Slashdot Mirror


VOIP Meets Cell Phones

pnutjam writes "This looks really interesting. It looks like this company, Xcelis, has a bunch of cellphones hooked to VOIP equipment. Basically you pay them and if you have free in-network calling on your phone you call their phone and then dial out to whomever you want. Voila, unlimited calling to anyone."

190 comments

  1. Great - there goes free unlimited in network calls by sonofagunn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hope this doesn't become too popular! Companies will have to raise prices elsewhere.

  2. Yes, but will it teach your kids pronunciation? by js7a · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No, you'd need to go to Jared Bernstein and Leo Neumeyer for the VoIP version. I can help you with stand-alone.

  3. Unlimited by SilkBD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When will the wireless networks give us unlimited plans as an option... that's what I want to know. VoIP is too buggy... there are numbers that you can't call and faxes don't like it.

    --
    00101010
    1. Re:Unlimited by epod · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, in Canada, Telus already had an unlimited calling plan in the city of Winnipeg. It was $30 CDN a month, unlimited local calling all the time. It was their marketing gimmick to get into a new market. The only problem is, due to their contact the user is entitled to renew their contract when it expires for the same plan ad infinitum. This has led to those cell phone plans being bought and sold for as much as $3000, since as long as you renew it, you've got an unlimited cellphone for life for $30.

    2. Re:Unlimited by Snocone · · Score: 1

      Fido in Canada does that now.

      Here in Vancouver, for Cdn $45 you get a larger unlimited calling area than you do with a landline.

      http://cityfido.ca/get/getcityfido.jsp?lang=en&c it y=vancouver

    3. Re:Unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unlimited local calling is already the norm in the us. unlimited calling anywhere is what this is about.

    4. Re:Unlimited by Precion · · Score: 3, Informative

      The success with a VOIP depends on many factors. There are many companies who provide VOIP service who meet the QOS rule of five nines (99.999% uptime). It depends on the type of service you sign-up for with the VOIP provider. What may be suprising to find out is that many cellular providers are already using VOIP on the backend to process calls, but it is transparent to the user.

      Less overhead (bandwidth) is needed to handle voice calls than data/fax calls. There are plenty of companies who provide VOIP Fax using the T.38 protocol) which is reliable.

      Compared to the traditional telephone VOIP is in its infancy. Marginal improvement have been made over the last couple of years thanks to the OpenSource movement. If you really want to find out more about VOIP checkout the OpenSource Asterisk PBX at asterisk.org.

    5. Re:Unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but by cell phone? Thirty bucks Canadian for unlimited minutes on your cell phone for local calls is a pretty good deal. I'd drop my land line in a second if I could do that here.

      City Fido's a similar sort of thing, but their plan costs 45 CAD, which is slightly less of a good deal...

    6. Re:Unlimited by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      No, we don't get unlimited on our cell phones except in the following circumstances: nights & weekends, holidays, and to others using the same carrier. For many people this amounts to unlimited useage, but certainly not all. Not all cell carriers have the rules I described but most do.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    7. Re:Unlimited by ekimminau · · Score: 1

      MetroPCS:
      Sorry, we do not offer any products for your chosen carrier in zipcode 48348.

      Cricket:
      Sorry, we do not offer any products for your chosen carrier in zipcode 48348.
      You may have entered a location that we do not yet cover.

      Nextel:
      Offer expires December 31, 2004. Requires one or two-year service agreement and credit approval. $200 early termination fee applies, after 15-day trial period (conditions apply). Set up fee of $35 per phone, up to $70 max per account applies. Unlimited Direct Connect minutes are included in your local calling area only and do not include Group Connect calls, which are $0.15/min and are calculated by multiplying the minutes of use, number of participants, and the applicable rate. Group Connect can only work with members of the same network while in their home market. Nationwide service is not available for Group Connect calls. Not available in some markets. Additional charges may apply and may vary by market, including state and federal taxes, a Universal Service Assessment of either 1.124% or 1.25%, in some states a Gross Receipt Recovery Fee of 1.4% to 5%, a TRS charge of approx. .07%, and a state-required E911 fee. Other Terms: Nextel reserves the right to modify or terminate these offers at any time. Offers may not be available in all markets. Other conditions may apply. Read service agreement for details.

      --
      Armaments, 2-9-21 And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade' N
    8. Re:Unlimited by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      When will the wireless networks give us unlimited plans as an option... that's what I want to know.

      Cricket Communications currently does offer unlimited local and incoming calls for under $40 per month.

      Too bad their coverage areas are so sparse.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re:Unlimited by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Here's their new tagline.

      "Cricket Communications. If you can hear one, you're out of range!"

    10. Re:Unlimited by SorcererX · · Score: 1

      in Norway Tele2 has a unlimited calling plan for $10/month over normal POTS, and VoIP is $20/month for unlimited calls within Scandinavia, Western Europe and North America.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
  4. Nice idea but... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I really like the idea but...

    This is very inconvenient, because it essentially makes the addressbook on my cell phone useless. I'd love to have something that just automatically routes calls through them. That would definately add to the value of their service.

    This, and what about incoming calls? I believe most cell phone companies still count your # of minutes based on people calling you, as well as your outbound calls.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Nice idea but... by stecoop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what about incoming calls

      How about removing the phone companies from the picture and just have basically Route your call like DNS does or like DHCP giving you an IP address. Instead of dialing a phone number you would dial something like voip://yourname.yourhost.com.

    2. Re:Nice idea but... by pavon · · Score: 1

      Not useless. All of the cell phones that I have used have mechanisms to automate touch-tone voice menus. So you could for could easily prefix the (out of network) numbers on your cell phone with this number. You'd have to do it for each one, but in most cases I'd expect you would really only want to do it for a few expensive (out of country) or frequently called (girlfriend out of network) numbers, and let the rest of the calls count against your normal minutes.

      If you were concerned about incomming calls I don't see why they couldn't give you a VOIP phone number to have people call which is redirected to your cell phone via a in-network call, just like for outgoing calls.

      So, no you probably wouldn't want to use this for all you calls - just like most landline VOIP users don't use it for all their calls - instead you would use it to save money on expensive long distance calls.

    3. Re:Nice idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA.. is that like saying remove ISP companies from the picture and just basically have routers route you to points of interest....hmm wait a minute isn't that a grand idea...

    4. Re:Nice idea but... by KillerLoop · · Score: 1

      That's what ENUM (Electronic Number Mapping) is good for.

      You can learn more about ENUM, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), and the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) at this link.

    5. Re:Nice idea but... by r2q2 · · Score: 1

      Except computer systems have nowhere near the reliability of phone systems. Phone systems are designed to be much more robust that computer systems.

      --
      My UID is prime is yours?
  5. well ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder how long until cell phone companies get rid of unlim mobile to mobile...

  6. Queue up by Neil+Blender · · Score: 0

    The lawsuits by the free in network providers.

  7. Well, if not already in there by lottameez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suspect the cell phone companies user contract will contain a provision prohibiting you from dialing a service such as this.

    --
    Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
    1. Re:Well, if not already in there by jamonterrell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no, they will just prohibit you from running a service like this. Voila, all the phones the company has for accepting incoming calls go bye-bye.

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    2. Re:Well, if not already in there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      probably more like a provision that says your cellphone is only for your own personal use and you can not resell service. This way they can sue the company doing this and shut them down.

    3. Re:Well, if not already in there by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Or the contract will just contain a provision prohibiting you from offering a service such as this.

    4. Re:Well, if not already in there by gazuga · · Score: 1

      I have no real knowledge to back this up, but I'd be willing to bet that cell providers can't legally disallow you from calling a given phone number.

      --
      "I turn away with fright and horror from the lamentable evil of functions which do not have derivatives."
    5. Re:Well, if not already in there by rewt66 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't put it past the cell phone companies to try this, but on what basis? I mean, if it's a local call for the cell phone, then in terms of the usage of the cell phone network, it's a local call, right? So what's the basis for prohibiting it (or putting a surcharge on it, which IMHO would make more sense for the cell companies to try)?

    6. Re:Well, if not already in there by lottameez · · Score: 1

      I'd probably take that bet. Why can't they? You don't have to use their service. As long as the cell phone company isn't denying someone rights based on race, sex, religion, I'd be surprised if there's anything in the law that would prohibit them from putting anything in their contract that they want.

      --
      Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
    7. Re:Well, if not already in there by js7a · · Score: 1
      Under certain conditions, there may be no way to detect this without voilating the wiretap laws.

      The companies that offer and allow the better and greater service will make more money that those who attempt to corner the market. Especially in this market.

    8. Re:Well, if not already in there by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I suspect the cell phone companies user contract will contain a provision prohibiting you from dialing a service such as this.


      That sounds unlikely. Either they'd have to be the ones blocking it or they wouldn't have much to say.

      Really ... if they had a policy that said "you may not call our competitors to compare rates using our phone" it would be just as meaningless.

      You'll still be paying the cell-company for the air-time you use with them, it's not like you'd not be using their network.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Well, if not already in there by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Bingo. No in-network phone = no service.

    10. Re:Well, if not already in there by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > no, they will just prohibit you from running a service like this

      I agree. It probably falls under the heading of "reselling minutes" which is effectively what these guys are doing.

      To me, this is simply exploitation of the unlimited calling plans.

      The idea is that if the cellular service provider can get you to convince friends/family to sign up for the same service by giving you free minutes for intra-carrier calling, they will gain additional revenue. So the companies are using the free minutes to reduce subscriber acquisition fees.

      However, using this system, this company is charging you to game the system. So I wouldn't blame the wireless service providers if they prohibited this.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  8. linkage for teaching pronunciation by js7a · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    1. Re:linkage for teaching pronunciation by js7a · · Score: 1

      The point is that those other guys can offer it as a service, and I can offer the same thing as a product. But anyone who knows how to load and use a Tcl UDP library can turn my product into a service that would work on the phone as described in the article.

  9. Can you here me NOW? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Funny
    Great

    So you can have the underwater sound of a regular cellphone, combined with the intermittent stuttering of VoIP.

    1. Re:Can you here me NOW? by biz0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was just thinking about this myself. Layering abstract technologies like this can only lead to combination of 'bugs' and 'issues' leading towards an overall lower quality service. Now whether or not people will accept this is another issue to discuss...

      --
      /* sig */
    2. Re:Can you here me NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I where you when?

    3. Re:Can you here me NOW? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      The intermittent stuttering of Voip would end if they would
      stop using using ATM ( Asynchronous Transfer Mode )

      Asynchronous Transfer means packets arrive out of order .

      SONET on the other hand is a Synchronous Optical Network .

      Use SONET, QoS and IPv6 and this is the foundation of
      making it work right .

      SONET is what the majority of the voice trunks ride on now anyways .

      But what alot of ppl do not know is that it also carries alot
      of the DATA out there instead of ATM .

      Sprint has provided ATM data services at a much lower rate than
      other ppl charge for SONET services , but there is a reason .

      Cheap is not always good .

      This country, and in fact the world has left the engineering of
      alot of things to the accoutants and the the bottom line
      has become the foundation of their problems .

      Use SONET for Voip and this problem will be able to be engineered
      out of the picture .

      Peace,
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    4. Re:Can you here me NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great spellers on /. I am hear and I can here you now... ANd I don't no weather the whether is gonna be god...

    5. Re:Can you here me NOW? by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      If the VOIP network is designed right, you won't get jitter and lost frames.

      One thing you shouldn't do - layer your voip network ontop of an existing data network - or worse yet use the internet as your transport medium - this will lead to the problems you describe.

      To guarantee the QOS needed for voice grade traffic you must have a dedicated H.323 (or whatever the next better emerging protocol is - I can't recall its name atm) from end to end.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  10. Terms of service? by 26199 · · Score: 1

    Generally any kind of free call comes with associated restrictions. It can be as vague as 'reasonable use', but it's almost always there. So, unless they've agreed this specifically with the cell phone providers... aren't they breaking their TOS?

  11. Great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...does it support 14.4 dialup?

  12. How about land lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to make cheap or free international calls from anywhere.

    Let me buy a calling card for $0.01/min domestic and as-cheap-as-possible international and I'm there.

  13. Why? by fredistheking · · Score: 1

    It doesn't cost the cell company anything extra just because I am routing the call elsewhere at one end. I still pay the monthly service fee.

    1. Re:Why? by freshman_a · · Score: 2, Informative

      I see what you mean, but just because it doesn't cost the companies anything doesn't mean they won't raise prices to make more money if they know lots of people are using it.

    2. Re:Why? by entrager · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it costs them something. Why would I sign up for a 2000 minute plan when I can get unlimited calling to anyone on my 300 minute plan?

    3. Re:Why? by Buttercup · · Score: 1

      This is the crux of the modern argument for capitalism. Essentially, it boils down to asking, "If we don't create artificial scarcities, how will we funnel money in our direction?" It is not an argument borne of a desire to create wealth, but rather of a desire to cadge wealth out of other people, to whatever effect, good or ill.

      Any business model built upon this logic will fail catastrophically as technology alleviates scarcity. I think most people already sense this, intuitively.

      --
      Don't try that "protecting the children" shit you people use to keep the tits and bad words off my TV. --Seanbaby
    4. Re:Why? by bsgk · · Score: 0

      BS...

      The fact that technology will alleviate scarcity is also capitalism, not just that businesses try to maximize profit.

      Capitalism is the entire market working together to bring equilibrium to supply and demand. If companies have too much control over supply (monopoly-like) and prices get too high, then the market will create alternatives to release this pressure (i.e., Linux, VoIP). It's all a part of capitalism.

      Invisible hand, folks...

    5. Re:Why? by Buttercup · · Score: 1

      The essential problem with this argument is that the Invisible Hand is not omnipotent. When you refer to Linux as a market alternative you are taking tremendous liberty with the facts. GNU/Linux and Open Source are not market entities, but rather independent entities in their own right that frequently interact with capital markets.

      Typically, the response here is to broaden your definition of "market" to inflate the importance of the Invisible Hand, and then switch in "capitalism" and "capital markets" as substitutes at the last minute. Don't bother.

      Pointing out that capital markets behave in this or that way is all very well, and I won't argue with the thrust of your comment. But capital markets (and capitalism) are increasingly being replaced in human society by subtler and more complex patterns. I simply want to point out that there's a common apologetic for capitalism often referred to as "whatever the market will bear", and that this apologetic will not buttress capitalism for long in the face of _alternatives_, market-directed or otherwise.

      --
      Don't try that "protecting the children" shit you people use to keep the tits and bad words off my TV. --Seanbaby
  14. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by Rei · · Score: 1

    Yeah - this business model has the probable lifespan of a mayfly.

    --
    The *special* hell.
  15. Am I the only one who doesn't get it? by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At first I thought this sounded interesting for international calls, but now I see that international calls are not permitted, at least during the trial period. Am I the only one who can't figure out what this is for? I have free long distance on all my mobile phone minutes. I have unlimited calling on off-peak hours and more anytime minutes than I would possibly want to spend on my phone in a given month. Looking at the other plans my provider offers, I'd bet you couldn't even take advantage of some of them unless you had an extra battery for your phone. Who is the target market for this?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get it? by BridgeBum · · Score: 3, Informative

      The target market is people who have unlimited mobile-to-mobile calls, but would have to pay for calls to land lines during business hours. The call you make is to a mobile number, allowing you to effective have unlimited minutes to any number.

      --
      My UID is the product of 2 primes.
    2. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get it? by Feynman · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that this might be worth the $9.99 to someone if :

      (A) They make LOTS of outgoing calls during peak times (to numbers outside their mobile network), AND

      (B) They could switch to a fewer-minute plan that is more than $9.99 cheaper.

    3. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get it? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's about loopholing the flaws in some carriers plans that allow unlimited to another cellphone in the same carriers network - bridging these phones so to speak.

      expect it to not last too long.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get it? by TheCow · · Score: 1

      This would allow you to decrease your cell phone minutes enough to just get enough to cover incoming on peak minutes and the unlimited in network calling. That way instead of paying another $20 for another 300 minutes per month, you pay $10 to this company. This way you can almost get the previously mentioned unlimited service for about $50 a month (Cingular's cheapest plan that includes unlimited mobile to mobile is $39.99, plus $9.99 a month for this service).

      Doesn't sound too bad if you use more minutes than are offered by the $50 plans, provided you don't mind the hassel of dialing or programming extra numbers.

      One question I have, does the CallerID get passed on?

      Just my 2cents

  16. Wow.. by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

    This is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

    Can the next Slashdot poll ask 'Who will sue Xcelis first?'?

    Aero

    --
    Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
  17. Imagine by dfj225 · · Score: 1

    a beowulf clust of cell phon.....crap!

    --
    SIGFAULT
    1. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America only old people make beowulf jokes.

  18. Pay phones blocked 950 and 800#s by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Back before they were required to place 1-800 and 950-xxxx calls for free, some off-brand pay phones blocked #s to long distance companies. They wanted to force you to pay thier exhorbitant "operator-assisted" rates.

    Of course, now pay phones just stick you for the cost of a local call. If you can find one.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  19. Cellular? Bah! by chainsaw1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just take the cellphone out of the picture entirely

    --
    - Sig
  20. Kwality with a capital K by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

    hmmm, I think I can deal with dropped cell calls every now and then, and VoIP, although a bit noisy, isn't too bad on its own. But, together? Seems like one noisy-assed channel.

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
  21. conection to landlines? by IASmaster · · Score: 1

    They should also add something which enables connections to landlines for a minimal fee. On many providers, calling a landline if your minutes are used up can cost as much as $.50 while many telephone or calling card companies charge $.05 or lower.

    --
    There's no place like ~/
    1. Re:conection to landlines? by freshman_a · · Score: 1

      actually, if i RTFA right, it's there...

      Your cellular call will be routed over the Internet using VOIP or over the public landline telephone network.

      so does that mean not all calls will be over VOIP? or did i misread that?

    2. Re:conection to landlines? by nstrom · · Score: 1

      I'd venture to guess that outgoing calls made to the local calling area of their datacenter(s)/incoming switch(es) would be sent via the landline network... In other words, if they have their equipment located at their offices in Wayne, PA, any outgoing cellphone calls to Wayne, PA and surrounding areas (Villanova, Bryn Mawr, etc) would go out over standard phone lines instead of VOIP, since it's cheaper for them.

  22. They'll probably get shutdown but... by ttroutma · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could do this for yourself or for a small company which is a great idea!

  23. D-Bus API in skype Asterisk anyone? by lkcl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when skype release their linux version with a d-bus API it will be possible to do this yourself.

  24. Now. by cve · · Score: 1

    I have the Charter plan through AT&T wireless with unlimited minutes for $99/month.

  25. Don't do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Verizon can and is terminating accounts of people using this service. Others will follow suit...

    The providers know about this service and hate it, and also have enough money to crush it. So don't plan on umlimited minute plans for the time being.

    1. Re:Don't do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like a good way to get out of Verizons early contract termination fee.

  26. Caller ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've signed up for the trial. I'm interested in caller-id.

    1. Re:Caller ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't signed up for the trial. I am interested in vaginas.

    2. Re:Caller ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when the pcs companies cancel caller ID on mobile to mobile calls? they could no longer authenticate users.

  27. Pause Feature by Myriad · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is very inconvenient, because it essentially makes the addressbook on my cell phone useless. I'd love to have something that just automatically routes calls through them. That would definately add to the value of their service.

    Not necessarily... while it would no longer be as simple as entering the number of the person you want to call, many phones will let you daisy chain them with a Pause feature. This feature tells the autodialer to wait n number of seconds (or half seconds or what have you for the particular phone) before dialing more numbers.

    So you set it up to dial your access number, say 702-555-1212. You want it to then call your destination number, say 613-555-1234. You would then program the phone to dial:
    702-555-1212,,,,613-555-1234
    (the comma representing whatever character your phone uses to indicate a pause).

    This way the phone dials the access number, waits a few seconds to let that call process and the service connect, then dials your destination number.

    You could even insert access codes if necessary with additional pauses if need be (ie code 1234):
    702-555-1212,,,1234,,,,613-555-1234

    It is more work to setup, and you'd need to figure out what sort of delay you needed, but otherwise it should work. The ability to pause and enter more digits has been built into many phones for years...

    Blockwars: Free, multiplayer, head to head game.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Pause Feature by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
      Let me try and adapt the form to the phone companies. It's a joke... laugh...
      Your post advocates a

      (x) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante

      approach to changing the phone system. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work.
      (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other
      flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

      (X) Most phone users will not put up with punching letters on a keypad (SMS anyone)
      (X) Phone companies will not put up with it
      ( ) The police will not put up with it
      (X) Requires too much cooperation from phone companies
      (X) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
      (X) Many users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers

      Specifically, your plan fails to account for

      (X) Foreign countries
      ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
      (X) Asshats
      (X) Jurisdictional problems
      (X) Public reluctance
      ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
      (X) Susceptibility of protocols to attack
      ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
      (X) Technically illiterate politicians

      and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

      (X) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever
      been shown practical
      (X) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
      ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
      ( ) Killing phone companies is not slow and painful enough

      Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

      (X) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
      ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
      ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your
      house down!
      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    2. Re:Pause Feature by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1, Informative
      Shit, I replied to the wrong post...
      Furthermore, this is what I think about myself:

      (X) I'm a stupid assh0le!
      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    3. Re:Pause Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think of the mods who put you at +4, Funny anyway? ;-)

    4. Re:Pause Feature by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      +3 Informative? HA!

    5. Re:Pause Feature by finkployd · · Score: 1

      VerizonWireless will purchase a law in PA making this illegal, so it wouldn't help me any.

      Finkployd

  28. nothing new by JDizzy · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is nothing new, Verizon already uses Voip on the back-end of their cellphone network, although most people don't know that. VZ is converting their entire telephony network to a managed IP network and all call legs are slowly being converted to Voip/Sip. So that means for cell phones, the switch at the tower does the conversion of voice to IP, and the end-user is never the wiser. Now a cell phone that has a sip stack is an entire different thing, and that is being worked on. In other words there are two Voip implementations: one, where you have Voip from the phone you use (has an Ip address, etc), and two the transitional where you get a typical phone and that is converted to IP down-stream. So cell phones these days can connect to an IP network, browse online, etc. once that is more standard you will start to see cell phones that have optional soft-phones built-in aka SIP plus RTP stacks.

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
    1. Re:nothing new by forrestt · · Score: 1

      What I'd really like to see is a box I can plug into my lan so I can use my cellphone in my house. My house was built in 1924, and has solid brick walls. I can't get a signal at all inside unless I put my phone on a window sill. If I could get a box so my phone would work in my house, I would cancel my land-line phone. Does anyone know of such a product?

    2. Re:nothing new by 1_interest_1 · · Score: 1

      Uhm, incorrect.

      Typically most ILEC's and cell phone carriers are still using TDM encoding on the backend, simply because it is more efficient than any existing VoIP protocol. Since they own their own network ( the copper / fiber in the ground ), it does *not* make sense whatsoever to convert all existing equipment to utilize VoIP. The upgrades would be / will be in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

      Thank you, please try again.

    3. Re:nothing new by O · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh, knew I'd seen something like this in Wired several years back.

      http://wired.com/wired/archive/8.08/fetish.html

      Cellular Division

      Hang ViperCell antennas on the walls of your company's far-flung locations, connect them to the Ethernet, and pow: Your branch offices are now free-calling zones for cell phones. Using cellular voice-over-IP, ViperCell intercepts calls or messages sent with GSM or PCS phones, then routes them via your network - and your regular cell provider will never know.

      ViperCell: price TBA. Cisco Systems: (800) 553 6387, +1 (650) 330 2800, www.cisco.com.

      Unfortunately, I don't think it ever came to market.

      You can get repeaters that get put inside your building or car and run to an antenna outside. The passive ones are super cheap, and would be simple to build, too, but I wonder how well they would work in a situation like yours. There are also active repeaters, but those are targeted toward corporations with big buildings and are priced accordingly.

      --

      1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 -- Mathematics is the Language of Nature.
    4. Re:nothing new by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Maybe, depending on exactly what you can live with. There is a bluetooth module for asterisk, that can connect to some cell phones. It is not stable yet, but it in theory you can set a computer with bluetooth up near the window, running asterisk. When you get home you put your cell phone by the window (and on a charger), and Asterisk connects to the phone. Then you call from whereever you can connect to that machine. Either with VOIP from other computers in the house, or a FXS/FXO (I can never remember which is which without a lot of reading) board to your current phones. Not to mention all the VOIP networks asterisk can connect to.

      Like I said, it isn't exactly what you asked for, and not all the modules are stable. However it is worth checking out anyway.

    5. Re:nothing new by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Actually, this IS something new.

      You join their service, and call their phone number, which is in-network for your phone. They use voip to route it to whatever phone network they need and make an outgoing in-network phone call on that network.

      The twist is not that this is VOIP.

      Essentially, the "twist" is that you are "in-network" on 2 networks, through them. Kind of abusing the whole "in-network" model, though my understanding is that some land-carriers have done similar things before.

    6. Re:nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad most of the PSTN outside of the local analog loop has been running over a managed ATM network since the mid-80's. All they're doing is replacing the ATM switches with IP routers.

      The voice is still the same (even in VoIP). It's just 64kbps G.711 PCM carried in some sort of data packet. You know there's a reason why all the telco data network standards are a multiplre of 64 right? Of course there's also G.729 which is a really good voice CODEC and can get that 64kbps down to the rank of 6-8kbps, but it's encumbered by a number of patents just like all of the newer CODECS coming out now. (As a sidebar: Remember boys and girl Qualcomm is still in business because of the money they make off of every Verizon Wireless phone you buy.)

      Also, they don't (and probably won't) use SIP for the signalling. It's usually some form of encapsulated SS7 or SS7 bastardized protocol like MEGACO.

  29. use phone features for calling cards, office PBX's by Brian+Ristuccia · · Score: 1

    I use a pretty ancient CDMA cellphone, the Motorola Startac ST7868W. It has the ability to place calling-card and PBX extension calls from the phone book. After sending a number, it can send digits as DTMF, complete with the necessary timed delays and pauses. You can use this feature to call a calling card access number and then automatically dial access code and real destination number, or to call your main office number and then enter digits to ring a certain extension. I also use it to enter the access codes for a conference bridge I frequently use. Certainly it could be used for placing calls through a cellphone -> voip gateway service.

    If such an ancient phone has this feature, it's likely more modern ones have something similar.

  30. bigzoo.com by Mantorp · · Score: 2, Informative
    is similar to this. You prepay for minutes then you call a local or tollfree number and they route your calls over the internet. Kick ass international rates too. Highly recommended.

    They use caller id to identify you so no need for pin codes, and they have an online phone book with speed dial. I'm using skypeout to call from home and bigzoo from my cell and pay on average

    1. Re:bigzoo.com by Mantorp · · Score: 1
      oops damn touchpad

      I was going to say that I pay on average 2-3 cents per minute for international calls

    2. Re:bigzoo.com by stimutacs · · Score: 1

      I myself am a BigZoo user and love their rates. The main difference between BigZoo and Xcelis is that BigZoo uses your minutes. Since most cell phone plans have free domestic long distance anyway, it's really only useful for international calling from when used from a cell phone.

      But alas, I received an email from them the other day, and they will no longer offer their services starting February of next year.

      From the email:
      "Over time, with increasing alternative technologies and providers of telecommunication service, we have found it difficult to provide a competitive service under these conditions"

      Perhaps from cheaper unlimited VoIP providers and free programs such as Skype?

    3. Re:bigzoo.com by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      That is truly tragic. My cell phone carrier (cingular) currently charges >$1 per minute to most countries. Bigzoo has saved me bundles.

    4. Re:bigzoo.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad they are going out of buisiness!

      "BigZoo.com (Prepaid Calling Service) Phasing Out of Service

      We deeply regret having to inform you that BigZoo will phase out our Prepaid Calling services on January 31, 2005 at 11:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time).

      This is a difficult decision, but we hope you will understand. We wish to thank you for using BigZoo Prepaid Calling Service. We have tried to provide you with great value and reliable customer service. Over time, with increasing alternative technologies and providers of telecommunication service, we have found it difficult to provide a competitive service under these conditions."

  31. At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone that actually understands voila (pronounced vwä-lä).

    If I see one more post on slashdot that spells out wah-lah, I am gonna puke!

    1. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wah-lah, start puking!

    2. Re:At last! by neurocutie · · Score: 1

      If that bothers you, try it as viola!...
      Let me see you fiddle with that...

    3. Re:At last! by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, it is either 'la voila' or 'le voila', depending on whether the object is female or male.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  32. Racks of Phones? by Qbans · · Score: 1

    So hold on a second here, basically what they have is a bunch of cellphones from various providers (with free in network calling of course) hooked into a VoIP system to place phone calls? It seems that way from what they state on their website:

    "In our office there are hundreds of Pantheon products that are connected to the wireless service providers. These Pantheon units are also connected to the Internet and to the public telephone landline network. When you place a call using our service you are making a mobile to mobile call, which is free, however our technology allows that call to be routed over the Internet or landline telephone network."
    and--
    "Most wireless carriers including offer unlimited free Mobile-to-Mobile calls when you call another cellular phone on the same network. This feature is normally included in their wireless calling plans. Depending on your calling plan, you may have to pay an additional fee to add this feature to your account."

    I'm sure when some cell providers find out about this, they'll put an end to it. They are after all loosing money on the deal. It's a great idea for unlimited international long distance though, as from most cell phones you can't place international calls (well sometimes at decent rates.)

    1. Re:Racks of Phones? by bobcat7677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, A bunch of fixed wireless nodes wired into their VOIP switches is exactly what they are doing. I have been expecting someone to do this...would have done it myself if I had the facilities & resources to get it started.

      It's still a pretty cheesy solution though. What we really need is for the Cellular providers to setup VOIP gateways directly to their private networks (preferably with IAX2 protocol as an option to work with asterisk http://www.asterisk.org/) and then I can broker calls to or from my cell phone, the traditional phone network, or any VIOP network as I please using my asterisk switch. The cell phone provider could charge a small monthly fee to those who want to use the gateway to cover their (relatively minor) costs of providing it and probably make a bit too and everybody could be happy. Are you listening VERIZON...AT&T...NEXTEL? I would think it would be a boon for NEXTEL as their many business & government customers could further integrate their wired and wireless communications making those accounts very happy and almost turnover-proof. Plus NEXTEL could offer services for setting up their clients with this technology integration for a nice hourly rate.

  33. Net2Phone for Internatinoal Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I do a similar sort of thing already for international numbers in order to avoid the very high long distance rates that T-Mobile has for international long distance. Using Net2Phone Direct you can get a local number somewhere in the United States, which you can call to access their VoIP service. If you set up your account to recognize your number on callerID, it won't ask for your account number or PIN, and then it will ask for the number you wish to call. Thereby, it saves me a fortune on all my international calls. All I need to do is program the local US access number with a wait signal before my friends number, like +12022169400w011491795555555, and I'm set. I highly recommend it. Only draw back is that your caller ID doesn't come through to the people you are calling.

  34. Not a long term strategy by captwheeler · · Score: 1
    from their FAQ:
    To use this service you MUST make sure that you have unlimited mobile-to-mobile calling activated on your wireless service calling plan.
    ...
    Currently, the service is only for placing outgoing cellular calls.

    It depends on the Wireless companies, only works for outgoing calls, and makes no mention of call quality or reliability. The cell phone companies will be the ones to decide how VOIP integrates with cell phones, and plans like this will just be loose out to them changing the rules.
    --

    Thanks for putting on the feedbag. Thanks for going all out. Thanks for showing me your Swiss Army knife.

    1. Re:Not a long term strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right above the funniest typo ever:

      "Q. Would I still get call waiting while using Pantheon?

      A. Yes, the Pantheon service does not not interfere with any of your cellphone functions..."

      Classic.

  35. Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow, 45 comments and not a single one bemoaning the privacy issues? What has become of Slashdot?

    If you sign up for this service, Xcelis will be in a fantastic position of keeping track of ALL the calls you make through your cellphone. Who you called, how long you talked to them, perhaps even what you talked about. Hmmm, Xcelis might just be a front for the American Spy Agency^W^W^W Dept of Homeland Security.

    1. Re:Privacy? by Queuetue · · Score: 1
      If you sign up for this service, Xcelis will be in a fantastic position of keeping track of ALL the calls you make through your cellphone.
      Hey, you're right - JUST LIKE THE PHONE COMPANY!
    2. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Verison/CellularOne/Etc don't have the ability to do that now?

    3. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, "just like the phone company" AND Xcelis AND your next spammer AND etc...

  36. Bad lag! by entrager · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have Vonage VoIP service at home on a cable modem connection. When I talk to a cell phone user over my VoIP phone, there is a noticable lag that occurs. I've gotten used to it, but initially my wife and I found ourselves talking over each other all the time because of the 1-2 second delay. It sounds to me like this service will only compound that problem.

    1. Re:Bad lag! by Excelsior · · Score: 1

      I used to have that problem with my Vonage phone, too. So let me explain this to you how you can clear up this problem. If you stop sharing 4 terrabytes of p0rn on Kazaa your phone won't lag so much.

      You also can stop worrying that the clicking noise you hear is the RIAA/MIAA tapping your line.

    2. Re:Bad lag! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Why you have lag issues ....

      If your a windows user download NeoTrace or an equivalent tool
      and watch your "latency" to other nodes and ip addresses of ppl on different or even the same network your on .

      The cable modem folks and some DSL providers are notorious for
      routing all their traffic in a region through one location and that
      location having routing issues because they are technically running
      it at capacity or ocassionally beyond capactiy .

      Where I am at everyone for hundreds of miles goes thru Kansas City .

      I have seen trace routes with hideous spikes through these routers,
      and not even been able to play a simple multi-player game with ppl
      on a different cable modem network .

      The networks needs some kind of guidance or oversight on quality
      control, and it will fix these problems .

      They are letting it stay like this due to the money .

      They can manage the network easier, and spend less on equipment .

      Over 90% of fiber in the ground in north america is dark fiber .

      Lack of fiber is a lie .

      With SONET and DWDM almost all the latency issues would go away .

      SONET = Synchronous Optical Network

      SONET already carries almost all of the voice trunks now that are
      controlled by the nation's SS7 network .

      ATM is Asynchronous but cheap , so the keep trying to develop it
      based on an accouting decisions .

      When the accoutnants start telling the engineers how to engineer
      what is right based on money ALONE , it often spells a substandard
      solution .

      SONET needs to be the way to make the networks work worldwide ,
      and Asynchronous technology needs to be phased out as time
      permits .

      Peace,
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  37. Great! by HexaByte · · Score: 1

    Now I can pay $10 a month to crappify my already bad cell connection!

    With already getting free calls to everyone on the network, and free long distance, I may actually want to pay exta dollars to get worse quality, just in case I need to make a 16 hour call to someone off-network!

    Who's the brain surgeon who came up with this one?

    --
    HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
  38. free mobile to mobile calling? by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 1

    Do mobile plans in the States really have mobile-to-mobile options that don't use up your minutes? That's cool. I don't think any of the providers in Canada have that, but getting unlimited local calling is pretty easy.

    I've got my cell on a plan with unlimited local evenings & weekends, and then use one of those ubiquitous call #X, enter account, password and destination # type plans. Similar to calling cards, but it's 500 minutes/month for CAD10. www.onlinetel.com. It's pretty easy to enter the entire sequence into your cell phone directory.

    Bryan

    1. Re:free mobile to mobile calling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is way behind in cellphone rates than USA. In the States, most cellphone plans offer free long-distance calls to anywhere in US and Canada, so there's no need to mess around with the kinds of plan you have. Also, the cellphone rates are much cheaper. The one plus side in Canada is Fido's unlimited local calling plan (not sure if any American providers have started offering that).

    2. Re:free mobile to mobile calling? by halo1982 · · Score: 1

      Yeah...all national carriers here offer free mobile to mobile...and our rates seem to be much cheaper than yours...1600 minutes with 2 lines, unl n/w, unl mobile to mobile for $120CDN from T-Mobile (US). Our phones are cheaper too...and we don't have to pay a monthly $6.95 line charge or whatever that is. Oh, and 3 year contracts for personal use in the US are unheard of, where they seem to be kind of standard with some of your providers. This is one of the areas the US excels at.

    3. Re:free mobile to mobile calling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      both bell and rogers will do no charge mob to mob...

    4. Re:free mobile to mobile calling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telus has unlimited cell-to-cell plans from $20/month (in the Calgary area anyways).

  39. Haha, sweet. by varuvaru · · Score: 1

    Hellooo Internet everywhere. Can't find a good AP for your cheap WiFi card? Plug in your cell phone and surf the net at ~56k speeds for only $10+whatever you're paying your cellphone provider. I find this quite amazing. It's like a landline that's always with you [as in calls are basically free and unlimited]. You're in the mountains or on the countryside with your shitty P233MMX laptop and you wanna see what's cooking on Slashdot, there you go. Only issues that still need to be cleared up: Let's take an average celly carrier, like Rogers AT&T in Toronto and the GTA. I'm not sure if they offer free mobile-to-mobile service, as I remember asking for such a thing when I signed up with them. I also remember going out of my "home" area and calling in the GTA from Barrie, it was apparently treated as long distance [even though that number was in my "home" area]. Point is, I'm not sure you can call other mobiles for free anywhere, like say those mobiles are in a different area code. And if you can't... that'd suck. The point of paying the $10/month would no longer justify itself. But it's a good concept. Cheap too. If your cellphone provider doesn't rape you in the process.

    1. Re:Haha, sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you obviousally know nothing.

      I DARE you to get a 56K connection dialing up through a cellphone.

      it's damned impossibe to get a 14.4 connection let alone a 56K one.

      I suggest you get a clue.... or beaten by a clue by four.

    2. Re:Haha, sweet. by lav-chan · · Score: 1

      Hellooo Internet everywhere. Can't find a good AP for your cheap WiFi card? Plug in your cell phone and surf the net at ~56k speeds for only $10+whatever you're paying your cellphone provider.

      I'm pretty sure you've been able to do that for a long time. My dad used to have a thing where he could somehow plug his mobile phone into his lap-top and use it to get on the Internet (very slowly, of course). And this was a few years BEFORE everyone and their dog had a mobile.

    3. Re:Haha, sweet. by MoNsTeR · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but with this service it doesn't consume your minutes.

    4. Re:Haha, sweet. by m41ku · · Score: 1

      Yeah... actually... the best way to fly is to use T-mobile's t-zones service. its $4.95 a month, and you can connect to it through bluetooth from your laptop (via some crazy hack involving dialing some weird number like #0911) I use it all the time, but my laptop isn't handy for the actual number. AC was right, its about 14.4 kbits... freaking slow, but ok for email and AIM.

  40. VOIP?? That's kid's stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Check THIS out: http://bobanddavid.com/cinco.html

    CINCO!!

  41. need international VOIP calling by bendawg · · Score: 1

    One of the nicest uses for this would be cheap international calling through cell phones, since a lot of phones already have unlimited nights and weekends and mobile to mobile within the US.
    Unfortunately, they don't seem to support that yet.

  42. Yes it does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    14.4k, that's another matter entirely.

  43. Save money... by sterno · · Score: 1

    The big benefit of this is that you can reduce the plan that you're on. Why get the 1000 minute plan when you can get the 300 minute plan? Off peak might be free, but if you need to make lots of calls on peak, it would be quite useful.

    Frankly though I can't imagine that this operation will be around for long. Phone companies are not going to tolerate somebody manipulating their market like this to make some money at their expense.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  44. If it's successful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All they'll accomplish is eliminating unlimited mobile to mobile minutes for everyone. The cell company isn't going to take a loss or provide service for free. Currently, the mobile to mobile minutes are more of a gimmick to get the friends/family of their customers to switch than anything. If this ceases to be an incentive because services like this make it irrelevant then they'll stop offering them.

    Mike

  45. Here's what the phone companies think by protoshoggoth · · Score: 1
  46. Re:Cellular? Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that that phone sends your SIP u/p in the clear. MD5 authentication is not yet supported by many devices and providers.

  47. Cell phone VoIP FXO port by puzzled · · Score: 1



    This is an interesting concept but what is really needed is a device that provides cellular service but is a black box that allows interfacing to a phone system. Every company of any size with a standard cell carrier would have a bank of phones attached to their PBX to cut cellular costs.

    Cell companies should jump on this by offering DS1 service for calls onto their network ...

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
  48. Legislation by killmenow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A bill to outlaw this type of service will be written by one or many cellular providers and presented to one or many congresstools in 3...2...1...

  49. Re:D-Bus API in skype Asterisk anyone? by arodland · · Score: 1

    And when Skype releases a version that uses ALSA, it might actually have a chance of working right on more than two different sound cards :)

  50. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

    Aren't most "unlimited" plans actually "high limit" plans? In other words, they're not truly unlimited, they just have very high thresholds and the phone companies count on the fact that most people never reach those thresholds. Check the fine print on your plan... even if there's no expicit threshold, the phone company may still be able to charge you for "unusually high" usage.

    Eric
    My cellphone customer disservice story
  51. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to believe they can't give me unlimited calling for the $35/month I'm paying.

  52. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by heir2chaos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you should rephrase. Companies will raise prices elsewhere. They already charge more than they have to for the disservice. However, if they feel they can milk a little more out of you, you know they will.

  53. So where is the advantage? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    You still have to have cell coverage by your provider right?

    I already have unlimited long distance on my cell phone.

    What am I missing? I read the page and it's probably obvious but it's just not clicking.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  54. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by CyberDave · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have "unlimited" night and weekend minutes and "unlimited" mobile to mobile minutes on my Cingular plan. When I looked at my usage online a few months ago, it turns out that I indeed did not have truly unlimited airtime: I had 99999 N/W and 99999 M2M minutes each month. Of course, this is more than twice the number of actual minutes in any given month, so there was no way I would ever exceed those minutes, so they were in fact unlimited to me. Now that I've added my brother and sister as additional lines on my plan and we draw from the same minute pool, it would be possible for us to exhaust all those minutes, but we would each have to spend 16 hours a day on the phone. Not gonna happen. That, and it was probably easier to program the billing system with a very high threshold for "unlimited" plans and not worry about it rather than programming truly unlimited minutes.

    CyberDave

  55. Re:bigzoo.com is DEAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Important Message: BigZoo.net (ISP Service) Phasing Out of Service Thank you for your interest in BigZoo.net Internet Service.Over time, with increasing alternative technologies and providers of telecommunication service, we have found it difficult to provide a competitive service under these conditions. We deeply regret having to inform you that BigZoo will phase out our Internet service on January 31, 2005 at 11:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time). This is a difficult decision, but we hope you will understand. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, BigZoo Customer Support

  56. Re:Cell phone VoIP FXO port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:

    Xcelis, a four-year-old start-up, sells a range of telecom gear, including a device called the Pantheon that lets people wirelessly redirect calls to and from their cellphones through their home or work landline phones

  57. The Home Kit would be a good seller... by MDMurphy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree that this will likely have a short shelf life. The extreme # of minutes on their cell phones will stand out like a flashing beacon to the cell carriers.

    But, a "home version" would be interesting. Two phones with the minimal accounts for unlimited mobile to mobile would still be cheaper than one of the mega minute plans. A kit to connect your "home" cell phone to your Vonage box would do the trick. The cell carriers wouldn't see the insane #'s of minutes on a service providers accounts but just you calling your other phone often. A slick trick would be to allow bi-directional calling with this kit.

    In early days of PacBell GSM here in CA they had 1st incoming minute free. I had my SIM in a box with a GPS receiver attached. I could call from a land line every minute, poll for position, hang up under a minute. One month I made 1800 sub-minute calls to my mobile to track my cars location.

    They later ammended the plan to not include data calls and then scrapped the 1st minute plan all together, but I got a lot of testing in before they did.

    1. Re:The Home Kit would be a good seller... by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      But, a "home version" would be interesting.

      Years ago I had a coworker who, along with her local ham radio club, rigged a ham radio up to land line. She swore it was better than a cell phone, although she did find it annoying when someone else was using the line.

    2. Re:The Home Kit would be a good seller... by JustAnotherBob · · Score: 1

      Pac Bell Wireless in CA has become Cingular Wireless since 2001, and for an additional $4.99 a month you can still tack on the 1st incomming minute feature.

  58. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of "unlimited" long distance for landlines. Here in Canada, some phone companies offered unlimited long distance (evening, nights and weekends) for $20/month. Apparently, though, enough people were using this that some of them had to slap on limits of like 800 hours or so per month. I think this was due to excessive long-distance calls for dial-up Internet connections.

    Anyhow, the point I'm making is that whether or not a plan is truly "unlimited" or merely "high threshold", I bet the phone company that people won't be calling excessively, no matter how attractive the plan. Kind of the same way that planes will overbook flights on the assumption that not everyone will actually show up for the flight.

    If this kind of scheme ends up using a lot of wireless bandwidth, the phone companies may take corrective action...

    Eric
  59. Haha by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's pretty obvious this is a really dumb idea. Most of the previous responses have detailed the reasons why.

    What I really see is PDA phones having WIFI or better yet, WIMAX, connecting to a network and doing VOIP that way, thereby completely bypassing the cell phone company.

    That way, when you have WIFI, you call for free (or very low cost). When you don't have WIFI coverage, you dial out using the cell phone network.

    Now THAT'S cell phone VOIP! Not this load of crap lol.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  60. Jan 31, 2005 = No more Bigzoo by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    I've been using them for a couple of years as my primary LD service.

    Now I have to search for a replacement. Any suggestions for a landline 'virtual calling card' service at ~2 cents a min?

    1. Re:Jan 31, 2005 = No more Bigzoo by digitalcowboy · · Score: 1

      Now I have to search for a replacement. Any suggestions for a landline 'virtual calling card' service at ~2 cents a min?

      I've been using Onesuite for a couple years now. I've not paid much attention to their International rates, but domestic US is 2.9 cents/min. if you access them toll free, and 2.5 cents if you use a local access number. No monthly fees, connection charges, etc. Just straight up per minute charge.

      They're not perfect; I sometimes have a problem getting connected on their toll free number. (That's very rare, though. It's probably happened to me a half dozen times in 2+ years of daily use.)

      Over all, I've been very happy with them and I would recommend them. If you try them out use my username (digitalcowboy1) as a referral and we each get 20 mins. free.

    2. Re:Jan 31, 2005 = No more Bigzoo by digitalcowboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can just use this link to sign up and get the same referral deal.

      I just discovered they offered the referral service that way.

  61. Re:frist post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  62. Re:Cellular? Bah! by interiot · · Score: 1
    So... you want to rely on 100' radius networks instead of miles-wide networks? Doesn't sound good.

    Oh yeah, what about WiMAX, right? Sorry, that isn't slated to be available in a truly mobile form until 2006/2007 (search for "Third-generation CPEs").

  63. That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just go to your favorite theater.

  64. When cell phones and VOIP converge by dmccarty · · Score: 1
    Check out this Usenet post for an idea of what we're in store for about 6 months from now: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1 &selm=e1jEPHU2EHA.1524%40TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl

    In case that link doesn't work, with the recent Google Groups changes and all, search for "Which version of Windows CE and Shell should be used" instead.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  65. I went another direction by krray · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On a back end web server listening on a re-directed port along with a password and you're prompted with:
    ENTER CURRENT #: (let's enter 19998887777)
    TRANSFER TO #: (let's enter 15554443333) ...and then the "old" modem in that computer taps C-Kermit and dials specifically:
    atdt ,19998887777,,,,5,!,*97,15554443333,,;

    So, it calls me (pauses due to finding the cell phone I may be holding), dials "5" for the heck of it (lets me know it is working :), flashes the line, dials my transfer code (*97) and dumps me to the phone number I entered.

    Free unlimited calls anywhere I go already ... as long as I can tap a web browser somehow. :)

  66. But the price is expensive by msblack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the new flexible pricing plan from Sprint PCS, additional blockes of 100 anytime minutes are just 5 cents a minute. At $9.95 per month, that's 200 extra minutes from Sprint. How many people really need more than 200 additional peak minutes on their plans? And as others have mentioned, the call quality of these "free" minutes is gonna suck.

    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
    1. Re:But the price is expensive by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      How many people really need more than 200 additional peak minutes on their plans?

      Teenage girls.

  67. AT&T Wireless had one by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    ONe of the GSM plans was a $99/mo, unlimited airtime plan.

    I don't think that it exists anymore.. it was a promo plan.

    1. Re:AT&T Wireless had one by mesach · · Score: 1

      one of my friends has it, 2 years ago when he moved to L.A. ATT was offering it, so he signed up, october came around and he was looking to change because $99 was alot to spend on a phone each month, so he started looking around, and checking his history for his bill...

      NO ONE could touch the deal he has, he on average uses 5000 minutes a month, I never thought anyone would talk so much on the phone, but he's a cinematographer and is ALWAYS talking to someone coordinating something. plus living in L.A. he is always on the road, which is when i get 45 minute calls from him, but its nice since im on the same network as him i dont get charged anything.

      --
      moo.
  68. Re:frist post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't be the only one who thinks homestarrunner is incredibly unfunny. In fact, it's almost as humorless as the Far Side.

  69. Re:Cellular? Bah! by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    You mean so I can spend $240 on the phone, and then another $30 to $50 for a VoIP subscription that's about as restrictive as most landline phones?

    At least it's mobile. But I think it's not worth the early investement.
    Pantheon's idea shows promise. But Sprint, Verizon, etc. won't let this last. It's going to hurt their bottom line, and they'll put the kibosh on free in-network calling quick.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  70. Would be great if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cable companies or DSL providers can provide voip to your homes and the service can be used with any cell phone. The cell phones don't have to be from any of the providers like Cingular or Verizon. Free from airtime charges! woo hoo Now that would be sweet!!!

  71. Unlimited Calling! Not. by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone has seen the advertising. Plans are sold with free unlimited in-network calling. If you read the boilerplate in your service agreement, you'll see something that reads (paraphrased) abuse of the network (re:unlimited free calling) is subject to termination.

    Unlimited free in-network calling doesn't mean UNLIMITED. It means unlimited until they choose to see otherwise, labelling it as "abuse" of their network. They have the right to terminate you for such abuse.
    What kind of abuse? It is up to your provider. Don't like it? Walk away. Or live with it. Most people don't abuse it. But there are plenty that try.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  72. You call their phone and then dial out ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is news????

    My brother and I have been doing this for over a year :-).

    I live in the US, he lives in "Unnamed Country in Central America".

    We both have VOIP phones, he hooked up his phone to a 3Com PBX.

    We (as in all my family) can call each other from any phone on the US or in "Unnamed Country in Central America" and not pay extortion telco international rates in either country.

    AC

  73. Re:So where is the advantage? -- unlimitee minutes by mdlbear · · Score: 1
    I have unlimited long distance, too, but it still costs me air-time.

    This scheme works for plans that have unlimited in-plan airtime, so both the airtime and the long distance are unlimited.

  74. Re:Cell phone VoIP FXO port by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    > This is an interesting concept but what is really needed is a device
    > that provides cellular service but is a black box that allows interfacing to a phone system.

    A Wavecom WMO2 could be made to do this without a lot of heartache. Long story short, it's a GSM cell phone.. except instead of a keypad and a screen, it has a serial port. And instead of a speaker and a microphone, it has a modular male end, like you plug into a standard telephone handset.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  75. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by ZiakII · · Score: 1

    hmmm like making fake fees that seem like taxes.... o wait that's already done

  76. inside/outside, leave me alone by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why don't they just do this with 2 different mobile networks: two sets of phones (1 set from each network with free in-network calls), connected in pairs through their gateway? Then they can market free calls to each network's subscribers, without relying on iffy VoIP, with its lower quality and smaller market of tightwadder customers? I smell a pure, unscalable gimmick.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  77. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The use of three-way calling also uses up twice as many minutes, so one person could use up all the minutes in theory.

  78. Fucktard by beeglebug · · Score: 1

    (X) Most phone users will not put up with punching letters on a keypad (SMS anyone)

    Apart from those users who contributed to the 500 billion sms messages sent in 2004 you mean?

    1. Re:Fucktard by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and everyone is going to do that each time they try to dial a number?

      On a telephone, what's easier, 661-277-8293, or punching in darkhelmet.myaddress.com?

      On a computer, it's easier to remember. On a phone, it'd be a bitch to dial in.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  79. peer to peer mesh network by davideo_ID · · Score: 1

    Why not wait just a year longer for the mesh network mobile phone. No servers/carriers needed. Just use your exces phone bandwith to route other peoples calls. Offcourse this would start as an feature that would work alongside a normal cellulare network at first... but ones we hit critical mass.... Ok enough of this the future is blinding me

    --
    I have nothing to say, just want people to read my cool new sig
  80. Free in what sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting idea, maybe I am missing something.

    Won't you be paying conference call chages to your telco service providor for initiating a call with two different parties?

    Party one: your current number 1999etc
    Party Two: The call destination 1555etc

  81. No sprint? No good! by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

    The find their lack of Sprint compatability disturbing.

    --
    --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
  82. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only the VHF band could be freed for sale to cellular deployment! everyone run to buy a Digital TV... so they can auction that spectrum already ;)

  83. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by wwwillem · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, and what about the $120 (OK, Canadian) a month I'm paying???

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
  84. SOYO VOIP Phone by sapgau · · Score: 1

    Take a look at this phone:

    It's a VOIP phone from SOYO that allows free direct calls between same model phones. They also provide an international calling plan but I don't think I will be interested in that.

    I bought two G668 models and I intend to place one in my parent's place (they live abroad) and one besides my regular telephone. That way it will work as a family "bat-phone" and reduce our long distance charges to zero.

    Two great advantages are that they don't need to get connected to a computer and they can make AND receive calls. These phones have their own number when used within the "Network".

    I expect to recuperate the cost in two months!

    /You have to understand that my parents are technophobes, with this they can just pick up the phone and dial a number

    //All my international calls go to family and friends, if this works I will be giving more phones for christmas next year!

  85. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

    I have "unlimited" night and weekend minutes and "unlimited" mobile to mobile minutes on my Cingular plan. When I looked at my usage online a few months ago, it turns out that I indeed did not have truly unlimited airtime: I had 99999 N/W and 99999 M2M minutes each month.

    Are you sure the 99999 isn't just a 'special number' used in the billing system database to designate unlimited. Most likely those fields in the database are numeric versus text so 99999 probably denotes unlimited. The software could just as easily do the following
    'if M2M==99999 then dont subtract minutes; else subtract mins'. This would truly be unlimited versus your suggestion that 99999 is actually a real cap.

  86. VOIP Article on the Economist.com by sapgau · · Score: 1

    I feel the VOIP explosion is upon us...

    Check this article from the Economist

  87. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Kind of the same way that planes will overbook flights on the assumption that not everyone will actually show up for the flight.

    Back in the 1980s the airline that my mother worked for had a standing policy to overbook by 15.

    It was cheaper do that than to schedule extra flights. For example if everyone showed up and you had 15 extra people, you could purchase tickets for all of them on a competing airline, refund their ticket prices and give them a free night in a hotel all for less than the cost of a second plane.

    Truthfully, that almost never happened. Usually overbooked flights would STILL have open seats on them.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  88. Will Xcelis survive? Depends too much on features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think about it, Xcelis communications depends on caller ID to verify whether the caller has paid his bill or not. The phone number also tells them if you are on a monthly plan, on a 7-day free trial or not authorized for the service. What happens if the cell providers fail to provide caller ID on mobile-to-mobile calls? Without Caller-ID, Xcelis can no longer authenticate its users. Without authentication, their service is open to anyone.

    What happens when the access numbers are posted on the Internet?

    What if call transfer was not allowed on a m-to-m call? If you think about it, the would have to hand out a whole list of numbers that you would have to go to if the number you called is busy. Most people won't deal well with a whole list of access numbers.

    What if the cell phone compnies signed up to the service and made perma-calls or repetitive calls to numbers that are in the boonies where it's not likely that Xcelis has a VoIP gateway? Xcelis would have to absorb long distance charges on those calls.

    What happens when the cell phones that are used to make the calls are blacklisted for re-selling the service? (read the small print) How would the cell phone company discover the access numbers? Well .. they get a bunch of people to sign up for the free trial.

  89. Re:Cellular? Bah! by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

    So you mean, that I can buy WiFi phone for $240 (and another $50 for AP?) where I could buy analog-to-sip adapter for $80 without strings attached and cordless DECT/GAP phone with base station for $40 (and additional handsets for $20 each)?

    I know, WiFi sounds so sexy...

    Robert

    --
    Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
  90. Like SIPphone's access numbers, but for cellphones by Linuxathome · · Score: 1

    Sounds like SIPphone.com's access numbers except you get to call anyone in the PSTN. For those of you not familiar with SIPphone's access numbers, it's one of the greatest services I've known that is free (like Netzero was free back in the day). Say you have a bunch of friends all over the country, each with broadband access. They all purchase analog telephone adapters for their phones from SIPhardware.com and sign up for SIPphone's service (free service, hardware is not free) and plug into the broadband. SIPphone to SIPphone calling is free, but you can also call a SIPphone on a regular phone line via the access number local to you. I think the access numbers also work for peer networks such as freeworldialup. Try it out, I think it's well worth the $60 upfront cost.

  91. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by evilviper · · Score: 1
    Companies will have to raise prices elsewhere.

    I hate this corporate spin bullshit.

    They will only have to raise prices if:

    A) They make no profit as-is.
    B) There is no place else they can cut to make-up the money.
    C) Basic cellphone coverage costs them more than they charge you already.
    D) They have a higher profit margin on the extras this is eliminating.

    etc, etc.

    Frankly, this is just normal competition. You might as well say that cheap long-distance plans will force local phone companies to raise their prices...

    I always hate hearing this bs idea, though. It's a poor attempt to rationalize trickle-down/voodoo economics, and is sadly taking root with many of the less intelligent individuals in this country.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  92. Re:Great - there goes free unlimited in network ca by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    I dunno, you're getting ripped off?

  93. Re:Cell phone VoIP FXO port by puzzled · · Score: 1



    Looks like WMO2 only does messaging. I want something in the same form factor as a Cisco VIC-2FXO that lets me connect to the cellular network the same fashion that this card lets me talk to land lines.

    I suppose an external device that was cellular on one side and FXS on the other would do the trick ... haven't seen such a beast offered anywhere yet.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
  94. Re:Cell phone VoIP FXO port by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    > Looks like WMO2 only does messaging

    That's it's common application (and what I use it for), but according to the docs, you can also place voice calls with it and have access to call setup/completion info. If you get the right cable, it has a voice plug on it (the DB15 on the unit has DB9 serial, microphone and speaker pins).

    So, you need to plug the WMO2 into an FXS(O? -- I'm not into VoIP) port, and have the computer control both pieces of hardware at once... i.e. receive the call on cellular, place a VoIP call, and a manage call completion. The WMO2 would be plugged into the VoIP gear as it were a regular telephone.

    You could also go the other way (although I have no idea why you'd want to transfer a VoIP call to the cellular network).

    Not the most elegant solution, but definately workable with COTS hardware.

    Oh -- and you can run the WMO2 off the 12V line of your PC's power supply if you're trying to make something small. You can also extend the antenna easily, since it's just a coaxial connection to a whip.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  95. Re:Cell phone VoIP FXO port by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    I just realized "regular telephone" carries some caveats. "Regular telephone handset" would be more like it. I'm not sure the WMO2 would be happy if your VoIP gear threw 48VDC at it.

    That said -- there must be software VoIP which can work from sound card inputs. I'll bet you could plug the WMO2 microphone/speaker signals into your sound card and have a WMO2+software solution with no extra hardware.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  96. Re:Cell phone VoIP FXO port by puzzled · · Score: 1



    I do a lot of work with Cisco equipment. There are a variety of voice capable routers but lets use the one I have in my office for testing as an example.

    The device is a Cisco 1750-2V. It has onboard ethernet, one slot for a WIC (data), one slot for a VIC(voice), and one slot that can be either data or voice. I have a VIC-2FXS and a VIC-2FXO available. The FXS device provides ring generation - that 48 volt battery you mentioned. The FXO device acccepts ring generation and can be used to connect a telco analog line to the VoIP network.

    There are other interfaces available - VIC-2E&M which is a phone system to phone system trunking interface, T1 and E1, etc, but those are not relevant for this dicussion.

    I'd like to have a device that could be hooked to either the FXS and accept the 48 volt ring or the FXO and provide a 48 volt ring, with the 'other side' being a cellular network. You describe a method to make the product work with a PC and that is an interesting hack, but I want to make money with it promptly.

    Think about how cellular is these days - free calling on net. Imagine an office with ten guys packing phones from the same carrier - they can call each other for free but they burn minutes when they have to call the office. If you have an FXS/FXO to cellular device you'd be able to take advantage of the free on net calling.

    Cell companies *won't* provide this because it would eat into their revenue. Given that they make money when calls terminate off their network it will take some enterprising hardware hacker to build and market this device.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
  97. Re:Cell phone VoIP FXO port by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    The device you describe is very interesting -- and you're right -- using a PC is a very hackish solution. But for the basement hacker, it's doable today (well, in a week of evenings assuming you're competent C programmer familiar with the termios interface and Asterix or something similar).

    > Given that they make money when calls terminate off their network it
    > will take some enterprising hardware hacker to build and market this device.

    If there are any enterprising hardware hackers out there, Wavecom makes a 'WISMO' module which (I think) is available as a single ASIC that does everything I've described the WMO2 as doing. That would make a good starting point -- it's a full GSM phone on a chip with I/O lines instead of buttons and a screen. I'm not sure how the voice side is handled, but I'm pretty sure the chip encodes/decodes it as audio instead of just fobbing off the GSM data stream.

    (googling..)

    Hey, the WISMO Quick looks pretty interesting -- it's not an ASIC but it's tiny and designed to be plugged into a slot. There is also a CDMA version!

    It's 58 x 32 x 6.5mm and weighs 11g. That's uh, about 2.25 x 1.5 x 0.25 inches and less than half an ounce for you 'mericans out there. :)

    Let's see.. Definately does voice, has a 60 pin board-to-board connector with microphone and speaker i/o, pins for a GSM SIM, and seems to support the same AT command set as the WMOD2 (serial interface from 300 to 115.2kbps). So in theory, you could prototype/POC with the WMOD2 and a PC, then scale down to a WISMO Quick-based embedded device.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  98. Re:Cell phone VoIP FXO port by puzzled · · Score: 1


    If I got the soldering iron out my roomie would dial 9, 1, and have his finger hovering above the 1 button :-)

    I am going to talk to this hardware guy I know and see if we can make an FXS to WISMO converter ... thanks for the tip, will post here if we get it going.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo