Slashdot Mirror


The Universal Off Button

jcr13 writes "Wired news is running a story about TV-B-Gone, a new weapon in the fight against the pervasiveness of television in our society. With this device, which takes the form of a keychain fob with a single button, you can turn off virtually any TV set. How does it work? By rolling through all known IR power-off codes, one by one, trying codes from the most popular brands first. Personally, I am terribly annoyed by TVs in restaurants and airports: they grab my attention over and over, no matter how hard I try to ignore them, and they distract me from the conversations that I should be having with my human companions. Unfortunately, the TV-B-Gone website seems to have already been swamped by the Wired coverage, so we cannot order these just yet. In the mean time, those of you with DIY proclivities may want to think about wiring one of these up yourself using a PIC chip or other micro-controller." An anonymous reader adds links to mentions at CNET, TV station KESQ and Ananova.

93 of 1,169 comments (clear)

  1. Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I need a Universal On button remote... it'll be like a battle between good and evil, light and dark.

    1. Re:Now by NemosomeN · · Score: 5, Informative

      It sends a "power" signal. In essence, it is a universal on remote. I've never seen anything with a button that turns a tv off but not on (though I have [and own] a vcr that has an on-only button and a on-off button).

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    2. Re:Now by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I used to have one of those digital watches, that had a remote control built in that would control on/off/channel changing on tvs and functions on VCR's. You'd just point the watch at the unit..and cycle through the different codes manually. Once you locked on..the fun began.

      We had more fun one time in a bar...a bunch of us were in there drinking..barmaid came out and we asked that the channel on the main tv be turned to a game. She'd flip the remote...I'd flip the channel back with my watch...she go, I'd go...we'd go through this periodically...she couldn't figure out why the tv was acting so weird. At one point, we had her so confused, we actually got her to take the batteries out of the remote...and try it that way. "Magically" it worked properly..when she'd click a button, I'd do it from my watch.

      I don't think we'd all ever laughed so hard. In the end we tipped the poor girl so much money to make up for it...but, man, that was fun. I think we tipped her near $200 or so...it was worth it.

      But, always was useful...go into a bar...turn the volume how you like it...change the channel to what you want to watch. I need to find that damned thing, get some new batteries and see if it still works.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Now by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hey, just simple clean fun in a bar. I forgot to mention at the time most all of us we either servers or bartenders ourselves. Whe showed her what we were doing at the end...and she got a good laugh out of it too.

      Sometimes simple fun is the best...lighten up and bit and let your sense of humor loose...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Now by The+Spoonman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've never seen anything with a button that turns a tv off but not on

      Most modern IR-controlled electronics have discrete On and Off signals, they're just generally not used. Some remotes, such as those from One-For-All support these discrete codes. They're very useful for setting up macros. For example, one of my macros is set to send "On to TV, Input 2 to TV, On to Amp, On to DVD" if I want to watch DVDs. If I used the generic "Power" button, I couldn't use this macro when I was already watching TV because it would turn off the TV and the amp, but turn on the DVD player. In a similar vein, I have a "System Off" macro that sends discrete off signals to every piece of equipment in my rack.

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    5. Re:Now by tbase · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, a good portion of A/V devices have what's called "discrete" on and off codes. Although not on the stock remote, when I got a Phillips Pronto and wanted to set up Macros for my home theatre, it became quickly apparent that I would need to be able to send an "on only" code, otherwise it would turn off a device that was already on. Same with "off"- If I'm watching the TV using the TV tuner, and the DSS receiver isn't on, I don't want it to turn the DSS on when I hit my "All Off" macro.

      Thankfully, it turns out that all my components bar one have discrete codes. It makes programming the remote for ease of use by non-geeks much easier. I just tell the wife and kid that if they hit "All Off" and the stereo is still on, hit it again.

      The article is vague in this respect, but in the closing paragraph it seems to indicate that the remote uses "Power" codes, not discrete "Off" codes.

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    6. Re:Now by IronChef · · Score: 5, Funny

      I did something similar in high school. We were suffering through some Shakespeare movie in the hated English teacher's class. The VCR in use was the same model as my girlfriend at the time owned. I had planned ahead and brought her remote with me. In the dark room it was trivial to make the VCR act up... pausing at random, that kind of thing.

      Mysteriously, the troubles would always clear up as soon as the teacher approached the VCR.

      By the end of the period she was fit to be tied.

      A silly prank, sure, but it still makes me laugh today to think about it. Unlike the waitress mentioned above, Mrs. Dunbridge never got a nice tip either!

    7. Re:Now by menscher · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A real geek would have done it with an HP-48 calculator.

      Been there, done that. Was useful in the dorms at college. When my roommate was playing his radio too loud, I'd just work out a calculation on my HP-48. White walls reflect the IR signal well, so I didn't even have to turn around to lower his volume a bit.

      Oh, and it was also helpful for controlling the TV in the lobby. Especially when there was something better on a different channel.

    8. Re:Now by Nurgled · · Score: 3, Informative

      My TV has an off button which isn't a toggle. To turn it back on, you simply press a channel number.

  2. Don't stop at just a power button by Patik · · Score: 5, Funny
    Personally, I am terribly annoyed by TVs in restaurants and airports: they grab my attention over and over, no matter how hard I try to-- *MUTE*

    1. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I lust after a gadget that can disable those car stereos 'what got bump'.
      Actually, that problem could be corrected by an acoustic sensor/camera combination that would detect these idiots on the road and mail them a ticket.
      If they insist on flaunting their stupidity, they should pay dearly for the privilege.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by brunson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I want a picture of this "inventor" guy so I can snatch a magazine out of his hands at an airport or crank up a boombox next to his table at a restaurant, thus freeing him to sit in silence and think about his navel.

      Just another example of someone who knows what's good for me better than I do and feels the need to impose his beliefs on me.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      Jesus loves you, I think you suck
    3. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Funny

      It would be much better just to hook those acoustic sensors (along with a motion sensor) up to remotely detonated mines. Place the mines as if they're manholes, notify everyone in the neighborhood to head for cover when they hear a "thump, thump, thump", and watch the 'tards fly.

      Now that's a noise ordnance! (Not the same as an ordinance, btw...)

    4. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I personally think this would be very rude. If a place has a television on and I'm not wanting to watch it I wouldn't turn it off for everyone else. I would go somewhere else if it was really that big of a deal.

    5. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by kperson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The ground is rough, but you don't require the whole planet to be covered in leather, you put on shoes. So when in the airport, use earplugs or your own audio source. And simply don't patronize restaurants that have an environment you don't enjoy (noise, smell, lighting, etc). It's quite arrogant to cram your wishes down the throat of everyone else, especially the OWNER of the TV and the establishment!

    6. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by seanmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean like this?

      It's in German, but if the google translation is correct, this device will the brothers many more subtly to the leather, once the elephant leaves the water. Which, of course, goes without saying.

    7. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by |/|/||| · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Just another example of someone who knows what's good for me better than I do and feels the need to impose his beliefs on me.
      Wait a minute, I thought that was the problem that this is supposed to solve...

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    8. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by Skye16 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When my case mod wakes everyone up in a 3 mile radius of where it sits, then your comparison would be correct. Until that time, they're just a bunch of jerk kids waking me up at 2 am >;\

    9. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by Cipster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can I get one of those for my wife? I'd pay very well.

    10. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Informative

      Holy Moley! Do not make one of these! An 800W Magnetron into a splash-fed positive gain antenna? This may zap a stereo, but it'll harm people, too (especially the eyes). IF you do the math, 800W of 2450MHz RF into a 15 dBi antenna is 'safe' 47 feet from the antenna (in an uncontrolled environment). Even at 0 dBi (like in a sidelobe) the RF exposure exceeds the uncontrolled limit over 8 feet away.

      I would think a strong RF field in the audio range (somewhere around 8-15 KHz) would cause the stereo to self-destruct without harming people. An equivalent safe distance at 10KHz and a 0 dBi antenna requires a power level of 1.2 MW (!!!) Good luck getting 0 dBi of gain at 10 KHz.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    11. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It has nothing to do with making fun of the actual mods themselves (ok, a rear spoiler on a front wheel drive car is an exception). I personally like some of the cars I've seen.

      What we (me at least) are annoyed about is that the vast majority of the folks who do the modding think that somehow by putting a rear spoiler on a front wheel drive car, adding a 6 billion watt stereo system, thin wheels, a tweaked engine chip and metallic paint makes them think that now they can go out and drive like the idiots we know them to be.

      As far as the whumping is concerned, you want to play your stereo as loud as you want, be my guest. Just don't do down a neighborhood street at 10 at night on weeknight. Go to some abandoned warehouse or drive to some out of the way place and crank it up.

      Don't think that by playing that crappy no rhythm 'music' that somehow you're 1337. You're not. You're just the typical wannabe who has no clue of what you're doing because 99.9% of the time you didn't even do the mods yourself. You paid someone to do it for you.

      As far as making fun of those type, yes I do. Especially in parking lots with speed bumps. While they have to creep over the bumps so they don't crumple their air dams on the front I'm driving around them and over the bump so the traffic jam they are creating doesn't get any larger. And no, I'm not the only one who drives around them.

      If they feel that whumping makes them important then I'm sure they won't mind me driving by their neighborhood at 7 in the morning with my death metal playing at similar levels.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    12. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by mixmasterjake · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It might be valid to compare modded computers with, say, fancy tire rims. But, the souped-up audio systems impose themselves on everyone - even if you are nowhere near the car. Additionally, for some reason, it ususally seems to occur mostly at 2am.

      Not only that, but, as awesome as the music may sound inside the car, those of us on the outside only hear low-frequency rumble combined with the sound of the car frame shaking. I'm a musician and I love good, loud music. When I want to hear it, I go to a club or crank the stereo in my own home. But, waking up in the middle of the night to the sound of a car stereo system overloaded and distorted is just annoying.

      It's basically just an easy way for a muscle-neck jackass to proclaim "look how rude and annoying I am!" It's a power-trip because they have the ability to go around and create a big scene.

      --
      TODO: come up with a clever sig
    13. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      What are you, some kind of black hole that eats fun?

    14. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by pnutjam · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or the guy that owns the bar will just cover the IR input with tape.

    15. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by zapp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Agreed, completely. Knowing the route someone takes to work in order to analize traffic patterns is WAY worse than destroying private property because of a personal pet peeve.

      You know folks, if you hate these guys with the stereos so much, why don't you quit hiding behind technology and do what you want anyway - follow then until they park, and slash their tires. Or run them off the road.

      --
      no comment
    16. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by ShawnDoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One problem with that line of thinking. The noise from the pipes is being projected BEHIND the Harley. It will do nothing to alert someone in front of you not to pull our or change lanes.

    17. Re:Don't stop at just a power button by Fishstick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      EMP mine, and I'm there -- fry their $$$ overpowered vehicular nuisance generator, er car stereo.

      "thump, thump, thu-bzzt"

      No messy shrapnel or bits of bloody pulp, just electronics turned paperweight.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  3. NFL by brjndr · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and women ruin Sundays for men across the nation.

  4. I can see it now... by hollismb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This might be the next red laser pointer. Built with a good purpose, but annoying as hell for everyone else.

    1. Re:I can see it now... by Patik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What good purpose does this device serve? If you don't own a particular TV, and it's not on your property, what right do you have to turn it off?

    2. Re:I can see it now... by gnuLNX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Same reason all those damned red lights should be green when I get to them!

      --
      what?
    3. Re:I can see it now... by moofdaddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What good purpose does this device serve? If you don't own a particular TV, and it's not on your property, what right do you have to turn it off? I totaly agree with this. Guess what folks, you are not the only people in the world. Those TVs in Best Buys? Lets think for half a second why they might be on...people who want to buy a TV tend to want to see the quality of it before they purchase it.

      What about the TVs in Cafe's or airports or other random places? Maybe you have a friend to chat to, but what about that lonely person behind you sitting all alone? Maybe she would like to be distracted while she eats her lunch. Maybe the employee at the local video store would like to watch the TV since its slow that night and they don't have much else to do.

      The bottem line is, your not walking around the park and having MTV blaring at you. When you run into these tv's its because the owner of that establishment has decided that for one reason or another they want it there. Sure, you don't have to be subjected to the TV, but your recourse is to leave the establishment, not turn off the TV. Or talk to the manager about it. But you are not the only person that lives in the world, you will not find everything convienent.

      --
      Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
    4. Re:I can see it now... by cft_128 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      'm majorly antispam, but it seems to me that getting junk email and listening to junk from a blaring TV is about the same thing. You own neither TV nor the senders mail server, but you still take action to protect your personal space/inbox.

      Not a good analogy: you own your computer that you use to view the spam and where you install the anti-spam software. You do not own the TV, the property that the TV is on and you share the TV with others that like the 'spam'

      The anti-spam for TV would be blinders and ear plugs. The TV-B-Gone for spam would be a device that let anyone shutdown any SMTP server that was sending them mail they didn't want to receive, regardless of what it is and who else was using the server. Still, a TV-B-Gone would be fun, if not quite ethical.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    5. Re:I can see it now... by HalfStarted · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it isn't quite the same as spam filtering. When you filter a spam server based on black list you are preventing it from sending you spam... you are not turning it off which would prevent it from sending anyone else spam. Your email in box is on your system, or it is on a system that someone is providing for your use, it is (or should be) your right to allow or block mail from any source you choose.

      Obtrusive TV can come in one of 3 forms: A private TV in a private venue (a TV in a bar for example); A private TV in a public venue (a TV inside a store but pointed out the store window.) A public TV in a public venue (a bit more rare... an example would be TV monitors in subway stations/trains that show train schedule information and news.)

      In the following I will assume that in none of the cases you are the person that owns the TV, venue or is otherwise responsible for the TV or venue.

      1) Private/private: I am sorry, as much as you may not like it, it is no more your right to turn off the TV a bar or restaurant owner has chosen to play than it is to decide who he or she is allowed to have as customers or what items they should have on their menus. It is your right to choose to eat/drink/seek entertainment someplace else though. Just because you do not like it does not mean the proprietor of an establishment must choose to accommodate you. You can ask for it to be turned off and they will choose between your business and the business of the people that enjoy having the TV on.

      2) The Private/Public case is a little more consensus... but in my opinion should be considered in the same light as bills, billboards and placards. Taking it upon yourself to turn of any TV that bothers you is an unfair abridgment of the owners first amendment right. Just because you do not agree with the message or the media it is presented on does not give you the right to suppress it. Part of living in a free society is living with others that wish to enjoy their freedom as well and I am sorry but your "freedom from distracting television" is not as important as others freedom of expression.

      3) The Public/Public case (assuming that it truly is a public/public case): Being a public TV in a public place I would assume that some body acting on behalf of the public interest choose to operate a TV running specific programming. Now, just how is it your right as an individual to override this decision on behalf of everyone else because you do not agree with the message or the media? It is your right to complain to the public body responsible for the set and it's programming so they can weigh the requests for with the complaints against and reach a compromise.

      I just can not see how it can be your right to turn off a TV that you do not own, on property you do not own with out the owners/operators consent. I applaud the motivation, but the execution is flawed. People if it really bothers you make it known, let the manager of the bar or restaurant you are at know that you find TV a distraction and you will choose to go some place else if they insist on playing it... if there is a public TV in a public place you find objectionable submit a complaint to the governing body. Part of living in a society that cherishes freedom though is accepting that there are other views that must be considered and you just may have to live with a public TV in a public space because the majority wants it and unless we throw the right to freely express one's self out the window you will always have to live with the private TV projecting into a public space, live with it, it's part of being free.

      --


      Have you thought for yourself today?
  5. toggle? by kyoorius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wouldn't the remote also turn on all the televisions which were originally off?

    1. Re:toggle? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Many devices have a toggle IR code that will do as you say. However, most also include descrete codes that will always turn the device off, or leave it off if it already is off. Home theater buffs who purchase advanced remote controls that have macro capabilities use the descrete codes to program an "All Off" button for instance.

    2. Re:toggle? by Feanturi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, the article indicates that it is a power toggle, not specifically an 'off' button. The device is to be appreciated for the 'off' function rather than the 'on' side of it. If it was intended to be used for turning TVs on, you'd obviously want more buttons to do channels and volume. So even though it toggles, having only the one button it makes more sense that you'd just be using it for switching them off.

  6. Free market, people by Gentoo+Fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, I am terribly annoyed by TVs in restaurants

    Then don't eat there. It's not your TV to turn off, and maybe other people want to watch it.

    1. Re:Free market, people by finkployd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you trying to insinuate that the entire world shouldn't conform to my preferences? How un /. of you.

      Finkployd

  7. Suicidal by enforcer999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want to die a quick death, try using this gizmo at an Oklahoma sports bar during an OU Sooners football game. You will not live long.

  8. who gave you the right? by jxyama · · Score: 4, Insightful
    you might be annoyed by TVs in restaurants and airports... but who's giving you the right to turn it off on behalf of everyone?

    if you are in a public place, you cannot turn that TV off as it's not solely yours. if you are in a private place not your own, you cannot turn that TV off as the TV is not yours.

    if you can't manage to turn off the TV in your own home, then you got other problems.

    1. Re:who gave you the right? by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is slashdot -- we're supposed to know that the tool is not the problem.

      Many times in a former life, I was the only one at a remote gate at O'Hare airport, minimal staff, no other passengers, TV blaring away on "CNN Airport" or whatever. In this situation, it would be nice to be able to turn the thing off without distracting the staff from their real jobs.

      If there are other people, my posession of this device does not automatically oblige me to discourteously deprive them of their TV. It's a tool. It can be abused. Boo hoo. If that happens, punish the abusers.

      --
      2*3*3*3*3*11*251
  9. Boo hoo for you... by Sc00ter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Personally, I am terribly annoyed by TVs in restaurants and airports: they grab my attention over and over, no matter how hard I try to ignore them, and they distract me from the conversations that I should be having with my human companions. "

    So because you don't have the ability to focus on a person sitting right in front of you and/or you can't go to a different establishment that meets your needs. Those of us that go to such places because we want to watch the TV there have to suffer. Not to mention that I'm sure it annoyes the owner of the establishment because he obviously wants them there.

  10. Awesome! by Shoeler · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now all we need is the salesman-be-gone, the policeman-be-gone, and the nagging-mother-in-law-be-gone. ^_^

  11. Wow by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The sheer fucking arrogance of this leaves me almost at a loss for words...

    Almost.

    What business is it of yours to tamper with things that don't belong to you? Other people might want to watch, and it sounds like the submitter has a problem with controlling his own actions if he can't talk with his "human companions" in the proximity of a TV. Television is merely a conduit of information; there is nothing inherently evil about it.

    And it's the height of arrogance and intellectual elitism to think that it's any of your business to turn off TVs that don't belong to you, in public or private places.

    The Wired article talks about "anti-TV activists". For fuck's sake, people...

    1. Re:Wow by Mattintosh · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wouldn't worry about it too much. This thing's about as easy to defeat as a copy-protected CD.

      Just put electrical tape over the IR sensor. Problem solved. Carry on.

  12. Now all we need is a ... by iago · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Universal Cell Phone off button.

    Whoever creates a small consumer-oriented cell phone signal jammer should win the Nobel Prize.

    --
    Worst Sig Ever
    1. Re:Now all we need is a ... by Shoeler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except for the fact that it's Illegal, I agree with ya. ;)

    2. Re:Now all we need is a ... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't need to turn them off. How about just forcing them to silent/vibrate mode and turning the receiver volume all the way up so that people don't feel inclined to scream into them. I have a long train ride each day and nothing is worse than digital Fur Elise at ear-shattering volume wrenching you out of a caffeine withdrawal snooze.

    3. Re:Now all we need is a ... by Shky · · Score: 3, Funny

      And we need devices to shut people up who talk too loud, or get rid of the fat people that sit beside you on the bus, or people who have coughing fits, or people who don't turn away when they sneeze. We need devices that will shut off the engines of airplanes overheard, because those things are just way too loud. I think we need a device that will get rid of any minor annoyance, then we'll all be happy, right..?

      Who's with me? I sincerely hope nobody..

      --
      CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
    4. Re:Now all we need is a ... by iago · · Score: 3, Funny

      No idea that this comment would get marked 5 Insightful. 70/30 Insightful/Funny. I meant it as a joke. I like this comment the best thus far, so I'll respond to it. I know its illegal to jam cell signals. And thats probably a good idear, but anyone who answers their phone in a movie theater deserves a swift punch in the nads.

      Anyways, here's what I do. I figure that my space is my space so I just join in on a conversation when someone is being overly obnoxious on a phone in a public place.

      Obnoxious Cell phone luser: "Oh my God, Neve, I can't believe he did that to you, did you tell Aurora, Skylar, and Hunter about this?"

      Me: "Yes, I did and after that he went and gave my hamster the clap."

      This typically makes them stop.

      My name is iago. And I wholeheartedly endorse this message. My dog is also a slut.

      --
      Worst Sig Ever
    5. Re:Now all we need is a ... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The flaw is that you are taking up the same arrogant stance as the people who created this device. IT IS NOT YOUR DAMN RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT I CAN AND CANNOT USE. We have laws that determine it.

      If you are really so incapable of using words to get people to turn their cellphone off, then I think there are more serious problems. And please don't assume I'm talking about jammers and such in theaters and the like, thats a whole nother can of worms.

      People do things that annoy other people, it does NOT give you the right to enforce your view on them.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  13. Don't forget TV Turn-Off Week by mind21_98 · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you like being able to turn off any TV you'd like, you'll like TV Turn-off Week. It's going to be held from April 25-May 1, 2005. Personally, the Internet's replaced TV for me; even though there is a TV here I don't really watch it now.

  14. Try it out during the final Sox-Yankees game by geekee · · Score: 5, Funny

    in a crowded bar. You'll make some new friends with this gizmo.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  15. All of us was ADD and AADD.......ooh, a shiny! by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, I TRY to pay attention to my friends, familiy, WIFE, when I'm in a public place with a television. I really do.

    It doesn't matter how horrendous the show that's on is either. If it's there, I zone in on it.

    Finally, an escape!

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  16. Bad idea. by rasteri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I disapprove of this concept - if you don't like the fact that wherever you are has a TV, go somewhere else. Just because you find it annoying doesn't mean you have the right to turn it off. It's similar to walking into a pub and demanding that everyone stop smoking because you are a non-smoker.

  17. During the Playoffs by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just as the ball gets hit and everyone goes nuts, so you don't see the outcome. Revenge of the nerds indeed. hopefully this is small enough so you don't get caught

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:During the Playoffs by vhold · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is kinda pedantic, but for what it's worth, the article said it takes around a minute for it to transmit all the codes in it's little database, so it's unlikely you'll be able to get the totally desired timing effect to -really- piss everybody off. Also it seems like it'd be pretty hard to use this thing discretely if you have to point it at a TV for half a minute on average.

  18. Do you have some sort of neurological disorder? by NerveGas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, I am terribly annoyed by TVs in restaurants and airports: they grab my attention over and over, no matter how hard I try to ignore them,

    You've got to be kidding me. Whenever I see TVs in places like that, they're always too small, too far away, and too quiet to keep my attention even when I want to watch them.

    If you can't pay attention to a real human right in front of you because of a TV somewhere in the distance, maybe the television isn't the real source of the problem.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  19. No, one would hope... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that people don't think that they have some God-given right to control other people's hardware.

    If there's a TV playing in someone else's bar, restaurant or whatever, what gives you the right to turn it off? If you don't like the TV being on you're always free to take your business elsewhere.

    Some people might politely ask the owner to turn down the volume, switch it off, etc if it really bothered them. This gadget is a cowardly way of avoiding possible disappointment and foisting your opinion on someone else. Score one for mannerless morons.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:No, one would hope... by fakeplasticusername · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like what you said, but wanted to add. The rant on the website said something that struck a nerve with me. It said something that I have heard applied to numerous other examples and I think pepole of slashdot might agree with how I feel on this.

      Their little blurb repeated over and over again their self-righteous reason for this little device: Providing a more meaningful life for those that are watching TV. They seem to believe that people watching TV are wasting their lives away in front of the TV when they could be out walking in the park or chatting in a coffee bar or some other "real" activity. I would say, if you like to do these things to occupy your time; great, i won't get in your way, but don't try to fix my life because i would rather play a video game or watch a DVD or watch the news or whatever. I'm glad you found something meaningful in your life, but don't think that your sense of meaning is universal, and don't force me to repent about my personal choices that i find fulfilling and I wouldn't want to give up.

      This is more of the same "I know what is best for you" mentality that i think is the biggest problem with my country. I'm sick to death of people telling me that my escapist pleasure of playing a video game is less valid then their escapist pleasure of watching a sports game, or going to get drunk, or getting high, or whatever. My choices make me happy, otherwise, I wouldn't be doing them.

      *Exhale*

  20. For those who like their TV... by iapetus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've created a device to counter this anti-social and selfish TV-deactivator. And what's more, it's easier and cheaper to construct. Just curl the fingers of your right hand into a tight roll, tucking the tips in towards the palm, and use this device to strike a sharp blow to the arrogant fool who thinks he has the right to mess with your expensive consumer hardware.

    Patent is, of course, pending, but I'll be offering a free license for use in this sort of situation.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  21. Don't forget .... by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Troll-be-gone
    FP-be-gone
    In-Soviet-Russia-be-gone
    Microsoft-anything-sucks-open-source-everything-ro cks-be-gone
    Cowboy-Neal-be-gone

  22. How about a Button to Turn Off People by syntap · · Score: 3, Funny

    And their cell phones. And not as noisy as a machine gun.

  23. Duct Tape over the receiver.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is there anything duct tape can't do?

  24. This is the height of pathetic victim mentality by scotay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, I am terribly annoyed by TVs in restaurants and airports: they grab my attention over and over, no matter how hard I try to ignore them, and they distract me from the conversations that I should be having with my human companions.

    No technology will ever substitute for lack of an internal moral compass (and by moral I include my atheist self - this is not a religious argument). You are in TOTAL control of what you perceive and your reaction to what you perceive. America (I assume the author is a member of the growing American victim class) has become a bunch of spineless victims that can't live in a world unless it caters to their total lack of impulse control. From the drug war, to the growing food war, to all the "for the children" arguments, this type of thinking is scary, and gives cause for more government control of every aspect of our lives. We need to grow some balls and stop playing the victim at EVERY opportunity.

  25. DMCA by leerpm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In related news, Sony will soon announce that all new TV models will use an encrypted signal to communicate between the remote and the box. Any third-party devices that attempt to imitate such remotes will be considered violations of the DMCA and thus be illegal to possess or manufacture.

    .. And thus begins the demise of the universal remote.

    1. Re:DMCA by jpetts · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry, but the garage door has already been shut on this possibility.

      Basically, a company called Chamberlain was suing another company called Skylink for building a "universal" door opener that operated with Chamberlain's products. Chamberlain cited the DMCA, but the case was thrown out on appeal.

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  26. How about Max Volume? by TrentL · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hit a button, and the TV's suddenly ramp up their volume to the max. THAT'S a hack.

  27. Re think this by finkployd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you do not have the balls to walk up and turn off a TV that other people are watching in a public place, perhaps you shouldn't turn it off at all. Either stand up for what you believe in (no matter how arrogant), or just learn to live with other people and their preferences. Don't be a coward.

  28. OT Remote story... by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Funny

    Back when I was 18 and worked at RadioShack in the mall, there was a TV store across the way. This place had like 50 TVs running, most on mute, all day long. They went off at night.

    My manager liked to take one of our universal remotes, and after hours turn the volume WAAAAAAAY up, then turn off the TV. He did this to all that his universal remote would reach.

    The poor TV store manager (who was a friend of my manager) would come in, hit the 'on' button on HIS special remote and get blasted out the front door...

    Fun with consumer electronics :)

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  29. Target Market by ebuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people (submitter perhaps withstanding) really wouldn't use this outside of perhaps their home.

    This smacks of a novelty item / gag gift, I mean you won't take it to your bar, because if you really wanted that TV off, you'd ask the manager or leave. Only the most die hard axxholes would consider acting out the scenario presented, and few of those would have the stomach to do it twice, or make a regular occurance out of it.

    Let's face it, we already know who would abuse this device, they're the same ones that are yelling at the manager / barkeep all the time, but don't have the common sense to stop coming to their "favorite resturant / bar".

    A piece of tape will solve the TV problems, and then they'll be back to ridiculous statements of infringement of their personal space / hearing when visiting a public place.

  30. Waste of money... by Zerbey · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't think I've ever been in a public place with a TV on in the background and it bother me so much I want to turn it off. I avoid places that have loud music/TV's anyway. Much less antisocial than pissing off a bunch of people :)

    Now, if they could invent a zapper that would kill the cell phone of the idiots who think they can drive and use one at the same time I'd be happy.

  31. Amusing by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here we have an incredibly insecure electronics device. It listens on a common EM frequency band and willingly turns itself off whenever a sequence of simple codes is received. When someone finally exploits this gaping security hole, aren't we supposed to blame the people who made the security hole? After all, problems in Windows are Microsoft's fault. Why is this the fault of the device's creator, and not the fault of the TV manufacturers?

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  32. Vandalism by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you go around turning off others TV's just because 'it annoys me' then you are nothing better than a common vandal and are committing a crime.

    If the TV in a restaurant bothers you, DON'T GO TO THAT DAMNED RESTAURANT.. problem solved. The world doesn't revolve around your sorry ass.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  33. You're missing an important distinction: by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Loud/fast cars impose themselves on everyone around them. What computer modders do in the privacy of their own mother's basement does not interfere with other people's lives.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  34. Re:Ahh, the digital watch/remote control :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We actually had one of my teachers convinced there was a ghost in the room because of one of these one day! And the "over-emotional" girl in the class was freaking out. It was great.

  35. Another great translation by mypalmike · · Score: 3, Funny

    "If the victim scharrt afterwards in the sand and shits into the yard, the adjustment was wrong or the dose too high."

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  36. Re:Great translation quote by CreatureComfort · · Score: 3, Funny



    *AARRRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!*

    Funny, I always have that reaction to Vogon Poetry.

    --
    "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
    Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  37. Re:I'll push your buttons. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You and the airport do not have a right to bomb me with adverts from some crappy TV.

    What gives you the idea that you have a right to peace and quiet when you're in a place of public accomodation? That's simply ludicrous.

    Don't like going to restaurants that have TVs blaring in the corner? Try going somewhere classier than a sports bar for once. You don't have the right to decide what everyone else is or isn't allowed to watch while they eat.

  38. Re:I'll push your buttons. by NitroWolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your right to swing your arm ends where my nose begins. Don't believe me? Come on over some day and I'll punch you in the nose. You and the airport do not have a right to bomb me with adverts from some crappy TV. I'm sick of it and I'll be getting one of these devices so that I can contemplate whatever I like while you go into some kind of broadcast stupidity withdrawal.

    WTH? Are you that stupid, or are you trolling? The airport certainly DOES have the right to bombard you with ads, if they so choose. Don't like it? DON'T GO TO THE AIRPORT. You have NO right to turn off TV's that don't belong to you. Don't believe me? Come over to my house and try to turn off the TV and I'll beat your ass with a baseball bat, all the while laughing like a pirate at your incredible lack of hubris and blatant stupdity.

    I'm sick of people like you, who think their way is the right way. I leave people like you alone to do whatever they wish to do, so long as it doesn't affect me. Why the hell can't you provide the same courtsey?

  39. Flawed argument by siskbc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You and the airport do not have a right to bomb me with adverts from some crappy TV

    Yes they do. It's their damned airport. Don't like it? Try another airport. Can't find one to accomodate your needs? Don't fly.

    I'm familiar with the classical "rights of man" argument you're making, but you're twisting it. You seem to believe that everyone, everywhere, in any place you could possibly go, is required to accomodate you to prevent you from being annoyed. Hate to tell you, but that is not the way the world works - nor should it. I'd certainly hate to live my life in a way that could never simply annoy anyone.

    In this specific instance, more people are entertained - or at least have their boredom reduced - by the TVs than people are annoyed by them, or else they wouldn't be there. Contrary to what you seem to believe, you *aren't* more important than other people.

    People in TV induced comas are known for their lack of situational awareness.

    Ah, the classic condescending "you watch TV so I'm smarter than you argument." Hate to burst your bubble, but lots of extremely intelligent people watch TV. And a lot of people of meager intelligence avoid TV because they think it makes them appear smarter. To paraphrase "A Fish Called Wanda" - a movie, no less - an monkey can read Plato, he just won't understand it. Self-affected intellectual elitism shouldn't be confused for intelligence.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  40. TV Remote Control Watch by santos_douglas · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This reminds me of a product I thought was cool in a geeky sort of way, a TV Remote Control Watch like this Quemex. It lets you control volume and channel. I don't know if it's as universal as the device listed in TFA, but someone could easily devise one. It's sold to the super lazy couch potato who's doens't even want to reach to the coffee table for the remote, but I always thought it would be pretty cool to have on those rare occassions when you're stuck in a waiting room or something with a TV stuck on QVC or something.

    I surprised at the posters getting all upset about this type of device. Yes it would be rude to mess with people in a crowded place like a bar or whatever if its obvious they're watching it. But how is an open IR receiver any different from say an open WAP? It's their fault if they didn't think about the possibility of someone using it in a way they didn't envision.

  41. Where the hell did these "rights" come from? by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Last I checked, there was nothing in the Bill of Rights that said "We have the right to have silence in public and other people's private places."

    TVs in the airport? Maybe people want to know what the weather's going to be like at thier destination. Maybe that guy who just spent 4 hours staring at the back of a seat would like to watch a game for an hour before spending another 6 viewing the threadcount of a headrest.

    TV at your local restraunt? Noone forced you to be there, if you don't like it, ask to be moved away from it or go somewhere else.

    TVs in stores? It helps to actually see a fully warmed up picture when viewing a TV. Besides, doesn't a TV turned on seem much more appealing than one turned off? If you wanted to view a TV turned off wouldn't you just get a cabinet?

    Just as I don't have the right to take that cell phone and shove it up your arse, you don't have the right to turn off someone elses TVs.

    Oh, and malls, airports, and restraunts are NOT public property. If you want public property to dispense your own brand of vigelante justice, the BLM land is usually well marked on topo maps. Go there and tell the crickets to shut the hell up. They might care.

    -

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
  42. Re:I'll push your buttons. by kelnos · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You and the airport do not have a right to bomb me with adverts from some crappy TV. I'm sick of it and I'll be getting one of these devices so that I can contemplate whatever I like while you go into some kind of broadcast stupidity withdrawal.
    I strongly disagree with this. Perhaps the airlines at the aiport offering lower fares because they're being paid to show advertising on TVs around the airport? I agree that random people sitting around don't have the right to be playing loud music, or their own loud TV, but the airport itself has _every_ right to play music, or have TVs on. They own the space, and they decide what goes on in it. If you don't like it, either complain, or use a different airport.

    The TV doesn't belong to you. Others may be watching it; what gives you the right to disturb that? If you're annoyed by it, try to find a place to sit such that it isn't a problem, or do the right thing and complain to someone at the information desk about it. Will it cause change? Well, probably not, because a random person complaining every now and again shouldn't cause change. If the vast majority of people are fine with the TVs on (in most of the airports i've been in, they usually have news broadcasts on, which I don't mind, and often like to watch), then they should stay on. Period. You have no right to impose your will on others in a public place, or a private place owned and operated by someone else.

    In my experience, I have no problem tuning out airport TVs in order to sit and read a book. If you can't handle that, perhaps that's your problem?

    Having said all that, I do agree that we in the U.S. watch way too much mindless TV. But pissing people off isn't the way to solve that problem. It's only a way to show how childish and immature you are.
    --
    Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  43. Librarian Annoyer becomes TV DoS device by swb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Back in the stone age (ie, early 80s) one of the electronics projects in our class was a "librarian annoyer" -- a small circuit that would run for a long time on a 9v battery and would periodically emit a shrill noise for a brief time and then go silent again. The idea was to put it in a hollowed out book in the library and the librarian would go nuts trying to find the source of the noise.

    Why not combine this concept with the TV turner-offer? A small device that would periodically emit all the OFF IR codes for TVs. Make it unobtrusive enough that it could be stuck someplace where it wouldn't be seen, or camouflaged as something that belonged on the wall (many places have rectangular thermostat sensors all over -- small metal rectangle with no controls).

    With the right power source and camouflage, you could really have some fun. It may also be interesting to not just send OFF codes, but to send random channel or input codes, mutes, volume up/down commands and so on.

    A single IR command might be simpler to implement, but it'd still be a blast.

    1. Re:Librarian Annoyer becomes TV DoS device by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Funny

      A friend of mine built a circuit that sounded exactly like a slow, periodic drip of water. Hidden near somebody's cubicle, it was almost impossible to find by ear, because of the long pause between drips. His victim hid a dead fish in his file cabinet, which was pretty effective revenge.

  44. The TV OWNS the room by Sir+Holo · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Unfortunately, in our society, the rule is that The TV owns the room.

    If I read the paper, I don't bother anyone. If I listen to my iPod, I don't bother anyone. Conversation, eating, etc.. But TV is different. If just ONE person in a crowded room wants to see the TV, then they can have it on. Loud. And you're a jerk if you turn it down/off. Doesn't matter if someone was sitting right in front of the "off" TV prior.

    And marketers exploit this, e.g. in airports, where you can't hide from the things.

    The rule needs to change.

  45. Re:Discrete on/off codes... by MacBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

    You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Virtually all TVs (and other popular devices like VCRs, DVD players, etc.) have discrete on/off codes. The original remote sure doesn't have the corresponding buttons, but that does not prevent the device from responding to the code if it receives it. The only device that I own that doesn't have the capability to use discrete on/off is my Panasonic VCR.

  46. Reare Spoiler on Front Wheel Drive by IBitOBear · · Score: 4, Informative

    [Aside: I ma not a car kid, and don't advocate "thump thump thump" but...]

    A rear spoiler on a front wheel drive car still makes sense, it possibley makse *more* sense. It *is* classically (mis)understood that the down-force provided by a spoiler is to improve traction of "the drive wheels" to improve power delivery and prevent high-speed power skids.

    In point of fact, the typical modern car, is effectively a marginal lifting body (look it up, the air passing over the car goes further/faster and so the air passing under the car generates some lift). The name "spoiler" come from the fact that the airfoil "spoils" that lift.

    In all front-engine cars the front doesn't need a spoiler because the engine weight is sufficent to the task of maintainting contact. The back end is left to kite around.

    In a front wheel drive car, that lift is still present, and even if those rear wheels are not doing anything to make the car go faster, they *are* important to keeping the car under control. If you don't beleive you need the back end to control your movements, I recommend having a rear tire seize-up on you some time. It can be _very_ enlightening... 8-)

    In fact, in a front wheel drive car, there is so _little_ weight in the back that the tendency to "lose the back end" while cornering at speed is rather increased. A rear spoiler combats that lack of weight and improves the manuverability of the speeding car.

    So don't laugh. The rear spoiler is actually slightly *more* important on a front wheel drive car.

    With a rear-wheel drive car it helps you accelerate when you are already going fast. With a front wheel drive car, it keeps you from experiencing a catstrophic loss of control at high speed.

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
  47. Re:I'll push your buttons. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was a time when the lowest common denominator of social behaviour was to be unimposing on the people around you. You would be polite and courteous to those around you.

    Now the lowest common denominator of social behaviour is to be tolerant, no matter how horrible the people around you are. We all must tolerate them and not interfere with the activities of those around us. From screaming children, screaming adults, overwhelming perfumes, body odour, aggressive dogs, swearing, public harassment of hapless victims around them, loud stereos, late night parties, we must tolerate them.

    The result is that the greatest asshole reaps the greatest bennefit. The people who do not value peace and quiet are never for want. Those who do not like it, have to distance themselves from the greatest assholes, leaving public spaces full of the most horrible people immaginable.

    If somebody asked me to turn off a T.V. in a public place, I would be embarassed that I was disturbing them and I would turn it down or off right away. It's a public space after all, not my living room.

  48. 850+ comments ... by Simulant · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...of righteous indignation over televisions being turned off.

    We are well and truly fucked folks.

  49. Re:Now all we need... by symbolic · · Score: 3, Insightful


    is a universal OFF button for car stereos. They are FAR more annoying, and entail FAR more of an encroachment on the rights of others. The icing on the cake would be a universal Self-Destruct button- because that's probably what it would take for the little queens that drive these cars to get the message.

    As far as the TV goes, I remember working out at the local gym - there was this gaggle of women that would often show up at the same time. If the TV was off, one of them would make sure to turn it on. If it was on, one of them would make sure to turn up the volume. If that wasn't enough, they'd spend their workout practically yelling back and forth across the room above the noise from the TV. Oh how I would have loved something like this.