Slashdot Mirror


NEC Strikes Back With SX-8 Supercomputer

News for nerds writes "It was just 3 weeks ago that we learned IBM's BlueGene/L with 36.01 TFlops edged out NEC's Earth Simulator, but today NEC announces a new SX-8 supercomputer with a peak processing performance of 65 TFlops (press release). It may be available in the U.S. as Cray's OEM like SX-6."

192 comments

  1. Shallow Minds by stecoop · · Score: 5, Funny

    65 trillion calculations per second and all I ponder is if NEC would mind using my user id while running seti@home.

    1. Re:Shallow Minds by over_exposed · · Score: 1

      I think the sheer number of WUs finished/fetched by this thing alone would overload Berkley's system...

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    2. Re:Shallow Minds by CriX · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The monthly rental price of the SX-8 starts from approximately 1,170,000 yen, and shipment will commence in December 2004."

      Have you been a good little nerd? :-)

      --
      Moderation: +1 pwnage
    3. Re:Shallow Minds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats only 10k USD.

    4. Re:Shallow Minds by pagal_paanda · · Score: 1

      Oh man, I wonder what the frame rate on Doom III would be if it ever runs on this beast :D

    5. Re:Shallow Minds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, and we get our new nodes early next year.

      [Looks down nose at Alienware owners]

  2. Packard Bell by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tom's Hardware stated the the guts are Packard Bell, and it comes with a WinModem. That sucks.

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
    1. Re:Packard Bell by PKPerson · · Score: 0

      I wonder how well it would run Doom 3? I bought my comp in last year and i rarely get more than 15.

  3. Yes, but... by extagboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...can it figure out the question to the answer 42?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by outriding9800 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Alex... What is 42 ?

    2. Re:Yes, but... by rwven · · Score: 0, Redundant

      lol it doesnt need to find the ANSWER to 42, just the QUESTION to 42...

    3. Re:Yes, but... by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      That's what the parent said. Can it find the question to the answer 42.

    4. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They decided on "how many roads must a man walk down."
      Nothing to see here

    5. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Uh...
      What is 43-1?

    6. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but it can build you a more powerful computer to find out that answer

    7. Re:Yes, but... by pagal_paanda · · Score: 1

      "....And here I have Brain the size of the planet and they are asking could I open the door" - Marvin

  4. It's like by Moby+Cock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is like an arms race of yesteryear. The Germans and the Brits with their battleships, the Americans and Soviets with there nukes, the Yankees and Red Sox with payroll. Except this race is way cooler and will likely pay off in a much more productive way.

    1. Re:It's like by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except this race is way cooler and will likely pay off in a much more productive way.

      Yes because this sort of computing power holds no attraction to the military for weapon modeling purposes or to the untouchables running echelon type programs.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:It's like by nomadic · · Score: 1

      And unlike the Yankees and Red Sox there's actual a question over who will win.

    3. Re:It's like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend to think it's a contest of penis size more than anything else. Why else did IBM shoot for 36.01 flops with BlueGene? It beats Earth Simulator by a negligble 0.15 flops. But when the ladies come a'lookin', that IBM engineer can say he has the biggest one around.

    4. Re:It's like by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Who do you thinks buys these systems first?

    5. Re:It's like by Jameth · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to think that the R&D money put into military concerns hasn't had many significant productivity spin-offs. For that matter, the nuclear arms race drove large segments of supercomputer production for years, with the best systems being military bought.

    6. Re:It's like by r2q2 · · Score: 1

      They use DSP to do that. No one knows how to run a AI to do echelon stuff. You could play a big MMORPG on one though. Besides aren't virtual explosions better than real ones?

      --
      My UID is prime is yours?
    7. Re:It's like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you managed to spell their both correctly and wrong in the same sentance . . .
      nice.
      sorry to nit-pick, but their/there/they're is my biggest pet peeve.

    8. Re:It's like by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It's all about penis. Even Slashdot regulars go onWhether it is better to buy an Intel or AMD penis. Or an ATI or nVidia penis. Or what brand penis motherboard to buy. Or the brand hard drive penis. Or what OS penis they are using, or whether they built their penis from source code or not.

    9. Re:It's like by Jungle+guy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The rules to have a job running on the Earth Simulator are very strict. All the results must be made available to the scientific community, under the public domain.

      It leaves almost all research projects with military or commercial purposes out of the Earth Simulator. Most of the data processed there help understand the global weather or the seismic movements. As Japan is a country that has to deal with typhoons and earthquakes, and the Japanese government is ultimately the owner of the Earth Simulator, it serves them well.

      It is very different from the fastest supercomputers on the United States, that are operated by the military. They have "white" and "black" nodes - the white nodes are used for scientific and public research, while the black nodes are used for classified research.

    10. Re:It's like by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I have a VIA C3 800MHz, that's a very tiny penis.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    11. Re:It's like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You managed to spell sentence wrong too... nice. Sorry to nit-pick but grammar nazis who can't spell are my biggest peeve.

  5. Obligatory... by Infinityis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, a beowulf cluster of SX-8 supercomputer overlords welcome me!

  6. Damn.... by identity0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Note that 'SX-8' pronounced 'Sex-ay' :-)

    1. Re:Damn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and let me guess... a sub model will be SX-869???

    2. Re:Damn.... by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Does that make the older SX-6 "Sexist"?

      thanks, you've been a great audience, I'll be here all week...

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    3. Re:Damn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      japanese know what they are talking about :)

  7. Real-world applications? by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's very impressive and all, but how is this going to benefit me down the line? It's not like they're affordable to small/medium businesses like the Cray or HP's highly valued Alpha DEC workstations.

    We are stiffling progress at the lower level by pricing these systems well beyond the reach of the average researcher or multi-national oil conglomerate.

    Why is this?

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:Real-world applications? by jstave · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's very impressive and all, but how is this going to benefit me down the line? It's not like they're affordable to small/medium businesses like the Cray or HP's highly valued Alpha DEC workstations.
      Are you kidding? A couple years from now you'll be seeing these things, shrink wrapped, on the shelves at Best Buy.
    2. Re:Real-world applications? by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      That's a dead alpha link (figures). Perhaps you meant this one?

    3. Re:Real-world applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll dumbass. I guess you didn't read the article? What prices well beyond the reach of the average researcher?

      It's 1,170,000 yen per month. Which is what? ... $10k/mo in US dollars? That's pretty cheap as far as research work goes.

    4. Re:Real-world applications? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At a rental of only $17,000/month, it's far more affordable than a Cray for small quick projects.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Real-world applications? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      That's for the single node version, with one processor installed. The "record breaking" configuration is a 512-node/4096 processor cluster.

  8. Usage by fembots · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was about to say "With a computer this powerful, the world probably only needs 4 of these", but history tells me otherwise :)

    1. Re:Usage by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      They expect to sell 700 during its "active lifetime", meaning until sx-9 will be out.
      Not all big versions, but even a 4 node one would have been HIGH in the top500 a few years ago...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  9. Runs Linux? by mukund · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems like it runs Linux as they are claiming that it will use the Global File System for clustered FS operations.. unless their Global File System is different.

    --
    Banu
    1. Re:Runs Linux? by mukund · · Score: 4, Informative

      In reply to my own post..

      The Cray SX-6 System runs the UNIX-based SUPER-UX operating system.

      Sorry about that. Maybe they ported GFS.. dunno.

      --
      Banu
    2. Re:Runs Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just let us know when you want us to join in this conversation, thanks.

    3. Re:Runs Linux? by flaming-opus · · Score: 1

      Nope. The Global File System in super-UX is much less general purpose than redhat's GFS. It relies on global shared memory afforded by the full crossbar interconnect of the sx-series computers.

      They are similar from a 1000 foot view, very different in implementation, design, and target user.

    4. Re:Runs Linux? by enrique66 · · Score: 1

      No, it runs SuperUX, a proprietary UNIX variant. GFS is NEC-GFS and has nothing to do with Sistina-GFS. Global File System is a too generic term...

    5. Re:Runs Linux? by enrique66 · · Score: 1

      That's wrong. It needs FC switches like most of the SAN solutions. It has nothing to do with the crossbar interconnect. Implementation is completely different, true.

    6. Re:Runs Linux? by leek · · Score: 1
      The GFS fileserver runs on an Itanium Linux server, the TX-7, while the number-crunching computation runs on the SX vector machine.

      Some customers who buy such hybrid SX/TX-7 systems want to use their TX-7 nodes for computation and not just I/O, and so NEC sells software development tools for Itanium systems as well. But the competition in Itanium server space is fierce, with SGI, HP, et.al. having similar offerings.

    7. Re:Runs Linux? by leek · · Score: 1
      Here is an example GFS configuration.

      There is no mystery about "porting" GFS to SX, because it runs on a TX-7 Itanium Linux server, as a dedicated SX peripheral.

      Here is another example

      High-speed File Sharing Through GFS: GFS (Global File System) is a file system that enables sharing between several nodes within a SAN (Storage Area Network) environment built on Fibre Channel. By using the TX7 series GFS, NEC offers high-speed file sharing with the SX supercomputer series.

      Imagine a 16-processor TX-7 Itanium GFS server dedicated to serving GFS for a 128-processor SX system.

      Most people are overwhelmed just by the thought of a 16-processor TX-7 by itself. Now imagine the TX-7 being dedicated solely for use as a file server for a SX supercomputer. Separate machines, separate OSes.

    8. Re:Runs Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be pretty sweet if it ran Windows. My Lineage II framerates would be awesome ^_^

    9. Re:Runs Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEC GFS does not rely on any kind of
      shared memory. It relies on HiPPI or Fibre Channel network to do third party data transfer
      from client to disk.

  10. 65 TFlop is only an estimate by foobar3149 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The 65 TFlop for the SX-8 is only an estimate while the 36 TFlop for BlueGene/L was real performance. So it is not certain that SX-8 will be faster than Blue Gene/L

    1. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're trying to say they could have overestimated the performance by almost 100%? Coming from the people that actually built what was until recently the fastest supercomputer, that's extremely doubtful.

      Also, the performance per-CPU and per-node is most likely real data, as they say the SX-8 would ship in December.

    2. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by foobar3149 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I just wanted to point out that is not an apples to apples comparison, and that such a comparison is not fair to either machine. For that matter, the number for the IBM machine is only a subset of BlueGene/L so then why not use the 360 TFlop projected performance of BlueGene/L as the comparison point?

    3. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by Troy+Baer · · Score: 4, Informative
      You're trying to say they could have overestimated the performance by almost 100%?

      No, the original poster was saying that the 65TF number from NEC is theoretical peak performance based on the maximum possible number of FP operations per clock cycle (which can never happen in real code, due to pesky little things like having to access memory), while the ~35TF number for the Blue Gene/L prototype is measured performance on an actual piece of code called the Parallel Linpack benchmark. It's not unusual for systems to perform as low as 50% of peak on Parallel Linpack, although 70-90% is more typical on systems with decent memory bandwidth (which the SX8 presumably has).

      (Note that I'm deliberately sidestepping the debate over whether Parallel Linpack bears any resemblence to reality.)

      --
      "My life's work has been to prompt others... and be forgotten." --Cyrano de Bergerac
    4. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by flaming-opus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's probably a pretty good estimate, as this is just a clock speed bump and packaging update to the sx-6 (earth simulator).

      An equally important criticism is that they've only announced the POSSIBILITY of building a 65TF system. No one has actually ordered one. The cray X1 can scale up to 50TF if fully populated. The X1E scales up to 150TF. This is of no great consequence, as the largest one in production is only 10TF. Yes they could build a really big sx-8, but it cost $200M to build the earth simulator, probably something similar to build this thing.

      There are a lot of computers that are really cool - on paper.

    5. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're trying to say they could have overestimated the performance by almost 100%?

      Well, that's what Virginia Tech did with their G5 cluster.

    6. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Virginia Tech achieved an "efficiency" of about 58%. Not great, especially as compared to earlier test builds of 128 nodes, but not among the worst performers, either. If a cluster has a low latency, high bandwidth interconnect, it's RMax score will approach its Rpeak scores, although a certain fraction of the computing task cannot be parallelized.
      According to Dongarra a certain cluster using the Apple XServe platform, composed of 1080 dual 2.3 IBM PowerPC w.Mellanox Infiniband and Cisco Ethernet secondary fabric scored 12050 GFlops on the RMax test.

      BlueGene 36.0 TF
      Earth Simulator 35.9 TF
      Red Thunder? 20.0 TF
      Project Columbia 19.6 TF
      ASQI Q 13.9 TF
      VT's Terascale 12.050

    7. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Does the NSA still disclose its computing capabilities?

    8. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The theoretical peak performance of the Earth Simulator was around 50TFlops, IIRC.

    9. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by enrique66 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Vector systems like SX-8 reach typically 50% of the peak performance in well tuned applications while massively parallel scalar systems crawl at less than 10% (no matter how much man power one invests in tuning). The effective performance of the SX-8 is much higher than that of BlueGene. The peak Linpack performance is meaningless, anyway. HPC Challenge benchmark makes a lot more sense for understanding what performance a machine can reach.

    10. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by flaming-opus · · Score: 1

      Not usually. I've actually done a little bit of work on NSA systems. (you get stack traces by fed-ex after they have been reviewed by security pros) I don't know about ALL of their systems, but the things I've dealt with they are more limited by data throughput, rather than pure number crunching.

      It's a good point that NSA, CIA, etc use big vector boxes, and don't report to top500. They basically bank-rolled the r/d phase of X1 development.

    11. Re:65 TFlop is only an estimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that SX-8's theoretical peak performance is 90TFLOPS(512 nodes).
      I think 65TFLOPS is not overestimation.
      See the ES's theoretical peak and Linpack result.

  11. I know I'm gonna get Flamed, by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 0
    or modded troll, or both. But....

    I like how this speed race keeps flip-"flopping"

    I didn't know John Kerry liked to race

  12. Future news... by Infinityis · · Score: 0

    Next up: NEC announces a name change to "Empire"

    Please revise headlines to read "Empire Strikes Back With SX-8 Supercomputer"

    Alternate headline: "Outsourcing to Japan Raises unemployment concerns for C3PO & R2D2"

    1. Re:Future news... by enigmals1 · · Score: 1

      Nice. ;)

  13. i wonder by patrick.whitlock · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    what kind of framerates will it make doom 3 hit

  14. In the interest of perpetuating rumors by hsmith · · Score: 1

    @ Virginia Tech it is rumored the US Gov't is gobbling(harhar) up Apple XServers in hopes to build the "Ultimate" Super computer...

    But then again these are just rumors as Srinidhi Varadarajan is being *highly* recruited

    1. Re:In the interest of perpetuating rumors by Mekabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      So is that why he's never there to teach my Networking class anymore?

    2. Re:In the interest of perpetuating rumors by anzha · · Score: 1

      Really? What exactly is the state of the X System at VTech? Last I heard is that they'd disassembled the original and were not yet in production with the replacement. It's not even on the Top500 anymore. Rumors here are that VTech bit off more than they could chew...

      --
      Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
    3. Re:In the interest of perpetuating rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. They are using Apple XServe's, so setting up the world's fastest super computer is simply a matter of unpacking the boxes, plugging them in and then running the benchmark. These are not Linux boxes that need 4 months of configuration work editing text files before they will even boot.

    4. Re:In the interest of perpetuating rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Which rumors? System X is back up and running with 2.3 GHz chips. And bring any new surprise contenders/drop outs should place 6th, next go around.

    5. Re:In the interest of perpetuating rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long will it stay up this time. 2 months?

  15. obligatory by fawlty154 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    /me makes some random obligatory comment about a beowulf cluster...

  16. What about cost? by Infinityis · · Score: 0

    Anyone know what the price tag is on a computer like this?

    Not that I'm in the market, but I'm just curious if this has any significant benefits over simply buying two supercomputers at half the speed...

    1. Re:What about cost? by tokenhillbilly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, the computer price is quite reasonable. It's the nuclear power plant to supply the 21 million jigawatts required to run it and its cooling system that will set you back big bucks.

    2. Re:What about cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the computer price is quite reasonable. It's the nuclear power plant to supply the 21 million jigawatts required to run it and its cooling system that will set you back big bucks

      No need for that. It's not AMD based.

    3. Re:What about cost? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      It will most likely be very expensive. The Earth Simulator was nearly $300 million dollars and that's just for the machine! I don't understand why people keep spending that much money when they could build a G5 cluster with the same overall speed for easily 1/10th the cost.

      I do understand that there are some things that the NEC computers are better at simulating and processing than a G5 cluster like the one at Virginia Tech, but for overall price/performance ratio these NEC computers cannot come close to matching Apple's G5 clusters.

    4. Re:What about cost? by amorsen · · Score: 1
      I do understand that there are some things that the NEC computers are better at simulating and processing than a G5 cluster like the one at Virginia Tech, but for overall price/performance ratio these NEC computers cannot come close to matching Apple's G5 clusters.

      If you only care about price/performance, then go with a non-clustered PC. Nothing will beat that. (Ok for certain codes the non-clustered G5 could possibly beat it, but that's basically a PC anyway.)

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    5. Re:What about cost? by Harbinjer · · Score: 1

      Because the G5 cluster is a cluster. It is not useful in all applications. I believe that earth simluator was very special purpose, and I believe that Blue Gene/L is/will be multi-purpose, but not general purpose.

      Sometimes you need a real supercomputer instead of a cluster.

    6. Re:What about cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harde-har-har shitface. Checked those consumption numbers for intel processors lately?

    7. Re:What about cost? by zepi · · Score: 1

      For certain kind of calculations Virginia Tech cluster is about as useful as one X-server with two processors... Each node in Real Supercomputer can communicate about gazillion times faster with other nodes when compared to nodes in cluster based on slow 1gb/s ethernet. Clusters are great for Seti@Home, but they suck ass in another kind of number crunching. Btw, BlueGene/L actually is actually only 18TFlops when doing calculations that need lot of communication with other nodes. Every other processor is dedicated for communication only. BlueGene reaches its peak rate only in cluster favorable calculations. (It's still much better than VT's machine for non-cluster favorable stuff). This just proves that you really can't get a Real Supercomputer for free. But sometimes you almost can.

  17. NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by reporter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    IBM has already proved that American technology is, at least, as good as Japanese technology despite all the moans and groans about how we have fallen behind Japan upon the introduction of the Earth Simulator. The good news is that the West (which includes the USA and Japan) have a lock on the most advanced computing technologies.

    Right now, this SX-8 announcement is just a publicity stunt to generate some "shock and awe" in the small supercomputing community of national and commercial research labs.

    Perhaps, the management of NEC should consider generating some "shock and awe" among the greater engineering community. I suggest that NEC donate computing time on an SX-8 to all the startups designing spaceships (e.g. SpaceShipOne). These startups are short on cash and cannot afford the kind of supercomputer that is needed for modeling the spaceships. Free time on a supercomputer would greatly assist these startups and would generate considerable shock and awe among engineers who daydream about what the predecessor of the M-5 computer could have been.

    Apparently, we are gradually building all the technologies needed to accomplish intergalactic space travel. The short list is matter-antimatter energy (which is undergoing top secret research in the American government) and high-performance computers (like the SX-8, which will model the spacecraft and possibly serve as the on-board computer).

    "Space...the final frontier. These are the voyages of the startship ..."

  18. In Other News by marktaw.com · · Score: 1

    In other news, scientists create a robot that could replace half of my friends.

    1. Re:In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 65 teraflops, this computer could replace ALL of your friends. Hell, my Gameboy could do it.

    2. Re:In Other News by marktaw.com · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but one well-placed beer could likely ruin just about an supercomputer. The Bar Bot lives for it. I have some intelligent friends, terraflops alone a friend does not make. Beer, on the other hand, is the universal ingredient in all meaningful relationships.

  19. Re:Two words... by bobgoatcheese · · Score: 3, Funny

    No Grendel! Stop attacking my village! I think you forgot "cluster."

    --
    How's my typing? Call 1-800-eta-shut
  20. Siemens is far ahead by fionbio · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The have SX-56 which is probably 7 times more powerful but unfortunatelly runs Windows CE... ;-(

  21. One Liners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1) I won't go out on a limb but I'll stick my NEC out for this supercomputer.

    2) SX-8? Is that the next in line to SSX Tricky?

    3) As you can see, I am resolute on this war on Tera...and my opponent is clearly a Tera-flopping machine.

    4) Please don't write articles with "$COMPANY Strikes Back" as its title. It begs "Return of the $RIVAL_COMPANY" as a follow-up.

    1. Re:One Liners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd mod you up, but there is no "+1, painfully bad jokes."

  22. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by thesilverbail · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The good news is that the West (which includes the USA and Japan) have a lock on the most advanced computing technologies.

    And why is this good news exactly?

    --
    I have found a truly wonderful proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, but unfortunately this sig is too small to contain it.
  23. BGL will be back on top in short order by tubbtubb · · Score: 5, Informative


    Remember that the 36.01 TF figure for BlueGene/L was only using 8 racks.
    The final BG/L will use 64 Racks.
    Also, the SX-8 figure is only an estimation.

    1. Re:BGL will be back on top in short order by The+Lost+Supertone · · Score: 2, Funny

      8 racks... brings new meaning to "look at that rack!"

    2. Re:BGL will be back on top in short order by HavokDevNull · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You forgot to mention IBM is developing for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (same system). Which is expected to be delivered in early 2005 and will have an estimated peak performance of 360 teraflops, according to IBM.

      Now that slams NEC to the ground...

      360 Teraflops (drool)

      --
      Sig
    3. Re:BGL will be back on top in short order by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      Now that slams NEC to the ground...

      today, yes. But it was 3 years ago that ES came out. Do you think that NEC was sitting around doing nothing? I suspect that NEC will be out with much larger machines than what they have today. It will be interesting to see who beats 1000 TF (what size is that?)

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:BGL will be back on top in short order by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Though you made a small mistake, the number you read about in the top 500 list is SUSTAINED performance, not peak performance(which is the number you listed). This is determined through running the Linpack benchmark, which solves a system of linear equations. It remains to be seen whether or not the supercomputer IBM is building will be able to sustain anywhere near 360 teraflops, so I would stop salivating at this point......

    5. Re:BGL will be back on top in short order by Hinhule · · Score: 0

      1PF

      peta

    6. Re:BGL will be back on top in short order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanx. Guess I am getting old.

    7. Re:BGL will be back on top in short order by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      And linpack is REALLY scalable. I really want to see how good they can run real world problems on 160000 (160 thousand!) cpus without major communication bottlenecks...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    8. Re:BGL will be back on top in short order by chipace · · Score: 1

      I completely agree... NEC deserves some crediblity for holding the number one spot for so many years. The earth simulator's peak and sustained values are very close too (that indicates good system engineering to me).

      If I got the same funds from the Feds, I could make something much better than blue-gene (and drive a ferrari to boot).

  24. I'd stick with IBM by phoxix · · Score: 0

    Why?

    Because IBM's Blue Gene/L was/is made with off the shelf parts based on the POWER arch. Meaning it becomes much more efficient dollar wise than the custom made stuff NEC keeps pumping out.

    (on a side note: Where does Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory get all that money to keep buying the latest and greatest super computer ?!)

    Sunny Dubey

    PS: Two of the Blue Gene/L folks will be presenting at my LUG tonite. I wonder if they will have any responces to this.

    1. Re:I'd stick with IBM by Bishop923 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      on a side note: Where does Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory get all that money to keep buying the latest and greatest super computer

      LLNL does nuclear research (basically simulating nuclear weapon detonations). We spend $400 Billion on defense per year, what is $200 - $300 million for the latest and greatest super-computer?

    2. Re:I'd stick with IBM by sexylicious · · Score: 3, Interesting

      LLNL does nuclear research (basically simulating nuclear weapon detonations). We spend $400 Billion on defense per year, what is $200 - $300 million for the latest and greatest super-computer?

      Also, since the US agreed to stop testing nuclear weapons, they've moved on to totally simulating them. Most often the research is done under the guise of astrophysics because the physical processes are almost identical. The US has to stay on top of things, and simulation is the only option to do so.

    3. Re:I'd stick with IBM by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1
      Where does Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory get all that money to keep buying the latest and greatest super computer ?!

      Have you looked at the amount of taxes taken out of your paycheck recently?

    4. Re:I'd stick with IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IBM's Blue Gene/L was/is made with off the shelf parts
      I hate not to sing IBM's official line on this one, but press releases to that effect oversimplify what the Blue Gene processors are: highly custom ASICs using a modified PPC core. Saying the architecture is not proprietary does not mean it's using commodity parts.
    5. Re:I'd stick with IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, we haven't entirely agreed to the test ban treaty... Second, we cannot fully simulate these weapons yet. Third, many of the interesting effects are the same as the effects of a terrestrial earthquake, so a large portion is not classified as astrophysics.

    6. Re:I'd stick with IBM by wilsonjd · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's part of the Department of Energy budget, which is $24 Billion. From: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/energy .html The 2005 Budget provides $9.0 billion for the national security activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration to include maintaining the safety, security, reliability and effectiveness of the Nation's nuclear weapons stockpile; preventing the spread of materials, information, and technology of weapons of mass destruction by eliminating or securing nuclear materials and related infrastructure and providing the U.S. Navy with safe, effective nuclear propulsion plants.

    7. Re:I'd stick with IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...no!

      The CPUs in Blue Gene are custom - they started with one of the lowered end PPCs used for embedded applications and bolted on the floating point unit from the PPC G5/960. (In other words, this is not an "off the shelf" part that anyone can buy and put a system together.)

      However, if you have the money to spend on custom ASICs, I'm sure IBM will gladly build a CPU like this for you.

  25. Make your time by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

    BlueGene/L is only at 36TFLOPS today, but by next year the full-size version is supposed to clock in at 180TFLOPS. The SX-8 has no chance to survive.

    1. Re:Make your time by Gil-galad55 · · Score: 5, Funny
      The SX-8 has no chance to survive.

      NEC, make your time.

      --

      To follow knowledge like a sinking star, / Beyond the utmost bound of human thought. ("Ulysses", Tennyson)

    2. Re:Make your time by Gil-galad55 · · Score: 1

      Jebus, I should read the subject lines... oh well. Cheers.

      --

      To follow knowledge like a sinking star, / Beyond the utmost bound of human thought. ("Ulysses", Tennyson)

    3. Re:Make your time by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Well, not all application can run well on the massively blown up notebook that is blue gene...
      (low power embeded cpus, lots of density, not much memory bandwith).
      There will be applications that can use for example >200GB/s memory bandwith per processor...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  26. Given the architecture... by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 0

    which is based on that well proven design of ropes and pulleys in Apraphulia (see Sci Am a long time back), I wonder if they will have heat dissipation problems from the friction...

  27. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is good news to all those who aspire to emigrate to the "West" from the third world via university admissions (you know, the F1, H1, GC route).

    BTW, happy "Apping".

  28. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "we are gradually building all the technologies needed to accomplish intergalactic space travel"

    Maybe in the same sense that cavemen were gradually building Internet2 every time they found a crystal of SiO2 in their navels.

  29. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should add another moderation option: "-1, Not funny any more" for posts like this.

  30. 65 Tflops on my desktop by websage · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even with 65Tflops it still takes 3 min to apply my desktop settings.

    --
    John Anthony Hartman
  31. No benefits to you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a few years, when someone gets get cancer, the medicine that cures him/her might just have been developed on this very machine.

    Protein folding research is vital in cancer research, and highly computationally intensive too.

  32. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by edge_crumbler · · Score: 1

    NEC say in the press release that these super computers start at ~$10,000 a month rental. Maybe that's the base line model but isn't $10,000 a month peanuts for a serious spaceship business?

  33. Re:Shall we get them out of the way now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    yeah but can it run longhorn ?

  34. Fast enough that you hit reality by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Do you really wish to move Doom from a game to Reality?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  35. I wonder if the SX-8 is related to the PX-8? by phil+reed · · Score: 1
    --

    ...phil
    "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  36. Highly valued Alphas? by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 0

    Oh, I wish they were, but sadly HP seems to have axed anything with Alpha. I wish Intel would
    take a good look in the mirror and buy the Alpha
    outright (FUD alert: if AMD does it first you are
    history guys...).

    Given the beautiful clean design I wonder if a really die-shrinked version of Alpha would make a nice PDA processor...

    Anyone out there have any clues?
    (sorry, but I just watched Bob Colwell's (ex intel chief architect) lecture to Stanford, so I'm in processor architecture mode right now...

    The answer "Lieutenant" is that this stuff benefits you because the problems it tackles are
    not addressable by distributed computing apps like seti@home. This sort of iron deals with problems where each point you are fiddling with (on a lattice) affects everything adjacent, so communications with other processors has to happen
    a lot. Scratch the idea of doing that over the
    snoozi-net...

    But even for Beowolf, you have to consider the running cost (which when you compute it isn't small beer - $20-$30/month per node given the power use. Multiply that by 256 and you could end
    up being the first individual to file for Chapter
    {whatever it is in the states}).

    ***** QUICK NOTE TO THE SLASHCODE AUTHOR ****
    In text mode, &lt and &gt should not get dumped
    in text mode. Yours, Angry Meta programmer
    ****** END RANT *****

    These days Cray isn't the Cray of old, and you could perhaps roll your own Cray Clone. It isn't like you get to have the cachet of ECL logic processors with *seats* around them, but what the heck..

    Beowolf class machines fill in some of the need for true crunch mode machines, but you can never have enough power, so watch Internet 2, and grid computing issues.

    Someone will *still* complain even if you turned the whole goddammn universe into their personal computer. It's that difficult. Some problems are just too horrid, and some Professors just too impatient.

    I don't expect Quantum computing devices to bail me out in a big hurry, but then again I might be
    wrong. (Real uncertain about this...).

    1. Re:Highly valued Alphas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But even for Beowolf, you have to consider the running cost (which when you compute it isn't small beer - $20-$30/month per node given the power use. Multiply that by 256 and you could end
      up being the first individual to file for Chapter
      {whatever it is in the states})."

      That is chapter 11. But, many people have already filed chapter 11. I wouldn't be the first by a long shot. :p

    2. Re:Highly valued Alphas? by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

      But in the US you can get away with that. Even be praised for your courage. In Europe, and especially the UK, it's like you are a paedophile or psychopath... (The standard trick in the UK is to get your *wife* to be responsible for the next company, but most of us run out of wives pretty damn
      quickly...).
      Good luck. I just spent two years literally homeless here in Athens GR, and am scraping my life back together (looks good so far), so keep believing in yourself...

      Hint: The doves or local friendly birds *always* believe in you if you feed them. That's great reinforcement. Not only that but if you work hard at it you might get enough material to write a book (which blows away the reason to muck around with computers to begin with...). (I did think about this and maybe I still will write something
      perhaps for the infamous gentleman from the Northeast US with the fun book covers...)

      Cheers,
      Andy

    3. Re:Highly valued Alphas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The design team behind the Alpha DID design a "PDA" processor - it was called StrongARM (you might have heard of it.)

      When DEC was sold to Compaq, the semiconductor operations went to Intel and Samsung. Intel got the StrongARM, Tulip network chips and PCI bridge chips. Samsung got the Alpha. Intel phased out the Tulip chips over time but the StrongARM evolved into the XScale which, strangely enough, is used in PDAs (as well as embedded apps such as DSL routers.)

      As to "clean" CPU design, anything is better than x86! I imagine the vector processors in these NEC super computers are pretty nice.

    4. Re:Highly valued Alphas? by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

      No, not really. ARM was "Acorn RISC machines" in the old days. Acorn was the UK company who did the "BBC Micro" (which was c.a. 1982) the most innovative machine around for the home market in the UK (and the basis for a pioneering effort by the BBC "Making the most of the Micro" to educate
      people about the possibilities of "little machines" (phrase borrowed from Dr.Pournelle)).

      (Ironically, it used a picture of an owl (Athena's
      Owl) and I'm living here in Athens GR these days)

      Later, they developed the ARM processor for the "Archimedes" range of machines, which had some nice
      ideas, but sadly wasn't so successful (too expensive)).

      (DEC had rights to the ARM, but didn't own the company). Sidepoint: ARM was RISC before most except the original IBM processor.

      It was "droppable" into the corner of your design,
      so it got designed in all over the place (many places in embedded processing you wouldn't be aware of). You point this out, and I think it was well liked because (cough) the bugs were well known (I haven't played with it, but *having* bugs
      is much less important than having *unknown* bugs). I could mention a real *mother* of a
      floppy disk controller which was deaf to commands.

      You're right about the design of x86. It sort of
      grew like a cancer. But it's well known that the 286 happened because Intel screwed up major league with their ambitious iAPX-432 (multi chip) project to replace the 8080. I've heard that
      it (the '286) was designed in a couple of weeks. I believe that. It sure looks that way. Nothing since has changed that.

      A lot of the "baggage" Intel processors carry around is stuff from the ill fated (but much
      copied - even Unix copies some ideas) Multics project. Hence the rings and gates which are stuff
      I never expected to see on my desktop after
      banging on them at university. When Multics finally managed to deliver (and it started in the mid 60's and eventually delivered *something* usable in the late 70's!!!), the world had moved on... (For those who *like*
      Multics, I understand, but computers as power stations is *so* 1960's). Looking ahead, it might
      once again become an issue (Grid computing).

      (Don't flame me if you're a Multics fan - I know
      about B0 etc...)

      I pretty much shudder at the thought of what rules the vector processor on the NEC uses. You'll need a custom compiler *and* you'll have to follow whatever black art coding rules they tell you to do. Scratch any idea of clean coding if you want fast...

      Maybe I'm wrong.

      Serious wish territory: is it too much to ask for
      a processor like even ARM with hyperfast net interconnects a la Inmos Transputer, *and* fast cheap memory (the holy grail even in 386 days).
      (Ever since then, memory hasn't kept up with Moore's law). Oh, and obviously I want a *really*
      fast FPU.

      Someone make me really *cheap* fast low latency memory. Pleeze. (Don't call me with DDR2 ok? or RAMBUS). Ok, so I want it all. But if you read
      the "386" manual from Intel, you'll see that the
      nightmare we are now stuck in is mostly the curse
      of molasses slow memory. Static memory was expensive then, and is *still* expensive. Anyone
      making *cheap* static memory could burn Intel...

      (which would be deliciously ironic, since Intel's
      first product was er.. (prob wrong) a 256 bit RAM chip)).

      Personally, I kind of sympathize with a ghost voice from the past who coded for the wonderful
      PDP-11. Now, even though I started during the '11's slow decline, I can *look* at assembly code
      for that machine and understand it (mainly because
      Motorola had the excellent taste to *steal* a lot of ideas when they made the 68000). (Except for
      the 11's middle-endianness. Bloody 1(A0) problem.)

      I keep promising myself I'll hack up an '11 emulator so I can look at the ancient root of
      the OS I started my career porting (ok, you read slashdot, so you guess). Something about Pascal I'd guess. Poke me if you want an old-timer to *really* tell a story...

      (yes I know there are a lot of them, but it's not the same...)

      Time. She's a bitch.

  37. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by tsumocat · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, the management of NEC should consider generating some "shock and awe" by having Oprah give away free SX-8.

  38. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the West (which includes the USA and Japan)

    WHAT?

    How is Japan part of "the West"?

  39. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    If you have everything prepared, then you get the supercomputer at the end to do your rendering, and in that way, it is cheap.

    Its just idle time.

    Do you have your software written to actually run on it correctly?
    Do the people who analyse the results work for peanuts?
    Have you tested it?
    "Just one more revision" is another 10k.

    Imagine, you get some time on a supercomputer donated to you.

    You sit yourself down at the console, what do you do?

    Well, after writing the obvious pi to 1e999 dp, or for a=0 to 1000000000000000000000 do print "whoa!"

    How would you use your time?

    do they run a terminal environment - the worlds fastest computer interactively scrolling messages to 100s of users, and only throttling up when someone stops playing and gets on with some serious work?

    I also wonder, do SuperComputers run screensavers?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  40. watch out google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh lord, its worse than the email storage wars!!!

  41. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by Exos · · Score: 1


    Here's your M5 for you, right here.

    Entertainment science at it's finest.

  42. Japan is Part of "The West" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Let me help you out, Chinese bigot. The Japanese committed to Westernization back in 1881 and even changed the start of the New Year to coincide with the date of the New Year in the West. By contrast, the Chinese continue to cling to Lunar New Year.

    Japan is a modern democracy with civil rights. Citizenship in Japan is not based on race or blood. Ditto for the USA. Oriental Japanese who emigrate to the USA are viewed, by Japanese citizens, as foreigners. Oriental Chinese who emigrate to the USA are viewed, by Chinese citizens, as part of the extended Chinese motherland.

    The Japanese have a normal ratio of male babies to female babies. That ratio is 1.05. Ditto for the USA. The Chinese, the Koreans, and the Indians (the 3 barbaric bigots of Asia) have a ratio of 1.20.

    Chinese are barbaric animals and think like them, aborting female fetuses like there is no tomorrow.

    So, yes, Japan is a Western nation.

    1. Re:Japan is Part of "The West" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Japanese but looks like You never lived in Japan.

  43. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by blincoln · · Score: 1

    And why is this good news exactly?

    Obviously you never played through the expansion pack for Battlezone. Let the Chinese get into space and the next thing you know they'll be building cloaked, super-fast hover tanks that kick the crap out of the American units you thought were so powerful in the original game.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  44. My TFlops are bigger than your TFlops by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    Has it come down to this? A TFlops-size contest?

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  45. Re:skynet ~$ by 21chrisp · · Score: 0, Troll

    *ouch* didn't realize this was such a no-no

  46. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by nitrocloud · · Score: 0
    The good news is that the West (which includes the USA and Japan)
    West is a direction, if we were to speak of the western world, we assume west of a given point. If we talk about West relatively however (as looking at the included countries) we are all west of ourselves. This leads to a connundrum that leads that the most powerful supercomputer is always West from here.
    --
    Karma: Good, or bust!
  47. But.. by SnarfQuest · · Score: 5, Funny

    How well does it handle XP SP2?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:But.. by zackeller · · Score: 1

      On a related note, it is the first computer reported to be able to play DOOM3 at a playable framerate.

    2. Re:But.. by tool462 · · Score: 1

      Better than it would handle Longhorn. But we'll probably have a petaflop machine by the time that's released, so we should be fine.

  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Better to use Intel chips. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G5's are fine, they're like Intel's chips from 2 years ago.

    When I use Macs, the power is lacking compared to the high powered Intel and AMD machines.

  50. Re:Shall we get them out of the way now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll shoot:

    I for one welcome our new super computer overlords.

  51. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by scoobrs · · Score: 1
    IBM has already proved that American technology is, at least, as good as Japanese technology despite all the moans and groans about how we have fallen behind Japan upon the introduction of the Earth Simulator.
    And how many birthdays has the Earth simulator celebrated before IBM finally beat only its Linpack numbers with a low memory per CPU specialized solution? I think BlueGene still loses the HPC Challenge benchmarks. That isn't what I call winning.
    --
    -Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither. -Ben Franklin
  52. WOOHOO! by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    WooHoo! Just in time for Halo2/Half Life 2!!!

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  53. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    the West (which includes the USA and Japan)

    Traditionally, Japan has been considered part of the orient, while the USA has been lumped in the occident.

    I agree that dedicating supercomputer time to investigating new technologies is good.

    Low impact alternative energy sources to supplant existing technologies would be a good start.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  54. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by glgraca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So chinese and korean bigots consider themselves equal to americans, whose bigots, on the other hand, consider themselves superior to the rest of humanity.

  55. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bush could use one of these to write his speeches.

    65 TFlops of err, ummm, urrrr, mmmm, ahhhhs processed per second!

  56. DC systems have more TFLOPS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least FAH DC has more power than these "little" boxes:
    http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=o sstats
    (At the moment 196 TFLOPS sustained!)

  57. Enough raw power for AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't a prevailing AI theory that given enough raw power some sort of emergent complexity will emerge?

    1. Re:Enough raw power for AI? by TimothyTimothyTimoth · · Score: 1
      I know that Ray Kurzweil estimated that a scan of the human brain can be modelled, at a neuronal level, in real time, on a 20 petaflop (20,000 teraflop) computer. Current, neroscience would expect this model to be functionally equivalent to a human mind in terms of matching inputs and outputs.

      20 petaflops is due around 2009/10 under Moore's law. (And I for one offer an early welcome to our expected new AI overlords ...)

      --
      It doesn't matter which ape activates the Monolith
  58. NEC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run on Turbografx-16 style HuCards?

  59. And then we have google by notany · · Score: 1

    And then comes Google with its massively distributed Array of Inexpensive Reduntant Computers (AIRC) and uses all those giga flops to fetch p0rn links and pictures. I'm coming!

    How many flops is 100000 low cost PC:s?

    --
    Dyslexics have more fnu.
  60. NEC SX-8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure that's not a game console? Just look at that name!

  61. Inside the NEC SX-8 by xutopia · · Score: 1

    Two IBM's BlueGene/L.

  62. Re:65 TFlop is a good estimate! by Asdex · · Score: 1

    The SX8 uses a 90nm CPU clocked two times as high as the one used in the SX6 respective the erarth simulator. Taking into account all the additional improvements it's save to say the SX-8 will be twice as fast as the old one - so 65 TFlops seem reachable.

    For those interested in how vector processing compares with scalar processing in terms of absolute performance and computational efficience, this paper of Leonid Oliker et.al. is definetely worth reading:

    http://www.sc-conference.org/sc2004/schedule/pdfs/ pap247.pdf

  63. Name made me think of the SX microcontroller. by francisew · · Score: 1

    I was picturing a massively parallel array of little PDIP Ubicom SX microcontrollers, all running at 50 MIPS. http://www.ubicom.com/processors/sx-family.htm

    [begin silly] I don't know exactly what it'd take, but I'd think 50 8-bit operations might be able to handle most floating point operations.

    That'd mean each SX could handle 1 MFLOP... so we only need a million of them. At 3$ each... with radio-shack proto-boards... it would only cost around $10 million including assembly. [end silly]

    Note that they don't specify the bus width of the SX-8 system. Is it 32 or 64 bit? More?

  64. doom3 in VB by OlivierB · · Score: 1

    Cool,
    Now ID soft can release Doom3 written in VB! I bet this thing willl get close to 30 fps!

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
  65. SX-8? I'll wait... by CleverDan · · Score: 1

    ... until they come out with something better than the SX-64.

  66. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I suggest that NEC donate computing time on an SX-8 to all the startups designing spaceships (e.g. SpaceShipOne). These startups are short on cash and cannot afford the kind of supercomputer that is needed for modeling the spaceships.
    Did slashdot suffer a timewarp and send the message I'm replying to from 1974 to 2004?

    We have more than sufficient computer power on our desktops to do the maths needed for a designing something like SpaceShip One. What's killing the startups isn't lack of cash, but lack of experience (both individually and across the industry) needed to make valid and rational engineering tradeoffs. (Not to mention that they aren't building for a market, but in hope of a market, thus making the design/tradeoff process even harder. Nobody knows what to design *to*.)
  67. Re:65 TFlop is a good estimate! by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    also, each cpu has 7 times higher io bandwith...
    The 65Tflops estimate is for 512 8 cpu nodes, which less then earth simulators.
    Plus each of the cpus now has 16GFlops (and can archive it with that much memory bandwith it has), but uses less than half of the power of the old sx6.
    So a "earth simulator 2" with 65TFlops would have 20% less cpus and 60% less power consumption then the first.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  68. SX-8, hmmmm, nah..... by Sand_Man · · Score: 1

    ...I'll wait for the DX version to come out, those SXs have the math coprocessor disabled.

  69. Once you open the case it is rather disappointing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it contains is 65 PS3s. %$#@!!! game consoles.

  70. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The short list is matter-antimatter energy (which is undergoing top secret research in the American government)

    It's not top-secret if a computer geek knows about it.

  71. Aha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I know why IBM vastly under-reported the Blue Gene numbers. I'm betting IBM formally reports the real ones that seriously trounce NEC at Supercomputing 2004.

  72. But... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    ...you'd really want more than four if you were going to make a half-decent beowulf cluster of these things.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  73. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by thesilverbail · · Score: 1

    This is good news to all those who aspire to emigrate to the "West" from the third world via university admissions (you know, the F1, H1, GC route). Ah of course, because us third worlder's would rather travel half way across the world, forsaking family and friends, to obtain the education and professionaly opportunities from the west we would never have otherwise; rather than staying around to get it on our our own countries if that were possible. BTW, happy "Apping". Thanks but I've already got into one your "prestigous" universities, and with my other third world cohorts, we're eating away at it from the inside.

    --
    I have found a truly wonderful proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, but unfortunately this sig is too small to contain it.
  74. They've built Data! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    65 TFlops - compares with Data from Trek:TNG:
    http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Dat abase/Query -ST.php?EpName=The%20Measure%20of%20a%20Man
    (Now, let's hope it doesn't also have an evil twin...)

  75. Needs a better version number... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SX is better than C, but 64 is better than 8.

    Really, what's wrong with giving the damn thing a name?

  76. Linpack means nothing.. by valdyn · · Score: 1

    when comparing 2 totally different architectures:
    Blue Gene/L ( power pc-440 cpu vs Earth Simulator ( sx6 ) cpu.

    Memory Latency: 7 microsec vs 2 microsec.
    Memory Bandwidth: 1.4 GByte/sec vs 5 GByte/sec per node
    Register size: 64Bit? vs 16Kbit ( 16 Thousand Bit! ).
    -> There's certainly cases where one 1 BlueGene/L TFlop ~ 1 B Earth Simulator TFlop, but for plenty stuff Earth Simulator will always outperform BlueGene/L, even if it gets cranked up to 360 TFlop.
    ( Data taken from the latest CT journal from www.heise.de )

  77. Apples vs. pears by lnixon · · Score: 1

    You can't compare those figures. The 65 Tflops is estimated peak speed, the 36 Tflops is measured sustained speed on LINPACK.

  78. Re:NEC SX-8: Predecessor of M-5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, that stung didn't it ? You still haven't answered the basic question - why do most of you hang around here after your grad studies are over ? I also know about the tall tales you guys normally come up with to "prove" to the immigration officials that you's actually go back home ?

    What's the deal with "Eating away" anyway ? If this is your attitude toward education, then it's a lost cause anyway.

    Why are you trying to come to the US again ? ofh yeah, lack of "opportunities" back home - right. So you still are a potential economic immigrant who are selling out your homeland for a few bucks.

    And you ask "why should the west not have the best of technologies ?"

    That's because we still get most of the third world grad students who would sell their own mothers for a buck, thats's why. Deal with it.