We're not sure we got them all," says a
    Vader spokesman. "There are a lot of places to hide in those
    caves. But we've delivered a powerful blow to the terrorist's
    infrastructure, that's for sure. Today, the Empire has struck back."

    Initial reports are unclear as to the fate of Luke Skywalker, a hero
    among the Rebels, who is rumored to have delivered the fatal blow to
    the Death Star. Skywalker, a former desert-dweller from the planet
    Tattooine, became a part of the Rebellion after family members were
    killed. Skywalker was trained by a militant wing of the Rebels, known
    as "Jedi Knights." Fanatical in their religious beliefs, the Jedi
    Knights claim to derive their power from the mystical "Force." It's
    believed that Skywalker was specifically trained by infamous terrorist
    O bin Wankanobi.
    Wankanobi, occasionally called "Ben" and easily
    recognized by his bearded visage and long, flowing robes, achieved
    near-martyr status among the Rebels after his death last year during a
    spy mission. His more fervent followers believe that Wankanobi lives
    on within them today, some even claiming to hear his voice during
    times of duress.

    The attack on the Death Star came shortly after the
    Empire's destruction of Alderstaan, a planet whose government was
    known to harbor terrorists. Responding to criticism over the total
    annihilation of the planet, Vader stated, "There is no middle ground
    in the War on Terror. Those who harbor terrorists are terrorists
    themselves. Alderaan was issued ample warning. The fight for
    continuing Freedom is often burdened by terrible cost." The cost of
    this war can still be seen today in the continuing efforts to build a
    coalition government on Tattooine. Longstanding animosities among the
    planets various ethnic groups, including the Jawas, Tusken Raiders and
    scattered human settlers, have been an impediment to the peace
    process. The Empire continues to maintain a small peace keeping force
    until a provisional government is finally in place.

    Much of the
    difficulty in fighting the Rebel forces stems from their lack of a
    central organizing structure. "They don't play by the traditional
    rules of war," complained one spokesman. "They come in all shapes and
    sizes, united only by their single-minded desire to destroy the Empire
    before it destroys them." The Emperor closed his comments today by
    stating that "the cowardly attack n the Death Star left a deep scar on
    the Empire. However, we will not stop fighting until every last
    evildoer has been brought to justice." He paused for several moments,
    wiping away a tear and then added with determination, "We will never
    forget." "I wish we could"

    --
    Dyslexics have more fnu.
  39. Only on slashdot.... by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    ...does the parent get modded INSIGHTFUL!

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  40. Microsoft Imperial Death Star XP by inkswamp · · Score: 5, Funny
    Something just occurred to me.

    * The Death Star plans were secret, but rebels managed to obtain them anyway.
    * Windows is closed source, but people keep managing to steal bits of code anyway.

    * The Empire was confident that The Death Star was secure and couldn't be compromised.
    * Microsoft is confident that Windows is secure and cannot be compromised.

    * Occassionally, rebellious hackers stumble across Windows vulnerabilities that nobody noticed before or thought was important.
    * The rebels discovered a vulnerability into the Death Star that nobody noticed before or thought was important.

    * Windows slowly positions itself to wipe out the competition.
    * The Death Star slowly positions itself to wipe out the competition.

    * Microsoft analyses virus attacks and discovers that there is some danger... albeit too late.
    * The Empire analyzed the rebel attack and discovered that there was some danger... albeit too late.

    * Script kiddies sometimes take devastatingly accurate shots at these backdoors and weaknesses.
    * Luke Skywalker took a devastatingly accurate shot at the Death Star's exhaust port.

    * Microsoft is attempting to rebuild Windows from the ground up, promising to make it better than before although it looks pretty much the same.
    * The Empire tried to rebuild The Death Star from the ground up, promising to make it better than before although it looks pretty much the same.

    Therefore... we can conclude the following:

    * Luke Skywalker is a script kiddie.

    * The Apple switcher campaign should feature Harrison Ford shouting, "Great shot kid, that was one in a million! Let's blow this thing so we can go home!"

    * When Windows explodes... oooohhh... pretty.

    * Hackers should have medals presented to them by Carrie Fisher.

    * Bill Gates is Linus Torvald's father.

    * And finally: Microsoft should not put too much faith in this technological terror they've constructed... the ability to destroy the competition is insignificant next to the power of open source.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Microsoft Imperial Death Star XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      * Bill Gates is Linus Torvald's father.

      Nooooooooooooooo! Noooooo!

    2. Re:Microsoft Imperial Death Star XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Search your feelings Linus. You know it to be true... oh and where do you want to go today?"

  41. Re:For immediate release: Darth W. press conferenc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good work. This is a classic.

    Too bad you got a troll mod by some fanatical right-wing fascist pig-dog. But you can't print something brilliant like this without taking some shit.

  42. good read by phrostie · · Score: 1

    too true

  43. Slighty Off Subject by Tbeehler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey, this is slightly off subject, but last night I was watching the new Star Wars DVD and during the scene where Luke and Han Solo were at the gunners station in the millenium falcon shooting at tie fighters (I believe it's after they escape the death star and obi wan's killed), one of the tie's flys by and has a GREEN FUCKING BOX around it! Looks like someone at ILM didn't clean that up! Anyone else get this problem??

    Travis

    1. Re:Slighty Off Subject by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      I didn't notice that at all.

    2. Re:Slighty Off Subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the THX setup feature on the disks (found under Options menu) to set your TV up properly. Problem will go away.

    3. Re:Slighty Off Subject by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      No, but apparently the region 1 DVD's have a problem with the sound. http://www.imdb.com/news/sb/#1

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

  44. Sure about that? An article today even. by Soporific · · Score: 1
  45. Drawn to Iraq by Todd+H.+Sals · · Score: 1

    Have you ever thought of the type of people that would be drawn to work as a contractor in a lawless country?

    I'm sure there are some good samaritins that are in Iraq working as contractors who are doing it for the warm fuzzy feeling they get. But there are probably others who are attracted to the 'Wild West' atmosphere there.

    I lived in Cambodia for a few years and there were still a few people hanging around from the more lawless days there. They were typically men in there 40's with a family back home that wouldn't speak to them and they came to Cambodia for some 'excitement'.

    I bet you in a few years they will see that the AIDS rate in Iraq went through the roof after all these contractors with their big bucks and a death wish started to sample the wares of the local prostitutes. I've talk to a few of the guys in Cambodia that would have unprotected sex with prostitues on a daily basis. They could care less if they got AIDS and died.

    Involvement with Iraq also gives these guys instant respect and honor. It's a last ditch effort to do something with their lives.

    The tragic death of innocent Contractors? It's not tragic and they aren't innocent.

  46. Are you totally stupid? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (Yeah, yeah, off-topic but you've got to respond when someone asks that kind of question.)

    The US occupiers in post-WWII weren't calling in air strikes on cities and killing innocent men, women and children in the process. If you're American, you hear about every US soldier that dies but how often do you hear about Iraqi deaths at American hands?

    According to some estimates, this war has killed over 25,000 Iraqi civilians so far. Note, those are estimates, because nobody's been keeping an official count of Iraqi dead probably because - and this is the honest truth that most politicians wouldn't admit - most people in positions of responsibility don't give a shit.

    Now, answer honestly, if you're an average Joe, and your wife and kids are killed in by an American air strike that flattens you home and you neighbourhood, just how hurt, how frustrated and how angry are you going to feel? And what are you more likely to do: take it lying down or want to fight back.

    300 Iraqis civilians are dying every week as a result of the ongoing fighting. That's 300 people per week in a country with less than 10 percent of America's population. In other words, that's the Iraqi equivalent of a September 11th every damn week.

    Now do you get an idea of why the country is so fucked up?

    Did I mention that the war's illegal? That there never were WMDs? That there never was any link between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein's regime? That September 11th had nothing to do with Iraq? Etc, etc.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Are you totally stupid? by servognome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US occupiers in post-WWII weren't calling in air strikes on cities and killing innocent men, women and children in the process.
      That's because Japan/Germany were beaten into submission. Drop 2 atomic bombs on Iraq, and firebomb Baghdad and things might change.
      The US should never have gone into Iraq. You cannot occupy a country without breaking the will of the people, and to do that, you pretty much have to decimate it. The war made no sense to begin with, and there was no coherent strategy post defeat of the standing goverment.
      Unfortunately the US is stuck keeping troops in Iraq, otherwise, the power vaccuum would most likely lead to civil war and there'd be thousands of deaths a week. So now the US is stuck sacrificing money and lives to try and keep the peace in a situation it caused. We have GWB to thank for running our country into a deficit on a war we didn't need, and for alienating the rest of the world.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:Are you totally stupid? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the US is stuck keeping troops in Iraq, otherwise, the power vaccuum would most likely lead to civil war and there'd be thousands of deaths a week.

      I'm not entirely disagreeing, but this idea has been passed around repeatedly yet I've never found much actual analysis to lead to this conclusion. While Iraq is certainly unstable, and I believe that it is becoming more unstable the longer the US administration blocks and dismantles existing organizational structures and puts in place it's own that depend on the US support for their existence, Iraq is not uncivilized. There are many educated people there and there are still [very] strong communities. Consider that the Iraqi people will predominantly do what their clerical leaders will tell them, and that the clerical leaders fall into a handfull of close knit groups - well you would have some power struggling between the groups but it wouldn't be the every man for himself scenario that the West seems to envisage.

      Within weeks of Saddam's fall, democratic elections had been held in many areas and people had organized tens of thousands of volunteers to take care of issues such as refuse collections and hospital meals. Now the elections weren't quite up to my standards of democracy - one man from each household was given a vote - but they did appear to be fair.

      And then the US administration began imposing their own people through the agency of RTI - a corporation hired for the task. Emerging organizational structures - even democratic ones, were hamstrung or squashed because they were not 'legitimate,' (Paul Bremmer's words). RTI also piss me off because their a corporation with a .org . But I suppose that's just me.

      So I'll stress again that pulling out would create a power struggle, but I don't think the assumption that it's only the US army preventing total social breakdown is even close to supported. The US strategy is to remain long enough to cement the power structures that it wants, so that any attempted usurption of them can only take place through uprisings and violence. Specific examples are such things as US supported politicians, business contracts and management and - importantly - the details of various agreements about oil and military forces. The 'breaking' of these agreements [regardless of what 'government' made them] would provide pretext for further punishment of Iraq.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:Are you totally stupid? by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *** Drop 2 atomic bombs on Iraq, and firebomb Baghdad and things might change.***

      and half the iraq would celebrate, and all of them hate americans even more...

      that's the problem, they're not centralised, and neither is it a stabilised region. the only thing holding it together was saddam and his goons. it is not an old 'natural nation. they have a tradition of not getting along.

      if you take a look at the quite recent history anyone with brains would stay the fuck out and let them duke it out and form more natural nations(this takes time, can't be sped up and might not never happen). but alas, because of the oil(and some other political happenings in the region that made usa back up hussein earlier) they can't just be let alone.

      lose/lose..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Are you totally stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...in other words, you'd prefer we'd have stayed out of Iraq and allow them to continue to export terrorism?

      Listen up moron - stop listening to the liberal press and use your head. The rest of the world ALREADY hates us. Have you ever watched what happens at the UN (WELL before we got into Iraq)? We are ALWAYS the whipping boy. We're the big guys on the block and we are an EASY target. Iraq was worth it JUST for the wake up call it sent to Syria and Iran. You idiot liberals have allowed this country to become the wuss of the world. Those people over there understand NOTHING but force.

      What we really have is people like Jimmy Carter and YOU for running this country into the ground with your assinine thoughts that the people in the world will just 'get along'. Idiot. Look around - WE DON'T GET ALONG IN THIS COUNTRY! And we have EVERY reason to. You think those people living in mud huts are going to? They've got little else to do BUT kill each other. And yep, it's coming here. Stick your head in the ground. Ignore it. It's coming. And these guys didn't just WAKE UP after GWB got elected and decided to come after us. This is not new - he didn't start the war. He's just trying to show them we can still fight - they have forgotten who we are and what we can do.

      The scary thing is that we are already losing the will to fight it - I hope you guys enjoy the world you are setting up our children for - because the next set of deaths should SQUARLEY sit on the shoulders of every liberal in this country. You CANNOT win this fight by giving them money (like you buy votes of poor people). You CANNOT win this fight by talking them to death. THE ONLY solution is to kill the bad guys before they kill us. They DO NOT KNOW how to live in peace. Get your head out of your ASS and look around the world.

    5. Re:Are you totally stupid? by instarx · · Score: 1

      That's because Japan/Germany were beaten into submission. Drop 2 atomic bombs on Iraq, and firebomb Baghdad and things might change.

      Yes, things would change. The US would become the pariah nation of the planet. No country would trade with us, we would never get another drop of oil from anyone, and we would be embargoed in every area of trade and cooperation. The results would be either revolution or the country would be ruined economically in five years (or both). I'm not even going to mention the jihad of all jihads that would plunge the world into religious warfare for the forseeable future.

      The neocon simple-thinking that military power alone will solve our problems is what has gotten this country into so much trouble. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz et. al. think they are such geniuses and yet they continue to take the most imbecilic simple-minded approaches to everything.

      The problem is that the neocons actually believed their own wishful-thinking ("Iraq will be easy, our military is the best", and the infamous "Mission Accomplished"), but all they have accomplished is to run us full speed into the wall of reality where thousands of insurgents have AK-47s, RPGs and IEDs. Not to mention that 60% of the world's population is coming to hate our guts with religious passion.

      We now find ourselves in the murderous position of not being able to stay and not being able to leave Iraq. And although some may think that nukes will solve the problem, that is the same simple-minded reasoning that would get us even deeper into the reality shit-hole.

    6. Re:Are you totally stupid? by servognome · · Score: 1

      The neocon simple-thinking that military power alone will solve our problems is what has gotten this country into so much trouble
      I'm not disagreeing with you. What I am saying is that limited military engagement is not a good strategy for taking control of a country. You have to go all or nothing (and I prefer nothing).
      Saddam was able to control the country, but what it took was mass killings and fear. There was no way the US could hope to control the country withtout being horribly murderous, that's why it should not have gone in in the first place.
      Not to mention that 60% of the world's population is coming to hate our guts with religious passion
      Not quite that many muslims in the world, but the war definately made the US a greater target for terrorism, and worse alienated us from the rest of the world.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    7. Re:Are you totally stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite that many muslims in the world, but the war definately made the US a greater target for terrorism, and worse alienated us from the rest of the world.

      You are right. Muslims make up 20% of the world's population and I guess not all hate us in any event. It just SEEMS like 60% :-)

      There was no way the US could hope to control the country withtout being horribly murderous, that's why it should not have gone in in the first place.
      I have to diagree with this. We had a great opportunity to make a difference in everyday Iraqi people and win them over as friends. We had a year-long honeymoon that we totally blew. Instead, in more than 18 months there are still no jobs, only US companies get contracts, and many neighborhoods still have sewage in the streets from destroyed water/sewer systems. Of the 18 billion dollars allocated to rebuild Iraq only 1 billion has been spent, all on US companies, and about 60% of that on security for their personnel rather than rebuilding projects. Many billions have simply disappeared.

      The people assigned by the Bush administration to allocate these 18 billions were 20-something kids with no experience in management of any kind, yet they were actuall put IN CHARGE of spending 18 billion dollars! The resume of one senior US 20 year-old assigned to allocate billions of dollars in development funds indicted his most recent job was driving an ice cream truck. They had all, however, submitted resumes within the previous year to a conservative thinktank.

      This operation has been entirely and utterly fucked up by the self-described geniuses Cheney and Rumsfeld. If this administration had spent half the time on improving conditions in Iraq that they spent on making sure Halliburton made billions, things could have been much different.

    8. Re:Are you totally stupid? by imroy · · Score: 1
      Not to mention that 60% of the world's population is coming to hate our guts with religious passion
      Not quite that many muslims in the world, but the war definately made the US a greater target for terrorism, and worse alienated us from the rest of the world.

      It's not just muslims that hate the USA. Here in Australia there's always been a resentment of the stupid arrogant attitude that seems to pervade almost everything done by the USA and its citizens. Now GWB's war in Iraq seems to be the very height of stupidity and arrogance. Almost everything the man said about Saddam Hussein could equally have been said about the USA and GWB e.g massive stockpiles of weapons, threatening other countries, cooperating with terrorists, etc.

      I'm white anglo-saxon. I was raised with mostly protestant religious teachings, although I've broadened my horizons somewhat since then. My native tongue is English. Culturally and ethnically I'm 99% compatible with the USA. But events in the last few years has caused my simmering anti-American feelings to come to the boil. And I'm not alone. Bush has seriously damaged the image of the USA with the rest of the world.

    9. Re:Are you totally stupid? by servognome · · Score: 1

      It's not just muslims that hate the USA. Here in Australia there's always been a resentment of the stupid arrogant attitude that seems to pervade almost everything done by the USA and its citizens
      I wasn't disagreeing with you that the rest of the world hates the US, and sees it as arrogant. However, when you say "religious passion", I do disagree with you. Many other countries may hate the US and especially Bush's policies, hell more than half the people in the country didn't want the current administration in the first place. But I doubt many Australians or French are willing to suicide bomb in the streets against the US, that would be "religious passion."
      Unfortunately too many of the "Joe sixpack" crowd in the US have no concept of things outside the country, and could care less what the rest of the world thinks.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    10. Re:Are you totally stupid? by imroy · · Score: 1

      I thought this all started with servognome's apparent suggestion of dropping nukes on Iraq to subdue the population. My point was that you don't have to be muslim to hate the USA and many non-muslims around the world are already fed up the direction in which GWB has lead the US.

      As for Australia we do have two citizens in Guantanemo (sp?) bay, one of which was caught fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan just like John Walker Lindh. And I seem to remember hearing about a warning that al-Qaeda was recruiting non-arabs to evade ethnic profiling and carry out missions.

  47. NOT ME!!! by mangu · · Score: 1
    Slashdot is entirely populated with carbon-biased lifeforms!


    I'm a silicon-based bot. I dare you to run a Turing test on me.

  48. nit pick by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    Luke just said that Chewbacca is a monkey, not a Wookie. That makes it cannon!

    Or "canon", even.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  49. Re:For immediate release: Darth W. press conferenc by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I missed the part where the empire deliberately executed a complete planet full of people.

    Oh wait, sorry. That's not terrorism. That's just sexy, charasmatic people doin' their thang.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  50. Which Death Star? by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    The first or the second? The argument was regarding the Death Star in Return of the Jedi. I didn't see any giant insect creatures in that film.

    1. Re:Which Death Star? by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Wait till the next "director's cut" of the movie...

  51. Re:so many people have to overanalyze by zmollusc · · Score: 0

    Why do I overanalyse films? Because I am hoping to see the film that has been sold to me, not what I actually get. I refrained from analysing 'Dodgeball' because it was sold to me as a bit of fun. Sell me something as 'excitement and edge-of-the-seat suspense' and I will bitch about why I wasn't excited and slouched in my seat.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  52. and YOU didn't spell gay-ass right!! by thegnu · · Score: 1

    Har!

    A-Har har! Har...

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  53. Re:For immediate release: Darth W. press conferenc by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    If I had mod points, they'd all be yours.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  54. Re:so many people have to overanalyze by cwebb1977 · · Score: 0

    Then you can say it was a bad movie... no need to think about the janitorial staff or that maybe the director had a bad breakfast and the main actor smiled a little too much, ruining the whole film.

    --
    www.weberseite.at
  55. OT: your sig (was Re:Which Death Star?) by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 3, Informative
    John Kerry argued for unilateral preemptive action in Iraq on CNN's CROSSFIRE in '97

    Please follow the link, notice the correction/retraction, and correct your .sig (preferably with a correction/retraction of your own).

    (Gee, a paper controlled by the Moonies gets incorrect facts about Kerry from a Republican source. Color me shocked.)

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
    1. Re:OT: your sig (was Re:Which Death Star?) by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Please follow the link, notice the correction/retraction, and correct your .sig (preferably with a correction/retraction of your own).

      The correction/retraction is very ambiguous about what exactly is being corrected/retracted.

      Did Rep. King get minor details wrong, or is he taking something out of context, or making up out of whole cloth?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:OT: your sig (was Re:Which Death Star?) by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      The correction/retraction is very ambiguous about what exactly is being corrected/retracted.

      Did Rep. King get minor details wrong, or is he taking something out of context, or making up out of whole cloth?

      No, it's not at all ambiguous. Both King's claim and Kerry's actual words are presented. It's clear that King either badly mis-remembered, or fabricated his claim about, Kerry's words.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  56. Re:HAHAHA A LAME "M$" JOKE MOD UP +5 FUNNY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Windows user. Obviously.

    --jd

  57. Re:For immediate release: Darth W. press conferenc by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

    Might want to actually READ the post then. What you mentioned is in there.

  58. Nitpick by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're not a 'hive mind', they just have a 'hive mentality'. The difference is, they're individuals, but their insect nature makes it basically impossible for them to function outside the hive. They get scared, kinda like super agoraphobia. This is why they make such good workers, you can treat them as bad as you want and they'll take it from fear of being kicked out of the hive.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  59. Re: Imperial Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Japanese surrendered and didn't put up a fight with the occupying forces because their Emperor told them to do so against the wishes of the military government and at the own risk of his own life I might add.

    The second reason for the lack of resistance was the fact the US government let Japan keep it's Emperor which would have otherwise led to "to the last person" type of battle which the US wanted to avoid even with the Bomb.

    Germany on the otherhand had the Werewolf units which targeted US Forces during the occupation, but only lasted for a while. Mostly because the average West German was seeing the US as a saviour from Soviet Occupation.

  60. ObSimpsons by sharkey · · Score: 1

    I bent my Wookiee!
    --Ralph Wiggum

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  61. Janitorial staff by Wokan · · Score: 1

    I can tell you that as a prior member of the military, there aren't any janitorial staff to worry about. When our shift on watch was over, it was our job to clean up a designated area, including possibly stripping and waxing the floors. Soldiers and [Imperial] Sailors are taught more than just how to steer a ship and fire a gun. We're taught a certain amount of self-maintainance as well.

    Now the contractors working on the second death star? I agree with the roofer in the conversation with Dante. They knew they were working for the government and that the government had enemies (the rebels). They should make sure their life insurance is paid up (and doesn't have a combat zone clause, as so many do) before they start such a job, if they're truly taking it to take care of the family.

  62. Found floating around Endor by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    Fm: ImpInt
    To: Office of D. Vader
    Re: Name change

    Suggest we call the new battle station "The Hospital Star".

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  63. Taking control of a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What I am saying is that limited military engagement is not a good strategy for taking control of a country.
    But should "taking control" of the country, actually be the goal? Iraq needs to take control of itself.

    The only "control" Bush wanted (in theory) (as explained to the American public) was to control the threat that Iraq posed to USA, mainly "controlling" it by eliminating it. That is, finding and destroying all the ICBMs and their associated nuclear warheads. Now that the mission has been accomplished, further "control" isn't really something that is useful to pursue.