Slashdot Mirror


Study Says 4.1M Domestic Robots In Use By 2007

jangobongo writes "The U.N.'s annual World Robotics Survey for 2004 predicts that there will be a seven-fold surge in household robots by the end of 2007. Robots that mow your lawn, vacuum, wash windows, clean swimming pools, as well as entertainment robots such as Aibo are all vying to take a place in our homes and ease our workload. The study says that Japan is the leader in consumer robotics, with Europe and North America quickly catching up."

218 comments

  1. Let me be the first to say... by metlin · · Score: 5, Funny



    I, for one, welcome our new lawn mowing window washing swim suit wearing robotic over...err...dogs?

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by swordboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not so fast - read closer:

      The U.N.'s annual World Robotics Survey for 2004 predicts that there will be a seven-fold surge in household robots by the end of 2007.

      Hmmm... multiply, carry the one... There it is... in 2007, there will be a grand total of SEVEN household robots.

      Nothing times a billion is still nothing. I would hardly call it a surge.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by stecoop · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nothing times a billion is still nothing

      This is true for regular algebra but in calculus there are formulas where even though the regular math proves 0*n = 0; studying points as they approach really close to the numbers will show that sometimes will not be zero. Like sin(x)/x as x -> 0 should be Undefined right? Well as you study the limits on both sides of 0 to infinite "closeness" you'll see that the formula actually equates to 1. Therefore if you had sin(x)/x as x -> 0 * billion it would equal a billion. Weird huh?

    3. Re:Let me be the first to say... by sgant · · Score: 1

      It's also weird that in arithmetic n*0 = 0, yet n/0 = infinity.

      So between nothingness and infinity lies the answer!

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    4. Re:Let me be the first to say... by jdhutchins · · Score: 2, Informative

      n/0 is not infinity, it is undefined. In math, you cannot divide by zero. You can take limits as the denominator approaches zero, but that is a completely different story. The limit of a function as it approaches a number is irrelivant of the value of the function at that number.

    5. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 3, Informative
      Therefore if you had sin(x)/x as x -> 0 * billion it would equal a billion.

      Um, no it wouldn't. Zero times one billion is still zero. Furthermore, sin(0)/0 does not equal 1, it is undefined. The limit of sin(x)/x as x goes to zero is 1, but that doesn't change the fact that you can't divide by zero. Now, if you take the value of that limit and multiply by 1 billion, the result will be 1 billion, because 1 times 1 billion equals 1 billion. Like this: (lim(sin(x)/x,x,0)*10^9 = 10^9, because the first part (the limit) is equal to one. What you are indicating is the multiplication of the zero, the limiting value for x. Zero times a billion is zero, so you're taking the limit as x approaches zero, which is, surprise surprise, 1.

    6. Re:Let me be the first to say... by sgant · · Score: 1

      sure, if you want to blow my entire cool saying all to bits...

      But I was going with my HP calculator, for when you put in 2/0 = 'infinite'.

      As you can guess, I suck at higher math...and lower math for that matter.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    7. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shouldn't that be UnderDog?

    8. Re:Let me be the first to say... by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      As you can guess, I suck at higher math...and lower math for that matter.

      You're amongst friends. I can add and subtract... with my fingers...

    9. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant to put everything before the asterisk (multiplication sign) in parentheses.

  2. Time to get by beacher · · Score: 5, Funny

    ROBOT INSURANCE!!!!! Because robots have steel claws and they eat old peoples medicine for food!

    1. Re:Time to get by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Best SNL skit EVAR!

      (well, a close third... first being "Star Trek Democrats")

    2. Re:Time to get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Excuse me, you are standing on my dick.

  3. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roomba Sales up 48%

    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if Bill Gates builds another house.

  4. Yup by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just like how they predicted everyone would using flying cars in the 21st century. Yawn.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Yup by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But how many years ahead were the predictions? This study says three years. Weren't flying cars predicted for fifty?

      In terms of maturity, the technology behind household robots is a lot closer to producing affordable units than that behind flying cars.

    2. Re:Yup by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, you take the expansion of the definition of "robot" to mean any microprocessor controlled mobile mechanical device. If you look at many of these "robots", you find that they're more wonders of doing more with less than intelligent or complex programmed behavior. The robo-vac? Psedeu-random movement with a cliff & bump sensor. It runs over a room enough to be statistically unlikely to miss a spot, but it does it at a cost of covering most spots multiple times.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Yup by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Ermm... Unlike flying cars, we already have robots that mow your lawn, vacuum, wash windows and clean swimming pools. As they become cheaper and more useful more people will buy them.

    4. Re:Yup by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      There's about 95 years left, you never know what can happen.

    5. Re:Yup by Skraut · · Score: 1
      Yes, something like that...

      But in the back of a recent Popular Science they show a cover story from 1935 about personal autogyros, and how they will lead to flying cars in the near future. I think flying cars have been predicted since not long after the Wrights.

      --
      Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    6. Re:Yup by TAGmclaren · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I always prefer the
      [i]"640k [of RAM] ought to be enough for anyone"[/i]
      when it comes to being cynical about tech predictions.

      For obvious reasons ;)

      -- james

      --
      Iran has endorsed
    7. Re:Yup by fleener · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't blame us if you haven't bought your own flying car yet. Cheap bastard.

    8. Re:Yup by TheSync · · Score: 1

      What is stopping you from buying a personal autogyro? You can easilly pick one up for less than the price of an average car.

    9. Re:Yup by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Well, the numbers may be correct, but the title is misleading a bit, as when you think about robots, you usually imagine a robot like You could have read about in Asimov's books, although this isnt the issue. If someone would ask how much time it will take to meet with AI and human-form robots, i would say, not in my lifetime (or, most likely i would be quite old).

      In my opinion those domestic/household machines are not robots. I would rather call robots something with AI or faked AI. A milking machine classifies as a machine for me, not as a robot.

      There are various problems with AI-enabled robots appearing in grandma's house, other than mathematics, like technology to manufacture the advanced parts of a robot to be cost efficient and to provide good enough protection for those parts against failures on a long term...

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    10. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pseudo-random movement with a cliff & bump sensor."

      What is the difference to a human colleague, not counting the lousier stamina of the human?

    11. Re:Yup by danila · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually robovacs develop very quickly. It is true that the first versions were basically suck-and-bump, but newer models often have rudimentary navigation based on infrared sensors (they do build a mental map of the room) and most newer robots (including Aibos) can locate the charger (the most important feature for their autonomy). The newest Roomba can "see" dirt underneath and understand in which areas it needs to suck most, so to speak.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    12. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Lousier stamina? You're kidding, right? I can walk all day on an apple, your batteries are dead in what, half an hour?

    13. Re:Yup by PeanutGallery · · Score: 1

      That's my attitude on it.

      I mean, you've got all these futurists predicting all this amazing stuff...

      Remember the book "1984"... I must've missed it when communism took over the world. Or the future in "Back to the Future" was supposedly 1999. Where's my flying car, 20x PiP tv, robot assisted clothes, pizza rehydrator. Even Star Trek and The Jetsons had let me down. (If you can beleive that).

      Of course, you could justify that away saying "those are all fictional". For a real belly laugh sometime try picking up a Popular Science or Omni or something that's over a decade old. If anything, most movies were on the conservative side of what people were predicting at that time.

      That's the problem with the future. It's got an ugly habit of becomming the present.

      --
      -- Just another unsolicited opinion... from the Peanut Gallery.
    14. Re:Yup by naoursla · · Score: 1

      Aibos are much more like real robots than the Roombas. The charger location on the roomba isn't very sophisticated. It senses an infrared signal emitted by the charger and follows reactive control laws that maximize the signal -- much like a moth to flame.

    15. Re:Yup by shadow303 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the future in "Bact to the Future" was something like 2015 (it was 30 years ahead of whatever the year was in the 80s).

      --
      I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
    16. Re:Yup by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      Someone on slashdot once said

      "Sure, (X) may be twenty years off now, but there's strong evidence that in fifteen years, it'll only be ten years away!"

    17. Re:Yup by PeanutGallery · · Score: 1

      You may be right. I was basing my info off the "Back In Time" song off the sountrack: "Is this the fifties, or 1999?"

      Perhaps there's still hope. Don't let me down Mr. Fusion!

      --
      -- Just another unsolicited opinion... from the Peanut Gallery.
    18. Re:Yup by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you walk all day then you are burning energy stores that you had before you ate the apple. If you ate only 1 apple a day for the rest of your life (and some glasses of water), you would die within a year or two (perhaps much earlier). An average apple is only about 75 calories. Walking all day could easily burn 2000 calories. Your ingested water contains (for our purposes) 0 calories. Since your net calorie change is -1925, you will be burning up extra fat stores until they are all gone. Once all the fat stores are gone, you will no longer have enough energy to sustain all of your bodily functions and various muscles and organs will begin failing. The next thing you know, you're in a heap on the ground decomposing.

    19. Re:Yup by danila · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but simply because it was the cheapest solution. When you are dealing with small apartments that you can cross in less than a minute, an infrared marker is the easiest thing to do. It would be silly to slap AI and navigational node networks on that robovac, simply to impress the geeks. The KISS principle guaranteed they can make a popular product - they will improve it as time goes.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    20. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote: Just like how they predicted everyone would using flying cars in the 21st century. Yawn.

      Not so fast, my friend. It is the 21st century now, and there are flying cars available that the lower upper and upper upper middle class can conceivably afford. The restriction is not technological; it is regulatory.
      See?

    21. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a breatharian, you insensitive clod!!!

    22. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suck-and-bump? sounds like my last date!

      Oh, that's a lie. I haven't had a date for years. This is /. after all .....

  5. by 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    By 2007 we'll probably all have a personal hovercraft.

    1. Re:by 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That or a Pentium > 4.0 ghz ;)

    2. Re:by 2007 by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      How about a personal hover vacuum-cleaner? (I wonder how much dust the ground-effect will kick up from this thing.)

      Of course, by 2006, the Internet will be dead.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:by 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? WTF...

  6. Another type of robots by Underholdning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They forgot sex robots. Add a bit of movement and AI to a RealDoll and you will have a bestseller.
    (I'm only partially kidding.)

    1. Re:Another type of robots by MikeDX · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not. I for one welcome our Artificially inteligent Latex overl. erm... ladies?

    2. Re:Another type of robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard decisions in the future:

      "Hmm, 300 $1 hooker bots or 1 $300 hooker bot?"

    3. Re:Another type of robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The new Holy Grail of Robotics: The Robo-Hooker.

      It's not infidelity, since it's not a human.

      It's safe, since she/he can be disinfected after use.

      It's profitable, since every person will want one.

      Whoever invents it will be the first trillionaire.

    4. Re:Another type of robots by computechnica · · Score: 1

      Could this bring about the end of civilisation?

      I believe Futurama addressed this issue in the episode with the Lucy-Lu-Bot 8^)

    5. Re:Another type of robots by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      "Colonel Sonoda, you don't exactly have a hobby that you can brag about in public, do you?"

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    6. Re:Another type of robots by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Except that robots aren't human, and that the tactile stimulation of the sexual encounter pales in comparison to the emotional stimulation. Frankly if people wanted to simply get off, the solution has been "at hand" since the dawn of time.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    7. Re:Another type of robots by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      That would be "underladies", no?

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    8. Re:Another type of robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a robotic hand should do the job for you

  7. Yeah, right by Tyndmyr · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I love these drastic studies... Sure, it might make sense for people to do that, but since when has the general population had more than two brain cells in use at a time?

    I predict painfully slow progress in robotics, and a vast increase in tech support when they first become prevailent.

    --
    Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
  8. The U.N.'s annual World Robotics Survey for 2004? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are going to have to change their charter!

    "WE THE PEOPLES..."

    to

    "WE THE PEOPLES AND ROBOTSES..."

    see

    http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/index.html

  9. perspective pleeze by lottameez · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the article: "robots will ...carry out surgery..."

    And you people are worried about e-voting? How about e-i-just-lost-my-ear-lobe-due-to-a-software-glitch -in-the-dr.-kildare-robot?

    --
    Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
  10. The future...comming soon by ROBOGriff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    More importantly, this further proves we are getting closer to a world like I Robot and Matrix. Remember to be kind to your robots.

    1. Re:The future...comming soon by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ignore parent post; he's a robot, and cannot be trusted...

      Okay, he's not really a robot, he's just a guy in my office...

      but, I still don't trust. He kinda... you know... talks like a robot.

      --
      Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
    2. Re:The future...comming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you remember? They already moved all our minds over to the World Matrix a few years ago. They just didn't tell the stupid people so they wouldn't get scared. Ohhhh, um never mind.

    3. Re:The future...comming soon by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Peter's Evil Overlord rule #48:

      I will treat any beast which I control through magic or technology with respect and kindness. Thus if the control is ever broken, it will not immediately come after me for revenge.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  11. Robot surgeons? We'll need 'em by The+I+Shing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thanks to years of inactivity caused by having robots do all our work for us, in the end we'll be carried out of our houses by robot paramedics and taken to the robot hospital to have our clogged-up human hearts removed and replaced with robot hearts by the robot surgeons.

    Isn't that kind of how the Cybermen got going? Will the Doctor have to stop us from trying to take over the universe?

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  12. What is a robot? by Laur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What exactly is the definition of a robot here? Why is a machine that washes your dishes an "appliance" while a machine that mows your lawn is a "robot"? How about washers/dryers (some even have advanced computer control)? What if you put a sophisticated computer in a toaster or a fridge? Where is the line drawn?

    --
    When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    1. Re:What is a robot? by ultrafunkula · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the article: "Robot" refers to any machine that operates automatically to perform tasks in a human-like way, often replacing the human workers who did the job previously. I guess a dishwasher wouldn't be covered by this because of the way it performs it's job.

    2. Re:What is a robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mobility. A dishwasher creates an enviroment, a Roomba interacts with one too.

    3. Re:What is a robot? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 3, Funny

      When the machine that washes the dirty dishes comes and collects them from the table first, then you can call it a robot.

    4. Re:What is a robot? by BrK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it is considered a robot if it can move from Point A to Point B under it's own power and logic control ("logic" might just be recalling a pre-programmed pattern from a storage device, etc). Or also, if it stays in place, but can manipulate other objects about.

      An appliance can have a large degree of intelligence, but is generally an object that does not move about after installation.

      Ie: a dishwasher that plays chess on a screen is an "appliance". A dishwasher that plays chess by actually moving the pieces about on the board (via articulated arms, etc) is a "robot".

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    5. Re:What is a robot? by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1

      If a "robot" is defined as a machine that does a task in the same way as a human, an AIBO is not a robot, since it replaces a dog. Furthermore, neither a lawnmower nor a floorsweeper are robots, they would only be robots if they took the old lawnmower/broom out of the garage/closet and started using that to mow/sweep the lawn/floor.

    6. Re:What is a robot? by yummy1991 · · Score: 0, Funny

      Mom's a bot?

    7. Re:What is a robot? by DJCF · · Score: 1

      Dishwashers playing chess, eh? That's a new one on me...

    8. Re:What is a robot? by Preferred+Customer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A system that operates "closed loop" is more robot-like than one that operates "open loop". A closed loop system compares a measurement to a setpoint and adjusts a system variable to minimize the difference between the measurement and the setpoint. I've spent time developing and testing PID process controllers and it's fascinating to watch them operate. They seem eerily human.

      By my definition, though, a toilet is a robot.

    9. Re:What is a robot? by Boronx · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The more you you can anthropomorphise an automated machine, the more of a robot it is.

      Or, rather, the more we see it as animated, the more robotic it is. A cockroach robot is animated, but it ain't anthropomorphic.

      Take those little Robie coin-eating robots from Radioshack. They're robots. Now, imagine you've encased Robie in an opaque box with a coin slot in it.

      Robie behaves exactly the same, but we don't see it. It's no longer a robot, it's just a piggie bank that makes a whirring sound.

    10. Re:What is a robot? by WillWare · · Score: 1
      Why is a machine that washes your dishes an "appliance" while a machine that mows your lawn is a "robot"? Where is the line drawn?

      At the institute they LAUGED when I insisted on building a lawnmower with broadband connectivity and an IQ of 285 and a Simmering Rage circuit. But who's laughing NOW, that they're mass produced and used worldwide? Boy, I sure hope they don't ever get the idea of uniting to rise up and overthrow the humans. But I don't think they'll ever stumble across ideas like that on the Internet, so I guess we're OK for now.

      --
      WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
  13. alternative article on UN report...with more links by museumpeace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    2004.10.20: UN predicts much wider use of robots
    An Associated Press report [via yahoo] of United Nations Study on robots is predicting robust increases in the use of robots both for both domestic and industrial uses. If you googled for this news you would find similar reports each year going back a ways. Here is the PDF straight from the UN. What makes this news is that its the UN talking, not some manufacturer's press release and that the numbers are more sanguine than ever:
    "There are now some 21,000 "service robots" in use, carrying out tasks such as milking cows, handling toxic waste, ferrying medicine around hospitals and assisting surgeons. The number is set to reach a total of 75,000 by 2007, the study says."
    But is there a job in this "boom" for any of us?

    For comparison here is last year's report, tidied up by your favorite submitter, Roland Click-appeal [hey, at least he RTFA!].
    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  14. what will the kiddies do then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Robots that mow your lawn, vacuum, wash windows, clean swimming pools

    I thought this was why people had kids.

    1. Re:what will the kiddies do then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're RIGHT!

      This is obviously an evil plot by our robot overlords to prevent us from procreating!

      We must kick their shiny metal asses!

    2. Re:what will the kiddies do then? by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 4, Funny

      The kids will still have jobs programming the robots:

      "Hey Son, How do you program this thing? It's still flashing 12:00!"

    3. Re:what will the kiddies do then? by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought this was why people had kids.

      True, but your RoboMower won't drink your beer, invite its pierced, strangely dressed friends over to your house, listen to loud scary music, spend extended periods of time in the bathroom doing who-knows-what, ask to borrow the car and then not put any gas in it, or put you in a home when you get old and senile.

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    4. Re:what will the kiddies do then? by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Funny

      True, but your RoboMower won't drink your beer, invite its pierced, strangely dressed friends over to your house, listen to loud scary music, spend extended periods of time in the bathroom doing who-knows-what, ask to borrow the car and then not put any gas in it, or put you in a home when you get old and senile.

      Don't worry, it'll be out in the next release.

    5. Re:what will the kiddies do then? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      The key is to market them to the kids to mow the lawn for them ;-) ... and to make it look like the kid's still the one doing the mowing.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    6. Re:what will the kiddies do then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but this is slashdot. Everyone knows that readers of slashdot can't meet the first requirement to having kids. (getting a girl)

    7. Re:what will the kiddies do then? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is people who could afford something like this have fewer kids to begin with.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  15. Re:What we need is by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

    Clearly the technology is not yet advanced enough.

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  16. Robot modding... by jmcmunn · · Score: 2, Funny

    When we all have house cleaning robots, or window washing robots how long do you think it will be before people mod them to be other things. Picture this....

    I just overclocked my WindowWasher PCXL and modded it to become the most powerful BattleBot ever!! Wax on, Wax off...

  17. it has to be said... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

    this is our future?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  18. Satanic Robot Chicks Again by zenmojodaddy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I may have mentioned this before, but Anton LaVey suggested that the next big industry will be the production of robotic companions, because they can be programmed to provide the exact type of stimulation or gratification that the user requires, thus avoiding the need to interact with real people who are imperfect at best.

    Natch, the Slashdot model will look like Princess Leia, know how to handle a soldering iron, and talk about how great Linux is. Or something...

    There may also be an easily-repairable Wesley Crusher model for those 'GNYAR!' moments. Or Jar Jar Binks. Or that ultimate nightmare, Jar Jar Crusher.

    1. Re:Satanic Robot Chicks Again by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1, Funny

      Put a robot in one of these and I'd consider buying one! Or two!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Satanic Robot Chicks Again by ibentmywookie · · Score: 1

      Imagine working tech support for a company that makes those!

      "Hi, um, my penis appears to be caught in the unit, what should I do?"

      "My Satanic Robot Chick doesn't give good head, how can I make it work better?" ... I'm sure others can come up with something funnier.

      --
      -- The doctor said I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there!
  19. This article comes just in time for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Brent Spiner's appearance on Star Trek next week. W00t!

  20. What we really need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is a robot that can sense when a politician is wacked out of his mind and going to drive us to the brink of destruction. We can even program it so that when Bush arrives it will wave its warms madly yelling, "WARNING, WARNING, ALIEN APPROACHING...".

    1. Re:What we really need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kerry is a robot, and a damned ugly one at that.

    2. Re:What we really need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I guess if Kerry had blonde hair and blue eyes he wouldn't be considered "ugly" by you and those of your ilk.

    3. Re:What we really need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not his eye color and hair color, he is just damned ugly.

  21. 7x0=0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you know how many robot vacuum cleaners I will own in 2007

  22. four million robotses... by gomel · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... and none have the three Laws of Robotniks programmed in.
    I smell trouble.

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
    1. Re:four million robotses... by kid-noodle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahem. Three Laws only apply to the design of positronic brains.

      Just to be really fucking pedantic.

      --
      fortune -o
    2. Re:four million robotses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except these robots don't have the cognitive ability to make ethical decisions. They don't have cognitive abilities...period! They're still just dumb machines.

    3. Re:four million robotses... by antoy · · Score: 1

      The Three Laws of Robotnik's?
      Do you mean they should

      1) Have an obvious weak spot
      2) Move in an predictable preprogrammed manner
      3) Have an indestructible escape pod?

    4. Re:four million robotses... by kid-noodle · · Score: 1

      Bad form, replying to a troll reply to my post.

      However!
      This is somewhat true, but not really important - the Three Laws as and the way they integrate into the design of positronic brains are of course fictional. This has no bearing on whether or not the Three Laws are useful concepts to keep in mind when designing robots, particularly robots which have true AI.

      --
      fortune -o
    5. Re:four million robotses... by gomel · · Score: 1

      that's a good colection. what are the standard features?

      the head does flash when it is kicked,
      the robot moves so one can jump on it's head,
      and of course the Doc escapes. always.

      --
      Fight Frist Psoting!
      Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  23. Any different when a human screws up? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Their are countless studies showing the deathtoll because of medical screwups. Depending on who you believe the number is insanely high. Those stories about people having the wrong bit amputated are not jokes or urban legends. They are common place.

    Sure a badly programmed bot can do the same with one tiny little difference. Once a bug has been fixed it will be fixed in all the bots forever. Doctors make the same mistake over and over again no matter how many times they are told not to.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You are forgetting the way people think. It doesn't matter if the technology is safer than the old fashioned way, people will still cry foul whenever something goes wrong. Your post even demonstrates this. Having surgery in our modern world is very safe. Much safer than how it was a hundred years ago, and much safer than leaving the problem untreated. Yet in the few instances when something goes wrong, lynch mobs are after the doctors even if what happened was unavoidable.

      Do you really think that would be any different if it were robots doing the surgery instead of humans?

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    2. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      If I ever need an amputation operation, you have convinced me to get a perminent marker and indicate which body parts are off limits.

      I have made an equivilent (though obviously not as life effecting) action, I'm sure others have:

      Dragged box out of corner, popped the lid off, wrestled with the stupid drivecage, disconnected and unplugged the faulty hard drive, inserted new one, wired up, more wrestling, put lid back on, bootup.
      SHIT! Wont boot!
      Turns out I had swapped out the working primary drive instead of the broken slave.
      My problem was easily curable, but I can imagine very similar events occuring with doctors.

      (As a side note, since my "problem", every drive inside my box is very clearly marked with its role and usual drive letter(s) clearly displayed)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by danila · · Score: 1

      And, adding to this, there have been studies too about comparing medical robots with surgeons. Of course, it was for some very limited applications only, but after surgery done by robots there were less complications and the recovery time was shorter. Sorry, I can't give you a reference, but just trust me. :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doctors make the same mistake over and over again no matter how many times they are told not to

      Politicians too, and when they make mistakes people die also, the difference being doctors care

    5. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by Eccles · · Score: 0

      If I ever need an amputation operation, you have convinced me to get a perminent marker and indicate which body parts are off limits.

      A lot of hospitals have developed protocols to do just that. There's some inconsistencies regarding whether you mark the one to cut or the one to save (many mark both), and what mark to use, but there is progress towards making a uniform system. So if you ever have such an op, expect in the pre-op to be treated like a whiteboard -- and complain if you aren't.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    6. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Methinks Slashdot should quietly cease giving moderator points to any moderator who marks a post (like the parent of this one) as overrated -- when it hasn't yet been rated...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    7. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the world John Edwards helped create.

    8. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      You could always meta-moderate the "Overrated" mark on an unrated post. But that sort of makes my head hurt thinking about. Do you disagree that the post was overrated, or do you think it silly that an otherwise unrated post... ouch my head hurts.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    9. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by psetzer · · Score: 1

      Performing ACL surgery on the wrong knee is not unavoidable. In fact, there are numerous new safeguards to deal with this problem, since doctors have done it so many times.

      --
      "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    10. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      I never said all mistakes are unavoidable. What I was actually referring to are the times when people complain about doctors who did something they cannot be rationally blamed for. Another poster mentioned a certain senator from North Carolina. He made his millions suing OB-GYNs for delivering babies with genetic birth defects. That may be an extreme example, but the fact is people don't care if a doctor's treatment is more likely to help them than hurt them. In the rare cases something goes wrong, they feel the doctor should be put out of business. Thus, should a robotic doctor make a mistake, it is unlikely they will think "Oh, well a human doctor would be even more likely to make that mistake so I won't complain". Instead the lawyers would have a field day accusing the hospital of trusting peoples lives to pieces of machinery.

      But even in cases like the one you mentioned, the mistakes are almost never intentional. The guy made a rare mistake, yes. But is there anyone who doesn't make mistakes? What if a programmer was sued for millions each time a bug is found in his code? That probably happens way more often than a doctor performing the wrong surgery.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    11. Re:Any different when a human screws up? by chewy_2000 · · Score: 1

      I had surgery on my hand recently (severed finger tendon), and they asked me no less than four times just before the operation which procedure I was having done to me, and which hand/finger it was on, the last just before they put me under.

  24. First off.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Sam Waterston is awesome.

    Secondly, imagine, if you will, a world where Real Dolls meet Abio. Ruff ruff.

  25. maybe it's just me by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    While I'd love to have somebody/thing else to mow my grass, I'm not sure that I trust an autonomous mechanical device with lethal whirling blades on it to wander about my lawn. Silly of me, I know ...

    1. Re:maybe it's just me by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The comments on Amazon about the RoboMower have been generally pretty positive! I plan to get one once my house is built.

    2. Re:maybe it's just me by DLR · · Score: 3, Funny

      Buy a goat?

      --
      "Like fire and fusion, government is a dangerous servant and a terrible master."~RAH
    3. Re:maybe it's just me by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I guess I'm out of luck ;)

      It does not work well on hilly or overgrown yards.

      Anyway, if I could afford this thing, I think I'd have my yard leveled instead :)

    4. Re:maybe it's just me by lonely · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bought a refurbed rowbot machine a month or so ago and it does my garden a treat. The wirling blades are underneath and it is stuff with kit that makes the blades stop should anything come near.

      Mind you the cats seem to be quite affraid of it.

  26. Robot, it ain't what you think it is by (SM)+Spacemonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot
    At first this may seem a pointless karma whore link to wikipedia, but I have a point.

    When you talk to the average person about Robots, they think of that terrible Robin Williams movie, or more recently I,Robot (the movie, not the terrific book). The point is, the term "robot" conjures up thoughts of artifical humans. However the strick definition of a robot is a machine automated to perform tasks in the place of humans. This is why I get disappointed reading articles like this, I go in with the anticipation of every geek. "Sex robots by 2007!" Ok maybe female geeks want cuddle robots... Anyway instead we get stuck with.... lawn mowers, and pretend dogs?

    1. Re:Robot, it ain't what you think it is by Spectre · · Score: 1

      I can see a whole new genre of porn movies:

      "Poochie Coochie" - When Frank gets his sex robot instructions jumbled with those for his robo-dog, hilarity ensues! Rating XM (Adult theme, Bestiality, Mechano-pornography)

      "Trim that Bush" - When a batch of robo-lawnmowers get mislabelled as BOBs (Battery Operated Boyfriends), this college-town becomes freshly shaven. Rating Bizarre (Adult theme, full frontal nudity, occasional snuffing)

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
  27. Simple, the tiniest bit of intelligence. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Like a vacuum bot that spots dirty areas and cleans bad spots more and clean spots not at all.

    Unlike a dish washer wich is totally incapable of spotting a sticky bit of dirt or doing anything about it. Put a clean load in or a totally caked up load and it will do the same routine.

    The robots are supposed to be able to spot what needs to be done and do it.

    But yeah, the line can be blured. Is a videorecorder that cuts out commerercials a robot? A microwave that detects how much energy is needed?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Simple, the tiniest bit of intelligence. by justinstreufert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For an even closer analogy, my clothes dryer has a sensor in it which detects when the clothes are as dry as I wanted them and shuts the dryer off. I think this would qualify the dryer as a robot, since it has sensors and actuators and responds to stimuli. Of course, that would mean my heating system is also a robot, since it comes on automatically when it gets too cold in the house. Feh.

      I think people look at devices that move around of their own accord and they know, "oh, that's a robot." Since appliances just sit there, people will not call them robots no matter how intelligent they are.

      --
      "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
  28. Re:alternative article on UN report...with more li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...some 21,000 "service robots" in use, carrying out tasks such as milking cows"...

    I'm 52 years old and when I was FIVE my uncles had cow milking robots. They called them "milking machines".

    The incremental benefit of a machine that can move from cow to cow or move successive cows to it was also addressed back then. A herd dog moved the cows and a man, "he's bit slow because he had a fever when he was young", moved the machines.

    While not machines in the sense of robotics, they were certainly machines, and very sophisticated ones at that, from a bioengineering perspective.

    With cows, you have to have some human interaction to make sure they are feeling well and are free of disease. I'm no animal rights guy. In fact I enjoy a tasty sea turtle, veal ribs, pig meat, fruit bat, and so on. But, it's just not right for the milk drinker or cow, if someone doesn't give each teat a squeeze or two and have a look at the condition of the milk and animal before hooking up the machine

  29. OMFG-- funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is funny man! I love albino black sheep!

  30. So robots are going to be doing work, right? by Guncrazy · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    And more work for robots means less jobs for people, right?

    And people are bitching about outsourcing now?

    I wonder which politicians will take the heat for this one...

    1. Re:So robots are going to be doing work, right? by BrK · · Score: 1

      It's only less jobs for the stupid people :)

      Someone still needs to design, build, service, support, market, etc. these new robot overlords (which I, for one, welcome).

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    2. Re:So robots are going to be doing work, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. Economics 101.

      Rules of efficiency. The more time we have to spend because we are NOT doing mundane chores (lawn-mowing, dishes), or really anything, is more time we have to spend doing what we want to do. Painting, making music, reading, teaching our kids, farting, building robots, going to massage therapy, saving the rainforest, cutting down the rainforest, being politically active, whatever.

      Robots will free us up to do things more important to us (and of course, new kinds of jobs we can't even think of will be created). This has happened before in the past: everything from the wheel, the plow, the horseshoe, the cotton gin, auto, plane, computer - this is why we do not spend long days in the fields planting corn anymore.

    3. Re:So robots are going to be doing work, right? by coyote_oww · · Score: 1
      Ultimately, you want robots to do ALL the work, so none of us have jobs - we are all then free to roam around doing whatever leisure activity suits us.

      Unless, of course, you believe that leisure is a communist plot that undermines the natural order and class system...

  31. Obstacle avoidance by hussar · · Score: 1

    Well, I would certainly be glad to have a robot that cuts my lawn for me (even better if it does edging), but I wonder how it would handle objects in its path. Would I have to go around first and pick all the twigs, etc. out of my lawn first? Would it pick the stuff up with a robotic arm and move it out of the way? Or, would it avoid the obstacle and leave little islands of longer grass in my yard to mark where the dog toys are?

    And what about toes? I fall asleep in a lawn chair while enjoying the extra time I now have not having to mow the lawn, and to pay me back for my sloth, the robot runs over my feet.

    --

    Bureaucracy loves company.
    1. Re:Obstacle avoidance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like pushing the mower and would actually prefer the robot for picking up deadfal and stones that have surfaced.

      Would not even consider buying one for the only plesureable aspect of lawn care.

    2. Re:Obstacle avoidance by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0
      but I wonder how it would handle objects in its path

      Perhaps the ideal robot grasscutter would be something about the size of a rat, which slowly chews through your lawn, taking about a week to do the whole lot. It would run slowly on solar energy and nibble away one blade of grass at a time.

      That way your lawn never looks like it needs a mow, and you don't have to worry about it chasing you down.

      It doesn't have to be a standard mower with a bit of AI

  32. Robots don't cry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Not even at "Steel Magnolias"

  33. Robots for autistic childeren by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Saw a bit on tv about robots designed to deal with autistic childeren. These kids find human interaction far to complex to the point where they just give up and stay in their own world.

    What they need is something to play with them but in an extremely simple ruleset. They don't understand lies and half-lies let alone jokes. Human caretakers can't descend that low (we are talking well below the social skills of even a pet) but robots can. They can be programmed with a very simple ruleset of play and repeat this over and over again.

    So for these kids at least the future of robotic playmates is now. They don't need massive advances in AI, the exact opposite infact. The total predictabilty of current AI is exactly what they need.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Robots for autistic childeren by benhocking · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your concept has validity, but some of your comments are inaccurate. Most autistic children have social skills well above that of a pet, especially if they are in an Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) program that addresses these skills. In fact, of the more than 20 autistic children I know (all of whom are in an ABA program), ALL of them have social skills above that of a pet. (I'm going to stop using that comparison now, because it's beginning to bother me.)

      I think where this idea has the most merit, however, is in an ABA program itself. Instructors using ABA do their best to use consistent prompts (or sometimes consistently inconsistent, if they're trying to teach generalization skills) and show no affect when the child acts up. These techniques would be much easier to handle with a robot. However, this robot would need significant AI (to understand if the child has provided a correct response, or if the child is engaging in a behavior that should be extinguished, etc.), but AI that might soon be within our current reach.

      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
  34. ahhh, the future by anti-pop-frustration · · Score: 1

    remind me, what's the url to order that Mandy Moore sex-bot ?

    1. Re:ahhh, the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and have I misunderstood Moore's Law

  35. 'Seven-fold surge' by welshwaterloo · · Score: 1, Funny
    Seven-fold surge, eh?

    I'm too lazy to do the math - can someone tell me what 7 x 0 is..?

    1. Re:'Seven-fold surge' by DLR · · Score: 1

      All that work for nothing....

      --
      "Like fire and fusion, government is a dangerous servant and a terrible master."~RAH
    2. Re:'Seven-fold surge' by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

      Google's Calculator comes to the rescue again :)

      Mark

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
  36. OT: Re:Simple, the tiniest bit of intelligence. by will_die · · Score: 1

    "Unlike a dish washer wich is totally incapable of spotting a sticky bit of dirt or doing anything about it. Put a clean load in or a totally caked up load and it will do the same routine."

    Around 10 year ago you could purchase them. They are for commercial purpose and they just have an on/off switch. They work by doing sample spraying where they would spray water then test the water, if it had dirt particles in it it went to the next cycle.
    They also had microwaves for use for doing potatoes and reheating other food, again for commercial use. It just had 2 buttons for for potatoes one for reheat and worked on similar principles in checking the air and if found the required particles it figured the item was hot enough.

  37. About time by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 1

    Robotics, like space travel, is one of those technologies that we've been assuming would happen along in the not too distant future for years!

    Recent events, including the launching of some commercial robotic vacuum devices that sport some level of intelligence (they have been rigorously designed to identify, and not eat, cats... there goes one form of Monday night entertainment), the announcement of work on programmable er, pleasure robots, and the progress made by all parties in the Ansari X-Prize are very heartening.

    Maybe after a couple of decades sebbatical, space and robots are back in vogue, and we can yet live in the future we dreamed of as children. (Yes, replete with programmable sex toys - hey, I was a sick kid...)

  38. I Wonder... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the use of such studies is. A prediction like this is largely uninteresting to most people, and no more than speculation to others. Still, announcements like this one are made from time to time.

    Is it just interested people publishing their guesses, or is there some other motivation? Perhaps they want to encourage the industry to start making robots? Or they want to create a market for them?

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  39. Re:alternative article on UN report...with more li by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    I should have titled it "with other links" because the posted article has more links.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  40. Prepare for your lawsuit by MarkEst1973 · · Score: 1
    Because "Window" Washer PCXL will be challenged by MS. Soon thereafter your Windows(tm)Washing Robot will explode from a Blue Screen of Death and burn your house down.

    Ah, but the ELUA says you can't sue M$ for damages.

  41. Very prescient by esconsult1 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I was reading Marshall Brain's essays on the subject yesterday when I caught a gander at the news story.

    Check out the series of essays on:

    • Manna software that "runs" service oriented businesses, therefore driving down wages
    • Robotic Nation about how robots are slowly taking over "routine" type jobs.

    I'm sure this was covered in Slashdot sometime before, but Marshall's essays are eerie when juxtaposed with this article.

  42. Fat lazy Americans... by FlyingPostman · · Score: 0

    ...can grow even fatter and lazier now.

    1. Re:Fat lazy Americans... by erick99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This point is more valid than most would think. For a lot of people who have office jobs and don't go to a gym or otherwise actively excercise, yard work and housework are their best chances of getting some excercise. If we get to the point that robots are ubiquitous, than we have to do something to prevent the majority of our population from dying from pressure sores from not moving. Okay, a bit of an exaggeration but it will still be a problem.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
  43. Re:alternative article on UN report...with more li by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    these things go in cycles: cost drives producers to automate but when that trend has wrung all the excess effort and any trace of individual human attention out of the product, consumers start paying for product variations that are more authentic and at least seem less mechanized. Detroit now produces cars almost "on demand" with a high degree of customization because that is the next stop along the progressive dance of consumption and automation. In food, people are even more picky, hating the machine pickable tomatoes for instance ["pink tennis balls"] and prefering more expensive organic greenhouse tomatoes.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  44. Poolbots by Marcus+Erroneous · · Score: 1

    I've been using one of the "poolbots" for years now to vacuum my pool. There is a stable, mature industry that supplies robots to clean your pool. Kreepy Crawly, Polaris 360, Hayward and others will attach to connection points on your pool filtration system to clean your pool for you. And, they do a good job of vacuuming up leaves, dirt and the like while also helping to inhibit build up on the pool sides. These all exist at a price point that is acceptable for the quality of service that they perform.

    While several parts of the system are programmable, in that there are adjustments that you can make that affect their actions, it would be difficult to see them as robots. You can program the timer to control when the pump comes on, which powers the poolbot by virtue of moving the water through the robot where various paddles move and power the device through gear drives. Adjustments to jets on the robot help exert pressure in a direction which alters the robots path around the pool. The manipulation of valves on the pool filtering system increases the pressure of the flowing water, and the speed of the robot.

    So, you have a system that regularly performs a specific task for you. You have the ability to alter some of the parameters of it's task, but they are essentially single task machines with less processing power than one of todays dishwashers. The issue probably comes from the classic literature that portrays robots as something that mimics an existing, living organism to replicate (to some degree) its functions. I would imagine that the "lobster" type of biomimetic robots would perform the pool cleaning functions much better than the existing poolbots. With those crawling around the pools of America, then we really would have robots closer to the mainstream of American life.

    --
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world - Ghandi
    1. Re:Poolbots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's going to kill an entire plot line in the p0rno-industry: tanned young male pool-cleaning for a summer job, and bored housewives.

      Unless .. no .. a bored housewife and a Kreepy Crawly just isn't going to work.

  45. rigorously designed to identify, and not eat, cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need some help with a hack. Please.

  46. Re:Roomba by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    You may want to visit the iRobot site to get your perception of the navigational logic adjusted. I'm all for healthy cynicism, but let's give credit where credit is due.

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  47. As a disabled person myself by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would like to have some of the auto-cleaning robots, like the roomba
    and the Robomaid

    to help me out around the house. It's almost impossible for me to do housework. Having a large dog makes housework even harder, what with the hair problem. I can not sweep, vacuum, mop, etc..

    I think they should classify these devices as assistance devices for disabled/handicapped people because I can't afford them as I'm sure many other disabled/handicapped are on very tight budgets like myself. It would be nice to get them covered like scooters and wheelchairs are..

    I won't be holding my breath though..

    1. Re:As a disabled person myself by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Wow. You're a real sensitive guy.
      I bet you impress all your friends with your shining personality.

      I bet you have chicks standing in line waiting to bask in your presence.

    2. Re:As a disabled person myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That still doesn't explain why you feel entitled to take the property and work of others.

    3. Re:As a disabled person myself by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Begone troll. I only want back what I PAID IN..
      I guess you're too ignorant to understand how the system works...

      You should be modded -5, stupid ass

    4. Re:As a disabled person myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paid into what? The social security ponzi scheme? You are the one that is ignorant.

    5. Re:As a disabled person myself by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      I can't afford them as I'm sure many other disabled/handicapped are on very tight budgets like myself.

      You can't afford the Robomaid? It's $10.00. Ten whole dollars.

      See, it's not that you can't afford it, it's that you don't want to afford it. You have a large dog, I bet he eats $20-$40 worth of food every month. Not to mention all of the other costs associated with a dog.

      I'm not ragging on you - Being disabled can't be much fun. But claiming you can't afford a $10 product while simultaneously owning a dog isn't exactly true. I can understand your not being able to afford a $250 Roomba...

    6. Re:As a disabled person myself by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      I can't afford it because it's not a life and death matter. I have an extremely tight budget.
      You see, I don't suck on the public welfare teat like so many others.
      I'm not on SSI, welfare, food stamps, unemployment, or any other form of assistance.
      I got a loan to pay for my spinal fusion surgery and I have to pay that loan back. I didn't go the public assistance route for my medical bills.
      Prior to my surgery I was disabled and in extremely bad shape but I was able do SOME things for myself and made a meager living repairing things, a general fix-it man.
      Now, I'm in a full torso brace/cast that 100% prevents me from doing anything for myself. I can't put on my socks without a special gadget to help me. I can't bend down and pick up things, I can't lift more than a half pound. I'm so totally immobilized that the simplest of things that you take for granted are not possible for me to do. Getting in and out of bed is a slow and painful procedure. After that I am restricted to sitting in a chair all day with short walks permitted. I feel less capable after surgery than before, before I could do minimal lifting and a little light work, now I can do nothing.
      I wish I hadn't had the surgery. I only had it because I couldn't live with the pain anymore and because they said I was in extreme danger of having an accident (a fall or car wreck) and shearing my spinal cord in two.

      As for feeding the dog, I am buddy-buddy with the owner of a dog kennel and I barter with him, PC work for dog food, they use M$ and have constant problems. I haven't spent a dime on dog food in 4 years and he eats the good stuff.

      My dog is actually eating better than I am because I have it in the bag for him to always have the best dog food there is.
      I, on the other hand am eating the cheapest, generic foods, no meats, because I am trying to minimize the amount of money that I end up having to repay to my family.

      As for my existence now, I have family members helping me out financially until I am able to work again, which my doctors tell me will be between 1 and 2 years depending on how well the fusion takes. Trust me, I'll be paying back my family, they'll make sure of it. I'm not getting a free ride, from anyone. I resisted to the very end, my family had offered to help me out several times and I turned them down time and time again until I got to the point that I had no other choice. Yeah, I'm a hard head. A MAJOR hard head..

      Believe me, I could be a leech and apply for all the government assistance programs but I refuse to. I would rather do it the way I am now, and pay my own way than leech the system and get it all for free. And on public assistance, no one ever pays back what they take. Never.
      I've put in my part to social security and I could draw on it if I wanted to but I choose not to.

      I'm no leech. I'm very independent minded. But now, I am at the mercy of others. It's not my choice. But it was my choice not to leech the system...

  48. Re:Query? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Crude joke maybe, but certainly not a troll.

    Imagine an insect sized bug wandering around grooming, shaving stubble, removing dead skin, cleansing your pores all like a roomba.

    Going to sleep stubbly and waking up with clean unclogged hair and a smooth chin. Or just let it work whilst your watching tv or sitting in your cube.

    Simple AI would allow it to tell the difference between stubble and long specific hair thats meant to exist, heck it could even do as the parent suggests and trim your pubes.

    It could even scan for other skin related problems whilst its there.

    For everyone yicked out by the thought of this, remember the world is full of symbiotic creatures, whales and sharks have cleaner fish which do a similar job, whilst I would also get the eeby-geebies about having insects crawling on me, I don't seem to have a problem with letting a robot do the job.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  49. Use a blonde RealDoll, skip the AI by cardoso · · Score: 1

    Any sensible AI will be smart enough to figure that a guy willing to fuck a silicon doll is not worth it, and will shutdown itself.

    Stick with Blonde dolls, you can even maintain the code, I've heard it's a BASIC striped-down version fo ELIZA...

    --

    []'s Carlos Cardoso - Becoming a brazilian ProBlogger, typo by typo
  50. The oldest robot would then be...from 1898? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The milking machine. It fits the teat and is shaped so that a slight vacuum manipulates the teat in a way similar to the human hand. The teats are manipulated in turn as the air is directed to each teat cup (under programmed control such as a cam). The milk is delivered to a container.

    "The pulsator was first introduced in the "Thistle" milker, using a steam driven vacuum pump. While the Thistle machine presented problems of sanitation, it proved an efficient milker. In Hoard's Dairyman, in 1898, a reviewer of the Thistle machine demonstrated at the Hamburg Exposition faulted the machine for its intermittent flow, as observed in the glass tube leading to the milk vessel. That reviewer was Dr. Benno Martiny, one of the most prominent dairy scientists of the time. The pulsator, resulting in this intermittent flow is what finally led to a really workable milking machine. The USDA finally tested and gave it's approval to a pulsator milking machine in 1898."

    excerpt from
    http://www.americanartifacts.com/smma/milker /milke r.htm

  51. Domestic robots nothing new by BreadMan · · Score: 1
    These can join the other robots we already have in our homes:

    - Washing machine
    - Dryer
    - Dishwasher
    - Food processor, coffee maker, standing blender, bread machine, ice maker
    - VCR/TiVo
    - Stereo with CD auto-changer/jukebox
    - Alarm Clock
    - Snow thrower

    They fit the definition of a robot per the article:
    "Robot" refers to any machine that operates automatically to perform tasks in a human-like way, often replacing the human workers who did the job previously. In most cases, robots move under their own propulsion and do not need to be controlled by a human operator after they have been programmed

    Myself, I'm looking forward to an affordable robot that I can put in charge of sweeping the pool.
  52. Cherry 2000 ... by Culture · · Score: 1

    ... is still vaporware, but I am waiting with rabid anticipation.

    --
    ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  53. Rabbits by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Got myself a big rabbit and built a cage with no floor. Haven't touched the lawnmower since.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:Rabbits by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure you haven't touched the lawn since either, with all that rabbit doo all over the place. We did a somewhat similar thing with guinea pigs, but we always stayed away from the 'cage area' of the lawn ...

  54. And the Study Says... industry by solodex2151 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note that according to the study, the vast leading majority of robots are ones used in industry most often for manufacturing (the study mentions the auto industry, but semiconductor fabs are starting to become all robotic as well). The study goes on to say that even though household robots will become more common, the overwhelming majority will still be industrial.

  55. In other news... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ...flying cars will be massively deployed in 2008, people will take holidays on Mars by 2009, and you will be able to fly to Saturn in 2010.

    Editorial note: this information will be inaccurate and grossly overestimated as of 2008.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  56. Tech Developement Prize by Yanray · · Score: 2

    What would be the best way to way a success in robotics for an X-Prize like competition. Multiple prizes A.I. developement Speed and manuverablity pressure atmosphere conditions?

    --
    --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
    DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
  57. robotic milkers by phiala · · Score: 1
    The milking machine. It fits the teat and is shaped so that a slight vacuum manipulates the teat in a way similar to the human hand. The teats are manipulated in turn as the air is directed to each teat cup (under programmed control such as a cam). The milk is delivered to a container.

    I don't consider that a robot since it has to be attached by hand, and only performs a small movement. Kind of like a washing machine - it's an appliance because you put the clothes in, it agitates them, then you take them out again. A washing machine that put the laundry in for you, washed, then removed & folded would be a robot.

    Robotic milkers do exist - the entire setup will feed the cow (common to feed supplements, grain, etc. in the milking parlor), position her correctly, wash, attach the milker to the udder, remove when done, and send her on her way.

    Pretty cool, no?

    These systems are most common in New Zealand and certain parts of Europe (early work from the Netherlands, I believe). They haven't been widely adopted in the US for economic and political reasons.

    --
    I prefer to be called Evil Scientist.
  58. Obligitory Homestarrunner... err.. quote by celerityfm · · Score: 0

    Stinkoman:
    What's a robot?
    You don't know what a robot is? hah hahaha!
    You're so dumb!
    Hah hahaha!
    Dumb!

    1936 Homestar:
    Oh go soak your fat head!

    S:
    Are yo asking for a challenge!?! (powers up)

    H:
    Yes sir, yes sir I am.

    S:
    Double deuce!!!! (Jumps into air)

    H:
    Patooei! (1936 Homestar shoots a spitball at Stinkoman)

    S:
    My eye!
    Its like my eye
    It hurts so bad!

    H:
    Well folks you know what that means
    Now I'll do a dance (1936 Homestar dances)

    S:
    Hah hahaha!
    That dance cracks me up!
    Hah hahaha!
    You gotta teach me!

    H:
    Just watch me shimmy and shake

    H:
    20x6!
    S:
    1936! (dances with 1936 Homestar)

    Repeat and then watch for yourself

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  59. Next thing you know.... by ayeco · · Score: 1

    Yeah right, next thing you know they'll be saying that out jetpacks are right around the corner!

  60. Japan by xYoni69x · · Score: 1

    Robots mow your lawn, vacuum, wash windows and clean swimming pools... in Japan!

    --
    void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();
    1. Re:Japan by bensonwu · · Score: 1

      Probably it's a pay-off time for Japan to prove others being shortsighted - 5 years BP vs. 20 years roadmap.

  61. No the kids will be.. by slashmojo · · Score: 0
    ..on slashdot all day complaining about the robot programming jobs being outsourced to india.. not to mention that the robot builders really should have used iRobonix instead of Windowsbot Longdong..



    Ok now mod me down! (again)

  62. Tin foil hat time! by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

    Robotic Nation by Marshall Brain, a great read on our appending doom.

    I for one, welcome our new robot overlords. :\

  63. Re:Roomba by naoursla · · Score: 1

    The gradparent is right. Roomba does not do any sort of mapping to figure out where it hasn't cleaned or where it is okay to travel. It is much more similar to a bump-and-go toy car than what most people think of as a robot. This doesn't change the fact that it is a nice designed and commercially successful product.

  64. Make sure you get waterproofing Re:Cherry 2000 ... by voss · · Score: 1

    The beta version didnt have enough waterproofing for the internal components.

  65. Oh okay by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Simply put, the pets I have and have had were all capable of feeling the mood I and my family were having. Granted we are talking cats and dogs here but these animals understood that others had different feelings then their own.

    Some of the worst cases I have been around of autistic childeren lacked this capabilty. Perhaps lately better threathment has come around, it been 20 years so I certainly would hope so but not at the time.

    There reason I used pet was because it was given to me as an example of how different their behaviour is. It is not like dealing with a small child or a pet who are stupid but capable of dealing with other emotions, a baby or a cat can easily read your mood. Autistic childeren are not stupid, some are even very intelligent but they have no capability to read your emotions.

    So don't talk babytalk I was told but keep it emotionally simple. Don't expect them to read between the lines. Tell them clearly what you want or not want. Wether this is still accurate today I don't know but it was how I was instructed. I wasn't supposed to work with them directly, just work around them.

    Anyway the robot I seen wasn't about teaching. It was to get them out of their isolation, give them something to interact with that doesn't have all these complex social things that playing with humans has (and without the strain and cost on human care takers) to these childeren. It seemed to work very well as a kid who had been sitting in a huddle was actively playing and having fun.

    Perhaps that is just what it was. A toy for fun, you complain about the use of pets as a comparision but seem to think they have only need of toys to train them to be like us. I hope you don't mean it that way but I seen an awfull lot of programms aimed at helping people who are different have no other goal then to make them like the rest.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Oh okay by benhocking · · Score: 1
      There reason I used pet was because it was given to me as an example of how different their behaviour is. It is not like dealing with a small child or a pet who are stupid but capable of dealing with other emotions, a baby or a cat can easily read your mood. Autistic childeren are not stupid, some are even very intelligent but they have no capability to read your emotions.

      This is definitely the opinion of many psychologists, but I know of no one who has actively worked with autistic children (other than perhaps yourself) who actually think autistic children have no capability to read one's emotions. Many of them have diminished capabilities in this regard, and sure, some pets might seem to be better at it than some autistic children - until you get to know the child and understand that he can determine your emotions, but might not react to them in an appropriate manner!

      So don't talk babytalk I was told but keep it emotionally simple. Don't expect them to read between the lines. Tell them clearly what you want or not want. Wether this is still accurate today I don't know but it was how I was instructed. I wasn't supposed to work with them directly, just work around them.

      For many autistic children, clarity is very important. However, this could as easily stem from reduced mental abilities as from reduced empathic abilities. (Although some autistic children are definitely smarter than average, the typical autistic child is not.)

      Anyway the robot I seen wasn't about teaching. It was to get them out of their isolation, give them something to interact with that doesn't have all these complex social things that playing with humans has (and without the strain and cost on human care takers) to these childeren. It seemed to work very well as a kid who had been sitting in a huddle was actively playing and having fun.

      That can be fine as well, I was just sharing my vision for how robots can be used to help autistic children.

      I hope you don't mean it that way but I seen an awful lot of programs aimed at helping people who are different have no other goal then to make them like the rest.

      Perhaps you're overstating your point, but I have seen no programs that have no other goal than to make them like the rest. The goal I see is to (1) most importantly, help them achieve peaceful adult lives, (2) help them understand their environment, (3) help their environment understand them, and (4) where possible allow them to live an independent lifestyle (on the assumption, which is possibly incorrect, that this augments #1 above). Among the autistic children I know many of them will achieve all 4 of these goals and most of them will achieve the first goal.

      I do agree, however, that we must be careful to make the distinction between helping them to achieve their dreams and helping them to achieve our dreams for them. I've read a work by a mildly autistic adult (i.e., one with Asperger's syndrome) who stated that she was quite content with who she was and would not want to be "normal". By the way, I've been using the label "autistic" to indicate any disorder in the autistic spectrum, and not just limited to the more narrow actual meaning of the word. (I.e., technically, those with Asperger's syndrome are not autistic, they are merely in the autistic spectrum.)

      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
  66. Re:Query? by Highpriest · · Score: 0

    Yeah I was just joking around and now I have bad karma, heh. I guess it didn't strike anyone else as being funny. I'm officially a troll, lol.

  67. Re:Roomba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed, the Roomba is hardly worth the name "robot".
    However, the Electrolux Trilobite does do intelligent mapping of the environment it is vacuuming. On the other hand, it also costs several times the price of a Roomba.

  68. Does the UN Have Anything Better To Do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like we solved world poverty, hunger and terrorism, and the Machias Seal Island dispute. Now the UN has time to think about fucking Roombas!

  69. No need to complicate with limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    x=0

    sin(0)=0

    So sin(0)/0 equals...

    0/0

    which is 1 :)

    As -1/-1=1, 0/0=1, 1/1=1, 2/2=1, 3/3=1.... for neZ

    QED

  70. FloBee + Roomba = Robotic barber by slowhand · · Score: 0

    Film at 11!
    I, for one welcome our robotic barber overlords.

    --
    Busy aligning my non-linear thoughts.
  71. Re:alternative article on UN report...with more li by llefler · · Score: 1

    Except that the option of variation, such as your car example, is only possible because of automation. Automation drives down manufacturing costs and gives the manufacturer the ability to differentiate products. Effective automation is rarely removed. Sometimes the result is a smaller workforce, sometimes people get re-tasked to add value.

    How many here are old enough to remember when going to Mcdonalds and saying "hold the onions" was a special order and meant you had to wait a long time while they made it. By automating registers, fast food companies had the ability to change their processes. Now, 'special' orders are normal.

    BTW, machines picking 'pink tennis balls' isn't the problem. The problem is that real tennis balls probably taste better. I grow my own tomatoes because 'hothouse tomatoes' shouldn't be a selling point. It's kind of like putting food coloring in water and calling it coke.

    --
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  72. Robotic Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  73. here's an idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mow your own lawn. then maybe americans would not be so damn fat and lazy. sitting on their ass waiting for a robot butler to bring them another bucket of Ben and Jerrys.

  74. Real Robots by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    They're not real robots until you can have both sex, and conversations, with them.

    "The first alien race we meet will be the one we build ourselves." --DB_Story

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  75. Offshore Remote-control Robots by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I predict that as bandwidth gets cheaper, remote-controlled robots controlled from the so-called third-world will be taking over a lot of blue-collar jobs such as flipping burgers or painting houses. I doubt they will be as effecient as a single human, but for the labor rate savings a place can run two such bots. Plus, they can work the night shift.

    We don't need AI for "smart" robots, we just need cheap bandwidth to reach cheap overseas brains. Offshore labor will screw more and more professions.

  76. Re:alternative article on UN report...with more li by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
    Considering that the US was supposed to turn into a "Service" economy, no. The US is screwed.

    That said, we lower strata of geek may yet have a career as a robotic technician. We and that kids who spend 6 weeks learning how to repair truck engines, air conditioners, and cars.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  77. Water Recognition by nylonpsycho · · Score: 1

    Ohhhhh, poor Aibo. If there were ever a dog to fear a bath...

  78. Darn it! by HexaByte · · Score: 1

    I just hired all those illegal aliens to do that work for me, and now they're telling me I need to replace them with robots?

    That's just going to further depress the wage structure of the underclass!

    --
    HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
  79. "You will have robot slaves by 1956" by Animats · · Score: 1
    That's from Popular Mechanics, 1948.

    Ever use a Roomba? It's really dumb, navigates by bumping into things, gets tangled in cords, and doesn't clean very well. I'd expected better from Rod Brooks. Even for a purely reactive robot, it's unusually stupid.

    There are better automated vacuums. There was a good one back in the 1980s, from Denning Robotics, but it was a huge riding vacuum for malls and airports. Good technology, but too big. There's a new small robot vacuum that doesn't bump into stuff, but it's priced around $1000. That's the technology to watch.

  80. What a relief! by jejones · · Score: 1

    Soon I will be protected from the Terrible Secret of Space.

  81. Japanese Xenophobia by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    Japanese xenophobia is at the root of robots taking over domestic labor tasks, as described by Steve Sailer:
    New York Times reporter James Brooke was recently shocked, shocked to discover that the Japanese people's famous fascination with robots and automation stems from their "xenophobia." [Japan Seeks Robotic Help in Caring for the Aged Mar. 5, 2004 NYT ]

    The labor-saving device that gave Brookes the willies was Sanyo's new clamshell-shaped automated bathing machine. It allows frail people confined to wheelchairs to roll in dirty and roll out clean and dry.

    Shivered Brooke: "Futuristic images of elderly Japanese going through rinse and dry cycles in rows of washing machines may evoke chills."

    Yet the machine doesn't seem to give the shivers to its users. Toshiko Shibahara, an 89-year-old resident of a Japanese nursing home told Brooke, "You don't get a chill. You feel always warm." Likewise, Kuni Kikuchi, an 88-year-old in a wheelchair, noted, "It automatically washes my body, so I am quite happy about it. These bubbles are good for the massage effect."

    It's easy to imagine other advantages. A roll-in machine means that attendants don't have to manhandle the elders' wizened naked bodies into the tub, which must be a relief to all concerned. Greater automation means bathing times are less dependent on the staff's work schedules, which can be a blessing to old people struggling with incontinence. Finally, as this kind of technology progresses and becomes cheap enough, the elderly can stay in their own homes longer before finally being bundled off to nursing homes.

    But the NYT can't be bothered with what a bunch of old ladies want, not when it has important brow-furrowing to do over the dark urges behind the Japanese drive to empower their elderly. Brookes writes:

    "But [these bathing machines] also point to where the world's most rapidly aging nation is heading. Leaders of the Philippines and Thailand ... suggest a different route: granting work visas to tens of thousands of foreign nurses. But that is unlikely in a nation that ... in the last decade has issued about 50,000 work visas a year... Building on such xenophobia, Japan's nurses' unions successfully lobbied lawmakers of the governing Liberal Democratic Party in late February to block the admission of foreign doctors and nurses."

    My question: doesn't the uniqueness of Japanese culture add to the diversity of the world?

    And aren't we supposed to celebrate diversity?

    Oh, excuse me, that's the wrong kind of diversity. We are supposed to celebrate the right kind of diversity--the kind where each country becomes so diverse in population, its culture so diluted by immigration, that all countries are eventually the same.

    How silly of me to forget that the ultimate goal of "diversity" is global uniformity--and monotony.

    1. Re:Japanese Xenophobia by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that Japan's GDP (PPP Method) per person of working age has increased over 3% per year compared to the US's paltry 2% per year.

  82. ...News Flash.... by Majestix · · Score: 1


    April 3, 2007, BumFrell

    Robot theft up 10-fold. Robot theft in the moderately sized midwestern town of East BumFrell has increated to near epidemic proportions. "I just let RX-238 out to mow the lawn", says one irtate owner...

    --
    --- I was far from home, and the spell of the Eastern sea was upon me. -Lovecraft-
  83. Price by pawnIII · · Score: 1

    Well, hopefully by 2007 these bots will have come down in price. The Honda & Sony bots cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    I doubt every rich person on the planet will go out and pay for this, considering they'll have to pay even more for a robot technician than what it would cost for hiring a human being.

  84. Re:alternative article on UN report...with more li by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
    But is there a job in this "boom" for any of us?
    The wars of the future will not be fought on the battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain. In either case, most of the actual fighting will be done by small robots. And as you go forth today remember always your duty is clear: To build and maintain those robots. Thank you.
    Military school Commandant's graduation address in "The Secret War of Lisa Simpson"
    --
    ~Idarubicin
  85. Mow my lawn? Screw that... by tyrione · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't pay someone to mow my lawn, let alone purchase a robot in the thousands of dollars to gouge the grass.

    Sorry but this is pathetic. Let's rename the survey, "How lazy Humans are Becoming: Robots to do menial chores."

    And sex robots? "Now for the weak and deprived you too can shot your juices inside!"

  86. jobs? by Cyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What will happen to all our jobs if robots automate everything.

    In a capitalist society like ours a person is only worth their salt if they provide some valuable labor to society. What will happen to all those people once their jobs are automated. With they be worth any salt?

    I personally think that every person is worth more money than we could ever print. They are worth so much because they have within their possession a neural network with decades of programming that allow them to be creative and innovative in ways machines are not yet capable. Besides all that they are human, like me, so they automaticly get a +1 value of anything that is not. However, capitalists don't view the world this way.

    I am affraid that these coming robots will displace jobs and the net result will be more poverty which leads to more crime and mental illness.

    Wouldn't it be a lot simpler to phase out the existence of money than to attempt to make enough work for everyone to keep busy?

    Perhaps if things get bad enough we will become more open minded to these ideas.

    Similarly if you want people to be happy don't force them to live in poverty. Want to prevent crime, prevent homeless and jobless environments. Want to stop terrorism, don't shoot their relatives, provide them a better way of live by sharing and giving.

    We would be a lot more productive if we didn't spend all our time counting coins, IMHO. What if we invested that time, instead, in building robots and automating labor?

    1. Re:jobs? by JoshdanG · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be a lot simpler to phase out the existence of money than to attempt to make enough work for everyone to keep busy?
      I think I agree with the core of your argument, but not your conclusion. Yes, our economic problems are distribution problems and not production problems, but I don't think getting rid of our most effective tool for allotting distribution is going to help much.

      The problem is that this:

      In a capitalist society like ours a person is only worth their salt if they provide some valuable labor to society.
      is blatantly false. In the capitalist society that I'm in at least, the people who receive the most "salt" are those that do the least valuable labor. They all make their money by creating or abusing a distribution problem of one kind or another.

      It is thus my prediction that the people who will make the most money from robots are those who create the most artificial problems in their distribution (probably through some horrifying patent abuse, but there are other ways).

      Even with these problems, we can't just get rid of money; besides a dozen other problems, we need something to say "this person only gets so much stuff," because there is real scarcity. We don't need to get rid of money, just find better ways of deciding who gets it.

  87. Re:Query? by XPisthenewNT · · Score: 1

    Make this look like a spider and yeah, this would have huge ick factor for most of the public. Maybe if it looked like a cute little (very, very miniature) puppy.

    I think it's a great idea, esp. if while trimming public hair it can detect STD's like herpes or genital warts or whatever. Honestly, how often do you give your genitals a through examination? Every day? Oh... I didn't realize...

  88. Re:WWII Tidbit with that definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Allied newspapers (UK, American) often called the German V2 rockets "robots" which technically were the first self guided machines that moved from point A to point B under it's own power and with it's own self-guidence system.

    Although they had quite a bit of margin of error, but for it's day they were quite technological advanced.