Slashdot Mirror


Digital Music Player Overview

An anonymous reader writes "MP3 Newswire just posted its fifth article of its 'iPod Killers' for the holidays list. Most interesting are a bluetooth unit from Aiwa, Sony's Vaio U, and an Ogg/photo/FM broadcast record, flash unit from SAFA." See also I, II, III, and IV.

228 comments

  1. What is the future of standalone MP3 players? by jokumuu · · Score: 4, Insightful
    'iPod Killers'

    Seems that ipod has the total "mental" superiority, as every MP3 seems to be compared to it.

    One thing that I wonder about is the digital convergence, will iPod surve with so many the new Mobile phones containing MP3 player functionality. It used to be that MP3 player phones were far between, but seems that all 3rd generation phones will contain it as standard feature.

    1. Re:What is the future of standalone MP3 players? by solowCX · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:What is the future of standalone MP3 players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, check out that car, it's a total ipod killer!
      Sweet, I wish I had a convertible, I'd be an ipod killer.
      Yeah man, the chicks dig ipod killers.
      Hey that girl over there's kind of an ipod killer, I'm gonna hit on her
      Sorry, but I already have a boyfriend, and he's such an ipod killer in bed.
      Damn, she hates me, that totally saved ipods.
      Let's go to that new bar, I hear it's an ipod killer.
      Yeah, I'll use my fake id, it's a total ipod killer.
      oh my ipod killer, look out!
      splat
      (our heroes were wearing ipod costumes and have been killed. the end)

    3. Re:What is the future of standalone MP3 players? by nayigeta · · Score: 1
      Apple already has that covered http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2004/jul/26motorol a.html

      The problems with such a partnership between Motorola phone and iPod are, the phone will
      1. be as bulky as iPod
      2. drain phone battery life very fast
      3. has stripped down functionalities, as it is quite difficult to imagine Motorola Linux phone - A760's next gen equipvalent - working alike an iPod

      Nevertheless, it would be interesting to see this phone when it is out.

      --
      Sunset over the lake, cool mist over the bridge; A leave upon the ripples, the snow reflects its glow.
    4. Re:What is the future of standalone MP3 players? by solowCX · · Score: 1

      Actually, the phones will just run a "phone version" of iTunes, so the phone could even use flash memory, thus keeping the battery alive longer and be practicaly the same size as a normal phone. The stripped down functionalities part is probably true, however most people probably don't need to crossfade from one song to another on their cell phone.

    5. Re:What is the future of standalone MP3 players? by paretooptimum · · Score: 1

      The timespan under discussion is clearly the issue. The blurb says "for the holiday season," which limits our scope. Expanding the scope, the answer changes...

      Headlines of the future:

      Christmas 2004 "iPod again the must-have"
      Christmas 2005 "With music in your Nokia/Motorola phone, Apple starts to hurt; is it the Macintosh all over?"
      Christmas 2006 "Samsung Camera/Phone/PDA/Music Player the latest must-have in this year's stockings. Finland still in depression following Nokia crash"
      Christmas 2007 "Shuttle Ultra-Mini lets you carry your pc around on your belt buckle. Bell bottoms are back"
      Christmas 2009 "Consumers flocking to Seiko Watch PC; interface with any wall monitor with 802.11z. Are the major movie studios following record giants into oblivion?"
      Christmas 2010 "The new rage among the techno-literate is tatooing "Linux Inside" on the forehead following nano implants. Slashdot updates color scheme"
      Christmas 2011 "Post Singularity survivory reinvent sundail"

    6. Re:What is the future of standalone MP3 players? by technos · · Score: 1

      Now, were those simulated Slashdot headlines?

      If so, the typos, spelling errors and grammar malfunctions add immensely to them.

      The only thing missing would have been a dupe of Christmas 2007 entered as Christmas, 2008.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    7. Re:What is the future of standalone MP3 players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... just like how camera phones replaced digital cameras. ... or how java and mophun games replaced bulky consoles. ... or how Smart Phones have replaced laptops.

      Or... no... wait, the only thing cellphones compete with are landline phones. That's all they should have to compete with. Someday someone will realize that cellphones already have their killer app... and they even had it back in the analog days. Then maybe one or two companies will work on actually keeping their customer base for more than two years, rather than hanging out in the middle of a mall, grabbing shoppers by their shirts, flashing them some eye candy, screwing them, and insisting that legal action is futile. Seriously, the first cell phone carrier with more class than me will get my account, even if all they offer is some crap black and while analog jobby.

    8. Re:What is the future of standalone MP3 players? by thewonderllama.com · · Score: 0

      Our client did not in fact kill the iPod and claiming such is libel. The defense asks that the charge be dropped to 'bad intentions with laughable execution'.

      All other digital music players (very little of my music is still in mp3) need to come a long way before they can unseat the iPod. Tie in the first online music store that actually works and the iPod's not going anywhere. I don't really want it merged with a phoen or a pda, I like it's primary function being music, all it's controls being devoted to music and not wasting my ipod's battery transmitting cell signals.

      ~BS
      --
      Home of the EULA shirt
  2. Other iPod crimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When are we going to hear about other crimes committed against iPods? I'm really interested in hearing about the iPod rapists.

    1. Re:Other iPod crimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm really interested in hearing about the iPod rapists.

      You really want to hear about some trying to stick a 1/4 inch head phone jack in the 1/8th inch port? You sick bastard.

    2. Re:Other iPod crimes by luvirini · · Score: 1

      Some people even document their crimes http://www.ipodhacks.com/

    3. Re:Other iPod crimes by Bi()hazard · · Score: 1

      I believe you're looking for her.

      (watch out, being a lickable Apple, she's very smart, and blocks slashdot referrer id's to prevent server rape)

    4. Re:Other iPod crimes by Vulcann · · Score: 1

      But didn't you hear? Netcraft confirms that the iPod is dead already.

  3. I for one... by odano · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new iPod killing overlords.

    1. Re:I for one... by KingPunk · · Score: 0, Funny

      make love, not ipod hate!

  4. X2 MegaView by wikinerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Linux-based X2 Megaview seems nice, but the site says it costs $4000 $-( Not in my range, but I suspect the competition will drive the prices down. Does anybody here uses this model?

    1. Re:X2 MegaView by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its 400 dollars. just a typo

  5. iPod Killers? by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't wait for them to come out with the FPS game in which you kill iPods!!

    1. Re:iPod Killers? by Ziviyr · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've always wanted to be the iPod on the grassy knoll...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:iPod Killers? by seringen · · Score: 1

      It's actually a halflife2 mod where bill gates (you) shatters the zombies' skulls by claiming windows media is an open standard compared to aac

    3. Re:iPod Killers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In soviet russia, iPods kill YOU!

  6. vaio u by mcslappy · · Score: 1

    The Sony Vaio U weighs in at 1.2 lb - light for a PC, heavy for a digital media player - uses a 20GB 1.8" drive and plays audio, video and anything else. The cost is $2000, far more expensive than an iPod and more than most laptops, so the premium priced Vaio U is not the most cost effective if you only want an entertaiment device. For road warriors whose company is picking up the tab. i'd be happier with a $2000 laptop, i wouldn't risk the chance of losing/smashing such a flimsy looking player.

    1. Re:vaio u by sodul · · Score: 1

      "The Sony Vaio U weighs in at 1.2 lb - light for a PC, heavy for a digital media player"
      But with 1.2 lb it sure seem heavy enough to kill an iPod and smash it in peices.
      I had one of those mini Vaio laptop ... the experience was: expensive, slow, no battery life, not to mention the tiny keyboard half the footprint of my fingers. Sure it could do many things (embedded web-cam, video out, even stereo speakers in such a small design) but it was doing it all badly.

    2. Re:vaio u by radio.cgt · · Score: 1

      They're not that really that flimsy, I've played with them in te shops here, and I can say thet they feel like bricks. Maybe because they're small, but they weigh a lot more than they look like the should. In a mano-a-mano fight, the Vaio would beat the iPod just by lying on top of it.

  7. Design, by nicholas. · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So looking at the photos of these players it would seem that Apple has hired all the designers and engineers who understand interface, asthetics and functionality.

    C'mon guys, give us something that's at worthy of competing with an iPod. I'll give you the first killer idea for free: make it just like the iPod but without the stupid glossy, scratch-prone plastic and polished metal.

    1. Re:Design, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only person who thinks the iPod is ugly? Heck, I own a G4 iBook, and I think that's ugly too - give me something that is understated, dark, and not as plastic-70's throwback, and I'd be happy.

      I just don't understand how cheap-looking came to be seen as the epitomy of style?
      (This isn't a troll - I really want to know why people like it. I get the idea of simplicity, but I prefer the look of the other mp3 players on the market, and the other laptops - even though I love the Apple functionality ;)

    2. Re:Design, by jokumuu · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Digital gadgets seemd to fall into about 3 categories:

      Geek toys - design unimportant, need 100 impossible to use functions that are cool

      Upmarket - Stylish design, ease of use are the important functions.

      Massmarket - Massproduced and designed things that have price as most importnt factor.

      Ofcourse there are other types too, but most designs can be fitted into one of the three.

    3. Re:Design, by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1
      Errr...that cheap looking stuff is polycarbonate you're dissing there. Sure, it's been around for a while, but the stuff they use on the iBook is many generations advanced, and is super tough, super light, UV resistant, has excellent transparency to EM radiation (ie, your airport reception will be damn good), and is pretty much as space-age as you're going to get on a consumer product. Scratches should also polish out pretty well with the right product (tip - I used to use toothpaste). Maybe you haven't noticed, but chicks also dig it - a good sign that it's pretty snappy in the fashion stakes.

      Jonathan Ives (Apple's designer) is a pretty switched on guy, and takes his cues from the cutting edge of design. Stainless steel with blue lights was so early 90's. Expect the product designs of 2009 to be sporting white led's, anodised aluminium, and polycarbonate.

      I understand that white is not everyones thing (hey, I'm a brown/grey guy myself), but man - the iPod is not ugly.

    4. Re:Design, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Samsuyng 20 GB HDD based mp3 player is pretty cool though not reviewed in the article for some reason.

    5. Re:Design, by TheGadgetGeek · · Score: 1
      Additional design ideas

      Include the following features:
      • an XM radio
      • an FM radio
      • includes a real car connection kit that doesn't sound like junk!
      • bluetooth (for headphones, pc connection, and car connection - that would be cool)
      • ability to be a 'tivo-like' device for XM and FM radio
      • ability to record and encode audio at good bitrates
      • built in voice recorder / mic
      • and small enough to fit in all the cool ipod cases
      • sync voice memos with my computer
      • includes a real desktop sync program with the ability to update and catergorize content...
      • can access shoutcast streams from the Internet using my cellphone or pc - via bluetooth
      Oh, yeah -- it needs to be under $400!
    6. Re:Design, by Loko+Draucarn · · Score: 1

      How about the ability to accept winamp/whatever input plugins so that we can take more varied formats than just compressed waves?

      I've got a lot of music that's in midi-type, MOD-type, and other non-standard forms that I'd like to be able to take with me, and can't (with the possible exception of that Vaio thing or the OQO.

      (sidenote: Alas, it only ships with winXP, but I'm sure that can be fixed by a clever alternate OS adherent.)

      sure, portability is great, but portability with high customizability is far better. Unfortunately, it's also loads more expensive.

    7. Re:Design, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the standard no one can create a box that works as well as an iPod, even though the poster hasn't tried any of the products.

  8. It's been done by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'll give you the first killer idea for free: make it just like the iPod but without the stupid glossy, scratch-prone plastic and polished metal.

    It's called the iPod mini.

    1. Re:It's been done by nicholas. · · Score: 1

      Part of my "killer idea" wasn't to ditch the gloss platic and polished metal and ALSO have a 1/10th of the capacity. But hey, I don't work at Apple: I'm just a Slashdot reader and history has shown that we know shit about real consumers.

  9. It's not the iPod companies have to better! by davidmcg1975 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think what companies don't realise that it's not really the player they have to better...it's iTunes. When it comes down to it, although the iPod is a great player, it's really it's integration with itunes that makes it work so well.

    1. Re:It's not the iPod companies have to better! by luvirini · · Score: 1

      well, yes, but as other companies have now set up music stores, maybe integration with one of them could help?

    2. Re:It's not the iPod companies have to better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way, iTunes sucks. I ditched it for ephpod almost as soon as I got my iPod.

    3. Re:It's not the iPod companies have to better! by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think what companies don't realise that it's not really the player they have to better...it's iTunes. When it comes down to it, although the iPod is a great player, it's really it's integration with itunes that makes it work so well.

      According to Apple, 2m iPods have been sold and 20m iTunes tracks.

      This means that for each iPod, there are 10 tracks from iTunes on it.

      Assuming each track is 3 meg big and the average iPod is 30 gig, then you are looking at ((3*10)/(30*1024))*100 = 0.1% of a users iPod taken up with iTunes music.

      Even if you double or quadruple the downloaded numbers, you are still talking less than 1% of iPod music is from iTunes.

      In short, based on these stats, I cannot see how anyone can consider the iTunes service as a key driver in someones purchasing decision of the iPod.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    4. Re:It's not the iPod companies have to better! by linuxci · · Score: 1

      He's talking about the itunes software, not the music store that it's linked to!

    5. Re:It's not the iPod companies have to better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other music stores are used with a damn web browser - they're way far behind iTMS, let alone portable player integration...

      Unless you want some kind of IE/WMP combo to sync you PC music to your portable player?

    6. Re:It's not the iPod companies have to better! by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      He's talking about the itunes software, not the music store that it's linked to!

      Oh blast, missed that :)

      Having said that, I installed iTunes (PC version) on my brothers computer and wasn't that impressed. It had a tendancy to mangle filenames, was rather sluggish and once the database and the partitioned hard-drive got out of sync with each other (which happened twice) there seemed to be no way to easily repair it short to exporting the lot to another location and then back again.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    7. Re:It's not the iPod companies have to better! by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Average iPod is probably closer to 20gig. Less actually when you consider mini's....

      And it's foolish to think that all iPods (or even half) are full or even close to it.

    8. Re:It's not the iPod companies have to better! by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      Average iPod is probably closer to 20gig. Less actually when you consider mini's....

      And it's foolish to think that all iPods (or even half) are full or even close to it.

      True. So if we assume that average iPod size is only 10 gig and only a quarter of it is full, then we're talking 2.5 gig.

      (3*10)/(2.5*1024))*100 = 1.18%

      Even with the generious statistics in Apple's favour, I still don't think its enough to really influence anyones purchasing.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    9. Re:It's not the iPod companies have to better! by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Well yea, I agree with your original point (should've said that) but was just nitpicking your numbers....my bad...=)

  10. All I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    is something that can play mod/xm/it/s3m/etc from flash. I'll even be happy with just a few kilobytes of memory!

    1. Re:All I want by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      buy a pocketpc then

      there are lots of mod players for it.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    2. Re:All I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention PSFs, NSFs, GYMs, SPCs... all those good old console game chiptunes.

  11. OGG? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    None of these play Vorbis/FLAC? (Or at least it doesn't say they do). That's my number one reason for choosing a player, it's too bad it's overlooked.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:OGG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of these play Vorbis/FLAC?

      The Rio Karma does... and it is sadly missing from these so-called IPod killer articles...

    2. Re:OGG? by zaxios · · Score: 1

      iRiver does too (Ogg Vorbis, not FLAC). Look into the H320/H340 if you want a feature-packed player with excellent sound and can accept unintuitive controls.

    3. Re:OGG? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Informative

      >None of these play Vorbis/FLAC?

      Dammit, at least RTFSlashdotSummary: "and an Ogg/photo/FM broadcast record, flash unit from SAFA."

    4. Re:OGG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be more interested in mix cd's working properly.

      On iTunes you can link tracks so it's a flowing work that the artist/dj intended. But it's one file.

      I want mix cd's to play seamlessly WITH proper track listing. At the moment you can have one or the other. Minidisc can do it, as far as i'm aware mp3/ogg/aac players can't.

    5. Re:OGG? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's overlooked, as only relatively few people around the world use it. I'm all for using little-known standards, just don't kick up a fuss when no-one supports it. I mean, if I made a new audio format using coat-hangers and corned beef, should I be entitled to cry and scream blue murder when Apple refuses to issue a patch?

    6. Re:OGG? by marsonist · · Score: 1

      The squeaky wheel gets the grease... De facto standards are not necessarily the best options. Without people advocating choice many people would never know that such a choice exists.

    7. Re:OGG? by chendo · · Score: 1

      Colour screen, 13 hours of user-rated battery life (16 on the site), USB Host function (plug in UMS devices, although not all of them work), firmware upgradeable, beta video playback (although it's limited to 10fps and XVID as of now, but still pretty good for a player that was never designed to play video), picture viewing, FM Radio, Text reader (supports a ton of languages + unicode), built in microphone, comes with external lapel microphone, line-in/out ports (comes with line-in/out cable), remote control, Seinheisser (spelling probably wrong) earbuds, direct mp3 encoding... come on! Best $782 AUD I've ever spent (bought at mp3direct.com.au).

      There's even image-modding programs now to change the images in the firmware.

      --
      Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
    8. Re:OGG? by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Fine - advocate the choice. If the choice was substantially better than MP3, the market will demand it. As it is, OGG is only better than MP3 on a licensing/ideology level, so why on earth would the industry spend time and money on rebranding MP3 with OGG, introducing support/codecs, updating the client software, and creating a whole bunch of issues with software just to support a few people's ideological preferences. That's like McDonalds getting rid of burgers because 2 vegetarians asked them.

      Anyway, it's a de facto standard as everyone's using it. If you'd said de jure standards were not always the best, I'd agree with you. As it is, MP3 wouldn't be so popular if OGG was better.

    9. Re:OGG? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      That's two references to beef. (Corned beef and McDonald's hamburgers)

      I think someone has the munchies.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    10. Re:OGG? by Quixote · · Score: 3, Informative
      From the bloody summary itself (above):
      and an Ogg/photo/FM broadcast record, flash unit from SAFA.

      RTFA, the SAFA SR-M800F can play MP3, WMA and OGG.

      I don't know what is sadder: people responding to /. without even reading the one sentence blurb, or the mods who didn't do the same and modded parent up.

      I know, this is /., it shouldn't surprise anybody...

    11. Re:OGG? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You're bang on the money :) I'm eating cheese sandwiches now. The hunger was too much to bare.

    12. Re:OGG? by marsonist · · Score: 1
      Ogg is a superior codec on more than just an ideoligical lever. I'm not an opensource zelot, I use what suits my needs best. Ogg sounds genuinely better than equal bitrate mp3s. You say that people would use Ogg if it were better, but how could that be the case if a majority of users have never heard of it. MP3 was first out of the door, but that doesn't make it better.

      If we only listen to the people that agree with us, then we will never get anywhere... It takes people pushing new ideas for them to get a foothold. To assume that products propagate from computer to computer on their own just because they are best is foolish at best.

      The problem with OGG is that it is an incrimental upgrade, not groundbreaking like mp3. Most people would still be using the first versions of Internet Explorer if there wasn't an 800 lb. gorilla forcing newer versions on people.

  12. Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I understand correctly, Apple's iTunes' architecture (at least, on a Mac) allows MP3 player manufacturers to write "plug ins" for it, so it works with their players much the same as it works with the iPod. A list of iTunes compatible players can be found here: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=935 48.

    My question is - why is this list so short? Isn't writing a plug-in a fairly simple thing? Why have so few of the MP3 player manufacturers bothered to make their players compatible with this program?

    iTunes for Windows won't work with any player but the iPod. If Apple makes that decision, to encourage people to buy iPods, that I at least understand. But as long as the architecture is there on the Mac, why don't more player manufacturers take advantage of it?

    - Alaska Jack

    1. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      They probably have to pay for it, I guess...

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    2. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by jokumuu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the maC market is quite small, so until the windows version supports other players, I do not see much market. Yes there is market as can be seen from the list, but of the total MP3 player market, the combination of people who use Mac and Itunes and want something else than iPod is Very low.

    3. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      The only people who buy anything other than an iPod are:

      1) Slashdot/OpenSource kooks - still clinging to the dead .ogg format

      2) MS diehards - foaming at the mouth that MS was blown out of the market by Apple with the now useless .wma format

      What would be the point of iTunes support for either of those two groups?

    4. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well from TFA:

      Apple has refused to the license FairTunes DRM to makers of other digital portables. This way only the iPod can play music purchased on iTunes. Well iPods and any PC using the Mac OS or Windows.

      Apperently the Sony workaround was to create a very small PC but i guess there are some limits on how small you can make a Windos / Mac - compatible Pc...

    5. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 0

      eing an iRiver user, I've ignored iTunes, I don't see what the big deal is... it doesn't get easier tahn drag n drop files from my c:\mp3\whatever_artist to f:\ (my iRiver drive)... What am I missing?

      Also on that link you gave, Apple states:

      "Songs purchased from the iTunes Music Store are encoded using the AAC Protected format and cannot be converted to MP3 format. You can burn them to audio CDs and play them in consumer audio CD players. "

      so...
      AAC -> Audio Cd -> CD Ripper -> MP3 ???
      Am I missing something?...

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    6. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      iTunes plays a whole lot of formats, not just iTMS AAC. That's what the grandparent poster was talking about; an MP3 player that works with iTunes, but not necessarily the iTMS.

    7. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by pyrros · · Score: 1

      Assuming you have all your music on iTunes AND you can fit all of it on your iPod, it can sync simply by pluging in the cable, no clicking involved. And you get two-way sync for ratings and playcounts as well.

      I do understand that the two assumptions, are quite limiting for you and me, but most non-techie people probably don't seem to mind.

      It would also be quite easy to write a program/ script that detects removable drives, looks for a file called 'hi-I-am-an-mp3-player.txt' in the root directory and syncs it to c:\music or wherever you store your music.

    8. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      That still misses the point that mp3 player interfaces are so horrible in general that iTunes for PC, as much of a memory hog as it is, blows them completely out of the water.

      I've never bought a single song from the iTunes store, but I've been using the player since it came out. Sound Jam was really nice to use, and iTunes is a reasonable facsimile of it, in some ways even a bit easier.

      Anyone who thinks winamp's interface is nice needs to be shot. Sure, it has some nice functions, but crappy, unreadable skinnability is *not* what I look for in an mp3 player. I want something that, you know, makes it easy to find/listen to my mp3's.

    9. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by feldsteins · · Score: 1

      AAC -> Audio Cd -> CD Ripper -> MP3 ???
      Am I missing something?...


      It can and does work just that way, but what you're missing is the fact that you have now compressed the audio twice. The first one, Apple's 128k AAC, really doesn't loose you much at all. It's a decent bitrate for a quality codec like that. But then you burn a standard audio cd. Fine, nothing lost there. Then you rip the audio cd.. If you're ripping with a lossy compression codec like mp3 or ogg or aac, you're losing more quality. Remember, there wasn't much fat to trim off this porkchop to begin with, it having been compressed once by Apple before you bought it.

      Does this make a huge difference in the listening experience? Your mileage will vary, I guess. On a good stereo, I suppose it would. Especially if you played it side-by-side, as it were, with a file which hadn't been compressed. But for most folks I expect it's probably still workable.

      The key here is that Apple was able to go to the record companies and say "it's no longer a 'perfect digital copy' of your product!" They were into that idea, these guys, worried that putting stuff on the internet resulted in everyone having a "perfectly reproduced copy," in contrast with the days in which we were all dubbing cassette tapes for one another.

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    10. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by feldsteins · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that other players could "integrate" with iTunes all they wanted with one exception: your player will never play stuff bought from the iTunes music store. I could be way wrong on this, but I thought Apple was basically holding the DRM keys on that one and not sharing at all. (To be clear: AAC is a standard format anyone can use, but the specific DRM used in the iTMS-bought AAC files is playable only by iPod.)

      Or have I got this wrong?

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    11. Re:Why so few iTunes compatible MP3 players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the point of an iTunes compatible player that still can't play iTMS purchased songs. If you've bought into the Apple way of organizing music, why buy an incompatible player?

  13. Mentality by zaxios · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'iPod Killers'

    Inevitably, something that wants to be just a "product A killer" lacks the originality that made "product A" popular to begin with.

    Creativity can't be mimicked. I for one welcome any products that aren't easily defined by other products. The next batch of iPod-mimicking underlords, on the other hand, aren't so well-met.

    1. Re:Mentality by Mornelithe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of these products probably aren't marketed as 'iPod killers'. They're just marketed as MP3/music players. However, that doesn't make for good headlines/page view tallies on mp3newswire or Slashdot, so people feel compelled to call every mp3 player an iPod killer.

      iPods are currently the most popular mp3 player (by far), so it's easy to characterize any mp3 player in terms of an iPod. I could just as easily characterize everything as a Nomad killer, or an iRiver killer, but less people would know what I'm talking about, and it wouldn't make sense since they're not the most popular mp3 player.

      Or are you saying that you only buy the most popular of any given product space? Will you not drink RC Cola because I could say, "It's like Pepsi." Do you only buy Kleenex brand facial tissues? Would you have never bought a portable cassette player that's not a Sony Walkman?

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    2. Re:Mentality by zaxios · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of these products probably aren't marketed as 'iPod killers'

      Maybe they're not marketed as iPod killers, but I suspect they are conceived as such. From a business perspective, winning the MP3 player market quite naturally involves killing the iPod, its current holder. However, more vulnerable than the position of the iPod as the most popular "MP3 player" is Apple's position as the manufacturer of the most popular "portable media player." (Or possibly, "most fashionable gadget.") My point is that no "iPod killer" will end up killing the iPod, but what might succeed is something that deliberately plans to be as suddenly unique to the world as the iPod was originally, something that people will buy instead of the iPod, but not something that does the same thing. Something consumers didn't realize they wanted, but as soon as it was presented to them, know that they do - and that they want it more than the iPod.

      Please don't ask me to be more specific. If I knew how to create the circumstances I detailed, I wouldn't be posting on Slashdot, thinking about sleep. (I would be counting money, thinking about sleep. Maybe I'm not missing all that much.)

      I could just as easily characterize everything as a Nomad killer, or an iRiver killer

      There wouldn't be too much point in killing the Nomad or the iRiver because their market shares are so small, so no, I don't think it comes as naturally to characterize MP3 players as potential killers of minor rivals as it does to compare them to the iPod.

      Or are you saying that you only buy the most popular of any given product space? Will you not drink RC Cola because I could say, "It's like Pepsi." Do you only buy Kleenex brand facial tissues? Would you have never bought a portable cassette player that's not a Sony Walkman?

      Personally, I'll buy what I think is the best product for my needs, for the best price. In my case, that was an iRiver H340. However, what I would buy is rarely the same as what sells well. More people drink Pepsi than RC Cola, regardless of my preferences.

    3. Re:Mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      reading all this orgy of quasi-bacchanalian religious fervour makes me never, ever want to buy any product made by apple ever for the rest of my life. I like macs, the ipod is an attractive *gimmick*, but this creepy act of prostration, this cult-like tongue-probing of Steve Jobs' and Jonathan Ives' (he's just a designer, a competent one, but by no means the best) nether regions makes me feel queasy. I'd prefer to marry a christian fundamentalist and spend the rest of my life hearing about 'Jesus, my best friend' than get involved in your self-abasing prostrations before the altar of a public corporation. look at yourselves, don't you feel embarassed?

    4. Re:Mentality by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Any product that tries to do what an iPod does but says "hey, but it's got Ogg Vorbis playback" is likely to succeed in nothing but a small market.

      What Apple have grasped and no-one else in the computer field has is what can be called "product love". That is, the complete opposite of product checklists. It's about real design, design orientated around the user, from both a usability pov, but also from it being something that they enjoy holding and keeping. Apple owners are like Morgan, Mini and Beetle owners. People don't love those cars because of their fuel economy, ride, handling or luggage space. It's something more than that.

    5. Re:Mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inevitably, something that wants to be just a "product A killer" lacks the originality that made "product A" popular to begin with.


      Inanimate objects can't want things.

      The producers aren't casting their devices as "iPod killers," journalists and bloggers are.

      The iPod wasn't the original MP3 player.

      Creativity can't be mimicked.

      Pull the other one! It's done all the time, and it works some of the time. Otherwise nobody would bother making knockoffs (or sequels).

    6. Re:Mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All true... However, the price. If i can get a 40 gig hard disk and the ability to store stuff on it, plus the ability to play MP3's stored on it, I'm willing to buy a worse design/less functionality device for a cheaper price. iPod's arent too expensive, but they aren't too cheap either.

      Besides, progress can be made through repeated imitation/experimentation. Some minor details can be improved, and that wouldn't be worthless in the grand scheme of things.

  14. Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mean, is there a technical reason (beyond the space-saving shape) that an iPod needs the kind of battery it has? Would an iPod work with regular ol' AA batteries? Or do they not supply enough juice?

    Being able to use just regular, store-bought batteries would really make an iPod a lot more appealing to me, even if they brought with them a small increase in size & weight.

    - Alaska Jack

    1. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by whatsup_will · · Score: 1

      more likely that if you did the good old AA bateries , you will have to spend more money on batteries than on the unit itself. with that in mind, would u like to run your ip on 4 AA battries like the first gameboy did? and i am not meaning that gameboy colour type either.

    2. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by seringen · · Score: 2, Informative

      get the belkin battery pack. it'll make your ipod bigger, but you'll get a lot of play time with it. there's another one on the market that uses a custom laptop battery as an addon, too. but that's even less like you want. personally i HATE changing batteries, it's a huge cash sink and also it's even more bad for the environment

    3. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by solowCX · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      I'm replying to my own comment here -- is that bad form? -- but I want to clarify two things in response to some of the other replys.

      1. If an iPod could just take AA batteries, that doesn't mean I couldn't use *rechargeable* AA batteries.

      2. I actually know about the Belkin battery pack and all that. But I just want to know: would it technically be possible to make an iPod that ran on regular batteries, or is there some technical reason it can't be done?

      - Alaska Jack

    5. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by sitharus · · Score: 1

      Technically it can run on AA. There's no reason why not, other than the form factor. The current requirements can be sorted by chaining the batteries in the right order.

      Since Belkin can do it I'd assume Apple can. They just don't want a half tonne ipod :P

      --
      --sitharus
    6. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or, a device that can charge the iPod/MP3 players from batteries via the "dock connector", atleast?

    7. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by dave420 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you seen the size of the battery in the iPod? I took my first-gen ipod apart, and the battery is a few millimeters high. AAs (and even AAAs) take up CONSIDERABLY more space. If the iPod was to use A{2,3}s, then it would be massive, removing a lot of its appeal.

    8. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? What?
      Who cares? Really, why would you want to go and do a thing like that? Seriously. Maybe these replies would be a little more focused if you could give one good reason for this. It'll probably work... especially since devices do exist, which you already know about, that power the iPod with the wastes of money that, for whatever evil, evil reason, you want to power it with. Do you work for Energizer or something?

      Boy did you ever pin Apple's big problem. If only the iPod used AA batteries, it wouldn't be such the flop it's been. They had really better hurry up and improve iPod's compatibility with the copper top before the whole project ends up in the Newton bin.

      I wish I had more time to ask rhetorical questions to nothingness, but I'm busy trying to power my laptop with a lead-acid battery. When I'm done, I'm going to hook my server up to a fucking windmill.

    9. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      Are you taking any medication? If not, you might want to consider it; if yes, you might consider breaking the pills in half.

      I simply

      1. noted that the iPod would have more appeal to me *personally* if it used regular, replaceable batteries, and

      2. out of curiousity, asked if there was any TECHNICAL reason it couldn't, or if it was just a design decision on Apple's part.

      As far as the "wastes of money" thing, if I had such an iPod I'm sure I would generally use rechargeable AAs -- in other words, instead of having a single, smaller but proprietary, non-removable rechargeable battery, I would use larger but standard, removable rechargeable batteries.

      I never said Apple had a problem, I neither said nor implied the iPod was a flop, etc. etc.

      The funniest part of your post is where you say "I wish I had more time to ask rhetorical questions to nothingness." Funny because you obviously *DO* have the time, seeing as how your reply was just as longer or longer than my comment.

      - Alaska Jack

    10. Re:Electricians: Could iPod use regular batteries? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree there would definately be a tradeoff. And I'm not critiquing Apple's choice in this -- obviously they have a huge winner on their hands. I'm simple noting that I personally would be fine with a slightly bigger iPod (within limits, of course) if it meant I could use standard and/or rechargeable AAs. Be better for long trips and things like that.

      Cheers

      - Alaska Jack

  15. Not that big of a problem by drgonzo59 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The competitor's iTunes are called Direct Connect, BitTorrent, Kazaa and eMule. Sometimes it is called "my friend from college that has 200GB of music and hasn't been busted by the record companies (yet!)" The usability factor is there, of course, but it is not that bad actually, and such a thing as "my boyfriend's friend who knows computers(tm)" or "my nephew who is into programming(tm)" coupled with $0 /song can make things much easier for the average consumer.

  16. Bluetooth by BrookHarty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My cellphone has bluetooth (Motorola UMTS A845), wish it could link up with an mp3 player and stream the music. I can put music on the phone but with 64 megs, I have to re-encode the files at a lower bitrate for more space. It really has good sound.

    Also, its got a 320x240 screen, good enough for mp4 move trailers and news, would be nice to stream movies too.

    Thought the idea of bluetooth was clustering, have a bunch of devices that can just hook up and use each other's resources. Sounds good anyways. Be nice to save photos over a bluetooth camera to the phone to mail or the video/mp3 player for storage.

    Thinking of that, I could just plug a 30 dollar bluetooth adapter into my laptop and go. Shame, so simple.

    1. Re:Bluetooth by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      And/or the other way round: a bluetooth headset profile on the iPod so you can hear your phone ringing while you're listening. It should announce the caller with a synthesized voice so you can decide whether to answer.

      The required microphone could be used to record your ideas/todos on the iPod quickly too.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    2. Re:Bluetooth by farnsaw · · Score: 1

      My mobile (Nokia 6230) has blue tooth and is an MP3 player, I even invested in a 1 Gig MMC card for it, however, don't count on Bluetooth for transferring music to the player. For those who don't know, bluetooth is slow. 1Mbit/sec sounds fast until you realize that, in the real world, it is much slower than that due to various factors from non-ideal conditions to the implementation of Bluetooth in your phone (or other device). I transferred songs to my phone using bluetooth and it took so long that I went out and purchased a USB 14 in one card reader and now do it that way. Don't even get me started on movies :) Bluetooth is fine for streaming the music to another device, such as an earpiece/microphone, as you don't care how fast it is so long as it is fast enough for real-time playback. But you don't want to take 5 minutes to transfer a 5 minute long song, you want it to take about 10 seconds (or less) and even the proposed upgrade to 3Mbit/sec will not solve this problem.

      Don't get me wrong, bluetooth is nice but it has it's limitations.

      --
      "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
    3. Re:Bluetooth by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Considering that's not what bluetooth is for, I'm not surprised you had problems with it :) It would be like me complaining that it takes a while for me to send text documents by semaphore ("my DSL is much faster!"). Bluetooth is made for streaming voice, control data, or sending text files. Anything else is stretching it beyond its design. Not to say it's not useful - I find it incredibly useful, it's just not meant to transfer megs and megs of MP3s :)

    4. Re:Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluetooth is fast enough to transfer files...

    5. Re:Bluetooth by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Small, easy-to-compress files? yes. Hundreds of megs of MP3s? No.

    6. Re:Bluetooth by farnsaw · · Score: 1

      I agree that what it was designed for it does fine. It even syncronizes my contacts at a fair rate. I admit that I started using bluetooth without any real knowledge of it's specification as it came with my mobile phone and I purchased a Bluetooth adapter for my laptop shortly there after. Using bluetooth as a wire replacement for headsets and the like is nice, however, there are those of us who see it as another device connectivity network for transferring data of any kind and I would like to see it up in the 10-11 Mbit range (ok, I admit it, the 100 Mbit range :) however, the tradeoff would be power consumption and space which would be unacceptible for a mobile phone and for a headset, though they are doing some incredible things with low power 802.11a/b/g stuff today.

      --
      "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
    7. Re:Bluetooth by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I hear ya. You seem to be a bit confused about what Bluetooth is actually for. It's to replace infrared, to stream audio, send small amounts of data, and replace any data cables for syncing devices. It's slow on purpose, as that allows the entire bluetooth chipset to cost cents, be tiny, and consume next to no power. A WLAN connection, which is essentially what you're requesting, would add tremendously to the weight, power consumption and cost of whatever you're adding it to.

  17. Yes, an iPod can use regular batteries by Jeff85 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Previously, on Slashdot... Build Your Own iPod Battery

    --
    Fetch Text URL - Firefox Extension
  18. Aesthetically challenged by traffi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's all well and good, but it is a shame that competitors are having such a hard time producing a product that looks as cool and slick as the iPod.

    Compared to the iPod and the mini, these products are just plain ugly. (IMHO). Until the competitors manage to steal or match Jonathan Ive, Apple's chief industrial design talent, the iPod will reign supreme.

    Since I'm financially challenged and these products are aesthetically challenged, I'll go without an mp3 player for now.

    --

    Treo + Kaffi = Traffi
    1. Re:Aesthetically challenged by tksh · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at iRiver's N10?

      It's a bit on the pricey side as far as flash players go but it's really small (about the size of my two pinkies put together), lightweight, has 10+ hours playtime with 192Kb songs and it looks great. Plus they have a white version coming out and I hear they plan to offer 1G sizes soon.

      I picked up a 512M model over the summer in HK for about $240USD and I've been really happy with it. Wearing around your neck, everyone either instantly recognises it as a mp3 player or think it's some sort of cool looking lighter.

    2. Re:Aesthetically challenged by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how come no gunmetal blue or brushed steel or tortiseshell or onyx or pearl or mica or walnut finishes on my mp3 player? Surely polycarb+stainless steel is not the PINNACLE of consumer design?

      Of course I'm sure we'll see some of those finishes on the iPod SE at some point next year!

  19. Digital Music Players? by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This article takes a very narrow view. What about the Mini Disc players. The new HD-MD format has a 1 gig disc that costs $7. 7 bucks for a 1 gig removable media alone should give this line of players a huge boost over most mp3 players. Add in the battery life (40-50 hours on a single AA), and it becomes a great option. Hardware prices start well below the price iPod mini too.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:Digital Music Players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MD is crippled by an stupid and overly involved system where you first have to convert it to a proprietary audio codec. They're great for certain purposes, but for the average person, you'd have to be crazy.

    2. Re:Digital Music Players? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I'm a huge minidisc fan. They've had their day. I got my first one in '98, and I used it until I got myself an iPod in '01. They've had their day. The problem is, they use removable media. With an iPod, you have 10,000 tracks in your pocket, not in your special-bag-for-your-media-player-as-it-has-no-bui lt-in-storage. I know it's a seemingly small issue, but when you don't have the music you want to listen to on the MD in your player, you have to change the disk. Being the 21st century, I thought we were above that ;) Oh yeah, and ATRAC sounds like ass.

    3. Re:Digital Music Players? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so to get the equivalent storage of my $300 40gb iRiver I would have to buy 40 minidisks at $7 each = $280.00, I doubt I can get a minidisc player for $20.00

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    4. Re:Digital Music Players? by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I look at it from a slightly different direction. With the MD player I have 50 hours of playback time in my pocket as well has 500 tracks. Adding to that 50 hours is easy by carrying a few extra AA batteries. You can also get AA's anywhere when you're travelling.

      What good is 10,000 tracks in your pocket when your 10 hour battery will only let you listen to 200 of them?

      To me the fact that I can change the media with extra discs in my special-bag-for-my-media-player is just icing on the cake. The cake is the standard batteries.

      I don't want to have to remember to charge my media player every day so I'll be able to use it the next day, and I want a lot more than 10 hours of play time off a charge. There are days when I listen to my MD player for more than 10 hours.

      I know there's a lot of people here complaining about the cost of batteries, but come on, alkaline AA's are 40 cents, that's under 1 cent/hour for playback. Over the life of the thing you'll spend less than the difference in price between the minidisc player and the iPod. That also assumes you won't be keeping the iPod more than a few years or you'll have to spend $100 on a battery replacement.

      If the iPod took a single AA battery like the MD player, got the same life out of it, and were no bigger than the MD player, I'd have bought one long ago.

    5. Re:Digital Music Players? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Having used iTunes as playback software on my powerbook and having loaded music into my MD player over the netMD interface, I really can't imagine synching music to the iPod is any easier than to the MD player.

    6. Re:Digital Music Players? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Once again, what good is 40gig of music storage if the batteries only last a few hours?

    7. Re:Digital Music Players? by dave420 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The thing with the iPod is not that you can listen to all your music on one charge, but that you can take your entire collection wherever you go. When I'm on a flight, all I need is my iPod. I don't have to scrabble about collecting which ever minidiscs I want to listen to on my holiday, or pack them all to have my whole collection.

      I take my iPod to parties, and with the mains adaptor/belkin battery pack and a headphone->stereo jack lead, I have (checking itunes...) 3 weeks of music. The beauty is, it can randomise ANY track you have on there, not just whatever's on the current MD. So, if you want to play "dance" music at the party, select the dance genre.

      Also, I don't have to think about what MDs to take with me - I just take all my music at once. :)

      Don't even get me started on the firewire interface (so I can capture my music even faster), and the fact it's a 40gig hard disk (I keep VMWare client install and a Windows 2003 adv. server VPC on the iPod - it's configured with VPN & SSH access to my home machine, so I have a PC on my home network wherever I can find an internet-connected PC with a firewire port).

    8. Re:Digital Music Players? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      My iRiver lasts 16 hours on a full charge, recharge time is just a couple of hours, more than ample for my needs.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    9. Re:Digital Music Players? by Mant · · Score: 1

      Not much, but are there any 40GB storage players which do that? I've got the iRiver 40GB and it does about 14 hours with vbr MP3 and OGG.

      That's plenty for me to listen to it in the car, at work, in the gym and in the car again. Then charge up over night.

      Plus, don't have to carry disks around. I guess if you have a smaller collection and spend long periods of time where you can't ge the mains (like camping or something) the new mini-discs would have more appeal.

    10. Re:Digital Music Players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't have 40Gb of music because want to listen to it *all in one sitting*.

      I have 40Gb of music because I want to be able to listen to any song I want without having to dig around for the right disc like a tool.

      Dur.

    11. Re:Digital Music Players? by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 1

      I was a big mini-disc fan up until the advent of the Open MG "Net MDs". This software puts such ridiculous restrictions on your music (the discs cannot be re-written by anything other than the original machine, the discs' contents cannot be removed by anything other than the original machine, and the original SP "full quality" recordings are no longer available with media transfered using this software.

      I am in the unenviable position of having 20 discs of music in this country, all my cds in another along with the original laptop, and no way to transfer the music back to pc.

      I realise that I could just record from the line out, but in this digital age, that's quite distasteful, and I don't have an optical port on my soundcard.

      Additional commentary can be found at
      http://www.minidisc.org/NetMD_faq.html#_q83

    12. Re:Digital Music Players? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Minidisc is a sham. $7 for a proprietary, hard-to-find disc, that can only be used on proprietary, expensive players, which only holds a gigabyte, and comes with built-in SCMS DRM? Absurd.

      Add to that the inherent incompatibility of the format: If you want to cut an MD for a friend (assuming you can even find a friend with an MD player), you first need to establish if their machine will play the LP ATRAC format, if they can play the Hi-MD discs, and so on. After that, you plug in your expensive DRM-crippling player with a USB port, and, since MD is inherently slow, start the long process of transcoding to ATRAC and copying music over.

      As another poster noted, it's cheaper to get a hard-drive based iRiver player.

      I've been feeding CD-Rs to my IMP-350 for years. The discs are oftentimes free, or at least less than twenty-five cents, and they hold 700 megabytes. I can make a disc full of music in a couple of minutes under Linux, or by dragging-and-dropping in Windows Explorer. No transcoding, no extra software, no DRM to piss people off with.

      And if I want to grab a stack of CDs off of the rack before heading out of town, I can do that without having to spend an afternoon ripping and encoding. It is a CD player, after all.

      And if someone shows interest in the music I'm listening to, I can just give them the disc. They're essentially free, after all.

      Since MP3 CD-Rs are universal, that person is sure to be able to play it. It works in home DVD players, in portable CD players, in everyone's PC, and they even play in the car.

      MD was stillborn over a decade ago. The promise of prerecorded discs has long since vanished. The blanks never have gotten cheap. And so, like all other magneto-optical formats ever produced, MD will forever reign in the "neat, but really fucking expensive" category. The only reason it is still around is that nobody has bothered to build a coffin for it yet.

      But since you asked for it, here's your Minidisc review:

      The MZNH600D. Despite its unpronouncible name, this is a really neat looking unit. It doesn't skip. And it runs on a single AA battery for the rest of your fucking life.

      But that's not all - get ready to increase your media costs by 20 times, and kill yourself and your music while transcoding to ATRAC, because that's what you've gotta do just to make one lousy disc.

      And don't bother sharing that disc with your friends, because they can't play it. Oh, and SCMS ensures that you can't copy it, either.

      At least it's small, and you'll save money on batteries.

      RIP.

    13. Re:Digital Music Players? by james_pb · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know with a MiniDisc player is a musician who uses it to record. I don't think this is a sampling problem; my suspicion is that that's the majority of the market for MiniDisc "players" these days.

      So far, there aren't a lot of other options. A decent cassette recorder is bulky (I still use my Sony WMD6 pro model recorder), so are DAT recorders, and neither offer the convenience of easy access to multiple tracks.

    14. Re:Digital Music Players? by adolf · · Score: 1

      I conveniently ignored that market segment in order to simplify my argument, but you're correct.

      The only people I know (who aren't pathetic morons that needlessly spend money on expensive gear, and then wonder why they have nothing to eat) who actually do use Minidisc are musicians.

      OTOH, of those musicians, the one who uses MD the most sees it as a performance aid, not a recording device. He's got a higher-end (Tascam, I think) rackmount model that he gigs with, and uses to queue backing tracks. He uses a simple pedalboard wired to the unit's PS/2 keyboard jack so that he doesn't have to turn away from the crowd or take his hands off of the guitar to make it work.

      It seems to work pretty well for him.

      The last live recording I did, personally, was at a 2-day outdoor festival. I used a laptop, some cheap Soundblaster USB audio kit, and a program called mp3directcut. The Soundblaster device is just 2-track, but it clipped smoothly and made a great-sounding recording. The laptop was also serving triple-duty offloading the photographers' flash memory cards, and keeping a current radar picture up via cellular modem.

      At the start of each day, I just pressed record, checked levels (once), and let it roll. It's hard to run out of tape when you're spooling MP3s onto a 60gig drive...

      No problems to report, despite the fact that it was running XP. I had half a mind to leave the laptop behind and use something different for recording (what, like I need to troubleshoot Windows while trying to work a monitor mix, FOH, and fight power problems), but I'm glad I didn't. It saved a lot of asses, and a lot of gear, when several angry storm cells converged overhead and formed a tornado just down the road. Keeping the radar on-screen gave us just enough warning to tarp the speakers and let people know that it was about to get ugly. (From blue sky to inches of rain, killer wind and hail in five minutes.)

      Minidisc players just don't do that stuff. :)

    15. Re:Digital Music Players? by brw12 · · Score: 1

      I've got the iRiver 40GB and it does about 14 hours with vbr MP3 and OGG.

      Ditto. I also had mp3 player reservations and my iRiver ihp-120 (20gb) dispelled (almost) all of them.

      1. it plays ogg vorbis
      2. 20gb is $300
      3. has line-in recording for mic or music; i interviewed gramps and stored hours of talk
      4. fm tuner with great reception
      5. plug it into an xp box and it just comes up as a drive -- no install cd BS
      6. battery lasts longer than fidel castro
      7. all accessories included, no cheap forced accessory purchase (earbuds, ac, remote)
      8. plays winamp playlists, so i can use same ones on my pc as on iriver
      9. pretty small (about size of gameboy pocket)
      10. and it looks sexy too, just not quite ipod-sexy.

      the only problems i've had are:

      1. wait time between tracks (currently about 1 sec) but one day that may be remedied by Rockbox's open source firmware upgrade project
      2. can't delete files directly on device
      3. gui is a little counter intuitive--i like it fine but if my girlfriend wants to play a song she needs me to queue it up for her
      4. needed to replace earbuds after 6 months, bought these sony fontopia earbuds which are awesome
    16. Re:Digital Music Players? by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      Heh heh, 16 hours? Bah, check out these MD players.
      http://www.minidisc.org/portable_table.h tml

      While they're not the HI-MD, it's obvious there's going to be a backlash in MD users if they come out with something with just a measly 16 hours.

      Some of these last 2 DAYS (48 hours) of continuous playback off 1 (yes, a single) AA battery. If your iRiver is to compare to an MD in battery life, there's no contest.

      And then there's an onboard lithium rechargable too....

    17. Re:Digital Music Players? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      I would far rather have to recharge my device every 16 hours and have 40B online instantly available (think shuffle mode...) than have to carry a library of minidisks with me.

      I do not see the 16 hour cycle as any sort of inconvenience at all

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  20. Maybe I'll miss the whole iPod thing by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was thinking the other day that I may never get an iPod or similar device. I don't like using the word never, of course, but I recently stumbled across something on eBay. 4 gig CF cards for $300. 2 Gigs on Newegg are in the $200 range. With that kind of storage, I'm seriously considering skipping the whole portable music player device and getting a new PocketPC/Palm that'll use one of these cards. 4 gigs is more than adequate for my music needs, plus I have other reasons for wanting a PDA.

    Though I doubt that's a reasonable alternative for a lot of people out there, I figured it was worth mentioning. I'm really attracted to the idea of having a little 'store all my interesting media' device.

    We gots some cool stuff coming around the corner.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Maybe I'll miss the whole iPod thing by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      The point is, you'll pay $300 for the storage alone and you'll have to take the PDA with you just to listen music, and finally you'll get the battery-life of a PDA with a 4gig CF card attached.

      How about buying a 4Gig MP3-player and a USB host-capable PDA?

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    2. Re:Maybe I'll miss the whole iPod thing by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "How about buying a 4Gig MP3-player and a USB host-capable PDA?"

      The main reason being that I want one unit. I don't have a strong demand for a stand-alone Mp3 player. I'm near a computer most of my waking life. I already have need for a PDA. Problem is, it's not a big enough need to a.) have it right now and b.) carry it around enough for it to be useful. But if one unit both carried all my music and did my PDA related stuff, that'd be enough to dump the money into it.

      Either way, you're right, $300 is spendy right now. That's why I don't own one yet. In maybe a year or so, the price should come down enough that it becomes an attractive idea. By then, I hope that PDAs have higher resolution screens. (Pity the Clie line is dying, those had an ideal screen for me.)

      Okay, I'm just babbling now. Point is I may actually be a PDA owner/user in the next year or so, but that'd kill my desire to be an iPod user/owner.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Maybe I'll miss the whole iPod thing by krouic · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have been long considering purchasing a portable player (to complement my old RIO PMP300 that I use only for jogging) and found using my PocketPC instead is a very viable alternative.

      Of course, with the current affordable memory capacities of about 1GB, I have to synchronize my collection about once a week (replacing tunes I have already listened to with fresh ones), but with the increasing capacities and decreasing prices, the time when I will have most of my collection "on-line" is not too far.

      As advantages of using my PDA, I do not have to carry two devices (I always have my PocketPC with me) and I can choose (or even develop my own) the player/navigation/synchronisation applications I use.

    4. Re:Maybe I'll miss the whole iPod thing by georgemoot · · Score: 1

      I've been using my Palm PDA as an MP3 player for some time now. I only have a 256 MB SD card for it, but I find that I can fit more music on it than the battery can last anyway. I'm okay with swapping out music every couple of days. I understand how music lovers might want a dedicated device such as an iPod, however for the person who just wants some music occasionally, and could make use of a PDA, then it's a great option.

      The only real limiting factor is the short battery life compared to other standalone MP3 players. I can get about 5 hours out of my Palm when I keep the screen off while it is playing. More than enough for my needs, and it charges back up very fast if need be.

      And of course the big benefit to relying on a PDA with swappable memory cards, is that the price of flash-based memory is constantly falling. I'm eyeing the 1 Gig SD cards presently. Cheapest I've seen is a rebate offer bringing them down to ~$50. Next time I spot one of those deals, I'll most likely pick it up so that I won't need to manage the music on my card nearly as often.

    5. Re:Maybe I'll miss the whole iPod thing by BP9 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've been pretty happy with my Nexia. It uses 2 AA's, the NiMH rechargables last around 20 hours, and its easy to keep a spare set around even when biking or whatever. It uses cheap, standard CF cards populated by simply copying files into the VFAT filesystem. No wacky 'media manager' or any of that BS.

      The s/w is just a little lame: in over a year they haven't been able to make it follow a playlist in order (it does almost always play in the order the directory was filled in though, so you can use it for audio books). Whoever they got for support in the US has a worthless website, if you want to d/l the latest firmware you have to go to the europe support site. Other than those minor issues the thing does what it does and does it well.

    6. Re:Maybe I'll miss the whole iPod thing by wehe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed "having a little 'store all my interesting media' device" not much bigger than just a portable audio player, but much more powerful, that's the way I like it, too. For example, you may use your Linux PDA not only to listen to "free" music, but also to view "free" pocket movies, to read a "free" eBook. Or the other way round, even generate your own media: writing a book (actually there is Z4CK a book written on a SHARP Zaurus Linux PDA already available), recording voices or music, take a picture, writing a program in the programming language of your choice, ...

    7. Re:Maybe I'll miss the whole iPod thing by mabu · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't hurt to wait, especially if you're using a PC. My iPod causes my PC to reboot whenever it plugs into the USB-based docking port. I have no problems with any other USB devices, so there are still some glitches to be worked out for iPod on the PC side of things.

  21. x2 megaview? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone have a link to anything else relating to the x2 megaview? A google search for "x2 megaview" only seems to turn up the article mentioned, and "x2 megaview mp3" doesn't do any better, with a paltry 126 results. You'd think I could at least find the product company's site, no? Must be quite a new company.

    This device looks like it's got a lot of potential to be an nice portable linux tool. I like the ability to record audio, and the fact that it has a hard disk. This'd alieviate some of the irritation of having to use an SD card for storage, as on a Zaurus. Now, if only it had a host USB hub, or maybe even an infrared port, I'd be set. USB host/client hub would be ideal, though (and, of course, a keyboard that would work with it).

    I wonder if I could run opie (or if it already has opie - doubt it, but that'd be cool) on it. I suspect it's quite capable of the task - and that too would be cool.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:x2 megaview? by sjoerd_visscher · · Score: 1

      Here you go. It's called MEGA View. (Found through this article.)

  22. Would it kill them... by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...to just put a table together with the product names, their suggested retail price, the type of media they use and/or built-in storage size, connectivity (Firewire/USB/etc) and their supported formats?

    And actually, I'm having my doubts that that's a comprehensive comparison/listing they've got on there in the first place.

    --
    All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    1. Re:Would it kill them... by no+haters · · Score: 1

      Reading back through the articles, it seems as if little effort/research was put into the articles. In the first one, the Creative Zen Micro, was listed as being "like the iPod Mini, [coming] in ten colors and [offering] 5GB of capacity." The iPod mini comes in 5 colors and offers 4GB of capacity. They also have the micro listed as retailing for $280 when it retails for $250. I only happen to know this because I just bought one, but if they can get so much wrong in one little blurb, I have little faith in the quality of the articles overall.

  23. Rio Carbon by lastberserker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's a fifth installment and we yet to see Rio Carbon - the best player in the iPod mini market segment. I wonder how much Apple hands over so the authors don't mention the player that beats mini in pretty much everything beginning with style, size (both 3d and hdd-wise) and battery life.

    And, yes, I know there is a rebranded Carbon in the list, but it doesn't have the original's style and battery life.

    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
    1. Re:Rio Carbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how much Apple hands over so the authors don't mention the player that beats mini in pretty much everything beginning with style

      Mod parent funny!

    2. Re:Rio Carbon by dave420 · · Score: 1
      What the fuck is up with you guys and conspiracy theories? When someone doesn't mention your favourite player, you think the company being praised has somehow paid off the writer. What the fuck?

      No. The Rio Carbon is a shitty player. It looks like someone took a Nokia phone and some tinfoil, and put them in the oven for a few hours. Read: curvy lines and selective plagiarism don't always make good design. Of course you're going to dispute this, just get back to me when someone mentions "rio carbon" in a sitcom, or as a generic term to refer to MP3 players. :) Just because you like something doesn't mean it's perfect and everyone else thinks the same way.

    3. Re:Rio Carbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When an iPod zealot gets backed into the corner and can not provide verifiable technical reasons, they bust out the opinionated "But the style". Typical and predictable. Of course you go above and beyond buy stating style depends on the person but then complain about the stlye? WTF? If that is not a flag to show some technical differences, i do not know what is.

      You seem to have forgot about the rest of the parents statement:

      the authors don't mention the player that beats mini in pretty much everything.

      You choose to defend the one that you claim yourself is up to the individual preference. Nice..

  24. iPod problems on PCs by mabu · · Score: 0

    I picked up an iPod the other day and I found that its USB and Firewire connectivity on PCs to be iffy at best. I couldn't get Firewire to work at all, most of the time when iTunes tries to connect to the iPod, it causes a fatal system error and I have to reboot XPpro. I haven't had trouble with any other devices using these ports so I have to assume the PC version of iTunes has some glitches that create problems with some PC configurations.

    1. Re:iPod problems on PCs by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I picked up an iPod the other day and I found that its USB and Firewire connectivity on PCs to be iffy at best. I couldn't get Firewire to work at all, most of the time when iTunes tries to connect to the iPod, it causes a fatal system error and I have to reboot XPpro. I haven't had trouble with any other devices using these ports so I have to assume the PC version of iTunes has some glitches that create problems with some PC configurations.

      Not sure what's so informative about that. I, too, have an iPod that I connect over Firewire to my PC and it works flawlessly, and has for a year without a single problem. Perhaps you should increase your sample size before making assumptions about the PC version of iTunes?

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    2. Re:iPod problems on PCs by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have iTunes on my PCs at work and at home, and it works perfectly, just like the mac. My firewire cards work fine, too, which makes me think you have a problem with your drivers, or some other software on your machine that uses your drives. Anti-virus springs to mind - that has effects on my ipod (such as making it unmountable - NAV sucks).

    3. Re:iPod problems on PCs by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      I started off using my iPod with a PC and I always found FW support on the PC to be very hit and miss. Both the cards and the drivers seem vary flakey: I guess a result of FW only really gaining any popularity on the PC since Apple released iTunes for Windows.

      Are the other devices you use succesfully with FW powered externally or via the FW cable? If they are externally powered then I'd suspect your FW card can't handle the current drain of the iPod.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    4. Re:iPod problems on PCs by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1
      I picked up an iPod the other day and I found that its USB and Firewire connectivity on PCs to be iffy at best. I couldn't get Firewire to work at all, most of the time when iTunes tries to connect to the iPod, it causes a fatal system error and I have to reboot XPpro. I haven't had trouble with any other devices using these ports so I have to assume the PC version of iTunes has some glitches that create problems with some PC configurations.
      It might be worth applying Occam's Razor here. Which is the more likely point of failure:
      • $300 Apple Hardware
      • Windows Drivers
      • $20 no-name firewire card

      --
    5. Re:iPod problems on PCs by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you have either:

      A massivley overclocked PC held together with string and duct tape that you've decided is "stable" because you can do basic IO and run SiSoft Sandra's CPU benchmark all the way through without the system crashing.

      or

      You have some name brand or off brand premade PC that you've never done any maintnence on. You keep it on the floor, the power supply and CPU heat sink have long been clogged with dust and/or the fans have died, and you might even smoke around it constantly...

      or

      You regularly install pirated software that contains viruses that your three year old virus scanner doesn't catch and you regularly click on e-mail attachments from unknown sender.

      and the part we know for sure:

      You wonder why some things don't work.

    6. Re:iPod problems on PCs by whitespacedout · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that HFS+ cannot be fscked from linux for the ipod mini yet (the normal ipods can with fsck.hfsplus. After 32 mounts, it needs an fsck or you get read only mode. Which means you can't change the stuff on the ipod. The only solution currently seems to be to get an XP machine to vfat the drive and it from linux like that henceforth, or to regularly go to an OSX machine to fsck the drive. Another part of the problem is that the usb module stack or fireware module can get cnofused if you don't do the connecting thing in the right order. Reconnecting a confused status further messes up things. This holds true for the MS windows kernel as well. I reckon any hardware problems are minor compared with that.

    7. Re:iPod problems on PCs by mabu · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous. This is a super clean AMD-based XP-Pro system that has nothing but the most basic startup processes that are part of the OS. I'm anal about making sure my systems are clean, and this PC that has the problems basically only runs 2-3 main applications. The system is not overclocked or non-standard. The closest thing to non-standard is that it's an AMD-based machine instead of Intel. The iPod should work, but it is buggy - or the driver software or something is messed up.

    8. Re:iPod problems on PCs by mabu · · Score: 1

      I have a Sony PC-100 video camera that I can connect right into the FW port on the PC and it works fine. It's only the iPod that isn't recognized.

      So I end up using the USB, which causes the system to reboot whenever I plug the iPod in (page fault in non paged area BSOD). After the system reboots, as long as I don't remove the iPod from the cradle, iTunes will recognize it. But if I tell iTunes to manually synch upon demand, the computer crashes again.

    9. Re:iPod problems on PCs by mabu · · Score: 1

      I thought maybe NAV was the culprit so I completely removed all references from the startup scripts and stripped the OS down to bare bones. I even changed BIOS settings regarding plug-n-play and peripheral and USB options.. nothing made a difference.

    10. Re:iPod problems on PCs by mabu · · Score: 1

      Suffice to say that critiquing any Apple product is likely to elicit great ire from the Apple sycophant community, but sorry, it's just my experience. I checked a lot of iPod-oriented messageboards and it seems I am far from the only person having these problems.

    11. Re:iPod problems on PCs by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I know this is a small sample, but one of the machines I sync my iPod with is a total mess of non-standard crap stuffed into too small of a box... Dual Athlon XP 1800+, Windows XP pro (SP1 - I uninstalled SP2 because it was unstable), $6 PCI Firewire card, 2 hard drives, 3 optical drives, PCI sound, PCI USB 2.0, PCI SCSI, PCI ethernet (all PCI slots used) DDS3 tape drive, AGP Gforce 5900, and I've been installing windows via upgrade since windows 3.1 including some Windows 95 betas (official, not pirated). All that, and iTunes still works fine with my iPod. Given all that, I'm gussing your problem is less of the "buggy" type and more of the "driver software or something is messed up" type.

    12. Re:iPod problems on PCs by mabu · · Score: 1

      I guess you're luckier than I am in this case.

  25. What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five pages of players and no Neuros? I'm severely disappointed.

    1. Re:What??? by madpuppy · · Score: 1

      I agree, I have one and it is pretty darn good.

    2. Re:What??? by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Shit, I have SIX. And I'm happily enjoying each of them.

      I have a 20GB HDD unit and five 128MB flash units. I take them to conferences and use them for voice audio recording. One 128MB flash unit recording 160Kpbs MP3s will record for close to 90 minutes.

      The 20GB unit is for recording 48Khz WAVs of live music.

      I use them professionally and although they have a few odd behaviors, they are overall very solid and excellent little mobile recorders. And they beat out Mini-Disc handily imho.

      Lastly, the firmware is now free speech software.

      Digital Innovations has done a good job. A very good job. Clicky.

  26. it's conceiveable... I think. :) by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, the real clincher here would be the fact that Lithium ion battery cells have a much higher energy density than alkaline, nickel cadmium, nickel metal hydride (sp?), or any of the other battery types (I can't think of any right now). So, you couldn't use "regular" AA or AAA batteries (1.5 and 1.2 volts, respectively, iirc) reasonably, without a significant mass of them (considering the ipod needs 11.1V).

    Lithium Ion AAA cells are 3V - 3.6V (I think), or so. You could conceiveably take 4, throw a resistor in there (can't think of the ohm you'd need off hand), and take it down to the 11.1 volts needed. Not really knowing what an iPod looks like (I've not really examined one in person), but this is conceiveably possible with my limitted understanding. Someone, please correct me if I'm wrong. :)

    I don't know if you'd be able to replace the internal battery when it dies, or if the damned thing is actually inside the ipod in an inconvenient fashion, but I -imagine- you could replace the internal battery (after it dies) with 4 lithium ion batteries and still charge them. I suspect that the ipod battery is simply a bunch of lion cells, anyway.

    You can get 4 li-ion AAA energizer batteries for about $10. I don't know if all liion batteries are rechargeable, or if the energizier batteries are - I'd think they would be. (anyone know for sure?) If they were, taking the time to figure this out might be worth the mod (once the battery dies), as an external battery pack costs about $80.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  27. RE Story Choice by D-Fly · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I wonder if the editors even read the stuff they pick for the front page. This is one of the most empirically worthless slashdot stories I've seen in a while though.

    This "story," submitted by an "anonymous reader" (ie the author of the review), was a complete waste of time. It's nothing but a collection of PR gibberish copied from the product pages of the players being reviewed. There is nothing of any interest in ANY of the blurbs, no evidence that the author has even seen the players he's "reviewing," and to top it all off, no links to the products he's "reviewing." (I googled one of the players he "reviewed" and got a bunch of garbage on the first page.

    I don't mean to insult Michael here, but I think he probably picked this one based on the headline (the writeup is better than the "story" linked to, and not supported by the story.)

    Obviously, people are indeed hoping to take some marketshare from Apple, but
    (1)none of the players reviewed in this story are going to take it (they're all obscure 2-bit companies which will be lucky to move 10k units.) and
    (2) Others (http://cnet.com/, http://wired.com/, and (don't laugh) even NYT's Circuits do a better job of reviewing gadgets). My advice though: just do a search for MP3 Player on http://engadget.com/ and http://gizmodo.com/.

    I am not trolling here. Please read the story yourself before moderating me.

    --
    \
  28. addendum to (2) above by D-Fly · · Score: 1

    ...err..other than Aiwa and Sony (which are the same company, I mean...

    --
    \
  29. OGG - who cares? by SlashdotMeNow · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Not to be nasty, but nobody really cares about OGG. 99% of the market of these things only cares about 1 format: MP3. Can it play MP3? Kewl, that's what I want. Nobody will switch anytime soon especially since most kids' friends players / PCs wont' play OGG either, so swapping OGGs (or any other new format) is harder than swapping plain ol' MP3s.

    I'm not saying OGGs suck, but the reality is that MP3 aint broken, so there's no need to fix it. My 192 kbps MP3s sound just fine and I have more space on my player than music to stuff it with.

    1. Re:OGG - who cares? by apanap · · Score: 1

      Actually my sisters not-so-geeky boyfriend was bragging to me about how his mp3-player could play ogg. Of course he didn't have a single ogg file to play on it, but apparantly it's bragable even for non-geek consumers nonetheless :)

      --
      Give me a job. Please?
    2. Re:OGG - who cares? by SlashdotMeNow · · Score: 1

      Nice. Having a cool name is always good for a technology!

  30. sigmatek dx740 by Keruo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if that sigmatek device could use external dvd drive for dvd playback, it would make perfect device for long bus trips
    it mentions support for mpeg-2, and if the device has enough power to unpack divx, it should have enough power to run dvds smoothly aswell, and with 40gb drive, you could even play the dvds from the hard drive instead carrying the disks with you

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
  31. Nope by zaxios · · Score: 1

    +1 Interesting, what are you kidding? All this post does is baselessly insult two groups. And yes, baselessly: the .ogg format/media container is becoming more popular, not less, and .wma is used by almost every non-iTunes store (i.e. it matters). If this deserves +1 Interesting, then I'm a ferris wheel.

    P.S. I'm not.

    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking ferris wheel, going round and around and around all day, opening your doors to every dick and jane and their god damned kids. Your a fucking slut! I'm never riding you again!


      Ok, may be one more time.

  32. Portable MP3 players are for escapists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually like to live, not escape to some other universe. Nerds.

  33. your nick by D-Fly · · Score: 1

    I take it from your nick you're a Jack from Alaska, like me. I grew up on Kodiak. Nice to find another one on Slashdot.

    --
    \
    1. Re:your nick by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      Been there (Kodiak) many times. In fact I used to fish out of Larsen Bay.

      - jc

  34. My tmobile ppc phone by under_clocker · · Score: 1

    My phone already does SPUD playes movies and games and it could even emulate sega, atari and even nes provided one had a source of roms- not that I know anything about that...

  35. "Fast/Cheap/Good" triangle by PygmyShrew · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a paradigm I find useful as a freelancer, where you can place a job as a point anywhere in the Fast/Cheap/Good triangle.

    So:
    If you want it Cheap and Good, it's going to take a long time.
    If you want it Good and done Fast, prepare to pay thru the nose.
    And if you want it done Fast and Cheap, it will suck...

    --
    I've had the theme tune to Quantum Leap going through my head all day... Now you have, too!
  36. Prices will drop. by Mazem · · Score: 1

    I'm saving my money for a 40+ GB solid state mp3 player that is small, robust, has 20+ hours of battery life and costs less than $100. Until then my trusty old CD player will do just fine.

    1. Re:Prices will drop. by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Were you trying to equate your CD player with more modern portable devices? If you were, good point, except that your CD player doesn't have 40gigs of storage :)

    2. Re:Prices will drop. by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Uh, 4gb hd with 8hr is $250 TODAY. In a year it will be 8gb for $200 with 12hr battery life. In two years it will be 20gb for $150 with 20hr battery life. In 3 years it will be 30gb for $125 with 25hr. In four years it will be 30gb for $100 with 30hr battery life.

      But it will still be a hard drive. The 'flash' version will be, if 1gb cf is $100 today, it will be $400 for 4gb, sans mp3 player. So if it were in a mp3 player it might cost $600 today. So by the time you get a 40gb solid state mp3 player for $100, it will be, I bet 9 years.

      Man, that's a rugged cd player if it will last you 9 years. What are you, stingy? :P

  37. iRiver controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The controls *are* unintuitive, though I have the same issue with the iPod controls.... Once you get used to the controls, it actually makes sense in a whacky kind of way. The biggest problem I have is that the remote has (though necessity) a different control system and I have gotten used to the remote version rather than the main unit control system.

  38. What about Xclef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see any mention of the M800 from Xclef. I bought one recently, having already ripped my entire CD collection to OggVorbis limited the options quite a bit
    It's not as ergonomic or pretty as the iPod, but it does a darn site more. Bit like the RIO products that aren't available here in OZ. English Product Page. No I'm not associated with them, just a reasonably happy user.

  39. mind the gap... by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

    I'd be more interested in mix cd's working properly.

    On i-Tunes you can link tracks so it's a flowing work that the artist/dj intended. But it's one file.

    I want mix cd's to play seamlessly WITH proper track listing. At the moment you can have one or the other. Minidisc can do it, as far as i'm aware mp3/ogg/aac players can't. Does it need a new format? (obviously minidisc uses it's own) or can aac be made to work? As i'm ripping stuff i own a new format doesn't bother me - as long as someone writes a winamp/xmms plugin

    --
    Acid House saves Souls
  40. no price, future mp3 players listed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks like a weak marketing blurb. I'm sure it took a while to type in - but it's weak.

    Few items in the entire list have prices listed (the two are > $1000), and it does not appear that anything was examined. Come to think of it, I don't think I saw the iPod listed in any of the five "Articles."

  41. Modular flash + hard drive player: where is it? by Rob+Cebollero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem I find with all these players is that it seems you get to choose between somewhat bulky, fragile hard drive units with a lot of storage but poor battery life, or small flash based players with at most 1gig of space. My own player, a Panasonic SV-SD80, is about the size of US quarter, but squared off. It weighs about an ounce and a half and I never go anywhere without it, as it is so small you can drop it in your pocket and almost mistake it for loose change. I've dropped it several feet onto hard pavement at least 10 times with no ill effects. Plus, running on its internal battery it gets 16-20 hours of run time, and with the water resistant case it comes with (which has an extra AAA battery inside) you get around 50 hours. Try that with an iPod... That being said, even with a 1Gb SD card installed (sidenote: why would anyone buy a non expandable flash player??) I only get perhaps 200-250 songs on it, which means I'm bored of the rotation in about a week.

    What I would like to buy is a player that comes packaged something like an ipod, but where the top 1/4 of it is a micro size flash based player (with an SD slot!) that contains a 1 or 2 line display, basic controls, and a small battery, and would afford the ultra-portable benefits of the SV-SD80 or similar player. For those times when you want access to your whole library, you would attach the bottom 3/4 would as 'dumb' modular add-on that simply holds a 20-60gb hard drive and a bigger battery to support it all, and the ability to shuttle songs to the flash unit as needed. Maybe even a larger (color?) display. It wouldnt need the player circuitry or controls, headphone jack etc, as that would all be contained in the flash head unit.

    1. Re:Modular flash + hard drive player: where is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too have wondered why they don't do something like this.. but i was thinking that the best bit for the flash player would be the remote.

      Make something like the iAudio M3, where all the navigation and LCD functions are on the remote (remotes for these players are about the size of flash players anyway) and then just allow the remote-flash-player to be detachable, with a small battery that recharges from the main unit when attached. Perfect.

      Although with the slow convergence with phones another option might be for the phone to have an sd card slot and then use this to transfer a small selection of songs from the hard drive unit to/from your flash player phone (and your camera of course...)

    2. Re:Modular flash + hard drive player: where is it? by Malc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      First of all, the iRiver iHP-120 will eaily pull 17 hours playing MP3s. It's a hard drive based player. It only gets about 11 hours with OOGs. This is my experience with a new one.

      Secondly, there is a player that does what you want. Over a year ago it was mentioned frequently here on /., although the news has been quiet recently. It's the Neuros player.

    3. Re:Modular flash + hard drive player: where is it? by Mex · · Score: 1

      The Neuros mp3 player has that exact functionality you're looking for, along with OGG, MP3, FM broadcasting, recording and open source software. Go get one.

  42. Tungsten T3 + 1gb SD card by xtal · · Score: 1

    Hope to be getting another SD card soon; cheap off ebay and does a lot more than the ipod for a comparable price. Good sound quality with an aftermarket player, plays videos, etc etc etc etc.

    Decided I'd try one before I went all in on an ipod mini, strikes me as a lot of money to spend for something that just does music - and is very likely to be obsoleted in the near future by a 4gb flash-based iPod device.

    It's shiney metal as well.

    --
    ..don't panic
  43. crap by fitteschleiker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    these pieces of crap are not ipod killers. 256kb? wtf is that scheisse. now try the iriver H320 or H340 perfect for the open source warrior, plays ogg vorbis , and now with the latest firmware, Xvid video! http://iriver.com/product/info.asp?p_name=H320

  44. SPAM by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sorry, but that article looks like SPAM. Especially with christmas closing in on us all. Advertising on slashdot? Who'd have thought it? I don't need junk mail in my slashdot news articles.

    --
    Does it go on forever?
  45. Killers.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to say "I will never have an iPod."

    I used to hate the iPod.

    After going through 4 or 5 other hard drive based mp3 players in two years, I finally broke down when Best Buy said I could trade my 6mo old 20GB Archos Jukebox in for a new 4g 40GB iPod, if I pay another $150.

    I have now had an iPod for about 3 months and love it. The battery time is nothing to write home about, but it lasts from when I plug it into the stereo in my car to drive to work, my whole eight hour shift, and the drive back home. I have dropped it on a hard tile floor, and nothing was damaged, chipped or not working.

    It's a wonderful little thing, and while I may never get a non-iPod apple product, I do love my iPod.

    The only problem I've ever had with it, is how easy the case picks up little scratches while in my pocket, but that's not a huge problem.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  46. To kill you must first catch up. by BaronSprite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems the name of the industry tagging game is still "iPod Killer", to me it should be tagged "iPod competitor". When you hold as much control over the market as the white devil does, toppling it in 1 swoop is unlikely. Even if your product hit it off, it would still take a while for it to reach the point of "killer".

    1. Re:To kill you must first catch up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might not have realized it, because this pin-head article makes no mention, but there are far superior options from iRiver that have been ahead of the iPod for at least a year now. With essential features like OGG playback and reasonable battery life. And radio, and decent recording.
      iPods are still waiting for a decent case. You can't even look at one without scratching the metal part on the back just a little bit.

      The iPod's been killed quite a few times, but just not in the press :)

  47. Missing Headlines by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1

    Christmas 2012 "Dvorak: Apple is dying!"
    January 2013 "iPod: 2012's hottest selling item, AAPL up 25%, Steve Jobs voted Time's 'Man most likely to be the Messiah'. "

  48. That's a Picturebook, not a U series by blorg · · Score: 1

    The U series doesn't have a built-in keyboard, camera, etc. The Picturebooks are 2.2lb rather than 1.2lb, besides being a traditional laptop form factor rather than a tablet form factor; they are a completely different class of computer.

    Anyway, it all depends on what your needs and capacities are; I had a Picturebook myself (the first Crusoe one) and had absolutely no problem with the keyboard, speed, or battery life, although I did find the screen a little on the short side at 1024x480. I probably wouldn't have so much of a problem with the newer 1280x600 screens. At the same time it was great for carrying around everywhere; I got it because I was sick of carrying a 3kg (7lb) laptop on my back every morning and evening on a 5-mile bike commute. My gf has it now and wouldn't swap it for a larger laptop. It's particularly good for unobtrustively taking notes when doing research.

  49. What about iRiver? by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm really surprised iRiver wasn't mentioned. I've got the 40GB HP-140 and it's a nice player with FM and the ability to record high quality compressed or uncompressed audio. The interface isn't as nice as the iPod, but with the open source Rockbox firmware being ported to several iRiver models, seems like a pretty serious competitor (especially for the Slashdot crowd).

    1. Re:What about iRiver? by james_pb · · Score: 1

      What's the recording like? All the product literature I've seen talks about the "voice recorder" capabilities of the iRiver units. I'd like to use this to record live music (essentially, as a replacement for the MiniDisc players most musicians are using these days) but it seems like it's not really up to the task.

      I'm talking about recording things like sessions and classes, the kind of thing where decent audio is desired but it doesn't have to be great. Convenience matters, as well as quality (so MiniDisc wins over DAT for these kinds of applications).

    2. Re:What about iRiver? by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

      I only record music with my friends away from my home studio once in a while, and I got my HP140 since our last session so I haven't had a chance to record with it much at all yet, but from my research, other users are generally happy. The main problem is that it doesn't a level meter (lame!) so you gotta practice setting the input level a bit, but the Rockbox firmware will fix that when it's released.

      But hey, why not give it a quick test -- I got it sitting right here. Here's a 192k mp3 I was listening to on my work desktop with the line out going into my HP140's line in and recording at 256k. Not very scientific, but sounds pretty decent (a little Sufjan Stevens): sufjan_iriver.mp3 (1.5MB)

  50. I hate you. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 0, Troll

    To let some logical thinking blemish the Ipod fan boy wankfest!

    You sir or lady have no manners.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  51. Ogg is well supported by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's not overlooked. If you start at the beginning (article I), you'll find that Ogg is specifically mentioned up front because of it's popularity, and that many of the units support do support Ogg. I only skimmed the five articles, but at a guess, I'd say that roughly a third of units support Ogg.

    And if your coat-hangers-and-corned-beef format could perform as well as Ogg has in independent, double-blind listening tests, then maybe you should be screaming blue murder if people are ignoring it.

  52. good luck finding a lot of these by zmcnulty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many of the players in the articles haven't been announced for domestic (the USA for me) release.

    Just glancing over, these two m:robe players from Olympus, the Aiwa S710BT, and the Toshiba gigabeat haven't been announced for release anywhere outside of Japan. As far as I know, anyway.

  53. for Christmas? Of what year? by jayloden · · Score: 1

    How exactly is a product (Entempo Spirit) an "iPod killer for christmas" if it isn't due out until January 31st?

    Or did they mean christmas next year...

    -Jay

  54. Where are the dvd-r based players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How come we don't see any DVD based players. 4.7 gig of music (or double that with dual layer media) is quite respectable. Such a player shouldn't cost much more than portable cd players.
    Does such a player exist?

    1. Re:Where are the dvd-r based players? by jerzee_devil · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a car stereo that would read mp3's off of a dvd. That would be a great idea.

  55. Overview? by jxyama · · Score: 1

    where can i get a digital music player overview overview?

  56. Re:for Christmas? Of what year? by revoke · · Score: 1

    Ever try Google? This product IS available now from stores besides Amazon. Believe it or not, you can by products at stores besides Amazon (albeit a very few -- I've only found 4 that have this in stock right now)

    One of the stores has this LOW COST player in stock now is eCost:
    http://www.ecost.com/ecost/ecce/shop/detail.asp? dp no=511652

    $170 for 20GB is pretty good, however people that have bought this (check engadget's forms) say it is a pretty cheap MP3 player. Think of it more as a external 20gb drive that just happens to play audio.

    Link to the manufacturer's site is here:
    http://www.entempo.com/products.html

    Enjoy!

    --
    (void) signal(SIGALRM, (alarm_fired=1)); if (alarm_fired) printf("Revoke is clueless!\n");
  57. Uh huh. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    iPod wasn't the first company to market MP3 portables. HD-based or otherwise. Samsung, iRiver (i.e. SonicBlue, then Rio), Creative, Archos, Pine Tech.... they were on the market before the year 2000.

    Sigh. I remember cruising the MP3 hardware sites, and getting all excited when new products would come out...

    Then 2002 came around. Apple's marketing machine that suddenly made that sort of device a must-have item.

    And then everyone started saying that everyone else was copying them... hah the nerve.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Uh huh. by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 1

      One feature I'd really like to see is a "built in FM station signal broadcaster" or whatever it's called. The type of apparatus that enables you to listen to the tunes in your MP3 player in your car stereo by tuning in an FM station. Does such an MP3 player exist?

    2. Re:Uh huh. by umshaggy · · Score: 1

      Yes. Check out the Neuros at www.neurosaudio.com. It isn't the prettiest thing on the planet, but feature for price it is one of the most robust.

      --
      Did you buy a Neuros today?
  58. No one wants their music player tied into a store. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because the majority of music that people have before they purchase an MP3 player (you would think they'd purchase it to listen to music they already have) ... is pirated or copied from CDs anyway... durrr.

    I don't think a lot of people would drop $200-$400 on a player to only turn around and go pay another $100 to fill it up with songs.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  59. Re:for Christmas? Of what year? by jayloden · · Score: 1

    Ok, yes, you can find it...great...but it's not going to "kill the iPod" if it's not readily available, which was the humorous (albeit not very humorous) point I was making.

    -Jay

  60. Hooray for *-tans! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  61. Near Worthless Article by Milican · · Score: 1
    This is just a collection of digital music players. There is no testing of the devices, and no specifics on what features are available. Yes it does include information about capacity and some other surface level stuff, but thats about it. What I would really like to see is an in depth review of digital music players. Ideally, the review would answer questions like:
    • Does it include gapless playback?
    • How loud is the unit?
    • How well does the software function?
    • Does the device work as a USB Mass Storage device?
    • Do devices have any cool extra features?

    JOhn
  62. obvious inaccuracy... by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    when an article has an obvious (to me, and I think many of the /. readership) inaccuracy, I have to wonder about more potentially obscure inaccurate bits of the review.

    the statement "Apple has refused to the license FairTunes DRM to makers of other digital portables"
    is not 100% correct

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  63. Re:No one wants their music player tied into a sto by shotfeel · · Score: 1

    Because the majority of music that people have before they purchase an MP3 player[snip] ... is pirated or copied from CDs anyway

    Which all plays fine on an iPod (unless you ripped your CDs into Vorbis).

  64. I got yer iPod killer right here by Holi · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. mac compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what options other than ipod are available for the mac, if any?

  67. iPod cases? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    No iPod cases? Someone forgot to do a google search!

    It's nice that you like your iRiver, but features alone to not a great product make.

    Some of us do realize what iRiver offers and still have iPods, which may not have a few of the features but are niceer to use in many ways.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  68. New subdomain by mkiwi · · Score: 1

    With all these iPod-related stories, slashdot should just update their name servers with an ipod zone (ipod.slashdot.org) and send people there.

  69. Not electricians by mkiwi · · Score: 1

    First of all, it's electrical engineers, not electricians, who do this sort of stuff. Big difference in salary and education level.

    Secondly, the iPod would be fine with 4x3.6V batteries without a resistor. Adding a resistor (as opposed to a voltage regulator) would be extremely inefficient. If anything, a voltage regulator called a 7812 should be in place. You can find the 7812 at http://www.jameco.com

    Apple lists the iPod's power block as 12V 1A, which is the same output as the 7812.

    1. Re:Not electricians by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I've got news for you. There's very little difference in the pay of a good electrician and a good electrical engineer.

      The median salary for an electrician is $40,000. Not much, I guess, but the low end is fairly near the average, with most falling close to $40k, and less than 25% making as much as $80k/year. Right now, there's quite a shortage of electricians, and their pay is going up. Contractors, obviously, make much more than salaried electricians. There are also a lot more electricians than electrical engineers, I'd wager, and there's a lot more demand.

      I'd rather take a job like an electrician, which requires little 'difficult' work (in terms of long work hours and high mental demands), work my 40, and have an almost-guaranteed source of income (being that the western world runs on electricity and wires, and all), for a smaller pay check, to be able to come home at night and have time and mental energy left to perform the tasks that I enjoy - for myself, not someone else.

      Not that I'm an electrician or an EE; I'm just saying. I take it you're an electrical engineer and get all uppity at the comparision between EEs and electricians, along the lines of the fuss computer "engineers" get in over being called "techies"? Yeah, if so - get over yourself. Seriously. Let it go.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Not electricians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not that I'm an electrician or an EE; I'm just saying. I take it you're an electrical engineer and get all uppity at the comparision between EEs and electricians, along the lines of the fuss computer "engineers" get in over being called "techies"? Yeah, if so - get over yourself. Seriously. Let it go.

      I take it you're not a computer engineer (or any kind of engineer), then.

  70. How do you say... “Supply Chain Management&am by allwaysmusic · · Score: 1

    It's hard to believe that iPod would run out of iPods the first week of December. Don't they have better supply chain management than that? Don't they want all of the sales they can get during the holiday season? Why would they allow themselves to run out of iPods, giving those sales would-have-been sales to competitors?

  71. None of those compete with iTunes. by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Drop 200gb of music into iTunes and it will happily store it into it's library.

    iTunes is merely the interface through which the iPod shines. Nothing about the situation negates the strengths of iTunes->iPod. Or if you want an analogy here, iTunes is to DC, BT, Kazaa, and eMule as a phonebook is to a service directory. iTunes just makes all 200gb of music easily accessible, and the fact that you can synch all this music to the iPod makes the music on an iPod also easily accessible.

  72. But which will do gapless playback? by gumbo · · Score: 1

    I can't believe that no one cares about gapless playback. Is the Rio Karma still the only player that can do gapless, or have others finally added support? I keep wanting to get a hard drive-based MP3 player, but not without gapless (and the stories of the Karma's reliability have scared me away from it.)

  73. Batting 600 by beetle496 · · Score: 1
    Well, I think the manufacturers have merely gotten the first two of the three parent's categories (okay, that's batting 667). Only the real penny pinchers have been tapped by the current mass market attempt. I don't think cheap has actually been offered. To be an "iPod Killer" something has to be "good enough" (i.e., about the same size -- shape and storage) and about half the price.

    Cost is reason enough to switch. The would-be iPod competitors are not really pricing their products to move. Even your average consumer can tell that 256 mb is not in the same ballpark as 4 gb. Fifty dollars less than the MSRP of an iPod mini ain't gonna get these pretenders anything, no matter how much they spend on marketing!

    Just let the device show up as a USB/firewire drive. Don't make me use propriety software! I want Mac compatibility for my iPod clone! The average consumer cares more about MP3s and ripping CDs than they do about buying DRM encumbered songs online. I find it ironic that the player manufactures act like WMV compatibility is a feature rather than a limitation! The iPod interface is nice, but people are willing to put up with a clumsy interface if the price is right.

    The market for people willing to purchase encrypted songs is well addressed (by iTMS and the windows-only stores). The only market space left is people holding out for something cheaper, much cheaper, but with comparable features. Sometime after xMas the product I am waiting for (the $99 5 gb MP3 player) will be on the market. (Okay, maybe after xMas 2006.) I think this ties into another post on this sub-thread, the "Fast/Cheap/Good" triangle:
    > If you want it Cheap and Good, it's going to take a long time.
    I can wait. There are millions of hold outs like me.

    Just to add to the referenced article, here is a new player review of a new player that isn't in the five-part series.

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
  74. *sigh* by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I know.
    My argument was against the thinking that the killer feature of an iPod (or other portables) was whether or not it would work with a music store / service.

    I say: Apple's marketing made iPods must-have items.
    Before, such devices would be considered geeky, nerdy, unnecessary. But as soon Madison Avenue, I'm sorry, I meant Apple says it's "in", well, then by god, that's what you want for Christmas.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  75. No. Because it's cheaper to just get this: by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Belkin TuneCast II

    There's already a few of these sort of devices on the market. They work with anything that has a headphone output. Since the cost is so low, no one is going to try to integrate that into a player (and then have to endure the extra paperwork with the FCC and other worldwide agencies).

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  76. Check these out. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

    put a table together with the product names, their suggested retail price, the type of media they use and/or built-in storage size, connectivity (Firewire/USB/etc) and their supported formats?

    The problem is that new players are being added to the marketplace every day, so it would be a bitch to keep it updated. Also, a lot of the new players are coming out of S. Korea, China and Japan, but are only for domestic consumption, so unless you can read Japanese, Chinese or Korean, you're out of luck.

    Little-known secret -- many of the "well-known" players are just rebranded Korean/Chinese units. The most egregious example of this is Jens of Sweden's MP-300, which is just a rebranded Nextway NMP-612T.

    You can find a few retailers that sell out-of-country players on the 'net -- my personal favorite is Cool MP3 Store. They feature some of the latest and greatest stuff coming out of the East -- way cooler than mere iPod's or MuVo's. Check out some of these bad-boys.

    1. Re:Check these out. by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1
      The problem is that new players are being added to the marketplace every day, so it would be a bitch to keep it updated.

      I didn't mean something that was constantly updated. Just a yearly/seasonal article with the current definitive listing (sort of how this article was plugged-- as if somehow the 4 previous years worth of shitty articles makes up for this years single shitty article).

      Updating it once a year (around Christmas most likely) doesn't seem so challenging to me, especially if you give yourself a few weeks to get the information gathered.

      Anyways, thanks for the other links, I'll have to take a look-see.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
  77. Any player based on Mini DV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there anyplayer based on miniDV so that we can have DVD quality: video and audio?

  78. All right! by MeatBlast · · Score: 1

    Finally they're a few mp3 players with a decent design and color-scheme. Otherwise the mp3 players still look like they were drawn by first graders (anyone notice the one that looked like a shaver?). Are there no creative minds out there, that can design a good (or even decent) looking mp3 player?