Slashdot Mirror


Government Linux Gaming Supercomputer

pupkick writes "Wired news has a story about a government supercomputer running Linux that 'pits two opposing teams of soldiers against one another in a fight for control over a city under siege.'"

114 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. GOVERNMENT LINUX GAMING SUPERCOMPUTER?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    error: oxymoron overload!!!

    1. Re:GOVERNMENT LINUX GAMING SUPERCOMPUTER?!? by shadowmas · · Score: 1

      you know all the army ads they put on tv and newspapers to recruit new soldiers. stuff abt glory and stuff. forget all those all they have to do post info about this into one of those game sites and all the geeks in us would be linining up to get recruited :).

      come to think of now that this has been already posted at slashdot.....

    2. Re:GOVERNMENT LINUX GAMING SUPERCOMPUTER?!? by jellybear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you trying to get past my spam filter?

  2. Complex people ? by thrill12 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "This technology has not really been used for immediate battle planning before," said Bob Lucas, a division director at the University of Southern California's Information Sciences Institute, or ISI, which helped port the Urban Resolve software to the Linux supercomputers. "The vast majority of people are computer-generated. Some are very complicated and consume a whole Pentium by themselves. Some are so simple, you can run a few hundred on a computer."

    I wonder who they chose to model for the simple simulated persons ... ?
    I guess it's part of the job...

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Complex people ? by JPriest · · Score: 4, Informative

      The idea is not that new, the ARMY has some warehouses full of tank sims plugged into a central servers (usually IRIX/SGI). It is pretty cool to place several companies in there with some geeks throwing computer tanks/rpg's/crunchies etc. at you. One of the few things I did in the ARMY that was actually in the brochure :)

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Complex people ? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I wonder how they decide who wins? I wonder how they decide if the game should be played in the first place.

      I mean is it really THAT important that the people of faluhja obey Allawi rather then somebody of their own choosing?

      Either way the civillians lose.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    3. Re:Complex people ? by peragrin · · Score: 3, Funny

      have you been watching War Games again???

      Want to play a game?

      Tic-tac-toe
      chess
      Global Thermo-nuclear War
      Backgammon
      checkers
      solitare
      poker

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  3. Greetings professor Falken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about a nice game of chess?

    1. Re:Greetings professor Falken by kpwoodr · · Score: 1

      No, that was G-l-o-b-a-l thermo nuclear war.

      --
      This sig has been removed pending an investigation.
    2. Re:Greetings professor Falken by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, that was G-l-o-b-a-l thermo nuclear war.

      It seems the only way to win, is not to play the game.

      Would you like to play a nice game of chess? (y/n)

    3. Re:Greetings professor Falken by Monoman · · Score: 1

      or was it tic-tac-toe? :-)

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    4. Re:Greetings professor Falken by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      Globalthermonuclearwar,
      Klobalthermonuclearwar,
      Xobalthermonuclearwar,
      TKobalthermonuclearwar

  4. and all it needs.... by Jeffery · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is Ash from "Army of Darkness" "This is my...... BOOOOOMSTICK!!!!"

    --
    President Bush Supporter
  5. Ah, yes by JoeWalsh · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've heard of that. Isn't it called War Operating Planned Response, or WOPR for short?

    I think there was a movie about it a while back.

    1. Re:Ah, yes by DHalcyon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think they will likely use a more advanced System, probably something like a Double-WOPR.

    2. Re:Ah, yes by 3nuff · · Score: 1

      Your war, your way...

      --
      "Give me taste, give me funk, give me fury, gimme some more."
    3. Re:Ah, yes by Kehvarl · · Score: 2

      Hopefully this one will be without cheese.

    4. Re:Ah, yes by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      ... I wish I could say I felt that those posts of mine that get modded up as anything but funny were worth the mod points spent on them...

  6. And it's name is: by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    WOPR

    Please select a game

    • city under siege
    • chess
    • tic tac toe
    • Global Thermonuclear War
    • CowboyNeal's Wild Wild West
    1. Re:And it's name is: by savagedome · · Score: 1

      If one chose 'city under seige', I believe Steven S might be tough to beat!

    2. Re:And it's name is: by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      If that kid in WarGames had picked CowboyNeal's Wild Wild West, that would have been one ugly movie!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:And it's name is: by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 2, Funny

      i think Steve G is more appropriate..

  7. WHAT A WASTE!!! by ferrellcat · · Score: 1, Redundant

    In the end, it will just start playing TIC-TAC-TOE then finally give up!

  8. yes, but can it.... by spectrokid · · Score: 3, Funny

    simulate fighting republicans and democrats after their voting- supercomputer goes tits up on election day?

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  9. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This has very little to do with technology. Was simulations have occurred for eons. They are moving to electronic formats. The validity of these simulations is only as good as the understanding of the real life situation, modified down for the capability of the programmin team to capture this in a computer program.

    The fact that it is running Linux is the only reason it appears on Slashdot. And it is the least interesting part of the article.

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    1. Re:Who cares? by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I do not even think that Linux is a great step forward as Battlefield Simulation has been done on Sparcs for over a decade. The British system used in Bosnia could accept map data for anywhere and test a battlefield of up to 8 different enemy armies (war are not always just between just 2 sides).

      When I worked on this, the problem was that map data was of countries and wars are often on borders. The world, as we know is not flat like a map, and the errors between 2 sets of map data will occur at the borders... The story quoted is about a very basic sim and not one of any real interest. We had to work on problems like a hedge is difficult to see through at a distance but easy to see through when you are close to it.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  10. Clarification by dasuridai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is U.S. Government supercomputer.

    1. Re:Clarification by TLSPRWR · · Score: 1

      You forgot to finish your statement.

      That is U.S. Government supercomputer you insensitive clod

  11. Does it have the UT2004 voiceovers? by Gentoo+Fan · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Wicked sick!"

    1. Re:Does it have the UT2004 voiceovers? by AngryScotsman · · Score: 1

      In UT2004 you are able to set all announcements to UT2003, male, female or sexy.

  12. CS? by poison_reverse · · Score: 5, Funny

    counter-terrorists win!

    --
    _+_+__+_+_+_+_+_+_+++
    when i moo u moo - just like that
  13. Good news! by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Between this, Tux Racer and xbill, Linux now has three games!

    1. Re:Good news! by Rikus · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are actually many games that are either written for or will run on Linux. Just go to the sourceforge games section and see for yourself.

    2. Re:Good news! by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Between this, Tux Racer and xbill, Linux now has three games!

      I was going to make this funny post about "We're gaining on the Mac gamers" and link to the Rooster Teeth (Red vs Blue fellas) site where they have the Mac Gamer "switch parody" video but the bastards took it down.

      Does anyone have a copy of that or a link somewhere? I think I've deleted my copy.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    3. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      1) I'm joking.
      2) If I were serious, that wouldn't be a particularly useful site to which to send me. hapypenguin.org is much more useful to a non-developer.

  14. Wonder how.. by d_jedi · · Score: 1

    .. it runs games like Star Wars:Battlefront.

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  15. Checking Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    They need to double check their facts:

    From the story:one at the Maui High Performance Computing Center in Hawaii and the other at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio

    From Photo Gallery: thanks to two supercomputers in Virginia and Hawaii.

  16. Interesting idea but... by farlcow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How seriously can one base decisions on the results? We've had weather simulation software in development for decades and the weather man on TV still can't tell me if it's going to rain tomorrow. It seems this simulation takes human emotion/reaction into account on a large scale, I would think that is much harder to simulate than a weather pattern. Also, who is in charge of programming the human simulations? I would hope they would consult very closely with people actually from the area in question.

    1. Re:Interesting idea but... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're thinking of the butterfly effect. Basically, weather systems are hard to predict over a long time because small mistakes/misinformation in assumptions add up to large differences over time.

      More importantly though, weather predictions fail because they are not closed systems. To be accurate over time, they would have to take into account all weather everywhere since it all bounces off itself. A simulated battle, on the otherhand, would be orders of magnitude easier to predict. Sure, if you're initial data is wrong the results will be wrong (e.g. you underestimate the range of weapon X, or its ability to go through armor Y), but there wouldn't necessarily be outside effects you aren't accounting for.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    2. Re:Interesting idea but... by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    3. Re:Interesting idea but... by ZB+Mowrey · · Score: 1

      " The Quantum Weather Butterfly (Papilio tempestae) is an undistinguished yellow colour, although the mandelbrot patterns on the wings are of considerable interest. Its outstanding feature is its ability to create weather. This presumably began as a survival trait, since even an extremely hungry bird would find itself inconvenienced by a nasty localised tornado. Look at me, the male says, flapping his wings lazily in the canopy of the rain forest. I may be an undistinguished yellow colour, but in a fortnight's time, a thousand miles away, Freak Gales Cause Road Chaos." Terry Pratchett

      --

      Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.

  17. supercomputer game? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Do you think we could run this game on a beowulf cluster?

  18. This sounds like the DARPA project... by tcopeland · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...Cougaar.

    There are a bunch of distributed agents scattered around lots of machines; some use more resources than others, and the system moves them from machine to machine in response to high loads. Nifty stuff, and open source - BSD licensed!

  19. hey hey hey by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    if i had to be stranded on a desert island with only one game, it would probably be freeciv.

    and i believe doom3 has a linux client.

    no, im not a very serious gamer, but its not like there aren't _any_ games.

    1. Re:hey hey hey by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      Linux gaming is already 'there' for me. All I seem to play is Civ!

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    2. Re:hey hey hey by matlhDam · · Score: 1

      OpenTTD seems to be a frighteningly good time waster, too.

  20. Silliest comment in article... by Glock27 · · Score: 2, Funny
    "If I'm wearing a red jersey and so drunk I can't stand up and I meet a guy in a blue jersey who's so drunk that he can't stand up, what happens?" joked Davis.

    Why, you both fall down of course!

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    1. Re:Silliest comment in article... by Spolster · · Score: 1

      If I'm wearing a red jersey...

      If you're wearing a red jersey, you won't last five minutes. The guy in the blue jersey has much better odds, especially if he has pointy ears.

  21. This is new? SimWar? by slowhand · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IIRC, Maxis, the company that brought you SimCity, SimEarth, SimTrain, SimAnt, SimWhatever has contracted with companies for several years providing its simulation engine for use in petroleum refinery research, manufacturing automation, factory floor managment simulation. I would be surprised if they HAVE NOT done similar work with DoD. Me thinks a nice beowulf cluster of xboxes running linux would make a nicer story...

    --
    Busy aligning my non-linear thoughts.
    1. Re:This is new? SimWar? by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      We already have SimWar. It's called:
      • Warcraft
      • Starcraft
      • Civilization
      • A bunch I'm probably forgetting
      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  22. AA:SF by spoonyfork · · Score: 1
    I've been playing this game for quite a while now. It's called America's Army. What's their server IP?

    Live in your world. Get pwned in mine.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  23. Deja Vu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this sound Strangely Familiar to anyone?

  24. Best part about /. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Are all the dupes I get to read from as little as two days ago.

  25. The FMV's are great by samberdoo · · Score: 1

    Especially the one with Slim Pikens riding the A bomb.

  26. Re:Yeah Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But it got a FIVE when it was posted for the prior writeup for this story.

    At least be consistent mods!

  27. Re:Repeat story by klubkid79 · · Score: 1

    Got the date wrong -> October 20, 08:50PM

  28. Huh... that seems odd... by TuxBeej · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those who checked the screenshots in the article, doesn't that second one look suspiciously like a certain motorcade route in Dallas?

    --
    Brendan "Beej" Dery "Only in Canada, eh?"
  29. government uses linux a lot by carnivore302 · · Score: 5, Informative
    The article suggests that the US government doesn't use linux supercomputers all that much. Because I felt the opposite is true I did a quick search on google which confirmed my initial beliefs. Mind you, I don't know if all these stories are true or hoaxes, but a couple of interesting ones are

    Linux NetworxTM EvolocityTM cluster supercomputer to study smallpox genomics in light of the threat of possible bioterror attacks here

    The Linux open-source operating system powers a new government supercomputer that will help meteorologists forecast the weather more accurately. here

    New SGI supercomputer to scale Linux to 1,024 CPUs
    The National Center for Supercomputing Applications will use it for research here

    And the list goes on and on.

    --
    Please login to access my lawn
  30. COOL! A Police Academy 6 simulator by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Funny

    'pits two opposing teams of soldiers against one another in a fight for control over a city under siege.'

    So I imagine one groups of soldiers is led by Capt Harris and the other team is led by Lassard and that zany Police Academy squad (minus Mahoney of course).

  31. All residents of Ames, Iowa by RealProgrammer · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..please report to the disintegration chamber. Your former city has been destroyed.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:All residents of Ames, Iowa by stateofmind · · Score: 1

      Well come on down to Des Moines, were doing just fine here. All else fails, we'll take cover in the skywalks.

      Josh

  32. re: and its name is... by ed.han · · Score: 1

    so my question: now that i've imagined a beowulf cluster of these, would such a thing make for the mother of all MMPORPGs? consider:

    1. imagine a beowulf cluster of urban resolve boxen.
    2. ?
    3. profit!

    ed

  33. the red team by Fr05t · · Score: 1

    "the red team" -- Awesome they have Halo on the XBox!

  34. I wanna see... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    What kind of movies the guys from Red vs Blue could do with this system!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  35. Semi Dupe? by drew · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not exactly a dupe, because it is referring to a different article, but this article is discussing the same project that was covered Wednesday in The War of the Virtual Worlds

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  36. Getting a bit unfair now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Back in the cold war there was a bit of a counter balance to the USA's military technology from the USSR, and both countries tended to support countries fighting against the other (see russian migs in Korea, US troops in Vietnam, Stinger missiles in Afghanistan). In the horrific act of war there was a counter balance to make things fairer, so technology alone couldn't prevail, and the most technologically advanced countries couldn't impose rules over their 3rd world adversaries. With the dissolution of the USSR this counter balance is relying on increasingly ancient Soviet technologies, which are becoming ineffective against Western military advances (how many planes did the Iraqi army shoot down? How did the Iraqi Soviet era tanks compare to the Americans) Not to sound like i am supporting one side or the other, or sound like i am supporting the actions of supposed terrorists, I am starting to think the idea of war in this world is getting a bit unfair and one sided. Some people put the defeat of the IRA partially down to the introduction of body armour for the british troops, their Armalites just weren't effective any more. How can peoples who want to fight counter this? The only weakness that currently can be exploited is Wide Spectrum electrical weapons (sorry probably wrong name), that can fry electronics of the more advanced Western armies (US army no longer teaches troops to read maps, only GPS). But this is increasingly countered by 'hardening' installations and equipment. Is there any wonder that 'terrorists' or 'rebels' have to resort to alternative weapon systems and war methodology? What hope do they stand in the modern battlefield? What hope for the future, China is the only real counter weight but they don't seem too keen on sharing. Whatever side you were on

    1. Re:Getting a bit unfair now by tbone1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You know, this has always been the way it's been, even before Rome and Carthage were duking it out.

      At the same time, consider that the US troops put themselves at greater risk by attempting to reduce the risks to civilians, even in enemy territory. And they try to keep things like electricity, water, and sewer systems running. Terrorists aim for civilians and infrastructure.

      And if you are hoping for Communist China to be a world-saver, go stand in front of that advancing armored personnel carrier and ask their opinion.

      Go ahead, mark me as flamebait, but worrying about how we can make things fairer for people who try to kill innocent civilians seems like some REALLY misplaced worry.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    2. Re:Getting a bit unfair now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Since you seem to be coming from an objctive point of view, almost anthropological, here's my take on the issue you raise:

      There are two diametrically opposed endeavors that comprise warfare regardless of time period. There is a technological advantage, and there is a tactical advantage.

      For a less technologically advanced force to prevail against a more technologically advanced force, it must employ superior tactics. The opposite also holds true: A technologically superior force can get by with a less tactically sound battleplan, letting it's technical superiority tip the balance in it's favor.

      You refer to two conflicts where this is demonstrated with near perfect clarity: U.S. involvement in Viet Nam, and Soviet involvement in Afghanistan.

      In both cases, the technologically superior force was outclassed by the tactically superior force. An insurgent force (rebels / guerillas / etc) can negate the technological advantage of the opposing force by changing the nature of the engagement.

      Your question about "keeping in check" a technologically advanced force answers itself.

    3. Re:Getting a bit unfair now by pluke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the point is maybe they wouldn't need to kill innocents if they had other options which the technological advances have cancelled out
      .

      Also what happens if heaven forbid the USA with its technology, happened to be doing something wrong and the people couldn't defend themselves. What options are they left with?

      I don't think they are looking for a 'saviour' in China just something to counter balance (-their words)

      --
      "all through my house i set up traps, it seems like the rats have a map, so now i feed the rats crack" - Donald D
    4. Re:Getting a bit unfair now by pluke · · Score: 1

      Very true and makes a very scary point, if the americans can conquer the tactical side so decisively, then what other options do other forces have? Will it push them towards more extreme methods of war? How can we rely on the USA to be a world 'policeman' if it appears to be politically rotten (character + money = politics!?!?)

      --
      "all through my house i set up traps, it seems like the rats have a map, so now i feed the rats crack" - Donald D
  37. Ender's game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The current attack on Fallujah is being coordinated by a 6 year old kid who thinks he's just playing a video game.

    1. Re:Ender's game by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
      Yeah...I kind of noticed that, too. With Dick Cheney standing right behind him. Proud grandfather that he is, he yells "Yaaayy! You won!" no matter what happens on the screen.

      I really want to know if they have a specual module featuring a "pissed-off insurgents who respawn faster than you kill them" mode, sort of like Nightmare mode from Duke Nukem. Come to think of it, if an actual game had been modelled a little more closely after Fallujah, reviewers probably would have put it down as unrealistic.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
  38. Surprised no one has asked... by saintp · · Score: 2, Insightful
    When do we get to play? Freeciv geeks would go NUTS over this thing.

    Or, if they wanted to make half a million /.ers simultaneously spooge, they could GPL it.

  39. I hope these guys read Sun Tsu.. by killpog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No wait, they do... General Norman Schwarzkopf said he never understood the true meaning of the word Byzantine as it applies to politics until he had taken command in the middle east. And he had studied the area EXTENSIVELY prior to his deployment there. These systems are modeling behavior of of crowds, soldiers in combat, "battlefield detainees", traffic patterns, weather, weaponry, supply lines, AND the political climate. The people playing these games ain't high school video gamers. They are retired or otherwise very experienced military personnel that advise the JCS. All of them are very well educated in the art of war, and it's drawbacks. That's why they're so quiet about it.

  40. Is it only me or by panurge · · Score: 4, Funny
    Am I insulted by the idea of being modeled by a Pentium? I think I deserve at least a couple of Opterons. And, the day I'm having today, I'd need at least 4G of Ram and a dedicated interrupt controller.

    It's a pity that in a battlefield simulation all that processing power would be wasted as I'd just be an immediate civilian casualty, but with luck I might manage to drop my old Laserjet 5M out the window on one of the combatants first.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Is it only me or by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Funny

      We'll just program it to say "I don't understand" or "give me a cup of tea" and you'll never notice the difference;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  41. OSGW: Open source guerrilla warfare would help... by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If they want to get a good simulation of battling against an ad hoc local army which has no centralized command, they should consider letting people from the public command small numbers of opposing (i.e. defending local) troops.

    Bush's suggestion that the only problem with the war currently was that we "won too quickly," that the enemy was supposed to stand, fight and be killed instead of retreating and coming back with car bombs the way they have, is ridiculous. It shows how out of touch he and his advisors are with the real world. All you have to do is look at American history: George Washington lost just about every battle he fought in, but the tactic of fight, retreat, and live to fight another day won the war.

    Since they seem to be unwilling to learn from history, before our beloved administration engages in another wasteful bloodletting, maybe the high end of the chain of command should take a moment to see how regular people would fight if thrown into the situation.

    Heck, make sure some 10-14 year olds are able to play. They're brutal! I remember when Warcraft came out, those little snots would pull some amazing tricks to kick butt right out of the gate. Remember the Grunt Rush offense?

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  42. They could make it public by inmortal · · Score: 1

    If they would put it online so everyone who wants may join a session, and even better if the clients would have the GTA3 or battlefield look and feel.. hehe

    --
    Rimember: Jappi Pipol In Da Jaus
  43. Wrong Simulator by jmole · · Score: 1

    I think the government is using the wrong type of simulation. They should be using a LAN game of Stratego to practice military their military strategies. If you think about it, every war could be won using Stratego to plan military maneuvers.

    For instance in Iraq we could be sending out Miners to detonate roadside bombs. Instead we are sending out scouts blindly into battle. The only option is for the US to set up a bomb shield around their flag in the bottom left quadrant of Iraq and use a Marshall and a General as a strike force. That will show them.

  44. social factors included? by actiondan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if this urban conflic simulator includes factors such as the fact that airstrikes of any intensity will always lead to some civilian casualties, which will in turn lead to easier recruitment by the bad guys.

    If this simulation doesn't include such social/psychlogical factors then I submit that it is pretty useless in determining the optimum strategy for urban conflicts.

    "The old crusade days when you go into a city with catapults and rubble everything are over,"

    Tell that to the people of Falluja right now.

    Are air strikes really the most effective way to deal with insurgency/terrorism?

    1. Re:social factors included? by jmole · · Score: 1

      If those airstrikes involve nuclear weapons, then yes because all the insurgents and terrorists will be vaporized along with everything else.

    2. Re:social factors included? by actiondan · · Score: 2, Funny

      f those airstrikes involve nuclear weapons, then yes because all the insurgents and terrorists will be vaporized along with everything else.

      True enough.

      So the most effective way to deal with domestic crime is the nuclear annihilation of cities where criminals are. Glad we cleared that up ;)

    3. Re:social factors included? by psamty · · Score: 1

      I work on another project at the ISI, and if I were to make a guess on whether social factors would make it into the simulation, I'd have to say yes. Emotional and psychological modeling have been given a lot of attention here, and I'd be surprised if we didn't use the technology we've developed over the last few years...

    4. Re:social factors included? by jmole · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen bobms would suffice too.

    5. Re:social factors included? by actiondan · · Score: 1

      That's good news!

      How are such models tested? Are social models of real situations created and then tested against how real events pan out?

      This must be a _really_ hard problem to model - cultural and historical factors are going to have a huge impact on how people react to things like airstrikes or ground assaults. Will they stay indoors until the fighting is over or will they come out with weapons? What about if their cousins house is hit? What about if they hear a rumour that a religious site was attacked?

      My mind boggles at the sheer number of variables that would need to be considered to get a simulation that even approached relevence to the real world.

      Hence my question about testing - how do you know how close the model is getting to how real people would react?

    6. Re:social factors included? by actiondan · · Score: 1

      Some sort of chemical or biological weapon might be better - remove the undesirables (along with the desirables) but leave the infrastructure intact.

      Hmmm, maybe once the crime rate of a city reaches a certain value, the population should be wiped out so that new folks can move in.

      Solve the crime problem and overpopulation in one neat policy.

    7. Re:social factors included? by jmole · · Score: 1

      I like your thinking. I am going to make you a write in on my ballot on Nov. 2nd.

    8. Re:social factors included? by jmole · · Score: 1

      And what variables will we encounter if Microsoft's HQ in Redmond, Washington is hit by an airstrike in the fog of war? Will the open-source and apple communities take to the streets and start celebrating like the Ewoks did on Endor when the Empire was defeated in Star Wars? Will there be an insurgancy of Mircosoft programmers in the streets fighting to the death in the name of Internet Explorer?

    9. Re:social factors included? by Kehvarl · · Score: 2, Funny

      be careful, you might find yourself electred supreme dictator of the united states... then I'd have to kill you for tryng to usurp my position.

    10. Re:social factors included? by psamty · · Score: 1

      Im not involved with the project being talked about (as I mentioned in my first post), so I can only speculate. Typically social simulations have a smaller number of agents, each of which maintains goals and an emotional state... all of which is pretty computationally expensive to simulate. Obviously getting this all to work in a massive scale is stunningly complex (realistic behavior with 5 people is hard enough), and I'm not sure what approach is being taken, but I'm pretty sure that the social aspect will fit in - because if it didn't, as you mentioned, the exercise would be much less beneficial than if it were..

  45. Yawn. by PMuse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a story about a government supercomputer running Linux that 'pits two opposing teams of soldiers against one another in a fight for control over a city under siege.'"

    Why is this news? The govt runs battle simulations on computers. Linux runs computers. What part of this didn't we know and why do we care?

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    1. Re:Yawn. by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm as much a "why is this news" guy as the next but in this case, give it a break. It's Friday afternoon and they just found a neat article on a cool simulation the gov't is running. Why not post it?

    2. Re:Yawn. by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Yeah, fair enough. Also, it's a fairly prominent application of Linux -- another mark on the tally board for the cheerleading crowd.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    3. Re:Yawn. by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      Might as well let them start the weekend on a high note ;)

  46. Re:OSGW: Open source guerrilla warfare would help. by felis_panthera · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Bush's suggestion that the only problem with the war currently was that we "won too quickly," that the enemy was supposed to stand, fight and be killed instead of retreating and coming back with car bombs the way they have, is ridiculous.


    But right in line with how things have been going over the last couple of centuries. The revolutionary war against brittain was fought using geurilla tactics learned from the native tribes. The brittish cried foul, saying that the yankees were'nt fighting "fair". We fast forward to 'nam, where the VC would hit and fade, hit and fade... hit and fade. This tactic has the advantage of continually reducing both enemy numbers and moralle. America cried foul, said the VC weren't fighting fair, took their ball and went home. Now the same thing is happening, a smaller, weaker enemy is using guerrila warfare to constantly harrass a larger and better equipped force. The tactic works, and always has worked.
    --

    The chains are broken
    Loki is free
    Ragnarok is at hand...
  47. APC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Yes, it was the APCs that ran over the crowd. The footage of that didn't make it out of China. I weep
    when I think of the courage of that guy before the tank. Had the students won, a peaceful unification of China would have been possible. Now China will obtain a modern military before political reform and inevitably be tempted to use it. This path will ruin our new century.

  48. Re:Korean/Chinese Soldiers in American Cities by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We really, really need a "-1; Bullshit" moderation option.

    Chinese soldiers in Mexico?! Haha!

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  49. Or Tribes by valjean78 · · Score: 1

    Shazbot!

  50. Incomplete information... by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny
    the article don't have all the required information for a linux game:
    • where is the torrent link to download it?
    • it is gpl?
    • it requires more hardware than doom3?
    • supports punkbuster?
  51. always has worked... by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    Except for the native americans.

    1. Re:always has worked... by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1


      Probably what lost it for them was that the enemy had an almost unlimited supply of "troops" shipped in over a long period.

      Imagine if the US could ship people into Iraq at the same rate (ignoring the public outcry of coarse)

  52. Say again? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

    From the article (really):

    "If I'm wearing a red jersey and so drunk I can't stand up and I meet a guy in a blue jersey who's so drunk that he can't stand up, what happens?" joked Davis.

    The answer is: Nothing much. (Or maybe Red vs. Blue gay porn).

  53. Re:Korean/Chinese Soldiers in American Cities by ZB+Mowrey · · Score: 1

    OK, *even if this IS true*, you flunked. You gave me two references for your first two assertions, but left me blind on the last. Got any links to authoritative info?

    --

    Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.

  54. More details please. by lashi · · Score: 1
    What's with this story? Two lines and one link only? Where is the details?

    I need to know what the subscription cost is per month! I need to budget my game money!

  55. I saw something about this by marktaw.com · · Score: 1

    I saw something about this on TV, I think on a Frontline about video games. There were these larger-than-life screens - (3) two-meter square arranged dressing-room mirror style - that each soldier in training interacted with. It used voice recognition, and AI (no expanation as to what kind of AI). In the episode, the man's task was to move a woman and her wounded daughter off the road so that road could be used for transport. Also, there would be some danger to the woman if she stayed.

    Wargames have been used in the military for centuries. Chess is a great and well known simulation designed to improve your critical thinking skills. Recently it's been proven by Gary Klein in his excellent book Sources of Power training shouldn't be academic. I think we'd all agree that it's one thing to read about, say, being a firefighter, and quite another to run in to a burning building and make decisions that affect dozens or hundreds of lives. Simulations are designed to train your mind to become accustomed to these situations, and are probably the single most effective tool in doing so.

    What I want to know is how long before one of the cadets in training hacks the computer to turn the odds in his favor.

  56. Ooh, ooh, ooh! I know! by bheerssen · · Score: 1


    Why don't we just use gas chambers? Low tech, efficient, and proven.

    Hmm... I think you'd make an excellent recruit for the movement. Here's your pistol and swastika armband. Zeig Heil!

    --
    (Score: -1, Stupid)
  57. Imagine... by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    Oh you mean like this?

    So... I don't have to imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

  58. Chinese Agents Cross Mexican Border into USA by reporter · · Score: 1
    You gave me two references for your first two assertions, but left me blind on the last. Got any links to authoritative info?

    Thanks for the lead into my next comment. Next time, just use Yahoo Search to find the article.

    Indeed, Chinese agents are enterin the USA from Mexico.

    If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then join me in writing the following on the November ballot.

    president: Bill O'Reilly
    vice-president: Tammy Bruce

    1. Re:Chinese Agents Cross Mexican Border into USA by WatchAndListen · · Score: 1

      Please. Get a real news source.

      WorldNetDaily.com
      is published by
      WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
      PO Box 1087
      Grants Pass, OR
      97528

    2. Re:Chinese Agents Cross Mexican Border into USA by ZB+Mowrey · · Score: 1

      How about next time, instead of referencing two out of three, you just reference them all? Saying your reader is too lazy to do his own research is a writing sin all its own, especially when you're providing partial references. It really makes it look like a baseless assertion because you were so proud to provide links to the other two, but just made a claim on the last. My criticisms are intended to help others get better at writing, expressing critical thought, and clearly communicating to an audience. Ignore or accept that criticism; the choice is always yours, but I won't be hurt either way. ;)

      --

      Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.

  59. It's called "Capital Warfare" by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Funny

    'pits two opposing teams of soldiers against one another in a fight for control over a city under siege.'

    Sounds like Washington, D.C. around election time...

  60. RE: OXYMORON ... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    1) The United States military does not condone "siege mentality", although it has been a tried-and-true strategy of warfare for over 3 thousand years. Gen. Patton's methods of massed armoured attack has been the preferred method since WW-II. Neither current training or doctrine support such "static" methods. When the USMC tried it in Fallujah in April, 2004, they were overruled by the DoD. 2) While linux might be a good OS for computer cluster technology, it does not scale to the level of "supercomputer" as defined by a CRAY or IBM or NEC or SGI implementation. I am not trying to be a troll here, but only to represent the truth (however painful.)

  61. Great.... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Wonderful, I just KNOW someone's going to be camping the fucking barret, not to mention the planes. God damn campers. I'll show them. Lets see how the army deals with TKs.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!