Slashdot Mirror


Detailed Empire Strikes Back DVD Change List

JSDopefish writes "The DVD news site DVDanswers.com is back with Part 2 (of 3) of the series by Chris Gould showing in detail the changes between some the various iterations of the Star Wars original trilogy movies. In Part 2, Chris covers The Empire Strikes Back, showing such important changes as the color of Han Solo's jacket before he's frozen in carbonite, as well as other things like the change in actor for the Emperor, and more on light saber colors. Chris has screen captures from the original, the 1997 remaster, and the 2004 DVD versions, plus some audio clips for you to check out. There is an existing Part 1 covering A New Hope, and a forthcoming Part 3 covering Return of the Jedi." Very detailed synopsis. Worth a read if... well, you're me.

219 comments

  1. Empire strikes back? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does Boba get swallowed (by the Sarlacc) first???

    1. Re:Empire strikes back? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Boba appear in post RotJ works (books, games, etc.) I'm not up to snuff on my SW canon, but how is that addressed? Jet-packed out off camera or something?

    2. Re:Empire strikes back? by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, in the Book "Tales from Jabbas Palace".

      The sarlacc (well one of the other digested minds) and him have some conversations, and Boba desides he really hates this Sarlacc so he manages to escape by flipping on his rocket pack (while in the sarlacc) which proceeds to explode (since he's entangled in the sarlacc) which sets him free but also cracks open his Mandalorian armor. He uses some remaining concussion grenades to knock some sand down into the pit for him to climb out. He later comes back in Slave II and hovers right over the opening and burns the crap outta the Sarlacc with the jet exhaust, but he returns the favor of Slow Digestion by not killing it entirely.

      Of course this is all from memory which might not be too accurate.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:Empire strikes back? by Bigthecat · · Score: 1

      I recall someone telling me that there was a novel where Jawas fished Boba out of Sarlaac at some point. Third-hand information, but I guess ways out of his death were limited :)

    4. Re:Empire strikes back? by chrish · · Score: 5, Funny

      Feh. Jet pack indeed. Kids today...

      In my day we had to climb out of the bloody Saarlak ourselves, then walk several kilometers across the desert, naked.

      --
      - chrish
    5. Re:Empire strikes back? by aquasheep · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I hope this isn't too off topic, since the story is about Empire Strikes Back, but I was listening to the commentary on the ROTJ DVDs, and Lucas said something to the effect of, "if I had known Boba Fett was going to be such a popular character, I would have put more effort into giving him a more interesting death. Most people don't really believe he's dead anyways."

    6. Re:Empire strikes back? by iceborer · · Score: 0

      When I went out with the Sarlacc, it was definitely a spitter.

    7. Re:Empire strikes back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Boba in this version, but when Han enters the dining hall in Cloud City I'm pretty sure Vader shoots first. ;)

    8. Re:Empire strikes back? by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 1

      Boba Fett was saved by Dengar, another bounty hunter, in one of the books (Tales of the Bounty Hunter? Tales from Jabba's Palace? can't remember).

      Anyway, Boba returns the favor by being best man at Dengar's wedding.

    9. Re:Empire strikes back? by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      Anyway, Boba returns the favor by being best man at Dengar's wedding.
      And I thought I had a tough time coming up with a best man toast...
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  2. sigh. by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


    The first story from that site with their Ep IV breakdown killed the server before a handful of comments were up. Noooo... let's try it again with another link to the Ep V review! Surely it'll be better this time around!

    Sheesh...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:sigh. by flyneye · · Score: 5, Funny

      Better? what could be better than EP V or IV?
      How about a sequel to John Waters "Pink Flamingoes"
      How about remastered Ed Wood movies with new THX?
      Reruns of "Real People"
      The Gong Show?
      Burger King Breakfast with the King commercial?
      obsession....tsk..tsk.

      just grumpy I guess.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    2. Re:sigh. by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      How about remastered Ed Wood movies with new THX

      yesterday I saw a blurb at fleshbot.com (nsfw so I'm not html'ing it) about Fleshbot releasing Ed Wood's Necromania in DVD, with other 'lost' Ed Wood smut films to follow soon.

      What makes my comment slightly less offtopic is that Ed Wood shot TWO versions of that movie, one which had less pr0n action, and another version that was more hot, aptly named the hot version.

      Apparently he had to use two cameramen, since his main guy refused to shoot hardcore (in the parlance of the time) scenes.

    3. Re:sigh. by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Burger King Breakfast with the King commercial?

      If you are talking about that recent one with the two guys in bed, one wearing a king costume, obviously after a really intense night of bizarre prince-and-pauper role playing, that's one the best commercials I've seen in a while. I'm looking forward to the next commercial, where the king announces that he is really that guy's father, and the guy starts screaming just like Luke did on that platform. I hear they are going to spin off a mini-series of prequels finally telling the story about how the king and a former queen got together to give birth to twins, who were kept hidden, leading to the climax of the original commercial. Truly fascinating stuff.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  3. ...been there, done that. by wertarbyte · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.schnittberichte.com/sw.php Although this is in german, the pictures speak for themselves. They also have Episode 1 as well as Episode 4/5/6.

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    1. Re:...been there, done that. by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      I find that the written comments for DVDanswers add a lot to the images, actually.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    2. Re:...been there, done that. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "http://www.schnittberichte.com/sw.php..."

      Am I the only one who initially thought that said "shit a brick?"

    3. Re:...been there, done that. by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who initially thought that said "shit a brick?"

      Hm, actually...yes. Yes indeed.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    4. Re:...been there, done that. by slumpy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Weird, I didn't know the movie used to be in german.

      --
      http://www.commaecho.com
    5. Re:...been there, done that. by lommer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I applaud what both these articles have, it really opened my eyes to what they can do these days. On that note was anyone slightly scared by how realistic and subtle these changes were? If not die-hard fanatics watching it repeatedly and comparing it to the original, they would never be noticed. Imagine what can be done these days with video feeds for press releases and publicity stunts. It certainly helped open my eyes to the fact that that the age where even video is completely untrustworthy is upon us, and has probably been here for longer than I thought.

  4. Why was this posted? by FosterKanig · · Score: 0

    It's obvious from what happened last time, that the site can't handle the traffic. Why would you post this? Is a little common sense too much to ask?

    1. Re:Why was this posted? by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      Common sense? Are you new here?

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    2. Re:Why was this posted? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would have thought that after last time they would have upgraded their server before attempting to host the continued story on it. _That_ would be common sense. They must have _known_ that it would attract the same kind of attention as the last installment.

  5. Umm the site says by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    'Upgrading, please come back later'

    I feel a great disturbance in the force, as if suddenly a web server had thousands of requests, cried out, and then went silent.

    1. Re:Umm the site says by D-Cypell · · Score: 4, Funny

      I claim dibs on this joke for the next star wars story!

    2. Re:Umm the site says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A communications disruption can mean only one thing: /. is kicking our arse.

    3. Re:Umm the site says by beacher · · Score: 1

      *waves hand* These are not the jokes you are looking for. (ok ok ok so thats ep4)

    4. Re:Umm the site says by mihalis · · Score: 2, Funny

      you don't need to see his web pages

      you can go about your surfing

      click along

    5. Re:Umm the site says by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      And I claim dibs on all future "Prey I don't alter it further" jokes.

  6. Fully armed and operational... by Reducer2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Three minutes and the server has already been blow to bits by the Death Star-like fanboys (and fangirls) of Slashdot.

    Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.

    --
    When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    1. Re:Fully armed and operational... by standsolid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fangirls? Somebody's on the wrong site...

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    2. Re:Fully armed and operational... by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

      > the Death Star-like fanboys (and fangirls)

      Yeah, you keep telling yourself that.

    3. Re:Fully armed and operational... by Buran · · Score: 3, Informative

      *taptaptap* Excuse me?

      We fangirls don't like it when you talk like that. ;)

    4. Re:Fully armed and operational... by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      A /. reading StarWars fangirl in the same city (StL) as me? I've been on /. for a long time and this is a first (and much too late since I'm married now). What are the odds!

      For the rest of you... just wait several years. It could be you next time.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    5. Re:Fully armed and operational... by Buran · · Score: 1

      Good job finding out where I am. :) Was it difficult or have I forgotten something blindingly obvious? (Perhaps you looked in my image gallery?)

    6. Re:Fully armed and operational... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      You forgot something blindingly obvious. Not only are you giving away your location, I think I can make a reasonable guess at your real name.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    7. Re:Fully armed and operational... by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Your DNS information for the registered domain name Buran.org gives almost all the information any good stalker needs to know. Your name (possibly first name J. last name S.) your possible address (in Apt A), possible company (N. Technologies) and lots of other information including your phone number, which is different from your business phone number. Also included is another person's name, your technical contact, who's location was not revealed.

      Sooooo ummm yeah. There is lots of info out there. As soon as anyone register's a domain name, they "bend over." Granted, the pants are still on, but potential for trouble is there.

      To see what I'm talking about, just go to dnsstuff.com and do a WHOIS lookup an anyone.

      jason

    8. Re:Fully armed and operational... by Buran · · Score: 1

      That's what I figured you were doing -- nothing there I didn't know. I asked more because I wondered what route you use (DNS info vs looking around the website) rather than genuinely not knowing.

      I'm fully aware that all that info is all there. However, you aren't supposed to put fake info in the domain name registration. (Though maybe it's OK to not list your full physical address; I shall have to check.) I'm not sure whether or not it's technically OK for the technical contact to not be listed, though his location is hidden by his request. So far, I haven't gotten in trouble for it!

      Perhaps I will change the registration to list my work address instead, which is safer.

    9. Re:Fully armed and operational... by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      I believe PO boxes are also allowed for WHOIS information purposes, and those are fairly good at turning away the lazy stalkers. Only the realy obsessed stalkers go further than that.

      I also have all my info on WHOIS for a domain. But then again, I'm a balding mid-20s guy that has a concealed weapons license (and uses it). Not too many stalkers follow my kind. :-)

      jason

    10. Re:Fully armed and operational... by Buran · · Score: 1

      Eh, not many stalkers chase the ones with their noses in sci-fi books all the time with geek t-shirts on, either!

      However, I'm stumped... some of the info that that site showed me is WAY out of date and I can't figure out how to access it in the register.com interface (the 'registrant' stuff). I sent them a support request asking them how the heck they have all my old info and where in their GUI I can change it.

      Gnarrrr! I might end up changing registrars at this rate, although I'd have to make sure I wouldn't lose the remaining time on the registration or anything.

    11. Re:Fully armed and operational... by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Eh, not many stalkers chase the ones with their noses in sci-fi books all the time with geek t-shirts on, either!

      Heck that is my favorite kind of prey^H^H^H^H ummmm nevermind. :-)

      I used dyndns.org because they have a very slick automated web interface and have been quite responsive. They also are pretty cheap ($15 for a year registration) but that wasn't what tipped the scales in their favor for me.

      Via the interface you can change all three contact's info. They also host Dynamic DNS entries for free so that a hostname can be auto-updated to point to a dynamic IP (cable internet etc). My roommate used this for a few years before needing more bandwidth and moving his server off our cable net connection to a hosting service.

      Have fun with you registrar's tech support though.

      jason

    12. Re:Fully armed and operational... by Buran · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the recommendation! I'll check them out along with Dotster.

      The funny thing is that you can change all the contact info on the Register.com interface as well -- and none of them have that outdated info. Maybe there's some kind of profile about me that's separate from the site -- I don't know; I'll wait to see what they say before I do anything more.

    13. Re:Fully armed and operational... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All too easy.

    14. Re:Fully armed and operational... by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      It could be that the information was not ever propogated from your DNS servers to the ones used by the WHOIS service I referenced. It took 5 hours (or so) for my DNS info to be pushed out across the net so that just the name would resolve.

      jason

    15. Re:Fully armed and operational... by Buran · · Score: 1

      You'd think, eh? Several years is just bizarre, though. I do make sure to update all accounts and stuff when I change contact info.

    16. Re:Fully armed and operational... by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I wasn't really looking for your location. I just happened to notice this when I looked in your gallery. I enjoy seeing what other people do with their gallery. I use mine for pics of friends/family and as a beer review. I guess if I was trolling for geek girls I could start looking up DNS whois entries, but I really don't have the desire to find them.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    17. Re:Fully armed and operational... by Buran · · Score: 1

      That's cool. I don't mind at all, just was wondering, in general. I hope you enjoyed the pictures? If you had any favorites or categories you liked, feel free to send me an email, and it's kinda nice to get comments like yours that tell me people recognize the things I've photographed. I do it as a hobby so feedback is greatly appreciated.

      Thank you for looking. :)

  7. It's a rainy day here... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Seems like nitpicking movie changes and details would require a string of bad weather, as I hope the authors/researchers don't sit in on a good day. Heck, I can even remember when I used to watch movies for enjoyment other than picking them apart.

    I blame MST3K

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:It's a rainy day here... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I blame MST3K

      You riff because you must. If you were really wrapped up in the movie and enjoying it, it wouldn't occur to you to bust on it. But even good Hollywood movies throw so much riffable stuff in our faces we can't help it.

      This isn't true for older films. The cultural differences make it hard not to crack wise. I think "Gone with the Wind" could have been one of the best MST3K episodes ever.
      I was watching "Metropolis" (the Fritz Lang movie), and an observer would have been surprised to see me laughing out loud at my inner Crow T Robot.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:It's a rainy day here... by HumanTorch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I watched Episode V/DVD, and I thoroughly enjoyed it from start to finish. The ham handed CGI changes in IV and VI now make the overall quality of V stand out in sharp relief. The movie flows.

    3. Re:It's a rainy day here... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I watched Episode V/DVD, and I thoroughly enjoyed it from start to finish. The ham handed CGI changes in IV and VI now make the overall quality of V stand out in sharp relief. The movie flows.

      Pretty much my sentiments and about as far as picking at the movie as I get. The CGI added to the earlier films is about as awkward looking a house that's been half painted -- the old peeling paint has some sort of character, while the new paint draws sharp contrast. I don't think the idea in film is to draw contrast in your sets, but I'm not a bazillionaire.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  8. Han So-slowwww by RealProgrammer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Site's been slash-elipsized ("/....").

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Han So-slowwww by LightStruk · · Score: 1

      I think you mean the site has been slash-dot-dot-dotted.

    2. Re:Han So-slowwww by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      I want to know what JSDopefish has against DVDanswers.com - this is the second time he's Slashdotted them. :)

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
  9. Fascinating reads by SeanDuggan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I read the first part and am (hopefully) loading the second one. To me, it's fascinating, as many of the changes they make, I never would have noticed. I never really stopped and thought too much about lightsaber colors or the funky shadows below a landspeeder. And honestly, had I not read all the vehement discussions on the ramifications of Greedo shooting first, I might have passed over that change. (Well, not entirely... at least on the first remake, his head looks really weird when he dodges...) By opening my eyes to things I might not have noticed before, I think these articles are serving a valuable purpose.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  10. Splash Screen Change? by GuntherAEPi · · Score: 3, Funny

    So apparently the entire movie was replaced with a splash screen?

  11. Hmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks slashdotted after one comment. "Upgrading, please come back later"

  12. slashdotted by GerbilSocks · · Score: 5, Informative
    Thank goodness I read the article 6 hours ago before it got Slashdotted to hell.

    Basically, the baddest changes occured with Boba Fett's voice now dubbed by Temura Morrison. Also some changes in dialogue for Vader that helped with continuity, plus an extended scene with the Emperor.

    Visual changes include details shots of the Wampa, Cloud City exteriors, and a scene of Vader heading back to the Star Destroyer recycled from Outtakes from RoTJ.

  13. Wow... by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

    (Watches webserver go up in flames, stops stopwatch)

    We've only posted 23 comments and the server's already a smouldering ruin. I think it's a record.

    You'd think they would have learned from the first time....

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    1. Re:Wow... by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 1

      That's a remarkable stopwatch if it measures time in Slashdot comments. Where can I get one? :-)

    2. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      redundant

    3. Re:Wow... by daeley · · Score: 1

      Where can I get one?

      Library of Congress.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:Wow... by hostyle · · Score: 0

      maybe some people finally RTFA before posting ?

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  14. The force tells me... by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that this topic will be 95% filled with people complaining about Lucas.

    1. Re:The force tells me... by AvantLegion · · Score: 0
      ... that this topic will be 95% filled with people complaining about Lucas.

      GABE NEWELL IS FAT!

      Oops, wrong troll.

    2. Re:The force tells me... by ishpeck · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "My midichlorians tell me. . ." ?

      --

      "If I were to ask you a hypothetical question, what would you like it to be about?"

  15. Well well by Bigthecat · · Score: 3, Funny
    I've just created an article detailing the changes to this articles' webserver:

    Before - After

  16. Solo's jacket by Aidtopia · · Score: 4, Informative

    At last, Lucas made a change that makes sense. He fixed a continuity problem. Han Solo's jacket appears and reappears in different shots before they freeze him in carbonite. (Neat trick since he was wearing handcuffs.)

    1. Re:Solo's jacket by CoreyGH · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, if you RTFA you'll note that Han was never wearing a jacket that shot; the lighting cast a shadow on his shoulders that made them appear darker. They did end up lightening his shoulders to put such speculation to rest.

    2. Re:Solo's jacket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when Leia thaws him out his hands are free...

    3. Re:Solo's jacket by KaLogain · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the scene in the movie? It's not a shadow, it's a jacket. It's very clear.

      --
      Life's a bitch, then she kills you.
    4. Re:Solo's jacket by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've got all 3 on LD. It's not clear at all. That's the problem, it's dark. In the article, it says "If you've watched the show When Star Wars Ruled the World you might have seen a behind the scenes clip that shows this very moment being filmed. Han is clearly wearing a white shirt, and it is not until he steps up to his marker that the lighting casts a strange shadow, giving the appearance of a sleeveless jacket."

    5. Re:Solo's jacket by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

      TFA was slashdotted. I looked at the photos on another site that an earlier poster linked to. Perhaps that site had the before and after shots reversed, because it looks like they added his jacket rather than removing a shadow. On my "definitive collector's edition" laserdiscs, it sure looks like a continuity error between the medium shots and the close-ups. I've kept meaning to check Return of the Jedi to see if Han has the jacket or not when he's thawed, but I've never gotten around to it. My ILM friend, who worked on the special editions, used to joke with me about Han Solo's jacket.

  17. "Important Changes" by mumblestheclown · · Score: 4, Funny
    important changes as the color of Han Solo's jacket

    i suspect that my definition of "important" seems to vary considerably from that of the submitter.

    1. Re:"Important Changes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect your definition of "sarcasm" differs as well.

    2. Re:"Important Changes" by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      important changes as the color of Han Solo's jacket

      i suspect that my definition of "important" seems to vary considerably from that of the submitter.

      I assumed it was sarcasm. I mean, we're talking about changes in a film...

  18. As Dr Hibbert would say... by EdwinBoyd · · Score: 1

    Cheers for the outstanding and painstaking work, jeers for the annoying advertisments between pages

    1. Re:As Dr Hibbert would say... by gwynnebaer · · Score: 2, Informative

      haven't you heard of adblock?

  19. Great Reviews by M$+Mole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really like this guy's work. He's spot on regarding the far inferior delivery of lines with the new and improved Boba voice.

    One disagreement I have with him though: the line change for Vader from "Bring my shuttle" to "Alert my star destroyer to prepare for my arrival" was a bad idea.

    I know it doesn't bother him much, but I think that the original line and delivery better contributed to Vader's character arc, as the voice always sounded morose to me...like he was either angry with Luke or himself, and the curtness of the line was appropriate if that was the case. /shrug

    --
    Karma: Non-existant. Due mostly to the fact that you smell funny and nobody likes you.
    1. Re:Great Reviews by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      the line change for Vader from "Bring my shuttle" to "Alert my star destroyer to prepare for my arrival" was a bad idea.

      I agree completely.

      but I think that the original line and delivery better contributed to Vader's character arc, as the voice always sounded morose to me...like he was either angry with Luke or himself

      ditto! Now he sounds like he doesn't give a shit, it's just another day at the office.

  20. Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by MooseByte · · Score: 5, Funny

    "showing such important changes as the color of Han Solo's jacket before he's frozen in carbonite"

    OK, it's official: Someone is in desperate need of a girlfriend.

    Tip for first date - don't wear the Y-Wing pilot uniform, try a t-shirt. Also Yoda-speak does not make ladies hot. Unless they're into small green muppets. In which case send me their phone number.

    1. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by SoTuA · · Score: 3, Funny
      Unless they're into small green muppets

      Greased or non-greased?

      If she says greased, then go to the kitchen and start heating up some grits.

    2. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Amy,

      Today, someone informed me that chicks don't dig the rebel pilot jumpsuit. Unfortunately, this could have been brought to my attention last week and saved us both the awkwardness. Will you give me a second chance? I won't wear anything orange or a helmet. Love,

      Jimbo

    3. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Unless they're into small green muppets. In which case send me their phone number.

      Trust me. No girl is interested in your small green muppet.

    4. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by Dmala · · Score: 1

      Tip for first date - don't wear the Y-Wing pilot uniform, try a t-shirt.

      But not a Y-Wing t-shirt!

    5. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by AvantLegion · · Score: 5, Funny
      Also Yoda-speak does not make ladies hot.

      Bullshit.

      "Good on my floor, your clothes look."

      "In sack with me, you shall be!"

      "Kissing leads to sucking, sucking leads to screwing, screwing leads to cum-ming!"

      All stuff that's gotten me laid. Although they usually say "Pay up front, you must."

    6. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by MooseByte · · Score: 1

      "Kissing leads to sucking, sucking leads to screwing, screwing leads to cum-ming!"

      ROTFLMOA! I read that in "Yoda Voice" and damn near spewed coffee across my keyboard!

      I'll never see that scene the same again. :-)

    7. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sleep in the wet spot, I won't.

    8. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by Crouching+Turbo · · Score: 1

      "Judge me by my size, do you?"

    9. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Chris Gould, but CoyboyNeal has a wife. Which just goes to show... that there must be some other reason why the ladies aren't all over me.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    10. Re:Color of Han Solo's Jacket Important?!? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      No wait, never mind. CmdrTaco is the one with a wife. I have no idea what CoyboyNeal's marital status is.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  21. Not to put too fine a point on it..... by Jack+Auf · · Score: 0, Troll

    but, um, Get A Life. Really.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
    1. Re:Not to put too fine a point on it..... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful
      but, um, Get A Life. Really.

      Yes, I think that the wisdom of William Shatner applies to this story (s/TV show/movie/g):

      I'd just like to say... GET A LIFE, will you people? I mean, for crying out loud, it's just a TV show! I mean, look at you, look at the way you're dressed! You've turned an enjoyable little job, that I did as a lark for a few years, into a COLOSSAL WASTE OF TIME!

      [ a crowd of shocked and dismayed Trekkies.... ]

      I mean, how old are you people? What have you done with yourselves?

      [ to "Ears" ] You, you must be almost 30... have you ever kissed a girl?

      [ "Ears" hangs his head ]

      I didn't think so! There's a whole world out there! When I was your age, I didn't watch television! I LIVED! So... move out of your parent's basements! And get your own apartments and GROW THE HELL UP! I mean, it's just a TV show dammit, IT'S JUST A TV SHOW!

    2. Re:Not to put too fine a point on it..... by Animats · · Score: 1
      I'd just like to say... GET A LIFE, will you people? I mean, for crying out loud, it's just a TV show! I mean, look at you, look at the way you're dressed! You've turned an enjoyable little job, that I did as a lark for a few years, into a COLOSSAL WASTE OF TIME!

      He should talk. Shatner's career other than Star Trek has been a disaster. He has a minor part in "Dodgeball". A minor part in "American Psycho 2". A minor part in "Miss Congeniality". A minor part in "Loaded Weapon 1". Decades of minor roles, all the way back to Ranger Bob in the Howdy Doody TV series in 1952. He hasn't been a principal actor in a non-Star Trek feature film since he did Star Trek.

    3. Re:Not to put too fine a point on it..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. but you somehow forgot TJ Hooker

    4. Re:Not to put too fine a point on it..... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but I bet that he doesn't waste all his time repeatedly poring over and cross indexing his old movies and TV episodes looking for irrelevant inconsistencies in plot continuity.

    5. Re:Not to put too fine a point on it..... by aiabx · · Score: 1

      And TJ Hooker, a decent role in Judgement at Nuremburg, and some respect for doing Shakespeare at Canada's Stratford Festival.
      But I guess the real point is that he *did* all these things, he didn't just watch them on TV.
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
  22. Not this time by cryptochrome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Empire was directed by Irvin Kirschner, not Lucas, so he'll take the blame, or rather credit. Actually in my opinion, Empire is the only one of the whole series that is actually good. Not coincidentally, it is also the least re-edited of the originals. The acting and dialogue didn't suck, the use of color and light was far more sophisticated, and the plot had many twists and turns without being overly cliched.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Not this time by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget Leigh Brackett's hands in scripting the dialogue portions of the screenplay. The movie works in my mind because it has a gritty, fatalistic feel similar to many film noir movies -- where Brackett cut her teeth.

      Attack of the Clones proved to me that Lucas can't write dialogue to save his life. I think the mistake Lucas has made with the new trilogy is tryin to do too much. He's wealthy beyond imagination, and can make whatever movie he wants -- a bad combination for a director. Directing requires collaboration. Time and again great directors have made horrible, overbloated bombs when given carte blanche, even with proven track records. Look at Lucas' contemporaries....

      Spielberg - 1941; Cimino - Heaven's Gate; Coppola - Apocalypse Now is a good film, but it 'broke' him as a director. Aside from maybe Dracula, he's never met the standards of Godfather or AN; Scorcese - Gangs of New York; Polanski - Pirates. I could list another 30 or 40, but you get the point...

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:Not this time by gowen · · Score: 1

      And possibly the first, Eric von Stroheim's "Greed", which clocked in at over seven hours. As a contemporary review said : "Von Stroheim is a genius -- GREED establishes that beyond all doubt -- but he is badly in need of a stopwatch."

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    3. Re:Not this time by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      The only movie where a director was given unprecedented control and produced an all-time classic, that i can think of, was Citizen Kane by Orson Welles. Of course, this ignores the fact that his previous 2 attempts -- heart of darkenss, the golden bough(iirc?) -- were left on the cutting room floor. Its success also ruined his hollywood career and he never again reached such heights.

      i can't decide if I'd rather have immediate greatness and then suffer 50 years of decline, or enjoy moderate success over a lifetime. :/

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    4. Re:Not this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His career was ruined because Orson Welles was blacklist by William Randolph Hearst. Hearst viewed (correctly, IMO) Citizen Kane as a not-so-subtle jab at him and took it upon himself to make sure that Welles never worked again in film.

    5. Re:Not this time by miu · · Score: 1
      Directing requires collaboration.

      Or a smart despot who is smart enough to realize he isn't smarter than everyone working for him. Every director making a "vanity movie" comes across as believing their own press about what a genius they are.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    6. Re:Not this time by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Orson Welles continued to direct exceptional movies, such as "The Lady from Shanghai", "Othello", "MacBeth", "Touch of Evil" and "The Trial". All in all he is credited with 38 features to his name.

      "Citizen Kane" was a watershed, it is still today a very modern film. What happened is that his access to Hollywood was severely curtained after William Randolf Hearst, a media mogul at the time, took "Citizen Kane" as a direct attack against him. He tried to have the film banned. He didn't succeed in that but he got Welles blacklisted.

      For the rest of his life Welles spent most of his time putting together enough money to make the films he wanted. "Citizen Kane" made him as a filmmaker but also unmade him. He only somewhat recovered from this towards the end of his life when he received an honorary Oscar for "lifetime achievement".

      Note that his various films received almost all the awards that it is possible to receive in filmmaking, such as the Golden Lion in Venice and the Grand Prix at Cannes.

  23. Missing change... A new blooper! by Bigthecat · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Come on! How could it miss the most important change of all? That being revealing the 'creature' that attacks Luke in the snow to being nothing other than a hand puppet!

    1 | 2

    Shocking stuff how they could miss that while redoing it almost frame by frame, and now all my childhood memories of that creature looking real have been ruined. I hate you George Lucas :(

    1. Re:Missing change... A new blooper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      E.T. wasn't real either. Open the floodgates and cry away.

    2. Re:Missing change... A new blooper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, get a life

    3. Re:Missing change... A new blooper! by Bigthecat · · Score: 1

      I have a life.. It's just not deemed satisfactory by any modern means of worth

    4. Re:Missing change... A new blooper! by jea6 · · Score: 1

      At the risk of revealing my geekness (though hardly a Jedi Master Geek), that's not the "creature that attacks Luke". It's a Tauntaun. The "creature that attacks Luke" is a Wampa Ice Creature.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    5. Re:Missing change... A new blooper! by Bigthecat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No no, the 'hand puppet' flashing on screen is the Wampa attacking the TaunTaun, where it hit it in the face. I guess they didn't expect a HQ 16x9 DVD release more than 20 years in the future.

    6. Re:Missing change... A new blooper! by RedBear · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Turn in your geek card, citizen, and go watch the original Empire again. That is the tauntaun's head but the furry white thing is the ice creature's arm. The tauntaun isn't that furry around the neck. Watch closely and you'll see the scene where the ice creature jumps up from the snow and strikes the tauntaun on the side of the neck (where in Earth creatures you'll usually find the jugular vein). Whereupon the tauntaun falls down dead in the snow.

      As can be seen in the linked images, the ice creature's arm is a big puppet sleeve on the arm of somebody wearing a purple shirt. In the first image the puppeteer's hair is visible. It's hilarious, but it's also sad when you think about all the time and money that has been poured into redoing these DVDs. How the ---- do you miss something like that? Well, I guess George has missed the last two whole movies, so he's had a lot of practice...

  24. Another good site...similar stuff by jmcmunn · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know I posted the same thing when the story for a New Hope came out here on Slashdot...but if they make repetitive front page stories, I get repetitive posts.

    Here's another site that has detailed changes as well that I was reading a few WEEKS ago.

    http://www.thedigitalbits.com/reviews3/starwarscha nges.html

    1. Re:Another good site...similar stuff by SMQ · · Score: 1

      In the short pause between reading the first and second lines of your post I had this moment of fear where I thought you might be David Brin

      (OK, I actually appreciated David's post (assuming it wasn't just some AC copy/paste job), but somebody had to say it...)

      --
      SMQ 90AE4B2BC4F6BEAF7340F0B40BA2DEF7340F6BC2D0392
  25. Maybe George Lucas will make some GOOD changes.... by timepilot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was thinking, maybe George Lucas can use his magic movie editing powers for good instead of evil.

    For example, instead of doing idiotic things like making Greedo shoot first or inserting Jabba the hut into a scene that was rightfully left out from the original Episode IV, perhaps Mr Lucas can remove Jarjar Binks entirely from Episodes I and II.

    Or maybe he can graft some character onto Anakin Skywalker in Episode II.

    You listening George??

  26. Flying cars by dj245 · · Score: 4, Funny
    from page two:
    Here we see the original approach to Cloud City, as the Millennium Falcon, flanked by a pair of clod cars, makes its way towards the floating city.

    I want my flying cars you insensitive clods!

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  27. gunzip ep5v3.0.0.diff.gz | patch -R by ajlitt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that we know the changes, can we back this one out?

    1. Re:gunzip ep5v3.0.0.diff.gz | patch -R by julesh · · Score: 1

      I think you want either 'zcat' or 'gunzip -c'.

    2. Re:gunzip ep5v3.0.0.diff.gz | patch -R by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Oop... I knew something felt off.

  28. Copied character by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who thinks the Wampa (ice creature) looks an awful lot like the abonimable snowman from the children's Christmas special?

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Copied character by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      "Bumbles Bounce!"

      Yukon Cornelius :-)

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    2. Re:Copied character by zoeblade · · Score: 2

      Am I the only one who thinks the Wampa (ice creature) looks an awful lot like the abonimable snowman from the children's Christmas special?

      As a guess, yes, because you're the only person who's watched that horrible thing all the way through? :)

      (And I mean that with the utmost respect to you and your stamina)

    3. Re:Copied character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always thought that too.

    4. Re:Copied character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more along the lines of the one in Monsters Inc. Snowcone? Anyone?

    5. Re:Copied character by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Parent wasn't referring to the SW Xmas Special, but this fellow, from the animated puppet TV movie "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer."

  29. Page 5. by pablonhd · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it me or is page five incomplete?

    The page ends like so:

    In the original release, L

    And there are no page menu at the bottom.

    http://www.dvdanswers.com/esb5.html

    1. Re:Page 5. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed.

    2. Re:Page 5. by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      That's just you, it probably timed out and stopped loading due to the slashdotting.

  30. "Just do a half-assed job...." by FatSean · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with striving for perfection?

    --
    Blar.
  31. Episode 1 and 2 SPECIAL EDITIONS!!! by drfreejon · · Score: 0

    I heard they're getting remade and reissued on video and betamax.
    They're gonna build real models and use Darth Maul puppets.
    I heard if you look close you can see the marionette strings in the final saber fight in Phantom Menace.

    --
    http://www.lipservicemusic.com
  32. Re:Maybe George Lucas will make some GOOD changes. by MooseByte · · Score: 2, Funny

    "maybe George Lucas can use his magic movie editing powers for good instead of evil."

    He could, except that he's evil.

    What we need now is for his apprentice to throw him over the edge into the Death Star 2.0's core, and restore balance to the Force.

  33. Excellent review... by Ibby · · Score: 4, Funny

    But the clod cars weren't insensitive enough...

    --
    Karma: Good. I'm hoping in the same way as pizza is 'good'...
  34. Interesting... by Infinityis · · Score: 1, Funny

    I never noticed that partilar shot where Princess Leia's bikini thing fell off for a second...

    Oh, the site is Slashdotted now? Too bad...sorry guys, that's a shame. :)

    1. Re:Interesting... by melandy · · Score: 1

      What kind of fools do you take us for? Everyone knows the bikini scene is in ep VI.

      You know, I didn't realize how big a nerd I was, until I just typed that.

  35. The whole site is just a flipping advert by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1, Troll

    ..for 'free' cursors.

    I read page 1 of the part 1 story, then it dumped me in a 'get your FREE Cursors Now!' page and won't let me off it... Apparently unless I get my FREE Cursors Now! I'm not allowed to read the rest of the story.

    Total suckage.

    1. Re:The whole site is just a flipping advert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Shit, I kept getting re-directed to EBAY when trying to view page 2. Piss off.

  36. Come on people by Vlad_Drak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lucas is a posterboy for anti-corporate success, having financed Ep. V & VI himself, so he could maintain his artistic vision. That's pretty cool in my book. There are many similarities (in spirit, mostly) to OSS and blogging culture, if you think about it. There was a system in place that did not make sense to someone who deeply loves his craft. Lucas had the drive to do it differently, overcoming great obstacles. He hired SFX guys laid off by the corporate crew that took over the studios some years before, and gave the whole industry a new perpective. He fought the law and _he_ won.

    Lucas looks at his craft much like a technology-type, (Google-Lucky ILM & non-linear editing) so why shouldn't he be able to release version 1.2? He can do whatever he wants, it's _his_ story, so only he can decide when it's done. Go buy the original off eBay or something if it irks you, or don't buy the reworked films.

    Lots of people bitch and moan about the changes, (some posts are quite hilarious, though). But, before you jump on the smack-the-changer-of-the-story train, stop and think about it. Maybe there's some inspiration in the story of it all.

    1. Re:Come on people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks george.

      what are you doing here? dont you have some movies to go ruin?

    2. Re:Come on people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If it was open source we could fork a better version when the original maintainer started taking the project in the wrong direction

    3. Re:Come on people by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, c'mon. No one is overlooking the huge impact he made on moviemaking, and particularly in SFX, but the fanboys are right. Just because it's "his story" doesn't make it right that he changes it at will - minor details, given, but if you want to see what dazzled you as a kid in DVD, why can't you get it instead of "the original vision of the creator"? I'm not sure, but i'm pretty positive you can't even find the original, unedited trilogy in DVD.

      I mean, c'mon, Star Wars is what, 30, 35 years old now? He is woking on EP3, is it really necesary to go back and rework what came before just because it doesn't connect as well with the new trilogy? Simply having a quality digitalization of the original film would've been enough.

    4. Re:Come on people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "...so why shouldn't he be able to release version 1.2?"

      I don't care if he releases version 1.2, version 2.0.1, even "Star Wars XP 2010" if he likes..... as long as I can still get version 1.0, cuz it was good enough for me.

    5. Re:Come on people by mike3411 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      NO it is NOT his. Besides the fact that he was not the sole creator of these movies (lets not forget the original editors, script writers, actors, or the fact that Lucas didn't even direct all 3 original movies) once he releases the film he has given it to the public. WE went to see it, we sang its praises, we told our friends to check it out. We have all been made party to the success of the films, and that gives us claim. Lucas absolutely does not have the right (artistically, not legally) to change these movies. It is outrageous and unacceptable that I cannot purchase the movie I saw because some fuckhead producer wanted to change things. I enjoyed the original version, part and parcel, and as far as I'm concerned any changes are wrong and should not be included.

      The worst part is that these altered editions are not offered as options, but as the sole succesors to the originals. The "Special Edition" was not a special edition, sold next to the regular edition, it was the "New Edition" that replaced the old versions. The recently released DVD versions are even worse, as they simply call themselves Star Wars. BUT THEY ARENT. They are new movies made out of old ones. If people want to watch them, by all means go ahead, and if Lucas wants to make them, whatever, but they ARE NOT the real movies.

      Accordingly, I do not plan on buying any of this shit. Does anyone have a suggestion for how I could get the original movies in a good format? It's unbefuckinglievable that a popular movie will not be released in an unaltered form on DVD. Lucas, what a motherfucker.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    6. Re:Come on people by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Does anyone have a suggestion for how I could get the original movies in a good format?

      Look for .torrents of the LaserDisc rips on suprnova.com. Since the originals are probably never going to be released on DVD, the LaserDisc version is probably the best-quality format that will ever be available.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    7. Re:Come on people by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      Buy the DVDs.
      Aquire the laserdisc versions.

      Import into editor.

      Erase the worst changes by dropping in the original footage. Edit to make it as unnoticeable as possible.

    8. Re:Come on people by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I don't give a bleep if he changes the movies and releases any new versions he wishes to - as long as I can get cleaned up, UNALTERED versions of the originals - on DVD, as I saw them in the theater. (1977 in the Paramount Theater, Mason City, IA for example)

      Not saying I dislike the new versions, either - just that the originals are the ones nostalgic, bad sfx and all.

      I own all three originals on VHS - with backup copies, and good thing, as the original VHS tapes are getting funky - and a laserdisc version, which I no longer have the hardware to play.

      I'd PAY MONEY for digitally cleaned up versions on DVD, and I'm by far not the only person who would. Yo, George? You're ignoring a market!

      (and yes, I do have divx versions of the originals - but their quality is even worse than the VHS versions :-( )

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    9. Re:Come on people by mike3411 · · Score: 1

      that's actually a fairly reasonable idea, except i definately don't have the time, money, and equipment. but i'd be fully supportive if someone else were to do this, even if they charged me $20 for the set from their off-shore datahaven.

      the only problem would be that the video image would be inconsistent between DVD and LD versions. there's also the question of what stuff to replace, like just altered scenes & lines, or like the lightsaber scene that looks dumb because they messed with the image contrast. anyway i'm sure it could be done, but assuming the LD version is a good digital transfer of the original I might just stick with that. But i don't really know how much they may have improved the image quality between the VHS, LD, and DVD versions, so I can't tell if it would be worth it.
      -Mike

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  37. Re:I sense a disturbance in the Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is redundant. stop posting it.
    thank you.

  38. Re:Priorities People! by DeDmeTe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Whoa.. shouldn't you be posting in "politics"?? And here I thought I was just going to see a bunch of Lucas-flames. To whoever modded this "insightful".. how about "offtopic"?

    --
    -Guns kill people like spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat-
  39. Slashdotting, Episode II by SQLz · · Score: 1

    I'm starting to feel bad for these guys at dvdanswers.com. Thier webserver holds up for about 2 seconds before it stops responding.

    It reminds me of that scene in Star Wars when OB1 deactivates the tractor beam and it makes that low humm as the power is shut off.

  40. subtle changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Original version:
    "Join me Luke, we can rule the galaxy"

    DVD version
    "Get a life. Move out of your parents basement. You've turned a movie from 1977 into a colossal waste of time"

    1. Re:subtle changes by jthayden · · Score: 1

      Old Version: Vader: Luke, I am your father.
      Luke: Nooooo!

      New Version: Vader: You there, have you ever kissed a girl?
      Luke: Well Leia kissed me once.
      Vader: Dude, she's your sister.
      Luke: Noooooo!

  41. Not again.. by Pete+Brubaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You'd think after being slashdotted the last time that they would figure out that they were going to be slashdotted on parts 2 and 3 and get a bigger server....

    They are 0 for 2 right now. What are the odds that they'll get their problems resolved for part 3?

    My money is going on 0 for 3.

    --
    What's a sig? Pete Brubaker
    1. Re:Not again.. by norkakn · · Score: 1

      it'd be cheaper to post a huge warning saying that they will disembowel anyone who posts the link on slashdot.

  42. Good Plot For Ep. 7! by Farrside · · Score: 1

    Sounds more entertaining than 1 & 2... "Star Wars: My Dinner with Sarlaac".

  43. Quality of the writing needs a reissue by (SM)+Spacemonkey · · Score: 2

    In the original release of the movie, when Luke threw himself to his apparent doom after his duel with Darth Vader, he did so silently and with dignity. You can listen to this scene by clicking here. For the Special Edition release of the film, a scream was added as Luke fell. You can hear the new sound effect by clicking here. ...I'm of the opinion that it sounds terrible. Thankfully the scream was removed for the 2004 DVD release.
    Interesting information and well researched, but the writing is a tad amateur. Above is one humourous example.

    1. Re:Quality of the writing needs a reissue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Just because Luke wasn't speaking doesn't mean the scene was silent.

    2. Re:Quality of the writing needs a reissue by julesh · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I've seen much worse. I had to read your highlighted section 3 times before I noticed the incongruity of it.

    3. Re:Quality of the writing needs a reissue by JasdonLe · · Score: 1

      What are you, the George Lucas of grammar? I agree with the other poster. I've seen much worse--MUCH worse.

      --
      ** A Sketch a Week **
      http://www.sketchplease.com
    4. Re:Quality of the writing needs a reissue by Tarison · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me you didn't hear him not scream!

  44. They left one out by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure that on the 23,127th frame the shadow behind the guy standing 3/4 of the way across the frame is now casting a shadow that has a slightly bigger blue component than in the original movie. But I may have misremembered it.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:They left one out by julesh · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem with the special edition versions was that you could no longer see the stormtrooper banging his head on a door in Episode 4. Took the fun right out of it for me, that did. ;)

    2. Re:They left one out by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you can still see that in the new DVD versions, and Lucas has also added a sound effect for it. That's mentioned on the DVDAnswers page for ep. 4.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
  45. Interesting by indros13 · · Score: 2, Informative
    This guy is pretty insightful in his analysis of the changes. I particularly like that you can download the dialogue changes. I'm bummed about the removal of Luke's ad-lib on Dagobah, "you're lucky you don't taste very good," to R2. I wonder if Lucas was more interested in improving visual than audio (as could also be argued for his choice to change the voice for Boba Fett--lame).

    Anyway, I'm still going to be thrilled to have the "original" trilogy on DVD, my VHS copy is wearing out!

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Interesting by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1
      I'm bummed about the removal of Luke's ad-lib on Dagobah, "you're lucky you don't taste very good," to R2.
      I agree. That was one of the changes that bothered me on these. The other one like it was in ROTJ when Han was hanging from the skiff and was about to shoot the tentacle holding Lando. Lando said, "Wait, I thought you were blind!" Han originally says, "It's all right. Trust me." versus the new line, "It's all right. I can see a lot better." That seemed to me to be another case of a funny line getting replaced with a boring line.
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  46. Re:Log Entry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - Added more suck

    Hmm. Does Greedo shoot his load first in that edition?

  47. what? no girlish scream from Luke? by lashi · · Score: 2, Funny
    But that girlish scream from Luke is the only thing that makes me feel superior to Luke and can hold my head high while watching the movies.

    Now I have to sulk about how he is so heroic in every way and I can never be a good Jedi like him and will have to turn to the dark side instead.

    1. Re:what? no girlish scream from Luke? by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Oh, but there's still his whiny "I was going into Toshi Station to pick up some power converters" ...

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  48. Fashion Tips for Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "showing such important changes as the color of Han Solo's jacket before he's frozen in carbonite"

    OK, it's official: Someone is in desperate need of a girlfriend.


    Someone's noticed the clothes and is commenting on their color?.... I would suggest that "boyfriend" might be more appropriate in this case.

  49. Re:Maybe George Lucas will make some GOOD changes. by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

    Just the Anakin in Episode II?

    Episode I's Anakin wasn't fit to play the role of a Jawa!

  50. BUSTED! by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

    I don't know why they decided to follow up this "story," as this same site was slasdotted INSTANTLY last week and is once again down. www.digitalbits.com covered the changes in detail, TWO WEEKS before the release of the dvds, complete with fancy pictures :)

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  51. Editors: Please supply a mirror link! by Phong · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    It would be good if the Slashdot editor posting a story would insert a (mirror) link in the original article for any site that might get slashdotted. The example link I just used makes use of the Coral NYU Distribution Network, which will mirror any site as long as you add ".nyud.net:8090" onto the end of the hostname (of course, the /. editor would also need to follow the link to get the site into the cache).

    If the editors only want to add a mirror link for sites that actually need it, I'd suggest having each editor prepare the mirror link in advance, visit the Coral-mirrored version of the site (to get it into the cache), and then update the article with the mirror link if the site bogs down. (Unfortunately, the Powers That Be may be against this idea since they'd like to sell /. subscriptions, and having a site get slashdotted probably helps to sell more of them.)

    As it stands currently, the Coral caching system can't access the slashdotted site any more than we can, but if everyone will try to access the site using the mirror instead of the main article's link, the slashdotted site should become available more quickly than if everyone continues to pound on the site directly.

    --
    ..wayne..
  52. In summary by NSash · · Score: 4, Funny
  53. No more... please!!! by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2

    For the love of God... no more Star Wars...

    Let's stop talking about Star Wars while I still think it's still good.

    No more changes, no more new edits, no more extra scenes. I just want my Star Wars in plain old vanilla flavour!

    Oh, and I think CG is a terrible replacement to actual live models and puppets.

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  54. What the Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the bloody hell, advertising between pages and timed redirection?! Jesus christ. Lay off you vile leeches

    1. Re:What the Hell by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

      What the bloody hell, advertising between pages and timed redirection?! Jesus christ. Lay off you vile leeches.


      I use Outpost Firewall from agnitum.com and have it configured to filter such Javascript 'tricks' like this out. I had no problems browsing the Episode V site in the article.
  55. Lucas' Stilted Script Dialog by MooseByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "the line change for Vader from "Bring my shuttle" to "Alert my star destroyer to prepare for my arrival" was a bad idea."

    Agreed, for the reasons you mention. Also, he's freakin' DARTH VADER! "Alert my star destroyer for my arrival"? Yeah right. His entire staff would be like terrified meerkats passing the alarm, constantly alerting each and every station sector whenever Vader was about to even pass by, much less arrive at his destination.

    You think Patton ever said, "Alert my carrier for my arrival"? You think Genghis Khan ever said "Alert my Horde for my arrival"?

    Lucas has the dialog skills of the Zero Wing translation team.

    1. Re:Lucas' Stilted Script Dialog by brianber · · Score: 1
      You think Patton ever said, "Alert my carrier for my arrival"?
      No. General Patton wouldn't have a carrier. Perhaps "Alert my headquaters to prepare for my arrival." Ah, but no, he surprised II corps HQ. Gen Bradley: "George, we weren't expecting you until later." Gen Patton: "So I gather."
  56. Change list you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone really care. I mean, come on!

  57. Re:Maybe George Lucas will make some GOOD changes. by timepilot · · Score: 1

    Yeah I agree with that. He was more like an Ewok than a Jawa.

  58. Slight correction by BigBadBus · · Score: 1
    Great article but one niggle is the description of the Emperor footage in the 1980 ESB release. The article says that this was really a woman. However, I recall reading at the time that this was really Alec Guinness - he was about to undergo an eye operation and agreed to do the part (hence the reason for the goggles).

    1. Re:Slight correction by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're wrong... :(

  59. did you ever think ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that maybe that don't care?

  60. Silly Stormtroopers by xjerky · · Score: 1

    Did they leave in the scene where one of the Stormtroopers knocks his head against an opening door?

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    1. Re:Silly Stormtroopers by forkboy · · Score: 1

      I think that happened in Ep. 4, A New Hope. I remember the first time I noticed that, I was watching the VHS all stoned out of my head and I noticed the "bump." Man, we must have rewound and rewatched that like 20 times.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    2. Re:Silly Stormtroopers by SleepyShamus · · Score: 0

      I swear there is a sound effect added to that blooper. I hear a muted BOINK when he hits now!

  61. Secret hidden directors cut!!! by Kazrath · · Score: 1, Funny

    Next they will have the secret hidden sex scene with the princess and the wookie!!! On a serious note: pretty soon SW will outstrip dracula for remakes/revisions.

  62. Boba Fett changes are the worst by Glendale2x · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd say the worst change pointed out there is the re-dubbing of Boba Fett. The new voice sounds horrible; it's weak and delivered badly. Shit, I could do a better job. The accent doesn't work, either. With the original voice, he didn't have to say too much because when he did speak, it had the tone of "F with me and you'll regret it before you know it." The voice was the main thing, it made you feel the character, and it got bastardized.

    The new voice makes me think "WTF is Vader listening to this wimp for?" whereas before Boba Fett sounded like someone who was as equally badass as Vader.

    --
    this is my sig
    1. Re:Boba Fett changes are the worst by G-funk · · Score: 1

      If you think Temuera Morrison's voice doesn't scream "fuck with me and you'll regret it", you've clearly never met any maoris. Go rent "Once were warriors" and you'll have a new respect for our new boba fett (overlord?).

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  63. Confused moderator? Plus new mirror link by Phong · · Score: 1
    Some moderator must be confused -- I replied to a message that mentioned that the site is slashdotted with a message that provided a mirror link and a long-term solution to avoid slashdotting of small sites in the future and that is somehow off-topic?

    Note that the site has changed their content due to the increased traffic, so the mirror link is now different. That mirror is now working fine.

    --
    ..wayne..
    1. Re:Confused moderator? Plus new mirror link by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      odd. . . it isn't working (for me) currently. Could it be a proxy issue? Not likely, since the last comparison entry you also provided a link to te nyud project. Thanks for providing the link. Too bad something isn't working (either their site, or the link process).

      jason

  64. True story by ceswiedler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A friend of mine is a lead compositor at ILM. He worked on the Special Edition of Empire, and did the Cloud City scenes (among other things). To make some of the interior shots more realistic, he added slight reflections on the windows. He showed it to Lucas, who said thoughtfully,

    'Lose the reflections. In Cloud City, they use force fields to keep the bugs out.'

    1. Re:True story by Trogre · · Score: 1

      And rightly so.

      Reflections in those windows would add nothing to the composition, except to distort the pretty backgrounds and further clutter the shot.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:True story by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      The technology is certainly valid in the Star Wars universe. That would be the same thing they use in ship hangars. They have people inside the hangars that seem to be open to space. That is referenced in some of the novels how there is a force field in place at the hangar opening that air molecules cannot pass through, which keeps the interior pressurized. Ships can apparently fly through it, though.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  65. Re:Log Entry by tomcode · · Score: 1

    No, but Jar Jar follows the characters around in every scene, to add colorful commentary that the kids just love. Movie magic!

    --
    f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
  66. Scoring with the ladies... by MooseByte · · Score: 1

    "there must be some other reason why the ladies aren't all over me. "

    Have you tried wearing a "Han Shot First" t-shirt?

  67. So, um... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    Are - are you saying then that we should pay more attention to the movies?

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  68. You mean ROTJ, right? by YowzaTheYuzzum · · Score: 1

    You're thinking of Return of the Jedi...

  69. Forgot one thing (I think) by hoppo · · Score: 1

    The author forgot to mention one thing I noticed in A New Hope. In the scene where the stormtrooper hits his head, the sound it makes seems to be much louder.

  70. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He insulted the moderators. That's an automatic demerit in my book.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN! by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Except in my book, that gets you elected to county commissioner.

      jason

  71. Re:Maybe George Lucas will make some GOOD changes. by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

    You might want to look to the light side instead and hunt down the "Phantom Edit" or something similar.

  72. Boba Popularity by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Boba Fett action figure was available in some Kenner promotion before The Empire Strikes Back came out. It was hyped as a new character from the next Star Wars movie and it had some ridiculous requirement (mail order only with 5 barcodes from other figures plus money or something like that).

    While I may not recall the details of that merchandising campaign well, it WAS Lucas or his licensees that hyped Boba Fett as a big character before the movie came out. I think that he's being a bit coy by saying he didn't expect Boba Fett to be a popular character. Maybe he's telling the truth though, maybe the sales indicated a low interest in this guy and so Lucas had his part minimized in the movie. Who knows.

  73. Remake by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Look at it this way - the movies have now strayed so far from the originals - 21st century special effects, inserted actors, etc. - they are essentially remakes of the original movies. Maybe someday in another 50 years (after Lucas is gone) the original "lost footage" of the 1977 version of Star Wars will be "discovered" and reissued, like the recent reissue of the original (or whats left of it) "Metropolis"

  74. Speaks the truth, he does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turned on by Yoda, girlfriend is.

    Randier than most men, girlfriend is.

    Slightly odd lass, girlfriend is...

  75. Light red - not pink! by wylf · · Score: 1
    "It's pink-saber Vader!"

    Its not pink - its light red! (a-la rvb)